Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Eurovision Song Contest 2004

The 2004 was the 49th edition of the , organised by the and held for the first time with a semi-final on 12 May and a on 15 May in , , at the Arena, following 's victory in the 2003 contest with Sertab Erener's "Everyway That I Can." won the contest with Ruslana's "Wild Dances", marking the country's second consecutive victory and introducing energetic world music influences that propelled the song to chart success. The event featured 36 participating countries, including debuts from , , , and , while withdrew; the semi-final qualified ten additional acts to join the twenty-four automatic qualifiers from the "Big Four" and prior winners, aiming to broaden participation amid growing interest from Eastern Europe and the Balkans. Notable aspects included heightened geopolitical tensions reflected in voting patterns, with accusations of bloc voting favoring from Slavic and neighboring nations, contributing to its 280-point tally over runner-up 's "Shake It" by . Hosted by and , the contest underscored 's cultural outreach under the theme "Under the Same Sky," yet faced internal production challenges and debates over the semi-final's fairness in amplifying non-traditional entrants.

Background and Hosting

Host Country Selection

Turkey was selected to host the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 as the winner of the 2003 edition, in accordance with the European Broadcasting Union's (EBU) tradition that the broadcaster of the victorious entry organizes the subsequent contest. On 24 May 2003, in Riga, Latvia, Sertab Erener represented Turkey with the song "Everyway That I Can", composed by herself and Demir Demirkan, accumulating 167 points to secure victory over competitors including Belgium's Urban Trad (165 points) and Austria's Alf Poier (101 points). This marked Turkey's debut win after 28 years of participation since 1975, prompting Turkish broadcaster Türkiye Radyo Televizyon Kurumu (TRT) to assume hosting duties. TRT evaluated potential host cities within Turkey, initially weighing Ankara, the political capital, against Istanbul for its geographic and cultural prominence. Istanbul, uniquely straddling Europe and Asia, was ultimately chosen for its symbolic alignment with the contest's theme of unity "Under the Same Sky" and its capacity to accommodate international logistics as Turkey's largest metropolis. Antalya was considered but dismissed due to inadequate venue infrastructure and accessibility for a event expecting over 10,000 visitors, including delegations from 36 participating countries. The decision reflected practical EBU criteria, including arena suitability (requiring at least 10,000 seats), broadcast facilities, and security, amid Turkey's preparations for EU accession talks, which amplified the event's diplomatic weight. TRT confirmed Istanbul as host city on 26 June 2003, enabling venue finalization at Abdi İpekçi Arena.

Geopolitical Context

The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 took place in Istanbul, Turkey, shortly after the European Union's largest enlargement on May 1, 2004, which added ten countries—Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia—expanding the bloc to encompass much of post-Cold War Eastern Europe and symbolizing continental reconciliation amid ongoing integrations like NATO expansions. While the new EU members had long participated in Eurovision via the European Broadcasting Union, the timing underscored the contest's role in broader European unity narratives, with Turkey's hosting positioned as a bridge between East and West. Turkey, a candidate for EU membership since 1999 with negotiations advancing in the early 2000s, leveraged the event to promote its secular, pro-Western orientation and soft power, as officials explicitly tied the hosting to bolstering accession efforts amid domestic reforms under the Justice and Development Party government. The contest's theme, "Under the Same Sky," explicitly highlighted aspirations for Turkish integration into a unified Europe, reinforcing national identity construction through cultural diplomacy at a time when EU-Turkey relations emphasized economic and political alignment despite persistent hurdles like the Cyprus dispute. Cyprus's participation amid Turkish hosting revived tensions over the island's division and Turkey's non-recognition of the Republic of Cyprus, prompting domestic debates in Cyprus about potential boycotts, though none materialized; instead, mutual acknowledgments occurred through patterns, illustrating Eurovision's to navigate geopolitical frictions without formal rupture. Debuts by , , , and the Serbia and Montenegro union reflected stabilizing post-communist and post-Yugoslav transitions, with the latter representing a fragile federal state formed in 2003 following Milošević's ouster and amid simmering independence pressures that would culminate in Montenegro's referendum. These entries expanded the contest's geographic , mirroring Europe's evolving borders and the of states navigating authoritarian legacies, ethnic conflicts, and Western alignments.

Format and Rules

Introduction of the Semi-Final

The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 marked the debut of a semi-final round, implemented by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) to address the expanding number of participating countries and prevent overcrowding in the final. Prior formats had relied on a single grand final augmented by a relegation system that excluded lower-placing nations from the following year, but rising interest from EBU members necessitated a preliminary qualification stage to sustain broader inclusion without extending broadcast durations excessively. This structural shift enabled 36 countries to enter overall, with the semi-final serving as a filter for non-automatic qualifiers. Held on 12 May 2004 at the in , , the semi-final featured performances from 22 countries, primarily debutants and those not automatically advancing. The top 10 entries, determined by televote, qualified directly for the grand final on 15 May, joining 11 automatic qualifiers comprising the host nation , the "Big Four" (, , , and the ), and the top 10 non-Big Four finishers from the 2003 contest. This setup prioritized viewer preference in the semi-final while reserving slots for established broadcasters and recent high performers, fostering competitive balance amid debuts by nations such as , , , and . Not all entrants broadcast the semi-final; automatic qualifiers , , and opted out of transmission, though they participated in voting, as did Belgium's French-speaking broadcaster RTBF. The format emphasized expanded artistic exposure, allowing more songs and performers to reach audiences, while streamlining the final to 24 acts for feasible pacing and voting. This inaugural semi-final set a for subsequent expansions, including a second semi-final in 2008, reflecting the contest's to geopolitical and membership in .

Voting Procedures

Televoting formed the basis of the voting procedures for both the Qualifier Round (semi-final) on 12 May 2004 and the grand final on 15 May 2004, with each participating broadcaster required to implement public telephone and SMS voting accessible to at least 80% of its population. A fixed ten-minute voting window applied to both events, extended from the previous five minutes to accommodate the larger number of entries and countries. Votes were aggregated nationally to rank entries, excluding a country's own performance, and the top ten rankings received points of , 10, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1, respectively. In the semi-final, featuring 22 entries, televotes from participating countries that broadcast the event determined the rankings among those songs, with the top ten advancing directly to the final. For the final, comprising entries (the ten semi-final qualifiers plus 14 automatic qualifiers including the host nation and the "Big Four" of , , , and the ), all 36 participating countries conducted televoting to award points to their top ten preferred performances. Points were revealed during each show's broadcast by national spokespersons announcing in ascending order, first in English or , followed by the local language. Standby juries served as a contingency: each consisted of eight members (four music industry professionals and four public representatives) scoring entries from 1 to 10 points, with aggregated scores converted to the standard top-ten point distribution if televoting failed due to technical issues or insufficient participation (below a threshold verified by notaries). Ties in rankings were resolved sequentially by the greatest number of countries awarding the tied score's highest points (starting with 12s, then 10s, down to 1s); unresolved ties resulted in shared positions without altering the winner. In the final, Monaco awarded zero points to all entries after recording no valid votes, highlighting variability in national turnout.

Qualification and Eligibility Rules

Participation in the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 was restricted to active members of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), with broadcasters required to confirm their intent to participate by 1 October 2003. The introduction of a qualifying round, held on May 2004, allowed up to countries to compete on a first-come, first-served basis, with the top 10 advancing to the grand final based on televoting results. Automatic qualification to the final was granted to the host broadcaster (Turkey), the "Big Four" countries (France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom), and the top 10 finishers from the 2003 contest, excluding overlaps with the aforementioned automatic qualifiers, resulting in 14 pre-qualified entries and a total of 24 finalists. This format replaced the prior relegation system, enabling broader annual participation without automatic exclusions for low performers. Entries had to consist of original compositions, with lyrics and music not commercially released prior to 1 October 2003, and a maximum duration of three minutes, beyond which disqualification was possible. Songs were required to include vocals and could not be purely instrumental or a cappella without lyrics, though broadcasters had full discretion over language choice. Content deemed to discredit the contest could lead to rejection. Performing artists were limited to a maximum of six individuals on stage and had to be at least years old by the date of the qualifying round (12 May 2004). Each artist could represent only one country per edition, with performances featuring live vocals backed by pre-recorded tracks excluding any vocal elements. No live was permitted; however, decorative instruments such as a drum kit or grand piano could be approved if requested during the Heads of Delegation meeting on 22-23 March 2004. Broadcasters faced financial penalties for withdrawals after 1 December 2003 or for non-compliance leading to disqualification.

Participants

Number of Entries and Debuts

The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 saw participation from 36 countries, the highest number in the competition's history up to that point. This included 22 countries competing in the newly introduced semi-final on 12 May 2004, from which the top 10 advanced to the final, joining 14 automatic qualifiers to make a 24-country grand final on 15 May 2004. Four countries made their debuts in the contest: , , Belarus, and . Albania was represented by Anjeza Shahini with "The ", competing in the semi-final. Andorra debuted with Marta Roure and "Jugarem a estimar-nos", also in the semi-final. Belarus entered with Aleksandra and Konstantin performing "My Galileo", failing to qualify from the semi-final. Serbia and Montenegro, participating under its new constitutional name as the State Union following prior entries as FR Yugoslavia, was represented by Željko Joksimović with "Lane moje", which placed second in the final.

Withdrawals and Returns

Denmark, Finland, Lithuania, North Macedonia, Monaco, and Switzerland returned to the Eurovision Song Contest after missing the edition. These returns were enabled by the introduction of a semi-final format, which expanded the total number of participants to and alleviated the constraints that had limited entries to the previous year. Monaco's participation ended a 25-year hiatus, as the country had last entered in 1979 with "Notre planète" by Laurent Vaguet. No formal withdrawals occurred in the preparations for the 2004 contest. However, several countries that had competed in 2003—Belgium, Estonia, Poland, and Portugal—did not enter, primarily due to broadcaster decisions amid the transition to the semi-final system, which required non-automatic qualifiers to compete for final spots. These absences reflected strategic choices by public broadcasters facing potential non-qualification risks and resource allocation priorities, rather than disqualifications or geopolitical factors.

National Selection Processes

Most participating countries in the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 conducted televised national finals to select their artists and songs, typically involving live performances by multiple entrants followed by voting from juries, televoters, or a combination thereof, while others relied on internal selections by their public broadcasters. The exact format was left to each broadcaster's discretion under EBU guidelines, reflecting national preferences for public involvement versus curatorial choice. Debuting nations emphasized competitive processes to identify representative entries. Albania chose Anjeza Shahini with "Dua të jem imazhi yt" via the 42nd edition of long-standing annual song contest held in December 2003. Andorra's inaugural participation was determined through 12 Punts, a public vote selecting Marta Roure and "Jugarem a estimar-nos". Belarus organized a dedicated national selection in early 2004, won by Aleksandra and Konstantin with "Moy Galiley". Serbia and Montenegro, competing as a union for the first time, used Evropesma, a multi-stage contest culminating in a February final where Željko Joksimović prevailed with "Lane moje". Other countries with established finals included Austria's Song.Null.Vier, which in March selected Tie Break and "Du bist" via jury and televote; Belgium's Eurosong '04, crowning Xandee with "1 Life" in February; and similar events like Denmark's Dansk Melodi Prix (won by Tomas Thordarson, "Shame on You"), Estonia's Eurolaul (Neiokõsõ, "Tii"), Finland's Euroviisut (Jari Sillanpää, "Takes 2 to Tango"), Iceland's Söngvakeppnin (Jónsi, "Heaven"), Ireland's Late Late Show-Eurovision Song Contest Selection (Chris Doran, "If My World Stopped Turning"), Latvia's Eirodziesma (Fomins & Kleins, "Dziesma manā sirdī"), Lithuania's Nacionalinis finalas (Linas ir Simona, "What For?"), Malta's Malta Song for Europe (Julie and Ludwig, "On Again, Off Again"), the Netherlands' Nationaal Songfestival (Re-Union, "Without You"), Norway's Melodi Grand Prix (Knut Anders Sørum, "Heaven Can Wait"), Poland's Piosenka dla Europy (Blue Café, "Love Song"), Portugal's Festival da Canção (Harpa, "Como Um Rio"), Romania's Selecția Națională (Sanda, "I Admit"), Russia's National Selection (Julia Savicheva, "Believe Me"), Slovenia's EMA (Platin, "Stay Forever"), and Sweden's Melodifestivalen (Lena Philipsson, "It Hurts"). Internal selections, bypassing public competitions, were adopted by the host broadcaster TRT in Turkey (Athena, "For Real"), the "Big Four" automatic qualifiers—France (Jonathan Cerrada, "À chaque pas"), Germany (Max, "Can't Wait Until Tonight"), Spain (Ramo Stott and Toñi Prieto, "Para Llenarme De Ti"), and the United Kingdom (James Fox, "Hold On to Our Love")—as well as Cyprus (Lisa Andreas, "Stronger Every Minute"), Greece (Sakis Rouvas, "Shake It"), Hungary (Nógrádi Zsuzsa, "Ködös emlék"), Israel (David D'Or, "To Believe"), Monaco (Maryon, "Notre planète"), Switzerland (Piero Esteriore and Chiara Dunlap, "Celebrate"), and Ukraine (Ruslana, "Wild Dances"). These choices often prioritized experienced artists or strategic picks aligned with broadcaster goals, contributing to Ukraine's ultimate victory.

Venue and Production

Location and Arena Details

The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 was hosted in Istanbul, Turkey, at the Abdi İpekçi Arena in the Zeytinburnu district. Istanbul was chosen as the host city after Turkey's win in the 2003 contest with Sertab Erener's "Everyway That I Can," marking the country's first time hosting the event. The , a multi-purpose indoor , accommodated the semi-final on 12 May 2004 and the grand final on 15 May 2004. With a seating capacity of approximately 12,270, the venue was selected over the initially considered Mydonose Showland due to its larger size and better suitability for the expanded format introducing a semi-final. The arena, named after Turkish sports journalist , featured facilities for basketball, volleyball, concerts, and large-scale events, providing the necessary infrastructure for the contest's production under the theme "Under the Same Sky."

Hosts and Presentation

The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 semi-final and final were hosted by Turkish actress and model and actor , who presented the events in both English and Turkish to accommodate international and domestic audiences. Cumbul, known for her roles in Turkish cinema and television, and Abay, a veteran performer in theater and media, handled introductions, transitions between performances, and interactions with the audience and spokespersons during voting segments. Their bilingual approach marked a standard practice for host broadcasters in non-English-speaking countries, ensuring accessibility while highlighting Turkish cultural elements through occasional phrases and on-screen graphics. The previous year's winner, , served as the host, interviews with participants and providing backstage commentary broadcast to viewers. This role allowed Erener to engage directly with contestants in a more informal setting, contrasting the main stage's formality. The overall presentation was directed by Swedish Sven Stojanovic, who oversaw the visual , camera work, and of live elements at the . Opening the grand final, Erener reprised her 2003 victory of "Everyway ed by "Leave," setting a celebratory tone with orchestral backing and emphasizing Turkish motifs. The semi-final featured an interval of ABBA: The , while the final's interval act showcased the dance troupe, performing high-energy routines rooted in Anatolian traditions to represent the host nation's . These segments underscored the contest's blend of contemporary pop with cultural showcases, directed to maintain pacing across the multi-hour broadcasts.

Visual and Technical Design

The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 introduced the European Broadcasting Union's new generic logo, featuring a stylized heart shape incorporating the host country's flag, marking the first use of this enduring visual identity across future editions. The host broadcaster TRT complemented this with custom theme art aligned to the contest's slogan "Under the Same Sky," emphasizing unity and Istanbul's position bridging continents. The stage Turkish-inspired shapes and colors, prioritizing versatility over to accommodate diverse performances effectively. Directed by Stojanovic, the production utilized separate teams for the semi-final and final to maintain high technical standards, with Swedish broadcaster SVT contributing to overall execution. Postcards introducing entrants were created by external agencies without participant involvement, featuring distinct concepts for the qualifying round and . Graphics elements, including the logo, were developed by the Swiss agency T.E.A.M., while the official website was handled by Germany's Pixelpark. Technical implementation at Abdi İpekçi Arena focused on reliable multicamera setups and basic lighting rigs typical of the era, without notable innovations in LED screens or advanced pyrotechnics reported.

Contest Proceedings

Semi-Final Event

The semi-final of the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 took place on 12 May 2004 at the in , , introducing the format for the first time to expand participation beyond the traditional final by selecting ten additional entrants from twenty-two competing nations. This round excluded the host country and the automatic qualifiers—, , , and the —allowing debutants such as , , , and to vie for advancement alongside returning participants. Hosted by and Korhan Abay under the contest slogan "Under the ," the event featured live performances broadcast internationally, with countries performing in a pre-determined running order determined by draw. Performances commenced with Finland's Jari Sillanpää singing "Takes 2 to Tango," followed by Belarus ("My Galileo" by Aleksandra & Konstantin), Switzerland ("Celebrate" by Piero Esteriore & the MusicStars), Latvia ("Dziesma Par Laimi" by Fomins & Kleins), Israel ("To Believe" by David D'Or), Andorra ("Jugarem a Estimar-nos" by Marta Roure), Portugal ("Foi Magia" by Sofia Vitória), Malta ("On Again... Off Again" by Julie & Ludwig), Monaco ("Notre Planète" by Maryon), Greece ("Shake It" by Sakis Rouvas), Ukraine ("Wild Dances" by Ruslana), Lithuania ("What's Happened to Your Love?" by Linas ir Simona), Albania ("The Image of You" by Anjeza Shahini), Cyprus ("Stronger Every Minute" by Lisa Andreas), North Macedonia ("Life" by Toše Proeski), Slovenia ("Stay Forever" by Platin), Estonia ("Tii" by Neiokõsõ), Croatia ("You Are the Only One" by Ivan Mikulić), Denmark ("Shame on You" by Tomas Thordarson), Serbia and Montenegro ("Lane Moje" by Željko Joksimović), Bosnia and Herzegovina ("In the Disco" by Deen), and concluded with the Netherlands ("Without You" by Re-Union). Voting relied exclusively on televotes from the thirty-six participating broadcasters, though France, Poland, and Russia declined to submit votes despite eligibility. The top ten qualifiers advanced to the final on 15 May, determined by aggregate televote points, with Serbia and Montenegro leading via strong regional and diaspora support for Željko Joksimović's ballad "Lane Moje." Ukraine's energetic "Wild Dances" by Ruslana secured second place, propelled by its dance-pop appeal and broad appeal across voting blocs. Greece's upbeat "Shake It" by Sakis Rouvas rounded out the podium, benefiting from home-region enthusiasm and production quality. Switzerland received zero points, marking a poor showing for Piero Esteriore & the MusicStars' "Celebrate," while other non-qualifiers like Estonia and Slovenia fell short despite competitive entries, highlighting early patterns of bloc voting influence in the new format.

Final Event

The grand final of the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 occurred on 15 May 2004 at 21:00 CEST at the Abdi İpekçi Arena in Istanbul, Turkey. The event was hosted by Turkish television personalities Korhan Abay and Meltem Cumbul, who conducted the proceedings in English and Turkish. The show opened with the traditional "Te Deum" anthem, followed by introductions from the hosts and the presentation of the 24 finalists, comprising the ten qualifiers from the semi-final and fourteen automatic entrants. Performances proceeded in a draw-determined order, with each act delivering a three-minute song on stage amid elaborate staging and lighting directed by Sven Stojanovic.
DrawCountryArtist(s)Song
1SpainRamón"Para llenarme de ti"
2AustriaTie Break"Du bist"
3NorwayKnut Anders Sørum"High"
4FranceJonatan Cerrada"À chaque pas"
5Serbia and MontenegroŽeljko Joksimović"Lane moje"
6MaltaGiorgio Borg Olivier"7th Wonder"
7NetherlandsRe-Union"Without You"
8GermanyMax"Can't Wait Until Tonight"
9AlbaniaAnjeza Shahini"The Image of You"
10UkraineRuslana"Wild Dances"
11CroatiaIvan Mikulić"You Are the Only One"
12Bosnia and HerzegovinaDeen"In the Disco"
13BelgiumXandee"1 Life"
14RussiaJulia Savicheva"Believe Me"
15North MacedoniaToše Proeski"Life"
16GreeceSakis Rouvas"Shake It"
17IcelandJónsi"Heaven"
18IrelandChris Doran"If My World Stopped Turning"
19PolandBlue Café"Love Song"
20United KingdomJames Fox"Hold On to Our Love"
21CyprusLisa Andreas"Stronger Every Minute"
22TurkeyAthena"For Real"
23RomaniaSanda"I Admit"
24SwedenLena Philipsson"It Hurts"
Following the last performance, the Turkish dance ensemble Fire of Anatolia provided the interval act, showcasing traditional Anatolian dances and music. Voting then commenced, with televotes from all 36 participating countries determining the results through aggregated points (1–8, 10, and 12 per country, excluding votes for the home entry). Spokespersons from each nation announced their country's top points sequentially, building suspense until the hosts revealed Ukraine's Ruslana as the winner with "Wild Dances" after tallying 280 points. The victor performed an encore, marking Ukraine's first Eurovision triumph on its second participation.

Results and Voting

Semi-Final Outcomes

The semi-final of the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 was held on at the in , , with 22 countries competing for ten spots in the grand final. Voting relied exclusively on from viewers in the participating nations, though , , and —automatic qualifiers—did not broadcast the event and thus did not contribute votes. Each participating broadcaster awarded points from 1 to 8, 10, and to their top ten songs, aggregated to determine advancement based on total points received. Serbia and Montenegro topped the semi-final with 263 points for "Lane moje", performed by , marking a strong debut entry. Ukraine placed second with 256 points for "Wild Dances" by , while Greece secured third with 252 points for "Shake It" by Sakis Rouvas; these three entries dominated due to widespread televote support, including significant diaspora and regional voting blocs. The qualifiers were announced in randomized order during the broadcast to build , but official post-event rankings confirmed the televote hierarchy. The ten countries advancing from the semi-final were: , , , , Greece, , , , , and . Notable non-qualifiers included debuts from , , and , as well as established entrants like , , and . Minor discrepancies emerged between on-screen scores for non-qualifiers and official tallies, attributed to post-broadcast verification of televote data, though qualifier rankings remained unchanged.

Final Outcomes

Ukraine emerged as the winner of the grand final with Ruslana's performance of "Wild Dances", accumulating 280 points from televotes across 36 participating countries. This marked Ukraine's first victory in the contest on its second participation, following a third-place finish in its debut the previous year. The final, held on 15 May 2004, included 24 entries: the host nation Turkey, the automatic qualifiers (, , , and the ), and the top 10 from the semi-final. Serbia and Montenegro placed second with Željko Joksimović's "Lane Moje", receiving 263 points, while secured third position with Sakis Rouvas's "Shake It" earning 252 points, creating a tight race at the top. finished fourth with 123 points via Lisa Andreas's "Stronger Every Minute", and ranked fifth with Athena's "For Real" on 195 points. The bottom three consisted of the (last with 0 points for James Fox's "Hold On to Our Love"), (23rd with 37 points for Xandee's "1 Life"), and (debuting 24th with 11 points for Anjeza Shahini's "The Image"). The complete final rankings and points are summarized below:
PlaceCountryArtist(s)SongPoints
1"Wild Dances"280
2Serbia and Montenegro""263
3""252
4Lisa Andreas"Stronger Every Minute"123
5""195
6"It "107
7Julie & Ludwig"On Again, Off Again"106
8Julia Savicheva"Believe Me"67
9Aleksandra & Konstantin"My Galileo"109
10""87
11"You Are the Only One"133
12Fomins & Kleins"Dziesma Par Laimi"23
13"To Give"57
14""11
15Max"Can't Wait Until Tonight"4
16Neiokõsõmõ"Tii"31
17Macedonia""71
18Deen & Jalena"In the Disco"90
19DenmarkTomas Thordarson"Shame on You"21
20NetherlandsRe-Union"Without You"11
21AustriaTie Break"Du Bist"9
22PolandBlue Café"Love Song"61
23BelgiumXandee"1 Life"37
24United KingdomJames Fox"Hold On to Our Love"0

Detailed Voting Breakdown

In the grand final held on 15 May 2004, each of the 36 participating countries submitted votes derived exclusively from national televotes via telephone and SMS, with no instances requiring fallback to jury votes due to technical failures. Each country ranked its top ten performances, awarding 12, 10, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 point accordingly, for a maximum possible score of 432 points. Votes were revealed sequentially by spokesperson from each country during the broadcast, building suspense in a tight race among the top contenders. No entry received zero points. The aggregated results produced the following standings:
RankCountryArtistSongPoints
1UkraineRuslanaWild Dances280
2Serbia and MontenegroŽeljko JoksimovićLane Moje263
3GreeceSakis RouvasShake It252
4TurkeyAthenaFor Real195
5=CyprusLisa AndreasStronger Every Minute170
5=SwedenLena PhilipssonIt Hurts170
7AlbaniaAnjeza ShahiniThe Image of You106
8GermanyMaxCan't Wait Until Tonight93
9Bosnia and HerzegovinaDeenIn the Disco91
10SpainRamónPara Llenarme de Ti87
11RussiaJulia SavichevaBelieve Me67
12=MaltaJulie and LudwigOn Again... Off Again50
12=CroatiaIvan MikulićYou Are the Only One50
14North MacedoniaToše ProeskiLife47
15FranceJonatan CerradaÀ Chaque Pas40
16United KingdomJames FoxHold On to Our Love29
17PolandBlue CaféLove Song27
18RomaniaSanda LadoșiI Admit18
19IcelandJónsiHeaven16
20NetherlandsRe-UnionWithout You11
21AustriaTie BreakDu Bist9
22=BelgiumXandee1 Life7
22=IrelandChris DoranIf My World Stopped Turning7
24NorwayKnut Anders SørumHigh3
Ukraine's winning tally included eight maximum scores of 12 points, sourced from , , , , , , , and , alongside ten-point awards from , , and . Serbia and Montenegro accumulated seven 12-point votes, reflecting strong Balkan and Eastern support, while received five such top marks, bolstered by Mediterranean neighbors. These high-point distributions underscored the competitive , with the top three entries separated by just 28 points overall.

Analysis of Voting Patterns

Ukraine's victory with 280 points, the highest tally in contest history at the time, was supported by 12 points from 18 countries, demonstrating broad appeal that extended beyond regional lines. These included Eastern European nations such as , , , , , , , , , and , as well as Balkan and Mediterranean entries like Turkey, Cyprus, Greece, Israel, and Malta, and Western European microstates including Portugal, Spain, , Monaco, and San Marino. This distribution indicates that Ruslana's high-energy performance and catchy melody garnered genuine enthusiasm across cultural divides, countering claims of purely bloc-driven success. Serbia and Montenegro's third-place finish with 125 points highlighted pronounced Balkan bloc dynamics, as the entry received its 12 points almost exclusively from former Yugoslav republics and regional neighbors: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia, Montenegro (as part of the union), and North Macedonia. Croatia's allocation of 12 points to Serbia and Montenegro, despite historical tensions, underscored reciprocal voting among culturally and linguistically linked states, a pattern consistent with ethnic solidarity rather than isolated musical evaluation. Similar clustering appeared in other groups, such as Nordic countries favoring Denmark and Finland mutually, and Mediterranean nations like Albania awarding 12 points to Greece while receiving reciprocal high scores. Empirical studies analyzing 2004 data alongside broader Eurovision trends attribute these patterns to causal factors like geographical proximity, shared history, and influences, which predict vote shares more reliably than song quality metrics such as lyrical complexity or values. For example, models reveal that Balkan cliques formed stable alliances, elevating regional entries like Serbia and Montenegro's above entrants with stronger pan-European polling, while host nation Turkey benefited from diffuse sympathy votes totaling 195 points, including 12s from diverse sources like Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ireland. The shift to full televoting in 2004, excluding juries, intensified such biases by empowering national audiences to prioritize familiarity and identity over objective assessment. The investigated post-contest complaints but found no procedural violations, interpreting patterns as reflections of authentic viewer preferences influenced by real-world affinities rather than . Nonetheless, quantitative simulations comparing actual outcomes to randomized models confirm non-random deviations, with 2004 marking an of bloc effects following the semi-final's debut, which encouraged smaller nations to consolidate support for and final placements. Ukraine's success illustrates that compelling entries can these tendencies, yet the persistence of regional favoritism raises questions about the contest's to measure musical appeal.

Broadcasts and Reception

International Broadcast Details

The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 was distributed live via satellite by the to public service in all 36 participating countries, enabling simultaneous transmission of the semi-final on 12 May and the final on 15 May from Istanbul's Abdi İpekçi Arena. Each participating nation's broadcaster, typically an EBU active member, provided localized commentary and vote announcements, ensuring accessibility while adhering to EBU technical for audio and video feeds. Beyond participating nations, the event reached select non-European and non-participating territories, reflecting growing global interest coordinated through EBU associates and independent deals. In Australia, SBS TV aired the semi-finals on a deferred basis on 14 May and the final on 16 May at 19:30 AEST, with commentary by Des Mangan, marking an early instance of consistent Down Under coverage for the contest. Armenia's AMPTV transmitted unspecified portions, while Kosovo's RTK and Puerto Rico's MSN carried coverage with unknown commentators; in the United States, the Israeli Network broadcast to niche audiences, likely focused on expatriate communities rather than mainstream outlets. The final drew an estimated 100 million viewers worldwide, underscoring the contest's expanding international the debut of its semi-final format, which accommodated record participation without displacing established broadcasters. Transmission details varied by region, with some markets opting for delayed feeds to align with zones or programming schedules, though core EBU feeds remained standardized for and in .

Viewership and Media Coverage

The final of the Eurovision Song Contest 2004, broadcast on 15 May from , drew ated 100 million viewers worldwide. In the , the event on achieved 8.3 million viewers, marking it as the top-rated that evening. The preceding semi-final on 12 May, shown on , reached 208,000 viewers. National viewership varied by market size and broadcast slot. In , the contest aligned with high domestic interest following strong national selection ratings of 1.228 million viewers and a 75% share earlier in the year. Germany's preliminary events had similarly drawn 5.71 million viewers with an 18% share, indicating sustained engagement leading into the international final. Media coverage emphasized the contest's expanded format, including the debut semi-final and participation from countries, surpassing prior records. Outlets like reported extensively on Ukraine's unexpected victory by with "Wild Dances," framing it as a morale boost for the nation amid ongoing political challenges. Coverage also noted merchandising tie-ins and live radio accompaniment on , underscoring the event's commercial and reach.

Critical and Public Reception

The Turkish organization of the 2004 Eurovision Song Contest was widely commended for its professionalism and spectacle, transforming the event into a showcase of vibrant Eastern influences. A BBC review highlighted how the hosts "made the show their own with a riot of colour and an exotic dash of eastern promise," emphasizing the seamless execution and cultural flair that elevated the production beyond typical expectations. This marked Turkey's successful debut as host following Sertab Erener's 2003 victory, with logistical elements like the Abdi İpekçi Arena's capacity to accommodate over 7,000 spectators contributing to an atmosphere of high energy. Critical reception focused on the performances' diversity and intensity, particularly Ukraine's "Wild Dances" by Ruslana, which secured victory with 280 points—Ukraine's debut win and one of the contest's most energetic entries. Professional observers noted the song's fusion of world music elements and Ruslana's commanding stage presence, including her unassisted vocals amid vigorous choreography, as factors in its broad appeal. Serbia and Montenegro's "Lane Moje" by Željko Joksimović also drew acclaim for its emotive ballad style, finishing second with 263 points and influencing subsequent Balkan entries. However, some critiques pointed to uneven song quality overall, with the introduction of the semi-final format praised for filtering stronger acts but criticized for sidelining promising debuts like Estonia's. Public reception, gauged through viewer feedback and audience responses, was enthusiastic regarding the live atmosphere and crowd engagement, with reports of spectators actively singing along to amplify the communal feel. BBC viewer comments reflected this divide: while some dismissed elements as "naff," others described the show as "superbly arranged" with a "good standard of performances," specifically praising the UK's James Fox despite his fifth-place finish. The contest's expansion to 36 participating countries via the semi-final on May 12 generated buzz for broadening representation, though fan discussions later noted frustrations over eliminated acts like Belarus, underscoring a perception of variable field strength. Overall, the event's hosting in Istanbul fostered positive sentiment toward Turkey's role, setting a benchmark for future non-Western European venues.

Incidents and Irregularities

Technical and Procedural Issues

During the semi-final on May 12, 2004, a fault in vote aggregation from Monaco and Croatia led to miscalculated public televoting results for multiple countries. The (EBU) identified the issue approximately one hour after the broadcast concluded, attributing it to errors in incoming votes from those nations' broadcasters. Although nine participating countries experienced minor score adjustments, the overall qualification outcomes remained unchanged, with the top ten entrants advancing to the final as originally announced. In the same semi-final, Turkish broadcaster TRT inadvertently inserted an unscheduled commercial break immediately before Slovenia's performance, preventing domestic viewers from hearing the entry "Stay Forever" by Platin. This broadcast error stemmed from a cueing mistake by the host broadcaster and did not impact the international feed or competition results, though it highlighted coordination challenges in live transmission scheduling. The final on May 15, 2004, encountered broadcast disruptions during a planned mid-show hiatus for international advertising slots, where technical glitches caused delays in resuming the program. Host broadcaster TRT also reported issues with video cueing, including miscues during interval acts and the introduction of 2003 winner Sertab Erener, which affected the smoothness of transitions but not the core performances or voting process. These incidents reflected broader logistical strains from the event's expanded format, including the debut semi-final, but organizers confirmed no procedural violations or alterations to final rankings resulted.

On-Site Events

The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 semi-final and final took place at the Abdi Arena in on 12 May and 15 May, respectively, without documented major disruptions or irregularities at the venue itself. The production featured elaborate , including the opening of the final with 2003 winner descending in a simulated accompanied by the dance ensemble, which performed traditional Turkish routines integrated into the interval acts. Hosts Korhan Abay and Meltem Cumbul managed the proceedings, with all 22 final participants delivering their live performances as scheduled, drawing on the arena's capacity for over 12,000 spectators. Security measures were in place amid Turkey's hosting of an international event, but no protests, evacuations, or backstage altercations involving participants were reported in contemporary accounts. This contrasted with off-site voting discrepancies later identified by organizers.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Political Bloc Voting

Allegations of political bloc voting in the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 centered on the voting patterns favoring Ukraine's entry "Wild Dances" by Ruslana, which secured victory with 280 points, including 12 points from eight countries: Estonia, , , , , , , and . Critics, including media commentators, argued that the disproportionate support from former Soviet republics and Eastern European nations—such as (12 points), (10 points), (12 points), (12 points), (12 points), and (12 points)—reflected coordinated regional alliances rather than objective assessments of song quality, potentially disadvantaging Western entrants like those from Denmark or . These claims gained traction in post-contest discussions, with outlets attributing the outcome to emerging "Eastern bloc" dynamics amid the contest's expansion to include more post-communist states since the 1990s. Statistical analyses of voting data supported observations of clustered preferences but challenged purely political interpretations. Derek Gatherer's 2004 study, using simulations on historical voting matrices, identified a "" bloc involving Eastern European countries that exhibited statistically significant mutual high-point exchanges, consistent with patterns in the 2004 final where former Soviet and states prioritized each other over non-regional competitors. Similar findings in subsequent research, such as a analysis of political bias, highlighted Balkan and Eastern blocs but noted that correlations often aligned more closely with cultural, linguistic, or diaspora ties—such as shared or post-Soviet familiarity—than explicit geopolitical , as also received top scores from non-Eastern nations like Iceland and Israel. Gatherer's work further indicated that such patterns intensified between 1999 and 2005, coinciding with the influx of new participants, though causality remained tied to viewer familiarity rather than proven collusion. The European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which oversees the contest, did not conduct a specific investigation into 2004's voting but addressed broader bloc voting complaints in a 2007 review, concluding no evidence of systematic irregularities or manipulation across contests, emphasizing televoting's reflection of public tastes. Proponents of the allegations countered that self-reported viewer motivations, often invoking national solidarity, underscored causal influences from regional identities, though empirical models like Gatherer's showed these as emergent from bilateral "friendship" networks rather than top-down political directives. No formal sanctions or rule changes directly stemmed from 2004 claims, but they contributed to ongoing debates leading to later reforms like jury-televote splits in 2009 to counter perceived biases.

Nationalistic Influences and Bias Claims

Claims of nationalistic influences in the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 centered on the transition to telephone voting, which organizers hoped would mitigate jury-led biases but instead amplified patterns of diaspora support and regional favoritism. Turkish expatriates in Germany, for example, were reported to have mobilized votes for Turkey's entry, contributing to its strong performance despite mid-tier jury rankings in prior years. Similarly, entrenched alliances like consistently awarding top points to exemplified ongoing ethnic and historical ties overriding broader appeal. Ukraine's upset victory with Ruslana's "Wild Dances" fueled specific bias allegations, as the entry surged past favorites from Greece and Serbia and Montenegro through concentrated support from Eastern European and Balkan nations. Voting data revealed Serbia and Montenegro receiving 12 points from Croatia, indicative of sub-regional solidarity amid post-Yugoslav tensions. Critics attributed this to coordinated bloc tactics rather than universal song quality, with Ukraine garnering 12 points from nine countries, many sharing linguistic or Soviet-era affinities. Empirical analyses of 2004 voting matrices confirm geographical proximity and cultural similarity as predictors of high scores, with Balkan and former Eastern Bloc countries exchanging disproportionate points independent of performance metrics like national pre-selections. One study quantified neighborly voting effects, showing positive correlations for adjacent or linguistically linked entrants, potentially diluting merit-based outcomes. Patriotic self-voting and diaspora effects further skewed results, as expatriate communities in host nations like Germany influenced tallies beyond domestic listener preferences. Such patterns reinforced perceptions of Eurovision as a for identity assertion, with Turkey leveraging the role to national via themed postcards emphasizing Anatolian heritage, criticism from groups for exclusionary narratives. While some dismiss bloc claims as overstated—arguing votes reflect stylistic familiarity from shared influences—data consistently indicate non-musical factors like historical alliances exerted causal weight, challenging the contest's apolitical .

Responses from Organizers and Participants

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU), responsible for overseeing the contest, defended the full implementation of public televoting in 2004 as a means to reflect genuine viewer preferences, attributing apparent regional voting clusters to shared cultural and linguistic ties among audiences rather than deliberate political manipulation. Executive Supervisor Svante Stockselius emphasized that such patterns arose from natural affinities, a stance consistent with EBU analyses of voting data showing no evidence of systemic fraud or government-directed blocs. Turkish organizers, including host broadcaster TRT, highlighted the contest's smooth execution and high viewership as validation of the event's fairness, with presenter Korhan Abay explicitly rejecting political voting claims by noting, "The voting is by the people, not the governments," in response to on-site queries about Balkan and Eastern European point exchanges. No formal investigations into bloc voting were launched by the EBU post-contest, as preliminary reviews confirmed the robustness of the Digame voting partner system's aggregation from over 36 countries. Among participants, responses were subdued, with top finishers like Ukraine's Ruslana focusing on the energetic, folk-inspired appeal of "Wild Dances" to explain her record 280-point win, without engaging bloc allegations in immediate interviews. Second-place entrant Željko Joksimović from similarly attributed strong regional support to the ballad "Lane Moje"'s emotional across ex-Yugoslav and Balkan audiences. Western entrants, such as the 's James Fox (18th place), expressed private frustration over low points from Eastern jurors but offered no public statements challenging the results, aligning with the EBU's view that televoting captured influences legitimately.

Post-Contest Recognition

Marcel Bezençon Awards

The , named after the founder of the , were presented during the 2004 event in Istanbul to honor exceptional entries among the 24 finalists, as determined by specific voting groups rather than the general public televote. Introduced in 2002, the awards comprised three categories in 2004: the Artistic Award, voted by a panel of previous winners for the best overall artistic ; the Press Award, selected by accredited international press members for the most outstanding ; and the newly introduced Composer Award, replacing the prior Fan Award and voted by the participating composers for the best and most original . This shift to composer voting emphasized technical songwriting merit over fan popularity. The Artistic Award went to Ukraine's Ruslana for "Wild Dances," recognizing her energetic fusion of traditional Hutsul folk elements with modern pop and dance rhythms, performed with dynamic that contributed to her overall contest victory with 280 points. The Press Award was awarded to Serbia and Montenegro's Željko Joksimović for "Lane moje," a sevdah-influenced that placed second in the final with 263 points; journalists highlighted its emotional depth and vocal as standout qualities. The inaugural Composer Award recognized 's entry "Stronger Every Minute," performed by Andreas and composed by Connaris, praised by fellow composers for its melodic and lyrical resilience theme; Andreas finished erall with 170 points.

Other Honors and Achievements

, representing , was awarded a World Music in September 2004 for her performance and sales success with "Wild Dances". She was also appointed UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador for , serving from 2004 to 2005 in recognition of her cultural influence and advocacy efforts. The 2004 contest achieved , including the debut of a semi-final round to accommodate broader participation and the involvement of a , the highest number up to that point. Ukraine's winning tally of 280 points established a new benchmark for the highest score in a grand final, surpassing previous records and remaining unbeaten for over a decade. This outcome highlighted the entry's strong appeal across diverse voting blocs, contributing to the event's expanded global reach.

Official Album and Commercial Aspects

Album Release and Tracklist

The official compilation album for the Eurovision Song Contest 2004, titled Eurovision Song Contest: Istanbul 2004, was released as a double CD on , 2004, by in association with . It featured studio recordings of all 36 participating entries, divided across two discs in a copy-protected jewel case format with a 12-page booklet containing lyrics and artist information. The tracklist followed a sequence grouping semifinal and final performers, with approximate durations for each song ranging from 2:48 to 3:10 minutes.
DiscTrackArtistTitleDuration
11Marta Roure3:00
12Anjeza Shahini3:00
13Tie BreakDu Bist3:10
14DeenIn The Disco2:55
15Xandee1 Life2:57
16Alexandra & KonstantinMy Galileo2:55
17Piero & The Music StarsCelebrate!2:54
18Željko Joksimović & Ad Hoc OrchestraLane Moje3:01
19Lisa AndreasStronger Every Minute3:02
110MaxCan't Wait Until Tonight3:01
111Tomas ThordarsonShame On You2:48
112NeiokõsõTii3:01
113RamónPara Llenarme De Ti2:58
114Jonatan CerradaA Chaque Pas3:08
115Jari SillanpääTakes 2 To Tango2:59
116James FoxHold On To Our Love2:58
117Sakis RouvasShake It3:02
118Ivan MikulićYou Are The Only One3:01
21Chris DoranIf My World Stopped Turning3:01
22David D'OrTo Believe3:03
23JónsiHeaven3:06
24Linas & SimonaWhat Happened To Your Love3:02
25Fomins & KleinsDziesma Par Laimi3:03
26MaryonNotre Planète3:04
27Julie & LudwigOn Again... Off Again3:01
28Toše ProeskiLife3:02
29Re-UnionWithout You3:00
210Knut Anders SørumHigh3:03
211Blue CaféLove Song2:49
212Sofia VitóriaFoi Magia3:01
213SandaI Admit2:58
214Julia SavichevaBelieve Me2:49
215Lena PhilipssonIt Hurts3:03
216PlatinStay Forever3:00
217AthenaFor Real3:01
218RuslanaWild Dances3:02

Commercial Performance and Charts

The official Eurovision Song Contest: Istanbul 2004, released by on , 2004, achieved modest performance in . In the , it debuted at number 30 on the Official Compilation Albums Chart on , 2004, and remained on the chart for four weeks. No significant sales figures or certifications for the album have been publicly reported, reflecting the typically for Eurovision compilations at the time. The contest's winning entry, "Wild Dances" by Ruslana representing Ukraine, drove much of the associated commercial activity. The single topped the Belgian singles chart for 10 consecutive weeks, reached number one in Greece and Ukraine, and charted across nine European countries for a cumulative 97 weeks. It earned gold certifications in Belgium (25,000 units), Greece, and Romania. In the UK, it peaked at number 47 on the Official Singles Chart. Other contest entries saw limited post-event chart traction; for instance, Turkey's runner-up "For Real" by Athena and Poland's "Shake" by Natalia did not achieve comparable international success or certifications. Overall, the 2004 contest's commercial impact was concentrated on the victorious track, aligning with patterns where winning songs often outperform the broader compilation in sales and airplay.

Legacy and Long-Term Impact

Effects on Winners and Participants

Ruslana Lyzhychko's victory with "Wild Dances" on elevated her from a domestic to a prominent figure in pop music, with the track achieving sustained by topping charts in and charting across multiple countries for nearly two years. This facilitated tours, performances at major events, and her designation as a UNESCO Artist for Peace in 2005, while also enabling advocacy roles, including a 2004 hunger strike to highlight Ukraine's pro-democracy Orange Revolution and subsequent charity initiatives for affected children. Her post-contest trajectory included recognition as People's Artist of Ukraine, underscoring the win's role in amplifying her cultural and political influence amid Ukraine's geopolitical shifts. Among other top finishers, , who placed second with "Lane leveraged the debut performance's to sustain a prolific regional career, including composing entries that secured for in 2006 and in 2008, establishing him as a recurring Eurovision influencer. Sakis Rouvas, finishing third with "Shake It," capitalized on the result to reinforce his pre-existing stardom, as the single became one of best-selling CD releases and contributed to his 2005 World Music Award for World's Best-Selling . Broader participant outcomes were more varied, with debuting nations like and gaining initial that aided domestic for entrants such as and Aleksandra & Konstantin, though breakthroughs remained limited outside the podium. Allegations of Eastern bloc voting patterns, which propelled Ukraine's win despite lower jury preferences in some analyses, prompted scrutiny but did not demonstrably deter long-term participation or career pursuits among entrants, as evidenced by continued strong showings from established acts. Overall, the contest's semi-final format debut amplified for non-automatic qualifiers, fostering modest visibility gains for mid-tier performers without the transformative commercial lifts seen in winners.

Influence on Future Eurovision Formats

The introduction of a semi-final round in the 2004 represented a pivotal structural reform, enabling the participation of 36 countries for the first time by qualifying the top 10 performers from a preliminary event of 22 entrants to join the host nation (Turkey) and the "Big Four" (France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom) in the grand final, resulting in a 24-act finale. This change addressed the logistical constraints of an expanding field, which had previously led to the exclusion of countries via relegation systems in the late 1990s and early 2000s, thereby democratizing access and fostering debuts for nations such as Albania, Andorra, Belarus, and Serbia and Montenegro. The semi-final format established in 2004 became a cornerstone of subsequent contests, persisting with modifications like the adoption of two semi-finals in 2008 to further balance qualification opportunities and reduce scheduling pressures, ultimately supporting fields exceeding 40 entrants annually without reverting to exclusions. This evolution directly stemmed from 2004's precedent, as it demonstrated the viability of multi-stage events in maintaining broadcast feasibility while prioritizing inclusivity, with all participating countries granted voting rights in the semi-final to enhance engagement. Additional format innovations in 2004, including an extended 10-minute televoting window and the debut of a standardized EBU-owned logo adaptable with the host's flag, influenced long-term efforts, emphasis toward centralized and consistent visual across editions rather than host-specific designs. These elements contributed to the contest's from a single-night event to a multi-programme spectacle, setting the stage for future expansions in production scale and global reach.

Broader Cultural and Political Ramifications

Ukraine's triumph with Ruslana's "Wild Dances" on projected Hutsul ethnic influences—drawing from Carpathian traditions—onto a pan-European , fostering a revival of indigenous Ukrainian musical elements amid post-Soviet cultural reassertion. This debut victory for instilled widespread domestic , framing the contest as a for soft and self-imaging distinct from cultural dominance. Ruslana's subsequent activism during the protests in 2004 retroactively politicized her win, as her elevated profile from Eurovision enabled her to rally crowds in Kyiv's Square against electoral , intertwining cultural with pro-Western democratic aspirations. Her participation underscored causal links between international and domestic , though the contest itself remained apolitical in intent. Turkey's hosting in , the first in a Muslim-majority nation, embodied the event's "Under the Same Sky" on May 12–15, 2004, symbolizing secular aspirations for candidacy amid bridging Eurasian divides. With 36 participating countries—a record due to the new semi-final —this edition highlighted Turkey's modern infrastructure and , yet presaged tensions as Islamist governance under the AKP consolidated, contrasting the event's projected cosmopolitanism. Televoting introduced in prior years amplified regional affinities in 2004 outcomes, evident in Balkan cross-support (e.g., Croatia awarding 12 points to Serbia and Montenegro's debut entry), prioritizing cultural proximity over song merit per empirical analyses, though overt political collusion lacked substantiation. Public backlash, including calls to revert to juries, reflected perceptions of televote distortions favoring diaspora and neighborly ties over universal appeal. Overall, the 2004 contest exemplified Eurovision's function in participatory diplomacy, enabling smaller states like Ukraine to negotiate "Europeanness" via cultural performance, while exposing limits of apolitical framing in geopolitically charged contexts.

References

  1. [1]
    Istanbul 2004 - Eurovision.tv
    Istanbul 2004 ; Winner Ukraine Ruslana ; Semi-Final Wednesday, 12 May, 2004, 21:00 CEST ; Grand Final Saturday, 15 May, 2004, 21:00 CEST ; Venue & Location Türkiye ...Missing: city | Show results with:city
  2. [2]
    Eurovision 2004 Results: Voting & Points - Eurovisionworld
    Eurovision 2004 results: All the voting and points from the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 in Istanbul. Ukraine won with the song "Wild Dances" by Ruslana ...
  3. [3]
    Everything about Eurovision 2004 | Songs, videos, points, more
    Istanbul 2004. Number of participants: 36. Venue: Abdi Ipekci Sport Center. Hosts: Meltem Cumbul and Korhan Abay. Check the final here.
  4. [4]
    Entertainment | Your views: Eurovision 2004 - BBC NEWS
    May 16, 2004 · The song beat spirited competition from the Greek and Serbia and Montenegrin entries, but accusations of political bias in the voting may have ...
  5. [5]
    Riga 2003 - Eurovision.tv
    Winner Türkiye Sertab Erener · Final Saturday, 24 May, 2003, 21:00 CEST · Venue & Location Latvia Skonto Olympic Hall, Riga, Latvia · Host Broadcaster LPSM ...
  6. [6]
    The end of a decade: Istanbul 2004 - Eurovision.tv
    Dec 25, 2009 · The complete participants list of the 2004 Eurovision Song Contest.. The controversies. An hour after the Semi-Final had been aired, the EBU ...Missing: events | Show results with:events
  7. [7]
    Eurovision Istanbul for sure! - ESCToday.com
    Mar 17, 2015 · Therefore, Antalya was ruled out immediately. It was decided that Istanbul was the most appropriate city, since it met this criterion, and also ...
  8. [8]
    Ten Years On From Istanbul, Are We Still 'Under The Same Sky?
    Mar 12, 2014 · National identity as a construction and the politics of nationalism are both reinforced through the Eurovision Song Contest in 2004. Let's ...
  9. [9]
    EU enlargement - European Union
    Applied for EU membership in March 2004 · Became a candidate country in December 2005 · Membership negotiations opened in March 2022.Missing: Eurovision | Show results with:Eurovision
  10. [10]
    Eurovision sparks Cyprus debate | News - Al Jazeera
    May 9, 2004 · Meanwhile, Turkish officials see Istanbul hosting the competition as an important boost for the country's campaign to gain EU membership. This ...
  11. [11]
    (PDF) Turkey's Eurovision Entries as a Reflection of Political ...
    May 11, 2023 · This paper aims to investigate the relationship between Turkey's participation in the Eurovision Song Contest and its efforts to join the ...
  12. [12]
    The popular geopolitics of Eurovision - Geography Directions
    May 5, 2023 · Their performance of 'Stefania' secured Ukraine's third ESC victory in the history of their participation of a competition, which dates back to ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Gender and Geopolitics in the Eurovision Song Contest
    Malta and Cyprus, the two states outside eastern Europe to be included in the. 2004 EU expansion, had started participating in Eurovision in 1971 and 1981.
  14. [14]
    The Geopolitics of Eurovision
    May 11, 2024 · It explored how Eurovision was designed to be non-political, internationally friendly, and fun, it is – with these contexts in mind – also ...
  15. [15]
    The 20-year evolution of the Eurovision Semi-Finals
    Aug 16, 2023 · The first ever Eurovision Song Contest Semi-Final was held on Wednesday 12 May 2004 at 21:00 CET, with 22 countries performing. It kicked-off ...
  16. [16]
    Facts & Figures | Eurovision Song Contest
    The challenge was solved in 2004, when a Semi-Final was introduced. Growing interest lead to the introduction of a second Semi-Final in 2008. As a result, a ...
  17. [17]
    Milestone Moments: 2004 - Eurovision goes wild!
    Sep 21, 2016 · The 2004 contest saw a Semi-Final introduced for the first time. Albania, Andorra, Belarus along with Serbia and Montenegro all made their respective debuts.Missing: controversies notable<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    rules of the 2004 eurovision song contest
    13) Each Participating Broadcaster is required to book the circuits for the voting procedure as specified by the EBU Eurovision Operations Department, and to ...
  19. [19]
    Eurovision EBU released rules for Eurovision Song Contest 2004
    May 19, 2012 · The voting time will be extended from five to slightly to ten minutes. All countries taking part in 2004 will be given the chance to vote in ...
  20. [20]
    Eurovision Not one person voted in Monaco; or so they said
    The EBU stated that they have identified a problem with the sound during the semi final, have alerted TRT, and will do their best to sort the ...
  21. [21]
    Semi-Final of Istanbul 2004 - Eurovision Song Contest
    Official website of the Eurovision Song Contest. The latest news, photos, videos, participant info, voting results, the Contest's rich history and much ...
  22. [22]
    Participants of Istanbul 2004 - Eurovision Song Contest
    Istanbul 2004 ; Albania · Anjeza Shahini ; Andorra · Marta Roure ; Austria · Tie Break ; Belarus · Aleksandra & Konstantin ; Belgium · Xandee.
  23. [23]
    Countries Serbia & Montenegro - Eurovision.tv
    Serbia & Montenegro was a union of states that competed in the Eurovision Song Contests of 2004 and 2005. Their debut entry Lane Moje ('My Fawn') performed ...
  24. [24]
    Map of the amount of times each country has withdrawn ... - Reddit
    Jul 28, 2025 · (Belgium, Estonia, Iceland, Slovenia and Switzerland have only missed contests due to relegation and Germany only missed 1996 after failing to ...
  25. [25]
    National Selections: 2004 - Eurovisionworld
    Complete database with all the votings, points, songs and lyrics from the Eurovision Song Contest history: 2004
  26. [26]
    Abdi Ipekci Basketball Arena - All About Istanbul
    It is one of the largest indoor sports complexes of Turkey, with a total capacity of 10,500 spectators. Efes Pilsen, Fenerbahce Ulker, and Galatasaray Cafe ...
  27. [27]
    Full cast & crew - IMDb
    Cast ; Meltem Cumbul · Self - Host ; Korhan Abay · Self - Host ; Zeljko Joksimovic · Self - Serbia and Montenegro Entry: 1st Place ; Ruslana Lyzhicko · Self - Ukrainian ...
  28. [28]
    Eurovision Song Contest Presenters - escstats.com
    Here are all the Eurovision Presenters: ; 2004, Meltem Cumbal ; Korhan Abay ; 2005, Masha Efrosnina ; DJ Pasha.
  29. [29]
    2004 Eurovision Song Contest from Istanbul/Turkey - YouTube
    Jul 23, 2022 · Dates: Semi-final 12 May 2004 - Final 15 May 2004 Host Venue: Abdi İpekçi Arena, Istanbul, Turkey Presenters: Korhan Abay, Meltem Cumbul ...
  30. [30]
    List of Eurovision Song Contest presenters - eurofestivalpost.it
    Green room hosts ; 1980, Netherlands Hans van Willigenburg ; 2003, Latvia Ilze Jaunalksne and Dīvs Reiznieks ; 2004, Turkey Sertab Erener ; 2005, Ukraine Ruslana ...
  31. [31]
    Eurovision Song Contest 2004
    The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 was the 49th edition of the contest, held in Istanbul, Turkey at the Abdi İpekçi Arena and was hosted by Meltem Cumbul and ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  32. [32]
    Sertab Erener - Everyway That I Can / Leave | Opening Act
    Jul 27, 2025 · Your browser can't play this video. ... Sertab Erener opened the Grand Final of the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 in Istanbul with a performance of her winning ...
  33. [33]
    Eurovision Song Contest 2004
    Final ; 21, Flag of Cyprus Cyprus, Lisa Andreas, "Stronger Every Minute", English ; 22, Flag of Turkey Turkey, Athena, "For Real", English ...Missing: selection | Show results with:selection
  34. [34]
    EUROVISION SONG CONTEST 2004: AFTERSHOW + LIVE ...
    Apr 24, 2024 · The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 was the 49th edition of the Eurovision Song Contest. It took place in Istanbul, Turkey, following the ...Missing: details ceremony
  35. [35]
    Eurovision Inside details Eurovision Song Contest 2004
    May 19, 2012 · The stage will not be huge, but very usefull for different purposes and can be called typically Turkish in terms of shapes and colours. The ...
  36. [36]
    Grand Final of Istanbul 2004 - Eurovision Song Contest
    Official website of the Eurovision Song Contest. The latest news, photos ... Ruslana won the 2004 Eurovision Song Contest with her song Wild Dances ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  37. [37]
    Throwback to Istanbul – Eurovision 2004 - ESCBubble
    Jun 11, 2020 · Turkey got their first Eurovision victory 28 years after its debut thanks to Sertab Erener and her song “Every Way That I Can”.
  38. [38]
    Eurovision 2004 Semi-final Results - Eurovisionworld
    Results, voting and points from the Semi-final, Eurovision Song Contest 2004 in Istanbul. Serbia & Montenegro won the Semi-final with the song "Lane moje" ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Results of the Semi-Final of Istanbul 2004 - Eurovision Song Contest
    Official website of the Eurovision Song Contest. The latest news, photos, videos, participant info, voting results, the Contest's rich history and much more ...
  40. [40]
    The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 FINAL SCORES - HeyRick!
    Score table. 1st, Ukraine, The, 280, 12th, Croatia, 50. 2nd, Serbia & Montenegro, 263, 14th, F.Y.R. Macedonia, 47. 3rd, Greece, 252, 15th, France, 40.<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Results of the Grand Final of Istanbul 2004 - Eurovision Song Contest
    Who voted for Ukraine. Points received. 12. Estonia. Iceland. Israel. Latvia. Lithuania. Poland. Russia. Türkiye. 10. Andorra. Belarus. Portugal.
  42. [42]
    Ruslana Lyzhychko wins Eurovision 2004 Grand Prix in Istanbul and ...
    May 18, 2023 · It is noteworthy that Ruslana received the highest score (twelve points) thanks to the votes cast by viewers in Iceland, Estonia, Lithuania, ...
  43. [43]
    Eurovision: why bloc voting doesn't exist, and why 'we' think 'they' do it
    May 22, 2012 · In 2004, Croatia gave 12 points to Serbia-Montenegro, which was appearing for the first time (or the first time since 1992). The vote made ...
  44. [44]
    Results of the Grand Final of Istanbul 2004 - Eurovision Song Contest
    Istanbul 2004. OverviewParticipants Semi-Final Grand Final · Scoreboard Detailed voting results. Show results of. Albania, Andorra · Austria · Belarus · Belgium ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] An Analysis of Political Voting Bias in the Eurovision Song Contest
    This study supports the claims of political voting and that Eurovision voting patterns are meaningful indicators of public opinion and inter-regional ...
  46. [46]
    Examining Collusion and Voting Biases Between Countries During ...
    Comparison of Eurovision song contest simulation with actual results reveals shifting patterns of collusive voting alliances. Journal of Artificial ...
  47. [47]
    Eurovision: Exposing the voting patterns with data mapping!
    May 22, 2015 · Eurovision Song Contest: Regression analysis highlights the voting patterns ; Eastern Europe doesn't appear to be fans of the Spanish entries ( ...
  48. [48]
    The Eurovision Song Contest: voting rules, biases and rationality
    Jul 30, 2022 · Only the first ten collect points: 12 points for the top song, 10 for the second, 8 to 1 for the eight remaining songs; all other songs get zero ...
  49. [49]
    Eurovision cleared over block voting | Media | The Guardian
    Aug 6, 2007 · An inquiry by the organisers of the Eurovision song contest into claims that countries engaged in block voting has found no evidence of irregularities.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Derek Gatherer: Comparison of Eurovision Song Contest Simulation ...
    Mar 31, 2006 · Yair found 5 cliques of reciprocating nations. This was the first published evidence of collusive voting behaviour in the contest. However, the ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Eurovision Song Contest 2004 | International Broadcasts Wiki
    The Eurovision Song Contest 2004 was the 49th edition of the Eurovision Song Contest. It took place in Istanbul, Turkey, following the country's victory at ...
  52. [52]
    Ruslana Wins Eurovision - Kyiv Post
    Ruslana Lyzhychko's victory at the Eurovision 2004 Song Contest May 15 in Istanbul did more than make Ukrainians euphoric. It's raising questions about ...
  53. [53]
    Entertainment | Eurovision attracts 8.3m viewers - BBC NEWS
    ... million viewers, as Saturday's highest-rating show ... million viewers ... Eurovision 2004 Contest · Eurovision's hopefuls. HAVE YOUR SAY. Your views: Eurovision ...
  54. [54]
    Eurovision Shocking audience figures - ESCToday.com
    Viewing figures for the semifinal however increased from 208,000 in 2004 to 267,000 in 2005. This is an increase of 28.4% for the digital channel BBC3. 198,000 ...
  55. [55]
    Norway in the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 - Wikipedia
    The national final was watched by 1.228 million viewers in Norway with a market share of 75%. ... "Eurovision 2004: this is the running order!". Esctoday ...
  56. [56]
    Germany in the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 - Wikipedia
    Since 1996, NDR had set up national finals with several artists to choose both the song and performer to compete at Eurovision for Germany. On 26 September ...
  57. [57]
    Eurovision signs merchandising deal | Marketing & PR | The Guardian
    Apr 28, 2004 · The semi-final will be shown live on BBC3, with live coverage of this year's final on BBC1 and Radio 2. Wogan, whose acidic commentary is the ...<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Entertainment | Ukraine celebrates Eurovision win - BBC NEWS
    May 16, 2004 · Ukraine singer Ruslana wins the 2004 Eurovision Song Contest, held in Istanbul, in Turkey ... The host country Turkey took fourth spot in ...
  59. [59]
    Entertainment | Turks deliver Eurovision delight - BBC NEWS
    May 16, 2004 · The Turkish hosts of this year's Eurovision Song Contest made the show their own with a riot of colour and an exotic dash of eastern promise.
  60. [60]
    Entertainment | Voting fault hits Eurovision heat - BBC NEWS
    May 13, 2004 · Eurovision organisers admit a technical hitch meant public votes for the contest's semi-final were miscalculated.
  61. [61]
    2004 Eurovision Song Contest DVD - ESCToday.com
    And it's clear that there were technical problems with the broadcast, many of which are also on the DVD. Host broadcaster TRT miscued some video (example, the ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Derek Gatherer: Comparison of Eurovision Song Contest Simulation ...
    Mar 31, 2006 · Gatherer (2004) was the first study to explicitly state which collusive patterns were significant at the 5% level, and that paper also has a ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Culturally-Biased Voting in the Eurovision Song Contest
    In our analysis, we find empirical evidence for the existence of voting bias in the national contest (BSC). Furthermore, a large set of independent variables ...
  64. [64]
    Eurovision Song Contest: 'It's soft politics, but it's politics' | CNN
    May 24, 2012 · Fricker says that, much like the avowedly apolitical Olympic Games, the contest has become an important political forum because of its ...Missing: significance | Show results with:significance
  65. [65]
    Entertainment | Eurovision voting, mockery and politics - BBC NEWS
    May 15, 2004 · Turkey has pulled out all the stops to make Eurovision 2004 a stunning success. And as it has done so it has revealed the gaping chasm ...Missing: geopolitics | Show results with:geopolitics
  66. [66]
    Voting in the Eurovision Song Contest - Sage Journals
    Dec 4, 2017 · In this article, we are interested in the voting behaviour of Eurovision viewers. Do they vote sincerely, strategically according to rational choice ...<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    It's not always just about the musicin the Eurovision song ...
    ... 2004. Svante Stockselius, Eurovision's executive supervisor and the EBU's top representative in Athens, says regional culture and language ties can explain ...
  68. [68]
    Marcel Bezençon Awards | Eurovision Song Contest
    Former winners · Tel Aviv 2019 · Lisbon 2018 · Kyiv 2017 · Stockholm 2016 · Vienna 2015 · Copenhagen 2014 · Malmö 2013 · Baku 2012.
  69. [69]
    Marcel Bezençon Award
    “To honor and celebrate the outstanding participants of the Eurovision Song Contest the Marcel Bezençon Award has been handed out annually since 2002.
  70. [70]
    Watch Now #EurovisionAgain: Istanbul 2004 - Eurovision.tv
    Nov 20, 2021 · Eurovision Song Contest 2004 results in full. Ruslana's energetic performance impressed the audience in 2004 EBU. Turkish delight on a moonlit ...Missing: global | Show results with:global<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Ruslana returns! - Eurovision.tv
    May 4, 2017 · Since she won the Eurovision Song Contest with Wild Dances in 2004 the Ukrainian star has gone on to win a World Music Award and was listed ...
  72. [72]
    World Music Awards - Facebook
    May 24, 2015 · Ruslana was the UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador in Ukraine in 2004-2005. in September 2004 she received a World Music Awards at the 2004 Ceremony in ...
  73. [73]
    EUROVISION SONG CONTEST 2004
    Following Sertab Erener's fantastic victory in Riga last year, Istanbul is host city for Eurovision 2004. A record thirty-six countries took part in this year's ...
  74. [74]
    Ruslana Facts for Kids
    Oct 17, 2025 · She won the 2004 Eurovision Song Contest with her song "Wild Dances". She received 280 points, which was a record at the time. After her win, ...
  75. [75]
    Eurovision Song Contest: Istanbul 2004 - Vario... | AllMusic
    Eurovision Song Contest: Istanbul 2004 by Various Artists released in 2004. Find album ... Release Date. June 15, 2004. Duration. 01:47:58 ... Releases ...
  76. [76]
    Various - Eurovision Song Contest Istanbul 2004
    - **Release Date:** Not explicitly stated, but context suggests 2004 (e.g., ©&℗ 2004, released before the contest).
  77. [77]
    EUROVISION SONG CONTEST - ISTANBUL 2004 – VARIOUS ...
    Latest chart stats about EUROVISION SONG CONTEST - ISTANBUL 2004 - peak chart position, weeks on chart, catalogue number, week-by-week chart placement and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Chart Log UK: Various Artists (Compilations) - Zobbel.de
    ¶EUROVISION SONG CONTEST – ISTANBUL 2004 (EMI). 2004 (8.05.2004): 30 (-/4). ¶EUROVISION SONG CONTEST – KIEV 2005 (EMI). 2005 (14.05.2005): 30 (-/2). ¶EUROVISION ...Missing: positions | Show results with:positions
  79. [79]
    Before Russia Invaded Ukraine, They Were Bitter Eurovision Rivals
    Apr 28, 2022 · “Wild Dances” spent 10 weeks at No. 1 in Belgium and also topped the Greek and Ukrainian charts. Ruslana's album, with both Ukrainian and ...
  80. [80]
    Wild Dances by Ruslana - Music Charts - Acharts.co
    Wild Dances by Ruslana appeared on 9 charts for 66 weeks, peaked at #1 in Belgium. View detailed chart stats.Missing: Europe | Show results with:Europe
  81. [81]
    Eurovision's highest charting songs in the UK
    While mainland Europe has long enjoyed a wealth of languages in each country's chart ... 2004 Ukraine Ruslana "Wild Dances" # 47 2007 Russia Serebo "Song #1" # 99
  82. [82]
    Ruslana, still original and authentic - Eurovision.tv
    Aug 14, 2013 · After it won the 2004 Eurovision Song Contest, Ruslana's Wild Dances hit the charts in several countries and even topped some, like the Flemish ...
  83. [83]
    SPIEGEL Interview with Ukrainian Pop Star Ruslana: "Life Has ...
    May 4, 2005 · Ukrainian singer Ruslana Lyzhicko won the Eurovision contest. A half a year later, she went on a hunger strike in her homeland to draw more media attention to ...
  84. [84]
    Ruslana's Defiance in the Face of Horror - Wilson Center
    Nov 1, 2024 · Following her 2004 Eurovision Song Contest victory, she organized a charity concert for children suffering from the consequences of the ...
  85. [85]
    Željko Joksimović - Eurovision.tv
    He was runner up in the 2004 Eurovision Song Contest as a performer, took third and sixth places respectively as a composer in the 2006 and 2008 contests.
  86. [86]
    Sakis Rouvas - Eurovision.tv
    In 2005, Sakis won the World Music Award for World's Best-Selling Greek Artist. In 2006, Sakis and Maria Menounos were the hosts of the Eurovision Song Contest, ...
  87. [87]
    Second-time lucky for Sakis? - Eurovision.tv
    May 6, 2009 · In the Eurovision Song Contest 2004, Sakis reached the third place with his song Shake It. He performed in the closing ceremony of the Athens ...
  88. [88]
    8 times Ukraine's Eurovision ride got political - Politico.eu
    May 12, 2022 · Singer Ruslana took home the top prize with a fierce performance of “Wild Dances.” The song wasn't overtly political, but it embraced a post- ...
  89. [89]
    Why Eurovision is Ukraine's soft power secret weapon
    Jun 1, 2021 · No single event has done as much to promote Brand Ukraine or showcase the country's creativity as the Eurovision Song Contest.
  90. [90]
    The Eurovision Song Contest as platform for reproduction and ...
    May 16, 2025 · This article delves into the Eurovision Song Contest (ESC) as a space where national identity intertwines with evolving notions of “Europeanness” and the ...