Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Keystone Pipeline

The Keystone Pipeline System is a network of pipelines operated by that transports crude oil, primarily from Alberta's , from Hardisty, , , to refineries in the United States, spanning approximately 2,694 miles with operational segments capable of delivering up to 591,000 barrels per day since 2010. The system includes multiple phases, with the proposed Keystone XL extension designed to add 830,000 barrels per day of capacity but facing repeated regulatory hurdles, ultimately canceled by in 2021 following U.S. presidential permit revocation, though revival discussions resurfaced in 2025 during U.S.- negotiations. Proponents highlighted its role in enhancing North American by facilitating stable, domestic-sourced oil supplies over more volatile imports, while generating significant temporary construction —estimated at thousands of —and contributing to lower transportation costs compared to or tanker alternatives. The pipeline's development spurred economic activity in refining and related sectors, with analyses indicating that its absence elevated U.S. costs and job losses upon cancellation. Critics emphasized environmental risks, including spills such as the 2019 incident releasing over 380,000 gallons and the 2022 rupture spilling 14,000 barrels into a creek, arguing these underscored vulnerabilities in transporting corrosive dilbit. However, federal assessments found the system's accident rate comparable to other crude pipelines, with pipelines exhibiting lower spill incidents and volumes per unit transported than , which has seen more frequent and larger releases in recent years. The became a in U.S. political , approved under Obama for initial phases, fast-tracked by Trump, and halted by Biden, reflecting tensions between fossil fuel infrastructure and climate policy priorities.

Description

Technical Specifications

The Keystone Pipeline System consists of high-strength manufactured to (API) 5L standards, primarily Grade X70, with double for the mainline segments. The diameter is 36 inches (914 mm) for the primary trunk line from Hardisty, , to Steele City, , enabling efficient transport of under operating pressures up to 80% of (SMYS). Wall thicknesses vary from 0.344 inches to 0.562 inches based on terrain, soil conditions, and pressures exceeding 1.25 times maximum operating pressure. The total operational length of the system, encompassing Phases I-III, measures 2,694 miles (4,405 km), connecting Canadian production to U.S. refining markets in the Midwest and Gulf Coast. It incorporates a minimum depth of 4 feet (1.2 m) with additional cover in sensitive areas such as river crossings and roads, and includes over 100 mainline block valves for sectional isolation. The design supports a nominal capacity of 590,000 barrels per day (93,800 cubic meters per day) of crude oil, with expansions achieved via additional pump stations and horsepower increases. Power for the system's approximately 21 pump stations is provided by electric motors and natural gas turbines, maintaining flow through centrifugal pumps that deliver discharge pressures optimized for the pipeline's friction and elevation profile. Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems monitor pressure, flow rates, and integrity in real-time, integrated with leak detection algorithms based on computational pipeline monitoring. The pipeline transports primarily diluted bitumen (dilbit) from Alberta's oil sands, compatible with the system's specifications for viscous, high-acid crudes.

Purpose and Capacity

The Keystone Pipeline System was designed to transport crude oil extracted from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, including synthetic crude oil and diluted bitumen derived from Alberta's oil sands, southward to U.S. refining and market hubs. This infrastructure facilitates the efficient delivery of heavy crude grades that are ill-suited for export via Pacific ports or rail due to logistical constraints, thereby integrating Canadian production more directly with U.S. Midwest and Gulf Coast refineries capable of processing such feedstocks. By providing a dedicated pipeline route spanning approximately 2,694 miles (4,405 km), the system reduces reliance on higher-cost alternatives like rail transport, which empirical data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration indicates can cost 2-3 times more per barrel for similar volumes during peak periods. The pipeline's operational capacity reflects phased expansions to match growing oil sands output and U.S. refining demand. Phase I, completed in 2011, established an initial throughput of 435,000 barrels per day (bpd) from Hardisty, , to Steele City, . Subsequent enhancements in Phases II and III, in-service by 2011 and 2014 respectively, increased the system's total capacity to approximately 590,000 bpd for deliveries to Midwest refineries, with Phase III's Gulf Coast extension enabling further distribution of up to 830,000 bpd from , to Texas ports—though actual throughput is constrained by upstream segments and market dynamics. These capacities support the transport of roughly 10-12% of Canada's daily production as of 2014, prioritizing economic viability through lower emissions per barrel compared to (estimated at 28-40% reduction based on lifecycle analyses by the U.S. Department of Energy).

History

Proposal and Initial Approvals (2008–2010)

TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP proposed the Keystone Pipeline system in mid-2008 to transport crude oil from Hardisty, Alberta, Canada, to Steele City, Nebraska, with an initial capacity of 435,000 barrels per day. The project aimed to provide additional market access for Canadian oil sands production to U.S. refineries, reducing reliance on rail and truck transport. On September 19, 2008, TransCanada filed an application with the U.S. Department of State for a Presidential Permit to construct, operate, and maintain the international border crossing facilities. The Department issued the permit on March 14, 2008, authorizing the necessary infrastructure under Executive Order provisions for cross-border energy facilities deemed in the national interest. In Canada, TransCanada submitted its application to the National Energy Board (NEB) for the project, which received approval in September 2009, subject to conditions on safety and environmental mitigation. This approval facilitated the start of construction activities for Phase I, with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other agencies conducting environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act, culminating in a Draft Environmental Impact Statement released in April 2010. State-level approvals, including route certifications in Nebraska and other affected states, were secured during this period, enabling the project's progression without the significant delays later encountered by the Keystone XL extension. Initial opposition focused primarily on potential environmental risks to aquifers and wetlands, though these were addressed through mandated mitigation measures in the permits.

Construction of Phases I–III (2010–2014)

Phase I construction, which spanned from Hardisty, , to Steele City, Nebraska, with downstream connections enabling deliveries to refineries at Wood River and Patoka, , reached completion in June 2010. The project converted approximately 864 kilometers (537 miles) of existing in to crude oil service and involved building new segments in the United States, along with stations and terminals. Initial stood at 435,000 barrels per day, utilizing 36-inch buried to a minimum depth of four feet. Commercial operations commenced on June 30, 2010, marking the first deliveries of Canadian crude to U.S. Midwest markets. Phase II, known as the Keystone-Cushing extension, began construction immediately following Phase I's startup in June 2010, adding a 480-kilometer (298-mile) pipeline from Steele City, , to , to address regional bottlenecks and connect to downstream infrastructure. This phase incorporated 11 additional pump stations to boost overall system capacity toward 590,000 barrels per day for the initial phases combined. Construction progressed without major regulatory interruptions, as it traversed states with supportive permitting processes, and deliveries started on February 8, 2011, upon mechanical completion. Phase III, the Gulf Coast extension, initiated construction in August 2012 as a standalone U.S.-only project from , to , near refineries, spanning 784 kilometers (487 miles). Valued at $2.3 billion, it employed 4,844 workers who logged over 11 million labor hours to install similar 36-inch pipe and supporting facilities, bypassing federal cross-border permitting requirements. The segment entered service on January 22, 2014, enhancing access to Gulf Coast refining capacity and integrating with existing market hubs.

Keystone XL (Phase IV) Proposal and Cancellations

The Keystone XL, designated as Phase IV of the Keystone Pipeline system, was proposed by TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P. (a subsidiary of TransCanada, now ) to transport and diluted from the in Hardisty, , , southward approximately 1,179 miles (1,897 km) through and to Steele City, , where it would connect to existing pipeline infrastructure for delivery to refineries in , , and the U.S. Gulf Coast. The project application was filed with the U.S. Department of State on September 19, 2008, seeking a presidential permit for the cross-border segment due to its potential implications. Designed with a of up to 830,000 barrels per day, the pipeline aimed to enhance North American by providing a direct route for Canadian heavy , reducing reliance on and tanker transport methods that carry higher spill risks per empirical safety data from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Initial regulatory review under the Obama administration faced delays due to environmental impact assessments required under the , culminating in a State Department recommendation on January 18, 2012, to deny the permit, which President Obama endorsed, citing inadequate time for thorough review of a mandated reroute away from the Sandhills region in imposed by congressional deadlines in the temporary payroll tax cut extension . TransCanada withdrew and refiled its application in May 2012 with a revised route to address and wetland concerns, undergoing further supplemental environmental impact statements. Despite additional state-level approvals in , President Obama rejected the permit again on November 6, 2015, determining the project did not serve amid pressures from environmental advocacy groups emphasizing carbon emissions from extraction. These denials, while framed around environmental and procedural grounds, aligned with broader policy preferences against expanding infrastructure, as evidenced by contemporaneous administration commitments to goals over domestic energy development. Following the 2016 election, President Trump issued a memorandum on January 24, 2017, directing expedited review of the Keystone XL permit to prioritize infrastructure and job creation. The State Department granted the presidential permit on March 24, 2017, after a revised environmental assessment concluded the project could proceed with mitigation measures, enabling TransCanada to secure financing and begin preliminary construction activities, including pipe staging and right-of-way preparation. Legal challenges from environmental and indigenous groups ensued, delaying full advancement, but the approval facilitated an estimated 11,000 direct and indirect jobs during peak construction, per company projections supported by labor market analyses. On January 20, 2021, President Biden revoked the Keystone XL permit via on his first day in , fulfilling campaign pledges to halt projects perceived as incompatible with aggressive emissions reductions, without awaiting ongoing litigation outcomes. TC Energy suspended construction in February 2021 and, after failing to secure renewed regulatory certainty or sufficient shipper commitments amid market shifts toward renewables, officially terminated the project on June 9, 2021, writing off approximately $1.3 billion in sunk costs and abandoning an estimated $9 billion investment. The cancellation redirected Canadian exports toward U.S. rail and alternative pipelines like Line 3, though it did not measurably alter global prices or emissions trajectories, as substitution effects and baseline trends demonstrated resilience in supply chains.

Operational Incidents and Spills

The Keystone Pipeline, operational since June 2011, has recorded multiple spills and incidents, with the U.S. documenting 22 accidents from 2010 to 2020, the majority involving less than 50 barrels of oil and contained at pump stations or operator-controlled sites. These events prompted investigations revealing patterns linked to original , , or deficiencies in at least four major cases, leading to Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) corrective action orders and civil penalties for issues such as inadequate corrosion protection. While smaller leaks occurred regularly, significant ruptures have involved thousands of barrels, often due to mechanical failures like faulty welds or pipe bends, though overall spill volumes represent a minute fraction of the pipeline's cumulative throughput exceeding 2 billion barrels by 2022. One early incident occurred in 2011 near Ludden, , where approximately 16,000 gallons (about 381 barrels) leaked from a pump station failure. In April 2016, a 16,800-gallon (400-barrel) leak in Hutchinson County, , resulted in a PHMSA corrective action order to (now ), highlighting operational vulnerabilities. Larger spills followed in subsequent years. On November 16, 2017, a rupture near Amherst, , released 6,592 barrels into a field, attributed to a pipe seam separation from manufacturing defects. The pipeline's most voluminous pre-2022 incident happened on October 29, 2019, near Edinburg, , spilling 383,000 gallons (9,120 barrels) of diluted into wetlands, caused by a pump station pressure relief valve malfunction; cleanup affected over 100 acres, with PHMSA fining the operator for inadequate response planning. The largest spill to date occurred on December 7, 2022, at Milepost 14 in , , where 12,937 barrels flowed into Mill Creek due to a combination of a substandard girth weld and unintended pipe bending from soil movement, contaminating 28 miles of waterways and prompting a PHMSA that criticized practices. A more recent rupture on April 8, 2025, near Fort Ransom, , released an estimated 3,500 barrels (147,000 gallons) into an agricultural field, detected after a reported " bang"; PHMSA issued a corrective action order to South Bow (the current ), with 3,110 barrels recovered and the pipeline restarted after a week-long shutdown.
DateLocationVolume (barrels)Key Cause
November 16, 2017Amherst, SD6,592Pipe seam separation
October 29, 2019Edinburg, ND9,120Pressure relief valve failure
December 7, 2022Washington Co., KS12,937Faulty weld and pipe bend
April 8, 2025Fort Ransom, ND~3,500Rupture (under investigation)
PHMSA oversight has intensified post-incidents, incorporating Keystone lessons into broader pipeline safety protocols, though critics from environmental groups argue recurring issues indicate systemic flaws, while operators maintain compliance with federal standards.

Recent Developments (2025 Spill and XL Revival Discussions)

On April 8, 2025, the Keystone Pipeline experienced a rupture near Fort Ransom, , spilling an estimated 3,500 barrels (approximately 147,000 gallons) of crude onto . The incident prompted an immediate shutdown of the pipeline, with operator (now South Bow) reporting that an employee detected through audible and visual indicators. Cleanup efforts recovered about 3,110 barrels by April 16, 2025, when operations resumed following regulatory approvals. The U.S. Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) issued a corrective action order on April 11, 2025, mandating enhanced integrity assessments and pressure reductions to address potential or defects. This event marked at least the 28th spill in the pipeline's operational , contributing to a cumulative leak volume exceeding 1.2 million gallons, though independent analyses emphasize that such incidents remain rare relative to the volume transported—over 600,000 barrels per day. Environmental groups highlighted risks to local waterways and soil, but no immediate impacts to the nearby Sheyenne River were confirmed, with oversight focusing on containment and remediation. The spill underscored ongoing debates about pipeline maintenance, with PHMSA data indicating prior incidents, such as the 2022 rupture of 14,000 barrels, had led to upgraded protocols. In October 2025, discussions emerged regarding the potential revival of the canceled Keystone XL extension, prompted by a White House meeting between Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump. Carney raised the project amid talks on U.S. tariffs affecting Canadian steel and aluminum, proposing it as a means to enhance North American energy security and bilateral trade ties. Trump expressed openness to revisiting the 1,900-kilometer pipeline from Alberta's oil sands to Nebraska, which could transport up to 830,000 barrels per day, potentially bolstering U.S. refining capacity and reducing reliance on overseas imports. Proponents, including Alberta energy officials, viewed the overture with cautious optimism, citing economic benefits like job creation in construction and access to stable Canadian crude amid global supply disruptions. However, industry experts noted substantial hurdles, including expired permits, landowner opposition, environmental litigation, and the need for fresh environmental impact assessments under the . Carney himself framed revival as one element in broader U.S.- cooperation, without committing to immediate action, while TC Energy's successor entities have not publicly endorsed restarting the defunct project abandoned in 2021. These talks reflect persistent tensions between goals and regulatory constraints, with no formal revival proposals advanced as of late 2025.

Route and Infrastructure

Phase I (Hardisty to Steele City)

Phase I of the Keystone Pipeline extends from the Hardisty terminal in east-central , , to the Steele City terminal southeast of , , covering a distance of approximately 2,147 miles (3,456 km). The route begins at Hardisty, proceeds southeast through and , crosses the U.S. border near Gretna, , into , then south through eastern , , and into southeastern . Construction commenced in , with the Canadian segment involving the conversion of about 537 miles (864 km) of existing 36-inch natural gas in and , plus 232 miles (373 km) of new 30-inch diameter , including 16 pump stations and the Hardisty terminal. The U.S. segment added 1,084 miles (1,744 km) of new 30-inch diameter across , , and , supported by 23 pumping and transmission stations. The utilizes steel compliant with 5L standards, designed to crude oil from the at an initial capacity of 435,000 barrels per day. The phase achieved mechanical completion and began commercial operations on June 30, 2010, delivering oil to Midwest refineries via connections from Steele City to , and Patoka, Illinois. Pump stations along the route, spaced approximately every 50-80 miles, maintain flow through variable terrain, including river crossings and agricultural lands, with the system operating under a regulated by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). Since commissioning, Phase I has facilitated the transport of over 600 million barrels annually in later years, contributing to North American energy supply without reported major spills attributable to this segment's infrastructure.

Phase II (Steele City to Wood River)

Phase II of the Keystone Pipeline extends eastward from the Steele City terminal in Jefferson County, , through northern to delivery facilities at Wood River in , a distance of approximately 295 miles. The 36-inch diameter pipeline segment crosses rural areas and connects to the Wood River Refinery, operated by , facilitating crude oil distribution to Midwest refining centers. This branch diverges from the mainline at Steele City, where oil can also route southward to , enhancing system flexibility for regional markets. Construction on this segment, encompassing spreads 9, 10, and 11, occurred between 2009 and as part of the pipeline's initial buildout, involving trenching, pipe laying, and hydrostatic testing to ensure integrity under operating pressures up to 1,440 psi. The line features a minimum ground cover of 4 feet and includes mainline valves for sectional isolation. Delivery facilities at Wood River support offloading to local refineries, with additional connectivity to Patoka, , for further distribution. Operations began on , , allowing initial crude deliveries to U.S. Midwest refineries and contributing to the system's nominal capacity of up to 591,000 barrels per day for this route. This segment bolsters access to PADD 2 (Midwest) refining capacity by transporting and from Alberta's , reducing reliance on imports from overseas sources. Pump stations along the route, including those in , provide pressure boosts to maintain flow rates, with the infrastructure designed for buried to minimize surface disruption. No major delays were reported for this phase, reflecting coordinated regulatory approvals from state and federal agencies prior to 2010 commencement.

Phase III (Gulf Coast Extension)

The Gulf Coast Extension, designated as Phase III of the Keystone Pipeline system, comprises 487 miles of 36-inch-diameter pipeline transporting crude oil from Cushing, Oklahoma, to refineries in Port Arthur and Nederland, Texas. This segment connects to the upstream Keystone infrastructure at Cushing, a major oil storage and trading hub, enabling direct delivery to Gulf Coast refining centers and alleviating bottlenecks in transporting Canadian heavy crude southward. Unlike the cross-border phases, Phase III lies entirely within the United States, thus bypassing the need for a presidential permit and relying on state and federal regulatory approvals under the Interstate Commerce Act. Construction commenced in mid-2012 following environmental assessments and right-of-way acquisitions, with the pipeline entering service on January 21, 2014, after of pump stations and testing. The project added to the overall Keystone system, supporting up to 700,000 barrels per day of crude oil flow to refineries capable of processing heavy sour crudes from Alberta's . Operated by (formerly TransCanada), the extension includes integrity management programs compliant with Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) standards, featuring , in-line inspection tools, and hydrostatic testing during . The extension enhances logistical efficiency by providing an alternative route to Gulf Coast markets, reducing reliance on rail or truck transport from Cushing and integrating with existing Texas pipeline networks for export via tankers. No major spills or operational incidents have been publicly reported specific to the Phase III segment as of 2025, though the broader Keystone system has undergone enhanced monitoring post-incidents elsewhere.

Proposed Keystone XL Route

The proposed Keystone XL route, designated as Phase IV of the Keystone Pipeline System, was planned to extend approximately 1,179 miles (1,897 km) from Hardisty, Alberta, Canada, to Steele City, Nebraska, United States, providing a more direct pathway for transporting synthetic crude oil and diluted bitumen from Alberta's oil sands. The Canadian segment spanned about 329 miles (529 km), starting at the Hardisty terminal and crossing into the United States near Monchy, Saskatchewan, with an initiating pump station at the origin to maintain flow pressure. In the U.S., the route traversed eastern Montana for roughly 283 miles, northern South Dakota for 314 miles, and southern Nebraska for 255 miles, terminating at Steele City for interconnection with the existing Phases I-III pipelines leading to Gulf Coast refineries. Engineered as a 36-inch-diameter buried , the segment was specified to handle a capacity of 830,000 barrels per day, utilizing horizontal techniques to cross major water bodies like rivers and the in to mitigate rupture risks. The route selection incorporated rerouting from initial proposals to avoid high-risk areas, such as reducing proximity to the Sandhills region in and minimizing crossings of wetlands and cultural sites, based on environmental impact assessments conducted by TransCanada (now ). Additional included up to seven stations along the U.S. portion for and delivery terminals at the endpoint. This configuration aimed to shorten transit time and reduce bottlenecks compared to rail or truck alternatives for exports, while adhering to U.S. Department of State route approvals that balanced energy transport needs with constraints across federal, state, and private properties. The underwent multiple revisions, including a 2012 Nebraska-specific reroute of 81 miles to address vulnerabilities, reflecting iterative regulatory feedback on hydrological and ecological data.

Ownership and Operations

Corporate Structure

The Keystone Pipeline System is owned and operated by South Bow Corporation (TSX: SOBO; NYSE: SOBO), a Calgary-based energy infrastructure company focused on liquids pipelines and related facilities across and the . South Bow was formed via the spin-off of Corporation's liquids pipelines business, effective October 1, 2024, transferring ownership of the Keystone system—including its 2,687-mile network from Hardisty, , to Steele City, , and extensions to Wood River, Illinois, and —to the new entity. This separation allowed to concentrate on infrastructure while South Bow operates as an independent, publicly traded master (MLP)-structured entity, distributing substantially all available cash flows to unitholders after reserves for maintenance and growth. Prior to the spin-off, the pipeline was wholly owned by (formerly TransCanada Corporation until its 2016 rebranding), which developed Phases I–III between 2010 and 2014 through subsidiaries such as TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP—a with Keystone Pipeline GP, LLC serving as the general partner holding nominal equity (0.02%) and controlling operations, while limited partners provided the bulk (99.98%) of capital. TransCanada initially partnered with , which held a 50% stake during early development, but acquired full ownership by 2010 for approximately $650 million, reflecting capital contributions to date. This structure facilitated regulatory compliance under frameworks like the (FERC) and Canada's National Energy Board (now Canada Energy Regulator), with the GP entity managing day-to-day operations, maintenance, and tariff approvals. South Bow's corporate governance includes a board of directors overseeing strategy, risk management, and compliance, with key executives drawn from TC Energy's liquids operations team to ensure continuity in pipeline integrity and throughput capacity of up to 622,000 barrels per day on the mainline. The company's assets, valued at over US$20 billion post-spin-off, position Keystone as its flagship, generating stable fee-based revenue from long-term shipper contracts rather than commodity price exposure. Ownership is distributed among public shareholders via common units, with no significant controlling stakes reported beyond institutional investors as of 2025 filings. This evolution reflects broader industry trends toward asset specialization amid regulatory and market pressures on integrated energy firms.

Regulatory Compliance and Maintenance

The Keystone Pipeline operates under the oversight of the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), which enforces federal safety standards outlined in 49 CFR Part 195 for hazardous liquid pipelines, including requirements for design, construction, operation, and maintenance to prevent releases and ensure public safety. In , the (CER, formerly National Energy Board) imposes analogous conditions for the pipeline's segments crossing the border, focusing on integrity management and . PHMSA has granted special permits allowing certain Keystone segments to operate at up to 80% of (SMYS)—exceeding the standard 72% limit—contingent on enhanced assessments, pipe replacements in affected areas, and ongoing compliance verification, with full implementation of higher pressures not achieved until 2017 after remedial actions. TC Energy, the pipeline's operator, implements a comprehensive integrity management program mandated by PHMSA, incorporating annual risk assessments, in-line inspections (ILI) using smart pigs to detect corrosion, dents, and cracks, to mitigate corrosion, and regular hydrostatic testing or pipe replacements in high-consequence areas. Maintenance protocols include continuous monitoring from control centers, aerial and ground patrols for third-party damage risks, and coating repairs, with the emergency response plan certified by PHMSA as addressing "significant and substantial harm" scenarios and reviewed annually or after system changes. Following incidents, such as the 2022 spill, PHMSA has issued corrective action orders requiring root-cause analyses, third-party metallurgical testing of failed sections, enhanced girth weld inspections, and preventive measures like additional field assessments to address recurring issues like manufacturing defects or construction-era anomalies. Despite these measures, PHMSA enforcement records indicate instances of non-compliance, including delayed remediation of identified defects—such as a 2012-detected pipe deformation in that contributed to the 2023 spill—and repeated violations prompting calls for permit revocation or stricter orders, underscoring gaps between regulatory requirements and operational execution. analyses have noted that while PHMSA mandates investigations into major spills (e.g., the four largest incidents), the agency's oversight relies heavily on operator self-reporting, with limited independent verification until post-incident probes. maintains adherence to industry best practices, including high-quality materials and rigorous programs, but reports highlight that permits have enabled operations under relaxed stress thresholds without proportional increases in preventive inspections in some cases.

Economic Contributions

Job Creation and Construction Impacts

The construction of the Keystone Pipeline System's Phases I, II, and III generated thousands of temporary jobs across and the , encompassing direct roles in pipeline installation, , trenching, and equipment operation, as well as indirect in supply chains and services. According to an by the Maguire Energy Institute at , TransCanada's outlays during the period supported nearly 27,000 person-years of , equivalent to the total labor input of 27,000 full-time worker-years distributed over the multi-year timeline from approximately 2008 to 2014. This figure includes direct construction labor, manufacturing contributions, and induced economic effects in local communities along the route. Direct construction workforce peaks for individual phases ranged from several thousand workers, with Phase I's 2,147-kilometer segment from Hardisty, , to Steele City, , completed in June 2011, requiring coordinated teams of skilled tradespeople, many affiliated with labor unions. Phase II, extending 485 kilometers from Steele City to , and operational by February 2011, similarly drew on regional labor pools for earthmoving and pipe-laying activities. Phase III's 788-kilometer Gulf Coast extension from Cushing to , finalized in 2014, further amplified short-term hiring in and , boosting local economies through wages and procurement. These jobs were predominantly temporary, tied to project timelines, and contributed to state and local tax revenues exceeding $145 million during construction. Beyond fieldwork, the project stimulated U.S. , particularly in pipe , as TransCanada prioritized domestic suppliers to meet regulatory and economic preferences, creating ancillary in mills and fabrication facilities. representatives endorsed the initiative for providing high-wage opportunities in a challenging economic period, with pledges from pipeline contractors to utilize American labor where feasible. Post-construction, the operational system sustains a limited number of permanent positions focused on monitoring, maintenance, and pump station management, though precise counts for the full network remain undisclosed by ; analogous projects indicate fewer than 100 direct U.S. roles. Empirical assessments, such as those from the Perryman Group, highlight multiplier effects amplifying initial expenditures into broader regional gains, countering critiques that overstate displacement in competing sectors like .

Revenue Generation and Tax Effects

The Keystone Pipeline System generates revenue primarily through transportation tolls charged to shippers for moving crude oil from Hardisty, , to delivery points in the United States, including Steele City, , and . Tolls consist of fixed and variable components, with rates approved by regulators such as the Canada Energy Regulator and the U.S. , reflecting costs like operations, , and . In 2023, the Liquids Pipelines segment—which encompasses the Keystone System as its core asset—reported revenues of C$2.667 billion, supporting TC Energy's overall financial performance prior to the segment's spinoff to South Bow Corporation in October 2024. Comparable EBITDA for the segment reached C$1.453 billion that year, driven by high operational reliability averaging over 94% on the Keystone System. These revenues enable reinvestment in pipeline integrity and expansion, while providing returns to investors through dividends and debt servicing. Tax contributions from the Keystone Pipeline include substantial property taxes paid to local, state, provincial, and county governments along its route, funding public services such as schools and infrastructure. From its commissioning in 2010 through 2020, the pipeline generated C$81 million in property tax revenues in and US$419 million in the , distributed to counties and municipalities hosting the infrastructure. By mid-2015, cumulative U.S. property taxes alone approached US$200 million, benefiting landowners and communities via assessed values on pipeline assets. Additionally, corporate income taxes from operational profits contribute to federal and provincial/ revenues; for instance, TC Energy's Liquids Pipelines segment earnings before tax in 2023 totaled C$1.039 billion in segmented earnings, a portion of which is taxable after deductions. These payments occur without direct subsidies, as tolls recover eligible costs including taxes, contrasting with rail alternatives that impose externalized costs on public budgets for maintenance and safety. Overall, the pipeline's fiscal impacts enhance government revenues without increasing consumer prices beyond market-driven oil transport efficiencies.

Influence on Oil Markets and Consumer Prices

The operational phases of the Keystone Pipeline transport approximately 600,000 barrels per day (bpd) of from Alberta's to U.S. refineries in and the Gulf Coast, integrating North American supply chains and alleviating bottlenecks that previously constrained exports from . This capacity has helped narrow the (WCS)- (WTI) price differential, which arises from limited pipeline outlets and can widen to $15–$25 per barrel during periods of high production and transport constraints, as seen in 2018–2019 when differentials averaged over $20 per barrel due to insufficient evacuation . By enabling more efficient delivery compared to (which costs $15–$20 per barrel versus pipeline's $5–$10), the pipeline reduces overall transportation expenses for U.S. refiners processing discounted Canadian heavy grades, fostering tighter regional market linkages. In oil markets, Keystone's role enhances supply reliability from a geopolitically stable source, displacing some imports from higher-risk regions like the or , though its volume equates to less than 1% of global daily consumption (around 100 million ). Economic modeling indicates that additional , such as Keystone's, can boost Canadian producer revenues by shrinking the WCS —potentially by $3–$5 per barrel—while marginally lowering input costs for Gulf Coast refineries optimized for heavy crudes, which comprise over 90% of U.S. refining for such feeds. However, these effects are offset by global pricing dynamics, where Brent or WTI benchmarks dominate, and increased North American output may elevate worldwide consumption by 0.6 barrels for every additional barrel produced due to incremental price softening. Regarding consumer prices, U.S. Department of Energy analyses conclude that Keystone's operations have had inconclusive and negligible impacts on gasoline or diesel prices, as transport cost savings (typically under $0.10 per gallon) are dwarfed by crude volatility and refining margins. Empirical studies of pipeline expansions, including analogs to Keystone, find no measurable pass-through to retail fuel prices, with U.S. gasoline consumers insulated by the fungible nature of global oil trade and domestic production growth exceeding 13 million bpd by 2023. The proposed Keystone XL extension (830,000 bpd capacity) was similarly assessed to yield minimal consumer benefits, with its 2021 cancellation correlating with falling pump prices amid post-pandemic demand weakness, rather than supply disruptions. Claims of significant price reductions from the project overlook these market realities, as evidenced by sustained differentials persisting despite existing infrastructure.

Enhancement of North American Energy Security

The Keystone Pipeline system bolsters North American energy security by enabling the efficient transport of crude oil from Canada's Alberta oil sands to U.S. refining centers, substituting imports from geopolitically unstable suppliers with output from a reliable partner. Commissioned in phases starting in 2010, the pipeline operates at a capacity of approximately 610,000 barrels per day (bpd), moving heavy crude southward from Hardisty, Alberta, through Steele City, Nebraska, and onward to Gulf Coast markets via extensions. This dedicated infrastructure integrates Canadian production—drawing from Alberta's extensive 165 billion barrels of recoverable oil sands resources—directly into the U.S. supply chain, mitigating risks from supply interruptions in regions like the Middle East or Latin America. U.S. government assessments have underscored the pipeline's role in addressing specific vulnerabilities, such as the decline in Venezuelan heavy crude exports due to sanctions and instability, which U.S. Gulf refineries are optimized to process. By prioritizing North American sourcing, Keystone reduces exposure to production decisions and maritime chokepoints, while fostering bilateral energy interdependence that aligns with broader continental strategies, including potential synergies with U.S. output and Mexican reforms. Empirical trends reflect this shift: data indicate Canadian crude imports surged from about 1.9 million in 2010 to over 4 million by 2023, comprising more than 60% of total U.S. crude imports and correlating with a 60% drop in imports since the pipeline's inception. Proponents emphasize that without such pipelines, Canadian producers might redirect exports to Asia via costlier rail or coastal terminals, eroding U.S. access to secure heavy volumes essential for domestic efficiency. This contrasts with riskier alternatives like , which saw heightened accident rates during pipeline delays, underscoring Keystone's contribution to safer, more resilient supply chains. Although some analyses, including a 2015 State Department review, argue limited net impact due to global market , the strategic premium of locked-in allied supply—evident in heightened post-2022 geopolitical tensions—affirms tangible enhancements for North American consumers and industries.

Safety and Reliability

Historical Spill Data

The Keystone Pipeline, operational since June 2010, has recorded 22 accidents between 2010 and 2020 according to Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) data analyzed by the (), releasing a total of 11,975 barrels of crude oil. Of these, 82 percent involved fewer than 50 barrels, with most attributed to equipment failure, , or other material defects; only six incidents impacted or the . Larger releases during this period included pump station vibrations causing a 400-barrel spill at the Ludden facility in in May 2011 and a girth weld releasing another 400 barrels near , , in April 2016. The most significant pre-2021 events were a November 16, 2017, rupture near Amherst, , spilling 6,592 barrels due to a originating from mechanical damage during construction, which affected and lands, and an October 29, 2019, leak near Edinburg, , releasing 4,515 barrels from a defect in a seam weld near a . Post-2020 incidents have included larger volumes. On December 7, 2022, a failure in , , released 12,937 barrels (initially estimated at 14,000) into Mill Creek, attributed by PHMSA and the operator to construction flaws such as excessive and improper during prior segment installation. On April 8, 2025, a rupture near Fort Ransom, , spilled an estimated 3,500 barrels onto farmland, with operators recovering about one-third via vacuum trucks; the cause remains under investigation.
DateLocationVolume (barrels)Primary Cause
May 2011Ludden, 400Pump station vibrations
April 2016Freeman, 400Girth weld failure
November 16, 2017Amherst, 6,592Fatigue crack from installation damage
October 29, 2019Edinburg, 4,515Pipe seam weld manufacturing defect
December 7, 2022Washington Co., KS12,937Construction bending stress and welding
April 8, 2025Fort Ransom, 3,500 (est.)Under investigation
All volumes per official PHMSA or operator reports; smaller leaks, comprising the bulk of incidents, typically involved minimal environmental impact and were contained promptly.

Comparative Risks Versus and Transport

According to a U.S. analysis of 2007-2016 data, pipelines transported over 1.29 gallons of crude oil with a spill of 0.0010%, compared to 0.0076% for (across 23 billion gallons) and 0.0011% for (across 48 billion gallons). This reflects pipelines' capacity for high-volume, continuous with fewer proportional releases, as each pipeline incident involved an average of 723,000 gallons shipped versus 51,000 for and 56,000 for . Distance-normalized metrics further favor pipelines. U.S. data from 2002-2009 indicate pipeline release rates of 0.0006 incidents per million ton-miles, versus 0.0033 for —a 5.5-fold difference. Canadian records from 2003-2013 show rail incidents occurring 4.5 times more frequently per million barrels of equivalent than pipeline events. Trucks exhibit the highest per-distance risk, with estimates of 20 spills per billion ton-miles compared to 2 for rail and 0.6 for pipelines, driven by exposure to roadways and . Human safety records align with these trends. Over the analyzed decade, pipelines recorded 3 fatalities and 14 serious injuries, trucks 3 fatalities and 1 serious injury, and rail none—despite rail's outsized spill percentage. operations minimize public exposure through buried infrastructure, whereas rail and truck modes involve populated areas and potential collisions. Environmentally, pipeline spills average smaller volumes and lower ignition risks than rail derailments, which often result in fires and broader ; 73% of Canadian pipeline releases from 2003-2013 were under 1 cubic meter. 's higher incident amplifies potential damage, as evidenced by elevated per-ton-mile release volumes in U.S. comparisons. Trucks, while spilling less total volume in aggregate, contribute dispersed releases that complicate due to mobility. Overall, these metrics underscore pipelines' superior risk profile for mitigating both human and ecological harms in crude transport.

Incident Response and Technological Safeguards

The Keystone Pipeline System, operated by , incorporates multiple layers of technological safeguards to prevent and detect leaks, including 24/7 monitoring from Operations Control Centres (OCCs) that utilize on , rates, and volumes to identify anomalies and initiate flow shutdowns within minutes of detection. These systems are supplemented by in-line tools known as "smart pigs," which traverse the pipeline to assess wall thickness, , and defects, with data analyzed to prompt preventive digs and repairs as part of an annual integrity management program. Additional preventive measures include factory-applied pipe coatings, radiographic and ultrasonic weld inspections during construction, hydrostatic testing at pressures exceeding operational levels, and via low-voltage electrical currents to mitigate . Advanced detection technologies further enhance reliability, such as fiber optic sensing piloted on 's liquids pipelines to monitor acoustic signals, ground strain, and temperature variations along the route; acoustic systems that identify sounds; and pressure wave analysis tools for internal . External monitoring includes fiber optic cables and imaging via the Intelliview system, which was evaluated on the Keystone Pipeline using cameras and to detect unauthorized activities or signatures of . These methods are integrated into a broader program that reports has prevented through proactive interventions, with over $1 billion invested in integrity assessments and repairs during 2020-2021 alone. In the event of an incident, TC Energy's Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) dictate immediate activation of response protocols, including notification to the OCC, automated or manual isolation of pipeline segments via shutdown valves, and deployment of on-site teams equipped for containment and initial mitigation. The operator assumes full responsibility for cleanup, restoration, and associated costs, coordinating with local first responders, state agencies, and federal regulators like the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). Annual reviews and updates to ERPs ensure alignment with regulatory requirements and incorporate lessons from exercises, such as the 213 simulations conducted network-wide in 2023 to refine communication and response efficacy. PHMSA oversight reinforces these measures through mandatory incident investigations and corrective actions; for instance, following the December 7, 2022, Keystone spill in , PHMSA issued orders requiring enhanced integrity assessments, pressure reductions, and preventive maintenance to address root causes like coating damage and . Such responses emphasize rapid containment—TC Energy reported the 2022 pressure drop and mobilized within hours—while ongoing training and Geographic Response Plans tailor strategies to specific terrains and communities along the pipeline route.

Environmental Evaluations

Aquifer and Ecosystem Risks

The Keystone Pipeline system traverses the , crossing multiple aquifers, including segments overlying the , a critical freshwater resource spanning eight U.S. states and supporting for over 30% of U.S. irrigated land. The existing Phase I pipeline enters from the north, intersecting shallower aquifer zones, while the proposed Keystone XL extension was planned to pass through the Nebraska Sandhills, where the Ogallala lies close to the surface under highly permeable dune sands, potentially facilitating rapid contaminant migration if a spill occurred. assessments indicate that pipeline leaks could introduce diluted bitumen (dilbit), which is denser than water and prone to sinking, complicating cleanup and increasing infiltration risks in vulnerable karst-like formations. Quantitative analyses, including TransCanada's pipeline , project a low likelihood of large-volume spills, estimating fewer than one full-bore rupture per 50 years of operation across the system, with most incidents involving volumes under 1,000 barrels and limited to surface impacts. However, in the event of a rupture near recharge zones, dilbit's asphaltenes and toxic additives could persist in soils, posing long-term plume migration threats; modeling from the U.S. Department of State's Supplemental highlights elevated vulnerability in Sandhills segments due to shallow depth-to-water (often under 50 feet) and high . Empirical data from existing Keystone spills, such as the 2017 rupture releasing 210,000 gallons into surface waters, showed no detectable contamination after extensive monitoring, though localized soil and creek remediation was required. Ecosystem risks extend beyond aquifers to surface habitats, including wetlands and riparian zones crossed by the pipeline, where spills could cause to life via of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in dilbit. Construction activities pose temporary threats of and , potentially affecting migratory birds and like the American burying beetle, with the Final SEIS estimating up to 95% revegetation success post-disturbance but noting delays in sensitive ecosystems. Operational leaks, though rare, could smother and disrupt microbial communities in oil-impacted soils, as observed in smaller incidents; comparative studies affirm pipelines pose lower ecosystem spill risks than , but tar sands crude's corrosiveness elevates rupture potential over conventional oils. University of Nebraska hydrogeologists have assessed overall risks as minimal under engineered safeguards like horizontal directional drilling and , emphasizing that natural dilution and depth in non-Sandhills areas further mitigate widespread .

Carbon Emissions from Oil Sands Transport

Transport of diluted bitumen (dilbit) from Canadian oil sands via pipeline incurs lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than alternative modes like rail, particularly for the large volumes and long distances involved in projects such as Keystone. A peer-reviewed lifecycle analysis of bitumen transport to U.S. refineries found that pipelines generate 61 to 77 percent fewer GHG emissions than rail when handling capacities exceeding 50,000 barrels per day over distances comparable to Keystone's approximately 1,200-mile route from Alberta to Nebraska. This comparison accounts for full lifecycle factors, including construction materials, equipment manufacturing, and operational energy use, with pipelines benefiting from continuous flow and electric or low-emission pumping versus diesel locomotives' higher fuel consumption in rail. Direct operational emissions from pipeline transport are minimal, typically on the order of 10 grams of CO2 equivalent per tonne-kilometer, driven primarily by for stations rather than . For Keystone's proposed capacity of up to 830,000 barrels per day, transport-phase GHGs represent a small fraction—less than 5 percent—of the total well-to-wheel emissions for crudes, underscoring that upstream production dominates the carbon profile. In contrast, of dilbit requires additional energy for heating and handling, exacerbating emissions; without pipeline access, increased usage could elevate transport GHGs by factors of 2 to 4 per barrel-mile. Empirical assessments confirm pipelines' efficiency edge persists even after accounting for diluent blending and potential leaks, which studies estimate at low levels (e.g., 45 kg CH4 per km-year for pipelines, far below rail's operational exhaust). Opposition claims emphasizing total emissions often conflate with , but reveals that denying efficient shifts volumes to higher-emission alternatives, netting increased GHGs; for instance, rail-dependent scenarios for similar volumes yield 15 to 73 percent higher emissions depending on practices. Sources from environmental groups, such as NRDC reports projecting high aggregate emissions from Keystone-enabled , typically underweight these differentials and assume static without market displacement effects.

Empirical Assessment of Spill Impacts

The Keystone Pipeline system, operational since June 2010, has experienced at least 16 reportable incidents resulting in unintended releases, though most were small volumes under 50 barrels, with larger events confined to specific sites. Federal data from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) indicate that significant spills, defined as those exceeding 400 barrels, include the May 2011 release of 400 barrels at the Ludden Pump Station in , which contaminated adjacent farmland but did not reach waterways; the October 2019 incident near , , releasing approximately 9,120 barrels into wetlands; and the December 2022 rupture near , , spilling 12,937 barrels into Creek and surrounding soils. These events represent less than 0.01% of the pipeline's cumulative throughput, which exceeds 600,000 barrels per day, highlighting the infrequency relative to volume transported.
DateLocationVolume (barrels)Primary ImpactsCleanup and Recovery
May 2011400Soil and damage on farmland; no or intrusion reportedPrompt containment; full remediation via excavation and soil replacement completed without long-term contamination
Oct 20199,120 saturation over ~8 acres (expanded assessment to broader area); localized die-off; no verified mortality or impactsMajority recovered via vacuum trucks and booms; residual dilbit embedded in sediments, but monitoring showed no propagation to downstream ecosystems
Dec 202212,937Creek bed coating and soil saturation; temporary flow disruption in Mill Creek; no human health exposures or fishery closuresOver 650,000 gallons recovered; excavation of 5,000 cubic yards of soil; creek restored to natural flow by November 2023 with no detectable oil residues in post-remediation
Empirical evaluations, including PHMSA failure investigations and EPA on-scene assessments, demonstrate that spill detection via inline inspections and supervisory control systems enabled shutdowns within hours, limiting lateral spread to under one mile in all cases. Environmental effects were predominantly acute and site-specific: soil hydrocarbon levels elevated temporarily but reduced to below regulatory thresholds post-excavation and , with no documented persistent plumes or in local . The diluted (dilbit) transported posed cleanup challenges due to its density, leading to some submerged residues in the 2019 wetlands event, yet post-incident monitoring by state agencies confirmed revegetation and faunal return within 1-2 years, aligning with broader recovery patterns where ecosystems rebound absent chronic exposure. No peer-reviewed studies attribute long-term losses or trophic disruptions directly to these Keystone incidents, contrasting with alarmist projections that anticipated widespread, irreversible harm. Remediation costs, exceeding $480 million for the 2022 event alone, underscore effective regulatory oversight, though dilbit's persistence warrants ongoing surveillance rather than evidence of systemic failure.

Counterarguments to Catastrophist Claims

Critics of the Keystone Pipeline, particularly Keystone XL, have forecasted catastrophic environmental consequences, including widespread contamination and irreversible climate acceleration from expanded . However, empirical records and analyses indicate that such outcomes are improbable, as pipelines demonstrate superior reliability to modes like , with historical spills contained through rapid response without long-term ecological devastation. U.S. Department of Transportation data compiled by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) reveal that pipelines transport crude oil with the lowest incident rate per billion ton-miles among major modes, at approximately 0.89 spills per billion ton-miles from 2009 to 2018, compared to 2.81 for rail cars. This disparity underscores that rejecting pipelines shifts volumes to rail, which has produced larger, more destructive spills, such as the 2013 Lac-Mégantic derailment releasing over 1 million gallons of oil and causing 47 fatalities—volumes exceeding any Keystone incident. Keystone Phase I, operational since June 2010, has recorded 22 spills through 2022, primarily small releases under 100 barrels, with the largest at 14,000 barrels in December 2022 near , ; response efforts recovered over 5,500 barrels of oil and contaminated , limiting spread to a 4-mile creek segment without impacting sources or . No verified cases of persistent from these events have emerged, countering predictions of aquifer ruin under the Ogallala formation. Risk assessments for Keystone XL, informed by historical PHMSA data and engineering mitigations like horizontal directional drilling under water bodies and automated systems capable of identifying releases as small as 1% of flow volume, a low probability of large-volume spills—estimated at less than 1% annual risk for releases exceeding barrels, adjusted for protective measures. These probabilities derive from over 2,300 pipeline miles of analogs, where spill frequencies decline with modern integrity management, including inline inspections and , reducing rupture risks by up to 70% compared to legacy . Environmental groups' projections of up to 91 "significant" spills over 50 years, often cited for alarm, assume baseline rates without accounting for these advancements or the fact that most incidents involve pinhole leaks promptly isolated, not cascading failures. On greenhouse gas emissions, U.S. State Department analyses across multiple environmental impact statements, including the 2014 Final Supplemental EIS, concluded that Keystone XL would result in negligible net increases to global emissions—potentially offsetting 20,000 to 30,000 barrels per day otherwise shipped by or tanker—due to the pipeline's facilitation of efficient without expanding upstream . Oil sands development proceeds based on global market signals, not U.S. import infrastructure; absent Keystone, Canadian heavy crude would likely reach Asian markets via coastal tankers, incurring higher lifecycle emissions from longer voyages and less efficient . Claims of "tar sands lock-in" overlook this elasticity, as evidenced by sustained Alberta growth despite pipeline delays, with incremental pipeline adding mere 0.2-0.4% to North American throughput. These counterpoints highlight a where catastrophist narratives, frequently amplified by organizations with incentives to prioritize mobilization over probabilistic assessment, diverge from verifiable incident data and modal comparisons; pipelines' track record, bolstered by regulatory oversight, positions them as a lower-risk conduit than the status quo alternatives.

Political and Geopolitical Dimensions

U.S. Presidential Decisions Across Administrations

The U.S. State Department, under the Obama administration, approved permits for the initial phases of the Keystone Pipeline system between 2008 and 2010, enabling construction of segments transporting up to 435,000 barrels per day of Canadian crude oil to U.S. refineries in and . However, the proposed Keystone XL extension, intended to add 830,000 barrels per day capacity from to , encountered repeated delays and denials; in January 2012, President Obama rejected a congressional bill mandating approval due to insufficient review time for a rerouted path avoiding sensitive areas. On February 24, 2015, Obama vetoed legislation approving Keystone XL, with the failing to override. The State Department finalized rejection of the permit on November 6, 2015, determining it did not serve the national interest, citing limited domestic job creation and potential exacerbation of carbon emissions from without altering global supply dynamics. Following his inauguration, President expedited review via a January 24, 2017, presidential memorandum instructing federal agencies to recommend permit issuance for Keystone XL if criteria were met, emphasizing and job growth. TransCanada resubmitted its application on January 26, 2017, leading to the State Department granting the presidential permit on March 24, 2017, after assessing benefits including reduced reliance on foreign oil and creation of thousands of construction jobs. Subsequent approvals, such as a January 2020 right-of-way across , advanced construction until legal challenges and the administration change intervened. On January 20, 2021, his first day in office, President Biden directed revocation of the Keystone XL permit through Executive Order 13990, which mandated agency reviews of Trump-era energy projects for climate and environmental impacts, resulting in formally revoking it that day. This action, fulfilling campaign pledges to prioritize emissions reductions, prompted to suspend operations and ultimately terminate the project on June 9, 2021, citing regulatory uncertainty and sunk costs exceeding $1.3 billion. Congressional Republicans later introduced resolutions disapproving the revocation, highlighting economic losses estimated at 11,000 jobs.

Canadian Government Stances

The Conservative government under Prime Minister prioritized the Keystone Pipeline, particularly the XL extension, as a means to facilitate exports of Alberta's crude to U.S. markets, emphasizing economic benefits including thousands of construction jobs and reduced dependence on less efficient . Harper's administration approved the Canadian segment via the National Energy Board in 2010, and aggressively lobbied U.S. officials, elevating the project to a bilateral priority that strained relations during Barack Obama's deliberations. The subsequent Liberal government of Prime Minister maintained support for Keystone XL, framing it as compatible with efforts to expand pipeline capacity while advancing emissions reductions in the oil sector. Following U.S. President Joe Biden's revocation of the cross-border permit on January 20, 2021, Trudeau publicly expressed "disappointment" in a statement, highlighting the project's potential for high-wage jobs—estimated at over 7,000 in —and energy security, while urging continued dialogue with the U.S. administration. Despite this, Trudeau's government did not pursue aggressive retaliation or legal challenges, instead pivoting emphasis to domestic projects like the Trans Mountain Expansion, approved federally in 2016 and re-approved in 2019 amid consultations and environmental assessments. In October 2025, amid discussions with U.S. President-elect , Canadian officials raised the possibility of reviving Keystone XL, reflecting ongoing federal interest in cross-border energy infrastructure. Provincially, Alberta's governments across parties have consistently advocated for the pipeline, viewing it as critical to unlocking landlocked oil resources and generating revenue—TC Energy projected up to $1.3 billion annually in provincial royalties. The United Conservative Party administration under Premier Jason Kenney invested C$1.5 billion in equity support to TC Energy in 2020 and labeled Biden's cancellation a "gut punch" to workers, estimating 2,800 direct jobs lost in the province. Successor Premier Danielle Smith, as of early 2025, expressed readiness to collaborate with U.S. counterparts for a potential "Keystone 2.0" revival, aligning with Alberta's throne speech commitments to prioritize pipeline development for oilsands export diversification. These stances underscore provincial economic imperatives, often contrasting with federal balancing of climate policies, though empirical data on pipeline safety records—such as Keystone's zero major spills in its operational phases—bolstered arguments for approval over alternatives like rail, which incurred higher incident rates per volume transported.

Implications for Bilateral Energy Independence

The Keystone XL extension, if completed, would have transported up to 830,000 barrels per day of crude oil from Alberta's oil sands to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries, thereby augmenting the existing volume of Canadian petroleum imports, which already constitute over 50% of total U.S. oil imports as of 2021. This increased throughput would have reinforced bilateral energy ties by channeling more supply from a politically stable neighbor, reducing U.S. exposure to supply disruptions from volatile regions such as the Middle East or Venezuela, where imports have historically been susceptible to geopolitical instability. For the , the pipeline would have contributed to greater continental energy self-sufficiency by integrating Canadian heavy crude with domestic production, potentially displacing imports from non-allied producers and stabilizing refinery inputs tailored to feedstock. Proponents, including industry analyses, argued this would enhance by minimizing reliance on ocean tankers vulnerable to or blockades, while empirical data from U.S. records show Canada's share of U.S. crude imports rising from under 10% in the to over 60% of imports by 2024, underscoring the strategic pivot already underway without Keystone XL. Critics from environmental advocacy groups contended it would entrench oil dependency, but this overlooks the causal reality that diversified North American sourcing—bolstered by —has empirically lowered vulnerability to global price shocks compared to alternatives like , which carries higher spill risks per barrel-mile. From Canada's perspective, Keystone XL would have secured a dedicated export corridor to its primary market, mitigating risks of discounted sales to via costlier rail or tanker routes and bolstering economic amid fluctuating global demand. This alignment would have deepened bilateral interdependence, as evidenced by ongoing 2025 discussions linking pipeline revival to broader U.S.- cooperation amid trade tensions, fostering mutual benefits like job creation (estimated at 3,400 direct U.S. construction roles) and GDP contributions without compromising . Ultimately, the project's cancellation in 2021 deferred these gains, yet persistent high-volume imports via alternative pipelines demonstrate the underlying logic of prioritizing allied supply chains for against exogenous shocks, such as those seen in 2022's Ukraine-related crises.

Legal and Regulatory Framework

Permitting Processes and Delays

The permitting process for cross-border oil pipelines like the Keystone system requires a Presidential Permit under Executive Order 13337, administered by the U.S. State Department, which evaluates national interest factors including environmental impacts via the (NEPA). NEPA mandates preparation of an (EIS) assessing alternatives, public comments, and mitigation measures, often extending timelines through iterative reviews and consultations under laws like the Act and . Additional hurdles include state-level approvals for routing and , Federal (FERC) oversight for interstate segments, and Army Corps of Engineers permits for water crossings, with delays frequently stemming from lawsuits challenging procedural compliance rather than substantive rejections. For the original Keystone phases (I-III), approvals proceeded relatively swiftly: TransCanada applied in 2007, securing a State Department permit by June 2008 after a streamlined NEPA review, with Phase I operational by June 2010 transporting 435,000 barrels per day from Hardisty, , to Steele City, . Phase II, extending to , received FERC approval in 2009 and entered service in February 2011, while Phase III to , was authorized in 2010 and completed in 2014, reflecting efficient regulatory coordination absent the intense opposition faced by the XL extension. These phases involved minimal litigation, enabling within 2-3 years of application. The Keystone XL extension, proposed in 2008 to carry 830,000 barrels per day from to Steele City, encountered protracted delays totaling over 12 years from application to cancellation, exacerbated by repeated EIS revisions, judicial remands, and executive interventions. TransCanada submitted its Presidential Permit application on September 19, 2008; the State Department released a final EIS in August 2011, deeming it in , but President Obama delayed decision in November 2011 for further Nebraska review amid landowner opposition. A revised route application followed in 2012, with a new EIS issued in January 2014, yet Obama rejected the permit on November 6, 2015, citing climate concerns despite prior agency findings of limited incremental emissions. Post-rejection, President Trump issued an on January 24, 2017, directing expedited review and waiving certain notification delays, leading to a new permit on March 24, 2017; however, lawsuits prompted a federal judge to vacate it in November 2017 for relying on an outdated 2014 EIS. The State Department prepared a supplemental EIS released in December 2019 after addressing route changes and modeling, reissuing the permit in April 2020, but courts issued injunctions in May and July 2020 over Endangered Species Act violations, requiring further analysis. President Biden revoked the permit on January 20, 2021, via , prompting to terminate the project on June 9, 2021, after $1.3 billion in sunk costs, underscoring how serial litigation—often funded by environmental advocacy groups—and shifting administrations amplified regulatory uncertainty beyond standard NEPA timelines of 2-4 years.

Eminent Domain Proceedings

TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP, the developer of the Keystone XL extension, invoked eminent domain authority under Nebraska state law to condemn private land easements for the proposed route where voluntary negotiations with landowners failed, primarily in counties along the 87-mile segment through the state. This process began intensifying after 2011 route approvals, with the company filing condemnation actions against approximately 50 Nebraska properties by 2015, though most were resolved through settlements rather than full takings. Landowners challenged these actions in county courts, arguing procedural irregularities and insufficient public input on routing, leading to temporary halts; for instance, in February 2014, a Lancaster County judge issued a temporary injunction blocking eminent domain surveys pending resolution of a parallel suit deeming Nebraska's pipeline siting law (LB 1161) unconstitutional for bypassing the Public Service Commission. Several appellate rulings addressed fee awards and procedural validity in Nebraska eminent domain cases. In TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Dunavan (2019), the Nebraska Supreme Court upheld the Public Service Commission's approval of the mainline route alternative, affirming TransCanada's authority to proceed with condemnations under the revised path, rejecting claims that it violated single-subject rules or landowner due process. Conversely, in cases like TransCanada v. Tanderup (2020), county courts awarded landowners attorney fees and costs after TransCanada voluntarily dismissed actions post-2015 route challenges, a decision the Supreme Court reviewed for fee eligibility under statutory "prevailing party" provisions; similar outcomes occurred in TransCanada v. Bartles Farms (2018), where fees were affirmed for landowners after dismissal. In TransCanada v. Nicholas Family Limited Partnership (2018), however, a district court reversed a county award of fees, ruling that voluntary dismissal did not entitle landowners to recover costs absent a merits adjudication. Texas proceedings similarly involved eminent domain disputes, with TransCanada filing condemnations in counties like and Hardin. In a notable case, landowner Julia Trigg Crawford challenged the taking of her property, but a granted to TransCanada, denying her public-use and necessity claims; the later ordered TransCanada to respond to her in 2014, though the underlying was ultimately secured. Following President Biden's 2021 revocation of the federal permit, TransCanada dismissed remaining eminent domain actions across affected states, releasing condemned lands but leaving some landowners with unresolved claims for fees, surveys, or diminished property values from preliminary takings. Overall, while eminent domain filings numbered in the dozens, actual court-adjudicated takings were rare, with negotiations prevailing in over 90% of cases per project reports, highlighting the tool's role more as leverage than routine enforcement.

Key Lawsuits and Judicial Outcomes

In November 2018, U.S. District Judge Brian Morris in issued a preliminary halting of the Keystone XL Pipeline, ruling that the U.S. Department of State's environmental impact statement under the (NEPA) failed to adequately consider effects and vulnerabilities. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed this in June 2019, dismissing the case on grounds that the plaintiffs' claims were not ripe for review and lacked standing, allowing to resume briefly. A subsequent NEPA challenge in May 2020 led Judge Morris to issue another nationwide injunction, finding the administration's revised environmental review deficient in analyzing , alternative routes, and potential spills into the ; the Ninth Circuit denied TC Energy's request for a stay, upholding the block pending . Tribal plaintiffs, including the Rosebud Sioux Tribe, filed parallel suits alleging violations of treaty rights and inadequate consultation under NEPA, but these were largely dismissed for lack of or after TC Energy terminated the project in June 2021. TC Energy pursued two North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) arbitrations against the . Following Obama's 2015 permit denial, the company filed in 2016 claiming expropriation and denial of fair and equitable treatment, seeking damages but withdrawing the claim after Trump's 2017 approval. After Biden's 2021 revocation, TC Energy refiled in 2021 for over $15 billion, alleging discriminatory treatment compared to other cross-border pipelines; a NAFTA tribunal dismissed the case in June 2024, ruling that the U.S. actions constituted legitimate regulatory measures rather than treaty violations. At the state level, Nebraska landowners challenged TC Energy's use of eminent domain for the pipeline route, arguing the state's approval process violated public input requirements; the Nebraska Supreme Court upheld the route selection in January 2017, affirming the Public Service Commission's authority despite procedural disputes. In South Dakota, the state Public Utilities Commission granted a permit in 2015, upheld by the state Supreme Court in June 2018 against appeals claiming insufficient environmental safeguards. Federal courts dismissed most ongoing litigation as moot following the project's cancellation, with no judicial mandate directly causing the termination.

Indigenous Engagement

Tribal Opposition and Treaty Claims

Several Native American tribes, particularly those affiliated with the Great Sioux Nation, opposed the Keystone XL pipeline extension, arguing that its proposed route through and violated historical treaties guaranteeing their land rights and resource sovereignty. The Rosebud Sioux Tribe (Sicangu Lakota Oyate) and Fort Belknap Indian Community (comprising and tribes) led prominent challenges, asserting that the pipeline would encroach on unceded territories and mineral estates held in trust by the U.S. government without tribal consent. These claims centered on the 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie, which defined boundaries for Sioux hunting grounds and territorial integrity, and the 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie, which established the encompassing much of present-day , including areas the pipeline would traverse near the Cheyenne and White Rivers. Tribal leaders invoked these treaties to argue that federal approvals disregarded aboriginal title and subsurface rights, potentially exposing sacred sites, water sources like the , and cultural resources to pipeline leaks or construction impacts. In November 2014, Rosebud Sioux President described congressional approval of Keystone XL as an "act of war," emphasizing that the route violated the 1868 treaty's protections against unauthorized land use by non-tribal entities. The similarly rejected the project in consultations with the U.S. State Department, protesting its intrusion into treaty and aboriginal territories in . Critics within tribal governance highlighted inadequate consultation under the and potential threats to treaty-guaranteed hunting, fishing, and gathering rights. Legal actions amplified these treaty-based objections. In September 2018, the Rosebud Sioux Tribe and Fort Belknap Indian Community filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration, seeking to invalidate the pipeline permit issued in 2017; they contended that agencies like the State Department and Corps of Engineers bypassed treaty obligations and environmental reviews, including assessments of impacts on trust lands. A related 2019 motion to intervene in Ninth Circuit litigation by Northern Arapaho and Northern Cheyenne tribes underscored health and welfare risks from spills affecting reservation-adjacent waters and lands. While courts upheld permits in some instances, citing the route's avoidance of fee-to-trust reservation lands, tribes maintained that broader territories—spanning over 50 miles of potential impact zones—remained unprotected, reflecting ongoing disputes over federal interpretations of 19th-century agreements post the unlawful 1877 seizure of the .

Instances of Tribal Support and Economic Benefits

Several Canadian demonstrated support for the Keystone XL extension through direct investment and partnership agreements with , the pipeline's developer. In November 2020, Natural Law Energy (NLE), a coalition comprising the Ermineskin Cree Nation, Akamihk Cree Nation, Louis Bull , and Montana Cree Nation (formerly Little Pine First Nation), signed a definitive agreement to acquire up to a 10% equity stake in the project, valued at approximately $1 billion CAD. This arrangement aimed to provide long-term revenue streams from pipeline operations, including , to address historical economic disadvantages faced by these communities. The emphasized economic , with NLE's chief executive stating it represented one of the largest -led investments in energy infrastructure, potentially generating sustained income independent of government funding. committed to broader engagement, including contracts and benefit-sharing mechanisms extending to U.S. communities, though was curtailed by the project's cancellation in January 2021. Prior to termination, the initiative had already directed $1.6 million in direct contracts and $16.6 million indirectly to -owned businesses along the route. In the U.S., explicit tribal endorsements were limited amid predominant opposition, but some communities weighed economic incentives such as construction jobs and local revenue. The original Keystone Pipeline, operational since June 2010 and transporting up to 590,000 barrels per day from to refineries, generated over 9,000 temporary jobs during its initial phases, with ancillary benefits including tax revenues and opportunities for proximate indigenous groups in states like and . These agreements often involved negotiated impact benefit plans, providing tribes with mitigation funds, employment preferences, and infrastructure improvements, though specific allocations for U.S. tribes remain less documented than Canadian counterparts. Overall, supporters highlighted causal economic linkages: pipelines enable resource development that funds community services, reduces reliance on volatile federal transfers, and fosters , contrasting with alternatives that pose higher spill risks without comparable revenue potential. However, post-cancellation disputes, including NLE's 2022 claim against for $50 million CAD in compensation, underscored risks to anticipated benefits when projects falter.

Public and Activist Responses

Opinion Polls in the U.S. and Canada

Public opinion polls in the United States have consistently indicated majority support for constructing the Keystone XL pipeline extension, with support levels varying by timing and question framing but often exceeding 50% among respondents. A Pew Research Center survey conducted in April 2013 found 66% of Americans favored building the pipeline, reflecting broad bipartisan backing at the time, including 59% of Democrats. By December 2014, a CNN/ORC poll reported 57% support nationwide, with 80% of Republicans, 61% of independents, and 36% of Democrats in favor. Support appeared to wane amid heightened environmental activism, as a February 2017 Pew survey showed 42% favor and 48% opposition, driven by a sharp decline among Democrats to 20% support from prior levels of around 50%.
Poll DatePollsterSupport (%)Opposition (%)Notes
April 2013Pew Research Center66Not specifiedBroad support, including 59% Democrats
December 2014CNN/ORC5728Partisan split: 80% Republicans
February 2017Pew Research Center4248Democrats at 20% support
March 2022Maru Public Opinion (for Postmedia)71 (for restart to offset Russian oil)Not specifiedFramed around energy security post-Russia invasion
In , opinion on the Keystone XL has been more regionally divided, with strong support in oil-producing provinces like contrasting lower enthusiasm elsewhere, and overall support hovering below majority levels in national polls focused specifically on the project. An Angus Reid Institute poll following the 2021 cancellation by U.S. Biden found 48% of supported reviving Keystone XL, with opposition at similar levels, while only 18% prioritized pressing the U.S. administration for reversal per an survey, as many favored domestic instead. Broader sentiment toward pipelines remains positive, with recent polls showing 73% national support for new oil pipelines in a July 2025 Environics Research survey, including majorities across regions despite historical resistance. An October 2025 Angus Reid poll indicated 59% support for 's pipeline initiatives, potentially encompassing Keystone revival discussions amid U.S.-Canada energy talks. These figures underscore economic priorities in resource-dependent areas outweighing environmental concerns in aggregate public views.

Protest Movements and Their Tactics

Protest movements opposing the Keystone Pipeline, especially the XL extension, were spearheaded by environmental organizations such as via its Tar Sands Action initiative and the , focusing on alleged environmental risks from transporting crude. These efforts mobilized thousands through coordinated campaigns emphasizing and to influence federal permitting decisions. In August and September 2011, Tar Sands Action organized a two-week series of protests at the , where participants deliberately crossed police lines, leading to 1,252 arrests, including prominent figures like author and tribal leaders. Tactics involved mass sit-ins and risk arrest strategies to generate media coverage and public pressure on President Obama to deny the permit. A November 6, 2011, featured up to 12,000 demonstrators encircling the with a symbolic black inflatable replica to highlight opposition to tar sands expansion. In , construction of the 's southern segment prompted Tar Sands Blockade activists to deploy nonviolent direct actions, including tree-sits and equipment lockdowns; on September 24, 2012, eight individuals occupied platforms 80 feet above ground in the 's path near Winnsboro, pledging to remain until work halted, supplemented by ground supporters locking to machinery. These efforts delayed local operations but ended in December 2012 after route adjustments. The Cowboy and Indian Alliance, comprising ranchers concerned with land impacts and Native American groups citing treaty and resource threats, conducted the "Reject and Protect" action in Washington, D.C., from April 26, 2014, involving horseback rides to the , teepee encampments, and marches by thousands to symbolize cross-cultural unity against the project. Subsequent actions included the 2014 XL Dissent campaign, where 398 young protesters, many college students, were arrested at the on for chaining to fences in the largest youth-led event against the pipeline to date. Overall, these movements combined symbolic protests, high-profile arrests totaling thousands across events, and alliances to sustain opposition, though environmental claims often prioritized climate narratives over localized spill risks empirically observed in other pipelines.

Alternative Transport Methods

Rail and Truck Alternatives' Safety Records

Rail transport of crude oil has been associated with significant incidents, including the July 6, 2013, Lac-Mégantic derailment in , where a carrying 72 DOT-111 tank cars of crude oil derailed, releasing approximately 6 million liters of oil, igniting fires that killed 47 people and destroyed much of the town center. From 2000 to 2013, Canadian incidents involving crude oil resulted in spills totaling over 1.5 million barrels, with being 4.5 times more likely to experience an occurrence per ton-kilometer than pipelines. U.S. spill rates for crude averaged about 2 incidents per billion ton-miles from 2005 to 2009, higher than pipelines' 0.6 per billion ton-miles. Truck transport of crude oil exhibits even higher risk profiles due to road vulnerabilities. Trucking records approximately 20 spills per billion ton-miles, compared to rail's 2 and pipelines' 0.6 over similar periods. From to 2012, U.S. truck accidents involving hazardous materials, including crude, contributed to substantial spill volumes, with trucks experiencing 11 times more fatalities per billion ton-miles than rail in energy transport contexts. The decentralized nature of truck operations amplifies risks from and traffic density, as seen in incidents like the 2019 Philadelphia tanker explosion that killed 3 and spilled 12,000 gallons of , though crude-specific truck data underscores persistent vulnerabilities.
ModeSpills per Billion Ton-Miles (approx., 2005-2009)Relative Incident Rate vs. Pipelines
20~33x
2~3x
0.61x
These metrics, derived from federal and industry analyses, indicate that scaling up or volumes—as would occur without dedicated pipelines like —elevates overall spill and accident probabilities, with showing improvement post-Lac-Mégantic via enhanced tank car standards but still lagging pipelines in per-unit safety. reliance, often used for shorter hauls from terminals, compounds exposure through frequent loading/unloading and highway traversal.

Other Pipeline Projects

The Energy East Pipeline, proposed by TC Energy in 2013, aimed to transport up to 1.1 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil from Hardisty, , to refineries and export terminals in , primarily to enable Atlantic Coast exports and reduce dependence on U.S. pipeline capacity. The project, spanning approximately 4,600 kilometers, faced regulatory delays and opposition from environmental groups and authorities over spill risks and emissions, leading TC Energy to cancel it on October 5, 2017, citing unviable economics and prolonged uncertainty. The Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMX), an upgrade to the existing Trans Mountain Pipeline from Edmonton, Alberta, to Burnaby, British Columbia, increased capacity from 300,000 bpd to 890,000 bpd to facilitate exports via tanker from the West Coast, mainly to Asia. Acquired by the Government of Canada for C$4.5 billion in 2018 to prevent cancellation amid legal challenges and protests, the project encountered cost overruns reaching C$34 billion by completion and Indigenous opposition citing treaty rights and environmental risks; it entered commercial service on May 1, 2024. Enbridge Line 3 Replacement Project replaced a 50-year-old with a new 1,097-kilometer route from Hardisty, , to , boosting capacity to 760,000 bpd of heavy crude for U.S. Midwest and Gulf Coast refineries via connections. Despite protests from tribal groups and environmentalists over water crossings and potential spills, the U.S. portion received regulatory approval in 2020 and began operations in October 2021, with the full line enhancing reliability for Canadian production without expanding overall North American mileage. These projects, while serving similar goals of expanding for western Canadian crude, proceeded unevenly amid shared concerns over consultation, aquifer risks, and carbon lock-in, contrasting with Keystone XL's repeated U.S. permit revocations; collectively, they added over 1.3 million of since 2017, though much oriented toward export rather than direct U.S. interior delivery.

References

  1. [1]
    https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/data-analysis/facilities-we-regulate/2016/group1-companies/oil-liquids/canadas-pipeline-transportation-system-2016-keystone.html
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Keystone Pipeline System Emergency Response Plan CAN-US
    The Keystone Pipeline System includes 2,694 miles (4,405 km) of pipeline that transports crude oil from Hardisty, Alberta to markets in the United States at ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Keystone XL Extension Permit Revocation - Energy Costs and Job ...
    The 2014 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement found that there would be approximately 50 permanent jobs once the pipeline was operational.
  4. [4]
    Canada floated Keystone XL revival in tariff discussion with Trump ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney raised the prospect of reviving the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Alberta to the United States during ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Safety in the Transportation of Oil and Gas: Pipelines or Rail?
    Transporting oil and gas by pipeline or rail is in general quite safe. compared, taking into consideration the amount of product moved, pipe- lines are found ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] GAO-21-588, PIPELINE SAFETY - Government Accountability Office
    Jul 22, 2021 · Keystone's accident history has been similar to other crude oil pipelines since 2010, but the severity of spills has worsened in recent years.
  7. [7]
    Pipeline Safety: Information on Keystone Accidents and DOT Oversight
    Jul 22, 2021 · Keystone's accident history is similar to other pipelines, but the severity of its spills has worsened in recent years due to 2 large spills in 2017 and 2019.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Pipe Specifications - Keystone XL Pipeline (2012)
    Pipe for the U.S. portion of the Keystone XL pipeline line shall be double submerged arc welded in accordance with API 5L Steel Pipe, latest edition. New steel ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] MP14-Confidential-RCFA-FINAL-April-21-2023-Redacted.pdf
    ... TC Oil's Keystone Pipeline that contains 36- inch diameter pipe from Steele City PS (MP 0.0) to Hope PS (MP 95.7). The “affected segment” traverses ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    [PDF] pipeline and hazardous materials safety administration
    Oct 10, 2008 · Pipeline, at hoop stresses up to 80 percent of the specified minimum yield strength (SMYS) for mainline pipe totaling approximately 1,375 ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Pipeline Specification
    Pipeline Specification. The following summarizes pipeline specifications for the Keystone XL Pipeline Project. 1.0. DESIGN FORMULA. 2.0. The design parameters ...
  12. [12]
    Keystone Oil Pipeline - Global Energy Monitor - GEM.wiki
    Capacity: 700,000 barrels per day; Diameter: 36 inches; Length: 2,151 miles; Status: Operating; Start year: 2010. Background. The Keystone Pipeline system ...
  13. [13]
    Keystone Pipeline - EPCM Holdings
    2.6 PIPELINE, ROUTE AND LOCATIONS​​ The Keystone Pipeline is an oil pipeline system in Canada and the United States that began operation in 2010. It runs from ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Keystone XL Pipeline Project - BLM National NEPA Register
    Jan 17, 2020 · discharge pressure at the pump stations, optimized for efficiency at nominal flow capacity. Table 6-3 identifies pipeline segments on ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP - TC Energy
    Petroleum specifications as will reasonably be compatible with Pipeline System operations. Carrier may curtail receipts of Petroleum from a Shipper if such ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] United States Department of State
    The Keystone Project initially would have the nominal transport capacity of 435,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil from the oil supply hub near Hardisty to.
  17. [17]
    TC Energy — Our business
    **Summary of Keystone Pipeline System Information:**
  18. [18]
    Keystone Pipeline Starts Deliveries to U.S. Midwest - TC Energy
    Jun 30, 2010 · The U.S. portion of the Keystone Pipeline included 1,744 kilometres (1,084 miles) of new, 30-inch diameter pipeline in North Dakota, South ...
  19. [19]
    Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for ...
    Apr 20, 2010 · On September 19, 2008, TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP (Keystone) filed an application for a Presidential permit for the construction, ...
  20. [20]
    Keystone Pipeline Presidential Permit - state.gov
    Mar 14, 2008 · The Department of State issued a Presidential Permit authorizing TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP to construct, operate and maintain facilities related to the ...
  21. [21]
    Keystone XL Pipeline – Project Background
    Mar 25, 2025 · An initiating pump station, as well as seven pump stations and associated facilities; Three 55,600 m³ (350,000 barrels) operational tanks ...Missing: total | Show results with:total<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Keystone's Cushing Extension Begins Deliveries to Oklahoma
    Feb 8, 2011 · The Keystone XL project is a 2,673-kilometre (1,661-mile), 36-inch crude oil pipeline that will begin at Hardisty, Alberta and extend southeast ...
  23. [23]
    Gulf Coast Project Begins Delivering Crude Oil to Nederland, Texas
    Jan 22, 2014 · Construction of the 487-mile crude oil pipeline involved more than 11 million hours of labor completed by 4,844 workers in the United States ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Keystone XL Oil Pipeline - Global Energy Monitor
    On June 9, 2021, TC Energy announced that it had cancelled the the Keystone XL Pipeline Project. The proposed Keystone XL (sometimes abbreviated KXL, with XL ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
    [PDF] TC Energy Corporation, TransCanada PipeLines Limited Claimants ...
    Nov 22, 2021 · On September 19, 2008—more than 13 years ago—TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P.. (“Keystone”) submitted an application to the United States ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] A Primer on the Status of the Keystone XL Pipeline Project
    The Keystone XL Pipeline would carry 830,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil, while the capacity of the Keystone Pipeline is 590,000 bpd. 6. TransCanada ...
  27. [27]
    Denial of the Keystone XL Pipeline Application - State.gov
    January 18, 2012. Today, the Department of State recommended to President Obama that the presidential permit for the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline be denied ...Missing: rejection | Show results with:rejection
  28. [28]
    Statement by the President on the Keystone XL Pipeline
    I'm disappointed that Republicans in Congress forced this decision, but it does not change my Administration's commitment to American-made ...Missing: rejection | Show results with:rejection<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    How Keystone XL, the pipeline rejected by Obama, went ahead ...
    Mar 24, 2017 · Obama rejects TransCanada's application to build the pipeline, but holds the door open to considering a new submission. May 2012. TransCanada ...
  30. [30]
    President Obama Rejects Keystone XL Pipeline Plan - NPR
    Nov 6, 2015 · President Obama announced Friday that the US has rejected TransCanada's application for a permit to complete the Keystone XL pipeline.
  31. [31]
    Trump orders revival of Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines
    Jan 24, 2017 · Trump signed five executive orders including one to revive the Keystone pipeline, which would span nearly 1,200 miles across six US states, ...
  32. [32]
    Remarks by the President in TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline ...
    Mar 24, 2017 · Today, I'm pleased to announce the official approval of the presidential permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline. ... First Lady Melania Trump ...
  33. [33]
    Trump administration approves Keystone XL pipeline | CNN Politics
    Mar 24, 2017 · President Donald Trump announced Friday that his administration has approved the Keystone XL pipeline, reversing the Obama administration's decision to block ...
  34. [34]
    Lawsuit over Keystone XL pipeline can go ahead - CNBC
    Nov 24, 2017 · The administration argued that no further environmental reviews were necessary when President Donald Trump approved construction of Keystone XL.<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Biden kills Keystone XL permit, again - POLITICO
    Jan 20, 2021 · The decision came despite pleas to Biden from multiple Canadian government officials to give them time to make their case.
  36. [36]
    TC Energy confirms termination of Keystone XL Pipeline Project
    Jun 9, 2021 · Focus remains on continuing to meet the evolving energy demand today and in the future CALGARY, Alberta, June 09, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) ...
  37. [37]
    Keystone pipeline canceled after Biden revokes key permit - CNBC
    Jun 9, 2021 · The Keystone XL pipeline was expected to carry 830000 barrels per day of Alberta oil sands crude to Nebraska.
  38. [38]
    https://www.aapg.org/news-and-media/details/explorer/articleid/59967/what-does-the-cancellation-of-the-keystone-xl-pipeline-mean
  39. [39]
    Failure Investigation Report - TC Oil Pipeline Operations, Inc. | PHMSA
    Oct 25, 2024 · PHMSA is sharing its Failure Investigation Report following an investigation into TC Oil Operations' December 7, 2022, failure involving its 36-inch Keystone ...
  40. [40]
    Cause found in Keystone Pipeline's massive oil leak - ABC News
    Feb 9, 2023 · A spill of more than 500,000-gallons of crude oil from the Keystone Pipeline in December in Kansas was caused by a combination of a faulty weld ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  41. [41]
    Keystone Pipeline Leaks 383,000 Gallons of Oil in North Dakota
    Jan 18, 2021 · The pipeline also leaked about 16,000 gallons each in spills in 2011 in North Dakota and in 2016 in South Dakota. The original Keystone pipeline ...
  42. [42]
    USDOT Issues Corrective Action Order for Keystone Pipeline Spill
    Apr 11, 2025 · PHMSA today issued a Corrective Action Order (CAO) to South Bow which directs the operator to take specific actions to improve the safety of the Keystone ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Keystone Pipeline Ruptures and Spills Unknown Amount of Crude ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · In the last six years, Keystone has ruptured in the state of North Dakota four times alone, spilling at least 4,515 barrels of crude oil. And, ...
  44. [44]
    Keystone Pipeline Spills 9,120 Barrels of Oil in Dakota Wetlands - Eos
    Nov 8, 2019 · A section of the Keystone Pipeline spilled half an Olympic swimming pool's worth of sludgy oil into a North Dakota wetland on 29 October.Missing: TransCanada | Show results with:TransCanada
  45. [45]
    Milepost 14 Incident - TC Energy
    On December 7, 2022, TC Energy responses to a release of oil from our previously owned Keystone Pipeline System into a creek in Washington County, Kansas.
  46. [46]
    South Bow (Keystone) Pipeline Updates | PHMSA
    Apr 16, 2025 · PHMSA issues Corrective Action Order to South Bow for Keystone Pipeline spill. As of 1:00 a.m. local time, five vacuum trucks recovered and ...
  47. [47]
    Cleanup efforts underway after Keystone Pipeline spills estimated ...
    Apr 10, 2025 · An estimated 3,500 barrels of crude oil spilled into an agricultural field in North Dakota ... The Keystone Pipeline went online in 2011.
  48. [48]
    The Keystone pipeline's history of spills | Reuters
    Apr 9, 2025 · * A 2021 report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office found there had been 22 spills from the pipeline between 2010 and 2020. The ...
  49. [49]
    Cleanup underway of the Keystone oil pipeline spill in North Dakota
    Apr 10, 2025 · This image provided by South Bow shows a spill from the Keystone oil pipeline that occurred Tuesday, April 8, near Fort Ransom, ND.
  50. [50]
    Keystone Pipeline's 28th Spill Pushes Lifetime Leak Volume to 1.2 ...
    Apr 10, 2025 · On April 8, 2025, the Keystone pipeline spilled an initial estimate of 147,000 gallons or tarsands crude oil onto agricultural land near ...
  51. [51]
    Keystone Pipeline Burst Shows Continued Risk of Oil Reliance
    Apr 9, 2025 · Fargo, ND - A major burst and spill of 3,500 barrels of oil on the Keystone pipeline Tuesday marks the 23rd spill from the pipeline in its 15 ...
  52. [52]
    Canadian PM talked reviving Keystone XL during White House visit
    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney raised the prospect of reviving the contentious Keystone XL pipeline ... 2025 ...
  53. [53]
    Carney and Trump discussed Keystone XL revival, sources say - BBC
    Carney raised the Keystone XL pipeline in a broader conversation about US tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminium, the sources said, adding that ...
  54. [54]
    Back from the dead? Keystone XL's possible revival has proponents ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · CBC News reported that Prime Minister Mark Carney raised the Keystone XL oil pipeline during conversations with U.S. President Donald Trump at ...
  55. [55]
    Trump reportedly open to reviving Keystone pipeline deal, impacts ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · The Keystone pipeline, which would have major presence in Oklahoma, was never completed. Trump seems open to reviving it.
  56. [56]
    Industry experts see 'steep barriers' to Keystone XL revival
    Oct 11, 2025 · ... 2025 at 7:35PM EDT. The Keystone XL pipeline was a topic of discussion between Carney and Trump. Jeremie Charron on potentially reviving the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Keystone XL pipeline could play part in tighter US-Canada ... - Reuters
    Oct 10, 2025 · Reviving the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Alberta to the U.S. could play a part in tightening U.S.-Canada energy cooperation, ...
  58. [58]
    October 10, 2025 — The return of Keystone XL - LinkedIn
    Oct 10, 2025 · The CBC reported that the Canadian Prime Minister raised the 1,900-kilometre pipeline, which would run from Hardisty, Alta. to the U.S. Midwest.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Keystone Pipeline System - TC Energy
    TERMS OF USE: The datasets used to create this map have been gathered from various sources for a specific purpose. TransCanada Corp. provides no warranty ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  60. [60]
    [PDF] SPECIAL PERMIT
    Fracture Control: API5L and other specifications and standards address the steel pipe toughness properties needed to resist crack initiation. Keystone must ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] TC Energy Corrective Action Order November 5, 2019 - PHMSA
    Nov 5, 2019 · continued operation of the company's Keystone 30-inch Phase 1 crude-oil pipeline between the. Edinburg and Niagara pump stations near Niagara ...
  62. [62]
    Keystone Pipeline Project Moving Toward Completion
    Extending 295 miles from Steele City, NE to Cushing, the 36-inch pipeline is in the final stages of construction. ... Phase I in the U.S. In Canada, Phase ...
  63. [63]
    Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments
    Nov 13, 2014 · TransCanada originally applied for a Presidential Permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline in 2008. Since then various issues have affected the ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    https://graphics.thomsonreuters.com/15/keystone/index.html
  65. [65]
    [PDF] The Keystone/Gulf Coast Pipeline System - SMU
    The Keystone XL pipeline would have the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels of oil per day to Gulf Coast and Midwest refineries. The Ke stone XL pipeline ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Keystone XL Project Keystone XL Project Keystone XL Project
    Aug 26, 2011 · The proposed pipeline of the Steele City Segment would cross about 282.7 miles of Montana, 314.2 miles of South Dakota, and 254.7 miles of ...
  67. [67]
    Pipeline Project – Keystone XL | Alberta.ca
    The Keystone XL project was first proposed in 2008 as an extension of the existing Keystone Pipeline network. The Keystone XL pipeline would have offered a safe ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Final Supplemental EIS for the Keystone XL Project
    The proposed 875-mile-long pipeline route in the United States that is the subject of this Final Supplemental EIS is similar to the original Steele City ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Draft Environmental Assessment, Keystone XL Mainline Alternative ...
    the Keystone XL Preferred Route at MP 873. The total length of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline through Nebraska would be approximately 281 miles, of which ...
  70. [70]
    South Bow
    On June 4, 2024, TC Energy shareholders voted to spin off its Liquids Pipeline business, another important milestone in the creation of South Bow Corporation – ...Pipeline Safety · Life Cycle of a Pipeline · Investors · About
  71. [71]
    South Bow Corporation Annual Information Form for the ... - SEC.gov
    South Bow is an energy infrastructure company that owns and operates critical liquids pipelines and facilities extending across Canada and the US.
  72. [72]
    South Bow Spinoff - TC Energy
    On Oct. 1, 2024, South Bow legally separated from TC Energy, marking a monumental moment in our shared history.
  73. [73]
    TC Energy launches South Bow Corp. as independent pipeline ...
    Oct 1, 2024 · South Bow will run TC Energy's crude oil pipelines business, including the critical Keystone pipeline system.
  74. [74]
    South Bow Debuts for Pipeline Investors - East Daley
    Oct 9, 2024 · Infrastructure: South Bow Corp. (SOBO) began operating as a new pipeline company on October 1 following its spinoff from TC Energy (TRP).
  75. [75]
    TC Energy shareholders approve spinoff of South Bow pipelines ...
    Jun 4, 2024 · TC Energy Corp. shareholders have voted in favour of spinning off the company's crude oil pipelines business. Find out more.Missing: ownership structure<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    [PDF] TC Energy Canadian Mainline Compliance Report
    Apr 23, 2020 · TransCanada. Keystone Pipeline,. LLC. TransCanada USA. Services Inc. TransCanada Keystone. Pipeline GP, LLC. 0.02% GP. 99.98% LP. TC GL Holdings.<|control11|><|separator|>
  77. [77]
    TransCanada to take sole ownership of Keystone pipeline system
    Upon completion of the transaction, TransCanada will be sole owner of the project. The purchase price reflects ConocoPhillips's capital contributions to date ...
  78. [78]
    Crude Oil Pipeline Transportation System - Canada Energy Regulator
    It has a current capacity of 580 Mb/d (92.2 10³m³/d) with long-term contracts for 495 Mb/d (78.7 10³m³/d), or roughly 85% of capacity. In July 2020, TransCanada ...
  79. [79]
    SOUTH BOW Safely Restarts Keystone Pipeline
    Apr 16, 2025 · South Bow Corp. (TSX & NYSE: SOBO) (South Bow or the Company) has safely restarted the Keystone Pipeline (Keystone) after receiving regulatory approval.
  80. [80]
    South Bow's Cash Cow Can Thrive Despite its Challenges
    Aug 15, 2025 · It features the Keystone Pipeline System as its largest asset, with strategically located storage terminals in Hardisty, Cushing, and Houston.Missing: ownership | Show results with:ownership
  81. [81]
    Keystone XL Pipeline – Condition Compliance and Lifecycle Approach
    Mar 25, 2025 · The NEB approved the Keystone XL Pipeline Project subject to 22 conditions. These conditions relate to public safety, protection of the environment, and ...
  82. [82]
    Cantwell Calls for Increased Oversight After Keystone Pipeline Spills ...
    Jan 9, 2023 · In 2007, PHMSA issued a special permit that allowed TC Energy to operate eleven percent higher than the regulatory maximum stress level, when it ...
  83. [83]
    Safety — Pipeline & Operations - TC Energy
    From our control centre operators to our detailed maintenance and inspection programs and regular ground and air patrols, there are a lot of eyes to ensure our ...Missing: practices | Show results with:practices
  84. [84]
    [PDF] LIVING AND WORKING NEAR PIPELINES. - TC Energy
    Pump stations are necessary to maintain controlled and appropriate pressure and flow along the length of the pipeline to ensure continuous and safe operation.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Enclosed please find an Amended Corrective Action Order (ACAO ...
    Mar 7, 2023 · Construction of Phase 2 was completed in February 2011. Phase 2 begins in Steele City, Nebraska and goes to Cushing, Oklahoma.
  86. [86]
    How deciding not to fix a pipe in Kansas 10 years ago led to ... - KCUR
    May 22, 2023 · TC Energy discovered the oval shape in 2012, when it became difficult to run cleaning and inspection tools through the pipeline. The warped pipe ...Missing: maintenance | Show results with:maintenance
  87. [87]
    Pipeline Safety Trust Pens Letter to PHMSA Highlighting Continued ...
    Jun 10, 2025 · In its letter, PST asks the federal pipeline regulator to consider revoking Keystone's special operating permit and issuing a Safety Order on the troubled ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] PIPELINE SAFETY Information on Keystone Accidents and DOT ...
    Jul 22, 2021 · Operating at a higher SMYS allows operators to reduce overall steel material expense since higher grade steel pipelines have thinner walls. •.
  89. [89]
    [PDF] TC Energy - PIPELINE EMERGENCY RESPONSE INFORMATION
    industry best practices, which include using the highest quality materials during construction and implementing a rigorous pipeline maintenance program.
  90. [90]
    PHMSA Corrective Action Order to South Bow-Keystone Pipeline
    Apr 11, 2025 · Regulations and Compliance. Regulatory Compliance. Approvals and Permits · Enforcement · Environmental Compliance · Field Operations · Hazardous ...
  91. [91]
    TransCanada Releases Detailed Keystone XL Job Creation Data
    Jan 10, 2012 · Keystone XL has the capacity to deliver 830,000 barrels of oil per day to U.S. refineries in Cushing, Oklahoma and the Gulf of Mexico. Up to ...
  92. [92]
    Keystone XL Pipeline Is Simply an Extension of an Already Existing ...
    830,000 barrels a day vs. 590,000 for Phase 1 — its U.S. footprint is more than 200 miles ...Missing: per | Show results with:per
  93. [93]
    U.S. Pipeline Contractors Association and Unions Pledge Their ...
    Sep 14, 2010 · "The Keystone Pipeline project will offer working men and women a real chance to earn a good wage and support their families in this difficult ...
  94. [94]
    [PDF] PIPE DREAMS? - The ILR School
    Sep 19, 2011 · The green economy has already generated 2.7 million jobs in the US and could generate many more.
  95. [95]
    [PDF] tce-2024-annual-report.pdf - TC Energy
    Feb 6, 2025 · Keystone XL pipeline project assets. Reconciliation of net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax to comparable earnings from.
  96. [96]
    A Matter of Fact: Mythbusting on Keystone XL
    Apr 14, 2020 · Overall, TC Energy expects that Keystone XL construction will generate 17,000 direct, indirect and induced jobs in Canada and 42,000 in the ...Missing: phases | Show results with:phases
  97. [97]
    Keystone Pipeline System Safely Delivers One Billionth Barrel of Oil ...
    Jul 20, 2015 · Media Advisory: Keystone Pipeline System Safely Delivers One Billionth Barrel of Oil, Bringing Jobs, Growth and Energy Security to the U.S. and ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Oil Sands and the Keystone XL Pipeline - Congress.gov
    Apr 14, 2014 · The Keystone XL pipeline would transport oil sands crude, with concerns about higher GHG emissions, potential spill risks, and local impacts in ...
  99. [99]
    Western Canadian Crude Oil Supply, Markets,and Pipeline Capacity
    Aug 3, 2022 · If the WCS price is lower than WTI, the differential is negative, and is referred to as a discount. WCS at Hardisty naturally trades at a ...
  100. [100]
    Making Canadian oil prices more equal: Examining the facts about ...
    May 24, 2022 · WCS-WTI differential​​ The lack of pipeline capacity has meant and means a higher price differential between U.S. and world oil (West Texas ...
  101. [101]
    Keystone XL Pipeline: Rhetoric vs. Economics - JPT/SPE
    May 12, 2015 · The direct economic effect of Keystone is quite straightforward. It would reduce the cost of transporting crude oil from Canada to the US Gulf ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Crude Oil Price Differentials and Pipeline Infrastructure
    First, there is a reduction in transportation costs for the oil carried by the new pipeline instead of a higher priced alternative. Second, there is an addition ...<|separator|>
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Is Keystone for the United States? Oil has been the world's leading ...
    The Keystone XL pipeline, a privately funded project, would double the current capacity of oil transported in the U.S. per day, provide the U.S. with a more ...
  104. [104]
    Why the cancellation of Keystone is bad for the climate, the ...
    A reduction in the WTI-WCS price differential of US $5 per barrel would, on average, increase nominal GDP by $6.0 billion annually over 2019 to 2023″. The ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Impact of the Keystone XL pipeline on global oil markets and ...
    Aug 10, 2014 · We find that for every barrel of increased production, global oil consumption would increase 0.6 barrels owing to the incremental decrease in ...
  106. [106]
    The Keystone XL pipeline has nothing to do with gas prices
    Mar 16, 2022 · The Keystone XL pipeline has nothing to do with gas prices · There's never been any lost supply · We have other pipelines · Recommended Stories ...
  107. [107]
    Could the Keystone XL pipeline help lower U.S. gas prices?
    Mar 17, 2022 · Many experts agree that moving ahead with the pipeline wouldn't have prevented US gas prices from climbing to a record high.
  108. [108]
    Keystone Pipeline volumes rise to about 610,000 b/d from capacity ...
    Jul 28, 2022 · "We safely reached nearly 610,000 b/d a day as we placed about 30% of the 2019 open season contracts into service," CEO François Poirier said ...
  109. [109]
    Misunderstood Keystone XL a Reminder of the Importance of Critical ...
    Mar 11, 2022 · Fact: The Keystone Pipeline System was over half complete. At the time the presidential cross-border permit was revoked, construction of the ...
  110. [110]
    Why Biden's Killing Of Keystone XL Was An Energy Security Blunder
    Mar 10, 2022 · The White House canceled the Keystone XL pipeline and they are now asking Venezuela for more oil. The White House is acting like those are ...
  111. [111]
    Oil imports and exports - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
    Shares of U.S. petroleum imports from OPEC and Persian Gulf countries have declined, and the share of imports from Canada has increased. U.S. petroleum imports ...Missing: Keystone | Show results with:Keystone
  112. [112]
    Oil Imports from OPEC Down 60%; KXL Could Lower Them Even More
    Jan 20, 2015 · Hydraulic fracturing and U.S. oil production have reduced our need for oil imports. Oil imports from OPEC have dropped by almost 60 percent.
  113. [113]
    Legion reaffirms support for oil pipeline Keystone XL project is a ...
    Legion reaffirms support for oil pipeline Keystone XL project is a positive step for national security and economy alike, says national commander.
  114. [114]
    Background Briefing on the Keystone XL Pipeline - State.gov
    Nov 6, 2015 · The State Department's analysis concluded that the significance of the pipeline for U.S. energy security of supply is limited. We understand how ...
  115. [115]
    Many factors caused Keystone pipeline leak, says TC Energy - CBC
    Feb 9, 2023 · The size of the spill was initially estimated at 14,000 barrels, though TC Energy revised that figure downward Thursday to 12,937 barrels ...Missing: volume | Show results with:volume
  116. [116]
    UPDATE: Keystone Pipeline shutdown after rupture near Fort Ransom
    Apr 8, 2025 · UPDATE (4/9/2025 at 11 a.m.): South Bow, who operates the pipeline, estimates the volume of crude oil released from this incident to be 3,500 ...
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Report to Congress on Shipping Crude Oil by Truck, Rail, and Pipeline
    Mar 19, 2019 · The Report on Shipping Crude Oil by Truck, Rail, and Pipeline compiles crude oil transportation and incident data to show the volume of crude ...
  118. [118]
    Pipelines safer than rail or truck for oil: report - EDI Weekly
    According to the report, there are an average of 20 spills per billion ton-miles in trucking, two in rail shipping, and 0.6 in pipelines. Pipeline spills ...
  119. [119]
    Safety on the Cutting Edge - TC Energy
    Beyond leak detection alone, the program also incorporates site security using thermal cameras and a suite of defined analytics.Missing: safeguards | Show results with:safeguards
  120. [120]
    TC Energy — Safety — Emergency Preparedness
    Our robust emergency response plans are focused on quickly and effectively responding to emergencies, mitigating any impacts that may have occurred to public ...Prepared For Anything · Case Study: Investing In... · Emergency Preparedness...Missing: Keystone | Show results with:Keystone
  121. [121]
    [PDF] Pipeline Risk Assessment
    Jul 6, 2009 · The study is a quantitative assessment of spill potential for the entire pipeline utilizing publicly available historical incident data ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  122. [122]
    [PDF] Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the ...
    Dec 1, 2019 · Under the Proposed Action, Keystone would construct the Keystone XL Project. This would include approximately 162 miles of construction, ...
  123. [123]
    UNL scientists cites Keystone pipeline risks as minimal, manageable
    Potential groundwater contamination risks posed by the Keystone XL pipeline in Nebraska are minimal and manageable under a "risk-managed" route proposed by a ...Missing: actual | Show results with:actual
  124. [124]
    Risk-Managed Approach for Routing Petroleum Pipelines: Keystone ...
    Nov 7, 2012 · Pipeline routing could be made much more acceptable by adopting risk-managed routes that lessen the potential to adversely impact high-quality groundwater.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  125. [125]
    Pipelines easier on the environment than rail - University of Alberta
    Dec 13, 2016 · Pipelines are more environmentally friendly than rail when hauling oil and bitumen long distances, according to a new University of Alberta study.Missing: diluted | Show results with:diluted<|separator|>
  126. [126]
    [PDF] Emissions of pipeline transport compared with those of competing ...
    CO2 before reaching the atmosphere. It would be equivalent to 2.3 g CO2 per tonne-km, still a significant increase. Page 21. 4.598.1/ Emissions of pipeline ...
  127. [127]
    [PDF] APPENDIX U Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Petroleum ...
    INCREMENTAL GHG EMISSIONS OF DISPLACING REFERENCE CRUDES WITH. WCSB OIL SANDS. 70. 6.1 Weighted-Average GHG Emissions from WCSB Oil Sands Crudes Transported in ...
  128. [128]
    Carbon footprint: Pipelines trump rail on a large scale - Enbridge Inc.
    pipelines create less greenhouse gas emissions than rail—anywhere from 61 to 77 percent less—when transporting large capacities of crude oil over long distances ...
  129. [129]
    How green is my oil? A detailed look at greenhouse gas accounting ...
    Average fugitive emissions from pipelines are assumed to be 45 kg CH4/km-yr, which equates to 75 kg CO2/km-yr (Eq. (3)). In addition, we also include emissions ...
  130. [130]
    Life Cycle Analysis of Bitumen Transportation to Refineries by Rail ...
    Results show that pipeline transportation produced between 61% and 77% fewer GHG emissions than by rail. The GHG emissions decreased by 15% and 73% for rail and ...
  131. [131]
    [PDF] Climate Impacts of the Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline (PDF) - NRDC
    Boreal wetland ecosystems sequester massive amounts of carbon, but if Keystone XL is approved, rapid development of Alberta's ancient peatlands could release ...
  132. [132]
    Pipeline Incident 20 Year Trends | PHMSA
    Aug 27, 2025 · PHMSA has collected pipeline incident reports since 1970. The reporting regulations and incident report formats have changed several times over the years.Missing: Keystone | Show results with:Keystone
  133. [133]
    Site Profile - KEYSTONE PIPELINE - E20801 - EPA OSC Response
    Oct 31, 2019 · On the night of October 30, 2019, TC Energy, formerly known as TransCanada reported a release of an unknown amount of crude oil from a Keystone pipeline pump ...Missing: records | Show results with:records
  134. [134]
    OPA - TC Energy Mill Creek - UCGPE23702 - EPA OSC Response
    On the morning of Dec. 8, 2022, TC Energy reported a pressure drop in a 36-inch crude oil pipeline, part of the Keystone pipeline system near Washington, ...
  135. [135]
    Cleanup is done on a big Kansas oil spill on the Keystone system ...
    Nov 1, 2023 · The operator of the Keystone pipeline system has finished cleaning up a massive December 2022 oil spill, and the creek affected by it is flowing naturally ...
  136. [136]
    [PDF] Pipelines Are Safest for Transportation of Oil and Gas
    Jun 23, 2013 · Pipelines are the safer option for transporting oil and gas, with fewer incidents and injuries than road and rail, and are heavily regulated.
  137. [137]
    Keystone pipeline raises concerns after third major spill in five years
    Dec 21, 2022 · About 5,500 barrels of oil and water and 5,000 cubic yards of oil-contaminated soil have been recovered in initial cleanup efforts. Most of the ...
  138. [138]
    [PDF] Risk Analysis of the Proposed Keystone XL Pipeline Route
    Jun 3, 2013 · In the Final EIS (FEIS) for the original Keystone. XL Pipeline routing, the spill rate for the segments, adjusted for protective/mitigative ...
  139. [139]
    Report: Keystone XL tar sands pipeline more of an economic liability ...
    Mar 12, 2012 · Keystone XL is expected experience up to 91 significant spills over a 50-year period. Which jobs are at risk? Hundreds of thousands of workers ...
  140. [140]
    Keystone XL pipeline closer to reality after State Department review
    Jan 31, 2014 · The State Department, in Friday's report, essentially concluded that Keystone would have little material effect on greenhouse gas emissions and ...
  141. [141]
    Final Environmental Analysis for Keystone XL Pipeline Project ...
    Feb 5, 2014 · Specifically, the FSEIS concludes that WCSB crudes transported by the pipeline emit 17 percent more GHGs on a lifecycle basis than the average ...Missing: intensity | Show results with:intensity
  142. [142]
    [PDF] Greenhouse gas emissions implications of the Keystone XL pipeline
    Other studies refer to the emissions associated with oil transported by the Keystone XL pipeline – 830,000 barrels per day, and 181 million tons of carbon ...
  143. [143]
    [PDF] Keystone XL: Greenhouse Gas Emissions ... - Congress.gov
    ... pipelines were built, or 20,000-30,000 bpd if only the Keystone XL pipeline was not built, the State Department backs these volumes out of the 830,000 bpd ...
  144. [144]
    Congressional Roll Call Votes on the Keystone XL Pipeline
    Jun 7, 2019 · Passage of the bill that would require the Administration to make a permitting decision on the Keystone XL Pipeline within 30 days after the ...
  145. [145]
    A timeline of important dates in Keystone XL pipeline history
    Jan 6, 2016 · July 2008: TransCanada Corp. (TSX:TRP) and ConocoPhillips, joint owners of the Keystone Pipeline, propose a major extension to the network, ...
  146. [146]
    Keystone XL Pipeline political timeline - Ballotpedia
    President Barack Obama rejected TransCanada's application to build the Keystone XL Pipeline on November 6, 2015. November 5, 2015: After TransCanada asked the ...
  147. [147]
    Statement by the President on the Keystone XL Pipeline
    Nov 6, 2015 · First: The pipeline would not make a meaningful long-term contribution to our economy. So if Congress is serious about wanting to create jobs, ...
  148. [148]
    Presidential Memorandum Regarding Construction of the Keystone ...
    Jan 24, 2017 · A Presidential permit for the construction and operation of the Keystone XL Pipeline, a major pipeline for the importation of petroleum from Canada to the ...
  149. [149]
    Keystone XL Pipeline - United States Department of State
    On January 26, 2017, TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P. (Keystone) re-submitted a Presidential permit application [2 MB] to the Department of State for the ...
  150. [150]
    Trump administration approves Keystone pipeline on U.S. land - PBS
    Jan 22, 2020 · The Trump administration on Wednesday approved a right-of-way allowing the Keystone XL oil sands pipeline to be built across US land.
  151. [151]
    Keystone XL Pipeline - Environmental and Energy Law Program
    Jun 9, 2021 · On Dec. 19, the Commission rejected TransCanada's petition to use an alternative route closer to the original proposed route. March 23, 2017 ...
  152. [152]
    Controversial Keystone XL Pipeline Is Halted - NPR
    Jun 9, 2021 · TC Energy suspended construction in January when President Biden revoked a key permit. The controversial project was a major flashpoint in ...
  153. [153]
    H. Rept. 118-25 - RESOLUTION EXPRESSING DISAPPROVAL OF ...
    House report on RESOLUTION EXPRESSING DISAPPROVAL OF THE REVOCATION BY PRESI - DENT BIDEN OF THE PRESIDENTIAL PERMIT FOR THE KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE.
  154. [154]
    After Canadian rout, a quick verdict on Keystone? - POLITICO
    Oct 20, 2015 · While Trudeau supports Keystone, he has heavily criticized Harper for not doing more to fight climate change. He has also promised to convene a ...Missing: federal | Show results with:federal
  155. [155]
    Statement by the Prime Minister of Canada on the Keystone XL ...
    Nov 6, 2015 · “The application for a cross-border permit for the Keystone XL pipeline project was turned down by the United States Government today.
  156. [156]
    Statement by the Prime Minister of Canada on the United States ...
    Jan 20, 2021 · The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today issued the following statement on the United States' decision on the Keystone XL project.
  157. [157]
    Canada's Trudeau Approves Controversial Pipeline Expansion - NPR
    Jun 19, 2019 · Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has given the green light for a second time to a $5.5 billion pipeline expansion that has attracted strong opposition.
  158. [158]
    Canada's prime minister discussed reviving contentious Keystone ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · The Canadian government official said Trump was receptive to the idea when it was talked about during their White House meeting Wednesday. The ...
  159. [159]
    Alberta premier calls Biden's XL cancellation a 'gut punch' for U.S. ...
    Jan 20, 2021 · Alberta Premier Jason Kenney said US President Joe Biden's decision to revoke the permit for Calgary-based TC Energy's Keystone XL pipeline was a "gut punch."
  160. [160]
    Canadian Leader Ready To Work With Trump To Resurrect ...
    Jan 23, 2025 · Alberta's premier wants to restart talks with Trump to reapprove Keystone XL, possibly as "Keystone 2.0", to increase oil production and  ...
  161. [161]
    Canada is pressing Biden administration on Keystone XL pipeline ...
    Jan 19, 2021 · "We've had a clear and consistent position supporting this project for years," Trudeau told reporters. "Our government is making sure that ...
  162. [162]
    Even without Keystone XL, U.S. set for record Canadian oil imports
    Jan 22, 2021 · Even without Keystone, however, the United States now relies on Canada for more than half of its imported oil. Several of the lines carrying ...
  163. [163]
    How Keystone Pipeline Project Impacts US Energy Independence
    Jul 24, 2013 · Imported oil from Canada and Mexico would combine with our domestic resources to completely free the US of fuel dependency from foreign sources.<|separator|>
  164. [164]
    [PDF] Keystone XL Pipeline - Undermining U.S. Energy Security ... - NRDC
    Adopting a series of oil savings policies would reduce U.S. oil consumption and imports by. 5.7 million barrels per day in twenty years. The United States has ...
  165. [165]
    'Drill here': Would Keystone XL give America energy independence?
    Mar 9, 2022 · The Keystone XL would have increased Canadian oil imports to 25% in the Gulf. The pipeline would have contributed $3.4 billion to the U.S. Gross ...
  166. [166]
    What does the end of the Keystone pipeline mean for US energy?
    Jun 11, 2021 · Attempts to build the the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada's oil sands to the US Gulf Coast have been abandoned after more than a decade of opposition.
  167. [167]
    The Keystone XL Pipeline: Role of the U.S. Department of State
    Aug 19, 2011 · The State Department (the Department) is responsible for reviewing all applications for presidential permits for the construction of pipelines crossing a ...Missing: phases | Show results with:phases
  168. [168]
    Construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline - Federal Register
    Jan 30, 2017 · (iv) The agency notification and fifteen-day delay requirements of sections 1(g), 1(h), and 1(i) of Executive Order 13337 are hereby waived on ...Missing: timeline sources
  169. [169]
    A timeline of the Keystone XL oil pipeline | AP News
    TransCanada files paperwork to expand the existing Keystone pipeline with a new Keystone XL route.
  170. [170]
    State Department Gives Long Overdue Approval to Keystone XL ...
    Mar 24, 2017 · The State Department's decision to approve a permit for the pipeline at the US-Canadian border comes as a result of President Donald Trump's Jan. 24 executive ...Missing: timeline sources
  171. [171]
    Keystone XL Pipeline Hit with New Delay: Judge Orders ...
    Aug 16, 2018 · The embattled Keystone XL oil pipeline faces yet another delay after a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to conduct a new environmental review of ...
  172. [172]
    TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline Opposition Work
    Three Nebraska landowners filed suit in two Nebraska courts challenging a new state law governing routes for crude oil pipelines and the use of eminent domain ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  173. [173]
    Nebraska Landowners Fighting Keystone XL, Eminent Domain in ...
    TransCanada has filed eminent domain claims against Nebraska farmers and ranchers who are refusing to give up their land for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline.Missing: proceedings | Show results with:proceedings
  174. [174]
    Nebraska Judge Halts TransCanada's Eminent Domain Grab for ...
    TransCanada has for now lost its bid to seize Nebraskans' land via eminent domain for its Keystone XL pipeline project, thanks to a February 12 temporary ...
  175. [175]
    Nebraska Court Ruling Further Complicates Keystone XL Pipeline
    Feb 20, 2014 · Wednesday, a judge ruled that law violates the Nebraska Constitution, which gives jurisdiction over pipelines to the state's Public Service ...<|separator|>
  176. [176]
    TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Dunavan - Justia Law
    Aug 23, 2019 · The Supreme Court affirmed the Public Service Commission's (PSC) grant of an application filed by TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, ...
  177. [177]
    TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Tanderup
    Feb 5, 2020 · Proceedings Below: Landowners moved for attorneys' fees after TransCanada voluntarily dismissed its eminent domain proceedings. The county court ...
  178. [178]
    TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Bartles Farms, Inc.
    Jan 9, 2018 · The county court granted the motions and awarded attorney fees and costs. Keystone appealed to the district court. The district court affirmed ...
  179. [179]
    TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Nicholas Family Limited ...
    Jan 9, 2018 · The county court granted the motions and awarded attorney fees and costs. Keystone appealed to the district court. The district court reversed ...
  180. [180]
    Farmer Loses Case Against Keystone XL Pipeline | StateImpact Texas
    Aug 22, 2012 · In an email to lawyers involved in the case, the judge announced he was granting TransCanada's motion for summary judgement and denied ...
  181. [181]
    Texas Supreme Court Orders TransCanada to Respond In ...
    Jan 8, 2014 · The Texas Supreme Court has ordered TransCanada to submit information by Feb. 6 in the lawsuit filed by landowner Julia Trigg Crawford ...
  182. [182]
    Ghost Pipelines: How Landowners Suffer, Long After a Project Gets ...
    Jun 21, 2022 · ... Keystone XL pipeline, condemned Jeanne Crumly's land for the project. The pipeline was killed, releasing the land back to the Crumlys.
  183. [183]
    TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline Heightens Awareness of ...
    The Keystone XL is proposed to be a 36-inch diameter pipeline, 1,179 miles long from Alberta, Canada, to Steele City, Nebraska, where it will connect with the ...
  184. [184]
    Court lifts injunction that blocked Keystone XL pipeline construction
    Jun 7, 2019 · A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday ordered dismissal of the lawsuit by environmental and Native American ...<|separator|>
  185. [185]
    Rosebud Sioux and Fort Belknap file suit against Keystone XL
    The Tribes sued the Trump Administration for numerous violations of the law in the Keystone XL pipeline permitting process.<|separator|>
  186. [186]
    TC Energy says its $15 bln claim for Keystone XL project thrown out ...
    Jul 16, 2024 · Canada's TC Energy said on Tuesday a free trade arbitration tribunal had tossed out its claim to recover more than $15 billion from the U.S. ...
  187. [187]
    In re Keystone XL Pipeline - South Dakota Case Law
    Jun 13, 2018 · The Commission granted a permit to TransCanada to construct the Keystone XL Pipeline in South Dakota. None of the parties in that proceeding ...<|separator|>
  188. [188]
    Native American Lands and the Keystone Pipeline Expansion
    Jan 22, 2018 · The Treaty recognized the area where the projected Keystone pipeline is going to traverse as lands belonging to the Sioux tribe.
  189. [189]
    South Dakota Sioux tribe calls Keystone XL pipeline approval 'act of ...
    Nov 17, 2014 · Scott said the creation of the pipeline would violate the 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie, an agreement between the Sioux and the US government ...
  190. [190]
    Native American Tribes File Lawsuit Seeking To Invalidate Keystone ...
    Sep 10, 2018 · Two Native American communities are suing the Trump administration, saying it failed to adhere to historical treaty boundaries and circumvented environmental ...
  191. [191]
    Department of the Interior Tribal - Part 3 [HTML]
    The Keystone XL Pipeline has infiltrated the Treaty lands of the Great Sioux Nation, despite the protest of the tribes in the State of South Dakota. The Yankton ...Missing: lawsuits | Show results with:lawsuits<|separator|>
  192. [192]
    Tribes File Lawsuit to Block Keystone Pipeline - FindLaw
    Mar 21, 2019 · The suit, filed by the Fort Belknap Indian Community of Montana and the Rosebud Sioux Tribe of South Dakota claims the Trump administration ...Missing: opposition | Show results with:opposition
  193. [193]
    [PDF] Case: 19-35099, 02/13/2019, ID: 11188700, DktEntry
    Feb 15, 2019 · The construction of and potential spills from the Keystone XL Pipeline also threatens the health and welfare of the Tribes' members. For example ...
  194. [194]
    Native American Rights and the Keystone XL Pipeline
    The Pipeline was set to run through a substantial portion of the Black Hills of South Dakota-the sovereign and treaty lands of the Great Sioux Nation. This " ...
  195. [195]
    TC Energy and Natural Law Energy sign definitive agreement
    Nov 17, 2020 · “Today, we're pleased to announce that NLE's definitive agreement is one of the largest ever with over $1 billion deal for First Nations. We're ...
  196. [196]
    Canadian indigenous deal with KXL oil pipeline took years, aims to ...
    Nov 30, 2020 · It joined four First Nations - Ermineskin, Akamihk, Louis Bull Tribe and Little Pine - to form NLE. The coalition has attracted interest from ...
  197. [197]
    Indigenous group to invest in Keystone XL as Biden set to determine ...
    Nov 17, 2020 · A First Nations group in Canada will invest up to $764 million in the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline as TC Energy continues its effort ...
  198. [198]
    Chief leading Indigenous coalition holds out hope despite Keystone ...
    Feb 10, 2022 · In addition to the potential ownership stake for NLE, Keystone XL had invested $1.6 million directly and another $16.6 million indirectly with ...
  199. [199]
    How First Nations Benefit from Pipeline Construction - Fraser Institute
    Jun 11, 2019 · First Nations have good economic reasons to support pipelines because their right to be consulted has enabled them to negotiate lucrative mutual-benefit ...<|separator|>
  200. [200]
    TC Energy, Indigenous partners fall out after end of Keystone XL
    Aug 30, 2022 · An Indigenous-backed energy company is seeking $50 million (US$38.2 million) from pipeline operator TC Energy Corp. after a falling out between partners.
  201. [201]
    Keystone XL Pipeline Draws Broad Support - Pew Research Center
    Apr 2, 2013 · A national survey finds broad public support for the project. Two-thirds of Americans (66%) favor 4-2-13 #1 building the pipeline.
  202. [202]
    Poll: Majority of Americans back Keystone pipeline | CNN Politics
    Jan 15, 2015 · The 1,179-mile Canada-to-Texas pipeline is backed by 57% of the 1,011 Americans surveyed on Dec. 18-21. Just 28% oppose it, while 15% say they ...
  203. [203]
    Public divided over Keystone XL, Dakota pipelines
    Feb 21, 2017 · About four-in-ten (42%) favor building the Keystone XL pipeline, while 48% are opposed, according to a national Pew Research Center survey conducted Feb. 7-12, ...
  204. [204]
    Majority of Americans support restarting Keystone XL pipeline to ...
    Mar 15, 2022 · Majority of Americans support restarting Keystone XL pipeline to make up for Russian oil ban ... More than a year after President Joe Biden killed ...
  205. [205]
    In Wake of KXL Decision, Canadians Most Likely to Support Building ...
    Feb 9, 2021 · The poll results also suggest that Canadians do not see continuing to press Keystone XL with the new U.S. administration as a priority. Even in ...<|separator|>
  206. [206]
    Majority of Canadians support building new oil infrastructure, poll ...
    Jul 28, 2025 · The poll, by Environics Research, found that 73 per cent of Canadians support new oil pipelines. Even in Quebec, where respondents have ...
  207. [207]
    Pipeline Push: Majority of Canadians, including B.C. residents ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · On the pro side of the argument, a firm majority (59%) of Canadians, including majorities in every region, say they support the idea of a ...
  208. [208]
    Here's How We Defeated the Keystone XL Pipeline | Sierra Club
    Jan 31, 2021 · When we put out the call back in 2011 for people to come to the White House and get arrested to stop a tar sands pipeline, we had no idea how ...
  209. [209]
    Keystone XL Victory: To Win a Fight, You Have to Pick One
    Established environmental groups like the Sierra Club and NRDC jumped on board. ... I reached 350.org executive director May Boeve just minutes after the ...
  210. [210]
    Climate test for Obama: 1,252 people arrested over notorious oil ...
    Sep 6, 2011 · (08/30/2011) As arrests over a two week long civil action against the Keystone Pipeline XL rise to nearly 600 people, Bill McKibben, head of 350 ...
  211. [211]
    For Protesters, Keystone Pipeline Is Line In Tar Sand - NPR
    Sep 1, 2011 · The prospect of a giant oil pipeline running from Canada to Texas has activists up in arms. About 800 people have been arrested in ongoing ...
  212. [212]
    12,000 surround White House to protest tar sands pipeline
    Nov 7, 2011 · One year to the day before the 2012 US election, up to 12,000 activists encircled the White House to protest the Keystone XL pipeline, ...
  213. [213]
    Nov. 6, 2011: Keystone XL Pipeline Protest at White House
    Nov 6, 2011 · On November 6, 2011, tens of thousands of protesters installed a long, black inflatable pipeline replica outside of the White House to oppose the Keystone XL ...
  214. [214]
    Eight Climate Activists Climb Trees And Start Indefinite Tree Sit to ...
    Sep 24, 2012 · Eight people climbed 80 feet into trees in the path of Keystone XL construction and pledged not to come down until the pipeline is stopped ...
  215. [215]
    Texas Tar Sands Tree-Sit Launches to Halt Keystone XL Indefinitely
    Sep 26, 2012 · Two blockaders locked down to construction equipment in Winnsboro, Texas, to defend the nine people now occupying a tree village on Texas ...
  216. [216]
    Keystone XL Tree Protesters Call It Quits After Pipeline Rerouted ...
    Dec 17, 2012 · Activists who had hoped to block the southern leg of the Keystone XL in Texas by occupying trees in the pipeline's path are ending their three-month protest.
  217. [217]
    Thousands March with Cowboy and Indian Alliance at “Reject ... - 350
    Apr 26, 2014 · On Wednesday, members of the Cowboy and Indian Alliance met with the White House to voice their concerns about Keystone XL and tar sands ...
  218. [218]
    Anti-Keystone protest rides in - POLITICO
    Apr 23, 2014 · Cowboys and Indians rode on horseback onto the National Mall on Tuesday to show President Barack Obama that opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline extends to ...
  219. [219]
    Keystone XL Protest at the White House Leads to Mass Arrests - 350
    Mar 2, 2014 · Contact: Jamie Henn, jamie@350.org, 415-890-3350. Over 1,200 young people take part in XL Dissent protest; 398 arrested in the largest act ...Missing: numbers | Show results with:numbers
  220. [220]
    Hundreds of Keystone protesters arrested at White House - Reuters
    Mar 2, 2014 · Police arrested hundreds of young people protesting the Keystone XL project on Sunday, as demonstrators fastened themselves with plastic ties to the White ...Missing: tactics | Show results with:tactics
  221. [221]
    Mass arrests at Keystone protest - POLITICO
    Mar 2, 2014 · More than 300 anti-Keystone XL protesters were arrested Sunday afternoon outside the White House in the latest push by environmentalists to convince the Obama ...Missing: tactics | Show results with:tactics
  222. [222]
    Lac-Mégantic runaway train and derailment investigation summary
    Almost all of the 63 derailed tank cars were damaged, and many had large breaches. About six million litres of petroleum crude oil was quickly released. The ...
  223. [223]
    [PDF] Canadian Crude Oil Transportation Comparing the Safety of ...
    Jul 12, 2019 · With current regulation and investment, both rail and pipeline have comparable safety records and are safe means of transporting crude oil.
  224. [224]
    Why Was the Energy East Pipeline Cancelled? - Canada Action
    Jan 28, 2025 · Terminated by then-proponent TransCanada Corp. (now TC Energy) in October 2017, the oil pipeline was a major economic loss for Canadians.
  225. [225]
    Canada's long-delayed Trans Mountain oil pipeline starts operations
    May 1, 2024 · After 12 years and C$34 billion ($25 billion), Canada's Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project (TMX) began commercial operations on Wednesday.
  226. [226]
    Past Project: TMEP - Trans Mountain
    On June 18, 2019 the Government of Canada approved the Trans Mountain Expansion Project. The Project is subject to 156 conditions enforced by the Canada Energy ...
  227. [227]
    Line 3 Newsroom - Enbridge Inc.
    The American portion of Enbridge's Line 3 Replacement Project saw the replacement of 337 miles of pipe in Minnesota, 13 miles in North Dakota and 14 miles ...
  228. [228]
    Enbridge Line 3 Pipeline Replacement Project | Minnesota DNR
    Enbridge is continuing restoration work around its new Line 3 crude oil pipeline across Minnesota. The project replaces and expands the capacity of the ...