Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Priority review


Priority review is a designation by the (FDA) that expedites the evaluation of new drug and biologics license applications intended to treat serious conditions and offering significant improvements in safety or effectiveness over existing therapies. Under this status, the FDA aims to complete its review within six months, compared to the standard ten-month timeline, thereby accelerating patient access to promising treatments while maintaining rigorous scientific standards.
Established in 1992 as part of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) reforms, priority review introduced a two-tiered system to prioritize applications demonstrating substantial therapeutic advances amid growing demands for faster drug approvals during public health crises like the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Sponsors may request the designation at the time of application submission, supported by clinical data evidencing the drug's potential benefits, though the FDA makes the final determination independently. This mechanism has facilitated earlier availability of numerous breakthrough therapies for conditions such as cancer and rare diseases, though it has occasionally drawn scrutiny for balancing speed against comprehensive post-market surveillance to monitor long-term efficacy and safety. Priority review operates alongside other FDA expedited programs, including fast track, breakthrough therapy, and accelerated approval, forming a suite of tools to address unmet medical needs.

General Priority Review Designation

Definition and Criteria

Priority Review is a designation assigned by the (FDA) to certain original new drug applications (NDAs), biologics license applications (BLAs), and premarket approval () applications for medical devices, indicating that the agency aims to take regulatory action within six months of receiving a complete filing, as opposed to the ten-month standard review timeline. This expedited process targets therapies intended to treat, prevent, or diagnose serious conditions, where approval would represent a meaningful advancement over existing options. The FDA's criteria for granting Priority Review, as detailed in its 2013 Review Designation Policy, require that the application demonstrate the potential to provide safe and effective therapy where the benefits substantially outweigh the risks for the intended population. Specifically, priority status applies to drugs offering major advances in treatment or filling a therapeutic gap with no adequate alternatives, particularly for serious conditions defined as life-threatening illnesses or those causing substantial impacts on daily functioning, such as persistent or severe morbidity. Evidence must include substantial data from adequate and well-controlled clinical investigations showing significant improvements in safety or effectiveness, such as enhanced efficacy, reduced treatment burden, or better outcomes compared to standard therapies. Sponsors may request Priority Review at the time of application submission or earlier during development, but the FDA makes the final determination based on the submitted evidence of clinical benefit. This designation does not alter the approval standards but prioritizes review resources to accelerate access to innovative treatments addressing unmet needs. Standard review is assigned to applications not meeting these thresholds.

Review Process and Timelines

The priority review process for a (NDA) or biologics license application () commences upon submission, where the sponsor requests the designation if the proposed product addresses an unmet need for a serious condition. The U.S. () assesses the request as part of its initial 60-day review to determine filing status and review classification, typically granting priority status if the application demonstrates potential for significant therapeutic advantage. Upon filing acceptance, the FDA assigns a (PDUFA) goal date. For priority review, the FDA commits to a performance goal of reviewing and acting on 90 percent of applicable original submissions—such as new molecular entity NDAs and original BLAs—within six months of the filing date, in contrast to ten months for standard review. This accelerated timeline involves intensive multidisciplinary evaluation, including clinical efficacy and safety data, nonclinical studies, chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (), and biopharmaceutics assessments, often coordinated by a to meet internal milestones. Mid-review communications, such as information requests or labeling discussions, may occur, but major amendments submitted by the sponsor can extend the review clock. If an advisory committee meeting is required, it is typically scheduled within the review period to inform the FDA's decision-making. The agency aims to issue an action letter—approving the application, issuing a complete response letter, or refusing to file—by the , though actual performance may vary based on application complexity and resource allocation. Historical data indicate high compliance rates with these goals, supporting expedited access to therapies demonstrating substantial benefits.

Comparison to Standard Review

Priority Review designation shortens the FDA's target review timeline for new drug applications to six months from the filing date, compared to ten months under Standard Review, as established under the User Fee Amendments (PDUFA). This expedited clock applies to both original new molecular entities and non-new molecular entity applications, with the goal of accelerating access to therapies addressing serious conditions. The key criterion for Priority Review is that the drug must demonstrate potential for significant improvement in safety or effectiveness relative to available therapies, or represent a therapy where no adequate alternative exists for treating, diagnosing, or preventing a serious disease. In contrast, Standard Review is the default for applications showing adequate safety and efficacy without meeting this threshold of substantial therapeutic advantage, allowing FDA reviewers more time for comprehensive evaluation of incremental innovations. Designation decisions are made upon application filing, based on preliminary data review, and can influence sponsor strategies for unmet medical needs. Despite the timeline disparity, approval standards under both pathways require substantial evidence of and from adequate, well-controlled clinical trials, with no relaxation of these requirements for Priority Review. Priority Review often demands heightened FDA resource commitment, including dedicated review teams and more frequent sponsor interactions, to adhere to the compressed schedule, whereas Standard Review permits a broader distribution of workload across ongoing applications. Outcomes data indicate that Priority Review facilitates earlier market entry for breakthrough therapies, potentially reducing patient wait times by four months on average, though post-approval surveillance monitors for any expediency-related risks remains identical.
AspectPriority ReviewStandard Review
Target Timeline6 months from filing10 months from filing
Designation CriteriaSignificant improvement in / or no adequate for serious and without significant advantage
Resource AllocationIntensive, dedicated teams and interactionsStandard workload distribution
Approval StandardsIdentical: substantial evidence requiredIdentical: substantial evidence required
This table summarizes core distinctions, reflecting PDUFA commitments as of the latest guidance.

Priority Review Voucher Program

Legislative Origins

The Priority Review Voucher (PRV) Program was established by the (FDAAA), enacted on September 27, 2007. Section 524 of the FDAAA added Section 529 to the Federal , authorizing the to award a PRV to the sponsor of a application approved for preventing, diagnosing, or treating a qualifying . The program's primary objective was to incentivize pharmaceutical development for , which affect millions in low-income regions but offer limited commercial returns due to small markets in wealthy countries. The concept drew from a in Health Affairs by economists David B. Ridley, Henry G. Grabowski, and Jeffrey L. , advocating transferable vouchers to accelerate review of subsequent drugs, thereby creating financial value through expedited market entry for high-revenue products. Under the legislation, a PRV entitles its holder—transferable one time without FDA limitation on price or recipient—to a 6-month priority review for any subsequent , contrasting the standard 10-month timeline, while the qualifying tropical disease drug receives standard review. Qualifying diseases, listed in FDA guidance, include conditions like , , and dengue, selected for their public health burden in endemic areas and lack of adequate therapies. This inaugural PRV mechanism addressed market failures in drug innovation for orphan-like tropical indications by leveraging the economic premium of priority review—estimated to shorten approval by up to 4 months and boost revenues through earlier sales—without direct . The FDA issued its first PRV in for an antimalarial drug, validating the program's operational framework, though initial uptake was modest due to scientific and regulatory hurdles in developing such products. Subsequent expansions built on this foundation, but the 2007 legislation marked the origin of using vouchers as a targeted for underserved therapeutic areas.

Core Mechanism and Eligibility

The Priority Review Voucher (PRV) entitles its holder to a six-month FDA review period for a single subsequent (NDA) or biologics license application (), compared to the standard ten-month review for non-priority applications. This expedited process applies to any eligible product submission, provided the voucher is submitted concurrently and has not expired or been previously redeemed. Vouchers are transferable one or more times through a written agreement, with notification to the FDA required upon transfer, and each is limited to one-time use without combination with other review incentives. The mechanism aims to incentivize development of therapies for underserved conditions by allowing sponsors to monetize the time-value of accelerated approval for higher-priority pipeline candidates. Eligibility for award requires FDA approval of a qualifying product application under section 524 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, originally established for tropical diseases. The sponsor must demonstrate that the approved drug or biologic prevents or treats a statutorily designated tropical disease—such as malaria, tuberculosis, or dengue—and that it constitutes the first such approval for the specific indication or provides a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness over existing therapies. No voucher is awarded if one has previously been granted for the same product, manufacturer, or tropical disease indication, preventing duplicate incentives. Sponsors typically request pre-approval consultation with the FDA to confirm eligibility, ensuring the application meets novelty and clinical benefit thresholds verified at approval.

Acquisition, Transfer, and Redemption

Priority review vouchers (PRVs) are issued by the U.S. (FDA) to the sponsor of an approved biologics license application (BLA) or () for a product that meets the eligibility criteria of a specific PRV program, such as addressing a rare pediatric disease, a qualifying , or a material threat medical countermeasure. Issuance occurs automatically upon approval if the application is the first for that qualifying condition or satisfies program-specific requirements, like prior designation for rare pediatric diseases. For example, FDA awarded the inaugural PRV on April 27, 2009, to for artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem), the first FDA-approved antimalarial fixed-dose combination therapy. Between fiscal years 2009 and 2019, FDA issued 31 PRVs across programs, with the majority for rare pediatric diseases. PRVs may be transferred or sold by the holder to another any number of times prior to , with no statutory limit on transfers. The transferring must notify FDA in writing of the transfer details, including the unique voucher identification number, transfer date, and identities of the transferor and transferee; a complete chain-of-transfer record must be maintained and submitted to FDA upon to validate eligibility. Of the 31 PRVs awarded through September 2019, 17 were sold, with transaction prices varying widely: early sales reached $350 million in fiscal year 2015, while later ones (post-February 2017) typically ranged from $80 million to $130 million. For instance, BioMarin sold a rare pediatric disease PRV for Vimizim to in July 2014 for $67.5 million. Redemption entitles the holder to priority review for a subsequent BLA or NDA, shortening FDA's performance goal from 10 months (standard review) to 6 months for action on the application. The voucher may be applied to any drug or biological product, irrespective of therapeutic area or relation to the qualifying disease that earned it, and must accompany a complete application filing. Upon submission, the PRV is expended and cannot be reused or transferred further, even if the application receives a complete response letter or is withdrawn. Redemption incurs a priority review user fee, set at approximately $2.5 million in fiscal year 2019, in addition to standard application fees. By September 2019, 16 of the 31 awarded PRVs had been redeemed, often for high-priority applications in areas like HIV treatments or metabolic disorders.

Economic Valuation and Costs

The economic value of priority review vouchers stems from their capacity to shorten FDA review timelines for a subsequent drug application from approximately 10 months under standard review to 6 months under priority review, thereby advancing market entry and revenue generation by several months for high-value products. This acceleration can yield substantial returns, particularly for drugs with large projected sales, as the of expedited cash flows often justifies voucher acquisition costs exceeding $100 million. In the , vouchers have traded for prices ranging from $67.5 million to $350 million since the program's inception, with transactions reflecting demand from sponsors seeking expedited approvals for candidates. The inaugural sale occurred in , when transferred a tropical disease to for $67.5 million. Pharmaceuticals paid a record $350 million for a in a later transaction, highlighting peak valuations amid high-stakes development pipelines. Since , average sale prices have stabilized around $100 million, though 2024 saw a spike to approximately $150 million for rare pediatric disease vouchers due to the program's impending sunset and resulting . In that year, pharmaceutical companies disclosed expenditures totaling $513 million on vouchers earned for pediatric approvals. Redemption of a incurs direct costs to the holder in the form of an additional FDA user fee, which reimburses the agency for the incremental expenses of priority review over standard review. For 2025, this fee is set at $2,482,446, calculated as the difference between average priority review costs (approximately $4.7 million) and standard review costs (approximately $2.2 million), adjusted annually for and workload changes. The fee structure ensures FDA without subsidizing the expedited process from general funds, though it represents a minor fraction of the voucher's overall market value.
Fiscal YearPriority Review Voucher User Fee
2025$2,482,446
The program's design has channeled over $3 billion in value across dozens of s, providing non-dilutive capital to developers of qualifying therapies while imposing negligible direct costs on the FDA beyond the reimbursed s. However, critics argue that voucher-driven prioritization may strain agency resources and divert attention from other needs, potentially inflating development costs for non-voucher-eligible drugs through costs in . Empirical indicate that while vouchers have spurred 38 rare pediatric disease approvals since 2012, their economic incentives primarily benefit large pharmaceutical firms capable of monetizing transfers rather than small biotechs focused on niche indications.

Extensions and Specialized Variants

Tropical Disease Incentives

The Tropical Disease Priority Review Voucher program, authorized by Section 524 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as amended by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007, awards transferable vouchers to sponsors upon FDA approval of qualifying drug or biological products for designated tropical diseases. These vouchers grant priority review, reducing FDA review time from the standard 10 months to approximately 6 months for a subsequent application selected by the holder. Eligibility requires the product to address prevention, , or of a listed , qualify for priority review under FDA criteria demonstrating significant improvement over available therapies, contain no previously approved active moiety, and—for approvals after September 30, 2017—include new clinical investigation reports not previously submitted to regulatory authorities in , , , or other specified countries before September 27, 2007. Redemption entails submitting the voucher with a future application and paying the applicable user fee, set annually by FDA. FDA designates qualifying tropical diseases based on statutory examples and agency expansions when diseases present a significant threat in developing nations, lack adequate therapies, and disproportionately affect tropical regions. The current list includes: Additional designations include , , chikungunya virus disease (added 2018), cryptococcal meningitis (added 2018), , , and (added 2020). Unlike voucher programs for rare pediatric diseases, the tropical disease incentives lack a sunset date, enabling ongoing awards without expiration. As of 2016, at least three vouchers had been issued, including for artemether-lumefantrine (, 2009) and (, 2012). The program aims to stimulate investment in neglected diseases affecting over a billion people annually in low-income tropical areas, where market incentives are otherwise insufficient.

Rare Pediatric Disease Extension

The Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher (RPD PRV) program incentivizes the development of treatments for rare pediatric diseases by granting sponsors a transferable priority review voucher upon U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a qualifying drug or biologic product. Enacted in 2012 through the FDA Safety and Innovation Act, which amended section 529 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the program targets serious or life-threatening conditions where pediatric needs are unmet due to limited market incentives. Eligibility requires a rare pediatric designation from the FDA, requested by the sponsor before submitting a application. A rare pediatric disease affects fewer than 200,000 individuals under age 18 in the United States, with greater than 50% of the affected U.S. population being pediatric, and no reasonable expectation of absent incentives like exclusivity. The designation applies to novel drugs or biologics addressing the disease, excluding diagnostics unless submitted under a or biologics license application. Upon approval of the designated application—provided no prior RPD PRV was issued for the same drug, a previously approved version, or a similar molecular entity—the sponsor receives the . The RPD PRV entitles its holder to priority review for any subsequent FDA or biologic application, shortening the review period from 10 months to 6 months and potentially accelerating entry by up to 4 months. Vouchers are exclusive to one application, non-renewable, and fully transferable, including via , mirroring mechanisms in the original tropical disease PRV program but tailored to pediatric rarity criteria. Unlike standard priority review, which requires demonstrating significant clinical advantage, the voucher applies unconditionally to the selected application. Since inception, the program has issued approximately 56 RPD PRVs, supporting approvals for treatments addressing 39 distinct rare pediatric diseases and contributing to over 50 therapies reaching the market with pediatric-specific data. Reauthorizations occurred in 2016 and 2020, but the authority to grant new designations sunset on December 20, 2024, with voucher awards for prior designations possible until September 30, 2026. As of August 2025, the FDA continued issuing RPD PRVs for qualifying approvals. Bipartisan reauthorization efforts, including the —which passed the House Energy and Commerce Committee on September 17, 2025—seek to extend the program through 2029, though full enactment remains pending as of October 2025.

Ebola and Infectious Disease Provisions

The Adding Ebola to the FDA Priority Review Voucher Program Act, enacted as Public Law 113-233 on December 16, 2014, amended Section 524 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to explicitly include filoviruses—such as those causing virus disease—within the definition of qualifying s eligible for priority review vouchers (PRVs). This expansion aimed to incentivize development of treatments amid the 2014 outbreak, which reported over 28,000 cases and 11,000 deaths by March 2016 according to data. Prior to this, the PRV program, established in , focused on neglected parasitic and bacterial infections but excluded viral hemorrhagic fevers like despite their threat. The 2014 legislation removed the prior cap limiting sponsors to one PRV per , allowing multiple awards for filovirus products if they met criteria such as FDA approval for a new drug or biologic addressing an unmet need without prior incentives. It also shortened the required advance notification for voucher redemption from 365 days to 90 days, facilitating faster application to non- products. No PRVs were awarded under this specific filovirus provision until later integrations, as initial Ebola response efforts prioritized emergency use authorizations over full approvals. The of 2016 further broadened infectious disease provisions by establishing a distinct PRV pathway for material threat medical countermeasures (MCMs), defined as drugs or biologics for agents like that pose significant risks to national security. This category targets countermeasures against chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear threats, with qualifying due to its designation as a Category A agent by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sponsors receive a PRV upon FDA approval of an MCM product meeting unmet needs, transferable without expiration. In practice, this led to the December 21, 2020, approval of Ebanga (ansuvimab-zykl) for , earning Ridgeback Biotherapeutics a material threat MCM PRV. These provisions reflect a targeted response to outbreaks, including the 2018-2020 Democratic Republic of Congo epidemic with over 3,400 cases, but critics argue the PRV system's reliance on transferable vouchers primarily benefits large pharmaceutical firms through sales rather than directly advancing low-margin infectious disease R&D. Empirical data from the indicates that while PRVs have accelerated some approvals, only a fraction address neglected infectious threats, with vouchers often redeemed for high-revenue unrelated drugs. No additional filovirus-specific PRVs have been issued beyond MCM integrations, underscoring limited uptake despite eligibility expansions.

Medical Countermeasures

The Material Threat Medical Countermeasure Priority Review Voucher program, enacted under section 3086 of the (Public Law 114-255) on December 13, 2016, authorizes the U.S. (FDA) to award a priority review voucher (PRV) to the sponsor of the first FDA-approved drug or biological product application qualifying as a material threat medical countermeasure (MCM). Material threat MCMs are defined as products intended to diagnose, treat, or prevent harm from agents or toxins designated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services as posing a material threat to , sufficient to affect or the health and security of U.S. citizens, such as chemical, biological, radiological, or (CBRN) threats. Only one PRV may be awarded per designated material threat agent, and the qualifying application must receive FDA approval under section 505(c) or 351(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, without prior reliance on data alone. Eligibility requires the product to address an unmet need for a specific threat agent, with no previously approved MCM for that agent, and the sponsor must request the voucher at the time of approval submission. The PRV, once issued, entitles the holder to a six-month priority review for any subsequent , with the same transferability, expiration (five years from issuance), and fee waiver provisions as other PRVs under the program. FDA issued draft guidance for industry on January 17, 2018, outlining implementation, including procedures for sponsor requests and FDA's verification of material threat status. As of May 28, 2024, FDA has issued at least one such voucher, to Inc. for Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir and ), approved as a material threat MCM against , reflecting an expansion of qualifying threats beyond traditional CBRN agents to include certain pandemic pathogens deemed material threats. The program's expired on October 1, 2023, limiting future awards unless reauthorized by , as noted in analyses of its role in incentivizing MCM development amid low issuance rates compared to other PRV categories. Legislative efforts to extend it, such as the Material Threat Medical Countermeasure Priority Review Voucher Reauthorization Act introduced on September 26, 2023, by Representative , aim to sustain incentives for CBRN and emerging threat countermeasures. Empirical reviews, including a 2020 report, highlight the program's intent to address market failures in low-demand MCMs but question its overall impact given sparse utilization.

Commissioner's National Priority Voucher Pilot

The Commissioner's National Priority Voucher (CNPV) Pilot Program, initiated by the U.S. (FDA) in June 2025, aims to expedite the review of prescription drugs and biological products that address key national health priorities, such as crises, innovative therapies for unmet medical needs, enhanced affordability, and domestic manufacturing capabilities. Unlike transferable priority review vouchers (PRVs) from other programs, CNPV vouchers are non-transferable, valid for two years from issuance, and remain applicable through changes in corporate ownership. The program incorporates elements of existing priority review pathways but introduces a unique multidisciplinary evaluation process to prioritize submissions aligning with FDA-determined national imperatives. Eligibility under the CNPV pilot requires applicants to demonstrate how their product mitigates urgent health challenges, delivers breakthrough innovations, fills critical therapeutic gaps, reduces costs for patients or payers, or strengthens U.S.-based production to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities. Companies submit a single application per entity, consisting of basic firm details and a concise 350-word narrative outlining the product's alignment with these priorities, via the FDA's designated portal. A senior FDA review committee assesses submissions for potential impact, with vouchers awarded at the agency's discretion; insufficient data may lead to standard review timelines despite voucher granting. The pilot limits awards to manage FDA resources, initially targeting five or fewer in the first year, though operational flexibility allows adjustments. Recipients benefit from abbreviated periods—potentially compressing standard 10- to 12-month timelines to 1-2 months—alongside intensified FDA communication, cross-disciplinary input, and eligibility for accelerated approval mechanisms, all while upholding rigorous and standards. On October 16, 2025, the FDA announced its inaugural nine voucher recipients, spanning diverse indications:
  • Pergoveris for infertility treatment
  • Teplizumab (Tzield) for delaying onset of
  • Cytisinicline for nicotine vaping addiction
  • DB-OTO for congenital deafness
  • Cenegermin-bkbj for neurotrophic leading to blindness
  • RMC-6236 (daraxonrasib) for
  • Bitopertin for acute hepatic porphyria
  • for general via domestic manufacturing
  • Augmentin XR antibiotic via domestic manufacturing
These selections underscore the program's emphasis on both novel therapies and . Additional awards are anticipated in subsequent months, with the pilot's long-term efficacy to be evaluated based on accelerated for prioritized products without compromising regulatory integrity.

Secondary Market Dynamics

Trading and Transactions

Priority Review Vouchers (PRVs) granted by the U.S. (FDA) under various statutory programs are transferable one or more times to other eligible sponsors, enabling a for trading. Transfers must be reported to the FDA within specified timelines, with the agency maintaining a public list of issued and redeemed vouchers but not mandating disclosure of private transaction details such as prices or parties involved unless voluntarily reported via filings or press releases. This opacity in transaction data stems from the private nature of pharmaceutical deals, though industry trackers compile reported sales from regulatory disclosures. The first documented PRV sale occurred in 2014 when transferred a rare pediatric disease voucher to for $67.5 million. Subsequent transactions have included high-value deals, such as AbbVie's 2015 acquisition of a PRV from United Therapeutics for $350 million, marking the highest reported price to date. Prices have fluctuated based on supply scarcity, perceived value of expedited (reducing standard 10-month timelines to about 6 months), and market demand from large pharma firms seeking to accelerate blockbuster drug approvals. From 2020 through November 2024, 22 PRVs were traded in the out of 46 granted across programs, generating approximately $2.355 billion in total sales value and averaging $107 million per . Recent transactions have trended higher, with prices reaching $150-158 million amid reduced availability compared to prior years, reflecting increased competition and the strategic premium for priority status in crowded FDA queues. The market has stabilized since 2015 around an average of $100 million per , though individual deals vary by type (e.g., rare pediatric vs. material threat) and economic conditions. Trading typically involves direct negotiations between biotech developers earning vouchers through qualifying drug approvals and buyers like major pharmaceutical companies, often undisclosed until post-transaction announcements. No formal exchange exists; transactions are governed by the enabling statutes (e.g., 21 U.S.C. §360n for tropical diseases), which prohibit stockpiling by the same sponsor but allow resale without restrictions on end-use applications beyond FDA eligibility. Empirical data from reported sales indicate that vouchers enhance liquidity for smaller firms developing niche therapies, funding further R&D, while buyers gain competitive edges in time-to-market for high-revenue products. The for FDA Priority Review Vouchers (PRVs) has demonstrated robust activity since the program's inception, with vouchers transferable and tradable among pharmaceutical entities to expedite regulatory review for non-qualifying products. Historical sales reflect a wide valuation range, from a low of $21.2 million for a 2012 voucher to a peak of $350 million paid by for United Therapeutics' rare pediatric voucher in 2015. Between 2020 and November 2024, at least 24 PRVs were sold across categories, with prices stabilizing in the $100-150 million range amid growing demand for accelerated approvals. Recent trends indicate upward pressure on pricing, driven by the impending sunset of the rare pediatric disease PRV program and limited supply from other pathways like tropical diseases and medical countermeasures. Valuations have spiked to $150-160 million in 2025 transactions, reflecting scarcity as the rare pediatric program awarded its final vouchers and faces non-renewal. For instance, Zevra Therapeutics sold a rare pediatric PRV for $150 million in April 2025, while fetched $160 million for a voucher tied to its chikungunya vaccine approval in June 2025. completed a rare pediatric PRV sale for $158 million to an undisclosed buyer, underscoring sustained high-end pricing despite transparency concerns in private deals.
SellerVoucher TypeSale DatePrice (USD)Buyer
Zevra TherapeuticsRare PediatricApril 2025150 millionUndisclosed
June 2025160 millionUndisclosed
Rare Pediatric2025158 millionUndisclosed
Pricing differentials persist by voucher type, with rare pediatric vouchers commanding premiums due to historical volume (37 awarded from 2020-2024) compared to fewer tropical disease issuances (7 in the same period). The introduction of the Commissioner's National Priority Voucher pilot in October 2025, awarding nine initial vouchers, may introduce new supply dynamics, potentially moderating prices if redeemable flexibly, though early indications suggest continued elevation tied to perceived review acceleration value. Market opacity remains a challenge, as many transactions occur privately without public disclosure, complicating valuation assessments.

Targeted Diseases and Conditions

Qualifying Neglected Diseases

The Tropical Disease Priority Review Voucher Program, authorized under section 524 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), targets infectious diseases designated as "tropical diseases." These are defined as conditions with no significant market in developed nations that disproportionately affect poor and marginalized populations, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. The program incentivizes drug and biological product development by awarding a transferable voucher for expedited FDA review upon approval of a qualifying product, provided it meets criteria such as containing a novel active ingredient and qualifying for priority review status. The statutory list of qualifying tropical diseases, enumerated in section 524(a)(3)(S) of the FD&C Act, includes: , , blinding , , , dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever, (Guinea worm disease), fascioliasis, human (sleeping sickness), , (Hansen disease), , (river blindness), , (including , roundworm/, and whipworm/), and . These diseases are characterized by high prevalence in low-income countries, limited commercial viability due to small markets and poverty, and reliance on outdated or inadequate treatments, justifying the need for incentives. The FDA holds authority to expand this list by order for other infectious diseases meeting the same criteria of negligible developed-market demand and disproportionate impact on underserved populations, following public docket review. Notable additions include: As of June 2024, the combined list encompasses at least 19 diseases, reflecting iterative expansions to address emerging threats like vector-borne viruses while maintaining focus on neglected conditions with unmet needs. Eligibility for a voucher requires the product to address prevention, , or of one of these diseases, demonstrate clinical through new investigations (post-2017 amendments excluding prior foreign data in some cases), and fill a therapeutic gap without duplicating approved therapies. This framework has supported approvals for treatments like for in 2014, though critics note uneven uptake for the most burdensome diseases due to development risks.

Evolving Scope of Eligibility

The Priority Review Voucher (PRV) program was established under the Amendments Act of 2007, initially conferring vouchers exclusively for drugs or biologics approved to prevent, treat, or diagnose qualifying tropical diseases, defined as those designated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services as posing serious health risks in developing nations with no or limited approved therapies. Qualifying products required no prior FDA approval for the same active ingredient against the disease and had to represent a significant improvement over existing options or fill a complete treatment void. In 2012, the FDA Safety and Innovation Act extended eligibility to rare pediatric s, defined as conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 individuals under age 18 in the United States annually, with vouchers awarded for the first FDA approval of a drug addressing such a , provided it met priority review criteria. This expansion targeted unmet needs in pediatric populations, where development incentives were previously limited compared to adult indications. The of 2016 further broadened the scope by introducing vouchers for medical s against material threats, such as agents like virus that could pose significant risks to if engineered or naturally occurring, applicable to drugs or devices enhancing preparedness against chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear threats. Eligibility required the product to be deemed a qualified with priority review status and no prior voucher for the same indication. By 2025, the program's scope evolved again with the FDA's launch of the Commissioner's National Priority Voucher (CNPV) pilot program on July 22, 2025, enabling awards for drugs targeting diseases or conditions aligned with commissioner-determined national priorities, such as high-burden unmet needs with substantial impact, regardless of prior category restrictions. The FDA awarded the first nine CNPVs on October 16, 2025, to sponsors including and Revolution Medicines, based on applications demonstrating potential for accelerated development in areas like and infectious diseases. This discretionary expansion reflects a shift toward flexible, impact-driven eligibility while maintaining requirements for novel approvals eligible for priority review.

Achievements and Empirical Impacts

Successful Drug Developments

The Priority Review Voucher (PRV) program has spurred the approval of therapies for conditions with limited commercial incentives, including , rare pediatric disorders, and material threat medical countermeasures. Since its inception in for tropical diseases, the program has awarded vouchers for 10 such products, enabling expedited reviews that shortened development timelines and addressed unmet needs in low-income settings. Key successes include antimalarials and antituberculosis agents, which have treated millions in endemic regions despite modest revenues in high-income markets. Notable approvals under the tropical disease PRV include Novartis's artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem), the first recipient, approved on April 8, 2009, for uncomplicated in patients weighing at least 5 kg; it has since enabled over 200 million treatments globally, primarily through donations and access programs. Janssen's (Sirturo), approved December 31, 2012, for , marked the second ; as part of shorter regimens, it has contributed to treating over 80,000 patients worldwide by 2023, reducing mortality in resistant cases. Sanofi's (Impavido), approved March 19, 2014, for visceral, cutaneous, and mucosal , received the third ; this oral therapy has filled a gap for a disease affecting 700,000–1 million people annually, with post-approval data showing efficacy rates above 90% in field studies. These developments demonstrate the 's role in prioritizing orphan-like indications, though sales—such as Coartem's $125 million transfer in 2015—recouped costs for sponsors. In the rare pediatric disease PRV program, enacted in 2012, 54 vouchers have been awarded for treatments addressing 40 conditions, 37 of which lacked prior FDA-approved therapies. Examples include BridgeBio's fosdenopterin (Nulibry), approved March 18, 2021, for cofactor deficiency type A, a fatal neonatal disorder; it extends survival beyond infancy in responsive patients, with real-world use confirming cBVMO metabolite normalization. ' cannabidiol oral solution (Epidiolex), approved June 25, 2018, for Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes, earned a voucher and reduced frequency by 40–50% in pivotal trials; its redemption accelerated unrelated reviews, underscoring the program's dual impact. By incentivizing pediatric-specific formulations and trials, the program has accelerated approvals, with voucher-redeemed drugs showing comparable post-market revenues to non-voucher products, indicating sustained viability. For material threat countermeasures, including Ebola provisions under the , PRVs have supported approvals against biothreat agents. Ridgeback Biotherapeutics' ansuvimab (Ebanga), approved December 21, 2020, for in adults and children, received a PRV; phase 2 data showed 88% survival versus 71% for controls, outperforming prior standards in outbreak settings. Regeneron's atoltivimab/maftivimab/odesivimab (Inmazeb), also approved December 21, 2020, for the same indication, qualified similarly; it achieved 90% efficacy in the PALM trial against historical 50% mortality. SIGA Technologies' tecovirimat (TPOXX), approved July 19, 2018, for , earned a PRV and has stockpiled reserves; animal models demonstrate reductions, positioning it for threats like monkeypox. These approvals have bolstered U.S. strategic stockpiles, with PRVs enabling development amid limited peacetime demand. Overall, empirical data link PRV eligibility to 20–30% faster clinical progression for qualifying drugs compared to similar rare indications without incentives.

Evidence of Incentive Effectiveness

The FDA's Priority Review Voucher (PRV) programs have demonstrated varying degrees of effectiveness in accelerating across eligible categories, with stronger empirical support for rare pediatric diseases than for . A (GAO) analysis of awards from fiscal years 2009 to 2019 found that 31 PRVs were issued overall, including 22 for rare pediatric diseases, 10 for tropical diseases, and 1 for medical countermeasures, with 16 redeemed by September 2019 primarily for non-eligible conditions like and . Sponsors interviewed by GAO reported that PRVs influenced development decisions in some cases, though few independent studies (three examined) showed limited or no broad effects on overall drug pipelines. For , evidence is mixed, indicating modest incentives for less common conditions but limited overall stimulation of (R&D). A 2018 PLOS study identified 523 programs initiated since 2007, with annual starts rising from 21 for high-incidence diseases pre-PRV to 53 post-implementation—a 152% increase—while low-incidence diseases saw a 500% rise from 2 to 12 programs per year; confirmed a positive, statistically significant impact, particularly for low-prevalence targets, though only six PRVs were awarded by then, and 85% of programs remained preclinical or failed. In contrast, a 2022 difference-in-differences of 13,803 clinical trials (2005–2019) found no statistically significant increase in trial activity for eligible tropical diseases after PRV enactment (marginal effect 0.41, p=0.31), attributing this to the voucher's standalone limitations without complementary incentives like . High failure rates and concentration on already-resourced diseases like (66% of programs shared with ) suggest the program amplifies existing efforts rather than broadly catalyzing innovation for truly neglected areas. Rare pediatric disease PRVs exhibit more robust outcomes, with accelerated progression through development phases and broader disease coverage. From 2014 to 2022, 38 vouchers were awarded, addressing 245 unique rare pediatric conditions such as (30 designations) and (21), representing 7% of 569 total designations and spanning cancers to genetic disorders; a spike in 2020 (42% of designations) reflected anticipation of program sunset. Comparative analyses indicate these drugs advanced faster than those for rare adult diseases, with higher likelihood of phase I to II transitions, though the program did not alter rates of initiating or completing clinical testing overall. EveryLife Foundation data corroborates this, noting PRVs facilitated 47 novel indications across 39 diseases, including cases building on prior therapies.
PRV CategoryAwards (2009–2019, )Key Empirical Impacts
Rare Pediatric22Faster phase advancement; 245 diseases covered by 2022; no change in initiation rates but higher success in progression.
Tropical/Neglected10+152–500% program starts post-2007, significant for low-incidence; no trial increase in some analyses; 523 programs total.
Medical Countermeasures1Limited awards; scant development data due to low volume.
The nascent Commissioner's National Priority Voucher pilot, awarding its first nine vouchers on October 16, 2025, to sponsors in areas like for and treatments, lacks longitudinal but aims to address broader gaps beyond traditional categories. Overall, while PRVs provide transferable value (sales from $67.5 million to $350 million), their effectiveness hinges on market dynamics and supplementary policies, with pediatric successes highlighting potential when aligned with unmet needs, contrasted by tropical programs' failures to consistently overcome high R&D risks.

Criticisms, Limitations, and Controversies

Programmatic Flaws and Unintended Effects

The Priority Review Voucher (PRV) programs, intended to accelerate development of therapies for , rare pediatric conditions, and other priority areas, have demonstrated limited empirical impact on (R&D) in targeted diseases. A 2020 U.S. (GAO) analysis of available studies found few evaluations of the programs' effects, with those conducted indicating little or no stimulation of for qualifying conditions. Similarly, a 2022 econometric assessment reported a positive but statistically insignificant influence on R&D expenditures, suggesting the vouchers fail to serve as a robust trigger for innovation in underserved areas. These shortcomings stem from the program's structure, which awards a transferable expedited review (six months instead of ten) for the first qualifying product, often incentivizing minimal-effort designations rather than comprehensive pipelines, as evidenced by only sporadic approvals in core categories like tropical diseases since inception in 2007. Unintended financial windfalls have disproportionately benefited large pharmaceutical firms through sales, decoupling incentives from sustained gains. have traded for sums exceeding $300 million, such as a 2014 sale for a Zika-related , enabling buyers to fast-track unrelated high-revenue drugs while original developers capture outsized returns without proportional advancements in neglected treatments. This dynamic has fostered speculation, where companies pursue low-hanging qualifying drugs primarily for value rather than therapeutic merit, yielding negligible long-term R&D uplift; for instance, a 2015 review of early data showed no acceleration in targeted pipelines despite dozens of issued. Expansions, including the 2025 Commissioner's National Priority Voucher, introduce risks of compromised safety via rushed reviews for non-emergency products. Critics, citing historical expedited approval data, warn that compressing timelines heightens post-market safety signals, as seen in a 2008 New England Journal of Medicine study linking FDA review deadlines to elevated reports after launch. The new mechanism, granting discretionary priority to drugs aligned with commissioner-defined national needs, lacks transparent criteria, potentially favoring influential sponsors and straining FDA resources without mandatory evidence of superior or unmet need. Empirical gaps in post-approval for voucher-expedited drugs exacerbate these concerns, with incomplete tracking of safety issues documented in prior expedited cohorts.

Debates on Market Distortions

Critics argue that the Priority Review Voucher (PRV) program introduces market distortions by enabling the sale of expedited FDA reviews for prices detached from the underlying drug's therapeutic value, potentially diverting R&D resources toward marginal qualifying products rather than genuine unmet needs. Voucher transactions have ranged from $67 million to $350 million between and , with recent sales stabilizing around $100 million to $160 million, creating a where firms pursue eligibility strategically, such as through acquisitions of near-approval candidates for neglected diseases, to capture windfall gains unrelated to long-term innovation in those areas. Proponents counter that the transferable mechanism efficiently leverages private capital without direct government subsidies, fostering a market-driven for neglected development by allowing sponsors to monetize approvals through sales to entities with blockbuster candidates that benefit from shortened review times—typically reducing approval from 10-12 months to 6 months—thus accelerating overall market entry without taxpayer burden. Empirical analyses, however, reveal limited causal evidence of heightened R&D activity; for instance, the program showed no with increased initiation or completion of clinical testing for pediatric drugs, suggesting that voucher pursuit may prioritize low-risk, high-reward eligibility over substantive advancement. Further distortions arise from resource strain on the FDA, as redeemed vouchers compel queuing that can delay standard reviews and exacerbate backlog, indirectly subsidizing profitable drugs via incentives ostensibly for underserved indications—a dynamic likened to quasi-price-fixing where voucher values inflate based on the buyer's projected revenues rather than the seller's contributions. A 2020 Government Accountability Office assessment of 31 awarded PRVs found scant proof of program-induced development surges, with critics noting that while some patient benefits accrued (e.g., approvals for 47 indications benefiting over 200,000 individuals), many s funded treatments with existing alternatives, questioning the efficiency of cross-subsidization. In response to such concerns, the FDA's Commissioner's National Priority Voucher pilot eliminated transferability to mitigate market gaming, underscoring ongoing recognition of transferable PRVs' potential to misalign incentives with causal gains.

Policy and Ethical Concerns

The Priority Review Voucher (PRV) has faced critiques for its limited empirical on accelerating treatments for qualifying neglected diseases, with analyses indicating negligible incentives beyond existing mechanisms like grants or tax credits. A 2020 U.S. (GAO) review of the programs, including the variant, found that only three studies assessed developmental effects, with most showing little to no acceleration in pipelines for eligible conditions. Critics argue that are often redeemed for non-priority, high-revenue drugs, straining FDA resources without proportionally advancing goals in underserved areas. Additionally, the potential for declining voucher value—evidenced by sales prices dropping from peaks of $350 million in 2015 to $80–130 million by 2019—may further erode the motivational force as supply increases. Ethical concerns center on the program's structure, which exchanges expedited regulatory review—intended as a public good for neglected diseases—for private windfalls that rarely ensure equitable access. Of 14 tropical disease PRVs awarded since 2007, several supported products like Coartem and Lampit that were already registered in other jurisdictions, yielding minimal innovation while enabling voucher transfers to blockbuster therapies. This dynamic has been described as a flawed quid pro quo, rewarding pharmaceutical firms with monopoly pricing power for unrelated, profitable indications, thereby shifting costs to global payers without mandates for affordable distribution in endemic regions. For instance, PRV-backed tuberculosis drugs such as bedaquiline and pretomanid command high prices that limit uptake in high-burden, low-income countries, prioritizing shareholder returns over patient needs. Broader risks include erosion of trust in FDA approvals, as accelerated timelines could compromise rigorous safety and efficacy scrutiny, particularly if influenced by commercial or political pressures in expanded voucher variants. Such outcomes challenge the ethical rationale of subsidizing development via taxpayer-funded regulatory shortcuts when benefits accrue disproportionately to market-driven entities rather than vulnerable populations.

References

  1. [1]
    Priority Review - FDA
    Jan 4, 2018 · A Priority Review designation means FDA's goal is to take action on an application within 6 months (compared to 10 months under standard review).Fast Track, BreakthroughFast Track
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Expedited Programs for Serious Conditions – Drugs and Biologics
    A priority review designation means FDA's goal is to take action on the marketing application within 6 months of receipt (compared with 10 months under standard ...
  3. [3]
    Speeding Up the Drug Approval Process—and What That Means for ...
    In 1992, the FDA decided to add the priority review designation to the drug approval process. By providing a mechanism for expedited review with the same rigor ...<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    What is a priority review, and how is it obtained? - Patsnap Synapse
    Mar 20, 2025 · In summary, a priority review is an expedited FDA regulatory designation intended for drugs that offer considerable improvement in treatment ...
  5. [5]
    FDA's Expedited Approval Mechanisms for New Drug Products - NIH
    FDA independently decides whether to give Priority Review to a new drug product whether or not specifically requested, but a sponsor may request Priority Review ...
  6. [6]
    Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy, Accelerated Approval - FDA
    Jun 12, 2023 · The FDA uses Priority Review, Breakthrough Therapy, Accelerated Approval, and Fast Track to speed up drug availability for serious diseases.  ...
  7. [7]
    Expedited Programs for Serious Conditions | Drugs and Biologics
    Nov 28, 2023 · The following four FDA programs are intended to facilitate and expedite development and review of new drugs to address unmet medical need.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Review Designation Policy: Priority (P) and Standard (S) - FDA
    Jun 25, 2013 · Standard review designation is assigned to applications for drugs that do not meet the priority review designation criteria. • A priority review ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] PDUFA REAUTHORIZATION PERFORMANCE GOALS AND ... - FDA
    Review and act on 90 percent of priority NME NDA and original BLA submissions within 6 months of the 60-day filing date. c. Review and act on 90 percent of ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    [PDF] CDER 21st Century Review Desk Reference Guide - FDA
    The timelines to take action for applications that are not in the PDUFA V “Program” are 6-months from receipt for a priority review and 10-months for a ...
  11. [11]
    Development & Approval Process | Drugs - FDA
    Aug 8, 2022 · Priority Review means that FDA aims to take action on an application within six months, compared to 10 months under standard review. A Priority ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] The New Drug Approval Process - FDA
    NDA Types: Priority vs Standard. • Standard Review. – Non- NME: 10-month clock. – NME (under the Program): 12-month clock. • Priority Review. – Non- NME: 6- ...
  13. [13]
    The FDA's Drug Review Process: Ensuring Drugs Are Safe and ...
    Nov 24, 2017 · ... standard drugs no later than 10 months after the applications are received. The review goal is six months for priority drugs. (See "The Role ...
  14. [14]
    21 U.S. Code § 360n - Priority review to encourage treatments for ...
    Priority review means review within 6 months of application receipt. A voucher is given for tropical disease applications, which include diseases like malaria ...
  15. [15]
    Priorities for the Priority Review Voucher - PMC - NIH
    The U.S. Congress created the priority review voucher program in 2007 to encourage development of drugs for neglected diseases. Congress expanded the program in ...
  16. [16]
    Priority Review Vouchers - Sites @ Fuqua
    The US Congress created the priority review voucher program in 2007 based on a 2006 Health Affairs paper (Ridley, Grabowski, and Moe 2006).
  17. [17]
    Tropical Disease Priority Review Voucher Program - FDA
    Jun 13, 2024 · FDA to award priority review vouchers (PRVs) to sponsors of approved tropical disease product applications that meet certain criteria.
  18. [18]
    Tropical Disease Priority Review Vouchers - FDA
    May 6, 2020 · Section 524 authorizes the FDA to award priority review vouchers to sponsors of certain tropical disease product applications that meet the criteria specified ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Drug Development- FDA's Priority Review Voucher Programs
    Jan 31, 2020 · The tropical disease PRV program was first authorized in 2007, the rare pediatric disease PRV program was first authorized in 2012, and the ...Missing: legislative origins
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Tropical Disease Priority Review Vouchers Guidance for Industry
    It refers to a voucher issued by the FDA to the sponsor of a tropical disease product application at the time of approval of the application that entitles the ...
  21. [21]
    Rare Pediatric Disease Designation and Priority Review Voucher ...
    Sep 27, 2024 · FDA awards rare pediatric disease PRVs to sponsors of rare pediatric disease products that are approved and meet certain criteria.About rare pediatric disease... · Requesting rare pediatric...
  22. [22]
    FDA's new Commissioner's National Priority Voucher has lofty goals ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · Drug makers earn a voucher, entitling them to a faster drug review, by proposing plans to advance these public health priorities. FDA cites ...
  23. [23]
    The economics of priority review vouchers - ScienceDirect.com
    The idea underlying the PRV mechanism is that prioritization can act as an economic incentive: anticipating by 6–12 months [6] the market entrance of a drug can ...
  24. [24]
    Switching sales: Investigating the financial impacts of FDA's priority ...
    Jan 10, 2024 · The first ever priority review voucher sold to a pharmaceutical company was by BioMarin to Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for $67.5 million.
  25. [25]
    Drug Development: FDA's Priority Review Voucher Programs
    Jan 31, 2020 · Drug Development: FDA's Priority Review Voucher Programs. GAO-20-251 ... sale of a PRV to decline as more are awarded and available for sale.Missing: acquisition | Show results with:acquisition
  26. [26]
    Priority Review Vouchers: By the Numbers - BioSpace
    Mar 5, 2025 · Companies have disclosed spending $513 million on vouchers that were earned in 2024 so far. The failure of Congress to renew the rare pediatric ...
  27. [27]
    Fee Rate for Using a Priority Review Voucher in Fiscal Year 2025
    Sep 19, 2024 · Increasing the FY 2023 incremental priority review cost of $2,384,292 by 4.1167 percent (or 0.041167) results in an estimated cost of $2,482,446 ...Transferability of the Priority... · II. Priority Review User Fee...
  28. [28]
    FDA Analysis Reveals Decade of Growth in Rare Pediatric Disease ...
    The program awarded 38 priority review vouchers worth approximately $100 million each, providing crucial non-dilutive funding to rare disease drug developers.
  29. [29]
    The priority review voucher: a misconceived quid pro quo - PMC - NIH
    Dec 3, 2024 · They include public funding of basic and clinical research and a set of incentives, such as tax credits, reimbursement schemes, advanced market ...
  30. [30]
    A Temporary Extension for the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority ...
    Oct 14, 2024 · The dollar prices of the vouchers themselves have fluctuated, recent sales have been in the neighborhood of $100 million. Over 50 rare pediatric ...
  31. [31]
    Designating Additions to the Current List of Tropical Diseases in the ...
    Jul 15, 2020 · The FD&C Act lists the diseases that are considered tropical diseases for purposes of obtaining PRVs and provides for Agency expansion of that list to include ...
  32. [32]
    Can the Tropical PRV Have Its Moment (Again?) – Not all Priority ...
    Feb 4, 2025 · The Tropical Disease PRV program was not only the first priority review voucher program created by Congress, it is also the only one drafted without a sunset ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
    The Tropical Disease Priority Review Voucher: A Game-Changer for ...
    The Neglected Tropical Disease Voucher Program is a Congressionally-mandated program intended to promote approval of products for tropical diseases.
  34. [34]
    Analysis of the first ten years of FDA's rare pediatric disease priority ...
    Feb 25, 2024 · The Rare Pediatric Disease (RPD) Priority Review Voucher (PRV) Program was enacted in 2012 to support the development of new products for children.Missing: core | Show results with:core
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Vouchers - FDA
    We note, however, that such diagnostic products must be the subject of a NDA or BLA to qualify as a rare pediatric disease product application, as diagnostic ...
  36. [36]
    FDA Draft Guidance Clarifies Criteria and Process for Obtaining ...
    Nov 25, 2014 · FDA interprets the definition of “rare pediatric disease” to require that greater than 50% of the affected population in the U.S. be aged 0 ...
  37. [37]
    Trying again: Rare pediatric PRV program heads to House - BioWorld
    Sep 19, 2025 · To date, the FDA has issued roughly 56 RPD PRVs. The program was twice renewed, but efforts to reauthorize it ahead of its Dec. 20, 2024, ...
  38. [38]
    Bipartisan Trahan Bill to Advance Rare Disease Treatments for Kids ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · Since 2011, 53 PRVs have been awarded for 39 different rare pediatric diseases. Trahan's bill was advanced with unanimous support today in the ...
  39. [39]
    Reauthorize the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher ...
    Jul 23, 2024 · The RPD PRV has helped spur rare disease drug development in pediatric populations and brought over 50 therapies to market with critical safety and dosing data ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Congress Revives Pediatric Priority Review Voucher Program with ...
    Sep 19, 2025 · Originally created in 2012, the program was designed to incentivize the development of treatments for rare pediatric diseases by awarding ...
  41. [41]
    Issuance of Priority Review Voucher; Rare Pediatric Disease Product
    Aug 28, 2025 · FDA is announcing the issuance of a priority review voucher to the sponsor of an approved rare pediatric disease product application. Under ...
  42. [42]
    Hope for Rare Pediatric Disease Voucher Reignited as House Bill ...
    Sep 19, 2025 · First enacted in 2012, the FDA's rare pediatric priority review voucher (PRV) program is designed to incentivize drugmakers to work on rare ...
  43. [43]
    S.2917 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Adding Ebola to the FDA ...
    Text for S.2917 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Adding Ebola to the FDA Priority Review Voucher Program Act.
  44. [44]
    113th Congress (2013-2014): Adding Ebola to the FDA Priority ...
    Reduces from 365 days to 90 days the advance notice required before submitting a human drug application subject to a priority review voucher.Missing: provisions | Show results with:provisions
  45. [45]
    Text of S. 2917 (113th): Adding Ebola to the FDA Priority Review ...
    This Act may be cited as the Adding Ebola to the FDA Priority Review Voucher Program Act . 2. Priority review to encourage treatments for tropical diseases.
  46. [46]
    21st Century Cures Act: MCM-Related Cures Provisions - FDA
    FDA In Brief: FDA adds four tropical diseases (Lassa fever, chikungunya virus disease, rabies, and cryptococcal meningitis) to priority review voucher ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] 2025-06970.pdf - Federal Register
    Apr 22, 2025 · FDA is required to publish notice of the award of the priority review voucher. FDA has determined that EBANGA (ansuvimab-zykl) for injection,.Missing: Ebola disease
  48. [48]
    Material Threat Medical Countermeasure Priority Review Vouchers
    Jul 13, 2018 · Section 565A of the FD&C Act requires FDA to award a priority review voucher (PRV) to sponsors of certain medical countermeasure (MCM) ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] 2024-11643.pdf - GovInfo
    May 28, 2024 · Administration (FDA) is announcing the issuance of a priority review voucher to the sponsor of a material threat medical countermeasure ...
  50. [50]
    FDA takes steps to spur development of medical countermeasures
    Jan 17, 2018 · ... implementation of priority review voucher program to incentivize development of certain drug and biologic medical countermeasures.
  51. [51]
    Issuance of Priority Review Voucher; Material Threat Medical ...
    May 28, 2024 · The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the issuance of a priority review voucher to the sponsor of a material threat medical countermeasure (MCM) ...
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    Finstad Introduces Material Threat Medical Countermeasure Priority ...
    Sep 26, 2023 · The MCM PRV Program allows voucher recipients to expedite FDA review of a product that can be used as medical countermeasures in the event ...
  54. [54]
    Commissioner's National Priority Voucher (CNPV) Pilot Program - FDA
    Oct 16, 2025 · The council will select scientific and medical experts from relevant FDA offices and divisions for a team-based priority review. For ...
  55. [55]
    FAQs: Commissioner's National Priority Voucher Pilot Program - FDA
    Oct 16, 2025 · The CNPV pilot program will begin in 2025 and contains some of the elements and themes of the priority review programs and PRV programs with a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    FDA Awards First-Ever National Priority Vouchers to Nine Sponsors
    Oct 16, 2025 · Voucher recipients will receive a decision within 1-2 months following filing of a complete application for a drug or biologic. In addition, ...
  57. [57]
    Priority Review Vouchers (and select transactions) - Drug Database
    This dataset contains a list of Priority Review Vouchers issued by the US FDA, which are transferrable, and select data on reported transactions.
  58. [58]
    Recent Facts & Figures related to PRV Value - 2020 to 2024 - Kybora
    Dec 18, 2024 · From 2020 to Nov 2024, 46 PRVs were granted, 22 traded, with $2.355B in sales, averaging $107M per voucher. Recent sales exceeded $150M.
  59. [59]
    FDA Priority Review Vouchers Face Transparency Challenges Amid ...
    May 12, 2025 · Priority Review Vouchers (PRVs) have surged in value to $150-158 million in recent months, up from the typical $100 million, following ...
  60. [60]
    Zevra Announces Closing of Sale of Rare Pediatric Disease Priority ...
    Apr 7, 2025 · Today announced the closing of the sale of its Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher (PRV) for gross proceeds of $150 million.
  61. [61]
    Bavarian Nordic's $160M FDA PRV price reflects new realities
    Jun 18, 2025 · Bavarian Nordic has reached an agreement to sell a priority review voucher (PRV) gained from Vimkunya's approval to an unnamed buyer for $160 million.
  62. [62]
    Ipsen announces sale of Priority Review Voucher for $158m - Global
    Ipsen (Euronext: IPN; ADR: IPSEY) has entered into an agreement to sell its rare pediatric disease Priority Review Voucher (PRV) to a large global ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Tropical Disease Priority Review Vouchers - FDA
    It refers to a voucher issued by the FDA to the sponsor of a tropical disease product application at the time of approval of the application that entitles the ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  64. [64]
    Designating Additions to the Current List of Tropical Diseases in the ...
    Aug 24, 2018 · The Agency has determined that chikungunya virus disease, Lassa fever, rabies, and cryptococcal meningitis satisfy this definition and is ...
  65. [65]
    Eligibility – Priority Review Vouchers - Sites @ Fuqua
    To be eligible for a tropical disease priority review voucher, a drug or biologic must satisfy the following criteria. ... Rare pediatric disease (Congress added ...
  66. [66]
    Impact Of The Priority Review Voucher Program On Drug ...
    To stimulate drug development for rare pediatric diseases, Congress expanded the priority review voucher (PRV) program in 2012.
  67. [67]
    FDA's New Priority Voucher Program for Drug Developers Ties ...
    Aug 11, 2025 · In a recent updated program page and revised FAQs, FDA provided greater clarity on eligibility criteria, application procedures, and agency ...
  68. [68]
    Rep. Pallone is wrong about priority review vouchers - BioCentury
    Sep 23, 2024 · Fifty-four PRVs have been awarded for treatments for 40 rare pediatric diseases. Only three of these diseases had FDA-approved treatments prior ...
  69. [69]
    Renew the FDA's rare pediatric disease incentive program | STAT
    Apr 7, 2025 · In 2021, BridgeBio got FDA approval for Nulibry, a drug to treat an ultra-rare genetic disease called MoCD Type A. Untreated, kids with this ...
  70. [70]
    Everything You Need to Know About FDA's Priority Review Vouchers
    FDA's priority review voucher (PRV) programs are about drug development, and specifically the time and cost of drug development and the conditions a new drug ...
  71. [71]
    Analysis of the first ten years of FDA's rare pediatric disease priority ...
    Feb 25, 2024 · The Rare Pediatric Disease (RPD) Priority Review Voucher (PRV) Program was enacted in 2012 to support the development of new products for children.
  72. [72]
    Issuance of Priority Review Voucher; Material Threat Medical ...
    Apr 23, 2025 · The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) authorizes FDA to award priority review vouchers to sponsors of approved material threat ...
  73. [73]
    The Impact of the Priority Review Voucher on Research and ... - NIH
    May 19, 2022 · The PRV is said to lead to a 'win-win' situation, with the social welfare gains to patients both in LICs and HICs and the net gains to ...
  74. [74]
    Impact Of The Priority Review Voucher Program On Drug ... - PubMed
    We found that compared to drugs for rare adult diseases, drugs for rare pediatric diseases progressed more quickly through all phases of clinical testing.
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Impact of the Priority Review Voucher Program on Rare Pediatric ...
    Our study finds that these PRVs treat 39 diseases, corresponding to 47 novel indications. Even in cases where PRVs were awarded for diseases where a previous ...
  76. [76]
    The priority review voucher: a misconceived quid pro quo
    Dec 3, 2024 · This article shows that the PRV, except few examples, has largely failed to deliver medical benefits for patients suffering from neglected ...<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    FDA's Priority Review Voucher Program Not Spurring Drug ...
    Nov 13, 2015 · An analysis shows that the Priority Review Voucher Program is not spurring drug development in the disease areas it was created to address.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  78. [78]
    Drug-Review Deadlines and Safety Problems
    Mar 27, 2008 · Critics have suggested that these deadlines may result in rushed approvals and the emergence of unanticipated safety problems once a product is in clinical use.Missing: flaws unintended
  79. [79]
    FDA Commissioner's National Priority Vouchers Will Endanger ...
    Jun 18, 2025 · “Research has shown that when the FDA rushes to review and approve new drugs, there is a higher likelihood that these drugs will have safety ...
  80. [80]
    New FDA priority review drug program comes with risks, questions
    Jun 18, 2025 · The notion of faster drug reviews makes sense, but the "Commissioner's National Priority Voucher" program also threatens to come at a cost.
  81. [81]
    FDA Fails to Adequately Track Safety of Expedited Drugs | Oncology
    Mar 8, 2016 · The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lacks complete, timely, accurate, and easily accessible postmarketing data to track potential safety issues of expedited ...Missing: rushed | Show results with:rushed<|control11|><|separator|>
  82. [82]
    Impact of Priority Review Voucher Eligibility on Research and ...
    Jul 23, 2024 · The priority review voucher program was not associated with stimulating new clinical testing of investigational medical countermeasures.
  83. [83]
    Price-fixing Via Priority Vouchers - AAF - The American Action Forum
    Jul 14, 2025 · The idea is to have a fast-track review – as short as one to two months compared to 10 to 12 on the usual timeline – for drugs that address one or more ...Missing: trends | Show results with:trends<|separator|>
  84. [84]
    FDA Commissioner's National Priority Voucher Program - Vera Health
    16 oct 2025 · The CNPV program represents an evolution beyond prior voucher schemes, removing the tradeable market element criticized for distorting ...
  85. [85]
    Flaws in the FDA’s New Priority Voucher Program | NEJM
    **Summary of Key Policy and Ethical Concerns about the FDA’s Priority Review Voucher Program**