Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Particle zoo

The particle zoo is a colloquial term in for the diverse array of subatomic particles discovered primarily between the 1930s and 1960s through observations and early experiments, initially presenting a seemingly chaotic collection that challenged physicists' quest for fundamental building blocks of matter. These particles included leptons such as the and , as well as a proliferation of hadrons like pions, kaons, and baryons (e.g., and omega particles), many of which were short-lived resonances formed in high-energy collisions. The term highlights the historical confusion arising from over 100 identified particles by the 1960s, which were later rationalized by the and the of . The origins of the particle zoo trace back to the early , when the known elementary particles were limited to the (discovered in 1897), proton (1919), and (1932), alongside the as the mediator of . Key milestones included the 1930 prediction and 1932 discovery of the as the electron's , Pauli's 1930 proposal of the to conserve energy in , and Hideki Yukawa's 1935 theory predicting the as the carrier of the strong nuclear force, confirmed in cosmic rays in 1947. The 1936 discovery of the in cosmic rays added a heavier , followed by the neutrino's indirect detection in 1956, marking the weak interaction's involvement. By the 1950s, accelerators like those at Brookhaven and revealed dozens of new hadrons, such as the kaons (1947) and strange particles like the , prompting the introduction of "" as a to explain their decay patterns. This explosion of discoveries culminated in the 1964 quark model proposed independently by and , which posited that hadrons are composites of three types of quarks (up, down, strange) carrying fractional electric charges and a new "color" charge to account for their structure. Evidence mounted with the 1968 deep inelastic scattering experiments at SLAC confirming quarks' existence inside protons, and the 1974 discovery of the J/ψ particle signaling the charm quark. Subsequent findings included the bottom quark (1977), tau lepton (1975), and (1995 at ), expanding the model to six quark flavors and three generations of particles, mirrored by leptons. Force carriers like gluons (strong force, proposed 1970s), (weak force, discovered 1983 at ), and the (mass mechanism, confirmed 2012 at LHC) completed the framework, reducing the zoo to 17 fundamental particles and their antiparticles. The particle zoo's legacy underscores the evolution of particle physics from empirical discovery to theoretical synthesis, enabling predictions of phenomena like CP violation and guiding searches for physics beyond the Standard Model, such as supersymmetric particles or dark matter candidates. While the Standard Model successfully classifies the zoo, unresolved questions persist regarding neutrino masses, matter-antimatter asymmetry, and gravity's integration, driving ongoing experiments at facilities like the Large Hadron Collider.

Historical Context

Early Particle Discoveries

The discovery of the marked the beginning of physics. In 1897, J.J. Thomson conducted experiments with in vacuum tubes, demonstrating that these rays consisted of negatively charged particles much smaller than atoms. By deflecting the rays with electric and magnetic fields, Thomson measured the charge-to-mass ratio (e/m) of these particles, finding a value of approximately 1.8 × 10^11 coulombs per kilogram, which indicated they were fundamental constituents common to all matter. Ernest Rutherford's work further revealed the structure of the atom. In 1911, through the Geiger-Marsden gold foil experiment, Rutherford analyzed the scattering of alpha particles by thin gold foil, observing that most particles passed through undeflected while a few were scattered at large angles, implying a tiny, dense, positively charged at the atom's center surrounded by mostly empty space. This model replaced the and laid the foundation for understanding atomic structure. Building on this, in 1919, Rutherford bombarded atoms with alpha particles, producing nuclei as reaction products, which he identified as fundamental positive particles and named protons in 1920. The neutron's discovery completed the basic picture of the atomic nucleus. In 1932, James Chadwick irradiated beryllium with alpha particles from polonium, producing a highly penetrating neutral radiation that knocked protons out of paraffin wax with energies inconsistent with gamma rays. Chadwick interpreted this radiation as a neutral particle with mass similar to the proton, confirming the neutron's existence and explaining nuclear stability without excessive electrostatic repulsion. Key experimental tools and observations expanded the known particles. In 1911, C.T.R. Wilson invented the , a device that visualized ionizing particle tracks by supersaturating air with water vapor, allowing the paths of charged particles like alpha and beta rays to be photographed and analyzed. This instrument proved invaluable for detecting new particles. In 1936, cosmic ray studies using cloud chambers by Carl D. Anderson and revealed penetrating particles with mass intermediate between electrons and protons, later identified as muons, which penetrated matter more deeply than expected for electrons. By the mid-20th century, discoveries of numerous from cosmic rays and accelerators led to early efforts amid a growing . The term "particle zoo" emerged in the to describe this proliferation of over 100 hadron species, highlighting the challenge of organizing them without a unifying framework; the later provided such organization by proposing composite structures from fewer fundamental constituents.

Development of the Standard Model

The development of the Standard Model began in the 1960s as physicists sought to organize the growing particle zoo into a unified theoretical framework. Building on earlier observations of fundamental particles like the electron and proton, theorists proposed structures to explain the proliferation of hadrons and interactions. Central to this was the quark model, independently introduced by Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig in 1964, which posited that hadrons are composite particles made of more basic constituents called quarks. In this scheme, baryons such as the proton were described as bound states of three quarks, for instance, two up quarks and one down quark (uud), while mesons consisted of a quark-antiquark pair; this SU(3) flavor symmetry elegantly classified the observed hadronic spectrum without invoking numerous ad hoc particles. Leptons, in contrast, were established as fundamental, point-like particles unaffected by the strong force, with the , , and their associated neutrinos known by the mid-1960s, suggesting an organized structure of multiple generations. This generational pattern paralleled the quark sector and laid groundwork for later extensions. Meanwhile, efforts to unify forces advanced with the electroweak theory. Sheldon Glashow's 1961 model combined the weak and electromagnetic interactions via an SU(2) × U(1) gauge , but it lacked a mass-generation mechanism. This was resolved in 1967 by , who incorporated to predict massive mediating weak interactions, with independently formulating a similar unification in 1968. The strong force received its quantum field theory description through quantum chromodynamics (QCD) in 1973, when David Gross and Frank Wilczek, along with David Politzer, demonstrated asymptotic freedom in non-Abelian gauge theories based on SU(3) color symmetry. This property allowed quarks to interact weakly at short distances while confining at longer ranges, with gluons as the force carriers, completing the gauge structure for the strong interaction. Experimental validation came swiftly from deep inelastic scattering experiments at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) in 1968, conducted by Jerome Friedman, Henry Kendall, and Richard Taylor, whose results revealed point-like constituents inside protons with momentum fractions matching quark model predictions. Mass generation for particles was addressed by the , proposed in 1964 by and Robert Brout, and independently by , along with contributions from Gerald Guralnik, Carl Hagen, and . This framework used in a to endow gauge bosons with mass while preserving gauge invariance, integrating seamlessly into the electroweak sector and providing a cornerstone for the 's chiral structure. By the mid-1970s, these elements—quarks, leptons, electroweak unification, QCD, and the —coalesced into the , organizing the particle zoo into fermions as matter particles and bosons as force mediators.

Classification of Particles

Fermions: Matter Constituents

Fermions are fundamental particles characterized by half-integer , such as \frac{1}{2}, which leads them to obey Fermi-Dirac statistics and the , preventing multiple identical fermions from occupying the same . This connection between and statistics is formalized by the spin-statistics theorem, which dictates that particles with half-integer must be antisymmetric under particle exchange, in contrast to bosons with integer that follow Bose-Einstein statistics and can occupy the same state. The behavior of these spin-\frac{1}{2} particles is described relativistically by the , (i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m) \psi = 0, where \psi is the four-component spinor wave function, m is the fermion mass, and \gamma^\mu are the Dirac matrices, ensuring compatibility with special relativity and quantum mechanics. In the Standard Model of particle physics, fermions constitute the basic building blocks of all ordinary matter, comprising quarks and leptons that interact via the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces. Quarks, which carry color charge, bind together through the strong force to form composite hadrons such as protons and neutrons, while leptons, lacking color charge, typically exist as isolated particles, including electrons in atomic orbitals and neutrinos that permeate space. The Standard Model includes exactly 12 distinct fermion types: six quarks (up, down, charm, strange, top, bottom) and six leptons (electron, muon, tau, and their associated neutrinos), organized into three generations or families. Masses generally increase across generations, with first-generation particles (up, down, electron, electron neutrino) being the lightest and most stable, forming everyday matter, while heavier third-generation particles (top, bottom, tau, tau neutrino) decay rapidly. For massless fermions, —defined by the eigenvalue of the \gamma^5, which projects the into left- or right-handed components—coincides with , the projection of spin along the direction of motion. In the , weak interactions are purely chiral, coupling exclusively to left-handed fermions (negative helicity for massless particles), as embodied in the left-handed projection \frac{1 - \gamma^5}{2} within the charged-current term. This chiral structure arises from the electroweak and SU(2)_L invariance, where left-handed fermions form doublets and right-handed ones are singlets. Fermion number F, defined as +1 for quarks and leptons and -1 for antiquarks and antileptons, is conserved in strong and electromagnetic interactions (\Delta F = 0), but in weak interactions, conservation follows \Delta F = \Delta Q, where Q is , allowing processes like charged-current decays while preserving overall balance at tree level.

Bosons: Force Carriers

In the of , bosons are elementary particles with integer spin that follow Bose-Einstein statistics, permitting any number of identical bosons to occupy the same simultaneously. This statistical behavior contrasts with fermions, which obey the , and arises from the symmetric wave functions under particle exchange for integer-spin particles. Bosons serve as mediators of the fundamental interactions, with bosons responsible for transmitting the electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces between fermions. The scalar Higgs boson, distinct from the bosons, plays a crucial role in endowing particles with mass through its interactions. These bosons are integral to the theory's invariance, ensuring consistent descriptions of particle interactions. The is structured around the gauge group SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1), where SU(3) governs the strong force, SU(2) the component of the electroweak force, and U(1) the . This framework unifies the forces while preserving local symmetries, leading to the prediction of specific gauge bosons associated with each subgroup. Interactions mediated by bosons are conceptually represented in Feynman diagrams, where virtual bosons—off-shell particles not directly observable—exchange momentum and energy between interacting particles to produce the observed forces. For instance, the exchange of a virtual photon between charged particles accounts for the electromagnetic repulsion or attraction, illustrating how these transient bosons facilitate force transmission without violating energy conservation over short timescales. Among the gauge bosons, some remain massless, such as the , which propagates at the and mediates the long-range electromagnetic force. In contrast, the W and Z bosons acquire substantial mass through the mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking, enabling the short-range nature of the while the photon emerges as the massless remnant of the unified electroweak gauge fields.

Structure of Fermions

Quarks

Quarks are elementary fermions that serve as the fundamental building blocks of hadrons, such as protons and neutrons, within the of . There are six distinct types, or flavors, of quarks: up (u), down (d), (c), strange (s), (t), and (b). These flavors are organized into three generations, with the up and down quarks forming the lightest first generation, charm and strange the second, and and the heaviest third. Each quark carries a fractional measured in units of the e: the up, , and quarks have a charge of +2/3, while the down, strange, and quarks have -1/3. The masses of quarks span several orders of magnitude, reflecting their generational hierarchy. The light quarks—up, down, and —have masses on the order of a few MeV/c² (up: 2.16 ± 0.07 MeV/c², down: 4.70 ± 0.07 MeV/c², strange: 93.5 ± 0.8 MeV/c², all in the modified minimal subtraction scheme at μ = 2 GeV), making them relevant to low-energy . In contrast, the heavier quarks have significantly larger masses: at 1.2730 ± 0.0046 GeV/c² (at μ = m_c), at 4.183 ± 0.007 GeV/c² (at μ = m_b), and at 172.56 ± 0.31 GeV/c² (from direct measurements). The quark, being the heaviest, decays almost instantaneously via the , with a lifetime shorter than 10⁻²⁵ seconds. The existence of these flavors was theoretically predicted in the proposed independently by and in 1964, with experimental evidence for up and down emerging from experiments at SLAC in 1968. The was inferred from the discovery of strange mesons in 1947, while the quark was confirmed in 1974 through the observation of the J/ψ meson at SLAC and ; the quark followed in 1977 at , and the in 1995, also at . In addition to , quarks possess a strong interaction property known as , governed by (QCD). Each quark carries one of three possible color charges—red, green, or blue—while antiquarks carry the corresponding anticolors (antired, antigreen, or antiblue). This SU(3) color symmetry ensures that physical particles, or , are color singlets, meaning their total color charge is neutral, analogous to how photons mediate but with self-interacting gluons. Gluons, the mediators of the force, carry a combination of one color and one anticolor (eight types in total), allowing them to couple to quarks and other gluons, which leads to complex interactions at low energies. The concept of color charge was introduced in 1965 by Oscar Greenberg and to resolve issues with identical particle statistics in spectroscopy, and it was formalized in QCD by David Gross, , and David Politzer in 1973, earning them the 2004 for demonstrating . Due to the non-Abelian nature of QCD, quarks exhibit confinement: they are never observed in isolation but are perpetually bound within hadrons. This arises from , where the strong coupling constant decreases at short distances (high energies), allowing to behave as nearly free particles inside hadrons, but increases at long distances, creating a linear potential that prevents separation. Attempts to isolate a quark result in the formation of color flux tubes—string-like configurations of gluons—whose energy grows with distance, leading to the production of additional quark-antiquark pairs rather than free quarks. Hadrons form as color-neutral combinations of quarks: baryons consist of three quarks (qqq), such as the proton (uud) with charge +1 and the (udd) with charge 0, while mesons are quark-antiquark pairs (q q̄), like the positively charged (u d̄). These structures account for the observed spectrum of strongly interacting particles, with baryons making up atomic nuclei and mesons facilitating forces.

Leptons

Leptons are a of fermions in the of , comprising six distinct particles organized into three generations or flavors. These include the charged leptons— (e), (\mu), and (\tau)—and their associated neutrinos: (\nu_e), (\nu_\mu), and (\nu_\tau). Unlike quarks, leptons carry no and are not confined by the strong nuclear force, allowing them to exist as free particles. The charged leptons each possess an of -1 (in units of the e), while all neutrinos are electrically neutral with charge $0. Leptons play a crucial role in weak interactions, which are mediated by the W^\pmandZ^0bosons. In charged-current weak processes, aW boson facilitates flavor-changing transitions, such as the decay of a charged lepton into a neutrino of the same [flavor](/page/Flavor) and another particle, as seen in muon decay (\mu^- \to e^- \bar{\nu}e \nu\mu). Neutral-current interactions, mediated by the Z$ boson, involve flavor-conserving exchanges without changing the lepton type. Neutrinos were originally postulated to be massless in the , but experimental evidence from neutrino oscillations demonstrates they have non-zero masses on the order of the scale. The discovery of atmospheric neutrino oscillations by the experiment in 1998 revealed a zenith-angle-dependent deficit in neutrinos, consistent with \nu_\mu \to \nu_\tau oscillations and implying \Delta m^2 \approx 10^{-3} ^2. This phenomenon arises from quantum mechanical mixing among flavors, with individual masses constrained to less than 0.45 at 90% confidence level (from 2025 data). The masses of the charged leptons span several orders of magnitude, reflecting the generational hierarchy: the has a mass of 0.51099895000(15) MeV, the 105.6583755(23) MeV, and the 1776.93(9) MeV. These particles are point-like with no internal structure, and their properties align closely with electroweak theory predictions.
LeptonSymbolTypeChargeMass (MeV)
eCharged-10.511
\muCharged-1105.7
\tauCharged-11777
\nu_eNeutral0< 0.45 (eV)
Muon Neutrino\nu_\muNeutral0< 0.45 (eV)
Tau Neutrino\nu_\tauNeutral0< 0.45 (eV)
This table summarizes the properties, with neutrino masses as upper limits at 90% CL in eV for clarity.

Structure of Bosons

Gauge Bosons

Gauge bosons are the fundamental force-carrying particles in the Standard Model of particle physics, mediating the strong, electromagnetic, and weak interactions through local gauge symmetries. These vector bosons arise from the non-Abelian SU(3)_c × SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y gauge structure of the theory, where the photon mediates electromagnetism, eight gluons carry the strong force, and the W^± and Z bosons govern weak processes. Unlike matter particles (fermions), gauge bosons are spin-1 particles that facilitate interactions without conserving flavor in the case of the weak force. The photon (γ), the sole gauge boson of the U(1) electromagnetic symmetry in quantum electrodynamics (QED), is massless and thus mediates the electromagnetic force over infinite range. As the quantum of the electromagnetic field, it couples to electric charge and exhibits no self-interactions due to the Abelian nature of U(1), ensuring the theory's renormalizability. Photons propagate at the speed of light and are responsible for phenomena like atomic spectra and light propagation. Gluons, numbering eight, mediate the strong interaction within , the SU(3)_c gauge theory of color charge. Unlike the photon, gluons carry color charge themselves, enabling self-interactions that lead to complex dynamics such as gluon jets in high-energy collisions. They are massless, but confinement restricts the strong force to scales around 10^{-15} m, binding quarks into hadrons. A key feature of QCD is asymptotic freedom, where the strong coupling constant decreases at high energies (short distances), allowing perturbative calculations in that regime. The weak force is mediated by the charged W^± bosons and the neutral Z boson, arising from the SU(2)_L gauge symmetry in the electroweak sector. The W bosons carry electric charge ±1 and facilitate charged-current interactions, such as beta decay, while the Z boson handles neutral currents without charge exchange. Both are massive, with the W at approximately 80.4 GeV/c² and the Z at 91.2 GeV/c², limiting the weak force to short ranges of about 10^{-18} m. These masses emerge from electroweak symmetry breaking. The electroweak unification combines U(1)_Y hypercharge with SU(2)_L into the full electroweak group, where the photon emerges as a massless mixture of the original U(1) and neutral SU(2) bosons.
Gauge BosonMediated ForceGauge GroupNumberMass (GeV/c²)Electric ChargeKey Property
Photon (γ)ElectromagneticU(1)_Y100Infinite range; no self-interaction
Gluons (g)StrongSU(3)_c800Color-charged; self-interacting; asymptotic freedom
W^+ , W^-Weak (charged current)SU(2)_L2~80.4±1Massive; flavor-changing
Z^0Weak (neutral current)SU(2)_L1~91.20Massive; parity violation

Higgs Boson

The Higgs field is a scalar quantum field that permeates all of spacetime and plays a central role in the Standard Model by enabling electroweak symmetry breaking. This field acquires a non-zero vacuum expectation value (VEV) of approximately 246 GeV, which sets the scale for particle masses and preserves the underlying gauge symmetries while generating masses for the weak force carriers. The non-zero VEV arises from the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the field's potential, described conceptually by the Lagrangian term \mathcal{L} \supset -\lambda (\phi^\dagger \phi - v^2/2)^2, where \phi is the Higgs doublet, v \approx 246 GeV is the VEV, and \lambda is the self-coupling constant; this "Mexican hat" potential leads to a degenerate vacuum state, with the field settling into a minimum that breaks SU(2) × U(1) electroweak symmetry down to U(1) electromagnetism. Through the Higgs mechanism, fermions acquire mass via Yukawa couplings to the , where the interaction term in the Lagrangian \mathcal{L} \supset -y_f \bar{\psi} \phi \psi (with y_f the Yukawa constant and \psi the fermion field) generates a mass m_f = y_f v / \sqrt{2} after symmetry breaking. Gauge bosons, specifically the , obtain mass by "eating" the three Goldstone modes of the broken symmetry, effectively absorbing these massless degrees of freedom into longitudinal polarizations, resulting in m_W = g v / 2 and m_Z = \sqrt{g^2 + g'^2} v / 2 (where g and g' are the weak coupling constants). The itself is the quantum excitation of this field, manifesting as a spin-0 particle with no electric charge or color. The Higgs boson has a measured mass of approximately 125 GeV and was discovered in 2012 by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) through its decays into pairs of photons and Z bosons decaying to four leptons, confirming its consistency with Standard Model predictions at a significance exceeding 5σ. At the LHC, the dominant production mode is gluon fusion (gg → H), mediated by top quark loops, accounting for about 88% of the cross-section at 13 TeV, while vector boson fusion (VBF, qq → qqH via W or Z exchange) contributes around 8% and provides a distinct signature with forward jets. The boson's primary decay channels near 125 GeV include bottom quark-antiquark pairs (b\bar{b}, branching ratio ~58%), W boson pairs (~21%), and Z boson pairs (~2.6%), with rarer modes like τ lepton pairs (~6.3%) and gluons (~8.6%) also observed; these rates align with theoretical expectations from the Higgs field's couplings.

Particle Generations and Families

First Generation

The first generation of fermions comprises the lightest quarks and leptons in the Standard Model, specifically the up quark (u), down quark (d), electron (e), and electron neutrino (ν_e). These particles are fundamental constituents of ordinary matter and are characterized by their stability or long lifetimes, unlike heavier generations that decay rapidly. The up and down quarks are confined within hadrons due to color confinement and do not exist in isolation, while the electron and electron neutrino are free particles observed in nature. The up quark has a current mass of approximately 2.2 MeV/c², and the down quark approximately 4.7 MeV/c², both evaluated in the modified minimal subtraction (MS) scheme at a renormalization scale of 2 GeV. These quarks combine to form protons (uud valence quark content) and neutrons (udd valence quark content), which are the primary building blocks of atomic nuclei. Protons are stable with a lifetime exceeding 10^{34} years, while free neutrons decay with a mean lifetime of about 880 seconds, but remain stable within nuclei due to binding effects. The electron, a charged lepton, has a mass of 0.511 MeV/c² and is stable against decay. The electron neutrino is electrically neutral and has an upper mass limit of less than 0.45 eV/c², making it effectively massless for most practical purposes, and it is also stable. Electrons orbit atomic nuclei formed by protons and neutrons, enabling the structure of atoms and thus all visible matter in the universe. These first-generation particles participate in the strong, electromagnetic, and weak interactions. The up and down quarks experience the strong force mediated by gluons, binding them into hadrons, while the charged electron and quarks couple to the electromagnetic force via photons. All four particles interact via the weak force, mediated by W and Z bosons; a key example is the beta decay of a neutron into a proton, electron, and electron antineutrino: n \to p + e^- + \bar{\nu}_e This process, occurring through the emission of a W⁻ boson, exemplifies flavor-changing weak interactions and is responsible for phenomena like radioactive decay in nuclei. Charged leptons such as the electron do not undergo flavor oscillations due to their distinct masses and lack of mixing in the charged sector. For neutrinos, the electron neutrino participates in oscillations driven by the Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata (PMNS) mixing matrix, but mixing within or dominated by the first generation is minimal, with small mass-squared differences (Δm²_{21} ≈ 7.5 × 10^{-5} eV²) and a small θ_{13} mixing angle (sin²θ_{13} ≈ 0.022), primarily involving inter-generation effects with heavier states. This contrasts with the mass hierarchy observed in higher generations, where heavier fermions decay into first-generation products.

Second and Third Generations

The second and third generations of fermions consist of heavier quarks and leptons that play crucial roles in probing the weak interaction and flavor dynamics within the Standard Model. The second generation includes the charm quark (c) with a mass of approximately 1.27 GeV, the strange quark (s) at about 95 MeV, the muon (μ) at 105.7 MeV, and the muon neutrino (ν_μ) with mass less than 0.8 eV. The third generation features the top quark (t) at around 173 GeV, the bottom quark (b) at 4.2 GeV, the tau lepton (τ) at 1.78 GeV, and the tau neutrino (ν_τ) also below 0.8 eV in mass. Unlike the stable first-generation particles that form ordinary matter, these heavier fermions are unstable and decay rapidly via the weak force, enabling studies of flavor-changing processes in high-energy environments. These particles' short lifetimes underscore their transient nature: the muon decays primarily to an electron, electron antineutrino, and muon neutrino (μ⁻ → e⁻ \bar{ν}_e ν_μ) with a mean lifetime of 2.20 μs, while the tau has a lifetime of about 290 fs and decays into various lepton or hadron modes. The top quark stands out with an extraordinarily brief lifetime of roughly 5 × 10^{-25} s, causing it to decay before hadronizing and thus behaving as a nearly free quark, predominantly via t → W b. The charm, strange, and bottom quarks, when produced, form short-lived hadrons that decay through weak interactions. Such instabilities necessitate their production in high-energy collisions at accelerators like the and , where sufficient center-of-mass energies exceed their masses to generate them in pairs or via electroweak processes, allowing reconstruction from decay products. Flavor mixing among these generations is governed by the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix for quarks, which parameterizes the weak interaction vertices and reveals small mixing angles, such as |V_{cb}| ≈ 0.041 for charm-to-bottom transitions, contrasting with near-unity diagonal elements like |V_{ud}| ≈ 0.974 in the first generation. For leptons, the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrix similarly describes neutrino flavor mixing, incorporating three mixing angles and a CP-violating phase that drives neutrino oscillations. These matrices facilitate flavor-changing neutral currents and charged-current decays, which are suppressed but observable in experiments. Notably, CP violation in the second and third generations manifests in B meson decays, where asymmetries in b-quark transitions were first observed by the BaBar and Belle collaborations in 2001, confirming the Standard Model's prediction of matter-antimatter imbalance through interference in mixing and decay amplitudes.

Antiparticles and Symmetry

Concept of Antiparticles

The concept of antiparticles emerged from efforts to reconcile quantum mechanics with special relativity. In 1928, Paul Dirac formulated a relativistic wave equation for the electron, which successfully described its spin-1/2 nature but also yielded solutions with negative energy, interpreted as "holes" in a sea of negative-energy electrons. Dirac proposed that these holes represented positively charged particles with the same mass as electrons but opposite charge, predicting the existence of antiparticles as charge conjugates of ordinary particles. The first experimental confirmation came in 1932 when Carl Anderson observed tracks in a cloud chamber exposed to cosmic rays, identifying a positively charged particle with the mass of an electron—the positron, the antiparticle of the electron. This discovery validated Dirac's prediction and opened the door to the broader idea that every particle has a corresponding antiparticle. Antiparticles possess identical mass, spin, and lifetime to their particle counterparts but have opposite values for additive quantum numbers, such as electric charge, baryon number, and lepton number. For instance, the anti-up quark carries an electric charge of -2/3 e (compared to +2/3 e for the up quark) and opposite color charge, while the antiproton has baryon number -1 versus +1 for the proton. Antiparticles are produced in high-energy processes, such as particle collisions, typically in particle-antiparticle pairs to conserve quantum numbers like charge and baryon number. When a particle and its antiparticle meet, they annihilate, converting their mass into energy in the form of photons or other bosons; for example, electron-positron annihilation often yields two photons (e⁺ e⁻ → γγ). Despite these symmetric properties, antiparticles are scarce in the observable universe due to baryon asymmetry, where the Big Bang produced slightly more matter than antimatter, leading to the annihilation of most antiparticles early in cosmic history. This asymmetry is linked to subtle violations of charge-parity (CP) symmetry in particle interactions.

CP Violation and Asymmetries

CP symmetry refers to the combined transformation of charge conjugation (C), which interchanges particles and antiparticles, and parity (P), which inverts spatial coordinates; this symmetry is expected to hold if the laws of physics remain unchanged under these operations. In the Standard Model of particle physics, CP is conserved in strong and electromagnetic interactions but violated in certain weak decays, leading to differences in the behavior of particles and their antiparticles. The discovery of CP violation occurred in 1964 through experiments on the decays of neutral kaons (K^0), where James W. Cronin and Val L. Fitch observed that the decay rates of K_L mesons into two pions deviated from CP conservation predictions, demonstrating a small but significant asymmetry. This breakthrough earned Cronin and Fitch the 1980 Nobel Prize in Physics for revealing violations of fundamental symmetry principles in weak interactions. CP violation plays a crucial role in cosmology, particularly in explaining the observed dominance of matter over antimatter in the universe. In 1967, Andrei D. Sakharov outlined three essential conditions for baryogenesis—the process generating the baryon asymmetry: (1) violation of baryon number conservation, (2) C and CP violation to distinguish matter from antimatter, and (3) departure from thermal equilibrium to prevent symmetry restoration. These conditions remain foundational for models of the early universe. In the Standard Model, CP violation in the quark sector originates from a complex phase (δ) in the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) mixing matrix, with global fits yielding δ ≈ 1.15 radians (about 66°), providing the primary source for observed asymmetries in kaon and B-meson decays. In the lepton sector, an analogous Dirac phase (δ_CP) in the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) mixing matrix could enable CP violation in neutrino oscillations; current experiments show only hints and no definitive observation, though a joint analysis by T2K and NOvA experiments in October 2025 provided evidence for CP violation assuming the inverted mass ordering. The resulting matter-antimatter asymmetry is evident in the baryon-to-photon ratio η ≈ 6.1 × 10^{-10}, derived from cosmic microwave background measurements, far exceeding the symmetric expectation of zero.

Experimental Discovery and Evidence

Key Accelerators and Experiments

The discovery of fundamental particles began with observations of cosmic rays in the early 20th century. In 1932, Carl D. Anderson identified the , the antiparticle of the electron, through tracks in a cloud chamber exposed to cosmic rays, providing the first experimental evidence of . Four years later, in 1936, Anderson and Seth Neddermeyer detected the in cosmic-ray showers using similar cloud chamber techniques at high altitudes and sea level, revealing a heavier that initially puzzled theorists as it did not fit expectations for mediating nuclear forces. These natural high-energy events laid the groundwork for particle physics before controlled accelerators became available. As accelerator technology advanced, early machines like enabled the production and confirmation of predicted particles. The , a hypothesized by to mediate the , was first observed in cosmic rays in 1947 by and colleagues using nuclear emulsion plates at . Shortly thereafter, in 1948, , , and their team at the University of California's 184-inch in Berkeley produced pions artificially by bombarding carbon targets with , confirming their existence in a laboratory setting and measuring their properties, such as the charged pion's mass of approximately 140 MeV/c². This marked a pivotal shift toward accelerator-based experiments, allowing reproducible studies of short-lived particles. The invention of the bubble chamber in 1952 by Donald A. Glaser revolutionized particle detection by visualizing charged particle tracks as bubbles in superheated liquid hydrogen or propane, offering higher resolution than cloud chambers for studying interactions. Throughout the 1950s to 1970s, bubble chambers at facilities like Berkeley's Bevatron and captured decay topologies of strange particles, such as and , revealing the existence of strangeness conservation and enabling discoveries like the in 1964. A landmark event in this era was the 1974 discovery of the , a charm-anticharm bound state, by Burton Richter's team at electron-positron collider using the , which observed a narrow resonance at 3.1 GeV, simultaneously confirmed at , ushering in the era of heavy quark spectroscopy. Although later experiments shifted to electronic detectors, bubble chambers provided essential data on the particle zoo's diverse hadronic states. Modern colliders have confirmed and precisely measured the heaviest particles in the Standard Model. The top quark, the most massive quark at around 173 GeV/c², was discovered in 1995 by the CDF and DØ collaborations at Fermilab's Tevatron proton-antiproton collider through decays into W bosons and bottom quarks in events with high transverse energy. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, operational since 2008, has since provided higher-precision top quark studies via its ATLAS and CMS detectors, analyzing millions of events to refine production cross-sections and spin correlations. The LHC's crowning achievement came in 2012, when ATLAS and CMS announced the discovery of the Higgs boson—a scalar particle with a mass of 125 GeV—through its decays into photons, W/Z bosons, and bottom quarks, confirming the mechanism for electroweak symmetry breaking after decades of searches. Neutrino experiments have illuminated the elusive neutrino sector of the particle zoo. Super-Kamiokande, a massive water Cherenkov detector in Japan, provided compelling evidence for neutrino oscillations in 1998 by observing a zenith-angle-dependent deficit in atmospheric muon neutrinos, implying neutrino masses and mixing, with the oscillation parameter Δm² ≈ 2.5 × 10^{-3} eV² for ν_μ to ν_τ transitions. Complementing this, the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, embedded in Antarctic ice since 2010, has detected high-energy astrophysical neutrinos up to PeV energies, such as the 2013 event IC86-2011:59 from beyond the solar system, tracing cosmic ray interactions and opening probes into extragalactic particle acceleration. Recent precision measurements continue to test the particle zoo's completeness. In 2021, Fermilab's Muon g-2 experiment reported a 4.2σ deviation in the muon's anomalous magnetic moment from Standard Model predictions, with a_mu = 116,592,061(41) × 10^{-11}, suggesting possible new physics contributions from undiscovered particles or forces. This builds on Brookhaven's earlier results and highlights ongoing tensions that could expand the known particle repertoire.

Recent Developments and Searches

Following the 2012 discovery of the , precision measurements have refined its properties within the framework. In 2013, the analyzed proton-proton collision data to test the spin and parity of the new particle, providing strong evidence for a spin-0, positive parity state, which disfavored alternative spin-2 hypotheses at more than 5σ significance. Subsequent studies by both ATLAS and confirmed this spin-0 nature through angular correlations in diboson decays. Further advancements focused on verifying the to fermions; in 2018, ATLAS observed the decay of the Higgs to a pair of tau leptons with 5σ significance using 36 fb⁻¹ of data, establishing the first direct evidence of Higgs-fermion interactions beyond the top quark. CMS independently confirmed this observation shortly thereafter, combining it with prior results to reach 5.9σ overall. By 2022, comprehensive analyses of Run 2 data mapped the Higgs couplings across multiple fermion generations, showing consistency with Standard Model predictions to within 10-20% precision. Efforts to resolve the neutrino mass hierarchy—determining whether the neutrino mass eigenstates follow normal or inverted ordering—continue with next-generation experiments. The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) in China completed scintillator filling in August 2025 and began data taking, leveraging reactor antineutrinos over a 53 km baseline to achieve 3σ sensitivity to the hierarchy within approximately six years. JUNO's 20 kton liquid scintillator detector provides sub-percent energy resolution, essential for distinguishing the oscillation patterns of the two hierarchies. Complementing this, the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) in the United States is advancing toward operations, with far detectors under construction at Sanford Underground Research Facility and beam delivery from Fermilab expected by the late 2020s; simulations indicate DUNE could determine the hierarchy at 5σ in about five years under optimal conditions. Searches for dark matter candidates, such as weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) and axions, have yielded null results but tightened constraints, sustaining theoretical motivations. The XENON1T experiment, using 1.3 tonnes of liquid xenon, reported no excess events in 278 days of data from 2016-2018, excluding spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross-sections down to 7.7 × 10⁻⁴⁸ cm² for a 30 GeV/c² WIMP mass. Similarly, the LUX experiment's 2014-2016 run with 332 live days set world-leading limits, ruling out cross-sections above 1.4 × 10⁻⁴⁷ cm² for the same mass range, with no observed modulation signals indicative of annual WIMP interactions. Axion searches in these detectors also found no signals, constraining axion-electron couplings to below 10⁻¹², yet the cosmological need for dark matter drives ongoing pursuits with upgraded detectors like XENONnT and LZ. LHC Run 3, commencing in 2022, has intensified hunts for exotic particles like , which could mediate lepton-quark interactions beyond the . ATLAS analyses of early Run 3 data, combined with full Run 2 datasets, searched for resonant leptoquark production in lepton-jet final states, excluding scalar leptoquarks with masses up to 2.2 TeV at 95% confidence level assuming 100% branching to electron-quark modes. CMS results from similar channels extended limits to 2.0 TeV for vector leptoquarks, with no significant excesses observed in 140 fb⁻¹ of integrated luminosity by mid-2025. These bounds, surpassing 2 TeV, probe scales relevant to flavor anomalies and grand unification models. In 2025, key updates addressed longstanding anomalies and computational frontiers. The Fermilab Muon g-2 experiment released its final measurement of the muon's anomalous magnetic moment using data from 2018-2023, achieving 127 parts-per-billion precision and yielding a value of a_μ = 116592070(15) × 10⁻¹¹, which aligns with the updated Standard Model prediction from the 2025 Theory Initiative white paper, reducing the prior 4.2σ tension to below 2σ. Concurrently, quantum computing advances enabled simulations of lattice gauge theories underlying the particle zoo; a March 2025 study demonstrated hardware-efficient emulation of 2D U(1) gauge theories on qudit processors, observing confinement-deconfinement transitions relevant to quark-gluon dynamics. These simulations, scaling to non-Abelian groups, offer pathways to model beyond-Standard-Model phenomena intractable on classical hardware.

Implications and Open Questions

Unification Theories

Grand unified theories (GUTs) seek to unify the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions into a single gauge symmetry at high energy scales, embedding the Standard Model gauge group SU(3)_C × SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y within a larger simple group. These theories predict that the coupling constants of the three forces converge at an energy scale around 10^{16} GeV, a feature that arises naturally in minimal GUT models when extrapolated from low-energy measurements. However, achieving precise unification often requires additional physics, such as supersymmetry to modify the running of couplings or extra dimensions to alter the unification dynamics. The simplest GUT, proposed by Howard Georgi and Sheldon Glashow in 1974, is based on the SU(5) gauge group, where quarks and leptons are unified into 5 and \bar{5} representations, and an additional 10 for the remaining fermions. This model predicts proton decay through gauge boson exchange, with a characteristic lifetime on the order of 10^{31} to 10^{32} years, but experimental searches have not observed such decays, setting lower limits of >2.4 \times 10^{34} years for p \to e^+ \pi^0 and >5.9 \times 10^{33} years for p \to \bar{\nu} K^+ (as of 2020 and 2014, respectively), with ongoing experiments like tightening these bounds. An extension to SO(10), introduced by Georgi in 1975, incorporates all fermions, including a right-handed , into a single 16-dimensional per . This naturally accommodates the seesaw mechanism, generating small masses by pairing light left-handed neutrinos with heavy right-handed counterparts at the GUT scale. Despite these successes, GUTs face significant challenges, including the , which questions why the electroweak scale (∼100 GeV) remains stable against large quantum corrections from the much higher GUT scale without . The absence of signals further constrains minimal models, as detectors like continue to tighten lifetime bounds beyond original predictions. At even higher energies, emerges as a candidate for ultimate unification, positing that the particle zoo consists of low-energy vibrational modes of fundamental strings, resolving both gauge and gravitational interactions in a consistent quantum .

Beyond the Standard Model

The of particle physics successfully describes the electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions but leaves several key phenomena unexplained, such as the integration of , the nature of , and certain experimental discrepancies in flavor physics. Proposed extensions introduce new particles to address these gaps, expanding the particle zoo beyond the known fermions, gauge bosons, and Higgs. These models predict superpartners, Kaluza-Klein excitations, and exotic mediators, often motivated by theoretical consistency and observational evidence. Supersymmetry (SUSY) posits a symmetry between bosons and fermions, introducing superpartners for each particle with differing by 1/2 unit. For instance, quarks have scalar partners called squarks, and leptons have scalar partners called sleptons, both with zero . This framework resolves the by canceling quadratic divergences in the Higgs mass corrections through bosonic and fermionic loop contributions, stabilizing the electroweak scale against large quantum corrections. In minimal extensions like the (MSSM), these superpartners could manifest as new entries in the particle zoo, potentially detectable in high-energy collisions. Extra-dimensional models propose additional spatial dimensions beyond the observed three, compactified at small scales, leading to new particles via Kaluza-Klein modes—excitations of fields propagating in these extra directions. These modes appear as a tower of massive particles in four dimensions, with masses inversely proportional to the compactification radius. The Arkani-Hamed-Dimopoulos-Dvali (ADD) model uses large flat extra dimensions to explain the weakness of gravity, allowing gravitons to dilute their strength over the higher-dimensional volume while Standard Model particles remain confined to our three-dimensional brane. Such scenarios predict Kaluza-Klein gravitons and other resonances as observable new particles, addressing the hierarchy between the Planck scale and electroweak scale. Dark matter, comprising about 27% of the universe's with a relic abundance parameterized by \Omega_{\rm DM} h^2 \approx 0.12, requires stable, weakly interacting particles not in the . In SUSY, the lightest supersymmetric particle, often a —a mixture of gauginos and higgsinos—serves as a natural candidate due to its stability from R-parity conservation and annihilation cross-section yielding the observed relic density. Alternatively, sterile neutrinos, right-handed singlets under the gauge group, can act as warm dark matter, produced via oscillations with active neutrinos in the early through the Dodelson-Widrow mechanism, potentially explaining small-scale . Recent flavor anomalies, such as deviations in the lepton universality ratios R_K and R_{K^*} in b \to s \mu^+ \mu^- transitions observed by LHCb starting in , suggest new . As of 2025, these discrepancies continue to show tensions around 2-3σ for R_K and exceeding 3σ in angular observables like P'_5, hinting at contributions from leptoquarks—hypothetical bosons coupling quarks to s—that could mediate flavor-changing neutral currents at tree level, violating the Standard Model's flavor universality. Models with scalar or vector leptoquarks around the TeV scale fit the data while accommodating other B-meson observables. Another significant discrepancy is the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, a_\mu = (g-2)/2, where Fermilab's 2023 measurement confirms a deviation from predictions at >4σ level as of 2025, potentially indicating new particles or interactions in the sector. The excludes gravity, lacking an elementary as a spin-2 mediator, which leads to non-renormalizable interactions at high energies. approaches seek to incorporate gravitational effects quantum mechanically; emerges as a background-independent alternative, quantizing directly via spin networks and holonomies of the Ashtekar , predicting discrete at the Planck scale without introducing new particles like gravitons. This framework resolves singularities in black holes and through polymer quantization, offering a particle-zoo extension via effective gravitational .

References

  1. [1]
    None
    ### Summary of the Particle Zoo in Particle Physics
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Basics of Particle Physics - CERN Indico
    ∎ Particle physics is a branch of physics that studies the elementary. constituents of matter and radiation, and the interactions between. them. It is also ...
  3. [3]
    Introduction to Particle Physics · Stanford ATLAS
    Particle Zoo​​ For much of the first half of the twentieth century, physicists believed there were just three fundamental particles: the familiar proton, neutron ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    A Visit to the Particle Zoo | American Scientist
    Veltman shows how the foundations of modern particle physics lie in discoveries made many decades ago: observations of radioactivity, the constancy of the speed ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    October 1897: The Discovery of the Electron
    Oct 1, 2000 · JJ Thomson refined previous experiments and designed new ones in his quest to uncover the true nature of these mysterious cathode rays.
  6. [6]
    J J Thomson and the discovery of the electron - IOPscience
    This is JJ Thomson's determination of the mass to charge ratio (m/e) of cathode rays by deflecting them in magnetic and electric fields.
  7. [7]
    The Electron Discovery Experiment - Educational Games
    ... Thomson was able to determine the ratio between the electric charge (e) and the mass (m) of the rays. Thomson's result was. e/m = 1.8 10-11 coulombs/kg. The ...
  8. [8]
    May, 1911: Rutherford and the Discovery of the Atomic Nucleus
    May 1, 2006 · Rutherford's explanation, which he published in May 1911, was that the scattering was caused by a hard, dense core at the center of the atom–the nucleus.
  9. [9]
    Rutherford, Radioactivity and the Origins of Nuclear Physics
    It was out of this powerhouse that the nuclear theory of the atom emerged in 1911. In 1917, Rutherford 'disintegrated' the nitrogen nucleus using α-particles, ...
  10. [10]
    Ernest Rutherford – Biographical - NobelPrize.org
    In 1919, during his last year at Manchester, he discovered that the nuclei of certain light elements, such as nitrogen, could be “disintegrated” by the impact ...
  11. [11]
    The first true nuclear reaction and the discovery of the proton
    The discovery of the proton took place in a simple chamber filled with air (i.e. mainly nitrogen) containing an α source at variable distances from the screen, ...
  12. [12]
    May 1932: Chadwick reports the discovery of the neutron
    May 1, 2007 · In 1932, he tried similar experiments himself, and became convinced that the radiation ejected by the beryllium was in fact a neutral particle ...Missing: irradiation | Show results with:irradiation
  13. [13]
    James Chadwick – Facts - NobelPrize.org
    In 1932, however, James Chadwick proved that it consisted of a neutral particle with about the same mass as a proton. Ernest Rutherford had earlier proposed ...Missing: irradiation | Show results with:irradiation
  14. [14]
    C.T.R. Wilson – Facts - NobelPrize.org
    C.T.R. Wilson exploited this phenomenon when he constructed his cloud chamber in 1911—a glass container with air and water vapor and ingenious devices that ...
  15. [15]
    A note on the Wilson cloud chamber (1912) - IOPscience
    Sep 14, 2004 · A technical description of the 'Wilson cloud chamber' developed by C T R Wilson in 1911–12 will be given here. This instrument soon became a ...
  16. [16]
    Cloud Chamber Observations of Cosmic Rays at 4300 Meters ...
    Cloud Chamber Observations of Cosmic Rays at 4300 Meters Elevation and Near Sea-Level. Carl D. Anderson and Seth H. Neddermeyer.
  17. [17]
    The particle zoo - Book chapter - IOPscience
    The discoveries of the electron, the proton and the neutron marked the beginning of the understanding of nuclei. Observations of cosmic rays and their ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  18. [18]
    Particle pioneer Murray Gell-Mann, who coined the term 'quarks ...
    May 28, 2019 · ... particle zoo” that was created by the discovery of some 100 kinds of particles in collisions involving atomic nuclei. Dubbed the “eightfold ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The Discovery of Quarks* - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
    Quarks are recognized today as being among the elementary particles of which. matter is composed. The key evidence for their existence came from a.
  20. [20]
    An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its ... - Inspire HEP
    An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 1. Jan 17, 1964. 26 pages. DOI:
  21. [21]
    [PDF] THE DISCOVERY OF THE TAU LEPTON*
    The discovery of the tau lepton and the third generation of fermions came from the convergence of three physics streams in the late 1960's and early 1970's.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Asymptotic Freedom and Quantum ChromoDynamics
    Oct 5, 2004 · The original papers: • D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, ”Ultraviolet Behavior of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories”,. Phys. Rev. Letters 30 1343 ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] 10. Electroweak Model and Constraints on New Physics
    Dec 1, 2023 · The first term in Eq. (10.2) also gives rise to fermion masses, and in the presence of right-handed neutrinos to Dirac neutrino masses. The ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Tests of Conservation Laws - Particle Data Group
    Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) combine leptons and quarks in the same symmetry multiplets and, therefore, predict the violation of the baryon and lepton ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    The Standard Model | CERN
    Each fundamental force has its own corresponding boson – the strong force is carried by the “gluon”, the electromagnetic force is carried by the “photon ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] GLASHOW Lecture - Nobel Prize
    I was led to the group SU(2) x U(1) by analogy with the approximate isospin-hypercharge group which characterizes strong interactions. In this model there were.
  27. [27]
    Exchange Particles - HyperPhysics
    The photon is the exchange particle responsible for the electromagnetic force. The force between two electrons can be visualized in terms of a Feynman diagram ...
  28. [28]
    Some Frequently Asked Questions About Virtual Particles
    We can say that the particles exchange "virtual photons" which carry the transferred momentum. Here is a picture (a "Feynman diagram") of the exchange of one ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] QUARKS | Particle Data Group
    May 31, 2024 · The c- and b-quark masses are the MS masses renor- malized at the MS mass, i.e. m = m(µ = m). The t-quark mass is extracted from event ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] 15. Quark Model - Particle Data Group
    May 31, 2024 · This review is concerned with the description of the properties. (masses and matrix elements for couplings to electromagnetism and the weak ...
  31. [31]
    Scientists recall the discovery of the top quark 30 years ago at ...
    Mar 14, 2025 · Then we found out that there are other types of quarks, the strange quark and the charm quark. Fermilab then discovered the bottom quark in 1977 ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] 9. Quantum Chromodynamics - Particle Data Group
    May 31, 2024 · One widely-used model involves stretching a color “string” across quarks and gluons, and breaking ... their different color charges. There ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] LEPTONS - Particle Data Group
    L means lepton number violation (e.g. τ−→ e+π−π−). Following common usage, LF means lepton family violation and not lepton number violation (e.g. τ−→ e−π+π−) ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] 10. Electroweak Model and Constraints on New Physics
    May 31, 2024 · In the (second) third column lepton universality is (not) assumed. Quantity. Value. Value (universal). Standard Model. Γe+e−. 83.87 ± 0.12.<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    [hep-ex/9807003] Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos
    Jul 3, 1998 · Abstract: We present an analysis of atmospheric neutrino data from a 33.0 kiloton-year (535-day) exposure of the Super-Kamiokande detector.
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons
    Oct 11, 2013 · The 2013 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded to two of the theorists who formulated the Higgs mechanism, which gives mass to fundamental particles.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] 11. Status of Higgs Boson Physics - Particle Data Group
    Dec 1, 2023 · ... electroweak symmetry breaking [4] is responsible for generating a mass for the W and Z gauge bosons rendering the weak interactions short ranged ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons
    Oct 11, 2013 · The 2013 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded to two of the theorists who formulated the Higgs mechanism, which gives mass to fundamental ...
  41. [41]
    [1207.7214] Observation of a new particle in the search for ... - arXiv
    Jul 31, 2012 · Abstract:A search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC is presented.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] 60. Quark Masses - Particle Data Group
    May 31, 2024 · 60.1 Introduction. This note discusses some of the theoretical issues relevant for the determination of quark masses,.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] 1. Physical Constants - Particle Data Group
    electron mass me. 0.510 998 950 00(15) MeV/c2 = 9.109 383 7015(28)×10−31 kg. 0.30 proton mass mp. 938.272 088 16(29) MeV/c2 = 1.672 621 923 69(51)×10−27 kg.
  44. [44]
    Direct neutrino-mass measurement based on 259 days of KATRIN ...
    Apr 10, 2025 · The neutrino, a weakly interacting, uncharged elementary particle, has been shown to have a nonzero mass, the exact value of which remains ...
  45. [45]
    Neutrinos from beta decay
    In a beta decay, a neutron (made of one up quark and two down quarks) can transform into a proton (made of two up quarks and one down quark), an electron, and ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] 14. Neutrino Masses, Mixing, and Oscillations - Particle Data Group
    Dec 1, 2023 · The model explains all the interactions of the known fermions once they are assigned to a well defined representation of the gauge group. The ...Missing: theorem | Show results with:theorem
  47. [47]
    The quantum theory of the electron - Journals
    Husain N (2025) Quantum Milestones, 1928: The Dirac Equation Unifies Quantum ... II Original Scientific Papers / Wissenschaftliche Originalarbeiten ...
  48. [48]
    The Positive Electron | Phys. Rev. - Physical Review Link Manager
    C. D. Anderson, Science 76, 238 (1932); C. D. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 43, 381A (1933). Outline Information. Citing Articles (459); Abstract; See Also; References.
  49. [49]
    Antimatter | CERN
    Dirac interpreted the equation to mean that for every particle there exists a corresponding antiparticle, exactly matching the particle but with opposite charge ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  50. [50]
    [PDF] 13. CP Violation in the Quark Sector - Particle Data Group
    May 31, 2024 · Such an analysis provides model-independent proof that the KM phase is different from zero, and that the matrix of three-generation quark mixing ...Missing: delta | Show results with:delta
  51. [51]
    The Nobel Prize in Physics 1980 - NobelPrize.org
    The Nobel Prize in Physics 1980 was awarded jointly to James Watson Cronin and Val Logsdon Fitch for the discovery of violations of fundamental symmetry ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] 68. CP Violation in K0 Decays - Particle Data Group
    May 31, 2024 · After the discovery of large C and P violation in the weak interactions, it appeared that the product CP was a good symmetry. In 1964 CP ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] 12. CKM Quark-Mixing Matrix - Particle Data Group
    The CKM matrix elements are fundamental parameters of the SM, so their precise determination is important. The unitarity of the CKM matrix imposes P i VijV ...
  54. [54]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  55. [55]
    August 1932: Discovery of the Positron | American Physical Society
    Aug 1, 2004 · In August 1932, Anderson recorded the historic photograph of a positively charged electron (now known as a positron) passing through the lead plate in the ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] The pion's pioneers - INIS-IAEA
    It was Cesare Lattes (left) and Hugh Muirhead who, together with G. P. S. Occhialini and Cecil Powell, discovered the pion at Bristol in 1947. The two met ...
  57. [57]
    January 15, 1955: "Characteristics of Bubble Chambers" Published ...
    Jan 1, 2010 · The bubble chamber, which works on similar principles to a cloud chamber, except it is filled with a superheated liquid instead of a gas.
  58. [58]
    When the bubble chamber first burst onto the scene - CERN Courier
    Apr 29, 2001 · In 1953 Donald Glaser invented the bubble chamber(7), which went on to dominate particle physics, especially strange particle research, for the ...
  59. [59]
    Physicists discover top quark - Newsroom - Fermilab
    Mar 2, 1995 · The discovery of the subatomic particle called the top quark, the last undiscovered quark of the six predicted by current scientific theory.
  60. [60]
    The Higgs boson: a landmark discovery - ATLAS Experiment
    July 31, 2012. Following the historic CERN seminar on 4 July 2012, the ATLAS Collaboration released a paper to seal their landmark discovery of the Higgs boson.
  61. [61]
    Evidence for Oscillation of Atmospheric Neutrinos | Phys. Rev. Lett.
    We present an analysis of atmospheric neutrino data from a 33.0 kton yr (535-day) exposure of the Super-Kamiokande detector ... 1998 (to be published).
  62. [62]
    IceCube search for extremely high-energy neutrinos contributes to ...
    Feb 12, 2025 · The IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole searches for the sources of these astrophysical neutrinos in order to understand the origin of high-energy ...
  63. [63]
    Evidence for the spin-0 nature of the Higgs boson using ATLAS data
    Jul 4, 2013 · Studies of the spin and parity quantum numbers of the Higgs boson are presented, based on proton-proton collision data collected by the ATLAS experiment at the ...
  64. [64]
    New results indicate that particle discovered at CERN is a Higgs ...
    Mar 14, 2013 · CMS and ATLAS have compared a number of options for the spin-parity of this particle, and these all prefer no spin and positive parity. This, ...
  65. [65]
    Cross-section measurements of the Higgs boson decaying into a ...
    Nov 21, 2018 · A measurement of production cross sections of the Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions is presented in the H\rightarrow\tau\tau decay channel.
  66. [66]
    Observation of the Higgs boson decay to a pair of τ leptons with the ...
    Apr 10, 2018 · The CMS experiment observed Higgs boson decay to τ leptons with a 4.9 standard deviation significance, and 5.9 when combined with previous data.Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  67. [67]
    A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS ... - Nature
    Jul 4, 2022 · The quantum excitation of this field, known as the Higgs field, manifests itself as the Higgs boson, the only fundamental particle with no spin.
  68. [68]
    JUNO completes liquid filling and begins taking data to ... - Phys.org
    Aug 26, 2025 · JUNO is designed for a scientific lifetime of up to 30 years, with a credible upgrade path toward a world‑leading search for neutrinoless double ...Missing: hierarchy DUNE
  69. [69]
    JUNO takes aim at neutrino-mass hierarchy - CERN Courier
    JUNO is designed for a scientific lifetime of up to 30 years, with a possible upgrade path allowing a search for neutrinoless double‑beta decay, ...Missing: DUNE | Show results with:DUNE
  70. [70]
    [2502.08493] DUNE: science and status - arXiv
    Feb 12, 2025 · DUNE is a long-baseline neutrino experiment aiming to determine neutrino mass hierarchy and CP-violating phase, with detectors at Fermilab and ...
  71. [71]
    [2506.03069] Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous ... - arXiv
    Jun 3, 2025 · A new measurement of the magnetic anomaly a_{\mu} of the positive muon is presented based on data taken from 2020 to 2023 by the Muon g-2 Experiment.Missing: resolution | Show results with:resolution
  72. [72]
    Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit ...
    Mar 25, 2025 · Our results open the door for hardware-efficient quantum simulations of gauge theories with qudits in near-term quantum devices.
  73. [73]
    Meson dynamics from locally exciting a particle-conserving $Z_2 ...
    Oct 1, 2025 · Abstract. Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories is an important avenue to gain insights into both particle physics phenomena and ...
  74. [74]
    Gauge Coupling Unification in GUT and String Models - hep-ph - arXiv
    Jun 22, 1995 · ... couplings at the scales ~\sim 3 \times 10^{16} GeV ~and ~4\times10^{17} GeV, when all three couplings are taken as the experimental input.
  75. [75]
    Unity of All Elementary-Particle Forces | Phys. Rev. Lett.
    Feb 25, 1974 · Strong, electromagnetic, and weak forces are conjectured to arise from a single fundamental interaction based on the gauge group SU(5).Missing: GUT | Show results with:GUT
  76. [76]
    Search for proton decay via and with a 0.37 Mton-year exposure of ...
    While the predicted lifetime and products of proton decay depend on the GUT model, many are expected to be observable with the Super-Kamiokande (SK) experiment.<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    The real gauge hierarchy problem - ScienceDirect.com
    We discuss the problem of generating two vastly different mass scales through spontaneous symmetry breaking.
  78. [78]
    [1807.06209] Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters - arXiv
    Jul 17, 2018 · A combined analysis gives dark matter density \Omega_c h^2 = 0.120\pm 0.001, baryon density \Omega_b h^2 = 0.0224\pm 0.0001, scalar spectral ...
  79. [79]
    [hep-ph/9303287] Sterile Neutrinos as Dark Matter - arXiv
    Mar 22, 1993 · Authors:Scott Dodelson, Lawrence M. Widrow. View a PDF of the paper titled Sterile Neutrinos as Dark Matter, by Scott Dodelson and Lawrence M.