Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fineness modulus

Fineness modulus (FM) is an empirical numerical index used in to quantify the average and coarseness of , primarily fine and coarse employed in mixtures. The concept of fineness modulus was developed by American engineer Duff A. Abrams in as a practical tool for aggregate characterization in (PCC) and is standardized in testing protocols like ASTM C136 for and ASTM C125 for terminology related to aggregates. It is derived from sieve analysis by summing the cumulative percentages by weight of the aggregate sample retained on a specified series of standard sieves and dividing the total by 100, yielding a single value that serves as a grading descriptor for mix design purposes. For fine aggregates like , typical FM values range from 2.3 to 3.1 according to ASTM C33 specifications. Higher FM values indicate coarser gradations, while lower values signify finer aggregates. In concrete mix design, FM plays a critical role in proportioning to optimize properties such as workability, strength, and durability, as outlined in guidelines from the (ACI 211.1). While FM provides a simple summary of gradation, it has limitations in capturing full particle distribution and shape variations.

Definition and Significance

Definition

The fineness modulus (FM) is an empirical figure derived from sieve analysis that represents the average size of particles in an aggregate sample. It serves as a single numerical index to characterize the gradation of aggregates, providing a quick assessment of their coarseness or fineness without detailing the full particle size distribution. The is calculated as the sum of the cumulative percentages of the sample retained on a series of , divided by 100. This method yields a value that is roughly proportional to the average , with the exclusion of material passing the smallest and retained in the . For fine aggregates, typical FM values range from 2.3 to 3.1 according to ASTM C33 specifications. Coarse aggregates have higher values, typically from 6.5 to 8.0. Lower values indicate finer particles and higher values indicate coarser particles. The concept of fineness modulus originated in the early 20th century as a simple index for quick aggregate assessment in construction materials, developed by engineer Duff Abrams in 1918 to simplify gradation analysis and support concrete mix design.

Significance in Aggregate Characterization

The fineness modulus (FM) serves as a single-number empirical index that quantifies the average particle size distribution of aggregates, providing a straightforward measure of gradation coarseness or fineness. This value enables engineers to assess the overall texture and uniformity of aggregate samples without relying on full sieve analysis curves, facilitating quick comparisons across batches to ensure consistency in material quality during production and quality control. FM plays a key role in classifying fine aggregates, such as sand, based on their particle size characteristics. According to ASTM C33, fine aggregates must have an FM between 2.3 and 3.1. In terms of practical implications, FM directly influences concrete workability and performance. Lower FM values, indicative of finer aggregates, enhance mixture cohesion and improve finishability but often increase water demand, potentially leading to higher shrinkage and reduced strength if not adjusted properly. Conversely, higher FM values, representing coarser aggregates, can boost compressive strength and reduce water requirements but may promote segregation and diminish pumpability if the gradation becomes too uniform. These trends allow FM to predict key concrete properties, guiding adjustments for optimal pumpability in placement and surface finishability in finishing operations.

Sieve Analysis and Calculation

Standard Sieve Sizes and Procedure

The procedure for determining fineness modulus relies on standardized sizes to ensure consistent assessment across aggregates. For fine aggregates, the designated series includes openings of 150 μm (No. 100), 300 μm (No. 50), 600 μm (No. 30), 1.18 mm (No. 16), 2.36 mm (No. 8), and 4.75 mm (No. 4). These sizes, specified in ASTM C136/C136M, capture the gradation of material passing the 4.75 mm , focusing on the finer fractions essential for fineness modulus computation. For coarse aggregates, the sieve series begins at 4.75 mm (No. 4) and extends upward in approximate powers-of-two increments to accommodate larger particle sizes, typically including 9.5 mm (3/8 in.), 19.0 mm (3/4 in.), 37.5 mm (1 1/2 in.), and 75 mm (3 in.), with additional larger s (e.g., 150 mm) if the nominal maximum size exceeds 75 mm. This progression aligns with ASTM C136/C136M requirements for coarse material gradation. For FM calculation, s finer than No. 4 are included by using 100% for cumulative retained on each, as coarse aggregates have negligible material passing No. 4. The procedure involves dry sieving a representative sample to separate aggregates by size. For fine aggregates, a minimum test sample mass of 300 (though traditionally 500 in many labs for precision) is oven-dried to constant at approximately 110°C and placed atop the nested stack, with a pan at the bottom. The assembly is then mechanically shaken using a lateral and vertical motion (e.g., via a Ro-Tap shaker) for 10 to 15 minutes or until sieving is complete—defined as no more than 1% of the sample passing any during an additional 1-minute period. Weights retained on each are recorded to the nearest 0.1 , and percentages are calculated relative to the total original sample . For coarse aggregates, larger initial samples (e.g., 25 or more, depending on maximum size) are quartered to a workable test portion, following the same dry sieving steps but with adjusted minimum masses (e.g., 1 for 9.5 max size) to ensure representativeness. Key precautions maintain test accuracy and safety. Samples must be fully oven-dried to prevent moisture-induced clumping, which could bias results; constant mass is verified by reweighing after drying. Overloading sieves is avoided by limiting the sample layer to no more than 5 to 7 kg/m² for fine sieves (e.g., No. 200) and proportionally more for coarser ones, ensuring free particle movement. Material passing the smallest sieve (pan fraction) is assumed to be 100% passing for cumulative calculations, and all equipment, including s, must be to avoid . If wet conditions are encountered in field sampling, additional drying steps are required prior to sieving.

Step-by-Step Calculation

The fineness modulus (FM) is calculated from the results of a , which provides the distribution of particle sizes in an sample. This empirical value serves as a single index indicating the average , with higher values corresponding to coarser gradations. The calculation involves determining the percentage of material retained on each standard , computing cumulative percentages, and applying a standardized formula to derive the FM. This process is outlined in standards for aggregate testing and is essential for ensuring consistency in material properties. To compute the FM, begin with the weights of material retained on each sieve from the sieve analysis. The standard sieves typically include sizes from No. 100 (150 μm) up to No. 4 (4.75 mm) for fine aggregates, with larger sieves added for coarse aggregates based on nominal maximum size. For sieves finer than the aggregate's minimum size (e.g., below No. 4 for coarse), 100% retained is used in cumulatives. The following steps detail the mathematical derivation:
  1. Calculate the individual percentage retained on each sieve: For each sieve, divide the weight of aggregate retained on that sieve by the total weight of the sample and multiply by 100. This yields the % retained for each size fraction. Mathematically,
    % \ retained = \left( \frac{weight\ retained\ on\ sieve}{total\ sample\ weight} \right) \times 100.
    These percentages sum to 100% across all sieves and the pan.
  2. Compute the cumulative percentage retained: Starting from the largest sieve and proceeding to the smallest, add the individual % retained successively to obtain the cumulative % retained for each sieve. The cumulative for the largest sieve is its individual % retained (often 0% if all material passes), and each subsequent value includes all material retained on larger sieves plus the current one. For finer sieves beyond the analysis, use 100%. This creates a running total that increases from the coarsest to the finest sieve.
  3. Apply the fineness modulus formula: Sum the cumulative % retained values for all specified sieves and divide by 100 to obtain the FM:
    FM = \frac{\sum (\text{cumulative \% retained on all sieves})}{100}.
    This normalizes the index relative to the total sample mass. The result typically ranges from 2.0 to 3.3 for fine aggregates.
For illustration, consider a sand sample analyzed on six standard sieves with the following cumulative % retained: 0% (largest sieve), 5%, 20%, 45%, 70%, and 95% (smallest sieve). The sum of these cumulatives is 235%. Dividing by 100 yields FM = 2.35, indicating a fine aggregate suitable for concrete mixes requiring good workability. This example demonstrates how the calculation integrates particle size distribution into a concise metric.

Fineness Modulus for Aggregates

Fine Aggregates

Fine aggregates are defined as those portions of aggregate materials that pass through a 4.75 mm (No. 4) , primarily consisting of natural , manufactured , or a blend of both, and must be free from injurious amounts of organic impurities or deleterious substances that could affect performance. According to ASTM C33/C33M, these materials form the finer component in mixtures, contributing to the paste's and overall workability. The typical fineness modulus (FM) range for fine aggregates used in concrete is 2.3 to 3.1, as specified by ASTM C33, where values below 2.3 indicate an excess of very fine particles that may lead to increased water demand and potential shrinkage issues in hardened concrete. Conversely, FM values exceeding 3.1 suggest a coarser gradation, which can result in reduced workability and harsher mixes requiring additional water or cement to achieve proper consistency. For ongoing shipments from a single source, the FM should not deviate more than 0.20 from the established base value to ensure consistency in mix performance. In terms of impact on and properties, an optimal FM of 2.6 to 2.9 provides a balanced gradation that enhances both strength development and flowability, minimizing the need for excess paste while promoting uniform particle packing and reducing voids. Finer sands with lower FM increase surface area, demanding more water and potentially leading to higher shrinkage and cracking risks upon curing, whereas coarser sands with higher FM improve but may compromise pumpability and finishing quality. This balance is particularly critical in applications, where FM influences and under load. Testing for FM in fine aggregates involves a specialized using a finer set of sieves, typically from the No. 4 (4.75 mm) down to the No. 100 (150 μm), to capture the distribution of particle sizes accurately. The FM calculation, based on cumulative retained percentages, serves as an effective indicator for detecting from materials like clay or , as an unusually low FM signals excessive fines that could introduce weakness or in the final product. Such testing ensures compliance with standards and helps in selecting aggregates that maintain structural integrity without over-reliance on admixtures.

Coarse Aggregates

Coarse aggregates consist of particles predominantly retained on the 4.75-mm (No. 4) , with typical sizes extending up to 75 mm or larger depending on the application. The for coarse aggregates is determined through using the standard series of sieves from 150 μm up to the nominal maximum size, though fewer sieves contribute significantly to the value since minimal material passes the finer openings. This empirical index reflects the overall coarseness of the gradation and follows the universal procedure outlined in relevant standards. For coarse aggregates in , the typical FM range is 6.0 to 8.0, while very coarse materials such as railway ballast exhibit FM values of 8.0 or higher due to their larger particle sizes. A higher FM in coarse aggregates promotes better particle , enhancing load-bearing capacity and contributing to higher in the skeleton. However, it can lead to harsher mixes that require more water for workability and are susceptible to . The FM ensures gradation uniformity across production batches, supporting consistent structural . Furthermore, appropriate FM values guide the selection of aggregate sizes to improve against by forming a robust that resists wear.

Combined Aggregates

The fineness modulus for combined aggregates provides a single index to evaluate the overall when fine and coarse aggregates are blended for production. This measure helps assess the gradation of the mixture, which is critical for achieving optimal packing density and performance in the final . By calculating the combined fineness modulus, engineers can identify potential issues such as excessive voids (gaps in gradation) or overabundance of fines, which could compromise workability, strength, and durability. The combined fineness modulus is computed as the weighted average of the individual fineness moduli of the fine and coarse aggregates, based on their proportions by weight in the blend. The formula is: \text{FM}_{\text{combined}} = \frac{W_f \times \text{FM}_f + W_c \times \text{FM}_c}{W_f + W_c} where W_f is the weight of the fine aggregate, \text{FM}_f is its fineness modulus, W_c is the weight of the coarse aggregate, and \text{FM}_c is its fineness modulus. This approach leverages the linearity of the fineness modulus definition from sieve analysis, where cumulative percentages retained are averaged proportionally. For verification, a representative sample of the blended aggregates may be sieved directly according to ASTM C136 to confirm the calculated value, especially if the blend involves multiple coarse sizes. Proportions for the weighted average are typically determined by weight to align with sieve analysis procedures, though mix design standards may adjust for volume-based estimates of aggregate contributions. A common target combined fineness modulus ranges from 3.5 to 4.0 for well-balanced mixes, depending on the application. For instance, blending 40% with a fineness modulus of 2.8 and 60% with a fineness modulus of 6.5 by weight yields a combined fineness modulus of approximately 5.0, indicating a coarser overall gradation suitable for certain structural elements. This method allows for iterative adjustments to proportions to meet specified gradation requirements without full resieving at every step.

Applications and Standards

Role in Concrete Mix Design

The fineness modulus (FM) plays a key role in estimating aggregate-cement ratios during concrete mix design by indicating the average and surface area of aggregates, which directly influences the amount of paste needed for adequate workability. Aggregates with a lower FM, indicating finer particles and greater surface area, require more to coat the particles effectively and maintain mix , thereby increasing the overall content in the proportioning process. This relationship is incorporated into empirical charts developed by D.A. , which link FM values to water- ratios for achieving desired strength and workability; for instance, coarser aggregates (higher FM) allow for leaner mixes with lower demands, while finer ones necessitate richer pastes to compensate for increased water absorption. FM is often integrated with the slump test to fine-tune sand content and ensure optimal workability in the mix. A lower FM typically demands more water to achieve a target slump due to the higher surface area of fine particles, potentially leading to adjustments in sand proportion to balance flow without excessive bleeding or segregation. Conversely, a higher FM (coarser sand) may result in harsher mixes with reduced cohesion, prompting an increase in sand content to improve paste distribution and slump consistency, as guided by empirical adjustments in design procedures. Beyond , FM guides mix design in mixtures by assessing fine aggregate gradation for compatibility, where optimal FM values help predict asphalt demand and ensure uniform coating to enhance mixture stability and rut resistance. In formulations, FM influences flow control by affecting the fillability index of fine aggregates; finer gradations (lower FM) increase and water requirements, allowing designers to adjust proportions for desired pumpability and penetration without compromising structural integrity.

Relevant Standards and Specifications

The fineness modulus (FM) calculation relies on procedures outlined in ASTM C136/C136M, the standard for determining the of fine and coarse aggregates. This method involves sieving samples through a series of standard sieves to obtain cumulative percentages retained, which are then summed and divided by 100 to compute FM, serving as the foundational procedure for FM determination in aggregate evaluation. In , IS 2386 (Part 1):1963 (reaffirmed 2021) provides methods for and of aggregates for , including testing to calculate FM. The standard specifies FM limits for fine aggregates, typically ranging from 2.2 to 3.2 for Zones I through III sands as per associated grading requirements in IS 383:2016, ensuring suitability for mixes; combined FM values are also derived for overall aggregate blends in applications. The (ACI) 211.1 guidelines recommend an FM of 2.3 to 3.1 for used in structural to optimize mix proportions and workability. In the , current standards such as BS EN 933-1:2012+A1:2015 outline methods for determining via sieving for geometrical properties of aggregates, supporting assessment of gradation similar to FM calculations, though FM itself is not a primary index in European specifications like BS EN 12620:2013 for aggregate requirements in . As of 2024 updates in standards like ASTM C33/C33M-24a, emphasis is placed on using FM in conjunction with full gradation curves to ensure aggregate uniformity and compliance in production.

Limitations and Alternatives

Drawbacks of Fineness Modulus

The fineness modulus (FM) is an empirical metric that primarily relies on to provide an average indicator of size distribution, but it overlooks critical attributes such as particle shape, angularity, and the complete gradation curve, potentially leading to misleading assessments of void content in mixtures. For instance, aggregates with identical FM values can exhibit vastly different grading curves, as the calculation aggregates cumulative percentages without accounting for variations in particle morphology that influence packing density and interstitial voids. This limitation is particularly evident in how angular or irregular particles increase internal friction and void ratios, effects not captured by FM, which assumes uniformity in shape and . Furthermore, FM demonstrates insensitivity to extreme particle sizes, failing to detect excessive fines smaller than 150 μm or imbalances in mid-range distributions (e.g., 300–2.36 mm), as its sieve-based starts at the 150 μm and treats finer as a lumped passing. This can obscure issues like overabundant ultrafines that elevate water demand and reduce workability without altering the overall FM significantly, or gaps in intermediate sizes that compromise interlock. In practice, two gradations with poor mid-size distribution might yield the same FM as a well-balanced one, masking potential performance deficiencies in the hardened . In the context of modern high-performance (HPC), has become less effective due to its reliance on traditional sieving, which lacks the precision of advanced techniques like laser for capturing detailed distributions across a broader range, including sub-150 μm fines. Laser , commonly employed in HPC mix optimization, reveals nuances in gradation that averages out, enabling better control over and strength in low-water-cement-ratio designs. Variability in FM calculations is exacerbated by sampling errors in sieve analysis, where inconsistencies in small representative samples propagate through the cumulative summation, amplifying inaccuracies especially for heterogeneous materials like recycled aggregates with irregular shapes and variable mortar adhesion. For recycled aggregates, the non-uniform particle forms and adhered residuals introduce additional scatter in sieving results, rendering FM less reliable for predicting mix behavior compared to natural aggregates, as gradation quantified via FM generally does not significantly alter properties when replacing virgin fine aggregate. This makes FM particularly unsuitable for sustainable applications involving recycled materials, where precise is essential to mitigate performance inconsistencies.

Modern Alternatives

In contemporary aggregate evaluation, full gradation has emerged as a primary supplement to traditional single-value metrics, enabling visual assessment of (PSD) through graphical representation. One widely adopted technique involves plotting the percentage of material passing each size against the sieve opening raised to the 0.45 power on a semi-logarithmic scale, known as the 0.45 power chart. This method highlights deviations from ideal maximum density gradations, facilitating the identification of gaps or excesses in particle sizes that affect workability and strength. Developed for optimized packing in paving mixtures, the 0.45 power chart provides a more nuanced evaluation than empirical indices by allowing engineers to target gradations that maximize voids in mineral while minimizing paste volume. Advanced instrumental methods, such as diffraction and , offer higher-resolution measurements and incorporate particle factors, addressing limitations in sieve-based assessments. diffraction determines by analyzing the angular distribution of light scattered by particles in suspension, providing continuous distributions from micrometers to millimeters with precision for fine aggregates. This technique captures sub-sieve fractions and shape-related scattering patterns, improving predictions of aggregate behavior in mixes compared to discrete sieve data. Complementing this, image employs high-resolution cameras and software algorithms to quantify particle dimensions, angularity, and from 2D or images, enabling rapid, non-destructive evaluation of thousands of particles. Tools like the Aggregate Imaging System (AIMS) or mobile applications such as the Sika Sand App process images to derive form parameters (e.g., , roundness) that influence packing efficiency and water demand, with studies validating their correlation to mechanical performance. Emerging AI-based methods, such as particle clustering algorithms, achieve near-100% segmentation accuracy for multi-particle in under 2 seconds, enhancing evaluation of irregular or recycled aggregates where impacts . These methods are particularly valuable for irregular or recycled aggregates, where impacts . Other indices focus on surface-related and volumetric properties to better characterize interactions. (), analogous to the Blaine fineness test for , quantifies the total surface per unit mass of particles, influencing and absorption in mixes; it is measured via image-based sectioning or nitrogen adsorption for fines, revealing how irregular shapes increase and paste requirements. tests, integral to packing evaluation, assess the volume of inter-particle voids under controlled compaction (e.g., wet or vibratory methods), providing a direct measure of how combinations fill space—lower s indicate denser packing and reduced needs. Seminal work by de Larrard and others established models like the linear packing model to predict s from , optimizing mixes for high-performance . Hybrid approaches integrate as a preliminary screening tool with sophisticated software for comprehensive analysis, aligning with evolving standards. In practice, serves as a quick indicator of average , while laser or image-derived PSD refines gradation curves for precise mix adjustments; for instance, the Tarantula Curve method overlays empirical gradation bands on PSD plots to recommend proportions that enhance workability without excess fines. The ASTM C136/C136M-25 standard (published 2025) emphasizes accurate sieving for PSD alongside emerging digital validations, supporting workflows in . These combinations leverage FM's simplicity with modern tools' detail, improving efficiency in sustainable design.

References

  1. [1]
    Fineness Modulus of Aggregate
    ### Summary of Fineness Modulus of Concrete Aggregates
  2. [2]
    Fineness Modulus - Pavement Interactive
    Fineness modulus is a single number describing a gradation curve for fine aggregate in PCC. A larger modulus means more coarse aggregate. Typical range is 2.70 ...Missing: engineering | Show results with:engineering
  3. [3]
    Fineness Modulus of Fine Aggregate - Concrete Society
    Jun 2, 2025 · Fineness Modulus (FM) is an empirical calculation used to support the optimisation of a concrete mix. Fine aggregate or sand grading affects ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    None
    ### Summary of Fineness Modulus from the Document
  5. [5]
    C33/C33M Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates - ASTM
    Aug 17, 2023 · This specification defines the requirements for grading and quality of fine and coarse aggregate for use in concrete.
  6. [6]
    Simple Guide to ASTM C136: Sieve Analysis of Aggregates
    Sep 29, 2025 · For fine aggregate, the size of the test sample after drying should be minimum 300-g. For coarse aggregate or fine and coarse aggregate mixtures ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] CRD-C104-80 Method of Calculation of the Fineness Modulus of ...
    Mar 1, 1980 · - The sieve sizes used are No. 100 (150-µm), No. 50 (300-. µm), No ... applicable to fine aggregate than coarse aggregate or combined ...
  8. [8]
    CIVL 1101 - Part 6 - Concrete Agregates - The University of Memphis
    A fineness modulus for fine aggregates should be 2.3 - 3.1. Two aggregates with the same fineness modulus can have different grading curves. A low fineness ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] C 33/C 33M – 08 - Standard Specification for - Concrete Aggregates1
    6.4 For continuing shipments of fine aggregate from a given source, the fineness modulus shall not vary more than 0.20 from the base fineness modulus. The base ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Concrete Technology and Materials - image
    Optimal fineness modulus for concrete sand ranges from 2.3-3.1, with values of 2.6-2.9 providing best workability and finishing characteristics. Fine ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Standard Terminology Relating to Concrete and Concrete Aggregates
    Oct 29, 2024 · This standard is a compilation of definitions of terms as they are used in standards under the jurisdiction of Committee C09.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Effects of aggregate type, size, and content on concrete strength and ...
    They concluded that, for concrete with the larger aggregate, there is a higher degree of matrix-aggregate interlock, resulting in an increase in the energy.<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    [PDF] the Highway Materials Engineering Course, Lesson 10: Aggregates for
    The particle shape of the coarse aggregate, as determined by ASTM D4791, primarily influences the workability of the fresh PCC, as flat and elongated particles ...
  14. [14]
    Combined Aggregate Gradation | NPCA
    Mar 1, 2023 · Create one for fine aggregate fineness modulus to assess consistency between aggregate deliveries. Look for vendors that supply mix design ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The strength of concrete, its relation to the cement aggregates and ...
    This document discusses the strength of concrete and its relation to cement, aggregates, and water. It also covers the problem, scope, and principles and ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] 1006 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE
    3. A fineness modulus of the sand is important because of its effect on the water demand of the mix. The finer the sand, the lower the ...
  17. [17]
    Aggregates for Concrete
    Fineness modulus of fine aggregate (defined in the following). 2.0 to 3.3. Nominal maximum size of coarse aggregate. 9.5 to 37.5 mm. (3/8 to 1-1/2 in.).
  18. [18]
    [PDF] NCAT Report 21-01 - Auburn University
    Jan 1, 2021 · An aggregate gradation with a higher percentage of coarse aggregate will have a higher fineness modulus.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] ASSESSMENT OF GROUTS FOR CONSTRUCTABILITY AND ...
    fineness modulus of fine aggregates. The fillability index (FI) is expressed as: % VR. FI. 100 n i i. = ∑. (3.2) where n is the number of different sized ...
  20. [20]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  21. [21]
    [PDF] IS 2386-1 (1963): Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete, Part I
    IS 2386-1 (1963): Methods of Test for Aggregates for. Concrete, Part I: Particle Size and Shape [CED 2: Cement and Concrete]. Page 2. Page 3. Page 4. IS : 2386 ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] IS 383 (1970): Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregates From ...
    fine aggregate approaches the coarse outer limit.of Grading Zone I or the fine outer limit of Grading Zone IV, and the suitability of a given fine aggregate ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Effects of Aggregates Characteristics on the Performance of ...
    Aggregate shape, texture, and grading have a significant effect on the performance of fresh concrete. Aggregate blends with well-shaped,.
  24. [24]
    Sand gradation detection method based on local sampling - Nature
    Nov 27, 2024 · Therefore, the fineness modulus and particle gradation of sand ... ignores sand grains below 0.15 mm. Therefore, in order to ...
  25. [25]
    Laser diffraction, and Sieving: The comparison - Q&A
    Jun 13, 2017 · Excessive fines are easily seen in laser diffraction and can be measured in this 'sub-sieve' size region where blinding is much more likely to ...
  26. [26]
    Optimizing ultra high-performance concrete (UHPC) mix proportions ...
    The particle size distribution of the material was measured using the laser diffraction technique (Malvern Mastersizer 3000TM). ... Fineness modulus, 2.1 ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  27. [27]
    Effect of Aggregate Size on Recycled Aggregate Concrete ... - MDPI
    [10] reported that the higher the fineness modulus of coarse aggregate, the ... However, the existing literature does not consider the effect of OA in RCA.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Concrete Aggregate Combined Gradation Example
    The Power Chart is a plot of the percent passing each sieve size and the sieve size in microns to the 0.45 power. A well graded, tight packing aggregate that ...
  29. [29]
    Gradation Test - Pavement Interactive
    The standard gradation and sieve analysis test is: AASHTO T 27 and ASTM C 136: Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates. Background. The particle size ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution and Aggregates - Microtrac
    Evaluation of the shape by image analysis, expected to endorse the results of particle size distribution measurement by laser diffraction/light scattering, ...
  31. [31]
    Image analysis of shape and size of fine aggregates - ScienceDirect
    Image analysis uses computer analysis of digital images to characterize fine aggregate shape and size, measuring dimensions of particles.
  32. [32]
    Sand & Aggregate Analysis - Sika Group
    Particle shape analysis: The Sand App provides information about roundness, sphericity and aspect ratio. This result is not given by the traditional sieving ...Shaping The Future Of Sand... · Efficient Analysis For... · Key Features Of The Sand App
  33. [33]
    Determination of specific surface area of irregular aggregate by ...
    Mar 1, 2021 · In this paper, a 2D image-based methodology is proposed to measure the SSA by random sectioning of aggregate. The validation of the SSA ...
  34. [34]
    Measurement of particle size distribution and specific surface area ...
    Dec 30, 2016 · The study investigates which measurement methods are best applicable to crushed concrete aggregate fines smaller than about 250 µm to determine ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Packing Density: A Key Concept for Mix Design of High Performance ...
    The packing density of a given aggregate or a given lump of solid particles is the ratio of the volume of solids to the bulk volume of the solid particles.
  36. [36]
    Publications - Tarantula Curve
    Below are links to download our current publications, reports, spreadsheet, and other free downloads. Publications. ​Cook D, Seader N, Ley T, Russell B.
  37. [37]
    C136/C136M Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and ...
    This test method covers the determination of the particle size distribution of fine and coarse aggregates by sieving.