Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Conical scanning

Conical scanning is a radar tracking technique in which the antenna beam is directed to rotate in a narrow conical pattern around the predicted target location, offset by a small squint angle from the boresight axis, typically on the order of 0.45 degrees.^[1] This rotation, often at rates like 30 Hz, causes the received echo signal from the target to vary in amplitude sinusoidally as the beam periodically sweeps across the target, enabling the extraction of angular error signals in azimuth and elevation through amplitude comparison and synchronous detection using reference sine and cosine waveforms.^[1]^[2] The method relies on sequential sampling of the signal over multiple rotations to normalize and compute precise target position offsets, making it suitable for applications requiring angular accuracy in dynamic environments.^[3] Emerging in the mid-20th century, conical scanning built on early radar developments for target acquisition and was formalized through theoretical analyses, including foundational work by Fishback in 1951 on low-angle tracking performance.^[1] It became a staple in fire control radars, such as the C-band Prelort radar operating at 5450-5825 MHz and X-band shipborne systems, and extended to diverse uses including military aircraft tracking, balloon-borne instrument monitoring, and spacecraft position estimation via least-squares analysis of power variations sampled at rates exceeding the Nyquist criterion (e.g., 50 Hz for a 10 Hz bandwidth).^[1]^[4]^[3] The technique's implementation can be mechanical, using rotating feeds or mirrors, or electronic, as in phased-array antennas that generate the conical pattern through controlled phase shifts.^[4] Advantages of conical scanning include its structural simplicity, requiring only a single receiver channel and modest computational resources compared to simultaneous lobing methods like monopulse, which contributed to its widespread adoption in active military systems.^[1]^[2] It excels in rejecting disturbances, such as those causing errors as low as 0.01 mdeg from a 0.3 mdeg input, and supports efficient estimation in sliding-window modes that halve processing times (e.g., from 120 s to 60 s).^[3] However, disadvantages stem from its sequential nature, which makes it inefficient in radar resource use, vulnerable to target signal amplitude fluctuations (scintillation), and susceptible to jamming or electronic countermeasures that exploit the predictable scan pattern.^[2] These limitations prompted its partial supersession by monopulse techniques post-1950s, though conical scanning persists in niche roles like high-resolution wind profiling in airborne Doppler radars (e.g., HIWRAP at Ku- and Ka-bands) and parameter estimation in modern tracking scenarios.^[2]^[5]

Principles

Definition and Purpose

Conical scanning is a radar tracking method in which the antenna's main beam is mechanically or electronically displaced from the central axis of the antenna and rotated around that axis, generating a narrow conical scan pattern to illuminate a presumed target location. This displacement causes the beam to trace a small circle in the sky, with the cone's apex at the radar antenna, enabling the system to sample the target's echo signal from multiple angular positions during each rotation cycle.^[6] The core purpose of conical scanning is to facilitate precise automatic target tracking by measuring angular errors in azimuth and elevation relative to the beam's central axis, allowing the radar to adjust the antenna pointing in real time for sustained lock-on. This approach provides higher angular accuracy—typically on the order of 0.1 degrees or better—compared to simpler scanning techniques such as raster or spiral patterns, which are better suited for initial broad-area searches rather than fine tracking. By modulating the received echo amplitude through the conical motion, the system derives error signals proportional to the target's offset, supporting applications in fire control and guidance without requiring full antenna slewing.^[7]^[6] Conical scanning originated as an innovative response to the shortcomings of early fixed-beam radars, which struggled with real-time tracking of maneuvering targets during World War II. Developed at the MIT Radiation Laboratory, it was first implemented in the SCR-584 microwave radar system, an automatic-tracking fire-control radar introduced in 1943 that revolutionized antiaircraft defenses by enabling rapid, accurate adjustments to gun directors without extensive mechanical movement of the entire antenna assembly. This technique addressed the need for continuous, high-precision angular measurements in dynamic combat environments, marking a pivotal advancement in radar technology for military applications.^[8]^[7]

Operating Mechanism

In conical scanning, the radar beam is generated by offsetting it from the antenna boresight by a small squint angle, typically 0.5 to 2 degrees, and rotating it at a constant rate of 10 to 30 revolutions per second around the tracking axis, thereby tracing a conical path.^[6]^[1] This offset and rotation are achieved mechanically, often through a rotating feed or nutating subreflector, which displaces the beam's pointing direction without altering the antenna's main orientation.^[9] The received echo from the target exhibits distinct behavior depending on the target's position relative to the scan cone. If the target lies precisely on the cone's axis, the echo power remains constant over each rotation cycle, as the beam's peak gain illuminates the target uniformly.^[6] However, when the target is off-axis, the echo amplitude becomes modulated at the scan frequency, with the modulation depth proportional to the angular displacement from the axis and the phase of the modulation relative to the scan reference indicating the error direction—such as leading or lagging the rotation to signify azimuth or elevation offset.^[9]^[1] This modulation allows for quantitative estimation of the angular error θ, approximated by the formula

\theta \approx \frac{A_{\text{mod}} / A_{\text{dc}}}{\sin \rho},

where A_{\text{mod}} is the amplitude of the AC (modulated) component of the received signal, A_{\text{dc}} is the DC (average) component, and ρ is the beam squint angle.^[9] The phase difference between the modulation and the scan reference further resolves the error into orthogonal components for tracking adjustments.^[1] Conical scanning builds on the fundamental radar range equation, which relates received power to transmitted power, antenna gains, wavelength, target cross-section, and range, by introducing angular-dependent gain variations that refine precision in target localization beyond range-only measurements.^[9] The modulation provides a means to extract sub-beamwidth angular accuracy, typically achieving errors on the order of 1/100th of the beamwidth under ideal conditions.^[1]

Implementations

Antenna Configurations

Conical scanning is typically implemented using mechanical rotation of the antenna feed or subreflector to generate the required beam nutation. In this configuration, a feed horn is mounted slightly offset from the focal point of a parabolic dish antenna, and a motor drives its rotation around an axis tilted relative to the boresight, causing the main beam to trace a conical path with a small angular offset known as the squint angle.^[6] This tilted rotation ensures the beam periodically sweeps across the target while maintaining overlap with the central axis, enabling precise angle error detection from signal amplitude variations.^[1] A variant employs a nutated subreflector in a Cassegrain or similar dual-reflector system, where the subreflector is tilted and rotated to redirect the beam without altering the primary reflector's orientation, preserving polarization stability.^[10] The WWII-era SCR-584 radar exemplified this mechanical approach, utilizing a motor-driven offset dipole feed that was rapidly nutated in front of the parabolic reflector to produce the conical scan pattern at a rate of 30 revolutions per second.^[11]^[12] Such systems relied on robust mechanical components to achieve the necessary scan speeds, typically in the range of 20–30 revolutions per second for effective tracking in operational environments.^[1] Electronic alternatives emerged in the mid-20th century as hybrid methods to simulate conical scanning without physical motion, primarily using ferrite phase shifters integrated into multi-element arrays. These early systems employed four variable phase shifters, one per element in a linear or circular array, to progressively adjust the phase front and rotate the effective beam tilt electronically, mimicking the nutation of mechanical setups.^[13] Ferrite-based designs, such as those developed under U.S. Air Force programs in the 1960s, allowed scan rates up to 20 kHz with low insertion loss, though they were less prevalent in classic conical scan radars due to complexity and power demands compared to mechanical methods.^[13] Pin-diode arrays offered a semiconductor-based option for phase control but saw limited adoption in early conical scanning owing to higher losses at microwave frequencies.^[14] Antenna sampling techniques approximated the continuous conical pattern using multiple feeds or lobes, often in sequential lobing configurations that discretized the rotation into discrete positions. In such setups, 4–8 feed horns were arranged around the focal plane with spacing on the order of the beamwidth (typically λ/2 to λ for uniform coverage), and phase coordination via switching or fixed delays ensured the lobes sequentially traced the cone, providing sampled error signals for tracking.^[15] This method reduced mechanical wear while maintaining accuracy, with phase shifts calibrated to 90° increments for orthogonal sampling in elevation and azimuth.^[13]

Conical-Scan Receive-Only (COSRO)

Conical-Scan Receive-Only (COSRO) is a passive tracking technique in radar systems where the receive antenna employs conical scanning to detect and track targets illuminated by a separate, non-scanning transmit radar. This configuration allows the receiver to nutate its sensitivity pattern around the boresight axis, generating angle error signals from the modulated return echoes without modulating the transmitted beam. COSRO is particularly suited for applications requiring precise target tracking while minimizing interference from the transmitter, such as in semi-active homing scenarios.^[16]^[17] The construction of a COSRO system typically involves a fixed transmit antenna paired with a receive antenna featuring a rotary nutating scanner positioned in the waveguide between the duplexer and the receiver. This scanner modulates the receive beam by rotating an RF signal detector or feed element, often at rates around 30 Hz, to produce the conical pattern while the main reflector remains stationary. In designs using reflector antennas, such as Cassegrain configurations, the nutation can be achieved via a rotating subreflector or an offset feed to shift the receive lobe without mechanical movement of the entire dish, ensuring synchronization with the illuminator's pulse timing. This setup extracts elevation and azimuth errors through amplitude comparison of the received signals.^[16]^[1] COSRO offers distinct advantages over full conical-scan systems, including reduced self-jamming in co-located transmit-receive setups due to the steady, unmodulated transmit beam that avoids introducing scan-related interference into the receiver. It also enables the use of smaller and lighter receive antennas, as the transmit function can be handled by a dedicated, larger illuminator, making it ideal for space-constrained platforms. Developed during the 1950s primarily for airborne and fire-control applications, COSRO addressed vulnerabilities to electronic countermeasures like inverse conical-scan jamming by denying jammers a detectable transmit modulation pattern. It finds common use in missile guidance systems, where the ground-based receiver passively tracks targets using signals from an illuminator radar, and in secondary surveillance roles for enhanced accuracy without active transmission from the tracker.^[16]^[1]

Signal Processing

Error Detection

In conical scanning systems, error detection begins with the demodulation of the received radar signals, which are modulated in amplitude due to the rotating beam. Synchronous detectors are employed to separate the direct current (DC) component, representing the average received power, from the alternating current (AC) component at the scan frequency, which encodes the angular displacement information. These detectors operate by multiplying the incoming signal with a reference waveform synchronized to the beam rotation, effectively extracting the modulation envelope. Phase-sensitive amplifiers then process the demodulated outputs in quadrature (sine and cosine phases) to determine the direction of the error, producing signed voltages that indicate whether the target is offset to the left/right in azimuth or up/down in elevation. This process ensures that the error signal not only quantifies the magnitude of the misalignment but also its polarity, enabling precise angular corrections.^[9] The angular errors are derived from the quadrature demodulator outputs (sine and cosine voltages), normalized by the receiver gain and scan parameters to provide the error magnitude and direction in angular units, assuming small angular offsets where the signal variation is approximately linear. The reference signals for demodulation are generated by a two-phase mechanism driven by the scan motor, ensuring phase coherence between the beam rotation and the detection process.^[1] Noise considerations significantly influence the accuracy of error detection, as thermal and receiver noise corrupt the modulated signal, reducing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and introducing variance in the estimated errors. The RMS error due to noise is inversely proportional to the angle sensitivity factor and increases with the square root of any crossover losses from beam squint. Under favorable conditions with sufficient SNR (typically above 10 dB), conical scanning achieves an angular precision of approximately 1/10 of the beamwidth, allowing sub-beamwidth tracking of targets. However, low SNR environments, such as those with weak echoes or clutter, degrade this to coarser resolutions, emphasizing the need for robust receiver design.^[9] For stable error estimation, the system integrates data over multiple scan cycles to average out noise fluctuations, typically requiring at least 4–10 cycles depending on the scan rate (often 20–30 Hz) and desired variance reduction. Each cycle provides one set of quadrature samples, and accumulation over several cycles suppresses random noise by the square root of the number of independent measurements, improving reliability without introducing significant latency in dynamic tracking scenarios. This averaging is particularly critical in practical implementations where pulse repetition frequency limits the samples per cycle to a minimum of four (one per quadrant).^[9]

Tracking Algorithms

In conical scanning radars, tracking algorithms employ a closed-loop feedback system where error signals, derived from the modulation of received echo amplitudes, are processed to drive servo amplifiers that adjust the antenna pedestal or electronic beam steering mechanisms, thereby nulling angular errors and maintaining the target on the beam's central axis.^[18]^[1] This feedback loop ensures continuous alignment by continuously evaluating the phase and amplitude of the error signals against a reference scan modulation, with servo-motors responding to the resulting control voltages in both elevation and azimuth channels.^[1] Common algorithm implementations utilize proportional-integral (PI) controllers within the servo system to dampen oscillatory responses and achieve stable tracking, preventing overcorrections that could lead to loss of lock.^[18] The scan rate is fundamentally limited by the radar's pulse repetition frequency (PRF) to allow sufficient sampling of the target's return signals across the cone; for instance, a maximum scan rate of PRF / 4 is typical, as at least four pulses are required to resolve azimuth and elevation errors accurately, with practical systems often operating at around 30 scans per second.^[18]^[1] During initial target acquisition, the algorithm initiates a wide-cone scan mode to detect and capture the target within a broader field, subsequently transitioning to a narrow-cone tracking mode once the received signal strength exceeds predefined thresholds, enabling finer angular resolution for sustained lock-on.^[18] This transition logic relies on real-time signal-to-noise ratio assessments to switch modes without disrupting the feedback loop. In related sequential lobing variants, algorithms discretely switch the beam between predefined lobes to sample errors, contrasting with the continuous circular modulation of full conical scanning that provides smoother, real-time adjustments.^[18]

Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures

Jamming Effects

Conical scanning radars are particularly susceptible to electronic countermeasures that exploit their reliance on modulated error signals derived from the antenna's circular beam motion around the boresight. Amplitude jamming, such as inverse gain or amplitude modulation techniques, introduces false modulations in the received signal that mimic off-axis target displacements, thereby generating erroneous angle error signals and causing the tracking loop to steer away from the true target.^[19] Phase or frequency jamming disrupts the synchronization between the jamming signal and the radar's scan reference, leading to desynchronization of the modulation phase and eventual loss of tracking lock as the error detector fails to align with the conical pattern.^[20] Specific jamming techniques target the unique periodic structure of conical scanning. Scan rate modulation jamming alters the apparent scan frequency by introducing phase shifts or modulations at rates mismatched to the radar's nominal rotation, overwhelming the servo mechanisms and causing tracking instability or overload as the system attempts to compensate for perceived rapid target maneuvers.^[21] Noise jamming, often modulated at low frequencies to match the scan rate, elevates the overall noise floor in the receiver, degrading the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the modulation component essential for error extraction; for instance, a jamming-to-signal (J/S) ratio exceeding 10 dB can reduce the modulation SNR below detectable thresholds, resulting in tracking failure.^[20] The quantitative impact of such jamming manifests as an induced bias in the angle error, creating a fictitious target displacement that scales with the J/S ratio until saturation effects dominate.^[19] In amplitude-modulated jamming scenarios, maximum tracking errors can reach up to 1.44 degrees (approximately 90% of the seeker's field of view) at J/S ratios around 50, highlighting the vulnerability to even moderate jamming strengths.^[20]

Mitigation Strategies

To protect conical scanning systems from jamming, several design modifications enhance resilience by altering the radar's operational parameters to disrupt jammer synchronization. Monopulse techniques provide angle measurements from a single pulse, reducing vulnerability to amplitude modulation-based deceptions that exploit conical scan's periodic error signals. Frequency agility represents another design countermeasure, enabling the radar to unpredictably hop operating frequencies within pulse repetition intervals, which complicates jammer adaptation and synchronization with the scan pattern.^[22] Signal processing techniques further bolster conical scanning against jamming by refining the extraction of target information from noisy returns. Adaptive filtering algorithms can reject jamming modulation by dynamically adjusting to suppress frequency components matching known deception patterns, such as those in inverse gain jamming, while preserving the target's error signal.^[23] Additionally, integrating returns over multiple scans improves the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) against noise jammers, as coherent accumulation across scans enhances target detectability by a factor proportional to the square root of the number of integrated pulses, mitigating the dilution of signal power in jammed environments.^[24] Operational tactics provide practical defenses by leveraging system capabilities and deployment strategies to outmaneuver jammers. Extending the burn-through range through higher transmitted power allows the radar's target echo to overpower received jamming signals at closer distances, as the echo power scales with the fourth power of radar power while jamming falls off with the square, enabling reliable tracking once within the burn-through threshold.^[25] Decoy deployment confuses jammer targeting by introducing multiple apparent emitters or reflectors, forcing the jammer to spread its power across false targets and reducing effective jamming density on the true radar.^[26] A notable post-1970s advancement in conical scan anti-jam capabilities is the development of devices that eliminate amplitude modulation on transmitted signals via feedback-modulated waveguides, preventing repeaters from replicating the scan pattern for deception; such systems, patented in the late 1970s, improved jam resistance by countering angle-tracking exploits without requiring full monopulse redesign.^[27]

History and Applications

Development History

Conical scanning emerged as a critical advancement in radar technology during World War II, primarily to enhance angular tracking accuracy for fire control systems. The technique, which involves rotating a radar beam in a cone around the target axis to generate error signals for precise pointing, was first implemented in the German Würzburg D radar introduced in 1941. This model incorporated a conical scanning system using an offset receiver feed known as a "Quirl," achieving angular accuracies of approximately 0.2 degrees in azimuth and 0.3 degrees in elevation, significantly improving upon earlier lobe-switching methods for anti-aircraft gun direction.^[28] In parallel, Allied developments accelerated in the early 1940s at institutions like the MIT Radiation Laboratory, where microwave radar research focused on automatic tracking solutions. The British GL Mk. I gun-laying radar, entering service in 1939, represented one of the earliest practical applications of conical scanning in Allied systems, utilizing a wavelength of 3.5-5.5 meters for mobile anti-aircraft fire control with enhanced precision over prior sets.^[29] The later GL Mk. III, entering service in late 1942, introduced a 10 cm wavelength but relied on manual tracking. Conical scanning became operational in Allied radars as early as 1939, marking a shift toward automated target tracking that bolstered defensive capabilities against aerial threats.^[30] World War II saw widespread integration of conical scanning into major systems on both sides. The U.S. SCR-584 radar, developed at the MIT Radiation Laboratory starting in 1942 and first deployed in combat in February 1944, employed conical scan tracking with a 3 cm wavelength, delivering exceptional angular accuracy of about 0.06 degrees and range precision to 20 meters, which proved devastating against German aircraft during the war. Similarly, later variants of the German Würzburg series, such as the Würzburg-Riese, refined conical scanning for long-range applications, combining it with larger antennas to support night fighter direction while maintaining sub-degree accuracy. These advancements enabled effective anti-aircraft fire control, with the SCR-584 alone contributing to the downing of numerous Luftwaffe bombers through its reliable tracking.^[31]^[32]^[33] Post-war, conical scanning evolved to address emerging needs in missile guidance and surveillance. In the 1950s, variants like Conical-Scan Receive-Only (COSRO) were developed, where only the receive beam is scanned conically while the transmitter remains fixed, reducing mechanical complexity and enabling integration into guided missile systems such as early surface-to-air defenses like the US Nike Ajax. This adaptation supported post-war missile programs by providing lightweight, reliable tracking for interceptors.^[16] By the 1960s, the introduction of electronic scanning techniques began to minimize mechanical components in conical scan implementations, paving the way for hybrid systems that combined conical principles with phased arrays for greater flexibility.^[34] By the 1980s, conical scanning was largely phased out in advanced military radars in favor of monopulse techniques, which offered superior resistance to jamming and faster response times without the vulnerabilities of sequential lobe comparisons. For instance, the U.S. Patriot air defense system transitioned to phased-array monopulse radars like the MPQ-53, rendering mechanical conical scan obsolete in high-threat environments while preserving the core tracking accuracy that earlier systems had pioneered.^[35]

Modern Applications

In contemporary military contexts, conical scanning continues to be employed in low-cost tracking radars due to its mechanical simplicity and reliability for precision target acquisition. It supports applications such as artillery spotting and counter-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) defense by providing accurate azimuth and elevation data at update rates of approximately 30 times per second, making it suitable for integrated air defense systems and missile guidance without the complexity of advanced phased arrays. This technique is particularly valued in resource-constrained environments where high pulse repetition frequencies and narrow beamwidths enable effective tracking of low-observable threats.^[21] Civilian uses of conical scanning extend to radio astronomy and deep space communications, where precise antenna pointing is essential for capturing weak signals. In radio astronomy, the method enhances the pointing accuracy of large radiotelescopes by modulating the received signal through a conical pattern, outperforming orthogonal scan techniques in reducing errors from atmospheric effects and mechanical instabilities. NASA's Deep Space Network (DSN) implements conical scan tracking, or CONSCAN, to automatically acquire and maintain lock on faint spacecraft signals, achieving pointing accuracies better than 0.01 degrees through continuous beam rotation and phase-locked loop adjustments.^[36]^[37] Emerging applications leverage conical scanning in specialized environmental monitoring, notably with weather radars for studying bird and bat migration. These systems perform conical volume scans at multiple elevation angles to generate three-dimensional reflectivity profiles, enabling quantification of migration fluxes and flight behaviors during peak seasons. Such integrations provide cost-effective alternatives to dedicated ornithological radars, with scans repeated every 10-15 minutes to track nocturnal movements over broad areas. Additionally, recent prototypes explore conical scan architectures for compact spaceborne weather radars, reducing size, weight, and power requirements while maintaining wide-swath coverage for global precipitation mapping. As of 2025, the ESA's WIVERN mission, in Phase A development, utilizes conical scanning in a 94 GHz spaceborne radar for global wind measurements, demonstrating continued innovation in compact satellite systems.^[38]^[39]

References

[1]
[PDF] Theory of Conical-Scan Radars for Low-Angle Tracking, - DTIC
The method by which the squinted radar beams are formed defines the three generic types of tracking radars: Sequential lobing, conical-scan and monopulse ( ...
[2]
[PDF] Radar Measurements
Feb 9, 2010 · Monopulse is a simultaneous lobing technique that was developed to overcome the shortcomings of sequential lobing and conical scanning [13].<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
Antenna scanning techniques for estimation of spacecraft position
Three different scanning patterns (conical scan, Lissajous scan, and rosette scan) are presented and analyzed in this paper.
[4]
Phased-Antenna-Array Conical Scanning
Technique has many uses in military and civilian radar, principally in tracking aircraft, balloonborne weather instruments, and other moving signal sources or ...
[5]
Velocity–Azimuth Display Analysis of Doppler Velocity for HIWRAP
Aug 9, 2015 · The VAD technique provides a mean vertical profile of the horizontal winds for each complete conical scan of the HIWRAP radar.
[6]
Conical Scan - Radartutorial
### Summary of Conical Scan in Radar
[7]
History and Technology - Radars - NavWeaps
Dec 11, 2017 · The earliest trick, which is still used, is "conical scan ... Many of the earliest fire-control radars had very clumsy methods of ...
[8]
Mod II Radar Antenna - Cape Canaveral Space Force Museum
Its function was to provide the fire-control information necessary for operating a battery of four 90-mm antiaircraft guns. The SCR-584 was the first to use the ...
[9]
[PDF] CHAPTER 18 - Helitavia
This chapter describes the conical-scan, sequential-lobing, and monopulse. (both phase comparison and amplitude comparison) tracking-radar techniques, with the ...
[10]
Conical scanning antenna system using nutation method
That is, the sub-reflector has a predetermined sub-reflector angle tilted at a predetermined axis direction, and the sub-reflector makes the nutation motion ...Missing: parabolic dish
[11]
SCR-584 Technical Description - CarnarvonSpace
Nov 23, 2011 · (a) a helical scan (see diagram to the right) in which the antenna scans the sky around the radar; · (b) a spiral scan in which the antenna beam ...
[12]
[PDF] unclassified - DTIC
The method of producing conical scan by means of variable phase shifters is illustrated in Figure 1. There are four variable phase shifters, one in series with.
[13]
[PDF] Array Phase Shifters: Theory and Technology
MEMS can essentially be used to replace PIN diode or FET switches in conventional phase shifters. A typical switch consists of a metal membrane bridge ...Missing: conical | Show results with:conical
[14]
[PDF] Target Tracking - gpcet
Rates as high as 30 scans per seconds are commonly used. The conical scan squint angle needs to be large enough so that a good error signal can be measured.
[15]
Chapter 5 Automatic Tracking Systems
Any system whose function it is to track an energy source can be made to do so by employing the conical scan concept, i.e., laser, infrared, and sonic sensors.
[16]
[PDF] RADAR SYSTEMS - VEMU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
. A COnical-Scan-on-Receive-Only (COSRO) tracking radar radiates a non-scanning transmit beam, but receives with a conical scanning beam to extract the ...Missing: handbook | Show results with:handbook<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
None
### Summary of Conical Scanning in CRC Radar Handbook Chapter 11
[18]
[PDF] AD0692642.pdf - DTIC
Let us consider the effect on a radar with conical scanning of desired signal and interference aimed at the scanning frequency. We will assume that scanning ...<|separator|>
[19]
[PDF] Analysis of the jam signal effect against the conical-scan seeker
This study investigates the effect of using different jammer waveforms namely: the fixed carrier, low frequency, amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency- ...
[20]
[PDF] Electronic Warfare Fundamentals
Self-protection radar jamming targets the radar systems that support jamming ... A self-protection jamming system must have receive antennas to receive.
[21]
Air Electronic Warfare | Proceedings - October 1976 Vol. 102/10/884
During the Vietnam War, jamming equipment was added without removing its tanker capability, so that it could jam enemy radars while waiting to fuel tactical ...
[22]
[PDF] Optimizing ECM Techniques against Monopulse Acquisition ... - DTIC
Sep 1, 1989 · In conical scan, the scan rate has an effect on tracking range. This Is because the beam direction between transmission and reception must ...Missing: MPQ- | Show results with:MPQ-
[23]
[PDF] Frequency Agility Radar, - DTIC
Dec 6, 1982 · Annotation: This section of the book presents in detail the structure, components, mechanics, and applications of frequency agile radar.
[24]
[PDF] Radar Adaptive Interference Mitigation
Adaptive interference mitigation for radar involves understanding basics, using radar measurements, and suppressing clutter and jamming signals, which are ...
[25]
[PDF] Improvement in Radar Detection Under Scan to Scan Processing ...
Mar 3, 1992 · If I/B is replaced with the pulse width, 'T, the integrated SNR is equal to the energy over noise power density, a well known matched filter ...
[26]
[PDF] BURN-THROUGH / CROSSOVER RANGE
A radar can be designed with higher than necessary power for earlier burn-through on jamming targets. Naturally that would also have the added advantage of ...
[27]
[PDF] Advances in Anti-Deception Jamming Strategies for Radar Systems
Mar 1, 2025 · Attacks Against Non-Monopulse Radar: Against conical scanning radars, the inverse gain technique synchronizes with the radar's modulation and ...
[28]
Anti-jam device for a conical scan tracking radar - Google Patents
The conical scanning or lobing radars generate amplitude modulation of the radar signals by displacing the antenna beam center around the center line of the ...
[29]
The Freya and Würzburg Radar Systems
... Würzburg' radars. With a new conical scanner, the 'Würzburg D' model introduced in 1941 achieved a remarkable accuracy of 0.2 degrees in azimuth and 0.3 ...
[30]
Gun Laying (AGLT) | WordPress Venture
... 1942, the GL Mk. III, which was a microwave version of the earlier lobe-switching 30 to 300 megahertz, ten meters to one metre wavelengths (VHF) radar sets.
[31]
SCR-584 | radar - Britannica
Oct 26, 2025 · It employed conical scan tracking—in which a single offset (squinted) radar beam is continuously rotated about the radar antenna's central axis— ...
[32]
SCR-584 - Radartutorial.eu
It employed conical scan tracking. The SCR-584 was first used in combat in February 1944. It used the 2J32 magnetron tube as a microwave power source.
[33]
“Würzburg” Radar - Radartutorial.eu
The "Würzburg" radar, developed by Telefunken in Germany during WWII, was used as anti-aircraft guided guns. The last model used conical scan.
[34]
Radar Fundamentals (Part II ) - Aircraft 101 - WordPress.com
Aug 11, 2016 · For conical scan pattern, radar employs a beam of radar energy that is continuously rotated around the target. This circular rotation of a ...
[35]
radar_descptn_2 - Mobile Military Radar
Notes: 1962. MPQ-33 – Hawk Tracker/Illuminator; Frequency: 10,000 to 10,250 ... Antenna: 8 foot parabolic antenna; conical scan. Beam width: 3 degrees ...Missing: ECM | Show results with:ECM
[36]
Monopulse radar - Wikipedia
Monopulse radar avoids problems seen in conical scanning radar systems, which can be confused by rapid changes in signal strength. The system also makes jamming ...
[37]
Pointing large antennas using the conical scan technique
Conical scanning is also known as sequential-lobe compari- son, and is a technique widely used in tracking–radar sys- tems (Skolnik 1970).Missing: history | Show results with:history
[38]
[PDF] DSN CONSCAN - IPN Progress Report
CONSCAN requires the specification of four parameter values for proper operation: the CONSCAN radius, the scan period, the loop phase angle, and CONSCAN gain.
[39]
Conical scan weather radar - US20210239789A1 - Google Patents
A new measurement approach is disclosed that facilitates significantly smaller size, weight, and power (SWaP) spaceborne radar systems that can provide wide ...