Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fog computing

Fog computing is a decentralized computing architecture that extends cloud computing capabilities to the edge of the network, providing storage, processing, and networking services between end-user devices and centralized cloud data centers.^[1] Introduced by Cisco in 2012, it addresses the limitations of traditional cloud systems for Internet of Things (IoT) applications requiring low latency and real-time data handling.^[1] Key characteristics of fog computing include geographical distribution across numerous nodes, location awareness, support for device mobility, wireless access, and handling of heterogeneous environments with real-time streaming data.^[1] By placing fog nodes—such as routers, gateways, or local servers—closer to data sources, it minimizes transmission delays and bandwidth consumption compared to centralized cloud models, which often involve long-distance data travel to remote data centers.^[2] Fog computing differs from edge computing, where processing occurs directly on end devices like sensors or smartphones, by utilizing intermediate network elements in local area networks (LANs) for broader coordination and scalability.^[2] This architecture enables a symbiotic relationship with the cloud, where fog handles immediate, latency-sensitive tasks, and the cloud manages long-term analytics and storage.^[1] Notable applications span IoT-driven domains, including connected vehicles for real-time traffic management and collision avoidance, smart grids for efficient energy distribution, healthcare monitoring with wearable devices for instant alerts, and smart cities for optimizing traffic lights and parking systems.^[3] Benefits include reduced operational costs through local processing, enhanced scalability for billions of IoT devices, and improved reliability in geo-distributed scenarios.^[3] However, challenges persist in areas such as security vulnerabilities, resource constraints on fog nodes, energy efficiency, and ensuring interoperability across diverse hardware.^[2]

Overview

Concept and Definition

Fog computing represents a decentralized computing architecture that extends the capabilities of traditional cloud computing to the edge of the network, enabling data processing closer to the sources of generation, such as sensors and end-user devices. This approach addresses the limitations of centralized cloud systems by distributing computational tasks across intermediate nodes, thereby reducing the volume of data transmitted over long distances and enhancing responsiveness for time-sensitive applications.^[1] Formally, fog computing is defined as a highly virtualized platform that provides compute, storage, and networking services between end devices and traditional cloud data centers, typically situated at the network edge in the vicinity of users. It involves a federation of heterogeneous devices, including routers, gateways, and switches, that collectively form a distributed system for handling data-intensive operations. Key characteristics of fog computing include low latency through proximity to data sources, contextual location awareness for geo-specific processing, support for device mobility to accommodate moving users or assets, and tolerance for heterogeneity among diverse node types and protocols. Additionally, it emphasizes real-time interactions, predominant wireless access, and interoperability to enable seamless federation across the network.^[1] The term "fog computing" was coined by Cisco researchers in 2012, drawing from the meteorological metaphor of fog as a cloud close to the ground to describe this intermediate layer between ground-level devices and high-altitude cloud infrastructure. This nomenclature highlights the paradigm's role in bridging the gap between local edge resources and remote centralized computing, without relying solely on the distant cloud model.^[1]

Importance and Benefits

Fog computing addresses key limitations of traditional cloud computing by extending computational resources to the network edge, enabling efficient handling of data-intensive applications in real-time environments. This paradigm is particularly vital for the proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, which generate vast amounts of data requiring immediate processing to support applications like autonomous vehicles and smart cities. By decentralizing computation, fog computing mitigates the bottlenecks of centralized cloud systems, such as high transmission delays and network congestion, thereby fostering more responsive and resilient distributed systems.^[1] One of the primary benefits is reduced latency for time-sensitive applications, where fog nodes process data locally to achieve response times in milliseconds, compared to seconds in cloud-only setups. For instance, in 5G-enabled vehicular networks, fog computing can deliver end-to-end latencies below 10 ms, essential for safety-critical functions like collision avoidance. This low-latency capability stems from the proximity of fog resources to data sources, enabling real-time decision-making without the round-trip delays inherent in remote cloud processing. Additionally, bandwidth savings are realized by filtering and aggregating data at the edge, preventing the transmission of raw, voluminous datasets to the cloud and thus alleviating network strain.^[4] Fog computing enhances reliability through distributed processing, where multiple edge nodes provide redundancy and fault tolerance, ensuring continuous operation even if individual components fail. Its scalability advantages allow it to manage massive IoT data volumes—potentially billions of devices—without overwhelming central cloud infrastructures, as computation is offloaded to geographically dispersed fog layers. Energy efficiency is another key gain, as local processing on resource-constrained devices minimizes data transmission over power-hungry networks, supporting battery-limited sensors in wireless networks. Furthermore, enhanced privacy is achieved by processing sensitive data near its source, reducing the exposure risks associated with sending it across unsecured transit paths to distant clouds.^[1]^[5]^[6]

Historical Development

Origins

Fog computing was first proposed in 2012 by researchers at Cisco Systems, including Flavio Bonomi, Rodolfo Milito, Jiang Zhu, and Sateesh Addepalli, during a presentation at the First Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing (MCC) co-located with the ACM SIGCOMM conference.^[1] The concept was introduced in their seminal paper titled "Fog Computing and Its Role in the Internet of Things," which outlined fog computing as an extension of the cloud computing paradigm to the edge of the network.^[7] This proposal emerged in the context of the burgeoning Internet of Things (IoT), where the rapid proliferation of connected devices necessitated computational paradigms beyond traditional centralized cloud infrastructures.^[1] The primary motivations for introducing fog computing stemmed from the inherent limitations of cloud computing in handling the explosive growth of IoT-generated data, particularly from mobile and sensor networks. Cloud-based systems, while scalable, often suffered from high latency due to the physical distance between end devices and remote data centers, making them unsuitable for real-time applications such as connected vehicles or wireless sensor and actuator networks (WSANs).^[1] Additionally, the increasing volume of data from geo-distributed sources, coupled with requirements for mobility support and location awareness, highlighted the need for a more decentralized approach to processing and analytics.^[7] These challenges were inspired by emerging IoT scenarios, including smart grids and urban infrastructure management, where delays could compromise safety and efficiency.^[1] The term "fog" was deliberately chosen to contrast with "cloud," evoking imagery of a highly distributed, ground-level layer that brings computational resources closer to the end-users and devices it serves.^[1] As described in the original paper, "Fog is a cloud close to the ground," underscoring its role in bridging the gap between local devices and distant cloud centers.^[7] Initially, the focus was on networking aspects, positioning fog nodes—such as routers, gateways, or embedded devices—as intermediaries within IP networks to provide low-latency compute, storage, and networking services directly at the network edge.^[1] This intermediary function enabled efficient data filtering, aggregation, and real-time decision-making, reducing bandwidth demands on the core network while supporting the dynamic requirements of IoT ecosystems.^[7]

Evolution and Key Milestones

Building on Cisco's initial proposal of fog computing in 2012, which extended cloud paradigms to network edges for IoT applications, the field saw rapid institutionalization starting in 2015.^[1] That year, the OpenFog Consortium was formed by industry leaders including ARM, Cisco, Dell, Intel, Microsoft, and Princeton University to accelerate fog computing adoption through open standards and reference architectures.^[8] The consortium's efforts focused on addressing bandwidth, latency, and security challenges in distributed IoT environments, fostering collaboration across academia and industry.^[9] From 2017 to 2020, fog computing integrated deeply with emerging 5G networks, enabling low-latency processing for mobile edge scenarios and supporting the proliferation of connected devices. A pivotal milestone occurred in 2018 with the publication of IEEE 1934, which adopted the OpenFog Reference Architecture as a standardized framework for fog systems, emphasizing interoperability and scalability for IoT and 5G deployments.^[10] This standard provided a universal technical blueprint, influencing global implementations by defining core principles like security, manageability, and orchestration.^[11] The COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 onward accelerated fog computing's role in remote IoT deployments, as distributed edge processing became essential for real-time monitoring in healthcare, smart cities, and supply chains amid disrupted centralized infrastructures.^[12] Between 2021 and 2023, fog adoption surged in edge AI applications, where localized machine learning models reduced latency for tasks like predictive analytics and anomaly detection in industrial settings.^[13] Concurrently, the OpenFog Consortium merged with the Industrial Internet Consortium in 2019, enhancing its influence on edge and fog standards, though its foundational work continued to underpin IEEE initiatives.^[14] In 2024 and 2025, fog computing advanced toward 6G precursors, incorporating AI-driven resource orchestration to handle ultra-reliable low-latency communications in dense networks.^[15] Sustainability emerged as a key focus, with fog architectures optimizing energy efficiency through dynamic workload distribution and green data processing at the edge.^[16]

Architecture and Components

Core Components

Fog computing systems are built upon a hierarchical structure that spans from end devices at the network edge to fog nodes and ultimately integrates with the cloud, enabling decentralized processing and data management.^[17] This layered architecture positions fog nodes as intermediaries, processing time-sensitive tasks locally while offloading complex computations to the cloud.^[1] Fog nodes serve as the core building blocks, consisting of physical or virtual devices such as gateways, switches, routers, or servers equipped with computing, storage, and networking capabilities.^[17] These nodes are deployed at the network periphery, often in proximity to end devices, to support low-latency operations and efficient resource utilization in distributed environments.^[1] They can operate individually or in clusters, forming hierarchical or federated arrangements to scale across diverse topologies.^[17] End devices, including sensors, actuators, mobile devices, and IoT endpoints, generate raw data and initiate interactions within the fog ecosystem.^[1] These devices are typically resource-constrained but rely on nearby fog nodes for immediate data filtering, aggregation, and preliminary analysis to reduce bandwidth demands on upstream links.^[17] Cloud integration forms the upper tier, handling non-urgent, large-scale analytics and long-term storage that exceed the capacity of fog nodes.^[1] This complements the fog layer by providing centralized resources for global coordination, while fog nodes manage local, real-time requirements to minimize latency.^[17] Key properties of fog computing include resource virtualization, which abstracts hardware into scalable services such as Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS), and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) models for efficient provisioning.^[17] Service orchestration further enables automated management and coordination of resources across nodes, ensuring seamless deployment and interoperability in dynamic setups.^[1]

Operational Model

In fog computing, the operational model follows a hierarchical data lifecycle designed to optimize processing efficiency and latency. Data collection occurs primarily at edge devices, such as sensors and IoT endpoints, where raw information is generated in real time.^[9] Fog nodes, intermediate computational elements between the edge and cloud, then handle local processing and filtering to address immediate needs, such as real-time analytics or anomaly detection, while aggregating and compressing data to reduce volume.^[9] Only essential or summarized data—such as processed insights or long-term trends—is forwarded to the cloud for deeper analysis, storage, and global decision-making, thereby conserving bandwidth and enabling scalability across the network.^[1] This tiered approach ensures that time-critical tasks remain near the data source, with fog nodes autonomously managing the flow to prevent bottlenecks.^[9] Task offloading forms a core decision-making process within this model, where algorithms evaluate whether to execute computational tasks locally on edge devices, on nearby fog nodes, or remotely in the cloud. These decisions hinge on key constraints like network latency, device resource availability (e.g., CPU, battery), and task urgency, aiming to balance performance and energy efficiency.^[18] For example, heuristic-based methods compare estimated execution delays against thresholds—if local or fog processing can complete within the required timeframe without exceeding resource limits, the task is offloaded accordingly, avoiding the higher latency of cloud transmission.^[18] More advanced optimizations ensure adaptive allocation that prioritizes low-latency applications like vehicular networks or industrial controls.^[18] Resource orchestration oversees the dynamic management of fog nodes' capabilities, coordinating compute, storage, and networking to support seamless task execution across the distributed hierarchy. This involves provisioning virtualized environments, often using containers for lightweight deployment or virtual machines (VMs) for isolated workloads, to enable scalable resource pooling and migration. Platforms supporting container orchestration allow fog nodes to allocate resources on demand, monitor utilization, and redistribute loads during peak demands or failures. In practice, orchestration ensures fault tolerance and elasticity, such as spinning up additional containers for bursty IoT traffic, while integrating with fog-specific protocols for edge-aware scheduling.^[9] A representative workflow illustrates these elements in a smart grid scenario: sensor data from power distribution lines is collected at edge devices and routed to fog nodes for immediate analysis, where algorithms detect faults like voltage anomalies through local filtering and basic machine learning.^[19] If the issue requires urgent response, fog nodes trigger automated actions, such as load balancing, before aggregating diagnostic summaries for cloud-based predictive modeling and historical archiving.^[19] This process minimizes response times to milliseconds while offloading non-critical data, demonstrating the model's integration of lifecycle management, offloading heuristics, and orchestration for reliable operation.^[19]

Comparisons

With Cloud Computing

Fog computing contrasts with traditional cloud computing through its decentralized architecture, which positions computational resources closer to data sources at the network edge, rather than concentrating them in remote, centralized data centers.^[20] This distribution enables fog to act as an intermediary layer, processing data in proximity to end devices like IoT sensors, thereby addressing the geographical limitations of cloud systems that often require long-distance data transmission.^[21] In essence, while cloud computing relies on powerful but distant servers for all heavy lifting, fog decentralizes tasks to intermediate nodes, fostering a more responsive and location-aware paradigm.^[20] A primary performance distinction lies in latency and bandwidth utilization. Cloud computing frequently experiences delays exceeding 100 milliseconds due to the round-trip travel of data to centralized servers, which can hinder real-time applications.^[22] Fog computing mitigates this by targeting latencies under 50 milliseconds through edge-local processing, ensuring quicker decision-making in time-sensitive scenarios.^[23] Furthermore, fog reduces overall network traffic via localized computation, substantially decreasing the bandwidth demands compared to cloud's requirement to shuttle large volumes of raw data to remote facilities.^[24] Scalability represents another key divergence, with cloud computing optimized for vast, centralized resource pools that handle massive, non-urgent workloads efficiently.^[21] However, this centralization creates bottlenecks for the geo-distributed, high-volume data streams from IoT ecosystems, where rapid scaling across wide areas is essential.^[20] Fog computing enhances scalability by distributing loads across numerous edge nodes, allowing horizontal expansion that better supports dynamic, location-specific demands without overwhelming core cloud infrastructure.^[20] Cost considerations also differ markedly. Fog computing decreases long-term operational expenses by minimizing data transmission to the cloud, thereby cutting bandwidth and energy costs associated with remote processing.^[20] Yet, it demands initial investments in distributed hardware for edge nodes, contrasting with cloud computing's model of pay-per-use access to pre-existing centralized facilities.^[21] This trade-off positions fog as a complementary extension to cloud, balancing upfront capital with sustained savings in connectivity and efficiency.^[20]

With Edge Computing

Fog computing and edge computing both aim to bring computation closer to data sources to reduce latency and bandwidth demands, yet they differ in scope and implementation. Edge computing primarily involves processing at the very periphery of the network, often directly on end-user devices or local gateways, such as real-time image recognition in smartphone applications or sensor data filtering on IoT devices.^[25] In contrast, fog computing extends this paradigm across a broader, hierarchical network of intermediate nodes, including regional gateways and distributed servers that aggregate data from multiple edge points, enabling a more expansive coverage area while maintaining proximity to users.^[26] A key distinction lies in their collaborative nature. While edge computing is endpoint-centric, focusing on isolated or minimally coordinated device-level operations to handle immediate tasks, fog computing incorporates edge devices as part of a larger ecosystem, adding layers of aggregation and orchestration across networked nodes.^[27] This integration allows fog to leverage edge resources for initial processing but elevates functionality through intermediate coordination, such as synchronizing data flows from multiple sensors before higher-level analysis.^[25] In terms of complexity, edge computing is optimized for simple, low-overhead tasks requiring ultra-low latency, like local actuation in response to environmental inputs. Fog computing, however, supports more intricate analytics distributed across its "fog layer," facilitating advanced computations such as machine learning inference on aggregated datasets from diverse sources.^[26] For instance, in use cases involving immediate sensor actuation, edge computing excels in scenarios like vehicle onboard cameras processing traffic signals in real time, whereas fog computing is better suited for coordinated IoT orchestration, such as integrating data from city-wide traffic systems for dynamic signal optimization.^[27] From a 2025 perspective, fog computing is increasingly viewed as an enhancement of edge paradigms—"edge-plus-networking"—particularly in 5G and nascent 6G environments, where it bridges device-level processing with wider network intelligence to support massive connectivity and real-time applications in smart ecosystems.^[26]

Applications

In IoT and Smart Environments

Fog computing plays a pivotal role in integrating the Internet of Things (IoT) by managing the heterogeneity of diverse devices and processing real-time data streams from thousands of sensors. In IoT ecosystems, fog nodes act as intermediaries that aggregate and analyze data locally, accommodating varied protocols and formats from sensors, actuators, and edge devices to ensure seamless interoperability and reduce the burden on centralized cloud systems. This approach enables efficient handling of high-velocity data flows, such as those generated by urban sensor networks, where fog computing filters and processes information at the network periphery to support low-latency decision-making.^[28]^[29]^[30] In smart cities, fog computing facilitates applications like traffic management and environmental monitoring by deploying fog nodes to process data from distributed sources in real time. For instance, fog nodes can analyze camera feeds from traffic intersections to detect congestion and issue immediate alerts to adjust signal timings or reroute vehicles, minimizing delays without relying on distant cloud servers. Similarly, in environmental monitoring, fog-enabled systems integrate data from air quality sensors and weather stations across a city to provide localized pollution forecasts and trigger responses, such as activating ventilation in public spaces during high particulate levels. These implementations enhance urban efficiency by distributing computational tasks closer to data sources.^[31]^[32]^[33] In healthcare IoT scenarios, fog computing supports wearables that transmit vital signs, such as heart rate and blood oxygen levels, to nearby fog nodes for immediate anomaly detection, allowing for rapid interventions before data is archived in the cloud. This edge-based processing identifies irregularities, like sudden arrhythmias, using lightweight algorithms on fog gateways, which ensures privacy by limiting sensitive data transmission over networks and enables continuous monitoring in mobile or remote settings. Such systems have demonstrated improved response times in patient care, particularly for chronic condition management.^[34]^[35]^[36] Fog computing also addresses intermittent connectivity challenges in smart homes and buildings by enabling local data processing and storage at fog nodes, which maintains functionality during network outages. In these environments, devices like smart thermostats and security cameras continue to operate autonomously, with fog layers buffering data for later synchronization when connectivity resumes, thus ensuring reliability in scenarios with unstable Wi-Fi or mobile links. This resilience is crucial for applications requiring uninterrupted service, such as automated lighting or intrusion alerts.^[3]^[37]^[38] By 2025, fog computing has advanced smart grids for renewable energy balancing through distributed processing of data from solar panels and wind turbines. Fog nodes at substations analyze real-time generation and consumption patterns to dynamically adjust load distribution, integrating variable renewables like photovoltaic systems to prevent imbalances and support grid stability without constant cloud dependency. This has enabled more efficient energy management in decentralized grids, reducing curtailment of green sources.^[39]^[40]^[41]

In Industrial and Enterprise Settings

In the context of Industry 4.0, fog computing plays a pivotal role in predictive maintenance for manufacturing facilities by enabling local processing of sensor data from industrial machines, which allows for real-time anomaly detection and prevents costly downtime. For instance, fog nodes deployed at the factory edge analyze vibration, temperature, and performance metrics from IoT-enabled equipment, applying machine learning algorithms to forecast failures before they occur, thereby reducing maintenance costs in simulated industrial scenarios.^[42] This approach leverages the distributed processing model to minimize latency in data transmission to distant cloud servers, ensuring timely interventions in high-stakes production environments.^[43] In enterprise networks, fog computing supports video analytics applications in retail settings, where it processes footage from in-store cameras to monitor inventory levels and customer interactions without relying heavily on cloud infrastructure. By performing on-site deep neural network computations, fog systems enable immediate stock replenishment alerts and theft detection, enhancing operational efficiency and reducing bandwidth usage by filtering only relevant data for cloud upload.^[44] This local analytics capability is particularly valuable in large retail chains, where it supports dynamic inventory management and personalized customer experiences through rapid video frame analysis. For the oil and gas sector, fog computing facilitates remote asset monitoring in challenging environments such as offshore rigs and pipelines, where fog nodes act as intermediaries to process sensor data for immediate safety alerts. These nodes handle inputs from pressure, flow, and environmental sensors to detect leaks or equipment faults in real time, triggering automated shutdowns or notifications to mitigate risks in areas with limited connectivity.^[45] In harsh conditions, this setup ensures resilience by preprocessing data locally, avoiding delays from cloud dependency and improving response times for critical safety protocols. In the automotive industry, fog computing enhances vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications within fleet operations by providing low-latency coordination for traffic management and collision avoidance. Fog servers at roadside units aggregate data from connected vehicles, processing it to optimize routing and share hazard warnings among fleet members, which can reduce accident rates by enabling sub-second decision-making.^[46] This integration supports scalable fleet coordination in urban and highway settings, where artificial intelligence-driven fog analysis interprets V2X signals for predictive maneuvers.^[47] Fog computing is adopted in supply chain management for real-time tracking, addressing global disruptions through localized data processing that enhances visibility and agility. Fog-enabled systems monitor shipment locations, conditions, and delays using edge-deployed nodes along logistics routes, allowing for proactive rerouting and inventory adjustments amid events like trade volatility or natural disasters.^[48] This trend supports organizational resilience by integrating fog with IoT sensors for end-to-end traceability, reducing supply delays in perishable goods transport by enabling instantaneous analytics.^[49]

Standards and Frameworks

Major Standards

The OpenFog Reference Architecture, released in February 2017 by the OpenFog Consortium, establishes core principles for deploying fog computing systems, emphasizing a horizontal architecture that integrates information technology, communication technology, and operational technology to distribute resources closer to data sources. This framework promotes modularity, scalability, and security through eight pillars—Security, Scalability, Openness, Autonomy, Programmability, RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability), Agility, and Hierarchy—enabling efficient fog node deployment across diverse environments like IoT and industrial settings.^[9] In 2018, the IEEE adopted this architecture as IEEE Standard 1934-2018, titled "IEEE Standard for Adoption of OpenFog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing," which formalizes interfaces and management protocols for fog systems. The standard defines fog computing as a system-level architecture that disperses computing, storage, control, and networking services between the cloud and end devices, including specifications for node discovery, orchestration, and secure image management to ensure reliable operation.^[11] The European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) advances fog-aligned standards through its Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) initiative, which supports distributed processing for 5G networks by enabling applications to run at the cellular base station level for reduced latency. ETSI's MEC framework, detailed in Group Specifications like GS MEC 003 (version 3.2.1, April 2024), outlines reference architectures for edge hosting, application enablement, and service APIs, facilitating fog-like deployments in mobile and fixed networks. Phase 3 of MEC, completed in April 2024, introduced enhancements for AI-driven services and multi-vendor interoperability. As of 2025, ETSI MEC is in Phase 4 (2024–2026), focusing on enhanced federation, radio-network emulation, and collaboration with open-source initiatives for broader edge interoperability.^[50]^[51]^[52] NIST contributes to fog standardization via its Fog Computing Conceptual Model in Special Publication 500-325 (March 2018), which provides a taxonomy classifying fog as an intermediate layer in IoT architectures, detailing components such as fog nodes, gateways, and aggregators alongside their roles in data processing and orchestration. This model integrates fog within broader NIST IoT frameworks, such as the Cybersecurity Framework, to address reference architectures for secure distributed computing. As of 2025, the ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1, Subcommittee 39 (Sustainability, ICT and Innovation Sectors) is developing guidelines for environmental sustainability in distributed computing, including fog paradigms, through its business plan focusing on carbon metrics, resource efficiency, and lifecycle management for edge and data center infrastructures.

Interoperability and Protocols

Interoperability in fog computing is essential for enabling seamless integration across heterogeneous devices, networks, and platforms, allowing fog nodes to coordinate with IoT endpoints and cloud resources without vendor lock-in. This is achieved through standardized protocols that facilitate efficient data exchange and service orchestration in distributed environments. Key protocols such as MQTT and CoAP support lightweight communication between IoT devices and fog nodes, leveraging publish-subscribe and request-response models to handle resource-constrained scenarios with minimal overhead.^[53] For interactions between fog layers and cloud infrastructure, HTTP/REST APIs provide robust, stateless mechanisms for higher-level data transfer and service invocation, ensuring compatibility with web-based architectures.^[54] To enhance orchestration and cross-system compatibility, frameworks like FogFlow enable dynamic deployment of IoT services across fog, edge, and cloud nodes by automating workflow composition based on context-aware rules. Similarly, extensions to the oneM2M standard adapt its resource-oriented architecture for fog-IoT environments, promoting unified service exposure and discovery through common service functions that bridge diverse device ecosystems.^[55] These frameworks build on major standards like IEEE 1934 by implementing practical integration layers for multi-vendor deployments. Addressing core interoperability challenges, fog systems employ mechanisms such as DNS-SD for zero-configuration device discovery, allowing nodes to advertise and locate services via multicast DNS queries in local networks.^[56] Data format standardization further mitigates heterogeneity, with JSON schemas providing a flexible, schema-validated structure for exchanging structured payloads across fog components, ensuring parseability and consistency without rigid fixed formats.^[57] As of 2025, ongoing efforts integrate fog nodes with 5G network slicing protocols, such as those defined in 3GPP specifications, to enable isolated virtual networks that dynamically allocate resources for low-latency applications like autonomous systems.^[58] For instance, in smart factories, OPC UA facilitates cross-vendor fog interoperability by offering a platform-independent information model for real-time data sharing among diverse industrial controllers and edge devices.^[59]

Challenges and Future Directions

Technical and Security Challenges

Fog nodes in fog computing often suffer from resource constraints, including limited CPU, memory, and storage capacities compared to centralized cloud infrastructures, which can result in elevated latency, increased energy consumption, and difficulties in load balancing for processing IoT-generated data.^[2] These limitations are exacerbated in dynamic environments where high mobility of devices, such as in vehicular or wearable IoT applications, demands real-time resource reallocation and handover mechanisms to maintain service continuity without disrupting connectivity.^[60] Security vulnerabilities in fog computing arise from its distributed and geo-graphically dispersed architecture, making nodes susceptible to attacks like man-in-the-middle (MITM) interceptions that exploit unencrypted communications between heterogeneous devices and fog layers.^[61] Establishing trust models for these heterogeneous devices poses additional challenges, as varying hardware and software configurations across edge nodes increase risks of self-promotion or bad-mouthing attacks, necessitating robust reputation-based and authentication protocols to verify node integrity.^[61]^[2] Management of fog environments introduces orchestration overhead, where coordinating tasks across numerous decentralized nodes requires complex scheduling algorithms that account for varying workloads and network conditions, often leading to inefficiencies in resource utilization.^[62] Fault tolerance remains a critical issue in these failure-prone setups, as less reliable fog nodes—due to their proximity to end-users and exposure to physical tampering—complicate repair and recovery processes, potentially causing widespread service disruptions in large-scale deployments.^[63] Privacy concerns in fog computing stem from the tension between local data processing at the edge and regulatory compliance, particularly with frameworks like the GDPR, where data residency requirements mandate that sensitive information remain within jurisdictional boundaries to avoid cross-border transfer risks.^[64] The decentralized nature of fog nodes can inadvertently expose user data to unauthorized access during aggregation, challenging organizations to balance proximity-based analytics with privacy-preserving techniques without violating data sovereignty principles.^[64] As of 2025, emerging quantum threats pose risks to fog encryption protocols, with quantum computing advancements enabling potential decryption of traditional cryptographic methods used in distributed fog communications, particularly in resource-limited edge scenarios.^[65] Additionally, scalability issues with AI workloads strain fog infrastructures, as the computational demands of real-time machine learning inference on heterogeneous nodes outpace available resources, leading to bottlenecks in handling surging IoT data volumes.

Emerging Trends and Research

Fog computing is increasingly integrating with artificial intelligence and machine learning, particularly through federated learning paradigms that facilitate local model training on edge devices to enhance privacy and reduce latency. In architectures like FOGNITE, federated learning enhances fog-cloud systems by distributing training across fog nodes, resulting in an estimated 20% increase in memory usage but substantial improvements in efficiency for privacy-sensitive applications such as healthcare and finance. Systematic reviews highlight AI-driven service placement strategies in fog environments, where machine learning optimizes resource allocation and task offloading, enabling scalable deep learning applications that synergize edge processing with advanced analytics for real-time decision-making.^[66] These integrations address resource constraints by training models locally, minimizing data transmission to the cloud while maintaining model accuracy comparable to centralized approaches.^[67] The evolution toward 6G networks positions fog computing as a vital enabler for ultra-reliable low-latency communications (URLLC), supporting mission-critical applications like autonomous vehicles and industrial automation. 6G-enabled edge networks utilize fog layers to process real-time data with sub-millisecond latencies, outperforming 5G by integrating fog for distributed intelligence and reducing end-to-end delays.^[68] The 6G smart fog radio access network (F-RAN) architecture further advances this by providing low-latency access for massive data volumes, though it faces challenges in performance optimization for heterogeneous environments.^[69] Projections indicate that fog's role in URLLC will expand to support Industry 5.0 scenarios, coordinating real-time human-machine interactions with reliability exceeding 99.999%. Sustainability efforts in fog computing emphasize green architectures that optimize energy consumption across distributed nodes, aligning with global carbon reduction goals. GreenFog frameworks incorporate renewable energy sources and linear programming optimizations to minimize brown energy reliance, achieving up to 15% reductions in overall power usage through dynamic resource scheduling.^[70] Surveys of energy-efficient techniques reveal ongoing research into eco-friendly fog computing, including workload migration to low-energy nodes and integration of solar-powered edge devices, which collectively lower the environmental footprint of large-scale deployments.^[71] Emerging research areas include quantum-safe security protocols and blockchain-based trust mechanisms to fortify fog ecosystems against advanced threats. Quantum-resistant frameworks for fog-IoT employ dual-phase encryption and authentication, using post-quantum algorithms like lattice-based cryptography to secure data in transit and at rest, ensuring resilience as quantum computing matures.^[72] Blockchain enhances fog trust through decentralized models like TrustFog, which integrates Bayesian assessments on tamper-proof ledgers for scalable authentication in IoT networks, reducing single points of failure and improving verification speeds in simulated smart-city scenarios.^[73]^[74] Beyond 2025, hybrid fog-edge-cloud paradigms are projected to underpin metaverse applications, delivering immersive experiences with seamless latency management across virtual environments. Proposed fog-edge hybrids for the metaverse distribute rendering and interaction processing, cutting latency by up to 50% compared to pure cloud setups and enabling personalized, context-aware avatars in multi-user spaces.^[75] Influential IEEE research, including studies on hybrid fog-cloud orchestration for IoT scalability, demonstrates enhanced throughput and fault tolerance in these systems, with frameworks evaluating distributed work allocation on lightweight devices to handle exponential data growth.^[76]^[77] These advancements, drawn from recent IEEE conferences, underscore scalable fog's potential for metaverse-scale immersion while prioritizing energy-efficient, secure orchestration.^[78]

References

[1]
[PDF] Fog Computing and Its Role in the Internet of Things
Aug 17, 2012 · Fog Computing extends the Cloud Computing paradigm to the edge of the network, thus enabling a new breed of ap- plications and services.
[2]
An Overview of Fog Computing and Edge Computing Security and ...
According to [12], fog computing is defined as a distributed computing technology where maximum operations are performed by virtualized and non-virtualized edge ...
[3]
Fog Computing and the Internet of Things: A Review - MDPI
Apr 8, 2018 · This paper presents the state-of-the-art of fog computing and its integration with the IoT by highlighting the benefits and implementation challenges.
[4]
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/71376
[5]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8422317
[6]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8966451
[7]
Fog computing and its role in the internet of things
This paper explores the emerging technologies of quantum computing, cloud computing, and cloud computing, focusing on their principles, applications ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
[8]
Internet of Things Leaders Create OpenFog Consortium to Help ...
Nov 19, 2015 · The OpenFog Consortium was founded by the following technology industry leaders: ARM, Cisco, Dell, Intel, Microsoft and Princeton University to ...
[9]
[PDF] OpenFog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing
The OpenFog Consortium was founded by ARM, Cisco, Dell, Intel, Microsoft and Princeton University in November 2015. Through its global membership of leading ...
[10]
IEEE Standard for Adoption of OpenFog Reference Architecture for ...
Aug 2, 2018 · 1934-2018 - IEEE Standard for Adoption of OpenFog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing ... Date of Publication: 02 August 2018. ISBN ...
[11]
IEEE 1934-2018 - IEEE SA
IEEE Standard for Adoption of OpenFog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing ; Published: 2018-08-02 ; Society: IEEE Communications Society ...
[12]
Impact of COVID-19 on IoT Adoption in Healthcare, Smart Homes ...
In this paper, we discuss the pandemic's potential impact on the adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT) in various broad sectors.<|separator|>
[13]
AI augmented Edge and Fog computing: Trends and challenges
This survey reviews the evolution of data-driven AI-augmented technologies and their impact on computing systems.
[14]
fog and edge white papers - Industry IoT Consortium
The IIC and the OpenFog Consortium combined to become the largest and most influential international consortia in Industrial IoT, fog and edge computing.Missing: IEEE 2021
[15]
Synergistic Integration of Edge Computing and 6G Networks ... - MDPI
MEC, also known as fog computing, brings computational capabilities closer to end-users and IoT devices, enabling low-latency, high-bandwidth, and context-aware ...
[16]
Sustainable Developments in Cloud Computing and Its Applications
In this chapter, we examine how green technologies and energy-saving architectures are used in sustainable cloud computing. Solutions discussed include running ...
[17]
[PDF] ETSI GR CIM 051 V1.1.1 (2025-02)
Feb 11, 2025 · By using FOG, a building object can have multiple representations depending on calculation, interoperability or rendering needs. For a ...
[18]
[PDF] Fog Computing Conceptual Model
The fog node is the core component of the fog computing architecture. Fog nodes are either physical components (e.g. gateways, switches, routers, servers, etc.) ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[19]
Task offloading in fog computing: A survey of algorithms and ...
Sep 4, 2022 · We begin by introducing fog computing, and task offloading process followed by several task offloading factors governing decision-making process ...
[20]
[PDF] Chapter 2: Fog Computing for Smart Grids: Challenges and Solutions
The use of Fog computing to empower the edge-side processing capability of Smart grid systems is considered as a potential solution to address the problem. In.Missing: workflow | Show results with:workflow
[21]
A Framework of Fog Computing: Architecture, Challenges, and ...
Oct 26, 2017 · Fog computing (FC) is an emerging distributed computing platform aimed at bringing computation close to its data sources, which can reduce the latency and cost.Missing: differences | Show results with:differences<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
A review on fog computing: Issues, characteristics, challenges, and ...
Jun 3, 2023 · Fog computing is a paradigm that utilizes the advantages of both the cloud and the edge devices providing quality services, reducing latency ...
[23]
Edge Computing Optimization for Real-Time IoT Data Processing
It achieves an average latency of 152 ms (68.7% below Cloud-Only's 485 ms), throughput of 16.5 tasks/s (15.4%-101% higher), and energy use of 450 J (42.3% less ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[24]
A Structured Framework for Selecting Cloud or Fog Computing in ...
Jul 21, 2025 · reveal that Fog Computing reduces latency to 10–50 ms and decreases bandwidth consumption by approximately 45% compared to Cloud Computing.Missing: milliseconds | Show results with:milliseconds
[25]
Distributed Decomposed Data Analytics in Fog Enabled IoT ...
Apr 10, 2019 · The results show an 80% reduction in the amount of data transferred to the cloud using the proposed fog-based distributed data analytics ...
[26]
Comparison of edge computing implementations: Fog ... - IEEE Xplore
In this paper, we discuss the three different implementations of Edge Computing namely Fog Computing, Cloudlet and Mobile Edge Computing in detail and compare ...Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
[27]
A Review on FoG Computing in 5G Wireless Technologies: Research Challenges, Issues and Solutions - Wireless Personal Communications
### Summary of Differences and Relations Between Fog and Edge Computing in 5G Networks
[28]
A Comparative Study on Cloud Computing, Edge ... - ResearchGate
Jan 23, 2023 · Comparison of Fog Computing & Cloud Computing ... Fog computing is extending cloud computing by transferring computation on the edge of networks ...
[29]
Fog of Things Framework to Handle Data Streaming Heterogeneity ...
Fog Computing is also well known as Real-Time Edge Computing. It emerged from Cloud Computing and implemented closed to the end user's devices to deal with ...
[30]
An Overview of Fog Data Analytics for IoT Applications - PMC
This paper explores various research challenges and their solution using the next-generation fog data analytics and IoT networks.
[31]
[PDF] Fog Computing Platform to Handle Internet of Things Data ...
Data management and handling data heterogeneity locally on sensor boards and regionally on local servers using Fog and centrally on Cloud acts as an enabler for ...
[32]
A Low-Cost Vehicular Traffic Monitoring System Using Fog Computing
This work proposes a low-cost vehicular traffic monitoring system using IoT devices and fog computing.
[33]
Fog computing approaches in IoT-enabled smart cities - ScienceDirect
This paper proposes a study for the state-of-the-art fog-based approaches in smart cities. Furthermore, according to the reviewed research content, a ...
[34]
Enhancing environmental observatories with fog computing - Frontiers
We explore and review the value of Fog Computing, a technical solution bringing intelligence to operate adaptive heterogeneous sensor networks.
[35]
Health Monitoring with Low Power IoT Devices using Anomaly ...
The solution proposed includes a model to monitor and process the data disseminated by wearable devices related to the patients' health issues and connect the ...
[36]
Role of artificial intelligence in health monitoring using IoT based ...
Sep 18, 2025 · Their approach demonstrated improved accuracy in anomaly detection, enabling more responsive healthcare interventions. In the context of chronic ...
[37]
A hybrid fog-edge computing architecture for real-time health ...
Jul 15, 2025 · The Hybrid Fog-Edge Computing model that will be discussed in this paper focuses on optimal real-time data analysis of IoT applications for the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[38]
Fog-based smart homes: A systematic review - ScienceDirect.com
Mar 1, 2020 · These smart homes are implemented through fog computing that offers more security, ultra-low latency, and efficient cost and energy. For high- ...Missing: intermittent connectivity
[39]
Enhancing data management and real‐time decision making with ...
Nov 12, 2024 · The Hybrid Architecture seamlessly integrates IoT, Fog computing, and Cloud computing. This integration optimises data flow and processing ...
[40]
Fog Computing and Deep Reinforcement Learning for Smart Grid ...
Aug 4, 2025 · This paper reviews recent advancements in fog computing and deep reinforcement learning for smart grid demand response systems.2. Fog Computing In Smart... · 2.3. Iot Integration And... · 7. Future Research...
[41]
FOGNITE: Federated Learning-Enhanced Fog-Cloud Architecture
Jul 22, 2025 · These next-generation grids rely heavily on real-time data acquired from smart meters, sensors, and IoT-enabled devices to optimize energy ...
[42]
Fog Computing for Realizing Smart Neighborhoods in Smart Grids
The integration of large renewable energy sources like wind and photovoltaic (PV) solar energies into the power system will continue to grow for local and ...
[43]
IoT and Fog-Computing-Based Predictive Maintenance Model for ...
Jan 11, 2021 · This article presents the genetic algorithm (GA)-based resource management integrating with machine learning for predictive maintenance in fog computing.
[44]
A Scalable Fog Computing Solution for Industrial Predictive ... - MDPI
This study presents a predictive maintenance system designed for industrial Internet of Things (IoT) environments, focusing on resource efficiency and ...
[45]
A Serverless Cloud-Fog Platform for DNN-Based Video Analytics ...
Feb 5, 2021 · This paper presents the first serverless system that takes full advantage of the client-fog-cloud synergy to better serve the DNN-based video analytics.
[46]
Fog Computing Use Cases: Enhancing Connectivity and Efficiency
Jan 1, 2024 · Fog computing enables real-time data analysis and decision-making in scenarios such as industrial automation, retail, and autonomous vehicles.Popular Fog Computing Use... · Edge Analytics · Industry-based Fog Computing...
[47]
(PDF) The Role of Hybrid IoT with Cloud Computing and Fog ...
Fog computing can provide a rapid response for applications through preprocess and filter data. Data that has been trimmed can then be transmitted to the cloud ...
[48]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352667764_Fog_computing-based_logistic_supply_chain_management_and_organizational_agility_The_mediating_role_of_user_satisfaction
[49]
Deep-VFog: When Artificial Intelligence Meets Fog Computing in V2X
Aug 19, 2020 · In this survey, we address a novel and practical AI-enabled vehicular network architecture with FC in its core.Missing: automotive | Show results with:automotive
[50]
V2X: Vehicle-to-Everything Solutions | Southwest Research Institute
This system will leverage cloud, fog and edge computing to analyze road conditions and communicate important information to the traveling public, state/local ...
[51]
(PDF) Fog computing-based logistic supply chain management and ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Drawing on the Kano model and organization's theory this paper investigates the effect of fog computing-based LSCM on organizational agility.
[52]
A Fog Computing Framework for Blackberry Supply Chain ...
This paper investigates in-depth: (i) the application of fog computing in perishable produce supply chain management using blackberry fruit as a case study.
[53]
Multi-access Edge Computing - Standards for MEC - ETSI
Differentiation will be enabled through the unique applications deployed in the Edge Cloud. MEC completed its 'Phase 3' mid-April 2024 and currently focuses on ...Introduction · Our Role & Activities
[54]
[PDF] ETSI GS MEC 003 V3.2.1 (2024-04)
The present document provides a framework and reference architecture for Multi-access Edge Computing that describes a MEC system that enables MEC applications ...
[55]
(PDF) Communication Protocols in Fog Computing: A Survey and ...
Sep 25, 2022 · Addition to above, MQTT and CoAP are also extensively used protocols in most M2M communication. This survey paper is an exploration of these ...
[56]
A Survey of Communication Protocols for Internet of Things and ...
This article surveys e application layer communication protocols to fulfill the IoT communication requirements, and their potential for implementation in fog- ...
[57]
[PDF] DEVELOPING A ONEM2M-COMPLIANT FOG COMPUTING ...
Jan 7, 2024 · ... oneM2M-compliant fog computing framework tailored for IoT ... interoperability and seamless integration with various IoT devices and platforms.
[58]
An IOTA-Based Service Discovery Framework for Fog Computing
In addition to DHT-based SD, Kazuya Okada et al. [14] exploited DNS-SD, mDNS, and IP anycast to achieve the cooperation of SD among MEC nodes. Hessam Moeini ...
[59]
Edge and Fog Computing Platform for Data Fusion of Complex ...
The fact that in end applications a JSON format makes the message completely human readable can be a major advantage. However, if a particular application ...
[60]
Advancing the State of the Fog Computing to Enable 5G Network ...
This study proposes necessary measures to boost the growth of FC to 5G network usage. It is done by taking an extensive review of how 5G operates.
[61]
Application of the Fog computing paradigm to Smart Factories and ...
Fog technology addressed here. 2.4 M2M standards—OPC UA and oneM2M. Machine-to-machine stands for the communication between. devices and is one of the IoT's ...
[62]
Dynamic task allocation in fog computing using enhanced fuzzy ...
May 27, 2025 · To address mobility challenges in fog computing ... resource-constrained edge devices must operate efficiently while processing tasks.<|separator|>
[63]
Towards Secure Fog Computing: A Survey on Trust Management ...
In this paper, a survey along with a taxonomy is proposed, which presents an overview of existing security concerns in the context of the Fog computing ...
[64]
Challenges and Solutions in Fog Computing Orchestration
Aug 7, 2025 · We first identify the major challenges in this procedure that arise due to the distinct features of fog computing. Then we discuss the necessary ...
[65]
[PDF] Challenges and Software Architecture for Fog Computing
This article presents a detailed description of fog computing (also known as edge computing) and explores its research challenges and problems. Based on.
[66]
Regulatory Challenges and Frameworks for Fog Computing in ...
Aug 13, 2024 · This review explores these challenges in depth, discussing the implications of fog computing's decentralized architecture for data privacy.
[67]
A resilient fog-enabled IoV architecture: Adaptive post-quantum ...
Oct 20, 2025 · Additionally, IoVs systems must be equipped with defenses against evolving threats, including the emerging risk of quantum computing attacks. To ...
[68]
(PDF) Deep Learning Applications in Fog Computing Environments
Feb 19, 2025 · This review investigates the transformation of deep learning in a fog computing environment, strongly emphasizing synergy between these enabled technologies.Missing: trends | Show results with:trends
[69]
Federated Computing Trends & Insights: 2Q25 Review
Jul 14, 2025 · 2Q25 federated learning snapshot: new frameworks, stronger privacy, leaner communications, and real-world uses in healthcare, finance, edge, ...
[70]
6G-Enabled Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication in Edge ...
Apr 25, 2022 · In this article, we discuss the emerging 6G technology and its benefits toward edge networks for processing real-time applications.Missing: fog | Show results with:fog
[71]
6G smart fog radio access network: Architecture, key technologies ...
While the 6G smart F-RAN has the potential to offer low-latency access services for massive data, it still faces several challenges that impact its performance.
[72]
GreenFog: A Framework for Sustainable Fog Computing
Nov 29, 2022 · It is, therefore, necessary to reduce the percentage of brown energy consumption in these systems and integrate renewable energy use into Fog.
[73]
Survey of energy-efficient fog computing: Techniques and recent ...
This study offers a comprehensive survey of recent research endeavors focused on achieving energy-efficient fog computing and eco-friendly fog computing ...
[74]
Toward Quantum-Resistant Fog-IoT Security: A Dual-Phase ...
... fog computing has amplified the necessity for secure, efficient, and quantum-resistant communication protocols, especially in light of emerging quantum threats.
[75]
Blockchain-enhanced security and bayesian trust assessment for ...
Sep 30, 2025 · To address these challenges, the study proposes TrustFog, a blockchain-enhanced Bayesian trust model explicitly designed for secure and ...
[76]
A Block Chain - Enabled Trust Management System for Fog Nodes
Utilizing blockchain technology bolsters the effectiveness of our solution, as it provides a tamper-resistant foundation for trust computation and attack ...
[77]
[PDF] The Convergence of Metaverse and Mobile Edge Computing
In this paper, we propose a Fog-Edge hybrid computing architecture for Metaverse applications that leverage an edge-enabled distributed computing paradigm, ...<|separator|>
[78]
Hybrid Fog-Cloud Architectures for Enhanced IoT Scalability and ...
This research proposes Hybrid Fed + Fog-Cloud Orchestration model, which combines the favorable low latency advantages provided by fog computing with the higher ...
[79]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10539565
[80]
IEEE MVS 2025 | IEEE Smart World Congress 2025
IEEE Metaverse 2025 Topics ; Track 1: Metaverse Computing and Communications. Cloud /Edge/Fog Computing; Ubiquitous /Pervasive Computing ; Track 2: Metaverse ...