Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Glomar Explorer

The Hughes Glomar Explorer was a large ocean-going platform ship constructed in 1973–1974 for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's Project Azorian, a covert operation to recover the sunken Soviet ballistic missile submarine K-129 from the Pacific Ocean floor at a depth of approximately 16,500 feet. Disguised as a commercial deep-sea mining vessel for manganese nodules and ostensibly owned by industrialist Howard Hughes to provide plausible deniability, the ship incorporated advanced engineering features including dynamic positioning thrusters for station-keeping, a 600-foot derrick, and a custom heavy-lift system using steel pipes to hoist substantial sections of the submarine target. Launched amid strict secrecy at a cost exceeding $350 million (equivalent to over $2 billion in 2023 dollars), the Explorer executed the recovery attempt in 1974, successfully retrieving the forward portion of K-129 containing six of its crew remains and some naval equipment, though critical intelligence such as missiles or codebooks eluded capture due to structural failure during lift. The project's exposure by investigative journalist Jack Anderson in 1975 prompted the CIA to adopt the "Glomar response"—neither confirming nor denying the existence of records—which became a standard for handling sensitive Freedom of Information Act requests. Following Azorian, the vessel was repurposed for commercial ocean drilling under Military Sealift Command as USNS Glomar Explorer (T-AG-193) before being decommissioned and scrapped in 2012–2015.

Design and Construction

Development and Cover Story

The development of the Glomar Explorer stemmed from , a classified (CIA) initiative launched in the early 1970s to salvage sections of the Soviet submarine K-129, which sank in the in 1968. To execute the recovery without arousing suspicion, the CIA required a purpose-built vessel capable of handling extreme ocean depths up to 16,000 feet, prompting the design of a large platform equipped with a massive mechanical claw system for lifting heavy payloads from the seafloor. In 1970, the CIA enlisted billionaire industrialist to serve as the public face of the project, leveraging his reputation for eccentric ventures and involvement in offshore technology through his and partnerships with Marine Development Inc. Construction was awarded to Sun and Drydock Company in , with work commencing in late 1970 and the keel laid in 1971; the vessel was launched on November 4, 1972, and completed in 1973 at a cost exceeding $350 million (equivalent to approximately $2.3 billion in 2023 dollars). The cover story portrayed the Glomar Explorer as a pioneering commercial deep-sea mining ship designed to harvest manganese nodules—mineral-rich concretions on the ocean floor containing metals like , , and —using hydraulic lifting pipes and a moonpool for deploying collection equipment. This narrative was reinforced by Hughes' public announcement in 1972 of the venture as the world's first operational operation, with the ship's system and heavy-lift capabilities presented as innovations for resource extraction rather than salvage. The CIA's involvement remained hidden, with funding channeled through front companies to maintain .

Technical Specifications and Innovations

The Glomar Explorer was constructed as a dynamically positioned deep-sea with exceptional heavy-lift capabilities, measuring 618.8 feet (188.6 meters) in , with a of 115.8 feet (35.3 meters) and a draft of approximately 35 feet (10.7 meters) at operational loads. Its displacement was 50,500 long tons when light, enabling it to support variable loads up to 23,500 tons for extended missions. was provided by a diesel-electric system consisting of five Nordberg 16-cylinder engines, each rated at 4,900 brake horsepower, driving five generators and powering twin screws via two 2,200-horsepower electric motors, achieving a service speed of 10 knots at full load. Key innovations centered on the central —a 199-foot by 74-foot by 65-foot well in the hull allowing deployment of equipment in a controlled —and a motion-compensated platform rated for 10 million pounds, capable of ±7.5 feet of heave compensation to stabilize loads against sea motion. The vessel's automatic station-keeping (ASK) system utilized thrusters for positioning accuracy within 40 feet in light seas, essential for precise deep-water operations. Its hoisting mechanism featured a 14-million-pound-capacity operating at 6 feet per minute, supporting a tapered pipe string extending to 17,000 feet with an 8.5-million-pound working load, designed to assemble and deploy segmented pipes for heavy recovery tasks.
ComponentCapacity/Specification
Hoisting System14,000,000 at 6 /min
Pipe String17,000 depth, 8,500,000 working load
10,000,000 , ±7.5 heave compensation
Docking Legs8,000,000 combined lift, 140 travel
The capture device, or "claw," incorporated articulated fingers actuated by seawater hydraulics for gripping irregular loads up to 2,000 tons from the seafloor, complemented by a docking leg system for load transfer and support during retrieval. These features extended limits for deep-ocean heavy lifting, influencing subsequent technologies despite the mission's partial success. The design's dual-purpose as a nominal masked its intent, with capabilities for operational depths up to 10,000 feet post-mission adaptations.

Project Azorian

Background and Objectives

The Soviet Golf II-class diesel-electric ballistic missile submarine K-129 departed its home port of on the on February 24, 1968, as part of the Soviet Pacific Fleet's routine deterrent patrols amid escalating tensions. Carrying three SS-N-4 (R-21) submarine-launched ballistic missiles armed with nuclear warheads, the vessel operated under strict to evade detection while positioning for potential strikes against U.S. targets. On March 8, 1968, K-129 sank catastrophically approximately 1,800 miles northwest of at a depth of 16,500 feet, resulting in the loss of all 98 crew members; the precise cause—possibly a mechanical failure, battery explosion, or inadvertent missile test—remains undetermined despite subsequent analyses. The Soviet Navy conducted an extensive but fruitless search operation spanning over 70,000 square miles, ultimately abandoning efforts by mid-April 1968 due to the wreck's location outside their anticipated patrol zones. U.S. intelligence assets, leveraging the Navy's arrays and deep-sea photographic surveys, pinpointed the K-129's position by late March 1968, confirming its intact hull sections and the presence of missile tubes. This discovery presented a rare opportunity to acquire Soviet military secrets at a time when direct confrontations risked nuclear escalation, prompting initial CIA feasibility studies in 1969 under the broader context of technological intelligence gaps in and missile systems. was formally approved in March 1970 by CIA Director , with oversight from the 40 Committee (a subgroup), following assessments that the target's intelligence yield justified the engineering and operational risks. The operation's cover involved commissioning a custom vessel from Sun Shipbuilding & Drydock Company, ostensibly for ' to mine manganese nodules from the ocean floor, thereby masking U.S. government involvement. The core objectives centered on clandestine recovery of the submarine's forward and midsections to extract cryptographic materials, including one-time pads and devices, which could decrypt Soviet naval communications and reveal operational doctrines. Additional priorities encompassed the R-21 missiles for dissection of guidance, , and technologies; and components to evaluate acoustic and detection capabilities; and any intact torpedoes or crew remains for forensic and biographical on Soviet submariners. The Intelligence Board reaffirmed the high value in August 1972, estimating gains in countering Soviet submarine threats despite the project's $350–800 million cost (equivalent to over $2 billion in 2023 dollars) and the unprecedented challenge of lifting 2,000 tons from abyssal depths. Success was calibrated not merely by physical retrieval but by maintaining , as Soviet awareness could provoke diplomatic crises or accelerations.

Mission Execution

The Glomar Explorer departed , in late June 1974 under the cover of a commercial deep-sea mining expedition and arrived at the recovery site—located approximately 1,560 nautical miles northwest of at coordinates around 24° N, 157° E—on July 4, 1974. The site lay at a depth of approximately 16,500 feet (5,000 meters), where the Soviet submarine K-129 had sunk in March 1968. Over the ensuing weeks, the crew, comprising about 176 personnel including CIA operatives, experts, and civilian contractors, conducted preparatory surveys using and television cameras lowered through the ship's moonpool to precisely map the wreckage and confirm its condition. These activities were masked as manganese nodule mining tests, with the ship deploying dummy mining pipes and equipment to maintain the cover story amid intermittent surveillance by Soviet vessels, including the intelligence collector Kursograf and fishing trawlers, which observed but did not directly interfere with operations. Recovery commenced on , 1974, after final positioning and assessments, with the deployment of the capture —a massive, clamshell-like mechanical weighing 2,000 tons, designed to and grip a 132-foot (40-meter), 1,750-ton forward section of the . The vehicle was lowered to the seafloor via a telescoping pipe string composed of 3-foot-diameter steel segments, each approximately 60 feet long and weighing up to 4 tons, assembled sequentially through the moonpool and extended using the ship's system to maintain stability in swells up to 12 feet. Once on the bottom, the claws were actuated remotely to enclose the target, engaging the hull amid silt and debris; television feeds monitored the process in real-time from the control room. The ascent then began, reeling in the pipe string at controlled speeds of 10 to 15 feet per minute to minimize structural stress on the weakened remnants, a process powered by the ship's 30-million-pound hoist capacity and supported by ballast adjustments for balance. The lift operation spanned several days, navigating challenges such as ocean currents, on the pipes, and persistent Soviet shadowing that necessitated pauses and cover maneuvers, including simulated . By August 8, 1974, with the captured portion raised to within about 10,000 feet of the surface, occurred due to the sub's deteriorated state—likely exacerbated by damage, , and handling stresses—causing the stern section to detach and sink back to the seafloor. The remaining forward section was maneuvered into the Glomar Explorer's docking frame within the hull, sealed, and secured aboard by August 21, 1974, after which the ship departed the site under secrecy protocols, evading full disclosure through the mining facade. The mission adhered to compartmentalized command structures, with operational decisions guided by onboard CIA and leads to mitigate risks from the unprecedented deep-ocean salvage at such depths.

Recovery Outcomes and Intelligence Yield

The Glomar Explorer commenced recovery operations over the K-129 wreck site on July 4, 1974, at a depth of approximately 16,500 feet in the North Pacific. The mission partially succeeded in raising the 's forward section, including the torpedo room, which measured about 38 feet in length and weighed roughly 1,750 tons. This portion contained two nuclear-armed torpedoes, evidenced by contamination detected during post-recovery analysis, as well as the remains of six Soviet crew members. However, a mechanical failure in the lifting grapple caused the majority of the hull—estimated at 90% of the , including the compartment and potential cryptographic equipment—to shear off and return to the seafloor during ascent. The recovered remains underwent forensic examination at a secure U.S. facility following the Glomar Explorer's return to , in September 1974. The six Soviet submariners' bodies received a formal military with honors on an unspecified date shortly after recovery, accompanied by a videotaped featuring a religious service and the playing of the Soviet . Intelligence derived from the salvaged materials included technical details on Soviet bow construction, torpedo propulsion systems, and integration, confirming the K-129 carried operational weapons. These insights advanced U.S. understanding of Soviet naval armaments but fell short of primary goals, such as acquiring ballistic missiles (SS-N-4 types), codebooks, or devices, which resided in the unrecovered midsection. The assessed the yield as limited yet valuable for validating acoustic intelligence on the submarine's sinking and hull integrity, though much analytical detail remains classified. Independent evaluations, drawing on declassified records, describe the operation as a technical feat overshadowed by incomplete recovery, with no evidence of transformative cryptographic or missile-related breakthroughs.

Post-Mission Operations

Commercial Deep-Sea Mining Efforts

Following the completion of Project Azorian in 1974, the Hughes Glomar Explorer was leased in September 1978 to Ocean Minerals Company (OMCO), a consortium including Global Marine Development Inc., for testing deep-sea mining systems targeting polymetallic nodules on the Pacific seafloor. OMCO aimed to develop commercially viable extraction of manganese nodules containing metals such as manganese, nickel, copper, and cobalt, using the vessel's heavy-lift capabilities originally designed for the CIA mission. In October and November 1978, OMCO conducted at-sea trials of a second-generation test system at depths of approximately 5,000 meters (16,400 feet), deploying a Lockheed-developed trial miner weighing about 100 tons to collect nodules via hydraulic or methods. These operations, managed by Global Marine, successfully recovered nodule samples but highlighted challenges including equipment reliability, nodule processing efficiency, and high operational costs in water depths up to 5,200 meters. Further tests continued into 1980, demonstrating the technical feasibility of nodule collection but failing to achieve economic scalability due to fluctuating metal prices, unresolved international regulatory frameworks under the emerging UNCLOS , and competition from land-based sources. By 1980, the commercial mining initiative was abandoned, as the projected returns did not justify the vessel's $350 million cost or ongoing expenses, leading to the Glomar Explorer's lay-up and eventual refit for conventional oil drilling applications. These efforts represented one of the earliest large-scale attempts at commercial deep-sea nodule but underscored the technology's immaturity and market disincentives at the time, with no subsequent nodule production operations using the ship.

Conversion to Conventional Drillship

Following the failure of commercial deep-sea operations in the late , the Glomar Explorer was decommissioned and placed in reserve status by the U.S. Navy, remaining largely inactive for nearly two decades. In July 1996, the vessel was leased to Global Marine Drilling Company for commercial exploitation, with the Navy withdrawing custody in November 1996 to facilitate modifications. This marked the initiation of a major refit to repurpose the ship from its original heavy-lift and configuration into a conventional deepwater capable of oil and gas exploration. The conversion, undertaken by Global Marine at a in , involved extensive structural alterations, including the installation of a drilling derrick, mud systems, riser handling equipment, and upgrades to enable operations in water depths exceeding 7,500 feet. The project, lasting approximately 15 months, cost between $180 million and $200 million, transforming the vessel into what was then the world's largest with a drilling capacity to 30,000 feet below the . Upon completion in the first quarter of 1998, the ship—renamed GSF Explorer after Global Marine's merger with Santa Fe Drilling—entered a 30-year with the for an annual fee of $1 million, allowing GlobalSantaFe to deploy it for exploratory in regions like the . These modifications leveraged the vessel's existing robust and features, originally designed for Azorian's operations, but removed specialized and apparatus such as the large moon pool's heavy- piping systems in favor of standard rotary drilling rigs and preventers suited to . The refit enabled the Explorer to achieve record water depths for drilling, including preparations for wells in 8,000-foot depths shortly after reactivation, demonstrating its viability in ultradeep environments where traditional semi-submersibles were limited. Despite initial shakedown issues, the converted contributed to advancements in deepwater technology, operating commercially for over 15 years before economic pressures from falling oil prices led to its idling.

Ownership Changes and Scrapping

Following Project Azorian's completion in 1974, the Glomar Explorer reverted to commercial control under , a between ' and Global Marine Inc., its nominal builders and operators for the mining cover story. The vessel conducted limited deep-sea polymetallic nodule mining trials in the Pacific, but these operations yielded insufficient economic viability due to low metal prices and technological challenges, leading to its idling by the early . In 1996, the ship's unique recovery systems, including the dynamic positioning thrusters and mechanisms designed for salvage, were dismantled to facilitate into a conventional offshore capable of and gas . Ownership evolved through industry consolidations: Global Marine, the original commercial partner, merged into International in 1989 to form Global Marine (later GlobalSantaFe Corporation), which integrated the vessel into its fleet under the name GSF Explorer. This entity then merged with Ltd. in 2007, transferring full ownership to the Swiss-based drilling giant, under whose flag the GSF Explorer undertook deepwater drilling contracts worldwide until declining rig demand. By April 2015, amid a global oil price collapse that reduced activity, Transocean decommissioned the aging vessel—then over 40 years old—and listed it for disposal alongside other assets. The GSF Explorer was sold to an undisclosed buyer for scrapping later that year, with dismantling completed at a facility in , marking the end of its operational life as a pioneering but ultimately surplus deep-sea platform.

Assessments and Controversies

Technical Achievements and Limitations

The Glomar Explorer featured pioneering deep-sea engineering tailored for , including a massive measuring approximately 199 feet by 42 feet (60.7 by 12.8 meters), which allowed for the deployment of a heavy-lift pipe string up to 17,000 feet (5,200 meters) long to lower the "" capture vehicle—a claw-like grapple designed to secure and elevate payloads weighing up to 2,000 short tons (1,800 metric tons). This system integrated hydraulic tensioners and heave compensators to counteract from up to 20 feet (6 meters), ensuring stable pipe handling and preventing overload during ascent. Complementing these was an advanced system using multiple thrusters for precise station-keeping over the target site, critical for operations in the Pacific's variable currents and swells at depths of 16,500 feet (5,000 meters). These innovations advanced heavy-lift and recovery technologies, earning the vessel designation as a landmark for demonstrating feasible deep-ocean salvage under covert conditions. However, the 1974 mission exposed critical limitations in the recovery apparatus's robustness. On July 17, while lifting the Soviet K-129, the capture vehicle's claws failed around 8,500 feet (2,600 meters) from the surface due to excessive stress from an unanticipated snag on an underwater ridge, causing the hull to fracture and only the forward 38-foot (12-meter) section—containing two torpedoes but no ballistic missiles—to be retrieved. Declassified analyses cited in real-time monitoring and adjustment of the lift parameters, alongside inherent design vulnerabilities in the grapple's structural integrity under dynamic, high-tensile loads exceeding 3 million pounds (1.4 million kilograms). The extreme pressures, on the pipe string, and imprecise mapping further compounded operational challenges, revealing that while the system excelled in controlled descent and initial engagement, it lacked redundancy for brittle failures or geological surprises at such depths. These shortcomings highlighted broader constraints of deep-sea technology, including material fatigue in extended pipe assemblies and the difficulty of scaling mining-derived tools for irregular, fragile targets like a submerged , ultimately preventing full recovery and necessitating mission cancellation after security compromises.

Fiscal and Ethical Critiques

The operation, encompassing the , , and deployment of the Glomar Explorer, required expenditures totaling approximately $500 million in 1974 dollars, with some estimates reaching $800 million when including ancillary costs and adjustments for to over $3 billion in present-day value. derived primarily from classified CIA budgets, funneled through front companies and private partnerships, such as with ' , to maintain as a commercial deep-sea venture. This scale of —comparable to major contemporary programs like early space missions—drew scrutiny for its opacity, as budget oversight was limited to a handful of congressional figures, bypassing broader legislative review amid post-Vietnam . Fiscal critiques centered on the operation's cost-benefit imbalance, given the partial of Soviet K-129's forward section (about 38 feet long) in 1974, which yielded six crew bodies, torpedo components, and acoustic data but no intact nuclear missiles, encryption devices, or codebooks essential for gains. Mechanical failure during lift-off, attributed to collapse, limited the haul and prompted a scaled-back follow-on effort (Project Matador) that recovered only debris, further on the initial outlay. Detractors, including congressional auditors in the wake of intelligence reforms, highlighted how the project's engineering innovations, while pioneering and heavy-lift systems, prioritized speculative over proven intelligence methods like signals , rendering it a "lavish waste" in an era of tightening federal budgets. Adjusted for opportunity costs, the funds could have supported multiple operations or domestic priorities, underscoring systemic risks in unchecked classified spending where success metrics remained unverifiable. Ethically, Project Azorian exemplified tensions between operational secrecy and democratic oversight, as the CIA deceived by restricting briefings to select members of intelligence committees while concealing the true purpose from broader appropriations processes, fueling accusations of executive branch circumvention of constitutional checks. The fabricated cover story of mining, propagated through Hughes' public persona, extended to misleading media and contractors, culminating in the 1975 exposure by journalist Jack Anderson, which the agency countered with the novel "neither confirm nor deny" () response to Act requests—a later institutionalized but criticized for eroding . This opacity contributed to the broader 1975 investigations into CIA abuses, where Azorian's high-stakes gamble—undertaken without Soviet territorial violation but risking escalation—raised questions of proportionality in covert actions, particularly as partial yields failed to justify endangering U.S.-Soviet . Proponents defended the ethical imperatives of intelligence innovation amid threats, yet the operation's reliance on private-sector complicity and post-hoc justifications amplified concerns over accountability in taxpayer-funded espionage.

Strategic Impact and Long-Term Legacy

Project Azorian, executed via the Glomar Explorer in 1974, underscored U.S. technological superiority in deep-sea salvage during the , enabling the of a 38-foot section of the Soviet K-129 from 16,500 feet below the surface. This partial success—yielding two nuclear-armed torpedoes, six crew remains, and structural insights into Soviet Golf II-class vessels—provided valuable on design and operations, though key elements like codebooks and missiles eluded retrieval due to structural failure during lift. Strategically, the operation affirmed American resolve to pursue high-risk gains, potentially deterring Soviet undersea deployments by demonstrating covert capabilities, even as its $800 million cost (equivalent to approximately $5.1 billion in 2024 dollars) highlighted fiscal trade-offs in covert action prioritization. The mission's 1975 exposure by journalists, amid post-Watergate scrutiny, amplified of intelligence activities, contributing to the Committee's investigations and temporary erosion of CIA operational autonomy. This revelation strained U.S.-Soviet strategic posturing indirectly, as Soviet surveillance of the Explorer ceased further attempts but publicized U.S. audacity, fostering mutual wariness in ocean-floor domains without altering core deterrence dynamics. In legacy, Project Azorian pioneered heavy-lift systems, such as the hydraulic claw "Clementine" and Sun 800 crane, which evolved into tools like the Chesapeake 1000—deployed in 2024 for recovering wreckage from the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse—advancing global marine salvage and subsea engineering standards. The ensuing "Glomar response" doctrine—"neither confirm nor deny"—established a enduring legal precedent for shielding national security information under FOIA, invoked routinely in declassification disputes to this day. While accelerating commercial deep-sea mining prototypes, the project's innovations influenced offshore drilling transitions but underscored limits of classified megaprojects, prioritizing empirical engineering over full strategic yields.

References

  1. [1]
    Project AZORIAN - CIA
    The ship would be called the Hughes Glomar Explorer, ostensibly a commercial deep-sea mining vessel ostensibly built and owned by billionaire Howard Hughes, who ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] PROJECT AZORIAN: THE STORY OF THE HUGHES GLOMAR ...
    In March 1975, columnist Jack Anderson disclosed the existence of the Hughes. Glomar Explorer (HGE) project on national television and radio. The original press.
  3. [3]
    Project Azorian: The CIA's Declassified History of the Glomar Explorer
    Feb 12, 2010 · Today the National Security Archive publishes "Project Azorian: The Story of the Hughes Glomar Explorer," a 50-page article from the fall 1985 ...
  4. [4]
    The Glomar Explorer
    The twin screw, diesel-electric powered GLOMAR EXPLORER is a ship-shaped vessel with an exceptional number of innovative technical features (see Table 1-1).Missing: USNS | Show results with:USNS
  5. [5]
    Secret History of Drill Ship Glomar Explorer
    Construction began in 1972 by Sun Shipbuilding and Drydock Company in a Delaware River facility south of Philadelphia. Hughes' $350 million (about $261 billion ...
  6. [6]
    Project Jennifer / Hughes Glomar Explorer
    Oct 15, 2012 · Hughes Glomar Explorer. The Hughes Glomar Explorer [HGE] was built in 1973 by Sun Shipbuilding and Drydock Co. for an intricate CIA undertaking.<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Hughes Glomar Explorer - ASME
    The Hughes Glomar Explorer was designed to lift 2000-ton Soviet submarine 17 K feet from the bottom of the Pacific Ocean & also is recognized as ASME ...
  8. [8]
    Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
    ... Project AZORIAN: The Story of the Hughes Glomar Explorer” that described the origins and execution of the mission. (“Project AZORIAN: The Story of the ...Missing: development | Show results with:development
  9. [9]
    186. Memorandum to the Chairman of the 40 Committee (Kissinger)
    The AZORIAN Program recovery platform, HUGHES GLOMAR EXPLORER, ostensibly a deep ocean mining vessel, completed a series of extensive system tests and crew ...
  10. [10]
    Project Azorian: The CIA's Quest to Steal a Soviet Submarine
    May 2, 2024 · “Project Azorian remains an engineering marvel, advancing the state of the art in deep-ocean mining and heavy-lift technology.” glomar explorer.
  11. [11]
    The Loss—and the Mysteries—of the K-129 | Naval History
    Near the end of Project Azorian's disassembly of the K-129's retrieved remains, there was one large air flask on the Hughes Glomar Explorer's well deck that ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    The CIA Mission to Raise a Soviet Sub - ADST.org
    Dubbed Project Azorian, the plan was to build a special ship that would, under the cover story of deep-sea mining, covertly raise the K-129 and recover its ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Glomar Explorer and Polymetallic Nodule Mining - Facebook
    Apr 2, 2024 · The ship would be called the Hughes Glomar Explorer, ostensibly a commercial deep-sea mining vessel ostensibly built and owned by ...Interesting ship. GSF Explorer, formerly USNS Hughes Glomar ...Hughes Glomar Explorer was constructed in the early 1970s by Sun ...More results from www.facebook.com
  14. [14]
    Ocean Minerals Recovered From Floor Of Pacific By OMCO
    OMCO has leased the mining ship Glomar Explorer and plans to conduct initial development operations with a test miner later this year. At the start of these ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Deep-Ocean Mining Technology III: Developments - ISOPE
    3), OMCO developed a second-generation large-scale deep-ocean test mining system and tested it with the Hughes Glomar Explorer (Fig. 1) by conducting 2 at-sea ...
  16. [16]
    An Advanced Design Deep Sea Mining System - OnePetro
    May 4, 1981 · In October and November 1978, an advanced design deep sea mining system was tested on the ocean floor at approximately 5000 meters depth.
  17. [17]
    OTC 4094 AN ADVANCED DESIGN DEEP SEA MINING SYSTEM
    In October and November 1978, an advanced design deep sea mining system was tested on the ocean floor· at approximately. 5000 meters depth. The test was ...
  18. [18]
    Steeped in history, Glomar Explorer finally returns to industry | Offshore
    During this period, Global Marine did operate the vessel from 1978-1980 for legitimate deep-ocean mining tests in water depths up to 17,000 ft. Commercial ...
  19. [19]
    USS Glomar Explorer (AG 193) Class - Shipscribe
    In this reincarnation, the vessel was capable of drilling in depths up to 11,500 feet (3,500 meters). At the time, this was 2,000 feet (610 meters) deeper than ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  20. [20]
    Glomar Explorer being prepared for well in 8,000 ft depths | Offshore
    The Glomar Explorer, shrugging off early shakedown problems, sets its sights on a well in 8,000-ft water depths. The Glomar Explorer wasted little time in ...
  21. [21]
    Glomar Explorer - Deep Sea Mining
    Jun 8, 2023 · Glomar Explorer was a key component of Project Azorian, and it was a specially designed for the sole purpose of recovering the sunken Soviet ...
  22. [22]
    Submerged - Michigan Engineering News
    Feb 28, 2020 · Explorer featured three major elements: the vessel itself (built by Sun Shipbuilding); the heavy-lift pipe string (built by Lockheed); and the ...Missing: USNS | Show results with:USNS
  23. [23]
    Former CIA Spy Ship Hughes Glomar Explorer Sold for Scrap
    repurposed in the late 1990s as an offshore oil exploration platform — is a coda of what could ...
  24. [24]
    Grand Finale for Infamous Glomar Explorer - Part 1
    Jun 18, 2015 · The Glomar Explorer returned to Long Beach in September 1974 with a number of crates recovered from the sub. The sub itself was transported to ...
  25. [25]
    During the Cold War, the CIA Secretly Plucked a Soviet Submarine ...
    May 10, 2019 · The International Spy Museum details the audacious plan that involved a reclusive billionaire, a 618-foot-long ship, and a great deal of stealth.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  26. [26]
    Human Error Is Cited In'74 Glomar Failure - The New York Times
    Dec 9, 1976 · The Central Intelligence Agency's attempt in July 1974 to salvage a Soviet submarine failed when an error in judgment resulted in damage to prongs of a huge ...Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
  27. [27]
    The Glomar Explorer: what we can confirm and deny about “vast ...
    Sep 27, 2023 · It's the declassified report from the CIA describing the broad strokes of the operation (you can also find it by just searching for project ...
  28. [28]
    The Exposing of Project AZORIAN - CIA
    Mar 17, 2020 · The report revealed the truth about the Glomar Explorer and its connection to a secret intelligence operation.
  29. [29]
    Project Azorian: A CIA Mystery - The 1440 Review
    Jan 15, 2024 · If the wreck of K-129 could be recovered, US intelligence would get the chance to examine the R-21 missiles, T-5 torpedoes, codebooks, sonar, ...Missing: background objectives
  30. [30]
    “Neither Confirm Nor Deny:” The History of the Glomar Response ...
    Feb 11, 2014 · As Project Azorian developed, Seymour Hersh sniffed a story, but the CIA successfully convinced The New York Times to suppress publication. A ...
  31. [31]
    The secret on the ocean floor - BBC News
    Feb 19, 2018 · But amid all the excited public relations, there was one small hitch - the whole expedition was a lie. This was a Cold War deception on a ...
  32. [32]
    Cold War Spy Crane Aids Disaster Recovery Today - CIA
    Aug 14, 2024 · The Glomar Explorer arrived over the recovery site on July 4, 1974, and conducted salvage operations for more than a month under total secrecy— ...
  33. [33]
    The CIA Worked With Billionaire Howard Hughes to Recover Soviet ...
    Aug 1, 2021 · An enduring legacy of Project Azorian was the "Glomar Response," a bit of legalese devised by the CIA in response to a Freedom of ...