Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Orthogonal frequency-division multiple access

Orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA) is a multi-user variant of orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) that enables multiple users to share a communication channel by dynamically allocating subsets of orthogonal subcarriers to each user, allowing simultaneous transmission and reception of data streams with minimal interference.^[1] OFDMA operates by dividing the available spectrum into numerous closely spaced orthogonal subcarriers, each modulated independently to carry user data; these subcarriers are grouped into resource units (RUs) that can be assigned based on factors such as user bandwidth requirements, quality of service needs, packet size, and channel conditions.^[1] This approach builds on OFDM's use of the inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) for efficient modulation and the fast Fourier transform (FFT) for demodulation, while extending it to support multiple access through subcarrier partitioning rather than time or code division.^[2] The technique was first proposed in 1996 by H. Sari, Y. Levy, and G. Karam as a method for the return channel in cable television (CATV) networks, laying the foundation for its adoption in wireless systems.^[3] Key advantages of OFDMA include high spectral efficiency by eliminating guard bands between subcarriers and enabling flexible resource allocation, reduced latency through parallel data streams to multiple devices, and improved resilience to multipath fading and inter-symbol interference via cyclic prefixes.^[2] Unlike traditional frequency-division multiple access (FDMA), which requires guard bands that waste spectrum, OFDMA's orthogonality ensures no intracell interference among users assigned to different subcarriers.^[1] These benefits make it particularly suitable for high-density environments with diverse traffic demands. OFDMA has become a cornerstone of modern wireless standards, including IEEE 802.16 (WiMAX) for broadband access, 3GPP LTE and 5G NR for cellular networks, and IEEE 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6) for local area networks, where it supports peak data rates up to 9.6 Gbps in Wi-Fi 6 by serving multiple clients concurrently.^[1] In LTE, it is employed in the downlink to enhance throughput and coverage,^[3] while in 5G, it facilitates massive machine-type communications and ultra-reliable low-latency applications.^[4]

History

Origins and Early Development

The conceptual foundations of orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA) trace back to the development of orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM), a single-user multicarrier modulation technique designed to mitigate intersymbol interference (ISI) in dispersive channels. In 1966, Robert W. Chang at Bell Laboratories proposed the use of multiple orthogonal subcarriers to transmit parallel data streams through a band-limited channel without ISI, by ensuring subcarrier spacing aligns with the inverse of the symbol duration, allowing overlap without interference. This work laid the groundwork for multicarrier systems, with Chang filing a U.S. patent (No. 3,488,455) that was granted in 1970. Building on this, in 1971, Stephen B. Weinstein and Paul M. Ebert advanced the technique by incorporating the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) for efficient modulation and demodulation, enabling practical implementation of frequency-division multiplexing via digital signal processing, which significantly reduced computational complexity compared to analog filters. Early extensions toward multi-user capabilities emerged in the 1990s, as researchers explored dynamic allocation of OFDM subcarriers to multiple users to improve spectral efficiency in shared channels. The technique was first proposed in 1996 by H. Sari, Y. Levy, and G. Karam as a multiple access method for the return channel in cable television (CATV) networks.^[3] A pivotal proposal came in 1999, when Cheong Yui Wong and colleagues introduced adaptive subcarrier, bit, and power allocation for multiuser OFDM systems, assigning disjoint subsets of subcarriers to different users based on channel conditions to maximize total throughput while minimizing interference. This approach, detailed in their IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications paper, effectively prototyped OFDMA by treating subcarriers as granular resources for concurrent user access, influencing subsequent broadband designs. Concurrently, initial multi-user extensions appeared in cable modem trials and wireless local area networks (WLANs); for instance, in 1998, the Homeworx cable modem system employed OFDM modulation to double capacity over traditional QPSK methods in shared downstream channels, supporting multiple subscribers via frequency-domain resource partitioning. Key milestones in the late 1990s and early 2000s solidified OFDMA as a viable multiple access scheme for broadband wireless. IEEE papers around 2000, such as those on multiuser loading algorithms for OFDM-based systems, demonstrated efficient subcarrier assignment to achieve high throughput in fading environments. Notably, in 2006, Hujun Yin and Siavash Alamouti provided a comprehensive overview of OFDMA's design philosophies for uplink and downlink, emphasizing its superiority for broadband access through flexible resource allocation and interference management. First patent filings for subcarrier-based multiple access techniques surfaced between 1995 and 2000, particularly in digital subscriber line (DSL) contexts like discrete multitone (DMT) modulation for asymmetric DSL (ADSL), where subcarriers were allocated to handle multi-line interference, and in early wireless systems exploring dynamic frequency sharing.

Standardization and Evolution

The formal standardization of Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) began with the IEEE 802.16-2004 standard, which marked the first major adoption of OFDMA as a core multiple access scheme for broadband wireless access in WiMAX systems, enabling efficient spectrum use in fixed and nomadic applications. This standard, developed by the IEEE 802.16 working group, integrated OFDMA for both uplink and downlink to support scalable bandwidths up to 20 MHz, laying the groundwork for subsequent evolutions in mobile broadband.^[5] In parallel, the 3GPP LTE Release 8, frozen in December 2008, adopted OFDMA specifically for the downlink to achieve high spectral efficiency and robustness against multipath fading in cellular networks. This release defined OFDMA with 15 kHz subcarrier spacing and up to 20 MHz bandwidth, supporting peak data rates of 300 Mbps in the downlink while using SC-FDMA for the uplink to maintain power efficiency.^[6] The evolution continued with LTE-Advanced in 3GPP Release 10, completed in 2011, which enhanced OFDMA through carrier aggregation to combine multiple component carriers for wider effective bandwidths up to 100 MHz. This feature allowed dynamic aggregation of up to five 20 MHz carriers, boosting peak data rates to 1 Gbps in the downlink and enabling better interference management in heterogeneous networks.^[7] A significant advancement occurred with 5G New Radio (NR) in 3GPP Release 15, standardized in 2018, which introduced flexible numerology in OFDMA to support diverse use cases across sub-6 GHz and mmWave bands. The standard employed cyclic prefix OFDM (CP-OFDM) for both downlink and uplink in most scenarios, alongside discrete Fourier transform-spread OFDM (DFT-s-OFDM) for uplink coverage-limited cases, with scalable subcarrier spacings from 15 kHz to 240 kHz to optimize latency and throughput.^[8] ETSI, as a key partner in 3GPP, and the ITU played pivotal roles in certifying LTE-Advanced as an IMT-Advanced technology in 2010, validating its OFDMA-based framework against global requirements for peak data rates exceeding 1 Gbps and enhanced mobility.^[9] This certification by ITU-R under Recommendation M.2012 ensured interoperability and spectrum harmonization for OFDMA deployments worldwide. Recent developments in 3GPP Releases 18 and 19, spanning 2023 to 2025, advanced 5G-Advanced by integrating AI/ML techniques for OFDMA resource scheduling, including predictive beam management and channel estimation to improve efficiency in dense networks.^[10] Release 18, frozen in March 2024, introduced AI-based enhancements for air interface optimization, while Release 19, frozen in September 2025, further refines these for industrial IoT and extended reality applications, achieving up to 30% gains in spectral efficiency.^[11] Looking ahead, early 6G study items approved in 3GPP Release 20 during 2025 meetings confirmed the continuation of CP-OFDM as the baseline waveform for the physical layer, ensuring backward compatibility with 5G NR while exploring extensions for terahertz bands.^[12] These agreements, reached in RAN1 deliberations, affirm OFDMA's persistence in 6G due to its proven scalability and multi-user support, with initial studies focusing on enhanced numerologies for ultra-reliable low-latency communications.^[13]

Fundamentals

Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing Basics

Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM) is a multicarrier modulation technique that divides a wideband communication channel into a set of closely spaced, narrowband orthogonal subcarriers, each carrying a portion of the data stream. This approach effectively combats the effects of multipath fading and inter-symbol interference (ISI) by converting a frequency-selective fading channel into multiple flat-fading subchannels, where each subcarrier experiences relatively constant attenuation and phase shift over its narrow bandwidth. By exploiting the orthogonality property, OFDM enables efficient spectrum utilization without the need for guard bands between subcarriers, maximizing throughput in dispersive environments such as wireless channels.^[14] The orthogonality of subcarriers is fundamental to OFDM's performance, ensuring that the signal on one subcarrier does not interfere with others during demodulation. Mathematically, this is achieved when the subcarriers are spaced at multiples of the inverse of the symbol duration T, with subcarrier frequencies f_k = k / T for integer k. The orthogonality condition holds if the integral of the product of two distinct subcarrier signals over one symbol period is zero:

\int_0^T e^{j 2\pi (k - m) f t} \, dt = 0 \quad \text{for} \quad k \neq m,

where f = 1/T is the subcarrier spacing \Delta f. This property allows the receiver to recover each subcarrier's data independently using a discrete Fourier transform. To prevent ISI caused by multipath delays, a cyclic prefix (CP) is prepended to each OFDM symbol; the CP is a repetition of the last \tau_{cp} samples of the symbol, with \tau_{cp} chosen to be at least as long as the channel's maximum delay spread, ensuring the linear convolution approximates circular convolution within the FFT window.^[14] In practice, OFDM modulation and demodulation are implemented efficiently using the inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) at the transmitter to generate the time-domain signal and the fast Fourier transform (FFT) at the receiver to extract the subcarrier symbols. Guard bands, consisting of unused subcarriers at the spectrum edges, are incorporated to mitigate aliasing and filter roll-off effects, typically occupying about 5-10% of the total bandwidth. A primary advantage of OFDM lies in its robustness to frequency-selective fading, where deep fades affect only a small fraction of subcarriers, enabling simple one-tap equalization per subcarrier and high spectral efficiency. For instance, in Long-Term Evolution (LTE) systems, the nominal subcarrier spacing is 15 kHz, supporting bandwidths from 1.4 MHz to 20 MHz while maintaining orthogonality across up to 1200 subcarriers.^[15]^[14] This single-user OFDM framework provides the foundational signal structure for extensions to multiple-access schemes, where subcarriers can be allocated dynamically among users.

Transition to Multiple Access in OFDMA

Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) provides a foundation for efficient single-user transmission by dividing a wideband channel into multiple narrowband subcarriers that maintain orthogonality to minimize inter-symbol interference. The transition to orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA) extends this capability to multi-user scenarios by dynamically assigning subsets of these subcarriers to different users, enabling simultaneous transmissions from multiple devices without significant interference between them. This allocation leverages the inherent orthogonality of OFDM subcarriers, allowing each user to occupy a distinct portion of the spectrum for their data stream while sharing the overall bandwidth efficiently.^[16] A primary distinction between OFDM and OFDMA lies in resource management: while OFDM treats the entire set of subcarriers as a single block for one user, OFDMA introduces resource blocks—groups of consecutive subcarriers spanning specific time slots—as the basic units for allocation to individual users. This granular approach facilitates flexible partitioning of the available resources, accommodating varying data demands and supporting asymmetries between uplink and downlink transmissions, such as higher downlink throughput in cellular systems. By grouping subcarriers into these blocks, OFDMA ensures robust signal integrity and efficient scheduling across users.^[17]^[18] OFDMA can be conceptualized as an overlay of frequency-division multiple access (FDMA) principles on the OFDM framework, where the spectrum is divided into non-overlapping subcarrier subsets assigned exclusively to users, thereby avoiding the pulsed power concentration problems associated with traditional single-carrier FDMA schemes that require high peak transmit power for low-data-rate users. In OFDMA, power is distributed across assigned subcarriers, reducing peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) challenges for multi-user environments and enabling lower maximum transmission power per user without sacrificing coverage. This distributed power allocation enhances overall system efficiency in shared wireless channels.^[19]^[20] In practical implementations, such as Long-Term Evolution (LTE) standards, the minimum resource unit is defined as a physical resource block consisting of 12 subcarriers over one slot (0.5 ms), providing a standardized granularity for user assignments that balances overhead and flexibility. Furthermore, OFDMA's subcarrier allocation enables spectrum pooling in cognitive radio systems, where secondary users opportunistically access unused portions of licensed spectrum by dynamically sharing subcarrier resources with primary users, thereby improving overall spectrum utilization without causing harmful interference.^[21]

Principles of Operation

Subcarrier Allocation Mechanisms

Subcarrier allocation in OFDMA systems involves assigning orthogonal subcarriers to multiple users to maximize resource utilization while accommodating varying channel conditions. These mechanisms primarily operate in the frequency domain, leveraging the orthogonality of subcarriers to minimize inter-user interference.^[22] Allocation strategies are divided into static and dynamic types. Static allocation fixes subcarrier assignments to users regardless of channel variations, offering simplicity and low overhead but reduced efficiency in dynamic environments like mobile wireless channels.^[22] In dynamic allocation, subcarriers are reassigned based on current channel conditions, enabling adaptation to frequency-selective fading by allocating the best subcarriers—those with highest signal-to-noise ratios—to users who can most effectively utilize them. This approach exploits multiuser diversity, where users experience independent fading, to improve overall system capacity.^[22] Dynamic allocation relies on channel state information (CSI) feedback, where users report their channel gains for each subcarrier to the base station, allowing informed decisions on assignments.^[22] Accurate and timely CSI is essential, as outdated information can degrade performance, though quantization and limited feedback techniques mitigate overhead. Within dynamic frameworks, allocations are further classified as margin-adaptive or rate-adaptive. Margin-adaptive allocation minimizes total transmit power subject to predefined rate requirements for each user, ensuring reliable service under power constraints.^[22] Rate-adaptive allocation, conversely, maximizes aggregate data rate across users given a fixed power budget, prioritizing throughput enhancement.^[22] Both handle frequency-selective fading by preferentially assigning subcarriers with favorable channel gains. Power optimization complements subcarrier assignment, commonly via the water-filling algorithm, which pours more power into subcarriers with stronger channel gains to equalize the effective signal-to-noise ratio across the band. This maximizes the Shannon capacity for the system, formulated as:

C = \sum_{k=1}^{N} \log_2 \left(1 + \frac{|H_k|^2 P_k}{N_0}\right)

where N is the number of subcarriers, H_k the channel gain on subcarrier k, P_k the power allocated to it, and N_0 the noise power spectral density. The algorithm iteratively adjusts P_k to satisfy the total power constraint while boosting capacity. For assigning subcarriers to users, greedy algorithms like the Hungarian method model the problem as a bipartite matching task, optimally pairing users to subcarriers based on channel gain metrics to maximize total throughput or fairness.^[22] This method, with polynomial complexity O(M^3) for M users and subcarriers, provides near-optimal solutions in centralized OFDMA deployments.^[23]

Time and Frequency Resource Scheduling

In OFDMA systems, resource scheduling integrates time and frequency domains to allocate subcarriers and time slots efficiently among multiple users, optimizing throughput, fairness, and latency.^[24] This process typically occurs over transmission time intervals (TTIs), such as the 1 ms subframe in LTE, where frequency blocks (resource blocks) are assigned within each TTI to match user channel conditions and traffic demands.^[25] Common scheduling frameworks include round-robin (RR), which provides equal resource allocation across users for maximum fairness regardless of channel quality; maximum carrier-to-interference (Max C/I), which prioritizes users with the strongest channels to maximize overall system throughput; and proportional fair (PF), which balances throughput and fairness by favoring users with high instantaneous rates relative to their historical averages.^[26]^[27] The proportional fair scheduler selects the user with the maximum value of the scheduling metric \frac{R_i(t)}{\hat{R}_i(t)}, where R_i(t) is the instantaneous achievable data rate for user i at time t, and \hat{R}_i(t) is the estimated average data rate, which is updated over time to control the fairness-throughput tradeoff.^[28] Uplink power control in OFDMA employs fractional path loss compensation to mitigate interference, where the compensation factor (α, typically between 0.5 and 1) partially offsets path loss, allowing cell-edge users to transmit at lower power while preserving near-cell coverage.^[29] Additionally, dynamic time-division duplexing (TDD) adapts the uplink-downlink ratio in real-time to handle traffic asymmetry, such as higher downlink loads in video streaming scenarios, by reconfiguring slot allocations across cells to minimize cross-link interference.^[30] In 5G NR, mini-slots—shorter than the standard 14-symbol slot (e.g., 2, 4, or 7 symbols)—enable low-latency scheduling for ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) by allowing finer-grained time resource partitioning.^[31] Furthermore, these scheduling mechanisms effectively manage bursty traffic patterns in IoT applications, such as sensor data transmissions, by dynamically assigning sporadic resources without excessive overhead.^[32]

Characteristics

Spectral Efficiency and Interference Handling

OFDMA achieves high spectral efficiency primarily through the tight packing of orthogonal subcarriers, which minimizes guard bands and enables near-full utilization of the available bandwidth with low overhead. This orthogonality allows multiple users to share the spectrum without significant overlap, enhancing overall throughput compared to single-user OFDM systems. Additionally, multi-user diversity gain exploits channel variations across users, where scheduling algorithms assign subcarriers to users experiencing favorable fading conditions, boosting cell-wide spectral efficiency from approximately 1.2 bits/s/Hz with one user to over 2 bits/s/Hz with 30 users in interference-limited scenarios.^[33]^[34] In multi-user OFDMA environments, interference arises in two main forms: intra-cell interference between users within the same cell due to potential subcarrier overlaps or imperfect allocation, and inter-cell interference from adjacent cells reusing frequencies. To mitigate these, fractional frequency reuse (FFR) patterns partition the spectrum into sub-bands, assigning distinct portions to cell-edge users while allowing full reuse for cell-center users, thereby reducing inter-cell interference by up to 50% in edge regions without severely impacting overall capacity. Soft FFR variants further optimize this by adjusting transmit power on reused sub-bands, balancing interference suppression and resource utilization.^[35]^[36] A key challenge in mobile OFDMA systems is inter-carrier interference (ICI), which occurs due to Doppler shifts from user mobility, disrupting subcarrier orthogonality and causing signal leakage between adjacent carriers. This effect is particularly pronounced in high-speed scenarios, where Doppler spread proportional to velocity degrades bit error rates. To counter ICI and facilitate equalization, pilot subcarriers—dedicated known symbols inserted periodically across frequency and time—are employed to estimate channel responses, enabling interpolation-based compensation for frequency-selective fading on data subcarriers. Low-pass or spline interpolation on these pilots achieves robust equalization, maintaining performance in fading channels with Doppler effects.^[37]^[38] In 5G New Radio (NR) implementations of OFDMA, advanced beamforming techniques significantly reduce both intra- and inter-cell interference by directing signals toward intended users via precoding, suppressing sidelobes and minimizing leakage to neighboring cells. This spatial selectivity enhances signal-to-interference ratios, particularly in dense deployments. Furthermore, cognitive radio enhancements enable opportunistic spectrum access through spectrum sensing, where secondary users detect idle OFDMA subcarriers in primary networks, allowing dynamic reuse without causing harmful interference and improving overall spectrum utilization.^[39]

Quality of Service and MIMO Integration

Orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA) supports diverse Quality of Service (QoS) requirements by allocating subcarriers into groups tailored to specific traffic types, such as voice, video, and data services. In LTE systems, resource blocks—each comprising 12 subcarriers—are dynamically assigned by the eNodeB scheduler based on the QoS Class Identifier (QCI), which prioritizes guaranteed bit rate (GBR) bearers for real-time services like voice over non-GBR bearers for best-effort data. Priority queuing mechanisms within the scheduler enhance this by applying a delay-dependent sigmoid function for GBR traffic to meet packet delay budgets (PDB), while non-GBR traffic uses an α-fair utility maximization to balance fairness and throughput; under congestion, lower-priority QCIs receive boosted priority to prevent starvation. This subcarrier grouping ensures low-latency allocation for high-priority services while optimizing spectral resources for elastic data flows. In 5G New Radio (NR), OFDMA extends QoS support through layered resource allocation to accommodate enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB), ultra-reliable low-latency communications (URLLC), and massive machine-type communications (mMTC). eMBB receives broad subcarrier assignments for high-throughput streaming, URLLC employs puncturing—where short URLLC bursts preemptively overlap eMBB allocations in the same slot to achieve sub-millisecond latency—and mMTC uses compact, low-power subcarrier clusters for dense connectivity. Schedulers prioritize URLLC via dynamic bitmap-indicated resource sharing, ensuring reliability above 99.999% while minimizing eMBB disruption through QoS-aware compensation. OFDMA integrates with multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) techniques to enhance capacity and reliability, enabling spatial multiplexing across subcarriers where multiple data streams are transmitted simultaneously on the same frequency resources. In downlink MIMO-OFDMA, up to eight layers can be multiplexed per user equipment (UE) over assigned subcarriers, as supported in LTE categories 16–21, which extend spatial multiplexing to eight layers via transmission modes 9 and 10 for improved throughput. Multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO) further assigns identical subcarriers to multiple UEs, using beamforming to direct signals and separate users spatially; precoding matrices, derived from Type II codebooks in 5G NR, null inter-user interference by aligning beams toward intended receivers while suppressing signals at others. In 5G NR, MIMO-OFDMA achieves up to 256 QAM modulation with 8×8 configurations, supporting eight downlink layers and four uplink layers per UE, as defined in UE radio access capabilities for frequency ranges FR1 and FR2. Precoding for MU-MIMO employs codebook-based matrices to mitigate interference, with hybrid beamforming combining analog and digital precoding for massive MIMO arrays, ensuring efficient resource utilization across eMBB, URLLC, and mMTC scenarios. LTE category enhancements, such as those in categories 12–14, similarly leverage MIMO-OFDMA for up to four layers with 256 QAM, boosting peak data rates while maintaining QoS differentiation.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Key Benefits

OFDMA enables simultaneous low-data-rate transmissions from multiple users by allocating disjoint subsets of orthogonal subcarriers to each, thereby supporting efficient multi-user access without significant inter-user interference. This approach reduces the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) for individual low-rate users compared to full-bandwidth OFDM, as users transmit only on a limited number of subcarriers rather than the full bandwidth, leading to lower peak power requirements and improved power efficiency for battery-constrained devices.^[16] The technique offers robustness to frequency-selective fading through inherent frequency diversity, where data is spread across multiple subcarriers experiencing independent fading conditions, mitigating the impact of multipath propagation. Additionally, OFDMA facilitates constant end-to-end delay for real-time applications by enabling precise time-frequency resource scheduling that avoids excessive buffering, resulting in reduced latency and jitter in dense multi-user scenarios.^[40]^[41] Per-subcarrier power control in OFDMA allows adaptive allocation of transmit power based on individual channel conditions for each subcarrier, optimizing energy efficiency and overall system capacity while minimizing interference. When integrated with multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) configurations, OFDMA exhibits strong scalability for broadband services, enabling higher spatial multiplexing gains and improved spectral utilization in high-data-rate environments.^[42]^[43] Early studies demonstrated throughput improvements of approximately 20-50% in multipath fading channels compared to legacy OFDM systems, highlighting its performance advantages.^[44] Furthermore, OFDMA supports cognitive radio spectrum pooling by dynamically assigning unused subcarriers in licensed bands to secondary users, enhancing opportunistic access without disrupting primary transmissions.^[45]

Primary Limitations

OFDMA systems exhibit high sensitivity to carrier frequency offsets (CFO) and phase noise, which disrupt subcarrier orthogonality and induce inter-carrier interference (ICI).^[46] These impairments arise primarily from oscillator instabilities and Doppler shifts in mobile environments, leading to significant signal degradation even with small errors.^[47] To mitigate ICI effectively, synchronization must achieve residual CFO below approximately 1% of the subcarrier spacing, necessitating advanced estimation and compensation algorithms at the receiver. The implementation of OFDMA introduces substantial complexity in receiver design and resource scheduling, contributing to elevated power consumption.^[48] Multi-user scheduling requires dynamic subcarrier allocation and power control, often involving NP-hard optimization problems that demand high computational resources, particularly in dense networks.^[49] Additionally, when few subcarriers are assigned to a user, frequency diversity diminishes, potentially reducing robustness against fading channels compared to wider-band alternatives.^[50] This complexity not only increases hardware demands but also amplifies overall energy use in both base stations and user equipment.^[51] OFDMA incurs notable overhead from channel state information (CSI) feedback and cyclic prefix, as well as guard bands, which consume a portion of the available bandwidth.^[52] Frequent CSI reporting is essential for adaptive modulation but escalates uplink overhead, especially in fast-fading scenarios. The cyclic prefix overhead is typically around 7%, while guard bands account for 5-10% of the spectrum to prevent inter-channel interference but reduce spectral efficiency. Multi-cell interference coordination poses further challenges, as OFDMA's discrete subcarrier assignments complicate reuse patterns, unlike CDMA's spreading codes that inherently average interference across the band.^[53] A key drawback of OFDMA is its elevated peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR), approximately 3-4 dB higher than single-carrier systems, which stresses power amplifiers and reduces efficiency; this is why uplink transmissions in standards like LTE often use SC-FDMA instead.^[54] Recent 2025 studies highlight that artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, such as machine learning for predictive scheduling, are increasingly vital to alleviate the escalating complexity in OFDMA for 6G deployments.^[55]

Applications

Adoption in Wireless Standards

Orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA) was first adopted in the IEEE 802.16e standard for Mobile WiMAX in 2005, enabling mobile broadband wireless access with scalable channel bandwidths from 1.25 MHz to 20 MHz using scalable OFDMA (SOFDMA).^[56] This implementation supported downlink data rates up to 30 Mbps in typical mobile scenarios, facilitating high-speed internet access for portable devices at vehicular speeds.^[57] WiMAX's OFDMA approach allowed efficient subcarrier allocation to multiple users, marking an early commercial deployment of the technology for metropolitan-area broadband services.^[58] In the 3GPP Long-Term Evolution (LTE) standard, released in 2008 and commercially rolled out starting in 2009, OFDMA was specified for the downlink to achieve high spectral efficiency and support peak data rates up to 300 Mbps.^[59] The uplink employed single-carrier frequency-division multiple access (SC-FDMA), a variant of OFDMA designed to reduce peak-to-average power ratio for better battery efficiency in user equipment.^[60] By 2012, LTE networks using OFDMA had achieved global adoption, with 89 operators launching services in over 40 countries, enabling widespread 4G mobile broadband coverage.^[61] The 5G New Radio (NR) standard, specified by 3GPP in Release 15 from 2018 and commercially deployed from 2019, incorporates flexible OFDMA as the core multiple-access scheme for both uplink and downlink, supporting diverse frequency ranges including sub-6 GHz and mmWave bands.^[4] NR's OFDMA features scalable numerologies with subcarrier spacings of 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 kHz, allowing adaptation to varying channel conditions and use cases such as enhanced mobile broadband and ultra-reliable low-latency communications.^[62] This flexibility has driven rapid adoption, with global 5G connections projected to reach nearly 2.9 billion by the end of 2025, accounting for about one-third of all mobile subscriptions.^[63] OFDMA is also integral to IEEE 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6), released in 2019 and widely deployed by 2025, where it enables multi-user MIMO and resource unit allocation to serve multiple devices simultaneously, supporting peak data rates up to 9.6 Gbps in the 5 GHz band.^[64] Subsequent standards like Wi-Fi 6E (2020) and Wi-Fi 7 (2024) extend OFDMA to 6 GHz and beyond, enhancing capacity in dense environments such as homes, offices, and public hotspots.^[65] In 3GPP Release 18, completed in 2024, enhancements to reduced capability (RedCap) devices for Internet of Things (IoT) applications further leverage OFDMA. The original Rel-17 RedCap supports lower-complexity user equipment with peak rates up to 220 Mbps downlink over reduced bandwidth (e.g., 20 MHz) and fewer antennas. Rel-18 introduces evolved RedCap (eRedCap) for even simpler IoT, limiting peak data rates to 10 Mbps while optimizing OFDMA resource allocation for moderate data rates and extended coverage in industrial and consumer scenarios.^[66]^[67]

Future Developments in 6G

In 2025, the 3GPP Release 20 initiated foundational studies for 6G, marking a pivotal transition from 5G-Advanced by incorporating early explorations of radio interface enhancements while completing prior evolutions.^[68] These efforts, starting in June 2025, emphasize continuity in physical layer design to leverage existing infrastructure.^[12] A key agreement from the 3GPP RAN1 meeting in August 2025 confirmed CP-OFDM for downlink and DFT-s-OFDM for uplink as baseline waveforms in 6G, ensuring compatibility with OFDM-based systems while allowing studies of additional variants.^[13] This decision supports operations in terahertz bands above 100 GHz, where AI-native scheduling emerges as a core feature to dynamically manage beamforming, resource allocation, and interference in highly variable channels.^[69] Such AI integration aims to optimize OFDMA subcarrier assignments in real-time, addressing the propagation challenges of terahertz frequencies for peak data rates targeting 1 Tbps.^[70] Enhancements to OFDMA in 6G focus on variants tailored for extreme environments, such as orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation, which extends OFDM principles into the delay-Doppler domain for superior performance in high-mobility scenarios like vehicular networks exceeding 500 km/h.^[71] OTFS mitigates Doppler-induced inter-carrier interference more effectively than traditional OFDMA, enabling reliable connectivity in dynamic channels without excessive overhead.^[72] Complementing this, integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) leverages OFDMA's multi-subcarrier structure to simultaneously perform radar-like sensing and data transmission, using the same waveform for environmental awareness in applications like autonomous driving.^[73] In ISAC frameworks, OFDM-compatible processing extracts sensing information from communication signals, enhancing spectrum efficiency in 6G deployments.^[74] Non-orthogonal extensions, such as non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) overlaid on OFDMA, are under consideration to boost spectral efficiency beyond orthogonal limits, allowing multiple users to share subcarriers via power-domain or code-domain multiplexing. This hybrid approach addresses 6G's demands for massive connectivity, particularly in dense urban settings, by superimposing signals while retaining OFDMA's interference management.^[75] Energy efficiency remains a priority for sustainable 6G networks, with OFDMA resource allocation optimized through AI-driven techniques to minimize power consumption amid rising data demands, targeting reductions in operational energy by up to 100 times compared to 5G baselines.^[76] These developments, grounded in 3GPP Rel-20 studies, position OFDMA as a versatile foundation for 6G's terahertz-enabled, AI-integrated ecosystem.^[77]

Comparisons

With Time- and Frequency-Division Techniques

Orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA) contrasts with time-division multiple access (TDMA) primarily in its approach to resource sharing, enabling multiple users to transmit simultaneously on different subcarriers within the same time frame, whereas TDMA assigns sequential time slots to users on a single carrier frequency, restricting parallel access. This parallel frequency utilization in OFDMA supports more granular and flexible allocation, allowing resources to be tailored to individual user needs without the sequential constraints of TDMA, which can lead to underutilization during idle slots.^[78]^[79] OFDMA proves especially effective for bursty data traffic common in modern networks, as it permits dynamic subcarrier assignment to active users, reducing latency compared to TDMA's fixed slot scheduling that may force delays for non-bursty or low-activity users. However, this flexibility comes with higher synchronization overhead in OFDMA, requiring stringent timing and frequency alignment across subcarriers to maintain orthogonality and avoid inter-carrier interference, in contrast to TDMA's focus on time-slot synchronization alone.^[80]^[81] In comparison to frequency-division multiple access (FDMA), OFDMA offers dynamic reuse of subcarriers across narrow, orthogonal bands, avoiding the fixed wide-channel assignments and substantial guard bands typical of FDMA that waste spectrum to mitigate adjacent-channel interference. By closely spacing subcarriers with only a cyclic prefix for protection, OFDMA achieves higher spectral efficiency, though it demands greater computational complexity for subcarrier mapping and interference management than FDMA's static partitioning.^[82]^[83] OFDMA's core advantage lies in its multi-user diversity gain, where subcarriers are allocated to users experiencing favorable channel conditions on specific frequencies, a capability absent in the rigid time-slot or fixed-band structures of TDMA and FDMA that limit opportunistic scheduling. This feature makes OFDMA better suited to asymmetric loads, such as varying user demands in heterogeneous traffic environments, by enabling efficient redistribution of resources without the inefficiencies of unused slots or bands in traditional methods.^[84]^[85] Illustrating these differences, legacy 2G systems like GSM employing TDMA deliver throughputs below 1 Mbps—such as a maximum of 384 kbps with EDGE enhancements—while OFDMA in 4G LTE achieves over 100 Mbps downlink in a 20 MHz channel, underscoring the evolution from TDMA/FDMA in early generations to OFDMA for broadband demands.^[86]^[87]

With Code-Division Techniques

Orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA) differs fundamentally from code-division multiple access (CDMA) in its approach to user separation: OFDMA allocates orthogonal subcarriers to different users in the frequency domain, whereas CDMA employs pseudo-noise spreading codes to distinguish users across the shared spectrum.^[88] This orthogonality in OFDMA mitigates the near-far problem more effectively than in CDMA, where power imbalances from nearby and distant users can overwhelm weaker signals despite code-based separation.^[88] However, OFDMA exhibits greater sensitivity to carrier frequency offsets, which introduce inter-carrier interference and degrade spectral efficiency more severely than in CDMA variants like multi-carrier CDMA.^[89] A key distinction lies in receiver complexity: OFDMA enables straightforward frequency-domain equalization to combat multipath fading, avoiding the intricate rake receiver structures required in CDMA to combine multipath components.^[88] Furthermore, OFDMA integrates more seamlessly with multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, leveraging subcarrier-level processing for enhanced spatial multiplexing and diversity gains that are harder to achieve in CDMA due to its spread-spectrum nature.^[88] In contrast to single-carrier frequency-division multiple access (SC-FDMA), which employs a discrete Fourier transform precoding to map data to subcarriers, OFDMA transmits multiple subcarriers directly, offering greater flexibility for multi-user scheduling in the downlink.^[90] SC-FDMA, used in LTE uplinks, achieves a lower peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) by maintaining a single-carrier-like envelope, which improves power amplifier efficiency and battery life for user equipment compared to OFDMA's higher PAPR.^[90] This trade-off favors OFDMA for base station transmissions where power constraints are less stringent, while SC-FDMA suits mobile uplinks. The shift from 3G Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) based on CDMA to 4G Long-Term Evolution (LTE) adopting OFDMA exemplifies these advantages, delivering 2 to 3 times higher spectral efficiency in both uplink and downlink scenarios.^[91] Recent analyses as of 2025 highlight the potential of hybrid approaches combining OFDMA with code-division techniques, such as rate-splitting multiple access (RSMA) and code-domain non-orthogonal multiple access (CD-NOMA), to further boost 6G spectral efficiency and interference management in multi-functional networks.^[92]

References

[1]
What is OFDMA (orthogonal frequency-division multiple access)?
Oct 3, 2023 · Orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA) is a technology of Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) that lets access points serve multiple clients at the same time.
[2]
What is OFDMA? - everything RF
Mar 12, 2023 · OFDMA or Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access, is a multi-user version of the popular OFDM multi-carrier digital modulation scheme.<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
[PDF] A Review of OFDMA and Single-Carrier FDMA
This proposal was rejected by the. DVB cable group, but the concept was published in 1996 in. [5], which laid the foundation of OFDMA. The word. OFDMA itself ...
[4]
(PDF) The history of WiMAX: A complete survey of the evolution in ...
Aug 9, 2025 · The history of WiMAX: A complete survey of the evolution in certification and standardization for IEEE 802.16 and WiMAX.
[5]
[PDF] TS 136 302 - V8.0.0 - LTE - ETSI
3GPP TS 36.302 version 8.0.0 Release 8. Reference. DTS/TSGR-0236302v800 ... Downlink model. 6.2.1 Downlink-Shared Channel. The physical-layer model for ...
[6]
[PDF] ETSI TR 136 912 V10.0.0 (2011-04)
LTE-Advanced extends LTE Rel.-8 with support for Carrier Aggregation, where two or more component carriers. (CCs) are aggregated in order to support wider ...
[7]
[PDF] 5G NR Release 15 The technology foundation of the 5G evolution
DFT-Spread (DFT-S) OFDM. 3. Such as non-orthogonal Resource Spread Multiple ... Scalable 5G NR OFDM numerology—examples. Efficiently address 5G diverse ...
[8]
ITU-R Confers IMT-Advanced (4G) Status to 3GPP LTE
Oct 20, 2010 · The 3GPP candidate technology submission for IMT-Advanced developed as LTE Release 10 & Beyond (LTE-Advanced) was today accepted as a 4G technology.Missing: OFDMA | Show results with:OFDMA<|separator|>
[9]
Rel-18 Status and Rel-19 Progress in TSG RAN - 3GPP
Mar 7, 2024 · Rel-18 is close to completion, with functional freeze in RAN1 in Sept 2023 and RAN2/3/4 in Dec 2023. Rel-19 discussion is ongoing, with a ...
[10]
An Overview of AI in 3GPP's RAN Release 18: Enhancing Next ...
Mar 25, 2024 · The 3GPP Release-18 study on AI/ML for the NR air interface is a pioneering initiative in the 3GPP's development of wireless communication standards.Missing: scheduling | Show results with:scheduling
[11]
Release 20 - 3GPP
Technical studies on the 6G radio interface and 6G core network architecture within the RAN and SA Working Group to start in June 2025. Release 21 will be the ...Missing: CP- OFDM
[12]
6G meeting settles on same old air interface - The Mobile Network
Aug 28, 2025 · ... 3GPP meeting had agreed that the CP-OFDM and DFT-s-OFDM waveforms will be used in 6G. CP-OFDM and DFT-s-OFDM are the same waveforms that are ...Missing: study items
[13]
None
Nothing is retrieved...<|separator|>
[14]
[PDF] ETSI TS 136 211 V16.2.0 (2020-09)
This Technical Specification (TS) has been produced by the ETSI 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). The present document may refer to technical ...
[15]
What is OFDMA? - Cisco
OFDMA (Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiple Access) enhances Wi-Fi network performance by optimizing data transmission in high-density environments.
[16]
OFDM vs. OFDMA: A Detailed Comparison - RF Wireless World
... key difference lies in multiple access and resource allocation. OFDM primarily caters to single-user communication with fixed resource allocation. OFDMA ...
[17]
[PDF] Subcarrier Allocation in Multiuser OFDM Systems
In multiuser OFDM, subcarriers are small bands assigned to users. Dynamic allocation is a combinatorial problem, and the paper proves it is NP-hard.
[18]
[PDF] 5G Waveform & Multiple Access Techniques | Qualcomm
Nov 4, 2015 · Executive summary. Waveform & multi-access techniques evaluations and recommendations. • Key waveform and multiple-access design targets.Missing: overlay avoids
[19]
[PDF] SC-FDMA & OFDMA in LTE physical layer
3GPP published and introduced the various standards for LTE in Release 8 in 2008. In 2010, the Release 9 was introduced to provide enhancements to LTE. In ...
[20]
[PDF] LTE Radio Physical Layer - 3G4G
Transmission Resource structure. Basic unit of resource is the. Physical Resource Block. (PRB). 12 sub-carriers x 0.5 ms. Allocated in pairs (in time domain). 1 ...
[21]
Adaptive radio resource allocation in OFDMA systems - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · The performance (efficiency) is measured with respect to the optimal allocation computed by the Hungarian algorithm.
[22]
[PDF] Adaptive Subcarrier Assignment and Power Distribution in Multiuser ...
Two types of multiuser resource allocation problems are referred as margin adaptive (MA) [3] and rate adaptive. (RA) [4,5,6,7]. The margin adaptive objective is ...
[23]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4698505
[24]
Proportional Fair Scheduler - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
A Proportional Fair Scheduler is a scheduling algorithm that allocates resources to active users based on a metric calculation, giving priority to the user ...
[25]
Transmission Time Interval - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The basic unit of time interval for data scheduling and transmission defined in the LTE protocol is 1 Ms subframe. This is the main reason the air interface ...
[26]
[PDF] Performance Evaluation of Proportional Fairness Scheduling in LTE
One of the simplest scheduling algorithms is a Round Robin (RR) scheduling. RR provides fairness and identical priority among all UEs within a cell. It assigns ...
[27]
An improved scheduling scheme for high-speed rail scenario where ...
In the addressed scenario, it is shown that none of the max C/I, round robin (RR), proportional fair (PF) algorithms can provide good performance in terms of ...
[28]
[PDF] Power Control Factor Selection in Uplink OFDMA Cellular Networks
Feb 3, 2014 · It has been shown in [6] that fractional path loss compensation is advantageous than the full path loss compen- sation in terms of cell-edge ...
[29]
Service- and interference-aware dynamic TDD design in 5G ultra ...
May 16, 2017 · Dynamic time division duplex (TDD) technique has become a key technology of 5G networks due to its flexibility to support asymmetric services.
[30]
[PDF] Final Innovation Report - TU Ilmenau
Apr 7, 2010 · [WIN+D41] show that proportional fair scheduling taking into account the history of achieved throughput ... , where tnow,i is the elapsed time ...Missing: t_i | Show results with:t_i
[31]
5G NR Mini-slot: Basics and Functionality - RF Wireless World
This is what we call a “mini-slot” transmission. This feature facilitates very low latency for critical data communication and also minimizes interference with ...
[32]
Persistent Periodic Uplink Scheduling Algorithm for Massive NB-IoT ...
Apr 8, 2022 · In this study, we propose a persistent periodic uplink scheduling algorithm (PPUSA) to assist a plethora of Internet of Things (IoT) devices in reporting their ...
[33]
All about OFDMA - EE Times
Mar 13, 2007 · sOFDMA and Flash OFDMA, a variant created by the Flarion Inc. Last year, Flarion was acquired by Qualcomm, a clear sign that variants of CDMA ...Missing: invented | Show results with:invented
[34]
Impact of Multiuser Diversity and Channel Variability on Adaptive ...
Aug 7, 2025 · In an adaptive OFDMA-based system the cell spectral efficiency can be increased as the number of users is. This effect is called multi-user ...
[35]
Generalizing and optimizing fractional frequency reuse in ...
Jul 24, 2012 · Fractional frequency reuse (FFR) is one of the key concepts for mitigating inter-cell interference and optimizing cell-edge performance.
[36]
[PDF] Analytical Evaluation of Fractional Frequency Reuse for OFDMA ...
Jan 26, 2011 · Fractional frequency reuse (FFR) is an interference management technique well-suited to OFDMA- based cellular networks wherein the cells are ...
[37]
Intercarrier Interference in OFDM: A General Model for ...
Intercarrier Interference (ICI) in OFDM arises from carrier frequency offsets (CFOs), Doppler spread, and sampling frequency offsets (SFOs).
[38]
[PDF] Channel Estimation: Pilot Arrangement in OFDM Systems
In block-type pilot based channel estimation, OFDM channel estimation symbols are transmitted periodically, in which all sub-carriers are used as pilots. If the ...<|separator|>
[39]
None
Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
[40]
[PDF] Introduction to Single Carrier FDMA - EURASIP
We can see that all the cases for SC-. FDMA have indeed lower PAPR than that of OFDMA. Also,. IFDMA has the lowest PAPR, and DFDMA and LFDMA have very similar ...
[41]
Why is OFDMA a magical feature in 802.11ax standard?
Oct 19, 2020 · A transmission in OFDM is a number of simultaneous symbols on many sub-carriers. The receiver is able to track all the sub-carriers ...
[42]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/910933
[43]
Performance evaluation of OFDMA and MU-MIMO in 802.11ax ...
Dec 9, 2020 · In this paper, we introduce and evaluate the efficiency of DL and UL multi-user transmissions using OFDMA and MIMO.
[44]
[PDF] RESOURCE ALLOCATION SCHEMES FOR OFDMA BASED ...
4.8 Total throughput and log-sum of throughput of data users vs. number of ... multipath fading and achieve high data rate and low bit error rates (BER) ...
[45]
A Cross-Layer Architecture for OFDMA-Based Cognitive Radio ...
Moreover, cognitive radio transceivers based on OFDMA can readily enable DSA networks by employing spectrum pooling, where secondary users may temporarily ...
[46]
[PDF] Channel, Phase Noise, and Frequency Offset in OFDM Systems - arXiv
May 30, 2014 · However, OFDM systems are much more sensitive to synchronization errors than single-carrier systems. In practice, OFDM systems require ...Missing: OFDMA | Show results with:OFDMA<|separator|>
[47]
[PDF] Analysis of the Effects of Phase Noise and Frequency Offset ... - DTIC
OFDM's sensitivity to these frequency errors is one of its main drawbacks ... Daniel Landstrom, “Synchronization in OFDM systems,” Licentiate in Engineer-.
[48]
[PDF] OFDMA in the Field: Current and Future Challenges
Here, a trade-off in the design between complexity at receiver side and overhead for pilot symbols must be found to keep cost and energy consumption at an ...
[49]
[PDF] On the Complexity of Joint Subcarrier and Power Allocation for Multi ...
Nov 17, 2013 · The aim of this paper is to characterize the computational complexity of the joint subcarrier and power allocation problem for the multi-user ...
[50]
[PDF] Energy Efficiency Optimization in OFDMA Systems - People
Mar 16, 2013 · The increasing demand for high data rate and ubiquitous services has led to a high energy consumption in both transmitter(s) and receiver(s).
[51]
Energy Efficiency Optimization in OFDMA Systems - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · This paper considers orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) systems with simultaneous wireless information and power transfer ...
[52]
An OFDMA-Based Next-Generation Wireless Downlink System ...
The FG concept and IFGA technique help to reduce the feedback overhead of OFDMA system and theother-cell interference (OCI) problem by grouping the sub-carriers ...
[53]
[PDF] Interference Management in 5G and Beyond Networks - Hal-Inria
Jan 2, 2024 · El-Sayed, A Survey on. Inter-Cell Interference Coordination Techniques in OFDMA-Based. Cellular Networks, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 15 (2013) ...
[54]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4022700
[55]
(PDF) AI-BASED RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION FOR 6G WIRELESS ...
Jul 23, 2025 · This survey presents a comprehensive review of recent advances (primarily from 2021 to 2025) in integrating CL into various aspects of wireless ...
[56]
[PDF] The Mobile Broadband WiMAX Standard
Mobile WiMAX air interface specifica- tions are based on the IEEE 802.16-. 2004 Air Interface standard and the. IEEE 802.16e amendment, ratified in late 2004 ...
[57]
Achieving Wireless Broadband with WiMax - IEEE Computer Society
Reducing multipath distortion, therefore, increases bandwidth. Theoretically IEEE 802.16 can provide single-channel data rates up to 75 Mbits per second on both ...
[58]
IEEE 802.16e-2005
Feb 28, 2006 · This document provides enhancements to IEEE Std 802.16-2004 to support subscriber stations moving at vehicular speeds.
[59]
4G LTE Modulation: OFDM OFDMA SC-FDMA - Electronics Notes
The use of OFDM is a natural choice for LTE. While the basic concepts of OFDM are used, it has naturally been tailored to meet the exact requirements for LTE.
[60]
LTE Tutorial: OFDMA - Artiza Networks
OFDM is a form of transmission that uses a large number of closely spaced carriers that are modulated with low rate data.
[61]
LTE impressive growth in 2012 - 3GPP
Jul 12, 2012 · So far 89 LTE operators have launched services, the majority being LTE FDD systems with nine (9) commercial LTE TDD systems in operation. ... Alan ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[62]
5G System Overview - 3GPP
Aug 8, 2022 · Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB): Higher data-rates are specified. · Critical Communications (CC) and Ultra Reliable and Low Latency ...Missing: resource mMTC
[63]
Designing for the future: the 5G NR physical layer - Ericsson
Jul 24, 2017 · A scalable OFDM numerology is required to enable diverse services on a wide range of frequencies and deployments. The subcarrier spacing is ...
[64]
Mobile subscriptions outlook– Ericsson Mobility Report
5G subscription uptake continues apace and is expected to reach close to 2.9 billion at the end of 2025, accounting for one-third of all mobile subscriptions ...Missing: actual | Show results with:actual
[65]
A Glimpse into RedCap NR devices - 3GPP
Jul 25, 2023 · The 3GPP RedCap NR feature reduces UE complexity through fewer RX/TX antennas, reduced UE use of bandwidth, lower UE power consumption, relaxed data rates.
[66]
RedCap/eRedCap – standardizing simplified 5G IoT devices
Dec 19, 2024 · Following another study in 3GPP, the eRedCap device type introduced in 3GPP Release 18 in 2024 is a RedCap device with its peak rate capped to ...Missing: OFDMA | Show results with:OFDMA
[67]
3GPP Release 20: Completing the 5G Advanced evolution and ...
Jun 25, 2025 · For 6G, it defines the official technical study projects that will focus on foundational wireless technology areas crucial for the 6G Work Items ...Missing: CP- | Show results with:CP-
[68]
Future 6G radio-access network & design choices - Ericsson
May 15, 2024 · AI-native design to ensure that AI/ML can easily be applied when appropriate, for example, on hard-to-model problems and non-linear effects. ...
[69]
6G: Going Beyond 100 Gbps to 1 Tbps - Keysight
Getting to 100 gigabits per second (Gbps) to 1 terabit per second (Tbps) data throughput is a key objective and an active area of research for 6G.
[70]
Is OTFS the best waveform for 6G? - RCR Wireless News
Nov 17, 2024 · OTFS also offers improved energy efficiency compared to OFDM and OFDMA, particularly in high mobility scenarios. 'Borrowing a trick from ...
[71]
OTFS Modulation: Beyond OFDM for High-Mobility 6G
Jul 14, 2025 · Among the most promising of these is Orthogonal Time Frequency Space (OTFS) modulation, which promises to surpass the capabilities of Orthogonal ...
[72]
An OFDM Compatible Sensing Waveform Design for 6G ISAC System
The proposed OFDM compatible sensing waveform uses a frequency domain processing (FDP) module to realize chirp signal under the OFDM transmitter structure.
[73]
ISAC: Integrated Sensing and Communication - Ericsson
Jun 19, 2024 · We believe 6G will be based on orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM), therefore, sensing in 6G should be based on OFDM as well.Missing: OFDMA | Show results with:OFDMA
[74]
[PDF] 6G and NOMA technology
Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) presents interesting advantages and poses several demanding challenges when compared to the legacy OFDMA.
[75]
[PDF] The path to 6G with unparalleled energy savings - Nokia
From an environmental sustainability perspective, it is crucial to minimize the overall energy consumption of 6G networks through energy-saving designs right ...
[76]
Paving the Path to 6G: Key Takeaways for 3GPP Release 20
2025 is a pivotal year for the wireless industry and for 6G, as Rel-20 formally launches study items that will help define the next generation of connectivity.Missing: CP- | Show results with:CP-
[77]
OFDMA: A Broadband Wireless Access Technology - IEEE Xplore
OFDMA is a superior access technology for broadband wireless data network compared with traditional access technologies such as TDMA and CDMA.Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
[78]
Cross-layer QoS Analysis of Opportunistic OFDM-TDMA and ...
Specifically, OFDMA performs subcarrier assignment while OFDM-TDMA performs time-slot assignment, both statically or dynamically. The difference between static ...
[79]
Flow-level performance of opportunistic OFDM-TDMA and OFDMA ...
Dec 31, 2008 · Based on the analytical model, the scheduling gains in both OFDM-TDMA (time division multiple access) and OFDMA (orthogonal frequency division ...
[80]
[PDF] An OFDMA system for Ultra-Reliable Wireless Industrial Networking
Sep 2, 2021 · Compared with Time-Division Multiple Access (TDMA), OFDMA concentrates the transmit power to a narrower bandwidth, resulting in higher ...
[81]
A review of OFDMA and single-carrier FDMA - IEEE Xplore
The same questions arose later in wireless communications, and OFDM transmission with TDMA was adopted in the IEEE 802.11a specifications for wireless local ...Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
[82]
[PDF] OFDMA vs. SC-FDMA: Performance Comparison in Local Area IMT ...
As the spectrum load decreases, instead, OFDMA outperforms SC-FDMA also for a high number of frequency multiplexed users, due to its more flexible resource ...
[83]
[PDF] Adaptive Subcarrier and Bit Allocation for Downlink OFDMA System ...
Multiuser diversity describes the gains available by selecting a user or sub- set of users having “good” conditions. Adaptive modulation is the means by which ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[84]
[PDF] Cross-layer QoS Analysis of Opportunistic OFDM-TDMA and ...
A queueing model for OFDMA systems was used in [10] to design a scheduling scheme that balances multiuser diversity and queueing delay. Although the packet- ...
[85]
[PDF] TS 123 034 - V13.0.0 - ETSI
The air interface user rate in the original GSM data transmission is limited to 9,6 kbps with the 12 kbps air interface rate. The HSCSD described in the ...
[86]
[PDF] LTE—A Well-Designed Mobile OFDMA IP Solution - Qualcomm
LTE incorporates the most advanced techniques of OFDMA and antenna techniques such as MIMO (Multiple-Input. Multiple-Output), SDMA (Spatial Division Multiple ...Missing: enhancements category
[87]
[PDF] NEXT-GENERATION CDMA VS. OFDMA FOR 4G WIRELESS ...
Sep 6, 2009 · OFDM-IDMA has advantages in terms of spectral and power efficiency, low-cost iter- ative multi-user detection, flexible rate adaptation, and fre ...
[88]
[PDF] Spectral Efficiency Comparison of OFDM and MC-CDMA with ...
The spectral efficiency for both MC-CDMA and OFDMA drops to zero when the normalized CFO reaches one as expected, since subcarriers start overlapping.
[89]
The Application of OFDMA and SC-FDMA in LTE - LNTwww
Feb 9, 2023 · The decisive advantage of SC–FDMA over OFDMA is its lower "Peak–to–Average Power Ratio" (PAPR) due to its single-carrier structure. This is the ...
[90]
[PDF] Overview of LTE Air-Interface Technical White Paper
Initial LTE E-UTRA system performance results show a 2 to 3x improvement over a reference Rel-6 UMTS/HSxPA system configuration [1, 2] for both uplink and ...