Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Jet bridge

A jet bridge, also known as a passenger boarding bridge, jetway, or aerobridge, is an enclosed, movable walkway that extends from an gate to an 's door, enabling passengers to board and disembark while protected from and ground hazards. These structures are typically elevated and powered by electric motors, allowing them to adjust in height, length, and angle to accommodate different types. The concept of the jet bridge emerged in the mid-20th century amid the rise of commercial jet aviation, with early prototypes dating back to in the form of basic movable walkways at airports like and Gatwick. Modern jet bridges trace their origins to post-World War II innovations, including the 1952 Whiting Loadair system in , , and the 1954 Airdock design in , but the pivotal development came in 1958 when introduced the Aero-Gangplank at Chicago O'Hare International Airport, marking the first widespread use of an enclosed, telescoping bridge. By 1959, had implemented similar enclosed systems at , standardizing left-side boarding and accelerating their global adoption. Jet bridges offer significant advantages, including enhanced passenger safety by minimizing exposure to ramp vehicles and , faster boarding times, and improved for passengers with disabilities through features like lifts. They come in various types to suit different and needs, such as the common apron-drive model that rotates from a fixed , nose-loader bridges for direct front-door access, T-loaders for multiple-door servicing, and specialized designs like the A380 apron-drive for . Despite these benefits, challenges include potential damage from misalignment, constraints at crowded gates, and maintenance requirements for their complex mechanical systems. Today, jet bridges are a standard feature at major worldwide, evolving with advancements in and materials to support efficient .

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

A jet bridge, also known as a passenger boarding bridge, jetway, aerobridge, or skybridge, is an enclosed, elevated, and movable passageway that connects an gate directly to an door. This infrastructure element allows for the seamless transfer of passengers and crew between the terminal and the while maintaining a controlled . The term "jetway" originated as a trademarked brand name for early models developed by manufacturers like Pacific Iron and Steel Corporation in the late , and it has since become a generic descriptor for similar devices. The primary purpose of a jet bridge is to provide sheltered access, protecting passengers from weather conditions such as rain, snow, extreme temperatures, or wind during boarding and deboarding. This enclosed pathway facilitates efficient flow, reducing aircraft turnaround times by streamlining the boarding process and minimizing exposure-related disruptions that could lead to delays. Additionally, it supports continuity in protocols by keeping passengers within the secured area until directly reaching the . Today, they are a standard feature at major airports worldwide, accommodating both wide-body and to enhance overall .

Basic Components

A typical jet bridge, also known as a passenger boarding bridge (PBB), consists of several key structural and mechanical elements designed to facilitate secure connectivity between the airport and . The rotunda serves as the fixed attachment point to the building, featuring a rotating around a central support column that allows the bridge to pivot horizontally for alignment with the . Adjacent to the rotunda are the telescopic tunnels, which form the extendable corridor and typically comprise two to three nested sections that slide outward to bridge the distance to the ; the outermost section is the largest to accommodate passenger flow. The elevation system, often utilizing hydraulic cylinders or recirculating ball screws mounted on parallel columns, adjusts the height of the bridge to match the door sill, ensuring level access. At the end, the cabin provides a sealed passenger interface, incorporating an adjustable canopy or folding to create a weatherproof enclosure around the . Supporting mobility, the traction system employs wheels or rollers, typically with pneumatic or solid rubber tires driven by gear motors, enabling precise horizontal movement across the apron. Construction materials prioritize durability, lightness, and weather to withstand environments. The telescopic tunnels and frames are primarily built from aluminum alloy for its properties and , while structural elements like the rotunda and elevation columns may incorporate for added strength. Rubber seals and ensure weatherproofing at joints and the cabin interface, and glass panels are integrated into walls and for and natural lighting. Standard dimensions accommodate most commercial while optimizing space. When fully extended, a jet bridge measures approximately 20-30 in length, with a width of 2.5-3.5 to align with aircraft doors and an adjustable height ranging from 2 to 10 to accommodate varying door sill elevations. Interior clearances typically include a minimum height of 2 and width of 1.3 for passenger comfort. Integration with airport infrastructure occurs primarily at the rotunda, where electrical panels provide (e.g., 120V outlets), pneumatic or hydraulic lines supply elevation and drive systems, and data connections (such as CAT6 outlets) enable and communication interfaces.

Types and Variations

Standard Configurations

The standard configuration of a jet bridge, also known as a boarding bridge (), employs a single-tunnel telescopic that predominates in for single-deck , including the and Airbus A320. This setup features one extendable corridor composed of two or three telescoping sections with a rectangular cross-section, where the largest section is positioned nearest the to facilitate smooth flow while adjusting to distances between the terminal gate and the parked plane. The telescoping mechanism allows extension or retraction over a range typically spanning 10 to 20 meters, ensuring precise without requiring repositioning. A fixed rotunda at the terminal interface incorporates pivoting capability, generally supporting 180 to 270 degrees of to accommodate varying parking angles on the and align the bridge with the designated . This rotational flexibility, driven by electric motors or hydraulic systems, enables the bridge to service multiple stand positions efficiently within constrained gate areas. Height adjustments in standard configurations rely on automated leveling systems, often electromechanical or hydraulic, to elevate or lower the outer end of the bridge to the door sill, typically ranging from 3 to 5 meters for narrow-body jets. These systems compensate for undercarriage compression variations caused by , , and passenger loads, maintaining a level walkway with a recommended of 1:16 to 1:20, not exceeding 1:12 (8.33%), for accessibility and safety. Designed primarily for nose or mid-door boarding on , these bridges integrate drive or drive systems to enhance adaptability to and plane geometries. drive configurations position the entire bridge on a mobile with wheels or bogies, allowing lateral and rotational movement across the for versatile utilization amid changing mixes. In contrast, drive setups keep the bridge fixed at the while extending the corridor sections, suitable for stable layouts with minimal repositioning needs. Core components like the tunnels and mechanisms are calibrated during to match site-specific heights and door widths, typically 0.7 to 1 meter.

Specialized Designs

Specialized jet bridges adapt to unique operational challenges, such as accommodating multi-level aircraft, space-constrained gates, or temporary setups at less-equipped facilities. These designs prioritize flexibility, efficiency, and safety while addressing limitations of standard single-tunnel configurations used for most narrow- and wide-body jets. Double-deck bridges cater specifically to wide-body aircraft like the Airbus A380, featuring dual tunnels or elevating platforms that enable simultaneous access to upper and lower passenger doors. This setup allows for efficient boarding of up to 555 passengers by connecting separate bridges to each deck, reducing turnaround times compared to sequential access. For instance, at airports like Los Angeles International and San Francisco International, dual bridges handle the A380's double-decker structure, with one bridge serving the main lower deck and another elevated to the upper deck. Manufacturers such as TK Elevator provide flexible systems that service both decks of A380s alongside other aircraft types at dedicated gates. ADELTE's configurations also support A380 operations through multi-body designs with hydraulic or electromechanical elevation to align with varying door heights. Nose-loader bridges and multiple-bridge gates address constraints in parking areas or high-throughput environments, including configurations for freighter aircraft and busy passenger hubs. Nose-loader designs, anchored to the terminal with a telescopic tunnel extending to the aircraft nose, facilitate precise docking in restricted spaces where standard rotunda-based bridges cannot maneuver effectively. These are used for passenger boarding on commercial flights in tight gate setups, as seen in TK Elevator's models with automated pre-positioning to minimize errors. For high-volume hubs, multiple bridges per aircraft—typically two, one forward and one aft—accelerate passenger flow on wide-bodies, with post-2020 airport builds often incorporating 2–3 bridges per widebody gate to support larger fleets. While freighters primarily rely on cargo-specific loaders, some hybrid gates adapt nose-loader principles for mixed-use scenarios at cargo-passenger facilities. ADELTE's multi-body PBBs, with two or three sections, exemplify this by enabling forward and aft access for efficient operations. Remote or mobile bridges offer portable solutions for temporary gates, remote stands, or smaller regional lacking fixed infrastructure. These non-rotunda units, often towed manually or via , provide step-free access without permanent installation. Aviramp's International model, for example, serves wide-bodies like the and 787 on remote stands, using a solar-powered or hydraulic system operable by one person, with heights adjustable from 320 cm to 520 cm and anti-slip flooring for all-weather use. Such bridges enhance flexibility at under-equipped sites, supporting from A320s to A380 lower decks while requiring minimal maintenance. Post-2020 innovations emphasize and compactness, including electrified designs that replace systems with electric motors to cut emissions and use. Regulatory pressures in the and have driven adoption of these eco-friendly bridges, which integrate recyclable materials and power for quieter, more efficient operation. Slim-profile bridges, tailored for tight stands accommodating aircraft like the 787, feature compact 'low rider' elevations and reduced tunnel widths to fit constrained layouts without compromising alignment. TK Elevator's electromechanical systems and Aviramp's solar variants exemplify this shift, promoting greener airport infrastructure.

History

Invention and Early Development

The jet bridge, also known as a passenger boarding bridge, originated from the need to streamline aircraft operations during the post-World War II aviation boom. Early precursors included basic movable walkways at airports like and Gatwick in , the 1952 Whiting Loadair system in , , and the 1954 Airdock design in . Der Yuen, a Chinese-American aeronautical engineer and graduate, conceptualized the modern enclosed device in the mid-1950s, drawing on his wartime experience with efficient loading systems. This innovation addressed the challenges of expanding airports and the emerging , where increasing passenger volumes demanded faster boarding times, protection from inclement weather, and reduced exposure to blast—issues exacerbated by the shift from propeller-driven to faster jets like the Boeing 707. Development accelerated when Air Terminal, Inc. licensed Der Yuen's concept and collaborated with Air Lines to build the first , known as the Aero-Gangplank. This early model featured a telescoping, enclosed that extended from the terminal to the , powered by hydraulic systems for elevation and a motorized for horizontal movement, with manual assistance for final alignment. The design evolved from fixed gangways used at earlier , offering greater flexibility for nose-in parking and marking a shift toward fully movable units. The inaugural installation occurred on March 28, 1958, at Chicago's , where Air Lines deployed the Aero-Gangplank for testing with DC-7 propeller aircraft until November of that year. A subsequent rollout followed in 1959 at , serving both and flights, further validating the technology's practicality. Key technical milestones included the filing of U.S. Patent 3,060,471 on July 27, 1960, by Der Yuen and Francis B. Johnson, assigned to Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, which detailed the three-section telescoping mechanism, rotatable vestibule, and hydraulic adjustments for precise aircraft docking. By 1960, these initial hydraulic and manually operated models had demonstrated reliable performance, paving the way for broader implementation while transitioning from experimental prototypes to standard airport infrastructure.

Global Adoption and Evolution

The adoption of jet bridges accelerated in the 1960s and 1970s as major airports transitioned to handle the growing volume of jet aircraft traffic. In the United States, early installations occurred at key hubs such as New York's (JFK) and (LAX), where ordered 19 passenger boarding bridges in 1959 from the Pacific Iron and Steel Corporation to facilitate sheltered passenger access for its new jet services. These bridges marked a significant shift from open-air boarding, improving efficiency and weather protection at high-traffic facilities. In , the technology gained traction in the 1960s, with installations at major airports to handle increasing jet traffic. During the 1980s and 2000s, jet bridge designs evolved to address the demands of larger aircraft and operational . The introduction of wide-body jets, particularly the starting in 1970, necessitated longer bridges—often extended to over 70 meters—to reach the aircraft's main deck doors, leading to widespread modifications at international gateways. Concurrently, a transition occurred toward electro-hydraulic and electromechanical drive systems, which provided more precise control for extension, elevation, and alignment compared to earlier manual or purely hydraulic mechanisms, enhancing reliability for high-frequency operations. In the , jet bridges integrated advanced to optimize docking and safety. By the , systems incorporating sensors, , and —such as 3D scanners and automated guidance—enabled precise auto-docking, reducing manual intervention and adapting to variables like type and conditions. The further accelerated innovations, with emphasis on contactless operations through sensor-driven and the use of antimicrobial, easily sanitizable materials in bridge interiors to minimize . As of 2025, over 35,000 jet bridges are installed worldwide, reflecting the demands of global recovery and expansion. The Asia-Pacific region exhibits the highest density, driven by rapid hub development at airports like Singapore , where passenger boarding bridge installations support surging traffic volumes.

Operation

Extension and Alignment

The extension and alignment process for a passenger boarding bridge (PBB) begins once the aircraft has parked at the gate. The operator first rotates the rotunda to orient the bridge toward the aircraft door, followed by the telescopic extension of the tunnel sections, which can reach up to approximately 10 meters to span the distance to the fuselage. Elevation adjustments are then made to match the aircraft door height, using either sensors for automatic leveling or manual input, ensuring the cab floor aligns with the doorsill. Finally, the canopy or bellows deploys to seal against the fuselage, creating a weatherproof connection. Alignment during docking relies on visual guides, such as painted indicators on the , combined with or ultrasonic sensors to achieve precise positioning. These aids enable docking within a tolerance of about 20-30 centimeters to prevent any contact that could damage the . The full extension and alignment typically complete in 1 to 2 minutes for standard bridges, allowing efficient boarding; the process reverses similarly for deboarding after passengers exit. PBBs incorporate environmental adaptations, such as structural design for wind resistance up to 70 miles per hour sustained (113 kilometers per hour) and automatic retraction mechanisms triggered in higher gusts exceeding 90 miles per hour (145 kilometers per hour) to ensure stability.

Drive Systems and Controls

Jet bridges employ a variety of sources to facilitate their , including electro-hydraulic systems that use pumps to extension and mechanisms, electro-mechanical systems relying on electric motors for rotation and positioning, and fully electric configurations designed to minimize emissions by eliminating hydraulic fluids. Control interfaces for these systems typically integrate with centralized management platforms utilizing programmable logic controllers (PLCs) to enable remote and of bridge functions. Manual overrides are provided through controls located in the rotunda, allowing operators to intervene during alignment or in case of system anomalies. Automation levels in jet bridges range from semi-automated setups, where operators guide movements via interfaces, to fully automated systems such as AeroTech's JetDock (formerly associated with JBT Aerotech), which employs sensors and AI algorithms for precise aircraft door alignment and docking with minimal human input since its deployment in the 2020s. More recent innovations include China's deployment of the world's first fully autonomous passenger boarding bridge in July 2025, enabling unmanned docking in 45-48 seconds. These advancements support efficient extension steps by automating positioning without requiring manual adjustments. Energy specifications for jet bridges generally involve a 400V three-phase power supply in installations to support operational demands, complemented by backup batteries that ensure functionality for retraction and lighting during power disruptions.

Safety and Maintenance

Safety Features and Protocols

Jet bridges incorporate several mechanical safeguards to mitigate risks during operation. Overload sensors and relief valves in hydraulic or pneumatic systems prevent excessive pressure buildup, ensuring the structure supports at least 700 pounds (318 kg) per person or without deflection exceeding 3 degrees. Anti-collision systems, including proximity sensors, , and limit switches, detect obstacles and halt movement to maintain a safe distance of at least 12 inches (30 cm) from surfaces during . retract buttons and mechanisms, such as pilot-operated check valves on lift cylinders and automatic brakes that engage during power failures, allow immediate halting or retraction if obstructions are detected. Operational protocols emphasize preventive measures to ensure safe use. Pre-use inspections verify the functionality of all , including auto-leveling mechanisms that adjust the bridge floor to the aircraft doorsill within 1.6 to 16 seconds, in accordance with ARP1247 standards. requires trained operators to confirm alignment, often using visual docking guidance , with competency verified through annual training and a permit restricting to qualified personnel. Jet bridges are designed per FAA standards to withstand sustained winds up to 70 mph (113 km/h) and gusts up to 90 mph (145 km/h). Operators should retract the bridge if winds exceed safe operational limits, especially when occupied, and maintain visual oversight of aircraft proximity to avoid hazards. In incident response, jet bridges feature auto-disconnect capabilities during power outages, with brakes locking the structure in place and tow lugs enabling manual emergency movement. Integrated elements include pull stations, 5-pound (2.3 kg) BC-rated extinguishers, and smoke detectors in the operator cabin, supporting rapid evacuation if needed. Operators remain present in the cabin during passenger boarding and disembarkation to facilitate immediate response. Incidents involving jet bridges remain relatively rare, accounting for a portion of ground damage events but with low overall frequency due to these safeguards; for instance, according to IATA's ground damage database (2017-2022), passenger boarding bridges along with belt-loaders, cargo-loaders, and passenger stairs contribute to about 40% of such incidents, primarily during docking. A notable case occurred in December 2018 at Baltimore-Washington International Airport, where a partial jet bridge failure during deplaning injured six passengers, highlighting the importance of alignment checks despite the rarity of such events. More recent examples include a collision between a Boeing 767 and a jet bridge at Boston Logan International Airport in November 2024, and a jet bridge collapse during maintenance at Santa Barbara Airport in August 2025, which injured two staff members but no passengers.

Maintenance Requirements

Jet bridges, also known as passenger boarding bridges (PBBs), require structured preventive maintenance to ensure operational reliability, passenger safety, and extended . Routine schedules typically include daily visual inspections by personnel to check for visible damage such as cracks, loose bolts, , and issues with and structural components. These daily checks also verify the functionality of controls, signaling devices, , and exits to confirm safe movement without hazards. Weekly or routine tasks often involve of moving parts like hydraulic systems, chains, cables, and operator controls, alongside cleaning of electrical panels and fittings to prevent buildup. More comprehensive preventive occurs every six months, encompassing of hydraulic or electro-mechanical systems, wheels, canopies, and rails, as recommended by manufacturers and FAA guidelines. Annual structural inspections follow manufacturer protocols, including power washing, touch-up , and detailed assessments of telescoping tunnels, handrails, and mechanisms to detect or defects. Ultrasonic testing for hidden in metal components is advised every five years, particularly in harsh environments. Common maintenance issues for jet bridges include corrosion accelerated by to weather and de-icing chemicals used on airport aprons, which can degrade metal surfaces and structural integrity. on rollers and wheels, which support bridge , often necessitates replacement after 10-12 years of heavy use, contributing to overall system . Electrical faults in systems, wiring, and lighting are frequent due to environmental and stress, potentially leading to operational failures if not addressed through regular diagnostics. Annual maintenance costs per jet bridge unit typically range from $15,000 to $25,000 for a medium-sized installation, covering inspections, parts, and labor, with higher expenses for specialized tools like diagnostic software enabling through AI monitoring of system health. The typical lifecycle of a jet bridge is 20-25 years with proper upkeep, though it can extend to 30 years through periodic upgrades such as retrofitting hydraulic systems to more sustainable electro-mechanical or electric drives, which improve efficiency and reduce environmental impact.

Benefits and Limitations

Operational Benefits

Jet bridges significantly enhance efficiency by streamlining passenger boarding and deplaning processes compared to alternatives like mobile or buses, which often involve exposure to the ramp and additional logistical steps. This results in shorter overall turnaround times for , with short-haul operations typically achieving completions in as little as 45 minutes, allowing for more frequent flight schedules. As of 2025, advancements in , such as autonomous docking systems that align bridges in 45-48 seconds, further reduce operation times and staffing needs. For passengers, jet bridges offer substantial advantages by providing a protected, enclosed pathway that shields individuals from adverse weather conditions such as , , extreme , or , thereby maintaining comfort and reducing disruptions. They also minimize physical strain by eliminating the need to navigate stairs or uneven surfaces, which is particularly beneficial for elderly travelers, those with mobility impairments, or families with luggage, while facilitating a smoother transition from to the . Airlines and airports benefit from increased gate utilization enabled by these faster processes, as reduced turnaround durations allow a single gate to handle multiple flights daily without excessive downtime. Additionally, jet bridges lower the risk of injuries in ground handling by limiting and exposure to ramp hazards like vehicle traffic and , thereby decreasing associated claims and operational interruptions. From an environmental standpoint, jet bridges contribute to lower emissions by expediting deplaning and boarding in an enclosed space, which minimizes the time spend idling on the with engines running. This efficiency helps reduce fuel consumption and associated outputs during ground operations.

Drawbacks and Challenges

Jet bridges present several economic and operational drawbacks that can hinder their widespread implementation, particularly at resource-constrained facilities. Installation costs for a single unit typically range from $1 million to $2 million, encompassing , integration with , and compliance with standards. These high upfront expenses, combined with ongoing demands for systems to maintain passenger comfort, often deter adoption at smaller regional airports where budgets and traffic volumes are limited. For instance, the substantial space requirements—often exceeding 180 meters of linear frontage for multiple gates—further restrict their feasibility in compact designs typical of low-volume facilities. Logistical challenges also complicate jet bridge operations, especially with larger aircraft. Gates designed for narrow-body planes may require costly modifications to accommodate wide-body models like the or , including adjustments to bridge height, length, and docking mechanisms to ensure proper alignment. Misalignment during extension can lead to aircraft door or fuselage damage, with individual incidents incurring repair costs from several thousand dollars to over $2 million, contributing to an industry-wide annual ground damage tally approaching $5 billion globally. Such issues not only delay turnarounds but also necessitate specialized training and alignment aids to mitigate risks. Additional hurdles include vulnerability to conditions, such as icing in cold climates, which can impair bridge mechanisms, seals, and safety features, leading to operational disruptions or the need for de-icing procedures. Space inefficiency in layouts exacerbates this, as fixed bridges demand dedicated areas that reduce overall flexibility compared to apron-based alternatives. Moreover, marketing often overstates their universality, overlooking limitations at remote stands where , configuration, or cost prohibit installation, forcing reliance on or buses instead. To address these challenges, particularly in developing regions, there has been a trend as of 2025 toward hybrid and electric mobile boarding stairs and , offering lower installation costs and greater adaptability for expanding airports in and without extensive fixed infrastructure.

Industry and Standards

Major Manufacturers

JBT AeroTech, based in the United States, is a leading manufacturer of passenger boarding bridges, holding a significant market position in through its innovative automated docking systems like JetDock, which enhance and in bridge alignment to . The company, formerly part of John Bean Technologies and now under , specializes in apron-drive bridges that have been installed at major airports worldwide, emphasizing reliability and reduced operational damage. ThyssenKrupp Airport Systems, headquartered in and now operating as TK Elevator Airport Solutions, focuses on sustainable electric passenger boarding bridges that minimize environmental impact compared to traditional hydraulic models, serving prominent European airports with tailored solutions. Their designs prioritize and adaptability for diverse types, contributing to over 5,000 global installations across more than 370 airports. Vataple Machinery (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., a firm established in 2004, provides cost-effective boarding bridges tailored for the Asian market, offering both hydraulic and electro-mechanical variants suitable for regional . These bridges have been deployed in various Asian countries and exported to , , and , supporting growing in emerging markets. Historically, Ogden's Jetway Systems, founded in 1958 in , , pioneered the apron-drive passenger boarding bridge, installing over 3,000 units and revolutionizing airport operations before being acquired and integrated into larger entities like in the 1990s. This early innovator laid the groundwork for modern designs, though the original company is now defunct as an independent entity. More recently, (MHI) has expanded its role in the with high-tech bridges featuring barrier-free floors and skid conveyors for improved . The global passenger boarding bridges market, valued at approximately USD 434 million in 2024, sees annual production in the hundreds of units, driven by airport expansions and is projected to grow at a CAGR of around 6-12% through 2032, with JBT dominating , ThyssenKrupp leading in , and Asian manufacturers like Vataple and CIMC gaining traction in their region.

Regulations and Standards

The (IATA) establishes standards for passenger boarding bridges (PBBs), also known as jet bridges, through its Airport Development Reference Manual (ADRM) and Airport Handling Manual (AHM), which provide guidance on dimensions, compatibility with aircraft interfaces, and overall planning to ensure seamless flow and interoperability. In the United States, the (FAA) outlines requirements in Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5360-13A, which addresses planning, including load-bearing capacities for PBB structures to support and loads while integrating with designs. Safety regulations emphasize structural and operational integrity, with European standards under EN 12312-4 specifying health, , functional, and performance requirements for PBBs, including hydraulic and electro-mechanical systems for elevation and alignment to prevent hazards during use. Mandatory certifications for fire resistance align with NFPA 415, which mandates protection against ramp fuel spill fires and requires loading walkways to maintain integrity for at least five minutes under fire exposure to facilitate safe evacuation. For structural integrity, FAA standards in AC 150/5220-21C require PBBs to withstand wind loads up to 90 mph (145 km/h) for three-second gusts, ensuring stability in adverse weather without compromising passenger . Installation guidelines focus on site-specific compatibility and accessibility, with IATA recommending minimum gate spacing of approximately 100 meters between stands for to accommodate wingspans, turning radii, and safe ground handling operations. Post-2020 updates incorporate enhanced accessibility under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and FAA AC 150/5360-14A, mandating wheelchair-compatible features such as level boarding or integrated lifts in jet bridges to ensure equitable access for passengers with disabilities, with recent implementations including automated wheelchair elevation systems at major U.S. airports. Global variations promote harmonization through the (ICAO) Annex 14, which sets aerodrome design standards that indirectly influence integration by defining and stand configurations for consistent international operations. In regions like , stricter seismic standards under the Building Standard Law require PBBs and associated airport structures to withstand intense earthquakes, incorporating performance-based designs with isolation systems and reinforced foundations to exceed basic survival thresholds during events up to magnitude 7 or higher.

References

  1. [1]
    History: How Airport Jet Bridges Have Evolved Over The Years
    May 29, 2024 · Lockheed Martin used the Aerobridge concept to build the jet bridge as we know it today. The “Aero-Gangplank” was first used by United Airlines ...
  2. [2]
    Passenger Boarding Bridges for Airports - ADELTE
    The Apron Drive-type is the most commonly used worldwide. Additionally, there are also Nose Loader, T-loader, Commuter Bridge and the A-380 Apron Drive.
  3. [3]
    Passenger Boarding Bridge | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    A Passenger Boarding Bridge (PBB) (also known as an air bridge, jet bridge, jetway, and sky bridge as well as by other terms) is an enclosed, elevated ...
  4. [4]
    What does "Jet Bridge" mean? - GlobeAir
    It allows passengers to board and disembark an aircraft directly from the terminal without being exposed to outdoor elements.
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    jetway - American Heritage Dictionary Entry
    A trademark for a telescoping corridor that extends from an airport terminal to an aircraft that is used for the boarding and disembarkation of passengers.
  7. [7]
    What are jet bridges and how could they be improved?
    Feb 20, 2024 · They serve two primary purposes: providing passengers a way to safely embark and disembark from aircraft without being exposed to the elements, ...
  8. [8]
    What Is a Jet Bridge? - Business-Class.com
    A jet bridge is a movable, enclosed walkway that connects an airport terminal directly to an aircraft door, allowing passengers to board and disembark ...How Jet Bridges Work · Benefits For Travelers · Safety Considerations<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    A brief history of the jet bridge | Flightradar24 Blog
    Jan 29, 2021 · Ever wondered about the jet bridge? The first functioning model appeared in the late 1950s. Here's a brief look at its history.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] AC 150/5220-21C, Aircraft Boarding Equipment, 29 June 2012
    Jun 29, 2012 · Aircraft boarding chairs used to transfer passengers from their wheelchair or other apparatus to their seat in the aircraft cabin. The physical ...Missing: traction | Show results with:traction
  11. [11]
    FEM Analysis of the Telescopic Tunnel in Passenger Boarding Bridges
    Aug 7, 2025 · The results shows that the design of the telescopic tunnel can meet the demand of the passenger boarding bridge.
  12. [12]
    Jetway Passenger Boarding Bridges for Modern Airports
    Oshkosh AeroTech's Jetway passenger boarding bridges excel at helping manage the flow of passengers, crew, and all their carry-on luggage and supplies.Missing: components | Show results with:components
  13. [13]
    The Airbus A380: How it's influencing airport design - Stantec
    The A380 requires longer, wider runways, wider taxiways, larger hold rooms, more gate space, dual boarding bridges, and 90 minutes for boarding.<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Passenger boarding bridges by TK Elevator Airport Solutions
    We carefully customize each bridge to fit your airport's unique environment. For smaller airports, a special 'low rider' solution lets passengers board directly ...
  15. [15]
    Noseloader Bridge by TK Elevator Airport Solutions
    Our NL bridge is specifically designed to enable precise docking in areas with restricted aircraft size and/or parking constraints.
  16. [16]
    Jet Bridge Market Size, Scope, and Share by 2033
    Rating 4.5 (11) Aug 4, 2025 · The increasing focus on sustainability creates a niche for electric and hybrid-powered bridges that reduce emissions and energy consumption.Missing: electrified | Show results with:electrified
  17. [17]
    Passenger Boarding Bridge (PBB) Market Size, Share & Trends, 2034
    Oct 13, 2025 · Many new airports built since 2020 include multiple PBBs per gate, with 2–3 bridges per widebody gate. As airlines deploy larger aircraft, gates ...
  18. [18]
    International - Passenger Boarding Bridge for Wide Body Aircraft
    Aviramp's International mobile bridge offers seamless boarding for wide-body aircraft. Ideal for remote stand ramps, enhancing ground handling efficiency ...
  19. [19]
    The Aero-Gangplank and the Avant-Garde — Anyone Corporation
    ### Summary of Jet Bridge Invention Details
  20. [20]
    History of the Boarding Bridge-Part 1
    Jul 2, 2019 · The boarding bridges we know today date back to the late 1950s. However, their origins can be traced back all the way to the 1930s.
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    Our History - Heathrow Airport
    Terminal 1 opened in 1969, by which time five million passengers a year were passing through the airport as the jet age arrived with Boeing 707s, VC10s and ...
  23. [23]
    5 Operational Changes Brought About By The Advent Of The Boeing ...
    May 27, 2024 · Another adaptation that needed to be made to accommodate the Boeing 747 was the lengthening of jet bridges at airports where the aircraft was ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Jet Bridge Market Size, Share | CAGR of 9.1%
    The Global Jet Bridge Market size is expected to be worth around USD 550.7 Million by 2033, from USD 230.5 Million in 2023, growing at a CAGR of 9.1% during ...
  25. [25]
    Passenger boarding bridges: the latest tech - Airports International
    Sep 14, 2024 · “Our new product, AmpTek, helps bridge the gap for airports and airlines to move to electric ground support equipment (GSE) and the available ...Missing: electrified jet
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Aircraft cleaning and disinfection during and post pandemic - IATA
    Jan 22, 2021 · Frequent handwashing and/or use of alcohol-based sanitizers. 3. Personal hygiene to include minimal face-touching, encourage covering of mouth ...
  27. [27]
    Passenger Boarding Bridges Market - Industry Analysis & Forecast
    The Passenger Boarding Bridges Market size was valued at USD 434.17 Million in 2024 and the tota revenue is expected to grow at.
  28. [28]
    Method for automated docking a passenger boarding bridge to an ...
    For positive validation there may be a tolerance in the alignment between the validation tag 57 and the hinge side 3I of about 20 cm. The calibration tag 57 ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] PROJECT MANUAL NEW PASSENGER BOARDING BRIDGE
    Nov 7, 2022 · established grades, alignment or grade tolerances that do not concur with those specified or shown on the plans, the Contractor is solely ...
  30. [30]
    Airport Passenger Boarding Bridge | Made-in-China.com
    In stock Free deliveryHaobo's standard programmable logic controller( PLC) operating system enables a PBB ... controls The direction and the speed of the PBB freely with a joystick.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Replacement of (7) Passenger Boarding Bridges IFB#2022-1 ...
    Jan 28, 2022 · This addendum clarifies changes to the contract for replacing seven passenger boarding bridges, including changes to specifications, drawings, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    JetDock ® Automated Bridge Docking - Oshkosh AeroTech
    Oshkosh AeroTech's Automated Boarding Bridge Docking System offers fast, precise aircraft alignment without decals, improving airport efficiency and ...Missing: modern sensors post- COVID
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Steel Apron Drive
    Main power supply (mains 400V/50Hz): 63 A. Start-up intensity (short time): 95 A. Three-phase power supply voltage: 400 V ± 10% (3 phases, neutral and ground).
  34. [34]
    [PDF] PASSENGER LOADING BRIDGE REPLACEMENT July 10, 2024
    Jul 10, 2024 · j. The exterior sides of the boarding bridge shall be constructed of no less than 14 gauge flat steel panels.Missing: telescopic | Show results with:telescopic<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Passenger boarding bridge features - TIANYI GSE
    The humanized arrangement of the operation handles and buttons makes the operation simple and fast. Emergency retraction function. In the event of a power ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    None
    ### Summary of Safety Features and Protocols for Passenger Boarding Bridges
  37. [37]
    [PDF] FSF 2022 Safety Report
    Mar 1, 2023 · passenger stairs and passenger boarding bridges cause 40 percent of total incidents, according to the IATA ground damage database. Loss of ...
  38. [38]
    6 people sent to hospitals after jet bridge 'failure' at Baltimore airport
    Dec 30, 2018 · At least six people were injured Saturday evening during a partial equipment failure involving the jet bridge, the airport said.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  39. [39]
    How to Plan Passenger Boarding Bridge Maintenance and Inspections
    Know the difference between inspections and how your airport can work with vendors to keep equipment operational.
  40. [40]
    F8691B00100EN - PBB Maintenance Manual Basic | PDF - Scribd
    The maintenance manual for the Passenger Boarding Bridge (PBB) outlines essential maintenance procedures to ensure safety, reliability, and longevity, ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ...
    Aug 1, 2022 · Supervise and schedule maintenance work for all Contractor employees. ... Passenger Boarding Bridge Operation, Inspection and Maintenance Services.
  42. [42]
    Airports - American Galvanizers Association
    However, GSE are exposed to highly abrasive and corrosive conditions, rough handling and constant outdoor exposure to rain, snow, and de-icing chemicals can ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] DLH-Passenger-Boarding-Bridge-Reports-Ameribridge.pdf
    Life expectancy is generally 10-12 years for passenger boarding bridges (PBBs) before some major maintenance will need to be performed: replacing canopies, ...
  44. [44]
    Passenger Boarding Bridge (PBB) in Modern Airports
    A jetway is a type of jet bridge, which is an enclosed passageway that connects an airport terminal to an aircraft. The official term for a jet bridge is a ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Passenger Boarding bridges
    Mar 5, 2020 · New or Refurbish? ▫ Projected life of a bridge is 20 years provided that the OEM`s required maintenance is performed.<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    How Different Are Narrowbodies' Actual Turnaround Times To Their ...
    Jun 24, 2023 · According to Airbus, it takes between 35 and 45 minutes for a full-service turnaround of a 160-passenger A320 family aircraft.
  47. [47]
    Passenger Boarding Bridges Market - MarketsandMarkets
    The global Passenger Boarding Bridge Market size was valued at USD 273 Million in 2020 and is projected to reach USD 489 Million by 2025, at a CAGR of 12.3% ...
  48. [48]
    What Is a Jet Bridge? - Direct Travel
    A jet bridge is an enclosed, movable walkway that connects an airport gate directly to an aircraft door. It allows passengers to board and deplane safely ...
  49. [49]
    Airport Ramp Safety Aspects in Jet Bridge Operation
    Jul 17, 2022 · Jet bridge (also known as Passenger Loading Bridge, Passenger Boarding Bridge, Aviobridge or Jetty) is one of the most important pieces of ...
  50. [50]
    Enhancing Airport Operations: The Power of MARS Gates
    Sep 3, 2024 · With two passenger boarding bridges per gate, travelers can be processed more quickly, reducing wait times and improving the overall airport ...Missing: jet | Show results with:jet
  51. [51]
    Airport Solutions - TK Elevator
    Seamlessly move 1.8 billion people through our passenger boarding bridges every year; Installed more than 5,000 global gate solutions at over 370 airports ...Passenger boarding bridges · Contact · Apron Drive · Bridge LinkMissing: sustainable | Show results with:sustainable
  52. [52]
    Passenger Boarding Bridge - Vataple Group (华德宝集团)
    The passenger boarding bridges of Vataple are in hydraulic and electrical-mechamical versions. They are of good appearance, sturdy structure, rust proof and ...
  53. [53]
    Vataple Machinery (Kunshan) Co., Ltd - Made-in-China.com
    Vataple has started to manufacture passenger boarding bridge since 2004. With senior technical team, advanced production equipment, Vataple can fully meet ...
  54. [54]
    PA HOLDINGS EXPLORING THE SALE OF OGDEN'S JETWAY ...
    Sep 20, 1988 · Since its inception in 1958, Jetway has designed, fabricated and installed more than 3,000 passenger bridges. It also produces aircraft power ...
  55. [55]
    Passenger Boarding Bridge and Platform Screen Door for the ...
    (MHI-TES) offers products in this field such as a barrier-free passenger boarding bridge for more efficient passenger flow at air terminals. The government also ...
  56. [56]
    Top 10 : Passenger Boarding Bridge Companies in the World
    Oct 9, 2024 · Dual Bridges: Designed for large aircraft, allowing simultaneous boarding and disembarkation from two different doors. Over-the-Wing Bridges: ...
  57. [57]
    Airport Development Reference Manual (ADRM) - IATA
    The ADRM is the industry's most important guide for airport planning and development, providing best practice guidance and comprehensive information.Missing: jet bridge
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Advisory Circular 150/5360-13A, Airport Terminal Planning, 13 July ...
    Jul 13, 2018 · This advisory circular provides updated guidance on airport terminal planning, including initial considerations, a basic process, and a ...
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Aerodrome Design Manual - Skybrary
    Jul 1, 2015 · Dimensions for sizing aircraft stand spacing. 90 °. Nose wheel angle. Nose wheel radius. Nosegear. Undercarriage centre. Wheelbase. Main gear.
  61. [61]
    [PDF] AC 150/5360-14A, Access to Airports by Individuals with Disabilities ...
    Dec 6, 2017 · This AC assists airports in complying with laws regarding individuals with disabilities, provides standards for Service Animal Relief Areas ( ...
  62. [62]
    14 CFR Part 382 Subpart D -- Accessibility of Airport Facilities - eCFR
    Carriers must ensure terminal facilities are accessible to people with disabilities, including wheelchair users, and provide accessible routes, transportation, ...
  63. [63]
    Earthquake Resistance of Buildings in Japan — What to Know
    Jun 5, 2024 · Japan's Building Standard Act is strictly reviewed after every significant earthquake to ensure that all structures, including rental ...Missing: airport jet
  64. [64]
    Aiming for a Sustainable Airport Terminal | The Government of Japan
    Aug 9, 2024 · Image of view of an airport terminal with multiple jet bridges connected to aircraft ... The building can therefore meet Japan's strict earthquake ...