Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

IEEE 802.11ac-2013

IEEE 802.11ac-2013 is an amendment to the standard for wireless local area networks (WLANs), published on December 18, 2013, that enhances the (MAC) sublayer and physical layers (PHYs) to deliver significantly higher basic service set () throughput, particularly for typical client devices, while operating in license-exempt bands below 6 GHz. This standard, also known as 5, primarily targets the 5 GHz frequency band and introduces key improvements over its predecessor, IEEE 802.11n, including wider channel bandwidths of up to 160 MHz, support for up to eight spatial streams via multiple-input multiple-output () technology, and higher-order modulation using 256-quadrature amplitude modulation (256-QAM) for increased and data rates exceeding 3.5 Gbps. The amendment enables (MU-MIMO), allowing access points to communicate simultaneously with multiple devices, which reduces latency and boosts capacity in dense environments such as offices, homes, and public hotspots. It also incorporates advanced techniques to direct signals more precisely toward client devices, improving range and reliability without requiring additional hardware on the . These enhancements support emerging applications like streaming, online gaming, and large file transfers, addressing the growing demand for bandwidth-intensive and data services in WLANs. As Amendment 4 to IEEE Std 802.11™-2012, IEEE 802.11ac-2013 has been widely adopted in consumer and enterprise networking equipment, paving the way for subsequent standards like IEEE 802.11ax (), while remaining backward-compatible with earlier 802.11 variants to ensure seamless integration in mixed-device ecosystems. Its focus on very high throughput (VHT) PHY operations has significantly influenced the evolution of technology, enabling gigabit-speed wireless connectivity for billions of devices worldwide.

Introduction

Overview

IEEE 802.11ac-2013 is an amendment to the IEEE 802.11-2012 standard, published on December 18, 2013, that operates exclusively in the 5 GHz band to enhance the (WLAN) by enabling significantly higher data rates. The primary goals of this amendment are to deliver basic service set () data rates exceeding 1 Gbps at the () () and to support denser user environments through overall improvements. IEEE 802.11ac introduces Very High Throughput (VHT) capabilities and is branded as Wi-Fi 5 by the . It ensures backward compatibility with earlier standards, including IEEE 802.11n and IEEE 802.11a, allowing seamless integration in mixed environments.

History and Development

The development of the IEEE 802.11ac-2013 standard originated from the need to exceed the throughput limits of its predecessor, IEEE 802.11n, which supported peak rates up to approximately 600 Mbps using multiple-input multiple-output () technology in both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. In response, the initiated efforts to define Very High Throughput (VHT) capabilities, focusing on enhancements primarily in the 5 GHz spectrum to enable gigabit-level (WLAN) performance while adhering to regulatory constraints on unlicensed spectrum usage, such as those outlined by the (FCC) for wider channel bandwidths. The VHT Study Group was formally established in May 2007 during an plenary session to evaluate usage models, models, and technical requirements for VHT systems below 6 GHz, with an emphasis on and . This group conducted analyses over several meetings, culminating in the approval of a Project Authorization Request (PAR) and Criteria for Standards Development (CSD) in September 2008, which led to the formation of Task Group (TGac) to draft the amendment. Key industry participants, including and , contributed significantly through technical proposals on extensions, , and schemes, influencing the group's direction toward practical high-throughput implementations. TGac released its first draft, version D0.1, in early 2011, following initial proposal presentations and evaluations that prioritized 5 GHz operation to leverage available spectrum without the interference challenges of 2.4 GHz. The drafting process involved iterative letter ballots, comment resolutions, and refinements across multiple versions (D1.0 through D7.0), addressing technical complexities like and wider channels while ensuring interoperability. The Wi-Fi Alliance supported early adoption by launching its pre-certification program for Wave 1 devices in June 2013, based on Draft 3.0, which allowed manufacturers to test and ship compatible products ahead of final standardization. The achieved final on December 18, 2013, as IEEE Std 802.11ac-2013, marking a significant evolution in WLAN standards by emphasizing VHT in the 5 GHz band and incorporating lessons from prior amendments like 802.11n's . This timeline reflected collaborative industry input and regulatory alignment, enabling rapid market deployment of higher-speed solutions.

Technical Specifications

Physical Layer Enhancements

The IEEE 802.11ac-2013 standard defines operation exclusively in the 5 GHz frequency , utilizing the UNII-1 (5.15–5.25 GHz), UNII-2 (5.25–5.35 GHz), UNII-2 Extended (5.47–5.725 GHz), and UNII-3 (5.725–5.85 GHz) sub-bands to enable higher throughput while avoiding the 2.4 GHz band used in prior standards. Support for channel bandwidths of 20 MHz, 40 MHz, and 80 MHz is mandatory for all stations, whereas 160 MHz contiguous and 80+80 MHz non-contiguous configurations are optional, allowing for greater in environments with sufficient available spectrum. These channel widths build on (OFDM) techniques from earlier amendments, but with refinements to accommodate wider bandwidths without increasing susceptibility to interference. A key enhancement is the introduction of 256-quadrature amplitude modulation (256-QAM), which replaces the 64-QAM used in 802.11n and encodes 8 bits per compared to 6 bits per symbol, thereby increasing data density by approximately 33% under suitable conditions. This scheme is supported across all channel bandwidths, with optional coding rates of 3/4 and 5/6 to balance robustness and throughput. In conjunction with OFDM refinements, 802.11ac employs 234 data subcarriers for 80 MHz channels and 468 data subcarriers for 160 MHz channels, enabling finer granularity in signal distribution and higher raw data rates. Additionally, an optional shorter of 400 ns is provided (versus the 800 ns standard in 802.11n), which reduces overhead between OFDM symbols and can improve efficiency by about 10% in low-delay-spread environments. To support advanced multiple-input multiple-output () configurations, 802.11ac extends the maximum number of spatial streams to 8, doubling the 4 supported in 802.11n and allowing access points to serve more simultaneous data paths. Channel estimation for these streams is facilitated by the very high throughput long training field (VHT-LTF), a dedicated sequence that enables precise and pilot subcarrier tracking at the . The VHT-LTF design ensures accurate estimation across up to 8 streams, with variants for full and compressed sounding to minimize overhead while maintaining estimation fidelity. These PHY modifications collectively contribute to the standard's goal of gigabit-level throughput, integrating with MAC-layer mechanisms for end-to-end performance gains.

Medium Access Control Improvements

The IEEE 802.11ac-2013 amendment introduces Very High Throughput (VHT) variant frames to the MAC layer, enabling devices to signal and negotiate advanced capabilities specific to high-throughput operations in the 5 GHz band. These include management frames such as the VHT Capabilities element, which advertises supported features like maximum channel bandwidth (up to 160 MHz), spatial stream configurations (up to 8), and short guard interval options, allowing stations to align on compatible parameters during association. Similarly, the VHT Operation element conveys operational details, including the current operating channel width, center frequency segments for wider channels, and basic VHT-MIMO support, facilitating dynamic adaptation to network conditions without disrupting legacy compatibility. These enhancements build on 802.11n frame structures by adding VHT-specific information elements, ensuring seamless integration while optimizing for increased data rates. To support directional transmission efficiency, 802.11ac-2013 incorporates standardized procedures for single-user feedback at the level, relying on explicit to refine antenna weights. The process begins with a beamformer station transmitting a Null Data Packet Announcement (NDPA) , followed by a Null Data Packet (NDP) for probing; the beamformee then responds with a VHT Compressed Beamforming frame containing quantized , enabling the beamformer to adjust transmissions for better signal focus and reduced . This closed-loop mechanism improves single-user performance by providing precise feedback matrices, with compression techniques reducing overhead compared to uncompressed alternatives in prior standards. intervals can be negotiated via the VHT Capabilities element, ensuring feedback is refreshed as conditions vary. A key MAC efficiency gain in 802.11ac-2013 is the expansion of the maximum Aggregate Protocol Unit (A-MPDU) length to 1,048,575 octets, a significant increase from the 65,535-octet limit in 802.11n, which allows for larger frame aggregations and reduced protocol overhead in high-throughput scenarios. This extension supports the aggregation of multiple Protocol Units (MPDUs) into a single physical frame, with each MPDU now capable of reaching up to 11,454 octets, minimizing inter-frame spacing and acknowledgment delays to boost effective throughput. All VHT transmissions are mandated to use A-MPDU aggregation, even for single MPDUs, ensuring consistent gains across varying traffic loads. For protecting transmissions over wider channels, 802.11ac-2013 enhances mechanisms to handle bandwidths up to 80 MHz (and optionally 160 MHz), incorporating VHT variants that allow clear-to-send (CTS) responses on idle sub-channels only. An frame transmitted over the full channel width prompts the recipient to assess each 20 MHz sub-channel; it then replies with CTS frames selectively on clear sub-channels, enabling partial-bandwidth while avoiding unnecessary blocking of adjacent traffic. This dynamic reduces collision risks in mixed environments, where narrower devices might occupy portions of the wider VHT channel, and integrates with the operating channel information from VHT elements for precise coordination.

Key Features

Mandatory Features

IEEE 802.11ac-2013 operates exclusively in the 5 GHz frequency band to enable higher throughput capabilities, distinguishing it from previous standards that supported multiple bands. All compliant devices must support channel widths of 20 MHz, 40 MHz, and 80 MHz within this band to ensure and with legacy 802.11 systems. Additionally, a minimum of one spatial stream is required for very high throughput (VHT) stations, forming the baseline for single-user multiple-input multiple-output (SU-MIMO) operations that enhance signal reliability and data rates. The standard mandates binary convolutional coding (BCC) as the forward error correction mechanism across VHT modulation and coding scheme (MCS) indices 0 through 7, with coding rates of 1/2, 3/4, 2/3, and 5/6, using up to 64-quadrature amplitude modulation (). Low-density parity-check () coding is optional for these indices and provides improved performance over BCC, particularly in high-throughput scenarios. Single-user MIMO (SU-MIMO) is a mandatory feature, enabling one access point to communicate with a single station using multiple spatial for increased throughput and range. This is signaled through VHT capabilities. To maintain with earlier 802.11 protocols, VHT-specific preambles and signaling (SIG) fields are mandatory, including the VHT-SIG-A and VHT-SIG-B fields that convey essential parameters like channel width, spatial , and MCS . These fields are transmitted in the VHT following legacy short training fields (STF) and long training fields (LTF), allowing non-VHT devices to detect and defer to 802.11ac transmissions while enabling VHT devices to decode advanced signaling for coordinated operation.

Optional Features

IEEE 802.11ac-2013 introduces several optional features that enable higher performance in wireless local area networks, allowing implementers to extend capabilities beyond mandatory requirements for enhanced throughput, efficiency, and user capacity. These features are not required for standard compliance but can significantly boost when supported by both access points and stations. A key optional enhancement is 256-quadrature (256-QAM), allowing for denser constellation mapping and up to 33% higher compared to the 64-QAM used in prior amendments. This modulation is available for VHT MCS indices 8 and 9, with coding rates of 3/4 and 5/6. Downlink multi-user multiple-input multiple-output (MU-MIMO) permits an access point to simultaneously transmit distinct data streams to up to four client stations using spatial streams. This capability improves in multi-device environments by multiplexing users in the downlink direction, with inter-user interference prevented through nulling and standard guard intervals of 0.4 μs or 0.8 μs to accommodate minor timing differences among recipients. Channel bandwidth options extend beyond the mandatory 80 MHz to include 160 MHz contiguous channels, effectively doubling the available for higher rates. Complementing this, 80+80 MHz non-contiguous bonding allows two separate 80 MHz s to operate as a virtual 160 MHz , providing flexibility in spectrum-constrained deployments while maintaining wide effective . Support for up to eight spatial streams represents another elective advancement over the four streams in prior standards, enabling greater parallelism and proportional increases in throughput for compatible devices. Explicit transmit is an optional method where the transmitter uses feedback from the receiver to direct signals, improving link quality without relying on legacy implicit methods. This mechanism enhances SU-MIMO efficiency and is signaled through VHT capabilities. Implicit is an optional transmit beamforming method that directs antenna patterns toward client locations using derived solely from received signals, without needing explicit from the client. This improves signal strength and range, particularly for 802.11 devices, by focusing energy without additional overhead. VHT Transmit Power Save (VHT TXOP PS) provides an optional mechanism for very high throughput stations, allowing them to enter a low-power doze state during unscheduled portions of an access point's transmit opportunity. This feature enhances battery efficiency in client devices by reducing time while maintaining compatibility with aggregated frame transmissions.

Deployment Phases

Wave 1

The began certifying the first generation of IEEE 802.11ac devices, known as Wave 1, in June 2013, using IEEE Draft 3.0 of the as the baseline for and testing. This initial certification phase focused on establishing reliable high-throughput in the 5 GHz band, enabling manufacturers to ship compatible products ahead of the full ratification later that year. Wave 1 devices emphasized foundational enhancements over 802.11n, prioritizing stable deployment in diverse environments without introducing the more complex features planned for subsequent phases. Key limitations in Wave 1 included a maximum channel bandwidth of 80 MHz and support for up to three spatial streams, which constrained the overall system capacity compared to later expansions. These devices exclusively implemented single-user (SU-), allowing an access point to communicate with one client at a time across multiple streams, and supporting explicit single-user to improve signal focus and range for that individual . Such configurations delivered an aggregate maximum PHY-layer throughput of approximately 1.3 Gbps under optimal conditions, leveraging 256-QAM modulation and a 5/6 coding rate per stream. This performance level was particularly suited for access points serving high-density user scenarios and routers handling streaming, marking a threefold improvement over typical 802.11n deployments. Certification testing by the rigorously verified interoperability with legacy 802.11n devices, ensuring seamless coexistence and in mixed-network environments through shared mechanisms like dynamic bandwidth selection. This emphasis on compatibility facilitated widespread adoption by confirming that Wave 1 products could integrate into existing infrastructures without disrupting prior generations. Overall, Wave 1 laid the groundwork for 802.11ac's market entry, balancing innovation with proven reliability for both professional and home use.

Wave 2

Wave 2 represents the advanced certification phase of the IEEE 802.11ac standard, launched by the in June 2016 to incorporate higher-capacity features that enhance beyond the initial Wave 1 rollout. Building briefly on Wave 1's single-user foundation, Wave 2 emphasizes multi-device efficiency through expanded bandwidth and concurrent transmission capabilities. A primary enhancement in Wave 2 is the support for 160 MHz channel widths, which doubles the spectrum availability compared to the 80 MHz limit in Wave 1, enabling greater data throughput for bandwidth-intensive applications. Devices certified under Wave 2 also support up to four spatial streams, allowing access points to deliver multiple parallel data streams to individual clients for improved peak speeds. Downlink multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO) stands out as a core Wave 2 feature, permitting access points to transmit independent data streams to multiple clients simultaneously, rather than sequentially as in single-user modes. This is paired with multi-user , which refines signal directionality to target multiple devices precisely, reducing and boosting overall capacity. These advancements enable aggregate throughputs reaching 3.5 Gbps while accommodating more simultaneous devices, making it particularly effective for dense deployments like conference centers or public venues. The Alliance's Wave 2 certification program expanded testing protocols to validate these features, ensuring interoperability across vendors and fostering ecosystem-wide adoption, with early certified products from companies such as and .

Performance Characteristics

Data Rate Calculations

The data rate in IEEE 802.11ac, known as Very High Throughput (VHT), is computed using the (PHY) service data rate formula, which accounts for key parameters such as the number of data subcarriers, modulation scheme, coding rate, number of spatial streams, and OFDM symbol duration including the (). The base equation for the PHY data rate R in Mbps is given by: R = \frac{N_{SD} \times N_{BPSCS} \times r \times N_{SS}}{T_{SYM}} where N_{SD} is the number of data subcarriers, N_{BPSCS} is the number of bits per subcarrier per spatial stream (determined by the and scheme or MCS), r is the coding rate, N_{SS} is the number of spatial streams, and T_{SYM} is the OFDM duration in microseconds (including ). This formula derives from the OFDM structure defined in the standard, where data is encoded across subcarriers within each period. For an 80 MHz channel, which is mandatory in 802.11ac, N_{SD} = 234 data subcarriers are used, supporting up to 256-QAM modulation (N_{BPSCS} = 8 bits per subcarrier) with coding rates ranging from 1/2 to 5/6 depending on the MCS index. The OFDM symbol duration T_{SYM} is 4 μs with the mandatory long GI of 0.8 μs added to the 3.2 μs useful symbol time, or 3.6 μs with the optional short GI of 0.4 μs to reduce overhead and increase throughput in low-delay-spread environments. The standard defines 10 MCS indices (0 through 9) for VHT, mapping to specific and combinations: MCS 0 uses BPSK with 1/2 rate (1 bit/subcarrier), MCS 1 BPSK 3/4 (1 bit), MCS 2 QPSK 1/2 (2 bits), MCS 3 QPSK 3/4 (2 bits), MCS 4 16-QAM 1/2 (4 bits), MCS 5 16-QAM 3/4 (4 bits), MCS 6 64-QAM 2/3 (6 bits), MCS 7 64-QAM 3/4 (6 bits), MCS 8 256-QAM 3/4 (8 bits), and MCS 9 256-QAM 5/6 (8 bits). For example, at MCS 9 with 1 spatial stream and 80 MHz channel using short , the rate is R = \frac{234 \times 8 \times (5/6) \times 1}{3.6} = 433.3 Mbps, calculated as 1560 information bits per divided by the 3.6 μs symbol time. Rates scale linearly with N_{SS} up to 8 streams and channel width; for instance, doubling to 160 MHz uses 468 data subcarriers, yielding approximately 866.7 Mbps for the same MCS 9, 1 stream, and short configuration. In practice, the achievable throughput is lower than the PHY rate due to MAC layer overheads, including frame aggregation (A-MPDU and A-MSDU), preambles, and acknowledgments, which reduce to approximately 80-90% under typical conditions with effective aggregation. This efficiency factor accounts for the protocol's CSMA/CA access method and variable packet sizes, ensuring the formula provides a foundational PHY estimate rather than end-to-end performance.

Theoretical and Advertised Speeds

The IEEE 802.11ac-2013 standard achieves a theoretical peak data rate of 6.93 Gbps, realized through 8x8 configuration, 160 MHz channel bandwidth, and modulation coding scheme (MCS) 9 with 256-QAM. This maximum represents the upper limit under ideal conditions, leveraging up to eight spatial streams and advanced to support very high throughput applications. However, practical implementations in and devices rarely reach this ceiling due to constraints. Typical devices, such as points and clients, cap at around 3.5 Gbps using 4x4 and 160 MHz channels, aligning with the standard's focus on balanced performance for real deployments. Advertised speeds for Wave 1 points commonly highlight 1.3 Gbps, based on 3x3 and 80 MHz channels, as a benchmark for entry-level high-throughput . These figures emphasize PHY layer capabilities but overlook overheads like headers, acknowledgments, and contention , which reduce achievable throughput to 500-800 Mbps in typical environments with and multi-device usage. The short guard interval (400 ns) option further enhances rates by approximately 11% compared to the standard 800 ns interval, minimizing in low-delay scenarios; for instance, a 1x1 at 80 MHz and MCS 9 yields 433 Mbps with long GI but rises to 480 Mbps with short GI. In mixed networks including 802.11a/n devices, effective throughput often halves due to mandatory protection mechanisms (e.g., ) and increased airtime contention, prioritizing compatibility over peak performance.

Configurations and Use Cases

Supported Scenarios

IEEE 802.11ac-2013 enables robust performance in high-density environments, such as auditoriums and stadiums, where numerous devices compete for . By leveraging downlink (MU-MIMO), access points can simultaneously serve up to four users, mitigating and improving overall network efficiency in these crowded settings. The standard's emphasis on the 5 GHz band supports backhaul links and high-bandwidth streaming applications, including video and VoIP, by avoiding the congestion typically experienced in the 2.4 GHz used by devices. This spectral focus allows for wider channels and higher schemes, facilitating seamless delivery of latency-sensitive content in residential and office environments without disrupting existing 2.4 GHz operations. In enterprise settings, 802.11ac serves as a key upgrade from 802.11n, enabling faster offloading of traffic from wired networks to support bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies. This transition enhances capacity for mobile workers accessing cloud services and applications, reducing bottlenecks in environments with growing numbers of personal devices. For power-constrained devices like smartphones and tablets, 802.11ac introduces the Transmission Opportunity (TXOP) Power Save mode, which permits stations to enter a low-power state during portions of a TXOP when not actively transmitting or receiving. This mechanism optimizes battery life in always-on connections by aligning sleep periods with access point transmission opportunities, particularly beneficial for mobile users in prolonged sessions.

Example Configurations

In a typical setup, an 802.11ac access point (AP) configured as 3x3 operates on an 80 MHz channel using 256-QAM modulation to deliver a maximum PHY data rate of 1.3 Gbps across three spatial streams. However, since many laptops support only 2x2 , the effective link rate to these devices is limited to 867 Mbps. This configuration commonly coexists with legacy 802.11n clients, such as smartphones, which connect at lower rates on the same 5 GHz band while benefiting from the AP's . For enterprise environments, a 4x4 Wave 2 802.11ac AP utilizing 80 MHz channels and MU-MIMO can simultaneously serve up to four clients with one spatial stream each, achieving a total aggregate throughput of approximately 1.73 Gbps (433 Mbps per stream with 256-QAM). This setup supports over 20 clients in a high-density deployment by scheduling MU-MIMO transmissions in downlink to multiple devices, such as laptops and tablets, while downlink directs signals to reduce and improve efficiency. For broader coverage, the AP can handle additional clients via beyond the simultaneous group. In mesh network extensions, 802.11ac supports 80+80 MHz non-contiguous channel bonding to form a 160 MHz equivalent , allowing multiple to select separated 80 MHz segments in the 5 GHz spectrum for backhaul links with minimal overlap. This configuration is particularly useful in multi-AP deployments across large areas, where non-contiguous channels avoid from neighboring networks, enabling sustained high-throughput wireless bridging between nodes. A 2x2 client device connected to an 802.11ac AP on an 80 MHz channel can achieve peak real-world throughput of around 800 Mbps in low-interference conditions, approaching 90% of its 867 Mbps PHY rate due to minimal overhead and optimal signal strength. This performance is observed in controlled tests with short-range, line-of-sight connections, highlighting the standard's potential for high-speed applications like video streaming.

Comparisons and Legacy

With Predecessor Standards

IEEE 802.11ac-2013 builds upon the foundation of its predecessor, IEEE 802.11n ( 4), by introducing key enhancements that significantly improve and throughput. While 802.11n supported widths up to 40 MHz and operated in both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, 802.11ac focuses exclusively on the 5 GHz band and doubles the primary width to 80 MHz (with optional 160 MHz ), allowing for greater data capacity without the challenges of the crowded 2.4 GHz . Additionally, 802.11ac upgrades from 64-QAM in 802.11n to 256-QAM, packing 8 bits per symbol instead of 6 for a 33% increase in data density per transmission. The standard further expands spatial stream support from a maximum of 4 in 802.11n to 8 in 802.11ac, enabling more concurrent data paths via . To ensure with 802.11n and earlier devices, 802.11ac employs mixed-mode preambles that incorporate legacy signaling fields from the 802.11n high-throughput (HT) , allowing older clients to decode the physical header while newer devices process the enhanced very high throughput (VHT) fields. In environments with only 802.11ac-compliant devices, greenfield preambles—similar to those in 802.11n—can be used to eliminate legacy overhead and maximize efficiency, though mixed mode remains the default for mixed deployments to maintain . Relative to the earlier IEEE 802.11a standard, which pioneered 5 GHz operation in 1999 with single-input single-output (SISO) transmission limited to 20 MHz channels and speeds up to 54 Mbps, 802.11ac retains the 5 GHz focus but integrates absent in 802.11a, alongside much wider channel options up to 160 MHz. This shift from SISO to multi-stream , combined with advanced and inherited and refined from 802.11n, transforms 802.11ac into a high-capacity solution for bandwidth-intensive applications. In ideal conditions, these advancements yield throughput gains of 3 to 5 times over 802.11n, with theoretical maximums reaching 6.93 Gbps for 802.11ac compared to 600 Mbps for 802.11n, though real-world performance depends on configuration, distance, and interference. The combined effects of wider channels, denser , and more provide the primary drivers for this , enabling 802.11ac to address the growing demands of multi-device environments beyond what 802.11n or 802.11a could support.

With Successor Standards and Adoption

IEEE 802.11ac lacks several advancements introduced in its successor, IEEE 802.11ax (), which was ratified in 2019. Specifically, 802.11ac does not support (OFDMA) for efficient channel sharing among multiple devices, uplink multi-user multiple-input multiple-output (MU-MIMO) to enable simultaneous data uploads from clients, or 1024-QAM modulation to achieve denser data packing compared to 802.11ac's 256-QAM. These features in 802.11ax enhance and capacity, making it particularly suited for ultra-dense environments such as those involving numerous devices. In comparison to (Wi-Fi 7), standardized in 2024, 802.11ac omits multi-link operation (MLO), which aggregates multiple frequency bands for seamless connectivity and reduced latency, and support for 320 MHz channel widths, as 802.11ac is capped at 160 MHz. Wi-Fi 7 delivers theoretical throughput up to 46 Gbps—approximately four times that of 802.11ac's maximum—while also providing lower latency through enhanced puncturing and coordination mechanisms. As of the second quarter of 2025, Wi-Fi 7 accounted for 21.2% of market revenues in the enterprise dependent access point segment, with forecasts indicating it will represent over a third of indoor AP revenues for the full year. This means a substantial share of enterprise deployments still incorporate or rely on 802.11ac support amid gradual upgrades to and beyond. In consumer markets, 802.11ac adoption has declined more rapidly due to widespread shifts toward and 7, though it endures in budget-oriented routers and endpoints. Migrating from 802.11ac to successor standards presents challenges, including spectrum allocation conflicts, as and leverage the 6 GHz band unavailable to 802.11ac, necessitating careful coexistence planning in mixed environments. Furthermore, 802.11ac maintains relevance in industrial IoT settings, where its proven reliability in the 5 GHz band outweighs the adoption risks of newer protocols in mission-critical applications.

References

  1. [1]
    IEEE 802.11ac-2013
    This standard defines one medium access control (MAC) and several physical layer (PHY) specifications for wireless connectivity for fixed, portable, and moving ...
  2. [2]
    802.11ac-2013 | IEEE Standard - IEEE Xplore
    Dec 18, 2013 · The purpose of this amendment is to improve the IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network (WLAN) user experience by providing significantly higher basic service ...
  3. [3]
    The Evolution of Wi-Fi Technology and Standards - IEEE SA
    May 16, 2023 · IEEE 802.11ac™, or Wi-Fi 5, was introduced in 2013 to support data rates at up to 3.5 Gbit/s, with still-greater bandwidth, additional channels, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    What Is 802.11ac? - Cisco
    802.11ac is a Wi-Fi standard that delivers higher throughput to WLANs than 802.11n, the preceding Wi-Fi standard. The IEEE introduced 802.11ac in 2013.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] IEEE 802.11ac: From Channelization to Multi-User MIMO - Rice ECE
    In contrast to all previous amendments of the 802.11 standard,. 802.11ac is aimed at improving total network throughput as well as individual link perfor- mance ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  6. [6]
    [PDF] IEEE 802.11ac: The New Gigabit Wi-Fi Standard - IJESI
    802.11ac will be backward compatible with 802.11n networks operating in the range of 5GHz and offers improvements in Wi-Fi reliability, throughput and range.<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Gigabit wireless LANs: an overview of IEEE 802.11ac and 802.11ad.
    ... IEEE 802.11. initiated a new study group in May 2007 to. investigate “Very High Throughput (VHT)”. technologies. Initially the study group was started to.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] IEEE 802.11ac: What Does it Mean for Test? - LitePoint
    Introduction to 802.11ac. Late in 2008, a new task group (TG) was formed within the IEEE 802 Standards Committee with the goal of creating a new amendment.
  9. [9]
    IEEE P802.11 - TASK GROUP AC
    Complete draft D0.1 comments resolutions. Generate draft D1.0 and go to WG Letter Ballot. January 2011. Achievements. Agenda is available at January 2011 Agenda.
  10. [10]
    Wi-Fi Alliance launches 802.11ac certification program - CNET
    Jun 19, 2013 · The Wi-Fi Alliance announces its Wi-Fi Certified ac certification program, which aims to guarantee the interoperability of 802.11ac-enabled devices.Missing: wave | Show results with:wave
  11. [11]
    [PDF] 802.11ac In-Depth
    802.11ad and fast session transfer. 802.11ac is not the only very high throughput (Vht) protocol making its way through the Ieee 802.11 standards process.Missing: core | Show results with:core
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Impact of IEEE 802.11n/ac PHY/MAC High Throughput ...
    Feb 10, 2017 · 802.11ac is 866.7 Mbps that can be achieved with 256-QAM modulation type. The 256 QAM requires higher Signal to. Noise Ratio (SNR) than 64 ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 802.11ac: A Survival Guide
    The stand‐ ards effort for 802.11ad completed in late December 2012, shortly after this book went into early release. Although the standards effort for 802.11ac ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    wlanVHTLTF - Generate VHT-LTF waveform - MATLAB - MathWorks
    The VHT-LTF is used for MIMO channel estimation and pilot subcarrier tracking. ... IEEE Std 802.11ac-2013 Adapted and reprinted with permission from IEEE.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Very High Throughput (VHT) Multi-User Multiple Input Multiple ...
    802.11ac also specifies an explicit beamforming mechanism as a standard that enhances the MIMO systems and introduces a special communication mode called Very ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] IEEE802.11ac: The Next Evolution of Wi-Fi - Qualcomm
    The 802.11ac standard requires all devices to support 20, 40, and 80 MHz channel bandwidths in the 5GHz band, with support of. 160 MHz channel bandwidth being ...
  17. [17]
    IEEE 802.11ac – Optional and Required Features - CWNP
    Mar 7, 2014 · Required 802.11ac features include 40/80 MHz channels, VHT single-user MIMO, A-MPDU padding, and VHT single MPDU. Optional features include 160 ...Missing: 802.11ac-2013 | Show results with:802.11ac-2013
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Gigabit Wireless LAN: Enhancements in 802.11ac
    • MAC provides an A-MPDU that fills the frame to the last byte for each user. • L ... – Require that A-MPDU always be used with both SU and MU VHT frames.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Evolution of the IEEE 802.11AC Standard - ScanSource
    Interestingly, the only new mandatory features in the standard are VHT frame formats and support for 80MHz channels in the 5GHz band. All the other 802.11AC ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] The things they don't tell you about 802.11ac - Winncom Technologies
    In the 802.11ac standard, beamforming will remain an optional feature, but its implementation will be standardized and more widely adopted as a result. The ...
  21. [21]
    An Enhancement for IEEE 802.11 STA Power Saving and Access ...
    In addition, 802.11ac specification introduced Very High Throughput (VHT) Transmission Opportunity (TXOP) power save; in this mechanism, when any STA finds ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] What is 11ac? | Solwise
    802.11ac Wave 1​​ 11ac uses 433Mbps spatial streams (c.f. 11n which uses 150Mbps streams) and supports up to 3 spacial streams giving a maximum, theoretical PHY ...
  23. [23]
    Wi-Fi: Overview of the 802.11 Physical Layer and Transmitter ...
    IEEE 802.11ac (aka VHT, Very High Throughput) is a standard that provide throughput in the 5 GHz band. 802.11ac leverages 802.11n (and 802.11a) structure ...
  24. [24]
    Cisco First Publicly Announced Commercial Enterprise-class AP to ...
    Jun 20, 2013 · Yesterday the Wi-Fi Alliance (WFA) launched their new certification program for 802.11ac Wi-Fi to ensure that the devices have been tested ...
  25. [25]
    Wi-Fi Alliance launches 802.11ac Wave 2 certification
    Jun 29, 2016 · Other features included in the 802.11ac Wave 2 certification are: 160-megahertz channels: Maximum channel bandwidth in Wave 2 is increased from ...
  26. [26]
    Gigabit Wi-Fi at last? 802.11ac "wave 2" arrives | ZDNET
    Jul 11, 2016 · 802.11ac wave 2 looks like it might set a new speed record. Wave 2 brings to the table the following features, according to the Wi-Fi Alliance:.<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    [PDF] 802.11ac Wave 2 with MU-MIMO: The Next Mainstream Wi-Fi ...
    802.11ac Wave 2 provides better Wi-Fi, reduced congestion, lower power consumption, and is now shipping in many devices.Missing: mandatory | Show results with:mandatory
  28. [28]
    WiFi Alliance Announces New ac Certification Features - SNBForums
    Jun 29, 2016 · The first Wi-Fi CERTIFIED ac products to support new features and which comprise the test bed for interoperability certification are: Broadcom ...
  29. [29]
    How to interpret 802.11ac datarates - Cisco Community
    The data rate display format employed for 802.11ac is, Format: aX.YcZ X = mcs (modulation coding scheme) 0-9 Y = No of spatial streams, 1-3. Z = Bandwidth 2, 4 ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] LANCOM Whitepaper IEEE 802.11ac
    IEEE 802.11ac is a WLAN standard in the 5 GHz frequency band. With gross data rates beyond 1 Gbps, it offers a considerable performance gain compared.<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    IEEE 802.11ax: The Sixth Generation of Wi-Fi White Paper - Cisco
    With 802.11ac, the Wi-Fi channel (20, 40, 80, or 160 MHz) was broken down into a collection of smaller OFDM sub-channels to mitigate interference. At any given ...
  32. [32]
    802.11ac MCS rates - Cisco Community
    Jun 5, 2015 · 802.11ac transmit beam forming requires that all spatial streams be modulated identically. 802.11ac first wave devices have up to 3SS (spatial ...Missing: IEEE | Show results with:IEEE
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Wi-Fi Capacity Analysis for 802.11ac and 802.11n: Theory & Practice
    ... IEEE 802.11ac standard ... These parameters are presented in Figure 5, which provides a simple equation to calculate the physical layer data rate.
  34. [34]
    MAC level Throughput comparison: 802.11ac vs. 802.11n
    The 802.11ac standard improves the achieved Throughput compared to previous generations by introducing improvements and new features in the PHY and MAC layers.Missing: core | Show results with:core
  35. [35]
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6140087
  36. [36]
    Explanation of SonicPoint and Internal Wireless advanced settings
    Mar 26, 2020 · ... interval to 400ns, can give you an increased data rate of 11%. 802.11a/b/g requires guard interval (GI) to be 800 ns. From 802.11n and the ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Evaluating 802.11ac Features in Indoor WLAN - Disney Research
    Oct 3, 2016 · In this paper we present and discuss the design and evaluation of two indoor WLAN testbeds as a mean to collect measurements and characterize ...Missing: mixed halve<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Very High-Density 802.11ac Networks Planning Guide VRD
    If you have an existing 802.11n deployment, consider upgrading your high-density locations to 802.11ac now, regardless of your anticipated timing for the ...
  39. [39]
    Products - Cisco Unified Wireless Network Solution Guide
    Rx SOP helps to optimize network performance in high-density deployments, such as stadiums and auditoriums, where access points need to optimize the nearest and ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Understanding the IEEE 802.11ac Wi-Fi Standard
    802.11ac will be an upgrade to the 5 GHz portion of the enterprise wireless LAN, but most enterprise Wi-Fi systems will need to support both standards for many ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] 802.11ac: The Fifth Generation of Wi-Fi
    It is estimated that the Wi-Fi Alliance will use this draft as the basis for an initial “wave 1” certification in early 2013. 802.11ac products might be ...
  42. [42]
    802.11n vs. 802.11ac: Which Wireless Will Work for You?
    Feb 25, 2014 · 802.11ac and BYOD may lead to a sharp increase in wireless traffic on enterprise networks, and traditional data capture and traffic analysis ...
  43. [43]
    Understanding the next generation of Wi-Fi | Digitalisation World
    IT administrators agree that there are many advantages to the new 802.11ac wireless standard, including unprecedented levels of bandwidth for a BYOD (bring ...
  44. [44]
    [DOC] doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0992r21
    A VHT mixed format (MF) preamble shall be supported in the draft specification and device support is mandatory. The VHT mixed format preamble shall have the ...Missing: feature | Show results with:feature
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Next-Gen 802.11ac Wi-Fi For Dummies - Intel
    For example, if you have an 802.11ac 3x3 AP and an 802.11ac 2x2 adapter, Page 19 13 the maximum data rate reaches up to 867 Mbps.Missing: setup | Show results with:setup
  46. [46]
    [PDF] 802.11ac MU-MIMO: Bridging the MIMO Gap in Wi-Fi | Qualcomm
    The IEEE 802.11ac standard defines mechanisms and techniques for dramatically enhancing the speed and capacity that a Wi-Fi Access Point (AP) can deliver.Missing: mandatory | Show results with:mandatory
  47. [47]
    What Is MU-MIMO? - Cisco
    MU-MIMO lets access points transmit data to multiple Wi-Fi clients simultaneously. This optimizes airtime efficiency regardless of the 802.11 version.Missing: 4x4 example
  48. [48]
    How are the 160 MHz and 80 MHz+80MHz channels ... - QNAP
    Jan 3, 2023 · The 80+80 MHz (non-contiguous) channel consists of two separate 80 MHz bandwidths that bond four contiguous Wi-Fi channels together. Bandwidth A ...
  49. [49]
    https://www.signalboosters.com/blog/the-80211ac-wifi-standard-explained/
  50. [50]
    [PDF] COMPARISON OF 802.11AC AND 802.11N PHY LAYERS
    802.11ac improves 802.11n on three different dimensions: – more channel bonding, increased from the maximum of 40 MHz in 802.11n up to 80 or 160 MHz,. – denser ...
  51. [51]
    Different Wi-Fi Protocols and Data Rates - Intel
    802.11ac wave2, 5 GHz, 20, 40, 80, 160MHz, Multi User (MU-MIMO), 1.73 Gbps ; 802.11ac wave1, 5 GHz, 20, 40, 80MHz, Single User (SU-MIMO), 866.7 Mbps ; 802.11n ...
  52. [52]
    What Are 802.11ac and 802.11ac Wave 2 - Huawei Technical Support
    Mar 8, 2024 · Supports only explicit Beamforming (implicit Beamforming is not supported). Improves channel probe and feedback modes. 802.11ac sends Null Data ...
  53. [53]
    https://reolink.com/blog/802-11ac/
  54. [54]
    IEEE 802.11ac: Enhancements for very high throughput WLANs
    The IEEE 802.11ac is an emerging very high throughput (VHT) WLAN standard that could achieve PHY data rates of close to 7 Gbps for the 5 GHz band.
  55. [55]
    802.11 standards: How do 802.11ac, 802.11ax, 802.11be differ?
    Mar 5, 2025 · The 802.11be standard surpasses its predecessors in speeds, bandwidth capacity, data rates and more. This article compares 802.11ac and 802.11ax ...Missing: halve | Show results with:halve
  56. [56]
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax): 5 Things to Know - Qorvo
    Aug 23, 2017 · Uplink MIMO: 802.11ac supports multiuser MIMO, but only in downlink mode. In contrast, 802.11ax adds uplink capability, so multiple users can ...
  57. [57]
    What is WiFi 7? How Does WiFi 7 Work? | WiFi 7 Routers - TP-Link
    WiFi 7 is the upcoming WiFi standard, also known as IEEE 802.11be Extremely High Throughput (EHT). It works across all three bands (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz)Introducing Wi-Fi 7 · Festa F76 · Deco BE75 · Deco WB10800
  58. [58]
    Wi-Fi 6/6E (IEEE 802.11ax) vs. Wi-Fi 7 - Ceva IP
    Nov 21, 2023 · Up to 320MHz channel bandwidth, compared to 160MHz in WI-FI 6/6E (IEEE 802.11ax). This is available only on the 6GHz band. · Up to 16×16 MIMO ...
  59. [59]
    Wi-Fi 7 in 2025: Will this be the year? - Network World
    Jan 23, 2025 · “By the end of 2025, we forecast about 17% of enterprise-class dependent AP revenue will be Wi-Fi 7, and by 2027, about half of new enterprise- ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  60. [60]
    Wi-Fi 7 to Drive Double-Digit Enterprise WLAN Growth in 2025 ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Wi-Fi 7 shipments will shoot up in 2025 and will represent over a third of Indoor AP revenues. "We expect that in 2028, Wi-Fi 7 sales will ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  61. [61]
    Wi-Fi 7 APs Surge to 11 Percent of Shipments in 4Q 2024 ...
    Mar 11, 2025 · The adoption of Wi-Fi 7 jumped by 5 points to 11 percent of Indoor Access Points; Huawei, HPE, and H3C gained share of Wi-Fi 7 revenues in 4Q 2024.
  62. [62]
    (PDF) The Evolution of Wi-Fi Standards: From Wi-Fi 6 to Wi- Fi 7
    Oct 2, 2024 · Challenges related to spectrum allocation, backward compatibility, and device adoption are discussed to provide a comprehensive understanding ...
  63. [63]
    The Future of Industrial Wi-Fi: Which Standards Are Being Embraced ...
    Sep 4, 2024 · Timing is another challenge hindering the potential for industrial Wi-Fi 7. ... Wi-Fi 6 to Wi-Fi 8 support. The Next Generation of ...