Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pollination

Pollination is the transfer of pollen grains from the anther of a flower to the stigma of the same or another flower, initiating fertilization and enabling seed and fruit development in angiosperms.^[1]^[2]^[3] This process can be self-pollination, occurring within a single flower or plant, or cross-pollination, involving pollen transfer between different plants, with the latter promoting genetic diversity through outcrossing.^[4]^[5] Pollination occurs via biotic vectors, such as insects, birds, bats, and other animals that inadvertently transport pollen while foraging, or abiotic mechanisms, including wind dispersal in grasses and trees or water in aquatic plants.^[1]^[6] Biotic pollination underpins the reproduction of approximately 80% of flowering plant species, sustaining biodiversity, ecosystem stability, and habitats for myriad organisms.^[7]^[8] In agriculture, it is indispensable for crop yields, with about 75% of leading global food crops depending on animal pollinators, contributing substantially to human nutrition and economic value exceeding hundreds of billions annually.^[7]^[9] Declines in pollinator populations, driven by habitat fragmentation, pesticides, and disease, pose risks to these services, highlighting the need for habitat conservation and sustainable practices to maintain pollination efficacy.^[7]^[10]

Fundamentals

Definition and Biological Role

Pollination is the biological process involving the transfer of pollen grains, which contain male gametes, from the anther of a stamen to the stigma of a pistil in flowering plants.^[1] This transfer sets the stage for pollen germination and the subsequent transport of sperm cells to the ovule, distinct from fertilization itself, which fuses gametes to form zygotes.^[3] In angiosperms, successful pollination is a prerequisite for seed and fruit formation, enabling the plant's reproductive cycle.^[11] The fundamental role of pollination lies in facilitating sexual reproduction, particularly through cross-pollination, which mixes genetic material from genetically distinct individuals to enhance offspring viability. Cross-pollination promotes heterosis, or hybrid vigor, yielding progeny with superior traits such as increased biomass, fertility, and stress resistance relative to self-pollinated counterparts, as evidenced by controlled breeding studies across species like maize and tomatoes.^[12] In contrast, self-pollination limits genetic diversity, often leading to inbreeding depression over generations.^[13] Empirical data indicate that approximately 90% of the roughly 350,000 flowering plant species depend on external vectors for pollen dispersal, encompassing both biotic pollinators and abiotic mechanisms like wind, rather than relying solely on self-pollination.^[14] This vector-mediated process sustains genetic variability essential for adaptation and population resilience in natural ecosystems. In agricultural contexts, pollination directly influences yield, with 75% of global food crop types requiring animal pollinators for fruit and seed set, including near-total dependence in crops such as apples (Malus domestica) and almonds (Prunus dulcis), where pollinator activity can account for 75-95% of production potential per Food and Agriculture Organization assessments.^[15]

Self-Pollination versus Cross-Pollination

Self-pollination involves the transfer of pollen from the anther to the stigma within the same flower (autogamy) or between different flowers on the same plant (geitonogamy), enabling reproduction without external vectors.^[16] This mode assures seed set in pollinator-scarce or isolated conditions, as observed in species like peas (Pisum sativum) and tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum), where flowers are structurally adapted for intrafloral pollen deposition via vibration or gravity.^[17] ^[18] In contrast, cross-pollination requires pollen transfer between genetically distinct plants, typically mediated by biotic or abiotic agents, fostering heterozygosity through allele recombination and reducing homozygosity for deleterious recessives.^[19] Self-pollination often incurs inbreeding depression, manifesting as reduced progeny viability, growth, and fecundity due to the unmasking of recessive deleterious alleles; studies across species like Acacia dealbata report 20-50% lower seed production, survival, and biomass in selfed versus outcrossed offspring.^[20] In alfalfa (Medicago sativa), selfing yields a 13-15% decline in seeds per pod or stem compared to cross-pollination.^[21] These fitness costs accumulate over generations, eroding adaptive potential in variable environments, though chronic selfers may purge lethal alleles, mitigating long-term depression in stable habitats.^[22] Geitonogamy, while vector-dependent, genetically equates to selfing within clonal ramets, amplifying inbreeding risks akin to full autogamy.^[16] Cross-pollination enhances genetic diversity, yielding heterosis or hybrid vigor, as evidenced in maize (Zea mays), where F1 hybrids from outcrossed inbred lines produce 20% higher grain yields than open-pollinated varieties on equivalent land.^[23] This stems from overdominance and epistatic interactions preserving favorable heterozygotes, bolstering resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses.^[24] Empirical data from perennial herbs show outcrossed progeny outperforming selfed by factors exceeding 2:1 in lifetime fitness metrics.^[25] Many plants exhibit facultative selfing, conditionally increasing autogamy rates under pollinator limitation or environmental stress to offset reproductive failure, though primary mating systems rarely shift permanently due to entrenched genetic loads.^[26] In drought-stressed populations, self-compatibility rises, prioritizing immediate seed set over long-term variability.^[27] Trade-offs thus favor self-pollination for reproductive assurance in predictable niches and cross-pollination for evolutionary flexibility amid heterogeneity.

Methods of Pollination

Biotic Pollination

Biotic pollination refers to the transfer of pollen mediated by animals, which facilitates reproduction in approximately 87.5% of angiosperm species worldwide.^[28] Insects dominate these interactions, accounting for the vast majority of animal-mediated pollen transfers observed in field studies across diverse ecosystems.^[29] Among insects, bees exhibit specialized behaviors such as buzz pollination, where rapid thoracic vibrations dislodge pollen from poricidal anthers, enabling efficient extraction in plants like Solanaceae species; this method can double vibration amplitude at anther tips, optimizing release.^[30] Larger bees prove more effective in such systems due to better stigma contact, as smaller individuals often fail to achieve sufficient pollen deposition.^[31] Pollination syndromes enhance specificity, with bee-pollinated flowers often featuring ultraviolet reflectance patterns invisible to humans but guiding foragers to rewards; empirical correlations confirm these signals align with insect visitation rates.^[32] Trap-lining foraging, where pollinators like bees revisit flower patches in repeatable sequences, boosts efficiency by minimizing travel costs and increasing pollen dispersal distances, as documented in behavioral observations.^[33] This strategy reduces self-pollination risks and elevates overall reproductive success in patchy resources.^[34] Vertebrate pollinators include birds and bats, which service distinct floral adaptations. Hummingbirds target long-tubular flowers, with bill length positively correlating to corolla depth for precise nectar access and pollen pickup; long-billed species outperform shorter ones in such specialized systems.^[35] Bats pollinate night-blooming species like agaves, where their visits yield higher seed set and fruit quality compared to alternative vectors, with non-bat pollination resulting in markedly reduced seed production.^[36] These interactions underscore biotic vectors' targeted efficiency over generalized dispersal.^[37]

Abiotic Pollination

Abiotic pollination encompasses pollen transfer via physical agents such as wind and water, independent of biological vectors, and prevails in gymnosperms like conifers as well as open-habitat angiosperms including grasses.^[38] This mode relies on passive dispersal governed by atmospheric or hydrodynamic forces, characterized by prodigious pollen production to offset low deposition precision; pollen-ovule ratios in anemophilous plants exceed those in biotic systems by orders of magnitude, indicating success rates per grain often below 0.01% based on aerodynamic dilution models.^[39] Anemophily, the dominant abiotic form, features lightweight, buoyant pollen grains optimized for airborne transport, as seen in conifers where pine species disperse pollen over distances up to 100 km via mesoscale winds, though effective pollen flow from such ranges measures around 4.4% in population-level studies.^[40] In grasses, pollen capture occurs primarily through impaction on windward stigmatic surfaces, but turbulent airflow limits efficiency, with models showing deposition probabilities declining sharply beyond local scales despite high release volumes.^[41] Viability post-dispersal varies; pine pollen retains 2-57% germination capacity after 3-41 km travel, reflecting physical settling and desiccation losses.^[42] Hydrophily, confined to aquatic environments, is rarer and involves water-mediated transfer without animal intermediaries. In Vallisneria spiralis, ephydrophily entails male anthers releasing pollen slicks on the surface, currents carrying them to emergent female flowers via surface tension gradients.^[43] Hypohydrophily, as in Zostera seagrasses, relies on submerged pollen threads extending up to 15 cm for direct stigmatic contact, with mucilage aiding flotation and adhesion amid low-energy flows.^[44] Efficiency hinges on habitat-specific currents, but overall waste remains high due to dilution in three-dimensional aquatic volumes. Ombrophily, involving raindrop splashes, supplements pollination in select orchids, where precipitation dislodges pollinia between nearby flowers, yielding seed set rates up to 10% in deceptive species under wet conditions.^[45] These mechanisms suit environments with consistent abiotic fluxes but incur substantial pollen expenditure, as quantified by elevated output in fossil gymnosperm records from open Paleozoic landscapes.^[38]

Mechanisms and Adaptations

Pollen Dispersal and Germination

Pollen dispersal involves the physical transfer of grains from anther to stigma, governed by biophysical forces such as electrostatic attraction, where pollen grains acquire charges typically around 1 fC, up to 40 fC, facilitating adhesion to oppositely charged pollinators without direct contact.^[46] ^[47] In cases of biotic transport by honeybees, grains are compacted into viscoelastic pellets by mixing with regurgitated nectar, exhibiting rate-dependent capillary viscous adhesion that stabilizes attachment under varying humidity and mechanical stress during flight.^[48] ^[49] Upon compatible deposition on the stigma, pollen grains absorb water and nutrients, initiating germination within minutes to hours, where the pollen tube emerges and elongates through the style toward the ovule, propelled by tip-focused growth mechanisms observed in microscopy assays.^[50] In species like lilies (Lilium spp.), tube growth rates reach several millimeters per hour, driven by cytoskeletal dynamics and vesicular trafficking, as quantified in in vitro cultures.^[51] Growth involves oscillatory extension, with wavelengths of approximately 6.3 μm per cycle, ensuring directed navigation via chemical gradients.^[52] Pollen-pistil compatibility is regulated biochemically, with self-incompatibility (SI) systems rejecting self or mismatched pollen in roughly half of flowering plant species to prevent inbreeding; in gametophytic SI via S-RNase mechanisms prevalent in families like Solanaceae and Rosaceae, pistil-expressed ribonucleases degrade incompatible tube RNA, halting growth.^[53] ^[54] Empirical assays show SI rejection reduces fertilization success, with pollen limitation from mismatches contributing to 10-60% lower seed set in controlled crosses of SI populations, though rates vary by species and environmental factors.^[55] ^[56] Successful pollen tube arrival triggers double fertilization, unique to angiosperms, where one sperm nucleus fuses with the egg to form the diploid embryo, and the second with the central cell to yield triploid endosperm; this nutrient-rich tissue empirically correlates with enhanced seed viability, as endosperm defects from failed fusion lead to abortion rates exceeding 90% in model systems.^[57] ^[58] Endosperm provisioning supports embryogenesis, with growth rates post-hybridization surpassing self-fertilization by factors of 2-3 in nuclear divisions, underscoring its causal role in angiosperm reproductive efficiency.^[59]

Floral and Pollinator Specializations

Flowers exhibit specialized morphological and chemical traits to attract and guide specific pollinators, facilitating precise pollen transfer. Nectar guides, often visible in ultraviolet light, direct insects toward reproductive structures, while floral scents are tailored to pollinator sensory capabilities; for instance, moth-pollinated species emit strong nocturnal volatiles to exploit crepuscular or night-active foraging.^[60] In trap flowers such as those of Aristolochia, slippery surfaces and downward-pointing hairs within the utricle temporarily imprison small flies, ensuring pollen deposition and collection after a period of retention, typically one day during the female phase.^[61] ^[62] These mechanisms rely on chemical mimicry of brood sites or decaying matter, with scents varying spatially and temporally across floral parts to optimize attraction without providing rewards.^[63] Pollinators display corresponding behavioral and physiological adaptations for exploiting these floral traits. Bees acquire a positive electrostatic charge during flight, attracting negatively charged pollen grains to their body hairs even across small air gaps, enhancing collection efficiency without direct contact.^[64] ^[65] This electroreception allows detection of floral electric fields altered by prior visits, signaling resource availability. Hummingbirds possess elongated, bifurcated tongues with trabeculae-lined grooves that enable capillary action and rapid nectar uptake from deep corollas, matching the tubular depths of specialized ornithophilous flowers.^[66] ^[67] Tongue retraction cycles, occurring up to 20 times per second, facilitate access to nectar hidden behind barriers inaccessible to shorter-tongued competitors.^[68] Specialization in these interactions is quantifiable through indices derived from interaction frequencies, revealing modular structures where subsets of plants and pollinators form tight, reciprocal linkages. Analyses of visitation data indicate that modularity predominates in diverse assemblages, with larger networks (>150 species) consistently partitioning into specialized modules that minimize interference and optimize transfer efficiency.^[69] Such modularity, measured via algorithms like those of Newman, reduces the costs of generalization by concentrating interactions within co-adapted pairs, as evidenced by lower connectance in specialized versus generalized systems.^[70] These traits underscore the precision of reciprocal adaptations verified through anatomical dissections and behavioral observations.^[71]

Evolutionary Aspects

Origins in Angiosperm Evolution

Angiosperms emerged in the fossil record during the Early Cretaceous epoch, approximately 135 million years ago, representing a diversification from wind-dominated gymnosperm ancestors.^[72] Unlike the predominantly anemophilous (wind-pollinated) gymnosperms, early angiosperms exhibited traits conducive to biotic pollination, such as enclosed ovules and more precise pollen transfer, which improved efficiency in heterogeneous environments and reduced pollen waste.^[29] This shift facilitated rapid radiation during the Cretaceous, as biotic vectors enabled targeted dispersal amid increasing ecological complexity.^[73] Fossil evidence links insect pollination to early angiosperm lineages, with direct associations appearing by the mid-Cretaceous around 100–99 million years ago, including pollen-laden bees preserved in amber.^[29] Basal angiosperm clades, inferred from both fossils and extant relatives, show predominantly entomophilous syndromes, indicating that animal-mediated pollination was likely plesiomorphic rather than derived.^[73] While some early fossils like Archaefructus from ~125 million years ago suggest possible hydrophilous (water-pollinated) traits in aquatic settings, broader Cretaceous pollen records and floral structures point to insect interactions as a key driver of diversification advantages.^[29] The ancestral angiosperm flower was bisexual, bearing both stamens and carpels, which permitted self-compatibility and autogamy as a baseline strategy.^[74] Subsequent transitions to unisexuality and dioecy, observed in multiple lineages, heightened dependence on external pollinators to ensure outcrossing, thereby amplifying the selective pressure for biotic adaptations over abiotic ones.^[75] This evolutionary progression underscores how pollination vectors contributed to angiosperm dominance by promoting genetic diversity in variable habitats.^[73]

Coevolutionary Dynamics

Coevolutionary dynamics in plant-pollinator systems arise from reciprocal selection pressures that refine traits for mutual benefit, often evidenced by phylogenetic congruence and experimental manipulations of interaction outcomes. In specialized mutualisms, plants and pollinators exhibit cospeciation patterns, where pollinator lineages track host plant radiations through host shifts and parallel speciation; for instance, molecular phylogenies of fig species and their agaonid wasp pollinators show that wasp diversification largely mirrors fig evolution, with over 80% of wasp clades tied to specific fig lineages via strict host specificity.^[76] Experimental studies, such as selective breeding in model systems, demonstrate how pollinator preference for floral traits drives plant trait evolution, while plant reward allocation influences pollinator foraging behavior, fostering trait matching over generations.^[77] The yucca-yucca moth interaction exemplifies an obligate mutualism stabilized by behavioral enforcement, where female moths (Tegeticula and Parategeticula spp.) must actively gather pollen into specialized mouthpart tentacles and deliberately deposit it on yucca stigmas prior to oviposition, achieving pollination fidelity approaching 100% as non-pollinating moths produce no viable offspring. Yuccas enforce reciprocity by aborting ovaries containing excess eggs, limiting larval damage to 20-25% of seeds per fruit on average, which phylogenetic reconstructions trace back over 40 million years of coevolution without widespread breakdown.^[78]^[79] Similarly, fig wasps exhibit extreme specialization, with each wasp species entering a single fig species' syconium to pollinate via pollen-laden bodies, a process coevolved over 60-90 million years; wasps lose wings post-pollination, committing fully, while figs punish non-pollinators through resin traps or galling, maintaining mutualistic stability.^[80] Arms-race-like dynamics akin to the Red Queen hypothesis operate within these mutualisms, as pollinators evolve resistance to floral toxins—such as alkaloids in nectar that deter inefficient visitors—while plants adapt to curb cheating, including nectar robbing by non-pollinating insects that pierce corollas without contacting stigmas. In experimental assays, bumblebees exposed to toxic nectar lines rapidly select for tolerance, prompting plant counter-adaptations like concealed rewards; models of such coevolution predict equilibrium where mutualists outcompete exploiters, with slower-evolving partners gaining disproportionate benefits under the Red King effect.^[81]^[82] Across the specialization-generalization spectrum, highly specialist dyads like fig-wasp and yucca-moth pairs buffer against perturbations through evolved enforcement mechanisms that deter defection, with simulation models showing these systems resist >90% partner abundance fluctuations via behavioral fidelity, unlike generalist networks prone to higher turnover. Empirical data from long-term phylogenies indicate specialist mutualisms incur lower extinction debts in isolation, as trait locking minimizes alternative partner shifts that could destabilize generalist webs.^[83]^[84]

Ecological Interactions

Plant-Pollinator Networks

Plant-pollinator networks constitute bipartite graphs where nodes represent plant and pollinator species, and edges denote observed interactions, forming emergent structures that underpin community dynamics. Graph-theoretic analyses quantify properties such as nestedness, modularity, and connectance, revealing how these configurations foster robustness against perturbations through redundancy and compartmentalization.^[85]^[69] Nestedness manifests as a hierarchical architecture: core generalist species interact with overlapping subsets of partners, enabling peripheral specialists to connect indirectly via these hubs, which enhances persistence by buffering against partner loss. This pattern predominates in empirical networks, as documented in analyses of 52 mutualistic assemblages, where specialists' interaction sets form proper subsets of generalists'.^[85] Connectance, defined as the fraction of possible links realized, empirically spans 0.05–0.3 across habitats, reflecting sparse yet non-random wiring that supports efficient information flow without excessive density.^[85] Modularity divides networks into discrete modules of tight intra-group linkages and sparse inter-group ties, a trait scaling positively with network size—universal in assemblages exceeding 150 species but absent in smaller ones. Such partitioning limits extinction cascades, as disruptions localize within modules rather than propagating globally.^[69] These properties confer dynamical stability, with simulations of random species removal demonstrating resilience: nested redundancy ensures that eliminating up to 10–20% of nodes typically erodes fewer than 20% of interactions, as alternative pathways sustain connectivity. Targeted removal of generalists, however, triggers sharper declines, underscoring the causal role of core-periphery structure in averting secondary extinctions.^[86]^[87] Meta-analyses synthesizing data from over 50 networks, with broader compilations exceeding 100, indicate biogeographic variation: tropical systems display denser linkage webs and reduced specialization (higher generalism), contrasting temperate networks' elevated modularity and partner specificity, likely driven by resource stability gradients.^[88]^[89]

Contributions to Ecosystem Stability

Pollination underpins ecosystem stability by facilitating plant reproduction, which sustains the primary productivity and structural integrity of vegetation communities that anchor food webs and support higher trophic levels, including herbivores, frugivores, and seed dispersers.^[90] Experimental pollinator exclusion in diverse habitats, such as grasslands and forests, reveals causal disruptions: without pollinators, seed production and fruit set decline sharply, leading to reduced plant biomass and altered community composition that cascades to diminished herbivore populations and forage availability.^[91] For instance, invertebrate declines, including pollinators, decouple key ecosystem processes like nutrient cycling and primary production, reducing overall service supply by altering trophic linkages.^[90] These indirect effects extend to vertebrate consumers, as pollinator-mediated fruit and seed production constitutes a critical dietary component for many frugivores and dispersers; deficits in pollination propagate through networks, potentially impairing regeneration and diversity in forest understories where such interactions dominate.^[92] Long-term monitoring underscores these causal roles, showing that persistent pollination shortfalls exacerbate vulnerability to disturbances, with reduced plant recruitment amplifying feedbacks that destabilize community dynamics beyond direct reproduction.^[93] Ecosystem resilience to perturbations is bolstered by pollinator diversity, which enables functional redundancy—where multiple taxa compensate for losses in pollination efficiency—maintaining service delivery and buffering against collapse.^[94] Studies confirm that higher species richness and trait overlap within pollinator assemblages enhance temporal stability and recovery from stressors, as redundant functions insure against idiosyncratic declines.^[95] Meta-analyses of biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships further validate this, demonstrating that pollinator loss erodes the "insurance" provided by diversity, heightening susceptibility to cascading failures in dependent webs.^[96]

Agricultural Significance

Crop Pollination Dependencies

Approximately 35% of global crop production volume derives from crops that exhibit some degree of dependence on animal pollination, according to analyses categorizing 87 leading crops by yield reduction in the absence of pollinators.^[97] This dependence spans levels from essential (yield loss exceeding 90%, as in almonds and apples) to modest (10-40% loss, as in coffee and onions), while self-compatible wind- or self-pollinated staples like grains, rice, and wheat show negligible reliance, typically under 10% yield impact or none.^[97] Empirical assessments confirm that pollinator-dependent crops constitute a minority of total production tonnage, with the majority (around 60%) from non-dependent staples.^[98] Yield gap studies, comparing open-pollinated flowers to bagged (excluded pollinators) controls, quantify causal impacts across crops, revealing variances from 0% in self-pollinators to over 90% in entomophilous fruits and nuts.^[99] For instance, coffee yields increase by 20-50% with animal pollination, depending on proximity to natural habitats and species like Coffea arabica, where forest-adjacent fields gain up to 20% via wild bees.^[100] Almonds demonstrate extreme reliance, with commercial yields approaching zero without managed bee pollination, as self-pollination fails to achieve viable nut set in most varieties.^[101] These gaps establish direct causality: pollination directly limits potential output in dependent crops, though baseline yields in non-pollinated scenarios reflect inherent varietal traits rather than external shortages. Global trends indicate rising productivity in pollinator-dependent crops through breeding for higher-yielding varieties and agronomic improvements, not declines in pollinator availability.^[102] From 1961 to 2006, the proportion of cropland devoted to such crops grew from 18% to 41% in developed regions, yet overall yields expanded without evidence of pollination-induced shortfalls, attributing gains to technological and genetic advances over pollinator dynamics.^[102] This pattern underscores that while dependencies persist, yield trajectories reflect human-directed enhancements, maintaining output stability amid shifting cultivation emphases.^[102]

Managed Pollinator Systems

Managed pollinator systems rely on the coordinated transport and placement of pollinator colonies to agricultural sites, primarily utilizing honey bees (Apis mellifera) for large-scale open-field crops. In the United States, this involves trucking approximately 2.5 million colonies annually to California's almond orchards during the February bloom, representing about one-third of all managed U.S. honey bee colonies and enabling the pollination of over 1 million acres of almonds.^[103]^[104] Beekeepers achieve scalability by splitting strong colonies post-pollination to replace losses, countering annual turnover rates that reached 55.6% of managed colonies between April 2024 and April 2025, with commercial operations experiencing up to 62% losses.^[105]^[106] Alternative managed systems employ solitary or semi-social bees for specialized applications. Bumble bees (Bombus spp.) are reared and deployed in greenhouses for crops like tomatoes and peppers, where their buzz pollination releases pollen from flowers more effectively than manual methods, improving fruit set and reducing labor.^[107]^[108] Mason bees (Osmia spp.), such as the orchard mason bee (Osmia lignaria), are released in orchards via nesting blocks, complementing honey bees by increasing pollinator abundance and fruit set in crops like sweet cherries and berries; studies show enhanced bee visitation and crop growth rates when nesting sites are provided alongside honey bee hives.^[109]^[110] Efficacy in these systems is assessed through metrics like colony or hive strength, often quantified by the number of frames covered with bees and brood. For orchard pollination, hives with at least 4.5 frames of bees (equating to roughly 10,800 adult bees) are considered adequate, as stronger colonies demonstrate higher foraging rates and pollination activity; weaker hives yield lower crop outcomes due to reduced bee density and visitation.^[111]^[112]^[113] This frame-based evaluation allows growers to select and manage pollinators for optimal service, though variability in weather and nutrition can influence final performance.^[114]

Strategies for Pollination Enhancement

Habitat augmentation through planting wildflower strips adjacent to crops has been shown to increase pollinator visitation frequency by an average of 25% compared to unplanted controls, thereby enhancing pollination services for nearby fields.^[115] In hedgerow restorations, bumblebee abundance can double in structurally diverse plantings with multiple woody species and low patchiness relative to less diverse edges.^[116] Similarly, uncommon native bee species exhibit up to sevenfold higher abundance on flowers within restored hedgerows than on unmanaged weedy borders, supporting greater pollen export to adjacent crops.^[117] Supplemental feeding with pollen substitutes during nutritional deficits improves managed honey bee colony outcomes; for instance, engineered supplements mimicking key pollen compounds have significantly boosted reproduction and overall colony health in field trials.^[118] Such interventions increase brood rearing and adult bee populations, with comparative tests demonstrating substantial gains in fall colony strength when patties are provided alongside natural pollen sources.^[119] Genetic engineering offers potential to reduce crop reliance on pollinators by enabling asexual seed production via apomixis, allowing high-yielding hybrids to propagate indefinitely without sexual reproduction or external pollen transfer.^[120] In self-pollinating crops like rice, which inherently minimize pollinator dependence, ongoing modifications target enhanced fertility traits to further stabilize yields under variable pollination conditions.^[121] Diversifying pollinator functional groups, such as by promoting varied bee traits like visitation timing and flower preferences, correlates with higher crop yields in pollination-dependent systems; in suboptimal pollination environments, such enhancements can yield 10-30% production gains through improved seed set and fruit quality.^[122]^[123] Intraspecific crop cultivar mixtures also facilitate better pollination success, even in partially self-compatible species, by attracting broader insect visitor assemblages.^[124]

Economic Dimensions

Valuation of Pollination Services

Economic valuation of pollination services employs methods such as market prices from hive rentals, production function approaches assessing added crop revenue attributable to pollination, and replacement costs estimating expenses for alternatives like manual pollination.^[125]^[126] Market-based estimates derive from fees paid to beekeepers for managed colonies, reflecting direct transactions in pollination-dependent crops.^[127] Replacement cost methods quantify the hypothetical expense of substituting natural pollination, often through labor-intensive hand-pollination techniques observed in crops like apples or kiwifruit, providing a lower-bound proxy for ecosystem service value.^[128] Production models, grounded in yield dependency data, attribute portions of crop output value to pollinators by comparing pollinated versus unpollinated scenarios in field experiments.^[129] In the United States, direct payments for pollination services reached $400.8 million in 2024, surpassing the $361.5 million in honey production revenue and underscoring that rental income exceeds honey yields for commercial beekeepers.^[130] Almond pollination accounted for $325.8 million of this total, comprising 81% of U.S. pollination receipts, with hive rental rates averaging $200–$225 per colony amid high demand for the crop's bloom period.^[131] Broader economic contributions, via added revenue to pollinator-dependent crops like fruits, nuts, and vegetables, exceed $18 billion annually according to USDA estimates integrating yield impacts.^[132] Globally, pollination supports 5–8% of agricultural GDP, with total services valued between $235 billion and $577 billion yearly, derived from dependencies in crops representing one-third of food production volume.^[133] Empirical grounding comes from rental markets in high-value sectors; for instance, U.S. almond fees provide a benchmark for similar systems worldwide, where pollination deficits could necessitate costly replacements.^[134] Non-market valuations highlight avoided costs, such as hand-pollination labor estimated at thousands of dollars per hectare in dependent orchards, emphasizing pollination's role in sustaining yields without mechanical substitutes.^[125] These figures, while varying by model assumptions, consistently affirm pollination's outsized economic leverage relative to direct inputs.^[135]

Commercial Pollination Operations

Commercial pollination operations involve the seasonal transport of honey bee colonies by beekeepers to agricultural sites, primarily to meet the demands of crops like almonds in California. During the almond bloom from mid-February to mid-March, approximately 85% of U.S. commercial honey bee hives are migrated to the state, where about 2.7 million colonies pollinate roughly 1.4 million acres of orchards in 2024.^[136] Contracts between growers and beekeepers stipulate colony strength, typically requiring hives with four to eight frames of bees, and ensure precise timing to align with bloom peaks, with hives placed two per acre for optimal coverage.^[111] These operations follow migratory routes, starting with almonds and extending to other crops such as apples in Washington or fruits in the Midwest, allowing beekeepers to maximize hive utilization across seasons. Logistics include trucking hives thousands of miles, often under cooled conditions to minimize stress, with beekeepers coordinating via associations to avoid delays. Despite challenges like hive theft peaking in 2023 and transport risks, the scale remains robust, supported by an estimated 2.6 to 2.7 million managed U.S. honey-producing colonies as of late 2022 to 2024.^[104]^[137]^[138] Profitability hinges on rental fees, averaging $181 to $188 per colony for almond pollination in recent years, generating over $240 million annually in industry revenue, though net returns per hive range from $50 to $100 after accounting for transportation, feeding, and wintering costs. High demand from expanding almond acreage drives participation, even as beekeepers face colony losses of 30-40% yearly, offset by techniques like splitting colonies, queen rearing, and imports to maintain numbers. Operations have stabilized since early 2000s lows from disorders like colony collapse, with total U.S. colonies recovering to levels supporting consistent scalability.^[139]^[140]^[141]

Population Trends and Threats

Observed Declines in Pollinators

In the United States, the number of managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies has fluctuated between approximately 2.6 million and 3.8 million from 2023 to 2025, with estimates reaching 2.60 million as of October 1, 2024.^[137] Annual colony losses for managed honey bees have consistently ranged from 40% to 55%, with beekeepers replacing losses through splitting hives and rearing new queens to sustain populations.^[142] The 2024-2025 U.S. Beekeeping Survey, conducted by Auburn University and collaborators, reported a national loss rate of 55.6% for managed colonies between April 2024 and April 2025, the highest in 14 years and exceeding the 13-year average of 40%.^[105] Winter losses during the same period (October 2024 to April 2025) were estimated at 40.2%, with state-level variations from 34.3% to 90.5%.^[137] Projections for 2025 indicate potential losses of 60% to 70% in commercial honey bee colonies, based on entomologist assessments from Washington State University, though pollination services have remained sufficient despite these trends due to rapid colony replenishment.^[143] Hive monitoring metrics, such as Varroa mite (Varroa destructor) infestation levels exceeding 3% of adult bees (typically measured via alcohol washes or sugar rolls), correlate with observed colony weakening and subsequent declines in managed populations.^[144]^[145] For wild pollinators, monitoring data reveal declines in bumble bee (Bombus spp.) populations, with North American species showing reductions of up to 46% in occupancy compared to historical baselines, and European species declining by about 17% over similar periods.^[146] Long-term surveys indicate widespread reductions of 20-30% in wild bumble bee abundances across monitored sites in the U.S. and Europe, based on community science and museum records.^[147]^[148] These trends contrast with managed systems, as wild populations lack artificial replenishment and exhibit habitat-specific variability in decline rates.^[149]

Parasitic and Pathogenic Causes

Varroa destructor, an ectoparasitic mite native to Asia, was introduced to the [United States](/page/United States) in 1987 and has since become a primary driver of honey bee colony mortality by feeding on the fat bodies of developing bees and adult workers, weakening host immunity and transmitting viruses such as deformed wing virus (DWV).^[150] Infestations exceeding 1-3 mites per 100 bees during critical periods like late summer or fall correlate with winter colony losses ranging from 20% to over 50%, as mites reproduce rapidly in brood cells and vector pathogens that suppress bee lifespan and foraging efficiency.^[151] ^[152] Beekeepers consistently identify varroa as the leading factor in overwintering failures, with fall mite burdens directly predicting collapse risk independent of other stressors.^[153] DWV, amplified by varroa transmission, causes physical deformities, behavioral impairments, and elevated mortality, with viral titers rising exponentially in mite-infested colonies; prior to varroa arrival, DWV was rarely symptomatic at population scales.^[154] Synergistic interactions with microsporidian fungi like Nosema ceranae further exacerbate losses, as nosema infection accelerates DWV replication in a dose-dependent manner, potentially increasing bee mortality rates by factors observed in controlled assays where co-infection reduced survival compared to single pathogens.^[155] Nosema ceranae disrupts bee digestion and energy metabolism, compounding viral effects to shorten adult lifespan and impair colony thermoregulation during winter clustering.^[156] Historical data underscore varroa's causal role: pre-1987 annual U.S. honey bee colony losses averaged below 15-20% under routine management, but post-introduction shifted to chronic elevations of 30% or more, persisting despite acaricide treatments and breeding efforts, as unchecked mite reproduction outpaces bee population recovery.^[150] ^[157] Empirical thresholds for intervention—maintaining infestations under 2-3%—derive from field monitoring showing that colonies surpassing these levels in autumn rarely survive winter without intervention.^[144] Other bacterial pathogens like Paenibacillus larvae (causing American foulbrood) contribute sporadically but lack the pervasive, synergistic impact of varroa-virus complexes in driving broad-scale declines.^[150]

Habitat and Nutritional Factors

Intensive agricultural practices, such as the establishment of large-scale monocultures, diminish floral diversity and forage availability for pollinators across landscapes. In European agricultural regions, conversion of seminatural habitats to arable monocultures has been associated with reduced wild bee abundance and species richness, with studies indicating that diversified farming systems support higher pollinator densities compared to uniform crop landscapes.^[158] For instance, in the United Kingdom, 76% of bumblebee forage plant species declined in frequency within 1-km survey squares between 1980 and 1999, correlating with national-scale reductions in pollinator forage suitability.^[159] These patterns arise from the temporal and spatial mismatch between pollinator activity periods and the limited blooming windows of monocrop fields, limiting access to diverse nectar and pollen resources essential for colony sustenance.^[160] Nutritional quality of available pollen profoundly influences pollinator health, particularly through protein content that supports larval development, adult longevity, and immune function. Pollen protein levels range from 2.5% to 61%, but diets dominated by low-protein sources impair hypopharyngeal gland development and increase susceptibility to stressors in honey bees.^[161] Empirical trials demonstrate that supplementing colonies with diverse, protein-rich pollen reverses antibiotic-induced declines in lifespan and immunity, highlighting how nutritional deficits below optimal thresholds weaken physiological resilience.^[162] In landscape contexts, monoculture reliance on pollen from crops like sunflower, which offer lower nutritional value, exacerbates these effects, as evidenced by reduced immune enzyme activity and altered lipid metabolism in bees foraging in such environments.^[163]^[164] Habitat fragmentation, driven by land-use changes, elevates isolation among remnant patches, constraining pollinator dispersal and genetic diversity while intensifying edge effects. Landscape-scale analyses reveal that fragmentation reduces overall habitat connectivity, leading to lower visitation rates in isolated fragments, though edges often harbor elevated floral resources that bolster networks for generalist pollinators.^[165] For example, forest edges exhibit 10-fold higher pollinator network robustness to species loss compared to interiors, due to increased plant-pollinator interactions at boundaries.^[166] Comparisons between urban and natural habitats underscore these dynamics: urban settings yield comparable pollinator abundances to semi-natural areas but diminished richness, with fragmentation further isolating populations and limiting specialist species persistence.^[167] Such contrasts emphasize that while edges and urban greenspaces can mitigate some forage shortages, pervasive fragmentation undermines long-term viability without broader habitat restoration.^[168]

Controversies and Debates

Pesticide Impacts and Evidence

Field studies have demonstrated sublethal effects of neonicotinoid insecticides on honeybee foraging behavior, with a 2017 large-scale trial across 33 European sites revealing reduced pollen collection and foraging activity by approximately 10-30% in colonies exposed to treated oilseed rape fields compared to controls.^[169] These effects stem from neurotoxic disruption of learning and navigation, though acute lethality in field-realistic doses remains low for adult foragers.^[170] Residues of neonicotinoids and other pesticides persist in bee-collected pollen and hive wax, with analyses showing up to dozens of compounds per sample; for instance, pollen often contains the highest diversity of residues, while wax accumulates lipophilic pesticides at concentrations posing chronic exposure risks during brood rearing.^[171]^[172] Synergistic interactions between pesticides and biotic stressors like Varroa destructor mites can amplify mortality, as laboratory and semi-field experiments indicate that mite infestation increases bee susceptibility to neonicotinoids by 2- to 4-fold through combined immunosuppression and toxin uptake during feeding.^[173]^[174] However, some studies report antagonistic effects where pesticides reduce parasite loads, potentially mitigating overall harm in certain contexts.^[175] The European Union's 2018 near-total ban on outdoor neonicotinoid use did not reverse pollinator decline trends, with wild bee populations continuing to decrease in monitored regions post-restriction, suggesting multifactorial causation beyond these chemicals alone.^[176]^[177] In the United States, honeybee hives routinely contain residues from over 100 distinct pesticides and metabolites, including fungicides, insecticides, and herbicides, as documented in nationwide surveys of wax, pollen, and bees.^[150]^[178] Despite this multi-residue exposure, the economic value of managed pollination services has risen more than 20% since the 1990s, driven by expanded acreage in pollinator-dependent crops like almonds, with no evidence of widespread yield shortfalls attributable to pollinator deficits.^[179] This resilience underscores the role of beekeeper management in sustaining colony health amid chronic low-dose exposures, though sublethal impacts on individual bees persist in empirical data.^[180]

Severity of Decline Narratives

Narratives portraying a severe crisis in pollination often emphasize high extinction risks for wild pollinators, with the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) estimating that approximately 40% of insect pollinator species, including bees and butterflies, face extinction globally due to factors like habitat loss and pesticides.^[181] Similar assessments project elevated risks for over one-fifth of native North American pollinators, underscoring potential vulnerabilities in wild populations.^[182] These claims, drawn from assessments like the 2016 IPBES pollinator report, prioritize biodiversity metrics over agricultural outcomes and have influenced policy discussions, though they predominantly address unmanaged species rather than commercial systems.^[183] In contrast, longitudinal data on managed honey bee colonies reveal substantial adaptability, with U.S. numbers declining from about 5 million in the 1940s to 2.71 million as of January 2024, yet stabilizing and even reaching record highs in recent years through beekeeper interventions such as hive splitting and queen rearing.^[150] ^[184] ^[185] Annual colony losses, often exceeding 30-50%, are offset by these management practices, maintaining pollination capacity without proportional declines in service provision.^[186] The economic value of pollination services further illustrates resilience, rising to over $400 million in U.S. commercial operations by 2024, a 26% increase from prior years, driven largely by demand for crops like almonds despite reported losses.^[187] ^[188] While wild pollinator declines are documented, they have not precipitated ecosystem collapse or mass crop failures, as yields of pollinator-dependent crops remain stable or have increased through intensified management and alternative pollinators.^[189] ^[190] Empirical analyses prioritize parasitic threats like Varroa destructor mites over pesticides as primary drivers of colony losses, with beekeeper surveys and meta-reviews identifying Varroa and associated viruses as the leading factor in over half of U.S. operations, often exacerbated by inadequate mite control rather than chemical exposure alone.^[191] ^[192] This emphasis on biological stressors aligns with historical trends from the 1940s onward, where efficiency gains in beekeeping have compensated for net colony reductions, challenging narratives of imminent pollinator-driven agricultural catastrophe.^[193]

Regulatory and Policy Responses

The European Union's 2013 ban on neonicotinoid seed treatments for crops attractive to pollinators, such as oilseed rape, aimed to mitigate risks to bee populations.^[194] Subsequent assessments documented yield declines in oilseed rape averaging 4%, alongside quality reductions of 6.3% and sector-wide economic losses estimated at €900 million annually.^[195]^[196] These effects contributed to reduced cultivated acreage, with pests like the cabbage stem flea beetle exacerbating crop failures, including 14% of UK fields requiring resowing in 2020 due to damage.^[197] Farmers responded by increasing foliar sprays of alternatives, primarily pyrethroids, by an average of 0.73 applications per hectare and up to 240,000 liters in some seasons.^[198]^[199] In the United States, Farm Bill programs like the Conservation Reserve Program have subsidized habitat restoration on marginal farmlands, incorporating practices such as rotational management to support pollinator forage and nesting.^[200] These initiatives have enhanced native bee abundance and diversity in targeted areas, though aggregate effects on broader pollinator populations remain limited amid ongoing colony stressors.^[201] Policy critiques highlight a misalignment with empirical drivers of decline, particularly the underemphasis on Varroa destructor mites, which parasitize honeybees and propagate viruses responsible for most overwintering losses in managed hives.^[202]^[203] Regulations targeting pesticides are seen as diverting resources from mite control, while habitat incentives often prioritize wild pollinators despite evidence that managed honeybee colonies deliver more consistent and scalable crop pollination services.^[204]^[205] This approach risks inefficient outcomes, as mite-induced mortality persists independently of reduced pesticide exposure in apiaries.^[206]

Recent Advances

Technological Interventions

In 2025, researchers developed a synthetic pollen-replacing diet capable of sustaining honey bee colonies indefinitely without access to natural pollen foraging, enabling year-round health maintenance even in suboptimal conditions.^[207] This formulation mimics key nutritional components of pollen, supporting brood development and adult bee vitality, as demonstrated in controlled trials where colonies exhibited comparable growth to those with natural foraging.^[208] A subsequent August 2025 advancement introduced a supplementary "superfood" additive that addressed previously unidentified nutrient gaps, further bolstering colony resilience against nutritional deficits.^[209] Selective breeding programs have produced Varroa destructor-resistant honey bee stocks, such as Russian honey bees, which exhibit lower mite infestation rates in brood and higher rates of damaged mites, thereby reducing overall colony losses compared to susceptible strains.^[210] Field evaluations indicate these stocks confer substantial resistance, with potential to decrease commercial beekeeping losses by integrating them into overwintering strategies, though efficacy varies by local mite pressure and management practices.^[211] Drone-based pollination systems have been deployed in pear orchards, particularly for varieties like 'Niitaka' reliant on artificial methods due to pollen inviability, achieving fruit set rates up to 62.1%—surpassing natural pollination at 53.6%—through optimized flight paths and liquid pollen application.^[212] In Chinese greenhouse settings, autonomous drones enhance pollination efficiency by reducing labor dependency and improving precision, with trials showing significantly higher fruit set than untreated controls.^[213] Complementary robotic systems, such as AI-driven pollinators for tomatoes, operate in enclosed environments to deliver mechanical vibration or pollen dispersal, addressing pollinator shortages without relying on live insects.^[214] Gene editing techniques are enabling crops with modified floral traits to facilitate robotic cross-pollination or self-fertility, reducing dependence on biotic vectors; for instance, multiplex CRISPR edits in soybean create male-sterile, exserted-stigma phenotypes compatible with automated hybrid seed production.^[215] In parallel, efforts toward apomictic propagation—engineering asexual seed formation—allow high-yielding hybrids to propagate indefinitely without pollination, as advanced in maize and other staples by 2023 protocols scalable to commercial use.^[120] These interventions, often paired with AI robotics like China's GEAIR system for targeted flower manipulation, promise accelerated breeding cycles and yield stability amid pollinator declines.^[216]

Current Research Directions

The U.S. Geological Survey's Pollinator Science Strategy for 2025–2035 prioritizes gap-filling research on pollinator health metrics, including standardized monitoring of population trends, stressors, and resilience indicators to inform management actions.^[217] This framework emphasizes tracking species status, understanding cumulative threats like habitat loss and pathogens, and developing novel tools for restoration, such as predictive modeling for habitat suitability.^[218] Concurrently, climate modeling efforts focus on projecting range expansions for pollinator species under warming scenarios; for example, analyses indicate that most North American pollinators, including monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus), could access expanded climate-suitable areas northward, potentially offsetting some contraction risks if dispersal barriers are addressed.^[219] A growing research trend integrates pollinator biodiversity and interaction networks to bolster crop yield stability, moving beyond isolated species studies toward ecosystem-level dynamics. In a 2025 field experiment across organic and conventional sunflower fields in Germany, researchers at the University of Würzburg demonstrated that diverse wild pollinator assemblages increased open-pollinated yields by an average of 25%, attributing gains to enhanced visitation rates and pollination efficiency irrespective of farming practices.^[220] Such network approaches highlight how functional redundancy in pollinator communities buffers against temporal variability in service delivery, with implications for agroecological design.^[221] To avoid overemphasizing singular drivers, current empirical modeling prioritizes multi-threat frameworks that simulate interactions among climate, chemicals, and land-use changes on pollinator dynamics. The EU-funded WildPosh project, launched in 2025, exemplifies this by combining population viability analyses with landscape-scale simulations to assess synergistic pesticide risks, enabling probabilistic forecasts of decline thresholds under combined exposures.^[222] These integrative models underscore causal complexities, such as how nutritional deficits amplify pathogen susceptibility, fostering more robust predictions than univariate assessments.^[223]

References

[1]
What is Pollination? | US Forest Service
Pollination is the act of transferring pollen grains from the male anther of a flower to the female stigma. The goal of every living organism, ...
[2]
https://extension.psu.edu/pollination-and-pollinators
[3]
Pollination - Developmental Biology - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Pollination refers to the landing and subsequent germination of the pollen on the stigma. Hence it involves an interaction between the gametophytic generation ...
[4]
Pollination Mechanisms and Plant-Pollinator Relationships
Mar 1, 2017 · Pollination is how flowering plants reproduce. The process involves the transfer of pollen from the male parts to the female parts of the same or another plant.
[5]
Biology, Plant Structure and Function, Plant Reproduction ... - OERTX
In angiosperms, pollination is defined as the placement or transfer of pollen from the anther to the stigma of the same flower or another flower.
[6]
Pollination | Fruit & Nut Research & Information Center
Pollination occurs when pollen grains move from anthers to a reproductively mature stigma. After pollen lands on the stigma, it initiates pollen tube formation.
[7]
Why is Pollination Important? | US Forest Service
Pollination is vital for seed production, genetic diversity, and is essential for human survival and crop yields, with 80% of crops needing it.
[8]
Pollination - Native Plants and Ecosystem Services
Pollination is the transfer of pollen from the male parts of a flower to the female parts of a flower of the same species, which results in fertilization of ...Why Are Bees Important? · Why Are Bees Good... · Why Do Bees Need Flowers...Missing: biology | Show results with:biology
[9]
The Importance of Pollinators - BASF Agricultural Solutions
Pollinators are vital for agriculture, helping plants reproduce, and one in three bites of food relies on them. They are also economic drivers.
[10]
Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops
Pollination by wild animals is a key ecosystem service. Although crop pollination is commonly cited as an example of an endangered ecosystem service (Corbet ...
[11]
Pollination and Pollinators - Penn State Extension
Jun 2, 2025 · Pollination is the transfer of pollen from the anthers of a flower to the stigma of the same flower or another flower.
[12]
Heterosis in plants - PubMed
Heterosis, also known as 'hybrid vigor', is a well-known phenomenon whereby hybrid offspring resulting from cross pollination exhibit greater vigor than either ...
[13]
Inbreeding, Hybrid Vigor, and Hybrid Corn | Corn Breeding: Lessons ...
Inbreeding is repeated self-pollination, resulting in loss of vigor. Hybrid vigor occurs when inbreds are cross-pollinated, sometimes producing more vigorous ...
[14]
New calculations indicate that 90% of flowering plant species are ...
Aug 11, 2023 · Between 85% and 87.5% of the ca. 352 000 species of flowering plants are animal-pollinated. These proportions were obtained by combining mean values of animal- ...
[15]
Global Action on Pollination Services for Sustainable Agriculture
Bees and other pollinators About 75% of global food crop types depend on pollinators, highlighting their importance in the diversity of our food supply. ...
[16]
(PDF) Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfing - ResearchGate
Aug 5, 2025 · In animal-pollinated plants, geitonogamy increases with size because pollinators visit more flowers in succession on large individuals (de Jong ...
[17]
Are Tomatoes Self-Pollinating? - SproutedGarden.com
Apr 22, 2023 · Tomatoes are, indeed, self-pollinating. And while bees and other pollinators can help things along, tomato flowers are what's known as perfect flowers.
[18]
Which Vegetables Self-Pollinate? - Laidback Gardener
Jun 14, 2021 · Many legumes such as lima beans, garden beans, soybeans, peas and peanuts likewise largely self-pollinate.
[19]
Reproductive patterns, genetic diversity and inbreeding depression ...
Methods Hand pollination experiments were conducted to determine the breeding system and to evaluate the potential for inbreeding depression in both species.
[20]
Self-pollination and inbreeding depression in Acacia dealbata
However, we found substantial inbreeding depression, with seeds per fruit, progeny survival and progeny growth being lower after self- than after cross- ...
[21]
Self-Fertilization, Inbreeding, and Yield in Alfalfa Seed Production
Jul 6, 2021 · There were a 15% decrease in the number of seeds per stem (seed set) and a 13% decline in the number of seeds per pod in selfed relative to ...
[22]
Why don't self pollinated crops show inbreeding depression?
Jan 10, 2018 · Yes, self pollination does lead to inbreeding depression. However, we found substantial inbreeding depression, with seeds per fruit, progeny survival and ...
[23]
Improving Corn - USDA ARS
Oct 18, 2023 · About 95 percent of our corn acreage now is planted to hybrid corn. We produce at least 20 percent more corn on 25 percent fewer acres than in ...
[24]
Recent research on the mechanism of heterosis is important for crop ...
Heterosis or hybrid vigor is a phenomenon where hybrid progeny have superior performance compared to their parental inbred lines.
[25]
Inbreeding depression is high in a self‐incompatible perennial herb ...
Sep 12, 2017 · High inbreeding depression is thought to be one of the major factors preventing evolutionary transitions in hermaphroditic plants from ...
[26]
Facultative self‐fertilization ability decreases pollen limitation in ...
May 29, 2024 · The ability to self-fertilize is predicted to provide an advantage in colonization because a single individual can reproduce and establish a ...
[27]
Transgenerational effects of stress on reproduction strategy in the ...
Aug 22, 2024 · Results. We found that stressed plants show an increased tendency for self-pollination and a deficit in floral and vegetative development.
[28]
Pollinator diversity benefits natural and agricultural ecosystems ...
In agricultural ecosystems, pollinator diversity increases the quality and quantity of crop yield. Furthermore, studies indicate that many pollinator groups are ...
[29]
Insect pollination for most of angiosperm evolutionary history
Jun 5, 2023 · Pollination by insects has clearly been a successful reproductive strategy throughout angiosperm history, with 86% of evolutionary time spent in ...<|separator|>
[30]
Buzz-pollinating bees deliver thoracic vibrations to flowers through ...
Sep 23, 2024 · We found that floral buzzing drives head vibrations up to 3 times greater than those of the thorax, which doubles the vibration amplitude of the anther during ...
[31]
Minimum size threshold of visiting bees of a buzz‐pollinated plant ...
Jun 10, 2021 · Our data reveal that small bees scarcely touched the stigmas, while large and fit-size bees were the most efficient pollinators.
[32]
Floral ultraviolet signals are correlated with pollination syndromes in ...
Dec 22, 2021 · The presence of ultraviolet (UV, wavelengths between 300-400 nm) reflectance in insect-pollinated flowers has been linked to pollination ...
[33]
Trapline foraging by pollinators: its ontogeny, economics and ... - NIH
Apr 26, 2009 · Traplining increases mating distance and mate diversity, and reduces 'iterogamy' (self-pollination caused by return visits) at the population ...
[34]
Statistically testing the role of individual learning and decision ...
Apr 19, 2018 · In a strategy known as traplining, foragers including bees, bats, and hummingbirds visit replenishing food sources in repeated patterns to ...
[35]
Does beak size predict the pollination performance of hummingbirds ...
Feb 14, 2018 · Long-billed hummingbirds are assumed to be better adapted than short-billed ones for the pollination of long tubular flowers.
[36]
Bats and Pollination – Maryland Agronomy News
Jul 23, 2020 · More specifically, fruits were 46% lighter and 13% less sweet when pollinated by other taxa. Additionally, seed set was markedly lower in the ...
[37]
Sexual Reproduction in Agaves: The Benefits of Bats - ESA Journals
Where bats remain, agaves in dense patches show higher seed set than do outlying plants, suggesting that the pollinators favor grouped plants. This behavior may ...Missing: yield | Show results with:yield
[38]
Pollination in conifers - ScienceDirect.com
Here we examine the ancestral wind-pollination mechanism in conifers and discuss how the process may have evolved to improve pollination success.Missing: characteristics grasses
[39]
Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of ... - NIH
Prodigious pollen production is a characteristic feature of the anemophilous syndrome, and pollen–ovule ratios are generally much higher than in animal- ...Missing: pine | Show results with:pine
[40]
Wind pollination over mesoscale distances: an investigation with ...
The results revealed significant effective pollen flow (up to 4.4%) from a large population located 100 km away, suggesting that the well-known mesoscale ...
[41]
The aerodynamics and efficiency of wind pollination in grasses - 2010
Jul 13, 2010 · Among wind-pollinated plants, larger reproductive structures appear counter-adapted to accumulate pollen by impaction on their windward surfaces ...Missing: pine | Show results with:pine
[42]
Long-distance pine pollen still germinates after meso-scale dispersal
Aug 5, 2025 · The experimental findings are as follows: pine pollen had germination rates of 2 to 57% after dispersal at distances from 3 to 41 km, sodium ...
[43]
Vallisneria - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Water pollination (hydrophily) may occur in aquatic plants with flowers either at or under the water surface. For example, Vallisneria (Hydrocharitaceae) ...
[44]
Correlations of Life Form, Pollination Mode and Sexual System in ...
Dec 19, 2014 · Ephydrophily is pollination at the water surface, e.g., Vallisneria (Hydrocharitaceae). Hyphydrophily occurs among flowers that are ...
[45]
Rain pollination provides reproductive assurance in a deceptive orchid
Jul 31, 2012 · Abiotic pollination by wind or water is well established in flowering plants. In some species pollination by rain splashes, a condition ...Missing: empirical waste fossil
[46]
The ecology of electricity and electroreception - Wiley Online Library
Avail- able measurements suggest a typical magnitude of roughly 1 fC, with some pollen grains reaching charges as high as 40 fC (Bowker & Crenshaw, 2007a).
[47]
[PDF] Robert, D. (2024). Aerial Electroreception. Current Biology, 34(20 ...
The role of electric fields in pollination was further consolidated by observations that pollen would readily travel from anthers to an approaching bee and that ...
[48]
Humidity-tolerant rate-dependent capillary viscous adhesion of bee ...
Mar 26, 2019 · We report a two-phase adhesive fluid recovered from pollen, which displays remarkable rate tunability and humidity stabilization at microscopic and macroscopic ...
[49]
Biomechanics of pollen pellet removal by the honey bee - PMC - NIH
Aug 25, 2021 · Using a self-built pollen scraper, we find that slow removal speeds reduce the force and work required to remove the pellet under shear stress.
[50]
Durotropic Growth of Pollen Tubes - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
This mechanism enables pollen tubes of some plant species to grow at rates of more than 300 µm·min−1 (Williams et al., 2016), faster than any other plant cell ( ...
[51]
[PDF] Pollen Tube Growt h and the lntracellular Cytosolic Calcium ...
Among the most rapidly growing of all cells, the pollen tube may reach rates of severa1 millimeters per hour (Barnabás and Fridvalszky,. 1984) and is driven ...
[52]
Lily Pollen Tubes Pulse According to a Simple Spatial Oscillator
Aug 14, 2018 · Here we show that in lily pollen tubes the distance or wavelength (λ = 6.3 ± 1.7 μm) over which an oscillatory cycle unfolds is more robust than ...Missing: hour | Show results with:hour
[53]
RNase‐based self‐incompatibility in cacti - 2021 - Wiley Online Library
Jun 8, 2021 · Approximately one-half of all flowering plants express genetically based physiological mechanisms that prevent self-fertilisation.Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[54]
RNase-Based Self-Incompatibility: Puzzled by Pollen S - PMC
Many plants have a genetically determined self-incompatibility system in which the rejection of self pollen grains is controlled by alleles of an S locus.Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[55]
Non-additive effects of pollen limitation and self-incompatibility ...
Non-additive effects of pollen limitation and self-incompatibility reduce plant reproductive success and population viability. Andrew G Young. Andrew G Young.Missing: mismatch | Show results with:mismatch
[56]
Pollen limitation and reduced reproductive success are associated ...
Dec 9, 2013 · Pollen limitation and reduced reproductive success are associated with local genetic effects in Prunus virginiana, a widely distributed self- ...
[57]
Double Fertilization In Angiosperms - BYJU'S
Double fertilization gives rise to an endosperm that provides nourishment to the developing embryo. It increases the viability of the seeds of angiosperms.
[58]
The beginning of a seed: regulatory mechanisms of double fertilization
In angiosperms, the haploid gametophytic generations produce the male and female gametes required to execute double fertilization. Both gametophytes are reduced ...
[59]
Double Fertilization and Development of the Seed in Angiosperms
6. The rate of growth of the endosperm following hybridization is significantly higher than after self-fertilization. 7. The number of endosperm nuclei ...
[60]
Spatial and temporal variation in volatile composition suggests ...
Scent-mediated pollinator attraction and imprisonment in the protogynous kettle trap flowers of Aristolochia occur on the first day of anthesis, during the ...
[61]
The betrayed thief – the extraordinary strategy of Aristolochia ...
Dec 8, 2014 · Aristolochia and other trap flowers were believed to lure saprophilous flies and mimic brood sites of pollinators. We demonstrate for A. rotunda ...
[62]
Trickery flowers: the extraordinary chemical mimicry of Aristolochia ...
Feb 25, 2015 · Flowers of Aristolochia have long been considered deceitful as they attract pollinators by advertising rewards that are not produced or ...
[63]
Aristolochia Pollination - UC Botanical Garden at Berkeley
Feb 1, 2024 · As with most species of Aristolochia, pollination requires that the flower trap, and imprison for a time, the pollinator.
[64]
The bee, the flower, and the electric field - PubMed Central - NIH
Jun 24, 2017 · Here, we present our latest understanding of how these electric interactions arise and how they contribute to pollination and electroreception.
[65]
The Hidden World of Electrostatic Ecology - Quanta Magazine
Sep 30, 2024 · Experiments show that bees can sense electrostatic fields around flowers and even collect pollen across an air gap using static forces. Kouzou ...
[66]
Nectar feeding beyond the tongue: hummingbirds drink using phase ...
Apr 3, 2023 · We reveal that the tongue base plays a central role in fluid handling, and that the bill is neither just a passive vehicle taking the tongue ...
[67]
Understanding Hummingbirds' Tongue Structure: Efficient Nectar ...
The unique tongue structure of hummingbirds is a result of co-evolution with the flowers they pollinate. Many flowers have evolved to produce nectar deep within ...
[68]
Resource competition triggers the co-evolution of long tongues and ...
Aug 20, 2008 · Once the two pollinator species differ in tongue length, divergence in corolla-tube depth between the two plant species ensues. Conclusions/ ...Missing: bird adaptations
[69]
The modularity of pollination networks - PNAS
All networks with >150 plant and pollinator species were modular, whereas networks with <50 species were never modular. Both module number and size increased ...
[70]
The influence of floral traits on specialization and modularity of plant ...
Jul 10, 2016 · In modular networks subsets of species interact more frequently with each other than with species in other modules (Newman, 2004; Olesen et al., ...
[71]
Floral anatomy, micromorphology and visitor insects in three species ...
Oct 11, 2017 · The genus Aristolochia L. has a specialised pollination system based on flowers that represent traps for insects. The floral anatomy and ...
[72]
Study: First Flowering Plants Appeared in Jurassic Period or Even ...
Feb 9, 2021 · The earliest-known fossil evidence of crown angiosperms dates to the Early Cretaceous epoch (135 million years ago), but the true time of their ...
[73]
Early steps of angiosperm–pollinator coevolution - PNAS
We provide data to show that early fossil angiosperms were insect-pollinated. Eighty-six percent of 29 extant basal angiosperm families have species that are ...
[74]
The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification - NIH
Aug 1, 2017 · Our study provides the first tentative evidence that the ancestral flower of all angiosperms most likely had a perianth (tepals) and an ...
[75]
The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems
Oct 1, 2014 · Within flowering plants, it is still unclear whether bisexual or unisexual flowers are the ancestral state and whether there was sexual ...
[76]
Critical review of host specificity and its coevolutionary implications ...
Apr 25, 2005 · We critically examine the idea that codivergence between figs and their pollinators has been dominated by strict-sense cospeciation.Missing: specialization | Show results with:specialization
[77]
Ecology and evolution of plant–pollinator interactions - PMC - NIH
This paper combines ecological and evolutionary perspectives to study plant-pollinator interactions, focusing on pollinator behavior, mating systems, and ...
[78]
[PDF] yucca moth obligate pollination mutualism - Segraves Lab
Nov 17, 2021 · Yucca species are polli- nated by one or two pollinator moth species at a locale and the moths lay eggs into the pistil of the flower (see ...
[79]
How to become a yucca moth: Minimal trait evolution needed to ...
The only significant morphological novelty in the yucca moths necessary for obligate mutualism, then, is the tentacular mouthparts used for pollen manipulation, ...Missing: fidelity | Show results with:fidelity
[80]
Figs and fig pollinators: evolutionary conflicts in a coevoled mutualism
Figs and fig wasps form one of the best known examples of species-specific mutualism and coevolution.Missing: specialization | Show results with:specialization
[81]
The Red King effect: When the slowest runner wins the ... - PNAS
We find that, contrary to the Red Queen, in mutualism evolution the slowly evolving species is likely to gain a disproportionate share of the benefits.
[82]
(PDF) The shift between the Red Queen and the Red King effects in ...
Aug 6, 2025 · The Red Queen effect argues that faster-evolving species are favoured in co-evolutionary processes because they are able to obtain a larger ...
[83]
Evolutionary stability of plant-pollinator networks - bioRxiv
Mar 22, 2018 · Pollinators that are specialized to a certain plant species have a high rate of conspecific pollen transport, whereas the efficiency of ...Missing: perturbations | Show results with:perturbations
[84]
coevolutionary transitions in the mutualism–antagonism continuum
Jul 23, 2025 · We show that strong ecological change, such as a radical host shift or colonization of a new environment, can trigger transitions in both directions.
[85]
The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks - PNAS
Here we analyze 52 mutualistic networks and show that they are highly nested; that is, the more specialist species interact only with proper subsets.
[86]
The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and ...
We used two qualitative and quantitative pollination networks to simulate extinction patterns following three removal scenarios: random removal and systematic ...
[87]
[PDF] of plant-pollinator networks
In previous simulations where all network interactions are considered positive, the removal of a given pollinator species could result only in the loss of one ...
[88]
Specialization of Mutualistic Interaction Networks Decreases toward ...
Oct 23, 2012 · We show that in contrast to expectation, biotic specialization of mutualistic networks is significantly lower at tropical than at temperate latitudes.
[89]
Why are some plant–pollinator networks more nested than others?
Aug 21, 2017 · It has been argued that ordered network structures may increase the persistence of ecological communities under less predictable environments.
[90]
Ecosystem consequences of invertebrate decline - ScienceDirect.com
Oct 23, 2023 · Our study shows that invertebrate loss threatens the integrity of grasslands by decoupling ecosystem processes and decreasing ecosystem-service supply.
[91]
Pollinators in food webs: Mutualistic interactions increase diversity ...
Oct 3, 2019 · The removal of dynamic feedbacks between pollinators and animal-pollinated plants reduces ecosystem biomass and persistence and alters species ...Missing: herb | Show results with:herb
[92]
Pollination and seed dispersal are the most threatened processes of ...
Jul 20, 2016 · Here we present the first integrative meta-analysis on how forest disturbance affects multiple ecological processes of plant regeneration.
[93]
Long-Term Monitoring of Pollinator Decline and Its Effects on ...
Jul 20, 2025 · This paper reviews long-term monitoring studies to assess the impacts of pollinator decline on ecosystem services, focusing on agricultural ...
[94]
Does functional redundancy affect ecological stability and resilience ...
Jul 8, 2020 · Functional redundancy, where species perform similar functions, may positively affect ecological stability and resilience, with a mean positive ...Introduction · Methods · Results · Discussion
[95]
High diversity stabilizes the thermal resilience of pollinator ...
Aug 10, 2015 · Species diversity within a functional group (functional redundancy) often stabilizes ecosystem functioning by providing insurance against ...
[96]
Declining resilience of ecosystem functions under biodiversity loss
Dec 8, 2015 · These mechanisms lead to an 'insurance' effect of biodiversity (also sometimes called 'functional redundancy') whereby higher species richness ...
[97]
Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops
We found that pollinators are essential for 13 crops, production is highly pollinator dependent for 30, moderately for 27, slightly for 21, unimportant for 7.
[98]
How much of the world's food production is dependent on pollinators?
Aug 2, 2021 · Three-quarters of our crops depend on pollinators to some extent, but only one-third of global crop production does.
[99]
Bee pollination increases yield quantity and quality of cash crops in ...
Dec 18, 2017 · A lack of pollinators and their service would cause a decrease in yield quantity between 50 and 87% and would lead to a yield gap and net loss ...
[100]
Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production - PMC
Using pollination experiments along replicated distance gradients, we found that forest-based pollinators increased coffee yields by 20% within ≈1 km of forest.Missing: gap | Show results with:gap
[101]
Overview of Bee Pollination and Its Economic Value for Crop ...
Bees are the main pollinators of plants. According to Gallai et al., insect pollination provided EUR 153 billion, representing 9.5% of the total economic value ...
[102]
Long-Term Global Trends in Crop Yield and Production Reveal No ...
Oct 28, 2008 · As a consequence, the percentage of cropping land devoted to pollinator-dependent crops in the developed world increased from 18.2% in 1961 to ...
[103]
2024 Almond Pollination Season "Wrapped" - Beewise
Apr 11, 2024 · Each year, more than 2.5 million bee colonies arrive from all over the US, all at the same time, as growers work to ensure that their ...
[104]
Hive Theft Peaked in 2023 - The Almond Board of California
This means over 1.5 million hives are trucked into California from all over the United States, coming as far away as Florida. Almonds are dependent on honey ...
[105]
U.S. Beekeeping Survey reveals highest honey bee colony losses ...
Jun 16, 2025 · The national survey estimated that 55.6% of managed honey bee colonies were lost in the country between April 2024 – April 2025.
[106]
Survey Reveals Over 1.1 Million Honey Bee Colonies Lost, Raising ...
Feb 20, 2025 · Commercial beekeepers (more than 500 colonies) lost an average of 62%—a reversal of typical trends, where commercial beekeepers generally ...Missing: annual | Show results with:annual
[107]
Bumble Bee Pollination in Tomato Greenhouses | Ohioline
May 23, 2023 · Bumble bees are managed for their pollination services in a variety of crop systems, including tomatoes, fruit trees, berries, and soybean.
[108]
Bumblebee Pollination | Low Maintenance & Efficient Pollinators
Free delivery 30-day returnsBumblebees are used for pollination in greenhouses (tomatoes, cucumbers, peppers) and outdoors (berries, squash) to save time compared to manual pollination.
[109]
Mason bees and honey bees synergistically enhance fruit set in ...
Jul 9, 2023 · Our findings demonstrate that offering nesting material for mason bees and employing honey bee hives can enhance bee abundance in sweet cherry orchards.
[110]
Supplementing small farms with native mason bees increases ...
Sep 14, 2017 · Our work demonstrates that mason bees can be used successfully to pollinate herbaceous berry crops. We found that berry growth rate was ...
[111]
Evaluating honey bee colonies for pollination - OSU Extension Service
Grade B units for orchard pollination would have at least 450 square inches of brood, 4½ frames of bees and approximately 10,800 adults.
[112]
Hive Strength and Bee Health/Safety - Sac Valley Orchards
Feb 12, 2021 · Hive strength makes a difference in pollination activity (see graph below). The more frames covered with bees in a hive means more foraging ...
[113]
Honey bee (Apis mellifera) colony strength and its effects on ... - NIH
This study draws into question the concept of a minimum strength honey bee colony, as highlighted in numerous crop pollination guides, as our research suggests ...
[114]
[PDF] Honey Bee Colony Strength in the California Almond Pollination ...
Less than one 12-frame hive per acre will pollinate the equivalent of two 6-frame hives. Consequently, growers can substitute hive density and colony strength ...
[115]
Experimental evidence that wildflower strips increase pollinator ...
Aug 1, 2015 · On average, the frequency of pollinator visits was 25% higher for crops with adjacent flower strips compared to those without, with a ...
[116]
Hedgerow structural diversity is key to promoting biodiversity and ...
Bumblebee abundance doubled in hedgerows with more than three woody species and low patchiness compared to hedgerows with low structural diversity (Garratt et ...
[117]
Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports ...
Uncommon species of native bees were sevenfold more abundant on hedgerow flowers than on flowers at weedy, unmanaged edges. Of the species on flowers at ...
[118]
Saving bees with 'superfoods': new engineered supplement found to ...
Aug 20, 2025 · An engineered food supplement, designed to provide essential compounds found in plant pollen, was found to significantly enhance colony ...
[119]
A Comparative Test Of The Pollen Subs (Part 1 & 2)
The supplemental feeding of pollen patties made a big difference! Question ... pollen resulted in an overall increase in average colony strength in fall (Fig.<|separator|>
[120]
Unmixed blessing - Science
May 18, 2023 · Researchers are closing in on the long-sought goal of creating high-yielding hybrid crops that can be propagated indefinitely, without sex.
[121]
Pollen Quantitative and Genetic Competitiveness of Rice (Oryza ...
Jun 28, 2025 · Rice, in contrast to maize, is a hermaphroditic, self-pollinating plant, where self-pollen typically holds a significant fertilization ...
[122]
Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield
This study related differences in three functional traits of pollinating bees (flower height preference, daily time of flower visitation and within-flower ...
[123]
Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators
Jul 29, 2020 · Our findings show that pollinator declines could translate directly into decreased yields or production for most of the crops studied, and that ...Missing: suboptimal | Show results with:suboptimal
[124]
(PDF) Intraspecific crop diversity for enhanced crop pollination ...
May 31, 2025 · We find evidence that mixing cultivars, even in self-compatible crops, improves pollination outcomes and yields. Additionally, given insect ...
[125]
Valuing Insect Pollination Services with Cost of Replacement
We apply the theoretical concept of ascribing a value to a service by calculating the cost to replace it, as a novel way of valuing wild and managed pollination ...
[126]
Valuing Insect Pollination Services with Cost of Replacement - NIH
Sep 10, 2008 · Here we present replacement costs as a more accurate value estimate of insect pollination as an ecosystem service, although this method could also be applied ...
[127]
Pollinators benefit agriculture | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Insect pollination services add more than $34 billion in economic value to U.S. agricultural crops annually and provide diverse diets for humans including ...
[128]
[PDF] Economic Valuation of Pollination Services:
For instance Costanza et al. (1997) provide a value estimate of $120 bil- lion per year for all pollination ecosystem services, whereas Richards (1993) finds ...
[129]
Measuring the economic value of pollination services
Our paper offers a conceptual framework for measuring the economic value of changes in insect pollinator populations, and then reviews what evidence exists.
[130]
Bees More Valuable for Pollination Than for Honey - The Packer
Jun 19, 2025 · A recent USDA report quantified the value of pollination services in 2024 at over $400 million, above the $361.5 million in revenue from honey.
[131]
https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/chart-detail?chartId=112782
[132]
National Honey Bee Surveys | Animal and Plant Health Inspection ...
Jul 7, 2025 · USDA's Economic Research Service (ERS) estimates that pollination is responsible for more than $18 billion in added revenue to crop production. ...
[133]
Economic value of Pollinators | Bayer Global
Jan 10, 2025 · Pollination from honey bees, native bees, and flies deliver billions of dollars (US) in economic value. Between $235 and $577 billion (US) worth of annual ...
[134]
Bees take flight to pollinate almond crop - Ag Alert
Feb 28, 2024 · The cost to the grower to rent beehives for almond pollination this year ranges from $180 for a six-frame hive of bees to $200 or more for ...
[135]
(PDF) Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture ...
Aug 10, 2025 · The total economic value of pollination worldwide amounted to €153 billion, which represented 9.5% of the value of the world agricultural ...<|separator|>
[136]
Where Have All the Honey Bees Gone? To California Almond ...
Feb 17, 2025 · Each acre of almonds typically requires two honey bee colonies for adequate pollination, meaning California's 1.4 million acres of almonds ...Missing: 87%
[137]
Preliminary Results from the 2024-2025 US Beekeeping Survey
These beekeepers collectively managed 219,097 colonies on October 1, 2024, representing 8.4% of the estimated 2.60 million managed honey-producing colonies in ...
[138]
[PDF] United States Honey Bee Colony Losses 2022-2023
Jun 22, 2023 · These beekeepers collectively managed 314,360 colonies on 1 October 2022, representing 12% of the estimated. 2.70 million managed honey- ...<|separator|>
[139]
Almond Growers Concerned About Bee Prices and Availability for ...
May 12, 2025 · Lost income from almond pollination is estimated to exceed $428 million as valued at 2023 hive rental fees which averaged at $181 per colony.2025 California Almond Pollination Bee Shortage - FacebookCommercial Apimaye users in California for almond pollination?More results from www.facebook.com
[140]
https://wcngg.com/2025/02/02/economic-outlook-and-other-considerations-for-the-2025-almond-pollination-season/
[141]
When is pollinating almond actually profitable for beekeepers?
Dec 1, 2019 · Total revenue received by United States beekeepers providing pollination services to almond is more than $240 million per year.Missing: net | Show results with:net
[142]
Honey bee colonies could face 70% losses in 2025, impacting ...
Mar 26, 2025 · Over the past decade, annual losses for colonies have typically ranged between 40% and 50%, marking a significant jump this year.
[143]
2025 Colony Losses | WSU Honey Bees + Pollinators Program
Mar 20, 2025 · Honey bee colonies could face 70% losses in 2025, impacting agriculture, written by Leah Sarnoff, ABC News, published March 26, 2025. Honey bee ...
[144]
Understanding Mite Counts - PerfectBee
May 16, 2025 · In most areas, during the months of August to October, the thresholds are a bit higher at 3% (3 mites per 100 bees). The higher threshold is ...Missing: declines | Show results with:declines
[145]
Varroa mite alert from the Honey Bee Lab - Oregon State University
The economic threshold to treat Varroa mites in general for temperate areas is considered to be about 3% or higher in fall, but as economic threshold depends ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[146]
Climate Change: It's a Buzzkill for Bumblebees, Study Finds
Feb 6, 2020 · Researchers found that bumblebee populations had recently declined by 46 percent in North America and by 17 percent across Europe when compared to a base ...
[147]
Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees - NIH
Disturbing reports of bumble bee population declines in Europe have recently spilled over into North America, fueling environmental and economic concerns of ...
[148]
Climate change contributes to widespread declines among bumble ...
Feb 7, 2020 · Our measurements of bumble bee species occupancy over time provide evidence of rapid and widespread declines across Europe and North America.
[149]
Integrating data to assess occupancy patterns of an endangered ...
Feb 25, 2025 · Bumble bees (Bombus spp.) have become the focus of several community science programs due to widespread population declines across North ...
[150]
Honey Bee Health - index : USDA ARS
Typical average annual losses jumped to about 15-22 percent of managed colonies. When Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) began to be reported in 2006/2007, annual ...
[151]
[PDF] TOOLS FOR VARROA MANAGEMENT - Honey Bee Health Coalition
Aug 1, 2022 · IPM techniques can help beekeepers maintain varroa mite levels in colonies below 2 to 3 mites per 100 adult bees (i.e., a 2 to 3 percent ...
[152]
Are increasing honey bee colony losses attributed to Varroa ...
According to beekeepers that participated in the questionnaire survey in 2022, Varroa was the main driver of colony loss over the winter 2021. A similar trend ...
[153]
(PDF) Varroa destructor is the main culprit for the death and reduced ...
Aug 5, 2025 · Winter colony mortality was 27.2%, and when examined as a fraction of all morbidity factors, fall varroa mite infestations were the leading ...<|separator|>
[154]
Do the honeybee pathogens Nosema ceranae and deformed wing ...
It is well established that millions of honey bee colonies have been killed due to the global spread of the Varroa mite and its inter-action with deformed wing ...
[155]
Evidence of the synergistic interaction of honey bee pathogens ...
May 15, 2015 · Our results showed that Nosema could accelerate DWV replication in infected bees in a dose-dependent manner at the early stages of DWV infection.
[156]
Nosema ceranae in Apis mellifera: a 12 years postdetection ...
Mar 24, 2018 · The effects on individual honey bees will have a direct impact on the colony by leading to losses in the adult's population. The absence of ...
[157]
Colonies in collapse: What's causing massive honeybee die-offs?
Jan 28, 2009 · Since 1987, varroa mites have wiped out between 17 and 40 percent of the total American bee population annually, a crisis that has pushed many ...
[158]
Diversified Farming in a Monoculture Landscape: Effects on Honey ...
Apr 4, 2020 · Land used for agriculture can reduce natural and seminatural habitat creating a scarcity in floral diversity and abundance that affects bee ...
[159]
Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale
Seventy-six percent of forage plants declined in frequency within 1-km squares, including those (e.g. Trifolium pratense) of particular value for threatened ...Missing: correlation | Show results with:correlation
[160]
Global agricultural productivity is threatened by increasing pollinator ...
Extensive monocultures are associated with a limited pollinator supply and reduced pollination, whereas agricultural diversification can enhance both. Therefore ...Missing: floral | Show results with:floral
[161]
Honey Bee Nutrition - ScienceDirect.com
Pollen is the primary source of protein in a honey bee colony. The protein content of pollen ranges from 2.5% to 61%. Ten amino acids in specific ...
[162]
Pollen reverses decreased lifespan, altered nutritional metabolism ...
Apr 5, 2019 · Pollen reverses decreased lifespan, altered nutritional metabolism and suppressed immunity in honey bees (Apis mellifera) treated with antibiotics.Honey Bees Used In This... · Bacterial Phylotypes In The... · Antibiotics Suppress Immune...Missing: below | Show results with:below
[163]
Pollen Diet—Properties and Impact on a Bee Colony - PMC - NIH
Sep 6, 2021 · Stored pollen showed lower nutritional value. After one year, pollen loses its stimulating properties by 76% [19]. Low-protein pollen exposes ...
[164]
Effects of Three Different Bee Pollen on Digestion, Immunity ... - MDPI
Honeybees fed sunflower bee-collected pollen exhibited reduced lipid deposition, enhanced immune enzyme activity, and increased expression of immune-related ...
[165]
Responses of insect pollinators to habitat fragmentation: A global ...
Sep 4, 2025 · Our results show that insect pollinators have declined globally due to habitat fragmentation. Reduced habitat area was the main driver of ...Missing: cascade | Show results with:cascade
[166]
Forest edges increase pollinator network robustness to extinction ...
Jan 30, 2023 · Meanwhile, network connectance typically increases as habitat area declines, suggesting that fewer potential resource linkages remain in the ...
[167]
The effects of urbanization on pollinators and pollination: A meta ...
Jun 22, 2023 · While pollinator richness in cities was lower compared with semi-natural areas, pollinator abundance did not differ between the two ecosystems, ...
[168]
Urban areas as hotspots for bees and pollination but not a panacea ...
Jan 29, 2020 · Other studies have, in contrast, shown urban areas to have neutral or even positive effects on biodiversity, including some insect pollinator ...
[169]
Pesticides damage survival of bee colonies, landmark study shows
Jun 29, 2017 · The world's largest ever field trial demonstrates widely used insecticides harm both honeybees and wild bees, increasing calls for a ban.
[170]
Reduced Honeybee Pollen Foraging under Neonicotinoid Exposure
Mar 7, 2025 · This study shows neonicotinoid insecticides specifically impair pollen foragers' performance within a colony, highlighting important ...
[171]
Pesticide residues in honey bees, pollen and beeswax - PubMed
May 24, 2018 · Beeswax showed the highest average hazard scores (HQ > 5000) to honey bees. Pollen samples contained the largest number of pesticide residues ...
[172]
Pesticide contamination of beeswax from managed honey bee ...
Pesticides were detected in all samples and included 34 fungicides, 33 insecticides, and 22 herbicides. Each wax sample contained 7–35 different residues (x¯ = ...
[173]
Synergistic and Antagonistic Interactions Between Varroa destructor ...
Nov 18, 2021 · The data suggest that V. destructor and neonicotinoids interacted synergistically to negatively affect adult drone survival, but that they interacted ...
[174]
Varroa destructor infestation amplifies imidacloprid vulnerability in ...
Varroa destructor and imidacloprid together increase bee mortality, disrupt gut microbiota, and affect enzyme activity, with V. destructor potentially ...
[175]
Parasites and pesticides act antagonistically on honey bee health
Dec 7, 2020 · We found that combined pesticide–parasite treatments do tend to be deadlier than uncombined treatments but are significantly less deadly than ...
[176]
Bee declines: is banning pesticides the solution?
Nov 29, 2018 · The EU placed a near-total ban on the world's most popular pesticides. But which bee populations are really affected by pesticides, and is banning them the way ...<|separator|>
[177]
Bees and pesticide regulation: Lessons from the neonicotinoid ...
Neonicotinoid insecticides have been signaled as an important driver of widespread declines in bee diversity and abundance.
[178]
Pesticide residues in honey: Agricultural landscapes and ...
Over the past two decades, more than 100 pesticides have been reported consistently in beeswax across the United States (Mullin et al., 2010, Traynor et al., ...
[179]
Driven by Almonds, Pollination Services Now Exceed Honey as a ...
Jul 2, 2018 · Pollination services income as a share of beekeeper revenue remained relatively small compared with honey sales through the 1990s.
[180]
The Global Stock of Domesticated Honey Bees Is Growing Slower ...
Apr 1, 2009 · Long-term global trends in crop yield and production reveal no current pollination shortage but increasing pollinator dependency. Curr. Biol ...
[181]
40% of pollinator species face extinction, report finds
Mar 21, 2016 · 75% of the world's food crops depend on pollination by pollinators, including bees, butterflies and birds, 40% of which face extinction.Missing: correlation | Show results with:correlation<|separator|>
[182]
Elevated extinction risk in over one-fifth of native North American ...
Mar 24, 2025 · We assessed the extinction risk of nearly 1,600 species of vertebrate and insect pollinators and found that more than one in five species is at ...Missing: IPBES | Show results with:IPBES
[183]
[PDF] assessment on pollinators, pollination and food production - IPBES
How insect-resistant. (IR) crop use and reduced pesticide use affect pollinator abundance and diversity is unknown. Risk assessments required for the approval ...
[184]
[PDF] Honey Bee Colonies 08/01/2024 - USDA-NASS
On January 1, 2024, US honey bee colonies were 2.71 million, down 1% from 2023. 396,820 colonies were lost Jan-Mar 2024, and 288,190 lost Apr-Jun 2024.
[185]
The number of bee colonies has reached an all-time high - Fortune
Apr 3, 2024 · Nearly a million bee colonies have been formed in the past five years, according to 2022 Census of Agriculture data from the USDA, boosting the ...<|separator|>
[186]
How much have US bee populations fallen, and why? - USAFacts
May 5, 2023 · Commercial honey bee colonies fell by more than 30% from 1989 to 2008. ... Between January 2015 and June 2022, the US lost 11.4 million honey bee ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
[187]
Pollination services valued at $400 million on 1.7 million acres
Jun 18, 2025 · Almond pollination alone generated $325.8 million in 2024, or about 81 percent of total U.S. pollination service receipts. By comparison, ...Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
[188]
Protecting Pollinators to Strengthen Specialty Crop Production
In 2024, managed pollination markets reached a total value exceeding $400 million. The value of pollination services has increased by around 26% compared to ...
[189]
Honeybee collapse: Stung from behind | Bees | The Guardian
Jun 7, 2010 · Despite all the talk, there was no evidence that crop productivity was going down. Ghazoul's purpose was not to defend big agriculture but to ...Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
[190]
Beepocalypse Myth Handbook: Assessing claims of pollinator collapse
Mar 3, 2023 · A 2015 study of wild bees' contribution to crop pollination concluded that only 2% of wild bee species accounted for 80% of all crop pollination ...Beepocalypse Myth Handbook... · Colony Collapse Disorder · Honeybee Health Problems Are...<|control11|><|separator|>
[191]
Insights from U.S. beekeeper triage surveys following unusually high ...
Aug 22, 2025 · Respondents, managing over half of U.S. colonies, most frequently cited Varroa mites as the cause for their losses. Varroa mites were followed ...
[192]
A national survey of managed honey bee colony losses in the USA
According to our results, beekeepers consider “Varroa mites and associated viruses” to be a major cause for colony losses in winter, while “Queen issues” were ...
[193]
A scoping review on the effects of Varroa mite (Varroa destructor) on ...
Jan 1, 2024 · The results suggest that Varroa mites are one of the predominant causes of global honey bee decline as they lack natural resistance to Varroa mites.
[194]
Three years of banning neonicotinoid insecticides based on sub ...
The 2013 EU ban of three neonicotinoids used in seed coating of pollinator attractive crops was put in place because of concern about declining wild ...
[195]
New Study Shows Neonicotinoid Ban has Cost European Oilseed ...
Jan 11, 2017 · The report found that the neonicotinoid ban has cost the European Oilseed Rape farming industry €900 million a year, including a yield loss of 4%.
[196]
The Impact of the Ban on Neonicotinoids - Seed World
Dec 7, 2017 · Yield depression: a negative yield impact of four per cent (weighted average) in oilseed rape production in the EU; · Quality losses: on average ...
[197]
EU Policies Led to Collapse of Major Biofuel Crop in UK and Europe ...
“In 2020, the equivalent of four out of ten UK fields of oilseed rape did not make it to harvest due to beetle damage, with 14% being resown due to severe pest ...
[198]
[PDF] impact-assessment-neonicotinoid-ban-oilseed-rape-seed-treatment ...
An estimated 240,000 litres of insecticide, mainly pyrethroid based, was applied to winter oilseed rape crops to combat actual or predicted attacks by CSFB. At ...<|separator|>
[199]
New study shows neonicotinoid ban caused severe economic and ...
Jan 17, 2017 · a negative yield impact of 4; an average of 6.3; an average of 0.73 additional foliar applications per hectare of cultivated oilseed rape. These ...
[200]
[PDF] Pollinator Conservation Farm Bill Programs (2018–2023) - USDA
Note: To minimize adverse impacts to pollinator populations, divide the habitat area into multiple management units and apply practices on a rotational ...<|separator|>
[201]
Native bee habitat restoration: key ecological considerations from ...
Generally, it has been shown that there is a positive effect of habitat restoration on bee population abundance and diversity, even if bees are not specifically ...
[202]
[PDF] An Analysis of the Measures Necessary to Increase U.S. Pollinator ...
59 Varroa destructor is a parasitic mite that lays its eggs on honeybee larvae before they pupate.60 Varroa mites spread to other parts of the hive once.
[203]
Risks of neonicotinoid insecticides to honeybees - PMC
Among the many postulated causes of honeybee mortality are the varroa mite, multiple viruses, overwintering and pollination stress, and pesticide exposure.
[204]
Risks and benefits of the biological interface between managed and ...
Sep 21, 2016 · We feel these ongoing activities ignore well-documented cases of global deleterious impacts on pollinator health exemplified by the Varroa ...
[205]
Want to Save the Bees? Focus on Habitat, Not Honey Bees
Mar 27, 2025 · Hungry hives crowd out native pollinators. Introducing a single honey bee hive means 15,000 to 50,000 additional mouths to feed in an area that ...
[206]
Critique of “A Proposal for Enhancing Pollinator Health and ...
Dec 14, 2014 · The document displays a somewhat superficial understanding of floral pollination and causes of over-winter bee deaths in Ontario.
[207]
New pollen-replacing food for honey bees brings new hope for ...
Apr 16, 2025 · Scientists have unveiled a new food source designed to sustain honey bee colonies indefinitely without natural pollen.
[208]
New Pollen-Replacing Food Could Save Bee Colonies Worldwide
May 1, 2025 · Scientists have developed a new food source capable of sustaining honey bee colonies indefinitely without the need for natural pollen.
[209]
Scientists found the missing nutrients bees need — Colonies grew ...
Aug 23, 2025 · An engineered food supplement, designed to provide essential compounds found in plant pollen, was found to significantly enhance colony ...Missing: increase | Show results with:increase
[210]
A derived honey bee stock confers resistance to Varroa destructor ...
Apr 7, 2022 · Our results demonstrate that Varroa-resistant honey bees present strong potential for reducing colony losses in commercial beekeeping operations ...
[211]
Adapting Overwintering Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Colony ...
Mar 4, 2025 · A management strategy that might reduce colony losses is the combination of Varroa-resistant Russian honey bees and overwintering colonies in indoor cold ...
[212]
Cluster-Based Flight Path Construction for Drone-Assisted Pear ...
The method achieved a fruit set rate of 62.1%, exceeding natural pollination at 53.6% and compared to the 61.9% of manual pollination. These results demonstrate ...
[213]
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311297
[214]
Pollination robot gets to work in greenhouse with closed screens
Oct 13, 2025 · Tomato plants in a greenhouse in Bleiswijk are currently being pollinated by a robot. The robot, called Polly+, is developed by Arugga AI ...
[215]
Engineering crop flower morphology facilitates robotization of cross ...
Aug 11, 2025 · Robotic pollinators carefully vibrate flowers to release pollen for self-pollination, aiding fruit production.47,48,49,50,51,52,53 However ...Missing: modification fertile trials
[216]
China unveils world's first autonomous robot for hybrid pollination
Aug 13, 2025 · The researchers used gene editing to change crop flowers to create male-sterile flowers that make it easier for robots to produce hybrid seeds.
[217]
U.S. Geological Survey Pollinator Science Strategy, 2025–35—A ...
Jun 12, 2025 · This “Pollinator Science Strategy” highlights the USGS's role in the research to promote healthy pollinator populations and address partner information gaps.
[218]
(PDF) USGS Pollinator Science Strategy 2025-2035 - ResearchGate
Jun 17, 2025 · Tracking species status and trends. Understanding species threats and stressors. Informing restoration and management actions. Developing novel ...
[219]
Potential expanded pollinator distributions in North America under ...
Apr 10, 2025 · Most pollinator species, including monarch butterflies, may gain potential climate space in the future. Shifting to new locations is an ...
[220]
Biodiversity strengthens pollinators and ensures stable yields ...
Sep 25, 2025 · The result: On average, freely pollinated sunflowers achieved around 25% higher yields—regardless of whether they were grown on organically or ...
[221]
Biodiversity Strengthens Pollinators and Ensures Stable Yields -
Sep 25, 2025 · Biodiversity Strengthens Pollinators and Ensures Stable Yields. 09/25/2025. Improving biodiversity and maintaining yields at the same time?
[222]
WildPosh: Pan-European assessment, monitoring, and mitigation of ...
Apr 28, 2025 · To enable long-term monitoring, we will provide a novel proteomics-based tool that will use molecular markers to assess bee health and ...
[223]
Integrating pollinators' movements into pollination models - Frontiers
Feb 13, 2025 · Accurate prediction of pollination processes is a key challenge for sustainable food production and the conservation of natural ecosystems.Missing: threat | Show results with:threat