Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Earth's magnetic field

Earth's magnetic field, generated by the motion of molten iron in the planet's outer core, envelops the Earth and extends into space, forming a protective magnetosphere that deflects harmful solar wind particles and cosmic rays from reaching the surface.^[1] This field approximates a magnetic dipole tilted approximately 10° from Earth's rotational axis, with a strength at the surface ranging from 22,000 to 67,000 nanotesla (nT), varying by location—weakest near the equator and strongest at the poles.^[2] The field originates from a self-sustaining dynamo process in the fluid outer core, where convective currents of electrically conducting material, driven by heat from the inner core and Earth's rotation, produce electric currents that in turn generate the magnetic field.^[1]^[2] The magnetosphere, shaped like a comet by the incoming solar wind, compresses on the dayside to about 10 Earth radii and stretches into a long tail on the nightside, trapping charged particles in regions known as the Van Allen radiation belts.^[1] This protective bubble prevents the erosion of Earth's atmosphere by solar wind and enables phenomena such as auroras, where charged particles interact with the upper atmosphere near the magnetic poles.^[1] The field's dipole moment has decreased by about 9% over the past 150 years, with the overall intensity weakening at a rate of roughly 5% per century, though it remains the strongest it has been in the last 100,000 years compared to longer-term averages.^[1]^[3] Earth's magnetic poles are distinct from geographic poles: the geomagnetic poles align with the dipole axis, while the magnetic poles indicate where the field is vertical, currently located near but offset from the rotational poles.^[3] The magnetic North Pole has drifted more than 600 miles since 1831, accelerating to speeds of up to 55 kilometers per year in recent decades, a phenomenon known as polar wander.^[1] Over geological timescales, the field undergoes periodic reversals, where the polarity flips, with the last full reversal occurring approximately 780,000 years ago; these events happen irregularly, averaging every 300,000 years but with intervals ranging from 100,000 to millions of years.^[4]^[3] During reversals, the field intensity can drop by up to 90%, but life on Earth has persisted through hundreds of such events without catastrophic effects.^[4]

Overview and Significance

Basic Definition and Properties

Earth's magnetic field is a complex vector field that originates within the planet's interior and extends far into space, enveloping the planet and interacting with the solar wind. It is primarily dipolar, resembling the field of a giant bar magnet, but includes higher-order multipolar components that contribute to its asymmetry and local variations. This field is generated mainly by dynamo action in the liquid outer core, where convective motions of molten iron create electric currents that sustain the magnetism.^[5] The magnetic field can be decomposed into three primary components: the main field, which is internal and accounts for approximately 95% of the total field strength at Earth's surface; the crustal field, arising from magnetized rocks and minerals in the lithosphere; and the external field, produced by electric currents in the ionosphere and magnetosphere. The main field dominates globally and varies slowly over time due to core dynamics, while the crustal field is static and localized, and the external field fluctuates on shorter timescales influenced by solar activity.^[6]^[7] As a vector field, Earth's magnetism is fully characterized by its intensity (denoted as B, the magnitude of the magnetic flux density), inclination (the angle the field makes with the horizontal plane), and declination (the angle between the horizontal component of the field and geographic north). These parameters define the direction and strength at any point, allowing compasses and other instruments to navigate relative to the field. The field is measured in tesla (T) in the International System of Units or in gauss (G) in the older cgs system, with 1 T = 10,000 G; the average intensity at Earth's surface ranges from about 25 to 65 microtesla (μT), or 0.25 to 0.65 G.^[3]^[3] Conceptually, the field's lines of force form closed loops that emerge from the vicinity of the magnetic south pole—located near Earth's geographic north pole—and curve around the planet to re-enter near the magnetic north pole in the southern hemisphere. This configuration means that a compass needle's north-seeking end aligns with the geographic north because it is attracted to the magnetic south pole there, illustrating the field's dipolar orientation.^[8]^[9]

Role in Protecting Earth

Earth's magnetic field generates the magnetosphere, a protective bubble that deflects the majority of charged particles from the solar wind and cosmic rays, thereby shielding the planet from harmful radiation and preventing the erosion of its atmosphere.^[1] Without this barrier, high-energy particles would bombard the upper atmosphere, potentially stripping away gases over geological timescales, as observed on Venus and Mars, which lack global magnetic fields and have experienced significant atmospheric loss due to direct solar wind exposure.^[10]^[11] The magnetosphere's formation relies on the field's dipolar structure, which extends far into space and creates a standoff region called the magnetopause where solar wind pressure balances magnetic forces.^[12] Within the magnetosphere, many incoming charged particles become trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts, two doughnut-shaped regions encircling Earth that capture and contain high-energy electrons and protons from solar and cosmic origins, significantly reducing radiation flux to the surface and protecting life from excessive exposure.^[13] These belts act as a natural shield, confining particles along magnetic field lines and preventing their descent into lower altitudes, where they could otherwise damage biological tissues or disrupt ecosystems.^[14] Particles that penetrate the outer magnetosphere are often guided by the field's lines toward the polar regions, where they collide with atmospheric gases, exciting atoms and molecules to produce auroras—vibrant displays of light known as the northern and southern lights.^[15] This ionization process occurs primarily in the upper atmosphere, with solar protons and electrons accelerating along geomagnetic field lines during magnetic storms triggered by coronal mass ejections, resulting in spectacular but harmless visual phenomena at high latitudes.^[16] During geomagnetic reversals, which typically last thousands of years, the field's intensity can weaken dramatically—to as low as 5-10% of normal—allowing greater penetration of cosmic rays and solar particles. This may elevate radiation levels and potentially deplete the ozone layer, though life on Earth has persisted through hundreds of such events without evidence of catastrophic effects. Proposed correlations exist between periods of low field intensity, such as geomagnetic excursions or hyperactive reversal phases, and environmental changes including increased UV exposure that could influence ecosystems or evolution, but these links remain hypothetical and under investigation.^[4] By safeguarding the integrity of the upper atmosphere against particle erosion and radiation, Earth's magnetic field plays a key role in maintaining long-term climate stability, as atmospheric loss could otherwise alter composition, temperature regulation, and oxygen levels essential for habitability.^[17] This protective function ensures the retention of vital gases like oxygen, which are produced through biological processes and shielded from solar wind stripping, thereby supporting a stable biosphere over billions of years.^[18]

Field Characteristics

Intensity and Measurement Units

The intensity of Earth's magnetic field, denoted as B, represents the magnitude of the magnetic field vector at a given point.^[19] In the International System of Units (SI), B is measured in teslas (T), but due to the field's relatively low strength, geomagnetism commonly employs the subunit nanotesla (nT), where $1 \, \mathrm{T} = 10^9 \, \mathrm{nT}.^[3] At Earth's surface, the field intensity varies geographically, typically ranging from approximately 30,000 nT (30 μT) near the equator to 60,000–65,000 nT (60–65 μT) near the poles.^[20] On average, the field is weaker in the southern hemisphere compared to the northern hemisphere.^[21] This intensity is primarily generated by electrical currents in the liquid outer core (the geodynamo), which accounts for over 90% of the observed field, with minor contributions from magnetized crustal rocks and external ionospheric/magnetospheric currents.^[19] Beyond Earth's surface, in regions where the core-generated field dominates, the intensity approximates that of a tilted magnetic dipole and decreases radially with distance r from Earth's center as $1/r^3.^[22] For Earth's dipole, with magnetic moment M \approx 8 \times 10^{22} \, \mathrm{A \cdot m^2}, the equatorial intensity is given by

B_e = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{M}{r^3},

and the polar intensity by

B_p = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{2M}{r^3},

where \mu_0 = 4\pi \times 10^{-7} \, \mathrm{H/m} is the permeability of free space; here r is measured from the dipole center (offset from Earth's center).^[23] Local crustal anomalies can cause deviations of up to several hundred nT from these dipole values but remain secondary to the core field.^[19]

Inclination and Dip Angle

The inclination, denoted as I, is the angle between the Earth's magnetic field vector and the horizontal plane at a given location, measured positive downward in the Northern Hemisphere.^[2] This angle, also known as the dip angle, quantifies the tilt of the field lines relative to the Earth's surface.^[3] At the magnetic equator, the inclination is 0°, where the field is purely horizontal, while it reaches 90° at the magnetic poles, where the field is entirely vertical.^[24] The dip angle is synonymous with inclination and plays a key role in magnetic instruments, such as compasses, where the needle aligns with the total field vector rather than just the horizontal component, causing it to dip at an angle equal to I.^[25] The Earth's magnetic field can be decomposed into vertical and horizontal components relative to this angle: the vertical component B_z = B \sin I and the horizontal component B_h = B \cos I, where B is the total field intensity.^[24] These components are derived from the orthogonal measurements of the field: north (X), east (Y), and down (Z), with B_h = \sqrt{X^2 + Y^2} and \tan I = Z / B_h.^[2] Globally, the inclination increases from 0° at the magnetic equator toward 90° at the poles, following a pattern largely symmetric about the geomagnetic equator in the ideal dipole model, which accounts for about 90% of the surface field.^[24] However, non-dipole contributions from higher-order multipoles introduce asymmetries, causing deviations in the inclination pattern that vary with longitude and are more pronounced in the Southern Hemisphere.^[26] This global variation is mapped using models like the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF).^[2] In practice, the inclination affects compass behavior by causing the north-seeking end of the needle to tilt downward in the Northern Hemisphere (and upward in the Southern), potentially leading to friction or errors if not balanced, which is why dip-compensated compasses are used at higher latitudes.^[27] It also influences magnetic surveys in geophysics and navigation, where accurate knowledge of I is essential for interpreting field data and ensuring precision in applications like directional drilling.^[2]

Declination and Local Variations

Magnetic declination, denoted as D, is the angle at a given location between the direction indicated by a magnetic compass (magnetic north) and true geographic north (the direction toward the North Geographic Pole). By convention, declination is positive (east declination) when the magnetic north direction lies to the east of true north, and negative (west declination) when it lies to the west.^[28]^[29] Current values of magnetic declination vary geographically around the world and evolve over time due to shifts in the geomagnetic field. For instance, in the eastern United States near New York City, the declination is approximately -3.5° (west) as of 2025, while in western Europe near London, it is about +1° (east). In other parts of Europe, such as Scandinavia, values can reach up to around 5° east. These estimates are derived from the World Magnetic Model 2025 (WMM2025), a standard geomagnetic reference updated periodically to reflect ongoing field changes.^[30]^[28] Local variations in declination occur on scales of kilometers to hundreds of kilometers and are primarily caused by uneven crustal magnetization, where rocks with differing magnetic properties—such as iron-rich formations—distort the ambient geomagnetic field. These anomalies can alter declination by up to several degrees in affected regions, such as over magnetic highs like the Kursk Magnetic Anomaly in Russia or certain volcanic terrains. The non-dipolar components of Earth's field, including crustal contributions, account for these deviations from the global pattern.^[31] The direction of the horizontal component of the magnetic field defines declination mathematically as D = \tan^{-1} \left( \frac{B_y}{B_x} \right), where B_x is the northward magnetic field component and B_y is the eastward component in a local coordinate system aligned with geographic north and east. This relation allows declination to be computed from vector measurements of the field.^[29] In navigation, accounting for declination is essential to align compass readings with true bearings on maps or charts, as unadjusted magnetic headings can lead to significant errors in direction. Navigators apply corrections by adding east declination or subtracting west declination to magnetic bearings; for precision, they consult isogonic charts or digital models like the WMM2025, which delineate lines of equal declination and annual changes to ensure accurate headings over land, sea, or air.^[28]^[7]

Global Spatial Patterns

The global spatial patterns of Earth's magnetic field exhibit significant non-uniformities, primarily arising from quadrupole and higher-order multipole contributions that introduce asymmetries beyond the dominant dipolar component.^[32] These higher multipoles result in a weaker field in the southern hemisphere compared to the northern hemisphere, with the quadrupole term particularly enhancing this north-south imbalance.^[33] For instance, the southern hemisphere's field intensity is reduced by up to 10-15% relative to a pure dipole model at equivalent latitudes due to these non-dipolar effects.^[34] A prominent feature of these patterns is the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), a vast region of weakened magnetic field extending over parts of South America and the southern Atlantic Ocean.^[35] In the SAA, the field intensity is approximately 30% lower than in surrounding regions at similar latitudes, reaching values as low as 20,000-25,000 nanoteslas near the surface.^[36] This anomaly, spanning roughly 20% of Earth's surface, is attributed to the reverse flux patch in the core beneath it, which reverses the radial field component and diminishes the overall shielding.^[37] Complementary regional variations include areas of enhanced field strength, such as over Siberia, where intensities exceed 60,000 nanoteslas, contrasting with lows elsewhere like the SAA.^[35] These highs and lows reflect the interplay of core-generated multipoles, creating patchy distributions that evolve over decades.^[38] To visualize these patterns, geomagnetists use lines of constant field parameters: isogonic lines connect points of equal magnetic declination, forming curved contours that shift over time due to secular changes; isoclinic lines link locations with identical inclination (dip) angles, typically ranging from 0° at the magnetic equator to ±90° at the poles; and isodynamic lines connect points of equal horizontal magnetic intensity.^[39] Global contour maps derived from models like the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) illustrate these features, showing declination, inclination, and intensity distributions with spherical harmonic expansions up to degree and order 13 for the main field.^[40] For example, IGRF maps reveal the SAA as a broad low-intensity trough flanked by higher values in the southern Indian Ocean and Africa.^[41]

Dipolar Approximation

The dipolar approximation models Earth's magnetic field as that produced by a giant bar magnet, or magnetic dipole, centered at the planet's core and oriented with its axis tilted approximately 11° from the geographic rotation axis.^[42] This simplification captures the dominant large-scale structure of the field, treating it as a geocentric dipole whose magnetic axis does not align perfectly with the spin axis, thereby introducing a slight asymmetry relative to geographic coordinates.^[43] This model accounts for about 90% of the observed magnetic field strength at Earth's surface, providing a foundational framework for understanding global patterns while ignoring finer-scale complexities.^[44] Due to the 11° tilt, the magnetic equator—where the field is horizontal—is offset from the geographic equator by roughly 11.5°, shifting it northward in some regions and southward in others.^[42] Mathematically, the scalar magnetic potential V for an axial dipole (aligned with the polar axis) is given by

V = \frac{M \cos \theta}{r^2},

where M is the dipole moment, r is the radial distance from the center, and \theta is the colatitude.^[22] For the tilted geocentric dipole, the potential generalizes to V = \frac{\mathbf{M} \cdot \mathbf{r}}{r^3}, with vector components in spherical coordinates yielding the field strength:

B_r = \frac{2M \cos \theta}{r^3}, \quad B_\theta = \frac{M \sin \theta}{r^3}, \quad B_\phi = 0.

These expressions describe a field that decreases with the cube of the distance and varies with angular position, establishing the basic dipole geometry.^[22] Despite its utility, the dipolar approximation breaks down near the magnetic poles, where higher-order multipole contributions become significant, and in regions like the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), where the actual field is substantially weaker than predicted, necessitating inclusion of spherical harmonic terms up to degree and order 13 or higher for accurate modeling.^[35] In the dipole frame, field lines emerge symmetrically from the south magnetic pole, curve outward, and converge at the north magnetic pole, forming closed loops that mirror each other across the equatorial plane.^[45]

North and South Magnetic Poles

The north magnetic pole, also known as the north dip pole, is the location on Earth's surface where the geomagnetic field is vertical, pointing directly downward with an inclination angle of 90 degrees.^[46] At this point, the field lines enter the Earth, attracting the north-seeking end of a compass needle. Conversely, the south magnetic pole, or south dip pole, is where the field points directly upward, with the north-seeking end of the compass repelled.^[46] These poles are defined observationally based on the actual geomagnetic field, rather than an idealized model. As of the 2025 World Magnetic Model, the north magnetic pole is located at approximately 85.762°N latitude and 139.298°E longitude in the Arctic Ocean, while the south magnetic pole is at 63.851°S latitude and 135.078°E longitude in Antarctica.^[46] Unlike true geographic antipodes, these magnetic poles are not directly opposite each other due to the geomagnetic field's tilt relative to Earth's rotational axis and contributions from non-dipolar components, resulting in a separation of about 2,700 km from exact antipodal positions.^[46] Their positions wander irregularly over continental and oceanic surfaces, influenced by underlying variations in Earth's core dynamics. The north magnetic pole has been drifting northwestward toward Siberia at an average speed of about 41 km per year since 2020, a rate that has decelerated slightly from peaks around 55 km per year in the early 2000s.^[47] The south magnetic pole moves more slowly, at roughly 9 km per year, primarily toward the Indian Ocean sector of Antarctica.^[47] These migrations trace paths across landmasses and seas, with the north pole having crossed from northern Canada into the Arctic Ocean over the past century. Historical tracking of the magnetic poles began in 1831, when British explorer Sir James Clark Ross located the north magnetic pole on the Boothia Peninsula in northern Canada during an expedition.^[48] Subsequent expeditions and aerial surveys have mapped its progression, revealing a consistent drift across the Canadian Arctic toward Russia, covering over 2,000 km since discovery.^[48] The south magnetic pole was first precisely located in 1903 near the Adélie Coast of Antarctica, with ongoing observations confirming its gradual southward and eastward movement.^[46] It is important to distinguish the magnetic poles from the geomagnetic poles, which are the theoretical points where the axis of Earth's best-fit magnetic dipole intersects the surface, often separated by several hundred kilometers from the observed dip poles.^[46] The geomagnetic poles assume a simplified dipolar field, whereas magnetic poles reflect the full, complex geomagnetic configuration measured at the surface.^[46]

The Magnetosphere

Structure and Boundaries

The magnetosphere, the region dominated by Earth's magnetic field, features distinct boundaries and internal structures that shield the planet from solar wind particles. Its outermost boundary is the bow shock, a shock wave formed where the supersonic solar wind interacts with and slows abruptly due to the magnetic field, typically located at approximately 10–15 Earth radii (R_E, where 1 R_E ≈ 6,371 km) from Earth's center on the sunward side.^[1] Inside this lies the magnetosheath, a turbulent layer of decelerated solar wind plasma, before reaching the magnetopause, the primary interface between the magnetosphere and the external solar wind. The magnetopause stands at about 10 R_E on the dayside, where magnetic pressure balances dynamic solar wind pressure, compressing under stronger flows while extending into a long magnetotail (>100 R_E) on the nightside.^[29] Within the magnetosphere, the Van Allen radiation belts form two torus-shaped zones of trapped high-energy particles spiraling along magnetic field lines. The inner belt, primarily protons with energies of 10–50 MeV, occupies 1–3 R_E above the equator, originating mainly from cosmic ray interactions with the atmosphere. The outer belt, dominated by electrons (energies from 200 eV to several MeV), spans 3–10 R_E and is more dynamic, populated by solar wind injections during geomagnetic activity. During intense geomagnetic storms, additional temporary radiation belts can form between the inner and outer belts, as observed in May 2024 when two extra belts were detected persisting for several months.^[29]^[49] Closer to Earth, the plasmasphere consists of cold, dense plasma (ions and electrons at ~1 eV) that co-rotates with the planet, extending from the ionosphere outward to roughly 4 R_E along the equator, bounded by the plasmapause where plasma density drops sharply. This region, filled with hydrogen and helium ions, maintains a relatively stable structure under quiet conditions but can erode during storms.^[29] At higher latitudes, the auroral ovals encircle the geomagnetic poles as dynamic rings where magnetospheric particles precipitate into the atmosphere, typically at 65–70° magnetic latitude, producing visible auroras through excitation of atmospheric gases. These ovals, oval-shaped due to the tilted dipole field, contract or expand with solar activity, narrowing to ~67° at midnight and widening equatorward during substorms.^[29]

Interaction with Solar Wind

The solar wind is a continuous stream of charged particles, primarily protons and electrons, emanating from the Sun's corona at speeds of approximately 400 km/s and exerting a dynamic pressure of around 2–5 nPa, while carrying the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) embedded within it.^[50]^[51] Upon reaching Earth, this plasma flow interacts with the planet's magnetosphere, compressing the field lines on the dayside to form the magnetopause boundary while elongating them antisunward on the nightside to create the magnetotail.^[52]^[1] A key mechanism of energy transfer occurs through magnetic reconnection at the dayside magnetopause, particularly when the IMF has a southward component antiparallel to Earth's magnetic field, allowing plasma from the solar wind to enter the magnetosphere and couple the two systems.^[53] This process erodes the magnetopause, opens field lines, and facilitates the inflow of solar wind particles, which can lead to enhanced particle acceleration and heating within the magnetosphere.^[54] On the nightside, the stretched magnetotail stores this transferred magnetic energy in the plasma sheet, a region of hot, low-density plasma, until reconnection events release it explosively.^[55] These nightside reconnection events trigger magnetospheric substorms, during which plasma from the tail's plasma sheet is ejected earthward, causing rapid reconfiguration of magnetic field lines known as dipolarization and injecting energetic particles into the inner magnetosphere.^[56] Substorms typically last about an hour and are characterized by bursts of energy release that brighten auroras at higher latitudes.^[57] Intensified interactions arise during geomagnetic storms, often driven by coronal mass ejections (CMEs)—massive expulsions of solar plasma that can increase solar wind speed to over 1,000 km/s and strengthen the IMF southward component, leading to prolonged reconnection and enhanced energy input.^[58]^[59] These storms amplify the ring current, a westward-flowing belt of charged particles encircling Earth equatorially, which depresses the surface magnetic field and can persist for days, with recovery times up to a month in extreme cases.^[60] The dynamic effects of these interactions include the equatorward expansion of auroral ovals due to intensified particle precipitation into the atmosphere, as well as the induction of geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in conductive ground-based infrastructure.^[1]^[56] GICs, driven by rapid changes in the geomagnetic field during storms, can flow through power grids, pipelines, and railways, potentially causing transformer saturation, voltage instability, and widespread blackouts in severe events.^[61]^[62]

Temporal Variations

Short-Term Fluctuations

Short-term fluctuations in Earth's magnetic field occur on timescales from minutes to days and are primarily driven by external currents in the ionosphere and magnetosphere. These variations, typically ranging from tens to hundreds of nanotesla (nT), contrast with longer-term changes and can significantly impact technological systems such as power grids and satellite operations. Geomagnetic storms are often triggered by variations in the solar wind, leading to enhanced energy input into the magnetosphere.^[63] Diurnal variations, known as the solar quiet (Sq) daily variation, arise from ionospheric dynamo currents in the E-region (approximately 90–150 km altitude), where solar heating induces neutral winds that interact with the geomagnetic field to generate electric currents. These currents form two vortex-like systems in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, with amplitudes of about 20–30 nT at mid-latitudes, peaking during daytime hours due to the diurnal component of solar tides. The variations are stronger in summer, with intensities up to three times higher than in winter, and exhibit equinoctial maxima in total current strength. At the magnetic equator, the equatorial electrojet (EEJ) component can amplify these effects, producing variations exceeding 100 nT.^[64] Solar activity, particularly sunspots and flares, induces sudden ionospheric disturbances (SID) that cause brief geomagnetic perturbations. Intense X-ray and ultraviolet emissions from solar flares ionize the lower ionosphere (D-region, below 100 km), enhancing conductivity and generating additional currents that superimpose on the regular Sq field. These effects, termed solar flare effects (Sfe), manifest as crochet-like signatures with amplitudes around 14 nT and durations of about 16 minutes, primarily affecting low- to mid-latitudes during daytime. Such disturbances are more frequent during periods of high solar activity, when large flares (e.g., M- or X-class) can increase ionization by factors of 80 or more.^[65] Geomagnetic storms represent intense short-term disturbances, characterized by a sudden storm commencement followed by a main phase where the disturbance storm time (Dst) index—a measure of the equatorial horizontal field depression—drops to -100 nT or lower due to enhanced ring currents in the magnetosphere. The main phase lasts several hours, driven by southward interplanetary magnetic field components that facilitate magnetic reconnection. Recovery occurs over days, as the ring current decays through charge exchange with the exosphere, with partial recovery sometimes extending to a week. These storms can reduce the surface field by up to several hundred nT globally, with stronger effects at low latitudes.^[63] Substorms, smaller-scale events within or independent of storms, involve rapid reconfiguration of the magnetotail and are marked by Pi2 pulsations—irregular oscillations in the magnetic field with periods of 40–150 seconds (frequencies 7–25 mHz). These pulsations originate from sudden plasma injections and field line dipolarization, leading to field depressions (bays) of 100–500 nT in the horizontal component at high latitudes (above 60° magnetic latitude), particularly near midnight. Such dips result from intensified auroral electrojets and are most pronounced during the expansion phase, with effects observable across latitudes but peaking in the auroral oval.^[66] The primary causes of these short-term fluctuations are external currents: Sq and EEJ from ionospheric dynamos, SID from flare-induced ionization, ring currents during storms, and auroral electrojets in substorms, all modulated by solar wind-magnetosphere interactions. These phenomena are monitored using global networks of ground-based magnetometers, such as INTERMAGNET observatories, which record variations in real-time to derive indices like Dst and detect pulsations like Pi2. Satellite magnetometers, including those on GOES spacecraft, complement ground data by providing in-situ measurements in the magnetosphere.^[64]^[67]

Secular Variation and Drift

Secular variation refers to the gradual changes in Earth's magnetic field over timescales of decades to centuries, primarily driven by dynamo processes in the planet's outer core. These variations affect both the field's intensity and direction, with the dominant feature being the axial dipole moment, which has been decreasing at an average rate of approximately 5% per century since the mid-19th century.^[68] This decline, observed through historical records from geomagnetic observatories, indicates a weakening of the overall field strength, particularly in the dipole component that accounts for about 90% of the field's energy at Earth's surface.^[2] A notable aspect of secular variation includes episodic rapid changes known as geomagnetic jerks, which occurred prominently in the early 2000s, such as those in 2003 and 2007. These jerks manifest as abrupt shifts in the second time derivative of the magnetic field (secular acceleration), often linked to sudden alterations in core flows, and are detected globally through observatory data and satellite measurements.^[69] Unlike short-term external influences, jerks reflect internal core dynamics and can alter the rate of secular variation for several years following the event. The movement of the magnetic poles exemplifies secular drift, with the North Magnetic Pole accelerating from about 15 km per year in the early 1990s to approximately 55 km per year by the 2000s, drifting northwestward toward Siberia due to evolving flows in the liquid outer core. This acceleration is attributed to high-speed flows under Canada pushing magnetic flux, as inferred from core-surface flow models derived from satellite observations like those from the Swarm mission.^[71] Secular variation is modeled using spherical harmonic expansions, where the magnetic field \mathbf{B} is expressed in terms of Gauss coefficients g_n^m and h_n^m. The temporal evolution is captured by the secular variation vector \frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}, with the coefficients often approximated as varying linearly over decadal intervals in models like the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF).^[72] These models integrate data from ground observatories and paleomagnetic records, revealing a surface westward drift of non-dipole features at about 0.2 degrees per year, consistent with azimuthal advection by core flows.^[73] Such changes necessitate regular updates to navigation systems, as the drifting poles and varying field intensity impact compass accuracy and satellite operations. The World Magnetic Model (WMM), developed collaboratively by NOAA and the British Geological Survey, is updated every five years to forecast secular variation and provide reliable magnetic declination data for global use.^[30]

Geomagnetic Reversals

Geomagnetic reversals represent periodic full swaps of the polarity of Earth's dipole magnetic field, where the magnetic north and south poles exchange positions over geological timescales. The most recent such event, the Brunhes–Matuyama reversal, took place approximately 780,000 years ago. These reversals occur irregularly, with an average interval of 200,000 to 300,000 years based on paleomagnetic records spanning the past 10 million years.^[74]^[75] The process of a reversal begins with a significant weakening of the dominant dipole field, which can drop to about 10% of its normal intensity, allowing nondipolar multipole components to become prominent and create a complex, unstable field configuration. This transitional period typically lasts 1,000 to 10,000 years, during which the field's direction shifts gradually through intermediate orientations. Field intensity during these transitions averages around 10–25 μT at the surface, far below the typical 25–65 μT of stable polarity states.^[75]^[76]^[77] Paleomagnetic evidence for reversals is obtained from the remanent magnetization locked into volcanic rocks upon cooling and into ocean floor sediments as they accumulate, preserving snapshots of the ancient field. Analysis of these records reveals virtual geomagnetic poles (VGPs)—hypothetical pole positions calculated from local field directions—that follow erratic, longitudinal-independent paths across the globe during transitions, underscoring the dominance of multipolar structures. There is no observed correlation between these reversals and mass extinction events, as geological and fossil records show no associated biological crises.^[75]^[78] At present, Earth's magnetic field exhibits ongoing secular weakening, but paleomagnetic data indicate no signs of an imminent full reversal. Shorter geomagnetic excursions, such as the Laschamp event around 41,000 years ago, illustrate temporary polarity deviations where the field intensity dropped sharply but recovered without a complete swap.^[74]^[79]

Historical Timeline

The earliest evidence for Earth's magnetic field derives from paleomagnetic remanence preserved in ancient rocks, indicating dynamo activity at least 3.5 billion years ago. Recent paleomagnetic analysis of 3.7-billion-year-old rocks from Greenland confirms the presence of a geodynamo generating a field of at least 15 μT, capable of shielding the planet from solar wind, extending the onset of core convection-driven magnetism to approximately 3.7 billion years ago.^[80] More refined paleointensity measurements from single silicate crystals in 3.4- to 3.45-billion-year-old lavas further support this early geodynamo activity.^[81]^[82] In the Precambrian, particularly around 1 to 2 billion years ago, paleomagnetic records reveal episodes of a weaker geomagnetic field with reduced dipole dominance, potentially exhibiting more multipolar configurations during intervals of low intensity. Quantitative reconstructions of virtual axial dipole moments from global paleointensity data highlight these low-field phases, contrasting with stronger, more stable dipolar behavior in later eras.^[83] A notable period of exceptional stability occurred during the Cretaceous Normal Superchron, spanning approximately 121 to 83 million years ago, when the geomagnetic field maintained normal polarity without any recorded reversals over nearly 40 million years. This prolonged absence of polarity flips, documented through marine magnetic anomaly profiles and continental rock records, coincided with peak large igneous province activity and elevated field strengths.^[84]^[85] The most recent full geomagnetic reversal took place about 780,000 years ago at the Matuyama-Brunhes boundary, transitioning the field into the Brunhes chron, a normal-polarity interval of relative stability that persists to the present. Within this chron, the field has shown only brief excursions rather than complete reversals, as evidenced by high-resolution sedimentary and volcanic records synchronized across global sites.^[86] Key insights into the field's historical variations come from seafloor spreading records, where symmetric magnetic stripes flanking mid-ocean ridges capture polarity alternations as new oceanic crust forms and cools, providing a timeline of reversals back to about 180 million years ago. Paleomagnetic remanence in continental rocks further supports reconstructions of ancient plate configurations and supercontinent assemblies, linking field behavior to tectonic evolution.^[87]^[88]

Future Predictions

The Earth's magnetic dipole moment has been decreasing at an average rate of approximately 5% per century since at least 1840, a trend observed through historical measurements and satellite data.^[89] This ongoing decay, if extrapolated linearly, suggests the field could weaken significantly over the next millennium, potentially leading to a geomagnetic excursion—a temporary deviation without full reversal—within 1,000 to 2,000 years, based on paleomagnetic estimates of dipole moment decline.^[3] The north magnetic pole continues to drift toward Siberia but at a decelerating rate of approximately 35 km per year as of 2025; earlier projections of reaching the region by 2040 are uncertain due to this slowdown.^[90] Concurrently, the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), a region of weakened field intensity over the South Atlantic, is expanding westward at about 20 km per year and deepening, with satellite observations indicating growth equivalent to half the size of continental Europe since 2014.^[35] Geodynamo models extrapolating core flows from seismic and magnetic data predict no geomagnetic reversal for at least the next 1,500 years, as current field configurations show stability against the rapid flux changes required for polarity switches.^[89] These simulations integrate observations of outer core convection to forecast dipole dominance persisting over centuries, though short-term fluctuations may intensify.^[91] A substantial weakening of the global field below 10 μT—roughly 20-30% of current average surface intensities—would heighten cosmic radiation exposure at Earth's surface and in low-Earth orbit, increasing risks of satellite malfunctions, electronic failures, and elevated radiation doses for astronauts and high-altitude aviation.^[35] The expanding SAA already exemplifies these hazards, with particles penetrating deeper into the atmosphere and causing glitches in over 1,000 satellites annually.^[92] Ongoing monitoring via the European Space Agency's Swarm satellite constellation provides short-term predictions through at least 2030, with the latest core field models extending forecasts to 2025 and beyond by assimilating over a decade of multi-satellite data.^[35] For longer-term projections spanning millennia, numerical geodynamo simulations constrain field evolution by modeling core dynamics, offering insights into potential decay trajectories without relying on linear extrapolations alone.^[91]

Physical Origin

Geodynamo in Earth's Core

The Earth's outer core, extending from approximately 2,890 km to 5,150 km depth, consists primarily of a liquid alloy composed of about 80-85% iron and 5-10% nickel, with lighter elements such as sulfur, oxygen, and silicon making up the remainder. This molten metallic fluid is electrically conductive and undergoes vigorous thermal and compositional convection, which is essential for generating the geomagnetic field.^[93]^[94] Convection in the outer core is driven by two primary heat sources: the latent heat released during the ongoing solidification of the inner core at its boundary, which provides thermal buoyancy and expels lighter elements into the surrounding liquid to create compositional density contrasts, and the heat flux conducted from the overlying mantle across the core-mantle boundary, estimated at 9 ± 3 TW. These buoyancy forces cause the fluid to rise and fall in columnar structures aligned roughly parallel to the rotation axis, influenced by the Coriolis effect from Earth's spin. The resulting fluid motions interact with the magnetic field through magnetohydrodynamic processes, sustaining a self-exciting dynamo.^[95] The geodynamo operates via the α-ω dynamo mechanism, where helical convection—arising from the Coriolis force twisting rising fluid parcels into spiral paths—generates poloidal magnetic field components through the α-effect, while differential rotation shears these field lines to amplify toroidal components via the ω-effect. This advection of magnetic field lines by the convecting fluid (u) counteracts diffusive decay, as described by the magnetic induction equation formalized in the Bullard-Gellman framework for kinematic dynamo models:

\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = \nabla \times (\mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B}) + \eta \nabla^2 \mathbf{B},

where \mathbf{B} is the magnetic field and \eta is the magnetic diffusivity. The process becomes self-sustaining when the magnetic Reynolds number R_m = U L / \eta \approx 10^3 (with U as characteristic velocity and L as length scale), exceeding the critical threshold for dynamo onset in Earth's core conditions.^[96]^[97]^[98]^[99] The solid inner core, with a radius of about 1,220 km, plays a crucial role by progressively solidifying from the center outward, releasing latent heat and lighter elements that enhance outer core convection and provide the energy to power the dynamo against ohmic dissipation. This solidification process also influences field morphology, as the inner core's anisotropic crystal structure aligns with the dominant axial dipole component of the geomagnetic field, stabilizing its geocentric orientation over geological timescales.^[95]^[100]

Numerical Modeling of the Dynamo

Numerical modeling of the geodynamo involves solving the coupled Navier-Stokes and induction equations in three dimensions to simulate convection-driven magnetic field generation in Earth's fluid outer core.^[101] Early efforts focused on achieving self-sustaining dynamos that incorporate realistic geometry, including a solid inner core and mantle boundaries. The seminal Glatzmaier-Roberts model of 1995 was the first three-dimensional, time-dependent simulation to produce a convection-driven dynamo with a rotating, finitely conducting inner core, maintaining a magnetic field for over 40,000 years (approximately three magnetic diffusion times).^[102] This model demonstrated inner core super-rotation relative to the mantle and captured the onset of polarity excursions, marking a breakthrough in replicating core dynamics.^[103] Subsequent advancements have refined these simulations to explore more Earth-like regimes, incorporating parity-breaking mechanisms that lead to dipole reversals. Modern models exhibit equatorial symmetry breaking through helical turbulence and buoyancy-driven flows, enabling transitions from stable dipolar states to multipolar configurations with reversals, as seen in simulations at low Rossby numbers.^[101] Boundary conditions often employ Ekman layers to approximate viscous effects at the core-mantle and inner-core boundaries, reducing computational demands while preserving rotational constraints; these layers model spin-up flows and have been implemented in models achieving Ekman numbers as low as 10^{-8} using hyperdiffusivity.^[101] Typical parameters in these simulations include a thermal Prandtl number Pr ≈ 1, reflecting the fluid properties of molten iron, and a modified Rayleigh number Ra^* ranging from 10^5 to 10^7 to drive supercritical convection beyond the onset threshold.^[104] The magnetic Prandtl number Pm is set around 1 in many cases, though lower values (≈0.1) are used to approach Earth's core conditions.^[101] These models have successfully reproduced key features of the geomagnetic field, such as the dominance of the axial dipole (contributing over 80% of the surface field intensity in stable periods) and secular variation, including westward drift at rates of 0.2–0.3 degrees per year.^[101] Simulations also generate low-intensity anomalies akin to the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), often linked to reversed flux patches near the core-mantle boundary tangent cylinder, with field strengths dropping to 20–30% below the global average.^[105] By assimilating historical geomagnetic data, such as from gufm1 models spanning 1590–1990, forecasts predict continued SAA intensification and potential splitting over the next century.^[101] Despite these successes, limitations persist due to computational constraints. High-resolution simulations require vast resources, restricting the Ekman number to 10^{-6} or higher—still orders of magnitude above Earth's 10^{-15}—which overemphasizes viscous forces and limits small-scale turbulence resolution.^[106] To extend predictions, models increasingly assimilate paleomagnetic data from volcanic rocks and sediments, constraining long-term behavior like reversal frequencies (every 200,000–300,000 years), though uncertainties in core heat flux and inner core growth remain challenges.^[107]

External Contributions from Oceans and Ionosphere

The motional induction generated by ocean tides arises from the flow of conductive saltwater through Earth's main magnetic field, producing secondary electric currents and associated magnetic signals. The dominant semidiurnal M2 tide, driven by the Moon-Sun gravitational interaction, generates the strongest of these signals, with amplitudes typically on the order of 1–3 nT at the Earth's surface.^[108] These signals exhibit spatial variations tied to ocean basin geometry and tidal flow patterns, such as enhanced amplitudes in regions like the North Atlantic and around New Zealand, and are detectable both at coastal observatories and from satellite altimetry.^[109] Other tidal constituents, like N2 and O1, contribute smaller perturbations, but the collective ocean tidal effects represent a persistent, albeit minor, external component superimposed on the core-generated field. Ionospheric currents, flowing in the E-region (approximately 100–150 km altitude), produce daily geomagnetic variations through dynamo action driven by solar radiation and tidal winds. The solar quiet (Sq) current system, a global circuit of eastward and westward flows, induces horizontal magnetic perturbations of about 20 nT under quiet conditions, with amplitudes reaching tens of nT during periods of enhanced solar activity.^[110] At low latitudes, the equatorial electrojet (EEJ)—a narrow, intensified eastward current along the magnetic dip equator—amplifies these effects, contributing daily variations of 20–50 nT or more in the horizontal field component, particularly during daytime hours near local noon.^[111] These ionospheric signals display seasonal and longitudinal asymmetries, with stronger EEJ intensities over sectors like the Indian Ocean due to variations in ionospheric conductivity. The magnetospheric ring current, a westward-flowing population of charged particles (primarily protons and electrons with energies of 10–300 keV) encircling Earth at 3–7 Earth radii, provides another significant external contribution during geomagnetic disturbances. Energized by solar wind interactions, this current depresses the geomagnetic field at low latitudes, as quantified by the disturbance-storm time (Dst) index, with typical reductions of 100–300 nT during intense storms (Dst < -100 nT).^[112] Such depressions can persist for hours to days, reflecting the ring current's partial ring-like asymmetry and its influence on the symmetric main field. Collectively, these external sources from oceans, ionosphere, and magnetosphere account for approximately 5–10% of the observed surface magnetic field variations, though their time-averaged contribution is smaller due to averaging over quiet periods.^[113] The signals are distinguishable from the internal core field by their higher-frequency characteristics and spatial patterns, with oceanic effects separable via conductivity contrasts (seawater vs. solid Earth) and ionospheric/magnetospheric effects via their dependence on solar forcing. Measurement relies on subtractive analysis at global geomagnetic observatories, where quiet-time data are processed to isolate external components—such as comparing daytime (ionosphere-dominant) and nighttime (ocean-dominant) records, applying principal component analysis for noise reduction, and using predictive models based on tidal ephemerides or solar wind parameters.^[114] This approach, combined with satellite observations, enables precise separation and quantification of these contributions.

Measurement and Analysis

Historical Detection Methods

The earliest known detection of Earth's magnetic field dates to ancient China around 400 BCE, where lodestones—naturally magnetized iron ore—were fashioned into spoon-shaped devices that aligned with the magnetic meridian, initially for geomantic practices like feng shui rather than navigation.^[115] By the Han Dynasty (circa 200 BCE), these lodestone indicators had evolved into more refined south-pointing spoons placed on smooth bronze plates, demonstrating consistent directional behavior that implied an underlying terrestrial magnetism, though their primary use remained divinatory until later adaptations for maritime guidance around the 11th century CE.^[115] In the late 16th century, English physician William Gilbert advanced the understanding of Earth's magnetism through systematic experiments detailed in his 1600 treatise De Magnete. Gilbert constructed a terrella—a spherical lodestone model of Earth—and used a versorium (a pivoted magnetic needle) to observe how iron filings and needles aligned with its poles, mirroring compass behavior and proving that Earth itself functioned as a giant magnet rather than being influenced by celestial bodies.^[116] His terrella demonstrations quantified magnetic dip (inclination) and declination at various latitudes, establishing the dipolar nature of the field and laying the groundwork for viewing Earth as a magnetic body.^[117] The 19th century marked a shift toward precise quantitative measurements, beginning with Carl Friedrich Gauss's invention of the magnetometer in 1833, which allowed absolute determinations of magnetic intensity by suspending a bar magnet in torsion threads and measuring its oscillation period.^[118] This instrument, described in Gauss's paper "Intensitas vis magneticae terrestris ad mensuram absolutam revocata," enabled standardized global comparisons by converting relative observations into absolute units, revolutionizing field strength assessments.^[119] For declination—the angular difference between magnetic and geographic north—scientists employed collimators integrated with declinometers, such as those used at the Greenwich Observatory, where cross-wire sights aligned the instrument's optical axis with distant references to achieve sub-degree accuracy in horizontal plane measurements.^[120] Simultaneously, international networks of magnetic observatories emerged in the 1830s to monitor spatial and temporal variations systematically, with Gauss establishing the first at Göttingen in 1833, followed by coordinated efforts under Alexander von Humboldt's influence, including stations at Cape of Good Hope, Hobart, and St. Helena by the early 1840s. These observatories, totaling over a dozen by mid-century, facilitated hourly readings of declination, inclination, and intensity using uniform instruments, revealing diurnal and annual patterns that earlier isolated efforts could not capture.^[121] Maritime contributions complemented these land-based networks, as ship captains' logs from the 17th and 18th centuries—such as those from James Cook's voyages—recorded compass calibrations against celestial north, providing distributed data on declination changes and aiding searches for the magnetic poles, exemplified by John Ross's 1831 expedition that located the North Magnetic Pole near Boothia Peninsula using onboard observations.^[122]^[123] Key figures like American physicist Joseph Henry and British astronomer Edward Sabine further illuminated dynamic aspects in the 1830s and 1840s, with Henry documenting sudden magnetic "storms" at the Albany Observatory in 1834 that coincided with auroral displays, suggesting external influences.^[124] Sabine, analyzing data from colonial observatories during the 1838–1843 Antarctic expedition and beyond, established in 1852 that geomagnetic disturbances correlated with sunspot cycles, linking solar activity to terrestrial magnetic variations through statistical comparisons of storm frequency and solar observations.^[125] Their work, building on observatory records, underscored the field's variability and prompted coordinated international efforts to disentangle internal and solar-driven components.^[126]

Modern Satellite and Ground Observations

Modern observations of Earth's magnetic field rely on a combination of ground-based and satellite-based systems, providing high-precision, global-scale data essential for understanding geomagnetic dynamics. The International Real-time Magnetic Observatory Network (INTERMAGNET) forms the backbone of ground observations, comprising approximately 120 digital observatories distributed worldwide that continuously monitor the magnetic field variations.^[127] These stations employ fluxgate and proton precession magnetometers, achieving a resolution of 1 nanotesla (nT) and recording vector components at 1-minute intervals, which enables the capture of both secular changes and short-term fluctuations driven by solar activity.^[128] INTERMAGNET data are standardized and quality-controlled through a network of Geomagnetic Information Nodes (GINs), ensuring real-time availability and long-term archival for global analysis.^[129] Satellite missions have revolutionized geomagnetic monitoring by offering comprehensive, three-dimensional coverage from low-Earth orbit, complementing the sparse ground network. The Ørsted satellite, launched in 1999 by the Danish Space Research Institute, was the first dedicated mission in over two decades to map the geomagnetic field with high accuracy, using vector magnetometers to measure field strengths and directions during its polar orbit at approximately 650-700 km altitude.^[130] Following Ørsted, the CHAMP (Challenging Minisatellite Payload) mission, operational from 2000 to 2010 and managed by the German GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), provided over a decade of data on both the core-generated field and external influences, with its Overhauser magnetometer and star camera enabling precise vector measurements sensitive to temporal variations.^[131] The ongoing ESA Swarm constellation, launched in 2013 and extended through at least 2025, represents the current pinnacle of satellite observations, consisting of three satellites in coordinated orbits to resolve spatial gradients and temporal evolution of the magnetic field.^[132] Swarm Alpha and Charlie orbit at about 450 km altitude, while Bravo is at 530 km, allowing for the detection of fine-scale structures through along-track differences; the mission's absolute scalar and vector magnetometers, along with electric field instruments, facilitate vector measurements with resolutions down to 0.1 nT and gradient sensitivities of 0.02 nT/m.^[133] These techniques, including magnetic gradiometry, enable the separation of core, crustal, and external field contributions, with data collected along orbital tracks spaced approximately 100-300 km apart at the equator, providing near-global coverage multiple times daily. Key data products from these observations include provisional and definitive hourly, daily, and annual field means, which support the derivation of geomagnetic indices like Dst and Kp for space weather forecasting.^[134] Real-time alerts from INTERMAGNET and Swarm feed into operational systems, such as those monitoring geomagnetic storms that could affect satellite operations and power grids. The combined datasets resolve the geomagnetic field to spherical harmonic degrees exceeding 90, corresponding to spatial resolutions finer than 200 km, with model updates incorporated every five years to reflect ongoing secular variation.^[135]

Crustal Magnetic Anomalies

Crustal magnetic anomalies arise from the magnetization of rocks in Earth's lithosphere, primarily through remanent magnetization preserved in igneous rocks and induced magnetization in sedimentary layers. Thermoremanent magnetization occurs when ferromagnetic minerals, such as magnetite, align with the geomagnetic field during cooling from high temperatures in volcanic or plutonic rocks, locking in the field's direction and intensity at the time of formation. In contrast, induced magnetization in sediments results from the alignment of magnetic minerals in response to the present-day geomagnetic field, often enhanced by chemical or depositional processes. These sources create localized distortions superimposed on the global main field generated by the core dynamo. These anomalies are characterized by short wavelengths, typically less than 100 km, reflecting the shallow crustal sources, with field amplitudes ranging from 100 to 1000 nT. A prominent example is the Kursk magnetic anomaly in Russia, where positive anomalies exceed +1000 nT due to Precambrian iron-rich formations, making it one of the strongest known crustal features. Such variations contrast with the smoother, larger-scale main field and are crucial for identifying subsurface geological structures. Mapping of crustal magnetic anomalies relies on high-resolution techniques, including aeromagnetic surveys conducted by aircraft that measure field variations at low altitudes to capture fine-scale details, and satellite missions like the European Space Agency's Swarm constellation, which operates at low orbits to resolve anomalies down to about 250 km wavelength. These methods provide global coverage, with Swarm data enabling the compilation of high-resolution crustal magnetic models by integrating satellite and ground observations. Applications of crustal magnetic anomalies extend to mineral exploration, where positive anomalies signal iron ore deposits, as seen in targeted surveys over banded iron formations, and to tectonic plate reconstruction by tracing ancient continental margins through preserved magnetic signatures in the crust. In mineral prospecting, aeromagnetic data help delineate ore bodies without invasive drilling, while in paleogeography, anomaly patterns aid in correlating continental drift histories. To isolate crustal signals from the dominant core-generated main field, researchers apply high-pass filters in geomagnetic models, which attenuate long-wavelength components (beyond 1000 km) while preserving shorter ones associated with the lithosphere. Techniques such as spherical harmonic expansion or wavelet transforms are used in global models like the World Magnetic Model to subtract the internal field, yielding dedicated crustal anomaly maps.

Mathematical Descriptions

The magnetic field \mathbf{B} outside current sources, such as in the region above Earth's core, is irrotational and can be derived from a scalar potential V, expressed as \mathbf{B} = -\nabla V.^[136] This potential satisfies Laplace's equation \nabla^2 V = 0 in source-free regions, allowing expansion in spherical harmonics for a geocentric coordinate system where the origin is at Earth's center, r is the radial distance, \theta is the colatitude, and \phi is the longitude.^[136] The general form of the scalar potential is

V(r, \theta, \phi) = a \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \sum_{m=0}^{n} \left( \frac{a}{r} \right)^{n+1} \left[ g_n^m P_n^m (\cos \theta) \cos(m\phi) + h_n^m P_n^m (\cos \theta) \sin(m\phi) \right],

where a is Earth's reference radius (typically 6371.2 km), P_n^m are the associated Legendre functions, and g_n^m, h_n^m are the Gauss coefficients determined from observations.^[137] These coefficients characterize the internal field contributions, with the main field (dominating at Earth's surface) typically modeled up to degree and order n=13, capturing the core-generated dynamo effects while higher degrees represent crustal anomalies.^[113] For the non-potential components arising from external currents, such as those in the ionosphere or magnetosphere, the scalar potential approach fails because \nabla \times \mathbf{B} \neq 0. In these cases, the field is described using a vector potential \mathbf{A}, with \mathbf{B} = \nabla \times \mathbf{A}, often expanded in spherical vector harmonics or toroidal-poloidal decompositions to account for the curl.^[138] Within Earth's core, where conductive fluid motion generates the field, the magnetic induction equation governs evolution: \frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = \nabla \times (\mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B}) + \eta \nabla^2 \mathbf{B}, with \mathbf{u} the velocity and \eta the magnetic diffusivity. Under the frozen-flux approximation, valid for high magnetic Reynolds numbers (Rm \gg [1](/page/1)), diffusion is negligible (\eta \approx [0](/page/0)), simplifying to \frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \approx \nabla \times (\mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B}), implying magnetic field lines are "frozen" into the moving fluid.^[139] Representations often use geocentric coordinates aligned with Earth's rotation axis, but for magnetic analyses, geomagnetic coordinates are preferred, with the dipole axis tilted approximately 11° from the geographic axis and shifted slightly from the center. The dipole term corresponds to the n=1 harmonics in the scalar potential expansion.^[140]

Global Empirical Models

Global empirical models of Earth's magnetic field are data-driven representations constructed from satellite and ground-based measurements, typically expressed as spherical harmonic expansions to describe the main field and its secular variation on a global scale. These models provide standardized references for scientific analysis and practical applications, capturing the field's spatial and temporal structure without relying on physical dynamo theory. The International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) and the CHAOS series exemplify such models, offering progressively refined fits to observational data spanning decades.^[40]^[141] The IGRF, maintained by the International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, is a widely adopted reference model updated every five years in epochs, with the fourteenth generation (IGRF-14) providing definitive coefficients for the main field up to degree and order 13 at epoch 2025.0, alongside a predictive linear secular variation model extending to 2030.0.^[41] It is derived primarily from vector and scalar magnetic measurements collected by satellites such as Ørsted, CHAMP, and Swarm, combined with ground observatory data, to represent the internal field originating from the core and crust. The model's spherical harmonic coefficients enable computation of field components like declination, inclination, and intensity at any location and time within its validity period. In contrast, the CHAOS model series offers higher-resolution descriptions by integrating satellite data from missions including Ørsted, CHAMP, SAC-C, CryoSat-2, and Swarm with annual means from over 180 ground observatories, modeling the field from 1997 to 2025 in its eighth iteration (CHAOS-8).^[142] It resolves the core field up to degree 20 with time dependence and incorporates crustal signals up to degree 90 by merging with dedicated lithospheric models like LCS-1 beyond degree 25, enabling separation of internal contributions. This approach allows CHAOS to capture finer-scale features, such as rapid secular variation in the low-degree field, which the IGRF approximates more coarsely.^[141]^[143] Temporal evolution in these models is parameterized using polynomial expansions and splines: for instance, CHAOS employs quadratic Taylor series for secular variation in low-degree (up to 16) core field coefficients to model smooth changes, transitioning to continuous B-splines with 6-month knot spacing for higher degrees and recent intervals to accommodate accelerated variations. The IGRF uses simpler linear extrapolation for its predictive phase beyond definitive epochs. These methods ensure the models track observed field drift, such as westward motion in the geomagnetic dipole.^[141]^[144] Validation of these models involves comparing predictions to independent observations, yielding root-mean-square residuals typically below 10 nT at Earth's surface for ground stations and around 2–5 nT for satellite vector data in quiet-time conditions. Such accuracy supports their use in deriving the World Magnetic Model (WMM), a navigation-standard variant of the IGRF truncated at degree 12 and updated quinquennially for applications in aviation, maritime, and military systems.^[141]^[7]^[145] Post-2020 updates, including CHAOS-8 extending to 2025 and the WMM2025 release, incorporate extended Swarm satellite observations to refine tracking of the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), where field weakening has accelerated, aiding in monitoring radiation risks for satellites. These enhancements maintain model fidelity amid ongoing secular changes.^[142]^[30]

Biological and Technological Effects

Biomagnetism in Organisms

Biomagnetism in organisms, or magnetoreception, refers to the ability of certain species to perceive and utilize Earth's magnetic field for orientation, navigation, and other behaviors. This sensory capability is widespread across taxa, from bacteria to vertebrates, and likely evolved early in life's history, with evidence of magnetite biomineralization genes conserved across all domains of life.^[146] Two primary mechanisms are proposed: a magnetite-based system involving iron oxide crystals that align with magnetic fields, and a radical-pair mechanism in cryptochromes, light-sensitive proteins that respond to magnetic influences on electron spins.^[147] These mechanisms enable animals to detect field parameters like inclination (the angle relative to horizontal) and declination (deviation from true north), forming an internal compass or map.^[148] In birds, such as European robins, magnetoreception facilitates long-distance migration by providing an inclination-based map that distinguishes latitudes through variations in field angle. Robins employ cryptochromes in their retinas, where the radical-pair mechanism allows detection of magnetic inclination, as demonstrated by behavioral assays showing orientation disruption under broadband radiofrequency fields that interfere with spin dynamics.^[147] Additionally, magnetite particles in the beak's upper mandible, connected to the trigeminal nerve, may contribute to an intensity-based map, though direct evidence for intracellular magnetite in avian receptors remains limited.^[149]^[150] Marine organisms also rely on geomagnetic cues for survival. Sea turtles, like loggerheads, imprint on the magnetic signature of their natal beaches during hatching and use a bicoordinate map of inclination and declination to navigate vast oceanic distances during migration and return to foraging grounds.^[151] Experiments in arena tanks confirm that hatchlings adjust swimming direction in response to simulated field gradients mimicking remote locations.^[152] Sharks and rays detect magnetic fields via electroreceptive ampullae of Lorenzini, which sense both electric potentials from prey and geomagnetic variations for navigation, enabling them to follow field anomalies toward hunting grounds or migration routes.^[153]^[154] In humans, magnetoreception remains controversial, with evidence suggesting vestigial sensitivity rather than active use. Recent studies as of 2025, however, provide further evidence for a magnetic sense, including light-dependent mechanisms and links to probabilistic decision-making and electromagnetic hypersensitivity.^[155]^[156] Biogenic magnetite crystals have been identified in human brain tissue, particularly in the ethmoid bone and meninges, potentially forming a ferromagnetic transduction system.^[157] Behavioral studies show subtle orientation effects, such as eastward bias in sleep or navigation, but these are inconsistent. Neuroimaging experiments reveal alpha-wave desynchronization in response to rotating Earth-strength fields, indicating unconscious processing in the occipital and temporal lobes, though functional significance is debated.^[158]^[159] Supporting evidence comes from experiments where artificial magnetic fields cause disorientation in animals. Migratory birds exposed to oscillating radiofrequency fields matching Larmor frequencies lose magnetic compass orientation, confirming radical-pair involvement.^[160] Similarly, exposure to extremely low-frequency fields from power lines disrupts alignment in cattle and deer.^[161] These findings, combined with genetic conservation of magnetoreception proteins like MagR across vertebrates, suggest an ancient evolutionary origin, possibly exapted from bacterial magnetotaxis for eukaryotic navigation.^[162]^[163] Insights from biomagnetism have inspired navigation technologies mimicking animal senses, such as magnetic anomaly waypoint systems for autonomous underwater vehicles that use field signatures for GPS-denied environments. The Earth's magnetic field serves as a fundamental reference for magnetic compasses, which align with the horizontal component of the field to indicate magnetic north, enabling navigation in aviation, maritime, and terrestrial applications where GPS may be unavailable or unreliable.^[19] To achieve accurate true north bearings, users must correct for magnetic declination, the angular difference between magnetic and geographic north, which varies by location and changes over time due to field dynamics.^[7] This correction is essential for safe operations, such as in aircraft heading systems and ship steering, where uncorrected errors could lead to navigational deviations of several degrees.^[30] In geophysical exploration, magnetometers exploit variations in the Earth's magnetic field caused by subsurface magnetic minerals to map geological structures, aiding the discovery of oil, natural gas, and ore deposits.^[164] These instruments detect anomalies in the crustal field, where ferromagnetic rocks like iron ore create localized distortions that signal potential resources.^[164] Airborne magnetometer surveys, conducted from aircraft at low altitudes, efficiently cover vast areas—often hundreds of square kilometers per flight—providing high-resolution data for mineral prospecting and hydrocarbon exploration without extensive ground access. For instance, such surveys have been instrumental in identifying iron ore bodies and sedimentary basins conducive to oil accumulation. Geomagnetic storms, triggered by solar activity, induce geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in conductive infrastructure like power grids, pipelines, and railways, posing significant risks to technological systems.^[165] These currents arise from rapid changes in the magnetic field, driving quasi-DC flows that saturate transformer cores, leading to overheating and potential failures.^[166] A prominent example is the March 13, 1989, storm, which caused a nine-hour blackout of the Hydro-Québec power system, affecting six million people and resulting in widespread economic disruption across North America. In space applications, satellites leverage the Earth's magnetic field for attitude control through magnetorquers—electromagnetic coils that generate torque by interacting with the ambient field, enabling precise orientation without expending fuel.^[167] This method is particularly cost-effective for low-Earth orbit missions, providing three-axis stabilization by aligning or desaturating angular momentum.^[167] However, the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), a region of weakened magnetic field over the South Atlantic Ocean, exposes satellites to elevated radiation levels as the protective magnetosphere thins, increasing the flux of high-energy particles into low-Earth orbits. As of 2025, satellite observations indicate the SAA continues to grow and is splitting into two lobes, expanding westward and southward toward Africa, heightening risks for spacecraft transiting the region.^[168]^[169] This vulnerability has caused frequent glitches in satellite electronics, such as temporary computer shutdowns and sensor errors, necessitating operational safeguards like powering down sensitive components during SAA transits.^[170] To mitigate these challenges, real-time geomagnetic models like the World Magnetic Model (WMM), developed collaboratively by NOAA and the British Geological Survey, provide updated declination, inclination, and field intensity values for navigation corrections and risk assessment.^[7] The WMM, refreshed every five years with interim annual updates, supports applications from compass adjustments to predicting GIC vulnerabilities in power infrastructure, ensuring resilience against field variations.^[30] For space operations, it aids in trajectory planning to minimize SAA exposure.^[7]

References

[1]
Earth's Magnetosphere: Protecting Our Planet from Harmful Space ...
Aug 3, 2021 · Earth is surrounded by an immense magnetic field called the magnetosphere. Generated by powerful, dynamic forces at the center of our world.
[2]
An Overview of the Earth's Magnetic Field - BGS Geomagnetism
At the Earth's surface the total intensity varies from 22,000 nanotesla (nT) to 67,000 nT. Other units likely to be encountered are the Gauss (1 Gauss = 100,000 ...
[3]
Geomagnetism Frequently Asked Questions
Earth's magnetic field intensity is roughly between 25,000 - 65,000 nT (.25 - .65 gauss). Magnetic declination is the angle between magnetic north and true ...
[4]
Are we about to have a magnetic reversal? - USGS.gov
Is it true that Earth's magnetic field occasionally reverses its polarity? Yes. We can see evidence of magnetic polarity reversals by examining the geologic ...
[5]
[PDF] The Magnetic Field of Planet Earth - DTU
Abstract The magnetic field of the Earth is by far the best documented magnetic field of all known planets. Considerable progress has been made in our ...
[6]
[PDF] THE EFFECTS OF THE EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELD ON ... - Veritas
Bm is referred to as the main field component and accounts for 95 % of the total field. The main field is created through a dynamo process and it is located ...
[7]
World Magnetic Model (WMM)
Earth's main magnetic field dominates, accounting for over 95% of the field strength at Earth's surface. Secular variation is the slow change in time of the ...
[8]
Magnetic Field of the Earth - HyperPhysics
It is attracted to the geographic North Pole, which is a magnetic south pole (opposite magnetic poles attract). Earth Data · Index · Magnetic field conceptsMissing: emerge | Show results with:emerge
[9]
The Earth's Magnetic Field - The Ocean Web
The field lines emerge from the southern half of the earth and re-enter in the northern half.
[10]
NASA's MAVEN Makes First Observation of Atmospheric Sputtering ...
May 28, 2025 · Early on in Mars' history, the atmosphere of the Red Planet lost its magnetic field, and its atmosphere became directly exposed to the solar ...Missing: lack | Show results with:lack
[11]
Stripping the Martian Atmosphere - NASA SVS
Nov 10, 2015 · Mars' atmosphere is stripped by the sun's solar wind, which lacks a magnetic field, stripping away electrically charged gas atoms. Mars loses ...
[12]
Magnetosphere - Solar Wind - Space Technology 5
The magnetosphere is a strong magnetic field that surrounds our planet. Acting as a shield, it deflects most solar energetic particle radiation that emanates ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[13]
What are the Van Allen Belts and why do they matter? - NASA Science
Jul 23, 2023 · The Earth's magnetosphere traps the high energy radiation particles and shields the Earth from the solar storms and the constantly streaming ...
[14]
Van Allen Belts - NASA Science
Nov 30, 2023 · When solar material streams strike Earth's magnetosphere, they can become trapped and held in two donut-shaped belts around the planet called the Van Allen ...
[15]
Auroras - NASA Science
Feb 4, 2025 · Auroras are vibrant light displays created when energetic particles from the Sun interact with Earth's magnetic field and atmosphere.
[16]
How Auroras Form - Space Technology 5
These natural light shows are caused by magnetic storms that have been triggered by solar activity, such as solar flares (explosions on the Sun) or coronal mass ...
[17]
Hyperactive magnetic field may have led to one of Earth's major ...
Rapid reversals of Earth's magnetic field 550 million years ago destroyed a large part of the ozone layer and let in a flood of ultraviolet radiation.
[18]
Magnetic field reversal may have contributed to mass extinctions
Feb 18, 2021 · The weakening of Earth's magnetic field beginning around 42000 years ago correlates with a cascade of environmental crises, scientists say.
[19]
NASA Scientists Find Ties Between Earth's Oxygen and Magnetic ...
Jun 18, 2025 · Earth's magnetic field arises from the flow of material in the planet's molten interior, which acts like a giant electromagnet. The flow isn't ...
[20]
NASA discovers link between Earth's core and life-sustaining oxygen
Jun 27, 2025 · Many scientists have argued that the magnetic field is crucial for protecting the atmosphere from eroded by energetic particles coming from the ...
[21]
Introduction to Geomagnetism | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
The geomagnetic field is used to explore the dynamics of Earth's interior and its surrounding space environment.
[22]
FAQ: "The Great Magnet, the Earth" - PWG Home
Feb 23, 2008 · ... fields based on satellite data. On the surface, actually, the field varies more in intensity than in direction--25-42,000 nT on the equator ...
[23]
Persistent high paleosecular variation activity in southern ...
Nov 1, 2016 · Geomagnetic field is weaker on average in the southern hemisphere than the north. The highest activity level for paleosecular variation is at ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[24]
[PDF] Properties of Magnetic Dipoles - NASA CCMC
where M is the dipole moment, which can be positive or negative. In the case of Earth, M = -8x1015 T m3 or. -31,000 nT Re. 3. It is often useful to use ...Missing: value | Show results with:value
[25]
[PDF] Earth's Magnetic Field
Mar 1, 2017 · Earth's magnetic field is approximated by a centered dipole tilted 11.5°, with strength varying from 30,000nT at the equator to 60,000nT at the ...
[26]
[PDF] The Magnetic Field of the Earth
3.2 The internal field. The internal field has two components: [1] the crustal field and [2] the core field. The crustal field. The spatial attenuation of the ...
[27]
Magnetic Dip | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
Definition. Magnetic dip, dip angle, or magnetic inclination is the angle made with the horizontal by the Earth's magnetic field lines.Missing: pattern | Show results with:pattern
[28]
[PDF] On Modeling Magnetic Fields on a Sphere with Dipoles and ...
This paper studies modeling magnetic fields on a sphere using dipoles and quadrupoles, focusing on the global geomagnetic field and quadrupoles.
[29]
[PDF] Chapter 7 The compass
Between the magnetic equator and the poles, however, one end of the needle tends to dip down (by the local inclination angle), causing drag, with the potential ...
[30]
Magnetic Declination (Variation) | NCEI - NOAA
Magnetic declination (variation) calculator based on the IGRF magnetic field model. Estimates magnetic delination world-wide from 1900 - present.
[31]
Space Weather Glossary
Thus the D component = H (the horizontal intensity) multiplied by delta D (the declination angle relative to geomagnetic north, expressed in radians).Missing: formula | Show results with:formula<|control11|><|separator|>
[32]
World Magnetic Model 2025 Released | News
Dec 17, 2024 · The World Magnetic Model 2025 (WMM2025) provides more precise navigational data for all military and civilian planes, ships, submarines, and GPS units.WMM · Tracking Changes in Earth’s... · Geomagnetism
[33]
What is declination? | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
Declination is simply a manifestation of the complexity of the geomagnetic field. The field is not perfectly symmetrical; it has non-dipolar "ingredients," and ...
[34]
North–South Asymmetries in Earth's Magnetic Field
Jul 12, 2016 · In this paper we review the primary differences in the magnetic field at polar latitudes, and the consequences that these have for the M–I–T coupling.
[35]
Recurrent ancient geomagnetic field anomalies shed light on future ...
Jun 6, 2022 · The quadrupole contribution to the field is here ... This has led to a more pronounced field asymmetry in the Southern Hemisphere ...
[36]
North-south asymmetry in the magnetic deflection of polar coronal ...
A possible model for explaining the N-S asymmetry is to consider the global magnetic field as the contribution of several multipole components, and to ...
[37]
Swarm reveals growing weak spot in Earth's magnetic field - ESA
Oct 13, 2025 · For example, in the southern hemisphere there is one point where the magnetic field is particularly strong, and in the northern hemisphere ...Missing: asymmetry | Show results with:asymmetry
[38]
A new high-resolution geomagnetic field model for southern Africa
Jan 30, 2024 · ... South Atlantic Anomaly. and the most recent geomagnetic jerk, and the ... 30 % weaker than in other regions at similar latitudes around the globe.
[39]
geomagnetic field disturbances: Topics by Science.gov
... South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) where the geomagnetic field intensity is almost 30 % weaker than in other regions at similar latitudes around the globe ...
[40]
A massive weak spot in Earth's magnetic field is growing, scientists ...
Oct 14, 2025 · A weak spot in Earth's magnetic field over the South Atlantic Ocean has ballooned in size since 2014, satellite data reveals. The region, known ...
[41]
Magnetic Declination Varies Considerably Across The United States
Magnetic declination is the direction and amount of variation between the Magnetic Pole and True North.
[42]
International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the thirteenth generation
Feb 11, 2021 · Figure 1 shows global maps of the IGRF-13 declination (D), inclination (I), and total field magnitude (F) on Earth's surface at 2020 in Miller ...
[43]
International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF)
The International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) is a standard mathematical description of the Earth's main magnetic field.Missing: contour patterns
[44]
Background - Earth's field - UBC EOAS
To a first approximation, Earth's magnetic field looks like that of a dipolar source within the Earth, which is tilted about 11.5 degrees from the spin axis ...
[45]
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs): GFZ
The poles of the magnetic field do not coincide with the geographic poles. The axis of the approximate dipole is tilted by about 10 degrees compared to Earth's ...
[46]
Magnetism: Notes: The Earth's Main Field - Pamela Burnley UNLV
Ninety percent of the Earth's magnetic field looks like a magnetic field that would be generated from a dipolar magnetic source located at the center of the ...
[47]
Visualizing the Earth's dipolar magnetic field
Aug 28, 2019 · We can plot the dipole component of the Earth's magnetic field as a Matplotlib streamplot. We first construct a meshgrid of ( x , y ) (x,y) (x,y) coordinates.
[48]
Wandering of the Geomagnetic Poles
Based on the current WMM, the 2025 location of the North Magnetic Pole is 85.762°N and 139.298°E and the South Magnetic Pole is 63.851°S and 135.078°E.Historical Magnetic Declination · North Dip Poles · South Dip Poles
[49]
[PDF] December 2023 State of the Geomagnetic Field
Dec 2, 2023 · MAGNETIC DIP POLES AND BLACKOUT ZONES Magnetic dip poles, defined as the points where the geomagnetic field is exactly vertical (i.e., ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
[50]
Tracking Changes in Earth's Magnetic Poles | News
Mar 28, 2016 · Since 1831, the pole has been moving across the Canadian Arctic toward Russia. NCEI scientists with the Cooperative Institute for Research in ...
[51]
What Is the Solar Wind? - NASA Science
Nov 21, 2024 · Earth's magnetosphere is much stronger than Mercury's, so most of the solar wind is deflected. The solar wind flows around Earth's protective ...
[52]
[PDF] s-1 ) Hourly Standard Deviation in Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure (nPa)
altitude (cm. -2 s-1. ) Hourly Standard Deviation in. Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure (nPa). H+ Giles. O+ Giles. O+ Pollock. O+ Moore. Log(O+Flux) = 8.8+1.02Log(SDP).
[53]
Solar Wind - Space Technology 5
When the solar wind encounters Earth, it is deflected by our planet's magnetic shield, causing most of the solar wind's energetic particles to flow around and ...
[54]
THEMIS Discovers Biggest Breach of Earth's Magnetosphere
Dec 15, 2008 · NASA's THEMIS mission has overturned a longstanding belief about the interaction between solar particles and Earth's protective magnetic field.Missing: climate stability
[55]
Particle simulations of driven collisionless magnetic reconnection at ...
The simulations were used to examine many features associated with the dayside magnetic reconnection process, including the acceleration and heating of ...
[56]
The magnetotail and substorms - NASA Technical Reports Server
Dec 1, 1973 · The tail plays a very active and important role in substorms. Magmetic flux eroded from the dayside magnetosphere is stored here.
[57]
Substorms - NASA SVS
Jan 17, 2007 · This animation shows a magnetospheric substorm, during which the reconnection causes energy to be rapidly released along the field lines ...
[58]
Substorms - Phy6.org
Nov 25, 2001 · A period of the order of one hour or less, during which energy is rapidly released in the magnetospheric tail.
[59]
Solar Storms and Flares - NASA Science
Coronal mass ejections, or CMEs, are immense clouds of solar material blasted into space by the Sun at over a million miles per hour, often following a solar ...
[60]
Coronal mass ejections - Space Technology 5
Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are huge bubbles of coronal plasma threaded by intense magnetic field lines that are ejected from the Sun over the course of ...
[61]
Geomagnetic storms - Space Technology 5
Geomagnetic storms and substorms are generated by the southward solar wind and the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) it carries along.
[62]
Geomagnetically Induced Currents (GICs)
Apr 19, 2017 · GICs can flow through railroad tracks, underground pipelines, and power grids. In extreme cases, they can cause blackouts. Download JPG.Missing: storms | Show results with:storms
[63]
Living with a Star: NASA and Partners Survey Space Weather Science
Apr 19, 2017 · Storms from the sun can affect our power grids, railway systems and underground pipelines through a phenomenon called geomagnetically induced ...
[64]
Geomagnetic Storms | NOAA / NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
A measure of this current, the disturbance storm time (Dst) index, has been used historically to characterize the size of a geomagnetic storm.
[65]
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020027
[66]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117725009081
[67]
A broad climatology of very high latitude (∼75°) substorms: An update
Substorms frequently expand to very high (∼ 75°) geomagnetic latitudes. •. Time of onset and intensity of substorms exhibit profound hemispherical asymmetry. •.
[68]
GOES Magnetometer | NOAA / NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
GOES magnetometer data have been used for constructing magnetic field models, and to help forecasters identify the buildup and release of energy in Earth's ...<|separator|>
[69]
Gyre-driven decay of the Earth's magnetic dipole - PubMed Central
Jan 27, 2016 · Direct observations indicate that the magnitude of the Earth's magnetic axial dipole has decreased over the past 175 years; it is now 9% weaker ...
[70]
Geomagnetic secular acceleration, jerks, and a localized standing ...
Feb 8, 2014 · Spatially anticorrelated secular acceleration pulses occurred in 2006 and 2009 These pulses resulted in geomagnetic jerks in 2003, 2007, ...
[71]
Flip Flop: Why Variations in Earth's Magnetic Field Aren't Causing ...
Aug 3, 2021 · Generated by powerful, dynamic forces at the center of our world, our magnetosphere shields us from erosion of our atmosphere by the solar wind ...
[72]
What Caused Recent Acceleration of the North Magnetic Pole Drift?
Jun 3, 2011 · During the 1990s the NMP drift speed suddenly increased from 15 kilometers per year at the start of the decade to 55 kilometers per year by the ...
[73]
Secular Variation - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
They are commonly reported in terms of time derivatives of Gauss coefficients in a spherical harmonic analysis. ... [1] ∂ B ∂ t = ∇ ∧ u ∧ B + η ∇ 2 B. where B is ...
[74]
Predictions of the geomagnetic secular variation based on the ...
Oct 22, 2020 · Meandering westward flows at low Atlantic latitudes explain the notorious westward drift of magnetic features observed in this region.Missing: paleomagnetic | Show results with:paleomagnetic
[75]
Deciphering records of geomagnetic reversals - PMC
Geomagnetic reversals are an extreme manifestation of the variability of the geomagnetic field created and sustained by dynamo action in Earth's core. This ...
[76]
The Steens Mountain (Oregon) geomagnetic polarity transition: 2 ...
Oct 10, 1985 · The transitional intensity is generally low, with an average of 10.9±4.9 μT for directions more than 45° away from the dipole field and a ...
[77]
Deciphering records of geomagnetic reversals - Valet - AGU Journals
Mar 24, 2016 · Assuming a deposition rate of 4 cm/kyr, a 1000 year transition will be integrated over the thickness of two samples and even much less in the ...
[78]
Do any mass extinctions correlate with magnetic reversals?
No. There is no evidence of a correlation between mass extinctions and magnetic pole reversals. Earth's magnetic field and its atmosphere protect us from solar ...
[79]
Is it true that Earth's magnetic field occasionally reverses its polarity?
They can happen as often as every 10 thousand years or so and as infrequently as every 50 million years or more. The last reversal was about 780,000 years ago.Missing: 200000 300000
[80]
Geodynamo, Solar Wind, and Magnetopause 3.4 to 3.45 Billion ...
Mar 5, 2010 · The Earth's magnetic field existed 3.4 to 3.45 billion years ago, pushing back the oldest record of geomagnetic field strength by 200 million years.
[81]
Origins of Earth's magnetic field remain a mystery | MIT News
Apr 8, 2020 · “There is no robust evidence of a magnetic field prior to 3.5 billion years ago, and even if there was a field, it will be very difficult to ...Missing: earliest | Show results with:earliest
[82]
Quantitative estimates of average geomagnetic axial dipole ... - Nature
Nov 30, 2020 · Outputs of magnetic field at Earth's surface were extracted from numerical dynamo ... weak dipole field epochs. J. Geophys. Res. 87, 3549–3556 ( ...
[83]
The Cretaceous Normal Superchron: A Mini-Review of Its Discovery ...
Feb 1, 2022 · The Cretaceous Normal Superchron (CNS) is an irregular stable polarity period in which no or few geomagnetic reversals occurred, lasting from 120 to 83 million ...
[84]
Frequent Polarity Reversals in the Cretaceous Normal Superchron
Feb 16, 2021 · The Cretaceous Normal Superchron (CNS) was defined as a single normal-polarity zone within the Cretaceous at ∼126–84 Ma. Geomagnetic field ...
[85]
Synchronizing volcanic, sedimentary, and ice core records of Earth's ...
Aug 7, 2019 · Earth's last magnetic field reversal was complex, with excursions at 795 and 784 ka before a final polarity flip at 773 ka.
[86]
MODEL OF SEA-FLOOR SPREADING
Students will make a paper model illustrating the concept of sea-floor spreading and the development of symmetrical magnetic stripes on either side of a mid- ...
[87]
Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics
Continental collisions are in turn the result of tectonic plate motions which result from seafloor spreading which releases heat from the Earth's interior.
[88]
Earth's magnetic field is probably not reversing - PNAS
Apr 30, 2018 · The geomagnetic field has been decaying at a rate of ∼5% per century from at least 1840, with indirect observations suggesting a decay since ...
[89]
The Magnetic North Pole Is Rapidly Moving Because of Some Blobs
Aug 23, 2025 · “Our predictions are that the pole will continue to move towards Siberia, but forecasting the future is challenging and we cannot be sure,” the ...Missing: 2040 | Show results with:2040<|separator|>
[90]
Dynamo constraints on the long-term evolution of Earth's magnetic ...
We combine numerical geodynamo simulations with theoretical scaling laws to investigate the variation of Earth's magnetic field strength over geological time.INTRODUCTION · METHODS · RESULTS · DISCUSSION AND...
[91]
A giant weak spot in Earth's magnetic field is getting bigger - Space
Oct 15, 2025 · Satellite data reveal that a weak region in Earth's magnetic field has grown by an area roughly half the size of continental Europe in the ...Missing: below μT
[92]
Inside the Earth [This Dynamic Earth, USGS]
Jul 11, 2025 · At the center of the Earth lies the core, which is nearly twice as dense as the mantle because its composition is metallic (iron-nickel alloy) ...
[93]
Core geophysics - PMC - NIH
The result is that the outer core must be composed of an iron and nickel alloy (80 wt% Fe, 5 wt% Ni) along with a smaller percentage of a less dense element ( ...
[94]
[PDF] properties and evolution of the earth's core and geodynamo
The entropy production rate increases when the inner core solidifies, due to additional release of latent heat and compositional convection. Prior to inner core ...
[95]
The Geodynamo (Chapter 14) - Cambridge University Press
Such differential rotation, if it is strong enough, will spiral out an azimuthal field from the observed dipole. This is called the Ω-effect and it is shown ...
[96]
[PDF] DYNAMO THEORY: THE PROBLEM OF THE GEODYNAMO
3) DIFFERENTIAL ROTATION. •Coriolis effect induced by the rotation of the Earth. •Forces conducting fluid to follow helical path. •Convection occurs in columns ...
[97]
Homogeneous dynamos and terrestrial magnetism - Journals
(2018) The kinematic dynamo problem, part I: analytical treatment with the Bullard–Gellman formalism, Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 10.1007/s00161-018 ...
[98]
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.1954.0018
[99]
Superionic effect and anisotropic texture in Earth's inner core driven ...
Mar 24, 2023 · We provide a new mechanism to explain observed complex and anisotropic inner core structure based on the aligned superionic Fe-H crystals driven by dipole ...
[100]
Full article: Advances in geodynamo modelling
May 13, 2019 · Both alternatives yield the same result when the magnetic Reynolds number Rm = τ λ / τ U assumes Earth-like values of about 1000. The ...
[101]
A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of ... - Nature
Sep 21, 1995 · A three-dimensional, self-consistent numerical model of the geodynamo is described, that maintains a magnetic field for over 40,000 years.
[102]
A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and ...
We present the first three-dimensional (3D), time-dependent, self-consistent numerical solution of the magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) equations.<|control11|><|separator|>
[103]
Numerical modelling of the geodynamo: a systematic parameter study
The critical magnetic Reynolds number for self-sustained dynamos is of order Rm=50. However, we also find that the field can die away when Rm is too large. The ...
[104]
Recurrent ancient geomagnetic field anomalies shed light on future ...
Jun 6, 2022 · Our reconstruction indicates that minima in the dipole moment tend to coincide with geomagnetic field anomalies, similar to the South Atlantic ...Missing: approximation | Show results with:approximation
[105]
Approaching a realistic force balance in geodynamo simulations
Oct 10, 2016 · The Ekman number is about 10 − 15 in the core, whereas simulations typically use 10 − 4 (2). The Coriolis force tends to suppress changes of the ...
[106]
Numerical models of the geodynamo and observational constraints
Oct 18, 2000 · [17] The first model [Glatzmaier and Roberts, 1995a, 1995b] was the first to exhibit reversals in a configuration trying to mimic the Earth's ...
[107]
The Magnetic Signatures of the M2, N2, and O1 Oceanic Tides ...
Apr 15, 2019 · This paper reports on new results in the determination of magnetic signals produced by oceanic tides as estimated from satellite magnetic measurements.
[108]
Tidal signals in ocean-bottom magnetic measurements of the ...
Motional induction in the ocean by tides has long been observed by both land and satellite measurements of magnetic fields. While these signals are weak (∼10 nT) ...Tidal Signals In... · 3 Power Spectral Density... · 5 Forward Prediction
[109]
Sq and EEJ—A Review on the Daily Variation of the Geomagnetic ...
Sep 14, 2016 · We review advances in our understanding of the geomagnetic daily variation and its source ionospheric currents during the past 75 years.<|control11|><|separator|>
[110]
Day‐to‐day variability of equatorial electrojet and its role on the day ...
Sep 30, 2015 · The equatorial electrojet (EEJ) is a narrow band of current flowing eastward at the ionospheric E region altitudes along the dayside dip ...
[111]
Geomagnetic storms: historical perspective to modern view
Feb 20, 2016 · Dst is an hourly index expressing the intensity of the ring current. The SYM-H index is the same as the Dst index—but computed at a higher ...
[112]
[PDF] SOURCES OF MAGNETIC FIELD
Primary sources of magnetic field include Earth's core, mantle, and currents induced in the mantle by magnetospheric ring current and ionospheric daily ...
[113]
Oceanic and ionospheric tidal magnetic fields extracted from global ...
Dec 2, 2024 · 1. The motional induction sources of the ocean tidal magnetic fields depend on the radial component of the main magnetic field ( 𝑅 ) as well as ...
[114]
Early Chinese Compass – 400 BC - Magnet Academy
Early Chinese compasses, made with lodestone, were used to order environments, not for navigation. They had a spoon shape, and a lodestone that always pointed ...Missing: ~200 credible
[115]
[PDF] William Gilbert's Investigation of Magnetism
William Gilbert (1540-1603), physician to Queen Elizabeth I of England, published in 1600, his major work De Magnete the first comprehensive, systematic ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[116]
On the Magnet - Wikisource, the free online library
Jun 23, 2024 · Chap. 6. How magnetick pieces of Iron and smaller loadstones conform themselves to a terrella & to the earth itself, and by them are disposed.
[117]
Carl Friedrich Gauss - Magnet Academy - National MagLab
In 1833, Gauss published his description of a device that he called a magnometer , more commonly known today as a magnetometer. Weber later developed the ...
[118]
A WWII submarine-hunting device helped prove plate tectonics
Jul 2, 2021 · In 1833, he reported devising the first magnetometer, which could measure the absolute intensity of Earth's magnetic field at any location. His ...<|separator|>
[119]
Greenwich Magnetical and Meteorological Observations, 1862
The declination-magnet was made to rest on blocks, and the cross-wires carried by it were used as a collimator for determining the line of collimation of the ...
[120]
History of Royal Observatory Greenwich | Home of GMT
In the 1830s the Observatory site was almost doubled in order to accommodate the new Magnet House.
[121]
Magnetic Observations on Cook's First Voyage | Captain Cook Society
During the First Voyage Cook made over 50 observations of magnetic variation: the angle between magnetic north and true north.
[122]
Ships' logs give clues to Earth's magnetic decline | New Scientist
May 11, 2006 · It was common practice for captains in the 17th and 18th centuries to calibrate their ship's compasses relative to true north and, less often, ...
[123]
[PDF] Scientific Writings of Joseph Henry
In these volumes the principal scientific writings of Joseph. Henry are collected for the first time. They include his contributions to various societies ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[124]
Storms from the Sun: The Emerging Science of Space Weather (2002)
After he published his results, Edward Sabine and other scientists compared the rise and fall of sunspot numbers with the frequency of magnetic storms around ...
[125]
Humboldt and the Earth's Magnetic Field - NASA ADS
During his Antarctic Expedition of 1839-1843 James Clark Ross established magnetic observatories on St Helena, at the Cape of Good Hope and at Hobart in ...
[126]
An international network of magnetic observatories
Oct 15, 2013 · Today the INTERMAGNET consortium encompasses 57 institutes from 40 countries supporting 120 observatories (see Figures 1a and 1b). INTERMAGNET ...
[127]
Geomagnetic observatory data
INTERMAGNET is an international program to provide quality controlled geomagnetic observatory data through a website and an ftp-server.
[128]
Geomagnetic Information Nodes (GINs) - Intermagnet
The Geomagnetic Information Nodes (GINs) are the collection points for real-time data within INTERMAGNET. They are connected to the INTERMAGNET observatories.
[129]
Oersted (named after Danish scientist Hans Christian Ørsted)
Jun 8, 2012 · The mission objectives are to perform highly accurate and sensitive measurements of the geomagnetic field and global monitoring of the high ...
[130]
GFZ Satellite Mission CHAMP
The measurements include both the spatial and temporal variations of the two fields. The CHAMP mission has opened a new era in geopotential research and has ...
[131]
Swarm - Earth Online
In November 2017, the mission was granted a four-year extension to 2021. It was then extended further and will operate till 2025. Swarm Objectives. Earths ...
[132]
Core field changes from eleven years of Swarm satellite observations
Weak magnetic field region in the South Atlantic has expanded between 2014 and 2025.
[133]
[PDF] WORLDWIDE NEAR-REAL-TIME GEOMAGNETIC OBSERVATORY ...
“The INTERMAGNET objective is to establish a global network of co-operating digital magnetic observatories adopting modern standard specifications for measuring ...
[134]
A Spherical Harmonic Model of Earth's Lithospheric Magnetic Field ...
Oct 21, 2021 · A global model that represents the magnetic field generated within the Earth's crust with a global 40 km horizontal spatial resolution.2 Data Selection And... · 2.2 Satellite Data... · 3 Data Inversion And...
[135]
[PDF] Contributions of Spherical Harmonics to Magnetic and Gravitational ...
Dec 4, 1992 · Magnetic fields are mathematically similar to gravitational fields in one important re- spect: each can be regarded as a gradient of a potential ...
[136]
[PDF] Magnetic multipole moments (Gauss coefficients) and vector ...
This paper presents a simple expression for the Gauss coefficients in terms of a volume integral over the current, and also a series expansion of the vector ...
[137]
Magnetic multipole moments (Gauss coefficients) and vector ...
Feb 21, 2012 · We show how our result is related to the classical expressions for the scalar potential given by a spherical current sheet, and to the results ...
[138]
Consistency between the flow at the top of the core and the frozen ...
Jan 11, 2008 · The flow just below the core-mantle boundary is constrained by the radial component of the induction equation. In the Alfvén frozen-flux limit,
[139]
Magnetic Coordinate Systems | Space Science Reviews
Jul 19, 2016 · Earth-fixed magnetic coordinate systems such as centered dipole coordinates are often used for magnetically organized phenomena close to ground, ...
[140]
The CHAOS-7 geomagnetic field model and observed changes in ...
Oct 20, 2020 · We present the CHAOS-7 model of the time-dependent near-Earth geomagnetic field between 1999 and 2020 based on magnetic field observations.
[141]
Magnetic Field Models - DTU Space
CHAOS-8, The CHAOS-8 - A model of the time-dependent near-Earth geomagnetic field between 1999 and 2025. CHAOS-8 is based on magnetic field observations ...
[142]
International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the eleventh generation
It updates the previous IGRF generation with a definitive main field model for epoch ... spherical harmonic coefficients comprising IGRF-11 are listed.
[143]
Verification of the geomagnetic field models using historical satellite ...
Dec 20, 2022 · To validate the IGRF, M-1, M-2, N-1 and N-2 models, we select data from nine mid-latitude observatories from both hemispheres for the period ...
[144]
CHAOS-8 geomagnetic field model - Zenodo
The CHAOS-8 model describes the time-dependent near-Earth geomagnetic field between 1997 and 2025. It is based on magnetic field observations collected by ...
[145]
Conservation of magnetite biomineralization genes in all domains of ...
Jan 10, 2022 · We extend the hypothesis that magnetite-containing cells have a universal genetic basis and role in magnetoreception through 1) in situ magnetic ...
[146]
Chemical magnetoreception in birds: The radical pair mechanism
Here, we present a physical chemist's perspective on the “radical pair mechanism” of compass magnetoreception in birds.
[147]
Chemical compass behaviour at microtesla magnetic fields ... - Nature
Aug 16, 2019 · Cryptochromes are expressed when birds perform magnetic orientation. The birds' ability to use the Earth's magnetic field is dependent on the ...
[148]
Cryptochromes and neuronal-activity markers colocalize in the ...
Two types of potential magnetoreception mechanisms have been suggested over the past decades: one mechanism that is based on magnetite particles and one ...
[149]
No evidence for intracellular magnetite in putative vertebrate ... - PNAS
We report that a small percentage of cells in both species appear to have large magnetic moments, but they do not contain biogenic magnetite.
[150]
Sea Turtles: Navigating with Magnetism - ScienceDirect.com
Feb 6, 2007 · Young sea turtles use the Earth's magnetic field as a source of navigational information during their epic transoceanic migrations and while ...
[151]
Magnetic Maps Guide Migrating Turtles | Science | AAAS
Researchers have found that turtles use Earth's magnetic field as both a compass and a map. It's no secret that turtles can figure out which way is north from ...
[152]
Insight into shark magnetic field perception from empirical ... - Nature
Sep 8, 2017 · Sharks in the study demonstrated strong responses to magnetic stimuli, making significantly more approaches to the target (p = < 0.01) during stimulus ...
[153]
New Evidence Suggests Sharks Use Earth's Magnetic Field to ...
May 6, 2021 · The idea that sharks can navigate by sensing these fields rests on the fact that Earth's geomagnetism isn't evenly distributed. For example, the ...
[154]
Human Brains Have Tiny Bits of Magnetic Material - Eos.org
Dec 12, 2019 · Magnetite could serve some physiological function, such as signal transmission in the brain, but scientists are only able to speculate. A ...
[155]
Transduction of the Geomagnetic Field as Evidenced from alpha ...
Mar 18, 2019 · We report here a strong, specific human brain response to ecologically-relevant rotations of Earth-strength magnetic fields.
[156]
Humans—like other animals—may sense Earth's magnetic field
Mar 18, 2019 · The mechanism of magnetoreception is only settled for certain bacteria, which harbor magnetite crystals that align with Earth's magnetic field.<|separator|>
[157]
Disruption of Magnetic Compass Orientation in Migratory Birds by ...
Birds exposed to weak time-dependent magnetic fields lose their ability to orient in the geomagnetic field.
[158]
Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields disrupt magnetic ...
We show that extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELFMFs) generated by high-voltage power lines disrupt alignment of the bodies of these animals with the ...
[159]
On the evolutionary trail of MagRs - PMC - NIH
Magnetic sense, or termed magnetoreception, has evolved in a broad range of taxa within the animal kingdom to facilitate orientation and navigation.
[160]
On the origin of microbial magnetoreception - Oxford Academic
May 21, 2019 · It has been proposed that magnetoreception evolved from a pre-existing trait (ie biomineralization) through the process of exaptation.
[161]
Magnetic Method | US EPA
May 27, 2025 · The magnetic method employs a magnetometer to passively measure Earth's magnetic field at points along the earth's surface.
[162]
[PDF] Geomagnetic Storms and Their Impacts on the US Power Grid
This report describes the threat of geomagnetic storms and their impacts on the US power grid, including past and future effects.
[163]
A 21st Century View of the March 1989 Magnetic Storm - Boteler
Oct 10, 2019 · On 13 March 1989, the largest magnetic storm of the last century caused widespread effects on power systems including a blackout of the Hydro-Québec system.
[164]
Autonomous spacecraft attitude control using magnetic torquing only
Magnetic torquing of spacecraft has been an important mechanism for attitude control since the earliest satellites were launched.Missing: Earth's | Show results with:Earth's
[165]
NASA Researchers Track Slowly Splitting 'Dent' in Earth's Magnetic ...
Aug 17, 2020 · “More specifically, a localized field with reversed polarity grows strongly in the SAA region, thus making the field intensity very weak, weaker ...Missing: hemisphere | Show results with:hemisphere