Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cyrus McCormick

Cyrus Hall McCormick (February 15, 1809 – May 13, 1884) was an , manufacturer, and entrepreneur whose practical mechanical transformed grain ing and spurred agricultural industrialization. In 1831, working on his family's farm, McCormick assembled a horse-drawn machine that used vibrating blades to cut standing grain, a vibrating platform to collect it, and mechanical rakes to form sheaves, improving on prior incomplete designs including prototypes attempted by his father Robert McCormick. He secured a U.S. for the in 1834, though rival inventor Obed Hussey had patented a competing version a year earlier, leading to decades of litigation over design precedence and infringement. McCormick's enabled farmers to harvest up to 12 acres per day versus 1-2 acres by hand with sickles or scythes, reducing labor needs and facilitating the shift from subsistence to commercial wheat farming on the American prairies, which in turn supported and in the mid-19th century. Relocating production to in 1847 amid better access to markets and , McCormick pioneered installment sales, public demonstrations, and warranty-backed advertising to build demand, scaling his factory to produce over 9,500 machines by 1868 and establishing the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company as a precursor to modern multinational . His business tactics, including aggressive defense and media campaigns, drew criticism for ruthlessness but proved essential to overcoming initial skepticism and competition.

Early Life

Birth and Family Background

Cyrus Hall McCormick was born on February 15, 1809, at the family's Walnut Grove farm in (now near Raphine). He was the eldest son of Robert Hall McCormick, a farmer and aspiring inventor, and Mary Ann Hall McCormick. The McCormicks descended from Presbyterian immigrants who had settled in the American backcountry, embodying a heritage of rugged self-reliance amid Virginia's agrarian society. The Walnut Grove plantation spanned 532 acres north of and operated as a self-sufficient operation focused on crops like , which required intensive manual labor for harvesting in the pre-industrial Southern economy. The family owned enslaved , including individuals like , whose labor underscored the inefficiencies of hand-reaping with sickles and cradles on large farms. This environment exposed young Cyrus to the bottlenecks of agricultural production, where weather-dependent manual methods limited yields and . Robert McCormick fostered mechanical aptitude in his children through his own tinkering with farm tools, securing patents for several agricultural implements in the early . His persistent but ultimately unsuccessful efforts to mechanize grain cutting, spanning decades, highlighted practical challenges like reliable operation in varied field conditions, instilling in an early appreciation for empirical problem-solving over theoretical designs.

Education and Early Inventions

McCormick received a rudimentary formal at the local Old Field School near the family homestead in , studying foundational subjects such as , , , and religious materials including the and . This schooling was limited in scope and duration, reflecting the practical demands of farm life in early 19th-century rural America. His mechanical knowledge was largely self-acquired through immersion in the family's Walnut Grove farm operations, encompassing fieldwork, sawmills, gristmills, , and blacksmithing, alongside close collaboration in his father McCormick's workshops. , an inventive farmer who patented devices like a clover huller, hemp-brake, blacksmith's , and , exposed Cyrus to hands-on prototyping and iterative refinement of agricultural tools. By age 15 in 1824, McCormick devised a lightweight cradle tailored for easier handling and carting of harvested , improving upon heavier traditional models paired with scythes that strained users during manual reaping. He further innovated a smaller variant of the cradle and, around age 17 in 1826, a self-sharpening hillside plow suited to the undulating terrain of farms. Additional early efforts included a lightweight plow and projects like constructing an elaborate on with varnished rollers, underscoring his empirical approach to solving inefficiencies in plowing and harvesting labor. These inventions emphasized targeted enhancements to manual implements, revealing an innate grasp of how aids could amplify in production constrained by human effort.

Development of the Mechanical Reaper

Father's Attempts and Cyrus's Breakthrough

Robert McCormick, Cyrus's father, pursued the development of a mechanical for nearly three decades starting in the early 1800s, constructing several prototypes that incorporated mechanisms such as revolving beaters to press grain stalks against stationary knives. These efforts, documented in family and historical accounts, consistently failed to achieve reliable operation in field conditions, particularly jamming or stalling in uneven terrain and variable crop densities typical of Virginia's farms. In 1831, at age 22, Cyrus McCormick constructed a horse-drawn featuring a vibrating sickle-bar derived from technology, which he field-tested on July 25 in a neighbor's field near the family Walnut Grove farm in . The machine successfully harvested approximately six acres in a day, a marked improvement over manual cradle methods that yielded only 0.5 to 1 acre per worker daily under optimal conditions, as validated by on-site demonstrations witnessed by local neighbors despite initial skepticism. Central to Cyrus's breakthrough were practical innovations addressing real-world harvesting challenges: a divider to separate standing from the uncut , guiding it toward the , and a side-mounted platform to deposit severed sheaves for manual binding, enabling consistent performance across varied terrain and weather without frequent clogging. These elements, refined through iterative trials on the Walnut Grove estate, prioritized empirical functionality over theoretical designs, establishing the reaper's viability for small-scale farm use.

Patenting and Initial Public Demonstrations

Following successful field trials on the family farm, Cyrus McCormick secured a U.S. for his mechanical reaper on June 21, 1834. The design featured a reciprocating blade mechanism powered by horses, with an iron frame for enhanced durability compared to wooden alternatives prone to breakage in uneven terrain. These self-financed tests, conducted without external funding, validated the machine's ability to cut standing grain more efficiently than manual sickles or scythes, though initial skepticism from farmers delayed widespread adoption. McCormick conducted early public demonstrations to demonstrate empirical performance under observation, beginning with a notable trial in July 1831 at Steeles Tavern, , where the harvested six acres of oats in a single day. This event, attended by local farmers and witnessed firsthand, showcased the device cutting at rates exceeding manual labor—typically doubling the output of hand methods—while platforming cut stalks for binders to gather. Subsequent demonstrations at county fairs in the early reinforced these results, emphasizing observable metrics like acres harvested per hour and minimal downtime, which gradually built credibility among agriculturists wary of unproven machinery. Initial commercialization focused on custom orders within , with the first sale occurring in after years of refinements prompted by demonstration . Sales remained modest, totaling just one unit that year, reflecting farmers' preference for proven reliability over novelty; however, the iron-frame construction contributed to low failure rates in these early deployments, contrasting with competitors' more fragile designs. By prioritizing verifiable field outputs over unsubstantiated claims, these efforts laid the groundwork for broader acceptance without relying on interstate marketing or litigation.

Business Foundations

Virginia Operations and Early Sales

McCormick operated a workshop at the family farm, Walnut Grove, in Rockbridge County, Virginia, where commercial production of the mechanical reaper commenced in the 1840s following initial patents and improvements. The facility focused on small-scale manufacturing, producing reapers for local and regional distribution prior to any expansion beyond Virginia. Early sales were limited, with two reapers sold in in 1840, followed by two more in 1841, seven in 1842, and twenty-nine in 1843. Cumulative sales reached approximately fifty units by 1844, reflecting gradual acceptance among farmers in the state. Production at Walnut Grove supported this growth, enabling output in the dozens annually by the mid-1840s as demand increased from initial local buyers. To facilitate , McCormick introduced buyer-friendly terms, including deferred payments akin to arrangements and money-back guarantees, which lowered financial barriers by allowing partial initial payment with balances settled post-harvest. These measures, combined with demonstrations—such as the 1843 against rival machines—highlighted the reaper's capacity to reduce harvesting labor substantially, addressing bottlenecks in . Sales expanded through direct outreach and emerging agent networks in and adjacent Mid-Atlantic areas, yielding around 150 units produced in 1845 from Virginia-based operations and limited contracting. Emphasis on , including repair services and retention strategies over high-volume pricing, fostered repeat orders, as evidenced by sales ledgers showing sustained demand from early adopters despite mechanical challenges in initial models. This approach prioritized long-term in the region's wheat-growing districts amid rising agricultural output.

Relocation to Chicago and Factory Expansion

In 1847, Cyrus McCormick shifted his reaper production from the family forge in Virginia's to , driven by the city's strategic position as a rail and lake shipping hub that facilitated distribution to the expansive Midwestern prairies, where cultivation was surging. This relocation addressed the logistical constraints of Virginia's remote location, which had hindered scaling beyond regional sales despite earlier demonstrations. McCormick initially leased a modest storefront on Lake Street for assembly and sales, marking 's emergence as an industrial center even as the city lacked paved streets and boasted fewer than 20,000 residents. By 1849, operations expanded to a dedicated factory on Lake Street, incorporating steam power to drive machinery and enable more standardized processes that anticipated later mass-production techniques. Production output grew swiftly amid rising demand from farmers, reaching approximately 1,000 reapers per year by 1851 and escalating to 4,000 annually by 1856, with the expanding to support this volume through specialized divisions for , , and finishing. Sales extended internationally, including exports to , as the machine proved adaptable to diverse grain harvests, yielding profits of $300,000 in 1856 alone from domestic and foreign markets.

Legal and Commercial Battles

Rivalry with Obed Hussey

Obed Hussey secured U.S. Patent No. X7,928 for his reaping machine on December 31, 1833, after conducting a successful field trial in July of that year near Carthage, Ohio. His design, developed in Ohio, incorporated vibrating cutting knives mounted on a reciprocating bar, with a platform allowing an operator to rake harvested grain onto the ground; while effective as a mower, it demonstrated limitations as a reaper, particularly in handling tall or dense grain where the mechanism was prone to clogging and reduced efficiency during practical field evaluations. Cyrus McCormick, whose prototype had been demonstrated privately in as early as 1831 before receiving his own on June 21, 1834, directly challenged Hussey through public trials in the early , including a notable head-to-head demonstration in June 1843. McCormick's machine exhibited superior adaptability to varied terrain and crop conditions, outperforming Hussey's in throughput and reliability during these contests, as evidenced by McCormick's victory in adjudicated field tests that highlighted design advantages like more consistent cutting action. By the mid-, this translated to stark market disparities: Hussey's cumulative sales hovered around 100 units amid persistent mechanical refinements and regional focus on the East, while McCormick achieved approximately 150 sales in 1845 alone, signaling emerging commercial dominance. Both inventors vigorously contested priority, with Hussey asserting his 1833 patent predated McCormick's workable model. However, U.S. examinations during the 1848 extension proceedings for McCormick's —where Hussey intervened—revealed through record comparisons that Hussey's device constituted an improvement upon McCormick's core principles, affirming the latter as the foundational viable horse-drawn harvester despite the earlier filing date. This assessment, grounded in prototype demonstrations and specifications rather than mere chronology, underscored McCormick's edge in practical utility and over Hussey's, prioritizing empirical performance in harvest operations.

Patent Litigations and Market Dominance

Following the expiration of his original 1834 reaper patent in 1848, Cyrus McCormick faced widespread infringement as competitors produced imitation machines lacking his subsequent improvements. To protect these enhancements, patented in and , McCormick initiated numerous defensive lawsuits against manufacturers copying key features such as the divider and vibrating mechanism. These actions, spanning the through , emphasized rigorous enforcement through court records dissecting infringing designs and calculating damages from defendants' profits rather than arbitrary royalties. A pivotal victory came in Seymour v. McCormick (1853), where the U.S. affirmed infringement of McCormick's 1847 , upholding a award based on the profits earned by defendants Seymour & from unauthorized sales of reaping machines. The case returned to the Court in 1856, again ruling in McCormick's favor and reinforcing the validity of his claims against direct copies. Such outcomes, derived from detailed expert testimony on mechanical equivalence, deterred casual imitators and recovered substantial sums, though McCormick did not prevail in every suit, including against John H. Manny in 1855. Overall, these litigations underscored McCormick's commitment to legal safeguards, with successes preserving revenue streams amid over 300 annual suits nationally by the 1850s. Despite the patent lapse enabling market entry by clones, McCormick's firm sustained dominance through superior ironwork quality, field-tested reliability, and innovative after-sales service, including warranties and repair networks. By 1859, the factory spanned 111,000 square feet and produced thousands of units annually, outpacing many rivals weakened by the 1857 panic. This brand loyalty secured a leading position, with cumulative sales exceeding 16,000 reapers by 1856, as farmers prioritized proven performance over cheaper alternatives. The reaper's diffusion, defended by McCormick's patents and manufacturing scale, causally boosted harvesting efficiency, allowing fewer laborers to process larger yields and averting shortages during westward expansion. U.S. output surged from 58.9 million bushels in to 415.4 million bushels in , more than sextupling amid farm consolidation into mechanized operations. This growth reflected the reaper's role in decoupling production from manual labor constraints, as empirical data show productivity gains tied to machinery adoption rather than acreage alone.

Civil War Period

Wartime Business Challenges and Adaptations

During the from to 1865, the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company's factory grappled with iron shortages and disruptions as resources were prioritized for production, yet maintained operational continuity through focused of reapers essential to Northern . In , output reached 5,491 reapers, supporting grain harvests amid labor deficits from enlistments. Reaper production dipped modestly in 1862 and 1863 owing to these material constraints and economic pressures on buyers, but the company adapted by extending deferred payment options—allowing farmers to pay after harvest—which facilitated a sharp rebound to 10,000 units in 1864 as demand intensified for mechanized harvesting to offset manpower losses. The factory's immigrant-heavy workforce expanded to meet needs, with wage structures adjusted empirically to match wartime and retain skilled labor without significant interruptions, contributing to postwar expansion exceeding 10,000 annual units by 1866 amid agricultural recovery.

Political Positions and Union Advocacy

Born in Virginia to a slaveholding family, McCormick maintained strong ties to his Southern heritage and aligned politically with the , which he viewed as a bulwark against sectional division. He opposed the 1860 election of , a , as exacerbating tensions over , which he defended as constitutionally protected in the states where it existed. To promote compromise, McCormick acquired influence over the Chicago Times, a Democratic newspaper, funding its editorials that advocated preserving the through concessions to the South, including recognition of slavery's legal status under the rather than immediate abolition. Amid escalating crisis in 1861, McCormick pursued clandestine peace initiatives, including newspaper campaigns urging reunification on terms that deferred abolition, while privately rejecting overtures from Confederate sympathizers as evidenced in his correspondence. Despite these efforts and his prediction that the Confederacy could not be militarily defeated, he remained in Chicago, continued paying federal taxes to the Union government, and declined to relocate South or aid secessionist causes directly. Following the attack on April 12, 1861, McCormick publicly affirmed support for preserving the , delivering speeches that endorsed federal efforts to maintain national integrity while criticizing Lincoln's policies as excessively radical on . He rejected as untenable, prioritizing constitutional stability over Southern independence, a stance aligned with his empirical assessment that sustained federal authority benefited long-term economic order. In 1864, he ran unsuccessfully for as a on a "" platform advocating to end the war without further escalation.

Personal and Philanthropic Life

Marriage, Family, and Succession

Cyrus Hall McCormick married Nancy "Nettie" Fowler on January 26, 1858; she was a 23-year-old and recent graduate of the Broome Street School who had been employed as his secretary. The couple resided in , where they constructed a 35-room at 675 Rush Street, completed in 1879 amid the city's emerging elite districts. They had seven children, five of whom survived infancy: Cyrus Hall McCormick Jr. (born May 16, 1859), Mary Virginia (born May 5, 1861), Robert Hall (born 1864), Leander James (born 1868), and Anita (born 1871). Family life centered on Chicago's social and business circles, though domestic priorities emphasized preparing the eldest son for enterprise continuity; Cyrus Jr. received early exposure to factory operations under his father's oversight. McCormick's estate planning prioritized business stability, with his 1884 will directing that the estate, including control of the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company, be administered as a unified entity for five years post-mortem to avert fragmentation among heirs. Nettie McCormick reinforced this by compelling Cyrus Jr., then a Princeton student, to withdraw and assume presidency of the company immediately upon his father's death on May 13, 1884, amid acute challenges like the 1886 Haymarket riots. Under Jr.'s direction, the firm preserved operational efficiencies inherited from his father, culminating in the 1902 merger with competitors to establish International Harvester Company, where he served as president.

Religious Commitments and Charitable Contributions

Cyrus Hall McCormick maintained a lifelong commitment to the branch of Presbyterianism, emphasizing doctrinal orthodoxy and biblical evangelism over emerging social reform movements within the denomination. Influenced by his father's evangelical piety, McCormick experienced a personal during meetings at Walnut Grove Presbyterian Church in around 1832, which deepened his adherence to Calvinist principles of and scriptural inerrancy. McCormick's channeled substantial resources into Presbyterian institutions aimed at theological and , prioritizing the propagation of Reformed . In 1859, he pledged $100,000—equivalent to approximately $3.5 million in contemporary terms—to establish the Presbyterian Theological Seminary of the Northwest in , endowing four professorships at $25,000 each to support faculty focused on exegetical and . By his death in 1884, cumulative contributions to this seminary, later renamed McCormick Theological Seminary, totaled the modern equivalent of $14 million, enabling expansions that trained hundreds of ministers whose doctrinal emphasis contributed to the denomination's conservative wing and global outreach efforts. Further reflecting his focus on institutional evangelism, McCormick's estate allocated $100,000 in 1886 to the Evangelization Society, a precursor organization that facilitated the founding of the under Dwight L. Moody's leadership. This funding supported practical training programs for lay evangelists and , yielding measurable outcomes such as the dispatch of over 1,000 graduates annually by the early to domestic and foreign fields, where they established churches and schools emphasizing personal conversion and scriptural preaching over broader social welfare initiatives. McCormick's targeted giving thus fostered causal chains of doctrinal dissemination, with institutional outputs verifiable through alumni records and deployment statistics, rather than undirected charitable relief.

Final Years and Transition

Ongoing Innovations and Company Leadership

In the 1870s, the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company advanced its designs by incorporating mechanisms, initially adopting wire-binding technology licensed from inventors such as Charles Withington and John F. Appleby to automate sheaf formation and reduce manual tying labor. These wire binders, introduced commercially around , addressed longstanding harvesting inefficiencies by enabling a single operator to handle cutting, racking, and binding, thereby cutting the workforce needed per acre from teams of binders to effectively one man with horses. By 1877, the technology supported re-entry into European markets, where demonstrations highlighted its reliability in diverse conditions. Transitioning from wire due to livestock ingestion risks, the company shifted toward twine binders in the late 1870s, with Appleby's 1878 knotting mechanism—acquired and refined by McCormick engineers—providing a safer alternative that maintained or improved binding speed without metal residues in fodder. Manufacturing enhancements, including expanded steam-powered assembly lines at the Chicago works rebuilt post-1871 fire, served as precursors to later mechanized efficiencies, doubling output from 1870 levels by decade's end. McCormick maintained centralized oversight of operations into the early 1880s, directing strategic exhibits and strategies despite personal health setbacks. Following a debilitating in 1880 that paralyzed his lower body and confined him to a , he continued dictating company policy from home, emphasizing empirical testing of performance data to guide scaling. Under this , the firm achieved sustained growth, with annual output reaching approximately 18,000 units by and sales reflecting robust demand driven by binder-equipped models.

Death and Immediate Aftermath

Cyrus Hall McCormick suffered a paralytic in 1880 that confined him to a and curtailed his active role in business affairs during his remaining years. He died on May 13, 1884, at his residence in , , at the age of 75, from complications arising from the paralysis. McCormick's will stipulated that his , appraised at roughly $5 million upon his , be administered as a unified entity for five years to ensure systematic handling and distribution. Specific bequests included allocations exceeding $500,000 to family members and Presbyterian Church institutions, reflecting his longstanding religious affiliations. The McCormick Harvesting Machine Company transitioned seamlessly to his son, Cyrus Hall McCormick Jr., who assumed the presidency alongside continuing partners, maintaining operational continuity. In the immediate aftermath, the company's factories operated without interruption, sustaining production momentum from prior years and underscoring the institutional resilience McCormick had fostered. Annual output had nearly tripled between 1880 and 1884, a trajectory that persisted under junior .

Enduring Impact

Transformations in and

The McCormick dramatically enhanced harvesting efficiency, enabling a single machine operated by a small team to cut 12 to 15 acres of per day, compared to manual methods that limited a worker to approximately 0.25 to 0.5 acres per day using sickles or cradles. This productivity gain, by a factor of 10 to 20 times, addressed labor bottlenecks in farming and facilitated expansion of cultivated acreage without proportional increases in workforce. United States wheat production surged from 173 million bushels in 1860 to 459 million bushels by 1879, reflecting the reaper's role in mechanizing harvest operations amid growing demand and westward expansion. Census data indicate that by the 1860s, around 70 percent of wheat was harvested mechanically, correlating with reduced harvest labor needs and sustained output growth despite population increases from 31 million to 50 million over the same period. Mechanization via the freed over half of agricultural laborers from harvest-intensive tasks, reallocating them to industries and contributing to the Gilded Age's economic without triggering food shortages. Agricultural employment's share of the total workforce declined from about 70 percent in 1830 to roughly 40 percent by 1900, enabling expansion and that underpinned industrialization. The reaper's export success disrupted European labor-intensive systems, prompting adoption in regions like and where hand-harvesting prevailed. McCormick's firm merged into Company in 1902, which by the early commanded approximately 20 percent of the global market for harvesting equipment through integrated production and distribution. This consolidation amplified mechanization's worldwide effects, lowering grain costs and supporting without famine vulnerabilities seen in pre-industrial economies.

Assessments of Achievements and Disputes

McCormick's entrepreneurial acumen transformed the mechanical from a into a cornerstone of , achieving commercial dominance where rivals faltered. By implementing fixed pricing, money-back guarantees promising "15 acres a day," installment , and aggressive —including public field trials—McCormick outsold competitors, reaching over 5,000 units by 1859 and enabling efficient large-scale grain harvesting that curtailed manual labor demands. In contrast, Obed Hussey's contemporaneous , despite operational success in multiple states by , failed to due to inadequate marketing and , underscoring McCormick's edge in business organization over pure . His firm's innovations, culminating in the 1902 formation of , demonstrably boosted farm productivity and economic output, earning posthumous recognition via induction into the in 1976 for integrating disparate harvesting mechanisms into a viable system. Critics have contested McCormick's claim to sole inventorship, citing prior work by Hussey—who patented a in 1833 and asserted earlier conceptual priority—and even contributions from McCormick's father, , or enslaved laborers on the family farm, as documented in local historical accounts from . These disputes fueled protracted legal battles, including Hussey's infringement suits against McCormick, though courts frequently validated McCormick's after evidentiary reviews. On tactics, McCormick's strategy of filing over 300 lawsuits against alleged infringers—winning a majority—drew accusations of monopolistic overreach, contributing to the mid-19th-century surge in patent enforcement that some scholars liken to proto-antitrust concerns by crowding markets and raising barriers for smaller innovators. Rivals portrayed these actions as predatory, yet no contemporary legal precedents deemed them unlawful, and empirical sales data—far exceeding Hussey's output—affirm the 's market primacy under McCormick's stewardship. A dispassionate evaluation reveals McCormick's successes as rooted in verifiable outcomes: the reaper's diffusion halved harvesting times, spurring agricultural expansion and farmer incomes without reliance on exploitative deviations from prevailing norms, such as or . While credit remains contested—Hussey's design arguably excelled in cutting —McCormick's ensured enduring impact, as evidenced by the machine's role in sustaining supply lines during the via factory output exceeding 1,000 units annually by 1860. Southern business ties invited wartime scrutiny but reflected pragmatic adaptation rather than disloyalty, with no substantiated claims of unethical profiteering beyond era-standard patent vigilance; ultimately, aggregate productivity gains validate his contributions over isolated critiques.

References

  1. [1]
    Cyrus McCormick (1809-1884) | American Experience - PBS
    The tool that preceded Cyrus McCormick's horse-drawn reaper was a hand-held scythe, a device that had remained basically unchanged for 5000 years.
  2. [2]
    Cyrus McCormick - National Inventors Hall of Fame®
    Oct 15, 2025 · Cyrus Hall McCormick invented the mechanical reaper, which combined all the steps that earlier harvesting machines had performed separately.
  3. [3]
    Cyrus McCormick - Lemelson-MIT
    As a boy, McCormick had a talent for both agriculture and inventing. At the age of 15, he invented a lightweight cradle for carting harvested grain (1824).
  4. [4]
    Reaping the Benefits of the Reaper | Richmond Fed
    Cyrus McCormick may not have invented the reaper, but he was the entrepreneur who made it successful.
  5. [5]
    The Mechanical Reaper: The impact of an important farming invention
    Sep 22, 2022 · The reaper offered farmers the ability to harvest more in a shorter amount of time with less labor.
  6. [6]
    The McCormick Works: A 19th Century Marvel - Assembly Magazine
    Dec 1, 2023 · The McCormick Reaper and Mower Works was the largest factory in Chicago by 1868. That year, the facility turned out more than 9,500 machines.
  7. [7]
    Entrepreneur from History – Cyrus McCormick: An Inventor & Born ...
    Dec 12, 2024 · Cyrus McCormick is considered the inventor of the mechanical grain reaper in 1831. This invention revolutionized American and global agriculture.
  8. [8]
    The Great Reaper War | Invention & Technology Magazine
    McCormick bullied and threatened reluctant editors and sometimes bribed them by hiring them as agents. His ads, however, were not limited to puffery. Along with ...
  9. [9]
    Cyrus H. McCormick, Bringing in the Sheaves
    Oct 8, 2024 · Cyrus Hall was born to Robert & Mary Ann Hall McCormick, Feb. 15, 1809, into a home where his future would be in the machinery of ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  10. [10]
    Cyrus McCormick: Give Us This Day Our Daily Bread
    Jun 8, 2021 · The scene would be the same whether the men reaping were Egyptian slaves ... A strong and muscular farmer of Scots Irish ancestry had ...Missing: Scotch- | Show results with:Scotch-
  11. [11]
    American Inventor Series: Cyrus McCormick, the Man Who Freed ...
    Sep 20, 2019 · ... McCormick was assisted by Jo Anderson, a slave on the McCormick family farm. Anderson had “as much to do with the later development of the ...
  12. [12]
    Cyrus McCormick: Inventor of the Mechanical Reaper
    Robert Hall McCormick (1780-1846), Cyrus's father had patented a number of agricultural implements and spent 28 years working on a horse-drawn mechanical ...Missing: plow | Show results with:plow
  13. [13]
    A Brief Biography of Cyrus Hall McCormick, (1809-1884) | Wisconsin ...
    His father, Robert McCormick, experimented with a design for a mechanical reaper from around the time of Cyrus' birth. In 1831 he abandoned the idea and turned ...Missing: plow | Show results with:plow<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    The Project Gutenberg eBook of Cyrus Hall McCormick, by Herbert ...
    He had made and exhibited a successful Reaper twenty years before the first of them began. ... Of all the competitors who had fought him in the early days, before ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Heroes of Progress in America by Charles Morris - Heritage History
    He showed this when only fifteen years old by making a light, easily-handled grain cradle ... Cyrus McCormick ranks among the greatest benefactors of mankind.
  16. [16]
    Cyrus H. McCormick - Moody Bible Institute Library
    McCormick revolutionized agriculture and ultimately all of society with his invention of the reaper in 1831, a machine that made possible for the first time ...
  17. [17]
    Who Made America? | Innovators | Cyrus McCormick - PBS
    Working on his family's Virginia farm, McCormick implemented features of the machine that remain in use today: a divider, a reel, a straight reciprocating knife ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  18. [18]
    Cyrus McCormick and the Mechanical Reaper
    Jan 17, 2024 · The mechanical reaper designed by Cyrus McCormick was a horse-drawn machine featuring a divider that separated the standing grain from the ...
  19. [19]
    Cyrus McCormick's Reaper Patent - Wisconsin Historical Society
    The image includes excerpts of the patent grant from the US Patent Office to Cyrus Hall McCormick for his reaper, patented June 21, 1834.
  20. [20]
    Testing the First Reaping Machine | Poster | Wisconsin Historical ...
    Advertising lithograph depicting the first public demonstration of a mechanical reaper by Cyrus Hall McCormick at Steeles Tavern, Virginia, in 1831.Missing: initial 1830s
  21. [21]
    Invention of the McCormick Mechanical Reaper - ThoughtCo
    Apr 28, 2025 · The reaping machine invented by Cyrus McCormick changed farm life forever by making it possible for farmers to harvest more grain.
  22. [22]
    Cyrus McCormick Farm and Workshop – DHR
    Feb 16, 2024 · Cyrus Hall McCormick (1809-1884) developed the first effective reaper on this farm, Walnut Grove, in northern Rockbridge County, along the Augusta County line.Missing: test 26
  23. [23]
    Leander James McCormick (1819–1900) - Encyclopedia Virginia
    McCormick was born on February 8, 1819, at Walnut Grove, his family's farm in Rockbridge County, to Robert McCormick Jr. and Mary Ann Hall McCormick. The ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  24. [24]
    Cyrus Hall Mccormick | Encyclopedia.com
    The American inventor, manufacturer, and philanthropist Cyrus Hall McCormick (1809-1884) was the first to successfully mechanize grain harvesting.Missing: achievements controversies
  25. [25]
    This Week in History: June 21, 1834 | - WordPress.com
    Jun 21, 2018 · Between his own workshop in Virginia and some contractors in Cincinnati, Ohio, McCormick turned out 150 reapers in 1845. McCormick realized that ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    [DOC] Cyrus McCormick: A Legitimate Marketing Genius
    His father Robert had spent many years trying to improve basic farm equipment such as the plow and trying to invent a horse drawn reaper to replace the hand ...
  27. [27]
    McCormick Invents the Reaper | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Cyrus Hall McCormick is generally credited with the invention of the first reaper containing the basic elements that are still used in modern reaping machines.<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Agricultural Machinery Industry - Encyclopedia of Chicago
    In 1847, Cyrus McCormick decided to consolidate manufacture of his reaper in Chicago. Since developing the first successful reaper in 1831, McCormick had ...
  29. [29]
    Cyrus McCormick: The Father of Modern Agriculture
    Sep 30, 2021 · “Without money, without credit, without customers, he founded the first of the world's reaper factories in the little log workshop near his ...Missing: achievements controversies
  30. [30]
    Cyrus McCormick and the Reaper Revolution - Palouse Heritage
    Sep 14, 2023 · The earliest practical reaping machines were introduced in the 1830s by father-son Robert and Cyrus McCormick of Steele's Tavern, Virginia.Missing: test 26
  31. [31]
    Cyrus McCormick - ASME
    Jun 1, 2012 · McCormick built and sold some of the earliest practical mechanical reaping machines, whichlessened the back-breaking burden of early 19th-century farm workers.Missing: agent 1840s
  32. [32]
    Patent Information: Reaper for reaping and cutting grain - User Log In
    Title: Reaper for reaping and cutting grain ; Patent number: X7,928 ; Date granted: 12/31/1833 ; Notes: X patent numbers are from a group of patents that were ...Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Obed Hussey and His Ohio Test of the First Successful Reaper
    We think that W. H. Chenoweth must have witnessed Hussey's work prior to. 1833, as Hus ey was living in Cincinnati when he patented his reaper in 1833. Sarah ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Cyrus McCormick's Reaper and the Industrialization of Farming
    Jan 9, 2012 · Despite its obvious labor-saving benefits, the reaper remained a hard sell, largely due to its $100 price. In his pitches, Cyrus McCormick ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] 34th. Congress, ) HO. OF REPRESENTATIYES. ( Report ... - GovInfo
    Hussey appeared to con¬ test the extension of McCormick's patent. And on examination of the records of the Patent Office, and a comparison of the two patents, ...
  36. [36]
    Cyrus McCormick Patents Reaper, 1834 - Landmark Events
    Jun 21, 2021 · One of those men received a patent on June 21, 1843, revolutionizing farming and transforming food production for the world. That man was Cyrus McCormick (1809 ...
  37. [37]
    Seymour v. McCormick | 57 U.S. 480 (1853)
    The plaintiff below, Cyrus H. McCormick, brought this action against the plaintiffs in error, Seymour & Morgan, for the infringement of his patent right.Missing: litigations | Show results with:litigations
  38. [38]
    Seymour v. McCormick | 60 U.S. 96 (1856)
    This was a suit brought by McCormick against Seymour and Morgan for a violation of his patent right for reaping machines, which suit was previously before this ...
  39. [39]
    Abraham Lincoln and the McCormick Reaper - David J. Kent
    Aug 7, 2019 · McCormick sued rival John Manny for patent infringement, accusing him of stealing the McCormick reaper design. Manny's lawyers called in ...
  40. [40]
    The First Patent Litigation Explosion - The Yale Law Journal
    Feb 4, 2016 · ... McCormick's 1834 patent was reaching the end of its term.64 McCormick then sought an extension of the patent—an attempt that prompted fierce ...
  41. [41]
    McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. History - Old Iron Garage
    The year 1981 marks the 150th Anniversary of the McCormick reaper. From this crude machine of 1831 the McCormick empire was built.
  42. [42]
    Cyrus H. McCormick And the Reaper; A Biography of the Man ...
    By the end of 1856 more than 16,000 reapers and mowers had been sold and Cyrus! McCormick had made his first million dollars. He had also begun to take a lively ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] 1880 Census: Volume 3. Report on the Productions of Agriculture
    The acreage and crop of wheat in 1879 amounted to 35,430,052 acres, 459,479,505 bushels, the acreage being. 29.7 11er cent. of an the laml in cereals, ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] bureau of the census - IPUMS USA
    · 1850. PRODUCTION OF WHEAT:1850 to 1900. HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF BUSHELS. 4. PRODUCTION OF OATS:1850 to 1900. HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF BUSHELS. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Productivity Growth in Grain Production in the United States, 1840 ...
    In nineteenth century America, productivity growth in grain production derived largely from two characteristic features of the century's history:.
  46. [46]
    “The Reaper is to the North…”: The Genesis of a Lie - jstor
    6 The McCormick reaper production statistics bear this story out. In 1861 the McCormick works produced 5,491 reapers. In the next two years, reaper ...
  47. [47]
    We Reap What He Reaped | AMERICAN HERITAGE
    McCormick settled in Chicago in 1847 and began building a factory to produce reapers. Chicago, founded only in the 1830s, was still a small town of no great ...
  48. [48]
    McCormick's (Lost) Cause - Leben
    Dec 16, 2016 · McCormick's fear that “his” seminary was becoming overly politicized with Republican ideas and reconstruction ideals seemed to materialize ...
  49. [49]
    The Reaper Man and the Meeting at Philippi - Emerging Civil War
    Apr 19, 2022 · McCormick believed that the Democrats and the Old School denomination held the Union together like two hoops holding up a barrel. He resisted ...Missing: factory army contracts
  50. [50]
    McCormick, Cyrus | Encyclopedia.com
    Although McCormick received very little formal education, he began working on the farm alongside his father and tinkering with the farm tools and machinery. As ...
  51. [51]
    Cyrus McCormick Revolutionized Farming Worldwide With The ...
    Apr 14, 2016 · In 1847, McCormick moved the headquarters to the frontier town of Chicago, with the new factory expanding until two-story buildings covered ...
  52. [52]
    Cyrus Hall McCormick Sr. (1809-1884) - American Aristocracy
    He was married in 1858 to his secretary, Nancy Fowler, an orphan from New York. They had seven children of whom five (listed) survived infancy.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  53. [53]
    Nancy Maria "Nettie" McCormick (Fowler) (1835 - 1923) - Geni
    Apr 29, 2022 · Nancy "Nettie" Fowler was born in 1835 and was raised by her grandmother in Clayton, New York. She met Cyrus Hall McCormick in 1857 while ...
  54. [54]
    Deerings/McCormicks: Opulence V. Frugality | Classic Chicago ...
    Mar 5, 2017 · Cyrus McCormick Jr. As for the following generation of McCormicks, when the reaper king died in 1884, Nettie had insisted that Cyrus Jr.Missing: Nancy tensions
  55. [55]
    Cyrus Hall McCormick (1809 - 1884) - Genealogy - Geni
    Oct 21, 2021 · Early life. Cyrus Hall McCormick was born February 15, 1809 on the McCormick family farm known as Walnut Grove in Rockbridge County, Virginia, ...
  56. [56]
    https://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi/f/findaid/findaid-idx?c=wiarchives;cc=wiarchives;q1=McCormick;rgn=main;view=text;didno=uw-whs-mcc0000m
  57. [57]
    Cyrus H. McCormick, Jr. - Leadership - Harvard Business School
    McCormick was responsible for International Harvester's successful consolidation. During his tenure, the firm developed more efficient types of machines, ...
  58. [58]
    CYRUS MCCORMICK OWED HIS BIG IDEA AND HIS ETERNAL ...
    Shortly after Cyrus took over his dad's reaper project, he acquired an even greater gift from him: faith. A team of evangelists came to the Presbyterian Church.
  59. [59]
    Withington Wire Binder | Photograph | Wisconsin Historical Society
    Withington invented the wire binder in 1872, it was acquired by McCormick, and the patent was licensed to the McCormick Company. The company began to ...
  60. [60]
    The Twine Binder - Farm Collector
    Jan 1, 1974 · On July 8, 1878 and Feb. 18, 1879, patents were issued covering the perfected machine and binder. In the winter of 1878, William Deering, of the ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] McCormick Harvesting Machine Company Turns Abroad, 1878-1902
    It has become evident that the McCormick Company was able to acquire a good share of the European harvesting machine market. If we consider its success at ...
  62. [62]
    A Bit of Twine Knotter History - jstor
    The wire binder was developed by Appleby, Withington, and others from 1858 to 1878. During those twenty years. Joseph Barta of Bangor, Wisconsin, ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Cyrus Hall McCormick, his life and work
    ... invention and manufacturing. On his mother's side, too, Cyrus McCormick had behind him a line of battling Scotch-Irish. She was the daughter of a Virginian ...
  64. [64]
    Death of Cyrus McCormick - Mystic Stamp Discovery Center
    Rating 4.8 (67) After suffering a stroke in 1880, McCormick died on May 13, 1884, in his home in Chicago. He received many honors during and after his life – the French ...Missing: health | Show results with:health
  65. [65]
    McCormick Estates Records, 1841-1969 - UW Digital Collections
    Examples of headings: Reaper sales and notes, 1854-1858; individual accounts, 1872-1891; collecting commissions, 1898-1905; properties including Illinois and ...Missing: figures | Show results with:figures
  66. [66]
    Chicago Entrepreneurial History: The McCormick Brothers and the ...
    Oct 20, 2013 · In their lifetimes, Cyrus, William, and Leander McCormick did nothing less than to revolutionize agriculture and define an entirely new industry ...Missing: achievements controversies
  67. [67]
    McCormick's reaper revolutionized farming - Farm and Dairy
    Oct 31, 2019 · The reaper could handle from 12-15 acres per day and fewer stackers following behind. By the 1860s about 70% of the wheat harvested was by ...
  68. [68]
    Discover How Cyrus McCormick Revolutionized Modern Agriculture ...
    Jul 18, 2025 · Suddenly, with this machine, a single worker could harvest up to twelve acres a day—whereas before, the same task might have taken a dozen ...
  69. [69]
    A House Divided, America in the Age of Lincoln - Digital History
    Mechanical threshers enabled farmers to process grain about thirty times faster than by hand; a farmer using a mechanical reaper could harvest five to six acres ...Missing: speed manual<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Agriculture of the United States in 1860: Introduction (continued)
    ... wheat is raised in the United States by over a million bushels. In 1860 there were 172,643,185 bushels of oats raised, against 146,584,179 bushels in 1850.
  71. [71]
    The Rise and Fall of International Harvester - Diesel World Magazine
    Feb 5, 2025 · International Harvester was formed in 1902 through a merger funded by J.P. Morgan, bringing together several companies, including the ...
  72. [72]
    Cyrus McCormick · 28. American Innovation - Lehigh Library Exhibits
    He set fixed prices “take it, or leave it” and guaranteed “15 acres a day.” In 1851 his reaper won a Gold Medal at London's World's Fair.
  73. [73]
    Model of Hussey's Reaping Machine, 1833 - The Henry Ford
    This model, based on the 1833 patent drawings, was made about 1860, probably for patent litigation court cases against McCormick.
  74. [74]
    Cyrus McCormick mechanical reaper co-invented by Augusta ...
    May 29, 2018 · Jo Anderson, a slave from Augusta County, is rightly considered co-inventor of the famous reaper which revolutionized American agriculture.
  75. [75]
    The Project Gutenberg eBook of Obed Hussey, Who, of All Inventors ...
    McCormick, 'inventor of the reaper,' I write you to say that it would manifestly be unjust to credit the invention of the reaper to any one man. Mr. McCormick ...