Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

D-list

In the entertainment industry, the term D-list refers to the lowest tier of status, describing individuals with minimal fame and recognition who are often known primarily for appearances on , game shows, or minor supporting roles rather than leading major films or high-profile projects. The concept emerged as an informal extension of the Ulmer Scale, a ranking system created by entertainment James Ulmer in the early to assess actors' "bankability"—their ability to generate revenue and global appeal based on factors like talent, marketability, and industry influence. Ulmer's original scale categorized stars into (top-tier, highly bankable performers like or ), B-list (solid but less dominant actors with steady careers), and C-list (niche or fading talents with limited mainstream draw). The D-list designation was coined for those so obscure they fell below even the C-list, representing "bottom-of-the-barrel" celebrities with scant industry leverage. The term entered mainstream lexicon in 2005 with the Bravo reality series Kathy Griffin: My Life on the D-List, which premiered on August 3 and followed comedian 's satirical take on her own marginal status. Running for six seasons until 2010, the Emmy-winning show chronicled Griffin's efforts to navigate fame's fringes, from booking gigs to dealing with , and it amplified the D-list as a cultural shorthand for ironic amid hierarchies. Today, D-list status often applies to reality TV , one-hit wonders, or personalities whose notoriety stems from scandals, moments, or niche audiences rather than sustained artistic or commercial success. While higher lists denote power and opportunities, D-listers typically rely on tabloid coverage, guest spots, or low-budget endeavors to maintain visibility, embodying the precarious and often humorous underbelly of .

Definition and Hierarchy

Definition of D-List Status

D-list status denotes the lowest tier in the informal hierarchy of celebrity classifications within the entertainment industry, encompassing individuals with minimal public recognition, low commercial bankability, and limited overall influence. These figures are typically characterized as "barely famous" or "has-beens," reflecting a tenuous level of notoriety that lacks the widespread appeal or professional momentum associated with higher tiers. This status highlights a form of fame that is marginal and often unsustainable, where individuals struggle to maintain relevance in a competitive field dominated by more prominent stars. Key attributes of D-list status include the absence of lead roles in major film or television productions, with careers instead centered on niche or low-profile opportunities such as supporting parts in independent projects, guest spots on lesser-known shows, or appearances in non-scripted programming. Fame at this level frequently stems from tabloid mentions or personal scandals rather than substantive artistic contributions, resulting in sporadic media attention that does not equate to enduring professional opportunities or financial viability. Such reliance on extrinsic factors underscores the limited industry leverage and public engagement typical of this category. While celebrity lists are inherently subjective and context-dependent, D-list specifically represents the bottom rung where status is often ironic or contested, questioning whether true exists at all. This places it distinctly below -, and C-list levels, which involve greater visibility and market demand, emphasizing instead a diminished or peripheral role in the ecosystem.

Place in the Celebrity Hierarchy

The celebrity hierarchy categorizes entertainers into tiers ranging from to D-list, reflecting varying degrees of fame, influence, and commercial viability within the entertainment industry. celebrities occupy the uppermost echelon, characterized by global appeal, starring roles in major blockbusters that drive substantial revenue, extensive media coverage across print and digital outlets, high-value endorsement contracts with global brands, and massive followings that amplify their reach. These factors position as the most bankable talents, capable of guaranteeing audience turnout and financial success for projects they headline. Descending the hierarchy, B-list celebrities maintain solid recognition but lack the universal draw of A-listers; they typically secure supporting roles in prominent films or lead in mid-tier productions, garner consistent but not dominant attention, and attract endorsement deals of moderate scale, often tied to niche markets. C-list celebrities fall further, with peripheral visibility through minor roles in films or television, sporadic appearances, limited influence, and infrequent endorsements, resulting in lower overall market impact. At the base, D-list status denotes the lowest tier of fame, where individuals achieve only marginal notoriety—often through brief stints, exposure, or —yielding minimal volume, negligible endorsement opportunities, and small audiences that fail to translate into significant commercial leverage. Criteria for tier placement emphasize bankability, assessed through factors like performance on major films, the frequency and prominence of mentions in major outlets, the scale of endorsement deals, and metrics such as follower counts and rates, which indicate and potential. D-list celebrities consistently rank lowest across these dimensions, with projects rarely exceeding modest viewership and endorsements limited to local or low-budget campaigns. This informal tiered system often considers bankability as a core measure of a celebrity's , drawing from traditional metrics focused on theatrical success and incorporating contemporary indicators like digital influence and streaming performance, thereby reflecting shifts in how fame generates economic impact.

Historical Development

Origins of List Classifications

The concept of list classifications in entertainment, particularly the designation, traces its roots to the late in theater and circuits. The term "A-list" first appeared around 1890, referring to the highest-tier performers who received top billing on playbills and posters, denoting their status as headliners capable of drawing audiences. In , where variety shows featured multiple acts, billing hierarchy was crucial for promotion; the top position—often called "top of the bill"—signified premier talent, while lower positions indicated supporting or lesser-known performers. This system emphasized visibility and earning potential, laying the groundwork for later celebrity rankings. As the entertainment industry transitioned to film in the early 20th century, these classifications extended to Hollywood during the 1920s and 1930s, coinciding with the rise of the studio system. Casting directors and producers began using informal lists to differentiate lead actors for major productions from those suited for supporting roles, often based on proven box-office draw and contract status. By the studio era's peak in the 1930s and 1940s, actors were systematically categorized by annual salaries and role prominence under long-term studio contracts, with top earners like Clark Gable and Bette Davis exemplifying A-list status through their association with high-budget "A-pictures." The emergence of B-lists paralleled the production of low-budget "B-movies," second features designed to fill double bills in theaters; actors in these films, such as those from Poverty Row studios, were relegated to B-list due to smaller budgets and secondary market appeal, a practice that defined much of the era's output from 1930 to the early 1950s. Prior to formalized scales in the late , the A-, B-, and C-list hierarchy evolved informally within Hollywood's agent and casting networks by the , incorporating C-lists to denote performers with niche appeal, declining careers, or limited mainstream recognition. These terms reflected subjective assessments of marketability rather than rigid metrics, often whispered in industry circles to gauge an actor's viability for projects amid the post-studio era's freelance landscape. This pre-digital persisted until more structured evaluations, such as the Ulmer Scale, gained traction in 2000, bridging early theatrical traditions with modern stratification.

The Ulmer Scale

The Ulmer Scale was developed by entertainment journalist James Ulmer in 2000 as a ranking system for assessing actors' bankability, or their market value in attracting financing and audiences for films, and was first detailed in his book James Ulmer's Hollywood Hot List: The Complete Guide to Star Ranking. This framework aimed to provide studios, producers, and international buyers with a data-driven evaluation of stars' commercial viability beyond mere figures. The scale structures actors into hierarchical tiers ranging from A+ at the top—reserved for elite global draws capable of opening high-budget films—to D at the bottom, denoting performers with negligible industry influence and typically no commitments to major studio projects. Intermediate levels include A, B+, B, and C, categorizing minor players with varying degrees of appeal across low ($1–$8 million), medium ($8–$30 million), and high (over $30 million) budget categories. Ulmer published annual updates through his Actors Hot List editions, expanding coverage to over 1,400 actors worldwide by the 2009–2010 version, though updates ceased around 2010. Methodologically, the scale relies on interviews with key industry stakeholders, including producers, sales agents, financiers, and executives from global markets like the U.S., , and , to score actors on factors such as recent film performance, salary negotiations, project prestige, , willingness, professionalism, and acting range. These inputs emphasize an actor's ability to guarantee upfront sales in international territories, with D-tier placements reflecting limited draw and absence of high-profile opportunities. The Ulmer Scale's legacy lies in shaping Hollywood's understanding of star power as a quantifiable asset, once serving as a go-to reference for studio decision-making on casting and budgeting. However, it has been criticized for its subjective reliance on opinions, overemphasis on international appeal at the expense of domestic success, inherent biases like underrepresenting women due to market preferences, and narrow focus on actors excluding other entertainment sectors.

Characteristics

Career Profiles

D-list celebrities typically follow one of two primary career trajectories: they are often former B- or C-list stars whose prominence has diminished due to factors such as public scandals, in niche roles, or shifts in industry preferences, or they are newcomers who achieve brief notoriety through viral moments or one-off appearances but struggle to build lasting momentum. These individuals sustain their careers through sporadic opportunities like guest spots on programs, where payments typically range from $1,500 to $5,000 per episode for lower-tier participants, though this varies by show. Professional work for D-list celebrities is generally limited to low-profile gigs, including appearances at fan conventions, infomercials, guest roles, and supporting parts in low-budget films, often totaling just 1-2 projects annually with compensation under $100,000 per engagement (as of the mid-2010s). At conventions, for instance, basic appearance fees start at $5,000 to $10,000, supplemented by earnings from autographs ($5 each) and photo opportunities ($10 each) organized by event promoters. In ultra-low-budget films (under $300,000 total production cost), actors receive minimum daily rates of $241 under the Ultra Low Budget Agreement (as of 2025), reflecting the economic constraints of these ventures. Endorsements for lesser-known figures, such as product promotions, can yield up to $50,000 but are infrequent and tied to niche markets. This sparse workload underscores the precarious financial reality, where annual earnings rarely exceed low six figures and require diversification into non-entertainment income sources to maintain stability (as of the mid-2010s). Key challenges in D-list careers include difficulty in securing representation from major agencies, which prioritize higher-profile clients, forcing reliance on self-promotion through personal websites, , and networking events to generate leads. Additionally, vulnerability to —where past roles define future opportunities—limits access to diverse projects, perpetuating a cycle of "fame-chaser" or peripheral characters and hindering upward mobility. These dynamics align with broader celebrity hierarchy assessments, such as the Ulmer Scale, which evaluates status based on coverage and booking power.

Public and Media Perception

D-list celebrities are frequently stereotyped in public discourse as desperate for attention, engaging in publicity stunts to revive fading relevance or cling to past . This perception positions them as "neverweres" or "wannabes," individuals who overstrive beyond their perceived merit, often evoking a mix of pity and scorn from audiences who view their efforts as misguided or pathetic. They are also commonly labeled as "trainwrecks," a term particularly applied to female figures whose personal struggles—such as breakdowns, substance issues, or unconventional behavior—are sensationalized as chaotic spectacles warranting mockery rather than . These stereotypes serve as in cultural narratives, reinforcing the idea that D-list status reflects personal failure in a meritocratic system. Media coverage of D-list celebrities prioritizes scandals and humiliations over professional achievements, with tabloids and gossip outlets amplifying their most unflattering moments to drive engagement. Publications like the and construct narratives that ridicule their appearances, decisions, or "meltdowns," framing them as cautionary figures who fail to maintain . further intensifies this ridicule, where viral clips of gaffes or stunts become fodder for memes and online derision, turning minor incidents into widespread that sustains their visibility at the expense of dignity. Such portrayals often ignore substantive contributions, instead emphasizing a of rise, fall, and futile clawing back, which uses to patrol societal norms around ambition and propriety. In broader societal terms, D-list celebrities embody the era of democratized fame, where and digital platforms lower barriers to notoriety, allowing individuals to achieve transient without traditional gatekeepers. However, this accessibility comes at the cost of and , as their is devalued as "" or manufactured, evoking disdain for disrupting the of "deserving" elites. They highlight a cultural tension: while enabling broader participation in , their mocked trajectories underscore the punitive side of , where minor celebrities are expendable symbols of in the .

Notable Examples

Traditional Entertainment Figures

Traditional entertainment figures classified as D-list typically include , comedians, and musicians from , television, and recording industries whose careers once showed promise but have since faded into obscurity, often relying on niche fanbases, roles, or low-budget projects. These individuals usually gained initial recognition through mainstream successes in the pre-digital era, only to experience prolonged downturns due to shifting industry trends or personal challenges. Unlike higher-tier celebrities, D-listers maintain a tenuous connection to fame, appearing sporadically in media without commanding significant or chart draw. Historical examples illustrate this trajectory among 1990s-era talents. , a comedian who peaked with sketches and films like (1992), saw his career plummet after the critically panned (1996), transitioning from leading roles to cult status with occasional stand-up tours and documentaries exploring his decline. Similarly, , a prominent child star in hits such as (1985) and (1986), struggled with addiction and legal issues in adulthood, leading to obscurity marked by reality TV stints and independent films, including a 2025 appearance on . In modern contexts, many D-list figures from 1980s-2000s teen-oriented projects now populate landscapes. , known for her role in (1999), has largely shifted to low-budget horror and action films like (2013), emblematic of faded teen idols sustaining careers through genre niches. , once a respected in films like (1984), has appeared in over 500 projects but predominantly in releases, reflecting a drop from B-list viability to prolific but undervalued work. In music, (Rob Van Winkle), whose 1990 hit "" topped charts worldwide, faded after a brief solo peak, later pivoting to reality TV and home renovation shows amid parodied cultural irrelevance, with ongoing ventures as of 2025. Transition patterns to D-list status often involve B- or C-listers descending due to aging, absence of recent successes, or personal setbacks like . A comprehensive analysis of over 1.5 million actors' careers reveals that peaks typically occur early, with productivity declining sharply afterward, and only about 1% sustaining high-output periods beyond 20 years. For instance, while overall acting careers average 28.4 years, the most successful phases at elevated tiers—marked by leading roles or hits—rarely exceed 5-10 years before market saturation or age-related prompts a slide to peripheral work. Female actors face accelerated declines, peaking around age 30 compared to 46 for males, exacerbating the drop to D-list obscurity.

Reality Television and Social Media Stars

Reality television has produced numerous D-list celebrities, particularly contestants from competition formats like The Bachelor and Survivor, who experience a surge of media attention during and immediately after their season but struggle to maintain relevance without transitioning to sustained entertainment careers. For instance, Olivia Caridi, a contestant on season 20 of The Bachelor in 2015, gained brief notoriety for her "villain" edit, leading to short-term tabloid coverage and social media buzz, but she has since pursued a career in digital marketing and podcasting with limited major follow-up deals. Similarly, Ashley Spivey from The Bachelor season 15 quit her job for the show, only to face financial hardship post-elimination with minimal ongoing opportunities beyond occasional low-profile gigs. These individuals often capitalize on their 15 minutes of fame through paid appearances at events or clubs. In the realm of , D-list status is epitomized by viral and creators who amass 1-5 million followers through algorithmic-fueled trends but fail to secure crossover success into or high-value brand partnerships, instead relying on merchandise sales, sponsored cameos, or affiliate links for income. A representative case is early Vine stars like Jerome Jarre, who exploded to millions of followers with comedic sketches but saw engagement plummet after the platform's 2016 shutdown, leading to sporadic content without major deals. Another example includes personalities behind one-off viral challenges, such as certain dance trend originators who peaked at 2-4 million followers in 2020 but faded as algorithms shifted, monetizing via limited-edition apparel or guest spots on podcasts rather than long-term endorsements. The rise of these D-list figures was propelled by the reality TV boom, which democratized fame through low-cost production and unscripted drama on shows like (premiering 2000), drawing massive audiences and creating instant "stars" from everyday participants. This trend accelerated in the with social media algorithms on platforms like and , which prioritize short-form, shareable content to boost user retention, enabling rapid virality but also quick obsolescence as trends cycle every few months. Public perceptions sometimes view this trajectory as a marker of desperation, with former stars pitching personal brands amid diminishing opportunities.

Cultural Impact

Kathy Griffin's "My Life on the D-List"

: My Life on the D-List is an series that premiered on on August 3, 2005, and ran for six seasons until August 3, 2010, consisting of 48 episodes. The show chronicled comedian 's everyday experiences in , where she playfully embraced her self-described D-list celebrity status through witty commentary and encounters with higher-profile stars, such as scheming for publicity at events or handling quirky personal projects. Central to the series were episodes exploring Griffin's professional and personal challenges, including her relentless Emmy campaigns, interactions with her outspoken parents and —who often became fan favorites—and her ambitious yet humorous bids to ascend to recognition amid gigs like low-budget appearances. The format emphasized raw, minimally produced footage with a single camera crew, capturing her publicity stunts and family tensions without scripted elements. The show received critical acclaim for its candid portrayal of fame's underbelly and won two for Outstanding Reality Program in 2007 and 2008, following six consecutive nominations. The series played a pivotal role in revitalizing Griffin's career, propelling her from fringe status to a dedicated following and enabling expansions like sold-out stand-up tours and bestselling memoirs, such as her 2009 . By leaning into , Griffin transformed the "D-list" label from an insult into an ironic emblem of , as she later reflected: "I do like when people say D-List was a real time capsule for that moment." This approach not only highlighted her comedic edge but also made her family dynamics a relatable highlight, turning the show into a cultural touchstone for aspirational underdogs in .

Broader Influence on Pop Culture

The concept of the D-list gained widespread traction in the mid-2000s, particularly following the 2005 premiere of Kathy Griffin's reality series, which self-consciously embraced the label and thrust it into mainstream entertainment discourse. Tabloid media outlets, such as those chronicling Hollywood gossip, amplified the term through satirical coverage of minor celebrities' pursuits of relevance, while internet memes and awards show banter further embedded it in popular lexicon. This visibility influenced casting trends in "celebreality" programming, prioritizing figures with niche or fading fame to capitalize on the allure of insider access to Hollywood's underbelly. The D-list notion mirrors broader societal transformations in fame during the reality TV boom of the early 2000s, when programs like Survivor and American Idol proliferated, reshaping television toward unscripted formats. Social media platforms exacerbated this by enabling "disposable fame," where viral moments grant temporary stardom but often result in fleeting relevance, critiquing celebrity culture's tension between apparent inclusivity—allowing diverse voices entry—and underlying exploitation of participants for profit. Scholars highlight how such dynamics undermine labor protections in media production, turning ordinary individuals into commodified spectacles while masking systemic inequalities. In contemporary extensions, the D-list framework has evolved into terms like "Z-list" to describe influencers and personalities with hyper-local or ephemeral followings, often derided as even further removed from traditional stardom. Parodies in television, such as those in mocking the ambitions of peripheral figures, underscore the term's satirical role in critiquing fame's hierarchies. By the , discussions of fame's democratization via platforms like emphasize how algorithms empower micro-celebrities, blurring lines between authenticity and manufactured virality while raising concerns over sustainability.

References

  1. [1]
    BBC World Service | Learning English | Keep your English Up to Date
    'A D-list', in other words, is a celebrity who is so obscure that he or she doesn't even get on to the scale. In other words, 'a D-list' is a bottom-of-the- ...
  2. [2]
    Company Ranks Celebrity Bankability - NPR
    Aug 6, 2010 · Michele Norris talks with James Ulmer about The Ulmer Scale, which ranks more than 1,000 actors worldwide by their bankability.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    Kathy Griffin: My Life on the D-List - Official Site - Bravo TV
    Season six of Bravo's two-time Emmy winning series, Kathy Griffin: My Life on the D List, premiering Tuesday, June 15 at 9 pm ET/PT on Bravo.<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    What Are D-List Actors? - Acting Magazine
    D-list actors are lesser-known, often with minor roles, brief fame, or reality TV appearances, and are not in high demand for major roles.
  5. [5]
    The 50 Most Infamous D-List Celebrities of All Time - Fox News
    Mar 8, 2017 · D-list celebrities are famous faces you know, but can't remember why, not based on professional success, but a nebulous label. Examples include ...
  6. [6]
    Film Review: 'Kathy Griffin: A Hell of a Story' - Variety
    Aug 3, 2019 · Prior to the controversy, Griffin was a self-described “D-list” celebrity with a predominantly gay following, whose shtick centered largely on ...
  7. [7]
    D-list - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
    An informal list of individuals in any of several categories, especially in the entertainment industry, whose celebrity is so obscure that they are generally ...
  8. [8]
    The A-List of Z-List Celebrities - Vulture
    or “celebrity” — whose ...
  9. [9]
    BBC World Service | Learning English | Keep your English Up to Date
    'A D-list', in other words, is a celebrity who is so obscure that he or she doesn't even get on to the scale. In other words, 'a D-list' is a bottom-of-the-heap ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    A-list, n. & adj. meanings, etymology and more
    A-list is formed within English, by compounding. Etymons: A n., list n.6 · See etymology ...
  11. [11]
    Vaudeville Lingo Dictionary - Ballycast
    The program or list of acts, in order of performance. As in “who else is on the bill?” Billing — The names of performers as ...
  12. [12]
    Salaries Of Hollywood In 1937 - A List of The Film Stars Pay
    Aug 30, 2014 · Here are the 1937 salaries of some of Hollywood's top talent. Number one was Gary Cooper ($370214) who overtook Mae West as the highest paid ...
  13. [13]
    B Movies | Encyclopedia.com
    B movies were, in fact, a fairly short-lived phenomenon, a product of the studio era that disappeared during the 1950s. From the 1930s through the 1950s, all of ...
  14. [14]
    James Ulmer's Hollywood Hot List: The Complete Guide to Star ...
    Ulmer's star power rankings can change a star's salary-or even whether or not he or she gets a role. An actor's star power includes:
  15. [15]
    Ulmer Scale - Hollywood Lexicon
    A scale developed by James Ulmer that ranks the bankability of 140 movie actors worldwide.
  16. [16]
    The Ulmer Scale: A true test of Hollywood star bankability?
    May 22, 2009 · There are only two actors on the A-plus list, Smith and Johnny Depp, followed by 26 actors on the A-list and 84 actors on the B-plus list.
  17. [17]
    Katherine Heigl: Can NBC's 'State of Affairs' Rescue Her Career?
    Nov 12, 2014 · Heigl, who has been acting since she was a child, took a publicity hit because of diva-like behavior toward the end of her “Grey's Anatomy” run.Missing: peak | Show results with:peak
  18. [18]
    Hollywood Salaries Revealed, From Movie Stars to Agents (and ...
    Oct 2, 2014 · Even D-list celebs who go on Wife Swap can make decent money: $10,000 to $20,000 an episode. But for the vast majority of reality show ...
  19. [19]
    Stars Getting Rich Off Fan Conventions: How to Take Home ...
    often paid up front — to show up, sign autographs, pose for photos and ...
  20. [20]
    Low-Budget Film Actors To Get 25-Percent Pay Hike Under New ...
    Jan 11, 2015 · Actors can currently be paid as little as $100 a day under the union's Ultra Low-Budget Agreement, which covers independent films produced ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    7 Key Insights on Celebrity Endorsements: Guaranteed Costs ...
    Oct 29, 2021 · 1. A-Lister Celebrities · $1 million to $10 million+ ; 2. B-List Celebrities · $500,000 to $1 million ; 3. C-List Celebrities · $50,000 to $500,000.
  22. [22]
    Mastering the Delicate Art of Self-Promotion - Backstage
    May 30, 2019 · Actors need to promote themselves for success. No one is immune unless you're an A-List actor, a group that makes up a fraction of the industry.
  23. [23]
    Typecasting: A Comprehensive Guide for Actors - Casting Networks
    May 6, 2024 · Actors face a double-edged sword when they get typecast. While it ensures steady work, it also limits their career progression by boxing ...
  24. [24]
    The Undead: Life on the D-List - ResearchGate
    ... The narrative of these three D-List celebrities is presented as a cautionary tale about the perils of celebrity detached from legitimised definitions of ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Celebrity and Schadenfreude piece.pdf - City Research Online
    The popularity of the D-list celebrity is particularly interesting because it is a new cadre of celebrity in which Schadenfreude is 'built-in' through media ...
  26. [26]
    Trainwreck Unpacks the Culture of Gawking at Female Celebrity ...
    Sep 22, 2016 · There's a sort of typical trainwreck redemption story that we see with Princess Diana, with Amy Winehouse, with Whitney Houston. After they're ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Celebrity Status - American Sociological Association
    Celebrity status, born from capitalism and mass media, is a form of status that dominates honor, generates economic benefits, and is "status on speed".
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The Unwatched Life Is Not worth Living - USF Scholarship Repository
    It is probably not coincidental that the elevation of ordinary celebrity has coin- cided with the popularizing of the notion of. A- list and D- list celebrities ...Missing: perception | Show results with:perception
  29. [29]
    The Rise and Fall of Pauly Shore - Vulture
    Jul 31, 2013 · 18 years ago, Pauly Shore was one of the biggest names in comedy and today he is relegated to “where are they now?” status.
  30. [30]
    Corey Feldman: A Timeline of the Actor's Ups and Downs
    Sep 19, 2016 · Feldman's name became associated with drug problems and legal turmoil. Here, we look back at his progression from fame to online infamy.Missing: obscurity list
  31. [31]
    Good Actors You Didn't Know Starred In Awful Direct-To-Video Movies
    Sep 10, 2025 · Good Actors You Didn't Know Starred In Awful Direct-To-Video Movies · Antonio Banderas · Nicolas Cage · Kelsey Grammer · Tara Reid · John Travolta.
  32. [32]
    D-List Actors Who Pretend Like They're A-Listers - Screen Rant
    Jan 15, 2018 · D-List Actors Who Pretend Like They're A-Listers · 15. Katherine Heigl · 14. Rob Schneider · 13. Amanda Bynes · 12. Charlie Sheen · 11. Lindsay Lohan.
  33. [33]
    Vanilla Ice - Songs, Project & Wife - Biography
    Mar 30, 2021 · Vanilla Ice is a rapper and TV reality show personality whose song "Ice Ice Baby" put him on the map in 1990.Missing: D- | Show results with:D-
  34. [34]
    Quantifying and predicting success in show business - PMC
    We study the careers of 1,512,472 actors and 896,029 actresses as recorded on IMDb as of January 16th, 2016, including careers stretching back to the first ...
  35. [35]
    How long is the typical film actor's career? - Stephen Follows
    Jun 7, 2020 · The average career length was 28.4 years, although there was a wide spread of careers. 46.5% of actors had a film career of between 20 and 40 years.
  36. [36]
    This Chart Shows Hollywood's Glaring Gender Gap - Time Magazine
    Oct 6, 2015 · While male actors see their careers peak at the age of 46, female actors reach their professional pinnacles at age 30, according to a TIME analysis.
  37. [37]
    Stars Who Got Famous on Reality TV and Then Vanished - MSN
    Olivia Caridi has a decent amount of followers on Instagram but didn't rise to high fame. After her villainess edit on season 20 of "The Bachelor," she ...
  38. [38]
    15 Former Reality Stars Who Struggled To Return To "Normal" Jobs ...
    Aug 4, 2023 · Like many contestants, Ashley Spivey quit her job to be on The Bachelor Season 15. After leaving the show, she had about $15 in her bank account ...
  39. [39]
    Reality TV Stars' Salaries - Business Insider
    Jun 6, 2016 · "A" players on a cable reality show: $30,000 to $10 million per season. Stars on an ensemble show are paid by how central they are to the show ...
  40. [40]
    The Rise and Fall of the Social Media Influencer
    By the late 2010s, influencer marketing was booming. Social media users weren't just tolerating sponsored content—they were seeking it out for product ...
  41. [41]
    How TikTok warped the fame game in 2022 - British GQ
    Nov 28, 2022 · TikTok's mysterious algorithm has turbocharged virality beyond anything we've seen before, convincing a generation that online celebrity is just one post away.
  42. [42]
    Reality TV boom | Critical TV Studies Class Notes - Fiveable
    Reality TV exploded in popularity during the early 2000s, reshaping the television landscape. This boom was driven by low production costs, audience desire ...
  43. [43]
    Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online - Emerald Publishing
    Different forms of internet celebrity have emerged in the last decade, such as memes, transient virality, trending social media posts, accidental celebrity from ...
  44. [44]
    How 15 minutes of fame became 15 years for the perma-stars of ...
    Jul 30, 2020 · We once tuned into reality TV to see “normal” people in incredible situations, but reality TV stars have professionalised being everyday.Missing: statistics 2-3 industry
  45. [45]
    Kathy Griffin: My Life on the D-List (TV Series 2005–2010) - IMDb
    Rating 7.4/10 (2,344) Release date · August 3, 2005 (United States) ; Also known as. Кэти Гриффин: Моя жизнь по списку 'D' ; Filming locations · Palm Springs, California, USA.
  46. [46]
    Kathy Griffin Reflects on My Life on the D-List 20 Years Later
    Aug 21, 2025 · Originally aired on Bravo (currently streaming on Peacock) and following in the format footsteps of early-aughts reality series like The ...
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    Kathy Griffin Official Website - Bio
    Griffin won two Primetime Emmy Awards for her hit reality series, Kathy Griffin: My Life on the D-List, which aired for six years on Bravo. It was nominated ...
  49. [49]
    Celebrity culture and exploitation: the case of reality TV
    Sep 29, 2017 · Paradoxically, those companies who exploit workers also directly rely on the surplus value they create, which gives workers in the television ...Missing: critiques inclusivity list
  50. [50]
    Popular Culture: Reality TV Is NOT Reality | Psychology Today
    Jan 31, 2011 · Some argue that reality TV is just giving us what we want. But I don't recall any demonstrations or picket lines outside of the television ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    A Celebrity Z-List? Yes, It Exists - The New York Times
    Aug 31, 2016 · Meet the striving celebrity underclass that has risen to dominate the gossip machine. Aspiring models, third-tier reality show stars, impossible-to-place ...
  52. [52]
    The Entourage Movie Is for People Who Love Entourage ... - Vulture
    Jun 4, 2015 · The satire part eventually faded away while the fantasy loomed ever ... D-list celebrities). A couple of nods to backstory might be one ...
  53. [53]
    From TikTok to Stardom: How Social Media is Creating the Next ...
    Sep 24, 2025 · This democratization of fame is why TikTok has become the definitive celebrity factory of the 2020s. Why TikTok Became the Celebrity Launchpad.