Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Norfolk four-course system

The Norfolk four-course system, also known as the Norfolk four-course rotation, is an agricultural method developed in 18th-century that cycles through four crops—wheat, turnips, , and —over four years to maintain without periods. This system alternates crops ( and ) with root crops (turnips) and (), allowing turnips to be used as winter for while fixes in the , thereby enhancing productivity and supporting integrated arable-livestock farming. Originating in the light soils of and , the system, already emerging in the region, was popularized in the early by Charles "Turnip" Townshend, the 2nd Viscount Townshend, upon his retirement to the estate in 1730, where he experimented with turnip cultivation and clover leys to replace traditional fallowing. By 1720, root crops like turnips were already grown by about 50% of farmers in these regions, but the full four-course integration gained momentum after 1750, spreading to enclosed farms across southern England's arable districts. Its adoption was facilitated by parliamentary enclosures, which allowed individual farmers greater control over land use, contrasting with open-field systems where communal practices limited innovation. The Norfolk system's impact was profound, contributing significantly to Britain's by increasing arable productivity through better soil management and livestock integration, which in turn boosted and output to feed a growing . The greater use of , such as in the Norfolk system, accounted for about one-third of the arable yield improvements in between 1750 and 1850. Overall agricultural innovations during this period, including the Norfolk system, enabled to support an additional 6.5 million by 1850 without proportional land expansion. However, its success was regionally specific, thriving on well-drained light soils but less effective in heavier clay areas or where hindered root crop growth, leading to uneven adoption nationwide.

History

Origins in Norfolk

The Norfolk four-course system emerged in the late 17th century amid the unique agricultural conditions of , particularly , where light, sandy soils predominated and posed significant challenges for traditional farming practices. These soils, often acidic and infertile, were prone to rapid nutrient depletion and , while the region's flat and high exacerbated drainage issues, especially in areas like the Breckland and Sandlings where and heathlands were common. Traditional open-field systems relying on fallowing—one-third of land left idle annually—proved inefficient here, as the light soils recovered slowly from exhaustion and were vulnerable to weeds and during idle periods, limiting overall productivity in an dependent on both arable crops and . Early experiments with alternative rotations began in the 1660s and 1670s, driven by local farmers seeking to address without extended s. Turnips were initially trialed as fodder crops for in enclosed fields, with records showing on estates like Raynham by the early 1700s and scattered adoption for and on lands; , imported from the by the 1620s, was sown experimentally in fenced closes by mid-century to fix nitrogen and support grazing. These practices evolved from earlier two- and three-course systems—common since the medieval period and influenced by 16th-century agronomists like Thomas Tusser, whose writings advocated legume integration for —gradually incorporating turnips to replace and to boost in setups. Local innovators, such as John Wace in Carbrooke (1723) who allocated 80 acres to turnips, and Erasmus Earle in Heydon (1726) who fed 33 bullocks on the crop, conducted these trials organically through trial-and-error on small scales, adapting continental ideas to Norfolk's conditions. By the 1730s, evidence of the full four-course rotation—wheat, turnips, , and —appeared in Norfolk farm accounts without any centralized promotion, indicating grassroots adoption among progressive tenants. inventories and estate records from places like Houghton (1701) and (1715–1719) document turnips in field rotations yielding improved outputs, with harvests rising from 15.9 bushels per (1680–1709) to 19.2 bushels per (1710–1739) and from 16.1 to 20.8 bushels per over the same periods. This prefigured broader refinements later associated with figures like , but the system's foundations were laid by local responses to environmental necessities.

Development and Key Figures

The Norfolk four-course system underwent significant refinement and popularization in the mid-18th century, transitioning from localized practices to a more systematically promoted approach among Norfolk landowners. , the 2nd Townshend, played a pivotal role following his retirement from politics on May 15, 1730, when he returned to his estate at in . There, he conducted experiments with cultivation, emphasizing their use as winter fodder to sustain livestock year-round, which complemented the by eliminating periods and enhancing soil fertility through integrated grazing. Townshend promoted these innovations through hands-on estate management, sharing his findings with fellow agriculturists and influencing broader adoption in the region. Complementing Townshend's efforts were earlier mechanical innovations that facilitated the system's implementation. Jethro Tull's invention of the in 1701 enabled precise sowing in rows, reducing seed waste and allowing for effective weeding and incorporation of root crops like turnips within the rotation, thereby supporting the four-course cycle's efficiency. Later, in the late , Norfolk landowner Thomas William Coke, 1st Earl of Leicester—known as "Coke of "—scaled the system across his extensive estate through experimental farming and public demonstrations, such as annual sheep shearings that showcased improved yields and productivity. By the 1770s, the rotation had evolved into a distinctly recognized "Norfolk system," as documented in contemporary agricultural treatises that highlighted its structured sequence of , turnips, , and . Agricultural writer Arthur Young, in works such as his 1776-1779 tour observations, praised its integration of crops and grasses, noting its role in preventing soil exhaustion and boosting overall farm output across eastern . This period marked the system's maturation from experimental practice to a model referenced in husbandry literature, solidifying its influence on British agriculture.

Description

Crop Rotation Cycle

The Norfolk four-course system employed a continuous four-year crop rotation that eliminated the need for periods, dividing into four equal fields to ensure year-round productivity. This rotation, developed in the light soils of , , during the eighteenth century, cycled through specific crops to maintain and support . In the first year, was sown as the primary grain crop, providing for human consumption and seed for future planting. depleted but yielded high returns on well-drained soils, setting the foundation for the subsequent phase. The second year featured turnips, a root crop grown as fodder for livestock during winter, while their cultivation involved thorough weeding that suppressed weeds and pests, cleaning the land after wheat harvest. Turnips also helped break up soil structure and incorporated organic matter when consumed or plowed under. During the third year, spring barley was planted as another grain crop, valued for its use in malting, animal feed, or human food; it was often under-sown with clover or grass seeds to prepare for the ley phase. Barley thrived after turnips, benefiting from the improved soil conditions without excessive nutrient demand. The fourth year consisted of clover or ryegrass as a legume ley, serving as green manure, providing grazing for livestock, and fixing atmospheric nitrogen into the soil through symbiotic bacteria. This phase restored soil nutrients, particularly nitrogen, for the wheat in the following cycle. Upon completion, the rotation repeated seamlessly across the four fields, with each field advancing to the next crop annually, ensuring no land lay idle and sustaining overall farm output. This structure allowed for balanced nutrient cycling, as the legume's nitrogen fixation briefly supported the demanding wheat crop.
YearCropPrimary Purpose
1WheatGrain for human consumption and seed
2TurnipsLivestock fodder; weed and pest control
3BarleyGrain crop; often under-sown with seeds
4Clover or ryegrassGreen manure, grazing, nitrogen fixation

Associated Practices

The Norfolk four-course system integrated specific tillage methods to optimize soil preparation and crop establishment within its rotation cycle. After the wheat harvest, fields designated for turnips underwent to break up compacted and incorporate residues, enhancing and penetration for the subsequent root crop. This practice, advocated by innovators like , contrasted with shallower traditional plowing and supported the system's emphasis on intensive land use. Hoeing was essential for in root crops such as turnips, where manual or horse-drawn hoes removed competitors during the , preventing yield losses and maintaining field cleanliness. Manuring practices relied heavily on the dung from expanded herds, enabled by the provided by turnips and , which was strategically applied to and fields to replenish nutrients like and . This organic fertilization, derived from sheep and on the ley and root crops, improved without relying solely on external inputs, creating a closed-loop . also served as a when plowed under after its growth period, further enriching the for the following grain crops. Sowing techniques varied by crop to maximize establishment and integration with the rotation. Clover seeds were typically broadcast or undersown with , allowing even distribution across the field for subsequent grazing or hay production, a method that leveraged the crop's nitrogen-fixing properties without intensive mechanical intervention. For turnips, row planting became prominent, influenced by Jethro Tull's invented in 1701, which deposited seeds at uniform depth and spacing, facilitating mechanical hoeing and reducing seed waste compared to . The system demanded year-round labor to sustain its productivity, with tasks distributed across seasons to utilize workers consistently rather than concentrating efforts during harvest peaks. Peak occurred during turnip weeding, which required meticulous hand or horse-hoeing to control weeds in rows, often involving large teams during summer months. harvesting for hay or seed collection similarly demanded significant effort in late summer, involving cutting, drying, and storage to support winter needs. These practices, while labor-demanding, aligned with the rotation's goal of continuous , minimizing idle periods and supporting overall efficiency.

Advantages and Innovations

Soil Management

The Norfolk four-course system enhanced primarily through the integration of leguminous and root crops that addressed key limitations of traditional rotations. In the third year of the cycle, was sown, often undersown with from the previous year, where its symbiotic relationship with bacteria facilitated biological . This process converted atmospheric into ammonium compounds usable by plants, replenishing soil levels depleted by preceding grain crops like and , with estimates suggesting fixation rates of 100-200 kg N/ha/year. Turnips, cultivated in the second year, contributed to by leveraging their deep root systems to penetrate compacted subsoil layers, thereby alleviating compaction and accessing like from deeper horizons. The associated hoeing practices during cultivation not only controlled weeds and pests by disrupting their life cycles but also aerated the , improving and infiltration while reducing risks. This mechanical intervention, combined with turnips' ability to scavenge residual , prevented surface-level depletion and fostered a more balanced profile across the . The alternation of crops in the system maintained overall equilibrium by preventing the selective exhaustion of specific elements, a common issue in continuous farming. Turnips acted as nutrient scavengers, drawing up leached minerals, while not only fixed but also added through root residues and eventual incorporation, enhancing and microbial activity. Compared to the three-field system's period, which left one-third of the land idle and reliant on natural regeneration, the Norfolk eliminated unproductive while achieving equivalent or superior fertility restoration.

Livestock and Productivity Gains

The Norfolk four-course system significantly improved fodder availability for livestock by incorporating turnips as a winter feed crop and as a nitrogen-fixing , enabling year-round and supporting substantial herd expansions. Turnips, planted in the second year of the , provided nutritious that prevented the need to slaughter animals during harsh winters, while in the fourth year offered lush that sustained larger flocks and of sheep and . This shift from periods to productive crops allowed farmers to maintain higher animal densities without common lands. In , the adoption of these crops led to marked increases in numbers; for example, and acreage rose from about 7% and 2% of cropped in 1660–1739 to 24% each by the , facilitating a doubling of overall densities from medieval levels by the and further expansions in the , particularly for sheep post-enclosure. Nationally, sheep numbers grew from 16.6 million in 1700 to 20 million by 1800, with similar proportional gains in attributed to enhanced feeding capacity. The greater animal populations, in turn, generated increased output, which was folded back into the fields as a natural , establishing a virtuous cycle that boosted and closed the nutrient loop more effectively than previous systems. These advancements translated into substantial productivity gains, with wheat yields in Norfolk climbing from around 20 bushels per acre in the early 18th century to 30 bushels per acre by 1854, driven by the combined effects of better nutrition for crops via manure and clover's role in soil nitrogen fixation. Overall farm output in regions employing the system increased by 150–200%, as land productivity doubled between 1700 and 1850, allowing English agriculture to support a population growth from 5.5 million in 1700 to over 8.7 million by 1801 without proportional land expansion. The rotation also enhanced labor efficiency by distributing workloads more evenly across seasons, mitigating the peaks and troughs of traditional farming that caused during winter months. Activities like sowing, weeding, and harvesting, along with management, provided steady opportunities, contributing to a doubling of labor from 1700 to 1850 at an average annual rate of about 0.45% since 1670.

Adoption and Spread

In Britain

The four-course system began spreading beyond its origins in to the wider region by the 1750s, becoming widespread on suitable loams and lighter soils through piecemeal and improved leasing practices that encouraged and cultivation. Early adopters, influenced by figures like Viscount Townshend, integrated the rotation into farm covenants, with turnips often specified as a non-fallow crop by the 1730s. Its promotion accelerated in the 1790s through the Board of Agriculture's county surveys, which highlighted the system's productivity gains in reports by surveyors like Arthur Young and Nathaniel Kent, emphasizing and soil management as models for national improvement. These surveys documented high yields in —such as at 24 bushels per acre around 1800—and urged similar practices across counties, linking the system to broader agricultural reforms. Regional adaptations emerged to suit local conditions, with emphasizing wheat in rotations on claylands, incorporating underdrainage in and water meadows in to support fodder crops on heavier soils. The Acts of 1760–1820 served as a key enabler, consolidating fragmented open fields into compact holdings that facilitated the system's implementation, particularly in where parliamentary enclosures covered 18–25% of land during the , removing barriers like shared foldcourse grazing. However, adoption faced resistance from smallholders, who lacked the capital for intensive inputs such as marling, (£10–£40 per ), and implements, favoring larger tenants with secure leases instead. By the , the Norfolk four-course system had reached peak adoption, especially on lighter soils where it dominated rotations and drove yield increases, such as from 19.2 to 26.5 bushels per between the 1710s and . In itself, turnips and each occupied about 25% of sown acreage, underscoring its role in regional productivity surges.

International Influence

The Norfolk four-course system spread beyond to during the early 19th century, influencing agricultural reforms amid growing interest in English methods for improving productivity and . In , variants of the Norfolk system emerged during the , adapted to local conditions through state-sponsored agricultural societies that promoted crop diversification and integration to address post-revolutionary land fragmentation. These adaptations, often replacing turnips with regionally suitable or adjusting sowing for varied soils, facilitated broader uptake in northern and eastern regions by the mid-19th century, contributing to the consolidation of scientific farming practices across the continent. The system's export to the began in the late , introduced to the via English and immigrants who carried knowledge of advanced rotations to combat soil exhaustion in frontier farming. By the , agricultural societies like the Agricultural Society promoted these techniques in the Northeast, with settlers in areas such as , , adopting rotations including and grasses for . Integration deepened in the Midwest by the 1850s, particularly in Ohio's Sandusky and Muskingum Valleys, where wheat farmers combined gypsum applications with legume-based cycles, supported by journals and fairs that disseminated European-inspired sustainable practices amid market-driven expansion. Within the , the Norfolk system was disseminated to colonies like and , often modified for divergent climates and soils. In , particularly , British settlers and guides introduced the in the early through agricultural societies and , with widespread adoption post-1840s as transportation improved; turnips were frequently substituted with or peas, while and grasses were emphasized for and livestock feed, enhancing cycling in systems. In , the system arrived with the in 1788, promoted by figures like Sir , but faced challenges from poor soils; () was trialed as a alternative to support needs, though economies largely supplanted full implementation by the 1820s. The Norfolk system's prominence waned internationally after 1900, primarily due to the advent of chemical fertilizers, which diminished the reliance on legume rotations for . Post-1945 intensification, driven by herbicides and synthetic inputs, enabled continuous monocultures, eroding the four-course cycle's role in and fertility maintenance across and , though elements persisted in organic and sustainable farming contexts.

Comparisons with Other Systems

Versus the Three-Field System

The Norfolk four-course system marked a significant departure from the medieval three-field rotation in land utilization. Under the three-field system, prevalent in Europe from the 8th to the 17th century, arable land was divided into three parts: one sown with winter crops like wheat or rye, another with spring crops such as oats, barley, or legumes, and the third left fallow to recover fertility, resulting in only two-thirds of the land being productive each year. In contrast, the Norfolk system divided land into four fields, rotating wheat, turnips, barley (often undersown with clover or ryegrass), and clover without any fallow period, enabling 100% annual land use and continuous cultivation to maintain soil health through diverse nutrient cycles. Crop diversity further distinguished the two systems. The three-field approach relied primarily on cereal grains and limited legumes, with fallow providing minimal soil restoration beyond natural processes, which often led to nutrient depletion over time. The Norfolk rotation introduced root crops like turnips for soil aeration and , alongside such as that fixed naturally, expanding beyond grains to include fodder crops that supported integrated farming and enhanced overall in field management. In terms of agricultural outputs, the three-field system yielded modest results, with medieval wheat production typically ranging from 6 to 10 bushels per acre due to the idle fallow year and limited soil amendments. The Norfolk system's elimination of fallow and incorporation of restorative crops boosted productivity, achieving wheat yields of around 20 bushels per acre in regions like Norfolk by the 18th century, alongside increased barley and fodder outputs that improved total farm returns. These innovations had profound social implications. The three-field system's constraints on output restricted food surpluses, contributing to periodic famines and limiting to below 6 million in before 1700. By contrast, the Norfolk system's higher yields and livestock integration enabled greater and surpluses, fueling England's expansion from about 5.5 million in 1700 to over 9 million by 1801 and supporting urbanization during the early .

Versus Other Crop Rotations

The Norfolk four-course system, with its emphasis on as a malting crop following turnips, represented a standardized approach tailored to the light, sandy soils of eastern , but it varied regionally in other four-field implementations. In areas like , a similar four-course rotation substituted oats for , better accommodating the cooler climate and heavier soils prevalent in the , which favored hardier feed grains over malting varieties. This adaptation reflected local market demands and soil suitability, allowing Leicestershire farmers to prioritize feed production while maintaining the system's core benefits of eliminating and integrating crops. Five-course rotations, particularly those developed in the and lowlands during the late 18th and early 19th centuries, extended the Norfolk model's principles by incorporating potatoes as a fifth , often inserted after turnips or to exploit their high yields and soil-deepening roots. These continental systems offered greater diversity and caloric output, especially in densely populated regions where potatoes addressed , but they demanded more intensive labor and precise timing compared to the Norfolk's streamlined four-year cycle. The addition of potatoes enhanced and in rotations but increased vulnerability to diseases like , underscoring the Norfolk system's advantage in simplicity for less specialized farms. Unlike the rigid, perpetual cycle of the Norfolk system, up-and-down husbandry—prevalent in the English and south during the 17th and 18th centuries—involved temporary leys where land alternated between short-term arable cropping and grass pasture every few years, providing a more adaptive response to fluctuating markets and . This convertible approach temporarily boosted through grass leys but lacked the Norfolk system's consistent integration of root and crops for year-round support, often resulting in uneven productivity. While up-and-down allowed farmers to shift between grain and based on needs, the Norfolk fixed promoted steadier outputs on suitable soils, contributing to its wider adoption in arable-dominated regions. A key limitation of the Norfolk system was its poor adaptation to heavy clay soils, common in parts of central and western , where poor hindered turnip establishment and clover growth, leading to waterlogging and reduced yields. On such clays, more flexible rotations like up-and-down or extended leys proved superior, as they permitted longer grass periods to improve without the intensive hoeing required for Norfolk's crops. This soil specificity confined the system's optimal use to lighter lands, influencing its uneven spread beyond and during the 18th and 19th centuries.

Legacy

Impact on the Agricultural Revolution

The Norfolk four-course system played a pivotal role in the productivity surge of the between 1700 and 1850, contributing to agricultural output more than doubling over this period from an index of 1.85 to 4.08. By replacing the traditional year with turnips and , the rotation restored soil nutrients through and provided for , enabling continuous cropping and higher yields without exhausting the land. yields, for example, rose from 19 bushels per acre in 1700 to 28 bushels per acre in 1850, while yields increased from 29 to 35 bushels per acre. This enhanced efficiency reduced the of farming relative to output, freeing surplus workers for industrial employment and underpinning the demographic and economic shifts of the era. The adoption of the Norfolk system was facilitated by the parliamentary enclosure acts, which consolidated open fields and commons into compact farms suitable for intensive rotation. Between 1750 and 1850, enclosures expanded cultivated land and allowed for capital investments in , marling, and , making the four-course method viable on larger scales. Enclosed acreage for improved pastures grew from 9 million to 15 million acres during this time, directly supporting the system's emphasis on crops and contributing to roughly one-third of the arable productivity gains across . Without these land reforms, the rotation's benefits—such as year-round labor utilization for weeding turnips and sowing clover—would have been limited to fragmented smallholdings. On the economic front, the system's gains helped moderate amid explosive , from 5.5 million in 1700 to over 16 million in 1850. Real agricultural prices remained stable, fluctuating only slightly from an index of 0.82 in 1700 to 0.79 in 1850, as output expansions outpaced demand pressures that could have triggered Malthusian crises. This , achieved through innovations like the Norfolk rotation, sustained per capita calorie availability despite population tripling and supported urban industrialization by keeping affordable—agricultural workers spent a declining share of on and . The result was a virtuous cycle where cheaper, more reliable supplies bolstered , reduced risks, and enabled the workforce reallocation essential to Britain's economic transformation. As a catalyst for , the Norfolk system spurred advances in and machinery by expanding numbers and refining farm operations. The abundance of turnips and as winter feed allowed for denser animal herds, facilitating experiments in and prompting figures like Robert Bakewell to develop systematic for traits such as faster growth and higher meat yields—beef output per animal, for instance, climbed from 260 pounds in 1700 to 700 pounds in 1850. production similarly rose from 300 to 440 gallons per cow over the same period. These gains in complemented the rotation's arable focus, while the need for precise planting and weeding in fields encouraged , including horse-drawn hoes and drills that doubled labor in harvesting through tools like scythes. Overall, the system integrated biological and technological progress, amplifying the Revolution's long-term impact on sustainable farming.

Modern Relevance

The principles of the Norfolk four-course system have experienced a revival in contemporary , where its emphasis on legume-based rotations promotes natural and enhances . In systems, clovers and other in the rotation sequence capture atmospheric , supplying 50-150 kg/ha to subsequent crops like or , thereby reducing the need for external inputs and supporting microbial diversity. This approach fosters a balanced by alternating root crops, cereals, and forages, which discourages buildup and encourages beneficial and organisms, as demonstrated in long-term trials where indices are higher compared to monocultures. Modern adaptations integrate the system's rotational framework into no-till and practices, improving while minimizing . For instance, like or vetch are sown ahead of root crops in updated Norfolk-inspired cycles, such as a six-year rotation of oilseed rape, , , and on estates like , yielding 20-30% higher outputs without . The European Union's (CAP) incentivizes these rotations through eco-schemes, providing payments of €50-200/ha for diversified cropping that includes and to meet 2030 sustainability targets, as outlined in national strategic plans. Despite these benefits, the system faces criticisms for its vulnerability to monoculture-like pressures in the absence of synthetic chemicals, particularly for root crops like turnips, which can attract soil-borne pathogens without . Since the 1940s, widespread adoption of synthetic fertilizers has largely supplanted unchanged Norfolk rotations by enabling intensive production with minimal , leading to nutrient imbalances in regions shifting to high-input farming. In its original form, the system is rarely implemented today due to these limitations and evolving market demands. The Norfolk system's legacy endures in models, where algorithmic optimization of rotations predicts yields and nutrient needs using data from soil sensors and . Multi-objective planning tools incorporate four-course principles to balance productivity, emissions, and , achieving 10-20% reductions in use through simulated integrations. However, these models typically modify the traditional sequence for site-specific conditions rather than replicating it .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] R3 Overton - Economic History Society
    The ultimate expression of these principles was in the Norfolk four-course rotation of wheat, turnips, barley and clover, although the rotation was rarely ...
  2. [2]
    British History in depth: Agricultural Revolution in England 1500 - 1850
    Feb 17, 2011 · ... Norfolk four-course rotation in unsuitable conditions) may have been positively harmful. And Arthur Young, the agricultural writer, has been ...Crop Yields · Farming Systems · More Food Per Worker
  3. [3]
    Farming at Raynham
    In the early 18th century, Charles Townshend, 2nd Viscount, developed the Norfolk four-course rotation system at Raynham. His method introduced a cycle of ...
  4. [4]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the origins of the Norfolk Four-Course System (17th and early 18th centuries) based on the provided segments. To retain all information in a dense and organized manner, I will use a combination of narrative text and a table in CSV format for detailed data (e.g., regional context, experiments, evidence, and farmers). The narrative will provide an overview, while the table will capture specific details across regions, time periods, and sources.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] UC Santa Cruz - eScholarship
    thin and somewhat infertile East Anglian soils. Both Turnips and clover were introduced into East Anglia in the latter part of the sixteenth century. Robert.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Agronomy and agricultural history in England
    The Norfolk four course rotation took well over a hundred years to develop. Turnips and clover were first grown by farmers for live- stock fodder in the ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  7. [7]
    The Norfolk Four Course: Turnips and clovers in revolution - AgProud
    Oct 31, 2018 · 1. Lord Townshend did not invent the rotation called the Norfolk Four Course. He copied it from continental Europe. · 2. Lord Townshend was not ...Missing: 17th | Show results with:17th
  8. [8]
    Charles Townshend, 2nd Viscount Townshend (1675–1738)
    On his retirement in 1730 he returned to Raynham and became absorbed in agricultural innovations such as the Norfolk four-course rotation system, which ...
  9. [9]
    Europe Gets Ahead - Penn Arts & Sciences
    Sep 14, 2023 · Norfolk four-course system: 1. Wheat for humans. 2. Turnip for animals. ... Introduced in England in 1730 by Charles Townshend. • Eliminates ...
  10. [10]
    The Project Gutenberg eBook of A Short History of English Agriculture
    ... Norfolk system in superior style; the whole being let at 15s. an acre, or ten times its original value. Townshend's two special hobbies were the field ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Coke of Norfolk (1754-1842): A Biography - Boydell and Brewer
    Thomas William Coke (“Coke of Norfolk”) (1754-1842) is best known as one of the main promoters of the improved farming of the “Agricultural Revolution”. He ...Missing: system | Show results with:system
  12. [12]
    [PDF] arthur young's tour in ireland (1776-1779) - Ricorso.net
    Norfolk system, of never letting two crops of white corn come together, they would not then find their gravel exhausted in 8 crops: it would probably last ...
  13. [13]
    The Dawn of High Farming in England: Land Reclamation in ... - jstor
    as the Norfolk four-course rotation. By the date of Waterloo this had been so ... Deep plowing followed but was found unsuccessful because it mixed the ...
  14. [14]
    The Agricultural Revolution - Key Stage 3 at www.johndclare.net
    'Turnip' Townshend, from Norfolk, developed the Norfolk Four-Course rotation. This was a four-year crop rotation, with wheat, turnips, barley and clover ...Missing: early experiments 1660s 1670s
  15. [15]
    The Agricultural Revolution
    ### Summary of Manuring, Livestock, Tillage, Sowing, and Labor in the Norfolk Four-Course System
  16. [16]
    The Turnip, The New Husbandry, and The English Agricultural ... - jstor
    The main purpose of this paper is to attempt such estimates by fashioning a crude input-output table of the Norfolk crop rotation, chiefly characterized by the ...Missing: deep control
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The Changing Basis of English Agricultural Prosperity, 1853-73'
    was epitomized by the Norfolk four-course system, with its close-knit cycle of fodder and grain crops, its arable flock, and its yard-fed bullocks. What.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Cover Crops and Rotations - USDA ARS
    The Norfolk rotation is a 4- year rotation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-turnip (Brassica rapa L.)-barley. (Hordeum vulgure L.)- and red clover ( ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  19. [19]
    The importance of long‐term experiments in agriculture: their ... - NIH
    ... Norfolk four‐course arable rotation. From 1847, field beans were grown each year on Geescroft, and from 1849 attempts were made to grow clover continuously ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Re-establishing the English Agricultural Revolution*
    Campbell and Overton, Land, Labour and Livestock, p 34I; Clark,. 'Agriculture and the industrial revolution', p 228. AGRICULTURAL. REVOLUTION. 5 imports. This ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] English and Welsh Agriculture, 1300-1850: Output, Inputs, and Income
    Cattle numbers more than doubled between 1300 and 1500 and then increased another third to 1700. The number of cattle dropped in the eighteenth century and then ...
  22. [22]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  23. [23]
    The Board of Agriculture Surveys
    Feb 5, 2021 · The surveys published on a county by county basis by the Board of Agriculture from 1794 to 1814 will usually be able to supply the answer.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Significant Milestones in Evolution of Agriculture in the World
    In the Norfolk four-course system, wheat was grown in the first year, followed by turnips in the second, then barley, with clover and rye grass under-sown ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Developing the Country: "Scientific Agriculture" and ... - UC Berkeley
    This dissertation examines the emergence and political significance of the antebellum agricultural reform movement in order to investigate how economic ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    [PDF] THE SETTLEMENT OF CANADA - NiCHE
    improved rotations such as the Norfolk four course and the. Northumberland five course. The settlers' guides took it as their main task to provide advice on ...
  27. [27]
    Post‐war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain
    Jun 26, 2002 · CROP ROTATIONS​​ In some ways, modern farming in England began with the advent of the 'Norfolk' four-course rotation in the 19th century.
  28. [28]
    Three-field system | Definition, History, Significance, & Facts
    Oct 31, 2025 · In the autumn one third was planted to wheat, barley, or rye, and in the spring another third of the land was planted to oats, barley, and ...
  29. [29]
    Norfolk four-course system | Crop Rotation, Manuring & Leys
    In the Norfolk four-course system, wheat was grown in the first year, turnips in the second, followed by barley, with clover and ryegrass undersown, in the ...Missing: 1730s Townshend
  30. [30]
    Origins of agriculture - Medieval, Crops, Livestock - Britannica
    Yields, never high (from 6 to 10 bushels of wheat per acre [about 500 to 900 liters per hectare] and a little more for barley, rye, and oats), were reduced ...
  31. [31]
    Yields and Output | Enclosure and the Yeoman - Oxford Academic
    ... Norfolk were yields systematically higher at about 20 bushels per acre (B. ... yields were similar to wheat yields; oats produced about 15 bushels per acre.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] England's Two Agricultural Revolutions - Cornell eCommons
    For example, the four-course Norfolk rotation was far more prevalent in enclosed villages than in open-field villages in the light arable district. The ...
  33. [33]
    Farming Practice and Techniques - Oxford Academic
    The cropping cycle within the Norfolk four-course introduced a crop that allowed the farmer to carry out one of the essential elements of the bare fallow, ...Missing: treatises | Show results with:treatises
  34. [34]
    THE AGRARIAN REVOLUTION - Eduindex News
    Jul 27, 2021 · He introduced the four-course ... While Norfolk landlords were thus making great improvements in arable farming, a Leicestershire farmer, Kama ...
  35. [35]
    Eighteenth-Century Agriculture on the Continent of Europe - jstor
    Many characteristics of highly developed agriculture can be found much earlier: the four-, five-, or six-course rotation, the rotation of crops with fodder ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] The Sheep,Corn Husbandry of Norfolk in the Sixteenth and ...
    Sheep-corn husbandry in Norfolk used open fields, sheep dunging for barley, and a unique fold-course system, with sheep ranging over open fields.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] The Agricultural Revolution and the Industrial Revolution: England ...
    These estimates show that the growing population of. Industrial Revolution England was fed mainly through food imports and through switching agricultural output ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] How Did Growth Begin? The Industrial Revolution and its Antecedents
    A prototypical example of this new rotation was a four-course rotation of wheat, turnips, barley, and clover (Timmer, 1969). This system had two primary ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Organic Rotations - Chris Alenson Apr '15
    The Norfolk four course rotation took the form of roots, barley, seed and wheat. It is essential to understand the role that rotations play in underpinning ...
  40. [40]
    Crop Rotations - Rodale Institute
    Crop rotation is the practice of planting different crops sequentially on the same plot of land to improve soil health, optimize nutrients in the soil, and ...
  41. [41]
    Norfolk four-course arable rotation brought up to date
    Apr 20, 2015 · A six-year cycle of crops was established across the coastal Holkham estate, and within three years yields had rocketed almost 30% higher.Missing: 1660s 1670s
  42. [42]
    [PDF] COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY FOR 2023-2027 28 CAP ...
    Crop rotations will also help disrupt pest and disease cycles and thus reduce use of pesticides. → In addition, the CAP Strategic Plans will help farmers ...
  43. [43]
    Understanding Crop Rotation: Enhancing Soil Health and Reducing ...
    Nov 29, 2023 · The four-field system, also known as the Norfolk ... rotation can improve soil health and reduce the reliance on chemical fertilizers.
  44. [44]
    Understanding Crop Rotation for Sustainable Agriculture
    Feb 14, 2025 · This practice reduces farmers' dependency on synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, which can be costly and harmful to ecosystems.Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  45. [45]
    Multi-objective models for crop rotation planning problems
    The study presents four Multi-objective Mixed-Integer Linear Programming models with integer and binary decision variables for Crop Rotation Planning Problems.
  46. [46]
    Crop Rotation Strategies for Sustainable Development - Farmonaut
    Crop rotation is a systematic approach to growing different types of crops in the same area across sequential seasons.