Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Precision approach path indicator

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) is a visual glide slope indicator system installed at airports to provide pilots with precise vertical guidance during the phase of landing, helping to prevent and runway excursions. It consists of a single row of four light units (or two for abbreviated versions) mounted perpendicular to the edge, typically on the left side when approaching, near the landing threshold. Each unit projects a beam divided horizontally into an upper white sector and a lower sector, creating a color that indicates the aircraft's position relative to a nominal 3-degree glide path. The PAPI's light configuration is interpreted sequentially from the pilot's perspective: four white lights signal the aircraft is too high on the approach; three white and one red indicate slightly high; two white and two red denote on the correct glide path; one white and three red mean slightly low; and four red lights warn of being too low. This system ensures safe obstruction clearance within ±10 degrees of the runway centerline and up to 3.4 nautical miles from the , with visibility ranging from approximately 5 miles during daylight to 20 miles at night. Installation requires frangible mounting to minimize hazards in case of contact, and the lights must operate reliably in extreme conditions, including temperatures from -67°F to 131°F and winds up to 100 mph. Developed in the late 1970s by the United Kingdom's as an improvement over earlier visual aids like the (VASI), the PAPI was adopted as an international standard by the (ICAO) in 1981. The U.S. (FAA) evaluated and incorporated it through rigorous testing in the early 1980s, establishing detailed specifications in Advisory Circular 150/5345-28, with updates incorporating LED technology for enhanced reliability and efficiency. Today, LED-based PAPIs extend lamp life to 40,000 hours from 2,000 hours in traditional incandescent models while reducing energy use, making it the predominant visual descent guidance system at runways worldwide.

Overview

Purpose and function

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) is an lighting system designed to provide pilots with precision vertical guidance during the phase of . It consists of a row of lights positioned alongside the , offering visual cues to ensure safe alignment with the . The primary function of the PAPI is to assist pilots in maintaining a nominal 3° glide slope, which helps prevent runway excursions, undershoots, overshoots, and incidents. By providing immediate feedback on the aircraft's vertical position, it promotes stabilized descents and reduces the risk of hard landings or deviations from the intended point. In low-visibility conditions, such as or reduced daylight, the PAPI serves as a critical supplement to instrument-based approaches, enhancing pilot and supporting safer transitions to visual flight. This visual aid is particularly essential for non-precision approaches where electronic guidance may be limited. The PAPI achieves its guidance through color-coded lights that indicate the aircraft's position relative to the ideal glide path, with white lights denoting above-path, red below-path, and an equal mix signaling on-path alignment.

Basic components

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) system consists of four identical units, designated as Type L-880 by the (FAA), arranged horizontally perpendicular to the edge to provide visual glide slope guidance. Each unit functions as a self-contained , typically weighing no more than 100 pounds (45 kg) and standing up to 40 inches (1 m) in height when mounted. At the core of each unit are the lamps, which can be either incandescent bulbs rated for a minimum 1,000-hour life or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for modern installations, arranged to project the required beam pattern. These lamps illuminate through a combination of optical elements, including precision reflectors that direct the light, color filters to achieve the red lower beam (using red-transmissive filters compliant with MIL-C-7989 Class B standards), and clear upper sections for the white beam, along with converging lenses made of heat-resistant glass to focus the output. The dual-beam design within each unit creates a sharp horizontal transition: the beam appears red to the pilot when below the optimal glide path and white when above, enabling intuitive vertical position assessment. The housings enclosing these components are constructed from corrosion-resistant materials, commonly anodized aluminum for durability against environmental exposure, with external surfaces painted in (Federal Standard 595 Color 12197) for visibility and UV-resistant plastics for any transparent or protective elements. For runways with space constraints, an optional Abbreviated PAPI (A-PAPI) variant uses only two light units (Type L-881), maintaining the same core components but scaled for abbreviated guidance.

Design and Operation

Light configuration and angles

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) employs a standard configuration of four light units arranged horizontally in a single row, oriented perpendicular to the centerline and typically installed on the left side of the . These units are spaced 9 meters apart, with the nearest unit positioned 15 meters laterally from the edge, and the entire array located approximately 300 meters from the threshold to align with a threshold crossing height of around 50-60 feet for most categories. This geometric layout ensures uniform visibility and precise angular coverage for pilots on . To guide along a nominal 3° glide path, the light units are optically aligned at specific elevation angles from the horizontal: the innermost (nearest to the ) unit at 3°30', the second at 3°10', the third at 2°50', and the outermost at 2°30'. These settings position the color transition points symmetrically around the 3° path angle, with the on-glide path occurring midway between the second and third units, providing a balanced indication of two red and two white lights when the is correctly aligned. The angles are adjustable within a range of 2° to 8° during installation to accommodate variations in elevation or obstacle clearance requirements. Each light unit produces a dual-color beam with a sharp transition from in the lower sector to in the upper sector, where the indicates the is below the intended and indicates above. The transition angle between these colors is limited to ≤3 arc minutes (0.05°) at the beam center and ≤5 arc minutes at the edges, ensuring minimal overlap and high in visual guidance; this narrow transition width is critical for maintaining the integrity of the glide indication over distances up to 3 nautical miles. The beams themselves have a vertical spread of approximately 4° to 10° and a spread of 20° to 30°, optimized for visibility without excessive light spill.

Signal interpretation

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) provides pilots with real-time visual guidance on their vertical position relative to the desired glide path through a row of four lights, where each light displays either or based on the 's eye height relative to the light's beam transition point. A configuration of two and two lights indicates the is on the correct 3-degree glide path. Three and one lights signify the is slightly above the path, while four lights indicate the is dangerously high and requires immediate correction to avoid excessive descent later. Conversely, one and three lights mean the is slightly below the path, and four lights indicate the is too low, with all also appearing when the is on the ground or at extremely low altitudes below all beam transitions. Pilots adjust their approach based on these signals to maintain the stabilized glide path: if more white lights are visible (too high), reduce power to increase the descent rate and fly a lower path; if more red lights are visible (too low), increase power to shallow the descent and fly a higher path. These adjustments ensure the crosses the at the appropriate height while adhering to safe obstruction clearance within 10 degrees of the centerline and up to 3.4 nautical miles from the . The interpretation of PAPI signals accounts for aircraft-specific factors, particularly the Minimum Eye Height over Threshold (MEHT), which varies by category to ensure the on-path indication aligns with the pilot's eye position at . For smaller in Category A, MEHT is typically 25 feet, while for larger in Category C or Height Group 4 (such as the or , with cockpit-to-wheel heights exceeding 25 feet), it increases to around 50-75 feet, often requiring a "slightly high" indication (three white, one red) for safe threshold crossing. This customization prevents smaller from flying excessively low paths on runways designed for heavy jets. PAPI systems may be activated by (ATC) at towered airports or by pilots at non-towered fields using pilot-controlled lighting (PCL) via keyed microphone clicks on the (CTAF), typically seven clicks for low intensity, five for medium, and three for high. This remote activation ensures the lights are available when needed, with visibility ranging from 5 miles daytime to 20 miles at night.

Installation and Calibration

Site requirements and placement

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) system is typically installed on the left side of the , approximately 300 meters beyond the landing threshold, to provide optimal visual glide slope guidance aligned with the runway centerline. This placement ensures the lights are visible to approaching pilots within a nominal range of approximately 5 miles during daylight and up to 20 miles at night, while maintaining compatibility with instrument landing systems (ILS) by positioning the lights at the same distance from the threshold as the ILS glide path touchdown point, with a tolerance of ±10 meters. For runways with specific constraints, such as obstructions or operational needs, the system may be placed on the right side or configured as a dual installation, though left-side placement remains the standard unless deemed impracticable. Laterally, the light units are positioned a minimum of 15 meters from the edge for runway codes 3 and 4, to avoid interference with operations and ensure frangible mounting for . The units are spaced 6 to 10 meters center-to-center, mounted at a low height of about 1 meter above ground level on level , and oriented parallel to the to appear to pilots. Frangible mounting structures are required to break away under impact with minimal hazard to . PAPI is suitable for precision approach runways (Categories I, II, or III) used by or in environments requiring enhanced visual guidance, such as over or featureless ; for shorter runways or non-precision operations, alternative systems like VASI may be considered instead. Site selection requires a flat approach zone with no significant terrain variations that could distort the glide path angle, nominally set at 3 degrees (adjustable between 2 and 3.5 degrees based on aircraft type and local conditions). Obstructions within the light signal clearance surface—extending from the light units at 1 degree below the lowest signal angle, laterally ±14 degrees, and up to 8 nautical miles—must be mitigated, particularly within 4 nautical miles of the threshold where full obstacle clearance is mandatory. According to FAA and ICAO standards, a comprehensive site survey is required prior to installation, evaluating obstruction-free zones, alignment with the runway centerline, elevation tolerances, and potential penetrations of approach or transitional surfaces; any obstacles within 3,000 meters must be removed, marked, lighted, or otherwise addressed to comply with aerodrome obstacle limitation requirements.

Calibration procedures

Calibration of the Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) involves precise alignment of the units to ensure the visual glide provides accurate guidance for approaching . The process begins with determining the appropriate glide path angle, typically between 2° and 4.5°, based on the minimum eye height over the (MEHT) for the expected category, as specified in international standards. MEHT values range from 10 meters to 60 meters depending on the aerodrome and type, with nominal values often between 12 and 16 meters for compatibility with instrument landing systems. Adjustments are made using data from aircraft manufacturers, such as eye height tables for various models, to set the angles so that the transition from red to white signals occurs at the desired height above the . The alignment procedure requires each of the four PAPI light units to be positioned parallel to the runway centerline and aimed vertically using specialized tools, such as digital inclinometers or aiming devices accurate to within ±3 minutes of arc. The inner two units are set to define the on-glide path, with the third unit's angle serving as the reference for MEHT calculation (angle B minus 2 minutes). For different aircraft types, custom adjustments account for variations in pilot eye height, wheel loading, and approach speeds; for example, higher MEHT settings may be used for larger turbojet to ensure adequate obstacle clearance. Tolerances for the glide path slope are maintained at ±0.1°, and the color transition sector must be within 3 minutes of arc to avoid misleading signals. Verification of the calibration is conducted through flyover checks or ground-based optical methods, such as theodolites, to confirm the transition points where the lights change from all (above glide path) to all (below glide path). During flyovers, pilots or survey approach along the extended centerline to observe the signal at specific distances, ensuring the 2 red/2 configuration aligns with the targeted MEHT. Ground surveys measure intensity, spread, and color at multiple points within the isocandela diagram, with intensity not falling below 50% of specified values. These checks must verify that the system provides safe wheel clearance over the threshold, typically 1.5 to 9 meters based on category. Calibration is performed initially during and periodically thereafter, with ICAO standards requiring at least annual flight checks or equivalent verifications to maintain accuracy, especially after any or environmental changes. In-field measurements, including photometric assessments, are recommended twice yearly for lights and once for elevated units, adjusted for factors like traffic volume and equipment condition. For runways serving diverse fleets, recalibration may be needed to accommodate varying operational requirements, ensuring the PAPI remains a reliable visual without compromising safety margins.

Technical Specifications

Optical and electrical characteristics

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) employs specific optical parameters to ensure reliable visual glide path guidance for . The light intensity for white lights typically ranges from 5,000 to 30,000 , while red lights maintain a minimum of 2,500 (up to 15,000 ), with adjustments for day and night operations to prevent dazzling pilots. These intensities are measured across from -4° to +4°, ensuring consistent within the approach sector. The beam configuration features a transition width of 10 minutes of arc (approximately 0.167°) at the beam (sharpening to 3 minutes at center and 5 minutes at edges when viewed from 1,000 feet), providing pilots with precise indication. The beam is adjustable between 2° and 8° above the horizontal to align with standard glide paths. Horizontally, the beam extends at least 10° on either side of the centerline, up to ±10° , forming a fan-shaped for broad coverage. Color coordinates adhere to standards, with white lights falling within CIE chromaticity boundaries of x=0.320–0.440 and y=0.292–0.433, and red lights between x=0.620–0.720 and y=0.290–0.350 (with y ≤0.320 at full intensity).
ColorChromaticity Coordinates (CIE 1931)Standard Reference
Aviation Whitex: 0.320–0.440, y: 0.292–0.433FAA EB 67D
Aviation Redx: 0.620–0.720, y: 0.290–0.350SAE AS-25050; FAA EB 67D; ICAO Annex 14
Electrically, PAPI systems operate under two primary styles: Style A, which uses single-phase voltage below 600 V with 3% regulation, and Style B, employing a constant-current series of 2.8–6.6 A via isolation transformers. types include incandescent bulbs with a minimum rated life of , reaching 100% intensity within 5 seconds of activation, or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) compliant with and photometric requirements. LEDs offer extended service life (typically exceeding 50,000 hours per manufacturer data), with intensity maintenance ensuring no more than 30% degradation after high-temperature testing at 55°C. For remote installations, solar-powered options with backups are available, providing secondary power with switch-over times of ≤15 seconds to maintain reliability in off-grid environments (per ICAO standards).

Maintenance and power requirements

Maintenance of Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) systems involves routine inspections and servicing to ensure reliable visual guidance for approaches. Daily checks require verifying that all are operational and of equal , with immediate of any burned-out or dimmed to prevent signal . Monthly maintenance includes inspecting the system for physical damage from equipment like mowers or snowplows, cleaning lenses and filters to remove , and confirming and vertical by recording . Quarterly procedures focus on thorough verification using precision tools accurate to ±3 minutes of arc and additional lens cleaning to sustain photometric performance. Annual inspections encompass comprehensive cleaning of all lenses and reflectors, structural checks for or , and full system testing per manufacturer specifications to maintain glide path accuracy. Power requirements for PAPI systems vary by configuration and light source technology, but a typical four-unit installation consumes 500–1,000 watts overall, with LED-based systems at the lower end due to efficient . Systems operate on either single-phase utility power under 600 volts (Style A) or series circuits at 2.8–6.6 amperes via constant current regulators (Style B), ensuring stable intensity across multiple brightness steps. For reliability during outages, backup generators are recommended, activating within 15 seconds to sustain operation and prevent lens fogging from intermittent use; these units typically provide at least 24 hours of fuel capacity. LED implementations in PAPI systems reduce needs by eliminating frequent replacements, as diodes offer a typically exceeding 50,000 hours compared to the 1,000-hour minimum for incandescent , while also cutting energy use by up to 80% for equivalent output. Protective features like built-in heaters prevent frost or dew on lenses without added upkeep. Many modern PAPIs incorporate self-diagnostic fault indicators, including monitoring for status and tilt sensors that de-energize units if misalignment exceeds ¼–½ degree, alerting for prompt resolution.

History and Development

Invention and early trials

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) was developed between 1974 and 1976 by Anthony J. Smith and David Johnson at the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE) in , , as part of efforts to enhance visual landing aids for aircraft. The project stemmed from a 1973 directive by the UK Department of Transport to the Blind Landing Experimental Unit (BLEU) at RAE , aiming to support (STOL) operations in urban areas with steeper approach angles up to 6 degrees and low decision heights of 100 feet. The primary motivation was to address limitations in existing systems like the (VASI), which suffered from imprecise glideslope guidance due to broader light transition zones, and the T-VASI, which was overly complex for routine use. Initial concept evaluations in involved flight tests with and HS 748 aircraft on Runway 24 at RAE , simulating high-angle approaches over two weeks to assess feasibility. Key innovations included a four-light array arranged horizontally, providing a sharper red-to-white transition of just 2 minutes of arc—finer than the 5-10 minutes in two- or three-light systems—for more precise vertical guidance at ranges exceeding 10 km and as close as 300 m from . This digital-like signal using red and white lights enabled pilots to maintain a 3-degree glideslope with high accuracy, even in night conditions or good visibility. Early trials commenced in 1976 at RAE Bedford and four other airfields, involving over 5,000 approaches by diverse aircraft such as the VC10, , and helicopters, which demonstrated the system's ease of interpretation and reliability without specialized training. These evaluations confirmed its operational flexibility, leading to recommendations for standardization as a VASI replacement. The (CAA) certified PAPI for operational use in 1978, following detailed assessments outlined in Aeronautical Information Circulars.

Adoption and technological evolution

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) achieved global standardization through the (ICAO) in 1981, when it was recommended for inclusion in Annex 14, Volume I, during the Aerodromes, Air Routes and Ground Aids Divisional Meeting, enabling worldwide implementation as a slope guidance system. This marked a pivotal shift from earlier visual aids like the (VASI), facilitating broader adoption at airports seeking cost-effective precision guidance. In the United States, the (FAA) evaluated and integrated PAPI into operational standards during the early , following British development and international trials, which supported its deployment as the preferred Visual Glide Slope Indicator (VGSI). Technological milestones advanced PAPI reliability and sustainability, notably with the introduction of (LED) variants in 2008, which replaced incandescent lamps to achieve a exceeding 50,000 hours—over 50 times longer than traditional bulbs rated at around 1,000 hours. This transition reduced power consumption by up to 75% and minimized maintenance needs, accelerating installations at both major and regional airports. Additionally, solar-powered LED PAPI variants emerged in the , tailored for remote and developing regions with limited grid access, such as isolated airstrips in the and , where hybrid solar systems ensure autonomous operation. Regulatory frameworks evolved to incorporate these innovations, with ICAO Document 9157 (Aerodrome Design Manual, Part 5: Electrical Systems) updated in subsequent editions to specify testing criteria for PAPI light units, including single and multi-lamp configurations for enhanced photometric performance. Similarly, the FAA's 150/5345-46, revised through its F edition in 2024, outlines specifications for compliant light fixtures, emphasizing LED compatibility and standards to align with modern safety requirements. As of 2025, PAPI systems are installed at thousands of airports globally, serving as the dominant VGSI and reflecting phased conversions from to LED configurations driven by mandates and lifecycle cost reductions. These upgrades, supported by market growth in retrofit solutions, continue to extend operational reliability in diverse environments.

Comparisons and Alternatives

Differences from VASI

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) offers greater precision than the (VASI) through its light configuration and aiming angles. A standard four-light PAPI provides five distinct glide path indications—ranging from all white (too high) to all red (too low)—allowing pilots to discern deviations in approximately 0.20° increments around the nominal 3° glide path, such as slightly low at 2.8° or slightly high at 3.2°; in contrast, a typical two-bar VASI delivers only three indications (all white, split red-over-white, all red) with coarser tolerances of 0.30° to 0.40° between transitions. In terms of physical configuration, PAPI lights are arranged in a single horizontal row of two or four units, usually mounted on the left side of the for a streamlined that simplifies and reduces the footprint. VASI, however, employs a split arrangement with two, three, or four horizontal bars (each containing two to four lights) positioned either across the or on both sides, creating a more distributed and complex setup that can span wider areas. These design differences confer advantages to PAPI, including a sharper color boundary that enhances accuracy for precision instrument approaches at high-traffic or obstacle-dense airports, while VASI's broader indications suit simpler, non-precision needs at smaller facilities but have led to its phase-out in many locations. Additionally, PAPI's obstacle clearance surface extends 3.4 nautical miles () from an offset point approximately 700 feet from the , compared to VASI's 4 starting directly at the , optimizing clearance for modern environments. PAPI was developed explicitly as a direct replacement for VASI, retaining the core red-over-white signaling convention—where red indicates below the glide path and white above—but with refined aiming angles and international harmonization for superior performance without requiring major infrastructure changes during upgrades.

Relation to other approach guidance systems

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) serves as a visual to the Instrument Landing System (ILS), providing pilots with a simple light-based indication of the correct glide path during non-precision approaches when transitioning from instrument to visual flight. Unlike the ILS, which delivers precise electronic guidance for both lateral and vertical alignment in low-visibility conditions, the PAPI offers a backup visual cue that enhances pilot without requiring equipment. This complementary role is particularly valuable at airports where ILS is available but pilots may elect visual approaches in better weather, ensuring consistent glide path adherence. PAPI systems are often integrated with Approach Lighting Systems (ALS), such as the with Sequenced Flashing Lights (ALSF), to provide comprehensive visual guidance during landing, especially in marginal weather. The ALSF-2, for instance, extends visibility with sequenced strobes along the approach zone, while the PAPI adds vertical path information at the runway threshold, creating a unified lighting environment that supports transitions from instrument procedures. This integration complies with FAA standards under 14 CFR Part 139, allowing for coordinated activation to improve safety in reduced visibility without relying solely on ground-based radio aids. In modern , PAPI is frequently combined with satellite-based like GPS and RNAV procedures to support approaches, where it acts as a visual verifier rather than a primary guidance tool. For example, during RNAV (GPS) approaches, pilots use PAPI lights to confirm the glide path at or before the point, bridging electronic with visual confirmation. However, PAPI cannot replace radio or satellite aids, as it depends on sufficient (VMC) for effective use, limiting its application to daylight or clear nights unlike the all-weather capability of ILS. This visual-only constraint underscores PAPI's role as an auxiliary system in the broader ecosystem of approach aids.

Applications and Performance

Visibility range and environmental factors

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) offers an effective visual range of approximately 5 miles (8 km) during conditions and up to 20 miles (32 km) at night, enabling pilots to acquire glide path guidance from significant distances under clear skies. This range is achieved through high-intensity output, with daytime visibility supported by full-intensity settings that activate at ambient light levels of 50-60 foot-candles, transitioning to lower night intensities of 5% or 20% of daytime levels to prevent dazzling. Performance diminishes in adverse weather, particularly and , where light scattering and absorption lead to intensity drop-off and reduced effective range. In , visibility can be limited to (RVR) conditions as low as 150 m for precision approaches. Rain testing standards require operation at rates up to 5.2 inches per hour (130 mm/hour) for 30 minutes without failure, but overall signal clarity decreases with intensity. Environmental adaptations ensure reliable operation across varying conditions, including high-intensity modes for bright daylight to maintain signal contrast against solar glare. Color stability is preserved in temperature extremes through classified designs: Class I units function from -31°F to 131°F (-35°C to 55°C), while Class II extends to -67°F (-55°C), with heating elements preventing lens icing or fogging to uphold / (Y coordinate ≤ 0.320 for at full intensity). Certification under ICAO standards involves rigorous criteria, including photometric testing per Appendix 2, Figure A-2-23, which mandates minimum intensities of 15,000 cd in red/white sectors and 10,000 cd in the main beam, alongside environmental simulations for (100%), , and temperature to verify performance in low-visibility operations down to RVR 100-150 m. FAA equivalents align closely, emphasizing light intensity specs that support these ranges without exceeding dazzle thresholds.

Special uses and global adoption

The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) has found specialized applications beyond standard operations, notably in high-profile scenarios requiring precise visual guidance. adopted PAPI systems for landings, where the lights provided critical descent path information during the phase at sites like and , ensuring alignment in the absence of traditional instrument aids. Similarly, the Final Approach Runway Occupancy Signal (FAROS) integrates a modified PAPI with surface to deliver real-time visual alerts to approaching pilots about occupancy by other aircraft or vehicles, thereby mitigating risks of runway incursions at busy airports. Globally, PAPI installations have proliferated, with the system serving as the predominant visual glide slope indicator at thousands of airports as of 2025, reflecting its status as a cost-efficient upgrade for enhancing approach safety worldwide. Adoption is particularly high in the United States and , where it aligns with FAA and EASA standards for most instrument and visual runways, supporting over 90% of equipped U.S. airports as of 2025. In and , deployment is accelerating through solar-powered variants, which enable reliable operation at remote or off-grid facilities, driven by infrastructure expansion in emerging aviation markets. PAPI's advantages include its relative cost-effectiveness for facilities, with installation and operational expenses significantly lower than full instrument landing systems (ILS), making it ideal for smaller airfields handling non-precision approaches. However, a key disadvantage is its reduced reliability in , where visual cues can be obscured or distorted, necessitating reliance on ILS for safer guidance in adverse weather compared to PAPI's line-of-sight limitations. Recent case studies highlight LED retrofits as a transformative upgrade, with airports worldwide reporting operational cost reductions of 75% or more due to lower power consumption and extended lamp life, as seen in installations across and that replace legacy systems while maintaining compliance.

References

  1. [1]
    VGLS - Precision Approach Path Indicators (PAPI)
    Feb 29, 2024 · The PAPI system is the current standard Visual Glide Slope Indicator (VGSI) consisting of four light boxes arranged perpendicular to the ...
  2. [2]
    Airport Lighting Aids - Federal Aviation Administration
    The lights marking the ends of the runway emit red light toward the runway to indicate the end of runway to a departing aircraft and emit green outward from the ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] AC 150/5345-28G, Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI ...
    Sep 29, 2011 · There must be two selectable night mode intensity settings, approximately 5 and 20 percent of the day mode intensities shown in Figure 1, to ...
  4. [4]
    Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI)
    PAPI was developed by the Royal Aircraft Establishment in the UK in the late 1970s. Subsequently the ICAO Aerodromes, Air Routes and Ground Aids (AGA) ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Evaluation of Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI). - DTIC
    The purpose for testing the Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) was to deter- mine whether the PAPI provides sufficient advantages over the standard red/ ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] 150/5345-28H, Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) Systems, 7 ...
    Jul 29, 2019 · The FAA recommends the guidance and specifications in this Advisory Circular for design of the Precision Approach Path Indicator System. This AC ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Product Catalog | Hughey and Phillips
    The PAPI system is used to provide visual approach path guidance to pilots ... Finish: Anodized aluminum body; stainless steel external metal parts.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] The Precision Approach Path Indicator - PAPI. - DTIC
    Typically this position is 300m from runway threshold giving, for a 3 degree glideslope, a threshold crossing height of 53ft. A PAPI installed at this point and ...Missing: array | Show results with:array
  9. [9]
    [PDF] LED Precision Approach Path Indicator (AV-PAPI ... - Avlite Systems
    Apr 9, 2018 · Set LHA -2 (next adjacent) to 3° 10 min. 12. Set LHA -3 to 2° 50 min. 13. Set LHA -4 (outermost) to 2° 30 min. 14. Adjust until the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    [PDF] AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual ...
    Feb 12, 2018 · This advisory circular provides guidance and recommendations on the installation of airport visual aids.
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    [PDF] EB 95, Additional Siting and Survey Considerations for Precision ...
    However, PAPI/VGSI operation does not require the airport operator to mitigate obstacles in the approach area beyond 4 nautical miles from the runway threshold.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Annex 14
    Annex 14 is related to Aerodromes, specifically Volume I covering Aerodrome Design and Operations, and is part of the Convention on International Civil ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] FAA Engineering Brief 67D, Engineering Brief No.67D Light Sources ...
    Jul 25, 2017 · Engineering Brief 67D provides requirements for light sources other than incandescent/xenon, including test and design requirements for ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] ENGINEERING BRIEF NO. 76, Using Solar Power for Airport ...
    Jan 11, 2008 · DESCRIPTION: This document provides guidance and information that is specific to solar- powered airport obstruction lighting equipment.
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    FAA PAPI Lights | Precision Approach Path Indicator - Avlite Systems
    Our Series 3 PAPI meets both FAA and ICAO requirements in the same compact, lightweight version. Patented LED optics achieve lowest power consumption.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] BAHG Newsletter - Farnborough Air Sciences Trust
    Origins of Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) (by Tony Smith). In 1973 the Dept of Transport tasked. BLEU to investigate the operational feasibility of ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] VASIS, T-VASIS and PAPI - DTIC
    London, UK. CAA (1979). The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPl)-operational evaluations. Aero- nautical Information Circular, No. 4, 15 January, Civil ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] State of Global Aviation Safety - ICAO
    Aug 11, 2025 · 1974 The precision approach path indicator (PAPI) system was first devised. It is a visual aid which provides guidance information to help a ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] LED PAPI | Airfield Lighting Systems
    Service Life: >50,000 hours. Compliance. FAA - AC-137-CA-2015-03-R1. ICAO ... They consistently give the right light output from high quality LED's with excellent ...ناقصة: 2008 lifespan
  22. [22]
    SOLAR SERIES LED PAPI - Solar LED Airfield Lighting Solutions
    Feb 11, 2019 · The Solar Series LED PAPI Lights consist of a series of Light Housing Assemblies or LHAs positioned perpendicular to a runway.
  23. [23]
    Solar LED Airfield Lighting System Delivered to South America
    Aviation Renewables was tasked with the design of a solar airfield lighting system for the extension of the runway at the International Airport, located in ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Doc 9157 Aerodrome Design Manual | Flash Technology
    Jan 13, 2018 · Per runway end, the light units of PAPI should be of the same technology. This includes where PAPI are installed on both sides of a runway. n) ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] AC 150/5345-46F Fixtures - Federal Aviation Administration
    Sep 30, 2024 · For all other airport operators, conformity with this AC is recommended. The FAA has determined the standards and guidelines contained in this.
  26. [26]
    PAPI and APAPI Systems: ensuring safe approaches day and night
    A: PAPI systems are a global standard, with thousands installed in major aviation networks like the US National Airspace System and across EASA member states.<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Runway LED PAPI Retrofit Market Research Report 2033
    The market is projected to expand at a CAGR of 7.1% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated USD 1,212.6 million by 2033. This growth is driven by the ...
  28. [28]
    How PAPI Lights Work - Boldmethod
    The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) uses light units similar to the VASI, but are installed in a single row of either two or four light units. These ...
  29. [29]
    VASI vs. PAPI: Understanding the Differences and Similarities
    Oct 17, 2024 · VASI is simpler and cost-effective, often used at smaller airports for basic guidance during landings. · PAPI provides more precise guidance, ...What Is PAPI? · The Differences Between VASI... · Similarities Between VASI and...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] ACF-CG RD 14-02-282 - VASI/PAPI Differences
    Oct 28, 2014 · PAPI and VASI systems use different Obstacle Clearance Surfaces (OCS). Essentially the VASI is 4 NM and begins at the threshold.
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Order 8260.42B - Federal Aviation Administration
    May 22, 2020 · Approach Procedure Types using RNAV (GPS). (1) IFR to an IFR ... approach path indicator (PAPI), etc. at or prior to the MAP. Obstacle ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI): Introducing Series 3
    Jun 9, 2020 · The primary function of a PAPI is to assist the pilot by providing visual glide slope guidance for non-precision approaches.
  35. [35]
    How it works: PAPI lights - AOPA
    Apr 1, 2019 · PAPI lights are activated by ATC (or the pilot at some smaller airfields) and were adopted by NASA for landing the space shuttle. Julie Walker.
  36. [36]
    Space shuttle landing: How is it performed? In Detail
    Aug 8, 2025 · elevation. Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) lights, Where the runway is visible, shows pilots if they are on the correct outer glide ...
  37. [37]
    Final Approach Runway Occupancy Signal (FAROS) - SKYbrary
    Mar 19, 2025 · FAROS is a system that provides a visual signal to landing aircraft that the runway ahead is occupied by another aircraft or a vehicle.
  38. [38]
    An Operational Evaluation of the Final Approach Runway ...
    This system utilizes surface surveillance, tracking logic and a modified precision approach path indicator (PAPI) to provide direct notification to pilots on ...Missing: prevention | Show results with:prevention
  39. [39]
    Precision Approach Path Indicator Market Research Report 2033
    The migration from traditional halogen-based systems to advanced LED and solar-powered PAPI units is driven by the need for lower maintenance, improved energy ...
  40. [40]
    Rain on Planes - Aviation Safety Magazine
    Furthermore, heavy rain can produce visual illusions that distort the pilots perception of the runway location and distance. Whether flying an airliner or a ...
  41. [41]
    SERIES 3 LED PAPI: ANOTHER CHOICE IN GLIDESLOPE ...
    Jun 10, 2020 · Our Series 3 PAPI meets both FAA and ICAO requirements in the same compact, lightweight version. Patented LED optics achieve lowest power consumption.
  42. [42]
    LED PAPI - Airport Lighting Specialists
    ١١‏/١١‏/٢٠٢٤ · LED PAPI uses 75% less power than a lamped equivalent and can be powered by Series Circuit, Mains AC or 24 volt DC.ناقصة: 2008 lifespan 50000 hours<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Making the Switch to LED PAPI: A Wise Investment or Overkill? - S4GA
    Apr 10, 2024 · LED PAPI lights boast an impressive lifespan of up to 100,000 hours, significantly longer than halogen bulbs (500 hours). This means fewer ...