Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Phalanx CIWS

The Phalanx Close-In Weapon System (CIWS), designated Mk 15, is a radar-guided 20 mm Gatling gun-based automated defense system designed to provide rapid-reaction protection for against anti-ship missiles, , and asymmetric threats such as small boats and unmanned aerial systems. It autonomously conducts search, detection, threat evaluation, tracking, engagement, and kill assessment without requiring external inputs, integrating with the host ship's combat management system for enhanced . Developed in the with production commencing in for the initial Block 0 variant, the system achieved its first operational deployment aboard USS Coral Sea in 1980, marking a significant advancement in point-defense capabilities by enabling engagements at speeds exceeding human reaction times. Subsequent upgrades, including Block 1 in 1988 and Block 1B in 1999, incorporated electro-optical sensors for improved performance against littoral and low-observable threats, along with optimized firing rates of up to 4,500 rounds per minute using armor-piercing discarding sabot from a 1,550-round . The has demonstrated , such as intercepting a Houthi targeting , underscoring its role as a critical last-line defense. Installed on all U.S. Navy classes and exported to 24 allied nations, the system totals over 900 units deployed worldwide, with land-based variants adapted for U.S. Army use in counter-rocket, , and roles. Its defining characteristics include the M61A1 and compact design weighing approximately 13,600 pounds for Block 1B configurations, prioritizing reliability and minimal crew intervention in high-threat environments.

Development History

Origins and Initial Requirements

The development of the Phalanx Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) originated in the late 1960s amid growing U.S. Navy concerns over the vulnerability of surface ships to sea-skimming anti-ship missiles (ASMs). The 1967 sinking of the Israeli destroyer INS Eilat by Egyptian-fired Soviet SS-N-2 Styx missiles during the demonstrated the lethal effectiveness of low-altitude, fast-approaching ASMs launched from small vessels, exposing limitations in existing shipboard defenses like surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), which struggled against terminal-phase threats penetrating outer layers. This event, combined with the emergence of Soviet Charlie-class submarines armed with SS-N-9 Siren missiles, underscored the need for a dedicated point-defense system as a final automated barrier against ASMs, , and emerging littoral threats that could evade longer-range interceptors. Initial U.S. Navy requirements emphasized a self-contained, -guided automated system capable of independent detect-track-engage operations with minimal crew input, prioritizing rapid response to saturate incoming projectiles in the final 1-2 miles of approach. The system was to employ a 20 mm derivative—adapted from the Army's M163 Air Defense System—for a high exceeding 3,000 rounds per minute, using armor-piercing discarding sabot (APDS) penetrators to reliably destroy missile warheads via kinetic impact rather than explosive proximity fuzes. Detection goals included ranges of approximately 10-16 miles, with engagement envelopes tailored to counter low-flying, maneuvering targets like the or , while ensuring the mount weighed under 13,500 pounds for compatibility with carriers, cruisers, and destroyers. , leveraging existing technology, received early development funding, culminating in a July 1974 contract for operational test models. These requirements reflected a first-principles focus on causal : overwhelming threats with sheer projectile volume to achieve probabilistic kills in seconds, bypassing human reaction delays and electronic jamming vulnerabilities observed in prior basic point-defense systems (BPDMS) tested around 1967. The aimed for full to handle salvos of multiple ASMs, with the system designed as an "inner layer" complement to broader defenses, not a standalone solution, ensuring high reliability under combat stress without reliance on ship-wide power or .

Prototyping and Testing Phase

The Phalanx CIWS prototyping phase began in the early 1970s under ' Pomona Division, focusing on an automated radar-guided gun system to counter anti-ship missiles. The initial prototype was installed aboard the USS King (DLG-10/DDG-41) in 1973 for at-sea trials. These tests assessed the system's detection, tracking, and engagement capabilities against simulated threats, revealing the need for enhancements in reliability and performance. Subsequent refinements led to additional prototype iterations, including a unit mounted on the decommissioned USS Bigelow (DD-942) in 1975 for land-based testing. By 1977, a underwent operational test and evaluation (OT&E) aboard USS Bigelow, demonstrating effectiveness in engaging subsonic drone targets at ranges up to 2 kilometers. The system exceeded requirements for maintenance, reliability, and lethality during these trials, with successful intercepts validating its role as a point-defense . Testing incorporated both live-fire engagements and simulated scenarios to refine the fire control algorithms and gun stabilization. Results from the 1973-1977 evaluations confirmed the Phalanx's ability to autonomously detect, track, and destroy incoming threats, paving the way for production approval in September 1977.

Initial Deployments and Early Feedback

A Phalanx CIWS was installed aboard the U.S. Navy destroyer USS King (DLG-10) in August 1973 for initial at-sea evaluation. This marked the system's first operational deployment, though further development was required following the tests. Another underwent land-based and shipboard trials, including mounting on the decommissioned destroyer USS Wallace L. Lind (DD-703) in 1975. Pre-production operational testing and evaluation occurred aboard USS Bigelow (DD-942) in 1977, where the system demonstrated performance exceeding Navy specifications for maintenance, reliability, and availability. These results led to approval for full-rate production in 1978. The first production Block 0 systems were delivered in 1979 and installed on aircraft carriers USS America (CV-66) and USS Coral Sea (CV-43) in 1980, representing the initial fleet-wide deployment. Early operator feedback highlighted the system's autonomous operation and rapid response capabilities, though integration challenges with shipboard systems prompted refinements in subsequent installations. No combat engagements occurred during this phase, with feedback primarily derived from live-fire exercises against drone and missile surrogates, confirming effective threat neutralization at close ranges.

System Architecture

Sensor and Radar Components

The Phalanx CIWS incorporates a self-contained search and track system for autonomous detection, evaluation, and engagement of incoming threats such as anti-ship missiles and . The search operates in the Ku-band frequency range (approximately 12-18 GHz) and employs digital (MTI) processing to distinguish moving targets from sea clutter and background noise during wide-area surveillance. Once a potential is identified, the system transitions to the track , also Ku-band based, which utilizes pulse-Doppler monopulse techniques for high-precision angular measurement and velocity determination, enabling accurate fire control solutions up to engagement ranges of about 1.5 kilometers. These are mounted on a swiveling , providing 360-degree coverage with limits suited to low-altitude threats, and are designed for rapid reaction times under 5 seconds from detection to firing. In the Block 1B variant, introduced in 1999, an integrated (FLIR) was added to complement the s, offering stabilized thermal imaging for detection and classification of surface threats like small boats in scenarios, particularly in conditions where performance may be degraded by or electronic countermeasures. The FLIR provides high-definition infrared imaging, enhancing target identification and enabling manual override modes for operators. This upgrade maintains while expanding the system's versatility without altering the core architecture.

Gun Mechanism and Ammunition Feed

The Phalanx CIWS is armed with the M61A1 Vulcan, a six-barrel 20 mm Gatling-type rotary cannon that fires 20×102 mm projectiles. The gun operates on the external power-driven Gatling principle, with an rotating the barrel cluster and electrically igniting the primers for sustained automatic fire. Early Block 0 and Block 1 variants achieve a cyclic rate of 3,000 rounds per minute using hydraulic drive, while Block 1B and subsequent upgrades employ pneumatic drive to reach 4,500 rounds per minute, enhancing engagement effectiveness against high-speed threats. Ammunition is fed via a linkless integrated into the , holding 1,550 rounds ready for immediate use. The system uses armor-piercing discarding sabot (APDS) rounds featuring sub-caliber penetrators optimized for defeating hardened casings; penetrators were initially employed but replaced with in 1988 due to environmental and handling considerations. The feed mechanism automatically indexes rounds from the to the gun's chamber, with spent casings ejected downward to minimize interference with ship operations. Drum reloading involves specialized cassettes that displace dummies with live through a front-loading , enabling rapid replenishment without full disassembly.

Fire Control and Automation Logic

The of the Phalanx CIWS employs an integrated , computer, and servo-controlled mount to automate detection and , enabling rapid response without in automatic mode. The core automation logic sequences through search, detection, evaluation, tracking, firing, and kill assessment phases, prioritizing the nearest high-priority threats such as anti-ship missiles or on collision courses. This process relies on Ku-band —a digital (MTI) search for initial scanning up to the horizon and a Doppler monopulse tracking for precise and data—to identify contacts against and . Upon detecting a potential , the digital computer evaluates its status by computing predicted , closing , and impact probability, engaging only if the contact meets criteria for imminent danger, typically initiating fire at approximately 4,000 yards (3.6 km). The then slews the mount to maintain lock using advanced tracking algorithms that accommodate maneuvering targets, calculates ballistic solutions accounting for environmental factors, and fires a controlled burst of 20mm rounds while simultaneously tracking outgoing projectiles to refine aim and predict intercept points. Post-engagement, radar assesses kill effectiveness by monitoring fragmentation, deviation, or cessation of motion, ceasing fire once the is neutralized or adjusting burst length based on type. Operational modes include fully automatic for autonomous logic-driven response, semi-automatic for operator confirmation, and manual override, with Block 1B variants adding stations and (FLIR) sensors for visual threat identification to reduce false engagements against asymmetric threats like small boats or drones. Block 1A upgrades introduced high-order language programming for enhanced engagement algorithms, improving discrimination against decoys and support for rolling airframe missiles, while maintaining the system's emphasis on minimal in . with shipboard systems allows cueing from external sensors, but the Phalanx retains standalone capability for self-contained operation.

Operational Mechanics

Threat Detection and Prioritization

The Phalanx CIWS utilizes a Ku-band search operating in digital (MTI) mode to perform continuous autonomous scanning from the horizon to vertical elevations, acquiring potential such as anti-ship missiles and at ranges up to 10 nautical miles. This rotates at 90 and discards outbound contacts while initiating evaluation of inbound tracks by analyzing target heading, speed, range, and predicted maneuverability to assess collision potential with the protected . Threat evaluation integrates these parameters to classify objects as high-priority dangers, focusing on those demonstrating trajectories consistent with direct . Upon detection, the system's software assigns prioritization at approximately 5 miles based on threat logic that emphasizes decreasing , high , and inbound headings, selecting up to the first six validated threats for engagement sequencing. This closed-loop prioritization ensures efficient against salvos, with engagement initiating around 2 miles if the threat remains confirmed on an intercept course. Operators can manually adjust parameters such as speed thresholds in certain modes, though the system defaults to fully autonomous operation for rapid response. In the Block 1B variant, introduced in 1999, an integrated electro-optical sensor suite, including (FLIR), augments detection for asymmetric threats like small surface craft, helicopters, and unmanned systems by providing heat signature analysis and stabilized visual tracking. This enhancement enables operator intervention for visual identification and discrimination between threats and non-threats, such as distinguishing decoys or civilian objects, thereby refining prioritization in complex littoral environments. The tracking , a Ku-band pulse Doppler monopulse unit, then assumes precise guidance for the selected targets, supporting the transition to fire control.

Engagement Sequence and Modes

![Phalanx CIWS firing during an engagement sequence](./assets/US_Navy_101027-N-8913A-252_Rounds_from_a_Mk-15_Phalanx_Close-in_Weapon_System_(CIWS) The Phalanx CIWS engagement sequence integrates search, detection, , tracking, fire control, and kill assessment into an automated process designed for rapid response to incoming anti-ship missiles and low-flying . The system's Ku-band continuously scans for potential threats within a detection of approximately 5 kilometers (3.1 miles), prioritizing up to six inbound targets based on criteria such as closing velocity exceeding 150 meters per second and projected impact within the ship's vulnerable zone. Upon identifying a hostile , the fire control computer evaluates using algorithms that assess speed, aspect angle, and predicted point of closest approach, rejecting non- like birds or debris through Doppler processing and, in Block 1B variants, (FLIR) confirmation. If validated as a , the system slews the mount to track the , computing a lead-angle firing accounting for projectile ballistics and motion. Engagement initiates automatically when the closes to within the effective firing of about 2 kilometers (1.2 miles), unleashing a short burst of up to 75 tungsten-penetrator rounds per second from the 20mm to saturate the path and achieve a kinetic kill. Post-firing, the Phalanx performs immediate kill assessment by monitoring returns for target breakup or cessation of motion, with FLIR-equipped systems providing visual verification of or plume disruption; successful kills trigger cessation of fire to conserve , while persistent threats prompt re-engagement or handoff to other defenses. The sequence repeats for subsequent threats, limited by magazine capacity of 1,550 rounds supporting roughly 20 seconds of continuous fire across multiple salvos. This closed-loop autonomy minimizes reaction time to under 5 seconds from detection to engagement. Operational modes include fully automatic, where the system independently executes the entire sequence without human intervention; semi-automatic, requiring operator confirmation via before firing to mitigate false positives; and manual mode, allowing direct operator aiming and triggering for or overridden scenarios. In automatic mode, deployed on U.S. vessels since 1980, the maintains constant vigilance in "ready" status, engaging threats as programmed, though operators can intervene via override switches. Block upgrades, such as 1A and 1B introduced in the and , enhanced mode flexibility with improved processors for faster threat discrimination and integration of electro-optical sensors for surface threats in Phalanx Surface Mode.

Integration with Broader Shipboard Defenses

The Phalanx CIWS serves as the innermost layer in a warship's multi-tiered air and architecture, engaging threats that penetrate outer defenses such as long-range surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) like the SM-6 or , medium-range systems, and electronic countermeasures. This positioning relies on prior interception attempts by shipboard radars and launchers, with Phalanx activating autonomously or via external cues when threats close to within approximately 2 kilometers. In U.S. Navy doctrine, it complements systems like the , which provides early warning via SPY-1 or SPY-6 radars, allowing Phalanx to prioritize verified inbound anti-ship missiles or low-flying aircraft after outer layers fail. Integration occurs primarily through the (SSDS) Mk 2, a combat management framework that fuses data from multiple sensors and effectors across the vessel. Block 1B and later variants include software interfaces, such as adaptive filtering in ADA language, enabling cueing from SSDS or Aegis-derived tracks to reduce false alarms and extend reaction time by handing off targets pre-detection. Conversely, feeds its Ku-band search and data back to the ship's central center, augmenting for other weapons like the Rolling Airframe (RAM) or SeaRAM, which may engage in parallel for redundancy. This bidirectional linkage, tested in live-fire exercises since the , ensures deconfliction to avoid , with defaulting to manual override if signals degrade. On non-Aegis platforms, such as frigates or amphibious ships, Phalanx interfaces with legacy systems like the Mark 23 Target Acquisition System () or standalone radars, often via standardized NTDS (Navy Tactical Data System) links for track sharing. International operators, including the Royal Australian Navy's Hobart-class destroyers, adapt Phalanx into baseline-agnostic architectures by linking it to CEA Technologies' phased-array radars, demonstrating modular plug-and-play compatibility introduced in Block 1A upgrades around 1990. Empirical evaluations from Red Sea engagements in 2023-2024 highlight this synergy, where Phalanx downed Houthi drones after Aegis intercepts depleted missile stocks, underscoring its role in conserving layered assets under saturation attacks.

Variants and Modernizations

Core Block Upgrades

The Phalanx CIWS originated with the Block 0 configuration, operational from , optimized primarily for intercepting inbound anti-ship missiles using a Ku-band for detection and a 20 mm for kinetic defeat. This baseline featured a 1,000-round magazine capacity and automated fire control limited to aerial threats at low to medium altitudes. Block 1 upgrades, introduced in 1988 with the first installation on USS Wisconsin (BB-64), extended engagement range to high-altitude missiles through an improved antenna design and increased ammunition capacity by 50% to 1,500 rounds. Additional enhancements included a multiple pulse repetition frequency search radar, expanded radar cross-section lookup tables for diverse targets, and an upgraded fire control processor for faster processing. Block 1A followed with software modifications to refine tracking algorithms and engagement logic, improving reliability against maneuvering threats. The Block 1B variant, first deployed on USS Underwood (FFG-36) in 1999, incorporated a stabilized electro-optical forward-looking infrared (FLIR) sensor to enable detection and engagement of surface threats such as small high-speed boats, in addition to aerial targets including helicopters and unmanned aerial vehicles. This upgrade added Phalanx Surface Mode (PSuM), allowing manual operator override via remote video terminals for threat identification, while optimized gun barrels (OGB) with electric drive mechanisms reduced maintenance needs and sustained firing rates up to 4,500 rounds per minute. By fiscal year 2015, the U.S. Navy had standardized all systems to Block 1B or later. Subsequent Block 1B Baseline 2 refinements, implemented from around 2020, enhanced electro-optical and radiofrequency tracking for closer integration with shipboard command systems, as seen in contracts for allied navies like Australia's upgrades to Hobart-class destroyers. In 2025, the U.S. Navy awarded Raytheon a $205 million contract for ongoing sustainment and upgrades, focusing on component overhauls to maintain effectiveness against evolving asymmetric threats without altering core kinematics. These iterative core block modifications have prioritized empirical improvements in sensor fusion and automation over radical redesigns, reflecting operational data from deployments emphasizing layered defense reliability.

Hybrid and Specialized Variants

The SeaRAM system constitutes a hybrid variant of the Phalanx CIWS, replacing the 20 mm Vulcan cannon with an 11-cell vertical launch system for RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missiles while incorporating the Phalanx Block 1B's Ku-band search and track radar, forward-looking infrared (FLIR) sensor, and closed-loop fire control architecture for automated threat detection, evaluation, and engagement. This design leverages the Phalanx's proven sensor suite to guide passive radio-frequency and infrared-homing missiles, achieving intercepts at ranges exceeding 5 km against anti-ship missiles, aircraft, and surface craft, compared to the gun-based Phalanx's effective range of approximately 1.6 km. Initial U.S. Navy deployment occurred on USS Independence (LCS-2) in 2010, with full operational capability declared in 2013; by 2021, over 20 systems were installed across littoral combat ships, amphibious vessels, and destroyers, often complementing existing Phalanx mounts for layered defense. Specialized naval adaptations of the include configurations optimized for asymmetric threats, such as the Block 1B Surface Mode variant, which emphasizes electro-optical identification and tracking of small boats and unmanned surface vessels through stabilized video and FLIR integration, enabling operator intervention via remote control stations for reduced false engagements in cluttered littoral environments. These systems, fielded since 2003, incorporate software updates for enhanced discrimination between threats and non-combatants, drawing on empirical data from exercises showing improved hit probabilities against low-altitude, slow-moving targets. Foreign operators have pursued specialized integrations, such as Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force mounting with indigenous fire control links on Akizuki-class destroyers for coordinated engagements with Type 03 medium-range missiles, commissioned starting in 2012.

Recent Sustainment and Enhancement Programs

In September 2025, the U.S. Navy awarded RTX's Raytheon a $205 million contract modification to support the continued production, upgrades, overhauls, conversions, and delivery of equipment for the Mk 15 Phalanx CIWS, as part of a multi-year sustainment initiative across the surface fleet. This program addresses wear from operational use and evolving threats, including asymmetric dangers like drones and small surface craft, by ensuring system reliability through component replacements and performance enhancements. The initiative builds on the Block 1B baseline, which incorporates stabilized electro-optical/ sensors for improved target identification in surface and air modes, with recent efforts focusing on overhauls to maintain firing rates of up to 4,500 rounds per minute using 20mm penetrators. Conversions under the program upgrade legacy systems to this configuration, extending operational life while integrating with shipboard networks for layered defense. These sustainment activities, managed by , prioritize depot-level repairs and supply chain resilience to counter missile salvos and low-flying threats, with the Navy exploring palletized variants for flexible deployment on non-traditional platforms amid rising near-peer competition. Empirical data from prior engagements validates the need for such enhancements, as Phalanx's radar-guided automation has demonstrated effectiveness against high-speed inbound projectiles, though overhauls mitigate degradation in sensor accuracy and barrel life.

Combat Performance and Incidents

Documented Successes in Engagements

The Phalanx CIWS achieved its first confirmed combat kill on January 30, 2024, when the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Gravely (DDG-107) engaged and downed an incoming Houthi anti-ship in the . The missile, launched by Yemen's Houthi rebels, approached within approximately one (1.6 km) of the ship before the system's 20 mm fired a burst of tungsten rounds, successfully neutralizing the threat as a final line of defense after longer-range interceptors were employed. Subsequent engagements in the demonstrated the system's utility against Houthi swarms and during ongoing operations against Iran-backed attacks on international shipping. On May 5, 2025, (RTX), the manufacturer, confirmed another successful intercept of a Houthi targeting a U.S. , underscoring the system's effectiveness in high-threat environments where threats penetrate outer defenses. In November 2024, the destroyer utilized during an extended "hours-long shoot-out" with Houthi forces, contributing to the repulsion of multiple and salvos amid intensified assaults. These incidents represent the Phalanx's primary documented successes in live naval combat, primarily against subsonic or slower threats like Houthi cruise missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles, where its autonomous radar-guided fire control enables rapid response within seconds of detection. Prior to these events, no verified combat intercepts by the naval Phalanx variant were publicly confirmed, though extensive testing and simulations had validated its capability against anti-ship missiles and . The engagements highlight the system's role in layered defense architectures, where it serves as a kinetic "point defense" weapon after missile-based systems like the SM-2 or ESSM are expended or bypassed.

Failures, Accidents, and Friendly Fire Events

On May 17, 1987, during the Iran-Iraq War, the (FFG-31) was struck by two anti-ship missiles fired by an Iraqi F1 aircraft, resulting in 37 sailors killed and 21 wounded. The ship's Phalanx CIWS failed to engage the incoming missiles, which flew low over the horizon and were detected late by ; the system had experienced intermittent maintenance issues in the preceding weeks, including failures in systems operability tests, and was reportedly placed in standby mode to minimize emissions in the crowded operating environment. During Operation Desert Storm on February 25, 1991, the USS Jarrett (FFG-33)'s Phalanx CIWS, operating in automatic engagement mode amid a perceived Silkworm missile threat, mistook chaff deployed by the nearby battleship USS Missouri (BB-63) for an incoming target and fired a short burst of 20mm rounds. Several stray projectiles struck the Missouri, with one penetrating a bulkhead into an interior passageway and another hitting the ship's exterior, though no personnel were injured in the incident. On June 3, 1996, during the multinational exercise off , the destroyer JS Yūgiri's Phalanx CIWS engaged and shot down a U.S. A-6E Intruder from , which was towing a . The crashed into the ocean, but both crew members ejected safely and were rescued; a post-incident investigation determined that the destroyer's gunnery officer had ordered firing prematurely, before the Intruder exited the CIWS engagement envelope, overriding safety protocols. These events underscore operational challenges with the Phalanx CIWS, including vulnerability to low-altitude threats when not fully activated and risks of erroneous engagements in cluttered environments or during exercises, where automated targeting can misidentify decoys, , or non-hostile assets as threats without sufficient human oversight.

Empirical Effectiveness Evaluations and Debates

Testing of the Phalanx CIWS in the 1970s demonstrated high effectiveness against representative threats, with the system destroying all inbound missiles during evaluations aboard USS Alfred A. Cunningham in 1975 and exceeding reliability and maintenance specifications under and noise conditions on USS Bigelow in 1977. Block 1B variants achieved availability rates of 72-81% in fiscal years 1997-1999, indicating improved operational reliability over earlier models following upgrades to address corrosion and maintenance issues. In land-based deployments, the system downed mortar rounds in starting May 2005, providing empirical evidence of utility against in ground defense roles. Combat data remains sparse for naval applications due to the system's role as a last-ditch defense, with few confirmed engagements against s. However, incidents like the 1987 Exocet attack on saw the Phalanx on standby without engagement, contributing to the ship's severe damage, while a 1991 event involving USS Jarrett resulted in the system firing on a chaff cloud and inadvertently striking in . Debates center on the system's limitations against evolving threats, with analyses concluding it cannot effectively intercept hypersonic missiles under current configurations due to insufficient time and . Critics highlight vulnerabilities to saturation attacks, given the 1,550-round magazine depletes in approximately 20 seconds at full 4,500 rounds-per-minute rate, and an effective engagement range of about 1.5 km, which allows debris from downed supersonic to potentially damage the host . Proponents emphasize its value in layered defenses, where it reduces and functionality even if not achieving clean kills, and note successes against threats, UAVs, and small boats in trials. Reliability enhancements, such as those implemented after early fielding issues, have been credited with sustaining its role, though some assessments question its standalone adequacy against tactics or sea-skimming maneuvers without integration with longer-range systems.

Land-Based and Derivative Systems

Centurion C-RAM Adaptation

The C-RAM, also known as the Land Phalanx Weapon System (LPWS), represents the adaptation of the naval CIWS Block 1B for ground-based counter-rocket, , and defense. Developed by in 2004 amid vulnerabilities exposed during the , the system integrates the Phalanx's 20mm rotary cannon with radar-guided detection and tracking to automatically engage incoming projectiles. Mounted on mobile platforms such as HEMTT trucks for rapid deployment, it provides point defense for forward operating bases and high-value assets, operating effectively within a approximately 2 km radius. Initial deployment occurred in during summer 2005, where units protected sites around against insurgent-fired rockets and mortars. The system employs the Phalanx's Ku-band search and track to detect threats at low altitudes, cueing the to fire bursts of tungsten penetrator rounds at rates up to 4,500 per minute to fragment incoming projectiles mid-air. According to a representative, defeated 105 attacks in , primarily mortars, demonstrating practical utility in asymmetric conflict environments despite its origins in anti-missile naval roles. Produced in collaboration with for sensors and for vehicle integration, the emphasizes automation to minimize operator intervention, though it can incorporate external cueing from other radars for extended detection. Sustainment efforts continue, with RTX (formerly ) securing a U.S. in June 2025 for maintenance and upgrades to ensure reliability against evolving threats like drones. While effective for short-range point defense, its high consumption—approximately $3,500 per second of —necessitates careful integration with layered defenses.

Performance in Ground Defense Roles

The land-based adaptation of the Phalanx CIWS, known as Centurion , was first operationally deployed in in 2005 to counter rocket, artillery, and mortar threats to forward operating bases. This system integrates the Block 1B gun module with enhanced electro-optical/infrared sensors for detecting low-flying, surface-launched projectiles, enabling automatic engagement within seconds of threat detection. In and , C-RAM's sense-and-warn subsystems provided timely alerts for over 2,500 incoming rocket and mortar attacks, allowing personnel to take cover and reducing casualties from . Combat intercepts demonstrated variable effectiveness against sporadic insurgent launches. In , the system reportedly achieved 70-80% knockdown rates for rockets and mortar shells in operational use, leveraging its 20 mm penetrator rounds fired at 3,000-4,500 rounds per minute to fragment threats in mid-air. Pre-deployment tests confirmed a 60-70% shoot-down capability against representative threats, though real-world performance depended on factors like launch volume and environmental conditions. By 2020, units continued engaging rockets over Baghdad's , illustrating sustained utility against persistent low-tech threats post-major combat operations. Limitations emerged in scenarios involving multiple simultaneous projectiles or faster-moving threats. Analysis of specific engagements, such as video-documented firings, indicated success rates as low as 20-50% when threats evaded initial bursts due to clutter or velocity mismatches, highlighting the system's optimization for single or low-density attacks rather than massed barrages. expenditure—up to 1,500 rounds per —necessitated rapid reloading, constraining prolonged defenses without logistical support. Adaptations extended to intercepts, with downing incoming unmanned aerial vehicles in at least one documented base protection event. Overall evaluations affirm its role in layered ground defense, prioritizing area protection over precision against high-volume fire.

Global Operators and Deployments

Primary Naval Operators

The United States Navy serves as the primary operator of the Phalanx CIWS, which it developed through Raytheon under a program initiated in the early 1970s to counter anti-ship missile threats. The system achieved initial operational capability aboard the USS King (DLG-10) for testing in 1973 and entered full service on the USS Coral Sea (CV-43) in 1980, subsequently becoming standard equipment on all surface combatant classes, including aircraft carriers, guided-missile cruisers, destroyers, littoral combat ships, and amphibious assault vessels. This widespread integration provides an automated terminal defense layer against incoming missiles, fixed-wing aircraft, rotary-wing threats, and small surface vessels, with ongoing sustainment contracts ensuring reliability across the fleet; for instance, a $205 million award in September 2025 supported production and upgrades for continued deployment. Allied navies constitute secondary but significant operators, with the installed on warships of 24 partner nations to bolster point defense capabilities compatible with U.S. systems. Prominent among these are the Royal Australian Navy, which equips its surface combatants including Anzac-class frigates and Hobart-class destroyers; the , featuring the system on Akizuki-class destroyers and other major vessels; and the Royal Navy, which adopted it post-Falklands War for Type 23 frigates and Type 45 destroyers as a last-line defense against air and surface threats. These deployments reflect export successes driven by the system's proven autonomy in search, detection, tracking, and engagement functions, though operational numbers vary by fleet size and remain classified in detail for most users.

Export and Non-US Deployments

The Phalanx CIWS has been exported to allied navies through U.S. , with installations on warships of approximately 24 nations as of 2020. Australia's employs Phalanx Block 1B systems on Hobart-class destroyers and supply ships, including successful live-fire trials aboard HMAS Supply during a 2022 regional deployment. Canada's integrates on Halifax-class frigates for close-in defense. Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force received U.S. approval for Phalanx Block 1B in 2018, incorporating the system on advanced destroyers like the ASEV-class for enhanced anti-missile protection. The United Kingdom's mounts Phalanx on select surface combatants, including Type 23 frigates, as a supplementary point-defense layer. South Korea pursued acquisition of two Phalanx Block 1B units via FMS approval in 2020 for KDX-III Batch II destroyers, with procurement requests formalized in 2022. Other operators include the navies of , , , and , with Thailand installing Block 1B on the Bhumibol Adulyadej-class as the sole Southeast Asian adopter.

Technical Specifications

Block 1B Baseline Parameters

The Block 1B configuration of the Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) builds on prior by integrating capabilities for engaging both anti-ship missiles and asymmetric surface threats, such as small and unmanned surface vessels, through the addition of a stabilized electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) sensor suite including (FLIR). This baseline entered service after operational evaluation on USS Underwood in 1999 and deployment on USS in 2000, featuring an optimized (OGB) for improved dispersion and enhanced lethality cartridges (ELC) with 50% greater penetration mass compared to earlier ammunition. Key baseline parameters include a total system weight of 13,600 pounds (6,169 kg), encompassing the mount, , radar, and magazine. The employs an M61A1 20 Vulcan 6-barreled Gatling with an OGB extending the bore length to approximately 78 inches (1.981 m), enabling selectable fire rates of 3,000 rounds per minute for surface targets or 4,500 rounds per minute for aerial threats. capacity stands at 1,550 rounds of ELC in a , supporting sustained bursts with around 3,600 ft/s (1,100 m/s).
ParameterSpecification
Effective Range1,625 yards (1,490 m) maximum
Elevation Limits-25° to +85°
Traverse150° from either side of centerline
RadarKu-band digital (search); Doppler monopulse ()
Power Requirements440 VAC, 60 Hz, three-phase; 18 kW (search ), 70 kW ( )
SensorsIntegrated FLIR/ for visual identification and tracking
These parameters enable autonomous detection, tracking, engagement, and kill assessment, with optional manual override via stations for target verification. The system's height approximates 4.7 meters, optimized for shipboard integration on destroyers, frigates, and carriers. Block 1B's dual-mode operation addresses limitations in earlier blocks against low, slow, or surface threats, though it retains the core radar-guided autonomy for high-speed intercepts.

Comparative Systems

Peer Close-In Weapon Systems

The , developed by (formerly Hollandse Signaalapparaten), employs a 30 mm GAU-8/A seven-barrel mounted in a radar-directed for autonomous detection, tracking, and engagement of incoming anti-ship missiles, , and surface threats. It achieves a of 4,200 rounds per minute using armor-piercing discarding sabot (APDS) or high-explosive incendiary (HEI) optimized for missile penetration, with an effective engagement range of up to 3.5 km against aerial targets. The system integrates search and tracking radars with electro-optical sensors for operation in adverse conditions, and has been adopted by navies including the , , and several Asian operators since its introduction in the . The , a Soviet-era design produced by the Tulsky Oruzheiny Zavod, features a 30 mm GSh-6-30 six-barrel in a stabilized mount, delivering 4,000 to 5,000 rounds per minute from a 2,000-round magazine to counter low-flying aircraft, missiles, and small surface craft. Its and optical supports an effective range of 4 km for air targets and up to 5 km maximum, with the weapon's higher caliber compared to 20 mm systems providing greater projectile mass for improved lethality against hardened threats. Widely exported and deployed on over 500 platforms across and allied fleets, including and navies, the AK-630 often operates in pairs for 360-degree coverage. The Kashtan (Kortik) CIWS, manufactured by , combines two 30 mm GSh-6-30KD six-barrel guns—firing at a combined rate of up to 10,000 rounds per minute—with eight 9M311 surface-to-air missiles in vertical launch tubes for layered defense against missiles and aircraft at ranges extending to 10 km for missiles and 5 km for guns. The system's multi-sensor suite, including and trackers, enables salvo firing and prioritization of threats, with upgraded Kashtan-M variants featuring improved gun velocity and adverse-weather optics. Primarily equipping Russian Kirov-class cruisers, Admiral Gorshkov-class frigates, and exported to and , it represents a approach to extend engagement envelopes beyond pure gun systems. Other notable peers include China's Type 730 (H/PJ-12), a seven-barrel 30 mm system with 4,600–5,800 rounds per minute and phased-array guidance, deployed on Type 054A frigates and Type 052D destroyers for ranges up to 3–5 km. These systems collectively provide navies with alternatives emphasizing larger calibers for enhanced kinetic impact or integrated missiles for standoff capability, though empirical combat data remains limited primarily to tests and rare engagements.

Relative Advantages and Vulnerabilities

The Phalanx CIWS excels in automation and rapid response compared to less integrated peer systems like the , leveraging a self-contained suite for detection, tracking, and engagement that surpasses human reaction capabilities, with a fire rate of up to 4,500 rounds per minute from its 20mm . This enables effective interception of high-speed threats such as anti-ship missiles and at close range, as demonstrated in operational testing where it has neutralized incoming shells, rockets, and mortars. Relative to the , Phalanx offers a smaller deck footprint and reduced structural penetration requirements, facilitating easier integration on diverse naval platforms without compromising core anti-air performance. Its Block 1B upgrade further enhances versatility with an for surface threat engagement, such as small boats, outperforming radar-only systems in cluttered littoral environments. Despite these strengths, remains vulnerable to saturation attacks, as its single gun turret and sequential firing limit it to engaging approximately one to two threats concurrently, allowing coordinated salvos of anti-ship missiles to overwhelm it before depletion—typically after 10-15 bursts from its 1,550-round magazine. The system's effective range of 2-3 kilometers confines it to point defense, rendering it ineffective against threats neutralized earlier by longer-range systems like the , which can intercept supersonic missiles at greater standoff distances. Compared to Goalkeeper's 30mm higher-velocity projectiles, 's penetrator rounds exhibit reduced lethality against sea-skimming missiles due to lower (approximately 1,100 m/s versus 1,200+ m/s), potentially allowing some low-altitude penetrations in high-sea-state conditions. Additionally, while robust against electronic countermeasures in testing, its radar-dependent operation can be degraded by advanced or decoys, necessitating reliance on layered defenses rather than standalone efficacy.

References

  1. [1]
    MK 15 - Phalanx Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) - Navy.mil
    Sep 20, 2021 · Phalanx is the only deployed close-in weapon system capable of autonomously performing its own search, detect, evaluation, track, engage and ...
  2. [2]
    Phalanx Weapon System | Raytheon - RTX
    The Phalanx close-in weapon system stopped a Houthi cruise missile that was within seconds of impacting U.S. Navy ship USS Gravely, saving more than 300 sailors ...
  3. [3]
    R2D2 with Attitude: The Story of the Phalanx Close-In Weapons
    Nov 23, 2017 · Phalanx is a Close-In Weapons System (CIWS) designed as a last chance, point defense, automated gun system designed to destroy in-bound anti-ship cruise ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Phalanx Mk 15 CIWS - Archived 2/2003 - Forecast International
    May 5, 2002 · The US Navy (USN) requirement for a close-in weapon system (CIWS) was given greater impetus by the appearance of the Russian Project 670 ...
  5. [5]
    The Phalanx CIWS – An Advanced Naval Close-In Weapon System
    Jun 19, 2023 · Designed to counter threats from anti-ship missiles, aircraft, and other fast-moving targets, the Phalanx is a testament to the prowess of modern military ...Origins Of The Phalanx · Design Of The Phalanx · Advancements and Variants<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Mk-15 Phalanx Close-In Weapons System - Navysite.de
    Mk-15 Phalanx Close-In Weapons System ; Contractor: Hughes Missile Systems Company (formerly General Dynamics' Pomona Division, sold to Hughes in 1992) ; Weight: ...
  7. [7]
    USA 20 mm Phalanx Close-in Weapon System (CIWS) - NavWeaps
    Aug 8, 2022 · The Phalanx FLIR provides increased capability to search, track and engage coastal warfare threats as well as provide better anti-ship missile ...
  8. [8]
    Navy Fact File: Phalanx Weapons System - GulfLINK
    Background: The Phalanx Close-In Weapons System (CIWS) underwent operational tests and evaluation onboard USS Bigelow in 1977, and exceeded maintenance and ...
  9. [9]
    MK 15 Phalanx Close-In Weapons System (CIWS)
    Jan 9, 2003 · Electric. Date Deployed, 1980 (aboard USS America). Sources and Resources. CG 47 CLASS ADVISORY NR 13-93 -- WEAPON CONTROL SYSTEM - CLOSE IN ...
  10. [10]
    MK-15 Phalanx CIWS - Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance
    The Phalanx is a necessity for U.S. naval ships to enter disputed seas, or seas with a U.S. adversary conducting “Anti-access/area denial” (A2/AD) ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] PHALANX - General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems
    The Enhanced Lethality Cartridge provides a. 50 percent increase in penetration mass. The Phalanx FLIR provides a unique capability to search, track and engage.
  12. [12]
    Mk.15 Phalanx Close-in Weapon System (CIWS) - Seaforces Online
    In May 2009 the US Navy awarded a $260 million contract to Raytheon Missile Systems to perform upgrades and other work on the Phalanx. ... General Dynamics Pomona ...
  13. [13]
    Phalanx CIWS Costs $3,500 Per Second In Ammo To Fire
    Mar 13, 2024 · Phalanx is a self-contained, turreted close-in defense system armed with a six-barrel M61 Vulcan cannon. The systems have their own search and ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  14. [14]
    Complete Ammunition Handling Systems - Nobles Worldwide
    Fast-reaction, detect-thru-engage, radar guided 20-millimeter gun weapon system. The Phalanx CIWS consists of a radar-guided 20 mm Vulcan cannon mounted on a ...
  15. [15]
    Phalanx CIWS: the Navy's automated, radar-guided 20mm gatling ...
    The Phalanx CIWS has developed into a stand-alone, automated system that can be mounted on any desired location of a ship or, in the case of the Army's land- ...
  16. [16]
    Close-in Weapons Systems: The last line of defense
    Sep 24, 2025 · CIWS is a point-defense system designed to detect, track and engage short-range targets such as anti-ship missiles and aircraft. Most large ...
  17. [17]
    US Navy's 4,000 Rounds-A-Minute Phalanx Gun Shoots Down ...
    Feb 1, 2024 · US Navy's 4,000 Rounds-A-Minute Phalanx Gun Shoots Down Houthi Missile That Breached Aegis Radar. By. Parth Satam. -. February 1, 2024.
  18. [18]
    Upgraded Mark 15 Phalanx Block 1B Baseline 2 Close-in Weapon ...
    Jun 22, 2020 · The MK 15 PHALANX CIWS Block 1B Baseline 2 upgrades will provide enhanced electro-optical and radiofrequency close-in detection, tracking and ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Raytheon Wins $205 Million Navy Contract to Upgrade Phalanx ...
    Sep 10, 2025 · Weighing 13,600 pounds, it can fire up to 4,500 20mm rounds per minute. The Navy has upgraded the system over time. The Block 1B, now the ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  20. [20]
    SeaRAM Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) Anti-Ship Missile ...
    Sep 20, 2021 · The SeaRAM CIWS is a complete combat weapon system that automatically detects, evaluates, tracks, engages, and performs kill assessment ...
  21. [21]
    SeaRAM Ship Defense System | Raytheon - RTX
    An affordable capability upgrade, this above-deck system fits the footprint of the Phalanx system, uses the same power and requires minimal modification.<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    News | RTX's Raytheon awarded $205 million contract for continued ...
    Sep 8, 2025 · RTX's Raytheon awarded $205 million contract for continued production of the Phalanx Close-In Weapon System. September 08, 2025.Missing: life | Show results with:life
  23. [23]
    U.S. Navy awards Raytheon $205M contract for Phalanx systems
    Sep 8, 2025 · The contract, announced September 8, includes upgrades, overhauls, conversions, and the delivery of related equipment as part of a multi-year ...Missing: service | Show results with:service
  24. [24]
    U.S. Navy boosts ship defenses with multi-year Phalanx CIWS ...
    Oct 5, 2025 · The current fleet baseline is Block 1B Baseline 2. This iteration added a surface mode and stabilized infrared imaging, useful when small craft, ...
  25. [25]
    US Navy ships to get 13,600-lb robot guns firing 75 bullets a second
    Sep 8, 2025 · The agreement covers conversions, overhauls, and related equipment, with work scheduled for completion by January 2029. The contract underscores ...
  26. [26]
    Navy Prepares For Another Multi-Year Round For Phalanx CIWS
    Oct 3, 2025 · The Navy is conducting another round of research to determine potential sources that can manufacture the terminal defense MK 15 Close-In ...Missing: sustainment | Show results with:sustainment
  27. [27]
    U.S. Navy Pursuing Palletized CIWS Systems as Threats Evolve
    Apr 17, 2025 · The US Navy is leaning heavily into palletized and containerized solutions for additional firepower on lightly armed surface combatants.<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    The US Navy's Phalanx CIWS Anti-Air System Is Getting a $200 ...
    Sep 11, 2025 · The Phalanx CIWS has been in service with the Navy since the 1970s, and has received significant technological upgrades since then to improve ...
  29. [29]
    Phalanx CIWS Downs Houthi Missile Dangerously Close To Destroyer
    Jan 31, 2024 · Taken at face value, this is a very unsettling revelation as Phalanx's engagement envelope is very close to the ship and is seen as a 'last ...Missing: sequence | Show results with:sequence<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    U.S. Navy Phalanx Close-In Weapon System Makes Its First Kill
    Feb 6, 2024 · As Phalanx's radar begins to pick up on incoming missiles, it starts prioritizing the first six at a range of 5.58 miles. Phalanx automatically ...
  31. [31]
    Phalanx Close-In Weapon System Proves Critical Efficiency in ...
    May 12, 2025 · On May 5, 2025, Raytheon RTX officially confirmed that its Phalanx Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) successfully intercepted a Houthi anti-ship ...
  32. [32]
    Iran Is Freaked: Navy Breakthrough Means Deck Guns Can Destroy ...
    May 5, 2025 · In November 2024, the U.S. Navy destroyer USS Stockdale was engaged in what has been described as an “hours-long shoot-out with the Houthis.” A ...
  33. [33]
    Op-Ed: Close Call in the Red Sea: Assessing the Recent Houthi ...
    Feb 1, 2024 · CNN recently claimed that a Houthi-launched cruise missile came alarmingly close to USS Gravely in the Red Sea, marking the closest encounter with a Houthi ...
  34. [34]
    A Houthi missile was just seconds from hitting a US warship ... - CNN
    Feb 2, 2024 · The guided-missile cruiser USS Antietam fires a Phalanx Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) during a live-fire exercise, Philippine Sea, on June 6, ...
  35. [35]
    The Stark Report | Proceedings - May 1988 Vol. 114/5/1,023
    May 17, 1988 · In addition, there have been reports of maintenance problems with the Stark's Phalanx in the weeks preceding the attack. Unclassified ...
  36. [36]
    The Attack on USS Stark at 30 - USNI News
    May 17, 2017 · Burning at 3,500 degrees, the weapon ground to a halt in a corner of the chiefs' quarters, and failed to explode,” wrote Brad Peniston in his ...
  37. [37]
    TAB H -- Friendly-fire Incidents - GulfLINK
    For some reason, the Jarrett's Phalanx Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) operating in the automatic engagement mode, malfunctioned and fired a quick burst at the ...
  38. [38]
    USS Jarrett FFG 33 guided missile frigate Vice Admiral Harry Bean ...
    Some stray Phalanx rounds struck Missouri, one of which penetrated a bulkhead and embedded in an interior passageway of the ship. Another round struck the ship ...
  39. [39]
    The Last Time A Japanese Warship Shot Down A U.S. Navy Plane ...
    Jun 5, 2021 · Twenty-five years ago today, a Japanese destroyer blasted a US Navy A-6 Intruder strike aircraft out of the sky.Missing: Yūgiri | Show results with:Yūgiri
  40. [40]
    JAPANESE SHIP DOWNS U.S. PLANE - The Washington Post
    Jun 5, 1996 · The incident occurred 1,600 miles west of Hawaii when the Japanese destroyer Yugiri accidentally targeted the Navy's A-6E Intruder attack ...Missing: Yūgiri | Show results with:Yūgiri
  41. [41]
    Last ditch defence – the Phalanx close-in weapon system in focus
    Aug 10, 2020 · Development of the Vulcan Phalanx began in the 1960s as the US Navy woke up to the threat of the sea-skimmers after the destruction of Israeli ...
  42. [42]
    Analysis on effectiveness of phalanx weapon intercepting ...
    The result shows that under existing conditions, the CIWS can't intercept HM effectively, and new technology should be proposed.Missing: evaluations performance
  43. [43]
    CIWS Assessment - Navy Matters
    Nov 3, 2014 · We've already identified that both a strength and weakness of CIWS is the non-penetrating nature of the unit. A larger projectile would further ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    [PDF] The Cost and Benefits of Reliability in Military Equipment - RAND
    Among the cases examined in this study, reliability improvement programs were initiated when serious reliability problems emerged in the Phalanx Mk 15 Close-in ...
  45. [45]
    Ukraine requests Centurion C-RAM from the US - Unmanned airspace
    Nov 11, 2022 · In 2005, Phalanx CIWS was rapidly converted to a land-based version that received its own name – Centurion C-RAM. What is a limiting factor ...
  46. [46]
    The C-RAM - LinkedIn
    Aug 24, 2024 · The Centurion C-RAM, also known as the Land Phalanx Weapon System (LPWS), is an American air defense artillery system designed for countering rockets, ...
  47. [47]
    C-RAM System engaging and destroying an incoming drone ...
    Jan 8, 2024 · Basically CRAM is only effective within a 2km radius so it's fantastic for defending singular locations like ships or military installations. In ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Centurion Counter-Rocket, Artillery and Mortar (C-RAM) system ...
    Oct 6, 2014 · According to Wikipedia: A Raytheon spokesman told Navy Times that 105 attacks were defeated by the systems, most of those involved mortars.
  49. [49]
    RTX Secures Contract for Centurion C-RAM Support - MILMAG
    Jun 28, 2025 · The system automatically detects, tracks, and intercepts incoming rockets, artillery shells, and mortar rounds in the air before they strike ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  50. [50]
    Counter Rocket, Artillery, and Mortar (C-RAM) - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 15, 2022 · Tests showed that C-RAM had a 60 to 70 percent shoot-down capability. The Forward Area Air Defense Command and Control (FAAD C2) was the ...Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
  51. [51]
    Counter-Rocket, Artillery, Mortar (C-RAM)
    C-RAM was operationally deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan, where its sense and warn capabilities provided timely warning of more than 2,500 rocket and mortar ...
  52. [52]
    Centurion's Roaring Whips Of Exploding Shells Are Still Engaging ...
    Nov 17, 2020 · After 15 years, Centurion is still swatting artillery from Baghdad's skies. Today's engagement came shortly after the US withdrawal was announced.
  53. [53]
    C-RAM Performance - Navy Matters
    Sep 1, 2021 · He stated that C-RAM was not effective against one of the rounds so, as noted in the post, the best possible interpretation is 50% success.
  54. [54]
    How effective is the Centurion C-RAM at negating artillery? - Reddit
    Mar 24, 2018 · It's only effective against few random artillery rounds that typical insurgency can do, not against artillery barrage in a war. It can be used ...C-RAM System engaging and destroying an incoming drone ...C-Ram Knocks Taliban Rockets Out of The Sky, Bagram Airforce BaseMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: performance combat
  55. [55]
    The US Army's C-RAM Shot Down Suicide Drones to Prevent an ...
    Jan 4, 2022 · The C-RAM system boasts of a wide range of sensors that allow it to automatically search, track, prioritize and engage targets. RECOMMENDED ...
  56. [56]
    Raytheon wins $205m US Navy CIWS contract - Naval Technology
    Sep 9, 2025 · The advanced Block 1B variant enhances the system's capabilities further by incorporating control stations for manual target identification and ...
  57. [57]
    DID - Phalanx CIWS: The Last Defense, On Ship and Ashore
    Dec 3, 2020 · July 26/11: Poland submits a DSCA notice for service life extensions of its FFG-7 frigates, which includes upgrades to its MK 15 systems from ...
  58. [58]
    RAN's HMAS Supply completes Phalanx CIWS firing trials
    Jul 4, 2022 · The first-of-class testing was conducted during a regional presence deployment, reported lieutenant Nancy Cotton. Go deeper with GlobalData.
  59. [59]
    Phalanx CIWS System - Full Specifications | TheDefenseWatch.com
    Oct 16, 2025 · Manufacturer, Raytheon Technologies ; Country of Origin, United States ; In Service, Yes ; Year Introduced, 1980 ; Unit Cost, $5.5–6 million.
  60. [60]
    Japan to Acquire Phalanx Close-in Weapon System for Naval Defence
    Mar 6, 2018 · The US State Department has approved a possible Foreign Military Sale to Japan of MK 15 Phalanx Close-in Weapon System (CIWS) Block IB ...
  61. [61]
    Japan's ASEV Super Destroyer: Fresh Details Unveiled - Naval News
    Mar 6, 2025 · It's impressive how the Japanese rely on the Phalanx CIWS on even their newest warships rather than RAM or SeaRAM systems. No visible hatches ...
  62. [62]
    United States Approves Possible FMS Of Phalanx CIWS for Korea's ...
    Dec 3, 2020 · The Phalanx weapon system is installed on all U.S. Navy surface combatant ship classes and on those of 24 allied nations. About ROK Navy's ...
  63. [63]
    South Korea submits procurement requests for two Phalanx CIWS ...
    Feb 8, 2022 · The South Korean government has raised a request to Washington, seeking to procure two Mk 15 Phalanx Block 1B Baseline 2 close-in weapon system (CIWS) units.
  64. [64]
    Naval Close-In Weapon Systems (CIWS) from Around the World ...
    Apr 9, 2025 · Thailand is the only country in Southeast Asia armed with PHALANX CIWS. Thailand has installed Phalanx Block-1B CIWS on HMS Bhumibol ...Missing: export | Show results with:export<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    [PDF] GOALKEEPER - General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems
    Goalkeeper is a 30mm close-in ship defense system using a seven-barrel Gatling gun, firing 4,200 shots per minute against missile and aircraft threats.
  66. [66]
    Goalkeeper Close-In Weapons System (CIWS)
    Aug 17, 2018 · The Goalkeeper CIWS is a ship-mounted, short-range air defense system using a 30mm Gatling gun with missile-piercing ammunition, and is ...
  67. [67]
    Russia / USSR 30 mm/54 (1.2") AK-630 - NavWeaps
    Oct 30, 2016 · The AK-630 is a 30mm/54 (1.2") AO-18 6-barrel Gatling gun, used in the AK-630 system, a main close-in defense system on Russian ships.Missing: CIWS | Show results with:CIWS
  68. [68]
    AK-630
    The AK-630 comprises the 30mm six-barrel GSh-6-30K automatic anti-aircraft cannon and a 2,000 rounds magazine. The weapon system has a maximum range of 5,000 ...
  69. [69]
  70. [70]
    What made the Royal Navy move away from the 30mm Goalkeeper ...
    Aug 12, 2024 · The ammunition the Phalanx fires has to pass Lot Acceptance Testing at EAFR for accuracy and reliability. A Houthi missile was just seconds ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    What is the accuracy of the Phalanx Close in weapon System (CIWS ...
    Nov 10, 2022 · Yes Phalanx CIWS can be effective against high speed Anti-ship missile, with several qualifications. Effective if there is few missiles swaming ...Is the US Navy's Phalanx CIWS still a relevant and effective anti ...How effective is the Phalanx C-RAM? - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  72. [72]
    Phalanx CIWS vs RIM-116 RAM & SeaRAM: Best Close In Defence?
    Aug 7, 2025 · Regarding RAM, one of its main advantages is being able to engage supersonic missiles further away from the ship. When CIWIS engages supersonic ...
  73. [73]
    US Navy PHALANX CIWS vs. Small Boat - The Truth About Guns
    Dec 17, 2015 · So while CIWS can be saturated by too many threats, and isn't a guaranteed killer on every threat… it's a valuable last line of defence ...