Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Parathion


Parathion, with the IUPAC name O,O-diethyl O-(4-nitrophenyl) phosphorothioate and molecular formula C₁₀H₁₄NO₅PS, is an organophosphorus compound classified as a highly toxic insecticide due to its irreversible inhibition of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase, which causes rapid onset of cholinergic symptoms including nausea, convulsions, and respiratory failure in exposed humans and animals.
First synthesized in 1944 by chemist Gerhard Schrader as part of research at IG Farben, parathion was registered for agricultural use in the United States in 1948, targeting a broad spectrum of chewing and sucking insects on crops such as cotton, fruits, and vegetables.
Its effectiveness was overshadowed by extreme acute toxicity, resulting in thousands of documented poisonings worldwide, particularly among farmworkers during mixing, application, and post-harvest handling, which prompted progressive regulatory restrictions; by 1991, it was designated for restricted use in the U.S., and all remaining registrations for ethyl parathion were voluntarily canceled by manufacturers in agreement with the EPA in 2003, effectively banning its domestic production and sale.

History

Discovery and Early Development

Parathion, an , originated from research conducted by German chemist at IG Farbenindustrie during the 1940s, as part of efforts to develop potent compounds for using domestically available phosphorus-based materials. Schrader's work built on earlier explorations initiated in , which inadvertently yielded highly toxic nerve agents like tabun in 1936 and in 1938 while seeking improved ; these military applications highlighted the class's biochemical potency against enzymes in . By 1944, Schrader synthesized parathion (O,O-diethyl O-(4-nitrophenyl) phosphorothioate) specifically as a candidate , recognizing its potential to inhibit in arthropods more effectively than prior compounds. Initial laboratory evaluations in demonstrated parathion's exceptional insecticidal efficacy, with low doses paralyzing and killing test such as and through rapid nervous system disruption, outperforming arsenic-based alternatives in speed and potency. These empirical tests, conducted amid wartime resource constraints and agricultural demands for controlling crop pests like those devastating food supplies in , validated parathion's transition from experimental synthesis to viable agricultural candidate. filed early German patents covering parathion's production and use around this period, though Allied seizure of documents after delayed international dissemination until the late 1940s. The compound's development reflected first-principles focused on stability and nitrophenyl for targeted bioactivation in , with lab-scale production achieving yields sufficient for preliminary bioassays by 1944–1945. This phase prioritized insect-specific toxicity data from controlled exposures, establishing parathion's LD50 values against common pests in the microgram-per-kilogram range, far below thresholds for practical application.

Commercial Adoption and Agricultural Expansion

Parathion entered commercial markets in the late 1940s, shortly after its synthesis methods were acquired by Allied forces at the end of , with initiating production in the United States around 1945-1946 for agricultural applications. Its broad-spectrum contact, stomach, and fumigant action against and mites facilitated rapid adoption on major crops including , fruits, grains, and in the US and , where it replaced less effective earlier pesticides like amid emerging resistance issues by the early 1950s. In the US South, parathion's deployment via aerial and ground applications supported expansion by targeting key pests such as boll weevils and , correlating with stabilized volumes despite historical weevil-induced losses exceeding 50% in untreated fields during the mid-20th century. Usage peaked in the 1950s-1960s, with insecticides like parathion integral to overall growth, which rose steadily from the late and enabled agricultural intensification without proportional land expansion. Parathion's export dynamics extended its reach to developing countries, particularly in tropical regions, where it addressed high insect pressures on export-oriented crops like , vines, and , reducing pre-harvest losses documented in FAO evaluations as critical barriers to surplus output. During the Green Revolution era, its foliar applications complemented high-yield varieties by curbing pest damage, with field data linking such controls to yield gains in pest-vulnerable systems, though specific attributions varied by crop and region. This expansion underscored parathion's causal role in bridging pest-induced yield gaps, fostering productivity surges in both temperate and through targeted suppression.

Incidents Leading to Restrictions

In the early 1950s, reports emerged of acute parathion poisonings among farmworkers in orchards, primarily from dermal absorption of residues during reentry into treated fields without adequate protective equipment or waiting periods, leading to cholinesterase inhibition and symptoms such as , sweating, and respiratory distress. Similar occupational exposures in U.S. cotton fields documented levels of 0.09–1.06 μg per 30 minutes up to 72 hours post-application and dermal absorption of up to 6.0 mg over 5 hours, often resulting in cholinesterase reductions exceeding 50%, which heightened scrutiny over handling practices. From 1956 to 1964, recorded 30 child fatalities from parathion exposure, with an average victim age of 2.9 years; 16 cases involved from improper in accessible containers like soft drink bottles, 4 from dermal contact with contaminated surfaces such as floors or windowsills, and 4 from including one confirmed powder exposure, all causing death within hours due to rapid cholinesterase inhibition and . In April–May 1958, over 100 deaths occurred in , , from parathion-contaminated , an accidental mass poisoning linked to inadequate safeguards and , demonstrating the pesticide's high oral and prompting early concerns about in non-professional settings. By the mid-1960s, aggregated data from U.S. poison control and health reports revealed parathion's elevated compared to less toxic pesticides, with exposures frequently causing profound depression (e.g., 59% red blood cell inhibition at airborne levels of 0.2 mg/m³ over weeks) and underscoring causal factors like volatility and insufficient , which influenced initial mandatory label warnings for restricted use.

Global Phase-Out and Bans

The (EPA) suspended most uses of ethyl parathion in 1991 after reregistration evaluations revealed unacceptable risks from worker exposures, dietary residues, and incidents, prompting an agreement with registrants to restrict applications to nine crops with phase-out timelines. Further actions included prohibiting imports of technical parathion by September 2000 and terminating production and remaining registrations by December 2002, effectively halting domestic availability while citing persistent evidence of cholinesterase inhibition hazards outweighing mitigated benefits under revised safety standards. In the , parathion faced severe restrictions under Council Directive 2003/118/EC, leading to a full ban on all uses by due to its WHO classification as Toxicity Class Ia (extremely hazardous), emphasizing irreversible neurotoxic effects and environmental persistence as disproportionate to agricultural gains. The reinforced this through guidelines highlighting parathion's extreme dermal and oral toxicity, with no-observed-adverse-effect levels as low as 0.1 mg/kg/day in dermal studies, driving notifications to the for global prior informed consent on exports. Globally, phase-outs accelerated via the , with bans in over 50 countries by the 2000s, though enforcement lags in some developing nations where parathion persists illegally, contributing to thousands of annual poisonings and suicides—estimated at 20-30% of total pesticide-related deaths in regions like despite alternatives' availability. Post-ban transitions to less acutely toxic substitutes, such as pyrethroids, have correlated with 20-50% reductions in severe poisonings in monitored cohorts, per epidemiological data, but raised concerns over incomplete coverage potentially yielding 5-15% lower crop protections in high-infestation scenarios without integrated . Rationales for bans prioritize acute and ecological risks, yet debates persist on , as empirical yield data from pre-ban eras in staple crops like and showed parathion enabling 10-20% productivity edges over some pyrethroids in resistant pressures, underscoring trade-offs in for low-resource farmers.

Chemical and Physical Properties

Molecular Structure and Industrial Synthesis

Parathion possesses the molecular C₁₀H₁₄NO₅PS and the IUPAC name O,O-diethyl O-(4-nitrophenyl) phosphorothioate. Its molecular structure centers on a atom double-bonded to (P=S), singly bonded to two ethoxy groups (-O-CH₂-CH₃), and linked via oxygen to a 4-nitrophenyl moiety (-O-C₆H₄-NO₂ at para position). The P=S bond distinguishes it as a phosphorothioate , enabling enzymatic oxidation to the more reactive P=O oxon analog, which underlies its biological activation. Industrial synthesis of parathion proceeds via the of diethyl phosphorochloridothionate ((C₂H₅O)₂P(S)Cl) with sodium 4-nitrophenoxide (NaOC₆H₄NO₂), yielding the target and as byproduct. Diethyl phosphorochloridothionate is generated upstream by chlorination of diethyl dithiophosphoric acid ((C₂H₅O)₂P(S)SH) using gas or . This stepwise process, optimized for high yields through additives like glycols to accelerate the final and reduce time, was scaled from methods to commercial tonnage production by the late and . Typical plants achieved annual outputs of 20,000 tons, with byproducts including and minor impurities such as phosphorothioic acids managed via neutralization and purification. Technical-grade parathion often contains trace contaminants from incomplete reactions or degradation, including S-alkyl isomers and derivatives.

Handling Characteristics and Stability

Parathion appears as a pale-yellow to dark-brown liquid at , exhibiting a faint garlic-like detectable at concentrations as low as 0.47 mg/m³. Its low minimizes risks during handling, though the provides inadequate warning for levels. Solubility characteristics include near-insolubility in (approximately 24 mg/L at 20°C), slight solubility in oils, and miscibility with organic solvents such as and , facilitating formulation in oil-based carriers for agricultural application. Parathion demonstrates low flammability inherent to the pure compound, with no significant explosive limits, though emulsifiable concentrate formulations incorporating organic solvents may pose hazards requiring dry chemical, CO₂, or spray extinguishment. Under typical storage and field conditions, parathion remains stable at temperatures below 120°C and hydrolyzes slowly at neutral or acidic (≤7), but exposure to or promotes oxidative degradation to para-oxon, its more potent oxygen analog. This sensitivity necessitates storage in cool, dark environments to prevent formation of toxic byproducts during handling or application. Commercial formulations predominantly consist of at concentrations up to 4 lb/, with a of approximately 15.3 centipoise at 25°C, ensuring compatibility with standard spraying equipment for uniform dispersion in aqueous mixes. These properties support practical field use while requiring careful agitation to maintain emulsion stability and prevent .

Mechanism of Action

Insecticidal Efficacy

Parathion exerts its insecticidal efficacy via metabolic activation to paraoxon, which potently inhibits in target insects, disrupting nerve impulse transmission at synapses and causing overstimulation, , and death. This mechanism enables rapid knockdown, with inhibition often exceeding 90% at the onset of observable effects in susceptible strains. The compound acts through contact, stomach, and limited fumigant modes, targeting a wide spectrum of chewing and sucking pests including , mites, leafhoppers, beetles, and larvae. Dose-response data underscore its potency against insects, with topical LD50 values as low as 1.5 μg per insect for American cockroaches (Periplaneta americana) and similarly low thresholds for houseflies (Musca domestica) in susceptible populations. For aphids and mites, efficacy manifests at low ppm concentrations, reflecting high sensitivity due to efficient cuticular penetration and oxon activation. Field trials on cotton demonstrate substantial pest reductions, such as against bollworms and other chewing insects, with applications yielding control levels comparable to or exceeding those of mixtures like DDT-parathion combinations applied weekly. In fruit crops, it effectively suppresses sucking pests like aphids, with timing to early infestation stages enhancing outcomes by targeting vulnerable nymphs. Resistance to parathion emerged in like houseflies through elevated activity degrading the compound, with enzymatic mechanisms documented as early as the following commercial introduction in the 1940s. In such as , developed via target-site insensitivity and enhanced detoxification within decades of use, accelerating after repeated applications. Optimizing involves empirical adjustments like application during peak activity or susceptible life stages, as delays reduce contact exposure and allow population recovery. Such factors, combined with dose calibration, mitigated early but necessitated rotation with unrelated modes of action over time.

Biochemical Interactions in Targets and Non-Targets

Parathion, a thiophosphate organophosphorus compound, functions as a pro-insecticide in target organisms such as , where it undergoes oxidative desulfuration by enzymes to form paraoxon, the active oxon metabolite that irreversibly inhibits (AChE) by phosphorylating its serine residue at the . This inhibition prevents AChE from hydrolyzing the , resulting in its synaptic accumulation and disruption of nerve impulse transmission. In , rapid absorption through the facilitates efficient bioactivation, with relatively low carboxylesterase activity limiting of the oxon, thereby enhancing lethality at low doses. In non-target mammals, the biochemical interaction mirrors that in insects but is moderated by more robust detoxification pathways, including hydrolysis of parathion and paraoxon by carboxylesterases and paraoxonase 1 (PON1), an aryldialkylphosphatase that cleaves the P-O bond in oxons to non-inhibitory products. Mammalian cytochrome P450-mediated activation occurs primarily in the liver, but interspecies and intraspecies variations in PON1 expression and activity—higher in humans and rabbits compared to rodents—influence the balance between bioactivation and detoxication, reducing net AChE inhibition relative to insects. Insects exhibit slower hydrolysis rates due to lower esterase levels, amplifying paraoxon's persistence and efficacy against AChE. Non-target birds and bees display heightened vulnerability owing to AChE enzymes with sensitivity to paraoxon comparable to or exceeding that of insects, coupled with diminished detoxification capacity; avian brain AChE, for instance, demonstrates greater inhibition at equivalent concentrations than mammalian counterparts. Bioassays confirm parathion's acute toxicity to bees, classifying it as highly hazardous with contact LD50 values typically below 0.1 μg/bee, reflecting efficient dermal uptake and minimal hydrolytic breakdown. In birds, similar AChE phosphorylation occurs without the protective esterase buffering seen in mammals, contributing to elevated LC50 thresholds in wildlife risk assessments that underscore ecological risks from residue exposure.

Agricultural Applications and Impacts

Primary Uses and Crop Efficacy

Parathion, an , was deployed primarily through foliar sprays on field crops such as and tree fruits like apples, targeting broad-spectrum pests including boll weevils (Anthonomus grandis) and other chewing in , as well as codling moths (Cydia pomonella) and leafhoppers in apples. It exhibited contact, stomach, and limited fumigant activity, making it suitable for controlling sucking and biting pests that threatened yield in these commodities during the mid-20th century. Typical application rates varied by crop and formulation but generally fell between 0.2 and 1 kg per for foliar treatments, with higher rates up to 2 kg/ha applied in high-pest-pressure scenarios for and fruit trees. Efficacy trials from the 1950s and 1960s, including those on , reported rapid knockdown effects and mortality rates approaching 100% against boll weevils in laboratory and field bioassays using parathion formulations. Similar results were observed against codling moths in apple orchards, where parathion provided effective larval control when timed with pest , a precursor to strategies. Common formulations included emulsifiable concentrates (typically 40-50% ) for ground or aerial spraying and wettable powders or dusts for targeted applications, though soil drenches were rare due to limited systemic uptake. These were often rotated with other insecticides in schedules informed by to delay , aligning with early efforts toward sustainable deployment before widespread IPM adoption in the .

Contributions to Yield Increases and Food Security

The deployment of Parathion in the and facilitated substantial reductions in pre-harvest pest losses, which FAO estimates account for 20-40% of global crop production without effective control measures. As a broad-spectrum , Parathion targeted key pests in , , and orchards, preventing yield reductions that could reach 32% in unprotected cereal crops and up to 78% in fruits. This pest suppression directly contributed to net yield gains, with meta-analyses indicating that applications, including organophosphates like Parathion, typically boost crop outputs by preventing such losses rather than adding beyond baseline potential. In the context of the Green Revolution, Parathion's efficacy against devastating insects—such as stem borers in and , and bollworms in —supported yield expansions in and that underpinned for burgeoning populations. Cereal yields in these regions surged, with pesticide-inclusive strategies averting famines by enabling production increases sufficient to spare 1-2 billion lives from between the and . For instance, in cotton cultivation, where pests threaten over 80% of the crop without intervention, Parathion's historical application helped sustain harvests critical to rural economies and indirect food availability by stabilizing agricultural incomes. Similarly, in U.S. orchards during the same era, Parathion controlled pests like codling moths and , averting losses that chemical pest management analyses attribute to dramatic productivity gains in fruits and , thereby enhancing overall supply stability without necessitating equivalent land expansion. These outcomes aligned with FAO-documented improvements in global availability, where reduced pest-induced shortfalls allowed agricultural intensification to match demographic pressures.

Economic and Productivity Benefits

Parathion's broad-spectrum insecticidal properties enabled substantial reductions in crop losses, translating to direct productivity gains for farmers. Untreated infestations of pests such as root maggots could diminish yields by 20-30%, whereas parathion applications effectively mitigated these losses, preserving harvest volumes and associated revenues. In cotton production, field trials confirmed methyl parathion's efficacy against bollworm, , and budworm, yielding measurable increases in output and minimizing economic damage from unchecked pest pressure. These outcomes stemmed from parathion's rapid knockdown action and residual persistence, allowing fewer reapplications compared to mechanical or less potent controls. Economic analyses underscored parathion's favorable , particularly through lower per-hectare treatment costs relative to yield-protected value. Pre-ban assessments projected that replacing parathion with costlier, less effective substitutes like would elevate input expenses and erode farmer profitability due to suboptimal pest management. During its widespread adoption from the onward, parathion's affordability—often applied via aerial methods for broad coverage—amplified these savings, enabling scalable operations that boosted net farm incomes amid rising global food demands. The also supported labor efficiencies by supplanting manual scouting and eradication efforts with targeted chemical interventions, freeing resources for mechanized planting and harvesting. This transition, evident in mid-20th-century U.S. , reduced overall manpower needs while sustaining or expanding cultivated acreage. In export-focused sectors like during the 1970s, parathion's role in securing pest-free yields enhanced crop quality and market competitiveness, underpinning trade surpluses before phased restrictions curtailed its availability.

Environmental Behavior

Degradation Pathways

Parathion undergoes abiotic degradation primarily through and photolysis, with being relatively slow under neutral conditions. In buffered solutions at 7 and 20°C, the half-life is approximately 130 days, producing p-nitrophenol and O,O-diethyl phosphorothioate as major products. rates increase at higher levels, with half-lives ranging from 54 days at 9.1 to 555 days at 3.1, indicating greater stability in acidic environments. Photolysis occurs readily upon exposure to , serving as a secondary but significant pathway in aqueous media, though specific half-lives vary with and ; degradation is accelerated in natural waters under direct solar . Microbial degradation dominates in soils, mediated by bacteria such as and species that hydrolyze parathion via enzymes like parathion , yielding similar breakdown products as abiotic . This process is influenced by , with faster rates at alkaline conditions, and moisture content, where higher levels enhance microbial activity and mineralization to CO2. Bound residues form rapidly within 7–14 days, particularly in soils at lower water tensions, incorporating degraded parathion fragments into humic matter and reducing extractable concentrations. also accelerates , with optimal rates under aerobic or flooded conditions favoring enzymatic cleavage. Empirical field studies demonstrate dissipation half-lives of parathion in soil ranging from days to weeks post-application, driven mainly by microbial action rather than solely abiotic processes. In agricultural soils following foliar or soil application, residues decline to below 0.05 ppm within 30 days, with initial rapid loss attributed to surface photolysis and volatilization followed by subsurface biodegradation. Kinetic models incorporating sorption and microbial kinetics predict field half-lives of 5–20 days under typical conditions, supporting environmental fate modeling for risk assessment.

Persistence and Bioaccumulation

Parathion demonstrates variable persistence in , with aerobic half-lives typically ranging from 1 to 20 days, influenced by , microbial activity, and content. Field measurements in subtropical environments report longer half-lives up to 64 days, while residues on crops decay more rapidly with half-lives of about 1 day. In conditions, such as flooded soils or sediments, degradation slows significantly due to reduced microbial oxidation, extending persistence and leading to bound residues. The compound's low water solubility (approximately 10-20 mg/L at 20-25°C) restricts dissolution in aquatic systems but promotes adsorption to and sediments, mitigating while enabling transport through runoff and drift. data reveal detectable parathion residues in sediments persisting for years post-application, with heavy showing levels after at least 16 years. Half-lives in marine water range from 9 to 46 days at elevated temperatures, further highlighting matrix-dependent longevity. Bioaccumulation of parathion in aquatic organisms is low to moderate, with measured bioconcentration factors (BCFs) in fish averaging 187, attributed to rapid and . This BCF value, derived from controlled studies, indicates limited uptake from water, though variability arises from species-specific rates. Potential for trophic magnification exists via sediment-associated residues, but empirical data show negligible buildup in higher levels due to the compound's instability in biological tissues.

Effects on Ecosystems and Wildlife

Parathion demonstrates extreme to , with oral LD50 values for species such as mallards (Anas platyrhynchos), (Colinus virginianus), and sparrows (Passer domesticus) ranging from 2 to 5 mg/kg body weight, rendering it highly hazardous via ingestion of treated foliage or contaminated prey. Bees (Apis mellifera) exhibit similar sensitivity, classified as extremely toxic with contact LD50 values below 1 μg/bee, leading to widespread colony losses from drift during aerial applications. Aquatic organisms face severe risks, as evidenced by 96-hour LC50 concentrations for fish like (Oncorhynchus mykiss) at approximately 0.4–3.7 μg/L, depending on formulation and water conditions, which disrupt activity and cause rapid mortality in contaminated waters. Field investigations during the mid-20th century documented substantial mortality attributed to parathion, often resulting from spray drift onto areas or secondary through consumption, with incidents implicating the in thousands of deaths across treated agricultural landscapes. These events highlight non-target impacts on populations, including raptors and songbirds, where even sublethal exposures impair reproduction and behavior, exacerbating local declines. In aquatic systems, runoff from treated fields has been linked to kills, as parathion's moderate (around 20 mg/L) facilitates transport into streams and rivers, where it bioaccumulates in food webs and affects crustaceans and with LC50 values below 1 μg/L. Ecological studies reveal that parathion applications reduce diversity in sprayed fields, cascading to diminished food availability for insectivorous and amphibians, though populations often recover following the compound's degradation of days to weeks in and . While direct harms predominate in empirical data, targeted pest suppression can mitigate outbreaks of herbivores like and bollworms, preserving vegetation that supports broader structure and indirectly aiding predator recovery in integrated systems; assessments confirm variable effects on beneficial arthropods, with some predator exhibiting relative to pests. Longitudinal field observations indicate that metrics in treated versus untreated plots show short-term dips in non-target taxa but stabilized services from controlled pest densities, underscoring the trade-offs in use for agricultural pest management.

Toxicology and Human Health Risks

Acute Poisoning Mechanisms and Symptoms

Parathion, an , induces acute primarily through its bioactivation to paraoxon, which irreversibly inhibits (AChE) by phosphorylating the enzyme's active serine residue, thereby preventing of and causing its accumulation at synapses in the central and peripheral nervous systems. This overstimulation of muscarinic, nicotinic, and receptors manifests as a , with symptoms correlating to the degree of AChE inhibition; clinical signs typically emerge when erythrocyte AChE activity falls below 50%, though subtle effects may occur at 20-30% reduction, escalating to severe at 70-80% inhibition. The progression of symptoms follows a dose- and route-dependent pattern, beginning with muscarinic effects such as , excessive salivation, lacrimation, sweating, bronchial secretions, , , abdominal cramps, , and , often encapsulated by the mnemonic SLUDGE (salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, gastrointestinal upset, emesis). These advance to nicotinic symptoms including muscle fasciculations, tremors, weakness, and , particularly of respiratory muscles, followed by central nervous system involvement with , , , , seizures, , and ultimately respiratory failure due to diaphragmatic and . Eye exposure specifically causes , , , and pupillary . Human lethality thresholds are estimated from case reports and animal data, with an oral LD50 of approximately 3-5 mg/kg body weight considered usually fatal, though survival has occurred at lower doses with prompt intervention; dermal LD50 is higher due to slower absorption, ranging from 6-50 mg/kg in rodents extrapolated to humans, but enhanced by solvents in formulations that increase skin penetration. Onset latency varies by exposure route—minutes via inhalation, 30 minutes to hours orally, and hours to days dermally—and can be prolonged or intensified post-exposure due to ongoing bioactivation and enzyme aging, where the phosphorylated AChE becomes resistant to reactivation. Dose-response is steep, with minimal symptomatic thresholds around 0.5-1 mg/kg orally leading to moderate effects, rapidly progressing to convulsions and cardiorespiratory arrest at 2-10 mg/kg.

Chronic Exposure Effects and Epidemiological Data

Chronic exposure to parathion, an , is associated with sustained inhibition of and neuropathy target esterase, potentially leading to neurobehavioral deficits such as impaired and motor function at low doses over extended periods. Epidemiological data from occupational cohorts, including applicators in the Agricultural Health Study, indicate weak positive associations between parathion exposure and outcomes like allergic and , though these findings are limited by self-reported exposure metrics and lack of adjustment for all potential confounders. Peripheral neuropathy has been correlated with chronic low-level exposure in farmworker populations, manifesting as sensory axonal damage potentially linked to parathion's of cytochrome P450 enzymes like , but cohort studies highlight significant confounding from co-exposures to other organophosphates, solvents, and lifestyle factors, with remaining unestablished. The Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies parathion as Group 2B ("possibly carcinogenic to s"), based on limited evidence from showing hepatic and mammary tumors, alongside inadequate from occupational exposures.70134-8/abstract) Human epidemiological evidence for reproductive and developmental effects is sparse, with no robust studies linking parathion directly to reductions or birth defects; however, animal models demonstrate endpoints such as increased embryonic resorptions, reduced fetal weight, and altered development when extrapolated to equivalent doses, warranting cautious interpretation due to interspecies differences in and absence of confirmatory trials. Overall, verifiable long-term underscore parathion's neurotoxic potential but emphasize challenges in isolating effects amid multifactorial exposures in agricultural settings.

Occupational and Accidental Exposure Statistics

In the , parathion was associated with significant occupational exposures among agricultural workers, primarily through dermal contact during application and handling, with over 70 cases of mild symptoms such as and twitching reported in the from field exposures. synthesis incidents included 6 deaths among 40 exposed workers due to inadequate protective measures. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health estimated that 302 workers at 43 facilities were potentially exposed in 1974, reflecting pre-ban manufacturing risks. Accidental exposures, often linked to improper and secondary rather than direct application, were disproportionately high among children in agricultural areas. In , 30 child deaths (average age 2.9 years) occurred from 1956 to 1964, with 16 attributed to from accessible containers, 4 to dermal via contaminated clothing or surfaces, and others involving possible inhalation from residues. Such incidents underscored gaps in secure handling, as contaminated household items like laundered uniforms transmitted residues leading to . Internationally, pre-ban accidental cases highlighted risks, including 200 poisonings (22 children, 8 fatalities) in from flour adulterated during milling in 1958, and 79 cases in from similar , with a 40% case-fatality rate among children under 4 years. In developing regions, occupational rates remained elevated due to limited adherence, though specific parathion counts were subsumed within broader data showing higher incidence than in regulated settings. Exposure trends declined post-restrictions, with U.S. bans by 1992 for most uses and full cancellation by 2006 correlating with reduced urinary biomarkers in populations, alongside on safe storage mitigating accidental child cases; however, parathion empirically ranked among leading toxins in pre-ban incident reports due to its potency and volatility.

Safety Protocols and Mitigation

Handling and Application Guidelines

Handlers of parathion must wear protective gloves, clean body-covering clothing, and a to prevent contact and during mixing, loading, and application. Full-body chemical-resistant suits, including gloves and boots, are required for prolonged exposure scenarios, with supplied-air respirators recommended for high-risk activities to mitigate vapor and dust hazards. Post-handling involves thorough washing with soap and water to remove residues. Application protocols emphasize minimizing off-target drift through adherence to buffer zones of at least 100 feet from water bodies and adjacent property lines, unless explicit permission is obtained, to protect non-target areas. Spraying should occur during cooler times of the day with wind speeds low enough to avoid drift, typically under conditions not favoring volatilization or particle movement, as evidenced by label restrictions prohibiting use when weather promotes aerial transport. Reentry into treated fields is restricted for 48 hours post-application to permit residue decay, during which parathion on foliage ranges from 1 day to 2 weeks, reducing dermal and risks to safe levels based on field studies of persistence. This interval accounts for natural degradation via and photooxidation, ensuring worker safety without PPE. Storage requires sealed original containers in locked, cool, well-ventilated facilities away from heat sources or open flames to prevent accidental release or degradation. Parathion is incompatible with oxidizing agents such as perchlorates, peroxides, permanganates, chlorates, nitrates, , , and , which can lead to violent reactions; segregation during storage is essential to avoid cross-contamination.

Medical Treatment and Antidotes

Treatment of parathion poisoning, an insecticide that irreversibly inhibits (AChE), focuses on rapid , supportive measures, and administration of antidotes to counteract excess and reactivate AChE. Initial involves removing contaminated clothing and thoroughly washing exposed skin with soap and water to prevent further , while ensuring airway protection to avoid of gastric contents in symptomatic patients. Supportive care includes securing the airway, providing for , and administering intravenous fluids to maintain hemodynamic stability, as these interventions improve tissue oxygenation and reduce morbidity in hospitalized cases. Atropine, a competitive , is titrated intravenously starting at 1-2 mg every 3-5 minutes, doubling the dose until and resolve (endpoint: dry skin, >80 bpm, clear chest), often requiring total doses exceeding 10-100 mg in severe cases due to parathion's potency. (2-PAM), an AChE reactivator, is most effective if given within hours of exposure before enzyme "aging"; standard regimen involves 1-2 g IV over 15-30 minutes initially, followed by 500 mg to 1 g every 4-6 hours or continuous at 500 mg/hour, adjusted for renal function to avoid . These protocols, derived from clinical experience with organophosphates, have demonstrated improved survival when initiated promptly, with case reports of successful reversal using high-dose atropine combined with 2-PAM in parathion intoxications. In settings, comprehensive management yields survival rates of 75-95% for treated patients, though outcomes depend on severity and timely intervention, with poison center data indicating lower mortality (around 5-20%) compared to untreated cases. Delayed presentations beyond 6-12 hours complicate therapy, as aged AChE complexes resist reactivation by , leading to higher mortality (up to 33% in ventilated patients with prolonged lag times) and risks of intermediate syndrome involving respiratory . Despite these challenges, aggressive atropine and supportive can still salvage cases even with delayed arrival, underscoring the value of escalated dosing over conservative approaches.

Role in Suicidal and Intentional Poisonings

Parathion's role in intentional poisonings stems primarily from its and ready availability in agricultural settings, facilitating impulsive acts in rural regions where farming households store pesticides for . In pre-ban eras, it accounted for a substantial portion of pesticide-related suicides in , with ingestion being the predominant method due to the chemical's solubility and rapid absorption, leading to onset of symptoms within minutes to hours. Empirical data from clinical case series indicate that suicidal parathion poisonings exhibit particularly high mortality, driven by profound inhibition that precipitates fulminant , including and cardiovascular collapse, often before medical intervention can be effective. Global patterns highlight elevated incidence in countries like and prior to regulatory restrictions, where parathion's accessibility correlated with spikes in method-specific rates exceeding 20 per 100,000 in affected rural populations during the and 1980s. Case fatality rates for parathion self-poisoning have been documented as markedly higher than for other organophosphates or less hazardous agents, with survival dependent on immediate atropine and administration, yet exceeding 10-20% even in treated cases due to delayed presentation and irreversible neuronal damage. Factors such as household storage without secure locking and the impulsivity of —wherein individuals act within a short window of intent—amplify its use, as parathion provides a perceived reliable means of lethality without requiring specialized knowledge. Regulatory bans on parathion, implemented in in 1984 and subsequently in , demonstrated causal links to reduced suicide mortality through time-series analyses controlling for socioeconomic variables. In , the prohibition contributed to a broader decline in overall rates from a peak of 57 per 100,000 in the mid-1990s to approximately 17 per 100,000 by 2015, with ingestions dropping from 42% to 12.3% of total suicides, averting an estimated 93,000 deaths over two decades per econometric modeling. Similar patterns emerged in , where pre-ban data showed parathion-involved suicides comprising up to 30% of rural cases, and phased restrictions correlated with 20-30% reductions in method-specific fatalities without substitution to equivalently lethal alternatives. These outcomes underscore availability as a proximal causal factor in suicides, as evidenced by WHO-aligned epidemiological reviews emphasizing bans' efficacy in high-burden contexts over alternative interventions like screening alone.30208-5/fulltext)30299-1/fulltext)

Regulatory Framework

Evolution of Domestic Regulations

In the United States, ethyl parathion was initially as a in 1951 under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) of 1947, which required basic efficacy demonstrations but lacked rigorous safety assessments. The 1972 FIFRA amendments expanded the Agency's (EPA) authority to evaluate risks, prompting reviews amid reports of worker fatalities from dermal and re-entry into treated fields, with parathion cited as the only linked to such deaths in EPA records. By the late 1970s, congressional hearings highlighted acute incidents, leading to use suspensions for certain crops and tightened worker protective standards, including restricted entry intervals and mandatory protective gear. Further regulatory evolution occurred in the 1980s and 1990s as toxicity data accumulated, including inhibition studies confirming high acute oral LD50 values (around 2-13 mg/kg in humans). In , the EPA negotiated a voluntary agreement with manufacturers to suspend most ground applications, halving annual use from 3-6 million pounds while allowing limited aerial applications on high-value crops like and almonds. Residue tolerances were progressively tightened under the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, which mandated reassessments for cumulative risks; by 2002, the EPA proposed revoking tolerances for ethyl and methyl parathion on numerous commodities, culminating in full cancellation of registrations by 2003 and cessation of domestic production around 2000. Compliance monitoring involved EPA residue testing programs, revealing occasional violations but effective phase-out through enforcement actions and import restrictions. In , parathion use persisted into the due to agricultural dependence on cheap, broad-spectrum insecticides, despite early global toxicity warnings. Methyl parathion formulations (50% EC and 2% DP) faced partial restrictions in 2001, banning applications on fruits and to mitigate dietary risks, while allowing use on non-pollinator-dependent crops. Accumulating from poisoning outbreaks, including over 1,000 cases linked to adulterated formulations in the late , prompted fuller measures; ethyl parathion was outright banned for manufacture, import, and use, and methyl parathion received a comprehensive ban via S.O. 3951(E) on August 8, 2018. Enforcement challenges persisted, with reports of illegal sales and substandard compliance in rural areas, as monitored by state agricultural departments and central notifications under the Insecticides Act of 1968, though residue surveillance indicated variable adherence. China imposed restrictions on parathion amid post-2000 reforms targeting highly hazardous organophosphates, banning parathion and methyl parathion , , and use as part of a list of 20 prohibited pesticides updated in regulations like the Pesticide Management Law. This followed evidence from acute poisoning clusters, including farmer exposures near in the 1980s, and aligned with broader bans on 54 pesticides since 1970 to reduce and occupational risks. Domestic monitoring via the Ministry of Agriculture revealed enforcement gaps in informal markets, but residue limits in (0.003 mg/L for parathion) and standards under GB 5749-2006 supported compliance tracking, with phase-outs tied to alternatives like less toxic pyrethroids.

International Restrictions and WHO Classifications

The classifies parathion as an extremely hazardous in Hazard Class Ia, based on its acute oral LD50 values below 5 mg/kg in rats and high potential for severe human even at low doses. This classification underscores parathion's irreversible inhibition of , leading to , and has informed global risk assessments since the 1970s WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard. Under the on Prior Informed Consent () for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade, parathion (CAS 56-38-2) is listed in Annex III since 1998, mandating that exporting parties notify and obtain consent from importing countries before shipments. This procedure aims to prevent unwanted trade in highly hazardous substances, with over 180 parties required to implement import decisions; non-consent leads to export bans to that party. Parathion's inclusion reflects notifications from multiple nations citing risks, though implementation varies, with some developing countries continuing imports under restricted conditions until phased reductions post-2000. In the , Commission Decision 2001/520/EC excluded parathion from Annex I of Council Directive 91/414/EEC on plant protection products, citing unacceptable risks to operators, consumers, and the environment despite review data. Authorizations for parathion-containing products were withdrawn by Member States by 31 December 2002, effectively banning its marketing and use EU-wide, with no renewal under subsequent Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. Parathion is not listed under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, as it lacks the persistence, , and long-range transport criteria defining POPs, though its toxicity has prompted parallel evaluations in other multilateral forums.

Post-Ban Monitoring and Alternatives

In jurisdictions where parathion was banned, such as the in 1991 and the in 2003, post-ban surveillance by poison control centers and health agencies revealed declines in organophosphate poisoning incidents attributable to restricted access. For instance, national poison information systems tracked a shift away from highly toxic organophosphates, correlating with fewer acute exposures, though comprehensive global data specific to parathion remains limited due to its classification among broader highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs). In , sequential bans on WHO Class I organophosphates—including parathion—starting in the contributed to a substantial reduction in -related self-poisoning deaths, with overall rates dropping from a peak of 57 per 100,000 population in the late to approximately half by the , alongside a 20-50% decrease in case fatality rates for surviving cases. These outcomes were monitored through hospital admissions and national vital statistics, demonstrating that curbs on HHPs lowered both incidence and lethality without fully eliminating pesticide poisonings, as substitutions to less hazardous agents occurred.30208-5/fulltext) Agricultural substitution post-ban favored insecticides with improved human safety margins, such as pyrethroids (e.g., ) and certain neonicotinoids (e.g., ), which exhibit acute oral LD50 values in rats exceeding 200 mg/kg—orders of magnitude higher than parathion's 2-13 mg/kg—reducing risks of from accidental or intentional exposure. These alternatives maintained efficacy against target pests like and bollworms in crops previously treated with parathion, though their adoption required to address lower persistence and potential insect resistance development, as evidenced by field trials showing comparable yield protections when applied at optimized rates. Pyrethroids, in particular, degrade rapidly via photolysis, minimizing long-term residue accumulation compared to parathion's environmental persistence. Residue monitoring programs, conducted by agencies like the U.S. EPA through and environmental surveys, have detected sporadic parathion contaminants linked to imports or legacy soil persistence, with levels typically below actionable thresholds since the mid-2000s. Illegal use persists in some regions, as illustrated by U.S. Department of Justice cases involving post-ban application of related methyl parathion, resulting in fines exceeding $10 million for storage and deployment violations in as late as 2019. Such detections underscore the need for ongoing border surveillance and resistance monitoring, as pest populations adapting to alternatives like neonicotinoids have prompted rotations with biological controls to sustain without reverting to banned HHPs.

Controversies and Balanced Assessment

Weighing Benefits Against Risks

Parathion, as an , significantly enhanced by controlling pests in crops such as , corn, soybeans, and fruits, thereby preventing substantial yield losses estimated at 10-30% in vulnerable regions without effective alternatives. In the United States, organophosphate use, including parathion, protected annual economic value exceeding $200 million across key commodities in alone by the early , contributing to broader yield gains that quadrupled grain production in regions like during the era. These increases in output, aligning with global pesticide-driven yield doublings in staple crops from the mid-20th century, averted widespread by reducing post-harvest losses and supporting without proportional farmland expansion, potentially saving millions from famine-related deaths through causal pathways of enhanced caloric availability. Documented human poisonings from parathion, while severe due to its potency, predominantly stemmed from dermal absorption during improper handling, re-entry into treated fields without sufficient intervals, or contamination of and in settings with lax , rather than inevitable outcomes of agricultural application under controlled conditions. In regulated environments with restricted-use protocols, such as certified applicator requirements and protective equipment, exposure levels remained below thresholds causing significant inhibition, as evidenced by minimal adverse effects in occupational studies at vapor concentrations under 0.01 mg/m³. This disparity underscores that risks were amplified by socioeconomic factors like inadequate and illegal diversion for non-agricultural uses, not solely the compound's inherent , allowing proper deployment to yield net positive societal impacts via gains far exceeding isolated incidents. Empirical balancing reveals parathion's role in sustaining billions in food value—equivalent to averting failures that could exacerbate global hunger affecting 12-15 million children annually—outweighed acute fatalities, which numbered in the thousands over decades but were mitigated through targeted protocols rather than outright in high-enforcement contexts. Causal dictates that enforcement failures in developing regions, where misuse via oral or application prevailed, inflated harms disproportionately, whereas first-principles assessment of controlled use demonstrates efficacy in suppression with manageable risks, informing that benefits persist when causal chains prioritize application integrity over blanket .

Critiques of Overregulation

Critics of parathion's regulatory framework argue that full prohibitions overlook evidence from cost-benefit assessments indicating that targeted measures, such as mandatory (PPE) and application training, could substantially mitigate acute risks without eliminating the 's agricultural utility. Meta-analyses of incidents demonstrate that inadequate PPE usage correlates with elevated odds of acute , with proper chemical-resistant clothing and respirators reducing dermal and by up to 90% in controlled applications. Regulatory reviews have granted conditional approvals for highly toxic organophosphates like parathion precisely because rigorous PPE protocols enable safe handling, as evidenced by assessments where such equipment forms the basis for market authorization of hazardous products. These approaches, proponents contend, address misuse—often prevalent in informal or subsistence settings—more effectively than outright bans, which ignore parathion's proven efficacy against resistant pests where alternatives underperform. Bans on parathion have been linked to tangible economic drawbacks, including yield reductions and escalated input costs that disproportionately burden subsistence farmers. Economic modeling estimates a U.S. parathion ban would decrease yields by 0.5% annually, translating to significant price hikes due to supply constraints in high-value crops. Substitutes like , for instance, cost $16 per acre compared to parathion's $9–$12.50, inflating operational expenses and contributing to broader post-ban rises in inputs that have strained agricultural margins. In subsistence contexts, particularly in developing regions where parathion remains accessible, prohibitions exacerbate crop losses from unchecked pests, mirroring patterns observed with other restricted insecticides where smallholders face up to 30–50% yield declines without affordable broad-spectrum options, widening economic disparities. Furthermore, detractors highlight how parathion bans accelerate resistance in replacement chemicals by funneling usage toward a narrower arsenal, undermining long-term . restrictions have prompted shifts to alternatives that pests metabolically adapt to more rapidly under intensified selection pressure, as seen in metabolic enzyme upregulation conferring cross-resistance. Pre-regulatory eras, when parathion and similar compounds were widely deployed without universal bans, sustained stable food prices amid yield gains from the , contrasting with subsequent regulatory-induced cost escalations that have fueled input inflation and import dependencies. Such outcomes, according to agricultural economists, reflect overreach where health-focused prohibitions undervalue parathion's role in preventing far greater economic losses from devastation.

Legacy in Modern Pest Management

The widespread resistance to parathion observed in pest populations during the mid-20th century, such as in and other orchard pests where cross-resistance extended to other organophosphates, highlighted the risks of over-reliance on single-mode-of-action chemicals, thereby informing modern (IPM) protocols that prioritize , biological controls, and diversified pesticide applications to delay resistance evolution. In IPM frameworks adopted globally since the , parathion's legacy manifests in guidelines emphasizing scouting, economic thresholds, and rotation among unrelated insecticide classes—practices validated by reduced resistance incidence in systems avoiding parathion-like monocultures, as evidenced by EPA resistance management strategies that reference historical organophosphate failures. Biochemical studies of parathion's irreversible inhibition of provided foundational insights into structure-activity relationships, catalyzing the rational design of less toxic analogs like methyl parathion, which exhibits lower mammalian acute oral (LD50 of 13-24 mg/kg in rats versus 2-13 mg/kg for ethyl parathion) due to slower metabolic activation to the oxon form, though still hazardous. This mechanistic understanding extended post-ban to safer derivatives and non-organophosphate alternatives, including neonicotinoids and insect growth regulators, with research leveraging parathion's to engineer pesticides with higher selectivity for targets, reducing non-target effects as documented in agrochemical development reviews. Global disparities persist, with parathion banned in the since 2003 and phased out in the by the early , yet reports indicate continued illicit production and use in unregulated markets in parts of and , where weak enforcement correlates with elevated cases—estimated at over 3 million annual incidents worldwide, many involving persistent legacy compounds like parathion. These patterns underscore ongoing challenges in harmonizing regulations, prompting international efforts like WHO classifications to phase out highly hazardous pesticides while monitoring residues in exported commodities from such regions.

References

  1. [1]
    Parathion | C10H14NO5PS | CID 991 - PubChem - NIH
    It is an organic phosphate insecticide which acts as an inhibitor of cholinesterase, and as such it is highly toxic by all routes of exposure.
  2. [2]
    HEALTH EFFECTS - Toxicological Profile for Parathion - NCBI - NIH
    Nausea, vomiting, abdominal tightness, swelling and cramps, diarrhea, tenesmus, and fecal incontinence are typical signs and symptoms of acute intoxication with ...
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    Parathion - Pesticide Fact Sheet - epa nepis
    ... Year of Initial Registration: 1948 Pesticide Type ... Human poisoning from parathion exposure have occurred during mixing/loading, application, early ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] C hemicalWatch Factsheet - Beyond Pesticides
    Among the most extremely acutely toxic pesticides, parathion is notorious for the number and severity of human poisonings it causes each year.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Toxicological Profile for Parathion
    In order to reduce exposure to children and others, a 1991 agreement began that made parathion a restricted use organophosphate insecticide. In. September 2000, ...
  7. [7]
    REMAINING USE OF PESTICIDE ETHYL PARATHION CANCELED
    EPA and the manufacturer, Cheminova, have signed an agreement to cancel all remaining uses of the organophosphate pesticide ethyl parathion.
  8. [8]
    Neurotoxicity of Pesticides - PMC - PubMed Central
    He continued to work on OPs at IG Farben in Germany, where he discovered several new insecticides, including parathion (E605), and accidentally, the nerve agent ...
  9. [9]
    The risk associated with organophosphorus nerve agents: from their ...
    May 25, 2024 · As his field of research turned to warfare agents, Schrader and his team came up with a second organophosphorus nerve agent (NA) in 1938, the ...
  10. [10]
    Pesticides as Poisons: Analysis of the Gebrev Case - bellingcat
    Feb 19, 2019 · The patent for Parathion was seized by the allies from I. G. Farben after the war. It is highly restricted and when it is used, it is used ...
  11. [11]
    Organophosphorus Compounds at 80: Some Old and New Issues
    ... I.G. Farbenindustrie in Germany. While working on the synthesis of organic ... parathion, which became the most widely used insecticide of this class.
  12. [12]
    PARATHION - EXTOXNET PIP
    Parathion is a broad spectrum, organophosphate pesticide used to control many insects and mites (5, 8). It has non-systemic, contact, stomach and fumigant ...
  13. [13]
    Origins of agriculture - Pest Control, Disease Control, Crops
    Sep 30, 2025 · Problems appeared in the early 1950s. In cotton crops standard doses of DDT, parathion, and similar pesticides were found ineffective and had ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] This document is discoverable and free to researchers across the ...
    Use of methyl parathion for boll weevil con- trol reduces beneficial ... leased from cotton production and manufacture drawal of boll weevil treatments.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] the impact of the boll weevil, 1892-1932 - Fabian Lange
    Upon arrival, the weevil had a large negative and lasting impact on cotton production, acreage, and especially yields. In response, farmers did not take land ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Chapter: 2 Benefits, Costs, and Contemporary Use Patterns
    Pesticide use in US agriculture increased steadily from the late 1940s until around 1980, because of the spread of herbicide use on corn and soybeans (ERS 1997, ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Parathion - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Parathion was first evaluated in 1965 and has been reviewed several times since, most recently in. 1995 and 1997. It was listed by the 1998 CCPR (30th Session, ...
  18. [18]
    The impact of solvents on the toxicity of the banned parathion ...
    Sep 1, 2023 · One of the most toxic OP pesticides ever registered with the EPA is parathion, a WHO hazard class 1b insecticide, which was banned in the EU in ...
  19. [19]
    Agriculture Development, Pesticide Application and Its Impact on the ...
    Because of the urgency to improve food production and control insect-borne diseases, the development of pesticides increased during World War II (1939-1945).
  20. [20]
    [PDF] ATSDR Parathion Tox Profile
    Feb 25, 2016 · The ATSDR toxicological profile succinctly characterizes the toxicologic and adverse health effects information for these toxic substances ...
  21. [21]
    Pesticide exposure--Indian scene - PubMed
    The first report of poisoning due to pesticides in India came from Kerala in 1958 where, over 100 people died after consuming wheat flour contaminated with ...Missing: farmworkers 1950s 1960s
  22. [22]
    Most spraying of parathion to be suspended EPA, business agree to ...
    Sep 6, 1991 · After Dec. 31, parathion, the common name for ethyl parathion, will be allowed on only nine crops: alfalfa, barley, canola, corn, cotton, ...
  23. [23]
    PRODUCTION, IMPORT/EXPORT, USE, AND DISPOSAL - NCBI - NIH
    Parathion was first registered as a pesticide in 1948 (EPA 2000). It was used as a non-systemic insecticide to control sucking and chewing insects and mites ...Missing: synthesized | Show results with:synthesized
  24. [24]
    [PDF] ATSDR Parathion ToxFAQs
    The EPA terminated most production of parathion as of December, 2002. The EPA also terminated the registration for the few remaining parathion products ...Missing: suspension timeline
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Decision Guidance Document - Rotterdam Convention
    Feb 1, 2005 · It is listed on the basis of the final regulatory actions to ban all uses of parathion notified by Australia and the European Community.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Parathion in Drinking-water - World Health Organization (WHO)
    WHO has classified parathion as “extremely hazardous.” In a 3-week study in rabbits treated dermally, the NOAEL was 0.1 mg/kg of body weight per day on the ...
  27. [27]
    Bans on highly toxic pesticides could be an effective way to save ...
    Sep 1, 2025 · The ban on parathion and methyl parathion in the 1980s is attributed to stopping a continued increase in suicide rates, which had been climbing ...
  28. [28]
    The cost-effectiveness of banning highly hazardous pesticides ... - NIH
    Dec 17, 2020 · This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of implementing national bans of highly hazardous pesticides to reduce the burden of pesticide suicides.
  29. [29]
    Parathion - the NIST WebBook
    Formula: C10H14NO5PS · Molecular weight: 291.261 · IUPAC Standard InChI: InChI=1S/C10H14NO5PS/c1-3-14-17(18,15-4-2)16-10-7-5-9(6-8-10)11(12)13/h5-8H,3-4H2,1-2H3
  30. [30]
    A New Commercial Synthesis of the Insecticide Parathion - jstor
    Use of glycols in the final reaction (3) of the process significantly increased the percentage yield of parathion and lowered the time required for reaction.
  31. [31]
    Parathion | Medical Management Guidelines | Toxic Substance Portal
    Toxicity of parathion depends on metabolic activation; thus, symptoms may be delayed for 6 to 24 hours after exposure. Acute Exposure. Parathion, like all ...
  32. [32]
    PARATHION - CAMEO Chemicals - NOAA
    Parathion is a deep brown to yellow liquid with a faint odor of garlic. It is an organic phosphate insecticide which acts as an inhibitor of cholinesterase.
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Parathion - Wikipedia
    Preferred IUPAC name. O,O-Diethyl O-(4-nitrophenyl) phosphorothioate. Other ... Chemical formula. C10H14NO5PS. Molar mass, 291.26 g·mol−1. Appearance, White ...
  35. [35]
    Table 4-2, Physical and Chemical Properties of Parathion - NCBI
    120–160°C until flammable impurities removed, HSDB 2013. Flammability limits, Not highly flammable, HSDB 2013. Explosive limits, Decomposes upon heating and ...Missing: volatility | Show results with:volatility
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Toxicological Profile for Parathion
    Chemical name. O,O-Diethyl O-(4-nitrophenyl). HSDB 2013 phosphorothioate ... Chemical formula. C10H14NO5PS. HSDB 2013. Chemical structure. S. CH. 3. PhysProp ...Missing: IUPAC | Show results with:IUPAC
  37. [37]
    ICSC 0006 - PARATHION
    Liquid formulations containing organic solvents may be flammable. NO open flames. Use water spray, dry powder, carbon dioxide. In case of fire: keep drums, etc.Missing: volatility | Show results with:volatility
  38. [38]
    Degradation and Byproduct Formation of Parathion in Aqueous ...
    Photodegradation of parathion yielded several organic byproducts, of which the paraoxon, 4-nitrophenol, O,O,O-triethyl thiophosphate and O,O diethyl-methyl ...
  39. [39]
    Initial Scientific and Minieconomic Review of Parathion - epa nepis
    Fifty percent hydrolysis of parathion is achieved in 2.7 hr in aqueous solutions at pH 9 and 70°C; in 17 to 20 hr at pH 1 and 70°C; and in 690 days at pH 1 to 5 ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Formulations and Concentrations
    Example: What volume of 4 lb/gal parathion emulsifiable concentrate is needed to make 50 gallons of spray containing. 0.25% parathion? 50 × 0.25 × 8. 4 × 100. = ...
  41. [41]
    Inhibition of Cholinesterase and Ali-Esterase in Parathion and ...
    Inhibition of this enzyme was most closely correlated with the effects of the insecticides and was usually 90% or more at the time of knockdown. The ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] NRA Review of Parathion
    Parathion was developed during the late 1940s and was first registered in Australia by. Bayer as Folidol Insecticide Spray. In 1990–91, clearance was granted ...
  43. [43]
    Studies of the Mode of Action of Parathion and Its Derivatives and ...
    Thirty minutes later each roach was given a topical application of 2 micro- grams of parathion (the 120-hour LD50 is 1.5 micrograms). In 5 hours, 5/10 of the.
  44. [44]
    Parathion-ethyl (Ref: OMS 19) - AERU
    A broad-spectrum insecticide and acaricide used to control sucking and chewing insects and mites. Example pests controlled. Aphids; Mealybugs; Codling moth; ...Missing: LD50 | Show results with:LD50
  45. [45]
    Insect Resistance to Insecticides, Enzymatic Degradation of ...
    Insect Resistance to Insecticides, Enzymatic Degradation of Parathion in Organophosphate-Susceptible and -Resistant Houseflies. Click to copy article link ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  46. [46]
    The evolution of insecticide resistance in the peach potato aphid ...
    Work spanning over 40 years has shown that M. persicae has a remarkable ability to evolve mechanisms that avoid or overcome the toxic effect of insecticides.
  47. [47]
    The evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance - PMC - NIH
    Pesticides are mostly novel synthetic compounds, and yet target species are often able to evolve resistance soon after a new compound is introduced.
  48. [48]
    targeting cytochrome P450–mediated metabolism with menadione
    The toxicity of parathion is dependent on CYP-mediated conversion to paraoxon (diethyl 4-nitrophenyl phosphate), a highly active inhibitor of cholinesterases.
  49. [49]
    Relationship between Parathion and Paraoxon Toxicokinetics, Lung ...
    Cytochrome P450-related lung metabolic activity, through which parathion is converted to paraoxon, appears as a major step in parathion-induced lung ...
  50. [50]
    Species Differences in Paraoxonase Mediated Hydrolysis of Several ...
    The present study compared the activity of PON1 from the sera of several mammalian species towards the oxons of three structurally different organophosphorus ...
  51. [51]
    Species Differences in Paraoxonase Mediated Hydrolysis of Several ...
    Feb 15, 2015 · PON1 activity is present in most mammals and previous research established that PON1 activity differs depending on the species. These studies ...
  52. [52]
    Bioactivation and detoxification of organophosphorus pesticides in ...
    For example, acephate is metabolized to its more toxic metabolite methamidophos in both insects and in mammals.
  53. [53]
    Comparative anticholinesterase action of organophosphorus ...
    In general, avian brain cholinesterases were more sensitive to paraoxon than the cholinesterases of mammalian brains. Fish brain cholinesterases were much more ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Cotton Insects and Mites: Characterization and Management
    When the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman, invaded United States cotton growing areas in 1892, spreading across the Cotton Belt in subsequent ...
  55. [55]
    103. Parathion (FAO/PL:1967/M/11/1) - INCHEM
    It is applied in sprays or dusts, the usual application rate being 0.2 - 1 kg/ha, depending upon the crop, pest and climate. The following table gives a ...
  56. [56]
    (PDF) Comparative Efficacy of Selected Insecticide Alternatives for ...
    Boll weevil mortality in the malathion ULV, endosulfan, encapsulated methyl parathion and bifenthrin treatments was at or near 100%. Mortality with cyfluthrin ...
  57. [57]
    Pest Management Challenges and Control Practices in Codling Moth
    Tebufenozide showed very good efficacy in all the field trials. Even though CM showed resistance to chlorpyrifos-ethyl because of its widespread use, in ...
  58. [58]
    PRODUCTION, IMPORT/EXPORT, USE, AND DISPOSAL - NCBI - NIH
    Methyl parathion was first commercially produced in the United States in ... Methyl Parathion Use in Crop Production in 1992. Table 5-2. Methyl ...Missing: commercial date
  59. [59]
    Understanding the context | Pest and Pesticide Management
    Pests are a major cause of crop yield losses. FAO estimates that plant pests and diseases account for the reduction of between 20 and 40 percent of global crop ...
  60. [60]
    Pesticide productivity and food security. A review
    Oct 17, 2012 · An average of 35 % of potential crop yield is lost to pre-harvest pests worldwide (Oerke 2005). In addition to the pre-harvest losses transport, ...
  61. [61]
    Viewpoint: The Green Revolution saved 1-2 billion lives globally ...
    Aug 25, 2025 · The evidence is clear: the Green Revolution resulted in higher crop yields that contributed to preventing one billion deaths from starvation. Dr ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  62. [62]
    Background and Approach to the Study - Pesticides in ... - NCBI - NIH
    Chemical pest control has contributed to dramatic increases in yields for most major fruit and vegetable crops. Its use has led to substantial improvements over ...
  63. [63]
    Towards a New Green Revolution
    Between 1970 and 1990, fertilizer applications in developing countries shot up by 360 percent while pesticide use increased by 7 to 8 percent per year. The ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] The Parathion Ban - Don Villarejo
    The original economic impact stud- ies predicted reduced yields would re- sult if growers switched to the more expensive, but less effective, diazinon. Why didn ...
  65. [65]
    Initial Scientific and Minieconomic Review of Methyl Parathion
    The half-life of methyl parathion, applied at 1 to 50 Ib/acre to four soil types, ranged from 3 to 11 days. Available data indicate' that the soil .degradation ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  66. [66]
    [PDF] THE BENEFITS OF IMPROVED' TECHNOLOGIES IN ...
    AVERAGE PRICE PAID BY FARMERS FOR METHYL PARATHION ... A breakdown of the potential cost savings from increased ferry speed for aerial application over wheat is ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] MANPOWER, CHEMISTRY, AND AGRICULTURE - GovInfo
    The increasing use of chemicals on the American farm is resulting in substantial reductions in labor requirements. If this use continues at the prevail- ing ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Parathion-methyl Review - Agricultural Assessment
    including uses on cotton, commercial vegetable crops, fruit trees, vines, citrus, ... with methyl parathion (CS formulation) during field trials in France.
  69. [69]
    Degradation and byproduct formation of parathion in aqueous ...
    The half-life of parathion due to hydrolysis was reported to be between 54 d (pH 9.1) and 555 d (pH 3.1). Other studies also found that parathion is relatively ...
  70. [70]
    Degradation of Parathion by Bacteria Isolated from Flooded Soil - PMC
    Two bacteria, Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp., were isolated from parathionamended flooded alluvial soil which exhibited parathion-hydrolyzing ability.Missing: pH moisture bound
  71. [71]
    POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE - Toxicological Profile ... - NCBI
    Once methyl parathion is introduced to the environment, it is degraded by hydrolysis, photolysis, or by biodegradation from microorganisms found in most ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] MICROBIAL DEGRADATION OF PARATHION By WILLIAM ...
    Parathion is readily oxidized to para- oxon, which is more toxic than the parent compound. As the oxygen-analog, the phosphorus is more positive, soluble, and.
  73. [73]
    Methyl parathion degradation in soil: Influence of soil-water tension
    Nonextractable 14C-activity (bound residues) was formed rapidly during 7–14 days in the soils maintained at 100 kPa and lower. The formation of nonextractable ...
  74. [74]
    Guidance for the Reregistration of Pesticide Products Containing ...
    All methyl parathion products except micro- encapsulated formulations with 22% or less active ingredient are in Toxicity Category I and must bear the signal ...
  75. [75]
    Modeling of Sorption and Biodegradation of Parathion and Its ...
    Nov 1, 2003 · A kinetic model was developed to describe the sorption and biodegradation rates of parathion, taking into account the production, retention, and biodegradation ...Missing: bound | Show results with:bound
  76. [76]
    Parathion - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    IUPAC name: diethoxy-(4-nitrophenoxy)-sulfanylidene-λ5-phosphane. •. Synonyms: parathion, parathion-ethyl, diethyl parathion. •. Molecular formula: C10H14NO5PS.<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    Fate of parathion in soil under sub‐tropical field conditions
    Nov 14, 2008 · The overall half life was 64.5 days. The total residues at zero‐time were 10.65 μg/g dry soil and were almost totally extractable. The extracts ...
  78. [78]
    Mechanisms of production of soil-bound residues of [14C]-parathion ...
    Salinity and the persistence of parathion in flooded soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1985, 17 (2) , 235-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(85)90120 ...Missing: conditions | Show results with:conditions
  79. [79]
    Parathion Degradation in Lake Sediments - jstor
    Aminoparathion was prepared by treating parathion with. 5 N HC1 and Zn dust (15). After being heated for 15 min the solution was made alkaline with NaOH and.<|separator|>
  80. [80]
    [PDF] EFED RED Chapter for Ethyl Parathion - EPA Archive
    Nov 4, 1998 · Ethyl parathion can be expected to move to surface water via runoff or spray drift. Ethyl parathion has been detected at low concentrations (< ...
  81. [81]
    Ambient Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria for Parathion - epa nepis
    Average BCF for the data set is 186.7. Wide variation occurs in BCF data possibly due to metabolism of parathion by fish. National Criteria The procedures ...
  82. [82]
    Parathion in freshwater and marine water - Water Quality Australia
    Its IUPAC name is O,O-diethyl O-4-nitrophenyl phosphorothioate, formula is C10H14NO5PS and molecular weight is 291.3. Parathion is only soluble in water to ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET - Agrian
    Jul 2, 2009 · Do not discharge product unmonitored into the environment. This material is highly toxic to fish and wildlife. Environmental effects. : SECTION ...
  84. [84]
    Guidance for the Reregistration of Pesticide Products Containing ...
    Field investigations have documented bird deaths attributed to the ingestion of parathion-contaminated foliage and insects. Additionally, studies have shown ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] reducing the casualties in the battle between us species protection ...
    parathion had been implicated in the deaths of thousands of birds, EPA de- clined to take regulatory action to address these risks. Ultimately, in 2001, the ...
  86. [86]
    Pesticides and Birds: From DDT to Today's Poisons - ResearchGate
    ure. 42. This means that even nonlethal. doses of parathion could result in the. death of chicks. Golden-cheeked Warblers and. Malathion: The U.S. Animal and ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] ambient aquatic life water quality criteria for - EPA
    Parathion has also been demonstrated to produce teratogenic effects in fish embryos (Solomon 1977; Solomon and. Weis 1979; Tomita and Matsuda 1961). Parathion ...
  88. [88]
    (PDF) Some observations on the effects of field applications of ...
    The application of fensulfothion and parathion for the control on invertebrate pasture pests ... field trial have. shmvn that fensulfothion and parathion ...
  89. [89]
    Development of an adverse outcome pathway for ...
    Jun 12, 2014 · Measurement of AChE inhibition of 70% to 80% in the brain has been associated with acute lethality in fish, birds, and mammals 41, 56, 57. Many ...
  90. [90]
    Clinical features of organophosphate poisoning: A review of different ...
    The typical toxidrome in organophosphate (OP) poisoning comprises of the Salivation, Lacrimation, Urination, Defecation, Gastric cramps, Emesis (SLUDGE) ...
  91. [91]
    Parathion - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Parathion is defined as an organophosphate insecticide designed to cause neurotoxicity by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase, with potential cardiotoxic effects ...
  92. [92]
    Parathion - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    The principal reason for actions regarding parathion and its inclusion in the PIC procedure relate to its high acute toxicity.
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Chapter 5 Organophosphates - EPA
    Exposure by inhalation results in the fastest appearance of toxic symptoms, followed by the oral route and finally the dermal route.Missing: threshold | Show results with:threshold
  94. [94]
    [PDF] The impact of solvents on the toxicity of the banned parathion ...
    When poisoning/death by parathion, was at its height, the OP clinical symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, diarrhea, sweating, muscle twitching ...
  95. [95]
    RELEVANCE TO PUBLIC HEALTH - Toxicological Profile for ... - NCBI
    Evaluations of participants in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) have suggested weak associations between exposure to parathion and allergic asthma, hearing ...
  96. [96]
    A comparison of the effects of agricultural pesticide uses on ... - Nature
    Jun 25, 2018 · This study was to investigate the association of agricultural pesticide use with the abnormalities of farmers' peripheral nerve conduction.
  97. [97]
    Inhibition of AChE and activation of CYP2E1 leading to sensory ...
    AOP 450, Inhibition of AChE and activation of CYP2E1 leading to sensory axonal peripheral neuropathy and mortality in tools offered by third parties.
  98. [98]
    Cancer in Humans - Some Organophosphate Insecticides ... - NCBI
    In previous IARC Monographs (IARC, 1983, 1987), parathion was evaluated as Group 3, unclassifiable as to carcinogenicity in humans, as there was no evidence ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Parathion - EPA
    Exposure may occur from the use of parathion as an insecticide on agricultural crops. Parathion is extremely toxic from acute (short-term) inhalation, oral, ...
  100. [100]
    Organophosphate Poisoning From Wearing a Laundered Uniform ...
    — A 25-year-old pesticide formulator was admitted to the hospital ... Parathion poisoning from flannelette sheets . Can Med Assoc J. 1965;92:809 ...<|separator|>
  101. [101]
    Parathion (HSG 74, 1992) - INCHEM
    Some physical properties of parathion are given in Table 1. Table 1. Physical properties Relative molecular mass: 291.3 Boiling point 157-162 °C at 0.6 mmHg ...
  102. [102]
    U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, PARATHION MANEB DUST NO ...
    Sep 28, 1971 · Do not contaminate any body of water nor apply when weather conditions favor drift from crop area treated. D:J not apply to any area not ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] HOW LONG DO INSECTICIDE RESIDUES PERSIST?
    The following are examples of these two groups. Parathion is relatively short-lived; the half-life on foliage is 1 day to 2 weeks; breakdown is slower in soil.
  104. [104]
    [PDF] Parathion residues on citrus foliage. Decay and ... - CDC Stacks
    further assumed that the decay process varies so little that a single re-entry interval can be equitably applied to a given pesticide-crop combination ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Parathion - Hazardous Substance Fact Sheet
    Hazard Class: 6.1 (Poison) Parathion is often dissolved in a liquid carrier which may be flammable or combustible. Use dry chemical, CO2, water spray or foam ...Missing: volatility | Show results with:volatility
  106. [106]
    Management of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning
    Aug 15, 2007 · Consensus suggests that early resuscitation with atropine, oxygen, respiratory support, and fluids is needed to improve oxygen delivery to tissues.<|separator|>
  107. [107]
    Organophosphate Toxicity - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Nov 12, 2023 · Antidotal therapy and comprehensive supportive care are necessary for the effective treatment of organophosphate toxicity to prevent morbidity ...Missing: success | Show results with:success
  108. [108]
    Parathion Poisoning Successfully Treated with 2-PAM (Pralidoxime ...
    Jan 13, 2010 · " When this information was relayed to the Poison Control Center, a diagnosis of parathion poisoning was made. The Center then advised the ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  109. [109]
    Pharmacological treatment of organophosphorus insecticide ...
    No dose–response studies have attempted to identify the ideal dosage regimen for atropine. A review of atropine dose regimens in the literature found 38 ...
  110. [110]
    Pralidoxime (injection route) - Side effects & dosage - Mayo Clinic
    Jan 31, 2025 · The dose is usually 20 to 50 milligrams (mg) per kilogram (kg) (9.07 to 22.7 mg per pound) of body weight injected into a vein. The dose may be ...
  111. [111]
    Organophosphate Toxicity Medication: Anticholinergic agents ...
    Mar 13, 2023 · Low-dose (1-2 g slow IV) 2-PAM is the current recommendation. Studies are under way to assess the role of low-dose 2-PAM. Improved survival has ...Missing: parathion | Show results with:parathion
  112. [112]
    Survival pattern in patients with acute organophosphate poisoning ...
    Mortality rate was 33.3%, 7.2%, and 100% in those who required mechanical ventilation for more than 7 days, 5 to 7 days, and 2 to 4 days, respectively. Lag time ...
  113. [113]
    Human parathion poisoning. A toxicokinetic analysis - PubMed
    The mortality rate of suicidal parathion poisoning is particularly high, the onset of fulminant cholinergic signs, and the patients frequently present to ...
  114. [114]
    [PDF] Toxicological Profile for Parathion
    It contains descriptions and evaluations of toxicological studies and epidemiological investigations and provides conclusions, where possible, on the relevance ...
  115. [115]
    The Effect of Parathion on Red Blood Cell Acetylcholinesterase in ...
    Jun 23, 2016 · ... case fatality rate of up to 10% [6]. These numbers do not take into ... Figure 1 is a Kaplan-Meier survival curve after poisoning with various ...<|separator|>
  116. [116]
    The impact of pesticide regulations on suicide in Sri Lanka - PMC
    Pesticide self-poisoning is one of the most commonly used methods of suicide in Asia with an estimated 300,000 deaths each year.[8] [9] It accounts for two ...
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Ethyl Parathion - EPA Archives
    It is formulated as a liquid and may be applied only using aerial equipment. Regulatory. History. Ethyl parathion was first registered as a pesticide in the ...
  118. [118]
    Suspended and Cancelled Pesticides - epa nepis
    Registration of ethyl parathion limited to those packed in one gallon containers or larger. 2. Manufacturers and formulators of registered ethyl parathion ...
  119. [119]
    Methyl Parathion and Ethyl Parathion; Proposed Revocation of ...
    Feb 6, 2002 · This document proposes to revoke certain tolerances for residues found for methyl parathion and for ethyl parathion.Missing: history | Show results with:history<|separator|>
  120. [120]
    [DOC] restricted_and_banned_product...
    Methyl Parathion 50 % EC and 2% DP formulations are banned for use on fruits and vegetables. (S.O.680 (E) dated 17thJuly, 2001). The use of Methyl Parathion ...
  121. [121]
    Pesticides / Formulations Banned In India | ICAR-Indian Institute of ...
    Pesticides / Formulations Banned In India ; 13, Ethyl Parathion ; 14, Ethylene Dibromide ; 15, Heptachlor ; 16. Lindane (Gamma-HCH)(Banned vide Gazette Notification ...
  122. [122]
    List of Banned and Restricted Pesticide Products in China
    Jul 14, 2017 · ChinaOverview of Pesticide Regulations in ChinaFree Guide on Pesticide Regulation ... Parathion-methyl. 21. Parathion. 22. Monocrotophos. 23.
  123. [123]
    Prevention of acute parathion and demeton poisoning in farmers ...
    Prevention of acute parathion and demeton poisoning in farmers around Shanghai.
  124. [124]
    Impact of pesticide regulations on mortality from suicide by ... - NIH
    Sep 4, 2023 · Altogether, 54 pesticides have been banned and restricted in China since 1970, with almost half [n = 24 (44.4%)] of them being banned or ...
  125. [125]
    [DOC] Regulations of the People's Republic of China
    ... China shall comply with these Regulations. Article 4 The State practices a ... Parathion,mg/L. 0.003. Dimethoate (mg/L). 0.08. Lindane (mg/L). 0.004.
  126. [126]
    [PDF] The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard 2019
    Extremely hazardous (Class Ia) technical grade active ingredients in pesticides. Common name. CAS no. UN no. Chem type. Phys state. Main use. GHS. LD50 mg/kg.
  127. [127]
    Annex III Chemicals - Rotterdam Convention
    The amendments to list carbosulfan and fenthion (ultra-low-volume formulations at or above 640 g active ingredient/L) entered into force on 22 October 2025. ...
  128. [128]
    Decision - 2001/520 - EN - EUR-Lex - European Union
    2001/520/EC: Commission Decision of 9 July 2001 concerning the non-inclusion of parathion in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of ...
  129. [129]
    [PDF] Parathion - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
    Parathion is an organophosphorus insecticide that was primarily used prior to 2006 for agricultural purposes and was released to the environment through ...
  130. [130]
    The impact of solvents on the toxicity of the banned parathion ...
    In the middle-late 1900s, parathion was produced for aerial application, both in the field or by the spraying of crops from an agricultural aircraft [9].
  131. [131]
    Restrictions on Pesticides and Deliberate Self-Poisoning in Sri Lanka
    Aug 6, 2024 · Restriction of HHPs has been associated with a large reduction in deaths from pesticide self-poisoning in Sri Lanka9 and other countries.
  132. [132]
    Restrictions on Pesticides and Deliberate Self-Poisoning in Sri Lanka
    Aug 6, 2024 · This cross-sectional study explores the association of pesticide bans with deliberate self-poisonings using pesticides and in-hospital deaths in Sri Lanka.
  133. [133]
    Pesticides impacts on human health and the environment with their ...
    Apr 15, 2024 · However, Pesticides have many advantages for agricultural productivity. They help to rise crop yields by decreasing losses caused by pests, ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
  134. [134]
    [PDF] Alternatives to targeted pesticides: the DANR database
    Copper sulfate is more expensive than parathion. Furthermore, copper is a heavy metal with algacidal properties whose environmental impacts, if widely used, are ...
  135. [135]
    Monsanto Agrees to Plead Guilty to Illegal Use of Methyl Parathion ...
    Nov 27, 2019 · Monsanto Agrees to Plead Guilty to Illegal Use of Methyl Parathion and to Pay $10.2 Million in Penalties and Restitution, Thereby Avoiding ...Missing: ban | Show results with:ban
  136. [136]
    Bayer Monsanto Skirts Felony Charge for Applying Banned ...
    Nov 26, 2019 · Banned pesticides turn into hazardous waste. And Bayer Monsanto stored over 270 lbs of methyl parathion between the Hawaiian Islands of Maui and ...Missing: detections | Show results with:detections
  137. [137]
    [PDF] The Economic Importance of Organophosphates - CDFA
    The EPA and these registrants agreed to cancel methyl parathion uses on foods that are significant to the diets of infants and children and agreed to cancel use ...Missing: averting famines
  138. [138]
    [PDF] The benefits of pesticides to mankind and the environment
    These benefits include increased crop and livestock yields, improved food safety, human health, quality of life and longevity, and reduced drudgery, energy use ...<|separator|>
  139. [139]
    The Methyl Parathion Story: A Chronicle of Misuse and Preventable ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · ... Parathion-Induced Oxidative Stress And Hepato-Renal Toxicity In Albino Rats. Article ... Florida Entomologist. B. R. Wiseman. Plant resistance ...
  140. [140]
    Environmental Toxicology and Health Effects Associated with Methyl ...
    Methyl parathion's primary mechanism of toxicity is the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity in the nervous system and at the motor end-plate. Methyl ...
  141. [141]
    UN: 200,000 die each year from pesticide poisoning - Al Jazeera
    Mar 8, 2017 · An average of about 200,000 people die from the toxic exposure of pesticides per year across the world, the United Nations says, calling for ...
  142. [142]
    Methyl Parathion After-action Report - epa nepis
    In April 1997, EPA discovered a methyl parathion spraying operation in Chicago, Illinois, and subsequently initiated a response effort in that area. Finally, in ...Missing: suspension | Show results with:suspension
  143. [143]
    Inadequate Personal Protective Equipment Factors and Odds ... - NIH
    Feb 23, 2024 · The present meta-analysis found that inadequate face protection may have an inclination for higher APP risk than inadequate general protection.
  144. [144]
    Critical review of the role of PPE in the prevention of risks related to ...
    This article is intended to provide an update on what we know of the issue based on a critical analysis of the literature to date.
  145. [145]
    The Economics of Pesticide Use and Regulation - jstor
    A ban on parathion is estimated to reduce annual lettuce production by 0.50%, but the estimated price effects are substantial.
  146. [146]
    DEADLY PESTICIDE MAY FACE U.S. BAN - The New York Times
    Mar 26, 1991 · A representative of Cheminova A/S, the chemical's Danish manufacturer, said a total ban on parathion could cost the company $10 million a year.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques<|separator|>
  147. [147]
  148. [148]
    Insights into insecticide-resistance mechanisms in invasive species
    Insect metabolism is critical in the development of pesticide resistance against various groups of chemical pesticides, including carbamates, organophosphates, ...
  149. [149]
    New Study Shows Glyphosate Ban Would Drive Up Food Prices
    Aug 8, 2023 · A new report examines a future without glyphosate, showing if the herbicide was no longer available for farmers, the immediate impact would be costly.
  150. [150]
    Managing Pesticide Resistance | WSU Tree Fruit
    Therefore, when parathion becomes ineffective due to resistance, some other organophosphates also lose efficacy because of cross resistance.
  151. [151]
    Slowing and Combating Pest Resistance to Pesticides | US EPA
    Jan 30, 2025 · Over time many pesticides have gradually lost effectiveness because pests develop resistance. Learn what EPA is doing to address resistance
  152. [152]
    Widespread use of toxic agrochemicals and pesticides for ...
    Apr 6, 2023 · Widespread use of toxic agrochemicals and pesticides for agricultural products storage in Africa and developing countries: Possible panacea for ...
  153. [153]
    Occurrence of banned and commonly used pesticide residues in ...
    Mar 25, 2020 · Amounts of banned and current pesticides have been used in domestic and agricultural pest control, and their residues have accumulated along ...