Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Desktop metaphor

The desktop metaphor is a foundational concept in graphical user interfaces (GUIs) that models the computer's operating environment as a virtual office desk, using icons to represent files, folders, applications, and tools like a trash can, enabling users to manipulate digital objects through intuitive actions such as dragging and dropping. Developed in the early 1970s at Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), it emerged as part of the innovative Xerox Alto personal computer, the first system to implement a bitmapped display with overlapping windows and mouse-driven interactions that mimicked real-world desktop activities. Pioneered by researchers including Alan Kay, the metaphor aimed to make computing accessible to non-experts by replacing command-line interfaces with visual, direct manipulation techniques like point-and-click and pull-down menus. Xerox commercialized elements of this design in the 1981 Xerox Star workstation, which introduced graphical icons for documents, printers, and file cabinets, though it remained expensive and limited to office environments. significantly popularized the desktop metaphor through its Lisa computer in 1983 and, more influentially, the Macintosh in 1984, refining the interface with a single-button , consistent visual styling, and features like system-wide copy-paste and functions to enhance for the general public. This approach revolutionized personal computing by democratizing technology, influencing subsequent systems like Windows and establishing the desktop paradigm as the dominant model for GUIs into the , despite ongoing debates about its relevance in mobile and touch-based eras.

Overview

Definition

The desktop metaphor is a foundational in (GUI) design that simulates a physical desktop environment to facilitate intuitive interaction with computers, particularly for non-expert users. It represents abstract digital concepts—such as , organization, and manipulation—through visual and interactive elements that mimic everyday items, including file icons resembling documents, folder icons evoking filing cabinets, and a wastebasket for deletion. This mapping allows users to perform operations like dragging and dropping items via direct manipulation, paralleling physical handling of papers and objects on a real desk. The primary goal of the desktop metaphor is to reduce by drawing on users' pre-existing familiarity with workflows, thereby lowering the barrier to learning and using systems without requiring extensive . By aligning computer interactions with tangible, real-world analogies, it promotes accessibility and efficiency in human-computer interaction (HCI), enabling novices to navigate complex software ecosystems more naturally. The term "desktop metaphor" was coined in the and to describe innovative concepts developed at PARC, and it has since become a standard concept in HCI literature and practice. As an early example of skeuomorphism in digital design, it imitates physical forms to enhance user comprehension of virtual interfaces.

Core Principles

The desktop metaphor is grounded in the principle of direct manipulation, which enables users to interact with on-screen representations of objects as if they were tangible physical items, such as dragging an to relocate a or resizing a by pulling its edge. This approach emphasizes continuous visibility of system status, immediate reversibility of actions, and physical-like operations that reduce the associated with command-line syntax, fostering a of and in users. A key structural element is the hierarchy of , which organizes spatially to mimic real-world systems, treating the screen as a surface where folders function like drawers or cabinets that can nest contents hierarchically. This principle promotes logical organization by allowing users to group and subgroup items intuitively, reflecting the containment relationships found in office environments and aiding in efficient without overwhelming the primary workspace. Affordances and further enhance by providing visual and interactive cues that signal possible actions and confirm outcomes, such as highlighting selected icons or outline feedback during interactions. In graphical interfaces, these perceived affordances—shaped by conventions rather than inherent physical properties—guide users toward appropriate interactions, while immediate feedback mechanisms, like cursor changes or status messages, ensure transparency and prevent errors by aligning digital responses with expected physical behaviors. Consistency across actions is essential to building user , employing standardized metaphors and mechanisms for common operations like opening, deleting, or organizing items, so that learned behaviors transfer seamlessly throughout the . This uniformity—such as uniform gestures or command paradigms—minimizes surprises and accelerates familiarity, drawing from the metaphor's to create a cohesive where similar tasks invoke analogous responses.

Historical Development

Origins at Xerox PARC

The desktop metaphor originated in the 1970s at 's Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), where a team led by developed innovative concepts for personal computing interfaces. Drawing inspiration from Ivan Sutherland's 1963 system, which introduced interactive graphical manipulation using a on a vector display, Kay's group envisioned computers as dynamic media for creative expression rather than mere calculators. This foundational influence emphasized direct manipulation of on-screen objects, laying the groundwork for user-centered graphical environments at PARC. A pivotal advancement came with the , introduced in 1973 as the first featuring a bitmapped display, a for input, and overlapping windows that evoked elements of a physical . Developed by a team including , Chuck Thacker, and , the Alto integrated these hardware innovations with software that allowed users to interact with graphical representations of files and applications, marking the initial synthesis of the analogy in a functional . Over 2,000 Alto systems were built and used internally at PARC and other facilities, fostering experimentation with graphics and pointing devices to simulate workspace organization. Building on the Alto's foundations, the system, released in 1981, represented the first full implementation of the in a comprehensive . Designed primarily for , the introduced the (windows, icons, menus, ) paradigm, where icons symbolized documents and tools on a , enabling users to drag, drop, and organize items intuitively. This prototype drew internal influences from Engelbart's 1968 oN-Line (NLS), which pioneered the and dynamic windows for collaborative augmentation, but PARC researchers uniquely adapted these into a cohesive office-oriented emphasizing familiarity and efficiency. The 's interface innovations, refined through iterative user testing, established core principles like selectable icons and pull-down menus that influenced subsequent graphical systems.

Adoption in Commercial Systems

The , released in January 1983, marked the first widespread commercial adoption of the desktop metaphor in a personal computer system aimed at business users. Inspired by demonstrations at PARC during a 1979 visit arranged in exchange for Xerox's investment in Apple stock, the Lisa incorporated a with overlapping windows, icons representing files and applications, and the desktop as a central workspace. Key innovations included the trash can icon for temporary file storage before deletion and pull-down menus for accessing commands, which streamlined interactions beyond command-line prompts. This adoption led to legal disputes, including the 1988 Apple v. Microsoft lawsuit alleging copyright infringement on elements, which was largely resolved in Microsoft's favor by 1997. Apple's Macintosh, introduced in 1984 at a more affordable price of $2,495, accelerated the metaphor's commercialization by targeting general consumers and educators. Building directly on the Lisa's design—many of which were repurposed internally—the Macintosh retained the desktop layout, trash can, and menus while emphasizing intuitive mouse-driven operations, helping to establish the as a standard for personal . Its success, with over 250,000 units sold in the first year, demonstrated the metaphor's appeal in making accessible without specialized . Microsoft followed with in November 1985, initially as a 16-bit graphical shell layered over to add windowing and icon-based program launching, drawing inspiration from Apple's implementation under a licensing agreement. Lacking full OS , it featured tiled windows and basic desktop elements but required commands for many tasks, limiting its early impact to enthusiasts. By in August 1995, Microsoft achieved deeper adoption, replacing as the primary interface with a true desktop metaphor, including the for program access and the for multitasking, which sold over 1 million copies in the first four days. The metaphor's influence extended to other platforms, notably Commodore's 1.0 with in 1985, which provided a graphical desktop alternative using icons for "projects," "drawers," and "tools" to manage files and applications on the computer. In the Unix workstation space, released in 1989 as part of its environment, licensing GUI concepts from to implement a desktop-like interface via the OPEN LOOK specification, featuring icons, windows, and menu-driven controls for professional engineering and scientific users. This commercial proliferation by the mid-1980s catalyzed a profound shift from text-based command-line interfaces to graphical ones, reducing the for novice users and expanding personal from hobbyists to everyday professionals.

Key Components

Icons and Documents

In the desktop metaphor, icons serve as visual shorthand for digital entities, representing files, applications, or shortcuts through standardized graphical symbols that evoke familiar office objects. Originating in the system, icons were designed as pictorial representations of , folders, and accessories to make abstract computer operations more intuitive for office workers. For instance, a icon typically depicts a sheet of paper with a folded corner, while application icons use distinctive symbols like a for , allowing users to quickly identify and access items without relying on text labels alone. The document metaphor extends this by portraying files as editable sheets of , akin to physical documents that can be manipulated on a desk surface. In early implementations, such as the , documents were visualized as icons that could be "opened" into windows, simulating the act of unfolding a paper to view its contents. Modern enhancements include thumbnails or previews embedded within icons, which display a miniature view of the file's interior—such as a reduced image for photos or a snippet of text for spreadsheets—to mimic glancing at the top of a paper without fully revealing it. This feature, introduced in systems like Mac OS System 7 around , reinforces the analogy by providing immediate visual cues about content, reducing the need for additional steps to inspect files. A core interaction enabled by these representations is dragging and dropping, which enforces the physical handling analogy by allowing users to select an icon with a pointing device and move it across the screen to perform actions like copying or relocating files. Pioneered in the Xerox PARC systems of the late 1970s and early 1980s, this gesture simulates picking up and placing objects on a desk, such as sliding a paper into a folder or bin. In practice, dragging a document icon over a folder icon initiates a transfer, with visual feedback like highlighting indicating the potential outcome, thereby making file management feel as natural as rearranging office supplies. Over time, icon design has evolved from simple monochrome bitmaps in early GUIs like the and —limited to black-and-white pixels for basic shapes—to vibrant, high-resolution graphics in contemporary operating systems. This progression began with the introduction of color in systems like the Amiga Workbench in 1985 and accelerated in the 1990s with Apple's adoption of shaded, three-dimensional effects in Mac OS, followed by glossy, skeuomorphic details in Mac OS X. Despite these advancements in detail and realism, icons have retained their desk-like , such as persistent paper motifs for documents, to preserve the metaphor's accessibility across hardware improvements.

Windows and Workspaces

In the desktop metaphor, windows function as resizable and movable frames that represent open applications or documents, akin to sheets of paper arranged on a physical desk. These windows can overlap one another, enabling users to layer multiple viewports while maintaining focus on the foreground one, and typically feature title bars displaying the window's name alongside controls for resizing, minimizing to an icon, maximizing to full screen, or closing the frame. This design supports multitasking by allowing simultaneous visibility and interaction with several items, though overlaps can obscure content and require manual rearrangement. The desktop background serves as the foundational workspace—an expansive, virtual surface that simulates the top of a real desk, providing ample room for placing and organizing windows alongside icons for files and folders. This infinite plane evokes a cluttered yet functional office environment, where users can spatially arrange elements to suit their workflow, and it is often personalized with wallpapers or patterns to reinforce the metaphorical familiarity and aesthetic appeal. Task management within this metaphor mimics the physical act of handling papers, such as stacking or spreading them out for review. Users switch between windows using keyboard combinations like , which cycles through open frames in a linear preview, or overview modes that all windows on the screen for visual selection, reducing the effort needed to locate and activate buried items amid overlaps. These mechanisms enhance in handling multiple concurrent activities without disrupting the overall spatial layout. Menu bars and docks represent persistent navigational aids, comparable to desk organizers or tool trays that keep essential items within easy reach. Positioned at the screen's top or bottom, menu bars provide hierarchical pull-down lists for application-specific commands and system-wide functions, streamlining access to options without cluttering the workspace. Docks, similarly, consolidate icons for frequently used applications and running tasks, allowing drag-and-drop interactions and quick launching, as refined in implementations to support fluid multitasking.

Implementations Across Platforms

Desktop Operating Systems

In macOS, the desktop metaphor is embodied in the , which functions as the central file management tool, enabling users to view, organize, and manipulate files and folders in a hierarchical, desk-like spatial arrangement. This design emphasizes intuitive navigation through sidebar favorites, column views, and icon arrangements that simulate physical document handling. complements this by offering a dynamic overview of all open windows, full-screen apps, and multiple desktop spaces, allowing seamless switching between workspaces to manage cluttered "desks." Windows realizes the metaphor through its Explorer shell, which integrates the desktop background for placement, the for quick access, and the as a primary launch point for applications, settings, and pinned items. The integrates search functionality and allows users to pin apps, files, and folders for rapid content discovery, featuring recommendations for frequently used items, while desktops extend the by providing isolated workspaces that users can name and switch between to organize tasks. Right-click context menus further enhance usability, revealing file-specific actions like copy, delete, or properties directly on selected items, streamlining interactions akin to manipulating objects on a desk. Linux desktop environments such as and provide highly customizable implementations of the desktop metaphor, adapting it through user-configurable . In , the supports themes for visual consistency and extensions that enable grids on the desktop, dynamic wallpapers, and workflow enhancements like positioning or overview modifications. emphasizes flexibility with plasma widgets for desktop , panels, and applets, allowing users to create personalized layouts with resizable arrangements and interactive that mimic a modular desk surface. Common across these systems are features that reinforce the metaphor's practical elements, such as the recycle bin or for handling deletions. The Windows Recycle Bin temporarily holds deleted files in a dedicated , permitting before permanent erasure to prevent accidental loss. macOS employs the , accessible via the , which stores removed items until emptied, with options for secure deletion on SSDs. In and , the integrates similarly, often represented by a or , ensuring cross-environment consistency in file recovery. Search functionality also unifies the experience, simulating a quick scan of the desk: in macOS indexes and retrieves files, apps, and web content via a global hotkey; Windows Search offers integrated querying from the ; and 's overview provides app and file discovery, all prioritizing speed and relevance. These elements share foundational (windows, icons, menus, pointer) principles for consistent user interaction.

Mobile and Touch Interfaces

The home screen adapts the desktop metaphor by displaying a of that serve as shortcuts to applications, arranged on a virtual surface reminiscent of a where users can freely position and access tools. Folders are created by dragging one icon onto another, resulting in stacked representations that evoke physical drawers or piles of documents for grouping related apps, facilitating intuitive on smaller touchscreens. This prioritizes direct touch over mouse-based precision, allowing users to to launch full-screen apps that occupy the entire , minimizing the need for resizable windows. Android launchers extend the metaphor through highly customizable home screens that incorporate widgets—interactive elements akin to sticky notes or desk accessories—providing live updates without opening apps. Users can pinch to zoom out for an overview of the "desktop" layout, spreading icons and widgets to rearrange content spatially, while app drawers slide up from the bottom like opening a desk drawer to reveal all installed applications in a scrollable list. This setup supports gesture-driven , such as swiping between multiple home screen pages to simulate different desk areas. Adapting the desktop metaphor to touch interfaces presents challenges due to the physical differences in input methods; finger-based lacks the pixel-level accuracy of a , leading to reduced support for overlapping windows that could obscure content or cause accidental touches. Consequently, mobile designs emphasize full-screen experiences to maximize usable space on limited screens and favor broad gestures like swipes for navigation over fine-motor dragging of elements, which can lead to fatigue or errors in prolonged use. These modifications ensure while preserving core organizational principles like spatial arrangement. Hybrid elements in mobile UIs sustain the desktop analogy through features like notification shades and control centers, which users access by swiping from screen —mirroring reaching to the periphery of a physical for quick-reference items or tools. In , the notification shade expands downward from the top to reveal alerts and quick settings, while iOS's Control Center is accessed by swiping down from the top-right corner on iPhones without a Home button or up from the bottom on those with a Home button, integrating persistent access to system functions without disrupting the main workspace. These edge-activated panels maintain the metaphor's emphasis on efficient content hierarchy in touch contexts.

Criticisms and Evolution

Limitations of the Metaphor

The desktop metaphor, while intuitive for simulating physical office environments, introduces a fundamental mismatch between physical and digital constraints, particularly in how it handles file accumulation and spatial organization. In a real desk, limited surface area naturally encourages tidying and filing away items to maintain usability, but digital desktops lack such physical boundaries, allowing users to indefinitely pile icons, files, and shortcuts without consequence. This leads to pervasive clutter, where screens become overwhelmed with disorganized elements, reducing efficiency and increasing cognitive load as users navigate increasingly chaotic interfaces. For instance, unlike a physical desk that enforces prioritization through space scarcity, the infinite capacity of digital storage promotes hoarding behaviors, exacerbating information overload in everyday computing tasks. This structural flaw extends to inefficiencies in managing non-office-oriented activities, such as handling web-based , resources, networking, or vast collections of files that defy simple spatial analogies. The metaphor's reliance on hierarchical folders and desktop placement assumes a contained, office-like , yet digital environments often involve distributed, ephemeral —like emails, tabs, or remote collaborations—that do not fit neatly into "" models. Organizing large numbers of files, for example, becomes impractical without advanced search tools, as the spatial layout fails to scale; users must resort to linear scanning or queries rather than intuitive dragging and dropping, which works poorly for large-scale . These limitations hinder seamless integration of networking features, where files might exist across multiple devices or servers without a clear "" equivalent, forcing fragmented interactions that disrupt . Furthermore, the desktop metaphor's heavy dependence on visual and spatial cues poses significant barriers, particularly for users with disabilities and those from non- cultural contexts. For visually impaired individuals relying on screen readers or non-visual interfaces, the metaphor's icon-based, overlapping windows, and drag-and-drop mechanics translate poorly, as they prioritize sighted direct manipulation over auditory or tactile alternatives, often resulting in disorientation or exclusion from core functionalities. Similarly, the draws from Western office norms—such as left-to-right layouts, trash bin icons, and personal possession concepts like "My Computer"—which can confuse users from cultures with different spatial orientations, color symbolisms, or communal work practices, leading to misinterpretations and reduced intuitiveness. In the era, these rigid file hierarchies feel increasingly outdated, as modern workflows emphasize fluid, app-centric, and cloud-native interactions that transcend physical simulations, favoring dynamic, context-aware systems over static metaphors.

Modern Alternatives and Adaptations

The decline of skeuomorphism in user interface design marked a significant refinement of the desktop metaphor, beginning prominently with Apple's iOS 7 release in 2013, which shifted to flat design by eliminating realistic textures like wood grains and leather stitching while preserving core structural elements such as icons and windows. This change, led by Jony Ive, reflected growing user familiarity with digital interactions, reducing reliance on physical desk-like visuals to convey functionality without abandoning the metaphor's organizational principles. Subsequent platforms, including Android's Material Design and Windows 8, adopted similar minimalist aesthetics, prioritizing clarity and scalability over ornate simulations of office environments. Cloud computing and app-centric models have further diminished the centrality of the local desktop by enabling seamless, device-agnostic access to files and applications, as exemplified by services like , which synchronizes documents across web browsers and devices without tying users to a single machine's . Web apps, such as those in , bypass traditional desktop folders by treating data as dynamically accessible streams, fostering collaboration in real-time and abstracting away local storage metaphors for a more fluid, network-based paradigm. This evolution supports hybrid workflows where users interact with content via browsers or progressive web apps, reducing the desktop's role as a primary organizational hub. Emerging alternative metaphors have challenged the desktop's dominance by introducing non-spatial or immersive paradigms; for instance, timeline views in email clients like organize messages chronologically as a linear rather than scattered icons, enhancing temporal for communication flows. In virtual reality, spatial computing via devices like Apple's Vision Pro reimagines interfaces as three-dimensional environments where apps float and scale in physical space, controlled by eye and hand gestures, offering infinite canvases unbound by flat screens. As of 2025, trends toward AI-driven interfaces and spatial canvases in experimental OS like UnivOS further adapt or challenge the metaphor by enabling dynamic, infinite workspaces integrated with for -aware interactions. Meanwhile, a revival of command-line interfaces in modern tools, such as integrated terminals in IDEs like , appeals to developers for their precision and scriptability, providing a text-based alternative that prioritizes efficiency over visual simulation. Adaptations of the desktop metaphor persist through virtual desktops and multi-monitor setups, which extend workspace capacity to accommodate the demands of 2020s hybrid work environments. Virtual desktops, as implemented in and macOS, allow users to create multiple isolated screens for task segregation, mimicking expanded physical desks to manage remote and multitasking. configurations, often paired with these features, boost by up to 40% in studies of workflows, enabling simultaneous views of documents, video calls, and tools essential for distributed teams. These enhancements sustain the metaphor's utility while adapting it to cloud-integrated, flexible routines.

References

  1. [1]
    Desktop Metaphor - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The desktop metaphor was created by designers at Xerox PARC in response to the challenge of communicating interaction design to users, most of whom were ...
  2. [2]
    50 Years Later, We're Still Living in the Xerox Alto's World
    Mar 1, 2023 · Xerox's attempt to turn the Alto into a true commercial product, 1981's Xerox Star, introduced a common graphical interface on the metaphor of a ...
  3. [3]
    35 Interface Innovations that Rocked Our World - Xerox
    Point and click, drag and drop, overlapping "windows," icons, menus – none of these things existed until a group of visionaries created the "desktop" metaphor ...
  4. [4]
    Forty Years Ago, the Mac Triggered a Revolution in User Experience
    Jan 19, 2024 · Beyond the mouse and desktop metaphor. As computers go, was the Macintosh innovative? Sure. But not for any particular computing breakthrough.
  5. [5]
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123852410000087
  6. [6]
    The reification of metaphor as a design tool - ACM Digital Library
    Despite causing many debates in human-computer interaction (HCI), the term ... The desktop metaphor as an approach to user interface design (panel discussion).
  7. [7]
    https://innerview.co/blog/skeuomorphism-in-ux-design-definition-pros-cons-and-evolution
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Direct Manipulation: - UMD Computer Science
    Ben Shneiderman, "A Computer Graphics System for. Polynomials," The Mathematics Teacher, Vol. 67, No. 2,. Feb. 1974, pp. 111-113. Ben Shneiderman is an ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  9. [9]
    GUIdebook > Articles > “Designing the Star User Interface”
    Nov 15, 2003 · The Star user interface adheres rigorously to a small set of design principles. These principles make the system seem familiar and friendly, ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Norman Affordances
    In graphical, screen-based interfaces, the designer primarily can control only perceived affordances. The computer system already comes with built-in physical ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The Xerox "Star": A Retrospective
    The 8000-series workstation was based upon a microcoded processor that was designed within Xerox especially to run the object. The Xerox "Star": A Retrospective.
  12. [12]
    The Xerox Star: A Retrospective - IEEE Computer Society
    The Xerox Star: A Retrospective. Sept. 1989, pp. 11-26, 28-29, vol. 22. DOI ... Download PDF. SHARE ARTICLE. Generate Citation. Abstract. A description is ...
  13. [13]
    How the Graphical User Interface Was Invented - IEEE Spectrum
    In 1973, PARC developed the prototype Alto, the first of two computers that would prove seminal in this area. More than 1200 Altos were built and tested. From ...
  14. [14]
    The graphical user interface - ACM Digital Library
    trashcan until the trash person comes. The first trash can icon did not ... Like the Xerox Star, the. Apple Lisa was not commercially success- ful. In ...
  15. [15]
    Toward more compatible human-computer interfaces - IEEE Xplore
    folders; the Apple Lisa added the handy trash basket, the icon for deleting ... screen-and pull-down menus that appear when one points and clicks on an ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    The History of Microsoft - 1983
    Microsoft unveils Windows, an extension of the MS-DOS operating system that provides a graphical operating environment. Windows features a window management ...
  17. [17]
    The history of PCs | Microsoft Windows
    Dec 31, 2024 · Uncover the evolution of personal computers, from their inception to modern-day innovations, and see how they transformed our lives.
  18. [18]
    Amiga Workbench 1.x - Toasty Tech
    The terminology revolved around the metaphor of a workman's workbench rather than an office desk. Tools - The application programs.
  19. [19]
    Shaping web usability: interaction design in context - ACM Ubiquity
    The introduction of the Xerox Star began a new generation of interfaces using the desktop as metaphor. ... Apple's computers: first Lisa, then the Macintosh. As ...Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
  20. [20]
    A Brief History of the Origin of the Computer Icon
    ### Summary of Computer Icon History (Xerox to Modern)
  21. [21]
    A brief history of icons, thumbnails and QuickLook
    Nov 2, 2024 · At some stage, perhaps in System 6 of 1988, or System 7 of 1991, document icons such as images could be displayed as miniatures or thumbnails ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] An Evaluation of Stacking and Tiling Features within the Traditional ...
    Mar 28, 2017 · In the traditional desktop metaphor, windows can float freely on the desktop and are allowed to overlap each other. One problem that arises ...
  23. [23]
    Definition of WIMP | PCMag
    (1) (Windows, Icons, Menus and Pointing device) A synonym for a graphical user interface (GUI). However, WIMP is sometimes used as a derogatory reference to ...
  24. [24]
    Toppling the Desktop - MIT Technology Review
    Nov 1, 2000 · Still prominent are the overlapping windows that have been around for 15 years. The sea change that Aqua brings is to the desktop metaphor ...Missing: papers | Show results with:papers
  25. [25]
    Use the Finder on Mac - Apple Support
    View files and folders on your Mac ... Click items in the Finder sidebar to view your apps, documents, downloads, and more. You can customize the sidebar to ...Customize the Finder sidebar · Sync content between your...
  26. [26]
    View open windows and spaces in Mission Control on Mac
    On your Mac, choose Apple menu > System Settings, click Desktop & Dock in the sidebar, then go to Mission Control. (You may need to scroll down.)Missing: metaphor | Show results with:metaphor
  27. [27]
    File Explorer in Windows - Microsoft Support
    Select Start > File Explorer , or select the File Explorer icon in the taskbar. · Select View from the Command Bar. · Select Show, then select Navigation Pane.
  28. [28]
    Customize the Windows Start Menu - Microsoft Support
    Learn how to customize the Windows Start menu, pin or unpin apps, adjust the layout, and personalize its appearance to enhance your productivity and user ...
  29. [29]
    Configure Multiple Desktops in Windows - Microsoft Support
    Learn how to configure multiple desktops in Windows to organize projects, or to quickly switch between desktops before a meeting.Missing: metaphor Explorer shell
  30. [30]
    Menus and context menus - Windows apps | Microsoft Learn
    Oct 24, 2022 · Menus and context menus are for organizing commands and saving space by hiding those commands until the user needs them.Is this the right control? · When should you use a menu...
  31. [31]
    GNOME Shell Extensions
    System extension. Customize Clock on Lock Screen. Apps Menu. by fmuellner. System extension. Add a category-based menu for apps. User Themes. by fmuellner.Installed Extensions · User Themes · Extensions · About
  32. [32]
    The Plasma™ Handbook
    Plasma™ is the core user interface to the desktop. Table of Contents. 1. Introduction · 2. Using Plasma™ · Plasma™ Components.Missing: metaphor | Show results with:metaphor
  33. [33]
    What Is the Recycle Bin? - Computer Hope
    Jul 9, 2025 · The Recycle Bin is a Windows feature that is similar to a folder in that it stores all deleted files and folders.
  34. [34]
    Trash management - ArchWiki
    A command- ...
  35. [35]
    Organize your apps in folders on iPhone - Apple Support
    Touch and hold the Home Screen background until the apps begin to jiggle. To create a folder, drag an app onto another app, then drag other apps into the folder ...Missing: metaphor | Show results with:metaphor
  36. [36]
    Move apps and create folders on your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch
    Sep 19, 2025 · Make a folder on your Home Screen · To make a folder, touch and hold an app until the apps jiggle. Then drag an app onto another app. · Drag ...
  37. [37]
    (PDF) Challenges for Designing the User Experience of Multi-touch ...
    In this paper we discuss eight challenges that need to be considered when designing the user experience of multi-touch interfaces.<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228950181_Challenges_for_Designing_the_User_Experience_of_Multi-touch_interfaces
  39. [39]
    [PDF] A new look at the Pad metaphor for Information Organization - Cog Sci
    However, here we start seeing limitations of the paper paradigm and the windows metaphor: 1. because most documents are inspired by the paper paradigm, their ...
  40. [40]
    The desktop metaphor must die - UX Collective
    May 22, 2019 · The Desktop environment enables Applications to exist. Apps are modes, and anything modal in an interface sets the user up for errors and slips.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Conceptual Metaphors for Designing Smart Environments - Frontiers
    Mar 16, 2020 · We present three metaphorical concepts that can frame new ways of designing a smart environment that focuses on interaction rather than building automation.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] 9 The Tangible Desktop: A Multimodal Approach to Nonvisual ...
    GUIs simplify interaction for sighted users using physical and visual metaphors supporting direct manipulation. (e.g., files and folders), but the digital ...
  43. [43]
    Towards culture-centred design - ScienceDirect.com
    The desktop interface, which is based on an American–English metaphor, offers particular complexities for users who come from different cultural backgrounds.
  44. [44]
    What Apple learned from skeuomorphism and why it still matters
    Aug 23, 2022 · Apple's deliberate approach with skeuomorphism and sudden shift to flat design in iOS 7 gave many users whiplash. Many people felt like they ...
  45. [45]
    The Future of Design Is More Than Making Apple iOS Flat - WIRED
    Jun 12, 2013 · Much of the commentary approves of the changes to iOS 7, arguing that because skeuomorphism teaches by analogy, and an entire generation of ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Mental Models for Cloud-Storage Systems - NN/G
    Nov 24, 2019 · Users have a rudimentary understanding of cloud services and attempt to fit them into their existent, simpler mental models that they had formed for similar, ...Why People Use Cloud Storage · Who Has Access To The Cloud... · Collaboration PracticesMissing: centric metaphor
  47. [47]
    What Is Cloud Computing? - PCMag
    Feb 15, 2022 · Cloud computing means storing and accessing data and programs over the internet instead of your computer's hard drive.Missing: replacing | Show results with:replacing<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Web-Based Applications Replace Desktop Apps for Good. Here's Why.
    Aug 10, 2021 · With easy access & widespread use, web-based applications are slowly overtaking desktop applications. The future of development is shifting.Missing: cloud centric models metaphor
  49. [49]
    TimelineView object (Outlook) - Microsoft Learn
    Jan 19, 2022 · The TimelineView object, derived from the View object, allows you to create customizable views that allow you to display Outlook items within a timeline.
  50. [50]
    Introducing Apple Vision Pro: Apple's first spatial computer
    Jun 5, 2023 · A revolutionary spatial computer that seamlessly blends digital content with the physical world, while allowing users to stay present and connected to others.Apple (AU) · Apple (CA) · Apple (UK) · Apple (SG)Missing: alternative metaphors email command- revival
  51. [51]
    CLI Shells – A Brief History of Human-Computer Interfaces
    Jul 18, 2023 · The way we interact with computers has changed over the decades, but command-line interfaces aren't going anywhere soon.History Of Cli Shells · Z Shell (1990) · Why Are These Cli Tools...
  52. [52]
    How Windows 11's Multiple Desktops saved my sanity | PCWorld
    Oct 20, 2025 · To switch between desktops quickly, hit WIN + RIGHT ARROW KEY or WIN + LEFT ARROW KEY . I still love my multi-monitor life, but I have started ...Missing: adaptations metaphor 2020s hybrid
  53. [53]
    https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/shells-a-history-of-human-computer-interfaces/
  54. [54]
    8 Virtual Desktop Features for Enhanced Remote Work - flexidesktop
    May 19, 2025 · Explore 8 essential features of virtual desktops that enhance remote work, from data security to seamless collaboration across devices.