Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Frequency-hopping spread spectrum

Frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) is a digital spread spectrum technique in which a signal is transmitted by rapidly switching a carrier wave over a series of distinct frequency channels within a large spectral band, following a pseudorandom sequence that is synchronized between the transmitter and receiver. This approach spreads the transmitted signal across a much wider bandwidth than required for the data rate, providing benefits such as resistance to jamming, interference rejection, and low probability of detection. The concept of FHSS originated during as a method to secure radio-controlled torpedo guidance against enemy jamming. In 1941, actress (also known as Hedy Kiesler Markey) and composer filed a patent for a "secret communication system" that employed synchronized frequency shifts using perforated paper rolls to control carrier frequencies, allowing the transmitter and receiver to hop among up to 88 channels. Granted as U.S. Patent 2,292,387 in 1942, the invention aimed to prevent adversaries from disrupting Allied naval operations by tuning into and blocking fixed frequencies, though it was not implemented during the war due to technological limitations. The patent expired in 1959, paving the way for broader adoption in the following decades. At its core, FHSS operates by modulating onto a carrier using techniques like (FSK), then hopping the carrier frequency according to a pseudonoise () sequence generated by a shared key. In slow FHSS, multiple data symbols are transmitted per hop, while fast FHSS involves multiple hops per symbol, offering greater anti-jamming capability but requiring more complex . The total is approximately N times the of a single hop channel, where N is the number of channels (often 20 or more), yielding a of 10–60 that allows the signal to operate below the . Unlike (DSSS), which spreads the signal continuously across the band, FHSS transmits in narrowband bursts per hop, making it suitable for noncoherent detection. FHSS has found widespread applications in both and domains due to its robustness and regulatory advantages in unlicensed . In military contexts, it underpins secure communications systems for anti-jamming. Commercially, it was integral to early standards (1997), devices for low-power personal area networks, and phones operating in the 2.4 GHz ISM band, where regulations permit hopping across at least 20 non-overlapping channels with dwell times under 400 ms. Modern uses extend to sensor networks, , and other reliable, interference-resistant technologies, demonstrating FHSS's enduring role.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) is a communication technique in which the of the transmitted signal rapidly switches among numerous discrete channels spanning a broad , guided by a pseudorandom shared exclusively between the transmitter and . This method ensures that the signal occupies a wide momentarily at each hop while maintaining low in any single channel, making it suitable for environments with potential . The core of FHSS involves spreading the signal's energy across the entire through these pseudorandom , which achieves a processing that enhances the signal's resilience against and . The processing gain G_p (in dB) is defined as G_p = 10 \log_{10} \left( \frac{B_{total}}{B_{channel}} \right), where B_{total} is the total spread and B_{channel} is the of an individual , and typically ranges from 10 to 60 dB in practical systems. Unlike (DSSS), which spreads the signal by multiplying the data with a pseudorandom code to generate a continuous , FHSS operates by discretely hopping to predefined , resulting in a flat power over the band. Key advantages of FHSS stem from its low power , which minimizes detectability and interception by adversaries, as the signal appears as noise-like across the spectrum. Additionally, by employing distinct pseudorandom sequences, FHSS supports multiple users through (CDMA), allowing simultaneous transmissions within the same without mutual .

Basic Operation

In frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS), the transmitter modulates the signal onto a that rapidly switches, or "hops," across multiple discrete within a predefined hop set. This hopping follows a pseudorandom sequence generated by mechanisms such as a (LFSR) or a , which ensures the pattern is deterministic yet appears random without the shared . The remains on each for a hop duration T_h, typically on the order of milliseconds or less, during which one or more symbols are transmitted before switching to the next in the sequence; this can be slow FHSS (multiple symbols per hop) or fast FHSS (multiple hops per symbol), with fast variants offering greater anti-jamming capability but requiring more complex . The receiver operates by generating an identical pseudorandom hopping sequence using the same key and synchronizing its to match the transmitter's frequency changes at precise intervals. During each T_h, the receiver tunes to the corresponding frequency, demodulates the incoming signal, and extracts the data symbols. Given the brevity of hop durations, which limits phase coherence across hops, non-coherent detection techniques—such as energy detection or differential —are commonly used to avoid the need for carrier recovery. The hop set comprises N channels spaced across the operating bandwidth, with the total spread determined by N times the channel spacing. The hop rate R_h = 1 / T_h dictates the switching , often reaching hundreds to thousands of per second. For instance, in the standard operating in the 2.4 GHz band, the hop set includes 79 channels of 1 MHz spacing, covering about 79 MHz, with a hop rate of 1600 per second corresponding to T_h \approx 0.625 ms.

Applications

Military Applications

Frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) plays a critical role in by providing robust anti-jamming capabilities, allowing signals to evade through rapid frequency changes across a wide . In tactical radios such as the Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System (), introduced by the U.S. Army in the 1980s, FHSS enables hopping over 2320 discrete channels spaced at 25 kHz within the 30-88 MHz VHF band, with a hopping rate exceeding 100 times per second to maintain reliable voice and data links in contested environments. This rapid pseudorandom sequence of frequencies makes it difficult for adversaries to target and disrupt transmissions, enhancing operational resilience in ground-based combat net radio (CNR) systems. Early implementations like the U.S. Air Force's system, developed in the 1970s, further demonstrated FHSS's value for secure voice and data communications in airborne operations. employs a slow-hopping mode with rates over 100 hops per second across the 225-400 MHz UHF band, synchronized via a daily word-of-day key to counter electronic countermeasures (ECCM) and protect air-to-ground and air-to-air links. Upgrades in , introduced in the , increased power output to 20 watts and hopping rates while integrating with broader CNR frameworks, ensuring interoperability across U.S. military platforms. In secure networks, FHSS underpins systems like the , operationalized as by in the 1990s, which combines frequency hopping with and (TRANSEC) encryption to support (TDMA) for real-time data exchange among airborne, surface, and ground units. operates in the 960-1215 MHz band, using pseudorandom hopping patterns across 51 frequencies to resist while enabling encrypted for tactical in operations. This integration of FHSS with TRANSEC provides both message and transmission-level protection, facilitating secure, high-capacity networks in dynamic battlespaces. Post-2020 developments have extended FHSS to address spectrum agility in drone swarms and (EW), where rapid hopping counters advanced jamming in autonomous (UAV) formations. Military UAV autopilots now incorporate FHSS communication links to prevent interception and maintain control amid swarm-scale operations, enhancing resilience against EW threats. In EW contexts, FHSS enables spectrum-efficient coordination for drone swarms, allowing adaptive frequency shifts to evade detection and disruption in high-threat environments, as seen in recent U.S. and allied programs integrating it with software-defined radios.

Civilian Applications

Frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) finds extensive use in civilian wireless devices operating within the Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) bands, particularly the 902-928 MHz and 2400-2483.5 MHz allocations, under FCC Part 15 regulations that allow unlicensed operation with maximum transmit powers up to 1 watt for systems hopping across at least 50 channels to minimize interference. These rules enable low-cost, short-range communications without requiring individual licenses, provided devices accept any interference from other ISM users. Common examples include cordless telephones in the 900 MHz band, which employ FHSS to hop rapidly between frequencies for clear voice transmission in home environments, and 2.4 GHz walkie-talkies designed for unlicensed personal use, where hopping helps share spectrum with other devices like Wi-Fi. A prominent integration of FHSS occurs in Classic technology (versions 1.0 and later), which utilizes a pseudo-random hopping sequence at 1600 hops per second across 79 one-MHz channels in the 2.4 GHz ISM band to enable robust, short-range connections for peripherals such as wireless mice, keyboards, and headphones. This adaptive frequency-hopping mechanism avoids crowded channels, improving coexistence with other 2.4 GHz technologies like . In applications, Bluetooth's FHSS supports low-power connectivity for smart home devices, including sensors and controllers, facilitating seamless data exchange in mesh networks. In industrial and process control settings, FHSS enhances reliability in noisy environments through standards like , adopted in the 2010s, which combines frequency hopping over 15 channels in the 2.4 GHz band with to support low-duty-cycle communications for sensors and actuators. Post-2020 expansions in have leveraged FHSS in smart home ecosystems for improved interference resistance, as seen in -enabled devices for , where hopping ensures stable operation amid increasing wireless density. However, civilian FHSS implementations typically feature lower hop rates and power levels compared to military systems, constrained by FCC limits on emissions and duty cycles to prevent spectrum overcrowding.

Historical Development

Early Concepts

The early concepts of frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) emerged from foundational work in wireless communication and secure signaling during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, predating formalized military applications. Earlier, Jonathan Zenneck (1909) discussed wavelength diversity in wireless telegraphy, and Dutch inventor J. Broertjes patented (U.S. 1,869,659, 1929) a frequency-hopping method for secure communication using synchronized shifts. In 1903 (filed 1901), Nikola Tesla patented a method (U.S. Patent 723,188) using multiple electrical impulses of different periodicities in sequence for secure selective signaling, an early idea in multi-frequency secure transmission though not true frequency hopping. Military research in the 1930s increasingly explored frequency diversity to counter , particularly in and guidance systems. U.S. Naval Research Laboratory efforts from the 1930s incorporated frequency diversity in prototypes to mitigate and , with early demonstrations of aircraft detection using pulsed signals in the 60-100 MHz range achieving ranges of tens of miles. Similarly, frequency diversity techniques emerged in design to combat multipath effects, with initial applications traced to late-1930s phased-array concepts that switched frequencies for improved detection reliability. Pre-World War II experiments in torpedo guidance highlighted practical uses of frequency variation; for instance, U.S. Navy officer Ellison P. Purington's 1935 (U.S. 1,992,441, filed 1930) proposed "frequency wobbling" in single-sideband systems, where the carrier frequency was rapidly modulated via synchronized motors at transmitter and receiver to prevent , using an auxiliary tone for alignment and achieving secrecy through unpredictable shifts. European developments paralleled these efforts, with engineers documenting awareness of frequency-hopping principles by the mid-1930s for anti- in radio-controlled systems, including guidance, as evidenced by archival records contrary to some narratives of novelty, though implementation was limited by vacuum-tube technology. research in the same era, focused on secure naval communications and early guided munitions, experimented with frequency changes to evade interference in acoustic and radio prototypes, as part of broader initiatives that emphasized spectral agility against potential adversaries. These overlooked contributions from early radio engineers underscored FHSS's roots in addressing jamming vulnerabilities, setting the stage for wartime refinements without relying on exhaustive numerical benchmarks.

Key Inventions and Patents

One of the seminal inventions in frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) was patented on August 11, 1942, by actress (under her married name, Hedy Kiesler Markey) and , under U.S. Patent No. 2,292,387 for a "Secret Communication System." This system proposed synchronized frequency hopping across 88 channels to secure radio-guided torpedoes against jamming, using perforated paper rolls—reminiscent of mechanisms—to coordinate frequency changes between transmitter and receiver at a constant speed. , drawing from her observations of radio vulnerabilities during the spread of in , collaborated with Antheil to adapt his expertise in synchronized , marking a notable transition from entertainment to technological innovation. The patent described modulating control signals (such as 100-cycle tones for rudder adjustments) on a , with the receiving station mirroring the hops to execute commands, while incorporating decoy channels to thwart interception. Following , Lamarr and Antheil offered the patent to the U.S. Navy, which did not implement it during the war due to technological limitations in electronic synchronization, though it was later considered for secure communications without formal classification as top secret. By the 1950s, amid submarine threats, the Navy began adopting FHSS principles to secure communications for , granting limited access to the patent in 1955 to protect aircraft-sonobuoy links from jamming. Sylvania Electronic Systems developed the BLADES (Broadband Low-Altitude Defense and Early Warning System) in 1955, an FHSS implementation for submarine communications that became operational by 1963 aboard the U.S.S. Mount McKinley, demonstrating practical post-war integration. This adoption highlighted FHSS's role in enhancing sonar-related detection systems, where frequency hopping mitigated interference in underwater acoustic networks. In the , U.S. laboratories refined FHSS through classified programs, transitioning from to electronic hopping mechanisms for broader secure communications, as evidenced by declassified records of trials during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, where the technology supported naval quarantine operations. These developments, shrouded in secrecy until partial declassifications in the 1970s, influenced War-era systems by enabling jam-resistant links in , with labs like those at Sylvania and the advancing pseudo-random sequence generation for hopping patterns. Declassified documents from the era reveal early field tests in the and that validated FHSS's , paving the way for its integration into tactical networks.

Technical Implementation

Synchronization and Coding

In frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) systems, hopping codes are generated using pseudonoise (PN) sequences to produce pseudorandom patterns that determine the sequence of carrier frequencies. These sequences, such as m-sequences, are created with linear feedback shift registers (LFSRs) configured using primitive polynomials of degree k, yielding maximal-length binary sequences of period N = 2^k - 1. Gold codes, preferred for their balanced and low properties essential in multiuser environments, are constructed by the modulo-2 sum (XOR) of two decimated m-sequences from preferred pairs of LFSRs. The hopping sequence itself is derived from these PN sequences via a deterministic function, expressed as s(n) = f(\text{key}, n \mod N), where s(n) selects the nth from a hopset of M channels, the initializes the PN for , N is the code period, and f ensures across the frequencies to minimize predictability. synthesizers, such as fractional-N types, implement this mapping by adjusting the output carrier as f = f_{\text{ref}} \cdot (B + A/M), where f_{\text{ref}} is the reference and B, A, M are integers derived from the code. Synchronization between transmitter and requires initial acquisition to align the hopping patterns within a fraction of the hop duration, followed by tracking to maintain timing. Acquisition techniques include serial search, which sequentially tests code phases or frequency offsets using a single correlator, and parallel search, which employs multiple correlators to evaluate several possibilities simultaneously for faster convergence. The mean acquisition time for serial search is approximated by T_{\text{acq}} = \frac{N}{2} \left(1 + \frac{P_f}{P_d}\right) \tau, where N is the number of uncertainty cells, P_f and P_d are the probabilities of and detection, and \tau is the time per cell. Once acquired, tracking uses delay-locked loops (DLLs), which generate a timing error signal e(t) \propto R(\Delta \tau) - R(\Delta \tau + \delta) from early and late code replicas, where R(\cdot) is the autocorrelation function and \delta is a small offset, to continuously adjust the local code phase. In mobile environments, Doppler effects pose significant challenges to synchronization by inducing carrier frequency shifts (up to tens of kHz) that smear correlation peaks and code-rate variations that alter chip widths, thereby increasing acquisition uncertainty and false alarms, particularly at low signal-to-noise ratios. To address security vulnerabilities in code generation, modern FHSS implementations incorporate cryptographic keys, such as 128-bit AES-derived session keys, to encrypt or seed the PN sequences, preventing unauthorized reconstruction of the hop pattern and ensuring exclusive synchronization among intended parties.

Interference Resistance and Performance

Frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) provides robust resistance by rapidly switching the carrier across a wide according to a pseudorandom sequence, forcing a jammer to distribute its power over the entire to achieve full . The probability of a hit P_h, or the likelihood that the jammer affects the current , is given by P_h = \frac{B_{channel}}{B_{total}} per hop, where B_{channel} is the of an individual hop and B_{total} is the total spread ; this equates to P_h = \frac{1}{q} in synchronous systems, with q as the number of slots. Achieving a full jam thus requires the jammer to employ power distribution, significantly reducing its effectiveness compared to jamming on fixed-frequency systems. Key performance metrics for FHSS under include the bit error rate (BER), which degrades based on the jamming-to-signal ratio (J/S). For partial-band , where the jammer targets a fraction \rho of the , the BER can be approximated as P_e = \max_{0 \leq \rho \leq 1} \left[ \rho \cdot \frac{1}{2} \exp\left( -\frac{E_b}{N_0} \cdot G_p \cdot \rho \right) \right], with G_p = q as the and adjustments for partial-band ; this reflects the worst-case scenario where the jammer optimizes \rho to maximize errors, often around \rho \approx 0.5 for noncoherent detection. In coded FHSS systems, such as those using convolutional or Reed-Solomon codes, BER improves by 2-3 under J/S ratios of 20-30 , maintaining reliable communication even with 10-20% of hops jammed. FHSS offers advantages in multiuser environments, including mitigation of the near-far problem in CDMA applications through orthogonal slots per , which reduces capture effects from stronger nearby signals without relying solely on . Additionally, its pseudorandom hopping pattern enables low probability of intercept (LPI), as the signal appears as to unintended receivers lacking the hopping , with detection probabilities below 10^{-3} for observation times under one period. However, limitations include self-interference from partial hits in multiuser scenarios, where simultaneous hops to the same channel by unintended users act as partial-band noise, increasing BER by up to 1-2 orders of magnitude without coding.

Variations

Adaptive Variants

Adaptive frequency hopping (AFH) represents a key modification to traditional FHSS, enabling dynamic adjustment of the hopping sequence to avoid interfered channels in , thereby enhancing in congested environments. Introduced in the Bluetooth Core Specification version 1.2 in 2003, AFH allows devices to identify and exclude channels affected by interference from sources like or microwave ovens in the 2.4 GHz band. In AFH implementation, Bluetooth devices continuously monitor packet error rates (PER) on each of the 79 available 1 MHz channels spaced 1 MHz apart from 2.402 GHz to 2.480 GHz. Channels are classified as "good" or "bad" based on whether the PER exceeds a predefined , with classifications updated periodically, based on implementation-specific intervals, to reflect changing interference conditions. The master device then generates a new hopping sequence using only the good channels, ensuring at least 20 channels remain active to maintain and hopping diversity, and negotiates this updated channel map with slave devices via Link Manager Protocol (LMP) messages. This adaptive mechanism significantly improves coexistence and throughput in dense 2.4 GHz deployments, reducing by up to 70% in scenarios with overlapping traffic, as demonstrated in early coexistence studies. AFH is widely deployed in consumer devices such as wireless headphones, which maintain stable audio streaming amid , and fitness trackers that ensure reliable data transmission during movement in urban settings. Post-2020 enhancements in 5.x specifications have extended AFH capabilities to low-energy () profiles, including LE Audio introduced in version 5.2 (2020), which utilizes the Channel Selection Algorithm #2 ( #2, introduced in 5.0) to optimize hopping sequences for better interference avoidance in broadcast and unicast audio streams. These updates also support mesh networks, such as those in Mesh, by enabling more efficient AFH map sharing across multi-device topologies, facilitating robust connectivity in smart home and industrial sensor applications.

Related Techniques

Chirp spread spectrum (CSS) represents a related technique that diverges from FHSS by employing continuous linear frequency sweeps, known as chirps, rather than discrete frequency hops, enabling robust over wide bandwidths with inherent resistance to multipath fading and . In CSS, information is encoded by modulating the starting frequency of up/down chirps within a period, contrasting with FHSS's pseudorandom hopping across discrete channels. This approach has gained prominence in the 2010s for long-range (IoT) applications, particularly in LoRaWAN networks, where CSS facilitates low-power, wide-area connectivity over distances exceeding 10 km in rural environments while maintaining data rates up to 50 kbps. Hybrid systems combining FHSS with (DSSS) integrate the frequency agility of hopping with the code-based spreading of DSSS, enhancing overall security and jamming resistance in challenging environments. In such hybrids, the signal is first spread using a pseudonoise sequence as in DSSS, then modulated onto a hopping carrier, allowing for multi-level protection against and ; for instance, military waveforms like the (JTIDS)/Link-16 employ this combination to achieve secure, jam-resistant tactical data links operating at rates around 31.6 kbps over VHF/UHF bands. These hybrids improve and error performance in channels compared to pure FHSS, with bit error rates reduced by factors of 10 or more under partial-band , as demonstrated in analyses over AWGN and models. In the 2020s, FHSS has extended to emerging applications in non-terrestrial networks (NTN) for , such as in LoRaWAN using long-range frequency-hopping spread spectrum (LR-FHSS) to support direct-to-satellite connectivity by hopping across channels to mitigate Doppler shifts and losses in links, achieving reported link budgets of up to 170 dB for low-Earth deployments. Similarly, frequency-hopping variants in (UWB) systems leverage multiband hopping across 3.1–10.6 GHz to enable precise positioning with accuracies below 10 cm, as in multiband OFDM UWB for indoor localization, combining hopping with impulse to resolve multipath in dense environments. These integrations build on FHSS's interference resistance to address scalability in NTN and UWB, facilitating coexistence with terrestrial spectrum while supporting applications like and (V2X) navigation.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] An Introduction to Direct-Sequence Spread-Spectrum ...
    Feb 18, 2003 · If the PRN acts as an on/off gate to the transmitted signal, we have a time hopping spread spectrum technique (THSS). There is also the chirp ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Spread Spectrum (SS)
    BASIC PRINCIPLE OF SPREAD SPECTRUM SYSTEMS: DSSS AND FHSS ... FHSS = Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum. • ≥ 20 non-overlapping channels ...
  3. [3]
    Actress/Inventor Hedy Lamarr – and How Far Wireless ... - IEEE SA
    Jun 23, 2023 · Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) and the Spark of Innovation ... In the 1960s, FHSS gained renewed interest, leading to its practical ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    US2292387A - Secret communication system - Google Patents
    This invention relates broadly to secret communication systems involving the use of carrier waves of different frequencies, and is especially useful in the ...
  5. [5]
    (PDF) Frequency hopping spread spectrum: History, principles and ...
    The article presents the history, principles and applications of the FH-SS technique. Both military and commercial applications are discussed.
  6. [6]
    An Introduction to Spread-Spectrum Communications
    Feb 18, 2003 · The FHSS method does exactly what its name implies—it causes the carrier to hop from frequency to frequency over a wide band according to a ...An Introduction To... · Spread Spectrum Allows Cdma · Different Modulation...
  7. [7]
    https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg70-38342
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Spread spectrum and Pseudonoise Sequences 1 Overview
    Spread spectrum uses a pseudo-random sequence, called a pseudo-noise sequence, to broadcast a signal over a range of frequencies. This is used in frequency- ...
  9. [9]
    Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) Rules - IB-Lenhardt
    Jun 30, 2025 · Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) is a radio transmission technique in which the carrier frequency of the signal is rapidly switched ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The Capacity of Noncoherent Continuous-Phase Frequency Shift ...
    for frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) systems [10]. Because FHSS systems are characterized by short dwell times, there is typically insufficient time ...
  11. [11]
    Bluetooth Device Discovery and Hop Synchronization by the Eavesdropper
    **Summary of Bluetooth FHSS from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4516305:**
  12. [12]
    Bluetooth Technology Overview | Bluetooth® Technology Website
    ### Summary of FHSS in Bluetooth
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Evaluation of SINCGARS (Single Channel Ground and Airborne ...
    Mar 28, 1988 · The main feature of the SINCGARS radio is that its frequency hops over 2320 discrete channels ... In the frequency hopping mode, SINCGARS ...
  14. [14]
    SINCGARS - Intelligence Resource Program
    The radio hops, or tunes to a different frequency at a rate of over 100 times a second. If the radio is using a large number of frequencies which are spread out ...
  15. [15]
    SINCGARS-V - GlobalSecurity.org
    SINCGARS-V when operating in the frequency hopping mode, can use up to 2,320 channels. 34 The enormous number of variables introduced to frequency management ...
  16. [16]
    https://forums.radioreference.com/threads/havequick-training.340116/
  17. [17]
    HAVE QUICK - Crypto Museum
    Mar 31, 2010 · HAVE QUICK is an American frequency hopping system for military UHF radio traffic protection, used as an ECCM, not an encryption system.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] ARCHIVED REPORT HAVE QUICK II/IIA - Forecast International
    Sep 3, 2002 · HAVE QUICK II/IIA provides anti-jamming for UHF communications, using frequency hopping to counter jamming. It is a standard in most modern ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Performance Analysis of a JTIDS/Link-16-type Waveform ... - DTIC
    Link-16 is a tactical data link. It provides presumably secure and jam-resistant tactical information for land, sea, and air platforms. The communication ...Missing: TRANSEC | Show results with:TRANSEC
  20. [20]
    Link 16 Tutorial - Tonex Training
    Link 16 enables real-time transfer of tactical and combat data, voice communications, imagery, and navigation information in the battlespace, using multiple ...Missing: FHSS TRANSEC
  21. [21]
    Link 16 - Signal Identification Wiki
    Dec 24, 2023 · MSEC, or the encryption of message data, is applied to Link-16 messages at the link layer, while TSEC is applied to the entire transmission at ...Missing: TRANSEC | Show results with:TRANSEC
  22. [22]
    https://www.defenseadvancement.com/suppliers/drone-autopilots/
  23. [23]
    https://raksha-anirveda.com/drone-warfare-an-unconventional-strategic-leap/
  24. [24]
    How Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) Enhances ...
    May 22, 2025 · FHSS is a military-grade wireless technique that rapidly switches frequencies to avoid jamming, reduce interference, and maintain stable connections.
  25. [25]
    47 CFR § 15.247 - Operation within the bands 902-928 MHz, 2400 ...
    (1) Frequency hopping systems shall have hopping channel carrier frequencies separated by a minimum of 25 kHz or the 20 dB bandwidth of the hopping channel, ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] FCC Basics of Unlicensed Transmitters
    Client devices that operate in a master/client network may be certified if they have the capability of operating outside permissible Part 15 frequency bands,.
  27. [27]
    How Bluetooth Technology uses adaptive frequency hopping to ...
    Nov 15, 2020
  28. [28]
    Understanding Bluetooth Range | Bluetooth® Technology Website
    Missing: FHSS | Show results with:FHSS
  29. [29]
    New Bluetooth® Core 5.3 feature enhancements
    Jul 15, 2021Missing: FHSS | Show results with:FHSS
  30. [30]
    https://www.americanscientist.org/article/random-paths-to-frequency-hopping
  31. [31]
    Random Paths to Frequency Hopping | American Scientist
    Frequency hopping is largely jam-proof as well. If the frequencies are spaced widely enough, any jamming signal will interfere with only a small part of the ...Missing: Pre- | Show results with:Pre-
  32. [32]
    Spark Gap Transmitter: History Timeline - Electronics Notes
    In the spring of 1895, Guglielmo Marconi starts experimenting with Hertzian waves using spark transmitting apparatus. 1897, Marconi's specification for a ...Missing: agility | Show results with:agility
  33. [33]
    NRL History - RADAR - Naval Research Laboratory
    Nov 4, 2010 · During the greater portion of the 1920s, the division was tasked with advancing high-frequency radio technology for service to the Navy fleet.
  34. [34]
    Development of frequency diverse array radar technology: a review
    Feb 1, 2018 · It has been used initially in late 1930s [1]. Nevertheless, the researchers are still investigating towards improvements in phased array ...Missing: military | Show results with:military
  35. [35]
    https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2019/april/naval-warfare-and-most-beautiful-woman-world
  36. [36]
    Naval Warfare and the Most Beautiful Woman in the World
    Between 1940 and 1942, actress Hedy Lamarr developed the innovative concept of frequency hopping as a means to enable the U.S. Navy to build jamming-resistant ...
  37. [37]
    Principles of Spread-Spectrum Communication Systems | SpringerLink
    In stock Free deliveryThis 5th edition textbook provides updated state-of-the-art coverage of spread spectrum communication systems with new applications in mobile, cellular.
  38. [38]
    Optimal binary sequences for spread spectrum multiplexing (Corresp.)
    **Summary:**
  39. [39]
    [PDF] The Influence of Doppler on Spread Spectrum Signal Synchronization
    The Doppler effect has an effect on the carrier frequency and the pseudo code, which increases the uncertainty of the synchronization process.
  40. [40]
    None
    ### Summary: Use of Crypto Keys like AES for Secure Synchronization in FHSS
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Frequency-Hopped Spread-Spectrum
    Frequency-hopped spread-spectrum works by pseudorandomly changing the center frequency of the carrier over a set of frequencies. The sequence of frequencies ...Missing: equation | Show results with:equation
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Frequency-Hopping Communication Systems - DTIC
    This report presents a current review and analysis of the most important aspects of frequency-hopping communication systems. Frequency synthesis and other ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Spread-Spectrum - People
    Apr 8, 2019 · FHSS is not subject to the near-far problem but also cannot be used for MUD. Example: Bluetooth. BT is a wireless personal area network (WPAN) ...
  44. [44]
    Frequency Hopping verus Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum
    FHSS radios are more susceptible to narrowband noise and interference than DSSS systems, so they will need to retransmit the same packet often.
  45. [45]
    Adaptive Frequency Hopping for Reduced Interference between ...
    Jun 13, 2003 · Adaptive Frequency Hopping allows Bluetooth to adapt to the environment by identifying fixed sources of interference and excluding them from the list of ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] MT8852A-15 Bluetooth Adaptive Frequency Hopping Option ...
    When two Bluetooth devices connect under normal circumstances, they establish a basic frequency hopping scheme across 79 frequency.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Bluetooth® Core 5.0 Feature Enhancements
    Bluetooth LE uses adaptive frequency hopping to spread communication across channels in the. 2.4Ghz band. A new channel selection algorithm improves the way in ...
  48. [48]
    Analysis, optimization, and implementation of a hybrid DS/FFH ...
    Mar 12, 2015 · In this paper, error-probability analyses are performed for a hybrid DS/FFH system over standard Gaussian and fading-type channels.
  49. [49]
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/ultra-wideband
  50. [50]
    Frequency hopping spread spectrum: History, principles ... - Redalyc
    The frequency hopping spread spectrum (FH-SS) technique assumes the carrier generated by the syntesizer to hop from frequency to frequency over a wide ...
  51. [51]
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9482322
  52. [52]
    Ultra-Wideband - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Frequency hopping gives additional spreading of the basic OFDM signal for UWB. Multiband OFDM (MB-OFDM) is the system in which consecutive OFDM UWB packets are ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] 5G Physical Layer Resiliency Enhancements with NB-IoT Use Case ...
    To increase the LPX/AJ features of NB-IoT waveforms, we explore the possibility to use two techniques for physical layer hardening: Frequency Hopping Spectrum ...