Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fungibility

Fungibility is the property of a good, asset, or that renders its units interchangeable with one another, such that substituting one unit for another of equivalent type, , and does not affect , , or . This characteristic ensures that individual instances are indistinguishable in practical terms, facilitating seamless exchange and standardization. In and , fungibility underpins efficient markets by promoting and simplifying transactions, as participants can trade assets without needing to assess unique attributes of each unit. For instance, currency like U.S. dollar bills is fungible, allowing any $20 to be exchanged for another without loss in acceptability, and commodities such as No. 2 yellow corn or crude oil exemplify this, where standardized grades enable bulk trading on exchanges. In contrast, non-fungible assets like , artwork, or non-fungible tokens (NFTs)—unique digital certificates of ownership—lack interchangeability due to their distinct qualities or provenance. Cryptocurrencies like are generally fungible, though regulatory markings or blacklisting can impair this in practice. Legally, fungibility supports contractual fulfillment by permitting of equivalent items, provided they meet specified standards of and , irrespective of . Common examples include fungible goods like , , or shares of , where one unit substitutes for another in obligations such as or leases. In international agreements, such as pacts, fungible materials allow flexibility in sourcing components for , ensuring compliance through interchangeable properties. This also applies to specialized contexts, like nuclear materials, where is treated as fungible based on isotopic content rather than specific feedstock. Overall, fungibility enhances and legal predictability across domains, though in cases like earmarked foreign aid where funds may be reallocated to other sectors, it can complicate intended policy outcomes.

Definition and Core Concepts

Definition of Fungibility

Fungibility refers to the property of a good or asset in which its individual units are essentially interchangeable, such that one unit can be substituted for another without affecting the overall value or utility of the exchange. This concept is central to economic theory, implying that units of a fungible item, like or standardized commodities, are indistinguishable in terms of their functional equivalence. For instance, one U.S. dollar bill of a given holds the same worth and acceptability as any other of identical denomination, allowing seamless transactions without negotiation over specific units. The term "fungibility" derives from the Medieval Latin fungibilis, rooted in the verb fungi, meaning "to perform" or "discharge," which underscores the idea of fulfilling an through equivalent . In economic contexts, its usage emerged in the , particularly in discussions of commodities such as or , where uniformity in quality and quantity facilitated . The noun form "fungibility" first appeared in print around , building on earlier applications of "fungible" dating back to 1649. Classic examples illustrate this property: gold coins of identical weight, purity, and minting serve as an of fungible items, as any one can replace another in or reserve without loss of value, in contrast to non-fungible items like a unique , whose individuality prevents direct substitution. Economically, fungibility underpins efficient market operations by enabling standardized pricing, simplified trading mechanisms, and reduced transaction costs, as buyers and sellers need not assess the specific history or attributes of each unit.

Key Characteristics and Distinctions

Fungible assets are characterized primarily by homogeneity, where individual units are identical in both and , allowing them to be substituted without affecting their perceived value. This uniformity ensures that one unit of a fungible asset is indistinguishable from another, facilitating seamless exchanges in economic transactions. plays a crucial role in enforcing fungibility through legal and market mechanisms that define uniform specifications. For instance, international standards like assign unique codes to currencies, promoting their interchangeability across global markets. Similarly, commodity grading systems establish consistent benchmarks, such as No. 2 yellow soybeans, rendering units within each grade fully substitutable. In contrast, non-fungible assets possess unique attributes that influence their value, such as location-specific features in or rarity in collectibles, preventing direct . The degree of fungibility exists on a , assessed by the extent of interchangeability: fully fungible assets like exhibit complete homogeneity and uniformity, while partially fungible ones, such as branded , allow substitution within the brand but vary by producer-specific traits. Non-fungible assets lie at the opposite end, with no viable substitutes due to inherent . For example, physical like standardized grains illustrate high fungibility within defined categories.

Applications in Economics and Finance

Fungibility of Physical Goods

Fungible physical goods are tangible commodities that can be exchanged on a basis without loss of value, provided they meet standardized criteria, allowing for efficient bulk trading in markets. Common examples include barrels of crude oil of the same grade, such as (WTI), bushels of wheat conforming to specific USDA grades, and bars of pure gold meeting (LBMA) standards. Several factors enable the fungibility of these goods, primarily through rigorous processes that ensure . Grading systems, such as the USDA's Official Standards for , classify agricultural products like based on test weight, content, foreign , and levels, resulting in a uniform product suitable for trading. For crude oil, benchmarks like Platts American GulfCoast Select (AGS) define quality parameters for content and , allowing barrels within those specs to be treated as interchangeable. Certification and storage standards further support this; for instance, LBMA's Good Delivery List requires gold bars to be at least 99.5% pure, weigh 350–430 ounces, and bear approved refiner marks, ensuring global acceptance without individual assays. These mechanisms reduce the need for repeated quality inspections in each transaction, transforming heterogeneous raw into interchangeable units. In commodity markets, fungibility confers significant benefits by lowering transaction costs and enabling large-scale exchanges. Standardized goods facilitate trading on platforms like the (CME), where contracts for or corn can be settled without physical inspection of specific lots, as grading ensures equivalence. This uniformity supports hedging against price volatility for producers and buyers, streamlining bulk deliveries and reducing search and negotiation expenses in global supply chains. However, physical goods are not inherently fungible; variations in quality or impurities can render them non-interchangeable. For example, different crude oil grades like Brent and WTI differ in and , limiting direct substitution and fragmenting markets due to refining incompatibilities. Similarly, vintage wines possess unique attributes from , aging, and production specifics, making each bottle non-fungible unlike generic , which can vary by impurities or batch differences. Such challenges necessitate precise grading or to maintain market efficiency.

Fungibility in Currencies and Securities

In currencies, such as bills and coins exemplifies full fungibility, where individual units of the same denomination are interchangeable regardless of serial numbers or physical condition, as long as they remain . This interchangeability stems from government backing, which establishes the currency's value through laws and authority, ensuring acceptance in transactions without differentiation between specific units. Historically, under the gold standard from the late 19th to early , coins like the U.S. eagle were similarly fungible, as they contained a fixed weight of pure , allowing seamless exchange at across borders and converting freely to . Securities, particularly equity shares, demonstrate fungibility when units represent identical ownership interests in a company, such as common stock certificates for Apple Inc. traded on exchanges like the NYSE. These shares are treated as equivalent, enabling efficient buying and selling without regard to the specific certificate held, as each confers the same rights to dividends and voting. Bearer bonds, a classic example of fungible debt instruments, further illustrate this; issued without registered ownership, they entitle the physical holder to interest and principal payments, making them interchangeable by simple transfer. Market mechanisms like clearinghouses and depositories reinforce fungibility in securities . In the United States, the (DTCC), through its subsidiary the (DTC), holds deposited securities in "fungible bulk," treating identical units as indistinguishable for netting, clearing, and processes. This reduces physical handling risks and costs, standardizing for most U.S. and securities. Exceptions arise with non-fungible securities, such as , which bears legends limiting transferability under securities laws, altering its liquidity and risk profile compared to unrestricted shares. Similarly, unique debt instruments with varying terms—like bonds from different issuance series or those customized with non-standard covenants—are not interchangeable, as their distinct conditions affect value and tradability.

Fungibility in Cryptocurrencies

In the context of cryptocurrencies, fungibility refers to the property where individual units of a are interchangeable and indistinguishable from one another on the , meaning one unit of , for example, holds the same value and utility as any other regardless of its transaction history. This principle ensures seamless exchange without premium or discount based on , akin to traditional , but transparency can introduce challenges by enabling of funds. Bitcoin is generally considered fungible, as all units are identical in protocol design, but risks arise from taint analysis, where forensics track coins linked to illicit activities, potentially leading to blacklisting or value devaluation. Stablecoins like () maintain fungibility through their peg to currencies, treating all tokens as equivalent representations of the underlying asset, provided reserves are uniformly backed. In contrast, privacy-focused cryptocurrencies like achieve enhanced fungibility via ring signatures, which mix a user's with decoys from the network, obscuring origins and preventing linkage that could differentiate units. , however, exhibits reduced fungibility due to its public histories, allowing detailed tracing of units and exposing them to analysis that reveals spending patterns or associations. Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) explicitly reject this property, as each represents a unique digital item, such as or collectibles, with no interchangeability between tokens. Recent regulatory developments have addressed fungibility concerns in cryptocurrencies. The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, fully applicable from December 2024, mandates assessment of fungibility for classifying assets, excluding unique non-fungible crypto-assets like NFTs from its scope while requiring fungible tokens to meet uniform standards for issuance and trading to ensure market integrity. In the United States, following the 2022 FTX collapse, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has intensified scrutiny on "tainted" cryptocurrencies associated with fraud or illicit finance, pushing for enhanced anti-money laundering measures that impact perceived unit equivalence. In 2025, the U.S. Congress passed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) in July, providing a regulatory framework for stablecoins, and the House passed the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act (Clarity Act) in July with a bipartisan Senate draft released in November, advancing oversight on crypto issuance, trading, and AML compliance to support fungible treatment of assets. Technical innovations help bolster fungibility in traceable blockchains. Mixing services, such as for , combine multiple users' transactions into a single output, breaking links to prior histories and restoring interchangeability without centralized trust. Zero-knowledge proofs, employed in cryptocurrencies like , enable verification of transaction validity while concealing details, ensuring shielded units remain fully fungible by default.

Legal and Regulatory Dimensions

Fungibility Under Law

In , the (UCC) Article 2 governs the sale of goods and explicitly addresses fungible goods in delivery contracts. Fungible goods are defined as those where any unit is equivalent to another by , usage of , or agreement, such as standardized commodities like or . Under UCC § 2-105(4), an undivided share in an identified bulk of such goods is sufficiently identified for sale, even if the exact quantity in the bulk is undetermined, allowing the buyer to acquire an interest proportional to the agreed measure (e.g., by weight or volume). This facilitates efficient transactions in interchangeable commodities, where delivery of equivalent units from the bulk satisfies the contract without needing to segregate specific items, as seen in sales of agricultural products or bulk chemicals. In securities regulation, the and the treat shares of the same class as fungible, enabling registration at the class level rather than for individual certificates or units. This fungibility simplifies trading and exemptions, as shares representing identical interests are interchangeable regardless of issuance details. For exchange-traded funds (s), the SEC's Rule 6c-11 under the , informed by the 1933 and 1934 Acts, permits generic registration for ETF shares as fungible securities, allowing creation and redemption in large blocks without separate prospectuses for each fund, provided they meet standardized conditions like and . The (IRS) treats fungible assets, such as identical shares of or units of , as for tax purposes, applying consistent rules for determining capital gains or losses upon sale or exchange. For , if multiple lots of identical shares are acquired at different times and costs, taxpayers may use specific identification to designate which shares are sold, provided adequate records exist; otherwise, the default is the first-in, first-out () method, assuming the oldest shares are disposed first. LIFO (last-in, first-out) is generally not permitted for securities like , though it may apply in limited inventory contexts unrelated to investments. For , which are often fungible like units, the IRS applies similar rules, with Notice 2014-21 confirming as subject to capital gains taxation. Revenue Ruling 2019-24 further clarified taxation of certain crypto events like hard forks, treating received units as . In 2024, Revenue Procedure 2024-28 provided transitional relief for allocation in fungible digital assets, allowing reasonable methods (e.g., specific unit or global allocation) for remaining units as of January 1, 2025, to ease compliance with upcoming broker reporting under Form 1099-DA. Key case law from the mid-20th century, particularly under wartime commodity controls and the Commodity Exchange Act, established tests for fungibility in futures trading by emphasizing interchangeability and market equivalence. In United States v. Commodities Trading Corp. (1950), the Supreme Court addressed requisitioned black pepper—a classic fungible commodity—ruling that pricing for just compensation under the Fifth Amendment should reflect average market value rather than specific acquisition costs, underscoring that units of fungible goods lack unique attributes and are valued uniformly in trading contexts. This built on earlier 1940s precedents like United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. (1940), where the Court examined manipulation schemes in fungible oil products, affirming that antitrust scrutiny applies to interchangeable commodities in interstate commerce, influencing regulatory standards for futures under the Grain Futures Act amendments. These rulings reinforced fungibility tests focusing on whether goods or contracts are substitutable without affecting economic value, guiding modern Commodity Futures Trading Commission oversight.

Fungibility in Other Jurisdictions

In the , Directive 2002/47/EC on financial arrangements establishes a harmonized regime for using fungible assets like and financial instruments in transactions, enabling close-out netting to reduce by treating equivalent assets as interchangeable. This directive defines financial to include assets that can be substituted without altering their value, ensuring enforceability across borders even in proceedings. As of 2025, the (MiCA) Regulation further harmonizes the treatment of fungible cryptoassets as and financial instruments across member states. Belgium's legal framework, rooted in and the reformed ( on property rights, effective from 2021), classifies artworks as non-fungible due to their unique characteristics, distinguishing them from interchangeable goods in contractual and property disputes. Under these principles, artworks cannot be substituted equivalently in obligations, emphasizing their individuality over generic replaceability. In the , the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (FSMA 2023) amended existing legislation to expand regulatory oversight of , enabling provisions that address fungibility in cryptoassets under the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) . As of 2025, fungible tokens like qualifying stablecoins are subject to stricter rules as regulated financial instruments, while non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are generally exempt from promotion regulations due to their unique nature, unless they confer rights akin to securities. China's regulatory approach, through the 2021 Notice on Further Preventing and Disposing of Risks in Virtual Currency Trading issued by the and other agencies, effectively bans activities involving fungible digital currencies such as by prohibiting financial institutions from facilitating their trading or services, aiming to safeguard ; non-fungible tokens, however, face separate guidelines focusing on content compliance rather than outright prohibition. International standards for , developed by UNCITRAL, promote fungibility in commercial transactions through instruments like the on Contracts for the Sale of (CISG), which provides uniform rules for contracts involving interchangeable , facilitating cross-border exchanges by treating identical items as substitutable without need for specific identification. Comparatively, jurisdictions like rely on statutory and doctrinal definitions in the , where choses fongibles are understood as those replaceable by equivalents of the same kind, quantity, and quality, to determine legal treatment in contracts and obligations, contrasting with systems' case-based evolution of fungibility through judicial precedents assessing interchangeability contextually. Emerging issues include India's tax regime under the 2022, which imposes a 30% on gains from virtual digital assets (VDAs) and requires 1% TDS on transfers exceeding thresholds, with 2024 updates to reporting rules under the Act enhancing scrutiny of fungibility for anti- (AML) compliance via the Prevention of Money Laundering Act's inclusion of VDAs as reportable property.

Relationships to Related Economic Concepts

Fungibility and Liquidity

Fungible assets exhibit higher compared to non-fungible ones primarily because their interchangeability reduces search costs for buyers and sellers, allowing trades to occur more readily without the need to match specific units. This enables trading, where participants can units without identifying or negotiating over unique characteristics, thereby streamlining processes and concentrating trading activity. For instance, functions as a highly liquid medium because any bill is equivalent and can be traded instantly, whereas unique bonds with idiosyncratic terms, such as certain municipal securities, require more effort to and transfer, diminishing their liquidity. In economic theory, particularly within models, fungibility contributes to narrower bid-ask spreads by fostering deeper order books and higher trading s, as standardized assets attract more participants and reduce inventory risks for market makers. The Amihud illiquidity measure, defined as the average ratio of absolute daily return to trading , further illustrates this relationship; fungible assets typically show lower values of this measure due to their association with elevated volumes, while non-fungible assets exhibit higher illiquidity as their uniqueness limits exchangeability and volume. Fungible commodities, such as or , exemplify this in spot markets, where high standardization supports rapid, high- trading on exchanges like the , enhancing overall . In contrast, non-fungible assets like demand intermediaries such as brokers for matching parties and appraisals for valuation, which introduce delays and costs that erode . Despite these advantages, fungibility does not ensure liquidity under all conditions, as external factors like or market stress can override it. During the , mortgage-backed securities (), which are generally fungible due to their pooled and standardized nature, experienced a severe liquidity freeze as uncertainty about underlying asset quality led to widened spreads and halted trading, demonstrating that perceived homogeneity alone cannot sustain liquidity amid systemic shocks.

Fungibility Versus Interchangeability

Interchangeability refers to the broader concept of substitutability between goods or assets in practical use, where one item can replace another without necessarily preserving exact equivalence in value or quality. For example, in a recipe calling for oranges, apples might serve as an interchangeable substitute due to their shared role as fruits, though the flavor profile differs. In contrast, fungibility denotes perfect equivalence, where individual units of a good or asset are indistinguishable and interchangeable on a one-for-one basis without any loss of economic value or utility. This strict form applies to items like units of the same currency or standardized commodities, ensuring seamless exchange in transactions. Fungibility and interchangeability exist on a rather than as binary categories, reflecting degrees of substitutability based on homogeneity and perceived similarity. Fully fungible , such as gallons of the same grade of , allow for complete since each unit delivers identical performance and value. Partially interchangeable , like similar models differing only in minor features such as color or , permit substitution but often require adjustments or incur slight value discrepancies due to those variations. This gradation arises from underlying attributes, including physical and market standards, influencing how readily items can be swapped in economic contexts. In economic utility theory, fungible items are defined by their identical marginal utilities, meaning each additional unit provides the same incremental satisfaction to the consumer, facilitating efficient allocation and trade. This uniformity underpins models of where budget constraints treat such units equivalently. However, empirical studies in , such as analyses of responses to commodity price shocks, have found violations of fungibility, where consumers exhibit non-equivalent behaviors to changes versus adjustments due to or salience effects. By contrast, Veblen goods derive added value from their uniqueness and exclusivity, often through that signals status, resulting in demand that rises with rather than diminishing . Such non-fungible characteristics, exemplified by unique non-fungible tokens (NFTs) like , emphasize individuality over interchangeability, inverting standard utility dynamics. Misclassifying the level of fungibility can lead to inefficient contractual arrangements, as remedies and obligations must align with the asset's substitutability. For non-fungible goods, such as unique or artwork, courts typically require to enforce delivery of the exact item, since monetary fail to replicate its irreplaceable value. Treating such assets as fungible might default to , resulting in undercompensation and distorted incentives for parties, whereas over-specifying terms for fully fungible items unnecessarily complicates agreements and raises transaction costs. This distinction ensures contracts reflect true economic equivalence, avoiding inefficiencies in fulfillment and .

Extended Uses Beyond Economics

Fungibility in Computing and Task Management

In computing and task management, fungibility refers to the interchangeability of tasks or resources, allowing systems to treat them as equivalent units for efficient allocation and execution, analogous to economic principles where identical items can be substituted without loss of value. This concept enables optimization in dynamic environments by facilitating seamless or redistribution. In , fungible resources underpin scalable infrastructure by providing identical, on-demand units that can be provisioned interchangeably. (AWS), for example, deploys virtual machines (VMs) as homogeneous instances within Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2), where each VM offers equivalent compute, memory, and storage capabilities, allowing users to scale applications by swapping or replicating them without differentiation. This approach supports load balancing, where incoming tasks—such as web requests or jobs—are distributed across these fungible VMs to maintain and , using algorithms that route traffic to underutilized nodes seamlessly. Research on highlights how treating cloud resources as fungible enables efficient oversubscription, where multiple VMs share underlying hardware dynamically, optimizing costs and throughput in large-scale deployments. Scheduling algorithms in further leverage fungibility by modeling jobs as interchangeable units to minimize completion times and resource idle periods. In systems like clusters, these algorithms—such as those for workloads—treat identical tasks (e.g., matrix multiplications) as fungible, enabling parallel execution across processors where any job can be assigned to any available without dependencies. Seminal work on fungible scheduling demonstrates that this interchangeability reduces scheduling overhead by up to 30% in heterogeneous environments, using optimization techniques like to allocate resources proportionally based on demand forecasts. For example, in distributed systems, jobs are queued and dispatched as fungible batches, allowing preemptible reassignment if higher-priority tasks arise, which is critical for balancing throughput in multi-tenant setups. A prominent example of fungible units in modern is , where pods serve as the basic deployable entities for scaling applications. Pods created by controllers like ReplicationControllers or Deployments are designed to be fungible and semantically identical, meaning multiple instances can run the same containerized workload interchangeably to handle varying loads. This fungibility supports horizontal scaling: when demand increases, additional pods are spun up and load-balanced across nodes, with the system treating them as equivalents for and elasticity. In contrast, non-fungible tasks—such as those involving unique (e.g., stateful database migrations requiring specific )—cannot be swapped freely, as they depend on persistent state or specialized resources, necessitating custom scheduling to avoid errors or . This distinction underscores fungibility's role in enabling stateless, scalable architectures while highlighting limitations in stateful computing scenarios.

Fungibility in Quantum Physics

In , the indistinguishability of identical particles—analogous to fungibility—means that exchanging any two such particles does not alter the overall of the system. This indistinguishability arises from the particles sharing identical intrinsic properties, such as , charge, and , and is enforced by the symmetrization postulate, which requires the total to be either symmetric or antisymmetric under particle exchange. For example, electrons, which are fermions, exhibit this indistinguishability in multi-particle systems where their wave functions overlap, leading to collective behaviors governed by quantum statistics rather than classical distinguishability. The historical development of this framework began with the introduction of Bose-Einstein statistics in 1924, when proposed a quantum treatment of photons, treating them as indistinguishable entities, and extended it to massive particles, predicting phenomena like . This contrasted sharply with , where particles are treated as distinguishable, allowing for permutations in statistical counting. In 1926, and independently developed Fermi-Dirac statistics for particles with half-integer spin, incorporating antisymmetry to account for their indistinguishability. Bosons, such as photons, follow Bose-Einstein statistics with symmetric wave functions, allowing multiple particles to occupy the same quantum state and thus behaving as fully indistinguishable in symmetric configurations. Fermions, like protons and electrons, obey Fermi-Dirac statistics with antisymmetric wave functions, enforcing the Pauli exclusion principle that prohibits double occupancy of quantum states, yet they remain indistinguishable within this antisymmetric framework. These distinctions underpin key quantum phenomena: in superconductivity, paired electrons (Cooper pairs) act as composite bosons, enabling indistinguishable, zero-resistance flow due to their effective indistinguishability and attraction mediated by lattice vibrations. Similarly, Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) emerge when bosons cool to near absolute zero, forming a macroscopic quantum state where atoms behave as a single, indistinguishable entity; experiments in May 2025 with ultracold sodium atoms in hybrid traps achieved efficient BEC production, advancing studies of quantum coherence.

References

  1. [1]
    Understanding Fungibility in Finance and Its Importance - Investopedia
    Fungibility refers to the ability of assets to be interchangeably used, simplifying trade and exchange. Examples include money and commodities like corn, ...Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  2. [2]
    FUNGIBLE - The Law Dictionary
    Recognized as being uniform, exchangeable, and a worthwhile substitute. Applies in the economy as cash for cash, corn for corn, and gold for gold.
  3. [3]
    Fungibility Definition | Legal Glossary - LexisNexis
    Nuclear materials are considered fungible on the basis they are mutually interchangeable.
  4. [4]
    Fungible Goods or Materials: Legal Definition Explained
    Common examples include commodities like oil, grain, and currency, where one unit is equivalent to another of the same type. Table of content. Legal use & ...
  5. [5]
    FTA Provisions for Fungible Goods - International Trade Administration
    Fungible goods or materials refers to goods or materials that are interchangeable for commercial purposes and whose properties are essentially identical.<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    FUNGIBILITY AND CONSUMER CHOICE: EVIDENCE FROM ... - NIH
    Abstract. We formulate a test of the fungibility of money based on parallel shifts in the prices of different quality grades of a commodity.
  7. [7]
    FUNGIBLE Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    Sep 16, 2025 · In broader use, fungible can mean “interchangeable,” or sometimes “readily changeable to adapt to new situations.” Synonyms of fungible.
  8. [8]
    Fungibility, Labels, and Consumption | IZA
    Fungibility of money is a central principle in economics. It implies that any unit of money is substitutable for another and that the composition of income ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  9. [9]
    Fungible - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from Medieval Latin fungibilis (Latin fungi "perform"), this word means capable of being used or replaced in place of another.
  10. [10]
    fungibility, n. meanings, etymology and more
    The earliest known use of the noun fungibility is in the 1870s. OED's earliest evidence for fungibility is from 1873, in Dublin Review. Nearby entries. fungal, ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    fungible, adj. & n. meanings, etymology and more | Oxford English ...
    Originally Scottish. An item that can be replaced by another identical item; a fungible item. 1681. A Fungible is that which is estimate according to the ...
  12. [12]
    What Are Fungible Goods? Meaning, Examples, and How to Trade
    Fungible goods are interchangeable items and identical to each other for practical purposes, such as commodities, common shares, and dollar bills.
  13. [13]
    Why is market power presumably high when goods are fungible and ...
    Sep 26, 2015 · "Fungibility", when referring to goods, essentially means homogeneity -all units of the good are exactly the same from all aspects that ...
  14. [14]
    Infographic: The Properties of Money
    Divisible: Can be divided into smaller units of value. · Fungible: One unit is viewed as interchangeable with another. · Portable: Individuals can carry money ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] A PRACTICAL THEORY OF FUNGIBILITY Shorish, Jamsheed
    May 27, 2021 · from the Latin meaning ”to perform”. Cash dollars are usually regarded as interchangeable because we care about their function in getting us ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] The Successes and Failures of Commodity Exchanges Author
    Second, they adopt standardized grading systems for commodities. These systems eliminate the need for repeated measurement at each trade and transform commodity ...
  17. [17]
    how Platts AGS brings fungibility to the US crude export market
    Sep 15, 2020 · By setting standards that ensure that the quality of the barrel in the AGS assessment falls within defined parameters that reflect Midland-grade ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Grain Quality U.S. Grades and Standards
    These grain standards are designed to ensure that the processes and procedures for assessing weights and quality grades result in a uniform product that.
  19. [19]
    5. London Good Delivery – Gold and Silver - LBMA
    Only gold and silver bars that meet the LBMA's Good Delivery standards are acceptable in settlement of a Loco London contract. The LBMA benchmarks and regulates ...Lbma Physical Committee · Gold Bars · Silver Bars<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Crude Oil Is Not Fungible, Where It Comes from Does Matter, and ...
    Jun 13, 2012 · '' They often repeat phrases such as ''oil always moves to the highest bidder,'' or ''oil is fungible and where it comes from does not matter. ...Missing: grades | Show results with:grades
  21. [21]
    'Wine Is Not Fungible': How an Alum's Firm Made Global Headlines
    Jun 4, 2025 · Wine is not fungible. You can move a chip factory to Michigan, but you can't make Champagne in the Napa Valley. Wines—especially the kind we're ...Missing: commodity | Show results with:commodity<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Cryptocurrencies and Crypto Assets: Avoid the Hype, Get the Facts
    Fiat: Fiat just means government-backed money, like the U.S. dollar or the Euro. Mining: Mining is the process by which computers compete to verify the ...
  23. [23]
    https://www.gold.org/history-gold/the-classical-gold-standard
  24. [24]
    What is the Gold Standard System?
    The Gold Standard was a system where countries fixed currency values to gold, with currencies freely convertible into gold at a fixed price.
  25. [25]
    Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary - SEC.gov
    [S]hares of stock (as distinguished from certificates evidencing the shares) are considered fungible in that each share represents the same economic interest in ...
  26. [26]
    Bearer Instrument: What it is, How it Works - Investopedia
    A bearer instrument, or bearer bond, is a type of fixed-income security in which no ownership information is recorded and the security is issued in physical ...
  27. [27]
    Key legal issues in English law in debt capital markets—fungibility
    Jul 1, 2025 · Debt securities and other assets are fungible if they are substantially indistinguishable from one another and are interchangeable for trading purposes.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] DEMYSTIFYING DTC: THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY AND ...
    DTC, as a “securities intermediary,” holds its deposited securities in “fungible bulk” meaning that there are no specifically identifiable securities directly ...
  29. [29]
    Securities Transaction Settlement Cycle - Federal Register
    Mar 29, 2017 · DTC serves as the CSD and securities settlement system for most equity securities and a significant number of debt securities held by U.S. ...
  30. [30]
    What Are NFTs and How Do They Work? - CoinDesk
    Mar 24, 2022 · By definition, fungible tokens are those that can be mutually exchanged for another token like-for-like. For example, Bob can swap his one ...
  31. [31]
    Bitcoin Fungibility, Mixing And The Legal Limits On Maintaining ...
    Mar 17, 2020 · Blockchain forensic analysis can include the collection of large amounts of personal information about a user's spending habits, total holdings, ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Central bank money as a catalyst for fungibility: the case of stablecoins
    Fungibility in means of payments is predominantly safeguarded through the introducon of central bank money as a quasi-ulmate selement medium to ensure that the ...
  33. [33]
    Monero Research Lab (MRL)
    Abstract: Ring signatures are a common construction used to provide signer ambiguity among a non-interactive set of public keys specified at the time of signing ...
  34. [34]
    Towards Measuring the Traceability of Cryptocurrencies - IEEE Xplore
    The public ledger ensures transparency, which enables public verifiability but harms untraceability, fungibility, and anonymity.
  35. [35]
    Non-Fungible Token (NFT): What It Means and How It Works
    Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are assets like artworks, digital content, or videos that have been tokenized via a blockchain.
  36. [36]
    Regulation - 2023/1114 - EN - EUR-Lex
    Summary of each segment:
  37. [37]
    The cryptocurrency industry wants to put Sam Bankman-Fried ... - NPR
    Nov 11, 2023 · "I think the FTX debacle tainted and diminished the cryptocurrency industry." FTX's implosion and Bankman-Fried's subsequent downfall ...
  38. [38]
    Coinjoin: What It Is, How It Works, and Privacy Considerations
    Jul 21, 2024 · CoinJoin is a cryptocurrency mixing service that scrambles transactions and signatures into other transactions. It is designed to enhance ...
  39. [39]
    What is Zcash (ZEC)? The Privacy Coin Using Zero-Knowledge Proofs
    Oct 7, 2025 · It is a fungible cryptocurrency when coins are fully shielded, meaning tokens in the private pool are not linked to transaction history.
  40. [40]
    § 1-201. General Definitions.
    ### Definition of "Fungible Goods" from UCC § 1-201
  41. [41]
    2-105. Definitions: Transferability; "Goods"; "Future" Goods; "Lot"
    (4) An undivided share in an identified bulk of fungible goods is sufficiently identified to be sold although the quantity of the bulk is not determined. Any ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Exchange-Traded Funds (Conformed to Federal Register version)
    Sep 25, 2019 · FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, SECURITIES. EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940,. INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF ...Missing: fungible | Show results with:fungible
  43. [43]
    Publication 550 (2024), Investment Income and Expenses | Internal Revenue Service
    Summary of each segment:
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Gross income. (Also §§ 61, 451, 1011.) Rev. Rul. 2019-24 ... - IRS
    (2) A taxpayer has gross income, ordinary in character, under § 61 as a result of an airdrop of a new cryptocurrency following a hard fork if the taxpayer ...Missing: fungibility 2024
  45. [45]
    None
    ### Key Points from Rev. Proc. 2024-28 on Digital Assets Cost Basis
  46. [46]
    United States v. Commodities Trading Corp. | 339 U.S. 121 (1950)
    United States v. Commodities Trading Corp. No. 156 Argued January 10-11, 1950 Decided March 27, 1950
  47. [47]
    United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., Inc. | 310 U.S. 150 (1940)
    (10) A conspiracy to fix prices violates § 1 of the Act though no overt act is shown, though it is not established that the conspirators had the means available ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Directive - 2002/47 - EN - EUR-Lex
    ### Summary of Fungible Assets and Netting in Directive 2002/47/EC
  49. [49]
    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/310/150/
  50. [50]
    China's top regulators ban crypto trading and mining, sending ...
    Sep 24, 2021 · It also barred financial institutions, payment companies and internet firms from facilitating cryptocurrency trading nationally.Missing: fungible | Show results with:fungible
  51. [51]
    Understanding India's Crypto Regulations in 2024 - FinTax
    May 20, 2025 · The 30% crypto tax applies in the following cases: Selling cryptocurrency in exchange for Indian rupees or other legal tender; Conducting crypto ...Missing: regime fungibility
  52. [52]
    None
    Below is a merged response that consolidates all the information from the provided summaries into a single, comprehensive overview. To maximize detail and clarity, I’ve organized the content into a table format, which is presented as a CSV-style representation for density and ease of understanding. Following the table, I’ll provide a narrative summary to tie everything together, ensuring all details are retained.
  53. [53]
    The behavior and determinants of illiquidity in the non-fungible ...
    We provide the first study of time-varying and cross-sectional properties of liquidity in the nascent and rapidly growing non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace.
  54. [54]
    The ten most traded global commodities - FOREX.com
    Commodities are considered fungible, meaning any commodity is interchangeable with any other commodity of the same type as long as they maintain the ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Mortgage-Backed Securities and the Financial Crisis of 2008
    We examine the payoff performance, up to the end of 2013, of non-agency residential mortgage- backed securities (RMBS), issued up to 2008.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] A PRACTICAL THEORY OF FUNGIBILITY - WU Research
    May 27, 2021 · Abstract. We formalize 'degrees of fungibility' by differentiating goods according to both their underlying attributes and the perceived ...
  57. [57]
    "Working Paper No. 56, Towards a Veblenian View of Non-Fungible ...
    Mar 17, 2022 · This inquiry seeks to establish that ideas advanced by Thorstein Veblen in his book, The Theory of the Leisure Class [1899], offer insights into nonfungible ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Chicago Unbound Remedies
    allow specific performance when the contract's subject matter is a unique, rather than fungible, good. He suggested that with unique goods, far more so than ...
  59. [59]
    NATO After Next: From Interoperability to Fungibility
    Jul 30, 2024 · Modern credibility rests on fielding interoperable and fungible forces that can pivot between missions and enable more dynamic task organization ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] force xxi operations - DTIC
    Aug 1, 1994 · It describes, in general terms, how the Army will operate in the future to accomplish missions in operations where control on land is essential ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Evolution of Army Doctrine for Success in the 21st Century
    Mar 2, 2012 · The central idea of unified land operations is rooted in AirLand Battle doctrine and retains many of the key full spectrum operations ideas ...Missing: fungible research
  62. [62]
    What is a Virtual Machine? - Amazon AWS
    A virtual machine (VM) is a digital version of a physical machine that functions as an isolated system with its own virtualized hardware resources and ...
  63. [63]
    The Evolution of High Performance Computing: Architectures and ...
    May 25, 2016 · Having access to modular, fungible resources as a set of building blocks that can be configured and reconfigured as-needed is crucial for this ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Allocation of Fungible Resources via a Fast, Scalable Price ...
    Apr 20, 2021 · We consider the problem of allocating fungible resources to a set of jobs. The goal is to maximize a concave utility function of the ...
  65. [65]
    Integrated and Fungible Scheduling of Deep Learning Workloads ...
    Fungible Scheduling Algorithms. To cope with the inaccuracy of estimated or predicted resource demands, fungible resource allocation based works are proposed ...
  66. [66]
    ReplicationController - Kubernetes
    Mar 14, 2024 · Pods created by a ReplicationController are intended to be fungible and semantically identical, though their configurations may become ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Indistinguishable Particles in Quantum Mechanics - arXiv
    a purely quantum effect — and must now obey the Symmetrization Pos- tulate: there are symmetry ...
  68. [68]
    As the world looks for quantum solutions, Bose statistics turns 100
    Feb 9, 2024 · Interactions between Bose and Einstein resulted in a new statistical tool, the Bose-Einstein statistics, introduced for photons in 1924 by Bose ...
  69. [69]
    Indistinguishable elements in the origins of quantum statistics. The ...
    Jan 5, 2022 · In this paper, we deal with the historical origins of Fermi–Dirac statistics, focusing on the contribution by Enrico Fermi of 1926. We argue ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Chapter 10: Superconductivity
    Apr 26, 2017 · Further- more they tend to pair in a zero center of mass (cm) state so that the two electrons can chase each other around the lattice. 3.2 ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Efficient production of sodium Bose-Einstein condensates in ... - arXiv
    May 27, 2025 · We describe an apparatus that efficiently produces 23Na Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) in a hybrid trap.