Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nothing (meaning)

Nothing is the conceptual absence of anything—beings, , , time, or attributes—serving as the fundamental to and "something" in , , , and everyday . It encapsulates the void or non-being, prompting existential inquiries like "Why is there something rather than nothing?" that have shaped intellectual thought for millennia. In philosophy, the idea of nothing traces back to ancient Greece, where Parmenides argued in his poem On Nature that "what is, is, and it is impossible for what is not to be," asserting that non-being cannot exist, be spoken of, or even thought, as it leads to contradiction. This principle, often summarized as "nothing comes from nothing" (ex nihilo nihil fit), influenced later thinkers by rejecting the possibility of creation or change from absolute void. In the 20th century, Martin Heidegger reframed nothing as integral to human Dasein (being-there), revealed through anxiety, where "the nothing makes possible the manifestness of beings" by allowing things to stand out against the backdrop of absence. His 1929 lecture "What Is Metaphysics?" sparked debates, with logical positivists like Rudolf Carnap dismissing such talk of nothing as "pseudo-statements" lacking empirical verification, highlighting the analytic-continental divide in philosophy. In mathematics, nothing is precisely defined as the (∅), a set with no elements, which paradoxically exists as a foundational object in . Introduced in the late 19th century to rigorize mathematics, the empty set underpins natural numbers: 0 is ∅, 1 is {∅}, 2 is {∅, {∅}}, and so on, providing a logical basis for and all subsequent structures. In physics, nothing corresponds to the , traditionally the absence of matter, but shows it as a dynamic state teeming with virtual particles arising from energy fluctuations, never truly empty. For instance, the quantum vacuum's has zero particles but nonzero energy, enabling phenomena like the , where plates in "empty" space attract due to these fluctuations. In cosmology, the vacuum may be metastable—a ""—potentially decaying to a true vacuum in a process that could unravel the universe, though such an event is unlikely within billions of years. further posits a "landscape" of myriad possible vacuums, suggesting our reality is one bubble amid infinite nothings.

Etymology and Conceptual Foundations

Linguistic Origins

The English word "nothing" originates from nā þing, a translating to "no thing," where nā derives from Proto-Germanic ne (not) and aiwaz (ever, always), emphasizing , and þing stems from Proto-Germanic þingą (, , or object). This construction first appears in texts around the , evolving through no þing or nothyng by the , and solidifying as a single word by the 13th century to denote absence or nonexistence. The term's use, meaning "not at all," emerged around , reflecting its semantic shift from literal composition to abstract . In Latin, the primary term for "nothing" is , a of nihilum, formed from the negative ne- (not, from Proto-Indo-European ne) and hilum (a or small thing, possibly from Proto-Italic heilo- meaning a whit or particle). This implies "not a whit" or "not even a ," underscoring the idea of utter insignificance or void, with earliest attestations in Republican-era literature around the BCE. The related contraction nil later influenced , such as nada (from nata, a of natus meaning "born" but semantically shifting to "trifle" or nothing) and rien (from Latin rem, accusative of res meaning "thing," negated as "no thing"). Ancient Greek expresses "nothing" through ouden (οὐδέν), a neuter form of oudeis (οὐδείς, no one), compounded from ou- or ude- (not even, from Proto-Indo-European ne and de-) and heis (one, from Proto-Indo-European *sem-). This structure, meaning "not even one," dates to Homeric Greek (8th century BCE) and highlights a philosophical aversion to pure nothingness, often rendered in contexts of negation rather than absolute void. In Sanskrit, the concept of "nothing" or emptiness is captured by śūnya (शून्य), derived from the root śvi or śvac (to swell or be hollow, from Proto-Indo-European *sueh₂- meaning to swell), evolving to denote void or zero by the 5th century CE in mathematical and philosophical texts like those of Āryabhaṭa. This term influenced the development of the numeral zero and Buddhist notions of śūnyatā (emptiness), contrasting with simpler negations like na (not) + asti (is), literally "is not." Across , expressions for "nothing" commonly arise from negating units of —such as "one," "thing," or "particle"—reflecting a shared Proto-Indo-European where () combines with roots for entity or quantity (*oi-no- for one, *bʰeh₂- for being). This pattern persists in Germanic (niht in , from + wiht meaning creature), (ničto in , from + čto meaning what), and beyond, illustrating how linguistic structures encode the paradox of absence through reference to presence.

Basic Philosophical Concepts

In , the of nothing, or nothingness, pertains to the absence of being, non-existence, or the void, raising profound questions about and . thinkers initiated this inquiry, with of Elea (c. 515–450 BCE) asserting that nothingness is inconceivable and impossible, as to speak of it implies some form of , leading to a ; he thus denied the reality of change, , and void in favor of a singular, eternal being. In contrast, atomists like (5th century BCE) posited the of void as an actual nothing to explain atomic motion and differentiation, marking an early acceptance of emptiness as a necessary counterpart to being. A central puzzle in metaphysics is the question "Why is there something rather than nothing?", famously articulated by in 1714, who argued that the existence of contingent things demands a sufficient reason, ultimately tracing back to a necessary being like , as nothingness would be simpler yet is not the case. This query challenges brute facts of existence and underscores the intuitive primacy of something over nothing, though it lacks a priori proof and invites debates on whether an is metaphysically possible via subtraction arguments—removing all objects successively until none remain. In logical terms, ontological neutrality addresses nothingness by formulating systems that do not presuppose , such as free logics where universal quantifiers like "all" can apply to empty domains without implying entities; this avoids Aristotle's assumption of existential import in syllogisms and allows coherent discourse about possible non-being. Existential philosophers further developed these ideas phenomenologically: , in his 1929 work What Is Metaphysics?, linked nothingness to human anxiety (), where the nothing "noths" and reveals the groundlessness of being, accessible only through Dasein's confrontation with death. , building on this in (1943), portrayed nothingness as an absence introduced by consciousness—the "for-itself"—enabling negation (e.g., expecting someone who is absent) and human freedom, distinguishing it from the inert "in-itself" of objects. These views position nothingness not as mere privation but as a dynamic force integral to and action.

Philosophy

Western Traditions

In ancient Greek philosophy, Parmenides of Elea initiated a profound interrogation of nothing by asserting that non-being cannot exist, be thought, or be spoken of, since any attempt to conceive it implies that it is something. In his poem On Nature, he declares, "For never shall this prevail, that things that are not are," equating the unthinkable with the impossible and establishing being as eternal, uniform, and indivisible. This Eleatic denial of void or change influenced subsequent thought, prohibiting absolute nothing from ontological discourse. Plato, addressing Parmenides' paradox in the Sophist, reconceptualized non-being not as utter nothingness but as "otherness" or difference from a given form, enabling the possibility of falsehood and multiplicity without contradicting the reality of being. For Plato, to say something "is not" means it participates in the form of the Different, thus non-being becomes a relative negation rather than absolute privation. Aristotle advanced this framework in his Metaphysics by distinguishing potentiality (dynamis) from actuality (energeia), where matter serves as the substrate of potential rather than a void or nothing. He critiqued the notion of creation from nothing, arguing that all change arises from something preexisting in potency, as "from nothing, nothing comes" (ex nihilo nihil fit), emphasizing that form actualizes matter without implying preexistent emptiness. In medieval Western philosophy, this Aristotelian inheritance merged with Christian theology to formulate the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo, the idea that God brought the universe into existence from absolute nothing, distinct from both Platonic emanation and Aristotelian eternal matter. Early Church Fathers like Theophilus of Antioch articulated this in the late 2nd century as a response to Gnostic dualism, asserting God's sovereign power over non-being; Thomas Aquinas later integrated it into scholasticism, arguing in the Summa Theologica that creation is not a change from one thing to another but the divine act of giving existence ex nihilo, where nothing precedes all contingent beings. The modern era saw Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz elevate the question of nothing to a metaphysical principle in his Principles of Nature and Grace (1714), famously asking, "Why is there something rather than nothing? For nothing is simpler and easier than something." He contended that the contingency of the world demands a sufficient reason in a necessary being—God—who chooses the best possible world from absolute possibilities, rendering nothing an implausible default. In the 20th century, Martin Heidegger radicalized the inquiry in "What Is Metaphysics?" (1929), positing nothing (das Nichts) not as a mere absence but as the origin of negation, revealed primordially through human anxiety (Angst), where beings as a whole become questionable and nothing "nothings" to disclose Being itself. Heidegger critiqued traditional ontology for overlooking this experiential nothing, arguing it grounds our understanding of beings without reducing to logical non-being. Jean-Paul Sartre extended this existential dimension in Being and Nothingness (1943), identifying nothingness with consciousness (pour-soi), which introduces negation into the solid in-itself (en-soi) of objects, engendering human freedom as the "hole of being" that allows choice and responsibility amid absurdity. For Sartre, nothing is not abstract but concrete, arising from the for-itself's perpetual flight from facticity. These developments trace a trajectory from denial and relativization to nothing's active role in ontology and human existence.

Eastern Traditions

In Eastern traditions, the concept of "nothing" manifests primarily as philosophical notions of , void, or non-being, which challenge dualistic perceptions of and non-. These ideas emphasize interdependence, potentiality, and beyond apparent forms, serving as pathways to or harmony with the . Unlike Western , Eastern interpretations of nothingness avoid absolute negation, instead viewing it as a dynamic underlying all phenomena. In Buddhism, particularly through the school founded by Nāgārjuna (c. 2nd century CE), () denotes the absence of inherent, independent existence in all dharmas (phenomena). Nāgārjuna's argues that entities arise through dependent origination (), lacking self-nature or essence, thus embodying the between and . This realization dissolves attachments to a fixed self (anātman), fostering compassion and liberation from suffering (), as emptiness reveals the interdependent, illusory nature of reality. Taoism (Daoism) conceptualizes nothingness as wu (non-being or void), a generative source complementary to you (being), as articulated in the Daodejing attributed to (c. BCE). Chapter 40 states, "The ten thousand things are born of being, and being is born of non-being," portraying wu as the origin of all forms, exemplified by the utility of empty spaces in a or (Chapter 11). In Zhuangzi's writings (c. BCE), wu enables wu wei (effortless action), allowing sages to align with the Dao—the ineffable way—through spontaneity and of dualities, transforming apparent absence into profound potentiality. In Hinduism's tradition, systematized by Adi Shankaracharya (8th century CE), nothingness emerges through (not this, not that) in the , negating the illusory world (māyā) to reveal as the non-dual, formless absolute. The Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upanishad (c. 700 BCE) describes beyond attributes, where individual (ātman) realizes unity with this ultimate reality, dissolving distinctions of existence and non-existence. This "nothingness" is not void but the substratum of all, contrasting yet paralleling Buddhist by affirming a positive, eternal essence over mere interdependence.

Theology and Religion

Abrahamic Perspectives

In Abrahamic theology, the concept of "nothing" primarily manifests through the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo, which posits that God brought the universe into existence from absolute non-being, without any pre-existing material or divine emanation. This idea emphasizes divine sovereignty, omnipotence, and the radical contingency of creation, distinguishing the Creator from the created order across Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The doctrine counters ancient notions of eternal matter or chaos, affirming that only God possesses aseity—self-existence—while all else derives from divine will alone. In , emerges in and , interpreting Genesis 1 as God's formation of matter itself rather than shaping pre-existent substance. Texts like 7:28 and the Dead Sea Scrolls (e.g., 1QS 3.15–16) reflect this view, portraying creation as an act of divine fiat from void. Kabbalistic mysticism further develops "nothingness" as , symbolizing the infinite, ineffable divine essence () beyond comprehension or attributes, from which the emanate to form reality—a paradoxical "nothing" more real than being itself. This concept, explored in works like the and by thinkers such as , underscores creation as a descent from divine unity to multiplicity, with human contemplation of ayin fostering spiritual nullification of the self (bitul). Christian theology formalizes creatio ex nihilo in the second century through apologists like and , responding to Gnostic by asserting that alone is uncreated, with the emerging solely from divine command as in Romans 4:17 and John 1:3. This doctrine, later systematized by in his , highlights 's transcendence: creation is not eternal but sustained moment by moment by , rendering "nothing" the primordial state of non-existence prior to 's creative word. In mystical strands, such as Meister Eckhart's writings, divine "nothingness" (Nichts) echoes negative theology, portraying as beyond being and creatures as "pure nothing" apart from divine infusion, paralleling Jewish in emphasizing detachment for union with the divine. In , the doctrine aligns with Qur'anic affirmations of creation from non-existence (ʿadam), as in 19:67 ("Has there not come upon man a long period of time when he was not a thing mentioned?") and 36:82 ("His command is only when He intends a thing that He says to it, 'Be,' and it is"), interpreted by scholars like Fakhr ad-Din al-Razi as origination from absolute nothing to affirm tawḥīd (divine unity). While the term khalaqa (to create) implies division or formation rather than explicit void, mainstream kalām theology (e.g., Ash'arite and Maturidite schools) upholds to reject eternal matter, viewing "nothing" as the pre-eternal absence preceding divine volition. This framework reinforces God's incomparability, with creation as a free, non-necessary act, though some modern interpreters debate the literal ex nihilo reading in favor of processual emergence.

Non-Abrahamic Views

In non-Abrahamic religious traditions, particularly those originating in , the of "nothing" or often serves as a profound metaphysical rather than mere absence, emphasizing interdependence, , or the illusory nature of phenomena. These views contrast with more substantive ontologies by highlighting the lack of inherent essence in , fostering paths to or . In , especially within Mahāyāna schools, śūnyatā () denotes the absence of intrinsic existence (svabhāva) in all phenomena, meaning nothing possesses an independent, permanent essence but arises through dependent origination (). This realization counters attachment and , leading to nirvāṇa, the cessation of suffering, without implying or sheer void. Nāgārjuna's articulates this via the (fourfold negation), rejecting extremes of existence, non-existence, both, or neither, thus positioning emptiness as the . Hindu traditions, notably Advaita Vedānta, approach nothingness through (neti neti, "not this, not that") to transcend dualistic categories, revealing as the non-dual, infinite reality beyond being and non-being. Upaniṣadic texts describe as sat-cit-ānanda (existence-consciousness-bliss), where apparent multiplicity arises from (illusion), and (mokṣa) dissolves the ego's false sense of separation. Classical schools like and treat (abhāva) as a distinct ontological category, enabling knowledge of non-existence without reducing it to mere linguistic absence. Taoism conceptualizes through wú (nothingness) and the formless , as in the , where "the Dao that can be spoken is not the eternal Dao," evoking a generative void from which all arises without . (non-action) embodies this by aligning with natural flow, avoiding forceful intervention, and recognizing as the source of fullness rather than annihilation. This differs from Buddhist śūnyatā by alternating between void and plenitude, emphasizing over analytical . In , emptiness relates to anekāntavāda (many-sidedness), which accommodates by affirming multiple perspectives on , avoiding absolute denials of or non-existence. This underscores the interdependence of substances (dravya) and modes (paryāya), where "nothing" manifests as relational absence rather than inherent void, supporting ethical non-violence (ahiṃsā) through nuanced understanding.

Scientific Interpretations

Physics of Vacuum and Emptiness

In , the is conceptualized as a region of devoid of , radiation, or fields, serving as an absolute reference frame in Newtonian mechanics. However, with the advent of , this notion evolved: the became the invariant background of , free from any preferred frame, where electromagnetic waves propagate at the without a medium. The introduction of revolutionized this understanding through the , which implies that even in a , precise simultaneous measurements of and —or energy and time—are impossible, leading to inherent fluctuations in quantum fields. In (QFT), the state is defined as the lowest-energy configuration of all quantum fields, yet it is not truly empty; instead, it teems with virtual particles that briefly emerge and annihilate, borrowing energy from the in compliance with the uncertainty relation \Delta E \Delta t \geq \hbar/2. These fluctuations represent the ground-state energy, known as , arising from the quantized harmonic oscillators underlying each field mode. Observable manifestations of these quantum vacuum effects include the , first predicted in , where two uncharged, parallel conducting plates in a experience an attractive force due to the restriction of vacuum fluctuation modes between them compared to outside, resulting in a pressure differential. The force per unit area is given by F/A = -\frac{\pi^2 \hbar c}{240 d^4}, where d is the plate separation, demonstrating the tangible reality of . Other effects, such as the in atomic spectra—arising from vacuum fluctuations interacting with electrons—and , further confirm that the quantum influences physical phenomena at measurable scales. The total vacuum energy density in QFT, summed over all field modes, yields an enormous theoretical value, far exceeding observed cosmological energy densities, posing the unresolved "." Despite this, the quantum vacuum's dynamic nature underscores that "nothing" in physics is a seething of potentiality, underpinning phenomena from to the structure of the .

Cosmological Implications

In , the concept of the universe emerging from "nothing" is explored through models that avoid singularities and initial boundaries by leveraging . The Hartle-Hawking no-boundary proposal posits that the universe has no sharp beginning, with its derived from a over compact geometries, effectively allowing the cosmos to arise smoothly from a state without classical time. This implies that the early universe transitions from a purely spatial configuration to the expanding we observe, resolving the "something from nothing" paradox by treating the origin as a rather than a classical . Complementing this, Alexander Vilenkin's tunneling model suggests the universe can quantum-tunnel from "nothing"—defined as the absence of spacetime—to an exponentially expanding , driven by a positive . Such proposals carry profound implications for , predicting that our is one of potentially many, each nucleating independently from quantum fluctuations in a pre-existing state, thus supporting scenarios without invoking a singular origin. However, debates persist; critics argue that certain contours in the no-boundary model lead to unphysical fluctuations incompatible with observed uniformity, though proponents maintain that proper quantum yields a stable, inflating . Beyond origins, the notion of "nothing" manifests in the quantum vacuum's nonzero energy density, which acts as the (Λ) in , accelerating the universe's expansion. predicts this from zero-point fluctuations of virtual particles, yet the observed value is about 120 orders of magnitude smaller than theoretical estimates, posing the and challenging our understanding of empty space. This discrepancy implies that the properties of "nothing" fine-tune the universe's fate, enabling over cosmic timescales; without such a small Λ, the universe would either collapse or expand too rapidly for galaxies to form. Recent analyses, such as those solving the Wheeler-DeWitt equation, further support spontaneous creation from nothing, where a true bubble emerges via quantum fluctuations from a metastable and expands exponentially under an effective quantum potential mimicking Λ. Cosmologically, this underscores that "nothing" is not inert but dynamically generative, influencing the universe's homogeneity, flatness, and ultimate acceleration toward a heat-death dominated by . Ongoing research, including observations, aims to test these models by probing fluctuations and early-universe conditions.

Mathematics and Formal Logic

Set Theory and Emptiness

In , the concept of "nothing" or absolute emptiness is precisely captured by the , denoted \emptyset, which is defined as the unique set containing no elements whatsoever. This set exists independently of any other sets and serves as the foundational building block in the axiomatic construction of the mathematical universe. The empty set's uniqueness follows from the , which states that two sets are equal they have the same elements; since no elements satisfy membership in \emptyset, it is the sole such set. The existence of the empty set is established within Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF), the standard axiomatic framework for modern mathematics. In Ernst Zermelo's original 1908 axiomatization, the empty set is not postulated as a separate axiom but derived using the axiom of separation (or specification), which allows the formation of a subset from any existing set S based on a property P: \{x \in S \mid P(x)\}. Applying the contradictory property x \neq x yields \emptyset = \{x \in S \mid x \neq x\}, which contains no elements regardless of the choice of S, assuming at least one set exists (as implied by Zermelo's axiom of infinity). This derivation underscores the empty set's role as an inevitable consequence of basic set-forming principles, ensuring the theory's consistency without urelements (non-set atoms). In full Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with choice (ZFC), the 's existence is similarly derivable from the axiom schema of separation combined with the , which guarantees an infinite set to which separation can be applied. Some pedagogical formulations of ZF explicitly include an of the for clarity: \exists z \forall x (x \notin z), directly asserting a set with no members. This explicit version emphasizes its foundational status, as the is the starting point for constructing all natural numbers via the hierarchy of ordinals, where $0 = \emptyset, $1 = \{\emptyset\}, $2 = \{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}\}, and so on, enabling the inductive definition of and beyond. Without the , the iterative construction of sets from "nothing" would collapse, rendering much of mathematics undefinable. The empty set's properties further illustrate its embodiment of emptiness. It is a subset of every set A, since \emptyset \subseteq A holds vacuously (no element of \emptyset fails to be in A), making it the universal initial object in the . The intersection of the empty collection of sets is undefined in standard theory to avoid paradoxes, but the empty set itself intersects with any set to yield \emptyset, reinforcing its role as the identity for unions (the union of \emptyset is \emptyset) and a neutral element in many operations. These traits highlight how the empty set formalizes "nothing" not as an absence but as a rigorously defined essential to logical and structural proofs across .

Logical and Paradoxical Aspects

In formal logic, the concept of "nothing" often arises in discussions of quantification and reference, where it functions primarily as a quantifier rather than a singular term. Bertrand Russell's theory of descriptions (1905) addresses paradoxes stemming from apparent references to non-existent entities, such as "the present king of France," by analyzing sentences like "The king of France is bald" as existential claims that fail when no referent exists, avoiding commitment to "nothing" as an object. This approach resolves the apparent paradox of negative existentials, like "Nothing is both round and square," by reformulating them without positing nothingness as a substantive entity. A related issue emerges in handling empty domains or vacuous truths, where universal statements over an are deemed true despite their counterintuitive implications. For instance, in classical logic, the formula \forall x \, P(x) holds vacuously if the is empty, meaning "All are mythical" is true not because unicorns satisfy the predicate, but because there are no unicorns to falsify it. This can appear paradoxical, as it allows sweeping generalizations about non-entities, yet it is a of standard , ensuring consistency in systems without assuming non-empty domains. Free logics, developed by Karel Lambert (1960), extend this by permitting empty domains explicitly, treating existential quantifiers as non-vacuous to avoid ontological commitments to "something" where nothing exists. More radically, dialetheic logics embrace paradoxes of nothingness as true contradictions, particularly through mereological constructions. Graham Priest (2014) formalizes nothingness as the mereological fusion of the empty collection, denoted \sigma(\emptyset), which qualifies as an object (hence something) while inherently lacking parts (hence nothing). This yields the dialetheia: \exists y \, (\text{nothing} = y) and \neg \exists y \, (\text{nothing} = y), resolvable only in paraconsistent systems that tolerate inconsistencies without explosion. Such an account integrates nothingness into reality's structure, challenging the law of non-contradiction and drawing on both Western mereology and Eastern conceptions of emptiness.

Cultural and Symbolic Representations

Literature and Mythology

In various mythological traditions, nothingness or void represents the primordial state preceding creation, often depicted as an amorphous emptiness from which the cosmos emerges. In Greek mythology, Chaos is portrayed as the initial void or abyss, a formless expanse that gives birth to the first deities and the structured universe, as described in Hesiod's Theogony, where it precedes Gaia (Earth) and Tartarus. This concept underscores Chaos not merely as absence but as a generative potential, embodying the unordered origins of reality. Similarly, in Norse mythology, Ginnungagap serves as the yawning void or great abyss between the realms of fire (Muspelheim) and ice (Niflheim), a neutral emptiness where the primordial giant Ymir forms and the world is subsequently shaped from his body by Odin and his brothers. Scholars interpret this gap as a power-filled magical void rather than mere emptiness, facilitating the transition from non-being to cosmic order. Other traditions evoke nothingness through concepts of pre-creation obscurity. In ancient Chinese cosmology, as outlined in Daoist texts like the , the universe arises from a state of "void and " (), where undifferentiated (vital energy) coalesces from this primal non-form into space, time, and matter, emphasizing harmony emerging from absence. , particularly in the Rig Veda's (Hymn of Creation), describes a time "when there was neither nor non-," a neutral void and light, from which the one (Tao-like principle) stirs into being through divine impulse, highlighting epistemological limits on knowing the origin. These myths collectively frame nothingness as a foundational : an absence that paradoxically enables all subsequent form and diversity. In literature, nothingness has been a recurring motif, often symbolizing existential absence, creative potential, or philosophical negation, with roots in Renaissance wordplay evolving into modern existential explorations. During the Renaissance, English writers like Shakespeare employed "nothing" to probe identity, value, and illusion; in King Lear, Lear's declaration "Nothing will come of nothing" (Act 1, Scene 1) reflects themes of loss, economic privation, and metaphysical void, while the play's over 30 uses of the term—often in jest or despair—tie it to disorder and renewal. In A Midsummer Night's Dream, the "airy nothing" (Act 5, Scene 1) that imagination shapes into form underscores creativity's power to animate void. Poets such as John Donne further elevated nothingness through alchemical metaphors in his Holy Sonnets, portraying self-negation as a path to divine union, blending theological creatio ex nihilo with personal erasure. Epigrammatic works, like Edward Daunce's The Prayse of Nothing (1585), earnestly praised void as a Protestant emblem of humility and origin, influenced by Latin traditions such as Jean Passerat's Nihil (1582), which playfully debated nothing's semantic and existential weight. Twentieth-century literature intensified nothingness as a narrative driver, particularly in existential and modernist works where absence generates meaning. Samuel Beckett's , such as in The Unnamable, deploys self-negating —"All I say cancels out, I’ll have said nothing"—to evoke infinite being from and void, linking to : "For to is nothing... that is when enters in." In , the refrain "nothing happens, twice" reveals the infinite real beneath conventional absence. Vladimir similarly used voids as creative abysses; in The Real Life of Sebastian Knight, the protagonist's "dazzling succession of gaps" propels the , positing reality as emergent from imaginative nothing. Later, Victor Pelevin's post-Soviet novels like Chapaev and Void (1996) portray as reality's core, with bifurcated worlds (historical and a madhouse) unveiling truth through cultural void, transcending into enlightenment. These portrayals, from paradox to modernist , illustrate nothingness not as endpoint but as a generative force in literary inquiry.

Art and Modern Media

In , the concept of nothing has been explored through and conceptual works that emphasize absence, void, and emptiness to provoke reflection on perception and existence. Artists have pushed boundaries by creating pieces that appear devoid of content, challenging viewers to confront the implications of non-representation. For instance, Kazimir Malevich's Suprematist Composition: (1918) consists of a white square on a white canvas, representing the ultimate reduction to pure form and the infinite void beyond traditional depiction. Similarly, Robert Rauschenberg's White Paintings (1951) are blank white canvases that act as screens reflecting ambient light and shadows, demonstrating that even apparent emptiness interacts with its environment. Yves Klein further advanced this theme with The Void (1958), an exhibition at Galerie Iris Clert in featuring empty white rooms, which drew over 3,000 visitors and symbolized immateriality and the dematerialization of art. In the realm of performance and sound, John Cage's composition 4'33" (1952) consists of four minutes and thirty-three seconds of silence, where performers do not play instruments, inviting audiences to experience ambient sounds as the true content and redefining music as the art of nothing. These works, rooted in early 20th-century movements like Dadaism and , influenced later conceptual artists such as , whose Work No. 227: The lights going on and off (2001) simply alternates gallery lights every five seconds, earning the for its stark exploration of minimal intervention. In modern media, particularly film, nothingness manifests through visual and narrative voids that evoke existential isolation and the emptiness of or . Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) prominently features the vast, silent void of , with sequences like the long, static shots of the spacecraft drifting in blackness underscoring human insignificance against cosmic emptiness; Kubrick described this as evoking "the unimaginable" through neutral, awe-inspiring visuals. The film's Star Gate sequence, a psychedelic journey through infinite corridors of light, further symbolizes passage into the unknown void, blending with philosophical . Gaspar Noé's (2009) delves into nothingness via a hallucinatory portrayal of and rebirth, following Oscar's out-of-body perspective after being shot, floating through Tokyo's neon-lit as a representation of pre-birth and post-death void. Noé frames as a return to an atheistic nothingness, devoid of , emphasizing cycles of meaningless repetition through extended, dissociative camera movements. Across genres, empty shots—defined as frames with ≤5% human presence lasting ≥3 seconds—appear in over 20% of high-rated from 1905 to 2019, particularly in sci-fi and to build tension and convey spatial or emotional voids, as seen in adventure films where they exceed 25% to highlight vast, isolating environments. These representations in media extend art's legacy, using absence to probe human confrontation with the infinite and the absent.

References

  1. [1]
    How a debate over 'nothing' split Western philosophy apart - CBC
    Dec 1, 2021 · As Heidegger playfully puts it: "For human existence, the nothing makes possible the manifestness of beings." For philosopher Martin Heidegger, ...
  2. [2]
    Parmenides, Greek fragments and Burnet's English translation
    Parmenides embodied his tenets in a short poem, called Nature, of which fragments, amounting in all to about 160 lines, have been preserved in the writings of ...<|separator|>
  3. [3]
    Nothing comes from nothing - Parmenides
    "Nothing comes from nothing" (Latin: ex nihilo nihil fit) is a philosophical concept first argued by Parmenides and intertwined with ancient Greek cosmology ...
  4. [4]
    Nothingness: Mathematics starts with an empty set | New Scientist
    Nov 16, 2011 · THE mathematicians' version of nothing is the empty set. This is a collection that doesn't actually contain anything, such as my own collection ...
  5. [5]
    How the Physics of Nothing Underlies Everything | Quanta Magazine
    true nothingness. Merrill Sherman/ ...
  6. [6]
    A Study About Nothing - AIP.ORG
    Jun 29, 2017 · According to quantum physics, even vacuums are not completely empty. Constant fluctuations in energy can spontaneously create mass not just out ...
  7. [7]
    Nothing - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    "Nothing" originates from Old English nan "not one" + þing "thing," meaning "no thing" or "insignificant thing" since c.1600; also used adverbially as "not ...
  8. [8]
    nothing, pron., n., adv., int. meanings, etymology and more
    The earliest known use of the word nothing is in the Old English period (pre-1150). nothing is formed within English, by compounding. Etymons: none adj., thing ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Nil - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    "Nothing" originates from Latin nil, a contraction of nihil meaning "not at all," combining ne- "not" + hilum "small thing"; it signifies the absence or ...
  10. [10]
    nihil - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
    → Indonesian: nihil. Indonesian. Etymology. Borrowed from Dutch nihil, from Latin nihil. Pronunciation. (Standard Indonesian) IPA: /ˈnihil/ [ˈni.hɪl]; Rhymes: ...Nihil dicit · Nihil album · Nihil debet · Nonnihil
  11. [11]
    Nada - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Slang "nada" means "nothing," originating in 1933 from Spanish nada, from Latin nata "small thing," rooted in PIE *gene- meaning "to be born."<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Shunya, Shùn yá, Shun ya, Sǔn yā, Sun ya, Śūnya, Śūnyā, Śunya
    Jul 21, 2025 · Śūnya (शून्य) refers to “waste places (solitude)”, according to the 15th century Mātaṅgalīlā composed by Nīlakaṇṭha in 263 Sanskrit verses.
  13. [13]
    nothing - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
    Etymology. From Middle English nothyng, noon thing, non thing, na þing, nan thing, nan þing, from Old English nāþing, nān þing (“nothing”, literally “not any ...English · Etymology · Pronoun · Noun
  14. [14]
    Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? | Issue 125
    There seem to be three ways of answering this question posed by Gottfried Leibniz: (1) 'Something' – the universe – has always existed; (2) A necessary entity ( ...
  15. [15]
    Explaining Why There is Something Rather than Nothing | Erkenntnis
    Jun 7, 2020 · Leibniz, for example, argued that the answer to the question “why is there something rather than nothing” could only be found in “a necessary ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Logic, Ontological Neutrality, and the Law of Non-Contradiction
    circumstance—logic is supposed to be ontologically neutral. It ought to have nothing to do with questions concerning what there is, or whether there is anything ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] THE NOTHINGNESS - PhilArchive
    CONCEPTS OF "NOTHINGNESS" IN PHILOSOPHY. Nothingness is a negative concept, defined by negation: it is the negation of Being. However, this negation can only ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Being and Nothingness - Dominican House of Studies
    This is a translation of all of Jean-Paul Sartre's L'E:tre et Ie Neant. It includes those selections which in 1953 were published in a volume.
  19. [19]
    Sophist, by Plato - Project Gutenberg
    For Plato has not distinguished between the Being which is prior to Not-being, and the Being which is the negation of Not-being (compare Parm.). But he is ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Principles of Nature and Grace Based on Reason - Early Modern Texts
    Principles of Nature and Grace. G. W. Leibniz. 14. As far as the rational soul—the mind—is concerned, there is something more to it than to monads generally ...Missing: online | Show results with:online
  21. [21]
    None
    ### Summary of Western Philosophical Traditions on 'Nothing' or 'Nonbeing' (Parmenides to Heidegger)
  22. [22]
    [PDF] The Buddhist Notion of Emptiness and its Potential Contribution to ...
    Jan 1, 2008 · It is the purpose of this paper to briefly define and describe the ramifications of adopting this Buddhist idea into the realm of psychology and ...
  23. [23]
    Nagarjuna | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Armed with the notion of the “emptiness” of all things, Nagarjuna built his literary corpus. While argument still persists over which of the texts bearing his ...
  24. [24]
    Daoist Philosophy
    Those who wu wei do act. Daoism is not a philosophy of “doing nothing.” Wu-wei means something like “act naturally,” “effortless action,” or “nonwillful action.
  25. [25]
    Beyond Duality: Exploring “Nothingness” in the Advaita Vedānta and ...
    This article explores the concept of “nothingness” in the Advaita Vedānta and Madhyamaka traditions of Indian Buddhism, analysing their convergences, ...
  26. [26]
    Four conceptions of creatio ex nihilo and the compatibility questions
    The notion of creatio ex nihilo has become a doctrine firmly established in the three Abrahamic religions (i.e., Christianity, Judaism and Islam). Almost ...
  27. [27]
    Creatio ex nihilo in Palestinian Judaism and Early Christianity
    Jul 27, 2012 · This essay re-examines all three convictions with particular reference to the biblical creation accounts in Palestinian Jewish reception.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] VARIETIES OF MYSTICAL NOTHINGNESS:
    It comes as no surprise that in Jewish and Christian thought God is called “nothingness” only rarely, whereas sunyata is central to Buddhism. Paradox, also ...
  29. [29]
    Creation Ex Nihilo - Article - BioLogos
    Oct 27, 2015 · The doctrine of creatio ex nihilo says that God had no such pre-existents to work with. Most of us have intuitions that you can't get from nothing to something ...
  30. [30]
    Nothingness - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Aug 28, 2003 · There is no such thing as nothingness, and zero does not exist. Everything is something. Nothing is nothing. Man lives more by affirmation than by bread.Why is there something rather... · Ontological neutrality · Is there any nothingness?
  31. [31]
    Emptiness (Śūnyatā)
    ### Summary of Emptiness (Śūnyatā) in Buddhism
  32. [32]
    Sunyata (Emptiness) in the Mahayana Context - BuddhaNet
    Sunyata is the skilful means that disentangle oneself from defilement and unsatisfactoriness. The realisation of sunyata leads one to no attachment and ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Beyond Duality: Exploring “Nothingness” in the Advaita Vedānta and ...
    Recent works on Indian philosophies highlight diverse approaches to nothing- ness and ultimate reality across Advaita Vedānta and Madhyamaka Buddhism.
  34. [34]
    Thinking Negation in Early Hinduism and Classical Indian Philosophy
    Feb 23, 2017 · The paper explores the Mīmāṃsā, Nyāya, Jaina and Buddhist theorizing on the various forms and permutations of negation, denial, nullity, nothing and ...
  35. [35]
    Quantum Fluctuations and Their Energy - Matt Strassler
    Aug 29, 2013 · Quantum fluctuations are the jittering of quantum fields, like a particle in a trap, and they have energy.<|control11|><|separator|>
  36. [36]
    FOLLOW-UP: What is the 'zero-point energy' (or 'vacuum energy') in ...
    Aug 18, 1997 · "In quantum-field theory, the vacuum state is defined to be the state having the least energy density. Something funny happens when we use a ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Casimir1948.pdf - MIT
    Hendrik Casimir, On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates. (reprint from Proceedings 51, (1948), 793-795), in: ... History of science and ...
  38. [38]
    [hep-th/0503158] The Casimir Effect and the Quantum Vacuum - arXiv
    Mar 21, 2005 · The Casimir effect is often invoked as decisive evidence that the zero point energies of quantum fields are real.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem
    The cosmological implications of this vacuum energy density follow when certain assumptions are made about the relation between general relativity and QFT. 2.
  40. [40]
    Vacuum Energy - The Cosmological Constant - Sean M. Carroll
    The cosmological constant turns out to be a measure of the energy density of the vacuum - the state of lowest energy.
  41. [41]
    Wave function of the Universe | Phys. Rev. D
    Dec 15, 1983 · Wave function of the Universe. J. B. Hartle · S. W. Hawking. Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 and ...
  42. [42]
    Physicists Debate Hawking's Idea That the Universe Had No ...
    Jun 6, 2019 · Soon an entire field, quantum cosmology, sprang up as researchers devised alternative ideas about how the universe could have come from nothing, ...
  43. [43]
    Creation of universes from nothing - ScienceDirect.com
    A cosmological model is proposed in which the universe is created by quantum tunneling from literally nothing into a de Sitter space.
  44. [44]
    Vacuum Energy Density, or How Can Nothing Weigh Something?
    May 19, 2012 · Einstein introduced a cosmological constant into his equations for General Relativity. This term acts to counteract the gravitational pull of matter.
  45. [45]
    The Cosmological Constant Is Physics' Most Embarrassing Problem
    Feb 1, 2021 · Vacuum energy is thought to be the main ingredient in the “cosmological constant,” a mathematical term in the equations of general relativity.
  46. [46]
    Spontaneous creation of the universe from nothing | Phys. Rev. D
    Apr 3, 2014 · An interesting idea is that the universe could be spontaneously created from nothing, but no rigorous proof has been given. In this paper ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  47. [47]
    https://mathworld.wolfram.com/EmptySet.html
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory
    Mar 25, 2022 · Zermelo proved his. Well-ordering Theorem in 1904. In 1908, he published a second proof, and a set of axioms, on which his proofs could be ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] fundamentals of zermelo-fraenkel set theory - UChicago Math
    Aug 23, 2011 · Definition 2.4. The unique set with no elements is called the empty set and is denoted by 0. Now that we have established that a unique set ...
  50. [50]
    Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms are the basis for Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. In the following (Jech 1997, p. 1), exists stands for exists, forall means for all.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Empty set
    The empty set, denoted as 0, contains no elements. It is a subset of any other set, but not necessarily an element of it.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] 無: Paradox and Emptiness - University of Ljubljana Press Journals
    Nothingness is a concept that is both something and nothing, implicated in contradiction and paradox, and is a key concept in Buddhist philosophy.
  53. [53]
    A Theoretical Interpretation of Hesiod's Chaos - jstor
    primordial triad of Chaos, Gaia, and Eros as the &px71 of the gods.7 The three should be taken together, because upon each of them depends the existence of ...
  54. [54]
    https://brill.com/abstract/book/9789004691674/BP000005.xml
  55. [55]
    (PDF) Before the Creation in Old Norse Mythology – Empty Abyss or ...
    The study reveals gap ginnunga refers to a magical, power-filled void before creation, indicating a state of complete emptiness. How does Völuspá's creation ...
  56. [56]
    THE MYTH THAT CHINA HAS NO CREATION MYTH - jstor
    The Way began in void and emptiness; the void and emptiness engendered space and time; space and time en- gendered primordial qi. Primordial qi has a brink ...
  57. [57]
    Stewards of Creation Covenant: Hinduism and the Environment - jstor
    Gautama, Kanada and other philosophers of the era (ca 600 - 300 B.C.E.) proposed the Arambhvad theory of creation from VOID which is gaining much ... of gross ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] IDEAS OF NOTHING IN RENAISSANCE LITERARY AND ...
    This thesis explores the literary theme of 'Nothing' in the Renaissance, its diverse semantic implications, and its use in English verse, including Shakespeare.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] NARRATIVES OF NOTHING IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY ...
    Nov 11, 2011 · This study begins with the observation that much of twentieth-century art, literature, and philosophy exhibits a concern with nothing itself.
  60. [60]
    Nothing works: The void - Tate
    For decades, artists have pushed the boundaries of how close to nothing an artwork or exhibition can be. How far can they go?
  61. [61]
    How 'nothing' has inspired art and science for millennia | Aeon Essays
    Oct 3, 2025 · The idea of nothing pushes at the limits of thought, spawning paradoxes that have long nourished art, philosophy, and science.Missing: representations | Show results with:representations
  62. [62]
    “2001: A Space Odyssey”: What It Means, and How It Was Made
    Apr 16, 2018 · Fifty years ago, Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke set out to make a new kind of sci-fi. How does their future look now that it's the past?
  63. [63]
    Enter the Void and the Inhuman Condition | Features - Roger Ebert
    May 19, 2019 · “Enter the Void” acts as the answer to that: a nearly three-hour dissociation of living, dying, and repeating, all from an atheistic view.
  64. [64]
    a quantitative analysis of empty shot distribution across film genres
    Feb 20, 2025 · This study introduces a novel approach that combines methods to define empty shots and assess their occurrence from 1905 to 2019 (N = 2464).