Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fictitious force

A fictitious force, also known as a pseudo-force or inertial force, is an apparent force that seems to act upon an object in a non-inertial reference frame—such as one that is accelerating or rotating—but originates solely from the motion of the observer's frame rather than any physical interaction between the object and its environment.^[1]^[2] These forces are introduced to make Newton's laws of motion applicable in such frames, where they would otherwise appear violated, and they always act in proportion to the object's mass and the frame's acceleration.^[3] In classical mechanics, fictitious forces distinguish themselves from real forces, which have identifiable physical sources like gravity or electromagnetism and corresponding reaction forces as per Newton's third law.^[2] A key criterion for identifying a fictitious force is the absence of a reaction force; for instance, in a linearly accelerating car, a passenger feels pushed backward, but no external agent pushes them— the effect stems from the frame's acceleration.^[2] Prominent examples include the centrifugal force, which appears to push objects outward in a rotating frame like a merry-go-round, actually resulting from the object's inertia resisting the curved path.^[1]^[3] Another is the Coriolis force, which causes moving objects in a rotating frame—such as a ball thrown on a spinning platform—to deflect perpendicular to their velocity, influencing phenomena like the rotation of hurricanes (counterclockwise in the Northern Hemisphere and clockwise in the Southern).^[1] Fictitious forces play a crucial role in practical applications and geophysical contexts, where Earth's slight rotation introduces subtle effects despite its near-inertial nature.^[2] For example, centrifuges exploit the centrifugal force to separate substances by density, while the Coriolis effect guides long-range ballistics and ocean current patterns.^[1] In non-inertial frames, the effective force on an object is the vector sum of real forces and fictitious ones, allowing consistent predictions of motion; however, transforming to an inertial frame eliminates these artifacts, revealing only genuine interactions.^[1]^[3]

Introduction and Background

Definition and Historical Context

Fictitious forces, also known as pseudo-forces or inertial forces, are apparent forces that emerge when analyzing the motion of objects within a non-inertial reference frame. These forces lack a tangible physical source, such as the interactions underlying gravity or electromagnetism, and instead arise due to the acceleration or rotation of the observer's frame relative to an inertial one. In such frames, the observed deviations from straight-line motion at constant speed—contrary to Newton's first law—necessitate the introduction of these fictitious terms to restore consistency with Newtonian mechanics.^[4]^[5] Newton's laws of motion hold strictly only in inertial reference frames, where no net external forces act on objects at rest or in uniform motion, and acceleration is proportional to applied forces. Non-inertial frames violate this by introducing extraneous accelerations, requiring fictitious forces to account for the apparent motion without altering the underlying physics. This distinction underscores that fictitious forces are mathematical artifacts, not real interactions, enabling the extension of Newtonian analysis to accelerated or rotating systems.^[6]^[7] The origins of concepts related to fictitious forces trace back to the 17th century, with Christiaan Huygens introducing the term "centrifugal force" in 1659 to describe the apparent outward tendency of rotating bodies, deriving its mathematical form for uniform circular motion.^[8] Isaac Newton built on this in his Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687), incorporating centrifugal effects into his theory of absolute space and motion; he used the rotating bucket experiment to demonstrate absolute rotation, treating such effects as real manifestations relative to absolute space rather than frame-dependent artifacts.^[7] Newton's framework established the equivalence of inertial frames moving uniformly relative to one another and laid essential groundwork for later analyses of apparent forces in accelerated systems. The explicit recognition of fictitious (or inertial) forces as corrections for non-inertial frames emerged in the 18th century, notably with Jean le Rond d'Alembert's 1743 principle, which introduced inertial forces to reformulate Newton's second law for constrained or accelerating motions.^[9] Leonhard Euler further developed these ideas in the context of rotating systems, systematically incorporating centrifugal effects into the dynamics of rigid bodies and fluids, as seen in his contributions to the equations of motion for rotating machinery.^[10] By the late 19th century, Ernst Mach critiqued Newtonian absolute space, proposing that inertia and rotational effects arise from interactions with distant matter in the universe, influencing Albert Einstein's development of general relativity. Einstein, drawing on Mach's principle, reinterpreted rotation—and the associated fictitious forces—as relative to the cosmic distribution of mass, integrating them into a spacetime geometry where such forces reflect geodesic deviations rather than isolated frame artifacts. This perspective marked a profound shift, linking fictitious forces to broader gravitational phenomena.^[11]^[12]^[13]

Inertial vs. Non-Inertial Frames

In physics, an inertial reference frame is defined as one that moves with constant velocity relative to the distant stars, often referred to as the "fixed stars," where Newton's laws of motion hold exactly without the need for additional modifications.^[14] In such frames, the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net real force acting on it, as described by Newton's second law, \mathbf{F} = m \mathbf{a}, with no extraneous terms required to explain observed motions.^[6] This uniformity ensures that all frames moving at constant velocity relative to one inertial frame are themselves inertial, forming a class of equivalent reference systems under Galilean relativity.^[14] In contrast, a non-inertial reference frame undergoes acceleration, either linear or rotational, relative to an inertial frame, necessitating the introduction of fictitious forces—also known as pseudo-forces—to reconcile the observed motions with Newton's laws.^[6] These additional terms, such as those arising from linear acceleration or angular velocity, appear as effective forces in the equations of motion within the non-inertial frame but have no physical origin in terms of interactions between objects.^[15] For instance, in a linearly accelerating frame, a pseudo-force proportional to the frame's acceleration and opposite in direction must be added to each object's mass to maintain the form of Newton's second law.^[15] Rotational non-inertial frames similarly require terms accounting for the frame's angular acceleration and velocity to describe dynamics accurately.^[6] The key distinction between inertial and non-inertial frames lies in the absence or presence of these pseudo-components: in inertial frames, all forces contributing to acceleration are genuine interactions, whereas in non-inertial frames, every apparent force includes contributions from the frame's motion, which must be explicitly subtracted or accounted for to recover true physical forces.^[6] This criterion allows physicists to identify the frame type by checking whether Newton's laws apply without amendments; deviations indicate non-inertial conditions.^[15] A brief example illustrating local inertial behavior is a free-falling elevator in a uniform gravitational field, where the frame accelerates downward at g, making it equivalent to an inertial frame for observers inside, as the pseudo-force cancels the gravitational effect.^[15]

Observable Examples

Centrifugal Force in Rotation

In a rotating reference frame, the centrifugal force manifests as an apparent outward force acting on objects, directing them away from the axis of rotation. For instance, passengers in a car navigating a sharp curve experience this force as a sensation of being pushed toward the outside of the turn, where loose objects like a coffee cup may slide across the dashboard if friction is insufficient to counteract it.^[16] This effect arises because the rotating frame accelerates relative to an inertial observer, altering the perceived motion of objects within it.^[17] Physically, the centrifugal force is a fictitious or inertial force, meaning it has no counterpart as a real interaction in an inertial reference frame; instead, it accounts for the tendency of objects to continue in straight-line motion due to inertia, as described by Newton's first law. In the rotating frame, this apparent force enables the application of Newton's second law in a modified form, but from an external inertial perspective—such as that of a stationary observer watching the car turn—the outward motion is simply the result of unopposed inertia without any additional force acting.^[18] The force's existence is thus frame-dependent, real and measurable only to those within the non-inertial system.^[6] One measurable effect of the centrifugal force is its role in simulating gravity through rotation, as seen in proposed designs for space stations where a cylindrical habitat spins to produce an outward acceleration that mimics Earth's gravitational pull, allowing astronauts to walk on the inner surface without experiencing weightlessness. In such systems, the force helps maintain physiological health by providing the necessary loading on bones and muscles during long-duration missions. Similarly, in amusement park rides like the rotor—a vertical spinning cylinder where riders are pressed against the wall after the floor drops—the centrifugal force balances the riders' weight, creating the illusion of defying gravity through the apparent outward push.^[19]^[20] The magnitude of the centrifugal force is proportional to the square of the angular velocity of the rotation and the distance of the object from the axis, increasing with faster spin rates or greater radial separation, which directly influences the intensity of effects in applications like these.^[17]

Coriolis Effect in Motion

The Coriolis effect manifests as a fictitious force that causes a perpendicular deflection of the path of any object moving within a rotating reference frame, such as Earth's surface. This deflection arises because the rotating frame imparts an apparent acceleration perpendicular to both the object's velocity and the axis of rotation, altering the observed trajectory relative to the frame. For instance, in the case of a projectile launched horizontally, such as an artillery shell, the path appears to curve due to this effect rather than following a straight line in the rotating frame. Similarly, the motion of air masses, like those forming trade winds, experiences this deflection on a planetary scale.^[6]^[21]^[22] The direction of this deflection depends on the sense of rotation and the hemisphere in which the motion occurs. In the Northern Hemisphere, where Earth's rotation is counterclockwise when viewed from above the North Pole, the Coriolis effect deflects moving objects to the right of their velocity vector for horizontal motion. In the Southern Hemisphere, the deflection is to the left due to the opposite perspective of the rotation. This rightward or leftward bias is consistent for all directions of motion and is independent of the object's orientation, provided it has a component of velocity perpendicular to the rotation axis.^[6]^[21]^[23] The Coriolis effect is negligible on small spatial and temporal scales, such as in everyday activities like tossing a ball indoors, where the deflection is on the order of micrometers and overwhelmed by other forces like friction. However, it becomes significant for large-scale motions, such as long-range projectiles traveling tens of kilometers or atmospheric flows spanning continents, where deflections can amount to several kilometers. Notably, the effect is zero for objects stationary relative to the rotating frame, as there is no velocity to deflect, and also vanishes for purely radial motion aligned with the rotation axis, where the velocity is parallel to the frame's angular velocity vector.^[22]^[6]^[21]

Applications on Earth

Weather Patterns and Ocean Currents

In the Earth's atmosphere, the Coriolis force deflects moving air masses to the right in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere, influencing large-scale wind patterns. This deflection is crucial for the formation of cyclones, where winds rotate counterclockwise around low-pressure centers in the Northern Hemisphere and clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere, and anticyclones, which exhibit the opposite rotations: clockwise in the North and counterclockwise in the South. These rotational patterns arise from the balance between the Coriolis force and pressure gradient forces, shaping global weather systems.^[24]^[25] Similarly, in the oceans, the Coriolis force drives the circulation of major current systems, such as gyres, which are large-scale loops of circulating water. In the Northern Hemisphere, it deflects surface currents to the right, resulting in clockwise gyres like the North Atlantic Gyre that includes the warm Gulf Stream, which flows northward along the U.S. East Coast before curving eastward toward Europe. In the Southern Hemisphere, deflection to the left produces counterclockwise gyres, such as the South Pacific Gyre. A key aspect of this influence is Ekman transport, where wind-driven surface currents interact with friction and the Coriolis force, causing water layers to spiral downward: the surface layer moves nearly in the wind direction but at a 45-degree angle due to Coriolis deflection, with deeper layers rotating further until the net transport is 90 degrees to the right of the wind in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere. This spiral effect, extending to about 100 meters depth, contributes to the piling of water in gyre centers and sustains their overall circulation.^[26]^[27]^[28] The magnitude of the Coriolis deflection is determined by Earth's angular velocity of approximately $7.29 \times 10^{-5} rad/s, which provides the scale for these effects in both atmosphere and oceans; however, the force vanishes at the equator, where no deflection occurs, explaining the absence of gyres or cyclone formation there. In practice, these fictitious forces interact with real forces, particularly pressure gradients, to achieve geostrophic balance, where the Coriolis force counters the pressure gradient force, resulting in steady flows parallel to isobars or sea surface contours in large-scale systems. This balance dominates mid-latitude circulations, enabling winds and currents to flow without significant acceleration.^[29]^[26]^[30]

Engineering and Transportation Examples

In engineering and transportation systems, fictitious forces such as the centrifugal force play a critical role in designing safe and efficient structures for curved paths. For vehicles navigating banked curves or roundabouts, the centrifugal force appears to push the vehicle outward, requiring the banking angle to provide a component of the normal force that counters this effect and supplies the necessary centripetal acceleration. This design minimizes reliance on friction, allowing higher speeds without skidding; for instance, seatbelts and vehicle suspension systems are engineered to withstand the resulting lateral loads, preventing passenger displacement.^[31] Trains on curved tracks experience a similar centrifugal load, which engineers address through superelevation, or canting the outer rail higher to balance the outward fictitious force with a gravitational component, thereby reducing lateral wheel-rail forces and enhancing stability. This adjustment ensures that the net force aligns with the track's curve radius, with typical superelevation values ranging from 0 to 6 inches depending on speed and radius, resulting in experienced g-forces of up to 0.1g laterally for passengers at design speeds. Measurable in accelerometers, these forces inform track maintenance to prevent derailments.^[32]^[33] In aircraft, particularly during long-haul navigation, the Coriolis effect introduces a fictitious deflection that can accumulate over time, altering the perceived inertial path relative to Earth's rotation; this is compensated in inertial navigation systems using gyroscopes that account for the Coriolis acceleration to maintain accurate heading and trajectory. Such corrections are essential for transoceanic flights, where uncompensated errors could lead to positional drifts of several kilometers.^[34]^[35] Amusement park roller coasters incorporate fictitious forces into their design to create thrilling yet safe experiences, with engineers calculating the apparent centrifugal and gravitational forces in loops and curves to limit passenger g-forces to between -1g and 5g. For example, in vertical loops, the track is shaped so the fictitious outward force at the top combines with gravity to keep riders seated without excessive restraint loads, verified through dynamic simulations that ensure structural integrity under these apparent accelerations.^[36]^[37]

Detection Methods

Identifying Non-Inertial Frames

A reference frame is considered non-inertial if it undergoes acceleration relative to an inertial frame, where acceleration encompasses both linear changes in velocity and rotational motion. In such frames, Newton's laws of motion do not hold in their standard form without the introduction of fictitious forces to account for the observed deviations.^[38] A primary theoretical criterion for identifying a non-inertial frame involves observing the trajectory of a free particle, which experiences no real forces. In an inertial frame, this particle moves in a straight line at constant velocity, adhering to the principle of inertia.^[39] Conversely, in a non-inertial frame, the same particle's path appears curved or accelerated, necessitating fictitious forces to explain the motion within that frame. Indicators of a non-inertial frame include the presence of apparent forces acting on objects that are stationary relative to the frame. For instance, in an elevator accelerating upward, a plumb line suspended inside deviates from the true vertical direction, as if pulled by an additional force opposite to the acceleration.^[40] This deviation arises because the frame's acceleration imparts a fictitious force on the bob, mimicking the behavior of a real force. All reference frames fixed to the Earth's surface are approximately non-inertial due to the planet's rotation about its axis and its orbital motion around the Sun, both of which introduce small but measurable accelerations.^[41] These effects require fictitious forces, such as the centrifugal and Coriolis forces, to describe motion accurately in terrestrial coordinates.^[38] The equivalence principle provides a deeper connection, stating that locally, the uniform acceleration of a non-inertial frame is indistinguishable from a homogeneous gravitational field.^[40] In this sense, the apparent forces in an accelerating frame, like that of the elevator, replicate the effects of gravity, underscoring why non-inertial frames demand fictitious forces to reconcile observations with inertial physics.^[42]

Experimental Verification

One of the earliest and most direct experimental verifications of fictitious forces, particularly the Coriolis effect arising from Earth's rotation, was provided by Léon Foucault's pendulum demonstration in 1851. In this setup, a long pendulum with a heavy bob is suspended to swing freely in a plane, but due to the Coriolis force in the rotating Earth frame, the plane of oscillation precesses over time. At the latitude of Paris (approximately 48.8° N), the precession period is about 32 hours, corresponding to a rotation rate of roughly 11.25° per hour, confirming the Earth's diurnal rotation without relying on astronomical observations.^[43]^[44] Building on this, Foucault extended his work in 1852 with a gyroscope experiment, which further illustrated the effects of non-inertial frames. A gyroscope, consisting of a rapidly spinning rotor with high angular momentum, maintains its axis of rotation fixed in inertial space due to conservation of angular momentum. When placed on Earth, the gyroscope's axis appears to precess relative to the ground, directly revealing the planet's rotation and the absence of true forces causing such motion in an inertial frame. This device provided simpler, more portable evidence of fictitious forces compared to the pendulum, as frictional losses could be minimized to observe the effect over shorter times.^[45]^[46] Modern iterations of these experiments employ laser gyroscopes for enhanced precision, detecting minute variations in Earth's rotation influenced by Coriolis and centrifugal effects in non-inertial frames. Ring laser gyroscopes, for instance, measure rotational rates by comparing counter-propagating laser beams in a closed loop, achieving sensitivities that track Earth's spin to within 10^{-9} radians per second and even diurnal fluctuations. These instruments confirm the fictitious nature of forces like the centrifugal term, as they align with inertial predictions without additional real forces.^[47]^[48] Space-based observations offer compelling verification by contrasting non-inertial and inertial frames. Satellites in orbit, analyzed in an inertial frame centered on Earth's mass, follow geodesic paths under gravity alone, with no observable centrifugal force acting outward to balance gravity; instead, the orbital motion provides the necessary centripetal acceleration. This absence of fictitious forces in free-fall inertial frames, as seen in missions like GPS satellites maintaining stable orbits without rotational corrections beyond tidal effects, underscores that such forces are artifacts of the observer's accelerating reference frame on Earth./04%3A_Rigid_Body_Rotation/4.09%3A_Centrifugal_and_Coriolis_Forces)

Mathematical Derivation

General Coordinate Transformation

In classical mechanics, the analysis of motion in non-inertial reference frames requires accounting for the frame's motion relative to an inertial frame, where Newton's laws hold without modification.^[49] The general coordinate transformation begins with the position vector of a particle, expressed as \mathbf{r}_\text{in} = \mathbf{R}(t) + \mathbf{r}_\text{non}(t), where \mathbf{r}_\text{in} is the position in the inertial frame, \mathbf{R}(t) is the position of the non-inertial frame's origin relative to the inertial origin, and \mathbf{r}_\text{non}(t) is the position relative to the non-inertial origin.^[50] This relation assumes the use of vector calculus to handle relative motion, including differentiation in rotating systems.^[49] To derive the acceleration, one first obtains the velocity transformation by differentiating the position relation, yielding \mathbf{v}_\text{in} = \dot{\mathbf{R}} + \dot{\mathbf{r}}_\text{non} + \boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{r}_\text{non}, where \boldsymbol{\omega} is the angular velocity vector of the non-inertial frame relative to the inertial frame, and dots denote time derivatives in the inertial frame.^[50] Differentiating again provides the acceleration in the non-inertial frame:

\mathbf{a}_\text{non} = \mathbf{a}_\text{in} - \ddot{\mathbf{R}} - 2 \boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{v}_\text{rel} - \boldsymbol{\omega} \times (\boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{r}_\text{non}) - \dot{\boldsymbol{\omega}} \times \mathbf{r}_\text{non},

where \mathbf{a}_\text{in} is the acceleration measured in the inertial frame, \mathbf{v}_\text{rel} = \dot{\mathbf{r}}_\text{non} is the relative velocity in the non-inertial frame, \ddot{\mathbf{R}} is the acceleration of the non-inertial origin, and \dot{\boldsymbol{\omega}} is the time derivative of the angular velocity.^[49] This transformation encapsulates the effects of both translational and rotational motion of the frame.^[50] In the non-inertial frame, Newton's second law is modified by introducing fictitious forces to restore the form \mathbf{F}_\text{total} = m \mathbf{a}_\text{non}. The fictitious force is thus

\mathbf{F}_\text{fict} = -m \left( \ddot{\mathbf{R}} + 2 \boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{v}_\text{rel} + \boldsymbol{\omega} \times (\boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{r}_\text{non}) + \boldsymbol{\varepsilon} \times \mathbf{r}_\text{non} \right),

where \boldsymbol{\varepsilon} = \dot{\boldsymbol{\omega}} denotes the angular acceleration of the frame.^[49] The term -m \ddot{\mathbf{R}} represents the translational fictitious force arising from the linear acceleration of the frame's origin, while the term involving \boldsymbol{\varepsilon} gives the Euler force, which manifests in cases of non-uniform rotation.^[50] These components ensure that observed accelerations in the non-inertial frame can be interpreted using real forces plus these apparent ones.^[49]

Forces in Linearly Accelerating Frames

In a reference frame undergoing constant linear acceleration \vec{a}_f relative to an inertial frame, Newton's second law must be modified to account for the apparent forces acting on objects at rest in the accelerated frame. The fictitious force \vec{F}_\text{fict} experienced by an object of mass m is given by \vec{F}_\text{fict} = -m \vec{a}_f, which acts opposite to the direction of the frame's acceleration. This force arises because the accelerated frame is non-inertial, and the term compensates for the lack of a true external force in the inertial frame. For instance, a passenger in a car accelerating forward at \vec{a}_f feels a backward fictitious force, causing them to lean rearward as if pushed by an invisible agent.^[4] This fictitious force directly influences the apparent weight of objects in the accelerated frame. In an elevator accelerating upward with acceleration \vec{a}_f, the effective gravitational acceleration becomes \vec{g}_\text{eff} = \vec{g} + \vec{a}_f, where \vec{g} is the true gravitational acceleration downward; thus, the normal force on a passenger's feet increases, making them feel heavier. Conversely, if the elevator accelerates downward, \vec{g}_\text{eff} decreases, reducing apparent weight until, at \vec{a}_f = -\vec{g}, weightlessness occurs. These effects explain variations in measured weight during acceleration in vehicles like cars or aircraft, and notably, the fictitious force depends only on the frame's acceleration, not its velocity.^[51]^[52] The introduction of this fictitious force in linearly accelerating frames underpins the equivalence principle in general relativity, where local acceleration is indistinguishable from a uniform gravitational field. An observer in a small, sealed elevator cannot differentiate between upward acceleration in free space and exposure to enhanced gravity, as both produce identical inertial effects on test masses. This local equivalence highlights how fictitious forces can mimic gravitational influences without invoking true spacetime curvature.^[53]

Forces in Rotating Frames

In a uniformly rotating reference frame with constant angular velocity \boldsymbol{\omega}, the laws of Newtonian mechanics must be modified by the inclusion of fictitious forces to account for the frame's rotation relative to an inertial frame.^[4] The position vector \mathbf{r} is the same in both frames, but the observed velocity and acceleration differ due to the rotation.^[54] The acceleration in the inertial frame \mathbf{a}_\text{in} relates to that in the rotating frame \mathbf{a}_\text{rot} by the equation

\mathbf{a}_\text{in} = \mathbf{a}_\text{rot} + \boldsymbol{\omega} \times (\boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{r}) + 2 \boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{v}_\text{rel},

where \mathbf{v}_\text{rel} is the velocity relative to the rotating frame and \boldsymbol{\omega} is directed along the axis of rotation.^[55] For constant \boldsymbol{\omega}, there is no additional Euler term arising from changes in angular velocity.^[4] Rearranging for the rotating frame gives

\mathbf{a}_\text{rot} = \mathbf{a}_\text{in} - \boldsymbol{\omega} \times (\boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{r}) - 2 \boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{v}_\text{rel}.

Newton's second law in the rotating frame then becomes m \mathbf{a}_\text{rot} = \mathbf{F}_\text{real} + \mathbf{F}_\text{fict}, where the fictitious forces \mathbf{F}_\text{fict} compensate for the frame's motion.^[54] The centrifugal force is the term \mathbf{F}_\text{cent} = -m \boldsymbol{\omega} \times (\boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{r}), which simplifies to m \omega^2 \mathbf{r}_\perp directed outward perpendicular to the rotation axis, where \mathbf{r}_\perp is the perpendicular distance from the axis.^[55] This force appears to push objects away from the rotation axis, even though no real interaction causes it in the inertial frame.^[4] The Coriolis force is \mathbf{F}_\text{cor} = -2m \boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{v}_\text{rel}, acting perpendicular to both \boldsymbol{\omega} and \mathbf{v}_\text{rel} with no component along the velocity.^[54] It deflects moving objects sideways in the rotating frame, with magnitude $2m \omega v_\text{rel} \sin\theta, where \theta is the angle between \boldsymbol{\omega} and \mathbf{v}_\text{rel}.^[55] These forces enable the analysis of motion as if the rotating frame were inertial, provided the real forces plus fictitious ones yield the observed acceleration.^[4]

Specific Motion Scenarios

Uniform Circular Motion

In uniform circular motion, an object moves at constant speed along a circular path. From an inertial frame of reference, such as one fixed to the ground, the object's velocity changes direction continuously, requiring a net centripetal force directed toward the center of the circle to produce the necessary centripetal acceleration a_c = \frac{v^2}{r}, where v is the tangential speed and r is the radius of the path.^[56] This centripetal force is real and provided by identifiable physical interactions, such as tension in a string or the gravitational attraction in certain setups.^[20] In a frame rotating with the object at angular velocity \omega, the motion appears stationary, and the dynamics are analyzed using fictitious forces derived from the coordinate transformation between inertial and rotating frames.^[4] Here, a centrifugal force of magnitude m \omega^2 r acts radially outward on the object of mass m, balancing the inward centripetal force to yield apparent equilibrium.^[57] The angular velocity \omega relates to the linear speed by \omega = \frac{v}{r}, ensuring consistency between the two perspectives.^[58] A classic example is the conical pendulum, where a mass attached to a string swings in a horizontal circle, with the string at an angle to the vertical. In the inertial frame, the horizontal component of tension supplies the centripetal force \frac{m v^2}{r}, while the vertical component balances gravity.^[58] In the co-rotating frame, the mass is at rest, and the centrifugal force m \omega^2 r outward is balanced by the horizontal tension component, maintaining equilibrium.^[59] Similarly, a satellite in uniform circular orbit around Earth experiences gravitational force as the centripetal force in an inertial frame; in a frame co-rotating with the satellite's orbital motion, the centrifugal force opposes gravity, resulting in the satellite appearing stationary relative to the frame.^[60]

Orbital Mechanics

In the co-orbiting reference frame of a satellite in circular orbit around a central body such as Earth, the satellite and its occupants appear stationary relative to the frame, which rotates with angular velocity \omega matching the orbital angular velocity. In this non-inertial rotating frame, the gravitational force pulling the satellite toward the central body is precisely balanced by the outward centrifugal fictitious force, resulting in zero net force and the sensation of weightlessness for objects inside the satellite.^[60] This balance can be illustrated hypothetically for a circular orbit at the surface of a non-rotating spherical body, where the gravitational acceleration g equals the centrifugal acceleration \omega^2 r, or mg = m \omega^2 r, with r as the radius of the body; however, such a low-altitude orbit is impractical due to atmospheric drag and structural constraints.^[4] In actual orbital mechanics, the orbital velocity for a circular orbit is given by v = \sqrt{GM/r}, where G is the gravitational constant and M is the mass of the central body, ensuring the required \omega = v/r to achieve the centrifugal-gravitational balance in the co-orbiting frame.^[60] In contrast, from an inertial frame fixed relative to distant stars, no fictitious forces are needed; the satellite follows a curved trajectory solely under the influence of the central gravitational force, continuously "falling" around the body without any balancing outward force.^[5] For non-circular orbits that precess, such as those perturbed by oblateness or other effects, analyzing motion in a co-rotating frame aligned with the orbit introduces additional fictitious torques arising from the time-varying rotation of the frame, which must be accounted for in the dynamics of angular momentum conservation.^[61]

Combined Rotation and Orbiting

In reference frames undergoing both self-rotation (spin) and orbital motion around a central body, the fictitious forces are governed by the composite angular velocity \vec{\omega}_\text{total} = \vec{\omega}_\text{spin} + \vec{\omega}_\text{orbit}, where \vec{\omega}_\text{spin} is the angular velocity due to the body's rotation about its own axis and \vec{\omega}_\text{orbit} is the angular velocity of the orbital motion around the central body. This total angular velocity determines the centrifugal and Coriolis terms in the equations of motion, with the centrifugal potential given by V_\text{cent} = -\frac{1}{2} m (\vec{\omega}_\text{total} \times \vec{r})^2, incorporating contributions from both spin and orbital components. If \vec{\omega}_\text{total} varies with time (e.g., due to precession or changes in orbital parameters), an additional Euler force term -m \frac{d\vec{\omega}_\text{total}}{dt} \times \vec{r} appears, though this is often negligible over short timescales. The Earth's surface reference frame exemplifies this combined motion, with \vec{\omega}_\text{spin} \approx 7.292 \times 10^{-5} rad/s directed along the polar axis and \vec{\omega}_\text{orbit} \approx 1.991 \times 10^{-7} rad/s directed normal to the ecliptic plane (calculated from Earth's mean orbital speed of 29.78 km/s at 1 AU).^[29] The two vectors are tilted by approximately 23.44° relative to each other, resulting in a total \vec{\omega}_\text{total} whose magnitude is dominated by the spin component (with the orbital addition contributing about 0.27%), but whose direction modulates slightly over the year. This composite rotation introduces fictitious forces that, while primarily driven by spin, include subtle orbital influences affecting high-precision applications. For instance, in the Global Positioning System (GPS), the non-inertial nature of the Earth-fixed frame necessitates corrections for both rotational (Coriolis and centrifugal from \vec{\omega}_\text{spin}) and orbital accelerations when transforming satellite positions from the inertial Earth-Centered Inertial (ECI) frame to the rotating Earth-Centered Earth-Fixed (ECEF) frame, ensuring sub-meter accuracy in user positioning.^[63] A representative example is the Foucault pendulum, where the primary precession arises from Earth's spin, causing the plane of oscillation to rotate at a rate \Omega = \omega_\text{spin} \sin \phi (with \phi the latitude). The orbital motion introduces a small additional precession on the order of \omega_\text{orbit}—negligible compared to the spin-induced rate of up to 15° per hour at the poles—but theoretically present as a constant shift in the effective rotation rate. This correction, while insignificant for typical demonstrations, highlights the hybrid non-inertial character of the frame. In such frames, the effective potential for particle motion combines gravitational and centrifugal terms from \vec{\omega}_\text{total}, yielding V_\text{eff}(\vec{r}) = V_\text{grav}(\vec{r}) - \frac{1}{2} m (\vec{\omega}_\text{total} \times \vec{r})^2, where the centrifugal contribution modifies bound orbits and stability, particularly near the equator where the orbital component aligns more closely with spin projections. For Earth, this enhances the equatorial bulge and influences geoid models used in geodesy, with the orbital term providing a minor but consistent outward force averaging about 0.003% of the spin centrifugal effect at the surface.

Theoretical Implications

Fictitious Forces and Mechanical Work

In non-inertial reference frames, fictitious forces perform work on objects, which must be accounted for to maintain the validity of the work-energy theorem. Unlike real forces in inertial frames, these apparent forces arise due to the frame's acceleration or rotation, leading to non-zero work contributions that alter the mechanical energy balance. For instance, in a rotating frame, the centrifugal force acts radially outward and does positive work on an object moving away from the axis of rotation, increasing its kinetic energy as observed in that frame.^[64] The total mechanical energy is not conserved in non-inertial frames unless an effective potential is introduced to incorporate the effects of fictitious forces. This effective potential is defined as V_{\text{eff}} = -\int \mathbf{F}_{\text{fict}} \cdot d\mathbf{r}, where \mathbf{F}_{\text{fict}} represents the fictitious force, allowing the system's dynamics to be described analogously to conservative systems in inertial frames. In rotating frames specifically, the centrifugal component contributes to this potential as V_{\text{cent}} = -\frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 r^2, while the Coriolis force, being perpendicular to the velocity, performs no work and thus does not affect the energy directly.^[64] A key theorem in rotating frames states that the work-energy relation includes contributions from both real and fictitious forces, with the Coriolis term integrating to zero over any path due to its velocity dependence and orthogonality, but the centrifugal force providing a non-zero term proportional to the change in radial distance. This ensures the theorem \Delta K = W_{\text{real}} + W_{\text{fict}} holds, where W_{\text{fict}} captures the frame's influence.^[64] As a result, dynamics in such frames require a modified Lagrangian that incorporates these fictitious effects, often through velocity-dependent terms or the effective potential, to derive correct equations of motion without explicitly adding forces.^[65]

Gravity as a Fictitious Force

In general relativity, gravity is interpreted as a fictitious force arising from the curvature of spacetime, rather than a fundamental interaction acting at a distance. This perspective stems from the equivalence principle, which posits that the effects of gravity are locally indistinguishable from those produced by acceleration in a non-inertial frame. Specifically, an observer in a small, freely falling elevator experiences no gravitational force, as it serves as a local inertial frame where objects follow straight-line paths; this equivalence implies that gravity can be eliminated by choosing an appropriate accelerated coordinate system.^[40]^[66] Albert Einstein formalized this idea in his 1915 theory of general relativity, where the motion of objects in a gravitational field is described as geodesic paths— the "straight lines" of curved spacetime—rather than deviations caused by a force. In this framework, the apparent gravitational force emerges as a pseudo-force in coordinate systems that are not freely falling, analogous to centrifugal or Coriolis forces in rotating frames; mathematically, this pseudo-force is encoded in the Christoffel symbols of the metric tensor, which quantify the spacetime curvature and appear in the geodesic equation as additional acceleration terms.^[67] The Newtonian limit of general relativity recovers the familiar gravitational acceleration \mathbf{g} as a fictitious force in an accelerated frame, where weak fields and slow speeds approximate the classical description, but the full theory extends this to all reference frames by treating gravity as geometry rather than a force vector. For instance, tidal forces illustrate this varying fictitious acceleration: in the vicinity of a massive body, the differential curvature of spacetime causes nearby geodesics to converge or diverge, manifesting as stretching or squeezing effects on falling objects, distinct from uniform acceleration.^[68]

Advanced Considerations

Fictitious Forces in Relativity

In special relativity, fictitious forces arise in accelerated reference frames, incorporating relativistic corrections to the classical expressions. For instance, in uniformly accelerated frames, the relativistic fictitious force modifies the Newtonian form to account for Lorentz transformations, ensuring consistency with the invariance of physical laws.^[69] In rotating frames, Thomas precession emerges as a kinematic effect, where a spinning object experiences an additional rotation due to the composition of non-collinear Lorentz boosts, interpreted as a fictitious torque in the rotating frame.^[70] This precession, first derived by Llewellyn Thomas in 1926, arises purely from the geometry of spacetime and has no electromagnetic origin, distinguishing it from related phenomena like Larmor precession.^[71] In general relativity, fictitious forces extend to all non-inertial observers, where motion deviates from geodesics— the straightest paths in curved spacetime. Any apparent force in such frames is pseudo, arising from the observer's acceleration relative to free-falling paths, with the metric tensor encoding these effects through the Christoffel symbols in the geodesic equation.^[72] For rotating observers, the spacetime metric includes terms that manifest as generalized centrifugal and Coriolis forces, integrated into the gravitational field description. This framework unifies all inertial effects as geometric, eliminating the need for separate force laws beyond the curvature induced by mass-energy. A foundational insight is the absence of absolute inertial frames in relativity; instead, local inertial frames are determined relative to the global distribution of matter. Mach's principle posits that rotational inertia is defined relative to the fixed stars or the average motion of the universe, suggesting that absolute rotation would be detectable only against the cosmic background.^[11] This idea influenced Einstein's development of general relativity, though its full implementation remains debated, as standard solutions like the Schwarzschild metric do not fully embody it.^[73] In modern applications, fictitious forces appear in the Kerr metric, which describes spacetime around rotating black holes and predicts frame-dragging, where the black hole's rotation twists nearby spacetime, imparting a fictitious azimuthal force on orbiting objects.^[74] This Lense-Thirring effect, a relativistic generalization of classical rotation-induced forces, has been observationally confirmed near Earth and is crucial for understanding accretion disks and jets in astrophysical contexts.^[75]

Limitations and Misconceptions

One common misconception is that fictitious forces, such as the centrifugal force, represent genuine physical interactions, often interpreted as a reactive outward push in rotating systems. In reality, these forces are not real but emerge solely as mathematical artifacts within non-inertial reference frames, lacking any physical origin like those of true forces (e.g., electromagnetic or gravitational interactions). This confusion arises from intuitive sensations in accelerating frames, but in inertial frames, motion adheres strictly to Newton's laws without such additions.^[76] Fictitious forces have inherent limitations in their applicability, particularly outside classical mechanics. In quantum mechanics, classical formulations of these forces do not hold directly and require significant modifications to account for wave-particle duality, leading to the emergence of quantum fictitious forces that depend on dimensionality and exhibit behaviors like attraction in two dimensions or repulsion in higher dimensions.^[77] For instance, in low-precision models or everyday engineering contexts, small fictitious effects—such as the Coriolis force in short-range ballistics—are routinely ignored because they are negligible compared to dominant real forces, simplifying calculations without loss of accuracy.^[78] Overreliance on fictitious forces can introduce errors, as seen when the Coriolis effect is erroneously applied to scenarios like short-range projectile motion where its influence is vanishingly small; experts emphasize preferring inertial frames, where Newton's laws apply unmodified, to maintain conceptual clarity and avoid unnecessary complications. Pedagogically, while fictitious forces aid intuition for phenomena in rotating frames, they are not fundamental entities and can perpetuate student misconceptions if overemphasized, underscoring the need for explicit framing as frame-dependent corrections rather than core physical principles.^[79]

References

[1]
6.4 Fictitious Forces and Non-inertial Frames: The Coriolis Force
Jul 13, 2022 · When non-inertial frames are used, fictitious forces, such as the Coriolis force, must be invented to explain the curved path. There is no ...
[2]
https://phys.libretexts.org/Courses/Georgia_State_University/GSU-TM-Physics_I_(2211)/04%3A_Forces/4.01%3A_Forces
[3]
Fictitious force - Einstein-Online
The best-known example: An observer on a rotating chain carousel must introduce the centrifugal force if he wants to explain how the seats of the chain carousel ...
[4]
[PDF] Chapter 31 Non-Inertial Rotating Reference Frames
Fictitious Forces and Newton's Second Law in Rotating Frames: The centrifugal fictitious force is given by ω × (ω × r)) , ! = −m(.
[5]
6.4 Fictitious Forces and Non-inertial Frames: The Coriolis Force
Each exhibits fictitious forces—unreal forces that arise from motion and may seem real, because the observer's frame of reference is accelerating or rotating.
[6]
38. Fictitious Forces and Non-inertial Frames: The Coriolis Force
Experiences such as taking off in a jet, making a sharp turn in a car, or riding a merry-go-round all involve fictitious forces—forces that seem real but ...
[7]
Inertial forces, absolute space, and Mach's principle - AIP Publishing
May 1, 2007 · Because inertial forces are not generally part of a third law pair, they are often called fictitious or pseudo forces. III. NEWTON'S ARGUMENT ...
[8]
The Relativization of Centrifugal Force
This memoir was part of a collective attempt by Alexis-Claude Clairaut, Leonhard Euler, Johann Bernoulli, and Daniel Bernoulli to find the motion of a body ...
[9]
mach's principle - Essay
Albert Einstein was profoundly influenced by Mach's version of this argument, and he sought to incorporate it explicitly in his theory of gravitation, general ...
[10]
[PDF] Mach's Principle: the original Einstein's considerations (1907-12)
To this argu- ment Mach answers noting that absolute rotation of liquid is nothing else that a relative rotation to fixed stars; they represent the right frame ...
[11]
The Forgotten Mystery of Inertia | American Scientist
Mach's arguments had a profound effect on Albert Einstein, who devised the general theory of relativity largely to abolish the idea of absolute motion, and ...
[12]
5.2 Newton's First Law – University Physics Volume 1
A reference frame moving at constant velocity relative to an inertial frame is also inertial. ... fixed,” stars is inertial. All frames moving uniformly ...
[13]
[PDF] Accelerated Reference Frames (revised) - Physics
Nov 28, 2011 · ... elevator frame is equal to the sum of the external forces plus a “pseudo force,” −m¨R. In particular, if the elevator is in free fall in a ...Missing: classical mechanics
[14]
Centripetal Force - HyperPhysics
The driver of a car on a curve is in a rotating reference frame and he could invoke a "centrifugal" force to explain why his coffee cup and the carton of eggs ...
[15]
Describing Motion in a Rotating Frame of Reference
We describe these effects of the rotating system in terms of centrifugal force and Coriolis force, both of which might properly be called "effective forces" ...Missing: physics | Show results with:physics
[16]
Why is the centrifugal force talked about so much if it's not real?
Dec 15, 2012 · The centrifugal force is very real if you are in a rotating reference frame. It causes objects in a rotating frame of reference to accelerate away from the ...
[17]
6.2 Centripetal Acceleration – College Physics chapters 1-17
10: A rotating space station is said to create “artificial gravity”—a loosely-defined term used for an acceleration that would be crudely similar to gravity.
[18]
6.3: Newton's Laws and Centripetal Acceleration
Centrifugal force is a commonly used term, but it does not actually exist. You must hang on tightly to counteract your inertia (which people often refer to as ...
[19]
Earthguide Online Classroom - Reading the Periodic Table of the Elements
### Summary of Coriolis Force Deflection
[20]
The Coriolis Effect: A (Fairly) Simple Explanation
This article will attempt to explain the basic workings of the Coriolis Effect in terms a non-physicist can understand.
[21]
[PDF] 1 Coriolis force Masatsugu Sei Suzuki Department of Physics, SUNY ...
Jul 22, 2013 · The Coriolis effect is a deflection of moving objects when they are viewed in a rotating reference frame. In a reference frame with ...
[22]
GG 140 - Lecture 13 - Global Climate and the Coriolis Force
The rotation of cyclones and anticyclones in the northern and southern hemispheres is controlled by this geostrophic balance.
[23]
Tropical Cyclones (Hurricanes) - Tulane University
Aug 19, 2014 · The Coriolis Effect causes any body that moves on a rotating planet to turn to the right (clockwise) in the northern hemisphere and to the left ...<|separator|>
[24]
Boundary Currents - NOAA's National Ocean Service
These major spirals of ocean-circling currents are called “gyres” and occur north and south of the equator. They do not occur at the equator, where the Coriolis ...Missing: transport | Show results with:transport
[25]
The Ekman Spiral - Currents - NOAA's National Ocean Service
Like the surface water, however, the deeper water is deflected by the Coriolis effect—to the right in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern ...Missing: gyres | Show results with:gyres
[26]
Effect of Surface Currents | manoa.hawaii.edu/ExploringOurFluidEarth
As water travels in a circular motion in the large currents that comprise gyres, Coriolis effects and Ekman transport direct water to the center of the gyre.
[27]
Angular Speed of the Earth - The Physics Factbook - hypertextbook
The Earth rotates at a moderate angular velocity of 7.2921159 × 10−5 radians/second. Venus has the slowest angular velocity (2.99 × 10−7rad/sec) and Jupiter has ...
[28]
Geostrophic balance – Physics Across Oceanography
The steady-state force balance between the Coriolis force and the pressure gradient force is called geostrophic balance and is the approximate state of most ...
[29]
[PDF] Textbook Presentation of Circular Motion Dynamics - ERIC
Centrifugal force can be observed in various everyday situations. For instance, when driving around a curve in a car, one feels being pushed to the side of the ...
[30]
[PDF] Federal Railroad Administration - ROSA P
With superelevation (cant), the centrifugal force acting on the passengers is reduced, or eliminated, by a component of the gravitational force (weight).
[31]
Superelevation
Superelevation refers to cross slope introduced into the cross section of a roadway in order to compensate for the centrifugal forces created by horizontal ...
[32]
[PDF] CASE FIL CORY - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
that already the horizontal Coriolis acceleration of the private plane or helicopter has a serious effect on inertial navigation. In order to prove this ...
[33]
4 Dynamical Effects and Their Applications - Feynman Lectures
A directional gyroscope maintains its orientation in an airplane that is turning. ... Could you go over again how the Coriolis force works on a gyroscope? Yes. I ...
[34]
[PDF] Chapter 8 Lecture
The figure shows a roller-coaster going around a vertical loop-the-loop of ... The fictitious force which seems to push an object to the outside of a ...
[35]
[PDF] Roller Coaster Acceleration
May 10, 2021 · Engineers pick whether they want a loop to have a constant G force, constant acceleration, or a range of G forces, and reverse engineer it.Missing: fictitious | Show results with:fictitious
[36]
[PDF] 6. Non-Inertial Frames - DAMTP
Viewed from S/, a free particle doesn't travel in a straight line and these fictitious forces are necessary to explain this departure from uniform motion. In ...
[37]
Space and Time: Inertial Frames
Mar 30, 2002 · For example, in Newtonian celestial mechanics, taking the “fixed stars ... If Newton's laws are true, then we can construct an inertial frame ...Galilean relativity in... · The emergence of the concept... · “Quasi-inertial” frames...
[38]
The elevator, the rocket, and gravity: the equivalence principle
Whether or not objects accelerate towards the floor is a matter of reference frame: Even in a gravity-free region of space, objects fall towards the floor if ...
[39]
Noninertial Frames of Reference
Noninertial Frames of Reference · rotation around an axis perpendicular to the equatorial plane. · orbital motion around the sun · orbital motion with the moon ...
[40]
Equivalence Principle | The Eöt-Wash Group
The equivalence principle (EP) states that all laws of special relativity hold locally, regardless of the kind of matter involved.
[41]
February 3, 1851: Léon Foucault Demonstrates That Earth Rotates
Feb 1, 2007 · Not until Léon Foucault's famous pendulum demonstration in 1851 was there clear dynamical proof of Earth's rotation.
[42]
pendulum_foucault.html - UNLV Physics
... Foucault pendulum, the precession period is rather long. The formula for precession period is. P = ( 1 sidereal day )/sin(L) where L is latitude. = 1 ...
[43]
Foucault and the rotation of the Earth - ScienceDirect.com
However the Foucault pendulum was the first direct experimental proof of Earth rotation. ... Foucault pendulum experiment by Kamerlingh Onnes and ...
[44]
Gyroscope - Physics - Kenyon College
As the earth rotated beneath the gyroscope, it would maintain its orientation in space. This proved to be hard to do in practice because the frictional forces ...
[45]
Laser gyroscope measures tiny fluctuations in Earth's rotation
Oct 6, 2023 · Researchers in Germany and New Zealand have unveiled a laser gyroscope that can track fluctuations in Earth's rotation in near real time and accurate to ...
[46]
New Chip-Based Laser Gyroscope Measures Earth's Rotation
Mar 4, 2020 · The new type of gyroscope has achieved something considered a benchmark for gyroscopes: the ability to measure the rotation of the earth.Missing: Foucault | Show results with:Foucault
[47]
[PDF] Noninertial Reference Frames - Physics Courses
A reference frame which is fixed with respect to a rotating rigid body is not inertial. The parade example of this is an observer fixed on the surface of ...
[48]
None
### Summary of Deriving Fictitious Forces in General Non-Inertial Frames
[49]
[PDF] Physics 351 — Monday, February 27, 2017
Feb 27, 2017 · If your elevator accelerates upward, you feel an additional downward force −mA, so your apparent weight is m(g + A). If your elevator ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[50]
[PDF] Lecture D14 - Accelerometers. Newtonian Relativity - DSpace@MIT
It is called the Principle of Equivalence. The concept is that, since ... The effective gravity will be gef f = −2gj. The strings for the plumb and ...
[51]
University of California, San Diego Physics 11
Sep 30, 2006 · The Equivalence Principle: Acceleration vs Gravity In this laboratory experiment we will investigate the relationship between gravitational ...
[52]
Rotating reference frames
Fictitious forces can always be distinguished from non-fictitious forces in Newtonian mechanics because the former have no associated reactions.
[53]
https://hepweb.ucsd.edu/ph11/lab2_06.html
[54]
6.3 Centripetal Force – College Physics
Centripetal force is any net force causing uniform circular motion, a 'center-seeking' force that always points toward the center of rotation.
[55]
38. 6.4 Fictitious Forces and Non-inertial Frames: The Coriolis Force
Rotating and accelerated frames of reference are non-inertial. Fictitious forces, such as the Coriolis force, are needed to explain motion in such frames.Missing: derivation | Show results with:derivation
[56]
[PDF] Circular Motion
A fictitious force due to a rotation of the observer is refereed as centrifugal force. Even if fictitious forces are not real, their effects are (Tom does not ...
[57]
Gravity and Centrifugal Force | Physics Van | Illinois
Sep 4, 2016 · The weight has ordinary gravity (mg) pulling it down plus a centrifugal pseudo-force pulling it out away from the rotation axis.Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
[58]
Astronautics, Space & Astrodynamics – Introduction to Aerospace ...
Circular orbits arise whenever the gravitational force on a satellite is equal to the centrifugal force needed to move in a uniform circular motion. The ...
[59]
[PDF] MSc in Applied Mathematics - UPCommons
In this body frame, the dynamics manifests the effect of a fictitious torque ... E1,E2,E3 is an orthonormal frame rotating with the orbit. λ = cos ψ sin ψ.
[60]
[PDF] Effective Potential - UCSB Physics
potential term is what is known as the centrifugal potential, now we can get the centrifugal force by taking the negative gradient of this potential term, −∇(−1.
[61]
Chapter 2: Reference Systems - NASA Science
Jan 16, 2025 · Terrestrial Coordinates. A great circle is an imaginary circle on the surface of a sphere whose center is the center of the sphere. Great ...
[62]
How does Earth's rotation affect GNSS orbit computations?
Apr 5, 2018 · As an example, in Calgary, Canada, ignoring Earth rotation results in a shift in the estimated user position of about 20 meters, primarily in ...
[63]
[1201.2971] Work and energy in rotating systems - arXiv
Jan 13, 2012 · The coriolis force does not contribute to the work coming from fictitious forces. ... frame can do work in the rotating reference frame and ...
[64]
https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.2971
[65]
[PDF] WHAT WAS EINSTEIN'S PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE?
Einstein's principle of equivalence is based on the equality of inertial and gravitational masses, extending relativity to accelerated motion.
[66]
[PDF] General Relativity - Physik-Institut | UZH
May 6, 2011 · The Christoffel symbols represent a pseudo-force or fictitious gravitational force which is of the kind of a Coriolis force. It arises.
[67]
Curved Coordinate Systems and Fictitious Forces - MathPages
Of course, we regard the “force of inertia” as a fictitious force, but the distinction between real and fictitious forces is less meaningful than is sometimes ...<|separator|>
[68]
[PDF] Chapter 1 INERTIAL FORCES: THE SPECIAL RELATIVISTIC ...
Jun 16, 2003 · Serret analysis of the trajectory in the rotating frame. One then has the combined effects of the centrifugal and Coriolis forces associated ...
[69]
[PDF] An exact derivation of the Thomas precession rate using the Lorentz ...
... fictitious force that appears only in the rotating frame where the electron is ensconced. In the present paper we derive the exact expression of the. Thomas ...
[70]
Thomas Precession - Duke Physics
... fictitious force appears in the lab frame, where it is not properly speaking fictitious. However, it is still kinematic. That is, there is no actual energy ...
[71]
[PDF] Pseudoforces and general relativity
For instance, in a rotating reference frame, the appearing pseudoforces are the centrifugal force, the Coriolis force and the Euler force.
[72]
Mach's principle and the origin of inertia - AstroNuclPhysics
Einstein mentioned three phenomena in GTR that could allegedly correspond to Mach's principle : a) An accelerating force will act on a body if nearby bodies ...
[73]
[PDF] Rotating Black Holes
Feb 23, 2015 · Frame Dragging. • A striking feature of the Kerr solution is frame dragging: loosely, the black hole drags spacetime with it as it rotates.
[74]
[PDF] Class 9 : Kerr Black Holes
Feb 25, 2020 · ○ Space-time near rotating black hole is dragged around in the direction of rotation: “frame dragging”. ○ Ergosphere – region where space ...
[75]
Normal, Tension, and Other Examples of Forces
Real forces have a physical origin. · Fictitious forces arise when an observer is in a non-inertial (accelerating or rotating) frame of reference.
[76]
https://openbooks.lib.msu.edu/collegephysics1/chapter/normal-tension-and-other-examples-of-forces-2/
[77]
[PDF] The Coriolis Force
distance from the axis of rotation,. R. A ... • The deflection by the Coriolis force is negligible for atmospheric motions with time scales that are short.Missing: ballistics | Show results with:ballistics
[78]
[PDF] Student Misconceptions about Newtonian Mechanics
Circular Motion. As expected with the case of circular motion, there is a strong misconception that there is some sort of fictitious force. As the statistics ...