Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Photochemical machining

Photochemical machining (PCM), also known as photochemical etching or chemical blanking, is a precision nontraditional manufacturing process that selectively removes material from thin metal sheets using masks, light exposure, and chemical etchants to produce intricate, burr-free components with high accuracy. This technique, developed in the mid-1950s, enables the fabrication of flat parts with thicknesses ranging from 0.01 to 1.6 mm (0.0005 to 0.062 in.) and tolerances as fine as ±0.0005 inches, making it ideal for complex geometries that are challenging with conventional machining. PCM is versatile for a wide range of materials, including , , , aluminum, alloys, and other sheet metals, with optimal precision for thicknesses up to about 0.01 inches (0.25 mm). Applications span (e.g., lead frames and encoder disks), (e.g., heat sinks and gaskets), medical devices, and decorative items like jewelry and nameplates, where intricate patterns and small feature sizes—down to 1:1 aspect ratios with sheet thickness—are required. Key advantages of PCM include no induced mechanical stress or burrs, cost-effectiveness for prototypes and medium-volume production, and the ability to etch complex shapes in a single operation, though limitations arise from isotropic etching leading to undercuts and restrictions to thinner materials.

History

Early Origins

The roots of photochemical machining trace back to ancient metalworking techniques, where artisans in around 2500 BC employed acidic solutions, such as , to etch decorative patterns into metals including for jewelry production. This early form of chemical laid foundational principles for selectively removing material from metal surfaces to create intricate designs. In the , scientific observations advanced the understanding of light's interaction with materials, pivotal for later photochemical processes. pastor and naturalist Jean Senebier noted in 1782 that certain natural resins, such as those from pine exudations, underwent color changes and hardened upon exposure to light, losing solubility in solvents like ; this discovery highlighted photosensitive properties that foreshadowed concepts. A significant milestone occurred in 1826 when French inventor Joseph Nicéphore Niépce developed the first practical photo-etching method. Niépce coated plates with , a light-sensitive , and exposed them to sunlight through a or , causing the to harden in lit areas while remaining soluble in unexposed regions; subsequent washing dissolved the unhardened areas, yielding an etched metal image or relief. This process marked the initial integration of and for precise pattern transfer on metal. By the late , industrial applications emerged with John Baynes' 1888 for a photo-etching . Baynes described a to etch thin metal sheets from both sides simultaneously using a photosensitive resist, enabling the production of uniform patterns for items like stencils and decorative components. These pre-20th-century innovations provided the chemical and optical groundwork that evolved into modern photochemical machining by the .

Modern Development

Photochemical machining emerged in the as a byproduct of the (PCB) industry, where techniques originally developed for circuit patterning were adapted for metal sheets to produce intricate components. This adaptation leveraged existing photographic processes to enable the fabrication of high-precision metal parts without mechanical stress, marking a shift from rudimentary methods to industrialized production. A key milestone in the was its adoption by firms to manufacture fine metal meshes and components, driven by the growing demand for in and . These applications capitalized on PCM's ability to create complex patterns in thin metals, such as foils under 0.5 mm thick, supporting the rapid expansion of and technologies. By the and , significant advancements in formulations—particularly the transition to dry film resists (25-125 μm thick)—and the introduction of automated etching lines with conveyor systems improved process consistency and enabled tolerances as tight as 0.001 inches. These innovations, including spray-etching machines, reduced variability in etch depth and enhanced registration accuracy to 15 μm, facilitating higher-volume production for demanding applications. Post-2000 developments further standardized PCM as an industrial process through integration with CAD software for phototool design, allowing digitized engineering drawings to generate precise masks via light-plotting or laser direct imaging, which minimized distortions from environmental factors. This digital workflow, combined with direct imaging technologies, expanded PCM's reach into medical and aerospace sectors, where it produces burr-free components like stents, implants, and lightweight structural meshes requiring tolerances down to ±0.0005 inches over larger areas. Such expansions underscored PCM's evolution into a versatile, high-precision manufacturing technique essential for advanced engineering fields.

Process

Preparation and Phototooling

The preparation and phototooling phase in photochemical machining involves creating precise artwork and setting up the metal substrate for accurate pattern transfer, ensuring high-fidelity replication of complex designs. The process begins with the design of artwork using (CAD) software, such as generating 2D files in DXF or formats that are converted to Gerber files for phototool production. These designs account for characteristics like undercut compensation, typically calculated as one-quarter of the metal thickness per side (e.g., 0.005 inches per side for 0.020-inch ), to achieve final part dimensions within tolerances of ±0.001 inches. The phototool itself is a negative image—a photographic with clear areas for etch regions and opaque areas for protected zones—produced on dimensionally stable materials like 7-mil Mylar film or high-resolution using an 8000-dpi photoplotter or laser photo-plotter. This tooling enables line widths and feature resolutions as fine as 0.001 inches (25 microns), supporting intricate patterns for precision components. Phototools are generated rapidly, often within 24 hours at a cost under $300 for sheets up to 24 x 30 inches, and include registration holes or optical targets for alignment in double-sided applications. Following artwork creation, the metal sheet—typically ranging from 0.0005 to 0.080 inches thick, depending on the alloy—is prepared by thorough cleaning to remove surface contaminants that could compromise adhesion or etching uniformity. Cleaning methods include mechanical scrubbing or chemical treatments with mild alkaline cleaners and high-pressure rinses using city water followed by deionized water in a multi-chamber conveyor system, avoiding solvent-based processes since the late 1980s to enhance environmental safety. For alloys like stainless steel, precision cleaning targets removal of passive oxide layers, such as chromium oxide, using controlled chemical agents to ensure etchants can effectively penetrate during later steps. This step occurs after shearing the metal from coils into workable panels, with all processes conducted in a controlled environment to prevent recontamination. The cleaned metal is then laminated with a UV-sensitive dry film photoresist, a photopolymer layer that protects non-etch areas during subsequent processing. Lamination applies the photoresist—typically 0.001 to 0.005 inches thick—to both sides of the metal sheet using a hot-roll system under controlled temperature and pressure, ensuring uniform adhesion without voids, bubbles, or defects. This occurs in a under safe-light conditions to preserve the photoresist's sensitivity, with the film sourced as aqueous-developable for compatibility with volume production and post-etch treatments like selective . For thinner gauges, entire coils may be laminated before cutting, while thicker sheets are handled as individual panels; excess resist is trimmed post-application to maintain precision. The photoresist's thickness is selected to exceed the metal's half-thickness for adequate , enabling high yields in fine-feature . Finally, the phototool is aligned with the laminated metal sheet to transfer the design accurately, particularly for double-sided etching where is critical. uses pin registration holes punched into duplicate phototool films or optical targeting systems, positioning the top and bottom precisely over the metal in a frame or contact printer to eliminate air gaps and ensure contact. Advanced setups, such as ALTIX LED printers, provide repeatable for complex multi-layer patterns, with sealing preventing distortion during the transition to exposure. This step maintains feature tolerances and prevents misalignment that could lead to errors, setting the foundation for the photoresist's role in pattern definition.

Exposure and Development

In the exposure step of photochemical machining, the photoresist-coated metal sheet is precisely aligned with the phototool on both sides using registration pins or automated systems to ensure accurate pattern transfer within micrometers. The assembly is then exposed to collimated (UV) light at wavelengths typically between 350 nm and 450 nm for 1 to 5 minutes, depending on the thickness and light intensity. This initiates photochemical cross-linking in the , hardening it in the areas protected from and rendering it insoluble to the while leaving unexposed regions soft and removable. Following exposure, the process removes the unexposed to reveal the metal surface in etch areas. The sheet is immersed or sprayed with an alkaline , commonly a 1% solution maintained at 80–100°F (27–38°C), for 1 to 3 minutes to dissolve the soft, unexposed without affecting the hardened portions. This step ensures clean, sharp definition of the pattern, with spray often preferred for uniform results and to minimize undercutting during removal. Controlled temperature and concentration are critical to prevent over-, which could degrade the hardened resist. After , the patterned sheet undergoes visual and magnified to detect defects such as pinholes in the resist, incomplete removal of unexposed areas, or misalignment between top and bottom patterns, which could lead to inaccuracies. If defects are identified, rework—such as re-exposure or spot touching-up—may be applied before proceeding. Additionally, due to the isotropic that follows, which results in undercutting of features by approximately the metal thickness on each side, internal features like holes or slots are designed with 50–100% dimensional expansion in the phototool to compensate and achieve the final intended .

Etching

The etching step in photochemical machining involves the selective of exposed metal areas using a chemical etchant, primarily ferric (FeCl₃), to achieve precise material removal. This process typically employs either , where the masked workpiece is submerged in the etchant , or spray etching, where high-pressure nozzles direct the onto both sides of the sheet for enhanced uniformity and faster rates. The etchant is maintained at a specific of 1.3 to 1.5 (corresponding to approximately 35-45°Bé), with temperatures controlled between 110°F and 130°F (43-54°C) to optimize reactivity while preventing excessive or side reactions. Etching durations generally range from 5 to 30 minutes, depending on material thickness and desired depth, yielding typical etch rates of 0.0005 to 0.001 inches per minute per side for common metals like and . The underlying chemical reaction involves the ferric ions (Fe³⁺) acting as an to dissolve the unprotected metal, producing soluble metal chlorides and reduced ferrous ions (Fe²⁺); for example, with , the reaction is Cu + 2FeCl₃ → CuCl₂ + 2FeCl₂, while for iron-based alloys, it is Fe + 2FeCl₃ → 3FeCl₂. The spent etchant can be regenerated through aerial oxidation, where oxygen from air reoxidizes Fe²⁺ back to Fe³⁺ (4FeCl₂ + O₂ + 4HCl → 4FeCl₃ + 2H₂O), allowing for and sustained efficiency in settings. This is inherently isotropic, meaning removal occurs equally in all directions, which results in slight undercuts beneath the photoresist mask—typically 50-100% of the etch depth—allowing for design compensation to maintain feature accuracy. Key control parameters include etchant concentration, temperature, and agitation to ensure uniform and prevent localized over-; for instance, spray systems use pressures of 20-40 and oscillation rates of 20-30 strokes per minute to promote even flow and . Double-sided etching is standard for creating through-features like holes or slots in thin sheets (up to 0.060 inches thick), with simultaneous exposure on both surfaces halving the required time compared to single-sided processing. Concentration is monitored via specific gravity or oxidation-reduction potential (ORP, typically 500-600 mV) to maintain consistent performance as dissolved metals accumulate. Endpoint detection is critical to halt at the precise depth, commonly achieved through visual of breakthrough for through- or by measuring post-immersion to calculate material removal rate, with tolerances as fine as ±0.0001 inches. In production, conveyor speed in continuous spray lines serves as a for time, calibrated against empirical etch rates for the specific metal-etchant combination.

Post-Processing

After the etching step, the remaining is stripped from the metal sheets using a sodium hydroxide-based alkaline in a or conveyorized spray system. This typically involves hot solutions at temperatures of 150-180°F for 5-10 minutes to effectively dissolve the protective coating without damaging the underlying metal. The etched parts are then rinsed and neutralized to remove any residual etchant or stripping chemicals. This includes initial rinses in city water followed by deionized water, along with dips where necessary to neutralize alkaline residues and prevent . Drying follows immediately, using hot air blowers, turbo dryers, or centrifuges to ensure complete removal of moisture and prepare the parts for inspection. Quality assurance involves thorough inspection of the finished parts for dimensional accuracy, , and integrity. Optical microscopy and systems verify feature dimensions against tolerances, which are typically ±0.001 inches (±0.025 mm) for thin metals up to 0.25 mm thick, or ±15-20% of the metal thickness in general cases. Profilometry assesses quality, confirming burr-free profiles and sidewall taper angles of 45-60° resulting from the isotropic process. Optional finishing operations may be applied to enhance functionality or aesthetics, including electroplating with metals like or for resistance, forming along half-etch lines for , or integration into assemblies via or . These secondary processes are performed post-inspection to meet specific application requirements.

Materials

Compatible Metals

Photochemical machining is compatible with a variety of metals and alloys, particularly those in thin sheet form, enabling the of intricate components with high . The process works best with materials up to 0.080 inches thick, though optimal results are obtained with gauges under 0.050 inches to avoid warping or uneven in thicker sections. Ferrous metals, including and mild , are widely used due to their structural integrity and compatibility with ferric etchants. , such as 304 grade, etches at approximately 0.0002 in/min under typical conditions of 32 °Bé ferric at 50°C, allowing for controlled material removal in corrosion-resistant parts. Mild etches faster than stainless varieties, supporting thicknesses up to 0.060 inches for applications in automotive and industrial components. Non-ferrous metals like , , and aluminum offer excellent suitability, especially for conductive applications in . Copper achieves a high etch rate of about 0.0004 in/min in 3.76 M ferric at 50°C, though cupric is often preferred for its and reduced undercutting; follows similar characteristics as a copper-zinc . Aluminum, valued for its properties, etches at around 0.00025 in/min (6.5 μm/min) with ferric or specialized solutions at 50°C, making it ideal for and electrical components. Specialty alloys such as , , and demand adjusted etching parameters owing to their slower rates, typically 0.0002–0.0005 in/min, which extend processing times but preserve material properties like thermal stability and strength. , for instance, etches at roughly 0.000006 in/min (0.15 μm/min) in 10:1 H2O: at , suiting medical and uses; and (a -iron ) require similar corrosion-resistant conditions, often using ferric chloride, for precision . The 's isotropic limits its effectiveness on thicker gauges beyond 0.050 inches, where internal stresses can cause or inconsistent depths.

Photoresists and Etchants

In photochemical machining, photoresists serve as light-sensitive masks that protect selected areas of the metal during the . These materials are typically UV-sensitive polymers designed to withstand chemical attack while allowing precise pattern transfer. Photoresists are available in dry film and forms, each suited to different production needs based on application method and performance characteristics. Dry film photoresists, often acrylic-based and solvent-resistant, consist of a multilayer structure with a photosensitive layer sandwiched between protective sheets for easy handling and onto the metal surface. This form provides consistent thickness and , making it ideal for high-volume applications where uniformity is critical. In contrast, liquid photoresists are applied via spraying or , with the electrodeposited variants offering enhanced uniformity on irregular or contoured surfaces due to their properties. in PCM can achieve resolutions down to 50 microns, enabling fine feature definition without compromising structural integrity. Etchants are aqueous chemical solutions that selectively dissolve unprotected metal areas, with serving as the primary etchant for a broad range of metals owing to its strong oxidizing properties and reliable performance in settings. For specifically, offers an effective alternative, characterized by its regenerability—allowing reuse after oxidation of byproducts—and lower corrosiveness to equipment compared to . is employed as an etchant for aluminum, providing controlled in compatible formulations. These etchants typically exhibit low values (around 1-2 for acidic types like ) to maintain reactivity, with viscosities in the range of 10-50 ensuring optimal spray delivery and surface contact during . Regeneration methods, such as air sparging for to reconvert cuprous ions back to cupric, extend etchant lifespan and reduce waste. Selection of photoresists and etchants hinges on compatibility with the to minimize issues like undercutting—lateral beyond the mask edges—or residue buildup that could compromise feature accuracy. Optimal choices prioritize strong of the to prevent mask lift-off and etchant formulations that yield high etch factors (depth-to-undercut ratios) for precise pattern fidelity. These criteria ensure clean, burr-free results while aligning with process parameters like exposure and spray dynamics.

Applications

Key Industries

Photochemical machining plays a pivotal role in the , where it enables the production of precision components such as stencils, shields, and connectors, meeting the demands of and complex geometries in and applications. The process's non-contact nature ensures high accuracy with tolerances as fine as ±0.03 mm, preserving material properties without introducing stress or burrs, which is essential for reliable performance in densely packed circuits. In the and sectors, photochemical machining is employed for fabricating components like fuel nozzles and grids, prioritizing high reliability and durability in extreme environments such as high temperatures and pressures. Its ability to create lightweight, intricate structures from materials like and aluminum supports applications in , drones, and GPS systems, with tolerances reaching 10 µm to maintain structural integrity. The industry relies on photochemical machining for surgical implants and diagnostic tools, capitalizing on its capacity to produce burr-free, biocompatible thin foils with tight tolerances of ±10 microns, ideal for minimally invasive procedures and implants like stents. This method avoids heat-affected zones, preserving material properties, which is crucial for neurovascular, ophthalmic, and devices. Within the automotive sector, photochemical machining facilitates the manufacture of components and seals, enabling efficient volume production of sensors for thermal management and systems. The process excels in creating fine channels and corrosion-resistant parts from and aluminum, enhancing performance in fuel injectors and bipolar plates without mechanical distortion.

Specific Components

Photochemical machining produces fine meshes and filters with precisely controlled openings typically ranging from 0.002 to 0.005 inches, enabling their use in fluid applications across industries such as , , and . These components feature uniform pore structures and high accuracy, with tolerances as tight as ±0.002 inches, making them suitable for separating particles or impurities in liquids and gases. Additionally, such meshes serve optical roles in light diffusion and acoustic functions in sound attenuation devices. Flat springs and gaskets fabricated through photochemical machining exhibit completely burr-free edges, ensuring reliable performance as seals in mechanical systems like pumps and engines. This edge quality arises from the isotropic process, which avoids mechanical deformation and provides smooth surfaces ideal for high-pressure sealing environments. These parts are commonly employed in automotive and industrial sectors for their stress-free construction. Sensors and shims benefit from photochemical machining's ability to create thin diaphragms for sensors, with dimensional tolerances held to ±0.0005 inches. These diaphragms, often under 0.010 inches thick, provide resistance and precision necessary for sensing applications in harsh environments. Shims produced similarly offer exact spacing control in assemblies, supporting uses in medical devices and . Decorative items such as intricate jewelry patterns and nameplates are realized through photochemical machining, allowing for highly detailed designs with resolutions down to 0.004 inches. This technique enables complex motifs on metals like or without surface imperfections, catering to jewelry, automotive embellishments, and branding elements. Such components find application in consumer goods and industries.

Advantages and Limitations

Advantages

Photochemical machining offers exceptional , enabling the fabrication of intricate features with sizes as small as 0.001 inches while avoiding and producing burr-free edges. This process utilizes to transfer patterns onto metal sheets, ensuring tight tolerances and repeatable results without the distortions common in methods. The technique provides significant design flexibility through the use of digital phototools, which allow for rapid iterations and modifications without the wear or replacement of physical tooling. Changes to the design can be implemented quickly by adjusting the artwork files, facilitating experimentation and refinement in product development. Material versatility is a key strength, as photochemical machining processes both soft and hard metals uniformly, such as , , , and , without introducing heat-affected zones that could alter material properties. This chemical-based preserves the inherent strength and of the metals across a range of thicknesses, from microns to millimeters. For , the process supports lead times as little as 1-2 days for small runs, making it ideal for quick-turnaround needs in development cycles. The absence of extensive setup requirements contributes to this efficiency, allowing prototypes to be produced and tested swiftly.

Limitations

Photochemical machining is primarily suited for thin metal sheets, with optimal performance for thicknesses under 0.050 inches (1.27 mm); beyond this range, proceeds more slowly due to prolonged exposure times needed for deeper material removal, and uneven can occur as etchant diffusion becomes less uniform across the thickness. The isotropic nature of the process leads to undercutting, where is removed laterally beneath the mask at rates comparable to the vertical etch depth, typically resulting in 100% to 200% of the etch depth in total lateral expansion (e.g., for an etch factor of 2:1, undercut equal to half the depth per side, totaling the full depth across ; for 1:1, totaling twice the depth). This undercutting limits the ability to produce sharp internal corners or fine features, as edges widen unpredictably and corners round off due to enhanced etching at points. The process generates significant chemical waste in the form of spent etchants laden with dissolved metals and corrosive byproducts, necessitating specialized , , or regeneration systems before disposal to comply with environmental regulations; this adds complexity and cost, making photochemical machining less suitable for very high-volume production where waste handling scales unfavorably. Resulting parts often exhibit tapered edges with sloped profiles due to the progressive etch rate from both sides, which can introduce an hourglass-shaped cross-section and may require secondary finishing operations like grinding or to achieve flat, perpendicular walls for applications demanding precise geometries.

Comparisons

Versus Mechanical Machining

Photochemical machining (PCM) differs significantly from mechanical machining processes such as stamping, milling, or CNC cutting in its tooling requirements. In PCM, phototools—typically photographic or acetate masks—are inexpensive and quick to produce, often costing between $100 and $350 for standard sizes, with lead times as short as one day. In contrast, mechanical methods require robust hard tooling like stamping dies or milling cutters, which can cost $10,000 or more, sometimes exceeding $50,000 for complex parts, and may take weeks to fabricate. This disparity makes PCM particularly advantageous for design iterations, as phototools can be easily modified without substantial reinvestment. A key distinction lies in the impact on material properties, where PCM produces stress-free parts without inducing or distortion. The chemical etching process removes material atom by atom through isotropic , preserving the original metallurgical structure, which is critical for thin foils (under 0.025 inches) prone to warping in operations. machining, involving physical forces from tools or dies, often causes residual stresses, burr formation, and , potentially leading to part deformation or fatigue in applications like components. PCM also outperforms mechanical methods in handling complex geometries and high-aspect-ratio features. It enables the creation of intricate patterns, fine holes (down to 0.002 inches), and undercuts with aspect ratios up to 10:1 or higher, limited only by etchant penetration rather than tool geometry. Mechanical processes, constrained by tool access and rigidity, struggle with such details, often requiring multiple setups or secondary operations for features like internal cavities or sharp corners. Regarding production volumes, PCM is ideally suited for prototypes and low-to-medium runs (up to thousands of parts), where its low tooling costs and rapid setup minimize during . Mechanical machining, with its high initial tooling investment amortized over large batches (millions of parts), becomes more economical for high-volume but is less flexible for .

Versus Laser Cutting

Photochemical machining (PCM), also known as chemical , differs fundamentally from as a non-thermal, subtractive process that relies on chemical reactions to remove material, whereas employs a high-energy beam to vaporize or melt the workpiece. This distinction leads to significant variations in performance across key aspects such as heat management, edge finish, material compatibility, and processing efficiency. Both techniques are employed in precision manufacturing industries like and for producing intricate metal components. One primary advantage of PCM over laser cutting lies in its cold process nature, which eliminates heat-affected zones (HAZ), thermal distortion, and recast layers that can compromise material integrity. In laser cutting, the intense heat from the beam creates HAZ typically ranging from 0.005 to 0.010 inches wide, potentially altering metallurgical properties and inducing stresses that lead to warping, especially in thin or heat-sensitive alloys. PCM avoids these issues entirely, preserving the original material microstructure and enabling the production of stress-free parts suitable for applications requiring high dimensional stability. Edge quality represents another area where PCM excels, delivering a uniform, isotropic etch with smooth, burr-free surfaces and no dross or kerf loss, as the chemical action removes material evenly from all directions. Laser cutting, by contrast, often results in edges with dross buildup, recast material, and kerf widths of 0.002 to 0.005 inches, necessitating secondary finishing operations like deburring to achieve comparable precision. This makes PCM particularly advantageous for components demanding pristine edges without post-processing. PCM also offers broader compatibility with challenging materials, such as highly reflective metals like and , where it etches uniformly without reflectivity-related absorption issues that can reduce efficiency or cause beam deflection in systems. Laser cutting struggles with these reflective surfaces, often requiring specialized coatings or lower speeds to mitigate energy reflection, which limits its versatility for certain alloys. This material flexibility positions PCM as a preferred method for diverse thin-sheet applications up to 0.080 inches thick. In terms of speed, laser cutting generally outperforms PCM for straightforward, single-level cuts due to its rapid beam traversal at rates of 200-300 inches per minute, making it ideal for low-volume or production. However, PCM surpasses for complex, multi-level patterns and high-volume runs, as its batch handles intricate features simultaneously without tool changes or heat-induced pauses, often yielding shorter lead times of 3-5 days for industrial-scale output.

Economics

Cost Factors

Photochemical machining involves several key cost components, primarily driven by its reliance on photographic tooling and chemical processing rather than mechanical wear. Tooling costs are notably low compared to traditional methods, with phototools typically produced for less than $300 for sheets up to 24 by 30 inches, enabling and production without expensive dies or molds. These tools, often made from or glass, can be regenerated if damaged and are reusable for thousands of parts, amortizing the initial expense over high volumes. For more complex designs, costs may range from $500 to $3,000, depending on part size and intricacy, but remain under $10,000 even for durable glass variants. Material and processing expenses form the bulk of variable costs, varying by alloy type, thickness, and sheet utilization. Common metals like , , and aluminum cost approximately $5 to $10 per as of the early 2020s, though prices fluctuate with market conditions (e.g., around $1-5 per in 2025 depending on grade and thickness); specialty alloys such as reach $35 per and exceed $150 per for thin foils. adds a consistent fee per , and etching time—typically minutes per of thickness—drives machine costs during cleaning, developing, and stripping stages. For or sheets up to 0.020 inches thick, overall processing costs (excluding material) approximate $0.20 to $0.40 per on larger 18- by 24-inch sheets, benefiting from efficient etchant use that minimizes through practices. Labor requirements are minimal and largely automated across the seven standard process steps—cutting, cleaning, laminating, , developing, etching, and stripping—with costs applied per sheet rather than per part, reducing per-unit expenses for medium production runs of 1,000 to 10,000 units. Overhead encompasses power, water, and facility maintenance, which scale with operational efficiency and support cost reductions as production volumes increase. Secondary costs, such as for spent etchants and residues, are integrated into overhead and typically represent a modest portion of total expenses, often mitigated by on-site regeneration systems that recover chemicals for reuse. Additional finishing operations, like or forming, may add to the base cost depending on complexity, but these are optional and volume-dependent.

Production Scalability

Photochemical machining excels in prototyping and low-volume production, typically ranging from 1 to 100 parts, owing to its rapid setup process that requires only 1 to 3 days for phototool creation and incurs minimal tooling costs, thereby avoiding the need for amortization over large quantities. This makes it particularly suitable for initial design iterations where flexibility and speed are prioritized over . For medium-volume runs, the process is optimal at quantities of 1,000 to 50,000 parts per sheet, capitalizing on efficient material utilization that can achieve yields up to 90% through optimized layouts. Lead times for these batches generally span 3 to 4 weeks, allowing for consistent production without extensive retooling. Photochemical machining can handle high volumes exceeding 100,000 units effectively through efficient processes and equipment investments, though suitability may vary compared to alternative methods for uniform mass manufacturing. It remains well-suited for custom or varied production. Nesting efficiency further enhances scalability by allowing multiple parts—often 1,000 or more small components—to be arranged on a single sheet, maximizing material use and reducing per-part costs through dense layouts that minimize waste. This approach is especially effective for intricate designs, where sheet sizes like 18 x 24 inches enable higher throughput per cycle.

Safety and Environmental Impact

Health and Safety Hazards

Photochemical machining involves significant primarily from etchants like ferric chloride, which can cause severe skin burns upon contact, serious eye damage, and respiratory through of vapors or mists. Occupational exposure limits for airborne ferric chloride are set at 1 mg/m³ as an 8-hour time-weighted average by both OSHA and ACGIH to prevent these effects. Physical risks in the process include generation of corrosive mists during spray etching operations, which can lead to airborne exposure, and (UV) light exposure during the exposure step, potentially causing skin burns or . shielding, such as enclosures or barriers, is required to block direct exposure and protect workers' eyes and . To mitigate these hazards, (PPE) is essential, including chemical-resistant gloves (e.g., or ), splash goggles or full-face shields, respirators for tasks involving mists or vapors, and protective aprons or coveralls. systems, such as fume hoods with a minimum face of 100 feet per minute (fpm) for effective capture, along with enclosed etching chambers and local exhaust, control airborne contaminants and prevent risks. Spill protocols, using secondary capable of holding at least 110% of the largest container volume, are implemented to manage accidental releases of corrosives. Worker training complies with OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200), covering safe handling of corrosives, recognition of hazards, proper PPE use, and emergency procedures, with annual refreshers to ensure ongoing awareness.

Waste Management and Regulations

Photochemical machining generates several types of waste, primarily spent etchants containing heavy metals such as iron and chlorides from ferric chloride solutions, photoresist slough from the stripping process, and rinse waters from cleaning and post-etching steps. These wastes are classified as hazardous due to their corrosive and toxic properties, requiring careful handling to prevent environmental contamination. Treatment of these wastes typically involves neutralization to adjust pH levels to 6-9, precipitation to remove dissolved metals, and filtration to separate solids before discharge or further processing. Etchant regeneration is a key method, where spent solutions are restored by extracting dissolved metals through electrochemical deposition or ion exchange, allowing significant recovery for reuse and minimizing fresh chemical needs. Waste volumes are relatively low, depending on part thickness and etchant concentration. In the United States, these wastes fall under the Agency's (RCRA), which regulates their classification, storage, transportation, and disposal as hazardous materials. In the , the REACH regulation imposes restrictions on the use and handling of chemicals like ferric chloride, requiring registration, evaluation, and risk assessments for substances of very high concern. Modern facilities increasingly adopt zero-discharge strategies, treating all effluents on-site to comply with these standards and avoid direct releases. Sustainability trends in photochemical machining emphasize closed-loop systems, where etchants and rinse waters are continuously recycled, reducing overall waste generation compared to traditional open systems. These advancements, including on-site regeneration and water recycling, align with broader environmental goals and certifications like .

References

  1. [1]
    Photochemical Machining - ASM International
    ### Summary of Photochemical Machining (PCM)
  2. [2]
    Photochemical Etching: Processes, Uses and Benefits - IQS Directory
    Photochemical etching, also known as chemical etching, photo etching, or photochemical machining (PCM), is an advanced precision metal fabricating process.The Photochemical Etching... · Leading Photochemical...
  3. [3]
    Photochemical Machining Process Overview - Resonetics
    ### Summary of Photochemical Machining Process Overview
  4. [4]
    [PDF] The Fabrication of Millimeter-Wavelength Accelerating Structures
    9: The photochemical machining process. This technique allows intricate geometries to be made on metal sheets. It is also an inexpensive approach for mass ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Layer Manufacturing of Heat Exchange Elements using Photochemic
    1. Photochemical Machining. Photochemical machining is a chemical milling process extremely well suited to the detailed cutting of thin sheets. The process ...
  6. [6]
    Chemical etching of Cu-ETP copper - ScienceDirect.com
    ... Egypt where copper was etched with citric acid to produce jewelry around 2500 b.c. ... Photochemical machining (PCM) removes material by controlling the ...
  7. [7]
    (PDF) Photochemical Machining of Copper and its Alloys
    Jan 4, 2016 · Photochemical Machining of Copper and its Alloys. May 2004 ... purpose in the Ancient Egypt around 2500 B.C.. This is the first time ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Argyronomicon - Mike Ware
    2.7 Resins. Jean Sénébier of Geneva observed in 1782 that light could bring about colour changes in resins. The exudations of certain pine trees, such as.
  9. [9]
    Le Christ portant sa croix | Niépce, Joseph Nicéphore
    Mar 10, 2017 · To create a negative, an engraving was varnished, placed over the plate and exposed to sunlight. The soluble unexposed bitumen was dissolved ...
  10. [10]
    The Printed Image in the West: Etching - The Metropolitan Museum ...
    Oct 1, 2003 · Etchings were first produced around 1500 in southern Germany. These early German etchers made use of iron plates, stronger than copper yet ...
  11. [11]
    The origins and evolution of the PCB: A review - ResearchGate
    Aug 5, 2025 · According to Petherbridge et al. (2004) the method of etching using an acid bath was described the first time by John Baynes in 1888, but it had ...
  12. [12]
    A little about the history of chemical etching from Etch Tech Ltd
    ... photo etching, having successfully developing the process in 1826. In 1888 John Baynes patented the process of etching the material from two sides.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] PHOTO CHEMICAL MACHINING (PCM) – AN OVERVIEW - NET
    John Snellman may have been the first to produce flat metal components by photo chemical machining of shim stock that was too hard for punching. He innovated ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The-Fundamentals-of-Photochemical-Machining-PCM.pdf
    Once the photoresist has been imaged to produce an etchant –resistant patterned coating, chemical etching is used to transfer that pattern into the metal by.
  15. [15]
    Everything You Need to Know About Photochemical Machining
    Rating 4.7 (21) May 14, 2024 · In the 1960s, photochemical machining (PCM) emerged as a spinoff from the printed circuit board ( PCB) sector. PCM was first employed to create ...
  16. [16]
    None
    ### Summary of Photochemical Machining (PCM) Adoption in the 1960s
  17. [17]
    What tolerances can be held in thin vs. thick metals? - Switzer
    Thin foils at the lower end of the thickness spectrum can hold exceptionally tight tolerances as precise as ±0.001 inches (±0.025mm), representing some of the ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR PRECISION ETCHED METAL
    During the Industrial Revolution, newspapers and periodicals used photochemical etching to create printing plates, ... removal in photochemical machining. Metal.
  19. [19]
    Photochemical Machining: From 'manufacturing's best kept secret' to ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Photochemical machining (PCM) is one of the least well-known non-conventional machining processes. It employs chemical etching through a ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] The Compr ehensive Guide To Photo Chemical Machining
    Photo chemical machining provides a fast, flexible and relatively inexpensive way to produce a wide variety of precision metal parts. Phototools replace ...
  21. [21]
    Photochemical Machining Process - Precision Chemical Etching
    Discover our precision photochemical machining process used to manufacture intricate metal parts with unmatched accuracy.Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
  22. [22]
    Photo Etching Services
    Feature sizes can be as small as 25 microns (0.025 mm), depending on the metal thickness, photoresist quality, and process control. Photochemical etching is ...
  23. [23]
    What is Photochemical Machining or Metal Etching?
    Sep 19, 2018 · In essence, by shining UV light through a mask, the image of the desired parts are transferred through the tooling to the photoresist and, by ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Product information PHOTORESISTS AND SPEcIAl RESISTS
    AR photo coatings are light-sensitive in the broad band UV range (300-450 nm) and thus also at the typical emission lines of mercury at 365 nm (i-line), 405 ...
  25. [25]
    Developing Dry-film Images
    The films are developed with a 1% (wt.) solution of sodium carbonate (common soda ash) operating at 100°F (38°C) ± 5°F and stripped with a 3 to 5 ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Chapter 3 Dry Film Photo-resist
    Developing: The developer is composed of 3% sodium carbonate. The developing time is critical and depends on the pattern size.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Advanced Photo Etching Tips & Tricks - Fathom Manufacturing
    This is certainly true with photo chemical machining. In this brochure we present a few ideas to help you understand the philosophy of design for photo.<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Understanding etch ratios and etch factors - Conard Corporation.
    Adjusting the etch factor is how we adjust the dimensions of the parts. We call this process “compensation.” The etch factor in photo etching is determined by ...
  29. [29]
    None
    ### Summary of Ferric Chloride Etching in Photochemical Machining
  30. [30]
    Characterisation of aqueous ferric chloride etchants used in ...
    Ferric chloride (FeCl3) is the most commonly used etchant for photochemical machining (PCM) but there is a great variety in the grades of the commercial ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Experimental Investigation of Photochemical Machining on Inconel ...
    In this paper experiments were conducted to varying the parameters of photo chemical machining process like temperature from 550C to. 650C, Time from 30 min to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Etch rates for micromachining processing-part II
    One of the reactions for etching of copper with ferric chloride is [21]. Other chloride complexes are also formed. The Fe ions are re- duced to Fe , which ...
  33. [33]
    Increasing utilisation efficiency of ferric chloride etchant in industrial ...
    This paper concerns the environmental impact of ferric chloride, the most commonly used etchant in PCM, and is believed to be the first quantitative analysis ...Missing: parameters | Show results with:parameters
  34. [34]
    Surface Texturing Through Photochemical Machining for Enhanced ...
    Photochemical machining (PCM) is a precise, nontraditional manufacturing process used for surface texturing to enhance tribological performance, ...
  35. [35]
    Characterisation of aqueous ferric chloride etchants used in ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Allen in [4] showed that variations in etchant's specific gravity, machining temperature, and oxidation-reduction potential can affect the rate ...
  36. [36]
    Optimization of photochemical machining process parameters for ...
    ABSTRACT. In the present study, the investigation on photochemical machining (PCM) of stainless steel (SS-304) by ferric chloride as etchant is reported.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] International Journal of Applied Engineering & Technology
    The study investigated the photochemical machining (PCM) of Monel 400 using ferric chloride (FeCl3) and cupric chloride (CuCl2) etchants under various process ...
  38. [38]
    Aluminum Etching: Steps, Tips, and Alloy Selection Guide - TMNetch
    First of all, remove the aluminum parts from the etchant and rinse right away in clean water. It is then dipped in a neutralizing bath. This ensures no chemical ...
  39. [39]
    A Guide to Photochemical Etching For Design Engineers
    This photochemical etching guide highlights the key features design engineers must consider to get the most from the etching process.Missing: line resolution<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Master Guide to Photo Etching and Finishing - PCM Products, Inc.
    This guide to photo etching offers a detailed overview of the process, its applications, and the types of finishing.
  41. [41]
    Which Metals and Alloys Can Be Etched? - Switzer
    Aluminum alloys including 1100, 3003, 5052, 6061, and others can be photochemically etched using ferric chloride or specialized aluminum etchants. Aluminum's ...
  42. [42]
    (PDF) Study of Etch Rate and Surface Roughness in Chemical ...
    Jun 14, 2016 · ... 2500 BC [3]. The. process accepted as one of the key manufacturing ... photochemical machining. Article. Jun 2004; J MATER PROCESS TECH.<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    (PDF) Chemical etching of Cu-ETP copper - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · In this study, copper is chemically etched with two different etchants (ferric chloride and cupric chloride) at 50°C.
  44. [44]
    Chemical etching of aluminium - ScienceDirect.com
    Apr 1, 2008 · This present paper aimed to study chemical etching of aluminium by using concentration of 1.25 mol FeCl 3 at different etching temperatures.
  45. [45]
    Dry Film Photoresists - Alfa Chemistry
    The top layer is composed of polyethylene film (PET), about 25 μm thick. · The middle layer is a blue polymer layer that hardens under the irradiation of strong ...
  46. [46]
    What is PCB Photoresist And Why is It Important? - Venture Electronics
    Jun 4, 2024 · It's also called liquid photoresist or circuit board ink and is applied by spraying or electrical deposition. What is PCB Photoresist Made Of?Missing: electrodeposited PCM
  47. [47]
    [PDF] DuPont™ Riston® LaserSeries LDI300
    Not only does it allow for faster throughput, but also better image quality than most of the slower photospeed standard resists. Resolution below 50 µm (2 mil) ...
  48. [48]
    Copper etching with cupric chloride and regeneration of waste etchant
    Jun 1, 2006 · The etching process was first practiced as an art form in the Ancient Egypt in around 2500 b.c. It was applied to produce jewelleries made ...
  49. [49]
    US3281293A - Method of etching aluminum - Google Patents
    The etching thus proceeds in acontrolled uniform manner despite the collective exothermal character of the aluminum, ferric chloride, and ammonium persulfate.Missing: photochemical | Show results with:photochemical
  50. [50]
    Iron chloride (FeCl3) | FeCl3 | CID 24380 - PubChem - NIH
    Slightly water soluble, where a 0.1M solution has a pH of 2.0. CAMEO Chemicals. Very hygroscopic. Water soluble, forming acidic aqueous solutions.
  51. [51]
    Ferric Chloride Etching - MG Chemicals
    MG Chemicals' 415 Ferric Chloride is a ready to use copper etchant solution for printed circuit board and photoengraving processes.
  52. [52]
    Dos & Don'ts Of Ferric Etching - Chemcut
    Dec 1, 2021 · Ferric chloride is one of the most widely used etchants in the field of chemical etching. It is commonly used to etch steel and stainless steel parts, but it ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Selection Criteria for Photoresists - MicroChemicals
    Wet-chemical etching requires optimum adhesion to the substrate to minimise the degree of lateral un- der-etching. The AZ® 1500 series is suitable for film ...
  54. [54]
    Photochemical Machining - ASM International
    i ! Application of photoresist. Prepare multiple- image masters. Workpiece exposure, development, etching,and final treatment .~. Dry, heat. Remove resist from.
  55. [55]
    Applications for Photochemical Etching | Fotofab
    Apr 27, 2021 · Photoetched components are found in a wide range of applications for aerospace, medical, defense, telecommunications, and more.Missing: key | Show results with:key
  56. [56]
    What Industries Use Photochemical Etching? - TMNetch
    Photochemical Etching is suitable for a variety of metal materials, including stainless steel, copper, aluminum, titanium, and nickel. Since this process uses ...
  57. [57]
    Photochemical Etching: A Modern Solution to Precision Manufacturing
    One primary industry heavily reliant on this process is aerospace, where lightweight and carefully designed parts are critical for aircraft performance. The ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Photochemical Machining for Medical Device Manufacturing | Resonetics
    ### Summary of Photochemical Machining in Medical Device Applications
  59. [59]
    How Metal Filtration Favors Photo Etching - Conard Corporation.
    This process uses light-sensitive photoresists and chemical etchants to shape and pattern metal components.Missing: gaskets items
  60. [60]
    Filters, Screens & Sieves Manufacturing - Precision Micro
    Uncompromising precision. Etched filters, sieves and screens can undergo precise machining to achieve openings as small as 0.1mm, with accuracy to ±0.020mm.Missing: 0.002-0.010 inches
  61. [61]
    Filtration - Conard Corporation.
    Precision etched meshes, grids, filters and screens are used in many types of industrial, decorative and architectural applications. In many cases, chemical ...Missing: 0.002-0.010 | Show results with:0.002-0.010<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    7 Photo Etching Metal Applications - PCM Products, Inc.
    Jan 11, 2023 · The photo etching method creates stress-free and burr-free gaskets during profile removal, unlike other methods like laser cutting. Moreover ...
  63. [63]
    A Guide To Photochemical Machining - Precision Micro
    Photochemical machining is an efficient and economical process for producing high-precision parts with intricate geometries rapidly and cost-effectively.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  64. [64]
    Precision Photochemical Etching for Complex Metal Parts - E-Fab
    Standard Tolerance, ±0.0005 in – ±0.002 in , depending on material thickness and feature size ; Minimum Feature Size, 120% of material thickness ; Supported ...Missing: inches | Show results with:inches
  65. [65]
    Precision Chemical Etching Titanium for Components | PEI
    May 14, 2024 · Our photochemical machining process allows very large, very thin single- or double-sided plates to be etched without incurring the stresses ...Missing: diaphragms pressure sensors
  66. [66]
    Etching of Decorative Metal Components - Fotofab
    Fotofab photochemically etches decorative metal components for individual crafters and companies within jewelry, automotive, graphic arts etc.
  67. [67]
    Mild Steel & Carbon Spring Steel Photo Etching - Qualitetch
    Decorative Items: The versatility of photo etching allows for the creation of decorative items such as jewelry, nameplates, and artistic pieces using both mild ...
  68. [68]
    Advantages of Photochemical Machining (PCM) vs Laser Cutting
    Sep 10, 2024 · PCM offers distinct advantages in terms of material integrity, burr-free edges, design flexibility, scalability, cost efficiency, and material versatility.
  69. [69]
    5 Benefits Of Photochemical Etching for Precision Manufacturing
    It has many benefits, including higher customizability, cheaper tooling, and quicker turnaround, when used to produce precision thin metal parts.
  70. [70]
    Why Photo Etching Services Offer Better Precision and Consistency
    Feb 28, 2024 · First introduced in the 1960's, the photo etching process was initially developed for fabricating intricate patterns on metal sheets to ...
  71. [71]
    Photo Etching / Chemical Etching - Tanfel
    Typical material thickness-under 0.05” (1.3mm). This process is also called Photo chemical machining – PCM, Chemical etching, Chemical milling. Stainless Steel ...
  72. [72]
    Technical Considerations For Photochemical Etching Metal Parts
    This article explores the key technical guidelines for photochemical etching, including material selection, feature sizes, accuracy and more.Missing: compensation expansion
  73. [73]
    How do you account for undercut during design? - Switzer
    To understand how undercut compensation works, it helps to visualize the etching process in cross-section. When a sheet of metal coated with patterned ...Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  74. [74]
    How are the chemicals disposed of or recycled in photochemical ...
    The photoresist stripping process generates waste streams containing dissolved photoresist polymers in caustic solutions, typically sodium hydroxide or sodium ...
  75. [75]
    How Much Does Chemical Etching Cost? - Precision Micro
    Phototools are low-cost – starting from less than €100/$120 – and extremely quick to manufacture, often less than 1 hour. Chemical etching can accommodate ...
  76. [76]
    What is the difference between Photo Etching and Metal Stamping?
    The lead time for the tooling was 6 weeks. The cost of the phototool we would use for etching would be $235. The lead time would be one day.
  77. [77]
    How Much Does Metal Stamping Cost? - Manor Tool & Manufacturing
    Metal stamping costs depend on tooling, material, part design complexity, QC, estimated annual usage, and shipping costs. Tooling is a critical investment.
  78. [78]
    How cost-effective is sheet metal stamping compared to other ...
    Once stamping dies are developed—typically requiring an upfront investment of $5,000–$50,000, depending on part complexity—per-part costs can drop to under $0. ...
  79. [79]
    Does Photochemical Etching Produce Burrs or Mechanical Stress in ...
    No, photochemical etching produces completely burr-free parts with zero mechanical stress introduced into the material, representing one of the process's most ...
  80. [80]
    Photochemical Machining vs. Other Metal Fabrication Techniques ...
    Photochemical machining offers a cost-effective solution for producing intricate, burr-free, and stress-free components in low to medium volumes. Compared ...
  81. [81]
    Metal Etching Compared to Other Metal Fabrication Processes
    No Mechanical Stress: As a non-contact process, etching avoids work hardening or deformation. Complex Geometries: Enables the creation of intricate patterns ...
  82. [82]
    9 Facts Design Engineers Need to Know About Photo Etching
    Oct 5, 2018 · In fact, except for electroforming, all other machining processes have some burr or mechanical stress. Laser cutting, water jet cutting, and ...<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    Advantages of Photochemical Machining (PCM) vs Metal Forming
    Aug 8, 2024 · PCM offers distinct advantages in terms of material integrity, burr-free edges, design flexibility, tooling costs, scalability, and material versatility.Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
  84. [84]
    When to Select Photochemical Machining (PCM) over the Others
    Apr 26, 2021 · Photochemical etching (PCM) is one way to create thin, precision metal parts for aerospace, defense, and medical applications that require tight ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  85. [85]
    Is Metal Stamping Expensive? - Mursix Corporation
    Metal stamping costs vary; initial tooling can be high, but it becomes cost-effective with high production volume and per-unit costs decrease.
  86. [86]
    Photochemical Etching vs. Laser Cutting - E-Fab
    Photochemical etching offers exceptional edge quality and material integrity ... laser cutting is valued for its speed and ability to process thicker materials.Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
  87. [87]
    [PDF] photo chemical machining - Thomasnet
    by stamping or laser cutting. “And with the photo chemical process we ... Photochemical machining leaves the mate- rial free of mechanical or thermal ...
  88. [88]
    What are photo tooling costs compared to other machining processes?
    Photochemical etching's tooling costs represent one of the process's most compelling advantages, with phototools typically costing anywhere from $500 to $5,000 ...Missing: mechanical stress
  89. [89]
    What Does Photo Etching Cost? - Conard Corporation.
    The most variable cost elements in photo etching are: metal and photoresist, labor, and machine time. The indirect costs consist of etching chemistries ...Missing: tooling | Show results with:tooling
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Understanding Photo Etching Costs - HubSpot
    The most variable cost elements in photo etching are: metal and photoresist, labor, and machine time. The indirect costs consist of etching chemistries.
  91. [91]
    How does phototool creation impact turnaround times? - Switzer
    Within the typical 10 to 15 business day standard lead time for photochemical etching projects, phototool creation consumes just 1 to 3 days, representing ...
  92. [92]
    Top Advantages to Use Photochemical Etching for Rapid Prototyping
    Nov 2, 2021 · The process of rapid prototyping through chemical etching allows design flexibility, reduced costs, and other advantages. Learn more!
  93. [93]
    Is photochemical etching suitable for high-volume manufacturing?
    Yes, photochemical etching is highly suitable for high-volume manufacturing, capable of efficiently producing thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even ...Missing: medium | Show results with:medium
  94. [94]
    How does part geometry affect the cost of photochemical machining?
    Sheet utilization efficiency, meaning how effectively parts nest together to maximize usable parts per sheet while minimizing waste, dramatically affects cost.
  95. [95]
    The Importance of Sheet Sizing in the PCM Process | Switzer
    Oct 28, 2025 · Consider 1,000 parts requiring 20 sheets with an inefficient layout. Adjusting dimensions to allow denser nesting may drop the need to 15 sheets ...
  96. [96]
    [PDF] MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET - Ferric Chloride
    Exposure Limits…………………….. ACGIH/TLV-TWA: 1mg/m3 (ferric chloride). OSHA/TWA: 1mg/m3 (ferric chloride). ACGIH: 2ppm ceiling (hydrogen chloride gas). OSHA: 5ppm ...Missing: machining | Show results with:machining
  97. [97]
    What Safety Precautions Are Taken During Etching? | Switzer
    Eye and face protection represents critical PPE for photochemical etching operations. Workers wear chemical splash goggles or full-face shields when handling ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] SAFETY GUIDELINE Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation Hazards - UNMC
    UV radiation can cause skin burns, eye damage, and skin cancer. Wear full-face shields, long sleeves, and gloves to protect from UV exposure.
  99. [99]
    Fume Hood Airflow Design Considerations - GMC Commissioning
    Feb 14, 2023 · A fume hood face velocity of 100 fpm is considered acceptable in standard practice by OSHA, ANSI and SEFA.
  100. [100]
  101. [101]
    Is photochemical etching environmentally friendly? - Switzer
    The chemical etchants are recyclable and the dissolved metal can be recovered, creating opportunities for closed-loop processing that minimizes waste and ...
  102. [102]
    Progress towards Clean Technology for Photochemical Machining
    This paper describes the cleaner photographic, metal preparation, coating and etching technologies that have been developed and includes details of current ...
  103. [103]
    EPA RCRA ID: PAD980919005 | US EPA
    Nov 21, 2024 · Lancaster Metals Science Corporation is a photochemical etching facility which has been in operation at this location since March 1984. The ...
  104. [104]
    (PDF) Increasing utilisation efficiency of ferric chloride etchant in ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · This paper concerns the environmental impact of ferric chloride, the most commonly used etchant in PCM, and is believed to be the first ...
  105. [105]
    Sustainability - Precision Micro
    We recycled more than 35% of the water used in our photochemical etching process · Sourced 100% of electricity usage from renewables · Achieved a decrease of 62 ...