Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fizeau interferometer

The is a common-path that measures the surface figure and flatness of optical components, such as mirrors and lenses, by generating and analyzing high-contrast fringes from multiple reflections between a high-quality reference flat and the test surface separated by a small air gap. Invented by the Hippolyte Fizeau (1819–1896) around 1862, the device was initially developed for precise of glass parameters and optical surfaces, building on Fizeau's earlier experiments from the that explored propagation in media. The configuration was later refined by Léon Laurent in 1883, establishing it as a standard tool in optical testing with monochromatic sources to produce straight fringes when the surfaces are parallel, and distorted patterns revealing deviations on the order of nanometers. In operation, incident passes through a partially transmitting flat, reflects off the test surface, and interferes with reflected from the flat's rear surface, forming a Fizeau etalon where the air gap acts as the interferometer cavity; tilting the reference introduces linear fringes for calibration, while phase-shifting techniques introduced in the 1970s enable quantitative analysis of wavefront errors without mechanical movement. Key applications include precision manufacturing of aspheric and spherical , quality control in semiconductor lithography, and astronomical interferometry—where Fizeau's 1868 inspired stellar measurements by resolving sizes through masking. Modern variants, incorporating lasers since the 1960s and swept-wavelength methods since the 1980s, extend its use to large-scale testing like meter-class mirrors and non-contact thickness gauging in industry.

History

Invention and early development

Hippolyte Fizeau, a prominent French physicist, invented the Fizeau interferometer in 1862 as a tool for precise optical measurements, drawing on his earlier collaboration with in the late 1840s to determine the using rotating mirrors. This device marked a significant advancement in , enabling high-resolution observations of light interference to quantify subtle differences. Fizeau's motivation stemmed from the evolving field of wave following Thomas Young's in 1801, which had demonstrated the interference of light waves, inspiring French scientists in the 1860s to develop instruments for more accurate spectral and determinations in optics laboratories. The initial design of the Fizeau interferometer employed a partially reflecting surface, such as a thin plate, to split an incoming into multiple reflected and transmitted components, producing patterns from the superposition of these beams. This configuration allowed for the formation of sharp fringes sensitive to minute changes in , making it suitable for applications beyond basic demonstration. Fizeau first demonstrated the instrument in French laboratories during the early 1860s, where it facilitated measurements of effects in various media. In his seminal 1862 publication in Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Fizeau introduced the interferometer specifically for measurements, describing how the spacing could be used to determine the of with exceptional precision by comparing patterns in controlled setups. This work laid the foundation for the device's use in quantitative and optical testing. The configuration was later refined by Léon Laurent in 1883, establishing it as a standard tool in the optical industry.

Initial experiments

In the early 1860s, Hippolyte Fizeau conducted pioneering experiments with his newly invented interferometer to measure the refractive indices of optical materials and the wavelengths of light. By introducing wedged plates into the , Fizeau generated straight fringes whose spacing and position allowed precise determination of these properties through the analysis of shifts caused by the varying air gap and material thickness. This approach provided a direct method for quantifying optical constants in glass and other media, marking a significant advancement in precision metrology for the era. In 1862, Fizeau applied the interferometer for testing the flatness and quality of mirror surfaces destined for astronomical telescopes. The setup involved placing the test mirror in contact or near contact with a reference flat, enabling the observation of Newton's rings-like fringes that revealed surface deviations with sub-wavelength precision, often better than one-quarter wavelength of visible light. This work demonstrated the instrument's utility in optical manufacturing, allowing for the correction of polishing errors that could otherwise compromise telescope performance. Early implementations of the Fizeau interferometer faced notable limitations that influenced experimental design. The system was highly sensitive to external vibrations, which could disrupt stability and require isolated setups or short exposure times to maintain accuracy. Additionally, clear patterns necessitated monochromatic sources, such as sodium lamps emitting at 589 , to minimize chromatic and avoid overlapping orders from polychromatic illumination. These constraints underscored the need for controlled conditions in initial tests.

Operating principle

Optical configuration

The Fizeau interferometer utilizes a common-path optical configuration to measure the quality of optical surfaces with high precision. In the standard setup, collimated monochromatic light from a laser source is incident on a high-quality optical flat with surface flatness better than λ/20, which serves as the reference surface. The reference flat is typically slightly wedged (a few arcminutes) to avoid interference from front-surface reflections. The incoming light partially transmits through the flat to the air gap and reflects from the test surface (such as a flat, spherical mirror, or lens), while the reference beam reflects from the rear surface of the flat (facing the test). The returning test beam recombines with the reference beam and propagates to a detector, such as a CCD camera, via imaging optics to record the resulting interference fringes. The light path in this minimizes environmental disturbances due to its common-path , where both beams share most of the except for the gap between the and test surfaces. Upon recombination, occurs because of the difference introduced by the gap and any deviations in the test surface. The path difference Δ is given by \Delta = 2 n t \cos \theta, where n is the of the medium in the gap (typically air with n \approx 1), t is the local thickness of the gap, and \theta is of incidence relative to the surface ; this expression accounts for the round-trip traversal and angular dependence, with surface irregularities in the test optic manifesting as variations in t. For testing aspheric surfaces, the configuration incorporates computer-generated holograms (CGHs) placed in the reference arm to produce a customized that matches the aspheric departure, enabling null testing without excessive aberrations. These CGHs feature diffractive patterns with line spacings of 1–10 μm to achieve the required , integrating seamlessly with the standard Fizeau setup by replacing or augmenting the reference flat. The Fizeau interferometer operates primarily as a two-beam for simplicity and stability, though multiple-beam variants can enhance contrast by allowing repeated reflections in a Fabry-Pérot-like arrangement, albeit limited by the low reflectivity (~4%) at the air-glass interfaces. Precise alignment and control are facilitated by piezoelectric transducers mounted on the reference flat or , which introduce controlled shifts (typically λ/4 steps) to optimize visibility and enable quantitative measurements.

Fringe formation and analysis

In the Fizeau interferometer, interference fringes arise from the superposition of light beams reflected off the reference and test surfaces, where the phase difference stems from the optical path length traversed twice through the intervening medium of refractive index μ and thickness d. For rays at angle θ within the medium, the path difference is 2μd cos θ. A π phase shift occurs upon reflection from the test surface due to the transition from low to high refractive index, while no such shift occurs at the reference surface (high to low). Consequently, destructive interference (dark fringes) occurs when 2μd cos θ = mλ, and constructive interference (bright fringes) when 2μd cos θ = (m + 1/2)λ, with m an integer and λ the wavelength. The fringe order m quantifies this interference and is given by m = 2μd cos θ / λ for dark fringes. To derive this, consider the total phase difference δ = (2π/λ)(2μd cos θ) + π. Setting δ = (2m + 1)π for destructive interference yields (2π/λ)(2μd cos θ) + π = (2m + 1)π, simplifying to 2μd cos θ = mλ after dividing by 2π/λ and rearranging. For bright fringes, δ = 2mπ leads to 2μd cos θ = (m + 1/2)λ. Near-normal incidence (θ ≈ 0, cos θ ≈ 1), the equation reduces to m = 2μd / λ, enabling direct computation of d from observed m, as in air gaps (μ ≈ 1) where λ/2 corresponds to one fringe order shift. Fringes in the Fizeau setup are categorized as localized (Fizeau fringes of equal thickness) or non-localized (Haidinger fringes of equal inclination). Localized fringes form in the plane of the gap with an extended source, depending primarily on local variations in d and resembling for slightly curved surfaces, as θ variation is minimized. Haidinger fringes appear with a observed at , depending on θ for uniform d, with order m varying as cos θ changes. The distinction arises because localized fringes require spatial across the source for position-specific interference, while Haidinger fringes rely on . Analysis of these fringes for precise measurements often employs , particularly the , to extract quantitative maps from the interference patterns. Four interferograms are captured by incrementally shifting the reference surface by 0, π/2, π, and 3π/2 using a , yielding intensities: \begin{align*} I_1(x,y) &= I_0(x,y) [1 + \gamma \cos \Psi(x,y)], \\ I_2(x,y) &= I_0(x,y) [1 - \gamma \sin \Psi(x,y)], \\ I_3(x,y) &= I_0(x,y) [1 - \gamma \cos \Psi(x,y)], \\ I_4(x,y) &= I_0(x,y) [1 + \gamma \sin \Psi(x,y)], \end{align*} where I_0 is the average intensity, γ the visibility, and Ψ the phase encoding the path difference. The wrapped phase is then \Psi(x,y) = \tan^{-1} \left[ \frac{I_4(x,y) - I_2(x,y)}{I_1(x,y) - I_3(x,y)} \right], unwrapped to provide the full phase map, from which gap variations are obtained via d(x,y) = \lambda \Psi(x,y) / (4\pi \mu) for the double-pass geometry. This method achieves sub-wavelength precision. Key error sources in PSI analysis include air turbulence, which introduces random phase errors through refractive index gradients induced by temperature or convection currents, degrading fringe stability and phase accuracy to several nanometers RMS in uncontrolled environments. Mitigation involves environmental controls such as sealed enclosures for thermal stability, low-velocity air conditioning to minimize gradients, or short-coherence-length sources to reduce sensitivity to path mismatches. Fringe visibility V = (I_\max - I_\min)/(I_\max + I_\min) governs the in analysis, with the diffraction pattern of the aperture influencing effective contrast in wide-field setups by modulating beam overlap. For low-reflectivity surfaces approximating two-beam , V = 2r / (1 + r^2) where r is the reflectivity ratio of the beams.

Fizeau's ether-drag experiment

Experimental setup

The experimental setup for Fizeau's 1851 ether-drag experiment adapted the basic principles of optical to detect potential entrainment by measuring changes in speed through moving . from , with a of approximately 550 , was directed laterally through a translucent mirror to split the beam into two paths, each traversing a separate filled with flowing . The tubes were parallel, with traveling along their centers to avoid wall effects, and a mirror at the far end of each path returned the beams for recombination, forming fringes observable through a equipped with adjustable slits and a graduated for precise measurement. A convergent was placed behind the slits to enhance fringe visibility. The glass tubes had an internal diameter of 5.3 mm and a length of 1.487 m each, allowing for a double transit path of about 3 m per . was pumped through the tubes in opposite directions—parallel to the propagation in one tube and antiparallel in the other—to isolate any effect on , with flow speeds reaching up to 7.059 m/s. Two telescopes facilitated in both flow configurations, enabling comparison of the patterns with and without water motion. To address chromatic dispersion caused by the water, compensators consisting of adjustable glass plates were inserted into the paths, equalizing optical lengths for different wavelengths and ensuring clear monochromatic fringes. The apparatus included modifications such as enclosing the tubes in a controlled environment to minimize or variations due to heat from the setup or ambient conditions. The entire experiment was performed at Fizeau's home in near .

Results and theoretical significance

In Fizeau's 1851 experiment, the speed of light propagating through moving was observed to increase by an amount corresponding to a of approximately 0.44 times the of the . This result aligned closely with the prediction from Augustin-Jean Fresnel's 1818 hypothesis of partial ether drag, where the coefficient f = 1 - \frac{1}{n^2} \approx 0.44 for 's n \approx 1.33. The measured fringe shift in the interferometer was consistent with the expected phase difference given by \Delta \phi = \frac{2L}{\lambda} f \frac{v}{c}, where L is the optical path length through the water, \lambda is the wavelength of light, v is the water speed (around 7 m/s in the setup), and c is the speed of light; this derivation follows directly from Fresnel's formula adapted to the interferometer geometry. Fizeau reported these findings in the Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, establishing empirical support for partial rather than complete ether entrainment by moving media, thereby challenging both fully stationary ether models and complete-drag theories like that of George Gabriel Stokes. The experiment's significance extended beyond immediate optics, profoundly influencing 19th- and 20th-century physics. It prompted to incorporate the Fresnel drag coefficient into his electron theory of 1895 and later transformations, providing a framework to reconcile ether-based models with observed phenomena. The Michelson-Gale experiment of 1925 further confirmed the drag effect in a rotating system, measuring fringe shifts in agreement with Fresnel's coefficient to within experimental precision. Ultimately, Einstein's 1905 theory of provided a definitive explanation without invoking the , attributing the observed speed variation to relativistic velocity addition, , and effects in the moving medium. Modern recreations, including fiber-optic implementations, have resolved minor discrepancies in Fizeau's original data due to factors like dispersion and flow turbulence, confirming the relativistic prediction with agreement typically within a few percent. These validations underscore the experiment's enduring role as a in the transition from classical theories to .

Applications

Optical surface testing

The Fizeau interferometer serves as a in for evaluating the flatness and of surfaces by comparing the test optic to a reference flat or spherical surface, generating fringes that directly indicate path length deviations. Each shift corresponds to a λ of difference, enabling quantitative mapping of surface irregularities with resolutions down to λ/10 or better, which is critical for high-performance components such as (EUV) mirrors where sub-nanometer accuracy is required to minimize scattering and aberrations. This comparative approach leverages the common-path configuration to suppress , ensuring reliable measurements of surface figure errors across apertures up to several meters. For non-spherical like aspheres, null testing configurations incorporate computer-generated holograms (CGHs) as diffractive elements to produce a reference that matches the ideal test surface, nulling the pattern for direct error detection without auxiliary that could introduce aberrations. The captured interferogram is processed via phase-shifting to yield a wrapped map, which is then converted to surface height using the formula h = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi} \Delta\phi, where h is the height deviation, \lambda is the illumination wavelength, and \Delta\phi is the unwrapped phase difference, reflecting the double-pass propagation in the Fizeau cavity. Phase unwrapping is essential to resolve the modulo-2π ambiguity; algorithms such as least-squares minimization integrate local phase gradients globally to reconstruct continuous profiles, while branch-cut methods identify and connect discontinuity lines to prevent error propagation, achieving sub-wavelength accuracy even for surfaces with slopes exceeding 100 mrad. These techniques ensure robust profiling by handling noise and large phase jumps inherent in high-numerical-aperture measurements. In semiconductor , employs advanced Fizeau systems with low-coherence sources for homogeneity and surface verification of projection lenses, achieving measurement uncertainties below λ/100 to support nanoscale patterning. For astronomical applications, Fizeau interferometers have facilitated the qualification of large mirrors to figures of λ/20, as demonstrated in the fabrication and testing of segmented primaries where stitching multiple sub-aperture measurements ensures overall wavefront quality. These capabilities underscore the instrument's role in for demanding extreme precision. Advancements in detector technology, such as high-dynamic-range cameras, enable single-shot or phase-shifted acquisitions with pixel resolutions exceeding 1 megapixel, while software platforms like Zygo MetroPro automate fringe analysis, and tilt subtraction, and error budget allocation to isolate intrinsic surface errors from alignment artifacts. This integration supports real-time feedback in iterative cycles, reducing fabrication time for precision by orders of magnitude compared to manual methods. Fringe analysis methods from the operating principle are routinely applied here to extract maps for detailed profiling.

Sensing and other uses

Fiber-optic variants of the Fizeau interferometer, particularly extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric (EFPI) configurations, enable sensing of physical parameters such as , , and . In sensing, variations in the air gap between the fiber endface and a reflector alter the , shifting fringes to quantify applied force with resolutions down to 0.1 kPa. measurements exploit of the sensor cavity, while detection relies on elongation-induced gap changes, achieving sensitivities as high as 1 μɛ through low-coherence sources that eliminate ambiguity and enhance signal . These fiber-optic EFPI sensors provide inherent immunity to electromagnetic interference, allowing reliable operation in electrically noisy or high-radiation environments like nuclear facilities or biomedical implants. Recent innovations in the 2020s incorporate white-light interferometry for absolute distance measurements, extending unambiguous ranges to approximately 1 m with sub-micrometer precision by leveraging spectral-domain analysis of broadband interference envelopes. Beyond basic sensing, Fizeau interferometers support displacement measurements in , delivering nanometer-scale resolution essential for fabrication processes, such as flatness profiling with axial accuracies of 1 nm. In applications, vibration-immune designs using low-coherence illumination enable real-time analysis of structural vibrations, maintaining stability under dynamic loads up to 100 Hz. Specific implementations include mirror alignment in gravitational wave detectors like , where Fizeau systems characterize test mass surface figures to sub-wavelength precision, complementing primary Michelson interferometers for overall optical alignment. In biomedical contexts, Fizeau interferometers facilitate by mapping dynamic tear film and epithelial surface profiles , supporting diagnostics for conditions like with temporal resolutions under 1 ms.

References

  1. [1]
    Fizeau Interferometers – operation principles, surface characterization
    Fizeau interferometers, named after Hippolyte Fizeau, are a common type of interferometers which are used for characterizing optical surfaces, e.g. of mirrors ...
  2. [2]
    Laser Fizeau Interferometer History - Apre Instruments
    Mar 7, 2018 · A “White Light Fizeau Interferometer” was created by Professor Schwider in 1997. The light source was a broadband source with spectral content.
  3. [3]
    The state of the art in swept-wavelength laser Fizeau interferometry
    Aug 10, 2021 · Applications for swept-wavelength interferometry span the full ... Fizeau interferometer geometry as shown in Figure 2. Whether the ...
  4. [4]
    Page:1860 Fizeau en.djvu/3 - Wikisource, the free online library
    It consists in obtaining interference bands by means of two rays of light after their passage through two parallel tubes, through which air or water can be made ...
  5. [5]
    Fizeau-Laurent surface interferometer | optics - Britannica
    The system was described by the French physicist A.-H.-L. Fizeau in 1862 and adapted in 1883 into the instruments now widely used in the optical industry. In ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Testing Flat Surface Optical Components - The University of Arizona
    The basic use of a Fizeau interferometer for measuring the surface height differences between two surfaces was described earlier. If the reference surface is ...Missing: 1860s | Show results with:1860s<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    None
    ### Fizeau Interferometer Configuration for Flat Surface Testing
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Applications of computer-generated holograms for interferometric ...
    ABSTRACT. Interferometric optical testing using computer-generated holograms (CGH's) has proven to give highly accurate measurements of aspheric surfaces.
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Piezoelectric Actuated Phase Shifter Based on External Laser ... - NIH
    Apr 11, 2017 · Phase-shifting interferometry [1,2,3,4,5] is generally used for the interferometric optical testing, especially in Fizeau interferometers.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Part 4 Basic Classical Interferometers Plane Parallel Plate
    Fizeau Fringes - Point Source. (1862) d is film thickness (function of position) θ is angle within film (function of position) δ = 2π λ 2ndcosθ ± π. S. P n. Non ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 6.7 Phase-Shifting Interferometry - SPIE
    PZT is a ceramic that changes thickness in response to applied voltage. By applying specific voltages, small and precise movements of the mirror can be made. In ...
  14. [14]
    Guideline for Use of Fizeau Interferometer in Optical Testing - Llis
    The basic layout of a Fizeau interferometer is shown in Figure 1 (Reference 1.). A laser source is spatially filtered via a microscope objective and a pinhole.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Fizeau Interferometer Fact Sheet - 4D Technology
    Random error may be due to electrical noise, optical shot noise, or environmental factors such as air turbulence. Repeatability is most relevant when ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Coherence
    For minimum visibility the two fringe patterns are out of step 1/2 fringe. Each separate fringe pattern has a zero minimum. Let r be the ratio of the ...
  17. [17]
    Optical design, modelling and tolerancing of a Fizeau interferometer ...
    which the Fizeau interferometer is derived. z = coordinate of the vertex of ... where ∆l is the optical path difference between the two interfering beams.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Albert Einstein and the Fizeau 1851 Water Tube Experiment - arXiv
    Fresnel's predictions were confirmed in 1851 by the measurements of Hippolyte. Fizeau on the velocity of light in moving water, an experiment which is usually.<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Fizeau's “aether-drag” experiment in the undergraduate laboratory
    Jun 1, 2012 · The first Earth-based direct measurement of the speed of light was realized by Hippolyte Fizeau in 1849, by means of a rotating cogwheel. This ...
  20. [20]
    Hippolyte Fizeau (1819 - 1896) - Biography - MacTutor
    Hippolyte Fizeau was a French physicist, best known for measuring the speed of light, and the first to make a successful terrestrial measurement of it.<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    [PDF] A Reenactment of the Fizeau Experiment A Reenactment of the ...
    nel (1818) which was later experimentally confirmed by Hippolyte Fizeau (1851). ... Fizeau used an interferometer to measure any changes. Fizeau ascribed ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Note de Hippolyte Fizeau publiée dans les C - Académie des sciences
    Sur les hypothèses relatives à l'éther lumineux, et sur une expérience qui paraît démontrer que le mouvement des corps change la vitesse avec laquelle.
  23. [23]
    Hendrik A. Lorentz – Nobel Lecture - NobelPrize.org
    ... 0.44. By accepting this figure it is possible to explain various phenomena ... drag coefficient. There now arose the question of whether it is possible ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] arXiv:1201.0501v1 [physics.optics] 2 Jan 2012
    Jan 2, 2012 · The first Earth-based direct measurement of the speed of light was realized in 1849, yet by Hippolyte Fizeau, by means of a rotating cogwheel.
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    CGHs as Fizeau reference for interferometric null testing
    We present a new interferometric design for testing aspherical surfaces. The Fizeau type interferometer consists of an diffractive objective, which is ...
  27. [27]
    Asphere testing with a Fizeau interferometer based on a combined ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · Fizeau interferometers with an additional diffractive optical element are frequently used for measuring spherical and aspherical surfaces.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Introduction to Interferometric Optical Testing
    For a given fringe the separation between the two surfaces is a constant. Height error = (λ/2)(∆/S) ... Simultaneous Phase-Shifting Fizeau –. Short Coherence ...Missing: Δφ | Show results with:Δφ
  29. [29]
    Phase-unwrapping algorithm by a rounding-least-squares approach
    Feb 6, 2014 · A simple and efficient phase-unwrapping algorithm based on a rounding procedure and a global least-squares minimization is proposed.
  30. [30]
    Development of surface reconstruction algorithms for optical ...
    Dec 6, 2020 · This paper provides an in-depth perspective of surface topography reconstruction for optical interferometric measurements.
  31. [31]
    Interferometric testing of optical surfaces at its current limit
    Carl Zeiss uses a low coherent Fizeau interferometer with multi-fringe evaluation technique (DMI = Direct Measuring Interferometry) to accumulate many phase ...
  32. [32]
    Test And Evaluation Of The Hubble Space Telescope 2.4-meter ...
    Full-aperture interferometric testing of the uncoated mirror took place in air with the test chamber providing the necessary thermal and vibrational stability.
  33. [33]
    Verifire™ laser interferometers - ZYGO
    The Verifire optical interferometer provides fast and reliable measurements of surface form and transmitted wavefront of optical systems and more.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Interferometer Setups - ZYGO
    Zygo's MetroPro™ software can calculate angle errors as well as transmitted wavefront errors. Prism and Corner Cube Testing. _. Parallelism (Wedge). _. *A ...
  35. [35]
    Recent progress in fiber-optic extrinsic Fabry–Perot interferometric ...
    The recent progress in EFPI sensors is reviewed in this paper. First, the optical amplification technology is adopted into the EFPI sensor system.
  36. [36]
    Pressure sensor based on the fiber-optic extrinsic Fabry-Perot ...
    Nov 22, 2010 · EFPI-based pressure sensors are used in industrial and biomedical fields. They use thermal bonding, diaphragm-based sensors, and white light ...
  37. [37]
    A high-resolution technique for strain measurement using an ...
    Apr 29, 2008 · A high-resolution technique for strain measurement using an extrinsic Fabry–Perot interferometer (EFPI) and a compensating EFPI.<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Research plan for the development of optical fiber pressure sensors ...
    Fiber optic pressure sensors are desirable for nuclear applications because they are low mass/small size, immune to electromagnetic interference, high ...
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    Hardware optical correlation method for dynamic detection of ...
    Aug 22, 2022 · The experimental results show a good performance with a static stability of ±0.10 nm, and a resolution of better than 0.30 nm.Missing: semiconductor | Show results with:semiconductor
  41. [41]
    Stitching-Based Resolution Enhancement in Wavefront Phase ...
    The device achieves a lateral resolution of 7.56 μm and an axial resolution of 1 nm. It can measure a full 300-mm wafer in approximately 60 min, acquiring ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Low Coherence Vibration Insensitive Fizeau Interferometer
    A plot of fringe visibility as a function of test surface reflectivity for three different values of reference surface reflectivity is shown in figure 3. ...
  43. [43]
    Characterization of Core Optics in Gravitational-Wave Detectors
    Jul 8, 2020 · Since a Fizeau interferometer relies on proper alignment of the ... Cagnoli, Mirrors used in the LIGO interferometers for first ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] INTERFEROMETER FOR MEASURING DYNAMIC CORNEAL ...
    This chapter presents an interferometer for measuring dynamic corneal topography, or the Surface ... Fizeau interferometer. Optical Fabrication and Testing ...