Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Forum of Augustus

The was an imperial forum in , constructed by Emperor between approximately 42 BC and 2 BC as the second in a series of fora built by leaders to expand the city's civic spaces. It centered on the , vowed by Octavian (later ) at the in 42 BC to avenge Julius Caesar's assassination, symbolizing vengeance and imperial legitimacy. The forum's rectangular piazza, flanked by porticoes and exedrae housing statues of Rome's mythical ancestors and republican heroes, underscored Augustus's claim to restore the while linking his rule to its storied past. Primarily serving judicial needs, the Forum of Augustus provided expanded space for law courts handling criminal prosecutions and juror selection, addressing overcrowding in earlier forums. It also functioned for purposes, hosting ceremonial departures and returns of generals from campaigns, reinforcing Augustus's control over Rome's martial traditions. The architectural ensemble, including a monumental of in a at the entrance, propagated his achievements and the continuity of virtues through monumental . Though partially excavated in modern times, the forum's remains illustrate Augustus's strategic use of urban space to construct imperial identity and civic memory.

Historical Context and Construction

Origins and Initial Vow

Octavian, later known as , made a to construct a to Mars Ultor during the Philippi campaign in 42 BC, pledging it in exchange for victory over the assassins of his adoptive father, . This commitment, recorded by , was tied explicitly to avenging Caesar's murder through success in the war against Brutus and . Ovid similarly attests to the being raised amid the Philippi conflict, emphasizing Mars as the avenger of paternal blood. The , fought on October 3 and 23, 42 BC, resulted in the defeat and suicides of Brutus and , enabling Octavian to claim fulfillment of the vow as a divine endorsement of his cause. While the formed the core of the pledge, the adjacent Forum of Augustus emerged as its monumental context, envisioned from the outset as a to house the on Octavian's private land. Augustus later documented in his (chapter 21) that he financed both the temple and forum using spoils of war obtained in campaigns against Caesar's killers, underscoring the site's origins in triumphal retribution rather than mere urban expansion. This not only marked a personal religious obligation but also served as ideological groundwork, positioning Octavian as legitimate heir and restorer of order amid civil strife. Archaeological and textual aligns on the 42 BC timing, with no credible sources predating or contradicting the Philippi linkage, though some modern analyses note the 's vagueness in primary accounts beyond and .

Land Acquisition Challenges

Augustus faced significant obstacles in securing the narrow, irregularly shaped site for the Forum Augustum, located between the Forum Romanum and the Subura district in a densely urbanized area of . The land was occupied by private residences and possibly minor public structures, requiring the acquisition of multiple properties from individual owners. According to , Augustus explicitly avoided compulsory expropriation, purchasing the necessary parcels at the prices demanded by sellers rather than demolishing houses by force, a decision that reflected his emphasis on respecting amid his consolidation of power. This approach, funded primarily through spoils from military campaigns as noted in the , prolonged the process and introduced design compromises. Despite these efforts, could not obtain all required land, resulting in an asymmetrical layout where the northern was truncated to accommodate unyielding neighboring properties. Archaeological evidence and ancient accounts confirm that the forum's plan was adjusted accordingly, with the eastern shortened and the overall space compressed to fit the available terrain without further seizures. This limitation stemmed from the site's constrained —flanked by the Argiletum to the east and existing residences to the west—and the practical difficulties of negotiating with holdout owners in a high-value urban zone. The incomplete acquisition delayed full realization of the original vision, contributing to construction setbacks that extended over decades from the initial vow in 42 BC to in 2 BC. These challenges highlight the interplay between Augustus's political image as a restorer of values, including property rights, and the logistical realities of imperial building in Rome's crowded core. While propagandistic sources like portray this as principled restraint, the reliance on war spoils for purchases underscores the causal link between military success and urban expansion, enabling acquisition without overt coercion that might alienate the . The resulting , though imperfectly symmetrical, served its functions effectively, demonstrating adaptive over rigid imposition.

Construction Phases and Dedication

The construction of the Forum of Augustus followed the vow made in 42 BC and the subsequent land acquisitions, with initial demolition of existing structures on the site to prepare for the new complex. Work likely began around 31 BC, leveraging spoils from the to fund extensive groundwork and material procurement, including marbles from across the empire. The project encompassed erecting the rectangular piazza, porticos, exedrae, and the at the northern end, utilizing advanced techniques such as foundations and imported stone for durability and grandeur. Delays plagued the endeavor, attributed to architectural refinements and logistical challenges in sourcing and assembling multicolored marbles and sculptures, extending the timeline over decades despite Augustus' prioritization of monumental projects post-civil wars. Funding derived exclusively from war booty (ex manubiis), totaling around 100 million sesterces, underscoring the forum's role as a trophy of military success rather than public taxation. The complex was dedicated on 1 August 2 BC, fulfilling the original vow to Mars the , though the temple's interior and full decorative program remained incomplete, allowing partial use for judicial and ceremonial functions. This dedication aligned with ' assumption of the title Pater Patriae earlier that year, amplifying its political symbolism in consolidating imperial legitimacy. The event featured games and processions, as noted in contemporary accounts, but prioritized structural readiness over aesthetic perfection to meet symbolic deadlines.

Architectural Features

Overall Layout and Design

The Forum of Augustus was constructed as a rectangular complex measuring approximately 125 meters in length by 90 meters in width, oriented with its long axis perpendicular to the adjacent Forum of Julius Caesar. The central feature consisted of an open paved piazza, approximately 70 meters by 50 meters, surrounded by high walls and flanked on the north and south sides by porticos supported by columns of white marble. These porticos, each about 14 meters wide, incorporated large semi-circular exedrae with diameters of roughly 40 meters, providing spaces for judicial or assembly functions. At the western extremity of the piazza rose the , positioned on an elevated podium and aligned axially with the entrance, emphasizing the forum's propagandistic focus on Augustus's military vengeance. The eastern entrance, arched and monumental, connected directly to the of , facilitating processional movement while the enclosing walls on the other sides isolated the space from the surrounding Subura district. The design prioritized , axiality, and monumentality, utilizing pavonazzetto for accents and for structural efficiency beneath the . The overall layout derived from precedents like the Forum Romanum and Forum Iulium but innovated by integrating exedrae into the porticos for enhanced functionality and visual rhythm, creating a cohesive ensemble that served both civic and commemorative purposes. Surviving elements, including three temple columns over 17 meters tall, attest to the scale and durability of the , which employed advanced Roman engineering to achieve a harmonious blend of openness and enclosure.

Temple of Mars Ultor

The Temple of Mars Ultor, dedicated to the god Mars in his aspect as "the Avenger," was vowed by Octavian (later Augustus) in 42 BC prior to the Battle of Philippi, as a pledge to avenge the assassination of Julius Caesar. This vow fulfilled a religious obligation for divine aid in defeating the assassins Brutus and Cassius, marking the temple's inception as a symbol of retribution and restoration of order. Construction integrated into the Forum of Augustus proceeded over decades, reflecting the prolonged consolidation of Augustus's power, with the temple dedicated on August 1, 2 BC during his thirteenth consulship, though the structure remained incomplete at that time. Architecturally, the temple dominated the northern end of the Forum of Augustus, elevated on a high approached by broad steps, with a pseudoperipteral design featuring eight columns across the facade and twenty along the flanks, constructed primarily from white (Carrara) marble. The walls, also of marble, housed colossal cult statues: Mars Ultor in the center, flanked by Genetrix and the deified Julius Caesar, emphasizing Augustus's claimed descent from these figures and his role as avenger. The likely depicted mythological scenes reinforcing themes of vengeance, though surviving fragments provide limited detail on precise . Restorations occurred under later emperors, including , who rebuilt parts of the Augustan monument, preserving its prominence amid urban development. Today, substantial ruins persist, including podium remnants and column bases, excavated in the 19th and 20th centuries, offering evidence of its scale—one of Rome's largest temples—and , with foundations supporting the heavy superstructure. The temple's orientation aligned with the forum's axial symmetry, integrating it into a broader propagandistic landscape that glorified Augustus's achievements.

Porticos, Exedrae, and Decorative Elements

The twin porticos of the Forum of Augustus extended along the long sides of the central rectangular piazza, elevated three steps above a courtyard paved in white , and flanked the axial approach to the . These colonnades, likely two stories in height, were supported by columns of giallo antico with Corinthian capitals, bearing a coffered surmounted by a white attic. Integrated into the porticos near the rear enclosure wall were two monumental exedrae, semicircular hemicycles positioned at the northwest and southeast extremities. Each featured curved walls articulated by engaged columns and rectangular niches, with polychrome marble paving, and served primarily to display statuary linking Augustus to legendary forebears: the northwest exedra centered on Aeneas with statues of kings of Alba Longa, while the southeast highlighted Romulus (depicted with the spolia opima) alongside principes and triumphatores, accompanied by inscriptions of their achievements to underscore themes of piety and valor. Decorative elements enriched the porticos' elevations, with the attic adorned by alternating caryatids—modeled on those from the Athenian —and Hellenistic-style marble shields (parmae), evoking a fusion of Greek architectural precedents and Roman martial iconography. Back walls incorporated niches framed by engaged columns for further statues, including Julian clan figures and on the western portico and summi viri of the with accompanying elogia on the eastern, enhancing the ensemble's propagandistic depth.

Statuary Program

Placement and Types of Statues

The porticos on either side of the central in the Forum of Augustus were lined with over 100 statues depicting the summi viri, Rome's most illustrious historical figures, estimated at 108 in total. These statues, primarily in form, were positioned along the attics of the twin colonnades, which featured yellow marble columns and supports. Each statue base bore an elogium, a plaque with a biographical inscription summarizing the figure's achievements and virtues. The western portico displayed statues of the clan's mythical and historical ancestors, arranged chronologically from and the Alban kings through to , emphasizing Augustus's divine lineage. The eastern portico housed statues of heroes, such as Camillus, who repelled the in 390 BCE, and other triumphators, extending the narrative to the recent past. The hemicycles, or exedrae, at the northern ends of the porticos featured colossal statues, including depictions of carrying in the western exedra and with the twins in the eastern, symbolizing Rome's foundational myths. Additional niches in the rear walls accommodated further statues of notable Romans. Archaeological , including fragments and epigraphic remains recovered during 1930s excavations and copies found at sites like , supports this arrangement, with reconstructions drawing on literary descriptions by and . The central piazza likely held supplementary statues, such as a featuring , though direct is limited.

Elogia Inscriptions

The elogia were inscribed texts placed on the bases of over 100 statues (summi viri) arrayed along the porticos flanking the , inaugurated in 2 BCE. These inscriptions cataloged the names, lineages, magistracies, victories, triumphs, and other key accomplishments of Rome's exemplary figures, spanning mythical progenitors such as , early , heroes, and select imperial-era individuals aligned with Augustan lineage. Composed in a uniform, concise style emphasizing virtues like (valor) and (dutifulness), the elogia drew from historical traditions but were curated to project an idealized continuum of leadership culminating in . Structurally, each elogium adhered to a standardized format: opening with the honoree's name and filiation (e.g., "C. Marius, son of Gaius"), followed by offices (), exploits (e.g., conquests or dedications), and occasionally reign lengths for kings. Surviving fragments, documented in the (CIL VI, nos. 40931–41053) and edited by A. in Inscriptiones Italiae 13.3, reveal lacunae but consistent laudatory tone. For example:
  • : " primus Latinorum rex; ann(os) III." (, the first king of the ; reigned 3 years).
  • C. Iulius Caesar (the dictator's father): Lists praetorship, quaestorship, military tribunate, and campaigns, e.g., leading troops to Cerceina.
  • C. Marius: "Seven times ; captured ; routed the Cimbri and celebrated a second triumph."
These texts, while rooted in verifiable records like and triumphal lists, selectively omitted controversies (e.g., civil strife) to serve as moral exemplars, with confirmed through epigraphic comparisons to earlier Scipionic elogia. Approximately 28 elogia are cataloged in detail from surviving or restored pieces, though the full program likely matched the statue count of 108.

Iconographic Themes

The iconographic themes of the statuary program in the Forum of Augustus centered on exempla virtutis, portraying historical figures as models of Roman virtues including pietas, virtus, and clementia to underscore Augustus' restoration of traditional values. Over 100 bronze statues of summi viri—eminent men from Rome's past—lined the northern and southern porticos, each base bearing elogia inscriptions that cataloged their military triumphs, civic contributions, and pious acts, thereby framing Augustus as the culmination of this virtuous lineage. These statues were arranged in two symmetrical series: the eastern portico traced the Julian gens from Aeneas and Venus Genetrix to Julius Caesar, emphasizing divine Trojan origins, while the western depicted Romulus and early Roman kings through republican heroes, highlighting indigenous martial foundations linked to Mars. In the , the cult statues reinforced themes of avenging paternal piety and imperial legitimacy, featuring Mars as the avenger of Caesar, as ancestress of the Julians, and the deified , thus intertwining military retribution with dynastic divinity. The temple's pedimental reliefs depicted Mars centrally flanked by and on one side and on the other, symbolizing the protective alliance of war, ancestry, foundation, and prosperity under Augustan auspices. A colossal seated statue of in the forum's central , clad in military attire, embodied the theme of impartial justice, aligning the with the equitable rule of historical exemplars. This orchestrated imagery collectively propagated the of continuity between Rome's heroic past and ' regime, presenting his as the divinely ordained fulfillment of republican ideals rather than monarchical innovation.

Functions and Usage

Judicial and Civic Roles

The Forum of Augustus was established to expand Rome's judicial capacity, addressing overcrowding in the by accommodating criminal prosecutions, juror selection, and civil litigation. The northern and southern exedrae, semicircular recesses flanking the central courtyard, functioned as dedicated courtrooms, enabling urban praetors to adjudicate civil disputes involving private citizens. This judicial infrastructure supported the centumviral court, a key body for high-value civil cases, which Augustus reorganized to streamline proceedings amid growing caseloads in the late and early . Emperors including and personally presided over trials in the forum, underscoring its role in imperial oversight of legal matters. Civically, the forum hosted senatorial meetings and administrative deliberations, serving as an auxiliary venue when the Curia Julia proved insufficient for assemblies on legislative or issues. Augustus designated it for declarations of war and treaty ratifications, linking civic to military imperatives under senatorial purview. Its open layout facilitated public access for these functions, reinforcing the site's integration into Rome's administrative apparatus until at least the 2nd century AD.

Religious and Military Significance

The Temple of Mars Ultor, the dominant structure within the Forum of Augustus, embodied religious devotion to Mars as the avenger, fulfilling a vow made by Augustus after the Battle of Philippi in 42 BCE, where he defeated Julius Caesar's assassins, Brutus and Cassius. This dedication underscored vengeance as a pious duty, linking divine favor to the restoration of Caesar's legacy and Augustus's legitimacy as heir. Formally inaugurated on 1 August 2 BCE, the temple was financed through spoils of war, as noted in Augustus's Res Gestae Divi Augusti, and featured cult images potentially including Mars, Venus—symbolizing the Julian gens's mythological descent—and deified Caesar, evoking filial piety and Rome's founding deities. Rituals at the reinforced its religious role, serving as a venue for sacrifices, prayers seeking military victory, and the festival, a traditional honoring Mars tied to prowess and warfare. These practices positioned the site as a conduit for invoking divine sanction over Roman arms, blending piety with imperial ideology. Militarily, the forum and temple functioned as a ceremonial nexus, where commanders took auspices before departing for campaigns and triumphal processions originated. The Senate assembled here to debate and declare wars, centralizing military deliberation under Augustan oversight. Recovered standards—lost in defeats such as those to the Parthians under Crassus or in provinces like , , and —were consecrated in the temple, proclaiming Augustus's recovery of prestige without full-scale vengeance. Additionally, elite youths underwent the virilis ceremony here, marking their entry into military service and civic duty.

Integration with Triumphal Practices

The Temple of Mars Ultor within the Forum of Augustus served as the designated venue for deliberations on granting and declarations of war, as stipulated in the dedicatory legislation enacted around 2 BCE. This functional integration centralized imperial oversight of military honors, diverging from republican traditions where such decisions occurred in the or Temple of Bellona; victorious generals were required to dedicate spoils from their campaigns at the temple's altar, reinforcing Mars Ultor's role as and patron of Roman victories. Augustus's own records that, following his triple triumph in 29 BCE—celebrating victories in , , and —he declined additional decreed by the , instead channeling such honors through institutions like the . The temple's precinct housed bronze statues of past triumphatores, authorized by Augustan laws, which linked contemporary practices to a curated lineage of Roman military success, with Augustus positioned as the culmination via his summi viri program. This arrangement effectively subordinated traditional triumphal processions, which culminated at the Capitoline Temple of , to imperial symbolism, as the adjoined the route but emphasized and deliberative aspects over the parade itself. Such reforms reflected Augustus's broader monopolization of gloria militaris, where the Forum transformed from republican spectacles into state-controlled rituals honoring the princeps's vengeance for Caesar—vowed at in 42 BCE—and his regime's stability. No evidence indicates that triumphal processions physically entered the Forum, but its proximity to the and thematic focus on Mars ensured ideological continuity with the procession's martial themes.

Political and Ideological Role

Promotion of Augustan Legitimacy

The Forum of Augustus, dedicated in 2 BCE despite remaining incomplete, advanced ' legitimacy by embedding his rule within Rome's historical and mythological continuum through its statuary, inscriptions, and central . This visual program, as analyzed by Paul Zanker, established a novel iconographic language that portrayed as the restorer of republican virtues and heir to divine ancestry, countering perceptions of by evoking continuity rather than rupture. Central to this was the , vowed by Octavian in 42 BCE following the to avenge Julius Caesar's assassination, thereby framing as the dutiful who restored order after civil strife. The temple's likely depicted Mars alongside figures evoking lineage, reinforcing paternalistic and divine sanction for Augustus' power, with scholarly interpretations drawing on reliefs like the example from c. 50 . Flanking porticos housed approximately 100 statues of summi viri—mythical forebears such as and in the northern exedra, alongside republican consuls and heroes in the southern—accompanied by elogia inscriptions cataloging their achievements in verse and prose. These elements fabricated a selective tracing Julian origins to and , paralleling Augustus' to imply his virtues surpassed predecessors, thus legitimizing the as the natural evolution of . The forum's layout, oriented toward expansion and militarism, further underscored Augustus' role in imperial consolidation, with spaces for senatorial oaths and triumph preparations tying loyalty to his avowed mission of and . By adapting imagines maiorum traditions to imperial scale, the ensemble cultivated public perception of as primus inter pares, blending , historical reverence, and forward-looking stability without overt .

Reconstruction of Roman History

The Forum of Augustus featured a programmatic display of over 100 statues of summi viri—eminent figures from 's mythical and historical past—arranged along the porticos and within the exedrae flanking the central , accompanied by inscribed elogia that summarized their lives, magistracies, , and virtues. This arrangement chronologically traced 's origins from and the Alban kings on the northern portico to and key an heroes such as Camillus on the southern side, effectively encapsulating a linear of the city's foundational myths, regal period, and republican expansion up to the late . The elogia, carved in letters on bases beneath each , emphasized recurring themes of piety (), valor (), and civic service, with precise details like consulships held (e.g., multiple for figures like ) and celebrated, drawing from historical records while omitting failures or controversies to highlight exemplary conduct. This sculptural ensemble constituted a selective reconstruction of Roman history, privileging patrician lineages and military successes that aligned with Augustan ideals of (ancestral custom), while excluding plebeian or dissenting figures to forge a cohesive patrician-centric linking the clan to forebears via Iulus, son of . The inscriptions' historical accuracy—verified against sources like and —was maintained but curated to stress virtues embodied as , such as restoring the after civil strife, thereby presenting history not as neutral chronicle but as a didactic tool for elites to emulate in governance and warfare. Archaeological evidence from excavations confirms the statues' scale (life-sized to colossal) and placement, with fragments of bases and inscriptions recovered, underscoring the forum's role in materializing a monumentalized past that culminated implicitly in ' own achievements. By integrating these elements into the forum's —dedicated in 2 BCE after construction began post-42 BCE at —the program ideologically bridged Rome's republican heritage with imperial present, instructing visitors on historical precedents for autocratic rule masked as restoration, as evidenced by the alignment of summi viri triumphs with Augustus' own and Parthian recoveries. This reconstruction influenced later imperial displays, such as , but its Augustan iteration uniquely emphasized dynastic continuity over mere glorification, rooted in verifiable antique traditions rather than invention.

Scholarly Debates on

Scholars have long debated the extent to which the Forum of Augustus functioned as a vehicle for imperial , with interpretations ranging from overt ideological manipulation to a more integrative reconstruction of historical identity. Paul Zanker, in his seminal 1968 monograph Forum Augustum, portrayed the complex as a comprehensive propagandistic program, where the porticos flanking the piazza housed over 100 statues of summi viri—legendary kings, early consuls, and military heroes—selectively curated to trace two genealogical lines from and , culminating in himself positioned at the apex opposite the . Zanker contended that this arrangement, completed by 2 BCE, systematically edited Rome's past to elevate as the restorer of greatness, embedding dynastic legitimacy through visual and inscribed narratives that blurred lines between historical fact and Augustan myth-making. Critics of Zanker's emphasis on top-down control argue for a subtler ideological role, viewing the Forum as a site fostering civic memory and consensus rather than crude self-aggrandizement. Karl Galinsky, in Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction (1996), challenged propagandistic readings by highlighting how the Forum's themes of piety, valor, and continuity with the reflected evolving Roman cultural norms, influenced by elite participation and voluntary alignment with Augustan ideals rather than coerced messaging. Galinsky noted that the elogia inscriptions, praising virtues like and in 96 figures (48 per exedra), drew from authentic exempla, suggesting Augustus amplified existing traditions to build legitimacy through resonance, not invention, as evidenced by cross-references in Livy's histories and Virgil's . This perspective posits the Forum's as dialogic, engaging viewers in a shared historical that causally reinforced stability post-civil wars by aligning imperial power with ancestral authority. A focal point of contention involves the appropriation of republican rivals, exemplified by Magnus's statue among the summi viri, which some interpret as Augustus's strategic absorption of adversarial legacies to neutralize threats posthumously. Sander Egberink (2019) analyzes this as cultural appropriation, arguing the Forum reframed 's achievements—such as his 61 BCE eastern campaigns—as precursors to Augustan supremacy, with the statue's placement linking Pompeian victories to Mars Ultor's avenging cult, dedicated in 2 BCE to avenge . Egberink critiques Zanker's model for underplaying such reconciliatory tactics, proposing instead that Augustus's curation mitigated factional memories, fostering unity by co-opting rather than erasing opponents, as supported by numismatic evidence of 's post-Actium rehabilitation on coins from 29–27 BCE. Conversely, proponents of stronger propagandistic intent, like those examining the Forum's axial alignment with the , emphasize spatial control: visitors approaching from the Forum Romanum confronted Augustus's first, priming perceptions of his preeminence, a design element dated to construction phases around 20–12 BCE via stratigraphic evidence. These debates underscore causal tensions between intent and reception: while empirical reconstruction from fragments confirms the Forum's selective historicity—omitting figures like or who clashed with Augustan lineage—scholars differ on efficacy, with some citing Pliny the Elder's (ca. 77 CE) references to its awe-inspiring scale as proof of lasting impact, others noting post-Augustan modifications under (96–98 CE) that diluted original messaging. Recent analyses integrate visitor experience, arguing the Forum's propaganda succeeded by embedding ideology in ritual paths, such as triumphs routing through its gates post-2 BCE, thereby naturalizing Augustus's role in Rome's teleological narrative.

Later Developments and Preservation

Imperial Modifications and Restorations

In 19 CE, Emperor constructed two triumphal arches within the Forum Augustum to commemorate the military successes of his sons Drusus and against Germanic tribes, thereby integrating Flavian-era achievements into the Augustan commemorative landscape. These additions, documented in ' Annales and the (CIL 6.911), flanked the northern entrance and reinforced dynastic continuity without altering the core Augustan design. During the , Emperor (r. 81–96 CE) initiated restorations to the forum's structures, including repairs to porticoes and statuary, aimed at preserving the site's ideological links between Julio-Claudian and Flavian lineages through updated inscriptions and heroic imagery. These efforts, evidenced by surviving fragments and literary references to Flavian maintenance of Augustan monuments, addressed wear from public use and ensured the forum's role in imperial legitimacy persisted amid dynastic shifts. In the early 2nd century CE, Emperor (r. 117–138 CE) oversaw comprehensive restorations of the forum complex, including structural repairs to the , which involved reinforcement of marble elements and possibly recoloring to combat weathering and seismic damage common in the Subura-adjacent location. had earlier lauded the temple's aesthetic as among Rome's finest ( 36.102.5), and Hadrian's interventions, inferred from architectural analysis of reused materials and Hadrianic-era brick stamps in excavations, reflected a broader policy of conserving Augustan precedents to bolster his own philhellenic yet Roman-traditional image. No major expansions occurred, preserving the original trapezoidal layout and . These imperial works, spanning the 1st and 2nd centuries , prioritized durability and symbolic reinforcement over radical redesign, as confirmed by archaeological layers showing minimal disruption to Augustan foundations while incorporating later materials for stability. By the Severan period, further repairs likely occurred, though records are sparse, indicating the forum's enduring utility for judicial and ceremonial functions until broader urban decline set in.

Post-Roman Decline and Reuse

Following the deposition of the last Western Roman emperor in 476 AD, the Forum of Augustus experienced rapid decline as imperial patronage and maintenance ceased amid economic contraction and political fragmentation. The complex, once central to judicial, religious, and triumphal activities, was progressively abandoned by the , exacerbated by invasions, such as the Gothic sack in 410 AD and Vandal raid in 455 AD, which damaged structures and accelerated decay through exposure to and seismic activity. Spoliation intensified from the onward, with marble revetments, columns, capitals, and other decorative elements systematically quarried for reuse in early Christian basilicas, baptisteries, and fortifications across ; for instance, fragments from the forum's porticos and temple were incorporated into the . This practice reflected pragmatic resource scarcity in post-antique , where ancient monuments served as informal stone quarries rather than preserved relics, leading to the dismantling of much of the forum's superstructure by the . In the 9th–10th centuries, the elevated podium of the was adapted as the foundation for the church and monastery of San Basilio (or Sant'Basilio ai Fori Imperiali), first attested in documents from 955 AD, which occupied the site until its expansion and later transfer to the Knights of Saint John. The surrounding forum basin was repurposed for informal settlement, agriculture, and refuse disposal, resulting in a raised ground level of up to 10 meters through alluvial silt from the and human detritus, effectively burying surviving substructures beneath medieval layers. This reuse transformed the once-monumental space into a utilitarian zone amid Rome's transition to a medieval urban fabric dominated by ecclesiastical institutions.

Medieval to Early Modern Fate

The podium of the accommodated medieval reuse, including a chamber excavated within it to function as a burial vault. The temple podium itself hosted the Church of San Basilio ai Pantani during the , utilizing the elevated ancient platform amid encroaching settlement and marshy conditions in the surrounding area. Portions of the forum's enclosure wall persisted above ground, notably the Arco dei Pantani—triumphal arches incorporated into the precinct by in AD 19—which marked a amid medieval habitation and lent the site its "Pantani" designation, evoking the swamps that formed due to sediment accumulation and neglect. Stones from the forum supplied spolia for medieval construction elsewhere in , contributing to the gradual erosion of its fabric as the area transitioned into a zone of informal housing, narrow streets, and defensive structures typical of the medieval urban landscape. By the early , Renaissance antiquarian scrutiny elevated awareness of the site's remnants. In the 16th century, excavators uncovered wooden dowels from the original construction, preserved sufficiently for reuse in contemporary building efforts, signaling the forum's layered stratigraphic visibility. Artists and scholars, including those documenting topography, sketched surviving elements like the Arco dei Pantani and temple fragments, fostering a scholarly appreciation that preceded systematic 19th-century clearance.

Modern Excavations and Interpretations

19th and 20th Century Discoveries

Initial explorations at the site of the Forum of Augustus occurred in the early , with trial excavations conducted by Francesco Saponieri in beneath the medieval Arco dei Pantani, revealing underlying ancient structures. Further clearance in involved the demolition of overlying medieval towers and fortifications, exposing fragments of the forum's perimeter walls and paving. Systematic archaeological work intensified in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, transitioning from sporadic probes to broader investigations that identified the 's rectangular layout and . Major excavations from 1927 to 1931, followed by extensive digs in under the Fascist regime, uncovered the northern sector including bases, exedrae foundations, and the rear wall separating the forum from the Subura district; these efforts required demolishing the 16th-century Santissima Annunziata church and adjacent buildings in the Alessandrino neighborhood. Restoration during this period preserved three surviving 15-meter Corinthian columns of the , along with sections of the podium steps and fragments. The digs also documented the removal of ancient pavements in and subsequent medieval overlay, including remnants of the of San Basilio ai Pantani built atop the . These 20th-century campaigns, directed by architects like Italo Gismondi, produced detailed plans of the forum's 125-by-80-meter enclosure and confirmed its integration with adjacent imperial structures, though the eastern entrance remained buried under the constructed in 1932. Artifacts recovered included sculptural fragments from the summi viri statues lining the porticos and architectural elements like capitals and friezes, which informed reconstructions of the forum's decorative program. The excavations highlighted the site's post-antique abandonment and spoliation, with much of the marble reused in medieval and buildings.

Recent Archaeological Findings

Recent excavations between 2004 and 2007 uncovered traces of a third exedra on the southwestern side of the northern , paralleling a known southeastern and indicating a more symmetrical design than previously reconstructed. This feature, eliminated during the Trajanic period to make way for a contemporary structure adjacent to , suggests later imperial interventions altered ' original architectural intent for ideological or spatial reasons. Further work from 2004 to 2006, led by Rome's Superintendency of , exposed sections of the forum's central sector, including remnants of paving and foundational elements previously obscured by overlying structures. Analysis of these pavements, detailed in subsequent studies, revealed patterns consistent with Augustan-era construction techniques, such as finely cut Proconnesian slabs arranged in orthogonal grids, supporting the forum's dedication around 2 BCE. These discoveries, informed by stratigraphic and geophysical surveys, refine understandings of the forum's porticoed and exedral niches, which likely housed additional statuary of summi viri or mythological figures, though no new inscriptions or sculptures have been reported from these phases. They underscore the forum's evolution from a propagandistic space under to a layered site of imperial reuse, with minimal post-excavation artifacts due to prior spoliation.

Contemporary Restoration Efforts

In the early , restoration efforts at the Forum of Augustus have emphasized structural and stabilization of surviving elements, coordinated by the Soprintendenza Speciale Archeologia Belle Arti e Paesaggio di under the Italian Ministry of Culture. A notable project involved the of the back wall (muro di fondo), part of the broader initiative, which addressed deterioration from environmental exposure and urban proximity to ensure monument preservation and public safety. This work included reinforcement of the and brick masonry, removal of vegetative growth, and application of protective treatments to prevent further . Funded through Italy's National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), ongoing interventions as of 2025 target specific vulnerabilities, such as the southeast corner tower, where restorers consolidated fractured stonework and reinstated original and elements to mitigate seismic risks in Rome's historic center. These efforts build on post-1930s excavations, prioritizing non-invasive techniques like for documentation and to guide repairs without altering the site's archaeological integrity. Approximately 1,200 square meters of wall surface have been treated in recent phases, enhancing visibility of the Augustan-era opus quadratum facing while complying with guidelines for Trajan's Markets adjacency. Complementing physical work, digital restoration projects employ advanced technologies for interpretive enhancement. The DHIlab of Italy's CNR-ISPC has integrated recent geophysical surveys and data to produce updated virtual reconstructions, revealing previously obscured layouts and exedrae details from minor soundings. These models, accurate to within 5 cm, support scholarly analysis and public exhibits, such as the 2014 multimedia using projected to simulate the forum's original marble cladding and statues, viewed by over 100,000 visitors during its run.

Enduring Legacy

Influence on Subsequent Fora

The Forum of Augustus established a prototypical layout for subsequent forums, featuring a rectangular central flanked by double porticos and culminating in a at the northern , a design that emphasized and monumental scale using imported marbles. This configuration, measuring approximately 125 by 90 meters, provided space for judicial and senatorial functions while integrating sculptural programs glorifying the family, setting a standard emulated in later constructions to assert dynastic continuity and prestige. The (originally Forum Transitorium, initiated by around 85–96 CE and dedicated by in 97 CE) adopted this model but adapted it to a narrower, transitional space between the Forum of Augustus and the planned Trajanic developments, retaining porticos and a (to ) while incorporating arched gateways for traffic flow along the Argiletum. Its reduced width of about 25 meters reflected spatial constraints, yet it preserved the Augustan emphasis on enclosing elite functions within ornate, colonnaded enclosures, thereby linking the new forum visually and thematically to ' precedent. Trajan's Forum (dedicated in 112 CE), the most expansive at over 300 meters long, expanded the Augustan template by incorporating multiple courtyards, a , libraries, and the Column of Trajan, but maintained core elements like the temple-focused axis (Temple of Trajan) and encircling porticos, with the southern entrance aligning toward the to evoke imperial succession. Architect innovated with multi-level markets and columnar orders, yet the overall schema of a processional, temple-oriented piazza underscored the enduring influence of ' design as a framework for propagating autocratic power through urban monumentality. This continuity across the complex reinforced Rome's evolving civic core as a dynastic showcase, with Augustus' forum anchoring the sequence spatially and ideologically.

Symbolic Impact on Roman Identity

The Forum of Augustus, inaugurated in 2 BCE, embodied Augustus's ideological project to avenge Caesar's assassination through its central , transforming a personal into a public symbol of restored order and military . The temple's , as reconstructed from reliefs like the panel (c. 50 ), depicted Mars alongside —ancestress of the line—and likely or Divus , reinforcing Augustus's claim to divine patronage and while projecting vengeance against foes as a foundational . Flanking the temple, porticoes housed approximately 100 statues of summi viri—exemplary figures from Rome's past—accompanied by tituli and elogia inscriptions detailing their achievements, while exedrae featured mythical progenitors like carrying and with Remus. This arrangement curated a selective , aligning Augustus's dynasty with Rome's origins and , thereby legitimizing imperial rule as the natural evolution of ancestral traditions rather than a rupture. As a , the functioned as an open-air archive, visually instructing visitors—regardless of —on history's continuity and Augustus's pivotal role as , with 28 surviving elogia emphasizing virtues like and valor. By housing Parthian standards as in the temple, it materialized triumphs over external threats, fostering a rooted in martial success and internal harmony under Augustus's . This symbolic framework elevated Roman identity beyond civic , embedding it in a dynastic narrative that portrayed the as the fulfillment of destiny, with as both avenger and innovator, thus sustaining imperial cohesion amid the transition from to .

Relevance to Understanding Imperial Power

The Forum of Augustus exemplifies the strategic use of monumental architecture to consolidate and legitimize imperial authority in the early . Vowed by Octavian in 42 BC prior to the as a pledge to avenge Julius Caesar's assassination, the complex was dedicated in 2 BC after decades of construction funded by 100 million sesterces from war spoils. The central , an octastyle structure of white , symbolized Augustus' fulfillment of vengeance against Caesar's assassins and the recovery of Roman standards from , positioning him as the restorer of Roman military prestige and divine favor. This dedication not only marked the transition from republican chaos to Augustan stability but also centralized religious and military symbolism under the , with Mars as the patron of imperial vengeance and . The statuary and spatial design further reinforced Augustus' ideological narrative of continuity between Rome's mythical origins and his dynastic rule. Porticoes flanked by semi-circular exedrae housed statues of and alongside 108 summi viri—eminent figures depicted in triumphal attire—with inscribed plaques detailing their achievements, creating a curated culminating in the Julian line. The northern exedra specifically featured equestrian statues of ancestors and Alban kings, linking directly to and divine lineage, while the temple pediment's sculptures of Mars, , , and Divus underscored his role as divi filius. This arrangement transformed public space into a tool of dynastic , equating Augustan power with Rome's foundational virtues and implying the as the natural evolution of republican greatness. Functionally, the forum served as a hub for imperial governance, hosting law courts for criminal trials and juror selection, provincial administration, and key military decisions such as the appointment of generals for campaigns. The convened there to deliberate on declarations of war and , embedding ' oversight in 's institutional fabric and diminishing the traditional Romanum's centrality. By repurposing sacred and civic functions under imperial patronage, the complex illustrated the principate's subtle centralization of power, where presented himself as a modest restorer while wielding monarchical control through architecture, ritual, and . This model influenced subsequent emperors, highlighting how encoded the ideology of eternal under a singular .

References

  1. [1]
    Forum of Augustus
    The Forum of Augustus was built to provide additional space for the law courts, where criminal prosecutions and the selection of jurors were to be held.
  2. [2]
    Forum Augustum (Forum of Augustus) - Ancient Rome Live
    Continuing the trend started by Julius Caesar, Augustus vowed a temple (to Mars Ultor, to avenge the assassination of Caesar) and built it in a new forum ...
  3. [3]
    Forum of Augustus - History and Facts
    May 24, 2021 · The Forum of Augustus was built by the Roman emperor to celebrate avenging Caesar at the Battle of Philippi and defeating his assassins.
  4. [4]
    An Architectural and Historical Analysis of the Forum of Augustus
    The statues were meant to affirm a continuity with the great men of the past and with the Roman republic that Augustus was purported to have restored, ...
  5. [5]
    Forum of Augustus: Exedra
    The mythical ancestors of Augustus were placed in the exedrae, hemicycles or semi-circular apses that open behind the colonnade of the porticoes.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] The Forum of Augustus - MIT OpenCourseWare
    “Augustus built his forum because the two existing forums could no longer accommodate the increasing number of people and law cases,.
  7. [7]
    Forum of Augustus | The Art of Power - Columbia Blogs
    Under Augustus, the forum was used mainly for military purposes, such as ceremonious departures and returns from war.
  8. [8]
    Forum of Augustus - Madain Project (en)
    Its layout, iconography, and evolving function provide vital insight into the construction of imperial identity and the uses of urban space in antiquity.
  9. [9]
    Roman Republic - Key to Rome
    “... made a vow to build the temple of Mars [Ultor] in the war of Philippi, which he undertook to avenge his father”, ('Life of Augustus', 29: 2). This ...
  10. [10]
    Mars Ultor T., in Rome, erected ca. 2 BCE - ToposText
    He had made a vow to build the temple of Mars in the war of Philippi, which he undertook to avenge, -1. Ovid, Tristia (Letters from Exile), §2.253 raised ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Temple of Mars Ultor in Ancient Rome - World History Edu
    Jan 1, 2025 · The Temple of Mars Ultor was built to commemorate Augustus' victory at the Battle of Philippi in 42 BCE, where he avenged the assassination of ...
  12. [12]
    Augustus, Res Gestae - Livius.org
    Sep 15, 2020 · [21] On my own ground I built the temple of Mars Ultor and the Augustan Forum from the spoils of war.note[Against the murderers of Caesar.] On ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The Temple of Mars Ultor: What Was Being Avenged - CAMWS
    It is common wisdom that the Temple of Mars Ultor had been vowed by Octavian at the Battle of Philippi, yet this appears only vaguely and only in two sources ( ...
  14. [14]
    FORUM OF AUGUSTUS - fori-imperiali.info
    Having won the battle and thus avenged Caesar, upon his return to Rome Octavian kept his vow and began the construction of the temple that he wished to erect in ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  15. [15]
    Augusto Forum - Data, Photos & Plans - WikiArquitectura
    Construction began in 31 A.C., after considerable demolition work. Thirty years later, in 2 BC, the project was completed and inaugurated. Meanwhile, two ...
  16. [16]
    BUILDING PROJECTS IN ROME IN AUGUSTUS' TIME - CSUN
    BUILDING PROJECTS IN ROME IN AUGUSTUS' TIME ; 2, February 5: Augustus named Pater Patriae August 1: Dedication of The Forum Augustum and the Temple of Mars Ultor
  17. [17]
    LacusCurtius • Forum of Augustus (Platner & Ashby, 1929)
    ### Summary of Post-Antique, Medieval, and Early Modern History of Forum of Augustus and Temple of Mars Ultor
  18. [18]
    Forum Augusti - Digital Augustan Rome
    The Forum of Augustus and Temple of Mars Ultor, dedicated in 2 BC, comprised one of the most magnificent of Augustus' building projects in Rome.Missing: phases timeline date
  19. [19]
    Forum of Augustus in Rome: History, Architecture & Visitor Info
    The *Foro di Augusto* measured 125 by 118 meters (410 by 387 feet) and was built around a rectangular courtyard of 70 by 50 meters (230 by 164 feet). At the ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    THE FORUM OF AUGUSTUS EXPLAINED - A TOUCH OF ROME.com
    Besides being dedicated to the Roman god of war, Mars Ultor, this forum also served to glorify Augustus and his greater family as well as Roman values and ...Missing: vow | Show results with:vow
  21. [21]
    Imperial fora - Smarthistory
    The Forum of Augustus provided additional room for the meeting of law courts and was built on land acquired by Augustus. The temple at the center of the Forum ...
  22. [22]
    49. Augustus: The Man and His Forum - Get Ready for Rome
    Octavian—as Augustus was known before he took the title “Augustus”—had vowed to build a temple to this god if he should be victorious over Brutus and Cassius ...Missing: initial vow
  23. [23]
    View of THE MARS ULTOR COINS OF c. 19-16 BC
    In 42 BC Augustus vowed to build a temple of Mars if he were victorious in aveng-. ing the assassination of his adoptive father Julius Caesar.
  24. [24]
    The Temple of Mars Ultor in Rome and the Philippeion in Olympia
    It is argued that the planned rotunda was inspired by the Philippeion built in Olympia by Philip of Macedon as a dynastic monument.
  25. [25]
    Temple of Mars Ultor: a Pleiades place resource
    Jul 12, 2024 · The Temple of Mars Ultor was dedicated in the Forum of Augustus in 2 B.C., fulfilling a vow that Octavian had made to the god in 42 B.C..
  26. [26]
    The Date of Dedication of the Temple of Mars Ultor* | Cambridge Core
    Sep 24, 2012 · This date, 1 August 2 B.C., is based principally on the evidence supplied by Augustus, Velleius Paterculus and Dio, and has been accepted as an ...Missing: architecture | Show results with:architecture
  27. [27]
    Hadrian's Rome: View as single page | OpenLearn
    Hadrian restored or rebuilt at least two Augustan monuments: the Temple of Mars Ultor (in Augustus' Forum) and the Pantheon (in the Campus Martius). He also ...
  28. [28]
    New evidence for the design and urban integration of the Forum of ...
    Sep 22, 2021 · It is unlikely that this was a result of problems with land acquisition. Another possible explanation presents an enticing and powerful ...
  29. [29]
    The Portico of the Forum of Augustus
    Constructed in 1937 by Italo Gismondi, who also built the Model of Rome, it is 1:50 scale. References: Suetonius: The Lives of the Caesars (1914) translated by ...
  30. [30]
    Plan of the Forum of Augustus - VRoma
    The Forum of Augustus included the Temple of Mars Ultor, hemicycles with statues of Romulus and Aeneas, and a quadriga of Augustus. The courtyard was lined ...Missing: placement types
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    (PDF) The Public Life of Monuments. The Summi Viri of the Forum of ...
    The collection of summi viri in the Forum of Augustus exemplifies how monuments mediate historical narratives. Over 100 statues commemorated Rome's Republican ...Cite This Paper · Key Takeaways · References (159)
  33. [33]
    The Public Life of Monuments: The Summi Viri of the Forum of ...
    This article examines how monuments worked in the Roman world. It considers one monument as a case in point—the collection of summi viri that lined the ...
  34. [34]
    The Forum of Augustus: The Exploitation of Roman Memory and the ...
    Feb 25, 2021 · To contextualise the Forum of Augustus as a site that both preserved and displaced Roman conceptions of memory and ancestry, I first found it ...<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Heroes Great men (summi viri) celebrated in Forum of Augustus
    Great men (summi viri) celebrated in Forum of Augustus statues include: Aeneas,. Alban kings, Romulus. Republican heroes – Camillus (vs. Gauls 390 BCE); ...
  36. [36]
    Latin Inscriptions: Elogia - ATTALUS
    Elogia are Latin inscriptions found in the Forum of Augustus, summarizing the achievements of eminent Romans.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] The Elogia of the Augustan Forum - MacSphere
    The Augustan e/ogia, appended to the statues erected in the Forum, commemorated the lives and achievements of summi viri. The inscriptions provided the names ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Temple of Mars Ultor | The Art of Power - Columbia Blogs
    The Forum of Augustus served to buttress Augustus's power due to its connection to Caesar and the divine through the temple and the Forum. But the Forum, in ...
  39. [39]
    The Forum of Augustus and its instructive character - Academia.edu
    The Forum of Augustus served as a pedagogical tool, instructing citizens on Roman history and values. Augustus used the Forum to cement his legacy as the ...
  40. [40]
    The Forum of Augustus | Turismo Roma
    Naturally, as for the Forum of Caesar, the construction of the Forum of Augustus was also for the promotion of public opinion; the luxurious decorations ...Missing: Augusti | Show results with:Augusti
  41. [41]
    [PDF] The Rise of the Centumviral Court in the Augustan Age | Classics
    political order under Augustus involved restricting certain arenas in which aristocrats had long competed for social prominence and power. Well- known.
  42. [42]
    Temple of Mars Ultor
    The Temple of Mars Ultor was raised on a high podium, with eight columns on three sides, backed against the precinct wall (octastyle peripteral sine postico) ...Missing: phases | Show results with:phases
  43. [43]
    Augustus's Parthian honours, the temple of Mars Ultor and the arch ...
    Augustus's imperatorial salutations were for victories won by himself or by members of his family. He accepted supplicationes also for victories won by legati ...
  44. [44]
    The Origin of ornamenta triumphalia - jstor
    The erec- tion of bronze statues of victors was authorized by the laws of the temple of Mars Ultor dedicated in the Forum of Augustus in 2 B.C.. If these ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] The triple arch of Augustus and the Roman triumph by R. T. Scott
    triumphal procession's route to the Capitoline. Of the other triumphal arches that matter the following should also be noted: at the NW corner of the Forum ...
  46. [46]
    Wonders of Rome: The Imperial Forums (Part 2.) - Il Colosseo
    Mar 9, 2021 · To make decisions, in case of war, then, or to celebrate a triumph, or to thank for a victory, the senate met in the temple of Mars Ultor.
  47. [47]
    Augustus, First Among Equals - Brown University
    The Forum of Augustus, as described by Suetonius, plays a significant role within Augustus' political regime. He constructed the forum because “the two already ...Missing: difficulties | Show results with:difficulties
  48. [48]
    Remapping the Forum Augustum (Chapter 4) - The Poetics of Power ...
    Sep 18, 2018 · This chapter analyzes the Forum Augustum (2 BCE) as an ideological space that responded to and inspired literary debate about Augustus' place within Roman ...<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    The Elogia of the Augustan Forum - ResearchGate
    Beneath each statue an inscription was appended. Many of these inscriptions, known also as elogia, have survived. They record the name, magistracies held, and a ...Missing: narrative | Show results with:narrative
  50. [50]
    The appropriation of Pompeius Magnus at the Forum of Augustus
    Ever since Paul Zanker published his book 'Forum Augustum' in 1968, there has been debate regarding the Forum of Augustus as a 'propaganda forum'.
  51. [51]
    1997.2.24, Galinsky, Augustan Culture - Bryn Mawr Classical Review
    $$39.50Feb 24, 1997 · Galinsky's treatment is culturally more complete than Zanker's, including discussion of literature, art, politics, values, religion, and society.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] The Forum of Augustus as a Site of Memory
    A study of the statues in the Forum Augustum,. (Boston 2008). • Gillis, J.R, “Memory and Identity: The History of a Relationship”, ...
  53. [53]
    MOVEMENT, SPACE, AND IDEOLOGY IN THE FORUM AUGUSTUM
    Mar 18, 2025 · Richardson, jr., A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome (London, 1992), 39; E. A. Dumser, 'Forum Augusti', Digital Augstan Rome, D.G. ...
  54. [54]
    How Augustus Used the Marbles of Rome to Shape Its Memory
    Apr 18, 2024 · ... propaganda for ideology: 1) directly soliciting the audience to ... “The Public Life of Monuments: The Summi Viri of the Forum of Augustus.
  55. [55]
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Spoliation in Medieval Rome - CORE
    In the fifth century pieces of the marble ornament of this Forum were reused in the Lateran. Baptistery, see Romano i99 , 3t 7o. z3 Santangeli Valenzani 2oo7a, ...
  57. [57]
    Arco dei Pantani
    Arco dei Pantani. The high precinct wall that enclosed the forum preserves two triumphal arches, which were added by Tiberius in AD 19 to commemorate ...
  58. [58]
    Architectural Spolia and Urban Transformation in Ancient and ...
    Jun 27, 2024 · In the fifth century we also observe a haphazard abandonment of the Imperial Forums: Some, such as the Trajan's Forum, are still preserved and ...
  59. [59]
    Arco dei Pantani, Forum of Augustus, cornice, elevation; schematic ...
    Arco dei Pantani, Forum of Augustus, cornice, elevation; schematic elevation (recto) Temple of Apollo Sosiano, column base, elevation (verso).
  60. [60]
    FORO DI AUGUSTO - romanoimpero.com
    Nel 1888-1889 Rodolfo Lanciani condusse i primi scavi archeologici in un'area acquistata pochi anni prima dal comune di Roma. A partire dal 1924 il convento e ...Missing: scoperta terza data
  61. [61]
    Foro di Augusto - Wikipedia
    A seguito degli scavi, tra il 1927 e il 1931 si restaurarono i resti pavimentali, il muro di fondo del complesso e le superstiti colonne del tempio. Lo scavo ...Missing: 20 | Show results with:20
  62. [62]
    Photo of the excavations at the Forum of Augustus, for ... - Facebook
    May 3, 2025 · During the excavations, the remains of the monastery of San Basilio in Scala Mortuorum emerged, built on the remains of the temple's podium in ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] pagine-da-scavi-dei-fori-imperiali.pdf - L'Erma di Bretschneider
    Gli elementi architettonici dallo scavo del Foro di Augusto di Andrea Coletta, ... Sono a tutti note le vicende degli scavi degli anni '20 e '30 dello scorso ...
  64. [64]
    THE IMPERIAL FORA OF ROME, PART I: THE FORUMS OF JULIUS ...
    Jul 1, 2017 · These forums were built during Rome's imperial period by five of ancient Rome's most famous emperors between 46 BC and 113 AD.Missing: Augusti | Show results with:Augusti
  65. [65]
    Il Foro di Augusto: una ricchezza sepolta sotto uno stradone fascista
    Aug 15, 2023 · Una strada voluta dal regime fascista nasconde il Foro di Augusto, uno dei più importanti esempi di architettura in epoca augustea.
  66. [66]
    Forum of Augustus - Mercati di Traiano Museo dei Fori Imperiali
    Recent excavations at the Forum of Trajan have revealed the existence of a third exedra, which was removed to make way for a building of the same period.
  67. [67]
  68. [68]
    The forum of Augustus (Rome) - Extended Matrix
    The Forum of Augustus, built by Emperor Augustus, is in central Rome. It's a rectangular square with the Temple of Mars Ultor and two porticos.
  69. [69]
    A restoration made of light at the Forum of Augustus - Wanted in Rome
    One of the strong points of the project is precisely this: to succeed in integrating historic memories and current appearance for an active approach to the art, ...Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
  70. [70]
    Forum of Nerva - Madain Project (en)
    It formalized and monumentalized the Argiletum, a once-chaotic and densely trafficked street, integrating it into the architectural order of the imperial city.Missing: Augusti Traiani
  71. [71]
    8.4: The Nervan-Antonines - Humanities LibreTexts
    Oct 1, 2024 · The Forum of Augustus might have been the model for the Forum of Trajan, even though the latter was much larger. Both fora were rectangular in ...Missing: Augusti Traiani<|control11|><|separator|>
  72. [72]
    The Forum of Trajan - Smarthistory
    The Forum of Trajan was inaugurated in 112 C.E., although construction may not have been complete, and was designed by the famed architect Apollodorus of ...An Emperor Worth Celebrating · Unique Under The Heavens · The Massive Basilica UlpiaMissing: repairs | Show results with:repairs
  73. [73]
  74. [74]
    [PDF] The Forum of Augustus and its instructive character - periodicos@uem.
    In fact the Forum Augustum, with the Temple of Mars. Ultor, was the last and ultimate major enterprise in the rebuilding of Rome. The renovation of the temples.
  75. [75]
    None
    Summary of each segment: