Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Order in Council

An Order in Council is a legal instrument issued by the monarch of the on the of the , functioning as delegated legislation or executive decree. These orders derive authority either from statutory powers conferred by Acts of or from the royal prerogative, allowing the executive to implement policies, regulations, or administrative changes without requiring fresh parliamentary approval in designated areas. Common applications include redefining electoral constituency boundaries, declaring states of emergency, transferring governmental functions between departments, and appointing officials to certain overseas territories or public bodies. While providing procedural efficiency for routine or urgent matters, Orders in Council have sparked constitutional debates over executive latitude, as evidenced by judicial scrutiny in cases involving of or territorial governance, underscoring their susceptibility to review for exceeding legal bounds.

Origins and Legal Foundations

Historical Development

The practice of issuing Orders in Council originated in the medieval English monarchy, evolving from the advisory functions of the royal council, or , which dates to at least the 13th century as the primary executive body for governance and policy implementation. Initially informal, these council deliberations provided counsel to the sovereign on administrative, judicial, and matters, with recorded decisions emerging as binding directives by the ; for instance, under Edward III (r. 1327–1377), the council's role in issuing proclamations and ordinances formalized executive actions independent of parliamentary consent when urgency demanded it. This evolution reflected the monarchy's need for swift decision-making in an era of limited legislative sessions, enabling the king to exercise powers—such as regulating trade or mobilizing defenses—through council-approved instruments that carried the force of royal command. By the 16th and early 17th centuries, the , as the evolved successor to the curia regis, increasingly formalized Orders in Council as structured executive tools, particularly during periods of monarchical assertiveness; under (r. 1625–1649), the council served as the central channel for royal orders and policy amid tensions with , allowing governance without legislative approval during prorogations or conflicts. The English Civil Wars (1642–1651) highlighted their utility in crises, as royalist forces relied on such orders for administration when Parliament issued competing ordinances, though the monarchy's defeat led to the Privy Council's temporary abolition in 1649 and replacement by a parliamentary . Following the in 1660, Orders in Council were revived and systematically published from 1665 onward in the London Gazette, marking their transition from ad hoc royal directives to a staple of executive prerogative, evidenced by their role in post-war stabilization and routine administration. The of 1688–1689 integrated Orders in Council into the constitutional framework, subordinating absolute monarchical prerogative to under William III and , as affirmed by the Bill of Rights 1689, which curtailed arbitrary actions while preserving the Privy Council's advisory mechanism for legitimate governance. This shift emphasized collective ministerial responsibility, yet retained the orders' efficiency for urgent matters, such as foreign policy responses, contrasting with Parliament's slower deliberative process—empirically demonstrated in their use during the (1799–1815), where 1807 Orders in Council imposed rapid trade blockades on France and neutrals, enabling immediate without awaiting legislative cycles. In the 19th and 20th centuries, statutory expansions amplified their scope, with acts delegating legislative powers to the ; the Statutory Instruments 1946 formalized procedures for such orders by mandating numbering, , and , streamlining their role in modern delegated while underscoring their enduring value in crises like wartime mobilizations, where delays could prove costly.

Constitutional and Prerogative Basis

Orders in Council constitute executive instruments promulgated by the sovereign acting on the advice and consent of the Privy Council, enabling the formulation of legislation without requiring direct parliamentary enactment. This mechanism draws from the royal prerogative, an original authority vested in the Crown and preserved through common law precedents within the United Kingdom's uncodified constitution, which comprises statutes, judicial decisions, and conventions rather than a single codified document. Prerogative Orders in Council thus permit action in domains absent specific statutory authorization, such as aspects of treaty negotiation or emergency declarations, underscoring the executive's inherent capacity to govern independently of legislative processes. Distinguishing prerogative Orders from statutory variants highlights their foundational divergence: the former exercise undiluted powers, yielding primary unbound by parliamentary scrutiny at inception, whereas statutory Orders derive from delegations in acts of and operate as subordinate instruments subject to procedures like affirmative or negative . In contrast to Acts of , which demand bicameral debate, amendment, and following legislative initiative, Orders in Council embody executive discretion yet remain amenable to , with courts assessing their rationality, procedural fairness, and compatibility with principles or obligations. This reviewability tempers executive latitude, ensuring prerogative exercises align with constitutional norms without encroaching on . The framework bolsters the through mandatory in the London Gazette, which serves as an official, verifiable repository accessible to the public and , thereby facilitating and post hoc in lieu of preemptive parliamentary oversight. This requirement embeds Orders within a of , mitigating risks of opaque action and enabling legal challenges where substantive or procedural irregularities arise.

Classification and Types

Prerogative Orders in Council

Prerogative Orders in Council are issued by the Sovereign on the advice of the under the inherent , deriving authority from and historical usage rather than any of . These orders address core prerogatives, including the or , the making of treaties, the declaration of or peace, the recognition of foreign governments, and the governance of through instruments like royal charters. As a form of primary , they bypass parliamentary scrutiny in their creation, allowing the to act decisively where statutory processes would introduce undue delay. This mechanism facilitates rapid response to urgent imperatives, grounded in the empirical demands of statecraft. A historical instance occurred on 3 , when the declared war on following the ; this was executed via the prerogative power, advised by Neville Chamberlain's , enabling immediate without awaiting legislative endorsement, as parliamentary approval was sought only post-facto. Such applications underscore the prerogative's role in preserving agility for existential threats, where hesitation could yield causal disadvantages in international conflicts. Despite their potency, prerogative Orders in Council operate within constitutional bounds, constrained by conventions requiring ministerial advice to reflect collective cabinet responsibility, political accountability to Parliament, and judicial review for justiciability. The House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service UKHL 9 affirmed that prerogative exercises affecting individual rights or involving irrationality are amenable to judicial scrutiny, overturning prior presumptions of non-justiciability. Later cases, such as R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs UKHL 61, extended this to Orders in Council governing overseas territories, holding that prerogative legislation must adhere to principles of fairness and rationality, though deference persists in high-policy domains like foreign relations. These checks mitigate risks of abuse while preserving the prerogative's utility for non-legislated exigencies.

Statutory Orders in Council

Statutory Orders in Council constitute a category of delegated legislation authorized by specific provisions in Acts of Parliament, empowering the , on the advice of the , to enact subordinate rules for implementing primary statutes. Unlike prerogative orders, these derive their authority from parliamentary delegation, typically to address administrative, regulatory, or procedural matters requiring flexibility and expedition. statutes outline the scope, such as adjustments to regulatory frameworks or boundary delineations, ensuring action aligns with legislative intent while circumventing the need for repeated primary bills. This mechanism exemplifies delegated governance, where confers powers to mitigate overload from detailed rulemaking; for instance, the granted authority for Orders in Council to provisionally adapt administrative structures in partitioned regions, including fiscal and judicial adaptations. Contemporary applications include endorsing professional regulations, such as those promulgated by the General Medical Council under statutory mandates, or refining operational codes to align with evolving administrative needs. Pre-Brexit, statutory Orders in Council facilitated transposition of directives into law, converting supranational obligations into domestic instruments like sector-specific environmental or regulations. Parliament maintains oversight through procedural safeguards embedded in enabling Acts, primarily affirmative —requiring explicit approval via and vote—or negative , where instruments take effect unless annulled within a set period, typically 40 days. These processes, applied to statutory Orders in Council as a subset of statutory instruments, balance efficiency against democratic accountability; affirmative scrutiny applies to higher-impact measures, while negative suits routine updates, with approximately 2,000–,000 statutory instruments laid annually across the , encompassing such orders. This structure causally streamlines governance by reserving parliamentary time for principal policy , delegating granular execution to the , subject to revocation or if .

Procedural Framework

Role of the Sovereign and Privy Council

The Sovereign's role in issuing Orders in Council is to provide formal assent during meetings, a function that remains ceremonial under constitutional conventions requiring the to act solely on ministerial . This preserves the appearance of while ensuring executive decisions reflect elected government policy, with presiding to signify continuity of the Crown's authority. Following the death of Queen Elizabeth II on 8 September 2022, attended his first meeting on 10 September 2022, where he delivered a personal declaration and granted to initial orders, establishing the precedent for his ongoing symbolic involvement. The Privy Council comprises over 700 privy counsellors, drawn mainly from senior politicians such as current and former ministers, alongside select judges and royals appointed for life upon swearing an . Only a small subset—typically four or five government members—is summoned to meetings by the , with a statutory of three required to validate proceedings. In practice, substantive policy choices are finalized by ministers beforehand through or departmental processes, rendering the Council's advisory input formal rather than deliberative. Meetings occur approximately once per month, except during periods like , , or , totaling around 9–10 sessions annually at locations such as where the Sovereign resides. This infrequent, structured format underscores the mechanism's role in embedding actions within a neutral monarchical framework, providing institutional stability against abrupt political changes—unlike direct presidential orders in systems such as the , where authority ties more closely to the incumbent leader's discretion.

Drafting, Approval, and Publication Process

The drafting of an Order in Council typically originates from a relevant or , where officials, in consultation with legal counsel, prepare the text based on a ministerial recommendation or policy directive authorized by enabling legislation or prerogative powers. In the , drafts are prepared by lawyers as delegated legislation, often following Cabinet-level policy endorsement. In , collaborate with the Department of Justice's Legislative Counsel for review of legality and completeness before submission. Approval involves review by a Cabinet committee or equivalent body, such as the Cabinet or Canada's Treasury Board, which assesses the proposal for fiscal, regulatory, or administrative implications. The submission then proceeds to the or Governor in Council for , where a of privy councillors tenders formal to the or . The or representative applies the royal sign-manual or equivalent authentication, finalizing the instrument; in urgent cases, such as matters, this can occur same-day following expedited ministerial justification. For statutory Orders in Council—those deriving authority from acts of —the instrument is laid before for scrutiny, potentially subject to affirmative (requiring explicit approval) or negative (annulable within a set period, typically 40 days), enabling legislative oversight to verify compliance with parent statutes. Publication ensures public verifiability and transparency, with Orders in Council registered and promulgated in official gazettes: in the UK, where notices appear promptly post-approval, and the Canada Gazette in , alongside an online database accessible from issuance. In , registrable Orders are posted within three working days via the Office database, facilitating rapid public and archival access. This step-by-step framework, with mandatory gazetting and digital availability, mitigates risks of opaque executive action by embedding mechanisms for review and challenge.

Primary Applications and Functions

Domestic Governance and Administration

Statutory Orders in Council facilitate routine administrative adjustments within the United Kingdom's executive framework, such as transferring ministerial functions under the Ministers of the Crown Act 1975, which empowers the by Order in Council to reallocate duties between departments without requiring primary legislation. This mechanism supports changes, exemplified by post-election reorganizations that streamline departmental structures, thereby enhancing operational efficiency in non-crisis contexts. Such transfers have been instrumental in adapting to evolving policy priorities, reducing the administrative burden on for technical reallocations. A prominent application involves periodic reviews of parliamentary constituency boundaries, implemented through Orders in Council to reflect demographic shifts and ensure electoral equity. The Parliamentary Constituencies Order 2023, approved on 15 November 2023, enacted recommendations from the Boundary Commissions, redrawing boundaries for 650 constituencies effective at the 2024 general election and affecting over 90% of seats through boundary alterations or name changes. These orders, typically issued every eight years under the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986, exemplify precise administrative precision, with the 2023 review adjusting electorate sizes to within 5% of the national quota of 73,000 voters. In regions like during suspensions of , Orders in Council serve as primary tools for domestic legislation, covering areas such as local government boundaries and public services. For instance, under the Northern Ireland Act 2000, provisions enable Orders in Council to enact measures on housing, health, and education, with over 690 such instruments recorded since 1974 for governance continuity. This approach has empirically reduced legislative backlog by delegating routine regulatory tweaks—often numbering in the dozens annually for targeted reforms—to executive processes, as formalized post-World War II under the Statutory Instruments Act 1946, which standardized publication and scrutiny of delegated instruments including Orders in Council to support reconstruction without protracted parliamentary sessions.

Foreign Policy, Defense, and International Relations

Orders in Council have been employed extensively in British to exercise powers, enabling the to respond decisively to international threats and diplomatic imperatives without the delays inherent in multilateral negotiations or full parliamentary processes. These instruments facilitate actions such as the extension of sanctions regimes to overseas territories and the authorization of logistical measures for military operations, prioritizing interests. For instance, following Russia's invasion of on February 24, , the government swiftly extended sanctions to its overseas territories through amendments to the Russia (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) Order 2020, with multiple Orders in Council issued in to prohibit dealings with designated Russian entities and restrict , thereby isolating aggressors and supporting allied efforts. This approach allowed for rapid implementation, contrasting with slower consensus-based mechanisms in bodies like the , where veto powers can impede action. In defense matters, Orders in Council underpin operational flexibility by invoking for urgent mobilizations and resource requisitions. During the , initiated by Argentina's invasion on April 2, 1982, an Order in Council was promulgated on April 4 to enable the requisition of British merchant ships and their cargoes for naval support, facilitating the swift assembly and deployment of forces to reclaim the islands by June 14. This mechanism underscored the causal efficacy of executive instruments in crisis diplomacy, allowing the to independently and deter further encroachments on sovereign territories, as evidenced by the conflict's resolution without broader entanglement. Similarly, provisions under the Defence have authorized deployments via Orders for non-combat support roles, maintaining operational readiness while reserving combat decisions to ministerial prerogative subject to parliamentary oversight. Critics argue that such prerogative-heavy applications risk executive overreach by bypassing immediate legislative scrutiny, potentially undermining democratic accountability in high-stakes foreign engagements. However, these concerns are mitigated by constitutional conventions of ministerial responsibility to Parliament, where actions like the Falklands requisitions prompted subsequent debates and approvals, ensuring post-hoc review without paralyzing initial responses. In treaty-related diplomacy, while ratification itself follows the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010's parliamentary laying requirements, Orders in Council implement associated domestic effects, such as territorial extensions, reinforcing the UK's capacity to align international commitments with national priorities efficiently. This framework has proven adaptable, as seen in post-Brexit adjustments where executive orders supported sovereignty-focused trade realignments, though primary agreements underwent statutory scrutiny. Overall, the strategic deployment of Orders in Council in these domains exemplifies a realist orientation toward causal national advantage, balancing speed with eventual accountability.

Emergency and Crisis Response

Orders in Council serve as a mechanism for expedited executive response to existential threats, invoking prerogative or statutory authority to bypass protracted legislative deliberation when immediate action is causally essential for national survival. This application prioritizes rapid resource allocation, regulatory imposition, and threat mitigation, grounded in the executive's positional advantage for coordinated decision-making amid chaos. Historical precedents demonstrate their role in averting disorganized collapse during acute crises, with empirical evidence from wartime mobilizations showing faster implementation than alternative democratic channels could achieve. In , following the United Kingdom's entry on August 4, 1914, Orders in Council under the Defence of the Realm Act 1914 () authorized Defence Regulations that controlled munitions production, censored communications, and regulated labor, enabling swift industrial reconfiguration to support 2.9 million mobilized troops by war's end. These measures, including early requisitions of shipping and railways, prevented logistical paralysis in the initial months, as parliamentary acts alone would have lagged behind the German advance. Regulations required laying before but remained effective pending approval, ensuring temporary enforceability justified by the scale of invasion risk. World War II saw analogous use under the Emergency Powers (Defence) Act 1939, where Orders in Council promulgated over 1,000 Defence Regulations by 1945, mandating blackout protocols, of 70% of foodstuffs, and of 800 enemy aliens within weeks of September 3, 1939 declaration. This framework facilitated the evacuation of 1.5 million children by October 1939 and sustained supply lines against threats, with sunset provisions tying duration to hostilities' cessation on August 15, 1945. The speed addressed causal imperatives like air raid vulnerabilities, where delays could have amplified civilian casualties exceeding 60,000 from bombing. In the crisis, Canada's Orders in Council under the Quarantine Act, starting March 18, 2020, imposed 14-day quarantines on 1.3 million returning travelers and closures barring non-essential entry, adapting iteratively to case surges peaking at 20,000 daily by April 2021. Over 100 such orders by 2022 enforced quarantines costing CAD 2.4 billion and vaccine mandates for federal sectors, with empirical data linking early restrictions to averting healthcare overload seen in unmanaged peaks elsewhere. These were time-bound, many lapsing by June 2022 upon risk abatement, and subject to parliamentary review, balancing necessity against potential extension risks.

Variations Across Jurisdictions

United Kingdom

In the , Orders in Council constitute a primary instrument for implementing delegated legislative powers or prerogative actions, formalized by the on the advice of the and often used for administrative efficiency in areas like public appointments and international conventions. These orders derive authority from specific statutes or historical precedents, bypassing full parliamentary scrutiny in favor of affirmative resolution procedures where required, enabling rapid response to governance needs without primary legislation. A distinctive adaptation occurs in Northern Ireland, where the Northern Ireland Act 1974 authorizes Orders in Council to enact laws during suspensions of devolved institutions, instituting by the Government. Enacted after the 1972 prorogation of the Stormont amid ' escalation, this framework transferred legislative competence to the Queen in Council, covering matters from public order to economic policy, with orders laid before for approval. applied continuously from 1972 to 1998, and intermittently thereafter—including 2002–2007 and 2017–2020—resulting in hundreds of such orders that sustained administration, budgeted expenditures exceeding £10 billion annually by the , and coordinated security operations. This mechanism's deployment yielded measurable stability gains, particularly in countering terrorism: under direct rule, UK-wide intelligence coordination and legislative adaptations via orders correlated with a sharp decline in conflict fatalities, from 467 in 1972 to under 10 annually by 1998, facilitating the conditions for the 1998 Good Friday Agreement. Empirical data from conflict archives indicate that centralized executive powers enabled proactive measures like enhanced policing and internment policies, reducing paramilitary operational capacity despite initial violence spikes. Critics, including Northern Ireland constitutional scholars, contend that such orders eroded local accountability by overriding assembly prerogatives, potentially entrenching unionist perspectives and delaying power-sharing; however, security metrics—such as a 95% drop in bombings from 1970s peaks—substantiate claims of efficacy in averting state collapse over democratic purism in acute crisis contexts. Post-Brexit, orders have supported sovereignty reassertions, including adjustments to trade protocols affecting Northern Ireland, though primary implementation often occurs via statutory instruments under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 rather than standalone prerogative forms.

Canada

In Canada, orders in council are executive instruments issued by the acting on the advice of the federal Cabinet, collectively termed the Governor in Council. These differ from their counterparts by operating within a federal constitutional framework that divides legislative powers between the national government and provinces, necessitating statutory authorization for many orders to avoid encroaching on provincial . They serve primarily for administrative appointments, regulatory enactments under enabling legislation, and proclamations, with all such instruments registered and published in the Canada Gazette as required by the Statutory Instruments Act. Common applications include high-level appointments, such as to corporations or judicial roles, formalized through orders specifying tenure and conditions. Regulations under acts like the Canada Transportation Act or environmental statutes are also promulgated this way, reflecting a procedural emphasis on deliberation followed by viceregal signature. Unlike prerogative powers more freely exercised in the , Canadian orders typically derive from parliamentary statutes, aligning with the principle of where executive action remains accountable to . Historically, orders in council enabled mobilization under the National Resources Mobilization Act of June 21, 1940, which granted the Governor in Council authority to conscript men aged 21–24 for home defense training amid threats, initially avoiding overseas service to preserve national unity. This provision fueled opposition, as evoked memories of 1917 divisions and was seen as centralizing federal overreach, contributing to the 1942 Conscription Crisis when Prime Minister Mackenzie King extended service abroad via plebiscite and order. In constitutional milestones, orders facilitated the 1982 patriation process; the Governor General's proclamation on April 17, 1982, brought the Constitution Act, 1982 into force, affirming domestic amendment powers post-UK enactment of the Canada Act 1982. More recently, on February 14, 2022, the Governor in Council invoked the Emergencies Act—its first use since 1988—declaring a public order emergency to address blockades by trucker protests against COVID-19 mandates, enabling financial freezes and border enforcement. The Public Order Emergency Commission later deemed the invocation justified for restoring order, though a 2024 Federal Court ruling found it unreasonable and violative of Charter rights, highlighting debates over necessity versus executive latitude. Federal orders are tracked via the Privy Council Office database from 1990 onward, with publication in the Canada Gazette ensuring transparency; Part II issues, released biweekly, often include dozens of regulatory orders per edition, underscoring their routine role in . This statutory embedding mitigates , though critics argue it concentrates power amid federal-provincial frictions.

Other Commonwealth Realms and Territories

In , Orders in Council are issued by the on the advice of the Executive Council to enact executive decisions requiring legal effect, serving functions parallel to those in the but adapted to local constitutional arrangements. These instruments cover areas such as emergency management, regulatory amendments, and implementation of statutory powers; for example, following the 2011 earthquakes, multiple Orders in Council established the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) and delegated powers for reconstruction, with over 30 such orders issued between 2011 and 2016 to expedite recovery efforts. Similarly, in response to events in early 2023 affecting communities, Orders in Council modified laws to facilitate resource consents, building standards, and funding allocations, with provisions for periodic review to ensure ongoing efficacy. These orders maintain the prerogative elements of authority while integrating statutory bases, enabling swift action where parliamentary processes would delay outcomes, though they remain subject to and legislative oversight. In , the equivalent process operates through the acting in Council with the Federal Executive Council, producing instruments such as Administrative Arrangements Orders under section 64 of the Constitution to assign administrative responsibilities across departments and ministers. These orders, typically issued upon changes in government—such as the May 2025 iteration reallocating portfolios post-election—blend and statutory to support deployments, obligations, and regulatory frameworks without direct reliance on the UK Privy Council. For matters, the in Council approves regulations under acts like the Defence Act 1903, including force structure determinations and overseas mission authorizations, ensuring alignment with Australia's independent while preserving monarchical formalities. This system upholds constitutional continuity across realms, facilitating coordinated responses to shared security threats. For , Orders in Council issued by the directly apply to governance, extending UK laws and modifying local constitutions for territories lacking full legislative autonomy. These instruments address like defense, foreign affairs, and internal security; for instance, sanctions regimes such as the Ukraine (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) Order 2014 apply financial restrictions and asset freezes across territories including the and to enforce international obligations uniformly. Constitutional amendments, such as those to the framework via periodic Orders, define executive structures and protections while deferring routine legislation to local councils. This approach sustains the Crown's role in ensuring territorial integrity and compliance with global standards, with limited criticisms arising from perceptions of over-centralization, though local elected bodies mitigate this by handling non-reserved domains, reducing reliance on such orders to exceptional circumstances.

Controversies, Achievements, and Criticisms

Key Historical and Modern Examples

The Royal Proclamation of 1763, issued by King George III on October 7 following the that concluded the Seven Years' War, reorganized British North American territories including the Province of Quebec. It appointed a and for civil administration, retained for inheritance and property tenure, and barred settlers from purchasing lands directly, requiring Crown-mediated treaties instead. This provided short-term by curbing unregulated expansion and conflicts, with land restrictions averting immediate uprisings like , though it provoked colonial resentment over blocked settlement and drew critiques for withholding representative assemblies from French-speaking residents, limiting their political rights under British rule. In Bate's Case (judgment delivered in 1607 on a 1606 imposition), the Court of Exchequer validated King James I's levy of extra customs duties on currants via , without parliamentary consent, reasoning that retained ancient authority to impose such charges for prerogative purposes like trade regulation and defense when statutory revenues proved insufficient. The decision emphasized that impositions must align with historical customs and not become permanent taxes, establishing deference to absent clear overreach, a that expanded until challenged in subsequent cases like the 1637 ship money judgments, where courts initially upheld similar levies but public and parliamentary backlash led to their abolition in 1641. Judicial invalidations of Orders in Council remained exceptional, with outcomes often hinging on necessity claims rather than outright quashals. During World War I, Canada's Order in Council P.C. 1917-2721 under the War Measures Act facilitated wartime electoral reforms tied to the Wartime Elections Act, disenfranchising approximately 400,000 naturalized voters from enemy alien countries (unless they had close relatives in uniform) while granting votes to over 100,000 female kin of servicemen, marking the first federal female suffrage but selectively. These measures, enacted amid conscription debates, shifted the December 17, 1917, election toward Unionist victory with 73% of seats despite 46% popular vote, enabling mandatory military service for 401,000 men by war's end, though they fueled ethnic tensions and legal disputes over discriminatory application, with full women's suffrage delayed until 1918. In response to the , the invoked executive powers through instruments including Orders in Council to enact restrictions, such as the March 26, 2020, Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) () Regulations imposing lockdowns, business closures, and gathering limits, which by April covered 66 million people and correlated with a 90% drop in mobility per government . These facilitated rapid deployment of testing and , contributing to case declines from 5,000 daily in late March to under 1,000 by , though enforcement relied on issuing 500,000 fines by mid-2020 and faced over 100 judicial reviews, with some amendments quashed for procedural flaws like inadequate parliamentary scrutiny. Canada's 2023 Orders in Council, such as SOR/2023-128 registered on June 28, operationalized self-government agreements under the Jurisdiction over Education in Act, transferring authority over K-12 curriculum and operations to bands like Canim Lake (agreement dated March 10, 2023) and two others, affecting roughly 500 students and bypassing federal oversight for localized standards. This adjustment built on prior efforts, yielding measurable outcomes like customized programs in 20+ communities by year-end, though required federal funding of $10 million annually per agreement, with evaluations pending on academic performance metrics.

Debates on Executive Efficacy versus Accountability

The use of Orders in Council embodies a core tension in constitutional governance between the exigency of rapid decision-making and the imperatives of accountability, rooted in the historical powers that enable swift action without prior parliamentary approval. Proponents argue that this mechanism's stems from its capacity to address acute threats where deliberation could precipitate irreversible harm, as evidenced by its role in enabling large-scale mobilizations during existential crises like , where directives facilitated and preparations that empirically contributed to averting defeat through timely and scaling. Critics, often from academic and media outlets exhibiting systemic ideological skews toward expansive oversight, contend that such powers engender a "" by sidelining legislative input, yet this charge overlooks entrenched constitutional conventions requiring ministerial responsibility and post-hoc parliamentary scrutiny, alongside mechanisms that constrain abuse without paralyzing response. Empirical outcomes underscore the causal priority of executive speed: in high-stakes scenarios, delays from mandatory have historically amplified risks, as rapid Orders in Council deployment allowed for adaptive strategies that preserved against bureaucratic inertia or fragmented . Right-leaning analyses emphasize this as a bulwark for national autonomy, countering left-leaning portrayals of invocations as proto-authoritarian by highlighting how unchecked parliamentary processes could foster inefficiency, particularly in federated systems like Canada's where coordination overrides provincial points. Proposals for , such as formalized post-action reviews or enhanced select mandates, seek to bolster —e.g., through mandatory reporting timelines—without eroding the prerogative's core utility, as evidenced in comparative studies of and Canadian powers evolution. In contemporary discourse, particularly surrounding post-2020 emergencies, debates intensified over Orders in Council's necessity for containing diffuse threats like pandemics, where executive-led measures enabled immediate border controls and resource reallocations that mitigated initial surge fatalities, prioritizing causal intervention over protracted consensus-building favored in deliberative ideals. Accountability advocates, drawing from rule-of-law frameworks, decry potential overreach but empirical assessments of reveal that such tools' in averting —via enforceable directives—outweighs theoretical risks when bounded by evidentiary thresholds and audits, as seen in analyses of responses balancing urgency against institutional checks. This dialectic affirms that while vigilance against entrenchment remains essential, subordinating to exhaustive pre-approval would undermine 's adaptive in causally deterministic threat environments.

References

  1. [1]
    Orders in Council - Commissioner for Public Appointments
    An Order in Council is a form of legislation made in the name of the Monarch 'by and with the advice and consent' of the Privy Council.
  2. [2]
    Orders - The Privy Council Office
    Latest Orders and Proclamations · Order of Council 15 September 2025. Railway Benevolent Institution amendments to the Rules · Order in Council 10 September 2025.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    What are Orders in Council? - Commons Library
    Sep 14, 2023 · An Order in Council is legislation made by the Monarch and the Privy Council instead of Parliament. Such an order can be used to change constituency boundaries.
  4. [4]
    Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 - Legislation.gov.uk
    (2)Her Majesty may by Order in Council declare a provision of a convention entered into by the United Kingdom to be a provision whereby the United Kingdom ...
  5. [5]
    Jeff King: Miller/Cherry and Remedies for Ultra Vires Delegated ...
    Constitutional Law Group September 19, 2019 Judicial review, UK government, UK ... the Order in Council was null and void. That would mean that Parliament ...
  6. [6]
    The Privy Council: history, functions and membership
    Aug 3, 2025 · The Privy Council was originally the executive arm of English government from as early as the 13 th century, although its powers declined as political ...
  7. [7]
    Privy Council since 1386 - The National Archives
    This guide gives advice on the various series of records in which Privy Council papers can be found and how to search for them.Missing: development | Show results with:development
  8. [8]
    King Charles I's most loyal Privy Council - History of government
    Dec 21, 2015 · The Privy Council took on a more central role in government, functioning as the chief body through which Royal order, administration and policy was channelled.<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    The English Civil Wars: Origins, Events and Legacy - English Heritage
    The monarchy and Privy Council were abolished and replaced by Parliament and a Council of State, the latter elected each year. However, in 1653, after four ...
  10. [10]
    Orders in Council - Parliamentary Papers, Proceedings and ...
    Mar 24, 2025 · Where to find Orders in Council · Orders in Council are published from 1665 in the London Gazette, which contains a subject index from 1848, ...
  11. [11]
    Glorious Revolution - The National Archives
    The Glorious Revolution of 1688-89 replaced James II with the joint monarchy of his daughter Mary and her Dutch husband, William of Orange, both Protestants.
  12. [12]
    British Orders in Council, Summary, Facts, Significance
    Nov 4, 2024 · The Orders in Council were British trade restrictions enforced during the Napoleonic Wars. They intended to limit trade between France and neutral nations.
  13. [13]
    Statutory Instruments Act 1946 - Legislation.gov.uk
    An Act to repeal the Rules Publication Act 1893, and to make further provision as to the instruments by which statutory powers to make orders, rules, ...
  14. [14]
    The Acts, Orders in Council, &c. of Great Britain on Trade, 1793 - 1812
    The British retaliated with new Orders in Council in November 1807 banning neutrals from trading with France and its allies. Spencer Perceval succinctly summed ...
  15. [15]
    Privy council | Institute for Government
    The King approves legislation by saying “approved” to each order read out by the lord president of the council during meetings. In addition, he summons – or ...
  16. [16]
    The royal prerogative and ministerial advice
    Aug 1, 2025 · The main types are an Order in Council, a Royal Order, Commission or Warrant made under the Royal Sign Manual (the monarch's personal ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The royal prerogative and ministerial advice - UK Parliament
    Aug 1, 2025 · Prerogative Orders in Council also appoint clerics, judges and members of the. Royal Family as Visitors at universities throughout the UK. A ...
  18. [18]
    House of Lords - Constitution - Fifteenth Report - Parliament UK
    1. Under the Royal prerogative powers, the Government can declare war and deploy armed forces to conflicts abroad without the backing or consent of Parliament.
  19. [19]
    Declaration Of War: Parliamentary Approval - Hansard - UK Parliament
    Feb 19, 2003 · It would, therefore, be lawful and constitutional for the Government, in exercising the Royal prerogative, to make a declaration of war or to ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Prerogative Powers of the Crown - UK Parliament
    Dec 13, 2019 · legislate by prerogative orders in council or by letters patent;. • exercise the prerogative of mercy, eg to pardon convicted offenders ...
  21. [21]
    Understanding Legislation
    Prerogative Orders are called either 'Orders in Council' (when made by the King on the advice of the Privy Council) or 'Orders of Council' (when made by the ...
  22. [22]
    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/10-11/67/contents/enacted
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Cabinet Manual - GOV.UK
    Examples of statutory Orders of Council include approval of regulations made by the General Medical Council and other regulatory bodies. • Examples of ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Legislating for Brexit: EU directives - UK Parliament
    Apr 5, 2017 · EU directives that are implemented by statute will already be enshrined in UK law but the relevant Acts of Parliament will need to be amended if ...
  25. [25]
    Statutory instruments procedure in the House of Commons
    They generally pass through the Commons under one of two procedures, affirmative or negative. The procedure an SI follows is determined by its parent Act.Missing: oversight Council
  26. [26]
    Acts and Statutory Instruments: the volume of UK legislation 1850 to ...
    Apr 21, 2017 · No Orders in Council have been issued since 2016. Statutory ... An average of 3,000 UK SI were issued annually from 2010 to June 2019.
  27. [27]
    Accession Council of King Charles III - The Privy Council Office
    This was the holding of The King of his first Privy Council meeting, whch began with a personal declaration from His Majesty: The King then made the Oath ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The Privy Council: history, functions and membership - UK Parliament
    Oct 27, 2024 · Only those Privy. Counsellors summonsed (usually Cabinet ministers) by the Lord President of the Council attend, the quorum being three. The ...
  29. [29]
    The Privy Council Office
    The Privy Council goes back to the earliest days of the Monarchy, when it comprised those appointed by the King or Queen to advise on matters of state. As the ...
  30. [30]
    Process Guide for Governor in Council Submissions (Other than ...
    Nov 21, 2023 · Instructions on how to obtain approved Orders in Council can be found on the Privy Council Office website at the Orders in Council Database.Introduction · Preparation of a GIC submission · Overview of the approval...
  31. [31]
    Privy Council (United Kingdom) - Wikipedia
    The Privy Council formally advises the sovereign on the exercise of the royal prerogative. The King-in-Council issues executive instruments known as Orders in ...
  32. [32]
    Secondary legislation: how is it scrutinised? - Institute for Government
    May 19, 2020 · Parliament usually scrutinises secondary legislation through one of two routes, the negative and affirmative procedures.
  33. [33]
    Orders in Council - Canada.ca
    Order in Council (OIC) - A legal instrument made by the Governor in Council pursuant to a statutory authority or, less frequently, the royal prerogative. All ...
  34. [34]
    The Gazette | Official Public Record
    The Gazette is published by TSO (The Stationery Office) under the superintendence of His Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO), part of The National Archives.Browse Publications · A history of The Gazette · Wills and Probate · CompaniesMissing: Council | Show results with:Council
  35. [35]
    Orders In Council - Search - Canada.ca
    The Orders in Council online database makes it easy for you to search for Orders in Council (OICs) made from 1990 to the present.
  36. [36]
    Ministers of the Crown Act 1975 - Legislation.gov.uk
    The Ministers of the Crown Act 1975 consolidates enactments relating to the redistribution of functions and alteration of titles of Ministers of the Crown.
  37. [37]
    2023 Review | Boundary Commission for England
    We have now concluded the 2023 Review of Parliamentary constituencies in England, and submitted our final report and recommendations.
  38. [38]
    Northern Ireland Orders in Council (691) - Legislation.gov.uk
    Your search for English language Northern Ireland Orders in Council has returned more than 200 results. · Results by year · Narrow results by: ...Missing: domestic governance
  39. [39]
    The Russia (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) (Amendment) Order ...
    This Order makes amendments to the Russia (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) Order 2020 (S.I. 2020/1571) (“the principal Order”).
  40. [40]
    The Russia (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) (Amendment) (No. 3 ...
    This Order makes amendments to the Russia (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) Order 2020 (S.I. 2020/1571) (“the Principal Order”).
  41. [41]
    UK OTs Statement on the Implementation of Sanctions against Russia
    The Overseas Territories have acted swiftly to fully implement the UK sanctions against Russia that have been extended to them, through Orders in Council or ...
  42. [42]
    Falkland Islands Dispute: Reservists - Hansard - UK Parliament
    May 13, 1982 · The provisions of the Order in Council made on 27th June 1962 are, however, being extended by a new Order in Council to call out other officers ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] UK Operations: the Defence Contribution to Resilience - GOV.UK
    Nov 28, 2022 · For non-military tasks, the mechanism of a Defence Council Order is used to authorise the deployment of Defence resources. A Defence Council.
  44. [44]
    Military action: Parliament's role - House of Commons Library
    Oct 14, 2024 · The decision to deploy the armed forces in situations of armed conflict is a prerogative power, exercised by Government ministers.
  45. [45]
    Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 - Legislation.gov.uk
    (8)The treaty may be ratified if a Minister of the Crown has laid before Parliament a statement indicating that the Minister is of the opinion that the treaty ...
  46. [46]
    Progress on UK free trade agreement negotiations - Commons Library
    Sep 5, 2025 · This page provides details of the UK's trade agreements since Brexit. It includes only “new” agreements, not those rolled-over when the UK ...Missing: Orders 2019-2021
  47. [47]
    Emergency powers in the United Kingdom - The Constitution Society
    Jun 9, 2022 · The sorts of measures typically defined as 'emergency powers' first found expression in the United Kingdom through the 1914 Defence of the Realm ...
  48. [48]
    A Very British Dictatorship: The Defence of the Realm Act in Britain ...
    Mar 18, 2024 · The comparatively discreet use of emergency powers helped to avoid public scrutiny and undesired frictions while still allowing the government ...
  49. [49]
    emergency powers (defence) bill. - API Parliament UK
    I assume that an Order in Council will be made and will embody a substantial number of regulations. Each regulation will not be made as a separate Order in ...
  50. [50]
    Emergency Powers (Defence) Act 1939 | LawTeacher.net
    For instance, Defence Regulation 18B allowed the government to arrest persons who were suspected (but not proven) to be Nazi sympathisers. LawTeacher.
  51. [51]
    Orders In Council - Search - Canada.ca
    (b) monitor for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 until the expiry of the 14-day period and, if they develop any signs and symptoms of COVID-19, follow ...
  52. [52]
    Canada's legal preparedness against the COVID‐19 Pandemic - NIH
    We review Canada's legal preparedness for public health emergencies and the use of federal legislation to address the pandemic.
  53. [53]
    Canada Gazette, Part 1, Volume 155, Number 37: ORDERS IN ...
    Sep 11, 2021 · This Order in Council, entitled Order Amending the Minimizing the Risk of Exposure to COVID-19 in Canada Order (Prohibition of Entry into Canada ...Public Health Agency Of... · Quarantine Act · Explanatory Note
  54. [54]
    Northern Ireland Act 1974 - Legislation.gov.uk
    (b)Her Majesty may by Order in Council make laws for Northern Ireland and, in particular, provision for any matter for which the Constitution Act authorises ...
  55. [55]
    Anurag Deb: Direct Rule in Northern Ireland and the Power to Make ...
    Feb 17, 2023 · This Act authorised the making of laws by Order in Council in respect of Northern Ireland 'and, in particular, provision for any matter for ...
  56. [56]
    Northern Ireland: Direct Rule - The House of Commons Library
    Mar 30, 2022 · Direct Rule is the administration of Northern Ireland directly by the Government of the United Kingdom rather than by devolved government.Missing: Act | Show results with:Act
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Northern Ireland Legislation - UK Parliament
    During direct rule, the great majority of Northern. Ireland's primary legislation was brought into effect by means of Orders in Council and direct rule renewed ...
  58. [58]
    The Northern Ireland Constitution, 1974 - Ulster University
    Mar 9, 2025 · (b) "direct rule" under the Northern Ireland (Temporary Provisions) ... Order in Council, from March 1972 to January 1 1974;. (c) a new ...
  59. [59]
    The Northern Ireland Protocol and Windsor Framework
    Feb 1, 2024 · The Northern Ireland Protocol sets out Northern Ireland's post-Brexit relationship with both the EU and Great Britain.
  60. [60]
    Governor in Council appointments - Canada.ca
    Mar 17, 2025 · Once approved by Cabinet, appointments are made through an Order in Council, which is approved by the Governor General. This normally specifies ...
  61. [61]
    Orders in Council - Government Information: Canada
    Sep 20, 2024 · Orders in Council are notices of appointments, regulations, or legislative orders related to and authorized by existing legislation.<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/C.R.C.%2C_c._1509/FullText.html
  63. [63]
    Statutory Instruments Regulations ( CRC , c. 1509) - Laws.justice.gc.ca
    9 The Canada Gazette shall be published in three parts, namely, Part I, Part II and Part III. 10 The typography, style and format of Part I, Part II and Part ...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    Governor in Council and Ministerial Appointments
    Sep 16, 2025 · GIC appointments are those made by the GIC – the Governor General acting on advice of Cabinet. An Order in Council is the legal instrument, ...
  65. [65]
    Canada Gazette, Part 1, Volume 157, Number 19: ORDERS IN ...
    May 13, 2023 · Canada Gazette, Part I, Volume 157, Number 19: ORDERS IN COUNCIL. May 13, 2023. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT. CANADA TRANSPORTATION ACT.
  66. [66]
    How new laws and regulations are created
    The regulations are made once the Minister signs the regulations' covering order, or once the Governor General signs the regulations' Order in Council, as the ...
  67. [67]
    National Resources Mobilization Act | Military Wiki - Fandom
    National Resources Mobilization Act, 1940 · An Act to confer certain powers on the Governor in Council for the mobilization of resources in the present war.
  68. [68]
    National Resources Mobilization Act | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    Feb 7, 2006 · The Act enabled the government to requisition the property and services of Canadians for home defence. An earlier promise made by PM Mackenzie ...Missing: Council | Show results with:Council
  69. [69]
    Proclamation of 1982 - solon.org
    Now Know You that We, by and with the advice Our Privy Council for Canada, do by this Our Proclamation, declare that the Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject ...
  70. [70]
    February 14, 2022 Declaration of Public Order Emergency
    Feb 18, 2022 · On February 14, 2022, the Governor in Council directed that a proclamation be issued pursuant to subsection 17(1) of the Emergencies Act ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Report of the Public Inquiry into the 2022 Public Order Emergency
    Canada in January and February of 2022 justified the invocation of the Emergencies. Act. To do so, I must assess the actions of various entities, including ...
  72. [72]
    Federal Court Ruling on the Invocation of the Emergencies Act and ...
    Jun 10, 2024 · The Federal Court ruled that the invocation of the Emergencies Act to deal with the Winter 2022 illegal demonstrations and blockades was unreasonable.<|control11|><|separator|>
  73. [73]
    About the Canada Gazette - Canada.ca
    May 30, 2025 · It also contains documents such as orders in council, orders and proclamations. Only federal departments and agencies publish in Part II.Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency
  74. [74]
    Parliamentary Committee Notes: Invoking the Emergencies Act
    Dec 20, 2022 · On February 14, 2022, the Governor in Council declared a public order emergency under the Emergencies Act in response to the ongoing blockades and protests ...
  75. [75]
    CERA Orders in Council
    Apr 23, 2024 · An Order in Council is a legal instrument used by the New Zealand government to implement decisions that need legal force. The Executive Council ...
  76. [76]
    Orders in Council | Ministry for the Environment
    Orders in Council (Orders) allow a number of laws to be changed to help communities continue their recovery from the severe weather events in early 2023.
  77. [77]
    The Executive Council - The Governor-General of New Zealand
    Apart from Acts of Parliament, Orders in Council are the main method by which the government implements decisions that need legal force. The Executive Council ...
  78. [78]
    Administrative Arrangements Orders | PM&C
    May 13, 2025 · Section 62 provides for the Executive Council, and section 64 provides that the Governor General may appoint Ministers of State to administer ...
  79. [79]
    Administrative Arrangement Orders - Federal Register of Legislation
    The Administrative Arrangements Order or AAO is a document made by the Governor-General. It sets out the matters and Acts dealt with by each Department of ...
  80. [80]
    Federal Executive Council - Parliament of Australia
    The Executive Council is the legal means of ratifying executive acts (as distinct from prerogative acts) by or on behalf of the Governor-General. Any reference ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Orders in Council - GOV.UK
    ... (Overseas Territories) Order 2014/2710. Central African Republic (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) Order 2014/1368. Ukraine (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) ( ...
  82. [82]
    UK's relationship with its overseas territories - House of Lords Library
    May 18, 2023 · Orders in council may be utilised to revise an overseas territory's constitution or to legislate for the overseas territories. For example, in ...The UK's overseas territories... · Constitutional affairs skip to link
  83. [83]
    The Overseas Territories: An introduction and relations with the UK
    Jan 20, 2023 · This briefing introduces the Territories, sets out the UK's responsibilities towards them, and summarises their constitutions, human rights law and electorates.
  84. [84]
    The Royal Proclamation - October 7, 1763 - Avalon Project
    ... Council, declare it to be our Royal Will and Pleasure. that no Governor or Commander in Chief in any of our Colonies of Quebec, East Florida. or West ...
  85. [85]
    The Royal Proclamation of 1763
    Nov 14, 2024 · The Royal Proclamation of 1763 established new rules for Crown-First Nations relations, defining "Indian Territories" and prohibiting land ...
  86. [86]
    Proclamation Line of 1763, Quebec Act of 1774 and Westward ...
    ... Royal Proclamation of 1763, which forbid colonial settlement beyond the line of the Appalachian Mountains. The act also created the provinces of Quebec ...
  87. [87]
    Sources of English Constitutional History: Chapter 91
    In 1606 John Bates, a merchant trading with the Levant, refused to pay a custom of 5s. a hundredweight imposed by James I in addition to the poundage of 2s. 6d.Missing: Bate's | Show results with:Bate's
  88. [88]
    The Beginnings of Judicial Review (Chapter 4)
    Sep 26, 2025 · In Customer Smyth's Case (1598), concerning an imposition on alum, and in Bate's Case (1606), concerning an imposition on currants, the Court of ...
  89. [89]
    Wartime Elections Act - The Canadian Encyclopedia
    The Wartime Elections Act of 1917 gave the vote to female relatives of Canadian soldiers serving overseas in the First World War. It also took the vote away ...Missing: Council PC 1917-2721
  90. [90]
    War-time Elections Act (1917) - Dictionary of Canadian Biography
    In 1917, during the First World War, the Conservative government put forward the War-time Elections Act, which disenfranchised “enemy aliens” who had come to ...Missing: Council PC 1917-2721<|separator|>
  91. [91]
    Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations
    Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020.
  92. [92]
    Coronavirus Statutory Instruments Dashboard, 2020-2022
    Apr 9, 2020 · This Dashboard highlights key facts and figures about the Statutory Instruments (SIs) made and laid before Parliament from January 2020 to March 2022
  93. [93]
    https://gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2023/2023-07-05/html/sor-dors128-eng.html
  94. [94]
    Order Bringing Individual Agreements with First Nations into Effect
    Jul 5, 2023 · This Order brings three agreements into effect, per subsection 5(1) of the First Nations Jurisdiction over Education in British Columbia Act (the Act)
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Eidlin Full Dissertation FINAL 7-26-12 - eScholarship
    Order-In-Council PC 2685. But employers showed little interest in the guidelines, and unions complained loudly that the Order was not working. In response ...<|separator|>
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Class vs. Special Interest: Labor, Power, and Politics in the United ...
    In Canada, Order-In-Council P.C. 1003 was passed in February 1944, in the midst of a massive wartime strike wave, and months after the ruling Liberal Party ...
  97. [97]
    Tension and Legality: Towards a Theory of the Executive Branch
    Jul 26, 2016 · This article addresses a neglected area of modern public law research—the study of a general theory of the executive branch and its powers, one ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  98. [98]
    [PDF] The Strange Death of Prerogative in England - LSE Research Online
    In either case the act in question is the act of the executive. To talk of that act as the act of the sovereign savours of the archaism of past centuries.
  99. [99]
    (PDF) Parliament and the War Prerogative in the United Kingdom ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · This paper analyses how democratic legislatures oversee the military, using Canada as a case. The paper argues that the tendency to engage in ...
  100. [100]
    Parliamentarizing war: explaining legislative votes on Canadian ...
    Jan 31, 2023 · We propose and test four hypotheses to explain why and when governments willingly choose to involve parliament in war decisions absent ...
  101. [101]
    COVID-19, The Rule of Law and Democracy. Analysis of Legal ...
    The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on governance globally. Where the efficacy of pandemic laws adopted by governments are a matter of life and ...Missing: Council | Show results with:Council
  102. [102]
    COVID-19 and Federalism: Public Officials' Accountability and ...
    The flashpoints of controversy have ranged from the efficacy of masks, therapeutics, and vaccines to business and school closures and comprehensive lockdowns.Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
  103. [103]
    Preliminaries | A Theory of the Executive Branch: Tension and Legality
    This chapter introduces the setting for the study of the executive branch, and sets aside several issues that may be considered as challenges to the project ...