Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Jones calculus

Jones calculus is a matrix-based formalism in polarization optics that represents the electric field components of fully polarized light using 2×1 Jones vectors and describes the transformations induced by optical elements via 2×2 Jones matrices, enabling the analysis of polarization states and their evolution through optical systems under the paraxial approximation. Developed by American physicist R. Clark Jones, in collaboration with Henry Hurwitz Jr., at Harvard University, it was introduced in a seminal series of eight papers published in the Journal of the Optical Society of America from 1941 to 1956, beginning with "A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical Systems I: Description and Discussion."^[1] This approach revolutionized the treatment of polarized light by providing a compact algebraic method to model phenomena such as birefringence, dichroism, and optical activity, assuming monochromatic, coherent, and completely polarized waves without accounting for partial polarization or depolarization (which requires the Mueller-Stokes formalism).^[2] The Jones vector encodes the complex amplitudes and relative phase of the orthogonal electric field components (typically horizontal and vertical), normalized such that its magnitude squared yields the intensity; for instance, a horizontally polarized plane wave is represented as \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}, while circular polarization uses \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ \pm i \end{pmatrix}.^[3] Optical elements are characterized by Jones matrices that multiply the input vector to yield the output; examples include the linear polarizer \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} for horizontal transmission and the quarter-wave retarder at 45° \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -i \\ -i & 1 \end{pmatrix}, which converts linear to circular polarization.^[2] Sequential interactions are handled by matrix multiplication in the order of light propagation, facilitating calculations for complex systems like wave plates, rotators, and compensators. Originally motivated by the need to generalize earlier scalar treatments of light propagation, Jones calculus builds on 19th-century foundations such as Fresnel's wave theory and Malus's law while addressing limitations in handling vectorial effects in anisotropic media.^[1] Its equivalence theorems—proving that certain combinations of retarders and rotators can mimic any linear transformation—underscore its theoretical rigor and practical utility. Over decades, extensions have incorporated spatial variations for diffractive optics, Fourier-domain analysis for gratings, and applications in modern technologies including liquid crystal displays, spatial light modulators, metasurfaces, and polarization-sensitive imaging systems.^[1] Despite its restrictions to fully polarized light, the method remains a cornerstone for coherent optical simulations due to its computational efficiency and intuitive matrix representation.^[3]

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

Jones calculus is a mathematical framework that employs 2×2 complex matrices to describe the transformation of the polarization state of monochromatic, fully polarized light as it propagates through optical systems.^[4] Developed for analyzing coherent light where the electric field can be treated as a plane wave, it represents the polarization using complex amplitudes of orthogonal components, enabling precise modeling of phase and amplitude alterations induced by optical elements.^[3] The primary purpose of Jones calculus is to compute the output polarization state from a given input by successive matrix multiplications, allowing prediction of changes in both the polarization form (e.g., linear to circular) and the resulting intensity after passing through a sequence of components.^[4] This method facilitates the design and analysis of polarizing devices by quantifying how each element modifies the light's electric field vector, with intensity derived from the modulus squared of the output field.^[3] It is particularly suited for fully coherent, monochromatic beams, excluding partially polarized or incoherent light scenarios.^[5] Conceptually, the approach begins with the electric field of light modeled as a two-dimensional complex vector in the transverse plane, capturing the x- and y-components' amplitudes and relative phases for a given frequency.^[4] Each optical system is then represented by a corresponding Jones matrix, a 2×2 complex matrix that linearly transforms this input vector to yield the output state through matrix-vector multiplication.^[3] For a single element, the transformation is expressed as

\mathbf{E}_{\text{out}} = J \mathbf{E}_{\text{in}},

where \mathbf{E}_{\text{in}} and \mathbf{E}_{\text{out}} are the input and output Jones vectors, respectively, and J is the system's Jones matrix; for cascaded systems, matrices multiply in reverse order of propagation.^[5] This vector-matrix formalism provides a compact, algebraic tool for tracing polarization evolution without explicit time-domain integration.^[4]

Historical Development

The Jones calculus was developed by R. Clark Jones in 1941, shortly after receiving his PhD from Harvard University, during his time at Bell Laboratories. This invention addressed the need for a systematic method to track polarization transformations in optical setups, building on the growing interest in polarized light during the early 20th century. In collaboration with Henry Hurwitz Jr. on key aspects, such as the proof of equivalence theorems, Jones formalized and expanded the calculus through a series of eight papers published in the Journal of the Optical Society of America from 1941 to 1956, which detailed its principles, applications to various optical elements, and comparisons with other approaches. These works established the matrix-based representation that became central to the method, earning it the name "Jones calculus" in recognition of its creator. This distinguished it from prior vector-based descriptions of polarization, such as Fresnel's 19th-century coefficients for reflection and transmission or Poincaré's 1892 geometric sphere representation of polarization states.^[6] In the decades following its introduction, the Jones calculus gained broad adoption beyond classical optics, particularly in quantum optics starting in the 1950s for modeling coherent photon states and in fiber optics from the 1970s onward to describe polarization mode dispersion and birefringence in waveguides.^[7] Modern extensions have further adapted the formalism to non-paraxial beams and structured light fields, enabling its use in advanced applications like metasurfaces and high-numerical-aperture systems.^[8]

Core Components

Jones Vectors

In Jones calculus, the state of fully polarized monochromatic light is represented by a Jones vector, a two-dimensional complex column vector \begin{pmatrix} E_x \\ E_y \end{pmatrix}, where E_x and E_y denote the complex amplitudes of the electric field components along two orthogonal linear polarization directions, typically the x and y axes.^[4] This formulation captures both the amplitude and relative phase differences between the components, enabling the description of linear, circular, and elliptical polarization states.^[3] Jones vectors are conventionally normalized such that the total intensity is unity, given by |\mathbf{[E](/page/E!)}|^2 = |E_x|^2 + |E_y|^2 = [1](/page/1), where the modulus squared represents the time-averaged power.^[3] This normalization ensures that the vector encodes the polarization state independently of the overall intensity, which can be scaled separately if needed. The standard basis for Jones vectors corresponds to horizontal and vertical linear polarizations, with basis vectors \begin{pmatrix} [1](/page/1) \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} for horizontal and \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ [1](/page/1) \end{pmatrix} for vertical.^[3] An alternative circular basis can be employed by incorporating phase factors of \pm i, transforming the representation into superpositions of right- and left-circular polarizations.^[4] Representative examples include the horizontal linear polarization state \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} and the right-circular polarization state \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ -i \end{pmatrix}.^[3] The left-circular state is similarly \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ i \end{pmatrix}. The phase convention in Jones vectors assumes a time dependence of e^{-i\omega t} for the electric field, with handedness defined from the perspective of an observer looking toward the source (opposite to the propagation direction).^[9] Under this convention, right-circular polarization corresponds to the electric field vector rotating clockwise, achieved via a -90° phase shift (equivalent to the factor -i) in the y-component relative to the x-component.^[9] This ensures consistency in describing the helicity of the polarization ellipse.^[4]

Jones Matrices

Jones matrices represent linear transformations of the electric field vector in the Jones calculus, describing how fully polarized light interacts with optical elements such as polarizers, retarders, and absorbers. These matrices are 2×2 arrays with complex entries that account for both amplitude modifications and relative phase shifts between the orthogonal polarization components. The general form of a Jones matrix is

J = \begin{pmatrix} J_{11} & J_{12} \\ J_{21} & J_{22} \end{pmatrix},

where each J_{ij} is a complex number, with the real part relating to amplitude transmission and the imaginary part to phase differences. This formulation allows the output electric field \mathbf{E}_{out} to be computed as \mathbf{E}_{out} = J \mathbf{E}_{in}, where \mathbf{E}_{in} and \mathbf{E}_{out} are Jones vectors. Certain properties of Jones matrices arise from physical constraints of the optical system. For lossless systems, where no energy is absorbed and only phase and polarization are altered, the matrix is unimodular, satisfying \det J = 1, which ensures conservation of the total intensity up to an irrelevant global phase factor. In reciprocal systems, lacking magneto-optic activity or other non-reciprocal effects, the Jones matrix is symmetric, J = J^T, reflecting the equality of forward and reverse transmission coefficients for the orthogonal components. These properties facilitate analytical verification of physical realizability and symmetry in optical designs.^[10]^[11] Operations on Jones matrices enable modeling of complex optical setups. For a sequence of cascaded elements encountered in order from 1 to n, the total transformation is given by the matrix product J_{total} = J_n \cdots J_2 J_1, applied from right to left to match the propagation direction. Retracing a light path through the system, as in interferometric configurations, involves the inverse matrix J^{-1}, which for unimodular matrices satisfies J^{-1} = J^\dagger up to a phase, where \dagger denotes the conjugate transpose. The output intensity after transformation is calculated as I = \mathbf{E}_{in}^\dagger J^\dagger J \mathbf{E}_{in}, providing a quadratic form that quantifies power without resolving the output phase.^[10]^[12] For systematic analysis, particularly in decomposing polarization effects, a Jones matrix can be expressed via Pauli matrix decomposition as J = a_0 I + \mathbf{a} \cdot \boldsymbol{\sigma}, where I is the identity matrix, \boldsymbol{\sigma} = (\sigma_x, \sigma_y, \sigma_z) are the Pauli matrices, a_0 is a complex scalar, and \mathbf{a} is a complex vector. This expansion separates isotropic, linear, and circular birefringence/dichroism contributions, aiding in the interpretation of experimental data and design optimization. For instance, the coefficients reveal diattenuation along principal axes when aligned with the measurement basis.^[13]

Basic Optical Elements

Linear Polarizers

In Jones calculus, an ideal linear polarizer transmits one linear polarization component fully while completely blocking the orthogonal component. For a polarizer with its transmission axis aligned horizontally, the Jones matrix is given by

P_h = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix},

which projects an input Jones vector onto the horizontal axis.^[14] For a polarizer oriented at an arbitrary angle \theta relative to the horizontal, the Jones matrix is obtained by conjugating the horizontal matrix with the rotation matrix R(\theta) = \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta & \sin \theta \\ -\sin \theta & \cos \theta \end{pmatrix}, yielding P(\theta) = R(-\theta) P_h R(\theta).^[15] Realistic linear polarizers, particularly dichroic types, exhibit imperfect discrimination between polarization components due to material limitations. The Jones matrix for a horizontal dichroic polarizer is

P = \begin{pmatrix} \sqrt{T_x} & 0 \\ 0 & \sqrt{T_y} \end{pmatrix},

where T_x and T_y (T_x > T_y) are the power transmission coefficients for the horizontal (pass) and vertical (block) polarizations, respectively; the square roots account for the field amplitudes in Jones formalism.^[16] The performance is quantified by the extinction ratio, defined as ER = 10 \log_{10} (T_x / T_y), which measures the suppression of the unwanted polarization; high-quality polarizers achieve ER > 10^4. Jones calculus provides a straightforward derivation of Malus's law, which describes the transmitted intensity through a polarizer. Consider linearly polarized input light with Jones vector \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta \\ \sin \theta \end{pmatrix} (intensity I_0 = 1) incident on a horizontal polarizer P_h; the output vector is \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}, yielding intensity I = |\cos \theta|^2 = I_0 \cos^2 \theta. For two successive ideal polarizers with relative angle \phi between their axes (e.g., crossed at \phi = 90^\circ), the overall matrix is P(\phi) P_h, and the transmitted intensity is I = I_0 \cos^2 \phi, reducing to zero for crossed polarizers.^[5] As an illustrative example, a vertical polarizer with matrix P_v = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} acts on an arbitrary input Jones vector \begin{pmatrix} E_x \\ E_y \end{pmatrix} to produce the output \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ E_y \end{pmatrix}, transmitting only the vertical component while blocking the horizontal one entirely in the ideal case.^[14] In practice, linear polarizers vary by mechanism: absorbing (dichroic) types, such as dye-embedded polymer sheets, convert the rejected polarization into heat, while reflecting types, including wire-grid structures or birefringent prisms, redirect it via reflection; both are represented in Jones calculus by analogous diagonal transmission matrices for the forward-propagating beam.^[17]

Phase Retarders

Phase retarders are optical elements that introduce a relative phase shift between the orthogonal polarization components of light without altering their amplitudes, enabling the manipulation of polarization states such as conversion from linear to circular polarization. These devices operate based on birefringence, a material property where the refractive indices differ for light polarized along the ordinary (o-ray) and extraordinary (e-ray) axes, resulting in a phase difference \delta = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} (n_e - n_o) d between the components, with n_e and n_o as the indices, d the thickness, and \lambda the wavelength. In Jones calculus, the retarder is represented assuming the fast axis (lower index) is aligned horizontally, yielding the unitary matrix

\begin{pmatrix} e^{i\delta/2} & 0 \\ 0 & e^{-i\delta/2} \end{pmatrix},

which imparts an advanced phase to the horizontal component and a retarded phase to the vertical one, preserving the overall intensity. This form ensures the matrix is unitary up to a global phase factor, consistent with non-absorptive propagation. A quarter-wave plate (QWP) is a specific retarder with retardance \delta = \pi/2, introducing a \pi/2 phase shift that transforms linearly polarized light into circularly polarized light when the input polarization is at 45° to the fast axis. Its Jones matrix, for fast axis horizontal, is

\begin{pmatrix} e^{i\pi/4} & 0 \\ 0 & e^{-i\pi/4} \end{pmatrix} \equiv \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -i \end{pmatrix}

(up to global phase e^{i\pi/4}). For example, incident light linearly polarized at 45° has Jones vector \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}; multiplying by the QWP matrix yields \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ -i \end{pmatrix}, representing left circular polarization, demonstrating the state conversion. A half-wave plate (HWP) features retardance \delta = \pi, producing a \pi phase shift that effectively rotates the plane of linear polarization by twice the angle \theta between the input polarization direction and the fast axis. Its Jones matrix, aligned as above, is

\begin{pmatrix} e^{i\pi/2} & 0 \\ 0 & e^{-i\pi/2} \end{pmatrix} \equiv \begin{pmatrix} i & 0 \\ 0 & -i \end{pmatrix} \equiv \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}

(up to global phase i). This inversion of one component relative to the other achieves the rotation without absorption, a key application in polarization control.

Rotated Elements

Axially Aligned Rotations

In Jones calculus, axially aligned rotations refer to the reorientation of optical elements, such as polarizers or phase retarders, about the optical axis of light propagation, which is perpendicular to the plane of rotation. This transformation assumes normal incidence and maintains the element's alignment with the beam direction, allowing the use of two-dimensional Jones matrices to describe the effects on polarization states.^[18] The rotation is represented by the matrix R(\theta) = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta & \sin\theta \\ -\sin\theta & \cos\theta \end{pmatrix}, where \theta is the rotation angle from the reference axes. This matrix corresponds to a counterclockwise rotation of the coordinate system by \theta. To obtain the Jones matrix J(\theta) for an element rotated by \theta, the unrotated matrix J(0) is transformed via the similarity operation J(\theta) = R(-\theta) J(0) R(\theta). This formulation ensures that the polarization transformation is correctly referenced to the laboratory frame.^[18]^[19] The similarity transformation preserves key properties of the original matrix, including its determinant, which for lossless elements remains unity (up to a global phase factor). For instance, a linear polarizer aligned with the x-axis has the diagonal Jones matrix J(0) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}. After rotation by \theta, it becomes J(\theta) = \begin{pmatrix} \cos^2\theta & \cos\theta \sin\theta \\ \cos\theta \sin\theta & \sin^2\theta \end{pmatrix}, introducing off-diagonal elements that reflect the projection onto the rotated transmission axis. This off-diagonal form arises directly from the coordinate transformation and aligns with Malus's law for intensity transmission.^[20]^[19] A representative application is the half-wave plate (HWP) rotated such that its fast axis is at 45° to the incident polarization. The unrotated HWP matrix is J(0) = \begin{pmatrix} e^{i\pi/2} & 0 \\ 0 & e^{-i\pi/2} \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} i & 0 \\ 0 & -i \end{pmatrix} (up to a global phase). After transformation, it inverts the handedness of circularly polarized light: right-circular input becomes left-circular output, and vice versa, due to the relative phase shift of \pi along the rotated axes. This effect is fundamental in polarization control devices.^[21]^[19]

Arbitrarily Oriented Elements

In Jones calculus, extending the formalism to arbitrarily oriented optical elements requires accounting for both in-plane rotations and out-of-plane tilts, which introduce beam walk-off and modifications to the effective optical properties. General rotations are achieved by combining axial rotations about the propagation axis, represented by the 2D rotation matrix R_z(\theta), with tilts described via Euler angles that define the transformation between the local coordinate frame of the element and the laboratory frame. This approach allows the Jones matrix in the laboratory frame to be obtained as \mathbf{J}_{\text{oriented}} = \mathbf{R}^{-1} \mathbf{J}_{\text{local}} \mathbf{R}, where \mathbf{R} is the 3D rotation matrix constructed from successive rotations about the x, y, and z axes using Euler angles (\alpha, \beta, \gamma), adapted to the 2D polarization basis by projecting the electric field components perpendicular to the propagation direction.^[22] For tilted elements, such as birefringent plates at oblique incidence, the Jones matrix must incorporate beam walk-off due to the splitting of ordinary (o) and extraordinary (e) rays, as well as changes in the effective retardance arising from the altered path lengths within the material. The walk-off angle \rho is given by \rho = \tan^{-1} \left( \frac{n_o^2 - n_e^2}{2 n_o n_e} \sin 2\psi \right), where n_o and n_e are the refractive indices, and \psi is the tilt angle relative to the optic axis; this leads to a displacement between the o- and e-wave paths, modifying the overall polarization transformation. The effective retardance is reduced compared to normal incidence due to changes in ray paths and effective birefringence.^[23] A representative example is oblique incidence on a quarter-wave plate, where the tilt alters the Jones matrix from the standard form \mathbf{J} = \begin{pmatrix} e^{i\pi/4} & 0 \\ 0 & e^{-i\pi/4} \end{pmatrix} (for fast axis along x) to a modified version that includes coupling terms due to walk-off, resulting in partial conversion of linear to elliptical polarization rather than pure circular output. For a KDP waveplate tilted at \beta = 20^\circ (using Euler angle notation), the effective retardance is reduced, with walk-off introducing off-diagonal elements that couple the polarization components.^[22]^[23] The standard Jones calculus assumes paraxial propagation and neglects higher-order effects like multiple internal reflections or strong beam deviation, limiting its accuracy for tilts exceeding 30° where walk-off becomes comparable to beam size. In such cases, an extended formalism, such as the generalized Jones matrix method, is necessary to handle the full 3D field transformations and maintain coherence in the description.^[22]

Advanced Topics

Matrix Operations and Propagation

In Jones calculus, the analysis of complex optical systems involving multiple polarization elements relies on the multiplication of individual Jones matrices to obtain the overall transformation. For a cascaded system, the total Jones matrix J_{\sys} is formed by the product J_{\sys} = J_n J_{n-1} \cdots J_1, where the matrices are multiplied in the order from the output back to the input, reflecting the sequential application of transformations to the incident light.^[4] This non-commutative operation ensures that the polarization state evolves correctly through the system, as swapping the order of matrices generally yields a different result due to the inherent asymmetry in matrix algebra.^[24] For instance, in a setup with a polarizer followed by a retarder, the retarder acts on the light already filtered by the polarizer, altering the effective output compared to the reverse configuration.^[4] Propagation between elements introduces phase delays from free-space travel, which is accounted for by a diagonal propagation matrix that applies equally to both orthogonal components. Specifically, after traversing a distance z in free space, the Jones vector acquires the factor

P = \begin{pmatrix} e^{i k z} & 0 \\ 0 & e^{i k z} \end{pmatrix},

where k = 2\pi / \lambda is the wave number for wavelength \lambda.^[25] This matrix preserves the polarization state while imparting a common optical path phase, making it polarization-independent and often simplifying to a scalar multiplier in relative calculations. In full system descriptions, these propagation phases are incorporated into the cascaded product, yielding the comprehensive transfer function J_{\sys} = J_n P_n J_{n-1} P_{n-1} \cdots J_1 P_1, or more compactly J_{\sys} = \prod_i J_i e^{i \phi_i}, where \phi_i = k z_i represents the phase for each segment.^[4] A powerful tool for understanding the behavior of a single Jones matrix J or the effective matrix of a subsystem is eigenpolarization analysis, which identifies the principal polarization states via the eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The eigenvectors of J define the eigenpolarizations—input states that propagate through the system unchanged in their polarization form, only modified by a complex scalar eigenvalue \lambda.^[26] These eigenvalues encode the differential transmission: their magnitudes indicate diattenuation (polarization-dependent amplitude loss), while their phases reveal retardance (relative phase shifts). For homogeneous matrices, where eigenpolarizations are orthogonal, this decomposition directly parameterizes the element's action; in general, it highlights the principal axes of the polarization transformation, aiding in the design and optimization of optical devices.^[26] For media where refractive indices or birefringence vary gradually along the propagation direction, such as in inhomogeneous anisotropic materials, standard integral Jones matrices may not suffice, necessitating differential Jones matrices to model local infinitesimal changes. These differential matrices d\mathbf{J}/dz describe the rate of polarization evolution per unit length, derived from Maxwell's equations under the assumption of slowly varying properties, and are integrated along the path to compute the total retardation effect.^[27] This approach is particularly useful for analyzing wave propagation in stratified or gradient-index media, where abrupt interfaces are absent, enabling precise prediction of accumulated phase differences between polarization components over extended distances.^[27]

Relation to Mueller Calculus

The Mueller calculus is a matrix formalism that uses 4×4 real matrices to describe the transformation of Stokes vectors, enabling the analysis of partially polarized light and incoherent sources by accounting for intensity and polarization states without requiring phase information.^[5] In contrast, the Jones calculus applies 2×2 complex matrices to Jones vectors for coherent, fully polarized light, where phase relationships are preserved, but it cannot handle depolarization or partial coherence.^[5] These approaches are complementary, as every Jones matrix corresponds to a Mueller matrix, but not vice versa, since Mueller matrices can represent depolarizing effects absent in Jones formalism.^[28] The conversion from a Jones matrix J to the equivalent Mueller matrix M is achieved via the relation

M = A (J \otimes J^*) A^{-1},

where \otimes denotes the Kronecker product, J^* is the complex conjugate of J, and A is the basis transformation matrix linking the coherency matrix (derived from Jones vectors) to the Stokes parameters.^[29] Jones calculus is preferred for coherent systems like lasers and fiber optics, where full polarization is maintained, while Mueller calculus is necessary for general cases such as sunlight illumination or light scattering in turbid media, which often involve partial polarization and incoherence.^[5] Historically, Mueller calculus was formulated in 1943 by Hans Mueller, emerging concurrently with R. C. Jones's 1941 development of the Jones calculus but independently to address broader polarization scenarios.^[30]^[31]

Applications and Limitations

Practical Uses in Optics

Jones calculus plays a crucial role in modeling polarization effects in fiber optic systems, particularly for analyzing polarization mode dispersion (PMD), which arises from random birefringence in optical fibers. PMD is simulated by representing the fiber as a series of random Jones matrices that capture the stochastic variations in the principal states of polarization and differential group delay along the fiber length. This approach allows for the prediction of pulse broadening and signal degradation in high-speed telecommunications, enabling the design of compensation strategies. For instance, the Jones matrix transfer function for a PMD-affected fiber can be derived from its PMD vector, providing a tight methodology for calculating output polarization states.^[32]^[33] In liquid crystal displays (LCDs), Jones calculus is essential for simulating the behavior of twisted nematic (TN) layers, which are commonly modeled as cascades of thin birefringent retarders to account for the gradual twist in the liquid crystal director. Each infinitesimal layer is treated as a linear retarder with a Jones matrix rotated according to the local orientation, and the overall response is obtained by multiplying these matrices in sequence. This method accurately predicts the transmission and contrast ratios in TN-LCDs, facilitating optimization of viewing angles and response times. The extended Jones matrix formulation, which handles oblique incidence and non-uniform twist, has been particularly influential in refining these simulations for reflective and transmissive displays.^[34]^[35] For laser systems in quantum optics experiments, Jones calculus is used to design polarization controllers that maintain desired polarization states for entangled photons or single-photon sources. These controllers, often composed of half-wave and quarter-wave plates combined with polarizers, are modeled as cascaded Jones matrices to ensure precise manipulation of arbitrary input polarizations into target states, such as horizontal or diagonal linear polarizations required for quantum gates or Bell-state measurements. This enables robust implementation of quantum protocols in fiber-based setups, where fiber-induced birefringence must be actively compensated.^[36] An illustrative application is the design of anti-reflection coatings incorporating birefringent layers, where Jones matrices describe the polarization-dependent reflection and transmission at interfaces between isotropic and anisotropic media. By stacking birefringent thin films, such as those on sapphire waveplates, the coating can achieve broadband suppression of reflections for both polarization components, minimizing losses in high-power laser systems or imaging optics. This polarization-sensitive optimization ensures achromatic performance across a wide spectral range.^[37] Software implementations of Jones calculus enhance practical design workflows, with tools like Ansys Zemax OpticStudio integrating Jones matrix surfaces for polarization ray tracing in sequential and non-sequential modes. These allow simulation of complex systems, including rotated elements, by propagating Jones vectors through optical elements to compute output polarization pupils and efficiencies. Similarly, custom MATLAB scripts and toolboxes enable rapid prototyping of polarization effects, such as in fiber PMD or LCD modeling, by matrix multiplications and eigenvalue analysis.^[38]^[39]

Assumptions and Constraints

Jones calculus relies on several foundational assumptions to model the propagation and transformation of polarized light through optical systems. It assumes monochromatic light, where the wavelength is fixed, allowing the treatment of phase shifts and amplitudes without dispersion effects across a spectrum. Additionally, the calculus is formulated for fully coherent light, meaning the electric field components maintain a fixed phase relationship, enabling the use of complex vector representations for polarization states. The paraxial approximation is implicit, treating light as plane waves propagating along the optical axis with negligible divergence or transverse variations, which simplifies the mathematics to 2x2 Jones matrices. Furthermore, it operates within the framework of linear optics, where optical elements induce linear transformations on the electric field without intensity-dependent effects.^[40]^[40]^[1]^[41] These assumptions impose significant constraints, rendering Jones calculus inapplicable in scenarios involving partial or depolarized light, where the degree of polarization is less than unity due to incoherent superpositions or random orientations. It also fails for broad-spectrum sources, as wavelength-dependent phase retardations cannot be uniformly captured without violating the monochromatic condition. Nonlinear optical effects, such as those in high-intensity interactions, are beyond its scope since the matrix formalism assumes superposition principles that do not hold under power-dependent responses. In scattering media or environments with multiple reflections, the model breaks down because it neglects depolarization and loss of coherence. Phase inaccuracies arise particularly in thick optical elements, where birefringence-induced walk-off or dispersion disrupts the plane wave assumption, leading to erroneous predictions of polarization evolution.^[3]^[40]^[41]^[42] To address these limitations, workarounds include averaging Jones matrix calculations over discrete wavelengths for quasi-monochromatic or polychromatic sources, computing intensity outputs for each and summing incoherently to approximate overall behavior. For partial coherence, hybrid approaches combine Jones matrices with Mueller calculus elements, deriving Mueller matrices from Jones equivalents to incorporate depolarization while retaining phase information where applicable. Error sources like phase inaccuracies in thick elements or scattering can be mitigated by incorporating empirical corrections or transitioning to full vectorial simulations. Modern extensions, such as generalized Jones calculus, extend the framework to vectorial beams with orbital angular momentum and non-paraxial propagation, incorporating 3D polarization effects in anisotropic media through higher-dimensional matrices.^[43]^[42]^[44]^[45]^[8]

References

[1]
[PDF] Polarization in diffractive optics and metasurfaces - Projects at Harvard
Jan 3, 2022 · at Harvard University and namesake of this Jones calculus, in a series of eight papers. [16–23] beginning only in 1941—some 76 years after ...
[2]
[PDF] Chapter 6 - Polarization of Light - PhysLab
Clark Jones introduced a two-dimensional matrix algebra that is useful for keeping track of light polarization and the effects of optical elements that.
[3]
Jones Calculus - SPIE
The Jones matrix calculus is a matrix formulation of polarized light that consists of 2 × 1 Jones vectors to describe the field components and 2 × 2 Jones ...Missing: original | Show results with:original<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical SystemsI. Description and Discussion of the Calculus
### Summary of Jones Vectors and Polarized Light Representation
[5]
[PDF] Linear Algebra for Describing Polarization and Polarizing Elements
It is important to note that Jones calculus can only be used to describe light that is fully polarized and coherent. Jones calculus uses x and y as its ...
[6]
Higher-Order Poincaré Sphere, Stokes Parameters, and the Angular ...
Jul 25, 2011 · A prominent geometric representation of polarization came in 1892 when Poincaré showed that the state of polarization (SOP) of a light beam ...
[7]
PMD fundamentals: Polarization mode dispersion in optical fibers
The discussion includes the relation between Jones vectors and Stokes vectors, rotation matrices, the definition and representation of PMD vectors, the laws of ...Missing: calculus adoption<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
Generalized Jones & Mueller calculus for anisotropic media
Mar 24, 2025 · The interaction of non-paraxial polarized light with anisotropic media is inherently 3-D, and described by the calculus of generalized Jones ...Missing: extensions beams modern
[9]
[PDF] Polarization Handedness Convention - Thorlabs
Jul 10, 2017 · A clockwise rotation corresponds to a right-hand circular polarization state and a phase shift of -π/2, while a counterclockwise rotation refers ...
[10]
https://opg.optica.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?uri=josaa-11-10-2633
[11]
[PDF] arXiv:1311.5556v4 [cond-mat.str-el] 22 May 2014
May 22, 2014 · The condition above is a representation in the Jones matrix formalism. This de Hoop reciprocity distinguishes a form of time- reversal symmetry ...
[12]
Simplified approach to the Jones calculus in retracing optical circuits
The application of the Jones calculus to optical circuits in which counterpropagating light beams are present is discussed, with particular attention to the ...
[13]
https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-39-25-4626
[14]
[PDF] Introduction to Jones Vectors
The following table shows the Jones Matrices for some of the optical elements. Linear polarizer along the x - direction. Linear polarizer along the y - ...Missing: calculus | Show results with:calculus
[15]
[PDF] Jones calculus 1 Rotation of coordinate systems
This is the Jones vector for elliptically-polarized light, demonstrating that it can be created by linear combination of orthogonal linearly polarized sources.
[16]
[PDF] Yitian Ding Dissertation - The University of Arizona
The Jones matrix of a dichroic optical component with a horizontal maximum transmission is. Jdiat = [. Tmax. 0. 0. Tmin. ],. (1.2.5) where Tmax ...
[17]
[PDF] Polarizers - Galileo
Nov 15, 2005 · Jones calculus. - matrix method for calculations. 2. Page 2 ... Gives Malus's Law: For linear polarization incident on polarizer ...
[18]
https://opg.optica.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-31-7-488
[19]
[PDF] Retarders and the Jones Calculus - Galileo
Nov 17, 2005 · Polarizers. Ideal polarizer has transmission axis a transmits light with ˆ = a blocks light with ˆ ⊥ a. If a complex, transmit circ or ellip ...
[20]
https://opg.optica.org/josa/abstract.cfm?uri=josa-38-8-671
[21]
Achromatic change of circular polarization handedness
Oct 1, 2012 · A half-wave plate is a special kind of retarder that can change left circularly polarized light into right circularly polarized light or ...
[22]
Generalized Jones matrix method for homogeneous biaxial samples
**Summary of Generalized Jones Matrix for Tilted or Arbitrarily Oriented Elements**
[23]
https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-33-16-3502
[24]
Arbitrary Polarization Retarders and Polarization Controllers ... - MDPI
Since matrix multiplication in Jones calculus is non-commutative, these two configurations generally produce different results, and their effectiveness depends ...
[25]
https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-33-16-32955
[26]
Homogeneous and inhomogeneous Jones matrices
In this paper we treat only polarization elements without depolarization, those which can be described by Jones matrices. The Jones calculus is thus used ...
[27]
Differential and integral Jones matrices for a cholesteric | Phys. Rev. A
May 4, 2018 · We found that the form of the transformation rule for the local DJM under rotation of the coordinate system depends on the regime of light ...Article Text · I. Introduction · Iv. Eigenvalues And...Missing: axially | Show results with:axially
[28]
Jones Matrix - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
By using the N-matrix formulation, we can apply the Jones calculus to the most general problems of polarization optics, excluding depolarization phenomena.
[29]
Spectroscopic Ellipsometry | Wiley Online Books
Jan 26, 2007 · Author(s):. Hiroyuki Fujiwara, ; First published:26 January 2007 ; Print ISBN:9780470016084 | ; Online ISBN:9780470060193 | ...
[30]
A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical SystemsI. Description ...
The present paper is devoted to a description of the new calculus. When light passes through any of the three fundamental types of optical elements, the state ...
[31]
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/aot-2022-0008/html
[32]
Jones transfer matrix for polarization mode dispersion fibers
In the work, the tight methodology of calculating the Jones matrix, starting from the knowledge of the PMD vector, is shown. This new method is used to ...Missing: calculus | Show results with:calculus
[33]
Jones matrix of polarization mode dispersion
We describe how to calculate the Jones matrix transfer function of a fiber if its principal states of polarization and its differential group delay as ...
[34]
Extended Jones matrix method. II - Optica Publishing Group
Pochi Yeh J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72(4) 507-513 (1982). Comparison of extended Jones matrices for twisted nematic liquid-crystal displays at oblique angles of ...
[35]
Equivalent retarder-rotator approach to on-state twisted nematic ...
Jun 1, 2006 · Equivalent parameter model. Let us begin by recalling that the Jones matrix of a twisted nematic liquid crystal cell, M TNLCD ⁠, referred to ...Missing: cascaded | Show results with:cascaded
[36]
[PDF] Full polarization control for fiber optical quantum communication ...
The role of such a polarization control system is to insert a unitary transformation immediately before the receiver such that the Jones matrix of the global ...
[37]
Antireflection of optical anisotropic dielectric metasurfaces - Nature
Jan 30, 2023 · In 2018, Zhu used three laminating layers as a broadband antireflection coating for a birefringent sapphire waveplate. ... The Jones matrix of the ...Abstract · Introduction · Results And DiscussionsMissing: calculus | Show results with:calculus
[38]
How to use the Jones Matrix surface - Ansys Optics
If we change the Jones matrix elements to represent a half-wave plate in x ... circular polarization with the opposite handedness. Note the direction ...Missing: flips | Show results with:flips
[39]
Mueller-Stokes-Jones Calculus - File Exchange - MATLAB Central
Jan 17, 2014 · This package provides functions to assess problems involving the transmission of (un)polarized light through polarizing elements.
[40]
Advanced Jones calculus for the classification of periodic ...
By relying on an advanced Jones calculus, we analyze the polarization properties of light upon propagation through metamaterial slabs in a comprehensive manner.
[41]
A Jones matrix formalism for simulating three-dimensional polarized ...
Oct 6, 2015 · In this paper, we compare the use of the macroscopic and the microscopic model for simulating 3D-PLI by means of the Jones matrix formalism.
[42]
Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography – a review ...
The optic-axis orientation is defined by the eigenvector, which is an Eigen Jones vector of the sample matrix J s that describes a polarization state that is ...
[43]
Polarization characteristics of a polychromatic wave - ResearchGate
Aug 10, 2025 · imply the complex amplitudes of the Cartesian wave components. Hence, we introduce a modified Jones vector as a sum of vectors of the type ...
[44]
Application of the Jones calculus for Gaussian beams in uniaxial ...
In its early form[[1], [2]] the Jones calculus had some strict limitations, e.g., it was not able to treat waves that diverge in the medium.
[45]
[2103.13779] Generalized Jones Calculus for Vortex, Vector, and ...
Mar 25, 2021 · The work defines the general form of the Jones vector and establishes the Jones matrix for polarizers, wave plates, Faraday rotators, Q-plates, and spiral ...Missing: tilted Euler angles