Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Intelligence Squared

Intelligence Squared is a London-based organization founded in 2002 that hosts live Oxford-style debates on contentious public policy and cultural issues, featuring pairs of expert speakers arguing in favor of and against predefined motions before an audience that casts initial and final votes to gauge persuasion. The format, inspired by the Oxford Union tradition, includes opening statements, rebuttals, audience questions, and closing arguments, with the winning side determined by the largest net shift in audience opinion toward their position. Since its inception, Intelligence Squared has grown into a leading global forum for agenda-setting discussions, regularly selling out prestigious venues in London and expanding to events worldwide, drawing top intellectuals, policymakers, and commentators to foster informed public dialogue on topics ranging from geopolitics to scientific advancements. Its non-partisan approach has influenced affiliated initiatives, such as the U.S. branch established in 2006, which adapted the model to address American polarization through similar structured confrontations of opposing views, producing hundreds of debates broadcast via radio, podcasts, and video. While praised for promoting civil discourse and evidence-based argumentation, the organization has hosted debates on polarizing subjects like nationalism and policing biases without notable institutional controversies, maintaining a commitment to open exchange over predetermined outcomes.

Origins in the United Kingdom

Founding and Initial Launch (2002)

Intelligence Squared was founded in London in 2002 by media entrepreneurs Jeremy O'Grady and John Gordon. O'Grady, who served as editor-in-chief of The Week magazine, collaborated with Gordon to establish a platform for Oxford-style public debates on pressing topical issues, driven by observed demand for structured intellectual exchange amid polarized discussions. The initiative emerged in the fall of that year, positioning itself as a non-partisan forum to elevate civil discourse beyond partisan media echo chambers. The initial launch centered on high-profile debates in the UK's capital, with the inaugural event addressing fox hunting—a divisive issue amid ongoing parliamentary efforts to ban the practice. Subsequent early debates included one on the prospective Iraq War, reflecting timely geopolitical tensions. These opening events collectively drew around 900 attendees, selling out venues and demonstrating immediate public interest in the format's blend of expert argumentation and audience engagement. From inception, Intelligence Squared emphasized rigorous, evidence-based over emotive , with held in prestigious to attract influential speakers and audiences. This foundational approach laid the groundwork for expansion, prioritizing substantive policy examination—such as animal welfare in hunting or military intervention ethics—without institutional bias toward prevailing academic or media orthodoxies.

Early Debates and (2002–2005)

Intelligence Squared was established in 2002 by entrepreneurs Jeremy O'Grady, of The Week magazine, and John Gordon to create a forum for live public debates on pressing contemporary issues, addressing a perceived gap in accessible intellectual discourse. The initiative drew on the Union-style format but emphasized participation through pre- and post-debate to measure shifts in opinion, aiming to foster rigorous, evidence-based argumentation over partisan rhetoric. The organization's inaugural debates occurred in autumn 2002 at London's Royal Geographical Society, with four events held that season, each drawing audiences of 500 to 600 attendees. These early sessions focused on topical matters, capitalizing on public appetite for substantive discussion amid global uncertainties, including the post-9/11 geopolitical landscape. Attendance reflected growing demand for venues where experts could engage directly with informed publics, contrasting with the perceived superficiality of television coverage on issues like the Iraq War. From 2003 to 2005, Intelligence Squared experienced rapid growth, with consistently high turnouts signaling its appeal to the "chattering classes" seeking alternatives to polarized media narratives. The series expanded its schedule and reputation, positioning itself as a non-partisan platform that prioritized factual contention over ideological conformity, even as it navigated criticisms of elitism in its speaker selections and venue choices. By 2005, the debates had solidified their role in British intellectual life, influencing subsequent formats in other countries and demonstrating the viability of audience-voted outcomes as a metric for persuasive impact.

Core Debate Format and Methodology

Structure of Debates

Intelligence Squared debates employ the Oxford-style format, featuring two teams of two speakers: one arguing in favor of a proposed motion and the other in opposition. A neutral moderator introduces the motion, ensures adherence to time limits, and facilitates transitions between segments without taking sides. This structure emphasizes prepared arguments, direct engagement, and audience persuasion, distinguishing it from adversarial formats like those in parliamentary debating. The debate proceeds in four principal phases. It opens with individual prepared statements from each speaker, delivered alternately without interruption, typically lasting 7 minutes per speaker to outline key arguments and evidence supporting their position. This is followed by a moderated rebuttal and discussion segment, where teams cross-examine opponents, respond to challenges, and refine positions through back-and-forth exchange, often moderated to maintain focus on the motion. An audience question-and-answer period then allows selected attendees to pose queries, with speakers responding briefly to clarify or defend points, fostering interactivity while keeping responses concise. The format concludes with 2-minute closing summaries from each speaker, aimed at swaying undecided voters by recapping persuasive elements without introducing new . This timed progression, totaling around 90 minutes for live events, prioritizes substantive clash over extended oratory, with strict enforcement to prevent dominance by any side. Variations may occur for special formats, such as one-on-one debates, but the core Oxford-style remains standard for flagship events.

Audience Voting and Outcome Measurement

The audience voting process in Intelligence Squared debates begins prior to the opening statements, where attendees use electronic keypads to register their stance on the motion as either "For," "Against," or "Undecided." These pre-debate votes establish a baseline of audience opinion, with the distribution kept confidential until after the event to avoid influencing participants. The system ensures anonymity and captures the initial distribution across the three options, typically reflecting a mix where undecided voters comprise 10-30% depending on the topic's familiarity. Following the conclusion of the —including opening statements, rebuttals, cross-examinations, and closing arguments—the votes again using the same . This post-debate poll measures shifts in opinion, with the same three options available. The process emphasizes over initial majority support, as debaters aim to convert undecided voters or sway those from the opposing side. Outcomes are determined by comparing the percentage point changes in vote shares between pre- and post-debate polls. The winning team is the one that achieves the largest net gain in its favor, calculated as the increase in "For" (for the proposition side) or "Against" (for the opposition) percentages, which incorporates shifts from undecided and opposing voters. For instance, if the "For" side rises from 40% to 50% while "Against" rises from 40% to 45%, the "For" team wins due to the greater swing (10 points vs. 5 points). This methodology prioritizes demonstrable audience persuasion, with results announced immediately after the vote tally, often revealing swings of 10-20 percentage points in competitive debates. While live audience votes are primary, supplementary online polls for remote viewers follow a similar pre- and post-format but do not determine official winners.

Expansion and International Operations

Establishment of Intelligence Squared U.S. (2006)

Intelligence Squared U.S. was established in 2006 by Robert Rosenkranz, a financier and philanthropist who had built his career as CEO of the Delphi Financial Group through successes in insurance and investing. Rosenkranz founded the organization as a nonprofit, nonpartisan entity to counteract what he viewed as the absence of rigorous, civil public discourse on policy matters in the United States, drawing inspiration from the Oxford-style debate format of the British Intelligence Squared series launched four years earlier. His initiative aligned with his philanthropic interests in enhancing public policy deliberation, including direct involvement in selecting topics and participants for early events. The inaugural debate occurred on September 27, , in before a live , centered on the motion "Should the world tolerate a ?" and moderated by NPR's . This event featured panels of experts arguing opposing sides, with pre- and post-voting to measure , establishing that emphasized evidence-based argumentation over . Subsequent early debates in late addressed topics such as Hamas's status as a terrorist organization despite its electoral victory, further solidifying the format's focus on contentious geopolitical issues. From its outset, Intelligence Squared U.S. positioned itself as a platform for intellectual engagement, hosting events in Manhattan to attract policymakers, academics, and informed citizens, while prioritizing balanced representation of viewpoints to foster critical thinking amid polarized media landscapes. Rosenkranz's Rosenkranz Foundation provided foundational support, enabling the series to gain traction through live attendance and initial broadcast partnerships, such as with NPR, which aired select debates to broaden reach. By emphasizing verifiable arguments and audience-driven outcomes, the organization aimed to model substantive debate as a tool for public enlightenment rather than entertainment or advocacy.

Rebranding to Open to Debate and Recent Developments

In April 2023, Intelligence Squared U.S. rebranded as Open to Debate to sharpen its focus on combating polarization through structured, evidence-based discussions, drawing on data from audience vote shifts in prior events that showed measurable changes in viewpoints. The rebranding also addressed naming conflicts with the UK-based for-profit Intelligence Squared, enabling clearer positioning as a nonprofit dedicated to nonpartisan debate. Following the rebrand, Open to Debate expanded its programming, appointing Clea Conner as CEO to lead efforts in producing public policy debates across technology, culture, and geopolitics. In 2024, the organization reported significant growth in its impact report, including increased partnerships and content distribution, while laying groundwork for 2025 initiatives aimed at elevating civil discourse. Key 2024-2025 developments featured debates on timely issues such as U.S. birthright citizenship, the inevitability of war, and tariffs on Chinese imports to address fentanyl flows, often in collaboration with outlets like Bloomberg and Arizona State University. Upcoming events, including a October 10, 2025, discussion on AI's transformation of warfare amid nuclear threats, underscore ongoing efforts to engage audiences with expert-driven analysis of global risks.

Media Production and Dissemination

Podcasts and Digital Content

Intelligence Squared produces podcasts primarily featuring audio recordings and highlights from its live debates, talks, and discussions, making content accessible beyond in-person events. The flagship Intelligence Squared podcast, launched to archive over two decades of programming, delivers edited episodes with participants such as economists, authors, and public intellectuals, and is distributed on platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and SoundCloud, with episodes typically running 45–90 minutes. Specialized podcast series expand thematic coverage: Intelligence Squared Business examines capitalism's evolution through interviews with business leaders and economists, while Intelligence Squared: Arts & Culture provides weekly episodes on contemporary cultural topics, often revisiting archived live sessions from the organization's events. These series maintain the core debate format, emphasizing evidence-based arguments over partisan rhetoric. In the U.S. operations, rebranded as in , the corresponding emphasizes moderated s on and societal issues, such as and democratic institutions, with episodes polling shifts pre- and post-discussion, live . This , rated 4.6 on as of 2025, prioritizes nonpartisan analysis and has partnered with for select broadcasts, though has shifted toward . Digital offerings include subscription tiers via Intelligence Squared+, granting ad-free , early releases, and interactive , with over years of on-demand audio available to members as of 2025. These formats enhance dissemination, reaching global audiences without reliance on traditional broadcast, though listener metrics remain tied to rather than independently audited figures.

Video Distribution and YouTube Presence

Intelligence Squared primarily distributes its debate videos through its official YouTube channel, where full sessions, highlights, and classic debates from past events are made publicly available at no cost. Content includes agenda-setting discussions on topics such as free will, economic outlooks, and geopolitical issues, with uploads dating back to at least 2015 and continuing through 2024. The channel serves as a key repository for archiving and sharing these events, enabling global access to unedited or lightly produced footage of live debates featuring prominent speakers. In addition to YouTube, videos are accessible via the organization's website under the "Watch" section, which hosts on-demand content and links to streams, often integrated with membership perks for priority or exclusive viewing. Membership tiers, such as Silver and , provide early access to new videos, live event streams, and ad-free on-demand playback through the organization's app and online platform. This model supports both free public dissemination on open platforms like YouTube and premium features for supporters, enhancing retention of high-engagement content like economic panels sponsored by partners such as Global Investors. The U.S. affiliate, rebranded as Open to Debate, maintains a separate YouTube channel for its debates, distributing similar video formats including live-tweeted streams via partnerships like FORA.tv and collections on subscription services such as Wondrium. Certain videos from both entities have accumulated substantial viewership, with examples exceeding 1 million views for archival debates on historical and philosophical topics, demonstrating the format's appeal for sustained online engagement. This multi-platform approach prioritizes broad reach while monetizing through memberships and targeted partnerships, without reliance on traditional broadcast exclusivity.

Television and Broadcast Partnerships

Intelligence Squared debates originating in the United Kingdom have been televised through partnerships with the , including broadcasts on and . For instance, the 2019 debate "Brexit: No Deal is Better than a Bad Deal?" was chaired by journalist and aired as part of programming. These events are typically filmed live to capture the unscripted nature of the proceedings for audiences. In the United States, Intelligence Squared U.S. (now rebranded as Open to Debate) established broadcast partnerships with public television networks to expand reach. In April 2012, it announced a collaboration with World Channel, a 24/7 public television service dedicated to global issues, for national broadcasts of select debates. This was followed in November 2012 by an agreement with WTTW Chicago and PBS stations nationwide, enabling monthly airings starting January 17, 2013, thereby increasing visibility on public television. More recently, in , Intelligence Squared U.S. partnered with for the limited debate series That's Debatable, hosted by moderator John Donvan and incorporating elements of analysis from . The series debuted on , , at 7:00 , focusing on contemporary topics to engage and audiences. These television initiatives have complemented the organization's live by disseminating debates to broader viewership beyond in-person .

Collaborations and Institutional Ties

Key Partnerships

Intelligence Squared has established partnerships with media organizations to produce and distribute debate content. In September 2020, it collaborated with Bloomberg Media and IBM to launch the limited series "That's Debatable," hosted by John Donvan and incorporating AI from IBM Watson for audience interaction and insights. Earlier, Bloomberg Television broadcast an Intelligence Squared U.S. debate on economic policy in November 2009. The organization has also partnered with corporate entities for themed debate series. In October 2021, Intelligence Squared teamed with Iberdrola, a renewable energy company, for "Energised," a series examining climate and clean energy topics through expert debates. Additional collaborations include events with the Financial Times, such as the 2024 Economic Outlook featuring Tim Harford, and bespoke productions with brands like Chanel for cultural discussions. For its U.S. operations, now under Open to Debate, key institutional ties include a December 2024 knowledge partnership with the Future Investment Initiative Institute to advance debate formats on global issues. It has also formed a multi-year alliance with Johns Hopkins University's SNF Agora Institute for live debates starting in the early 2020s, focusing on democratic discourse. Philanthropic support sustains operations, with founding funder Robert Rosenkranz and donors including Paul Singer, alongside foundations such as the John Templeton Foundation listed as visionary supporters.

Academic and Media Alliances

Intelligence Squared has established partnerships with several academic institutions, primarily through its U.S. arm (now rebranded as Open to Debate), to host and co-produce debate series. In September 2025, Open to Debate announced a collaboration with Arizona State University's Institute of Politics to launch the "PRO/CONVERSATIONS" series, featuring live debates on policy topics such as birthright citizenship, aimed at engaging students and faculty in structured discourse. Similarly, in an ongoing two-year partnership with Johns Hopkins University's SNF Agora Institute, the organization produces live debate events focused on democratic challenges, integrating academic expertise into public forums. Additional academic ties include co-hosting events with 's Richman Center for Business, Law, and , which culminated in joint debates during the center's inaugural year, and collaborations with for forums like the 2016 debate on globalization's impact on America's . Northwestern University's Minow Debate Series has also featured Intelligence Squared U.S. formats, with events addressing topics like expansion in 2021. These alliances often involve university venues for live audiences and leverage institutional networks for speaker selection, though they remain event-specific rather than formal endowments. Events have been hosted at institutions including and , facilitating campus-based discussions on issues like speech and . In media alliances, Intelligence Squared maintains broadcast partnerships to amplify debate reach. Its U.S. debates have been regularly aired on National Public Radio (NPR) stations since the mid-2000s, with over 170 events distributed nationally to promote evidence-based argumentation. Bloomberg Television partnered in 2009 to expand coverage, co-producing debates and integrating them into programming, a relationship that evolved into the 2020 "That's Debatable" series hosted by Bloomberg journalists. Earlier media ties included Newsweek for promotional and broadcast support, while public television outlets like World Channel have simulcast events since 2012. These alliances prioritize outlets with established audiences for policy discourse, enabling wider dissemination without editorial control over debate outcomes.

Reception and Cultural Impact

Audience Engagement and Viewership Metrics

The hallmark of audience engagement at Intelligence Squared U.S. (now Open to Debate) lies in its structured polling mechanism, where participants vote before and after each live debate on the motion at hand. Data from numerous events reveal that, on average, 32% of the audience shifts their stance from one side to the other post-debate, demonstrating the format's capacity to prompt substantive opinion changes through exposure to opposing arguments. This metric, derived from consistent pre- and post-event surveys, highlights a level of intellectual openness uncommon in polarized public forums. Live debates routinely draw sold-out crowds to venues, fostering immersive participation in Oxford-style confrontations on , , and . Since its in 2006, the has hosted over 200 such , with audience polls not only gauging vote swings but also tracking attitudinal shifts toward greater for counterviews. Digital dissemination amplifies reach beyond physical attendance, with podcasts airing weekly on platforms like public radio (e.g., WNYC) and major streaming services, attracting an estimated 100,000 to 500,000 monthly listeners for the core series. Video content on the Open to Debate YouTube channel, featuring full debates and clips, garners engagement through subscriber growth to around 276,000 and per-video views ranging from tens of thousands to over a million for high-profile topics. These metrics reflect sustained interest in archived and live-streamed discussions, though exact totals vary by platform analytics and topic salience.

Influence on Public Discourse and Opinion Shifts

Intelligence Squared's Oxford-style debates have demonstrated measurable influence on audience opinions through a distinctive polling mechanism, where participants vote before and after the event, and the side achieving the largest net percentage swing is declared the winner. This format incentivizes debaters to persuade undecided and opposing voters, often resulting in significant shifts. For example, in the September 2011 debate on the motion "Men Are Finished," initial support stood at 20% for the affirmative and 54% against, but post-debate polls reflected a 46% swing toward the affirmative, with the winning side garnering majority backing. Similarly, the 2016 debate on "Free Speech Is Threatened on College Campuses" saw affirmative support rise from 49% to 66%, a 17-percentage-point gain that secured victory for that side. Empirical patterns from multiple debates reveal that opinion changes are more pronounced on science and technology issues—where audiences exhibit higher volatility—than on politics or economics, where views remain relatively stable due to prior entrenchment. Other notable swings include 38% for rationing end-of-life care and 37% for banning college football, underscoring the persuasive impact of structured argumentation on live attendees. Computational models of debate transcripts further attribute these shifts to the interplay of substantive content and rhetorical delivery, rather than mere style alone. Beyond immediate audiences, the organization's dissemination via NPR broadcasts, YouTube, and podcasts amplifies these exchanges, contributing to broader public discourse by modeling evidence-based rebuttal and exposing remote viewers to expert contention on contentious topics. This approach counters polarization by compelling engagement with counterarguments, though its societal-scale effects remain indirect, reliant on media reach rather than tracked long-term opinion trends.

Criticisms and Analytical Perspectives

Claims of Topic Selection Bias

Critics have occasionally alleged that Intelligence Squared selects debate topics with an implicit liberal slant, prioritizing issues aligned with progressive concerns such as climate change, affirmative action, and policing reforms while underrepresenting conservative priorities like fiscal conservatism or traditional values. However, such claims lack empirical substantiation, as the organization's debate archive demonstrates coverage of propositions critical of left-leaning institutions and policies, including "Liberals Are Stifling Intellectual Diversity On Campus," where the affirmative side prevailed in shifting audience opinion, and "Blame Liberals For The Rise of Populism." Independent media bias evaluators have assessed Intelligence Squared U.S. (now Open to Debate) as centrist or least biased in its approach, attributing this to its consistent format of pitting structured opposing arguments on politically diverse topics, from immigration enforcement—"Let's Stop Welcoming Undocumented Immigrants"—to media critique—"Good Riddance to Mainstream Media." These ratings emphasize the nonprofit's nonpartisan selection process, which draws from public policy, culture, and science without favoring one ideological camp, as evidenced by audience vote shifts in both directions across 200+ debates since 2006. Allegations of selection bias often stem from dissatisfaction with debate outcomes rather than topic curation, such as the 2017 "Give Trump a Chance" motion, where initial support eroded post-debate, prompting conservative outlets to question framing despite the topic's direct engagement with right-wing electoral success. No systematic analysis has quantified topic imbalance; instead, the breadth—including affirmative action critiques at Harvard Law debates—counters narratives of avoidance. Overall, claims remain anecdotal and unverified against the record of ideological pluralism.

Evaluations of Speaker Balance and Moderation

Intelligence Squared U.S., now operating as Open to Debate, structures its Oxford-style debates to promote speaker balance by selecting two proponents and two opponents for each motion, with speakers chosen for their expertise and ability to represent opposing viewpoints effectively. This format allocates equal speaking time—typically seven minutes per opening statement, followed by rebuttals, cross-examinations, and closing arguments—while a single moderator enforces rules to prevent interruptions and ensure substantive discourse. The organization's stated commitment to "restoring balance to the public square through expert moderation, good-faith arguments, and reasoned analysis" underpins this approach, with motions framed as testable propositions rather than open-ended discussions. Independent assessments affirm the organization's efforts at balance, rating Open to Debate as "least biased" due to its consistent presentation of diverse, opposing perspectives across ideological lines, though impartiality ultimately hinges on moderator neutrality and examiner rigor. For factual reporting, it receives high marks for sourcing debates to primary expert testimony and tracking audience vote shifts as a measure of persuasion rather than predetermined outcomes. In practice, this has yielded wins for underdog positions in politically charged debates, such as the 2017 motion "Policing Is Racially Biased," where opponents (including data-driven analysts) swung the audience vote by 22 points despite initial support for the affirmative. Criticisms of speaker selection remain sporadic and debate-specific rather than systemic. Participants or observers occasionally question composition in high-stakes topics, as in the 2004 UK debate on NHS , where opponents of the motion argued post-event that undervalued over rhetorical , though this reflected dissatisfaction with the outcome rather than inherent imbalance. Moderation under long-time Donvan has drawn for maintaining without injecting personal views, as evidenced by consistent audience shifts driven by arguments rather than procedural favoritism across over 100 U.S. events since 2006. No widespread exists of ideological in speaker invitations, with motions covering contentious issues like free speech, , and AI ethics featuring balanced expert lineups from academia, policy, and . Overall, the model's emphasis on pre- and post-debate polling quantifies persuasive , reinforcing perceptions of fairness by tying to audience reasoning rather than panels.

References

  1. [1]
    Intelligence Squared | Organization | C-SPAN.org
    Intelligence Squared. Intelligence Squared is an organisation that stages debates around the world. It was founded in 2002 in London where its head office ...
  2. [2]
    Intelligence Squared - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding
    Intelligence Squared is a forum for debate and intelligent discussion. Founded. obfuscated. obfuscation. Private London, England, United Kingdom 11-50 www.
  3. [3]
    What Is The Oxford-Style Debate Format?
    Jan 4, 2019 · The Oxford-style format is broken down into four sections: opening remarks, an intra-panel discussion, a question-and-answer period, ...
  4. [4]
    About - Intelligence Squared
    Intelligence Squared has established itself as the leading forum for live, agenda-setting debates, talks and discussions around the world.
  5. [5]
    Open to Debate - - Areas of Interest - Rosenkranz Foundation
    The series is based on the traditional Oxford-style debate format, with one side proposing and the other side opposing a sharply-framed motion. Before the ...
  6. [6]
    What We Do: Debate with an Open Mind
    A nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, Open to Debate, formerly known as Intelligence Squared U.S. addresses a fundamental problem in America: the extreme ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Intelligence Squared Debates - Philanthropy Roundtable
    Not only the audience but also website visitors are given a chance to vote their own position on the debate topic, both before it takes place and right after.
  8. [8]
    Intelligence Squared debate: Is nationalism a force for good?
    Jul 15, 2020 · As global problems continue to mount, does the 21st century require international leadership, or is nationalism a force for good?
  9. [9]
    Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates “Policing Is Racially Biased” in ...
    Jan 4, 2017 · Sessions' controversial nomination comes amidst increased demand for racial justice in policing fueled by the highly publicized deaths of black ...
  10. [10]
    The Bright Idea: The IQ2 US Debates - The Atlas Society
    IQ2 had been begun in the fall of 2002 by two media men: Jeremy O'Grady and John Gordon. ... Rosenkranz was impressed and received permission from the British ...
  11. [11]
    Rockefeller hosts 2008 IQ2 debates - News
    Sep 26, 2008 · IQ2US is modeled on the original organization, founded in London in 2002 by media entrepreneur John Gordon and editor in chief of The Week ...
  12. [12]
    A piece of their minds - The Economist
    Nov 21, 2002 · The first couple of debates on the Intelligence Squared card, on fox-hunting and Iraq, drew around 900 punters between them. This week's debate, ...
  13. [13]
    How the chattering classes turned to talk | British identity and society
    Mar 28, 2004 · The same market was invaded in 2002 by Intelligence Squared, a company set up by two young media businessmen, Jeremy O'Grady and John Gordon, ...
  14. [14]
    Let's Talk About It: The Rise of the Debating Club - Spear's Magazine
    Mar 20, 2012 · Sensing a desire for debate, using their flare for social enterprise, Gordon and O'Grady set up IQ2 in 2002 with a debate about fox hunting, two ...
  15. [15]
    Intelligent? That's debatable | Higher education | The Guardian
    John Gordon, one of the organisers, puts the popularity of Intelligence Squared partly down to the fact that "the TV coverage of Iraq is so appalling that ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] A Multimodal Predictive Model of Successful Debaters or How I ...
    the Intelligence Squared U.S. (IQ2US) organization. IQ2US ... Speakers have a maximum of seven minutes for their opening statements and two minutes.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Conversational Flow in Oxford-style Debates
    Oxford-style debates from the public debate series. “Intelligence Squared Debates” (IQ2 for short).2. These debates are recorded live, and contain mo- tions ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Oxford Style Debate - United States Courts
    Total Time: 90 min. The specified time limits are guidelines and should not be rigorously enforced. After the volunteer lawyers have set the stage and ...
  19. [19]
    How to win at Intelligence Squared US - Vox
    Apr 19, 2016 · Audiences change their minds most often on issues of science and technology ... Intelligence Squared debates cover a bunch of different topics. My ...
  20. [20]
    Intelligence Squared debates: voting data | Having New Eyes
    Jul 27, 2014 · After the debate, the audience is again polled. During both sets of votes, audience members can select “For,” “Against,” or “Undecided.” The ...Missing: works measurement
  21. [21]
    Debate: Was Edward Snowden Justified? - NPR
    Feb 18, 2014 · ... Intelligence Squared U.S. In these events, the team that sways the most people by the end of the debate is declared the winner. Debate: Was ...
  22. [22]
    Blumner: IQ2US an oasis of civilized debate - The Salt Lake Tribune
    Intelligence Squared U.S., an Oxford style debate ... The winning team is the one that sways the most people, not the one with the most votes. ... Intelligence ...
  23. [23]
    Robert Rosenkranz - - Board of Directors
    He is the Founder and Chairman of Intelligence Squared U.S., a public policy debate series that provides a forum for reasoned public discourse. He serves on ...
  24. [24]
    Robert Rosenkranz Creates Debate on Hot-Button Issues with ...
    Jun 11, 2013 · Rosenkranz created the debate series in response to his frustration with what he saw as the lack of true public discourse in the United States.
  25. [25]
    Debating a Nuclear Iran
    Oct 20, 2006 · ... Intelligence Squared program which began in London in 2002. The first U.S. debate, held Sept. 27 and moderated by Robert Siegel, brought ...
  26. [26]
    Intelligence Squared U.S. : NPR
    December 6, 2006 • Hamas was democratically elected by Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. Is it still a terrorist organization? Expert panelists consider ...
  27. [27]
    Intelligence Squared U.S. Is Becoming "Open to Debate"
    Apr 11, 2023 · Founded in 2006, the organization has produced over 220 debates ... " The company produced the first debate between artificial intelligence ...
  28. [28]
    Rebranding & Renaming of Open to Debate - Odgis + Co
    The problem that forced the renaming was that Intelligence Squared US (a not-for-profit organization) had the same name as the for-profit UK debate company that ...
  29. [29]
    IQ2US Rebrands as “Open to Debate” - Radio World
    Apr 11, 2023 · Media company Intelligence Squared U.S. is rebranding as Open to Debate. The nonprofit organization, which seeks to address polarization in the ...
  30. [30]
    Open to Debate (Formerly Intelligence Squared U.S.) Appoints Clea ...
    A nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, Open to Debate, formerly known as Intelligence Squared U.S. addresses a fundamental problem in America: the extreme ...Missing: rebrands | Show results with:rebrands<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    A Year of Growth and Change - Open to Debate
    Dec 20, 2024 · This impact report is intended to offer an overview of highlights from 2024, and to lay the foundation for another impactful year in 2025.
  32. [32]
    Open to Debate's 2024 year in review—a journey bold and swell
    Dec 21, 2024 · Open to Debate, in partnership with Bloomberg, is taking a closer look at a region that is strategizing its best move to become a competitor in ...
  33. [33]
    Latest - Open to Debate
    With geopolitical tensions rising, AI transforming warfare, and nuclear threats never… With Dylan Motin, Gabrielle Rifkind. October 10, 2025 ...
  34. [34]
    In the News - Open to Debate
    President Trump recently enacted a ten percent additional tariff on Chinese imports, citing the need to curb the flow of fentanyl into the United States.
  35. [35]
    Open to Debate: America's Leading Platform for Debate
    A nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, Open to Debate, formerly known as Intelligence Squared U.S. addresses a fundamental problem in America: the extreme ...Debates · Latest - Open to Debate · Contact Us · Where to Find Us
  36. [36]
    Podcast - Intelligence Squared
    With over 20 years worth of live debates, talks and discussions this podcast brings you the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential thinkers in the ...
  37. [37]
    Intelligence Squared - Apple Podcasts
    Rating 4.3 (721) Intelligence Squared is the home of lively debate and deep-dive discussion. Follow Intelligence Squared wherever you get your podcasts and enjoy four regular ...
  38. [38]
    Intelligence Squared | Podcast on Spotify
    Listen to Intelligence Squared on Spotify. Intelligence Squared is the home of lively debate and deep-dive discussion. Follow Intelligence Squared wherever ...
  39. [39]
    Intelligence Squared Business
    We speak to business leaders, authors, public intellectuals and economists about the future of capitalism and the trends changing the world of economics & ...
  40. [40]
    Intelligence Squared: Arts & Culture
    Join us every week as we feature the best of culture today and revisit some of the best live podcasts we have produced over the last twenty years.
  41. [41]
    Intelligence Squared U.S. Is now “Open to Debate”
    Our mission is to restore critical thinking, facts, reason, and civility to American public discourse. Debates · Insights · About.
  42. [42]
    Open to Debate - Apple Podcasts
    Rating 4.6 (2,103) We bring multiple perspectives together for real, nonpartisan debates. Debates that are structured, respectful, clever, provocative, and driven by the facts.
  43. [43]
    Intelligence Squared U.S. : NPR
    Two teams face off over the motion, "Containment is Not Enough: ISIS Must Be Defeated" in an Intelligence Squared US debate.
  44. [44]
    Intelligence Squared
    Join Intelligence Squared today to get access to live, interactive events every week and our full archive on Intelligence Squared+.
  45. [45]
    Podcasts - Intelligence Squared
    Intelligence Squared. Showcasing the very best of our live debates, talks and discussions with some of the most influential thinkers in the world.
  46. [46]
    Should We Fear the Digital Revolution? [2015] | Intelligence Squared
    Jan 5, 2024 · In this clip from our 2015 session titled 'Be afraid, be very afraid: the robots are coming and they will destroy our livelihoods,' speakers ...Missing: distribution | Show results with:distribution
  47. [47]
    DEBATE: Is Free Speech Under Threat? (Part 1) - YouTube
    Oct 11, 2024 · ... channel and turn on notifications: https ... The Free Will Debate | Intelligence Squared. Intelligence Squared•16K ...
  48. [48]
    Full Sessions - Intelligence Squared - YouTube
    Intelligence Squared has established itself as the leading forum for live, agenda-setting debates, talks and discussions around the world.
  49. [49]
    Watch - Intelligence Squared
    Debate: Sanctions Don't Work as a Tool of Foreign Policy. Rebecca Harding (via video link), Ian Proud, Edward Lucas, Tom Keatinge, Anne McElvoy ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Membership - Intelligence Squared
    Includes video-on-demand, live streamed events, all online and via our app; One free in-person event ticket per year of membership. Become a Member. Patron.
  51. [51]
    The Intelligence Squared Economic Outlook, with Tim Harford
    Nov 29, 2024 · Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel ... us to interrogate what the numbers are really telling us ...Missing: Debate | Show results with:Debate
  52. [52]
    Intelligence Squared U.S. / Open to Debate Showcases Live In ...
    The new FORA.tv video player will play live streams and on-demand video directly in tweets; Intelligent Squared U.S. will use the capability to share tonight's ...
  53. [53]
    Intelligence Squared U.S. Launches New Debate Collection on ...
    Nov 12, 2021 · Wondrium is a newly rebranded global subscription video on demand (SVOD) service offering over 7,500 hours of a broad slate of intellectually ...
  54. [54]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qgqa7MsnMGc
  55. [55]
    Intelligence Squared - Wikipedia
    Intelligence Squared uses the traditional Oxford-Style debate format inspired by the Oxford Union. A motion is proposed, with two speakers arguing in favour ...History · Debate format · Intelligence Squared U.S.
  56. [56]
    BBC News - Intelligence Squared Debate - Episode guide
    Episode guide: Brexit: No Deal is Better than a Bad Deal? The BBC's Nick Robinson chairs a debate on how Britain should leave the European Union.
  57. [57]
    Intelligence Squared - BBC News
    Jun 13, 2011 · Intelligence Squared takes you to the heart of the issues and the arguments that matter, in the company of some of the world's sharpest minds and most exciting ...Missing: PBS | Show results with:PBS
  58. [58]
    Intelligence Squared U.S., World Channel Partner for National ...
    Apr 11, 2012 · Intelligence Squared U.S., World Channel Partner for National Broadcast. NEW YORK, NY—April 11, 2012— Beginning April 13th, WORLD, public ...Missing: rebranding date
  59. [59]
    Public Policy Debate Series Intelligence Squared U.S.
    Starting January 17, Intelligence Squared U.S. debates will air monthly on PBS stations throughout 2013. The first episode to air nationally ...
  60. [60]
    Debate series launched on pubradio comes to PBS - Current.org
    Nov 13, 2012 · Intelligence Squared U.S., the nonpartisan public policy debate series airing on public radio and some public TV stations, is coming to PBS ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Bloomberg-Television-Intelligence-Squared-US-Announce-Lineup ...
    On Friday, October 9 at 7:00 PM ET Bloomberg Television will debut the new limited series “That's Debatable,” presented in partnership with Intelligence Squared ...Missing: broadcast | Show results with:broadcast
  62. [62]
    Bloomberg Media and Intelligence Squared U.S. present a new ...
    Sep 3, 2020 · “By partnering with Intelligence Squared for 'That's Debatable,' we will provide viewers with thoughtful discourse and insights into some of the ...Missing: broadcast | Show results with:broadcast
  63. [63]
    Bloomberg Broadcasts MSM Debate - ADWEEK
    Nov 2, 2009 · As a part of the Intelligence Squared US debate series, BloombergTV will be broadcasting a special debate titled “Good Riddance to the ...
  64. [64]
    Energised: A Series of Debates within Climate and Clean Energy
    Oct 13, 2021 · In this debate series from Intelligence Squared – in partnership with Iberdrola, a leading company in the field of renewable energy – we will hear from experts ...
  65. [65]
    The Intelligence Squared Economic Outlook, with Tim Harford
    In partnership with. For the final instalment of the Intelligence Squared Economic Outlook series for 2024, Financial Times columnist Tim Harford joined us ...
  66. [66]
    Partnerships - Intelligence Squared
    Intelligence Squared Partnerships puts you on stage and helps you deliver just the right message to your audience.Missing: television | Show results with:television
  67. [67]
    Open to Debate Announces Knowledge Partnership with Future ...
    Dec 6, 2024 · A nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, Open to Debate, formerly known as Intelligence Squared U.S. addresses a fundamental problem in America: ...
  68. [68]
    Open to Debate and Johns Hopkins University's SNF Agora Institute ...
    Open to Debate and Johns Hopkins University's SNF Agora Institute Partner for Two-Year Live Debate Series ; Open to Debate, the leading nonpartisan media ...
  69. [69]
    Membership - Debate Club
    Join the Open to Debate Society ; VISIONARY SUPPORTERS. Edward Conard; Robert Epstein · The John Templeton Foundation ; POLYMATH. David A. Coulter, Esq. Ravenel B.
  70. [70]
    Open to Debate and ASU's Institute of Politics Launch 'PRO ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · Nonprofit media platform Open to Debate today announced a new partnership with Arizona State University's Institute of Politics to bring live ...
  71. [71]
    Innovative Partnership Caps Richman Center's First Year | Columbia ...
    Innovative Partnership Caps Richman Center's First Year ... partnership with Intelligence Squared U.S., an ... University Professor and Nobel Prize–winning ...
  72. [72]
    Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates - The Proposition "Globalization ...
    Presented by Intelligence Squared US in partnership with Georgetown University live at the first Georgetown University Women's Forum.
  73. [73]
    We Should Expand the Supreme Court, Minow Debate Series ...
    Sep 30, 2021 · A non-partisan, non-profit organization, Intelligence Squared U.S. was founded in 2006 to address a fundamental problem in America: the extreme ...
  74. [74]
    Intelligence Squared Debate Tonight! - FIRE
    Tonight at 6:00 p.m., the 101st debate of the Intelligence Squared US debate series will take place at the Jack Morton Auditorium at George Washington ...
  75. [75]
    Intelligence Squared Debates, Minus Shouting, Win Partners
    Sep 20, 2009 · The producers of Intelligence Squared U.S. hope they can seize the political spotlight with live “Oxford style” debates on polarizing ...Missing: Fair | Show results with:Fair
  76. [76]
    Majority in Sold-Out Intelligence Squared U.S. / Open to Debate ...
    ' Prior to the debate, 23% of the audience was in favor of the motion, 45 % were against it and 32% were undecided. When it was over, the side arguing against ...Missing: engagement viewership metrics
  77. [77]
    Intelligence Squared: Contact Information, Journalists, and Overview
    Audience metrics · Listenership. 100K-500K monthly listeners · Reviews. 4.3 (593 ratings) ...
  78. [78]
    15 Debate YouTubers You Must Follow in 2025
    ... YouTube, and OpentoDebate.org. (Formerly Intelligence Squared U.S.) Email ****@opentodebate.org YouTube Subscribers 276KType Macro Since May 2007 Follow Get ...<|separator|>
  79. [79]
    Overwhelming Victory for the Motion "Men Are Finished" at
    Overwhelming Victory for the Motion "Men Are Finished" at Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates · 20% of audience agreeing with the resolution · 54% of audience ...
  80. [80]
    Is free speech threatened on college campuses? An audience casts ...
    Mar 2, 2016 · In Jason Stanley's classrooms at Yale, civil debates about controversial topics take place all the time, professor said during a recent IQ2 ...Missing: polling | Show results with:polling<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    The Glaring Evidence That Free Speech Is Threatened on Campus
    Mar 4, 2016 · That represented a 17-point shift from a poll taken as the event began. The evidence is that persuasive. One of the losers in the debate was ...Missing: vote | Show results with:vote
  82. [82]
    [PDF] The Joint Effects of Content and Style on Debate Outcomes
    Ideally, how- ever, debates would be won on the merits, as a function of which side has the stronger ar- guments. We propose a predictive model of debate that ...
  83. [83]
    How to Use Debate to Boost Audience Engagement - PCMA
    Jan 30, 2020 · In the Oxford-style debate format used here by Intelligence Squared USA, two teams argue for and against a statement decided in advance.
  84. [84]
    Racial Preferences Under Siege - National Review
    Mar 20, 2014 · Last month, a packed auditorium at Harvard Law School featured an Intelligence Squared U.S. debate on whether “affirmative action does more ...
  85. [85]
    Liberals Are Stifling Intellectual Diversity On Campus - Open to Debate
    Are liberals shutting down speech and debate on campus? Or is this theory a myth, based on the preponderance of liberals at universities rather than ...
  86. [86]
    Blame Liberals For the Rise of Populism - Intelligence Squared
    Some would argue the blame for the rise in populism rests with liberal left politicians in the West. For decades, they promoted high levels of immigration and a ...
  87. [87]
    Open to Debate Bias and Reliability | Ad Fontes Media
    Bias scores for articles and shows are on a scale of -42 to +42, with higher negative scores being more left, higher positive scores being more right, and ...
  88. [88]
    Open to Debate - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
    Jan 17, 2024 · Overall, we rate Open to Debate as least biased based on its commitment to presenting various and opposing opinions in debates. We also rate ...
  89. [89]
    Enforcement Wins — in Manhattan? | National Review
    I did a debate last night in New York hosted by Intelligence Squared on the motion “Let's stop welcoming undocumented immigrants.
  90. [90]
    Good Riddance To Mainstream Media - Open to Debate
    ... Intelligence Squared US, Mr. Robert Rosenkranz. [APPLAUSE] ROBERT ROSENKRANZ ... liberal bias in the media. It is who is heard and how people are heard ...
  91. [91]
    GW debate sways audience against giving Trump a chance
    Feb 2, 2017 · A spokesperson for Intelligence Squared, however, explained that the ... Jackson was a D.C. Campus Correspondent covering liberal bias and abuse ...
  92. [92]
    Harry Stern and Heather Mac Donald Win Debate in Support of ...
    ... Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates, the world's ... The team that sways the most audience members to ... *Graphic courtesy of Intelligence Squared U.S..
  93. [93]
    Intelligence squared? Regrettably not: 'The NHS is broken
    Speakers from the floor mentioned the dangers of allowing patient preference to trump medical science and politicians to interfere in the work of health ...Missing: evaluation criticism
  94. [94]
    Utne Q&A with John Donvan of Intelligence Squared
    Feb 26, 2015 · Intelligence Squared U.S. is an Oxford-style debate series covering a range of relevant controversial topics, from science refuting God to “too ...
  95. [95]
    All Debates | Open to Debate
    A nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, Open to Debate, formerly known as Intelligence Squared U.S. addresses a fundamental problem in America: the extreme ...Latest - Open to Debate · Upcoming debates · Trending · In the News