Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Current source

A current source is an electronic circuit component or device that delivers or absorbs a constant electric current through its terminals, independent of the voltage across them or changes in the connected load. This contrasts with a voltage source, which maintains a fixed voltage while allowing current to vary. In idealized models, current sources exhibit infinite output impedance, ensuring the current remains stable even as voltage fluctuates widely, a property known as high compliance range. They can operate as direct current (DC) sources, providing steady non-time-varying flow, or alternating current (AC) sources, where the current varies sinusoidally or otherwise over time. Current sources are fundamental building blocks in analog electronics, enabling precise control in . Practical implementations often rely on transistors, such as bipolar junction transistors (BJTs) in simple one-transistor configurations or metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) for integrated circuits, to approximate ideal behavior. More advanced designs incorporate operational amplifiers for precision, achieving low output compliance errors, or use dedicated integrated circuits like the LM334 for temperature-stable operation. Dependent current sources, which scale their output based on another circuit voltage or current, extend their utility in complex systems like amplifiers and loops. Key applications include biasing transistors in integrated circuits, driving light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with consistent brightness, and transmitting industrial analog signals over long distances via standardized 4-20 mA loops, which resist and voltage drops. In these roles, current sources ensure reliable performance by prioritizing current constancy, making them indispensable for sensors, actuators, and precision instrumentation.

Fundamentals

Definition and Ideal Characteristics

A current source is an electrical circuit element that supplies a constant to a load, independent of the voltage across the load or variations in its impedance. This distinguishes it from other sources by prioritizing current stability over voltage regulation, making it essential in applications requiring precise current delivery, such as in amplifiers or circuits. In its ideal form, a current source exhibits output impedance, expressed as R_{out} \to \infty, which ensures the output current I remains fixed regardless of changes in the output voltage V_{out}. The simplifies to I = I_s, where I_s is the constant nominal current, and V_{out} can vary freely based on the connected load without affecting I_s. Symbolically, the ideal current source is depicted as a parallel combination of an ideal current generator and an , representing its . The I-V characteristic of an ideal source is graphically represented as a straight horizontal line on a current-voltage plot, illustrating the invariance of with respect to voltage. This idealized representation establishes the theoretical basis for analysis, enabling the study of sources in isolation before addressing real-world behaviors.

Practical Limitations

In practical sources, the is finite rather than infinite, typically ranging from 10 kΩ to several megaohms depending on the design and components used. This finite impedance, denoted as R_{\text{out}}, causes the output to vary with changes in the load voltage, quantified by the relation \Delta I = \Delta V / R_{\text{out}}, where \Delta I is the deviation and \Delta V is the voltage change across the source. For instance, high-performance op-amp-based sources can achieve output impedances exceeding 100 MΩ at , but this drops at higher frequencies due to parasitic capacitances and loop bandwidth limitations. Such variations degrade the source's ability to maintain a under dynamic load conditions. Another key constraint is the voltage range, which defines the maximum and minimum voltage across the load over which the source can deliver the specified without saturating or dropping out of . Beyond this range, the output deviates significantly as the internal circuitry reaches its supply limits or saturation points. Typical compliance ranges for integrated current sources, such as those based on shunt regulators or op-amp configurations, extend from near 0 V minimum to 20–22 V maximum, influenced by the supply voltage minus headroom requirements like reference drops and sense resistor voltages. In applications like electrochemical measurements, compliance voltages are often limited to 10 V or less to conductivity and cell configuration requirements. Temperature and process variations further impact current stability in practical sources, particularly in semiconductor implementations where thermal coefficients affect transistor parameters like base-emitter voltage and mobility. For example, uncompensated bipolar junction transistor (BJT) sources may exhibit a negative temperature coefficient of about -0.33%/°C due to the temperature dependence of the base-emitter junction, leading to a 29% current decrease over 0–100 °C. Advanced designs, such as modified Howland circuits, can reduce this drift to as low as 0.03% over wide temperature ranges through matched components and feedback. Process variations during fabrication also introduce mismatches in resistor and transistor characteristics, amplifying output current errors by 1–5% in monolithic ICs without trimming. Power dissipation imposes a fundamental limit, as the product of output current and compliance voltage (P = I \times V) generates heat that can cause thermal runaway or component failure if exceeding device ratings. For discrete or integrated sources like the LM334, maximum dissipation is typically capped at 400 mW to prevent overheating, requiring derating in high-current applications (e.g., 20 mA at 20 V yields 400 mW). Exceeding this limit not only risks breakdown but also exacerbates temperature-induced drift, necessitating heatsinking or current limiting for reliability. Performance metrics like output resistance are evaluated using small-signal analysis at the operating point, where r_{\text{out}} = \partial V_{\text{out}} / \partial I_{\text{out}}, often approximated by applying a small test voltage and measuring the resulting current change (r_{\text{out}} \approx \Delta V / \Delta I). This method isolates incremental behavior from DC biases, revealing impedance under varying loads; for example, a 4 V change causing a 40 µA current shift indicates 100 kΩ output resistance. Such measurements are critical for validating source quality in precision applications, accounting for frequency-dependent effects in AC-coupled tests.

Implementations

Passive Current Sources

Passive current sources are basic approximations of ideal current sources achieved through passive components, primarily by employing high-value resistors in series with a voltage source to limit and stabilize current flow. The simplest configuration involves a stable voltage source, such as a battery or Zener diode, connected in series with a resistor, where the resistor's value determines the approximate current delivered to the load. For adjustable operation, resistor networks like potentiometers can be incorporated, allowing variation of the effective resistance to tune the current output without active elements. The operating principle relies on , where the I is roughly I \approx \frac{V}{R}, with V as the input voltage and R as the large series value, making it suitable for low-precision, simple applications. However, this setup is inherently voltage-dependent, as the actual is given by I = \frac{V_{in} - V_{out}}{R}, revealing non-ideality due to voltage drops across the load (V_{out}). These passive approximations exhibit poor , approximately equal to R, which is often limited to practical values (e.g., kiloohms), resulting in significant sensitivity to variations in supply voltage or load conditions. Advantages of passive current sources include their in and , low due to the use of inexpensive components, and no requirement for additional power supplies beyond the driving voltage. Historically, such resistor-based methods were foundational in early circuits, dating back to the application of in the for basic before the advent of active devices. Common applications encompass current limiting in simple LED drivers, biasing networks in basic amplifiers, and as temporary placeholders in circuit prototypes where high precision is not essential.

Active Implementations Without Feedback

Active implementations without feedback utilize the inherent nonlinear properties of devices, such as transistors operating in or diodes in breakdown, to regulate current flow. These designs leverage device physics to maintain relatively stable output currents over a range of load voltages, offering improved performance over passive resistive methods without requiring error-correcting loops. In current-stable nonlinear implementations, a Zener diode biased in its breakdown region provides a stable reference voltage that sets the base-emitter voltage of a transistor, resulting in a collector current approximately equal to the Zener current under proper biasing. For instance, in a basic configuration, the transistor's collector current I_C is given by I_C \approx (V_Z - V_{BE}) / R, where V_Z is the Zener voltage, V_{BE} is the base-emitter drop (typically 0.7 V), and R is a shunt resistor; this approximates I_C \approx I_Z when the resistor is small relative to the Zener's dynamic resistance. Such circuits achieve moderate stability with temperature coefficients around 0.3%/°C when diodes are thermally coupled to the transistor. Following voltage implementations, like the basic , employ matched where the output current tracks a reference current through shared base-emitter or gate-source voltages. In a (BJT) , the diode-connected reference transistor sets a common V_{BE}, yielding I_{OUT} \approx I_{REF} for identical devices, though finite current gain \beta introduces errors such that I_{OUT} = I_{REF} (1 - 2/\beta). versions avoid base current losses, providing I_{OUT} = I_{REF} more accurately. These open-loop designs depend on device matching for precision. Voltage compensation implementations enhance stability by incorporating additional diodes to account for V_{BE} variations, particularly temperature-induced changes. The current is determined by I = (V_{REF} - n V_{BE}) / R, where V_{REF} is a stable reference (e.g., from two forward-biased diodes yielding ~1.2 V), n is the number of compensating diodes (often 1 or 2), and R sets the magnitude. Thermally coupling the compensation diodes to the minimizes the negative temperature coefficient of V_{BE} (-2 mV/°C), achieving coefficients below 200 /°C in optimized setups. Current compensation implementations, such as bootstrapped sources, mitigate current errors in BJTs by using an to amplify the and reduce loading effects. In these circuits, a second or device (e.g., TLV431 shunt) drives the , effectively boosting the current gain and making I_{OUT} less dependent on \beta variations. This enhances regulation without , with dropout voltages around 1.35 V. Common traits of these active designs include moderate output impedances typically in the 10-100 kΩ range, arising from effects like the Early voltage in BJTs (output resistance r_o \approx V_A / I_C, where V_A is ~100 V) or channel-length modulation in MOSFETs. They exhibit sensitivity to temperature drifts in device parameters and mismatches between components, leading to 1-5% current variations under nominal conditions. These implementations provide higher voltage compliance (up to several volts) than passive resistor-based sources, enabling operation over wider load ranges, but offer limited (e.g., 1-2% ) compared to feedback-enhanced alternatives due to reliance on physics alone.

Simple Transistor Current Sources

Simple current sources utilize junction transistors (BJTs) or metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) configured with to provide stable output currents with high . The basic configuration employs a single with an emitter (or source) for degeneration , where the output current is approximately I_{out} \approx \frac{V_{BE}}{R_E} for BJTs, rendering it largely independent of the 's current gain \beta. This setup introduces local that stabilizes the current against variations in \beta and supply voltage. The feedback mechanism arises from the emitter degeneration R_E, which increases the effective by a factor of approximately (1 + g_m R_E), where g_m is the . Small-signal analysis reveals that this degeneration provides a that counteracts changes in collector (or ) voltage, enhancing ; for instance, an incremental test at the output produces a voltage drop across R_E that modulates the base-emitter (or gate-source) voltage to oppose the change. In BJT implementations, the can reach up to 1 M\Omega, while proper biasing—such as maintaining —yields a low , typically mitigating the inherent -2 mV/°C variation in V_{BE}. Improved versions, such as the using three transistors, further reduce errors from base current loading and , achieving an of approximately r_{out} \approx \beta (R_E + r_e), where r_e = V_T / I_E is the small-signal emitter . This configuration, invented by George R. in , employs additional feedback to equalize voltages across matched transistors, minimizing systematic mismatches. MOSFET variants replace emitter degeneration with source degeneration, offering similar independence from device parameters but with output currents set by I_{out} \approx \frac{(V_{GS} - V_{th})^2}{2 R_S} in saturation, and these can be made adjustable by varying a reference current through a parallel mirror branch. Despite their advantages, these sources have limitations, including a finite voltage—the minimum output voltage required for operation, often V_{CE(sat)} + I_{out} R_E for BJTs—which restricts use in low-voltage designs and can cause headroom issues. Historically, simple current sources became common in circuits during the following the commercialization of transistors, and they played a key role in current mirrors for early integrated circuits starting in the late .

Op-Amp Current Sources

Op-amp current sources employ operational amplifiers to achieve precise current regulation through mechanisms, converting an input voltage to a controlled output largely independent of load variations. These circuits leverage the op-amp's high to enforce a or specific voltage condition, ensuring stable current delivery across a range of compliance voltages. Common configurations include basic voltage-to-current (V-to-I) converters and more advanced topologies like the Howland current source. A fundamental implementation is the V-to-I converter, which typically incorporates an op-amp driving a to control through a load. In this setup, the op-amp senses the across a R_\text{sense} connected in series with the load, adjusting the base voltage to maintain a constant voltage equal to the reference input V_\text{ref} across R_\text{sense}. The load is thus given by I_\text{load} = \frac{V_\text{ref}}{R_\text{sense}}, allowing straightforward adjustment via V_\text{ref} or R_\text{sense}. The loop ensures the remains stable despite load changes, provided the op-amp can supply the required output voltage. The Howland current source represents a balanced configuration using a single op-amp, enabling bidirectional flow. It features four s forming a bridge around the op-amp: from the output to the non-inverting input, and paths to the inverting input. With balanced s where R_1 / R_2 = R_3 / R_4, the output simplifies to I_\text{out} = \frac{V_\text{in}}{R_s}, where R_s is the sense , and V_\text{in} is the input voltage. This supports sourcing or sinking based on input polarity, offering true bidirectionality without additional components. The circuit's approaches infinity under ideal balance, though practical mismatches limit it to values like ±250 kΩ with 1% tolerances. An improved variant, the unbalanced Howland current source, addresses limitations in single-ended power supplies by modifying the resistor network for better headroom and accuracy. Here, the ensures a at the sense point on the inverting input, while the path uses an adjusted resistor (e.g., R_4 = R_2 - R_s) to minimize errors. The output current follows I_\text{load} = \frac{V_p - V_n}{R_s}, with V_p and V_n as the positive and negative inputs, suitable for supplies from 1.5 V to 36 V depending on the op-amp. Buffering variants further enhance by reducing feedback current errors. This configuration provides higher precision than the basic Howland, especially in gain-settable designs. In all these circuits, the feedback loop exploits the op-amp's high (often >100 dB) to achieve low error from offsets and minimal dependence on load. The output impedance exceeds 1 MΩ in well-designed implementations, as the loop gain amplifies the effective by the factor (1 + A_\text{ol} \beta), where A_\text{ol} is the and \beta is the feedback factor. Op-amp offset voltages contribute negligible error (e.g., <0.1% for typical 1 mV offsets) due to this high . Key advantages include a wide voltage range (limited only by the op-amp's rails), low for easy voltage referencing, and precise adjustability via input voltage. These sources maintain stable output even with varying loads, making them ideal for applications requiring high regulation. However, they often necessitate dual supplies for bidirectional operation, and performance is constrained by op-amp limitations such as (affecting ) and finite , which can degrade if resistors are mismatched. In modern applications, op-amp current sources are prevalent in interfaces, such as driving resistive transducers or excitation currents in precision measurement systems, where variants incorporating amplifiers enhance accuracy for low-level signals.

Voltage Regulator Current Sources

Voltage regulator current sources are integrated circuits originally designed for but adapted to deliver stable output currents through external programming resistors, making them ideal for robust power applications such as driving loads that require precise current control. These devices leverage internal reference voltages and loops to maintain , offering simplicity and reliability in linear topologies. The LM334 serves as a dedicated three-terminal adjustable current source, programmed by an external connected to its set pin. The output current follows the relation I_\text{out} = \frac{67.7 \, \text{mV}}{R_\text{set}} at 25°C, where R_\text{set} determines the current level across a 10,000:1 range from 1 μA to 10 mA. Its operation relies on an internal loop that sustains a nominal 64 mV sense voltage across the setting resistor, which is proportional to absolute temperature for inherent temperature-sensing capability. In a similar vein, the adjustable is repurposed as a programmable current source by placing a between its output and adjustment terminals. Here, the output current is set by I = \frac{1.25 \, \text{V}}{R}, with the internal bandgap reference enforcing a 1.25 V drop across R to regulate current up to 1.5 A. The mechanism dynamically adjusts the to hold this voltage constant, ensuring current stability despite load or input variations. Fixed three-terminal regulators like the series (e.g., LM7805) can be modified into current sources by adding a resistor in series with the load to trigger their internal current-limiting circuitry, enabling operation as a constant-current limiter with capabilities up to 1.5 A. This adaptation exploits the device's inherent short-circuit protection to clamp output current at a programmed value. These IC-based current sources provide high , often exceeding 100 kΩ in configurations like the , which minimizes current variations with output voltage changes. They also demonstrate good thermal stability, with the LM334 achieving a temperature coefficient of ±0.33%/°C and built-in protections against overload and overheating across devices. Common applications encompass LED drivers, where the constant current safeguards against and extends lifespan, and battery chargers, such as the LM317 circuit delivering 50 mA to NiCd cells via a 24 Ω for controlled charging. Despite their advantages, these linear voltage regulator-derived current sources are constrained by fixed internal topologies that necessitate a minimum dropout voltage—approximately 3 V for the —leading to significant power dissipation as heat. They are less suitable for low-power integrated circuits due to inefficiency but continue to be employed in higher-current linear power supplies for their simplicity and protection features.

Curpistor Tubes

A curpistor is a subminiature constant-current designed for precise current regulation in electronic circuits. It features two electrodes enclosed in a nitrogen-filled containing a calibrated amount of radioactive material, typically radium-226, which generates a steady stream of ions to maintain stable current flow. This design allows the curpistor to function as a simple, passive current source without requiring external amplification components. The operation of the curpistor relies on the constant produced by the within the , which ensures the plate remains approximately constant across a wide range of applied voltages. The ions facilitate flow between the electrodes, resulting in a regulated output that is largely of load variations or voltage fluctuations, typically in the microampere range for minute regulators like the CH1027 model. This inherent stability arises from the fixed , measured in becquerels, providing a predictable number of ions per second and thus a consistent . High output , often in the megaohm range, is a of this due to its ionization-based . In circuit applications, the curpistor is typically connected in series with the load, acting as a self-contained limiter; for example, a self-biased might incorporate a simple network to set the current, leveraging the tube's characteristics for overall . These devices were particularly valued in early analog for applications requiring reliable, low-level constant currents, such as in timing circuits or sources. Developed in the by Electric Inc., the curpistor represented an innovative approach to current stabilization using radioactive elements in technology, aimed at providing tolerances and longevity unmatched by conventional resistors or early alternatives at the time. It found use in precision instruments and military applications, such as in timing systems where consistent current was essential for charging or oscillator stability. However, its reliance on radioactive materials and the associated handling precautions, including compliance with regulations, limited broader adoption. Performance-wise, curpistors offered exceptional stability with currents regulated to within tight tolerances and operational lifespans extending over decades due to the long half-life of the radioactive source, though they consumed notable power for their size and required careful shielding from external fields. The output current can be approximated as I_p \approx \frac{\text{ionization rate}}{\text{mobility}}, where the ionization rate is fixed by the radioactive calibration, ensuring minimal variation over voltage swings from tens to hundreds of volts. Despite these advantages, the technology proved bulky and power-intensive compared to emerging solid-state options. By the post-1970s era, curpistors became obsolete with the dominance of transistors and integrated circuits, which provided more compact, efficient, and safer regulation without radioactive components; they are now primarily of historical interest in the study of analog electronics. Their rarity today underscores the transition from to solid-state paradigms in precision instrumentation.

Comparison with Voltage Sources

Behavioral Differences

An ideal voltage source delivers a constant output voltage regardless of the drawn by the connected load, exhibiting zero that behaves as a at (). This characteristic is represented on an I-V plot as a vertical line at the fixed voltage V_s, where can vary from negative to positive . In contrast, an ideal source supplies a constant output irrespective of the voltage across its terminals, possessing infinite equivalent to an open circuit at . Its I-V characteristic appears as a line at the fixed I_s, with voltage ranging from negative to positive . The behavioral duality between voltage and current sources is formalized through the Thévenin-Norton theorems, which allow any linear to be equivalently represented as either a Thévenin equivalent—a V_{th} in series with impedance Z_{th}—or a Norton equivalent—a current source I_n in parallel with the same impedance Z_n = Z_{th}. The conversion between these forms follows from V_{th} = I_n \cdot Z_{th} and I_n = V_{th} / Z_{th}, highlighting how a models low-impedance driving while a current source models high-impedance sourcing. In circuit stability, current sources provide high output impedance suitable for applications, where they maintain stable current without significantly loading the circuit, whereas voltage sources offer low ideal for driving loads that require consistent voltage delivery. For delivery, current sources efficiently transfer to high-impedance loads, as dissipation P = I_s^2 R_L increases with load R_L, while voltage sources optimize to low-impedance loads via P = V_s^2 / R_L. This trade-off underscores the conceptual distinction: current sources control and stabilize current flow for loads sensitive to current variations, such as certain sensors, whereas voltage sources regulate voltage for applications demanding fixed potential differences.

Capacitor Charging Example

To illustrate the behavioral differences between voltage and current sources, consider an where a C is charged through a R by either an ideal with amplitude V_s or an ideal source with value I_s. In both cases, the circuit begins with the initially discharged (V_C(0) = 0), and the switch closes at t = 0 to initiate charging. For the voltage source case, Kirchhoff's voltage applied to the loop yields V_s = I(t) R + V_C(t), where V_C(t) = Q(t)/C and I(t) = dQ/dt. Substituting and solving the dQ/dt + Q/(RC) = C V_s gives the charge Q(t) = C V_s (1 - e^{-t/(RC)}). Thus, the capacitor voltage is V_C(t) = V_s (1 - e^{-t/\tau}), with time constant \tau = RC, and the charging is I(t) = (V_s / R) e^{-t/\tau} = C dV_C/dt. The voltage starts at 0 V and approaches V_s asymptotically, reaching about 63% of V_s at t = \tau and 99% after roughly $5\tau. The is an from an initial peak of V_s / R to zero. In , the capacitor fully charges to V_s, and ceases as the capacitor acts as an open circuit. In contrast, for the constant source case, the I(t) = I_s flows directly into the since the source maintains fixed current regardless of voltage. From the relation I_s = C dV_C/dt, integrating yields V_C(t) = (I_s / C) t (assuming initial V_C(0) = 0), producing a linear voltage ramp with I_s / C. The remains flat at I_s. Without a path or limit, the voltage ramps indefinitely; in practice, real current sources have a voltage limit beyond which they cannot maintain I_s, causing . The shows a straight-line voltage increase from 0 V, contrasting the curved exponential approach in the case. These dynamics highlight key implications: a suits applications requiring exponential settling to a fixed value, such as filters or power supplies where steady-state equilibrium is desired, while a source excels in generating linear voltage sweeps, as in op-amp integrators where output is proportional to input integrated over time (V_C(t) = (1/C) \int I_s \, dt). In simulation tools like , sources avoid numerical issues such as or convergence failures in high-impedance states (e.g., isolated capacitors), where s might impose conflicting potentials; sources simply inject charge without enforcing voltage, aiding stable transient analysis. This example underscores why current sources are prevalent in timing circuits, such as ramp generators in timers or voltage-controlled oscillators, where the linear ramp enables precise time-based triggering—unlike the nonlinear curve from voltage sources that complicates timing accuracy. Describing the waveforms: plot V_C(t) versus time for the voltage case as a concave-down curve saturating at V_s, versus a straight ascending line for the current case, with overlaid decaying current for voltage (peaking early) and constant for current, emphasizing the sources' complementary roles in ./06%3A_Analog_Integrated_Circuits/6.08%3A_555_Ramp_Generator)

References

  1. [1]
    An Introduction to Current Sources - Technical Articles
    Jan 2, 2023 · Current sources generate a current that is unaffected by changes in the load. They're widely used to send analog process signals over long ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] EE 42/100 Lecture 4: Resistive Networks and Nodal Analysis
    Jan 25, 2012 · A current source is the dual of a voltage source. It supplies a constant current regardless of the external voltage applied to its terminals ...
  3. [3]
    2.4 Current and Voltage Sources
    Current sources maintain a specified current, while voltage sources maintain a fixed voltage. Both can be DC (constant) or AC (time-varying). Dependent sources ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Chapter 2 Electrical devices: Voltage and current sources, resistors ...
    Like a voltage source, this means that a current source can either supply or absorb energy from the circuit.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] ECE 205 “Electrical and Electronics Circuits”
    In this course, we will assume that sources are ideal. IDEAL CURRENT SOURCE. An ideal current source has infinite internal resistance and can have up to ...
  6. [6]
    L.A. Bumm (Phys2303) Thevenin and Norton Equivalent Circuits
    The Thevenin model: an ideal voltage source VTH in series with a resistor RS. The Norton model: an ideal current source IN in parallel with a resistor RN.
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Current Sources, Sinks and Mirrors in Audio - Elliott Sound Products
    Feb 21, 2023 · The output impedance (Zout) of the current source is therefore 1.66 MΩ. The calculations are tedious, even using a simulator which gives results ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Introduction to Current Sources | Electronics Textbook
    This performance characteristics of the current source is best expressed as output impedance: the change in voltage (4 V) divided by the change in current ( ...
  10. [10]
    What is Compliance Voltage on the Source-Measure Units and ...
    Compliance voltage is the maximum voltage a current source will go to in its attempt to source the programmed current.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Compliance Voltage – How Much is Enough? - Gamry Instruments
    For a non-isolated counter electrode, commonly employed electrolyte concentrations (0.1M or above) generally require compliance voltages of 10 V or less. ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    None
    ### Summary of Practical Limitations of the LM334 Current Source
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Basic and advanced current references - University of Toronto
    Abstract: Two main reasons for variation of current output of current source are temperature depen- dency and process dependency of output current.
  14. [14]
    Current Source and Dependent Current Sources - Electronics Tutorials
    A Current Source is an active circuit element that is capable of supplying a constant current flow to a circuit regardless of the voltage developed across its ...
  15. [15]
    Introduction to the Common-Drain Amplifier: Small-Signal Behavior
    Aug 7, 2024 · To find the output resistance, we connect a test voltage (vt) to the output node and calculate the current sourced from it (it) with the ...
  16. [16]
    Potentiometer, Preset Potentiometers and Rheostats
    The potentiometer is a three-wire variable resistive device that acts as a voltage divider to produce a continuously variable voltage output.
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    Constant Current Sources with BJT - Robert Loos
    Jun 4, 2025 · Most constant current sources follow a very simple principle: keep a constant voltage (Vref) at the base of a BJT and you'll get a constant ...
  19. [19]
    Chapter 11: The Current Mirror - Analog Devices Wiki
    Sep 17, 2021 · In a diode-connected transistor the collector is short-circuited to the base, so the transistor collector-base junction has no time-varying ...
  20. [20]
    A negative feedback model for transistors with emitter/source ...
    Sep 20, 2017 · This paper shows that a transistor with an emitter degeneration resistor turns a feedforward circuit into a negative feedback system.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Fundamentals of Microelectronics Chapter 5 Bipolar Amplifiers
    Oct 20, 2010 · Output Impedance of Degenerated CE Stage. ➢ Emitter degeneration does not alter the output impedance ... circuit a better current source.Missing: typical | Show results with:typical
  22. [22]
    A two-way Wilson current mirror - EDN
    Jun 11, 2025 · Happily, a fix for the Early effect was devised back in 1967 by George R. Wilson, an IC design engineer at Tektronix. Wilson's simple yet ...
  23. [23]
    Transistors - Engineering and Technology History Wiki
    Apr 12, 2017 · It acts like a tiny hand on an electrical spigot. The first germanium junction transistors were introduced around 1950, and engineers quickly ...
  24. [24]
    How the First Transistor Worked - IEEE Spectrum
    Nov 20, 2022 · The BJT was the technology used to make integrated circuits, from the first ones in the early 1960s all the way until the late 1970s, when metal ...
  25. [25]
    Voltage-to-Current Signal Conversion | Operational Amplifiers
    An op-amp with negative feedback acts as a current source, outputting voltage to maintain a precise current, converting voltage to current.
  26. [26]
    The Howland Current Pump - Technical Articles - All About Circuits
    Jan 7, 2019 · The Howland current pump, shown in Figure 1a, is a circuit that accepts an input voltage vI, converts it to an output current iO = AvI, with A ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Analysis of Improved Howland Current Pump Configurations (Rev. A)
    The Improved Howland current pump is a circuit that uses a difference amplifier to impose a voltage across a shunt resistor, creating a voltage-controlled ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] LM317 3-Pin Adjustable Regulator - Texas Instruments
    The LM317 is an adjustable three-pin, positive-voltage regulator capable of supplying more than 1.5A over an output voltage range of 1.25V to 37V. The device ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] LM134/LM234/LM334 3-Terminal Adjustable Current Sources
    For the Basic 2-Terminal Current Source circuit shown in Figure 13. ISET is determined by the following formula: ISET = 67.7 mV/RSET (@ 25°C). Set current error ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] MC7800, MC7800A, MC7800AE, NCV7800 - onsemi
    These are fixed-voltage regulators with internal current limiting, thermal overload protection, and short circuit limiting, capable of output currents ...
  31. [31]
    LM317/337 as current regulator - diyAudio
    Jun 14, 2014 · The current source itself has an output impedance of many 10's or even 100's of kOhms. A 100nF after 100k rolls of the performance already ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Precision Current Sources and Sinks Using Voltage References
    Current sinks are often for applications such as LED driving, battery discharging, thermocouples, and sensor biasing. Figure 1. Current Sink Block Diagram.
  33. [33]
    Introduction to Electronics Textbook - Studylib
    [7] “Tung-Sol: Curpistor, minute current regulator data sheet” (PDF). ... current device can be a vacuum tube, discrete solid state compo- gain. A radio ...
  34. [34]
    Electrical Resistance Element - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Curpistor. A subminiature ... The condition in which the plate current of a vacuum tube cannot be further increased by increasing the plate voltage.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] TUNG-SOL - Frank's electron Tube Data sheets
    BECAUSE OF THEIR CLOSE TOLERANCES AND EXTREMELY LONG LIFE, CURPISTORS. PROVIDE A CIRCUIT FUNCTION NOT OBTAINABLE BY ANY OTHER SIMPLE COMPONENT. CH1027 - 9.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Engineering Design Handbook: Timing Systems and Components
    Dec 31, 1975 · ... Current Gasless Compositions. Relays. Sensitivity. Need for ... Curpistor-diode Oscillator. 10-8. 10-14 Sawtooth Charge-discharge Curve. 10-9.
  37. [37]
    An Introduction To Electronics | PDF - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (2) (vacuum tube) based electronics. The ... [6] See above note on logarithmic current dependence. [7] Tung-Sol: Curpistor, minute current regulator data sheet
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Laboratory 2 Simple Transistor Amplifiers: Lecture 2
    Output resistance is an indication of a source's ability to drive a load impedance. An ideal voltage source has zero output resistance. An ideal current ...
  39. [39]
    2.9 Device I-V Characteristics - Open Books
    An ideal current source maintains a specified value of current through its terminals independent of the voltage drop across its terminals and independent of ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Thevenin's and Norton's Equivalent Circuit Tutorial. (by Kim, Eung)
    Norton's Thereom is identical to Thevenin's Theorem except that the equivalent circuit is an independent current source in parallel with an impedance (resistor) ...Missing: ideal | Show results with:ideal
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Laboratory 2 Simple Transistor Amplifiers: Lecture 3
    An ideal current source has infinite output resistance. To find the output resistance of the CE amplifier, we ground the input and drive the output. From the ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Operational amplifiers
    It can be arranged to pro- duce a current source (near-infinite out- put impedance) or a voltage source (near- zero output impedance), and it can be con- nected ...
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    [PDF] EE 42/100 Lecture 12: Capacitance
    Capacitor Current. • A steady DC current into a capacitor means that the voltage ramps linearly. In theory it would ramp to infinity but in practice ...
  45. [45]
    Op-amp Integrator Circuit Performs Integration on its Input Signal
    Op-amp Integrator circuit produces a single output voltage that is proportional to the integral of the input voltage which ramps over time.
  46. [46]
    Why do circuit simulators like LTSpice prefer current sources instead ...
    Sep 30, 2020 · Unlike current sources and/or resistors, they will not yield to capacitances at small time steps during convergence difficulties in a transient analysis.Current source driving capacitor in LTspiceLTSpice capacitor network simulation questionMore results from electronics.stackexchange.comMissing: impedance | Show results with:impedance