Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Megaphone


A megaphone is a cone-shaped acoustic device held to the mouth to intensify and direct , functioning by matching to project waves more efficiently over distances. The term derives from the Greek roots megas ("great" or "large") and phōnē ("voice" or "sound"), reflecting its purpose of magnifying vocal output without electronic amplification. Unlike powered loudspeakers, traditional megaphones rely on passive acoustic principles, such as that preferentially boosts higher voice frequencies for improved intelligibility. Early precursors to the megaphone appeared in , with animal horns or conical shells used for signaling, but formalized designs emerged in the when English mathematician Samuel Morland and German scholar independently developed trumpet-like speaking tubes around 1655 to enhance communication. Thomas Edison advanced the device in the late with larger conical megaphones aimed at long-range projection, though practical widespread adoption followed improvements in materials and form. Electric variants, incorporating microphones and amplifiers, appeared in the early , with significant patents by engineers like Harold S. Osborne in 1917, marking a shift from purely acoustic to powered amplification. Megaphones have defined applications in fields requiring audible commands amid noise, including for tactical directions, operations for troop coordination, and public events for announcements, underscoring their utility in causal sound propagation where electrical reliability may falter. Their non-electronic nature ensures robustness in adverse conditions, though modern iterations often blend acoustic horns with battery-powered for greater volume and portability.

History

Ancient and Pre-Industrial Origins

The precursors to modern megaphones emerged in through the use of natural conical objects like animal horns and shells, which amplified and directed for signaling during hunting, warfare, and communal activities. Archaeological evidence from sites across , , and indicates these items, dating back tens of thousands of years, increased vocal projection by focusing sound waves outward, leveraging empirical acoustic effects such as between the vocal tract and free air to reduce energy loss. While primarily signaling tools, they could be adapted for speech, as the flared opening enhanced and intensity without mechanical power. In ancient civilizations, horn-like devices served military and ceremonial roles, though direct evidence for dedicated voice-amplifying cones remains sparse before the early . Blown instruments such as the Greek salpinx—a long, conical trumpet used for commands in battles and athletic events around the 8th century BCE—demonstrated early mastery of horn acoustics for projection, suggesting analogous principles applied to speaking adaptations in theaters or fields where actors and leaders needed to reach audiences without amplification aids. Roman equivalents like the tuba similarly signaled troops, with conical designs aiding sound focus empirically verified through historical artifacts and texts. Refinements appeared in the amid growing interest in acoustics. Jesuit scholar detailed speaking trumpets in his 1673 Phonurgia Nova, illustrating conical horns that channeled voice for distant communication, such as maritime calls or announcements, based on observations of sound and wave bundling. Kircher posited ancient origins, including examples, but his designs emphasized passive amplification via , tested through prototypes that extended audible range by 10-20 times over unaided speech in open air. Contemporaneously, Indigenous North Americans employed cones for leadership addresses, as recorded by French Jesuit Louis Nicolas in the Codex Canadensis (c. 1675–1682), depicting a rallying warriors via such a device rolled into a shape for enhanced projection across camps or battle lines. These pre-industrial megaphones, crafted from organic materials like wood, leather, or bark, were constrained by durability issues—prone to warping or tearing—and suboptimal efficiency for ranges beyond 100-200 meters, limiting adoption to niche contexts like naval or frontier signaling where alternatives like drums sufficed. Amplification derived purely from acoustic focusing, without electrical means, reflecting causal reliance on shape-derived for gain.

19th and Early 20th Century Developments

In the mid-19th century, speaking trumpets, also known as acoustic megaphones, transitioned toward more durable metal constructions, primarily , , or tin, replacing earlier materials like wood or for enhanced projection and longevity in demanding environments. These devices featured conical shapes with bells typically 6 to 8 inches in diameter and lengths around 16 to 20 inches, allowing officers to direct voice commands over and . Improvements included added metal rings for attaching cords, facilitating portability during use. Such megaphones found widespread application in maritime settings, where naval officers employed brass speaking trumpets to relay orders across decks amid wind and sea noise during the 1800s. On Confederate commerce raider CSS Florida from 1862 to 1863, a silver speaking trumpet enabled Lieutenant Sardine Graham Stone Jr. to issue critical instructions, including during the ship's evasion of Union forces in Mobile Bay on January 16, 1863. Firefighters similarly used tin or brass models to coordinate responses at chaotic scenes, amplifying commands for engine companies. While direct evidence for railway use remains sparse, analogous acoustic horns served in early public signaling and industrial contexts requiring vocal projection over machinery or crowds. Despite these advances, pre-electric acoustic megaphones remained constrained by the speaker's vocal strength and environmental factors, offering limited volume—often insufficient beyond 100-200 yards in calm conditions—and poor performance against wind or ambient noise, underscoring the demand for greater amplification capabilities. Their reliance on passive geometry for sound focusing highlighted inherent physical limits in scaling projection without mechanical or electrical augmentation.

Invention and Evolution of Electric Megaphones

The electric megaphone emerged in the early 20th century as electrical components enabled powered sound amplification beyond acoustic limits. Building on Thomas Edison's 1877 carbon microphone for voice-to-electric signal conversion, early devices combined microphones with battery-powered electromagnetic reproducers and horns. A pivotal development occurred in 1917 when Harold S. Osborne, an engineer at General Electric, patented the first such electric megaphone, which amplified speech through a carbon microphone linked to an electric driver, marking the transition to electrically enhanced projection. These initial models offered increased volume for applications like military commands but remained bulky due to inefficient power sources and speakers. Advancements in loudspeaker technology further propelled electric megaphone design. In 1925, Chester W. Rice and Edward W. Kellogg at invented the moving-coil dynamic , featuring a lightweight cone driven by an electromagnetic , which delivered higher efficiency and fidelity compared to prior magnetic armature drivers. This innovation was adapted into megaphones, often paired with amplifiers for greater output, though portability was constrained by heavy batteries and heat-generating tubes. Such systems achieved practical use in the for public address, yet required tethered power or large packs, limiting mobility. Post-World War II semiconductor breakthroughs enabled compact, reliable amplification. The 1947 transistor invention facilitated battery-operated designs without vacuum tubes' drawbacks. In 1954, Japan's launched the EM-202, the first transistorized handheld megaphone, integrating a , transistor , and horn into a portable unit powered by dry batteries. This model projected clear voice over extended distances, revolutionizing field deployment by reducing size and enabling outputs significantly louder than acoustic predecessors. During the , proliferation drove iterative improvements, yielding smaller, more durable megaphones with extended battery life and enhanced for reduced . These evolutions prioritized handheld and reliability, incorporating features like adjustable and auxiliary inputs, while maintaining horn-directed for directed projection. By decade's end, electric megaphones had supplanted acoustic variants in most professional contexts, embodying electrical engineering's causal progression toward efficient, portable amplification.

Design and Technology

Acoustic Principles and Construction

Acoustic megaphones function by directing the initially spherical sound waves from a into a narrower, more focused beam, thereby reducing energy loss due to and increasing on-axis . The device's shape acts as an acoustic transformer, matching the higher of the vocal tract to the lower impedance of free air, which minimizes reflections at the and enhances efficient radiation of . This concentration of acoustic power, without adding external energy, results in greater at targeted distances compared to unassisted projection. Construction typically employs a conical or exponentially flared , with the narrow interfacing directly with the mouth to capture output efficiently. Simple conical designs provide basic , while exponential flares optimize response by gradually expanding the cross-section, better accommodating the frequency spectrum of human speech from approximately 200 Hz to 5000 Hz. Materials prioritize rigidity and low mass; modern non-electric models use injection-molded plastics such as for lightweight portability and resistance to environmental factors, or aluminum alloys for enhanced durability in demanding conditions. These passive systems inherently avoid feedback loops and electronic but are constrained by physical size and geometry, limiting primarily to directive effects rather than substantial augmentation. Larger horns yield greater at lower frequencies, yet practical portability caps overall performance, emphasizing over volume .

Electronic Components and Operation

The core operation of an electric megaphone begins with a , typically a noise-cancelling dynamic or magnetic type, that converts acoustic voice input into an electrical signal. This weak signal passes through a pre- to raise its level, followed by a power —often a multi-stage Class B design—that increases the to drive the output . The amplified signal then energizes a , usually paired with a re-entrant for directional projection and efficiency in converting back to waves. Power is supplied by portable batteries, such as eight cells providing 12 V or rechargeable lithium-ion packs, enabling handheld mobility without external wiring. Signal flow is user-initiated via a press-to-talk switch or trigger, which activates the amplification chain while isolating the from ambient ; many units include a built-in , triggered by a dedicated switch, that generates a high-priority tone independent of voice input. , arising from output sound looping back to the , is mitigated through directional patterns that reject rearward sound and basic filters or equalizers that attenuate resonant frequencies, though full suppression often requires operator positioning to avoid direct acoustic paths. Output levels reach 110-120 SPL at 1 meter under full , prioritizing over . Battery trade-offs limit continuous high-volume operation to 4-8 hours per charge, depending on draw and use, with alkaline cells draining faster under sustained load than rechargeables; over-discharge risks , necessitating removal during storage. In contrast to public address () systems, which employ modular, stationary components like separate mixers and larger amplifiers for broader coverage, electric megaphones integrate all elements into a compact, self-contained unit for individual portability and rapid deployment.

Modern Enhancements and Variants

Contemporary electric megaphones frequently integrate rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, enabling continuous operation for up to 10 hours or more depending on output power and volume settings, thereby improving portability over alkaline battery-dependent predecessors. connectivity, often version 5.0 or higher, facilitates wireless audio streaming from smartphones or tablets, allowing integration of without auxiliary cables. Enhanced durability is achieved through weatherproof casings, with many models rated IP67 for water and dust resistance, submersibility up to 1 meter, and compliance with standards for shock and vibration tolerance, suiting prolonged outdoor exposure. Wireless variants incorporate detachable or dual-channel operating on UHF frequencies for interference-free over short distances, while recording-enabled models support storage of audio clips ranging from 10 seconds to 240 seconds for looped playback of alerts or instructions. Consumer-grade units often include volume attenuation features to self-limit output below 100 in with urban noise thresholds, though professional configurations can exceed 120 at the source. Electrically amplified models project effectively over 500 to 1,000 in open conditions, far exceeding the 100 to 200 typical of unpowered acoustic , due to powered drivers and exponential horn geometries that minimize energy loss.

Applications

Public Address and Emergency Uses

Megaphones enable clear announcements in stadiums and large venues, where amplified voice projection directs crowds during events and maintains order amid ambient noise. Their output ensures instructions reach specific sections of spectators, facilitating efficient communication for safety protocols and game updates. In emergency evacuations, megaphones provide authoritative voice commands that penetrate chaotic environments, as demonstrated in coastal where handheld devices disseminated warnings to prompt community sheltering. Battery-powered models offer reliability independent of electrical infrastructure, functioning during power failures to coordinate exits from buildings or sites. Law enforcement integrates megaphones with patrol vehicles for , allowing officers to issue dispersal orders or rerouting directives audible over vehicle noise and distances up to several hundred yards. This setup supports rapid incident response by minimizing reliance on digital systems prone to outage disruptions.

Sports, Events, and Professional Settings

Megaphones enable coaches in athletics to deliver feedback to athletes during and competitions, particularly in sports like where immediate verbal instructions are shouted over distances or water noise. Devices with ranges up to 1000 yards support communication in large fields or tracks, reducing the need for coaches to strain their voices and allowing sustained sessions without fatigue. In team sports and games, cheerleading squads employ megaphones to amplify chants and , enhancing crowd energy and sideline motivation amid stadium ambient noise. Portable models, often powered for louder output, integrate into routines at games and pep rallies, projecting voices directionally to engage spectators effectively. Event coordinators and masters of ceremonies at outdoor gatherings use megaphones for announcements and interaction, ensuring instructions reach participants and attendees in open venues. This facilitates smoother event flow, such as during timeouts or , by enabling clear, amplified directives over background sounds. In professional settings like sites and warehouses, megaphones deliver instructions and warnings in high-noise areas, where machinery and ambient sounds hinder normal speech. OSHA evaluations, including a 2022 review of an facility, document their deployment for broadcasting critical updates to workers, underscoring their role in and routine hazard communication. Such tools promote compliance by improving message audibility, as amplified voice projection outperforms unassisted shouting in environments exceeding 85 decibels.

Protests, Activism, and Political Expression

Megaphones have facilitated coordination among protest participants in dissent-oriented gatherings by allowing leaders to project directives and chants to dispersed crowds. In labor actions, such as a 1948 strike, early transistorized models were deployed by workers to articulate grievances amid industrial disputes. During the , figures like Rev. Fred D. Taylor utilized megaphones to guide marches and lead communal singing in Atlanta-area demonstrations, enabling sustained organization over extended periods from the 1960s onward. In anti-war activism of the , megaphones amplified opposition messaging at large-scale events, including the June 23, 1967, protest outside in , where several thousand demonstrators confronted President Lyndon B. Johnson's appearance, culminating in a rock-throwing . Increased adoption by African American and women's groups during this era and into the supported protests against racial and gender discrimination, with devices serving to overcome ambient noise from authorities or bystanders. Tactically, megaphones sustain participant cohesion in demonstrations by enabling repetitive chants and overrides of opposing sounds, a practice documented in activist toolkits for groups up to 50 individuals where powered amplification is restricted. This amplification empowers underrepresented voices to reach broader audiences but can heighten confrontational dynamics, as louder projections drown out alternatives and correlate with escalations like physical altercations in documented cases.

Societal Impact

Facilitation of Mass Communication

Megaphones facilitate through acoustic amplification that enables a single speaker to project their voice to large audiences without requiring electrical or complex setups, a principle rooted in one-to-many broadcast models where a source transmits directly to multiple receivers. Thomas Edison's 1878 invention extended to approximately 200 yards in open spaces, allowing efficient dissemination of announcements in pre-digital settings such as 1895 races and 1912 tours. This portability democratized reach, empowering individuals in remote or infrastructure-poor areas—like military fields or rural open grounds—to convey instructions vital for coordination and awareness. In developing regions, megaphones remain empirically effective for information broadcast where digital alternatives are limited; for instance, Bangladeshi imams utilized mosque-mounted devices in to deliver prevention messages to millions of households lacking smartphones, ensuring broad penetration of health directives. Similarly, community broadcasts via megaphones on remote islands have amplified announcements to maximize listener coverage. Post-1940 transistorized variants further extended efficacy to 2,000 feet, enhancing one-to-many in dynamic environments. The devices' preferentially amplifies higher vocal frequencies, improving speech intelligibility over ambient and supporting clearer in crowded or multilingual contexts where directed minimizes and aids of accents or varied . This causal enhancement of signal fidelity aligns with models emphasizing reduced distortion for effective receiver uptake. Historically, such capabilities accelerated public norms by standardizing amplified in events from sports to emergencies, fostering scalable that preceded modern media infrastructures.

Role in Social and Political Movements

Megaphones facilitated mobilization in early 20th-century social movements, including women's suffrage campaigns where activists like Inez Milholland used them to proclaim "Votes for Women!" from New York City windows in 1909, drawing crowds and spreading demands for enfranchisement. During the 1896 suffrage efforts in Sebastopol, California, speakers employed megaphones from automobiles to address passersby, enabling direct public engagement despite limited technological alternatives. In labor unions, amplified speeches coordinated strikers and rallied support, as in Poland's Solidarity movement throughout the 1980s, where megaphones broadcast opposition leaders' messages to sustain worker defiance against state control amid economic hardship. Contemporary political movements across ideologies continue to leverage megaphones for immediate amplification. protests, peaking after George Floyd's death on May 25, 2020, routinely featured organizers directing chants and announcements via megaphones to maintain crowd cohesion during marches involving millions nationwide. rallies from 2009 onward similarly deployed them, such as at the , 2009, tax-day event in drawing 5,000 attendees, where speakers used megaphones to denounce and articulate fiscal conservative priorities. While megaphones lower barriers for participation by requiring minimal resources beyond the device itself, their short-range projection confines influence to proximal audiences, hindering scalable consensus formation essential for enduring change. This limitation manifests in cases like encampments starting September 17, 2011, where amplified general assemblies energized initial gatherings but failed to yield concrete policy victories, dissipating by mid-2012 without institutional reforms. Similarly, despite widespread megaphone use in 2020 BLM actions, systemic police changes remained elusive in many jurisdictions, underscoring how vocal amplification heightens passion yet does not compel broader alignment or override entrenched interests.

Criticisms Including Noise Pollution and Public Disruption

Megaphones typically generate sound pressure levels of 90 to 110 at close range or short distances such as 15 yards, comparable to rock concerts or industrial machinery. These intensities exceed the threshold for potential (NIHL) with sustained exposure, as sounds above 85 can damage hair cells over time, leading to permanent threshold shifts. The U.S. (OSHA) mandates hearing conservation programs for exposures at or above 85 averaged over eight hours, with a permissible limit of 90 and peak impulsive limits not exceeding 140 . However, empirical data on NIHL emphasizes cumulative duration; brief, intermittent megaphone use—common in public address scenarios—rarely approaches these thresholds for most bystanders, as damage requires prolonged proximity rather than fleeting peaks. In densely populated urban environments, megaphone amplification has prompted complaints of immediate disruption, including sleep interference and stress from sudden loud announcements during off-hours or protests. Specific cases document alleged harassment via directed megaphone blasts at individuals, such as during demonstrations outside businesses, where victims reported temporary tinnitus or sought medical evaluation for auditory trauma. Neighborhood reports highlight amplified voices exacerbating ambient chaos in residential zones, with some residents framing the devices as invasive tools that override personal space and tranquility. Causal assessments of reveal megaphones' contribution as minimal relative to chronic sources; urban traffic routinely sustains 70-85 over hours via tire-road interactions and engine output, while construction sites often peak at 100+ intermittently but dominate daily exposure profiles. Studies on soundscapes attribute the bulk of burdens—such as elevated or cognitive strain—to persistent vehicular and infrastructural noise, not sporadic amplified speech, which dissipates rapidly due to its directional and transient nature. Exaggerated portrayals of megaphones as primary pollutants overlook this disparity, as their episodic peaks fail to accumulate compared to baseline urban acoustics, per halving rules where exposure time halves per 5 increment above 90 . Some critics, including affected proprietors, contend the devices enable targeted in disputes, yet verifiable long-term epidemiological links to widespread disruption remain empirically sparse amid broader acoustic overloads.

Legal Framework and Controversies

Noise Ordinances and Local Regulations

In the United States, municipal noise ordinances typically limit daytime sound levels in residential zones to 55-65 decibels (), equivalent to normal conversation, while prohibiting or severely restricting amplified devices such as megaphones during quiet hours, often defined as 10 p.m. to 7 a.m., to prevent disturbance of and daily activities. These limits are measured at the property boundary or receiver's location, with megaphones frequently classified as loudspeakers subject to outright bans in sensitive areas like schools or hospitals outside permitted times. Such regulations derive from longstanding doctrines of , which address unreasonable interference with community use and enjoyment of property, and were adapted to amplified sound technologies in the early as devices like megaphones proliferated for public address. The federal Noise Control Act of 1972 further codified this framework by establishing a national policy against endangering or , empowering local governments to enact enforceable codes tailored to urban and suburban contexts. Internationally, variations exist; in the , while overarching directives like the Directive (2002/49/EC) focus on assessment and mapping, local bylaws impose caps for amplified sound—often 90-100 dB(A) for short-term events—with megaphone use regulated under general prohibitions against undue disturbance in residential or public spaces. Enforcement across jurisdictions relies on fines, such as $300-1,000 in major U.S. cities for initial violations escalating with repetition, and is predominantly reactive, triggered by resident complaints via systems like hotlines, yielding low citation rates for sporadic, non-event-related megaphone use due to resource constraints and prioritization of persistent offenses.

Free Speech Protections and Limitations

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the use of megaphones and other amplification devices as extensions of verbal expression in public forums, provided the content does not fall into unprotected categories such as incitement or true threats. In Saia v. New York (1948), the Supreme Court invalidated a municipal ordinance in Lockport, New York, that prohibited sound amplification devices in public places without a police chief's permit, which lacked objective standards and granted excessive discretion, thereby violating free speech protections by enabling arbitrary denial based on content or viewpoint. This ruling affirmed that amplification tools, including those akin to modern megaphones, cannot be subjected to absolute bans or unchecked permitting schemes in traditional public spaces like parks and streets. However, such protections are not absolute, and governments may impose content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on amplified speech to serve significant interests like preserving public tranquility, as long as they are narrowly tailored and leave open ample alternative channels for communication. In Kovacs v. Cooper (1949), the Court upheld a , ordinance banning "loud and raucous" noises from sound trucks on public streets, reasoning that while is protected, regulations targeting intrusive volume—rather than message—do not infringe the First Amendment when they address direct harms like neighborhood disruption without broadly suppressing speech. Similarly, Ward v. Rock Against Racism (1989) sustained City's guideline requiring use of city-provided sound systems in to cap levels, as the measure was deemed viewpoint-neutral, substantially advanced , and did not foreclose other expressive opportunities. These precedents establish that megaphone use can be limited by objective criteria, such as volume thresholds or designated zones, but not through measures that hinge on the speaker's ideology. Civil liberties organizations, including the , contend that permit requirements for amplification devices risk facilitating viewpoint discrimination, where authorities selectively enforce rules against disfavored messages, contravening under the First Amendment. For instance, in a 2019 Ninth Circuit ruling, a city's permitting scheme for bullhorns during protests was challenged as overbroad, with the court siding against restrictions that burdened core political speech without sufficient justification. Regulators, conversely, defend such curbs by invoking empirical evidence of public complaints and measurable annoyance levels, arguing that unchecked amplification imposes externalities like sleep disturbance or safety hazards, warranting intervention absent proof of direct harm from the speech itself. Claims of uneven enforcement persist, though data on noise citations in protests reveal mixed patterns, with some analyses indicating higher intervention rates against left-leaning demonstrations despite theoretical neutrality.

Notable Legal Cases and Recent Developments

In 2016, two protesters in , were fined $500 each by town authorities for using a megaphone during a on Royal Palm Way, citing violations of local noise ordinances that prohibit amplified sound without permits. The incident underscored early conflicts between amplification and residential quiet zones, with fines upheld despite claims of speech infringement, as the ordinance targeted disruptive volume rather than content. The 's challenge to 's noise ordinance represented a significant escalation in megaphone-related litigation. In December 2023, police cited a protester using a megaphone for a , invoking Code § 5-7-3, which restricts amplified sound in public spaces. The filed a lawsuit in April 2024, arguing the ordinance unconstitutionally chilled First Amendment activities by requiring permits or risking enforcement against environmental and social protests. A U.S. District Court issued a preliminary in April 2024, enjoining enforcement against the group in downtown pending resolution, allowing megaphone use at a youth climate rally. By July 2025, Council amended the ordinance to exempt First Amendment-protected protests, permitting measured use of megaphones and loudspeakers without prior approval, resolving the suit and balancing speech rights with public order. In , 2024 disputes over embassy-area protests highlighted ongoing megaphone use versus anti-noise laws. Chinese dissidents employed megaphones daily from 7 a.m. outside the ambassador's residence, blasting messages up to 100 decibels and prompting resident complaints under the city's Tranquility Act, which limits excessive noise. Similar routines targeted the embassy with sirens and amplification, leading to calls for stricter enforcement but no resolved federal cases by late 2024; local council members advocated time-based restrictions while acknowledging First Amendment limits on content-neutral regulation absent proven harm. Broader trends include courts upholding speech protections for amplified devices when ordinances are narrowly tailored. In Cuviello v. City of Vallejo (2019), the Ninth Circuit struck down a permitting requirement for bullhorns—functionally akin to megaphones—as overbroad, favoring activists absent evidence of time, place, or manner restrictions justified by substantial government interests. Emerging directional speaker technologies, which focus sound beams to minimize spillover, have prompted regulatory adaptations for compliance rather than bans, with adoption in public spaces reducing claims and supporting targeted communication without broad First Amendment challenges.

References

  1. [1]
    Megaphone - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms - Vocabulary.com
    Definitions of megaphone. noun. a cone-shaped acoustic device held to the mouth to intensify and direct the human voice.
  2. [2]
    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/megaphone
  3. [3]
    Megaphone - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from Greek mega- "great" + phone "voice," megaphone (1878) means a funnel-like instrument for amplifying sound or aiding hearing.
  4. [4]
    Megaphones: Heard above the Noise | Acoustical Engineer
    Aug 15, 2019 · Many inventors and scientists developed types of megaphones, the most famous being Thomas Edison. Edison created a massive megaphone that is ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Wayne Hinshaw: The many uses of a megaphone | Salisbury Post
    Jan 13, 2016 · Both Samuel Morland and German Jesuit scholar Athanasius Kircher invented crude megaphones in the 17th century around 1655. Thomas Edison, ...
  6. [6]
    View of The Megaphone as Material Culture: Design, Use and ...
    Originally conceived by Thomas Edison as a cone-shaped device which would improve communication by amplifying the human voice, the modern megaphone continues to ...
  7. [7]
    The Fascinating History of Megaphones
    Apr 21, 2023 · In 1917, Harold S. Osborne, an engineer at General Electric, patented the first electric megaphone, which used a carbon microphone and a battery ...
  8. [8]
    History of Megaphone - umaudio.com
    Feb 17, 2023 · In 1915, Chester Rice and Edward W. Kellogg invented the first electric megaphone, which used a carbon microphone to amplify sound.
  9. [9]
    Speaking-Trumpets - Nature
    THE antiquity of the speaking-trumpet may be proved upon far higher authority than that of the imaginative Athanasius Kircher. It is literally as old as the ...
  10. [10]
    Falconer's Horn - German or British - The Metropolitan Museum of Art
    The falconer's horn and shofar produce only a few pitches, while the fingerholes of the bukkehorn and cornetto allow melodic playing.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Echoes of the salpinx: the trumpet in ancient Greek culture. Carolyn ...
    The salpinx, a Greek trumpet, was used in war, athletic competitions, sacrifice, ceremonies, entertainment, and ritual in ancient Greece.
  12. [12]
    The Salpinx and the Tuba in the Graeco-Roman Games
    May 1, 2023 · The salpinx/tuba was used in Graeco-Roman games to call players to the field, start races, and announce winners, not just for military purposes.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] athanasius kircher's phonurgia nova - Acoustics Today
    Athanasius. Kircher. (Geisa, Germany; 2. May 1602– Rome, Italy;. 27 November 1680) became a. Jesuit in 1628 in Mainz,. Germany (Fig. 1). He taught in.Missing: 1684 | Show results with:1684
  14. [14]
    Examples from Athanasius Kircher's Phonosophia anacamptica
    May 19, 2018 · Kircher declared that he had already fully demonstrated in his Oedipus Aegyptiacus (Rome: 1652–1654) that the ancient Egyptians also had the ...
  15. [15]
    The Fire Officer Speaking Trumpet | F.F.A.M.
    May 18, 2024 · The acoustic megaphone is an unpowered cone or horn-shaped device “used to increase the audibility of the human voice.”6 Most people today have ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Athanasius Kircher - Phonurgia nova, sive conjugium mechanico ...
    Kircher's "Phonurgia nova," dedicated to Leopold I, is a work on acoustics, dealing primarily with the reflection, dispersion, and focusing of sound.
  17. [17]
    Speaking Trumpet | National Museum of American History
    This brass trumpet dates from the 19th century. The trumpet has small bands around the mouthpiece and bell, but lacks any engraving or adornment.
  18. [18]
    A History of Mobile in 22 Objects: Civil War Speaking Trumpet
    Mar 25, 2021 · The speaking trumpet was invented in the late seventeenth century by Sir Samuel Morland (1625 – 1695), an English diplomat, mathematician ...
  19. [19]
    Rice-Kellogg
    Jan 25, 2001 · Rice and Edward W. Kellogg at General Electric was important in establishing the basic principle of the direct-radiator loudspeaker with a small ...Missing: megaphone 1915
  20. [20]
    1925 Chester Rice & Edward Kellogg, General Electric Co. Modern ...
    Sep 1, 2007 · Advanced for its day, the 1925 Rice-Kellogg design for a dynamic loudspeaker included modern touches such as a rubber (butyl) surround around ...Missing: megaphone 1915
  21. [21]
    TOA History | About TOA | TOA Electronics, Inc.
    In 1954 TOA developed the world's first electric megaphone. Offering clear sound over long distances, the convenient portable design allowed the user to hold ...Missing: battery- | Show results with:battery-
  22. [22]
    TOA History | TOA - Sound and Communication
    In 1954 TOA developed the world's first electric megaphone. Offering clear sound over long distances, the convenient portable design allowed the user to ...Missing: battery- | Show results with:battery-
  23. [23]
    MONACOR megaphone
    Both Samuel Morland and Athanasius Kircher are credited with having invented the megaphone around the same time in the 17th century: Morland wrote about his ...
  24. [24]
    How do megaphones work? - Physics Stack Exchange
    Apr 23, 2015 · A megaphone extends the vocal tract, increasing acoustic impedance, and channels sound in a narrow, directional cone, concentrating intensity.
  25. [25]
    How does a megaphone amplify sound? - Quora
    Apr 21, 2016 · By means of acoustic transformer that matches acoustic impedance of the sound source that of open air. Acoustic transformer is very simple. It ...How does a cone amplify sound?How does a megaphone work?More results from www.quora.com
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Horn Theory: An Introduction, Part 1
    The source impedance of any loud- speaker, on the other hand, is high, so there will be a considerable mismatch between the source and the load. The result is ...
  27. [27]
    https://www.5core.com/blogs/meghphone/the-science-and-utility-of-megaphones
  28. [28]
    Does natural amplification TRULY exist in acoustics or does it have ...
    Dec 7, 2023 · According to the law of conservation of energy you can't amplify sound without an energy input. What you can do is concentrate the sound locally ...
  29. [29]
    Acoustic horns and impedance matching - Physics Forums
    Sep 12, 2015 · It was suggested that acoustic horns are essential for matching impedance in sound reproduction, particularly for compression drivers, which ...
  30. [30]
    FS A12SA Amdt.A Voice Gun Electronic Megaphone User Manual
    Voltage: 12 V, 8 AA batteries. Amplifier: 3-stage, Class B output. Speaker: Re-entrant horn and driver type. Microphone: Noise-cancelling, magnetic. Megaphone ...
  31. [31]
    DIY Little Megaphone - EDN Network
    Aug 15, 2019 · A megaphone is a portable and compact public address system comprised of a microphone, a voice amplifier, and a loudspeaker.
  32. [32]
    https://www.acrartex.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/1562/Y1-03-0340E.PDF
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Voice-Gun-Electronic-Megaphone-Manual_255A209.pdf - Plytix
    A. The electronic megaphone is operated by simply pressing the trigger button and speaking into the microphone. The button should be depressed only when ...
  34. [34]
    https://www.5core.com/blogs/meghphone/how-to-reduce-feedback-in-both-megaphones-and-pa-systems
  35. [35]
    Audio and Microphone Noise Theory - Wildtronics LLC
    For example: The output of a 120dB siren at 1 meter, will only be 100dB at 10 meters, 80dB at 100 meters, and 60dB at 1000 meters. Therefore, a sound source SPL ...
  36. [36]
    Technical Pro Rechargeable Megaphone Battery - Amazon.com
    Dimensions (L x W x H):4.5"x 1.5" x 2.7". The unit charges in 4-6, and lasts for 8 hours of continuous use. TPMPHBATTERY. SIMPLE TO USE. The ...
  37. [37]
    https://cpr-savers.com/rechargeable-megaphone-bullhorn-speaker.html
  38. [38]
    How to Choose a Handheld PA & Megaphone - AudioLinks
    Jan 19, 2016 · The main difference is the shape of the area where amplified sound is heard. By definition a megaphone with the same power as a PA system will ...
  39. [39]
    Understanding Microphones and PAs for Schools
    Sep 20, 2020 · They typically contain a microphone, amplifier, and speaker all in one compact unit. The advantages of megaphones are that they are compact, ...
  40. [40]
    50 Watt Professional Bluetooth Megaphone Bullhorn Speaker with ...
    In stock Free deliveryTwo Power Modes:This megaphone bullhorn built-in rechargeable lithium battery, which can realize long-term endurance after one charge. In addition, it also ...
  41. [41]
    https://www.globalindustrial.com/p/mg-electronics-50-watt-bluetooth-megaphone-with-rechargeable-battery-pack-and-mic
  42. [42]
    Megaphone 100W - Powerful & Rechargeable Sound Amplifier
    4.2 326 Bluetooth Connectivity. Modern 100W megaphones feature Bluetooth 5.0 or higher, enabling seamless wireless pairing with smartphones, tablets, and laptops. This ...
  43. [43]
    https://blueoceanmegaphone.com/blue-ocean-megaphone
  44. [44]
    US Department of Defense relies on NK for megaphones for Army ...
    Feb 27, 2019 · The Blue Ocean Megaphone is MIL-STD-810G transit shock drop-tested and IP67 water and dust proof. It is fully buoyant for easy retrieval if ...
  45. [45]
    Megaphones, Bullhorns & Loudhailers - AudioLinks
    Free delivery over $50AudioLinks offers a selection of megaphones, bullhorns and loudhailers with various features including detachable microphones, sirens and recordable playback.Missing: modern electric enhancements variants 2000
  46. [46]
    japomizuno Bullhorn Rechargeable Megaphone Speaker with 240's ...
    30-day returnsBullhorn Rechargeable Megaphone Speaker with 240's Recording,Siren,U-Disk Player, 800 Yard Range, Rechargeable BatteryMissing: functions decibel limits
  47. [47]
    Electronic Megaphone: Powerful & Portable for Any Event - Accio
    Rating 5.0 (99) Most US cities restrict decibel levels (typically 85-100dB max), time of day usage (often prohibiting residential use after 9PM), and may ban them entirely in ...
  48. [48]
    https://pyleusa.com/blogs/sound/the-ultimate-guide-to-choosing-the-right-megaphone-for-your-needs
  49. [49]
    The Role of Megaphones in Sports Events: Amplifying the Fan ...
    Jun 20, 2023 · The amplified sound reaches a large audience, enabling swift and effective communication during critical moments.
  50. [50]
    A systematic review of Community Engagement (CE) in Disaster ...
    Paul [55] reported that local communities in coastal areas in Bangladesh were involved in the dissemination of cyclone warnings using megaphones, handheld ...
  51. [51]
    https://www.thunderpowermegaphones.com/why-a-megaphone-is-essential-to-your-disaster-kit/
  52. [52]
    AmpliVox Multipurpose Safety Wand Megaphone Designed to ...
    Oct 7, 2016 · The AmpliVox S606 Safety Wand Megaphone combines the features of an LED crowd and traffic management wand with a loudspeaker megaphone.
  53. [53]
    AmpliVox Megaphones & PAs Facilitate Emergency ... - PR Newswire
    Mar 31, 2020 · Most feature rechargeable batteries to ensure power for repeated use. Some models also have sirens, whistles, recorded voice capability, and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    How to provide quality feedback when coaching - British Rowing Plus
    Dec 18, 2018 · Feedback can be as simple as a coach shouting through a megaphone or putting a straw on the boat to indicate a catch angle – or it can be as ...
  55. [55]
    https://www.everythingtrackandfield.com/Megaphone/
  56. [56]
    https://www.thunderpowermegaphones.com/megaphones-and-cheerleading-unite/
  57. [57]
    https://www.prolightsounds.com/blogs/why-choose-prolightsounds/amplify-your-spirit-with-the-perfect-cheer-megaphone
  58. [58]
    https://www.5core.com/blogs/meghphone/the-impact-of-megaphone-speakers-on-sports-and-event-communications
  59. [59]
    [PDF] 3498noise-in-construction-pocket-guide.pdf - OSHA
    The guidance is advisory in nature, informational in content, and is intended to help construction workers and supervisors understand and reduce noise exposure ...
  60. [60]
    OSHA's Response to Amazon Warehouse Tornado Cautions ...
    May 6, 2022 · The letter notes three areas of deficiency in Amazon's emergency planning: (1) a megaphone used to broadcast information to employees was ...
  61. [61]
    Handheld LRAD vs Megaphones: Key Differences & Benefits
    Aug 11, 2025 · Discover how LRAD technology outperforms ordinary megaphones with directional sound, 3x range, and 95% speech clarity in noise.Missing: studies compliance
  62. [62]
    Atlanta civil rights activist known for using megaphone during ...
    Jun 22, 2024 · Rev. Fred D. Taylor was known for his unique approach to leading protests with the help of a megaphone. He'd use the same megaphone to sing ...
  63. [63]
    Anti-Vietnam War demonstrators with signs and megaphones ...
    Anti-Vietnam War demonstrators with signs and megaphones protest in front of Century Plaza Hotel in Los Angeles, Calif., June 23, 1967.
  64. [64]
    Design, Use and Symbolism in North American Society, 1878-1980
    This article examines the ways in which the megaphone was utilized as an object of communication and as a semiotic cultural symbol in North America between.
  65. [65]
    Sound At Protests 101 - Campaign Gears
    It was developed because New York City bylaws did not allow the use of powered amplification systems. ... Every activist organization has a squad of megaphones.
  66. [66]
    https://www.5core.com/blogs/meghphone/the-role-of-megaphone-in-mobilizing-crowds
  67. [67]
    Communication Theory: An Underrated Pillar on Which Strategic ...
    Aug 13, 2018 · This theory uses a lens through which communication is seen as a process directed from a sender to one or more receivers, in which the meaning ...
  68. [68]
    Religious leaders play key role in battle against COVID-19 - Unicef
    May 24, 2020 · Imams reach millions of Bangladeshis through mosque megaphones, bringing life-saving information to families that do not have a smartphone ...
  69. [69]
    Communicating with communities through microprogrammes
    Mar 1, 2022 · The islands have several broadcast platforms which play through mounted megaphones, we chose to air using the one with the most listeners.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] A Mathematical Theory of Communication
    This case has applications not only in communication theory, but also in the theory of computing machines, the design of telephone exchanges and other fields.Missing: broadcast megaphone<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Inez Milholland — - ATX Celebrates Women's Suffrage
    In 1909, in New York City after graduating Vassar, Milholland heard a crowd outside and grabbed a megaphone, shouting out her window “Votes for Women!” to the ...
  72. [72]
    When Suffragists Met - by Dale Dougherty - Sebastopol Times
    Aug 14, 2022 · New marker in town highlights women's suffrage campaign in 1896. ... They spoke in buildings or they spoke from their automobiles with megaphones ...
  73. [73]
    Megaphone | Musical Solidarities - Oxford Academic
    This chapter examines the sonic amplification of some of the opposition's most charismatic leaders. Through Solidarity's decade, speeches and ceremonies on ...
  74. [74]
    Unidentified individual speaks into a megaphone during a Black ...
    Title, Unidentified individual speaks into a megaphone during a Black Lives Matter demonstration, Pasadena, 2020. Date, 2020-06-26.
  75. [75]
    5000 attend tax-day 'tea party' at Capitol - The Denver Post
    Apr 15, 2009 · Toward the end of the rally, a man on a megaphone began shouting that income tax is unconstitutional. Earlier in the day, one man held a ...<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Five Secrets of the Tea Party's Success | Sightline Institute
    Aug 25, 2016 · ” For my research, I attended Tea Party rallies and events around ... The Tea Party gave safe haven (and megaphones) to the silently simmering ...
  77. [77]
    The legacies of the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street
    Mar 22, 2016 · In 2011, Sanders had given full-throated endorsement of Occupy, and his massive campaign rallies have given Occupy issues a megaphone within the ...
  78. [78]
    The Heart of the Uprising in Minneapolis | The New Yorker
    Jun 15, 2020 · Activists delivered speeches between the gas pumps at a filling station; messages in chalk—“fight back,” “Stay Woke”—covered the street.
  79. [79]
    Megaphone and Hearing Protection What You Need to Know
    Mar 31, 2023 · A megaphone can produce noise levels of up to 110 dB, which is significantly louder than 85 dB. Therefore, it is important to use hearing ...
  80. [80]
    Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) - NIDCD
    Apr 16, 2025 · Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) occurs when the sensitive structures in the inner ear are damaged by loud sound.Missing: megaphone | Show results with:megaphone
  81. [81]
    WHO releases new standard to tackle rising threat of hearing loss
    Mar 2, 2022 · Exposure to loud sounds causes temporary hearing loss or tinnitus. But prolonged or repeated exposure can lead to permanent hearing damage, ...Missing: megaphone | Show results with:megaphone
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Noise Exposure and Hearing Conservation - OSHA
    For noise, OSHA's permissible exposure limit (PEL) is an 8-hour TWA noise level of 90 dBA. 1 Time of exposure is reduced by half for each 5 dBA increase.
  83. [83]
    OSHA worksite noise regulations - Healthy Hearing
    Apr 24, 2024 · According to OSHA's standards, employers must implement a hearing conservation program when noise exposure is at or above 85 decibels averaged over 8 working ...
  84. [84]
    Residents complain of megaphone use by protestors | Local News
    Jun 23, 2020 · Black Lives Matter protest organizers will have to wait until June 24 to receive an amplified noise permit after downtown businesses and ...
  85. [85]
    2 Ohio Protesters Accused Of Causing Hearing Loss ... - CBS News
    Jan 29, 2021 · Two people accused of causing permanent hearing loss to a Cleveland restaurant employee while using megaphones during a coronavirus protest outside the eatery ...
  86. [86]
    Can protesters legally use megaphones in your face while picking ...
    Nov 19, 2021 · Today at my kids' school we had 2 protesters show up with megaphones and they were blasting them at people at point blank range.Question for Protest Strategy : r/Anarchy101 - RedditTips for using a megaphone or a microphone and electric speakerMore results from www.reddit.com
  87. [87]
    Neighbors sound off on protesters blaring 7am megaphones - WUSA9
    Oct 24, 2024 · The protesters blare the megaphones from 7 a.m. until shortly after 9 a.m., when the ambassador leaves for work. Some days, they also return for ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] Highway Traffic Noise | Acoustics Today
    The generated noise level is highly dependent on the road sur- face, the tire tread pattern, and construction. For the road surface, there are two broad ...
  89. [89]
    Reviewing Noise Analysis - Resources - Noise - Environment - FHWA
    Jan 6, 2018 · A 9-10 dB increase in sound level is typically judged to be twice as loud as the original sound, while a 9-10 dB reduction is half as loud.
  90. [90]
    Is Noise Pollution the Next Big Public-Health Crisis? | The New Yorker
    May 6, 2019 · Research shows that loud sound can have a significant impact on human health, as well as doing devastating damage to ecosystems. By David Owen.Missing: megaphone disruption
  91. [91]
    Noise pollution and annoyance: An urban soundscapes study - PMC
    The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of noise exposure in six urban soundscapes: Areas with high and low levels of noise in scenarios of ...Missing: megaphone | Show results with:megaphone
  92. [92]
    Noise Limits by City: Hosting Events Without Breaking the Law in 2025
    May 6, 2025 · Typically, daytime sound in residential areas is limited to 55–65 decibels (dB)—about the volume of normal conversation or mellow background ...
  93. [93]
    EPA Identifies Noise Levels Affecting Health and Welfare
    Sep 14, 2016 · Levels of 45 decibels are associated with indoor residential areas, hospitals and schools, whereas 55 decibels is identified for certain ...
  94. [94]
    § 132.05 DISTURBING NOISES. - American Legal Publishing
    Prohibited noises include loud music (10pm-7am), loudspeakers (10pm-7am weekdays), loud vehicle horns, and loud vehicle operation. Construction is restricted ...
  95. [95]
    Noise Control - City of Newark, NJ - eCode360
    No person shall cause, suffer, allow, or permit the operation of any source of sound on a particular category or property in such a manner as to create a sound ...
  96. [96]
    Summary of the Noise Control Act | US EPA
    Jul 25, 2025 · The Noise Control Act of 1972 establishes a national policy to promote an environment for all Americans free from noise that jeopardizes their health and ...Missing: amplified | Show results with:amplified
  97. [97]
    SOUND REGULATIONS IN EUROPE - Live DMA
    Feb 9, 2023 · In Europe, the sound levels authorized vary from 90 dB(A) to 114 dB(A) with momentary peaks up to 140 dB(C).Missing: amplified devices megaphones
  98. [98]
    D.C. Law 25-313. Amplified Sound Mitigation Regulation ...
    This law establishes a license for amplified sound devices in public spaces, sets decibel limits, and creates a 311 complaint option for noise.Missing: States | Show results with:States
  99. [99]
    Saia v. New York | 334 U.S. 558 (1948)
    A city ordinance forbidding the use of sound amplification devices in public places except with the permission of the Chief of Police and prescribing no ...
  100. [100]
    Saia v. New York (1948) | The First Amendment Encyclopedia
    Jan 1, 2009 · The Supreme Court in 1948 invalidated a New York town's ordinance that required police permits to use sound trucks and allowed the chief too much discretion on ...Missing: megaphone | Show results with:megaphone
  101. [101]
    Ward v. Rock Against Racism | 491 U.S. 781 (1989)
    Held: The city's sound-amplification guideline is valid under the First Amendment as a reasonable regulation of the place and manner of protected speech. Pp.
  102. [102]
    Kovacs v. Cooper | 336 U.S. 77 (1949) | Justia U.S. Supreme Court ...
    An ordinance of Trenton, New Jersey, forbids the use or operation on the public streets of a "sound truck" or of any instrument which emits "loud and raucous ...
  103. [103]
    Know Your Rights: Free Speech, Protests & Demonstrations
    If you grab a megaphone during a riot and yell "shoot the cop" or "loot the shop," you may reasonably expect trouble. Can I talk about government overthrow or ...
  104. [104]
    Appeals Court Sides With Activist In Challenge Over City's Bullhorn ...
    Dec 11, 2019 · Joseph Cuviello wanted to use a megaphone while protesting alleged animal mistreatment at a Six Flags amusement park in the Bay Area city of ...
  105. [105]
    WARD et al. v. ROCK AGAINST RACISM - FIRE
    A New York City regulation requiring performers in Central Park to use the city's sound amplification system and technicians violates the First Amendment.
  106. [106]
    Data show U.S. police more likely to use force against liberal ... - UPI
    Jan 14, 2021 · New research shows that police in the United States are roughly three times more likely to use force against liberal-leaning protesters than ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  107. [107]
    Protesters fined for using megaphone in Palm Beach
    Sep 3, 2016 · Two Lake Worth residents were fined by the town Thursday for using a megaphone last month to protest on Royal Palm Way.
  108. [108]
    Sierra Club challenges City of Boise law that chills protest
    Apr 2, 2024 · Police wielded the law once again in December 2023 against a protester using a megaphone to call for a ceasefire in Palestine. Idaho Climate ...
  109. [109]
    Sierra Club v. City of Boise, No. 1:2024cv00169 - Justia Law
    Apr 29, 2024 · The Court enjoins enforcement of Boise City Code § 5-7-3 against Sierra Club in the downt own area of Boise while this lawsuit is pending.
  110. [110]
    Boise City Council Amends Noise Ordinance to Protect Free Speech
    Jul 8, 2025 · Amend its noise ordinance to add an exception for First Amendment activities, allowing people to use megaphones or loudspeakers as part of local ...
  111. [111]
    Boise amends noise ordinance for protestors using megaphones ...
    Jul 11, 2025 · The amendment allows citizens to use loudspeakers and megaphones in peaceful protests without retaliation from police.
  112. [112]
    Chinese protesters' megaphones ruffle feathers in Washington
    Oct 21, 2024 · Chinese protesters shouting through megaphones outside the ambassador's house are irking Washington residents.
  113. [113]
    Relentless protest rocks the Israeli Embassy - The Forward
    Mar 27, 2024 · The protesters point their megaphones toward the Israeli embassy every morning, and blast the sound of a siren so loud it can be heard a ...
  114. [114]
    How Directional Sound Speakers Solve Noise? - Audfly
    Directional speakers address noise pollution by focusing audio in a controlled beam, preventing sound from spilling into unintended areas.
  115. [115]
    Directional speaker... A solution of noise pollution! - Focusonics
    Directional speakers are a type of sound system that can be a solution for noise pollution by directing sound towards a specific area or group of people.<|control11|><|separator|>