Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

MSCI

MSCI Inc. is an American financial services company that develops and calculates a wide range of indices, including equity, fixed income, and multi-asset class benchmarks, alongside risk and performance analytics and research tools. Headquartered at in , the firm serves the global community by providing data and solutions used to benchmark trillions of dollars in assets. Originally founded in 1969 as a division of Capital International and later known as Capital International, MSCI became an independent in through a from . The company now calculates over 246,000 indices daily, with approximately $18.3 trillion in assets benchmarked to its equity indices alone, making its products essential standards for institutional investors tracking global market performance. MSCI's indices, such as the Index which covers large- and mid-cap stocks across 23 developed markets, have achieved widespread adoption as performance yardsticks, influencing exchange-traded funds, mutual funds, and pension allocations worldwide. However, the firm has faced notable controversies, particularly around its ratings, with accusations of methodological biases—including penalties on companies for operations linked to —leading to investigations by attorneys general from 18 U.S. states and calls for federal scrutiny over potential alignment with movements.

History

Origins as Capital International (1965–1985)

Capital International was established in 1965 by associates of in , , as part of the firm's expansion into global investment management. , founded in 1931 by Jonathan Bell Lovelace, had begun internationalizing its operations in the early with the opening of its first European office in , driven by trends in global economic integration and the need for reliable in non-U.S. markets. The initiative addressed a critical gap for U.S. investors: the absence of standardized benchmarks to evaluate , enabling Capital Group's portfolio managers to assess global allocations empirically rather than through anecdotal or domestic proxies. The core output of Capital International was a series of pioneering equity indices launched starting in 1969, which tracked market capitalization-weighted performance across markets excluding the U.S. These indices prioritized empirical on constituent companies' market caps, , and trading accessibility, constructing investable universes that approximated real-world exposure rather than theoretical totals. Unlike prior domestic-focused benchmarks, they incorporated causal considerations such as minimum size thresholds and sufficient free-float shares to ensure representation of liquid, accessible securities, thereby avoiding distortions from illiquid or government-held holdings. Initially serving as an internal tool for Capital Group's global funds, the indices quickly gained external recognition for their rigor in mirroring diversified portfolios. Through the 1970s and early 1980s, Capital International expanded its index coverage to include regional benchmarks for , , and emerging areas, while refining methodologies to incorporate updated on and capital flow reductions post-Bretton Woods collapse. By 1985, these indices had become standards for institutional investors seeking to quantify non-U.S. returns, with over 20 years of historical supporting long-term analysis free from politically driven exclusions or biases toward specific ideologies. The focus remained on transparent, data-driven construction, emphasizing verifiable market facts over subjective adjustments.

Integration with Morgan Stanley and Index Launch (1986–2006)

In 1986, acquired licensing rights and a significant stake in International's index operations, rebranding the entity as Morgan Stanley International (MSCI). This integration provided with control over a suite of equity benchmarks originally developed by International since the 1960s, enabling enhanced distribution through its global network. The move aligned with growing demand for standardized, investable indices amid expanding cross-border flows in the 1980s. Under MSCI branding, the flagship MSCI World Index was formally launched on March 31, 1986, capturing large- and mid-cap stocks across 23 developed markets with free-float-adjusted market capitalization weighting to reflect investable opportunity sets based on empirical market data. Concurrently, the MSCI EAFE Index—covering Europe, Australasia, and the Far East excluding the U.S. and Canada—was introduced on the same date, providing a benchmark for non-U.S. developed market performance and quickly becoming a staple for international portfolio allocation. These indices emphasized verifiable pricing and capitalization data sourced from stock exchanges and custodians, prioritizing causal representation of market realities over subjective adjustments. Expansion continued with the launch of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index on December 31, 1987, incorporating free-float-adjusted market cap weighting for approximately 85% of adjusted market capitalization in 24 emerging economies by later standards, driven by investor interest in high-growth regions. This period saw methodological refinements, including quarterly rebalancing and sector classifications grounded in Global Industry Classification Standards (GICS) co-developed with , ensuring transparency and replicability without non-market overlays. Early collaborations with data providers and exchanges enhanced accuracy, positioning MSCI as a dominant provider of equity benchmarks by the early . Initial forays into indices occurred in the late 1990s and early 2000s, with MSCI developing and aggregate benchmarks weighted by market value to address demand for diversified measurement, though remained the core focus. By 2006, MSCI's indices underpinned trillions in assets under , reflecting their evolution from niche tools to essential references for global investment strategies rooted in observable dynamics.

IPO, Independence, and Expansion (2007–Present)

In November 2007, MSCI completed its following a from , marking the first instance of an index provider operating as a standalone public company. The IPO, priced at $18 per share, involved the sale of 14 million shares and raised $252 million, with trading commencing on the under the MXB on November 15. This separation allowed MSCI to prioritize index licensing revenue from asset managers and institutional investors, insulated from Morgan Stanley's broader activities and potential conflicts. Post-IPO, MSCI expanded operations amid rising demand for passive investment vehicles like ETFs, which increasingly benchmarked against its indexes. The company's equity indexes now underpin $18.3 trillion in , reflecting organic growth in coverage across developed, emerging, and . This scaling relied on licensing fees tied to assets tracking MSCI benchmarks, fostering a centered on transparent, rules-based indexing rather than subjective advisory services. and earnings have compounded at annual rates of approximately 15% and 22%, respectively, since the IPO, driven by broader adoption of standardized global benchmarks. MSCI further diversified by enhancing its offerings, which originated from pre-IPO acquisitions but saw significant post-2007 development to include advanced risk and portfolio management tools. This expansion supported institutional clients' needs for data-driven , complementing core indexing without overlapping into methodology-specific applications. Overall, facilitated strategic investments in global infrastructure, enabling MSCI to serve a growing focused on efficient, scalable investment tracking.

Corporate Structure and Operations

Organizational Overview

MSCI Inc. is headquartered at , 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, , New York 10007. The company operates with a global footprint, maintaining offices in major financial centers across more than 30 countries, including locations in the , , Asia-Pacific, Africa, and the Middle East. As of June 30, 2025, MSCI employed 6,208 individuals, with approximately 29.6% in developed markets outside the U.S. and 70.4% in emerging markets and the U.S. Leadership is headed by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Henry A. Fernandez, who has held the CEO position since 1998 and assumed the chairman role in 2007, guiding the firm's expansion in financial data and analytics through strategic focus on market needs. The board of directors comprises 13 members, including lead independent director Robert Ashe, tasked with oversight of operations and to align with shareholder interests. MSCI's revenue structure emphasizes recurring subscriptions and asset-based fees, with the Index segment—encompassing licensing of and other —contributing the largest share, exceeding 50% in recent years, supplemented by platforms and ESG data services. For the full year 2024, total operating revenues reached approximately $2.9 billion, reflecting growth driven by these core streams.

Key Acquisitions and Collaborations

In 2010, MSCI acquired Group, Inc. for approximately $1.55 billion in a cash-and-stock transaction, enhancing its and portfolio management capabilities by integrating RiskMetrics' ISS governance data and tools into MSCI's and offerings. The deal, completed on June 1, 2010, was financed through existing cash, debt proceeds, and issuance, aiming to provide clients with comprehensive empirical grounded in rather than subjective overlays. MSCI expanded its ESG research in 2014 by acquiring GMI Ratings for $15 million in cash, incorporating GMI's and datasets to bolster of corporate controversies and board structures without initially prioritizing non-financial criteria. This move supported MSCI's empirical approach to integrating verifiable corporate data into investment tools, though subsequent developments faced scrutiny for potential subjectivity. To strengthen real estate and private asset data, MSCI completed the $950 million cash acquisition of Real Capital Analytics (RCA) in September 2021, gaining access to RCA's database covering over $20 trillion in global property transactions for improved market transparency and risk modeling based on transactional evidence. The acquisition aligned with MSCI's strategy to enhance empirical private market insights, facilitating better benchmarking against public indices using historical deal data. MSCI has pursued collaborations with data providers to refine through and specialized inputs, such as partnerships with QuantCube for economic nowcasting and MKT MediaStats for sensitivity metrics in thematic indices. In 2024, MSCI partnered with Moody's to datasets, including access to Moody's Orbis firmographic on over 500 million companies, to expand private company coverage and risk analytics rooted in verifiable firm-level . These alliances prioritize causal linkages from and economic signals over normative adjustments, though critics note risks of silos influencing neutrality.

Products and Services

Equity and Fixed Income Indices

MSCI's index family centers on capitalization-weighted benchmarks that prioritize investability through and free float adjustments, providing representation of large- and mid-cap segments across global markets. The Index, a core developed markets , tracks approximately 1,320 constituents from 23 countries, capturing 85% of each market's free float-adjusted to reflect broad economic exposure while ensuring replicability for passive strategies. Complementing this, the MSCI All Country World (ACWI) integrates developed and coverage, including large- and mid-cap stocks from 23 developed and 24 emerging economies, thereby representing roughly 85% of the global investable equity universe with around 2,900 holdings. MSCI's emerging markets indices, such as the MSCI , similarly target these capitalization tiers in higher-growth economies, applying screens for trading volume and accessibility to facilitate benchmarking for regional allocations without favoring specific sectors or themes in core designs. In , MSCI's offerings focus on government and segments, constructed to mirror investable markets via criteria emphasizing issuance size, , and maturity distribution rather than non-financial attributes. The MSCI Indexes track eligible securities from government-related issuers across global jurisdictions, providing performance measures for and quasi-sovereign with adjustments for . The MSCI Indexes, meanwhile, developed market corporate issuances, selecting bonds based on credit ratings, outstanding amounts, and trading activity to support investment-grade and high-yield tracking. These indices collectively benchmark over $17 trillion in assets as of mid-2025, directing substantial flows into ETFs, mutual funds, and institutional mandates by serving as neutral references for returns.

ESG Research and Ratings

MSCI ESG Ratings evaluate companies' management of industry-specific risks using a scale from (leader) to (laggard), relative to sector peers. The framework assesses exposure across 37 key issues grouped into three pillars——and ten themes, with scores derived from a company's policies, practices, and outcomes. Data inputs primarily draw from public sources, including company disclosures, sustainability reports, regulatory filings, and coverage for controversy tracking. Controversies are scored separately on a 0-10 scale, factoring in severity, scale of impact, and company involvement, with deductions applied to overall ratings for unresolved issues. These ratings inform the construction of sustainable indices, such as the MSCI ESG Leaders Indexes, which select companies with the highest scores within each sector of a parent index, aiming for representation without sector biases. For instance, the MSCI ESG Leaders Index targets firms demonstrating superior ESG management, often excluding or overweighting laggards to tilt toward higher-rated constituents. Indices like the MSCI Extended ESG Leaders Index extend this approach to provide broader exposure to high-ESG-rated large- and mid-cap U.S. equities. MSCI offers subscription-based ESG research services delivering granular data, including pillar-level scores, key issue breakdowns, and controversy alerts, integrated into investor platforms for . These tools enable clients to assess ESG exposures at the company, sector, or level, with annual subscriptions providing access to updated datasets and analytical reports. MSCI's internal analyses, covering data from approximately 2007 to 2024, indicate that firms with top-quintile ESG ratings exhibited greater earnings stability and outperformance relative to lower-rated peers, attributed to resilience against ESG-related disruptions.

Analytics and Risk Management Tools

MSCI's Barra risk models utilize multi-factor decomposition to quantify and forecast portfolio risk by breaking down into sensitivities to predefined factors such as industry sectors, style characteristics (e.g., , , ), and country-specific exposures. These models, developed from empirical spanning decades, enable precise prediction of risk contributions at both asset and portfolio levels across equities, , and . By incorporating macroeconomic variables like interest rates and through factor loadings derived from historical regressions, the models emphasize observable causal drivers of returns rather than mere correlations, aiding investors in and scenario analysis. In addition to core Barra models, MSCI offers integrated analytics platforms like RiskManager, which provide institutional clients with tools for multi-asset class simulations, , and risk decomposition without rendering investment recommendations. These platforms support custom workflows for modeling exposures under varying economic conditions, leveraging vast datasets to simulate outcomes based on interactions and empirical estimates. Updated periodically with fresh data—such as the Barra Equity Model (USE4) enhancements in 2011 incorporating refined estimation—these tools prioritize transparency in model assumptions and against realized market events. MSCI's analytics extend to advanced simulation capabilities, allowing users to integrate client-specific for forward-looking assessments that account for cross-asset correlations and liquidity constraints. For instance, the Integrated Model (BIM) combines equity and factors into a unified framework for holistic evaluation, grounded in statistical validation against out-of-sample to ensure robustness. This approach facilitates causal by linking factors to underlying economic mechanisms, such as how sector-specific shocks propagate through macroeconomic channels, thereby supporting -driven adjustments in asset allocation.

Methodology

Index Construction and Maintenance

MSCI indices are constructed using free float-adjusted weighting, whereby constituent securities are weighted according to the value of shares available for public trading, excluding those held by strategic investors or governments with limited . This prioritizes the investable portion of a company's , applying minimum free float thresholds—typically 15% for developed markets and 10-15% for emerging markets—to ensure eligibility and accurate representation of market opportunity. Investability screens further filter the universe by imposing requirements, such as a minimum annual traded value ratio and median daily traded value, alongside size thresholds based on full relative to the broader market. These rules-based criteria segment companies into large, mid, and within investable market universes, fostering replicability and alignment with passive investment strategies. Index maintenance involves quarterly rebalancing to reflect evolving market dynamics, during which the full investable universe is screened for compliance with eligibility rules, resulting in adjustments to weights, additions, or deletions. Additions occur when securities meet or exceed investability thresholds, often triggered by corporate actions like initial public offerings or increased free float, while deletions follow failures in screens or events such as delistings and bankruptcies. This process adheres strictly to predefined, transparent parameters derived from verifiable data, eschewing subjective judgments to minimize turnover and for users. Buffers around thresholds prevent excessive churn, with light rebalancing applied between quarters for significant events. In contrast to competitors like FTSE Russell, MSCI employs more stringent criteria for emerging market inclusion and classification, requiring higher standards of market accessibility, regulatory efficiency, and settlement practices to qualify securities as investable for international portfolios. For instance, MSCI classifies South Korea as emerging due to ongoing limitations in foreign ownership and trading mechanisms, whereas FTSE deems it developed, leading to divergent constituent lists and weights that affect investor exposure to risks like lower liquidity in frontier-like segments. This conservative approach enhances causal relevance for global allocators by filtering out less viable opportunities, though it may underrepresent total market capitalization compared to broader FTSE universes. Annual market classification reviews underpin these distinctions, evaluating over 80 countries against quantitative and qualitative metrics without ad hoc adjustments.

ESG Rating and Controversies Framework

MSCI's ESG Controversies framework assesses companies' involvement in events that may indicate unmanaged environmental, , or risks, using a 0–10 score where 0 denotes the most severe cases. Controversies are flagged through publicly reported allegations aligned with global norms, including the UN Global Compact, , ILO Conventions, and UN Guiding Principles on Business and . Assessments evaluate severity based on the nature of harm (from very serious to minimal), scale of impact (from extremely widespread to low), company role (direct or indirect), and status (ongoing or concluded), with exacerbating factors like impacts on vulnerable groups or extenuating ones such as legacy issues over 20 years old. Red flags, corresponding to a score of 0, are assigned to very severe, direct, and ongoing cases, such as major environmental violations or human rights abuses. The framework covers 28 themes across three pillars—Environmental, Social (with sub-pillars for , , and stakeholder opposition), and Governance—with the overall company controversies score determined by the lowest pillar score, reflecting the most significant unresolved issue. In the broader ESG Ratings methodology, pillar scores for , , and are derived on a 0–10 scale from exposure to industry-material key issues and management of associated risks and opportunities. Environmental and pillars aggregate weighted averages of key issue scores, while the pillar employs a deduction-based approach from a baseline of 10, incorporating controversies as deductions ranging from -0.4 for minor issues to -5.0 for very severe ones that impact management effectiveness. These pillar and key issue scores are adjusted relative to industry peers within GICS sub-industries, ensuring comparisons account for sector-specific , with drawn from company disclosures, sustainability reports, and third-party sources such as , ILO, and government databases like OSHA and . The resulting industry-adjusted scores map to letter ratings from (leaders, 8.571–10.0) to (laggards, below 1.429), with annual reviews of key issues, weights, and benchmarks to reflect evolving distributions. ESG Ratings serve as an analytical overlay for evaluating company resilience to sustainability risks, distinct from their application in index construction where they inform exclusions or tilts rather than core weightings. In response to on scoring , MSCI refined the in the , including a November update (v4.0) shifting certain pillars to absolute 0–10 scales, introducing new key issues like relations, and enhancing sourcing for climate-related financing risks across full loan books. Further adjustments in June 2022 (v4.1) removed company size influences from product safety assessments, and April 2023 (v4.2) eliminated select key issues to streamline focus, alongside annual materiality map updates for industry relevance. Controversies monitoring occurs continuously via news and reports, integrating deductions into ratings without fixed semi-annual resets for individual scores.

Controversies and Criticisms

Debates on Index Composition and Diversification

Critics have argued that the MSCI World Index's market-capitalization weighting results in excessive concentration in U.S. , which comprised approximately 70% of the index's weight as of 2024, thereby undermining claims of global diversification. This U.S. dominance, driven by the outsized of American large-cap firms, exposes investors to region-specific risks such as U.S. regulatory changes or economic slowdowns, rather than providing balanced exposure. Furthermore, the index's focus on large- and mid-cap —covering about 85% of free float-adjusted in developed markets—largely excludes small-cap companies, limiting diversification benefits from smaller firms that may offer higher growth potential but with different risk profiles. Proponents of equal-weighted alternatives contend that such indices reduce concentration risks and have historically delivered higher long-term returns through greater exposure to and factors, though often with elevated compared to cap-weighted benchmarks. Defenders of MSCI's cap-weighted emphasize its alignment with investable market representation, where larger firms inherently offer superior essential for accommodating massive institutional passive flows without significant price impact. Empirical analyses indicate that cap-weighted indices like facilitate efficient trading and lower transaction costs for large portfolios, as weights prioritize highly liquid securities, contrasting with equal-weighted approaches that amplify illiquid small-cap holdings and incur higher rebalancing expenses. This structure better mirrors real-world capital allocation, where investor capital gravitates toward established leaders, enhancing the index's utility as a for performance. A notable in composition debates occurred during the 2018 phased of A-shares into MSCI's Emerging Markets Index, where 222 large-cap A-shares were added in stages from May to August, initially at a 5% factor to balance against concerns over and foreign restrictions. Skeptics highlighted risks from state-owned enterprises' dominance and opaque practices in , arguing that partial weighting might insufficiently mitigate volatility from policy interventions or limited convertibility. MSCI's rationale prioritized gradual integration to reflect improving via programs like Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII), while empirical post-inclusion data showed low correlations of A-shares with other emerging markets, aiding overall portfolio diversification despite initial qualms.

ESG Ratings: Subjectivity, Bias, and Political Influence

MSCI's ESG ratings have faced criticism for inherent subjectivity in their scoring methodology, which relies on qualitative assessments of factors across 33 key issues weighted by perceived materiality. This approach leads to significant divergence from other rating providers, with studies showing low —often below 0.6—between MSCI scores and those from agencies like or , attributed to differences in data interpretation and pillar weighting rather than objective metrics. Critics argue this subjectivity introduces ideological preferences, such as heavier emphasis on transition risks over traditional metrics like profitability in sectors, potentially penalizing firms in fossil fuels without evidence of causal long-term harm to stakeholders. Political influences have amplified concerns over , particularly in MSCI's controversies , which assesses events like or environmental incidents using severity scales that some view as selectively applied. For instance, MSCI's lower ratings for Israel-linked companies have prompted accusations of anti-Israel double standards, leading to investigations by attorneys general from 19 U.S. states in 2024 into potential violations of anti-boycott laws. Similarly, perceived anti-fossil fuel tilts in criteria have fueled U.S. state-level pushback, with 18 states enacting restrictions on by 2024, including divestments from funds incorporating MSCI ratings due to boycotts of energy producers. These actions reflect broader skepticism that ESG frameworks, including MSCI's, embed left-leaning priorities from academic and NGO sources, which often prioritize normative goals over empirical risk assessment. Empirical evidence on the financial implications underscores these critiques, with meta-analyses of studies finding only about 39% demonstrating a significant positive between ESG ratings like MSCI's and firm performance, while others report or negative links, particularly for environmental scores. MSCI maintains its ratings are data-driven and , citing internal safeguards against and historical outperformance of high-rated firms in earnings stability. However, detractors highlight causal gaps, noting that penalizing profitable sectors like oil without proven superior alternatives risks suboptimal returns for investors, as evidenced by underperformance in ESG-heavy portfolios during energy price spikes. This has prompted calls for greater transparency in weighting and controversy scoring to mitigate unverified assumptions.

Market Power, Antitrust Concerns, and Regulatory Scrutiny

MSCI maintains a commanding presence in the index market, with $18.3 trillion in benchmarked against its indexes, supporting widespread adoption in passive investment vehicles. This dominance extends to exchange-traded funds, where over 1,400 ETFs track MSCI benchmarks, encompassing more than $2 trillion in assets as of 2025. Such scale arises from network effects, where broad investor reliance on established indices like the reinforces their utility and liquidity, enabling cost-efficient benchmarking for asset allocators. However, this market power has elicited concerns over anticompetitive dynamics in index licensing, where proprietary methodologies underpin revenue streams from fees charged to ETF issuers and other users. Licensing fees from the dominant providers—MSCI, , and —collectively generate billions annually, with estimates indicating they comprise roughly one-third of expense ratios passed to investors. Critics, including asset managers and analyses, contend these fees reflect enabled by limited in the oligopolistic structure of index provision, potentially inflating costs without commensurate in construction methods. Regulatory attention in the U.S. and has focused on these practices, with users and emerging competitors highlighting opacity and as impediments to market contestability. While formal antitrust probes targeting MSCI remain absent, broader scrutiny of licensing models questions whether protections justify pricing that may deter or alternative benchmarks. Defenders emphasize that MSCI's investments in maintenance and —sustained by licensing income—yield standardized, reliable products that lower overall passive investing frictions, though empirical assessments of pass-through and competitive pressures underscore the need for ongoing to prevent undue concentration rents.

Impact on Financial Markets

Role in Passive Investing and Asset Allocation

MSCI indices underpin a vast array of passive investment vehicles, serving as tracking benchmarks for exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and index funds offered by leading asset managers like BlackRock's series, which replicate indices such as the . As of December 31, 2024, $18.3 trillion in were benchmarked to MSCI equity indexes, with over $2 trillion specifically in ETF assets linked to these benchmarks by mid-2025. This scale directs massive capital inflows into index constituents, as passive strategies require funds to mirror MSCI's quarterly rebalances—adjusting holdings to reflect changes in weights—which often triggers synchronized buying or selling across trillions in assets, resulting in elevated trading volumes and short-term price pressures for added or deleted stocks. The widespread use of MSCI benchmarks promotes market efficiency in passive investing by enforcing disciplined, rules-based allocation that captures broad market beta with minimal deviation, thereby reducing the costs and potential errors associated with active stock selection. Yet, this passive dominance can foster during rebalances, where mechanical adjustments amplify demand imbalances and contribute to effects in over-weighted securities, potentially exacerbating or distortions in concentrated holdings. MSCI's indices thus influence by prioritizing capitalization-weighted exposure, which inherently favors larger firms and sectors, steering portfolios away from or value-oriented active bets. Globally, MSCI benchmarks guide allocation decisions for institutional investors, including sovereign wealth funds and pension plans, which benchmark significant portions of their equity portfolios against MSCI standards to achieve diversified, low-cost exposure to developed and emerging markets. Surveys of over 200 such asset owners indicate heavy reliance on these indices for , accelerating the transition from active to and embedding MSCI's methodologies into trillions in long-term capital. This integration shapes broader capital flows, as passive adherence to MSCI weights influences liquidity provision and cross-border patterns without the discretion typical of traditional active strategies.

Empirical Evidence on Index and ESG Performance

Studies tracking the Index, a market-cap-weighted of large- and mid-cap across 23 developed , have documented long-term annualized returns of approximately 8.7% in USD terms (total gross returns) from December 31, 1986, to July 31, 2025. This performance reflects positive returns in about 74% of annual periods from 1979 to 2024, with cap-weighting contributing to relative outperformance during bull markets, as larger constituents amplify gains from market leaders. However, cap-weighted structures can underperform equal-weighted alternatives in periods of , though long-term data shows limited divergence over extended horizons. Empirical analyses of MSCI ESG Ratings, spanning 2007 to 2024, indicate that top-rated firms in the and ACWI universes have exhibited greater earnings stability and revenue predictability compared to lower-rated peers, with higher scores correlating to more consistent flows. MSCI's internal reviews attribute this to fundamental advantages in , though sector-specific patterns reveal underperformance in and among high-ESG portfolios, partly due to exclusions or tilts away from carbon-intensive holdings. Critiques highlight in ESG construction, where avoidance of volatile sectors like — which have periodically outperformed amid cycles—may inflate apparent stability without isolating causal drivers. Risk-adjusted evaluations further temper claims of ESG alpha generation. While raw returns for high-MSCI ESG-rated equities have occasionally exceeded benchmarks, adjustments for factors like size, value, and momentum often reduce or eliminate excess returns, suggesting no robust of outperformance beyond conventional premia. Independent meta-analyses confirm a nonnegative but not consistently positive ESG-financial link across studies, with unproven and potential from self-selection among rated firms complicating interpretations. Analyses skeptical of normalized "sustainable" premiums argue that observed edges stem more from sector bets than intrinsic ESG factors, particularly in energy-dependent environments where exclusions correlate with opportunity costs.

Recent Developments

Post-2020 Growth and Innovations

MSCI exhibited robust revenue growth in the years following , adapting to heightened and investor demand for advanced . In the second quarter of 2025, operating revenues increased 9.1% year-over-year to $772.7 million, with at 8.3%, driven by strength in and segments. revenues rose 9.5% to $434.8 million, reflecting sustained asset under inflows and licensing demand, while the segment grew 7.1% to $177.7 million amid post-pandemic emphasis on tools. This performance underscored MSCI's resilience, as adjusted EBITDA expanded over 10% and grew nearly 15%, supported by recurring subscription stability. To address emerging risks in a shifting regulatory and environmental landscape, MSCI innovated in modeling, enhancing its Climate Risk Center with advanced analytics for pricing physical and transition risks. In February 2025, the firm partnered with to integrate expertise into climate scenario modeling, enabling more precise assessments of financial impacts from and policy changes. Complementing this, MSCI incorporated to quantify asset-level climate exposures, aiding investors in mitigating vulnerabilities not captured in traditional models. Expansion beyond public equities marked a key innovation, with MSCI developing private asset indices and factor models to support allocation in illiquid markets. The Private Asset Solutions suite includes tools for tracking and climate-aligned strategies in private and capital, responding to the sector's rapid growth. The MSCI Private Infrastructure Factor Model, released in 2025, quantifies risks across sectors like utilities and energy, facilitating benchmarking for investors navigating private markets' opacity. Notwithstanding these advancements and beats, MSCI faced skepticism, as evidenced by an 8.1% pre- decline after the Q2 2025 results, despite exceeding and expectations. This reaction highlighted investor doubts about the durability of MSCI's competitive advantages amid intensifying competition in data and analytics.

2025 Earnings and Market Trends

In the second quarter of 2025, MSCI reported operating revenues of $772.7 million, reflecting a 9.1% year-over-year increase, with organic operating revenue growth at 8.3%. Adjusted EBITDA grew by more than 10%, supported by operating leverage from higher revenues, while rose 13.8% to $303.7 million. Certain segments, such as , saw adjusted EBITDA margins expand to 35.6% from 30.0% in the prior year, driven by revenue gains despite moderated new business activity. Despite exceeding forecasts, MSCI's price declined following the Q2 release, attributed to concerns over decelerating momentum and a shifting mix with potentially lower margins. The company highlighted ongoing challenges like lower retention rates in some areas, though it emphasized product innovation and run-rate increases exceeding 10% as offsets. MSCI's 2025 investment trends analysis projected heightened U.S. policy-driven economic divergence from other major markets, influenced by electoral outcomes and fiscal measures. It also forecasted advancements and dynamics reshaping equity valuations, alongside Asia's leadership in investments amid innovation in storage, mobility, and low-carbon power. In response, MSCI prioritized recurring revenue streams for stability in varying conditions, leveraging its and platforms to adapt to these empirical shifts.

References

  1. [1]
    MSCI: Bringing clarity to investment decisions
    We offer data, analytics and technology designed to help you meet private asset, wealth management, sustainability, index and risk management goals.About Us · Contact us · Portfolio Management · Careers
  2. [2]
    Investor Relations – MSCI Inc.
    MSCI is a leading provider of critical decision support tools and services for the global investment community. With over 50 years of expertise in research, ...Events & Presentations · Annuals and Proxies · Quarterly Earnings · SEC Filings
  3. [3]
    MSCI Inc - Company Profile and News - Bloomberg Markets
    ADDRESS. 7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Fl New York, NY 10007 United States. WEBSITE. www.msci.com. NO. OF EMPLOYEES. 6208. Latest News.
  4. [4]
    MSCI Inc. (MSCI) Company Profile & Facts - Yahoo Finance
    MSCI Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides critical decision support tools and solutions for the investment community to manage investment processes ...
  5. [5]
    MSCI Indexes
    A global leader in equity indexes ; $18.3 trillion in AUM. benchmarked to MSCI equity indexes. ; 246,000+ equity indexes. calculated daily – 16,300+ in real time.Market Cap Indexes · About Us · MSCI World Index · MSCI Investor RelationsMissing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  6. [6]
    https://dcfmodeling.com/blogs/history/msci-history-mission-ownership
  7. [7]
    [PDF] the MSCI World index factsheet
    MSCI is a leading provider of critical decision support tools and services for the global investment community. With over 50 years of expertise in research, ...
  8. [8]
    MSCI's Anti-Israel ESG Ratings Merit State and Federal Investigations
    Sep 11, 2024 · The New York-based MSCI, Inc., imposed “severe controversy” environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings on two Illinois-based companies for doing ...
  9. [9]
    Southern AGs investigate investment firm MSCI over anti-Israel bias
    Mar 29, 2024 · The group of 18 is probing whether MSCI “is embracing the boycott, divestment and sanctions, or BDS, movement against Israel,” Moody announced.<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Did you know MSCI indices can trace their roots to Capital Group? In ...
    Jan 20, 2024 · In 1965, associates in Geneva created Capital International indices (now MSCI Inc.). The indices mirrored international markets and were a first of their kind.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  11. [11]
    Our History – A Legacy of Innovation and Integrity | Capital Group
    Discover the storied history of Capital Group, from its founding in 1931 to becoming a global leader in investment management. Learn how our commitment to ...
  12. [12]
    Nilly Sikorsky - Graduate Institute
    Founded in 1931, the Capital Group established a presence in Europe in the early 1960s. A founding associate of the Geneva office, Nilly Sikorsky, became a ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  13. [13]
    MSCI: Indexing the World - Quartr
    In the years that followed, Capital International rolled out indexes that covered the U.S., Europe, Asia, and Australia, along with broader global benchmarks.
  14. [14]
    [DOC] Introduction to the M.S.C.I. - NYU Stern
    The history of the MSCI Indices goes back to 1969. Capital International S.A. (CISA), an international management company fully owned by The Capital Group ...Missing: 1965 origins
  15. [15]
    Equity investing at Capital Group
    Began investing outside North America. 1958. The Capital System is established. 1965. Developed what became the MSCI indices1. 1986. Launched world's first EM ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] MSCI World Index (AUD)
    The MSCI World Index was launched on Mar 31, 1986. Data prior to the launch date is back-tested test (i.e. calculations of how the index might have performed ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] MSCI EAFE Index (USD)
    The MSCI EAFE Index was launched on Mar 31, 1986. Data prior to the launch date is back-tested test (i.e. calculations of how the index might have performed ...
  18. [18]
    MSCI World Index
    The MSCI World Index was launched on Jan. 1, 1958. Data prior to the launch date is back-tested (i.e. calculations of how the index might have performed ...
  19. [19]
    MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Index
    The MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Index was launched on Dec. 31, 1987. Data prior to the launch date is back-tested (i.e. calculations of how the index might ...
  20. [20]
    Fixed Income Indexes - MSCI
    Our Fixed Income Market Cap Weighted, Sustainability, Climate and Tradable Indexes measure a diverse range of opportunity sets across global markets.
  21. [21]
    MSCI Prices Initial Public Offering – MSCI Inc.
    MSCI's IPO was priced at $18.00 per share, with 14,000,000 shares offered, and began trading on November 15, 2007, under the symbol "MXB".
  22. [22]
    Morgan Stanley's MSCI soars in market debut | Reuters
    Nov 15, 2007 · ... spinning off, soared in its market debut on Thursday after its initial public offering priced at the top of expectations and raised $252 million
  23. [23]
    Data & Analytics | MSCI
    Access a diverse range of historical, real-time and forward-looking data covering global markets, corporate actions and financial instruments.
  24. [24]
    Investor FAQs – MSCI Inc.
    Where is MSCI's corporate headquarters? MSCI's headquarters are at the following address: 7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street 49th Floor New York, NY ...
  25. [25]
    MSCI Inc Company Profile - GlobalData
    It operates in the Americas, Asia-Pacific, Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. MSCI is headquartered in New York, the US.
  26. [26]
    MSCI Reports Financial Results for Second Quarter and Six Months ...
    Headcount: As of June 30, 2025 , we had 6,208 employees, reflecting a 2.5% increase, with 29.6% and 70.4% of employees located in developed market and emerging ...
  27. [27]
    Henry Fernandez – Management – MSCI Inc.
    Henry A. Fernandez has served as a director and Chairman of our Board since 2007 and as our CEO since 1998. He served as our President from 1998 to 2017.
  28. [28]
    Corporate Governance – MSCI Inc. - MSCI Investor Relations
    It is the duty of the Board of Directors to serve as a prudent fiduciary for shareholders and to oversee the management of the Company's business. To fulfill ...
  29. [29]
    MSCI Inc. (MSCI) Leadership & Management Team Analysis
    MSCI's CEO is Henry Fernandez, appointed in Jan 1998, has a tenure of 27.75 years. ... Henry FernandezChairman & CEO, US$15.70m. C. D. PettitPresident, US ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    MSCI Inc Revenue Breakdown - Finviz
    It operates through the following segments: Index, Analytics, ESG and Climate, and All Other-Private Assets. The Index segment focuses on the investment process ...
  31. [31]
    MSCI Completes Acquisition of RiskMetrics
    Jun 1, 2010 · The additional capital was used to fund the acquisition of RiskMetrics as well as to repay all prior outstanding terms loans of both MSCI and ...
  32. [32]
    MSCI to buy RiskMetrics for $1.55 billion - Reuters
    Mar 1, 2010 · Investment analysis firm MSCI Inc plans to buy RiskMetrics Group Inc for $1.55 billion in cash and stock to add to its financial risk management business.
  33. [33]
    MSCI to Acquire GMI Ratings - MSCI Investor Relations
    MSCI Inc. (NYSE:MSCI) announced today that it has agreed to acquire GMI Ratings, a provider of ESG (environmental, social and governance) ratings and research.Missing: 2020 | Show results with:2020
  34. [34]
    MSCI to Acquire GMI Ratings - CorpGov.net
    Jun 30, 2014 · MSCI Inc. (MSCI) announced it has agreed to acquire GMI Ratings, a provider of ESG (environmental, social and governance) ratings and ...
  35. [35]
    MSCI Completes Acquisition of Real Capital Analytics
    MSCI acquired Real Capital Analytics (RCA) to help investors manage risks and expand its real estate solutions, as the sector sees transformation.
  36. [36]
    MSCI Strengthens Private Asset Capabilities With Acquisition of ...
    Aug 2, 2021 · MSCI Strengthens Private Asset Capabilities With Acquisition of Real Capital Analytics · Reinforces commitment to improve transparency in global ...
  37. [37]
    MSCI buys real estate data provider for $950 million
    Aug 2, 2021 · Index provider and analytics firm MSCI has agreed to acquire Real Capital Analytics for $950 million in cash.
  38. [38]
    Data Partners for Thematic Indexes - MSCI
    MSCI's data partners are QuantCube, which provides real-time economic data, and MKT MediaStats, which provides stock-level inflation sensitivity data.
  39. [39]
    Moody's and MSCI Announce a Strategic Partnership to Enhance ...
    Jul 1, 2024 · MSCI will gain access to Moody's Orbis database, the world's leading source of firmographic information with data on more than 500 million ...
  40. [40]
    MSCI and Moody's Announce Strategic Partnership
    Dec 3, 2024 · The partnership aims to increase ESG transparency. Moody's will use MSCI's data, and MSCI will use Moody's Orbis database to expand private ...Missing: collaborations | Show results with:collaborations
  41. [41]
    MSCI ACWI Index
    The MSCI ACWI captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% ...
  42. [42]
    Emerging Markets Indexes - MSCI
    Leverage extensive EM experience. MSCI launched one of the first EM investable benchmark indexes, MSCI Emerging Markets Index, in 1988. Design solutions for ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] MSCI GOVERNMENT BOND INDEXES METHODOLOGY
    MSCI Government Bond Indexes are constructed to measure the performance of eligible bonds issued by government-related entities in the global fixed income ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] MSCI Corporate Bond Indexes Methodology
    The MSCI Corporate Bond Indexes1 ('the Indexes') are constructed to measure the performance of the developed market eligible corporate bond debt. The MSCI ...
  45. [45]
    Global ETF Assets Tracking MSCI Equity Indexes Exceed $2 Trillion
    Jul 16, 2025 · More than $17 trillion of assets are benchmarked against MSCI indexes, including non-ETF products, other asset classes including fixed income ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] ESG Ratings Methodology | MSCI
    However, the contribution of each Theme and Key Issue to the Pillar score is presented in the ESG. Ratings drill-down. The Governance Pillar-level deductions ...
  47. [47]
    A Beginner's Guide to ESG Rating Agencies and Methodologies
    Jan 23, 2023 · MSCI ESG Research looks at 37 key ESG issues, divided into three pillars (environmental, social, and governance) and ten themes. The data is ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] MSCI ESG Controversies and Global Norms Methodology
    MSCI ESG Controversies overview .......................................................... 5. 1. ESG controversy case assessment methodology .
  49. [49]
    [PDF] MSCI ESG Controversies and Global Norms Methodology
    MSCI ESG Controversies is designed to identify companies within the MSCI ESG. Controversies and Global Norms coverage universe that may be subject to.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] MSCI ESG Leaders Indexes Methodology
    The MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Index is constructed by targeting 50% of the free float- adjusted market capitalization within each sector of the MSCI USA ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] MSCI ESG LEADERS INDEXES
    The MSCI ESG Leaders Indexes target companies that have the highest environmental, social and governance (ESG) rating in each sector of the parent index. MSCI ...
  52. [52]
    MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index
    The MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index is a capitalization weighted index that provides exposure to companies with high Environmental, Social and Governance ( ...
  53. [53]
    ESG Ratings - MSCI
    Our ESG Ratings are designed to measure companies' resilience to financially relevant, industry-specific sustainability risks and opportunities.Provisional ESG Ratings · ESG Ratings Badges for... · Contact us & Subscribe
  54. [54]
    [PDF] msci esg research
    MSCI ESG Research products and services are designed to provide in-depth research, ratings and analysis of environmental, social and governance-related business.
  55. [55]
    17 years of MSCI ESG Ratings and long-term corporate performance
    Mar 4, 2024 · Quintiles are created every month based on adjusted scores: Pillar scores are first z-scored by Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS®) ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Equity Factor Models - MSCI
    Combining leading academic and practitioner research, our Barra equity factor models represent the forefront of measuring factor exposure, managing risk and ...
  57. [57]
    Barra Models - MSCI
    It is these models that help our products forecast risk for equity, fixed income, cash and derivative instruments, at both the asset and portfolio level.Global Equity Model · Barra Trading Models · Barra Integrated Model (BIM)
  58. [58]
    Understanding Barra Risk Factor Analysis: Definition and Market ...
    Sep 2, 2025 · The Barra Risk Factor Analysis is a multi-factor model that evaluates a security's risk relative to the market using over 40 data metrics. · It ...
  59. [59]
    Barra Global Equity Model (GEM2 S/L) - MSCI
    Barra's multi-factor risk models compute an asset's sensitivities to intuitive factors such as industry groups, market characteristics and fundamental data.<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    Risk Management Solutions | MSCI
    MSCI is an innovator in risk analytics delivering impactful risk statistics to help measure, monitor and manage risk consistently across the total portfolio.
  61. [61]
    [PDF] RiskMetrics® RiskManager | MSCI
    RiskManager is designed to deliver efficient workflows, modelling transparency, and modern reporting tools to help risk teams manage risk across asset classes,.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] The Barra US Equity Model (USE4) - Top1000funds.com
    Model Highlights. This document describes the new methodologies that underpin the USE4 model. Our aim is to produce a document that is clear and concise, ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] MSCI Free Float Data Methodology
    Mar 1, 2023 · Non-free float shareholding (%). 43.22%. 87.60%. Free float (%). 56.78%. 12.40%. Free float adjusted market capitalization. USD 57 Billion. USD ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] MSCI Global Investable Market Indexes Methodology
    ... investability and replicability of the indexes through the use of size and liquidity screens. ... Investable Market Indexes may follow light rebalancing ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] MSCI Index Policies
    MSCI indexes use rules-based methodologies, aiming for representativeness, replicability, and efficiency. They are rebalanced regularly, and methodologies are ...
  66. [66]
    Quarterly Index Review - MSCI
    August 2025 Index Review. Designed to remain aligned with their respective markets, the indexes' full investable universe is reviewed at each rebalance.Missing: screens | Show results with:screens
  67. [67]
    Market Classification - MSCI
    MSCI evaluates equity markets around the world each year to determine whether they should be classified as a developed, emerging, frontier or standalone market.<|control11|><|separator|>
  68. [68]
    MSCI Vs FTSE: Which is the best index provider? - DIY Investor
    Nov 24, 2024 · The biggest discrepancy between the two index providers is whether they count certain countries as developed or emerging markets. For example, ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  69. [69]
    MSCI vs FTSE - What's the difference? - Timeline
    Sep 29, 2022 · Comparing MSCI and FTSE indices reveals key differences in country classification, Chinese A-shares inclusion, market coverage, ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  70. [70]
    [PDF] ESG Ratings Model History - MSCI
    Jul 14, 2025 · MSCI ESG Ratings provide an opinion of companies' management of financially relevant ESG risks and ... MSCI ESG Research has. Page 17. ESG Ratings ...
  71. [71]
    ESG score calculation: How to find your company's rating (Part 1)
    Sep 13, 2023 · Although scorers typically update company ratings annually, MSCI's research team continuously monitors corporate news for controversies and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Criticism of the MSCI World index: is it justified? - justETF
    Apr 25, 2024 · Criticisms include the MSCI World being too risky, not diversified enough, and too US-centric, with US companies accounting for around 70% of ...
  73. [73]
    Outperforming Cap- (Value-) Weighted and Equal-Weighted Portfolios
    Jan 19, 2024 · Equal-weighted portfolios have produced higher returns than cap-weighted ones because they have more exposure (they “tilt”) to factors such as size and value.
  74. [74]
    3 Types of Indexing for ETF Success - Investopedia
    Equal-weighted and fundamental index ETFs are more diversified and have a greater potential for outperformance but typically have higher management fees and ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] S&P 500: Market Capitalization vs Equal Weighted - Raymond James
    Company Concentrations: The market cap weighted index provides more exposure to larger, growth companies while the Equal Weight Index has more exposure to ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Market Developments and the Impact of MSCI China A Shares ...
    MSCI added 222 large cap China A shares in two stages from May to August 2018 to reach an inclusion factor of 5%,20 resulting in a China A shares index weight ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] ACGA China Corporate Governance Report 2018
    Sep 3, 2018 · The story of modern corporate governance in China is closely connected to the rapid evolution of its capital markets following the opening ...
  78. [78]
    China A Shares: What Have We Learned? - MSCI
    Oct 30, 2020 · From a risk-diversification perspective, the exhibit below shows that China A shares demonstrated relatively low correlation to other EM and ...
  79. [79]
    Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings*
    This paper investigates the divergence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings based on data from six prominent ESG rating agencies.
  80. [80]
    An unregulated ESG rating system reveals its flaws - IEEFA
    May 2, 2023 · The impending widespread MSCI downgrades highlight how subjective and inflated ESG ratings are. This points to a greater need for regulatory intervention.
  81. [81]
    What Makes ESG Ratings Problematic - TenderAlpha Blog
    Jun 23, 2021 · ESG ratings are problematic due to subjectivity, self-reported data, lack of standardization, and significant divergence among agencies, making ...
  82. [82]
    MSCI ESG Ratings May Violate State Anti-BDS Laws - FDD
    Apr 11, 2024 · The firm may be imposing punitive environmental, social, governance (ESG) ratings on Israel-connected companies “for conducting business in Judea and Samaria ...
  83. [83]
    Republican AGs investigate investment company over anti-Israel ...
    Apr 10, 2024 · (The Center Square) – A coalition of Republican attorneys general has launched an investigation into MSCI, a New York-based investment ...
  84. [84]
    Anti-ESG legislation in the USA: Emerging risk for financial ... - ecofact
    18 US states have used their legislative powers to place limitations on ESG investing or to prohibit their state governments from doing business with financial ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  85. [85]
    Opposition to environmental, social, and corporate governance ...
    This section tracks a selection of gubernatorial activity opposing ESG investing, including activity related to the divestment of state funds from asset ...
  86. [86]
    MSCI pushes back against shareholder proposal claiming anti-Israel ...
    Jan 6, 2025 · MSCI has pushed back against a shareholder proposal claiming its ESG ratings “have a distinct anti-Israel bias and double standard towards Israel”.
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Do ESG Ratings Drive Financial Performance? A Systematic ...
    In total, 98 studies were analysed, with approximately. 39% demonstrating a significant correlation between. ESG ratings and financial performance. The most.
  88. [88]
    Coalition Applauds MSCI's Actions to Safeguard Against Bias in ...
    Sep 10, 2025 · During the engagement, MSCI demonstrated its commitment to neutrality and reinforced its safeguards against bias, by: Archiving and removing ...
  89. [89]
    Insights on MSCI ESG Ratings and Business Performance
    Jul 17, 2025 · The analysis shows that firms with higher ESG scores tend to enjoy more stable revenues ... higher ratings outperformed their lower-rated ...Missing: 2007-2024 | Show results with:2007-2024
  90. [90]
    ESG rating changes and stock returns - ScienceDirect.com
    MSCI ESG rating changes impact US stock returns over multiple months. E rating changes affect six-month abnormal returns; S and G have no clear impact.Missing: semi- | Show results with:semi-
  91. [91]
    ESG Ratings: A Call for Greater Transparency and Precision
    Nov 10, 2022 · Ratings Bias: Consumers of ESG ratings should consider the possibility of unintended ratings bias being injected into the process. As noted ...<|separator|>
  92. [92]
    Global ETF Assets Tracking MSCI Equity Indexes Exceed $2 Trillion
    Jul 16, 2025 · More than $17 trillion of assets are benchmarked against MSCI indexes, including non-ETF products, other asset classes including fixed income ...
  93. [93]
    Index Providers: Whales Behind the Scenes of ETFs
    Aug 8, 2023 · We estimate that the index licensing fees comprise about one-third of all ETF expense ratios that ETF issuers collect from ETF investors. This ...
  94. [94]
    [PDF] The Unsupportability of Index Providers' Imposition of Licensing ...
    Consideration of these problems leads to a surprising conclusion: the index providers' practice of imposing licensing fees on secondary exchanges for ETFs is ...
  95. [95]
    Index fees fatigue: Regulators, startups move in on the big 3 ...
    Mar 6, 2023 · Users of index data often complain about the fees they have to fork out, particularly to the likes of S&P, FTSE Russell, and MSCI.
  96. [96]
    MSCI's index monopoly - Intelligent Investor
    Nov 8, 2023 · The secrets are minimal leverage, high margins, superior returns on capital, and stable earnings, fortified by formidable moats that repel ...Missing: antitrust concerns
  97. [97]
    MSCI's 17% Index-Based Fee Growth: A Structural Shift in Asset ...
    Jul 22, 2025 · - MSCI's Q2 2025 ABF rose 17% as ETF and index-linked product inflows surged, driven by $2T+ in ETF AUM tied to its benchmarks. - The growth ...
  98. [98]
    Price and volume effects of changes in MSCI indices
    Trading volumes increase significantly and remain at high levels after the change date for the added stocks. There are also considerable cross-country ...
  99. [99]
    iShares MSCI World Index ETF | XWD - BlackRock
    The iShares MSCI World Index ETF seeks to provide long-term capital growth by replicating, to the extent possible, the performance of the MSCI World Index, ...
  100. [100]
    THE INVERSE INDEX EFFECT OF MSCI INDEX REBALANCING
    Jul 29, 2025 · This study examines the effect of herding behavior, institutional investor trading activity, and price momentum on abnormal stock returns ...
  101. [101]
    [PDF] MSCI Investment Insights 2021
    Jan 26, 2021 · For this report, we surveyed 200 asset owners (pension funds, insurers, sovereign wealth funds and endowments/foundations).
  102. [102]
    Historical Data of the MSCI World Index: Performance, Return
    Aug 12, 2025 · From the MSCI website, we can extract MSCI World Index data in USD from December 31st, 1969. However, the index was only launched on March 31st, ...
  103. [103]
    MSCI World: historical performance from 1978 to 2025 - Curvo.eu
    The MSCI World index had a positive return during 363 of the 561 months (65%) between 1979 and 2025.
  104. [104]
    [PDF] ESG Ratings in Global Equity Markets - MSCI
    Exhibit 2 shows that companies in the highest quintiles for MSCI ESG ratings for the MSCI ACWI Index have consistently outperformed those companies in the ...Missing: firms | Show results with:firms
  105. [105]
    [PDF] The Myth of ESG Underperformance - CIBC Asset Management
    Given the relative underperformance and added volatility of the energy sector over the last decade, it's no surprise that investment strategies with lower ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] “Honey, I Shrunk the ESG Alpha”: Risk-Adjusting ESG Portfolio ...
    We use monthly ESG ratings data from MSCI (also known as IVA for 'Intangible Value Assessment') from January 2007 to June 2020. ESG ratings range from 0.0 to ...
  107. [107]
    ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more ...
    The results show that the business case for ESG investing is empirically very well founded. Roughly 90% of studies find a nonnegative ESG–CFP relation.
  108. [108]
    ESG Risks and Market Valuations: Evidence from the Energy Sector
    These companies also exhibit poor performance in metrics that measure the positive environmental impact of new products, services, and green revenues. While the ...
  109. [109]
    MSCI Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates, Revenues Rise Y/Y, Shares Fall
    Jul 22, 2025 · MSCI's Top-Line Details. In second-quarter 2025, Index revenues of $434.8 million increased 9.5% year over year. Recurring subscriptions and ...
  110. [110]
    MSCI Revenue Climbs 9.1% in Q2 2025 - Nasdaq
    Jul 22, 2025 · Adjusted EPS was $4.17 in Q2 2025, beating the consensus by $0.02 and up 14.6 % year over year. GAAP revenue reached $772.7 million in Q2 ...
  111. [111]
    MSCI Inc (MSCI) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Revenue ...
    Jul 23, 2025 · Revenue Growth: Over 9% increase in the second quarter. · Adjusted EBITDA Growth: Over 10% growth. · Adjusted Earnings Per Share Growth: Almost 15 ...
  112. [112]
    Climate Data and Metrics - MSCI
    Our Climate Risk Center is developing breakthrough innovation in models and analytics for pricing risk and allocating capital.
  113. [113]
    MSCI and Swiss Re Join Forces to Enhance Climate Risk Assessment
    Feb 27, 2025 · MSCI, a leading research provider, has announced a strategic partnership with Swiss Re Reinsurance Solutions to bolster the financial industry's capabilities.<|separator|>
  114. [114]
    How MSCI GeoSpatial Asset Intelligence can help investors to ...
    Sep 23, 2025 · MSCI is using geospatial intelligence to reshape how investors assess and manage climate risks.
  115. [115]
    Private Asset Solutions - MSCI
    Climate assessment. View greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, manage aggregate exposures and build climate-aligned strategies for a more complete view of risk and ...MSCI Private i · Private Capital Transparency · Private Capital Intel
  116. [116]
    The MSCI Private Infrastructure Factor Model
    Sep 24, 2025 · Total risk varies across sectors including utilities (6.1%), industrials (8.2%), energy (14.9%) and generalist (7.4%). The sum of the variance ...Missing: climate | Show results with:climate
  117. [117]
    Earnings call transcript: MSCI beats Q2 2025 forecasts, stock drops
    Jul 22, 2025 · MSCI demonstrated robust performance in Q2 2025, with revenue growth of over 9% and adjusted EBITDA growth exceeding 10%. The company's ...
  118. [118]
    MSCI: After Justified Valuation Reset, Shares Are Attractive
    Aug 11, 2025 · After a few hiccups, MSCI delivered consecutive quarters of beats on both revenue and EPS to start 2025. Revenue in the second quarter was ...<|separator|>
  119. [119]
    MSCI Inc | 10-Q: Q2 2025 Earnings Report - moomoo
    Jul 22, 2025 · MSCI Inc. reported robust Q2 2025 financial results, with net income rising 13.8% to $303.7 million and operating revenues increasing 9.1% ...<|separator|>
  120. [120]
    MSCI Inc. Earnings Call: Strong Growth Amid Challenges - TipRanks
    Jul 22, 2025 · MSCI Inc. reported impressive financial results for Q2 2025, with revenue growth exceeding 9%, adjusted EBITDA growth over 10%, and adjusted ...Strong Financial Performance · Innovative Product Launches · Lower Retention Rates
  121. [121]
    Investment Trends in Focus: Key Themes for 2025 - MSCI
    Jan 6, 2025 · Ashley Lester explores these themes, offering a perspective on the forces that will shape investment risks and opportunities in 2025.
  122. [122]
    MSCI Report Highlights Investment Trends for 2025 - Hubbis
    Jan 23, 2025 · 1. U.S. Policy Could Further Deepen Economic Divergence · 2. Technology and Trade Shape Equity Markets · 3. Asia Leads the Energy Transition · 4.
  123. [123]
    [PDF] 2025 Sustainability and Climate Trends Paper | MSCI
    The latter half of this decade will bring profound shifts, driven by geopolitics, disruptive technology breakthroughs and environmental challenges.
  124. [124]
    MSCI (MSCI) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript | The Motley Fool
    Jul 22, 2025 · Total Revenue Growth: Revenue grew over 9% in Q2 2025, reflecting broad-based client and product momentum, as stated by management. Adjusted ...