Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Geometric mean

The geometric mean is a measure of for a set of , defined as the nth root of their product, where n is the number of values in the set. For a \{x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n\} consisting of positive numbers, it is computed as \tilde{x} = \sqrt{\prod_{i=1}^{n} x_i}, which effectively redistributes the overall product equally among the values to identify a "typical" multiplicative contribution. This contrasts with the , as the geometric mean is particularly suited to scenarios involving ratios, percentages, or compounded growth, where it preserves the multiplicative relationships inherent in the data. A key property of the geometric mean is its relationship to other means, encapsulated in the arithmetic mean-geometric mean (AM-GM) inequality, which states that for positive real numbers, the arithmetic mean is always greater than or equal to the geometric mean, with equality holding only when all numbers are identical. Another important characteristic is that the logarithm of the geometric mean equals the arithmetic mean of the logarithms of the original numbers, making it logarithmically symmetric and ideal for datasets spanning multiple orders of magnitude. For two numbers a and b, the geometric mean simplifies to \sqrt{ab}, which also represents the side length of a square with the same area as a rectangle of sides a and b. In applications, the geometric mean is widely used in finance and economics to calculate average growth rates over time, such as compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for investments, where it accurately reflects the effect of compounding by taking the nth root of the product of (1 + periodic returns). For instance, for annual returns of +12%, -8%, and +2%, the geometric mean return is approximately +1.67%, providing a more realistic long-term average than the arithmetic mean of +2%. It also appears in geometric progressions, where the square of a middle term equals the product of its neighbors, confirming the sequence's structure and linking the mean to broader concepts in sequences and inequalities.

Definition and Formulation

For two positive numbers

The geometric mean of two a and b is defined as \sqrt{a b}, which represents the side length of that has the same area as the rectangle with side lengths a and b. This interpretation arises from equating the area of the square to the area of the rectangle. Let x denote the side length of the square, so its area is x^2. Setting this equal to the rectangle's area gives x^2 = a b, and solving for x yields x = \sqrt{a b} (taking the positive root since lengths are positive). For example, the geometric mean of 4 and 9 is \sqrt{4 \times 9} = \sqrt{36} = 6, as $6^2 = 36 = 4 \times 9. The definition assumes a > 0 and b > 0 to ensure the result is a real number, avoiding complex values from the square root of a negative product.

For n positive numbers

The geometric mean of n positive real numbers a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n is defined as the nth root of their product: G = \left( \prod_{i=1}^n a_i \right)^{1/n}. This formulation generalizes the concept to any finite set of positive values, capturing a central tendency that emphasizes balance in the product of the numbers. The geometric mean exhibits a multiplicative property, meaning it is particularly suitable for datasets where values interact through multiplication, such as growth rates or ratios, as it preserves the overall product while distributing it evenly. For example, consider the numbers 1, 2, and 8: their product is 16, and the geometric mean is $16^{1/3} \approx 2.52, which reflects a balanced representative value favoring equality among the inputs to maintain the product. To compute the geometric mean directly, first calculate the product of the n numbers, then raise it to the power of $1/n. However, for large n or large values, the intermediate product can cause arithmetic overflow in numerical computations. Although the definition assumes , edge cases arise if zeros or negatives are included. By , the geometric mean is zero if any a_i = [0](/page/0), as the product is zero. It is undefined for negative numbers in the real numbers, requiring extensions for such cases.

Logarithmic expression

The geometric mean G of n positive real numbers a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n can be reformulated using logarithms as G = \exp\left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \ln a_i \right). This expression reveals that the geometric mean is the applied to the of the natural logarithms of the original numbers. To derive this form, begin with the product definition G = \left( \prod_{i=1}^n a_i \right)^{1/n}. Taking the natural logarithm of both sides yields \ln G = \ln \left( \left( \prod_{i=1}^n a_i \right)^{1/n} \right) = \frac{1}{n} \ln \left( \prod_{i=1}^n a_i \right) = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \ln a_i, using the properties of logarithms. Exponentiating both sides then recovers the original geometric mean: G = \exp\left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \ln a_i \right). For illustration, consider the numbers 1, 10, and 100. Their natural logarithms are \ln 1 = 0, \ln 10 \approx 2.302585, and \ln 100 \approx 4.605170. The arithmetic mean of these logarithms is (0 + 2.302585 + 4.605170)/3 \approx 2.302585, and exponentiating gives \exp(2.302585) \approx 10, which matches the direct computation (1 \cdot 10 \cdot 100)^{1/3} = 1000^{1/3} = 10. This logarithmic expression offers computational advantages, particularly in avoiding overflow or underflow when the a_i span very large or small values, as the logarithms compress the range before averaging and exponentiation. It also facilitates theoretical analysis, such as proofs relying on the concavity of the logarithm, where applied to \ln directly implies relations like the .

Mathematical Properties

Relation to arithmetic and harmonic means

The arithmetic mean A of n positive real numbers a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n is given by A = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n a_i, representing an additive average. The harmonic mean H is defined as H = \frac{n}{\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{a_i}}, which serves as the reciprocal of the arithmetic mean of the reciprocals. In contrast, the geometric mean G acts as the multiplicative counterpart, G = \left( \prod_{i=1}^n a_i \right)^{1/n}, capturing the central tendency under multiplication. For any set of , the means satisfy the H \leq G \leq A, with holding all a_i are equal. This ordering arises from the properties of functions and applied to the logarithm, positioning G between the additive A and the reciprocal-based H. Additionally, the geometric mean relates the other two via G^2 = A \cdot H. For example, with the numbers 1, 2, and 3, A = 2, G \approx 1.817, and H \approx 1.636, illustrating H < G < A. Conceptually, the arithmetic mean suits scenarios involving direct sums or totals, such as averaging lengths or quantities. The geometric mean provides a "typical" value for multiplicative processes or ratios, like growth factors or proportional scales. The harmonic mean is appropriate for rates or averaged reciprocals, such as speeds over equal distances. Notably, the geometric mean can be expressed logarithmically as G = \exp\left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \ln a_i \right), highlighting its role as the exponential of the arithmetic mean of the logarithms. The hierarchy among these means was recognized in ancient times by the Pythagoreans around 500 BCE, who termed them the classical means due to their applications in arithmetic, geometry, and music theory. This understanding was formalized more rigorously in the 19th century through inequalities like those established by mathematicians such as Cauchy.

AM-GM inequality

The arithmetic mean-geometric mean (AM-GM) inequality asserts that for any positive real numbers a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n, the arithmetic mean is greater than or equal to the geometric mean: \frac{a_1 + a_2 + \dots + a_n}{n} \geq (a_1 a_2 \dots a_n)^{1/n}, with equality holding if and only if a_1 = a_2 = \dots = a_n. A standard proof relies on Jensen's inequality applied to the concave logarithm function on positive reals. The concavity implies \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \log a_i \leq \log \left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n a_i \right). Exponentiating both sides (which preserves the inequality since the exponential is increasing) directly yields the AM-GM inequality, with equality when all a_i are equal due to the strict concavity of the logarithm. An alternative elementary proof begins with the case n=2. Expanding (\sqrt{a_1} - \sqrt{a_2})^2 \geq 0 gives a_1 + a_2 \geq 2\sqrt{a_1 a_2}, or equivalently, the arithmetic mean at least the geometric mean, with equality if a_1 = a_2. For general n, proceed by induction: assume the inequality holds for k < n, and pair terms or replace subsets to reduce to the base case, ensuring equality only when all terms are equal. In optimization, the AM-GM provides bounds for extremizing products under linear constraints. For instance, to maximize the product a_1 a_2 \dots a_n subject to the fixed sum a_1 + \dots + a_n = s with all a_i > 0, equality in AM-GM implies the maximum value (s/n)^n is achieved when each a_i = s/n. The generalizes to weighted forms, where positive weights w_i summing to 1 yield \sum w_i a_i \geq \prod a_i^{w_i}, with equality under analogous conditions; full details appear in the section on weighted geometric means.

Iterated and power means

The geometric mean of can be obtained as the of an iterative process involving and means. Consider two positive numbers a and b. Define sequences a_0 = a, b_0 = b, and for k \geq 0, a_{k+1} = \frac{a_k + b_k}{2}, \quad b_{k+1} = \frac{2 a_k b_k}{a_k + b_k}. These sequences converge to the same , which is the geometric mean \sqrt{a b}, since the product a_k b_k remains constant at a b throughout the iteration, and the exceeds the geometric mean, which exceeds the , with the gap narrowing monotonically. For example, starting with 1 and 100, the first iteration yields 50.5 and approximately 1.98; the second yields approximately 26.24 and 3.81; continuing, the values approach 10 from above and below, respectively, converging to \sqrt{100} = 10. This process provides a practical for computing the geometric mean without direct logarithms, relying solely on arithmetic operations. The geometric mean also arises as a special case in the family of power means, which generalize various types of means. For a_1, \dots, a_n and real parameter p \neq 0, the power mean is M_p(a_1, \dots, a_n) = \left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n a_i^p \right)^{1/p}. As p \to 0, M_p converges to the geometric mean: \lim_{p \to 0} M_p(a_1, \dots, a_n) = \exp\left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \ln a_i \right), derived via the Taylor expansion of the exponential or applied to the logarithmic form. Power means are monotonically increasing in p: if p < q, then M_p \leq M_q, with equality if and only if all a_i are equal; this follows from Jensen's inequality applied to the convex function x \mapsto x^{q/p} for q/p > 1. The geometric mean at p=0 thus occupies a pivotal position, bridging additive means like the (p=1) on one side and more concave means like the (p=-1) on the other, highlighting the distinction between additive and multiplicative averaging.

Generalizations and Extensions

Weighted geometric mean

The weighted geometric mean extends the standard geometric mean by incorporating weights that reflect the relative importance of each a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n > 0 in the calculation, where the weights w_1, w_2, \dots, w_n > 0 satisfy \sum_{i=1}^n w_i = [1](/page/1). It is defined by the formula G_w = \prod_{i=1}^n a_i^{w_i}. This product form arises naturally from the exponential of a in logarithmic space, equivalently expressed as G_w = \exp\left( \sum_{i=1}^n w_i \log a_i \right). The logarithmic expression highlights that the weighted geometric mean is the exponential of the weighted arithmetic mean of the logarithms, providing a multiplicative aggregation that generalizes the unweighted case. This formulation derives from the power mean family, where the weighted geometric mean corresponds to the case as the power parameter r approaches 0: the r-th power mean is \left( \sum_{i=1}^n w_i a_i^r \right)^{1/r}, and taking the limit r \to 0 yields the exponential-logarithmic form above, replacing the uniform average with a weighted one to account for varying importance. For example, consider a_1 = 4 and a_2 = 9 with weights w_1 = 0.7 and w_2 = 0.3. Then G_w = 4^{0.7} \times 9^{0.3} \approx 2.641 \times 1.933 \approx 5.10. Using the logarithmic form, \sum w_i \log a_i = 0.7 \log 4 + 0.3 \log 9 \approx 0.7 \times 1.386 + 0.3 \times 2.197 \approx 1.628, and \exp(1.628) \approx 5.10. Key properties include that it reduces to the unweighted geometric mean when w_i = 1/n for all i, ensuring consistency with the standard definition. Additionally, it satisfies the weighted AM-GM inequality: the weighted arithmetic mean \sum w_i a_i \geq G_w, with equality if and only if all a_i with positive weights are equal. This preserves the ordering and inequality relations from the unweighted case while allowing flexibility in emphasis. In practice, the weighted geometric mean is applied in contexts requiring differential emphasis on data points, such as prioritizing recent observations in time series to compute growth indices or aggregate metrics, where older data receives progressively lower weights to reflect evolving trends.

Geometric mean for vectors and matrices

The geometric mean extends naturally to positive vectors in \mathbb{R}^n_+ via the component-wise operation, where for two positive vectors \mathbf{a} = (a_1, \dots, a_n) and \mathbf{b} = (b_1, \dots, b_n), the geometric mean \mathbf{g} has components g_i = \sqrt{a_i b_i} for each i = 1, \dots, n. This preserves the positivity of the vectors and aligns with the scalar case when n=1. Alternatively, a scalar-valued geometric mean can be derived from vectors using their norms, such as \exp\left( \frac{1}{2} (\log \|\mathbf{a}\| + \log \|\mathbf{b}\|) \right), which computes the geometric mean of the vector lengths under a chosen norm \|\cdot\|. For positive definite matrices, the geometric mean of two such matrices A, B \in \mathbb{P}_n (the cone of n \times n positive definite matrices) is defined as A \# B = A^{1/2} (A^{-1/2} B A^{-1/2})^{1/2} A^{1/2}, where A^{1/2} denotes the unique positive definite square root of A. This A \# B is the unique positive definite matrix X satisfying the equation X A^{-1} X = B. Equivalently, in the Log-Euclidean framework, it corresponds to \exp\left( \frac{1}{2} (\log A + \log B) \right) when A and B commute, but the general definition accounts for non-commutativity via the Riemannian structure on \mathbb{P}_n. When A and B are diagonal positive definite matrices, the geometric mean A \# B reduces to the component-wise geometric means of their diagonal entries, mirroring the vector case. This extension originated in the 20th century, with the two-matrix case first introduced by Pusz and Woronowicz in 1975 for applications in quantum information theory, and further developed by Ando in 1979 for operator inequalities in statistics and analysis. In theoretical applications, the matrix geometric mean serves as the midpoint on the geodesic in the Riemannian geometry of the positive definite matrix manifold equipped with the affine-invariant metric \delta(A, B) = \|\log(A^{-1/2} B A^{-1/2})\|_2, enabling tools like fixed-point iterations for uniqueness in multivariable generalizations.

Integral geometric mean for functions

The integral geometric mean provides a continuous analogue to the discrete geometric mean for positive functions defined on an interval. For a positive measurable function f: [a, b] \to (0, \infty) such that \log f is integrable over [a, b], the integral geometric mean G is defined as G = \exp\left( \frac{1}{b-a} \int_a^b \log f(x) \, dx \right). This expression represents the exponential of the average value of \log f(x) over the interval, ensuring G > 0. The condition that \log f is integrable guarantees the existence of G, as it requires f > 0 almost everywhere and \int_a^b |\log f(x)| \, dx < \infty. This definition arises as the limit of the discrete geometric mean applied to finite partitions of [a, b]. Specifically, for a partition with points x_i^* in each subinterval and \Delta x = (b-a)/n, the discrete geometric mean \left( \prod_{i=1}^n f(x_i^*) \right)^{1/n} converges to the integral form as n \to \infty, since \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \log f(x_i^*) approximates the for \frac{1}{b-a} \int_a^b \log f(x) \, dx. This connection bridges and continuous settings in . As an example, consider f(x) = x on [1, e]. Here, \int_1^e \log x \, dx = 1, so G = \exp\left( \frac{1}{e-1} \cdot 1 \right) = \exp\left( \frac{1}{e-1} \right) \approx 1.790. This value lies below the arithmetic mean \frac{e+1}{2} \approx 1.859, consistent with the AM-GM . The integral geometric mean inherits key properties from its discrete counterpart. It is monotonic: if $0 < f(x) \leq g(x) for all x \in [a, b], then G_f \leq G_g, since \log is increasing and preserves the inequality under and exponentiation. In , it serves as an "average multiplier," capturing the geometric average growth or scaling factor of f over the interval, particularly useful for log-concave or multiplicative processes. By Jensen's applied to the convex function -\log, it satisfies G \leq \frac{1}{b-a} \int_a^b f(x) \, dx, with equality if and only if f is constant .

Applications

Growth rates and finance

In finance, the geometric mean is essential for accurately measuring average growth rates over multiple periods, particularly when dealing with multiplicative processes like compound interest or investment returns. For a series of growth factors r_1, r_2, \dots, r_n (where each r_i = 1 + periodic return), the average annual growth rate is calculated as \left( \prod_{i=1}^n r_i \right)^{1/n} - 1. This approach accounts for the compounding effect inherent in sequential returns, providing a realistic estimate of long-term performance that the arithmetic mean often overstates by ignoring volatility's impact on growth. A practical example illustrates this distinction: consider annual returns of 10%, 20%, and -5%. The growth factors are 1.10, 1.20, and 0.95, with their product equaling 1.254. The geometric mean return is then $1.254^{1/3} - 1 \approx 7.8\%, reflecting the compounded outcome. In contrast, the of (10% + 20% - 5%)/3 ≈ 8.3% would suggest higher growth if applied forward, leading to projection errors because it does not penalize the sequencing and variability of returns. This makes the geometric mean the preferred metric for historical performance analysis, such as the compound annual growth rate (CAGR), which normalizes multi-year growth to an equivalent annual rate for comparing . The geometric mean also adjusts for portfolio volatility, approximating the relationship where the geometric return equals the arithmetic return minus half the variance (or squared) under continuous assumptions. This "volatility drag" formula highlights how higher fluctuations reduce compounded , guiding construction toward strategies that balance expected returns with risk. In modern applications, such as post-2020 ESG investing, the geometric mean supports metrics emphasizing balanced across factors; its non-compensatory aggregation prevents high scores in one area from offsetting weaknesses in others, promoting sustainable, equitable performance over time.

Geometry and proportions

In classical geometry, the geometric mean is central to understanding proportions, particularly through the means-extremes property. For a proportion a : b = c : d, the product of the extremes equals the product of the means, so a d = b c. This relation directly connects to the geometric mean when constructing a mean proportional between two lengths a and b, defined as the length x = \sqrt{a b} that satisfies the proportion a : x = x : b, where x appears as both mean terms. A prominent application appears in geometric constructions involving right triangles. When an altitude is drawn from the to the , it divides the into two segments, say p and q, and the altitude length h is the geometric mean of these segments: h = \sqrt{p q}. This property follows from the similarity of the three right triangles formed (the original and the two smaller ones), ensuring proportional relationships that yield the geometric mean. Each of the original triangle is also the geometric mean of the and the of that onto the , reinforcing the mean's role in preserving similarity. The geometric mean further aids in maintaining shape and proportions during of similar figures, where aspect ratios remain under uniform linear . For instance, in selecting balanced aspect ratios for visualizations, the geometric mean of two candidate ratios (computed on a ) provides a natural compromise; an example is \sqrt{4:3} \approx 1.154, yielding a near-square suitable for equitable viewing of rectangular . Similarly, the ISO A series formats embody this principle with an of $1 : \sqrt{2} \approx 1 : 1.414, chosen so that folding a sheet in half along its longer dimension halves the area while preserving the same in the resulting sheet. This arises because the shorter side of the new sheet equals the geometric mean of the original longer side and the halved dimension, ensuring proportional consistency across sizes. In the regular pentagon, the geometric mean manifests through the \phi = \frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2} \approx 1.618, where diagonals intersect to divide each other in extreme and mean ratio. Specifically, each diagonal is segmented into a longer part g and shorter part s such that g / s = \phi and the whole diagonal d = g + s satisfies d / g = \phi. Here, the longer segment g is the geometric mean of the entire diagonal d and the shorter segment s: g = \sqrt{d \cdot s}, a property that underscores the geometric mean's role in pentagonal symmetry and constructions.

Statistics and social sciences

In statistics, the geometric mean serves as a robust measure of for skewed distributions, particularly those following a log-normal pattern, where data points span several orders of magnitude, such as concentrations of substances or biological measurements. For log-normal data, it is computed by taking the logarithm of the values, finding the of those logarithms, and exponentiating the result, which aligns with the distribution's multiplicative nature and provides a better representation of the typical value than the , which can be unduly influenced by outliers. Notably, the geometric mean approximates the of the log-transformed data, making it suitable for summarizing rates or ratios in datasets with positive . In the social sciences, the geometric mean is prominently used in constructing composite indices to aggregate multidimensional indicators while penalizing imbalances across components, ensuring that no single dimension dominates the overall score. A key example is the (HDI), developed by the , which measures a country's average achievements in , and . The HDI is calculated as the geometric mean of three normalized dimension indices: \text{HDI} = (I_{\text{Health}} \times I_{\text{Education}} \times I_{\text{Income}})^{1/3} where each index I is scaled between 0 and 1 based on goalposts (e.g., life expectancy at birth for ). This formulation emphasizes balanced development, as a low value in any dimension severely reduces the overall HDI; however, it is sensitive to near-zero values, prompting adjustments like setting a minimum of 0.1 for components in related indices such as the (GII), which includes maternal mortality rates, to enable computation. Beyond HDI, the geometric mean appears in price indices for inflation measurement, such as in the U.S. (CPI), where it approximates a modified Laspeyres index for elementary item categories by accounting for consumer substitution in response to relative price changes. This approach assumes a substitution elasticity of 1, yielding a more accurate cost-of-living estimate for goods like apparel or , where consumers shift toward cheaper alternatives. In , the geometric mean summarizes rates or counts on a , such as bacterial concentrations in assessments or exposure levels in studies, providing a central tendency that mitigates the impact of extreme values in positively skewed data. Recent applications in the extend to fairness metrics in social sciences research, where the geometric mean balances multiple subgroup performance scores to detect disparities in models, heavily penalizing any single low fairness value to promote equitable across demographics.

Other practical uses

In , the geometric mean is applied to model average growth rates in populations where changes occur multiplicatively, such as in bacterial division. For instance, when analyzing relative changes in bacterial counts over discrete intervals, the geometric mean of the growth factors provides a compounded average rate that avoids distortion from arithmetic averaging, ensuring accurate representation of exponential processes. This approach is particularly useful in for estimating net from sequential measurements, as demonstrated in studies of microbial where it yields a mean multiplier of approximately 1.172 for 10-minute intervals in a hypothetical bacterial . In , the geometric mean facilitates scale-invariant measures in and . For , it contributes to calculations, defined as the ratio of the geometric mean to the of the power spectrum, which quantifies how closely a signal resembles and aids in perceptual audio coding and algorithms. This metric, essential for applications like , helps balance tonal and noisy components without overemphasizing outliers. Similarly, in and water quality assessment, averaging pH values requires the geometric mean because pH is logarithmic; the of pH readings would misrepresent the true average concentration, whereas the geometric mean of concentrations (or equivalently, the negative log of the of concentrations) provides an unbiased , especially for unimodal distributions in environmental samples. Standardization efforts leverage the geometric mean for consistent, ratio-based metrics in . In ISO 532:1975, which outlines methods for calculating levels, the geometric mean frequency defines the center of bands, ensuring uniform perceptual scaling across frequency ranges from 63 Hz to 8 kHz; this approach maintains in noise assessment and metering, preventing biases in broadband acoustic measurements. Such applications extend to ISO-derived protocols for and product sound quality, where geometric means harmonize multiplicative frequency relationships. In , the geometric mean balances exposures for optimal histograms by accounting for the logarithmic nature of . Automatic exposure algorithms often compute the geometric mean of scene values to target (18% ), which is itself the geometric mean between typical (95% ) and (3.5% ) surfaces; this centers the dynamically, reducing clipping in high-dynamic-range scenes and ensuring even tonal distribution without over- or underexposing key elements. Recent advancements in incorporate the geometric mean for feature in analysis, particularly for studies processed via predictive models. Proportion-based methods, which divide features by their geometric means, outperform traditional centered log-ratio transformations by preserving relative abundances and improving accuracy in downstream tasks like prediction; for example, in a 2024 evaluation across multiple datasets, these methods showed improved performance in models compared to additive log-ratio approaches. This technique is especially relevant for log-scale embeddings in neural networks handling skewed, positive-valued features, enhancing stability in high-dimensional spaces.

References

  1. [1]
    2.5: Geometric Mean - Statistics LibreTexts
    Jun 26, 2024 · The geometric mean redistributes not the sum of the values but the product of multiplying all the individual values and then redistributing them in equal ...Missing: definition applications
  2. [2]
    Question Corner -- Applications of the Geometric Mean
    The geometric mean answers the question, "if all the quantities had the same value, what would that value have to be in order to achieve the same product?"
  3. [3]
    Properties of Geometric Progression and Geometric Mean
    Geometric Progressions exhibit unique mathematical properties that distinguish them from other sequences. These properties help in solving problems.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    Four Kinds of “Mean” - The Math Doctors
    Oct 27, 2020 · We'll look here at the arithmetic, geometric, harmonic, and quadratic means, focusing on how they are the same, how they differ, and how to choose one.Arithmetic Vs Geometric Mean... · The Big Idea: One Number... · Harmonic Mean
  5. [5]
    Geometric Mean -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The geometric mean is related to the arithmetic mean A and harmonic mean H by G=sqrt(AH) (Havil 2003, p. 120).
  6. [6]
    Question Corner -- Applications of the Geometric Mean
    Similarly, the geometric mean sqrt(AB) is the length of the sides of a square which has the same area as our rectangle.
  7. [7]
    2.6: Geometric Mean - Statistics LibreTexts
    Dec 19, 2020 · The geometric mean is the product of multiplying these three numbers together (4,096) and taking the cube root because there are three numbers ...
  8. [8]
    Geometric Mean: A Measure for Growth and Compounding
    Nov 1, 2024 · For larger datasets or to avoid overflow errors when dealing with very large numbers, we can use logarithms. This method simplifies ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Calculating Geometric Means - State Water Resources Control Board
    For example, if you had 11 values in the range A1...A10, you would simply write this formula in any empty cell: '=geomean(A1:A10)'.
  10. [10]
    The geometric mean and ... - GraphPad Prism 10 Statistics Guide
    The geometric mean cannot be computed if any values are zero or negative. •The geometric mean is in the same units as the data and the arithmetic mean. •The ...Missing: edge | Show results with:edge
  11. [11]
    Geometric mean for negative and zero values - ResearchGate
    With one or more zero values, the geometric mean is zero. With an odd number of negative values, the geometric mean is a complex number (e.g., see Habib 2012) , ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Handbook of Mathematical Functions
    Edited by Milton Abramowitz and Irene A. Stegun. Introduction. 1. The present Handbook has been designed to provide scientific investigators with a ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) Part 8 - NIST Pages
    ... geometric mean because the arithmetic mean of the log is the log of the geometric mean. Note that the geometric mean is tolerant of very large entries: for ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Convexity according to the geometric mean - Ele-Math
    Abstract. We develop a parallel theory to the classical theory of convex functions, based on a change of variable formula, by replacing the arithmetic mean ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] IMPORTANT INEQUALITIES 1. Arithmetic-Geometric-Harmonic ...
    Arithmetic-Geometric-Harmonic Means. Arithmetic Mean of n numbers. a1,a2,...,an are positive real numbers; their arithmetic mean is a1 + a2 + ... + an n.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Summarizing Measured Data
    Mode, Arithmetic, Geometric, Harmonic Means. ❑ Mean of A Ratio. ❑ Summarizing Variability: Range, Variance, percentiles,. Quartiles. ❑ Determining ...
  17. [17]
    Pythagorean Means -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The Pythagorean means are the three "classic" means A (the arithmetic mean), G (the geometric mean), and H (the harmonic mean) are sometimes known as the ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] inequalities-hardy-littlewood-polya.pdf - mathematical olympiads
    Finite, infinite, and integral inequalities. It will be convenient to take some particular and typical inequality as a text for the general remarks which occupy ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The Geometric Mean and the AM-GM Inequality - UCI Mathematics
    Feb 27, 2017 · It looks like that given a rectangle, the geometric mean of the side lengths is the side length of the square that has the same area as the ...Missing: interpretation | Show results with:interpretation
  20. [20]
    [PDF] The arithmetic-geometric mean inequality
    If the AM - GM Inequality holds for n = 2k−1, it holds for n = 2k. Proof. We assume the case n = 2 has already been done, and is available for use below ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Minimizing the Calculus in Optimization Problems Teylor Greff
    May 2, 2016 · We will show what must occur in order for the AM/GM inequality to solve an optimization problem correctly by first showing what goes wrong if ...
  22. [22]
    Geometric Mean Algorithms Based on Harmonic and Arithmetic ...
    Geometric Mean Algorithms Based on Harmonic and Arithmetic Iterations ... convergent to the geometric mean, solely relying on arithmetic and harmonic means.
  23. [23]
    The arithmetic-geometric mean - The DO Loop - SAS Blogs
    Aug 23, 2017 · The arithmetic-geometric mean is only defined for two positive numbers, x and y. It is defined as the limit of an alternating iterative process.
  24. [24]
    Generalization of the power means and their inequalities
    For these means we obtained generalizations of fundamental mean inequality, Hölder's and Minkowski's, and their converse inequalities. Previous article in issue
  25. [25]
    [PDF] 1. The AM-GM inequality - Berkeley Math Circle
    The AM-GM inequality. The most basic arithmetic mean-geometric mean (AM-GM) inequality states simply that if x and y are nonnegative real numbers, then (x + ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Chisini Mean -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    weighted geometric mean, x_1^(p_1)...x_n^(p_n). harmonic mean, x_1^(-1)+...+x_n ... Arithmetic Mean, Geometric Mean, Harmonic Mean, Mean. This entry ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Economic Indices for the North Pacific Groundfish Fisheries
    The decomposition expresses the aggregate as a weighted geometric mean (using a first-order approximation) for each class ... index time series. For example, the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Geometric Means in a Novel Vector Space Structure on Symmetric ...
    In this work we present a new generalization of the geometric mean of positive numbers on symmetric positive‐definite matrices, called Log‐Euclidean.
  29. [29]
    [2110.13371] The Expanding Universe of the Geometric Mean - arXiv
    Oct 26, 2021 · The story begins with the two-variable matrix geometric mean, moves to the breakthrough developments in the multivariable matrix setting ...
  30. [30]
    Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Formula and Calculation
    The CAGR produces a geometric mean which can be used to compare different investment types with one another. For example, suppose that in 2019, an investor ...
  31. [31]
    Geometric Mean - Corporate Finance Institute
    Example: An investor has annual return of 5%, 10%, 20%, -50%, and 20%. Using the arithmetic mean, the investor's total return is (5%+10%+20%-50%+20%)/5 = 1%.
  32. [32]
    Breaking Down the Geometric Mean in Investing - Investopedia
    Jun 22, 2023 · The resulting geometric mean, or a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR), is 20.6%, much lower than the 35% calculated using the arithmetic mean.
  33. [33]
    2.5 Geometric Mean - Intro To Business Statistics - Fiveable
    Example: if an investment has returns of 10%, -5%, and 20% over three years, geometric mean return is $\sqrt[3]{1.10 \times 0.95 \times 1.20} - 1 = 7.8 ...
  34. [34]
    Volatility Drag: How Variance Drains Investment Returns - Kitces.com
    Dec 27, 2017 · Volatility drag results in geometric mean returns which are less than the arithmetic average! Click To Tweet. Retirement Projections And When To ...
  35. [35]
    Take it with a pinch of salt—ESG rating of stocks and stock indices
    The geometric mean was chosen as an alternative approach, which is a non-compensatory aggregation method. In this way high scores in one component of the ESG ...Missing: growth | Show results with:growth
  36. [36]
    [PDF] James Olsen & Dan Gustafson - Western Illinois University
    Squares on a rectangle: If squares are placed on two consecutive sides of a rectangle, then the area of the rectangle is the geometric mean of the areas of the ...Missing: interpretation | Show results with:interpretation
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Arc Length-Based Aspect Ratio Selection
    Aug 1, 2011 · On a log scale, the midpoint between two aspect ratios corresponds to their geometric mean, a natural compromise aspect ratio. Figure 5 ...
  38. [38]
    A4 Paper / International Standard Paper Sizes
    Oct 29, 1996 · ISO 216 defines the A series of paper sizes as follows: The height divided by the width of all formats is the square root of two (1.4142).
  39. [39]
    Euclid's Elements, Book VI, Definition 3 - Clark University
    A straight line is said to have been cut in extreme and mean ratio when, as the whole line is to the greater segment, so is the greater to the less.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Lecture 14 - Biostatistics
    Oct 23, 2015 · Lecture 14 covers logs, the geometric mean, the CLT, comparisons, and the log-normal distribution. The geometric mean is calculated as (Xi)^1/n.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Technical notes - Human Development Reports
    Because a geometric mean cannot be computed from zero values, a minimum value of 0.1 percent is set for all component indicators. Further, as higher maternal.
  42. [42]
    Human Development Index (HDI)
    The HDI is the geometric mean of normalized indices for each of the three dimensions. The health dimension is assessed by life expectancy at birth, the ...Human development · The 2025 Human... · Human Climate Horizons data... · News
  43. [43]
    Research Issues Related to the Geometric Mean Formula for ...
    What does the geometric mean formula do? The modified Laspeyres formula currently used by the CPI estimates the price each month of a fixed basket of goods and ...
  44. [44]
    Lesson 2: Summarizing Data | Principles of Epidemiology | CSELS
    The geometric mean is the mean or average of a set of data measured on a logarithmic scale. The geometric mean is used when the logarithms of the observations ...
  45. [45]
    Geometric Means | National Exposure Report - CDC
    May 29, 2025 · A geometric mean gives a better estimate of central tendency for data that are distributed with a long tail at the upper end of the distribution.Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  46. [46]
    What Does It “Mean”? A Review of Interpreting and Calculating ... - NIH
    The geometric means are typically reported when describing data that have been Ln-transformed prior to analysis (e.g., AUC or Cmax). It is also used for the ...
  47. [47]
    Note on measures for spectral flatness | Electronics Letters
    ... audio signal processing applications. The traditional definition of spectral flatness is the ratio of the geometric mean to the arithmetic mean of the ...
  48. [48]
    The pH paradox - ScienceDirect.com
    Oct 10, 2024 · Based on the statistical results, the geometric mean can be used to calculate the average of pH if the distribution is unimodal. For a ...
  49. [49]
    What is middle grey and why does it even matter? - DIY Photography
    Apr 5, 2018 · And it is actually the geometric mean between white paper (95% reflective) and black ink (3.5% reflective). But capturing light is different to ...
  50. [50]
    Proportion-based normalizations outperform compositional data ...
    Mar 5, 2024 · Normalization, as a pre-processing step, can significantly affect the resolution of machine learning analysis for microbiome studies.