Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Minimum detectable signal

The minimum detectable signal (MDS), also referred to as the minimum discernible signal, is the smallest input signal power level that a or detection system can reliably distinguish from the prevailing , ensuring a specified probability of detection while limiting false alarms. This threshold is fundamental to the of systems in , communications, , and , as it defines the weakest target or transmission that can be processed effectively, directly impacting operational range and performance limits. In practical terms, MDS is often set at a signal 3 above the average level at the 's intermediate frequency stage, corresponding to typical values around -100 to -103 dBm for . The calculation of MDS accounts for , system imperfections, and detection requirements, using the formula MDS (dBm) = -174 + 10 \log_{10}(B) + + SNR_{\min}, where -174 dBm/Hz represents the power at standard (290 K), B is the in Hz, is the in dB quantifying added from the , and SNR_{\min} is the minimum needed for reliable detection (typically 10–13 dB in radar contexts). Factors influencing MDS include internal sources like resistor agitation and contributions, as well as external captured by the , with low- employed to minimize and enhance . In systems, the -referred MDS determines the minimum power for a discernible output, integrating into the range equation to predict maximum detection distances, though real-world losses from , clutter, and hardware inefficiencies often reduce effective range. Beyond , MDS evaluates performance in communication links, where it sets the limit for decoding faint signals, and in sensors for applications like or biomedical imaging.

Overview

Definition

The minimum detectable signal (MDS) is the smallest input signal power level at a receiver's input that produces an output (SNR) of 1 (0 dB), meaning the signal power equals the noise power at the point of detection. This threshold represents the fundamental limit of a receiver's , below which the signal cannot be distinguished from with acceptable confidence. In some contexts, such as receivers, MDS is defined at 3 dB above the noise level for a discernible signal. The concept of MDS emerged in the context of early radio receivers during the 1940s, evolving directly from advancements in radar technology, where detecting faint echoes amid and was essential for military applications. MDS is typically expressed in units of dBm (decibels relative to 1 milliwatt) or absolute watts, and its value depends on the receiver's , as wider bandwidths increase and thus raise the minimum detectable threshold. Typical values range from -100 to -103 dBm for radar receivers.

Importance in Engineering Applications

The minimum detectable signal (MDS) plays a pivotal role in defining receiver across disciplines, particularly in systems where it establishes the threshold for discerning weak incoming signals against inherent backgrounds. In and communications, MDS determines the system's ability to handle low-power transmissions from distant or attenuated sources, ensuring reliable operation in environments with high noise floors. This sensitivity metric is especially vital for applications involving faint signals, as it directly correlates with the receiver's capacity to achieve a specified (SNR) for accurate detection. In system design, MDS profoundly impacts the architecture of communication links and radar setups by guiding selections in gain, configurations, and overall power budgeting. Engineers leverage MDS calculations to optimize link margins, ensuring that transmitted signals remain above the detection threshold over extended ranges, which is critical for maintaining performance in bandwidth-constrained or power-limited scenarios. For instance, in satellite communications, a well-optimized MDS enables ground stations to receive extremely weak signals from deep-space probes, facilitating data relay over billions of kilometers with minimal retransmissions. However, pursuing a lower MDS introduces key trade-offs, as enhanced can elevate the risk of false alarms from fluctuations or clutter, potentially degrading system reliability. To mitigate this, designers often narrow bandwidths to reduce ingress, though this compromises data throughput; alternatively, advanced filtering may be employed at the expense of added complexity and cost. Notably, incremental reductions in receiver —directly lowering MDS—yield performance gains equivalent to major boosts in transmitter power, underscoring its leverage in efficient trade studies.

Fundamental Principles

Noise Characteristics in Receivers

In receiver systems, noise represents random fluctuations that degrade the ability to detect weak signals, with the primary sources including thermal noise, , and . Thermal noise, also known as Johnson-Nyquist noise, arises from the random thermal agitation of charge carriers in resistive components, producing a spectrum that is independent of frequency and present in all electronic devices at temperatures above . Shot noise originates from the discrete nature of charge carriers, such as electrons crossing a potential barrier in diodes or transistors, manifesting as Poisson-distributed fluctuations and becoming prominent in devices with current flow. Flicker noise, or 1/f noise, predominates at low frequencies (typically below 1 kHz) and is attributed to imperfections in material surfaces or interfaces, such as trapping and detrapping of charges in semiconductors, resulting in a power inversely proportional to frequency. To quantify and compare noise across systems, the concept of is employed, defining an equivalent T that characterizes the noise power as if it were purely noise from a at that . The standard reference is 290 , corresponding to , allowing normalization of noise performance in receivers regardless of their actual physical . This metric facilitates the assessment of how receiver noise contributes to the overall system baseline, influencing the minimum detectable signal level. The role of bandwidth B is critical, as noise power increases linearly with B; wider bandwidths admit more noise energy across the frequency spectrum, thereby raising the and potentially masking faint signals. In practice, designers balance bandwidth to match the signal's characteristics while minimizing unnecessary inclusion. sources are categorized as internal or external: internal is generated within the components, such as the aforementioned , , and types, while external enters via the and includes environmental contributions like atmospheric or radiation at approximately 2.7 K. These external sources can dominate in low-frequency applications, such as HF communications, whereas internal often limits performance in receivers. These noise characteristics establish the fundamental limit for signal detection thresholds, where the minimum detectable signal must exceed the cumulative noise to achieve reliable discrimination.

Signal Detection Thresholds

In signal detection theory, the Neyman-Pearson lemma provides the foundation for optimal by maximizing the probability of detection P_d for a fixed probability of P_{fa}, through a that compares the observed data against a derived from the . This approach is particularly relevant in and communication systems, where the hypotheses typically involve the presence (H_1) or absence (H_0) of a signal in , ensuring the most powerful test under constraints like P_{fa} = 10^{-6} and target P_d = 0.9. Threshold setting in detection relies on establishing a minimum (SNR) that achieves desired P_d and P_{fa} levels, with analog detection often requiring 10-13 for non-fluctuating targets in single-pulse scenarios to balance reliability against variability. In systems, processing techniques such as pulse integration introduce , reducing the required SNR to as low as 6-8 for equivalent performance by averaging multiple samples to suppress . These thresholds are set relative to receiver characteristics, adapting to environmental conditions without altering the core probabilistic framework. To handle varying noise levels, (CFAR) techniques employ adaptive ing, estimating local noise statistics from surrounding range-Doppler cells and scaling the detection to maintain a constant P_{fa} regardless of fluctuations. Common implementations include cell-averaging CFAR, which computes the as \alpha times the average in reference cells, where \alpha is chosen to satisfy the target P_{fa}; this method incurs a small detection loss of about 0.5-1 dB compared to fixed s but enhances robustness in non-homogeneous environments like clutter. In radar applications, target fluctuations significantly influence detection thresholds, modeled by Swerling cases that describe statistical variations in radar cross-section over time or pulses. Swerling I and III represent slow-fluctuating targets ( with 2 or 4 , respectively), requiring higher SNR—up to 21 for Swerling I at P_d = 0.9, P_{fa} = 10^{-6}—due to scan-to-scan variability, while Swerling II and IV model fast fluctuations, demanding even greater integration to mitigate pulse-to-pulse changes. These models guide threshold adjustments, increasing required power by 6-10 over non-fluctuating cases to ensure consistent detection performance.

Mathematical Formulation

Thermal Noise and Bandwidth

Thermal noise, also known as Johnson-Nyquist noise, represents the fundamental limit to signal detection in systems due to the random thermal motion of charge carriers in conductors. This noise arises even in the absence of an applied signal and sets the irreducible for receivers. The total N within a B at T is given by the Nyquist formula: N = k T B where k is Boltzmann's constant, with a value of $1.38 \times 10^{-23} J/K. The derivation of this formula stems from the in , which assigns an average energy of \frac{1}{2} [kT](/page/KT) per degree of freedom to each mode of oscillation in a system at . For electrical in a , this applies to both the electric and components, effectively doubling the contribution to yield a mean energy of [kT](/page/KT) per mode. Integrating over the frequency spectrum within the leads to the of [kT](/page/KT) (in units of power per hertz), resulting in the total N = k T B. In standard engineering specifications, the reference temperature T is taken as 290 K, corresponding to approximately 17°C, as defined by IEEE standards for noise figure measurements to ensure consistent comparisons across devices. For systems operating at cryogenic temperatures, such as those in or low-noise amplifiers cooled with , the effective noise temperature can be reduced significantly—often to below 5 K—thereby lowering the thermal and improving detection sensitivity. The bandwidth B in the Nyquist formula refers to the effective noise bandwidth, which for non-rectangular filters (such as Gaussian or Butterworth responses common in receivers) differs from the 3 dB bandwidth. The effective noise bandwidth is the width of an ideal rectangular filter that would pass the same total from a source, typically calculated as B = \int_0^\infty |H(f)|^2 \, df / |H(f_{\max})|^2, where H(f) is the filter's . This adjustment accounts for the filter's shape, ensuring accurate estimation in practical systems. This thermal noise power forms the basis for calculations in determining minimum detectable signals.

Incorporating Noise Figure and SNR

The minimum detectable signal (MDS) extends the ideal thermal noise floor by accounting for receiver imperfections through the noise factor and the required signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for reliable detection. Building on the thermal noise power N = k T B, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is the standard temperature (typically 290 K), and B is the bandwidth, the complete MDS formula incorporates the linear noise factor F and the minimum required SNR (\text{SNR}_{\min}) as \text{MDS} = k T B \cdot F \cdot \text{SNR}_{\min}. In decibels, this is expressed as \text{MDS (dBm)} = -174 + 10 \log_{10} B + \text{NF} + \text{SNR}_{\min}, where -174 dBm/Hz represents the thermal noise spectral density at 290 K, and NF is the noise figure in dB. The factor F quantifies the degradation in SNR caused by the and is defined as F = \frac{\text{SNR}_{\text{in}}}{\text{SNR}_{\text{out}}}, representing the by which the device exceeds the performance. It is commonly expressed in decibels as \text{NF} = 10 \log_{10} F. For multi-stage systems, the total factor follows the Friis cascade formula: F_{\text{total}} = F_1 + \frac{F_2 - 1}{G_1} + \frac{F_3 - 1}{G_1 G_2} + \cdots + \frac{F_N - 1}{G_1 G_2 \cdots G_{N-1}}, where F_n is the factor and G_n is the available (linear) of the n-th ; this emphasizes the importance of low and high gain in the first to minimize overall degradation. The minimum required SNR (\text{SNR}_{\min}) specifies the output SNR threshold for detecting the signal amid , typically 0 for basic detection where signal power equals noise power, but often 3–10 or higher in practice to ensure reliable performance with low false alarms. Processing techniques, such as pulse integration in systems, provide that effectively reduces \text{SNR}_{\min} by improving the post-processing SNR, allowing detection of weaker input signals. For example, consider a receiver with NF = 3 dB (F = 2), bandwidth B = 1 MHz, T = 290 K, and \text{SNR}_{\min} = 10 dB. The MDS is calculated as -174 + 10 \log_{10}(10^6) + 3 + 10 = -174 + 60 + 3 + 10 = -101 dBm, representing the input power needed to achieve the required output SNR.

Practical Considerations

Measurement Techniques

The measurement of the minimum detectable signal (MDS) in receivers typically involves determining the noise figure (NF) or directly assessing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the detection threshold through empirical techniques. These methods ensure accurate characterization in laboratory settings by accounting for receiver performance under controlled conditions. Standard approaches rely on calibrated equipment to inject known signals or noise and observe the receiver's response. One widely used technique for MDS determination is the Y-factor method, which measures the of the and subsequently computes MDS using established relations. This method employs and noise sources connected to the input; the source operates at an excess noise temperature T_h (typically around 15,000 K), while the source is at ambient or lower temperature T_c (e.g., 77 K using ). The output is recorded for each source, yielding P_h and P_c, from which the Y-factor is calculated as Y = P_h / P_c. The effective input noise temperature T_e is then derived as T_e = (T_h - Y T_c) / (Y - 1), and the as F = (T_e / 290) + 1, where 290 K is the standard reference temperature. MDS can be obtained from via the relation MDS = k T_0 B F \cdot \text{SNR}_{\min}, with k as Boltzmann's constant, T_0 = 290 K, B as , and \text{SNR}_{\min} as the minimum required SNR (often 10-13 for detection). This approach achieves uncertainties as low as 0.04 with calibrated meters but requires precise knowledge of source temperatures to within 1-5% for accuracy. Another direct method for measuring MDS involves using a to inject progressively attenuated continuous-wave () or modulated signals into the while monitoring the output SNR. A calibrated , often paired with a variable attenuator, delivers a known input power level starting above the expected . The output is observed using a power meter, , or to compute SNR, typically defined as the point where the signal equals the (0 SNR) or reaches a specified like 10 for reliable detection. The input power is decreased in steps (e.g., 1 ) until the output SNR drops to the , with the corresponding input power recorded as MDS. This technique is particularly effective for receivers and allows assessment of post-detection effects, but it demands stable output and to prevent . Measurements are repeated multiple times to account for statistical variations in noise, ensuring confidence levels above 95%. For wideband or complex modulated systems, vector signal analyzers (VSAs) provide an automated approach by performing swept-power tests to identify the 3 SNR degradation point. The VSA captures the receiver's input and output spectra during signal injection from a generator, computing SNR as the ratio of signal power to integrated in the . As input power decreases, the VSA monitors for a 3 drop in output SNR relative to a high-SNR baseline, marking the MDS where significantly impacts (e.g., error vector magnitude rises). This method supports digital modulation formats like QPSK or OFDM, with sweeps covering 20-60 dynamic range, and integrates time- and frequency-domain for precise threshold detection. It is advantageous for systems with nonlinearities, offering resolutions down to 0.1 but requiring pre-calibration of the VSA's . Accurate MDS measurements necessitate traceable calibration standards and careful management of mismatches, such as voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR). Calibration involves using primary standards like coaxial power sensors or noise diodes verified against national institutes to ensure accuracy within 0.5-1% and noise source temperatures to 1-2 . Mismatches (VSWR > 1.05) between source, receiver, and interconnects can introduce errors up to 0.2 per 0.1 VSWR unit, inflating apparent MDS by altering effective input power; thus, attenuators or isolators (achieving VSWR < 1.02) are employed, and corrections are applied using mismatch factors M = \frac{1 - |\Gamma_s \Gamma_L|^2}{(1 - |\Gamma_s|^2)(1 - |\Gamma_L|^2)}, where \Gamma are coefficients. Field or lab setups without such standards can yield errors exceeding 3 , underscoring the need for periodic recalibration per IEEE or NIST guidelines. These measurements are interpreted using the theoretical MDS formula for validation.

Factors Influencing Detection Limits

In real-world receiver systems, interfering signals such as adjacent channel interference (ACI) or intentional jamming can significantly elevate the effective noise floor, thereby degrading the minimum detectable signal (MDS). ACI occurs when energy from nearby frequency channels leaks into the desired band due to imperfect filtering or nonlinearities in the receiver front-end, adding unwanted power that masks weak signals. For instance, in radar receivers, external RF interference at levels just below the nominal noise floor can increase the receiver's noise figure by up to 0.5 dB, directly worsening sensitivity. Jamming, often deliberate in electronic warfare scenarios, further amplifies this by flooding the spectrum, forcing the MDS to rise proportionally with the interferer power to maintain adequate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). These effects modify the base MDS calculation by incorporating an additional interference term into the total noise power, effectively raising the detection threshold. Temperature variations and component aging also play critical roles in limiting MDS by altering the noise figure (NF) over time and environmental conditions. Higher operating temperatures increase thermal noise generation within active devices like transistors, as noise power is directly proportional to absolute temperature, leading to NF degradation of several dB in extreme cases. In silicon-germanium heterojunction bipolar transistors (), for example, cooling to cryogenic levels can reduce NF and improve MDS, but ambient fluctuations from -40°C to 85°C can cause up to 1-2 dB shifts. Aging exacerbates this through mechanisms like bias-temperature instability in CMOS devices, where long-term stress increases threshold voltages and reduces transconductance, resulting in NF rises of 1-3 dB after thousands of hours of operation in low-noise amplifiers (). Such changes accumulate in cascaded systems, compounding the overall NF and thus elevating the MDS from its ideal value. In digital receivers, quantization noise from analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) and linearity issues like intermodulation distortion (IMD) further constrain low-signal performance. Quantization noise arises from the finite bit depth of the ADC, introducing a uniform noise floor that limits the effective number of bits (ENOB) and raises the minimum SNR for detection; for an 8-bit ADC, this can add equivalent noise power comparable to thermal noise at low input levels, degrading MDS by 6-10 dB depending on oversampling. IMD, generated by nonlinear mixing of strong out-of-band signals, produces in-band spurs that mimic or obscure weak desired signals, particularly in wideband systems where third-order intercept point (IP3) is a key limiter. These digital domain effects modify the base MDS by adding quantization and distortion components to the noise budget, often dominating in software-defined radios where ADC resolution trades off against dynamic range. To mitigate these factors and approach theoretical MDS limits, several strategies are employed in receiver design. Low-noise amplifiers (LNAs) placed early in the chain minimize NF contributions from subsequent stages, providing 10-20 dB of gain with NF as low as 0.5 dB at microwave frequencies, thereby suppressing downstream noise impact. Cooling techniques, such as thermoelectric or cryogenic systems, reduce device temperatures to lower thermal noise, achieving NF improvements of 5-10 dB in sensitive applications like radio astronomy. Adaptive filtering algorithms, including least mean squares (LMS) methods, dynamically suppress interference by estimating and subtracting noise or jamming components in real-time, enhancing SNR by 3-15 dB in varying environments without hardware changes. These approaches collectively lower the effective noise floor, allowing MDS values closer to the fundamental thermal limit.

Applications

In Radar and Sensing Systems

In radar and sensing systems, the minimum detectable signal (MDS) fundamentally limits the ability to discern weak echoes from noise, directly influencing target detection capabilities and system range. Integrated into the radar range equation, MDS determines the maximum unambiguous detection range R_{\max}, expressed as R_{\max} = \left[ \frac{P_t G_t G_r \lambda^2 \sigma}{(4\pi)^3 \cdot \text{MDS}} \right]^{1/4}, where P_t is the transmitted power, G_t and G_r are the transmit and receive gains, \lambda is the wavelength, and \sigma is the target's radar cross-section. A reduction in MDS thus extends R_{\max} by the fourth root of the improvement factor, enabling longer-range sensing for low-observable targets such as stealth aircraft or distant precipitation. This relationship underscores MDS as a key design parameter, balancing receiver sensitivity against practical constraints like atmospheric attenuation. In pulsed radar systems, MDS is shaped by the interplay between pulse characteristics and receiver design. The receiver bandwidth B is matched to the inverse of the pulse width \tau (i.e., B \approx 1/\tau), so shorter pulses enhance range resolution but expand B, elevating noise power N = k T B F (where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is temperature, and F is noise figure) and consequently raising MDS. To offset this degradation and sustain equivalent signal energy for detection, shorter pulses demand higher peak transmit power, a common trade-off in high-resolution surveillance radars. Continuous-wave (CW) radars, by contrast, avoid pulsing and can utilize narrower bandwidths for equivalent Doppler processing, yielding a lower MDS in velocity-focused applications, though range determination requires frequency modulation. Phased array radars further mitigate MDS limitations through digital beamforming, which steers beams electronically to concentrate energy and suppress sidelobes. This process amplifies effective gains G_t and G_r proportionally to the element count, boosting SNR and permitting detection of signals below the baseline MDS of a single-element receiver. Such improvements are pivotal in multifunction arrays for simultaneous tracking of multiple targets. A practical illustration appears in weather sensing radars like the NEXRAD network, where MDS values around -114 dBm facilitate detection of faint precipitation echoes with reflectivities as low as about 2 dBZ at 100 km. These systems often incorporate constant false alarm rate (CFAR) thresholding to maintain reliable detection amid varying clutter.

In Communication Systems

In communication systems, the minimum detectable signal (MDS) defines the sensitivity S_{rx} = MDS, representing the lowest input power level at which the can reliably demodulate the signal while maintaining an acceptable bit error rate (BER), typically $10^{-5} or better. This threshold is integral to the link budget calculation, which determines the maximum allowable L and thus the communication range. The received power must satisfy P_{rx} = P_{tx} + G_{tx} + G_{rx} - L > MDS (in dB), or equivalently in linear terms, P_{tx} \cdot G_{tx} \cdot G_{rx} / L > MDS, where P_{tx} is the transmit power, and G_{tx}, G_{rx} are the transmitter and gains, respectively. This ensures the signal exceeds the sufficiently for detection, with L often dominated by free-space propagation and environmental attenuation in wireless links. The choice of modulation scheme directly influences the minimum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) required, thereby affecting the effective MDS. For uncoded binary (BPSK) and quadrature (QPSK) in AWGN channels, approximately 9.6 dB E_b/N_0 is required for BER below $10^{-5}, corresponding to about 9.6 dB SNR for BPSK and 12.6 dB SNR for QPSK due to the latter's higher . This elevated SNR requirement for QPSK raises the effective MDS compared to BPSK for a given noise level, impacting system design by limiting range or requiring higher transmit power in bandwidth-constrained scenarios. in the chain further degrades MDS by 3–10 dB depending on the front-end quality. In systems, MDS is often expressed in terms of the average number of per bit rather than power, with from arrival statistics dominating over at low signal levels. The sets the fundamental bound for error-free detection, requiring approximately 10 per bit for on-off keying (OOK) to achieve low BER (e.g., $10^{-9}) using ideal photon-counting receivers, as this minimizes quantum uncertainty in distinguishing '0' and '1' states. Advanced schemes like coherent detection or phase-sensitive amplification can approach or surpass this limit, but practical systems remain 3–6 above it due to imperfect detectors and dark counts. For instance, in networks, receivers in mmWave bands (e.g., 28 GHz, ) exhibit MDS around -90 to -100 dBm for configurations supporting high data rates, such as 100 MHz with QPSK modulation, enabling reliable uplink reception despite high and atmospheric absorption. This sensitivity level, derived from thermal noise, , required SNR, and integrated , allows mmWave systems to achieve gigabit speeds over short ranges with assistance.

References

  1. [1]
    Minimum Detectable Signal - MDS - Radartutorial.eu
    The minimum discernible signal is defined as the useful echo power at the antenna, which gives on the screen a discernable blip. Its value is determined at an A ...
  2. [2]
    Minimum Detectable Signal Calculator - everything RF
    The minimum detectable signal (MDS) is the minimum signal power level over the background noise that can be detected & processed by a receiver/detector.
  3. [3]
    Receiver Sensitivity / Noise - RF Cafe
    The "black box" term minimum detectable signal (MDS) is often used for Smin but can cause confusion because a receiver may be able to detect a signal, but not ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Minimum detectable signal - Microwave Encyclopedia
    Minimum detectable signal. ... New for March 2019: How do you define (and calculate) the inimum detectable signal in a receiver system?
  5. [5]
    [PDF] CHAPTER 3 - Helitavia
    Occasionally, a minimum-detectable-signal definition is employed. 2 ... If the radar employs a phase-coded signal, the elements of the receiver ...
  6. [6]
    Minimum Detectable Signal - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Minimum Detectable Signal is the sum of the drift and noise, or 2% of the full scale reading whichever is greater. •. Sensitivity is the value of the signal due ...
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Introduction: Sensors and RCS - Faculty
    The minimum received power that the radar receiver can “sense” is referred to as the minimum detectable signal (MDS) and is denoted Smin . Smin. R. Pr. Pr ∝1 ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    System Noise-Figure Analysis for Modern Radio Receivers
    Jun 14, 2013 · ... T0 is defined as the reference noise temperature of 290K. Unsurprisingly, a noise factor of 1 is represented by an equivalent noise temperature ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Receivers Bandwidth - Radartutorial.eu
    The wider the bandwidth, the greater the degree of noise that will be input to the receiver. Since noise exists at all frequencies, the broader the ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] System Noise Concepts with DSN Applications - DESCANSO
    The sources of noise can be separated into external and internal noise. Sources of external noise [1–5] include Cosmic Microwave. Background (CMB), Cosmic ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P.372-15 - Radio noise*
    The noise for a receiving system is composed of a number of noise sources at the receiving terminal of the system. Both external noise and the internal noise ...
  16. [16]
    Noise Figure: Overview of Noise Measurement Methods - Tektronix
    T0 in the above equation refers to a standard temperature, usually 290K. Noise factor and noise figure are an indication of the excess noise (beyond the system ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Lecture 6: Neyman-Pearson Detectors
    A classic result due to Neyman and Pearson shows that the solution to this type of optimization is again a likelihood ratio test. 1 Neyman-Pearson Lemma.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Detection Theory
    General Framework for Radar Detection ... If both H0 and H1 are simple, we can find the most powerful test of size α using the Neyman-Pearson Lemma.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Radar Detection - DSP-Book
    SNR np 1= Pfa. 10. 9. –. = PD np. 1 10 50 100. , , ,. = Pfa. 10. 6. –. = Pfa. 10. 12. –. = Figure 4.10. Probability of detection versus SNR, single pulse. . Pfa.
  20. [20]
    Modeling Radar Detectability Factors - MATLAB & Simulink
    A 1 m 2 target at ranges below 70 km will be detected with the probability of detection greater than or equal to 0.9, while between 70 km and 100 km it will be ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) Detection - Purdue Engineering
    CA-CFAR Pd versus N and SNR (dB) for a desired Pfa = 1 × 10−6. Figure from: Michael F. Rimbert, Constant False Alarm Rate Detection Techniques Based on ...
  22. [22]
    Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) Detection - MATLAB & Simulink
    This example introduces constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detection and shows how to use CFARDetector and CFARDetector2D in the Phased Array System Toolbox.Introduction · Cell Averaging CFAR Detection · CFAR Detection Using...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Probability of Detection for Fluctuating Targets - RAND
    This report considers the probability of detection of a target by a pulsed search radar, when the target has a fluctuating cross section. Formulas for detection ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Thermal Agitation of Electric Charge in Conductors - Physics 123/253
    THERMAL AGITATION OF ELECTRIC CHARGE. IN CONDUCTORS*. BY H. NYQUIST. ABSTRACT. Tke electromotive force die to tkernsul agitation in conductors is calculated by ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Thermal Johnson Noise Generated by a Resistor - Physics 123/253
    From the Planck distribution or the equipartition theorem, the mean thermal energy contained in each electromagnetic mode or photon state in the ...
  26. [26]
    Precision Measurement Method for Cryogenic Amplifier Noise ...
    Mar 1, 2006 · We report precision measurements of the effective input noise temperature of a cryogenic (liquid helium temperature) MMIC amplifier at the ...
  27. [27]
    Low Noise Amplifiers - Pushing the limits of low noise - NRAO
    Cryogenic cooling of receivers to reduce their noise temperature is especially important in radio astronomy and in satellite and space communication.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] EQUIVALENT NOISE BANDWIDTH ANALYSIS FROM TRANSFER ...
    Equivalent noise bandwidth - the bandwidth of an ideal rectangular filter which passes the same average noise power from a white noise source as the single.Missing: effective non-
  29. [29]
    None
    ### Definition and Formula for Minimum Detectable Signal (MDS)
  30. [30]
    None
    ### Extracted Definitions and Formulas
  31. [31]
    Introduction to Pulse Integration and Fluctuation Loss in Radar
    The radar detectability factor is the minimum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) required to declare a detection with the specified probabilities of detection, ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The Measurement of noise performance factors: a metrology guide
    Effective input noise temperature; measurement errors; noise factor; noise measurements; noise performance factors; noise temperature;. Y-factor measurements.
  33. [33]
    Noise figure measurements | Rohde & Schwarz
    SNR degradation is the linear ratio of input SNR to output SNR. Noise figure is typically measured with either a spectrum analyzer or vector network analyzer . ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] An improved method for microwave power calibration, with ...
    In the procedures for microwave power calibration, which are well documented, the subject of mismatch errors (or corrections) plays a major role.<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Radar Fundamentals - Faculty
    This receiver is a superheterodyne receiver because of the intermediate frequency (IF) amplifier. (Similar to Figure 1.4 in Skolnik.) • Coherent radar uses the ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] NEXRAD Technical Information - Radar Operations Center
    Minimum Discernible Signal, SP: < -112 dBm @ Antenna Port (Typically < -114 dBm, est. by NP = kTBG). Minimum Discernible Signal, LP: < -116 dBm @ Antenna ...Missing: detectable | Show results with:detectable
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Range Extension in IEEE 802.11ah Systems Through Relaying - arXiv
    In order to assess the achievable ranges, minimum detectable signal (MDS) levels are also given for. MCS0, in case where the channel bandwidth is B=2MHz (MDS = ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Adapting to the Wireless Channel - cs.Princeton
    For each modulation: What are the SNRs required for BER < 10-5? • BPSK: 7 dB; QPSK: 12 dB; 16-QAM: 20 dB; 64-QAM: 26 dB ...
  39. [39]
    Receiver Sensitivity in 5G Sub-6 GHz and mmWave
    Jun 7, 2025 · Sensitivity values here typically range from -100 to -120 dBm. For example, using a 20 MHz bandwidth with QPSK, 3GPP TS 38.101-1 shows ...Missing: MDS | Show results with:MDS