Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Walleye

The walleye (Sander vitreus) is a species of freshwater percid fish native to the St. Lawrence-Great Lakes, Arctic, and Mississippi River basins, ranging from Quebec and the Northwest Territories southward to Alabama and widely distributed across rivers, lakes, and reservoirs in North America.^[1] This predatory fish, characterized by its reflective eyes adapted for low-light vision, inhabits both clear and turbid waters, from shallow to deep environments, and prefers cool to moderate temperatures.^[2] Adults typically reach lengths of up to 91 cm and weights exceeding 10 kg, feeding primarily on fish, aquatic insects, and crustaceans as they mature from a diet of zooplankton in early life stages.^[1]^[3] Walleye reproduce by spawning in spring within streams or shallow shoreline areas, with eggs hatching after about one month, supporting self-sustaining populations in suitable habitats despite introductions beyond native ranges.^[4] Classified as Least Concern by conservation assessments due to robust management and wide distribution, the species sustains significant recreational fisheries, with anglers targeting it for its fighting qualities, and commercial harvests valuing its mild-flavored, firm white flesh.^[5]^[6]

Taxonomy and Etymology

Taxonomic Classification

The walleye (Sander vitreus) belongs to the domain Eukarya, kingdom Animalia, phylum Chordata, subphylum Vertebrata, class Actinopterygii, order Perciformes, family Percidae, subfamily Luciopercinae, genus Sander, and species S. vitreus (Mitchill, 1818).^[7]^[8] Historically classified as Stizostedion vitreum since the early 19th century, the walleye's genus was revised to Sander in the late 20th century following molecular phylogenetic studies that demonstrated its monophyly with other Sander species, including the European zander (S. lucioperca).^[9]^[10] This reclassification aligned North American percids with Old World relatives based on shared morphological traits and genetic evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequencing.^[8] Within Sander, the walleye and sauger (S. canadensis) form a North American sister clade, with molecular data estimating their divergence at approximately 2.75–3.12 million years before present, reflecting Pleistocene isolation events.^[8]^[10] Genetic analyses confirm walleye endemism to North America, distinguishing it from Eurasian congeners through fixed nucleotide differences and lack of hybridization outside introduced ranges.^[10] A proposed subspecies, S. v. glaucum (blue pike), described from Great Lakes populations in 1926, represented a distinct morph with bluish coloration but is now extinct and considered invalid as a subspecies due to insufficient genetic differentiation from nominal S. vitreus.^[8]

Etymology and Common Names

The common name "walleye" originates from the English term "wall-eyed," referring to the fish's eyes, which exhibit a distinctive opaque or milky appearance due to their light-reflecting qualities.^[11]^[12] This visual trait, resembling a glassy or pearlescent sheen, prompted the naming convention in American English by 1876.^[11] The species' scientific binomial, Sander vitreus, incorporates the Latin "vitreus" meaning "of glass," further emphasizing the eyes' translucent, reflective look.^[13]^[14] Regionally, walleye is often called "pickerel" in parts of Canada and the northern United States, a usage stemming from historical angler terminology rather than strict taxonomy.^[15] However, "pickerel" more precisely denotes smaller species in the pike family (Esox genus), such as chain pickerel (Esox niger), which differ in body shape, habitat preferences, and predatory behavior from walleye.^[16]^[17] This distinction avoids confusion, as true pickerels lack the walleye's perch-like morphology and are typically found in shallower, vegetated waters.^[16] Among Indigenous North American languages, the Ojibwe (Anishinaabemowin) term for walleye is "ogaa," used to denote the species in traditional contexts.^[18]^[19] This name appears in linguistic records and cultural references specific to walleye, reflecting its recognition as a key freshwater fish.^[18]

Physical Characteristics

Morphology and Sensory Adaptations

The walleye exhibits an elongated, nearly cylindrical body with a compressed cross-section, facilitating efficient movement through aquatic environments. It possesses a large terminal mouth suited for predation, two dorsal fins—the anterior spiny and the posterior soft-rayed—and a forked caudal fin. The first dorsal fin typically features a dark blotch on the posterior membranes, while the lower lobe of the caudal fin and the anal fin often display white tips.^[20]^[7]^[21] Dorsal coloration ranges from olive-brown to golden-yellow, with brassy flecks along the sides and a white ventral surface, variations influenced by environmental factors such as substrate and water clarity. Sexual dimorphism is limited, primarily evident in females attaining greater mature sizes compared to males due to differential growth rates post-maturity.^[22]^[23]^[24] A key sensory adaptation is the walleye's large, silvery eyes equipped with a tapetum lucidum, a reflective layer behind the retina that enhances scotopic vision for foraging in low-light or turbid conditions. This structure boosts photon capture, enabling effective predation during dusk, dawn, or night, though it compromises visual acuity and induces sensitivity to bright daylight. Walleye populations demonstrate plasticity between riverine and lacustrine habitats, with subtle morphological adjustments supporting such versatility.^[25]^[26]^[27]

Size, Weight, and Growth Patterns

Walleye (Sander vitreus) typically reach adult lengths of 40-70 cm (16-28 in) and weights of 1-4 kg (2-9 lb) in northern populations, with harvestable sizes often around 50 cm.^[28] Larger specimens exceed 80 cm and 5 kg in optimal conditions. The maximum verified length is approximately 107 cm (42 in), while record weights approach 11.3 kg (25 lb), though official IGFA all-tackle records stand at 10.2 kg (22 lb 7 oz) from Canadian waters.^[29]^[30] Growth follows the von Bertalanffy model, L_t = L_\infty (1 - e^{-k(t-t_0)}), where L_\infty (asymptotic length) ranges 60-90 cm and k (growth coefficient) varies regionally, typically 0.1-0.3 year⁻¹.^[31] Southern latitudes exhibit faster growth rates, with higher k values linked to extended growing seasons and warmer temperatures, as evidenced by comparisons across North American populations.^[32] Northern fish grow slower but may achieve similar asymptotic sizes due to longer lifespans.^[32] In the Great Lakes, record catches include a 7.3 kg (16.1 lb) walleye from Lake Erie, measuring 84 cm (33 in), reflecting robust growth in nutrient-rich waters.^[33] Condition factors, calculated as K = 100 \times W / L^3 (where W is weight in g, L in cm), average 1.5-2.0 for healthy adults, indicating plumpness influenced by prey availability and water quality.^[34] Variability arises from density dependence, temperature, and forage, with models showing environmental covariates significantly alter parameters.^[31]

Habitat and Distribution

Native Geographic Range

The walleye (Sander vitreus) is native exclusively to freshwater systems across North America, with its historical range confined to the St. Lawrence-Great Lakes, Mississippi River, and Arctic drainage basins. This distribution spans from eastern Quebec and the Northwest Territories in Canada southward through the northern and central United States to Alabama, Mississippi, and Arkansas.^[35]^[7]^[1] Genetic analyses of contemporary and archived specimens corroborate this basin-specific delineation, revealing low gene flow between populations separated by glacial history and physiographic barriers, consistent with pre-European settlement isolation.^[36] Within these basins, walleyes preferentially occupy riverine and lacustrine habitats in temperate climates, favoring turbid waters with rocky or gravel substrates for spawning and structured areas for foraging. Natural impediments, including major waterfalls like Niagara Falls and those along the Ohio and upper Mississippi tributaries, historically restricted upstream migration and gene exchange, fostering genetically distinct stocks; for example, Great Lakes populations exhibit haplotype diversity indicative of long-term separation from Mississippi basin groups.^[8]^[37] Pre-colonial abundance is evidenced by indigenous oral histories and archaeological remains from sites in the Great Lakes and Mississippi Valley, where walleye bones appear in middens dating to 1000–1500 CE, reflecting sustained harvest in core range areas prior to habitat alterations from European settlement. Fossil records from Pleistocene deposits further affirm the species' persistence in these basins since the last glaciation, with no verified pre-historic occurrences beyond the outlined drainages.^[38]^[36]

Introduced Ranges and Invasiveness

Walleye (Sander vitreus) have been intentionally introduced outside their native range primarily through stocking efforts by state and provincial fishery managers to establish sport and food fisheries, beginning in the late 19th century. One of the earliest documented introductions occurred in 1874, when walleye were stocked by Livingston Stone for food and sport purposes, with subsequent widespread efforts in the western United States and Canada during the early 20th century.^[1] In the Pacific Northwest, populations have become established in certain reservoirs, such as those in Idaho and Washington, often via downstream dispersal from upstream stockings or occasional illegal transplants, leading to self-sustaining fisheries in suitable habitats.^[1]^[39] Establishment success varies markedly by environmental conditions, with higher rates in cooler, northern latitudes and lower elevations where water temperatures support spawning and larval survival. In western states like Wyoming, initial stockings in 1936 failed, but efforts in 1943 and 1946 succeeded in creating persistent populations, attributed to adequate prey availability and hydrological connectivity allowing downstream expansion.^[1] Conversely, introductions in southern reservoirs, such as those in North Georgia during the 1960s, largely failed due to warm water temperatures exceeding tolerances for egg incubation and juvenile recruitment, resulting in negligible long-term populations.^[40] Causal factors for failures include thermal stress disrupting early life stages, as walleye recruitment declines sharply above approximately 20°C during critical periods, compounded by competition from warm-water species like largemouth bass.^[41] In established non-native ranges, walleye exhibit moderate invasiveness, primarily through predation on native prey fishes and competition for resources, particularly with salmonids like trout in oligotrophic lakes. Success in such systems depends on latitude and elevation, with climate warming predicted to reduce viability in marginal habitats by altering thermal regimes and prey dynamics.^[9] Hybridization with the congeneric sauger (Sander canadensis) occurs where ranges overlap post-introduction, facilitated by reservoir impoundments that alter habitats and increase encounter rates; genomic analyses reveal introgression rates up to 27% in some rivers, potentially diluting sauger genetic integrity and contributing to local declines.^[42]^[43] U.S. Geological Survey assessments indicate that while walleye have established in over 20 states beyond their native Midwest and Northeast distribution, management responses include bans on further stockings west of the Continental Divide in states like Montana to mitigate risks to native cutthroat trout via predation and resource competition, reflecting ongoing costs for monitoring and suppression in sensitive ecosystems.^[35]^[1]

Life History and Reproduction

Spawning Behavior and Reproductive Biology

Walleye (Sander vitreus) typically spawn in spring within shallow, rocky tributaries or nearshore areas of lakes and rivers, where they broadcast adhesive eggs over gravel or cobble substrates.^[44] Spawning is triggered primarily by rising water temperatures between 4°C and 10°C, though pre-spawning behaviors such as migration and courtship may commence as low as 1.1°C.^[45] Males generally arrive at spawning grounds first, at cooler temperatures, and guard territories before females join; fertilization occurs externally without nest-building or subsequent parental care.^[46] Fecundity varies with female size and age, ranging from approximately 50,000 to over 300,000 eggs per female, with larger individuals producing higher numbers.^[47] Sex ratios in spawning populations are typically near 1:1, though females mature later (often at lengths of 35-45 cm) and one to two years after males, leading to dimorphic growth patterns.^[48] Eggs are demersal and adhesive, adhering to substrates, but experience high mortality rates exceeding 90% due to predation, sedimentation, desiccation, and fungal infections prior to hatching.^[49] Hatching occurs after 10-20 days, depending on temperature, with optimal success at 6-12°C; rates decline sharply above 12°C or with abrupt thermal fluctuations.^[50] Spawning timing and thermal optima exhibit latitudinal variation, with southern populations initiating reproduction earlier (often March-April) at 8-10°C, compared to northern ones (April-May) favoring 6-8°C, reflecting adaptations to regional climate gradients.^[51] Maternal effects, including egg size and lipid content, influence hatching viability, though large females do not inherently produce lower-quality eggs when controlled for age and health.^[52]

Diet, Feeding Ecology, and Growth Stages

Walleye (Sander vitreus) larvae primarily consume zooplankton, including rotifers, copepods, nauplii, small cladocerans, and chironomid larvae, as determined by analyses of early-stage gut contents.^[46] This initial diet supports rapid initial development before exogenous feeding fully establishes. As juveniles, walleye undergo length-dependent ontogenetic shifts, transitioning to benthic insects such as chironomids and increasingly to small fish, with piscivory becoming dominant around 50-100 mm total length to maximize energetic efficiency.^[53] Adult walleye function as opportunistic piscivores, with stomach content studies revealing diets dominated by fish such as yellow perch (Perca flavescens), cisco (Coregonus artedi), and other forage species, comprising over 80% of biomass in many populations.^[54]^[44] Feeding activity peaks nocturnally, facilitated by specialized scotopic vision with a high density of rod cells and a tapetum lucidum, enabling prey detection in low-light and turbid conditions where light penetration is limited to under 1 meter.^[55] Stomach content analyses confirm selective predation on evasive prey like fish during crepuscular or nighttime periods, with reduced foraging in bright daylight due to photophobia.^[56] Young-of-the-year (YOY) walleye exhibit rapid linear growth, often reaching 100-150 mm by autumn in productive systems, driven by high consumption rates modeled at 1.4-1.7% of body weight per day via bioenergetics simulations calibrated to field data.^[57] Growth accelerates in the first 3-4 years, influenced by prey availability and temperature optima around 20-24°C, but decelerates post-maturity as energy reallocates to gonadal development, with annual increments dropping below 50 mm after age 4 in northern latitudes.^[57]^[58] Bioenergetics models, incorporating respiration, egestion, and specific dynamic action, accurately hindcast these trajectories without bias when parameterized from laboratory and wild consumption trials.^[57]

Ecology and Population Dynamics

Trophic Role and Predator-Prey Interactions

Walleye (Sander vitreus) function as apex piscivores in the nearshore zones of many freshwater lakes, particularly oligotrophic systems where they exert top-down control on intermediate trophic levels by preying on abundant forage fishes such as yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and various minnow species, thereby influencing energy transfer efficiency and stabilizing oscillatory predator-prey dynamics through density-dependent mechanisms.^[59] ^[44] Stable isotope analysis (δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N) of walleye tissues from the Great Lakes reveals a mean trophic position of approximately 4.0, positioning them as tertiary or quaternary consumers that integrate pelagic and benthic energy pathways while minimizing inefficient trophic transfers typical in lower levels.^[60] ^[61] As predators, walleye modulate prey community structure by selectively targeting schooling forage fishes, which reduces overabundance and prevents cascading effects on zooplankton and primary production; this regulatory role is evident in systems where walleye abundance correlates inversely with forage fish biomass, promoting balanced energy flow per first-principles of trophic ecology.^[62] ^[63] Conversely, walleye experience predation pressure from larger sympatric species, including northern pike (Esox lucius), which consume juvenile and subadult walleye, and to a lesser extent smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) in overlapping habitats, though such interactions are size-selective and diminish for adults exceeding 50 cm in length.^[64] ^[65] Invasive species introductions disrupt these interactions; for instance, rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) compete with walleye for shared invertebrate and fish prey while preying on walleye eggs and larvae, leading to multi-trophic shifts that elevate walleye foraging costs and alter baseline stable isotope signatures in invaded lakes.^[63] ^[66] Empirical models from interconnected lake chains demonstrate that such competition reduces walleye's effective trophic dominance, with smelt abundance explaining up to 30% variance in walleye recruitment variability independent of native predator-prey feedbacks.^[62]

Factors Influencing Population Trends

Walleye populations exhibit cyclic fluctuations primarily driven by variability in recruitment success, which is influenced by density-dependent factors such as spawner abundance and density-independent environmental conditions including water temperature and prey availability during larval stages.^[67] ^[68] In Lake Erie, for instance, the 2024 young-of-year index registered only 19 fish per hectare—67% below the long-term average of 58—reflecting poor hatch conditions that contributed to a projected decline in age-2-and-older abundance from 80.9 million in 2024 to 77.4 million in 2025.^[69] ^[70] Such variability underscores the role of stochastic biotic interactions, like predation on larvae, in modulating year-class strength independent of long-term trends.^[71] Climate-driven changes, including earlier ice-off dates and warming waters, disrupt walleye spawning phenology by decoupling historical alignments between thaw timing and peak reproductive activity, potentially reducing egg survival and larval recruitment.^[72] ^[73] Lakes are thawing approximately three times faster than walleye populations can adapt their spawning cues, exacerbating declines in naturally reproducing systems, though empirical models indicate these thermal effects are secondary to exploitation pressures in most cases.^[74] Habitat degradation from pollution and altered hydrology plays a lesser role in population models compared to recruitment bottlenecks, with biotic factors like invasive species interactions amplifying but not primarily causing observed downturns.^[75] Stocking programs, implemented for over 120 years in many North American waters, have augmented abundance in recruitment-limited lakes by supplementing natural cohorts, yet they carry risks of genetic dilution through admixture with non-local strains, potentially eroding local adaptations to spawning habitats. ^[76] While effective in boosting short-term yields in systems with low natural reproduction, prolonged reliance on hatchery fish can introduce maladaptive traits, as evidenced by reduced genetic differentiation in stocked populations.^[77] Overall, anthropogenic influences like these interact with natural variability, but data emphasize recruitment as the proximal driver of abundance shifts.^[75]

Fishing and Harvest Practices

Sport Angling Methods and Techniques

Vertical jigging with 1/4- to 1/2-ounce jigs tipped with minnows or soft plastics, often conducted directly beneath the boat, ranks among the most effective methods for targeting walleye, particularly in structured areas like reefs or drop-offs.^[78] Trolling crankbaits or worm harnesses at speeds of 1.5-2.5 mph similarly yields high success, mimicking prey such as shad or shiners while covering larger water volumes.^[79] These techniques leverage walleye's light-sensitive eyes, with peak activity occurring during low-light periods like dawn, dusk, or overcast conditions, when fish move shallower to feed.^[80] Seasonal adaptations enhance catch rates; in spring, post-spawn walleye congregate in rivers or near shorelines, responsive to jigging or slow trolling in 5-15 feet of water.^[80] Summer patterns shift fish to deeper thermoclines (20-40 feet), where long-line trolling with deep-diving crankbaits or bottom-bouncing rigs proves optimal, as walleye avoid bright surface light and hold near cooler, oxygenated layers.^[79] Empirical data from Lake Erie in 2024 demonstrate robust angling productivity, with Ohio anglers achieving a harvest rate of 0.8 walleye per angler-hour lake-wide, reflecting abundant populations and effective method deployment.^[81] Trophy pursuits emphasize live bait presentations; the International Game Fish Association-certified record of 22 pounds 11 ounces, caught in 1982 on Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas, involved trolling with deep-running lures, though disputed larger specimens like the 25-pound 1960 catch from Old Hickory Lake, Tennessee, were taken incidentally on minnows intended for catfish.^[82] Water clarity dictates lure selection: in clear conditions, subtle-action baits like natural-colored minnow imitations excel, as walleye rely on precise vision and avoid high-vibration profiles during daylight.^[83] Conversely, turbid or stained waters favor brighter hues (chartreuse, firetiger) and noisier lures to exploit reduced visibility, drawing strikes via vibration and silhouette detection along mudlines or current breaks.^[84]

Commercial Harvest and Economic Aspects

Commercial walleye harvest in the Great Lakes primarily employs gill nets and traps, with gill nets accounting for the majority of effort in Lake Erie, where over 17,000 kilometers of net were deployed in 2024 by Ontario operators.^[70] These methods target adult walleye in deeper waters during cooler months, yielding high volumes for filleting markets. In 2024, Ontario's commercial fishery alone harvested 6.118 million walleye from Lake Erie, contributing to a total lake-wide commercial take exceeding 9 million fish and approximately 13.1 million pounds in management units 1-3.^[70] Landed values for walleye reflect substantial economic output, with Ontario harvests generating $11.5 million from 8.9 million pounds in 2020 and $16.2 million from 11.4 million pounds in 2021, at ex-vessel prices around $1.30 per pound.^[85] Processed fillets command higher market prices, often $6.50 to $7.70 per pound wholesale and over $20 per pound at retail for premium products, much of which is exported from Canada to U.S. markets for restaurant and consumer sales.^[85] This trade supports processing jobs and supply chains, with walleye comprising a key portion of Lake Erie's commercial output, which represents about 80% of Ontario's Great Lakes fishery value.^[86] Historically, commercial walleye yields in the Great Lakes rose sharply in the 1950s and 1960s, peaking at levels like 170 tons in certain areas by 1966 before declining due to excessive exploitation and environmental pressures, with some fisheries dropping to near zero by the 1980s.^[87]^[88] Recovery began in the late 20th century through targeted management, restoring harvests to multi-million-pound annual levels by the 2010s and bolstering rural economies in fishing-dependent communities along Lakes Erie and Huron.^[89] These operations provide consistent revenue streams for small-scale fleets, contrasting with the seasonal nature of sport fishing, though they face ongoing tensions over allocation amid total fisheries valued at over $5 billion regionally.^[90]

Management and Regulations

Harvest Limits and Quotas

Harvest limits for walleye (Sander vitreus) in major fisheries, such as Lake Erie, typically include daily bag limits of six fish per angler, with a minimum size restriction of 15 inches, enforced across states like Ohio from May 1, 2025, to February 28, 2026.^[91]^[92] These creel limits aim to sustain populations amid high angler pressure, though variations exist by waterbody and season, with some areas imposing possession limits or closed periods to protect spawning stocks. Interstate total allowable catches (TACs) for walleye in Lake Erie, coordinated by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, were reduced for 2025 to 11.4 million fish, an 11.6% decrease from the 2024 TAC of 12.9 million, reflecting harvest control rules based on stock assessment models like SCAA to prevent overexploitation.^[93]^[94] This adjustment, ranging between 10.3 and 13.5 million under policy constraints, allocates quotas among U.S. states, Canadian provinces, and tribal entities, prioritizing sustainable yield over maximum harvest.^[95] Enforcement of these limits has yielded mixed compliance, with notable violations documented in 2025; for instance, ten anglers from Ohio and Michigan were convicted in Huron County Court in March for exceeding Lake Erie walleye bag limits, each fined $210 plus court costs, and 15 fish forfeited to wildlife authorities.^[96]^[97] Such cases highlight ongoing challenges in monitoring recreational harvest, particularly in high-traffic areas, despite patrols and reporting requirements. Empirical analyses reveal discrepancies in harvest efficacy, with a 28-year study of 179 inland lakes indicating that approximately 40% of walleye populations experience overharvest—defined as yield exceeding biomass production—tenfold higher than the 4% estimated by fisheries managers using traditional models.^[98]^[99] This "hidden overharvest" stems from underestimating recreational impacts relative to production dynamics, suggesting that current quotas and bag limits may insufficiently curb exploitation in many systems, even as TAC reductions like those in 2025 attempt to align with precautionary principles.^[100]

Stocking Programs and Enforcement Issues

Walleye stocking programs, often implemented by state agencies and nonprofit organizations, aim to bolster populations in waters with limited natural recruitment. In Wisconsin, the Walleyes For Tomorrow organization supports hatchery production and habitat enhancement, with chapters like the Green Bay group funding efforts to increase walleye abundance in Northeast Wisconsin tributaries.^[101] For 2025, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR), in partnership with Walleyes For Tomorrow, continued a reward tag study in the Bay of Green Bay, tagging up to 5,400 walleye across spawning areas including the Fox, Oconto, Peshtigo, Menominee, and Sturgeon Bay regions to assess population dynamics and angler harvest.^[102] These initiatives have demonstrated success in supplementing wild stocks, such as in Lake Superior's Chequamegon and Huron Bays, where fingerling stocking improved survival and growth rates.^[103] Similarly, Midwestern lake evaluations indicate that factors like stocking density and water quality influence contribution to adult populations, with some reservoirs showing stocked walleye comprising significant portions of the fishery.^[104] Despite these benefits, hatchery propagation carries ecological risks, including genetic dilution from introducing non-local strains, which can reduce within-population variability and adaptive fitness.^[105] Disease transmission poses another concern, as stressed hatchery fish may spread pathogens like columnaris bacteria during transfer to wild systems, though intensive rearing can mitigate some exposure compared to pond methods.^[106] Broad reviews of hatchery practices reveal that over 80% of studies document negative impacts on wild conspecifics, including competition and introgression, underscoring the need for source-strain matching to minimize long-term harm.^[107] Enforcement challenges undermine stocking efficacy, as poaching and regulatory violations erode supplemented populations. In the Great Lakes region, particularly Lake Erie, offenders frequently exceed possession limits or alter fish forms—such as removing skin or filleting—to evade identification of size or species, complicating inspections and allowing illegal harvest to persist.^[108] Cases include multiple convictions for over-limit walleye possession, with fines and restitution imposed but gaps in monitoring enabling cross-state transport of unlawfully taken fish.^[109] These issues highlight systemic enforcement limitations, where resource constraints hinder proactive patrols despite tagging programs aiding detection.^[110] Cost-benefit analyses favor targeted stocking over broad reliance on artificial propagation, given high per-adult survival costs ranging from $18 to $640 depending on density and life stage.^[111]^[112] Fingerlings often yield higher returns than fry, contributing 2-3 times more to fisheries at lower effective costs, yet programs must prioritize waters lacking natural recruitment to avoid subsidizing overharvest.^[113] Habitat-focused alternatives, which enhance spawning success, offer superior long-term value by reducing dependency on costly put-and-take models.^[114]

Conservation and Controversies

Evidence of Overharvest and Decline Drivers

A 2019 analysis of 179 Wisconsin inland lakes over 28 years revealed that approximately 40% of walleye (Sander vitreus) stocks were overharvested, with biomass harvest exceeding production (Y/P > 1) in these cases, a rate ten times higher than prior fisheries manager estimates based on recruitment models.^[98] This hidden overharvest, often undetected due to reliance on angler-reported data and incomplete creel surveys, contributed directly to population declines averaging 36% across study lakes, as harvest outpaced somatic production even amid stable or declining natural mortality.^[98] The study emphasized that conventional assessments underestimated fishing impacts by ignoring production dynamics, leading to persistent overexploitation in systems where walleye biomass had already fallen below sustainable thresholds. Catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) metrics further corroborate overharvest signals, with hyperstable yields—where harvest remains steady despite falling abundance—observed in northern Wisconsin walleye fisheries, masking true declines until recruitment fails.^[115] In production-based models, fishing mortality emerged as the dominant driver exceeding habitat degradation or climate effects in many inland systems, as evidenced by Y/P ratios surpassing 1 in overharvested lakes while non-fished controls showed balanced dynamics.^[98] Counterexamples of recovery, such as Alberta walleye populations rebounding rapidly after late-1990s harvest restrictions reduced exploitation rates below safe levels, demonstrate causality: quotas aligning with production restored biomass without confounding habitat interventions.^[116] Sustainable yields remain achievable under market-oriented management adapting to local productivity, as opposed to uniform regulations that overlook site-specific overharvest; for instance, Red Lakes walleye stocks began recovering post-1997 commercial closure by curtailing gillnet pressure, yielding biomass increases despite prior multi-decade overexploitation.^[117] Empirical models prioritizing harvest reduction over habitat proxies have predicted and achieved such rebounds, underscoring fishing as a proximal cause amenable to direct control, though compounded by secondary factors like warming temperatures in some models.^[118]

Debates on Tribal Rights and Equity in Access

The Wisconsin Walleye War, spanning the 1980s and 1990s, arose from tensions between non-Native sport anglers and Ojibwe tribes exercising off-reservation spearfishing rights for walleye in ceded territories of northern Wisconsin and Michigan's Upper Peninsula, following federal court rulings upholding 1837 and 1842 treaties that reserved hunting and fishing rights.^[119]^[120] In the 1983 Voigt decision, a federal court affirmed these treaty rights, allowing tribes to spearfish without state licenses while permitting state regulation only for conservation purposes, a ruling later upheld by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in 1988 and not overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court.^[121]^[122] Protests escalated into violence, including boat blockades, harassment of tribal fishers, and property damage, driven by perceptions among sport fishers that spearfishing—conducted at night on spawning beds with high selectivity and near-100% retention—unfairly depleted walleye stocks accessible to non-Natives via hook-and-line methods during open seasons.^[119] Critics argued this created inequities in access, as tribal quotas often exceeded state bag limits per person and fostered resentment among recreational users who viewed walleye as a shared public resource, potentially incentivizing overharvest in localized spawning areas despite overall quotas set annually by the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC).^[123]^[124] Empirical data indicate tribal spear harvests constitute a minority of total removals, averaging around 30,000 walleye annually in Wisconsin's ceded territory compared to hundreds of thousands from state-licensed angling, with GLIFWC assessments showing stable adult walleye populations in 86% of monitored speared lakes through quota adjustments and stocking contributions exceeding tribal takes.^[73]^[125]^[126] Nonetheless, debates persist on sustainability, with some analyses revealing hyperstable catch rates masking productivity declines and hidden overharvest risks across fisheries, including tribal subsistence, where concentrated spring efforts could exacerbate vulnerabilities in low-productivity lakes amid climate-driven earlier thaws.^[127]^[100] In the Red Lake Nation's waters, straddling Minnesota and Ontario, a walleye population crash in the late 1990s—attributed to excessive commercial gillnetting and unregulated subsistence harvesting—prompted a total fishing moratorium in 2000, followed by cooperative management with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources that banned commercial walleye fishing and imposed strict subsistence limits, enabling recovery to sustainable levels by the 2010s with annual tribal harvests now capped at 10 walleye per day per person.^[128]^[129]^[130] This case underscores arguments for culturally sensitive subsistence rights balanced against conservation imperatives, as tribal self-regulation demonstrated capacity for restraint, yet highlighted risks of inequitable access breeding non-compliance or poaching if perceived as preferential.^[131]^[123] Proponents of treaty rights emphasize preservation of indigenous practices tied to food security and sovereignty, arguing that historical cessions warrant prioritized access over modern recreational claims, while opponents contend that unchanging treaty allocations ignore population growth and ecological shifts, advocating proportional shares based on sustainable yield to mitigate social friction and ensure long-term viability.^[132]^[133] Co-management frameworks, such as those under GLIFWC since the 1990s, have reduced overt conflicts by integrating tribal and state data for quota-setting, though underlying debates on equity persist, with some viewing differential methods and limits as eroding public trust in shared resource stewardship.^[125]^[134]

Culinary Uses and Nutritional Value

Preparation Methods and Culinary Applications

Walleye fillets consist of mild-flavored, flaky white meat with a subtle sweetness, which benefits from straightforward cooking methods that highlight its tenderness without overwhelming the natural taste.^[135]^[136] Prior to preparation, filleting involves removing the skin and excising the Y-shaped pin bones along the lateral line to yield boneless portions, minimizing waste and improving texture during consumption.^[137]^[138] Pan-frying remains a primary technique, typically employing a light coating of flour, egg, and breadcrumbs or crackers, cooked in butter or oil over medium heat for 2-3 minutes per side to achieve a crispy exterior while retaining flakiness.^[139]^[140] Grilling or baking with lemon, garlic, and herbs offers alternatives, searing fillets at high heat for brief periods or roasting at 350-400°F until opaque, preserving moisture through minimal handling.^[141]^[142] These approaches suit walleye tacos, where fried or grilled strips are paired with fresh toppings for a portable dish. In the Great Lakes region, walleye features prominently in shore lunches, where fresh fillets are pan-fried on-site with simple seasonings, accompanied by tartar sauce, coleslaw, and fried potatoes for an immediate post-catch meal.^[143]^[144] For preservation, immediate freezing after gutting and filleting halts spoilage effectively, while smoking follows brining in a salt solution and low-heat exposure (around 150-225°F) to form a pellicle and infuse hickory or alder smoke, extending usability when vacuum-sealed.^[145]^[146] Culinary versatility aligns walleye with cod or tilefish, accommodating frying, broiling, or sautéing due to comparable mild profiles and firm-yet-flaky structures, though walleye's freshwater origin imparts a slightly sweeter note.^[147]^[148]

Nutritional Profile and Health Considerations

Walleye (Sander vitreus) provides approximately 93 kcal per 100 grams of raw fillet, with a macronutrient composition dominated by protein at 19.1 grams, alongside 1.2 grams of total fat and negligible carbohydrates.^[149] This lean profile supports its classification as a high-protein, low-calorie seafood option, comparable to other freshwater piscivores. Key micronutrients include potassium (389 mg), phosphorus (210 mg), and selenium (13.3 µg), contributing to electrolyte balance, bone health, and antioxidant defense, respectively.^[149] The fish contains moderate levels of long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) at 90 mg, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) at 230 mg, and docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) at 40 mg per 100 grams raw, totaling around 360 mg of EPA + DHA.^[149] These fatty acids, though lower than in anadromous species like salmon, associate with reduced cardiovascular risk through anti-inflammatory mechanisms and improved lipid profiles when consumed regularly (e.g., 1-2 servings weekly).^[150] Population studies link such intakes to lower incidence of coronary events, though walleye's leaner fat content yields benefits primarily from consistent rather than high-dose consumption.^[151] Health risks stem from bioaccumulated contaminants, particularly in predatory adults from industrialized watersheds. Mercury concentrations average 0.14 ppm in similar species like northern pike, placing walleye in the moderate range—lower than tilefish (1.45 ppm) but warranting caution for larger specimens (>20 inches), where levels can exceed 0.3 ppm and pose neurodevelopmental risks with frequent intake.^[152] In the Great Lakes, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) drive most consumption advisories for walleye, with mean fillet levels prompting limits of one meal per month for sensitive populations (e.g., pregnant women, children) due to carcinogenic and endocrine-disrupting effects; total PCBs have declined over 90% since the 1970s but persist above action thresholds in many samples.^[153] Empirical assessments indicate nutritional gains (e.g., protein and omega-3s) outweigh contaminant exposures for general adult consumers eating smaller, wild-caught walleye from unadvised waters, but site-specific guidelines from agencies like the EPA supersede general benefits in polluted regions.^[154]^[151]

Cultural and Historical Significance

Indigenous Knowledge and Traditional Uses

In Anishinaabe (Ojibwe) oral traditions, the walleye, termed ogaa or ogaawag, symbolizes knowledge, illumination, and guidance, attributed to its eyes that enable vision in murky, low-light waters of lakes and rivers.^[155] This cultural association underscores the fish's role in teachings about perception and wisdom within pre-colonial Great Lakes societies.^[156] Traditional harvesting centered on spearfishing during the spring spawning runs, when walleye migrated to shallow, clearer waters, allowing for precise nocturnal or dawn spearing from canoes—a method honed over centuries for efficiency in the region's inland fisheries.^[157] This practice targeted spawning adults while minimizing disturbance to broader stocks, aligning with observed seasonal abundances.^[158] As a staple protein source, walleye formed 17–38% of the traditional Anishinaabe diet in northern Great Lakes areas, often smoked for preservation to extend usability through non-fishing seasons and integrated with seasonal cycles like summer (niibin) fishing alongside fall wild rice (manoomin) gathering for balanced subsistence.^[159] ^[160] Oral histories preserved knowledge of sustainable selectivity, such as avoiding overharvest during vulnerable periods and respecting ecological cues to sustain populations across generations pre-contact.^[161]

Role in Modern Recreation and Symbolism

The walleye holds symbolic importance as the official state fish of Minnesota, designated in 1965, and South Dakota, designated in 1982, underscoring its central role in Midwestern angling traditions.^[162]^[163] Prized for its nocturnal habits and keen low-light vision, the species represents the quintessential challenge in freshwater pursuit, evoking the patience and skill demanded of anglers in regional fishing lore.^[164]^[165] Recreational walleye angling fuels economic vitality through competitive tournaments that draw participants nationwide, generating substantial revenue for host locales via expenditures on accommodations, fuel, and equipment. Major events, such as those hosted by the Professional Walleye Trail, have produced economic impacts exceeding $10 million in areas like the Quad Cities, bolstering tourism-dependent communities.^[166] Median participant spending in surveyed walleye tournaments reaches $1,562, highlighting the activity's direct contributions to local economies centered on sportfishing heritage.^[167] Post-1950s stocking initiatives have countered earlier population lows, restoring walleye abundance and amplifying modern recreational access across inland waterways. In regions like Missouri, systematic fry and fingerling stockings commencing in the early 1950s have sustained harvestable stocks, intertwining conservation efforts with the species' enduring appeal as a trophy quarry.^[168] This resurgence has reinforced the walleye's emblematic status, symbolizing resilience and the interplay of human management with natural fisheries dynamics in contemporary angling culture.^[169]

References

[1]
Walleye (Sander vitreus) - Species Profile
Size: 91 cm. Native Range: St. Lawrence-Great Lakes, Arctic, and Mississippi River basins from Quebec to Northwest Territories, and south to Alabama and ...
[2]
Walleye (Sander vitreus) | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Habitat. Walleye live in rivers, natural lakes and reservoirs, in both clear and turbid, as well as both shallow and deep water. While they can be found cold, ...Missing: distribution ecology
[3]
[PDF] Walleye (Sander vitreus)
Widely introduced elsewhere in U.S.. Habitat Description. Moderate to large coolwater lakes (> 100 ha) with shallow to moderate depths, moderate productivity.Missing: scientific distribution ecology
[4]
(species) sander vitreus - Utah Natural Heritage Program Field Guide
The species spawns in streams or in shallow water along shore-lines during the spring, and eggs hatch in about one month. Walleye prefer large lakes or streams, ...
[5]
Walleye Fish Facts - Sander vitreus - A-Z Animals
Sep 25, 2025 · The walleye is a species of ray-finned fish native to freshwater bodies in many states throughout the midwestern United States and in many regions of Canada.
[6]
Walleye - Agricultural Marketing Resource Center
Historically, the walleye has been a prized fish both for eating and recreational fishing. Numerous surveys and professional publications consistently ...
[7]
Sander vitreus, Walleye : fisheries, aquaculture, gamefish, aquarium
Sander · Species in. Percidae; - Classification -; Luciopercinae; Percidae · Perciformes/Percoidei; Teleostei; Chordata; Animalia. Search. Sander vitreus ( ...
[8]
Sander vitreus - Walleye - NatureServe Explorer
Relative abundance and distribution of fishes in Wisconsin. Fish Distribution Database to year 2000. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Haponski ...
[9]
Sander vitreus (walleye) | INFORMATION | Animal Diversity Web
Walleyes are native to freshwater rivers and lakes of the northern United States and Canada. Their native range makes a lopsided triangle.
[10]
[PDF] Molecular Systematics of Sander, and Hybridization between ...
Walleye and sauger were resolved as each other's closest relatives with divergence times estimated as 3.12 ± 1.33 (±SE) million years before present (MYBP) from ...
[11]
Walleye - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Origin and history of walleye type of fish (pike-perch), 1876, American English, said to be so-called from the positioning of the eyes (compare wall-eyed).
[12]
All About Walleye - City Seafood
Nov 19, 2024 · Their name comes from their large, milky, and slightly opaque eyes, which resemble the appearance of a "wall" (as in the eye looking like a wall ...
[13]
Walleye | Fishes of Wisconsin
Common name: Walleye · Scientific name: Sander vitreus (Sander refers to the German common name of the European relative) and vitreus means "glassy", referring ...
[14]
Fishes of Minnesota-Walleye, Sander (Stizostedion) vitreus
Feb 16, 2004 · Sander (sand-er) refers to German common name for the European relative of walleye vitreus (vit´-tree-us) means "glassy", alluding to the ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
[15]
Walleye or Pickerel – The Great Debate - Watersheds Canada
Jun 13, 2019 · Walleye are large, often called pickerel in Canada, while pickerel are smaller, part of the Pike family, and found in shallower waters.Missing: distinction | Show results with:distinction
[16]
Pickerel vs Walleye: Setting the Record Straight
Aug 3, 2015 · Walleye are in the perch family, while pickerel are in the pike family. Walleye are larger, and pickerel are not found in Lake Superior ...Missing: distinction | Show results with:distinction
[17]
Walleye vs Pickerel: Are they the same fish? - Tastylicious - Pinterest
Apr 19, 2022 · The main difference between walleye and pickerel is that walleye is from the perch family, while pickerel belongs to the pike family.<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
ogaa (na) | | the Ojibwe People's Dictionary
Baanizh igiw ogaawag. Filet those walleyes. es. Listen. Gii-ziigwang aamiwag ogaawag.
[19]
Fish Species Names in Ojibwe Anishinaabemowin Language
Walleye: Ooga or o gaas. Perhaps Sunset Country's favourite fish species, walleye need little to no introduction. These delectable table fare fish are sought ...
[20]
walleye Sander vitreus - Texas Freshwater Fishes
Body shape: Large, elongate fish with an almost cylindrical body (Ross 2001). Mouth position: Has a large, terminal mouth. The posterior margin of the jaw ...
[21]
Sander vitreus - NCFishes.com
Unique Characteristics: First (spinous) dorsal fin with a dark spot on the last 1 or 2 interradial membranes; dorsal fin with no black spots. White-tipped lower ...Missing: morphology body shape
[22]
Sander vitreus (walleye) | CABI Compendium
Apr 1, 2013 · Habitat List ; Brackish, Inland saline areas, Present, no further details, Natural ; Freshwater, Lakes, Principal habitat, Natural.
[23]
Is sexual size dimorphism in walleye, Sander vitreus , a driver of ...
Oct 19, 2024 · Walleye (Sander vitreus) are a sexually dimorphic species in which females are larger than males in adulthood. Walleye can also exhibit sex‐ ...Missing: duodenal bulb color
[24]
Sexual size dimorphism of walleye (<i>Stizostedion vitreum ... - OUCI
Sexual size dimorphism of walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum) is achieved by females having higher growth rates than males before and after maturation, ...
[25]
Effects of simulated light intensity, habitat complexity and forage type ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Walleye Sander vitreus, for example, possess a tapetum lucidum within the retina to allow for foraging in low light or turbid conditions in ...
[26]
Retinal Structure and Function in the Walleye (Stizostedion vitreum ...
In the sauger, Stizostedion canadense, the tapetum lucidum of the retina was found to be more highly developed than in the walleye, S. vitreum vitreum.Missing: sensory | Show results with:sensory
[27]
[PDF] An Updated Walleye Management Plan for Wisconsin
Jan 31, 2022 · Walleye are primarily a riverine species but can adapt to lacustrine (lake) environments. They require relatively cool, clean (but not ...
[28]
Walleye Dimensions & Drawings
Sep 11, 2025 · Walleyes have a total length between 22”-42” (56-107 cm), body height of 4.5”-8.5” (11.4-21.6 cm), and an overall weight in the range of 3-7 lb ...
[29]
https://www.fishing-worldrecords.com/scientificname/Sander%2520vitreus/show
[30]
world record walleye - IGFA Member Services
All Tackle (Length) World Records. Line Class. Length. Location. Catch Date ... W-03 kg (6 lb). Weight: 2.13 kg (4 lb 11 oz). Location: Whitefish Bay, Lake ...
[31]
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/F08-091
[32]
Latitudinal comparisons of walleye growth in North America and ...
Parameter estimates of von Bertalanffy growth models indicated that the growth of walleyes in Kansas was more similar to that of southern latitude populations ...
[33]
The Largest Walleye Ever Caught in the US, and the Biggest State ...
Dec 19, 2023 · Here's a look at every US state walleye record over 15 pounds, plus a glimpse at why millions of anglers target this fish each year.
[34]
Sexual and spatio-temporal variation of Lake Erie Walleye growth ...
The von Bertalanffy equation (von Bertalanffy, 1938) with a lognormal error distribution was used to model Walleye growth(3) L t = L ∞ ( 1 − e − K ( t − t 0 ) ...
[35]
[PDF] Walleye (Sander vitreus) ERSS - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
“Throughout the history of this species' introductions, walleye has been introduced into lakes and reservoirs predominantly as a sport fisheries target as well ...
[36]
A population genetic window into the past and future of the walleye ...
Jun 17, 2014 · A population genetic window into the past and future of the walleye Sander vitreus: relation to historic walleye and the extinct “blue pike” S.
[37]
relation to historic walleye and the extinct “blue pike” S. v. “glaucus”
Contemporary walleye populations possess high levels of genetic diversity and divergence, despite habitat degradation and exploitation. Genetic and previously ...
[38]
The Native Range of Walleyes in the Missouri River Drainage
Aug 7, 2025 · The southern limit of the native range of walleye Sander vitreus is difficult to determine because of sparse historical information, ...Missing: colonial | Show results with:colonial<|control11|><|separator|>
[39]
Forensic geochemistry identifies the illegal introduction of Walleye ...
Otolith geochemical analyses reveal that an invasive Walleye caught in Lake Cascade, Idaho, did not originate there but was instead illegally introduced.Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
[40]
Walleye Fishing & Stocking Information - Go Fish Education Center
Throughout the 1960s, walleyes were stocked in other North Georgia reservoirs; however, these early stocking efforts were largely unsuccessful in all but a few ...Missing: history western Canada Pacific Northwest
[41]
Walleye recruitment success is less resilient to warming water ...
Walleye recruitment was most resilient to warming in lakes with few largemouth bass, suggesting that the effects of climate change depend on lake-specific food ...
[42]
Spontaneous hybridization and introgression between walleye ...
Dec 14, 2020 · We used genotyping by sequencing (GBS) to examine 217 fish from two large reservoirs with mixed populations of walleye and sauger in Saskatchewan, Canada.
[43]
Influence of dams on sauger population structure and hybridization ...
Jul 21, 2024 · In this study, we examine the role of dams in altering sauger population connectivity and facilitating hybridization with introduced walleye ...
[44]
[PDF] A Biological Synopsis of Walleye (Sander vitreus) - Canada.ca
Walleye have been successfully introduced into Swan Lake. Efforts to introduce walleye from Charlie Lake into. Cameron Lake have not been successful. In ...
[45]
[PDF] AN EVALUATION OF WALLEYE (SANDER VITREUS) SPAWNING ...
different between walleye populations (lacustrine versus riverine). Therefore the type of habitat available in any system where walleye are stocked may ...
[46]
[PDF] Walleye and Sauger Life History Chapter 7
We focus on the lifetime growth pattern of walleye and show how this pattern is shaped by reproductive traits and influenced by environmental factors affecting.
[47]
[PDF] Survival of Eggs Spawned from Large Walleyes
Jun 20, 2024 · Many fisheries professionals involved in walleye (Sander vitreus) culture exclude large females from spawning, believing that larger fish ...
[48]
Demographic patterns of walleye (Sander vitreus) reproductive ...
Mar 10, 2024 · Walleye exhibit sexual dimorphism, as females tend to grow to longer lengths and mature 1–2 years later than males (Bozek et al., 2011; ...
[49]
Unobserved mortality occurs early in larval walleye (Sander vitreus ...
Jun 16, 2024 · Post-fertilization, the eggs were water-hardened for 1 h. After ... mortality occurs early in larval walleye (Sander vitreus) aquaculture.
[50]
[PDF] EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON WALLEYE EGG HATCH RATE"
Results of this study showed that rapidly reduoed hatch rates can be expected when water temperatures at fertilization exceed 12 C. Hatching success of walleye ...Missing: latitude variation<|control11|><|separator|>
[51]
A Guide to Spring Walleye Migrations - In-Fisherman
Southern walleyes prefer spawning temperatures between 48°F and 50°F, while their Yankee cousins and Canadian counterparts favor temperatures between 44°F and ...
[52]
Survival of Eggs Spawned from Large Walleyes
Jun 20, 2024 · ... (Sander vitreus) culture exclude large females from spawning, believing that larger fish produce lower-quality eggs. However, the ...<|separator|>
[53]
Age-0 walleye Sander vitreus display length-dependent diet shift to ...
Jan 27, 2019 · The ontogenetic diet shift to piscivory can be energetically beneficial for fish growth and allows larger, more energetically profitable ...
[54]
[PDF] Dietary Habits of an Underperforming Walleye (Sander vitreus ...
Apr 1, 2025 · During their juvenile phase, Walleye experience broad ontogenetic diet shifts where they transition from feeding at lower trophic levels, ...
[55]
Visual detection thresholds in two trophically distinct fishes are ...
Aug 17, 2018 · However, it is likely that too much light scattering in turbid water will pose a threat to the visual abilities of walleye at higher turbidity ...Missing: nocturnal | Show results with:nocturnal
[56]
Walleye biology and identification | Minnesota DNR
The walleye's low-light vision and sensitivity to bright light play a large role in its behavior. They usually feed in shallow water at dawn and dusk. Walleye ...Missing: ecology nocturnal
[57]
Reevaluation of a walleye (Sander vitreus) bioenergetics model
Sep 25, 2013 · Feeding rates ranged from 1.4 to 1.7 % of walleye body weight ... bioenergetics model predicted walleye growth without any detectable bias.
[58]
Understanding the Walleye Growth Rate - Cobham River Lodge
Dec 8, 2023 · As they reach maturity, walleye growth rate typically slows down. This is partly due to their increased energy allocation towards ...
[59]
Diets and growth of age-0 walleye in a recently recovered population
As top piscivores, walleye exert top-down pressure on food webs with potential to influence forage fish populations and community structure (He et al., 2015).
[60]
Stable isotope composition of walleye: 15N accumulation with age ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Age accounted for 81% of the variation in δ15N values of walleye (ages 2–27, N = 65, δ15N range = 15.3–19.2‰), providing evidence supporting 15N ...
[61]
Lake Michigan trophic structure as revealed by stable C and N ...
The objectives of this study were to describe the current trophic structure of Lake Michigan's upper food web using stable C and N isotopes.
[62]
Food habits of nonnative Walleyes in Lake Pend Oreille, Idaho
Dec 17, 2024 · Stable isotope analysis suggested that Walleyes occupied similar trophic positions as other top‐level piscivores in the system. As Walleye age ...
[63]
Cyclical, multi-trophic-level responses to a volatile, introduced ...
Jan 27, 2025 · Declines in recruitment and abundance of Walleye Sander vitreus have been associated with increasing Rainbow Smelt abundance (Johnson & Goettl, ...
[64]
Foraging ecology of walleye and brown trout in a Great Lakes tributary
Interactions among rainbow trout, walleye, and brown trout favored parr survival, i.e. the presence of alternate prey (rainbow trout) significantly influenced ...
[65]
Diet Overlap and Predation between Smallmouth Bass and Walleye ...
Of 389 adult walleye stomachs examined from June 1999 through March 2000, a total of 879 prey fish was found, but only one was identified as a smallmouth bass.
[66]
(PDF) Walleye Foraging Ecology in an Interconnected Chain of ...
Mar 3, 2016 · We used diet and stable isotope analyses to describe the contributions of native and nonnative forage species to the diets of Walleyes Sander vitreus within an ...
[67]
Biotic and abiotic factors that influence Walleye recruitment in ...
Nov 7, 2023 · The declines in natural Walleye recruitment are particularly troubling because of variability in population capacity to sustain exploitation ( ...Abstract · INTRODUCTION · METHODS · DISCUSSION
[68]
Factors Affecting Recruitment of Walleyes in Escanaba Lake ...
Recruitment may vary as a result of some factors, such as spawner abundance, that are density dependent and others, such as the environment, that are density ...
[69]
Walleye Numbers are Down in Lake Erie
Dec 26, 2024 · The 2024 index fell far short of the long-term average of 58 fish per hectare. This year, trawls determined there were only about 19 fish per hectare, a 67% ...Missing: TAX | Show results with:TAX
[70]
[PDF] 2024 Report by the Lake Erie Walleye Task Group, March 2025
Mar 19, 2025 · The 2025 abundance of age 2 and older Walleye in the west-central population is projected to be 77.4 million fish, with 52.3 million fish ...Missing: young- TAX
[71]
Factors related to growth and survival of larval walleyes
Poor growth of walleyes, coupled with high densities of larval gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum), resulted in poor recruitment during 1999. Walleyes grew ...
[72]
Lagging spawning and increasing phenological extremes ... - ASLO
Feb 26, 2024 · Our study provides some of the first evidence that increasing climate variability may disrupt tightly coupled ice-off and walleye (Sander vitreus) spawning ...
[73]
Study: Climate change affects walleye survival as lakes thaw earlier
Mar 1, 2024 · Researchers say climate change is causing lakes to thaw about 3 times faster than walleye are adapting.
[74]
Fishing plays greater role on Midwest fish populations than warming ...
Oct 10, 2025 · Xu said fishing had a greater effect on 92 percent of fish populations than warming across lakes studied between 1980 to 2021. The findings ...
[75]
The decline of walleye populations: an ecological tipping point?
Feb 6, 2025 · Numerous factors have been implicated in walleye population declines, including climate change, habitat loss, invasive species, species- ...
[76]
Human Impacts on Great Lakes Walleye Sander vitreus Structure ...
Nov 2, 2024 · Genetic distance was relatively low between walleye from the stocking ... However, these results indicate the potential risk of unknown genetic ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[77]
Contribution and Performance of Stocked Walleyes in the Recovery ...
Jul 7, 2016 · Stocking for longer than necessary could also increase genetic risks by reintroducing any maladaptive genes that selection might otherwise ...
[78]
Seventeen Tips for Catching Walleyes | Virginia DWR
Aug 24, 2022 · Vertical jigging with a jig or slab spoon directly under the boat is often the best way to catch walleyes. When using this tactic, try to keep ...
[79]
Summer Fishing Tips - Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife
Baits/Lures: The two best methods for summertime walleye are bottom bouncing worm harnesses, and trolling or casting crankbaits.
[80]
[PDF] DIVISION OF WILDLIFE - Ohio.gov
SEASONAL HOTSPOT. WALLEYE. SPRING WALLEYE. (MARCH - MAY) ... Anglers fish from boats by vertically jigging ice fishing lures, or trolling crankbaits in the middle ...
[81]
[PDF] Ohio's Lake Erie Fisheries - 2024 Angler Report
Generally, the 2024 adult Walleye population estimate is within the top 25% of the past 30 years and is comparable to the renowned populations of the 1980s.Missing: TAX | Show results with:TAX<|separator|>
[82]
The World Record Walleye and The Biggest Walleye Ever Caught
Apr 18, 2023 · Harper's fish was said to weigh 25 pounds, 4 ounces with an astonishing length of 41 inches and 29-inch girth. As is the case with the many of ...
[83]
Water clarity and walleye fishing | Woods N Water News
Jul 1, 2016 · In clear water lures that feature a subtle action generally out-produce high action baits and also baits that create a lot of noise in the water ...Missing: turbid techniques
[84]
5 Walleye Fishing Tips from Walleye Guide Jason Mitchell
Mar 2, 2016 · Fish can still see well in stained water but can't see well if the water is turbid (cloudy or muddy). This is why mud lines have a life ...
[85]
[PDF] 100% Great Lakes Fish
Oct 16, 2023 · Walleye, Yellow Perch and Lake Whitefish account for the majority. (84%) of the commercial catch for Ontario (Government of Ontario 2023).
[86]
Commercial Fishing Map - Conservation Gateway
The Great Lakes provide commercial fishermen with an annual average harvest of nearly 50 million pounds. Lake Erie supports the largest commercial fishery ...Missing: revenue | Show results with:revenue
[87]
[PDF] walleye stocks in the great lakes, 1800-1975: fluctuations and ...
In addition, the size and age distribution of walleyes of the. Muskegon River run in the critical years of 1958-62 (Tables 2 and 3) did not indicate unusually ...
[88]
[PDF] Harvest and Exploitation Chapter 10 - American Fisheries Society
Commercial walleye harvest peaked in 1950 at 0.6 million kg, declined to zero in 1987 and has remained at very low levels (Baldwin et al. 2002), prob- ably due ...
[89]
Dynamics of the recovery of the western Lake Erie walleye ...
After a 1957 collapse, walleye stock recovered with a fishing moratorium, quota management, and strong year-classes, but growth declined as the population ...
[90]
The Fishery - Great Lakes Fishery Commission
The Great Lakes commercial, recreational, and tribal fisheries are collectively valued at more than $5.1 billion annually and support more than 75,000 jobs.Missing: landed | Show results with:landed
[91]
[PDF] LAKE ERIE - Ohio.gov
Minimum size for walleye is 15 inches. MAY 1, 2025 to. FEBRUARY 28, 2026. DAILY BAG LIMIT: 6. MARCH 1, 2026 to.
[92]
Lake Erie Anglers Found Guilty for Walleye Fishing Violations
Mar 25, 2025 · The Division of Wildlife reminds anglers that the daily bag limit for walleye on Lake Erie is six fish, with a minimum length requirement of 15 ...
[93]
Ohio Division of Wildlife sets 2025 guidelines for walleye, perch
Apr 6, 2025 · The 2025 TAC for walleye is 11.4 million fish, a decrease of 1.5 million, or about 11.6%, from the 2024 TAC of about 12.9 million.
[94]
Walleye total allowable catch limits drop a bit from 2024 levels on ...
Apr 9, 2025 · The total allowable catch (TAC) for walleyes in the western and central portions of Lake Erie for 2025 was set at 11,373,000 fish, 11% less than ...<|separator|>
[95]
[PDF] lake erie committee walleye task group executive summary report ...
Based on the 2025 SCAA model, the 2024 population estimate was 80.9 million age 2 and older Walleye (Figure 2). The abundance of age. 2 (2022 year class) fish ...Missing: young- TAX
[96]
Multiple anglers found guilty of overfishing walleye from Lake Erie
Mar 20, 2025 · Ten anglers were charged in Huron Court, found guilty and paid $210 in fines and court costs. Fifteen walleye were forfeited to the Division of ...Missing: overharvest | Show results with:overharvest
[97]
Lake Erie anglers from Ohio, Michigan, guilty of walleye fishing ...
Mar 20, 2025 · Each was found guilty and paid $210 in fines and court costs. Fifteen walleye were forfeited to the Division of Wildlife. Six Michigan anglers ...Missing: overharvest | Show results with:overharvest
[98]
Production dynamics reveal hidden overharvest of inland ...
Nov 20, 2019 · We compared biomass harvest and biomass production in a unique 28-y, 179-lake dataset of a valuable inland fishery and found ∼40% of stocks to be overharvested.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[99]
Study says “hidden overharvest” from fishing plays a role in ...
Nov 18, 2019 · It finds that “40 percent of walleye populations are overharvested, which is ten times higher than the estimates fisheries managers currently ...
[100]
Study Says “Hidden Overharvest” From Fishing Plays a Role in ...
That study found that “40 percent of walleye populations are overharvested, which is ten times higher than the estimates fisheries managers currently use,” she ...
[101]
Walleyes for Tomorrow Green Bay Chapter in Northeast Wisconsin
The Green Bay chapter aims to increase walleye production and habitat, improve walleye and sauger fishing, and all funds raised stay in Northeast Wisconsin.
[102]
Green Bay Walleye Reward Program to Continue in 2025
Mar 13, 2025 · DNR staff will begin tagging up to 5,400 walleyes in major spawning areas near Green Bay, including the Bay of Green Bay and Sturgeon Bay, along ...
[103]
[PDF] Walleye-Rehabilitation Guidelines for the Great Lakes Area
In Lake Superior, fingerling-stocking programs in. Chequamegon Bay (Wisconsin) and Huron Bay (Michigan) have been successful in terms of survival and growth.
[104]
Assessing factors related to Walleye stocking success in the ...
Demand for Walleye stocking may increase if climate change limits the potential for natural recruitment in lakes. Consequently, the strategic distribution of ...
[105]
[PDF] Review and Assessment of Walleye Genetics and Stocking in Alberta
Dec 15, 2024 · Walleye stocking in the province of Alberta has occurred since 1926. The spatial pattern of stocking has tended to move walleye genes from ...
[106]
[PDF] Strategies for Fish Health Management of Tank-Raised Walleye
Timing of harvest and movement of fingerlings from the ponds to the hatchery is critical because of columnaris Qsease, a stress-mediated disease, that can.
[107]
50 years of research overwhelmingly shows hatcheries are harmful ...
Sep 6, 2023 · The study's results were resounding, revealing that 83 percent of all published research determined that hatcheries had an adverse impact on wild fish ...
[108]
Ohio DNR closes two big walleye over-limit cases on Lake Erie
Mar 21, 2025 · All six anglers were found guilty of taking more than the daily limit of walleye on Lake Erie and possessing fish in an unlawful form while away ...
[109]
State: Men poached walleye | Sandusky Register They waived ...
Mar 20, 2025 · Four Ohioans were charged with possessing walleye over the limit, a fourth-degree misdemeanor. They all waived the cases and paid $210 in fines ...Missing: skinless | Show results with:skinless
[110]
Suspected Poacher Stopped in Tennessee with Illegal Ohio Walleyes
Wildlife officials in Ohio and Tennessee combined in early June to apprehend a suspected poacher who reportedly took an over limit of walleye on Lake Erie, ...
[111]
[PDF] Survival and Return on Investment of Stocked Walleye in Bayfield ...
Survival of stocked walleye to maturity ranged from 0.17% to 1.04%, with cost per adult fish ranging from $101.77 to $640.01.
[112]
Evaluation of survival and cost to harvestable age of stocked fall ...
Lakes stocked at 24.7 fish/ha generally had the best survival resulting in the lowest cost to age-4 ($17.70 - $35.41/fish).
[113]
Evaluating the contributions and economic costs for Walleye fry and ...
Fingerling-stocked Walleye contributed 2.12 times in 2022 and 2.92 times more in 2023 than fry-stocked Walleye. Production cost estimates revealed that fry cost ...
[114]
Walleye inland lake habitat: considerations for successful natural ...
Jan 3, 2020 · Large lakes also have more available pelagic space for larval walleye to forage on zooplankton and to avoid predation (Priegel 1970).
[115]
Diminishing productivity and hyperstable harvest in northern ...
Embke et al. (2019) followed this research and found ∼40% of walleye populations experienced production-overharvest (i.e., yield > production) in the CTWI.<|control11|><|separator|>
[116]
[PDF] Walleye (lakes) Population Status History - Open Government program
Sep 23, 2015 · In the late 1990s, however, responsible restrictions on sport harvest of walleye were implemented and most walleye populations responded quickly ...<|separator|>
[117]
Comparisons of Walleye Fecundity Before, During, and After ...
Apr 11, 2024 · An ambitious interagency effort commenced to recover the Red Lakes Walleye population. Commercial fishing was closed in 1997, and recreational ...
[118]
Water clarity and temperature effects on walleye safe harvest: an ...
May 7, 2019 · In response to observed walleye population declines, walleye mortality has been well below estimated safe harvest levels in recent years (2013– ...
[119]
Behind Upper Midwest tribal spearfishing is a long and violent ...
Jul 9, 2024 · In 1983, the Supreme Court ruled to reaffirm Ojibwe treaty rights on and off reservation land. But then angry and misinformed locals started ...
[120]
Northwoods tribal leader reflects on 40th anniversary of court ... - WPR
Oct 31, 2023 · This year marks the 40th anniversary of a landmark ruling that reaffirmed the 1837 treaty rights of a northern Wisconsin tribe to hunt, fish ...
[121]
Anti-spearfishing Concrete Walleye Decoy | Wisconsin Historical ...
May 18, 2006 · Known as the Voigt Decision, that ruling confirmed that the 1837 and 1842 treaties between the United States and the Ojibwe guaranteed Ojibwe ...
[122]
How Ojibwe tribes in Wisconsin resisted efforts to deny treaty rights
the 1972 Gurnoe decision, the right to fish in Lake Superior. The 1983 Voigt ...
[123]
The Never-Ending Struggle for Tribal Fishing Rights | Mercatus Center
Dec 20, 2023 · Opposition to tribal fishing rights occurs because Indians are competing with non-Indians for a scarce resource—each fish Indians catch means ...
[124]
Wisconsin tribes raise, return far more walleye than they harvest
Dec 11, 2024 · The Ojibwe tribes have often been criticized for harvesting too much walleye, but evidence shows they stock much more walleye than they ...
[125]
[PDF] 2023-2024 Ceded Territory Fishery Assessment Report
1 Tribal harvest data used to calculate tribal exploitation provided by the Great Lakes Indian. Fish and Wildlife Commission. 2 Angler creel survey only in ...
[126]
[PDF] In the Wisconsin Treaty Ceded Waters
Feb 13, 2025 · Of the 293 speared lakes where walleye have been harvested, 252 (86%) have had at least one adult population estimate (Figure 2). Figure 1.
[127]
[PDF] Diminishing productivity and hyperstable harvest in northern ...
Jan 9, 2025 · Walleye Y was hyperstable along a production gradient among all management approaches and fishery types (i.e., angling only, angling/tribal ...
[128]
[PDF] Walleye Fishery Recovery Project - Harvard University
Feb 25, 2008 · In the mid-1990s, the Lake's walleye population collapsed. Years of over-fishing rooted in practices begun in the early part of the 20th century ...
[129]
[PDF] Walleye Recovery Program in Red Lake, Ojibwe County, Minnesota
The Walleye Recovery Program was created by the Red Lake Nation and Minnesota DNR in 1999 to restore the walleye population after a collapse, with a ban on ...
[130]
Red Lake walleye make comeback, but not without pain
May 13, 2016 · Today, tribal members are limited to hook-and-line fishing. Anglers fishing for subsistence can take 10 walleyes a day and have 30 in possession ...
[131]
Honoring Nations All-Stars Profile: The Red Lake Walleye Recovery ...
Jan 1, 2013 · The Red Lake Tribal Council passed a resolution banning hook-and-line subsistence fishing for walleye, effectively ending all fishing on tribal waters.
[132]
Ojibwe Treaty Rights | Milwaukee Public Museum
Later, a federal court ruled that the state of Wisconsin did not have the right to regulate hunting and fishing on Ojibwe reservations, and Blackbird was ...
[133]
Indigenous harvest rights still under attack in the upper Great Lakes
Apr 29, 2021 · Tribal members in the Great Lakes region who said they commonly experience harassment because non-Natives believe they are exploiting resources, breaking rules ...
[134]
Wisconsin officials urge respect for tribal fishing rights ahead of ...
Mar 18, 2025 · Wisconsin law prohibits interference with tribal citizens exercising treaty rights, including stalking, obstructing access to lakes, reckless ...
[135]
Is Walleye Better Than Cod? - Tastylicious - Pinterest
Mar 16, 2022 · The main difference between walleye and cod is that walleye has a subtle, sweet flavor, while cod has a mild, savory taste.
[136]
How would you describe the flavor of walleye? - Quora
Apr 14, 2024 · It has a mild fish taste, similar to many other whitefish. When properly prepared, as in broiled, fried, or deep fried, has a good texture, not chewy or mushy.What is better, tasting walleye or perch?What makes a better battered fish, cod or halibut?More results from www.quora.comMissing: culinary tilefish
[137]
How to Remove Y Bones from a Walleye Fillet | Nestor Falls Fly-In ...
Apr 27, 2015 · I use a simple trick to remove the Y bones before cooking a fillet. It's a quick process and you'll waste almost no meat. Here's what to do.
[138]
Perfect Boneless Walleye Fillet: Easy Bone Removal - YouTube
Feb 7, 2025 · This video is about how to fillet walleye that is all boneless meat that has no waste. Many times people have problems with the pen bones ...
[139]
Pan Fried Walleye - Beyond The Chicken Coop
Rating 5.0 (341) · 25 minFeb 21, 2019 · How to make pan fried fish · Lightly beat eggs in a dish · In another dish combine flour, bread crumbs and seasoning · Dip fish in egg and then in ...
[140]
Best Fried Walleye Recipe - Allrecipes
Rating 4.8 (135) · 35 minNov 18, 2024 · This fried walleye recipe gently fries seasoned walleye fillets with a crispy cracker coating to retain the naturally delicious flavor of ...
[141]
https://walleyex.com/blogs/news/grilled-pan-seared-and-fried-walleye-recipes
[142]
Baked Walleye with Lemon Garlic Butter and Herbs - Big Delicious Life
Rating 5.0 (19) · 17 minJul 31, 2023 · Method. Pat the fish filets dry with paper towels and place them in a shallow baking pan or baking sheet lined with parchment paper. Brush the ...What is walleye? · Ingredients and substitutions · Method · FAQs, tips and variations
[143]
Shore Lunch of Walleye, Homemade Tartar Sauce, Coleslaw and ...
This is the ultimate shore lunch: fried walleye filets, served with a tangy homemade tartar sauce, coleslaw and crispy fried potatoes.
[144]
Pan Fried Walleye Shore Lunch Recipe - Totem Resorts
Apr 22, 2024 · The ingredients that are required to prepare the pan fried walleye shore lunch recipe are the following: 4 walleye filets; 1 cup all-purpose ...
[145]
Preserving fish safely | UMN Extension
The four most popular methods of fish preservation are freezing, canning, smoking and pickling. Top-quality fresh fish are essential for fish preservation.
[146]
[PDF] Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute | Home Smoking of Fish
Proper brining is essential to successfully smoking fish because salt reduces the moisture content of the flesh, which preserves it. However, you can't rely on ...
[147]
Smart Fish Swaps: Alternative Species To Cook
Walleye, on the other hand, are a bit larger, with a firmer texture and a slightly more assertive flavour. They're often compared to cod or haddock, and they're ...
[148]
Walleye vs Cod: Is Walleye Better Than Cod? - Tastylicious - Pinterest
Mar 16, 2022 · The main difference between walleye and cod is that walleye has a subtle, sweet flavor, while cod has a mild, savory taste.
[149]
Fish, pike, walleye, raw nutrition: calories, carbs, GI, protein, fiber, fats
Fish, pike, walleye, raw nutrition (100 grams). Richest in Cholesterol: 86mg (29% of DV), Potassium: 389mg (11% of DV). Calories:93, Net carbs: 0, ...
[150]
The story on fish and heart health - Harvard Health
Jun 1, 2023 · Population-based studies have found that people who regularly eat fatty fish have a lower risk of heart disease compared with those who don't eat fish.
[151]
Risks and Benefits of Consumption of Great Lakes Fish
Beneficial effects of fish consumption on early cognitive development and cardiovascular health have been attributed to the omega-3 fatty acids in fish and ...
[152]
Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish (1990-2012) - FDA
Feb 25, 2022 · The table is sorted by MERCURY CONCENTRATION MEAN (PPM) from fish with lowest levels of mercury to highest levels of mercury.
[153]
Great Lakes Fish Monitoring and Surveillance | US EPA
Jan 10, 2025 · Mean total PCB concentrations in Great Lakes Lake Trout/Walleye from 1991-2019 collected at GLFMSP sites. These graphs open to images. View U.S. ...
[154]
Great Lakes Consortium PCB Protocol - MN Dept. of Health
Oct 3, 2022 · A protocol for determining consumption advice to protect against exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from eating fish.
[155]
Research Explores Conservation Strategies for Shifting Walleye ...
In Ojibwe, the fish is called “ogaa" and symbolizes knowledge, illumination, and guidance. Their unique eyes guide them through cool, dark, murky waters, making ...Missing: Anishinaabe indigenous uses
[156]
Ojibwe Lifeway: Fishing (“niibin”- summer) - G-WOW
Understand why fish and the harvest of cold and coolwater fish beings, especially walleye, are important to the Ojibwe culture both historically and today.
[157]
[PDF] Walleye Ogaawag Spearing in the Portage Waterway, Michigan
The objectives of this research were to 1) understand the values and concerns of KBIC tribal members on Anishnaabe walleye (ogaawag) spear-harvesting,. 2) ...Missing: ogaa | Show results with:ogaa
[158]
Spearfishing Controversy | Milwaukee Public Museum
During the 1980s and early 1990s, there were many violent clashes in northern Wisconsin over the issue of Ojibwe spearfishing.<|separator|>
[159]
Evaluation of Mercury Exposure Reduction through a Fish ... - NIH
Historically, fish comprised 17–38% of the traditional diet of Anishinaabe in Northern Wisconsin [11]. Walleye (Sander vitreus), a top predator that has ...
[160]
Anishinaabe tribes work to save a fish significant to their culture and ...
May 17, 2023 · According to the Michigan Sea Grant, early Native Americans would preserve the fish by smoking it. They also would make a powder of smoked Great ...
[161]
Treaty Rights and The Great Lakes Fishery | Clarke Historical Library
Pre-Contact and Early European Period. Native American fisheries were well established prior to the arrival of Europeans into the Great Lakes region.
[162]
Minnesota State Fish | Walleye
Minnesota designated walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) as the official state fish in 1965. Walleyes are a popular game fish found throughout Minnesota's lakes ...<|separator|>
[163]
South Dakota State Fish | Walleye
South Dakota designated walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) as the official state fish in 1982 (walleye is also a state symbol of Minnesota and Vermont).
[164]
Walleye and sauger - Minnesota DNR
The two species look similar, but you can tell them apart by looking at the tip of the lower part of the tail. That part of the tail is white on a walleye but ...Walleye biology · How to catch a walleye · Walleye catch & releaseMissing: taxonomy | Show results with:taxonomy
[165]
MN Fish Facts - Walleye Tips - Minnesota Muskie Fishing - Crappie
The state record for Walleye is 17 pounds, 8 ounces. The walleye is the most sought-after fish in Minnesota. Its thick, white fillets, and elusive nature make ...
[166]
Quad Cities named as host site of world's richest walleye tournament
... economic impact of more than $10 million. Moline and the Mississippi ... The rules of the tournaments you fish might also impact your decisions. On ...
[167]
the economic impact of bass, salmon, and walleye fishing ...
Total median spending amounts for the bass, salmon, and walleye tournaments surveyed were $555.00, $371.00, and $1,562.00 respectively. Housing accounted for ...Missing: revenue | Show results with:revenue
[168]
[PDF] missouri's walleye management plan 2017-2026
Sep 27, 2018 · Attempts have been made to develop and manage Walleye populations since the early 1950s. Walleye management at that time consisted of stocking ...
[169]
[PDF] walleye stocking guidelines - minnesota fisheries managers - files
(1995), in a review of the Minnesota DNR walleye stocking program, concluded that stocking is most likely to contribute to walleye population abundance in lakes ...