Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Open Journal Systems

Open Journal Systems (OJS) is an open-source software platform developed by the Public Knowledge Project (PKP) for managing and publishing peer-reviewed scholarly journals online. Released initially in 2002, it enables editors to handle the full editorial workflow—from manuscript submission and peer review to production and dissemination—directly through a web browser interface. OJS supports flexible journal customization, reader self-registration, automated indexing, and detailed usage statistics on article views and downloads, making it accessible for independent publishers transitioning to digital formats. With over 44,000 journals utilizing the system across 148 countries, OJS has significantly advanced open-access scholarly communication by reducing barriers to journal management and promoting wider dissemination of research.

Overview

Core Description and Objectives

Open Journal Systems (OJS) is an open-source software application designed for the management and online publishing of scholarly journals, encompassing the full editorial workflow from manuscript submission and peer review to production, indexing, and dissemination. Developed by the Public Knowledge Project (PKP), a research initiative originating at the University of British Columbia in 1998 and now hosted by Simon Fraser University, OJS enables editors to operate journals independently or as part of multi-journal platforms, supporting features such as customizable workflows, metadata generation in standards like Dublin Core and OAI-PMH, and integration with indexing services including Google Scholar, DOAJ, and Crossref. As of recent data, it powers over 44,000 journals across 148 countries, facilitating both open access and subscription-based models while emphasizing data ownership and long-term preservation through networks like PKP|PN and LOCKSS. The primary objectives of OJS align with PKP's mission to enhance the scholarly quality and public accessibility of research by reducing economic barriers to publishing and improving dissemination efficiency. By providing free, editor-controlled tools, OJS aims to make high-quality management viable for smaller or resource-limited outlets that might otherwise rely on costly platforms, thereby democratizing access to peer-reviewed literature and countering the dominance of systems in . It promotes in editorial processes through built-in tracking of submissions, reviewer assignments, and decision-making, while supporting multilingual interfaces in over 60 languages to broaden global participation. Fundamentally, OJS seeks to advance causal mechanisms for better research impact by streamlining workflows that minimize administrative overhead—such as automated notifications, checks, and production tools—and by fostering innovations like reader analytics and usage statistics to inform editorial strategies. This approach not only lowers costs for non-commercial but also encourages ethical practices, including options and compliance with preservation standards, ultimately aiming to increase the visibility and citation rates of published work without compromising rigor.

Development Context and Public Knowledge Project

The Public Knowledge Project (PKP) was founded in 1998 by John Willinsky, then a at the University of British Columbia, as a research and development initiative to enhance public access to scholarly research amid growing concerns over the commercialization of . The project emerged in the context of escalating journal subscription costs and restricted dissemination under proprietary models, seeking to leverage digital technologies for open dissemination without reliance on profit-driven intermediaries. Now a partnership involving , , and other institutions, PKP focuses on creating free, open-source tools to support the entire workflow, prioritizing researcher control and global accessibility. Open Journal Systems (OJS) was developed by PKP as a core component of this mission, with its initial release in 2002 originating from efforts at the to address gaps in affordable, editor-led . The software was conceived to counteract the dominance of expensive platforms by providing an integrated system for handling submissions, , editing, and online publication, thereby enabling small-scale and independent journals to operate efficiently and openly. This development aligned with the broader movement of the early 2000s, which critiqued how traditional publishers captured value from publicly funded research while limiting readership. PKP's stewardship of OJS emphasizes sustainability through community-driven enhancements and integrations with preservation networks like PKP Preservation Network (PKP|PN), ensuring long-term availability without vendor lock-in. By 2021, OJS powered over 25,000 journals worldwide, demonstrating its role in decentralizing scholarly publishing and fostering equitable knowledge distribution. The project's ongoing evolution reflects a commitment to empirical improvements in workflow efficiency, such as automated indexing with services like Crossref and DOAJ, while maintaining open-source principles to invite global contributions.

Historical Development

Inception and Initial Releases

The Public Knowledge Project (PKP), which developed Open Journal Systems (OJS), was initiated in 1998 by John Willinsky, then at the , with support from a Pacific Press Professorship endowment. The project's inception stemmed from concerns over the high costs and limited access associated with traditional scholarly publishing, aiming to leverage digital technologies to enhance research dissemination while maintaining rigorous . Willinsky's design principles emphasized editor-controlled workflows to reduce reliance on commercial publishers, drawing inspiration from prior online experiences at Knowledge Architecture. OJS emerged as PKP's second major software tool, following the early 2001 release of Open Conference Systems, with development led by a team of undergraduates under Kevin Jamieson's coordination. The system was launched in spring at Memorial University, marking its initial public availability as an open-source platform for managing online journals. This release introduced core functionalities for handling submissions, , editing, and publication, enabling journals to operate independently on local web servers without dependencies. Early versions of OJS, prior to the 2.0 update in 2005, focused on basic automation of editorial processes while prioritizing flexibility for customization, with ongoing refinements driven by PKP's research into efficiencies. These initial releases were distributed freely under an , facilitating adoption by small-scale academic publishers seeking alternatives to expensive hosting services. By 2005, incorporated enhancements led by developer Alec Smecher, including improved user interfaces and workflow stability, reflecting iterative feedback from early implementers.

Evolution Through Major Phases

Open Journal Systems (OJS) underwent its initial development phase with the release of version 1.x in the early , establishing core functionalities for managing peer-reviewed scholarly journals online, including submission tracking, editorial workflows, and basic publishing tools. This phase focused on providing an accessible open-source alternative to proprietary systems, with the software first launched in 2002 by the Public Knowledge Project at Memorial University. Early versions emphasized simplicity and integration with web servers, supporting initial adoption by small-scale academic publishers seeking to transition to digital formats without high costs. The second phase, spanning OJS 2.x from approximately 2005 to 2016, represented maturation and expansion, with marking a significant upgrade that enhanced , added support for Windows environments from 2.0.2 onward, and introduced advanced features such as improved user roles, plugin architecture, and multilingual capabilities. This series facilitated widespread global adoption, powering thousands of journals by refining peer-review processes, indexing integrations, and statistical reporting, though it relied on older technologies like 5.x. OJS 2.x reached end-of-life in , with its final release, 2.4.8-5, issued in May , prompting migrations due to accumulating vulnerabilities. The ongoing third phase began with OJS 3.0 on August 31, 2016, delivering a comprehensive overhaul after nearly a of planning, including a redesigned , streamlined workflows, enhanced performance via modern 7+ compatibility, and expanded plugin ecosystems for customization. Subsequent milestones in the 3.x series, such as 3.3 (designated in 2021) and 3.4 (August 2024), incorporated accessibility improvements, better mobile responsiveness, and integrations with tools like and Crossref. The latest major update, version 3.5 released in June 2025, introduced substantial enhancements in submission handling, , and , positioning OJS for continued relevance in open-access publishing amid growing demands for data and user-centric design. This phase reflects a shift toward sustainable, community-driven evolution, with regular security patches and feature releases ensuring long-term viability.

Technical Architecture and Features

Core Components and Workflow

The editorial workflow in Open Journal Systems (OJS) is structured around four primary stages: submission, , copyediting, and production, enabling journals to manage manuscripts from initial receipt to final publication. Authors initiate the process via a configurable step-by-step that collects such as keywords, abstracts, and references, along with file uploads categorized as article components (e.g., main text, figures, supplementary materials). Journal managers or editors oversee assignments to section editors, who handle initial and progression through stages, with built-in tools for tracking progress via activity logs and participant panels. Core components include role-based user interfaces for key participants—authors for revisions, section editors for reviewer assignments, peer reviewers for evaluations using customizable forms, and copyeditors/proofreaders for iterative file edits—with automated email notifications and reminders configurable per stage. The review stage supports modes like single- or double-blind anonymity, deadline enforcement, and decision tracking (e.g., accept, revise, reject), while production involves creation for online publishing, including support for and versioned outputs. management occurs through a centralized for uploads, discussions, and approvals, ensuring . OJS's modular architecture underpins these components via a PHP-based with extensible classes (e.g., Submission extending a base PKP library class), a for storing contexts like journals and submissions, and a system for custom integrations such as assignment or linking. Workflow settings allow customization of elements like submission checklists, review criteria, and publisher-shared documents, adapting to diverse journal needs without altering core code. This structure facilitates end-to-end management in a single platform, from coordination to issue assembly and indexing preparation.

Customization and Integration Capabilities

Open Journal Systems (OJS) supports extensive customization through its theming system and plugin architecture, enabling users to modify the and extend core functionality without altering the underlying . Custom themes allow developers to adjust layouts, styles, and visual elements using , , and CSS, as detailed in the official PKP Theming Guide, which targets web developers familiar with these technologies. This approach facilitates branding alignment for individual journals or multi-journal presses, with responsive off-the-shelf themes also available for basic needs. The plugin system provides a modular for adding or modifying features, including plugins for sidebar , authentication plugins for methods, and / plugins for handling. Plugins can into various application events to customize workflows, such as submission processes or review stages, and are installed via the OJS administration or by placing files in designated directories. This extensibility has enabled community-developed additions, like custom for , while official emphasizes using plugins over direct modifications to maintain upgradability. For integration, OJS includes a REST API documented for version 3.3, allowing programmatic access to endpoints for managing submissions, users, and , which supports connections to third-party applications. Native support for open standards such as DOIs via Crossref or DataCite, for author identification and authentication, for affiliations, metadata, and OAI-PMH for harvesting ensures interoperability with scholarly ecosystems. Archiving integrations with services like PKP Preservation Network (PKP|PN) and CLOCKSS/LOCKSS provide automated deposit for long-term preservation, while indexing compatibility with , DOAJ, and facilitates discoverability. Specialized plugins further enhance integrations, including the ORCID plugin for validating iDs during workflows and exporting works to ORCID profiles using either public or member APIs, and the Dataverse plugin for data submission, citation, review, and publication workflows linking journals to research data repositories. These capabilities, grounded in OJS's open-source design, promote seamless embedding within broader publishing infrastructures as of its ongoing development through version 3.x releases.

Version History and Updates

Major Version Milestones

Open Journal Systems (OJS) underwent its most significant architectural shift with the release of version 3.0 on August 31, 2016, following approximately ten years of development and testing. This milestone represented a complete overhaul from the preceding 2.x series, introducing a redesigned editorial workflow, improved role-based permissions, enhanced submission and processes, and a more intuitive built on modern frameworks and responsive design principles. The update addressed longstanding limitations in and customization while maintaining for core functions, enabling broader adoption in diverse scholarly publishing environments. Version 3.1, released in May 2017, served as the first major post-3.0 update, incorporating deferred features such as advanced for readership metrics, refined architecture for third-party integrations, and optimizations for multi-journal hosting setups. These enhancements stabilized the platform for production use, with a focus on performance improvements and bug resolutions identified during early 3.0 deployments. Subsequent iterations, including 3.2 (delayed to early after a 2019 code freeze) and 3.3 (finalized in August 2021 with 3.3.0-7), incrementally refined handling, support, and compliance, culminating in (LTS) designations for select releases to ensure sustained security updates. The 3.4 series, with releases spanning 2023 to August 2024 (e.g., 3.4.0-7), emphasized Crossref integration enhancements and automation, while 3.5.0-1, released on July 9, 2025, introduced streamlined user navigation, advanced multilingual support via community contributions, and for journal customization without extensive coding. These updates prioritize empirical data from PKP's global user base, reducing administrative overhead by an estimated 20-30% in stages based on internal testing. The 2.x series, which dominated prior to 2016 with iterative releases up to 2.4.8-5 in May 2019, was officially deprecated in 2021 to redirect development resources toward the more robust 3.x ecosystem.

Recent Releases and Enhancements

Open Journal Systems version 3.5.0 was released on June 17, 2025, introducing major enhancements focused on streamlining editorial processes and user interactions. Key improvements include a redesigned submission dashboard featuring an inline side panel workflow to reduce navigation steps, role-based invitations with ORCID integration for efficient user onboarding, and enhanced email management tools. Additional features encompass new dashboard metrics for performance tracking, editor workload monitoring to balance assignments, integration of Research Organization Registry (ROR) for precise author affiliations, and updates to JATS XML handling with added tabs for better metadata management. The release also emphasized GDPR compliance through aligned workflows for handling user and reviewer data, expanded role access to site settings for granular permissions, and masthead refinements for journal administration. Multilingual support saw significant upgrades, including editable submission languages visible throughout the editorial workflow, language-aware URLs (e.g., incorporating codes like /en/ or /fi/ for improved and discoverability), and decoupled metadata languages from settings to accommodate over 700 BCP 47 codes, enabling independent multilingual entry. These multilingual enhancements, contributed via the CRAFT-OA project, address prior limitations in handling diverse linguistic contexts without requiring full metadata re-entry. A maintenance update, OJS 3.5.0-1, followed on July 9, 2025, aggregating minor bug fixes and community-submitted patches to enhance stability, alongside experimental images for deployment testing. As of this release, version 3.5 remains non-LTS, with designation anticipated later in 2025 pending further community feedback and testing. These updates build on prior maintenance releases, such as those in November 2024 for versions 3.3 and 3.4, by prioritizing usability and compliance without introducing breaking changes.

Adoption and Implementation

Global Usage Statistics

As of 2023, Open Journal Systems (OJS) powered 52,320 journals that each published five or more items during the year, reflecting its extensive role in scholarly publishing infrastructure. This figure marks a notable increase from 44,776 active journals in 2022, where "active" denotes those issuing at least five articles annually. Between 2020 and 2022 alone, these active OJS journals collectively published 4,442,921 articles, underscoring the platform's capacity for high-volume output. OJS adoption extends to nearly every country worldwide, with more than 8 million total items published across its installations and serving over 1 million scholars. A 2020 assessment documented 25,000 OJS journals operating in 156 countries, supporting publications in over 60 languages and encompassing all disciplines. This broad geographic and linguistic distribution highlights OJS's facilitation of decentralized, multilingual open-access workflows, though detailed per-country breakdowns reveal concentrations in regions with strong institutional support for open-source tools, such as , , and parts of and . Growth in OJS usage has been consistent, driven by its free availability and integration with open-access mandates; for instance, installations rose from approximately 25,000 journals in 2020 to over 52,000 qualifying active sites by 2023. Public datasets and interactive maps from the Public Knowledge Project (PKP) track this expansion, enabling longitudinal analysis of journal counts by nation and revealing OJS's dominance among open-access models, where it underpins about 60% of sampled non-APC journals. These metrics, derived from PKP's Beacon project and harvested metadata, provide a verifiable for adoption, though they may undercount self-hosted or unregistered instances.

Hosting Options and Technical Requirements

Open Journal Systems (OJS) supports both self-hosting and managed hosting arrangements. Self-hosting involves installing OJS on an institution's or individual's own , which demands administrative expertise for setup, , patching, and backups. Managed hosting, offered by the Public Knowledge Project (PKP) Publishing Services, handles installation, daily data backups, application of patches and bug fixes, free upgrades to new versions, unlimited storage, priority email support, integration with the PKP Preservation Network for long-term archiving, and use of custom domains. Discounts apply for hosting five or more journals, and migration from existing OJS installations incurs a one-time fee. Third-party providers, such as specialized OJS hosts, offer comparable with tiered plans based on journal volume, traffic, and support levels, often starting at around $200 annually for basic setups. For self-hosting, the server must meet specific software prerequisites to run OJS 3.5.0-1, the latest release as of July 9, 2025. Required components include 8.0 or higher with extensions such as php-mbstring, php-xml, and php-intl enabled; a database backend of 5.7.22 or later, 4.1 or later, or 9.5 or later; and a compatible like , , or Microsoft IIS on or Windows operating systems. (CLI) access is necessary for and certain tasks, along with sufficient disk space—typically starting at 500 MB minimum, scaling with journal content—and an SSL certificate for secure operation. Hardware recommendations vary by scale: small journals may suffice with 1 CPU core, 1 GB RAM, and 10 GB disk, while larger multi-journal installations benefit from 4 CPU cores, 4 GB RAM, and 50 GB disk or more. Additional considerations include enabling PHP modules like fileinfo for full functionality in OJS 3.4 and later, and ensuring compatibility with OJS's reliance on character encoding for international support. Institutions opting for self-hosting should plan for ongoing updates to address vulnerabilities, as OJS follows a release cycle with (LTS) versions like 3.3 providing extended stability. Managed options mitigate these burdens but may limit customization compared to self-hosted environments.

Impact on Scholarly Publishing

Facilitation of Open Access

Open Journal Systems (OJS) enables publishing by offering a no-cost, open-source platform that automates the full editorial workflow, from author submissions to final dissemination, thereby eliminating financial and technical barriers for journals seeking to distribute content freely without paywalls. Developed by the Public Knowledge Project, OJS has been downloaded and implemented by over 44,000 journals across 148 countries as of recent reports, predominantly supporting models where neither readers nor authors pay fees. This cost efficiency is evidenced in cases like university presses, where OJS hosting has allowed over a hundred small, multilingual journals to transition to open models at reduced operational expenses compared to proprietary systems. Key features include a flexible submission wizard for authors, configurable processes (supporting open, single-blind, or double-blind methods), and production tools that generate accessible formats such as articles, downloadable PDFs, and EPUBs for immediate public release. OJS further promotes discoverability through compliance with the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH), which allows metadata in standards like or XML to be harvested by global repositories and indexes, facilitating aggregation in services such as and the (DOAJ). Integrations with Crossref for DOI assignment and for author identification enhance citation tracking and visibility, contributing to higher download and citation rates observed in literature. Licensing support in OJS allows journal managers to embed licenses at the article or journal level, standardizing permissions for reuse while retaining copyright attribution, which aligns with mandates from funders and institutions. Responsive reader interfaces with customizable themes ensure broad on mobile devices, while export tools permit to avoid , empowering independent journals to sustain long-term open dissemination. Empirical facilitation is demonstrated by widespread adoption in library-hosted instances, such as those at , where OJS supports peer-reviewed journals with features like automated indexing submissions, resulting in increased global reach for non-commercial scholarship. Surveys of OJS users indicate that the platform's emphasis on free distribution has enabled diverse scholarly outputs, including proceedings and bulletins, to achieve without reliance on article processing charges in the majority of cases.

Empirical Outcomes and Metrics

Open Journal Systems (OJS) has supported the publication of more than 12 million articles across over 44,000 active journals as of 2024. In 2023, 52,320 journals using OJS published at least five items each, reflecting sustained growth in its deployment for scholarly workflows. The platform operates in 148 countries and accommodates publishing in over 60 languages, enabling diverse scholarly communities to manage , indexing, and dissemination without reliance on proprietary systems. Empirical assessments of OJS implementation highlight operational efficiencies. A 2010 survey of 998 journals using the software found that editors reported substantial time savings in handling and production, with 78% indicating improved compared to prior methods. Users also noted enhanced transparency in processes, contributing to higher perceived publication quality, though these benefits were most pronounced in smaller, nonprofit journals outside dominant commercial ecosystems. OJS underpins a significant portion of non-commercial open access publishing. It powers more than half of journals, which operate without author fees or subscriptions, fostering equitable dissemination in fields like social sciences and humanities. This adoption correlates with broader metrics, where OJS-hosted journals benefit from integrated analytics showing increased download rates and readership visibility, though direct causal impacts on citation counts remain tied to general open access advantages rather than platform-specific features.

Criticisms and Controversies

Association with Low-Quality Publications

Open Journal Systems (OJS) has facilitated the hosting of low-quality and predatory journals due to its free, open-source framework, which requires minimal technical expertise or oversight to establish a publication outlet, thereby enabling operators lacking rigorous editorial standards to mimic legitimate scholarly venues. Analyses of predatory journal lists reveal that a subset of OJS-hosted titles exhibit hallmarks of low quality, such as inadequate peer review, fabricated metrics, and solicitation of articles via unsolicited emails. For instance, a three-phase examination identified 521 journals utilizing OJS that appeared on Jeffrey Beall's list of potential predatory publications, highlighting how the platform's accessibility supports such entities despite comprising only about 1.4% of the estimated 25,000+ OJS journals globally. This association stems from OJS's design emphasis on over centralized , allowing journal managers full control without platform-enforced vetting, which contrasts with proprietary systems that may impose stricter guidelines. Independent assessments, including cross-referencing with Cabell's Predatory Reports, confirm roughly 1% of OJS journals meet predatory criteria, often characterized by rapid timelines, hidden fees, and of marginal scholarly value. Such misuse undermines trust in OJS ecosystems, as low-quality outputs dilute the perceived credibility of models prevalent among OJS users, particularly in the Global South where 79.9% of these journals are based. Beyond predatory setups, OJS installations face exploitation through and unauthorized content insertion, exacerbating low-quality associations. Reports from journal operators document instances of issues—complete with fabricated articles—being uploaded via compromised manager accounts using XML imports, without requiring system hacks, affecting multiple third-party OJS sites as of early 2025. These vulnerabilities, including user registrations and bot-driven submissions, stem from default configurations lacking robust anti- measures like enforcement, enabling the proliferation of non-scholarly or plagiarized material. While OJS developers recommend plugins and best practices for mitigation, the persistence of such incidents illustrates how the platform's openness can inadvertently amplify low-quality content dissemination.

Technical and Operational Challenges

Open Journal Systems (OJS) encounters challenges, particularly in handling high volumes of submissions or , where inefficient database queries—sometimes exceeding 15,000 per submission view—and resource-intensive operations like nested content processing can lead to slow loading times and unresponsiveness. These issues are exacerbated by malicious bot , which consumes resources, and inadequate hosting configurations not optimized for OJS's , often necessitating advanced tuning such as InnoDB buffer pool adjustments or microcaching implementations to achieve significant speed improvements. For larger journals, limitations arise, requiring additional resources or custom optimizations to manage concurrent crawls and queries effectively. Security vulnerabilities represent a persistent , especially in versions prior to 3.3.0-17, where critical flaws enable unauthorized access, control by hackers, and escalation of privileges even for authors, potentially leading to site compromise such as the insertion of cloaked malicious . Regular updates are essential for , but self-hosted installations demand substantial efforts, including checks with evolving technologies and plugin ecosystems, which can introduce conflicts and backend errors if not managed expertly. Upgrading OJS poses technical hurdles, often classified as expert-level tasks that risk or workflow disruptions, particularly on limited budgets where full reconfigurations and reconciliations are needed to resolve outdated issues like submission errors. Initial setup and customization further compound operational challenges, requiring proficiency in ( 7.4 or higher), databases like , and management, which can overwhelm non-technical editorial teams and necessitate ongoing IT support. Extensive modifications or development demand advanced programming skills, limiting flexibility for journals seeking specialized workflows without external expertise. User adoption is hindered by a steep , despite the interface's relative accessibility, as editors and authors often lack technological preparedness, contributing to inefficiencies in tasks like and publication management.

References

  1. [1]
    Open Journal Systems (OJS) - Software - Public Knowledge Project
    The official home of OJS, the most widely used researcher-to-reader software to run scholarly journals and publish research articles.Download and Install OJS · PKP Docs · Try a Demo · PKP Technical Documentation
  2. [2]
    The History and Timeline of Open Journal Systems (OJS) - OJSPlus
    In 2002, PKP launched Open Journal Systems (OJS) at Memorial University. OJS was developed as an open-source publishing platform designed to facilitate the ...
  3. [3]
    About OJS 3.5 - PKP Docs
    Open Journal Systems (OJS) is an open source solution to managing and publishing scholarly journals online. OJS is a highly flexible editor-operated journal ...
  4. [4]
    Overview | Open Journal Systems
    Open Journal Systems (OJS) is an open source solution to managing and publishing scholarly journals online. It is a highly flexible editor-operated journal ...
  5. [5]
    About Open Journal Systems (OJS) - PKP Docs
    Open Journal Systems (OJS) is an open source solution to managing and publishing scholarly journals online. OJS is a highly flexible editor-operated journal ...Background # · What's New In Ojs 3.4 # · Workflow #
  6. [6]
    Public Knowledge Project
    PKP is the trusted, original home of Open Journal Systems (OJS), Open Preprint Systems (OPS), and Open Monograph Press (OMP) for scholarly publishing.Open Journal Systems · Download and Install OJS · PKP Docs · About
  7. [7]
    The Public Knowledge Project and Open Journal Systems
    Aug 10, 2025 · Purpose This paper aims to discuss the public knowledge project (PKP) preservation network (PN), which provides free preservation services ...
  8. [8]
    Open Journal Systems Help
    The origins of OJS. The system was first released in 2002 as a research and development initiative of the Public Knowledge Project at the University of British ...
  9. [9]
    PKP Timeline - Public Knowledge Project - Simon Fraser University
    PKP releases its first open source software package Open Conference Systems (OCS), which it supports until 2014. 2002, Open Journals Systems (OJS) launched ...
  10. [10]
    Twenty-Fifth Year Reflections on PKP - Public Knowledge Project
    Jan 11, 2023 · The Public Knowledge Project released its first version of Open Conference Systems early in 2001, followed by Open Journal Systems in the spring ...
  11. [11]
    Release Archive for OJS - Public Knowledge Project
    You will find every OJS package we've ever released below. However, these releases may no longer be secure and should not be used in production.
  12. [12]
    OJS 3.0 Arrives on August 31 - Public Knowledge Project
    Aug 10, 2016 · PKP is pleased to announce August 31, 2016 as the release date for Open Journal Systems version 3.0. ... OJS 1.0 to 2.0 way back in 2005!
  13. [13]
    Open Journal Systems - Wikipedia
    Open Journal Systems, also known as OJS, is an open source and free software for the management of peer-reviewed academic journals.History · Versions · Documentation · Usage
  14. [14]
    Which OJS Version Should You Upgrade To? OJS 3.3 or 3.4
    Jul 12, 2024 · We recommend upgrading to OJS 3.3.0.20. This will provide your journal with the latest stable features, security updates, and performance improvements.<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Download and Install OJS - Public Knowledge Project
    Download the latest releases of Open Journal Systems (OJS) and learn how to install and configure it on your own server.About Open Journal Systems · Open Preprint Systems · Release Archive for OJS
  16. [16]
    Learning Open Journal Systems 3.4 - Editorial Workflow - PKP Docs
    How to manage an article manuscript through the OJS workflow, from submission to publication ... About Open Journal Systems · Background · OJS Features · Install ...
  17. [17]
    Learning Open Journal Systems 3.4 - Workflow Settings - PKP Docs
    About Open Journal Systems · Background · OJS Features · Install and Upgrade · What's New in 3.4 · Community Contributions · Support · Site Administration.
  18. [18]
    Architecture - Technical Documentation - OJS|OMP|OPS - PKP Docs
    A single instance of OJS, OMP, or OPS can run many journals, presses or preprint servers. It is important to restrict requests for submissions, users and other ...
  19. [19]
    PKP Theming Guide - PKP Docs - Simon Fraser University
    The PKP Theming Guide is an introduction to building custom themes for Open Journal Systems 3.0+ and OMP 1.2+. It is written for web developers.
  20. [20]
    OJS/OMP/OPS Plugin Guide and Inventory - PKP Docs
    This guide contains information on how to install and enable plugins, as well as a list with links to documentation for OJS/OMP/OPS.
  21. [21]
    Customizing, modifying OJS - Software Support - PKP Forum
    Nov 15, 2021 · Plugin Guide for OJS and OMP. Learn how to create a plugin for Open Journal Systems and Open Monograph Press, to customize almost anything about ...
  22. [22]
    REST API - OJS (3.3) - PKP Docs
    This guide documents the REST API endpoints which can be accessed with this version of Open Journal Systems.
  23. [23]
    ORCID Integrations in Open Journal Systems and Open Preprint ...
    Apr 11, 2024 · In this webinar, Hanson covered two of PKP's open source ORCID-integrated products, Open Journal Systems (OJS) and Open Preprint Systems (OPS).<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Open Journal Systems and Dataverse Integration - Projects at Harvard
    This comprises a plugin for Open Journal Systems that supports a data submission, citation, review, and publication workflow; and an extension to the Dataverse.
  25. [25]
    OJS 3.0 Arrives on August 31 - Rogue Scholar
    Aug 10, 2016 · PKP is pleased to announce August 31, 2016 as the release date for Open Journal Systems version 3.0. This is the most comprehensive software ...
  26. [26]
    Making the Move to Open Journal Systems 3
    Feb 14, 2019 · OJS 3.0 was released in 2016 after almost 10 years of development ... At the time of the OJS 3.1 release, the UTL instance had 24 extra ...
  27. [27]
    Upcoming PKP Software Development Plans - Rogue Scholar
    OJS 3.1 – May 2017. This will be the first major release since the 3.0 launch and will add some of the functionality that didn't make the initial transition ...
  28. [28]
    Where's OJS/OMP 3.2? Release Q & A - Rogue Scholar
    In September 2019, we announced a code freeze leading up to the release of OJS/OMP 3.2 in what we hoped would be January 2020.
  29. [29]
    OJS Download Center - Open Journal Systems
    Aug 12, 2021 · Open Journal Systems Download Center. OJS 3.3.x. Latest Version: 3.3.0-7 | Release Date: Aug 2021. Click to Download.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  30. [30]
    OJS, OMP, and OPS 3.5.0 released - PKP Community Forum
    Jun 17, 2025 · This version includes major community-informed feature enhancements for easier task and user management, improved editorial usability, GDPR-aligned workflows.
  31. [31]
    What's new in Open Journal Systems (OJS) 3.5 Resources
    May 27, 2025 · PKP is getting ready to release OJS version 3.5! Check out this overview, slide deck, and video to get familiar with 3.5 before you upgrade.Missing: notes | Show results with:notes
  32. [32]
    CRAFT-OA Brings Multilingual Improvements to Open Journal ...
    Developed by the Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, these improvements are available in the recent OJS 3.5 release and represent an important step toward ...
  33. [33]
    OJS, OMP, and OPS 3.5.0-1 released - PKP Community Forum
    Jul 9, 2025 · These are maintenance releases, collecting a number of minor bug fixes. Thanks to our incredible community of coders, testers, documentation ...
  34. [34]
    OJS, OMP, and OPS 3.3.0-20 and 3.4.0-8 released
    Nov 29, 2024 · These are maintenance releases, collecting a number of minor bug fixes. There are also significant translation updates in 3.4.0-x. We recommend ...
  35. [35]
    Global Usage of OJS - Public Knowledge Project
    More than 8 million items have been published with Open Journal Systems, our open-source publishing software trusted by more than a million scholars.
  36. [36]
    Research - Public Knowledge Project - Simon Fraser University
    The 2024 analysis of the total active journals using OJS in 2022 revealed 44,776 active journals. A journal is defined as 'active' if it has 5 or more records / ...
  37. [37]
    An Update to PKP Membership Structure - Public Knowledge Project
    Jan 29, 2024 · The OA Diamond Journals Study shows estimates of OJS being used by 60% of the sampled journals. PKP software, including Open Preprint Systems ( ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Getting Started with OJS, OMP or OPS - Admin Guide - PKP Docs
    System Requirements # · PHP 8.0+ with php-mbstring, php-xml, and php-intl enabled · MySQL 5.7.22+, MariaDB 4.1+ or PostgreSQL 9.5+ · Linux, or one of the following ...
  39. [39]
    OJS Journal Hosting - Public Knowledge Project
    All of our hosting plans include installation and hosting of OJS, daily backups of your data, applying security patches and bug fixes, free upgrades, unlimited ...Archived Journal Hosting · Hosting for new OJS journals · Institutional Hosting
  40. [40]
    OJS Hosting | Open journal Systmes Hosting Solutions
    Jun 25, 2025 · OJS hosting solutions with professionally run servers that includes an up-to-date, secure version of the OJS software plus support, ...
  41. [41]
    OJS/OMP/OPS 3.4 Release Notebook - PKP Docs
    PHP 8.0+ #. The minimum required version of PHP is 8.0 or above, following PHP's version support schedule. Locales #. The country code has been dropped ...Hosting and Deployment · Integrations · Namespaces and Constants · Repositories
  42. [42]
    System Requirements for OJS - OPEN JOURNAL SYSTEM SERVICES
    System Requirements for OJS 3.3​​ To run the latest release of OJS 3. x, your web server will need: PHP 7.3 or later with MySQL, MariaDB, or PostgreSQL support.
  43. [43]
    Hardware requirements for more than 50 Journals - Software Support
    May 25, 2021 · For big journals, use 4 CPU + 4GB RAM + 50GB disk; regular journals, 2 CPU + 2GB RAM + 30GB disk; small journals, 1 CPU + 1GB RAM + 10GB disk.
  44. [44]
    What are the required Server PHP modules for OJS 3.4
    Dec 10, 2023 · The user asks for a list of required PHP modules for OJS 3.4. One missing module was fileinfo. System requirements are in the linked document.
  45. [45]
    FAQ about Features and Uses of Open Journal Systems (OJS ...
    OJS was developed for peer-reviewed journal publishing, however, it can also be used for newsletter, magazine, and bulletins.
  46. [46]
    Open Journal Systems: new standards to achieve ... - OpenAIRE
    Apr 29, 2019 · The new OpenAIRE plugin is a complete rewrite and is designed to replace the old plugin. It adds JATS as a new XML metadata format in OAI-PMH.
  47. [47]
    Florida Online Journals (OJ): Creative Commons in OJS
    Aug 7, 2025 · Florida OJ supports adding a license to articles. When this setting is filled in, it will be applied to article metadata for any articles ...
  48. [48]
    Home - Open Journal Systems (OJS) - Guides at Oklahoma State ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · Open Journal Systems (OJS) is open-source software created by the Public Knowledge Project (PKP) that provides a publishing platform for journals.
  49. [49]
    (PDF) A Survey of the Scholarly Journals Using Open Journal Systems
    Aug 6, 2025 · A survey of 998 scholarly journals that use Open Journal Systems (OJS), an open source journal software platform, captures the characteristics ...
  50. [50]
    Public Knowledge Project (PKP) 2024-2025 - Licence subscriptions ...
    OJS is used by more than 44,000 active journals in 148 countries, publishing more than 12 million articles. Investment in PKP's future, is a vital step in ...
  51. [51]
    https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/3/4/912/114119/Recalibrating-the-scope-of-scholarly-publishing-A
  52. [52]
    Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a ...
    A survey of 2,114 of JUOJS staff members found 97.8% of them to be open access (OA), with 13.6% utilizing Article Processing Charges (APC) to provide OA ( ...4. Language · 4.2. Language Results · 6. Indexing<|control11|><|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Understanding Quality in Research: Avoiding Predatory Journals
    This chapter presents a three-phase analysis of 521 journals that use the open source publishing platform Open Journal Systems (OJS) while appearing on ...
  54. [54]
    Publishing fake issues in third-party OJS (without hacking into OJS)
    Feb 5, 2025 · They had published a fake issue in their OJS. We noticed that there are many journals experiencing the same problem. Basically, an issue is ...
  55. [55]
    Fake issues in OJS 3.3.0.21 - PKP Community Forum
    Aug 27, 2025 · Delete any unexpected issues. · Review the list of Journal Managers, Journal Editors, and Administrators to ensure there are no surprise entries.
  56. [56]
    https://openjournaltheme.com/7-ways-to-optimize-your-slow-unresponsive-ojs/
  57. [57]
    7 ways to optimize OJS from slow & unresponsive load
    ### Summary of Reasons and Optimization Methods for Slow/Unresponsive OJS
  58. [58]
    Open Journal Systems (OJS) Guide: Features, Benefits, and Setup
    Open Journal Systems (OJS) is a software platform that is open source and created to simplify the management and publication process of academic journals.
  59. [59]
    Trends and Challenges in Open Journal System (OJS) - OJSCloud
    Feb 16, 2023 · The current challenges faced by OJS · Funding · Sustainability · User Adoption and User Engagement · Technological Infrastructure · Keeping up with ...
  60. [60]
    Full Upgrade of Self-Hosted OJS Installation (Limited Budget ...
    Jun 7, 2025 · We're facing persistent issues due to our outdated OJS version—plugin conflicts, workflow errors, and backend problems. A full upgrade to the ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges