Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Quantitative geography

Quantitative geography is a subfield of geography focused on the application of statistical, mathematical, and computational techniques to analyze numerical spatial data, develop spatial theories, and construct mathematical models of geographic processes.^[1]^[2] It gained prominence during the quantitative revolution of the 1950s and 1960s, shifting the discipline from idiographic description toward nomothetic science through hypothesis testing, empirical data analysis, and the integration of tools like regression and correlation to uncover spatial patterns and relationships.^[3]^[2] Key methods include geographic information systems for spatial data management, spatial statistics for detecting autocorrelation and point patterns, and optimization models for problems such as location allocation, enabling applications in urban growth simulation, regional economic analysis, and environmental modeling.^[1] A defining contribution is Waldo Tobler's first law of geography, formulated in 1970, which states that everything is related to everything else but near things are more related than distant things, providing a foundational axiom for spatial interdependence in quantitative analyses.^[4] Although it has enhanced geography's rigor and utility in policy-relevant forecasting, quantitative approaches have drawn criticism for reductionism, overreliance on aggregate data that may obscure individual agency, and challenges in fully representing nonlinear human-environment interactions.^[2]^[5]

Definition and Foundations

Core Principles and Objectives

Quantitative geography applies mathematical, statistical, and computational methods to the empirical examination of spatial distributions, interactions, and processes, emphasizing the use of numerical data to test hypotheses and build predictive models rather than descriptive accounts. This subfield seeks to quantify variables such as population density, land use patterns, and migration flows to reveal underlying spatial structures and regularities.^[1]^[6] Central objectives include discerning relationships among spatial phenomena through rigorous analysis, such as modeling diffusion processes or resource distributions to isolate factors influencing outcomes like agglomeration or dispersion. These efforts rely on foundational concepts like distance decay, where interaction intensity diminishes with increasing separation, as articulated in Tobler's First Law of Geography: "Everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related than distant things." This principle underpins efforts to formalize spatial dependencies empirically, enabling the simulation of how proximity shapes phenomena from epidemic spread to economic flows.^[7]^[8] The approach positions geography as a nomothetic discipline, prioritizing the derivation of generalizable laws from observable patterns over idiographic focus on singular cases, thereby fostering objective, replicable insights into spatial organization. By integrating verifiable datasets with hypothesis-driven inference, quantitative geography aims to advance causal understanding of why certain spatial configurations persist or evolve, supporting applications in policy and planning grounded in evidence rather than anecdote.^[8]^[1]

Distinction from Other Geographical Approaches

Quantitative geography emphasizes empirical measurement of spatial variables and statistical inference to derive generalizable patterns, setting it apart from qualitative and humanistic geographies that favor interpretive descriptions of lived experiences and cultural meanings without mandatory quantification.^[9] This approach enables systematic hypothesis testing and prediction, prioritizing data-driven validation over narrative accounts that may resist falsification. In contrast, humanistic methods often draw on phenomenological or subjective insights, viewing geographic phenomena as inherently interpretive rather than objectively measurable.^[10] Epistemologically, quantitative geography rests on positivist foundations, assuming an external reality governed by discoverable spatial laws amenable to scientific scrutiny, whereas constructivist epistemologies dominant in critical geography treat knowledge as socially negotiated and power-laden, downplaying universal patterns in favor of contextual ideologies.^[11] Critical approaches, frequently aligned with leftist politics, integrate normative goals like social justice advocacy, which can subordinate empirical testing to emancipatory narratives; quantitative methods, by contrast, strive for value-neutral analysis to isolate causal mechanisms in spatial processes.^[12] Academic institutions, exhibiting systemic biases toward constructivist paradigms, have marginalized quantitative rigor in favor of these interpretive frameworks, yet the latter's empirical testability preserves its utility for policy-relevant insights.^[11] The falsifiability inherent in quantitative geography allows debunking of ideologically driven claims lacking evidential support, such as deterministic assertions about environmental influences on societal outcomes, by subjecting them to statistical scrutiny that reveals interaction effects and confounding variables.^[13] This contrasts with qualitative critiques that may dismiss such testing as reductionist, prioritizing discourse analysis over verifiable refutation.

Historical Development

Early Precursors and Influences

Alexander von Humboldt pioneered quantitative approaches in geography during the early 19th century through systematic collection and analysis of empirical data on climate, vegetation, and topography during his expeditions in South America from 1799 to 1804. In his Essay on the Geography of Plants (1807), he correlated numerical measurements of altitude, temperature, and humidity with plant distributions to delineate ecological zones, emphasizing spatial patterns driven by physical causation rather than mere description.^[14] Humboldt further advanced this by introducing isotherms—lines connecting points of equal temperature—in maps published in 1817, enabling visualization of continuous spatial gradients and foreshadowing modern choropleth and isarithmic techniques.^[15] These methods integrated precise instrumentation and tabular data, establishing a foundation for hypothesis-testing in spatial sciences grounded in observable measurements.^[16] In the early 20th century, statistical applications emerged in population geography, where geographers leveraged census data to quantify distributions and trends. For example, analyses of U.S. decennial censuses from 1910 to 1930 mapped population densities and shifts, revealing patterns of urbanization and regional growth through aggregated counts and rates.^[17] Similarly, in Britain, L. Dudley Stamp's Land Utilisation Survey (1931–1938) employed field-based categorization to produce quantitative maps of land use, calculating percentages of arable, pasture, and woodland across counties, which supported evidence-based policy on agricultural productivity.^[18] These efforts marked a shift toward replicable, data-intensive surveys over anecdotal observation, though still limited by manual aggregation. By the 1930s and 1940s, probability theory and sampling techniques from advancing statistics influenced geographical modeling, particularly in agriculture, where random sampling estimated yield variations across regions to account for soil and climatic heterogeneity.^[19] The prevailing descriptive regional geography, however, constrained progress; Richard Hartshorne's idiographic framework in The Nature of Geography (1939) stressed unique areal syntheses without statistical validation or mathematical abstraction, rendering explanations non-generalizable and vulnerable to subjective interpretation.^[20] This qualitative emphasis, prioritizing holistic regional portrayal over causal analysis, underscored inherent limitations in falsifiability and predictive power, spurring isolated advocates like Griffith Taylor for more systematic, metric-based inquiry into human-environment dynamics.^[21]

The Quantitative Revolution (1950s-1970s)

The Quantitative Revolution, unfolding from the 1950s through the 1970s, transformed geography by supplanting chorological methods—which emphasized unique, descriptive studies of regions—with a spatial science approach centered on deriving generalizable laws through hypothesis testing, statistical inference, and mathematical abstraction.^[22] This paradigm emphasized nomothetic explanations of spatial patterns and processes, drawing on positivist ideals to position geography as a rigorous, predictive discipline akin to physics or economics.^[23] Practitioners sought to operationalize concepts like location, distance, and interaction via quantifiable variables, moving beyond qualitative synthesis to model-based analysis supported by empirical data. Post-World War II technological advancements, including the proliferation of electronic computers, accelerated this methodological pivot, with geography departments in the United States and United Kingdom ranking among the earliest adopters in the social sciences during the 1950s and 1960s. In the U.S., groups at institutions like the University of Washington under William Garrison pioneered spatial diffusion models and least-cost location theory using early computing resources, applying operations research techniques developed during wartime to geographical problems such as transportation networks and settlement hierarchies.^[23] These efforts integrated probability theory and simulation to test hypotheses about spatial organization, contrasting with prior reliance on cartographic description. Exemplifying the revolution's urban applications, Brian J.L. Berry advanced factorial ecology within the Chicago School during the 1960s, employing principal components and factor analysis on census variables to distill multidimensional social gradients—such as socioeconomic status and family lifecycle stages—from aggregate data across U.S. metropolitan areas. This technique, building on Shevky and Bell's social area analysis, enabled replicable identification of ecological structures, with Berry's studies of over 20 cities demonstrating consistent factorial dimensions that supported cross-urban generalizations.^[24] A cornerstone text emerged in 1965 with Peter Haggett's Locational Analysis in Human Geography, which synthesized graph theory, stochastic processes, and optimization models to address locational dynamics, including point, line, and area patterns in human settlement and trade.^[25] Haggett's framework formalized tools like nearest-neighbor statistics and spatial autocorrelation measures, influencing subsequent adoption of multivariate regression for dissecting areal differentiation. By the early 1970s, such methods had permeated curricula and journals, institutionalizing quantitative rigor while prioritizing falsifiable propositions over narrative regionalism.^[26]

Evolution into Computational and Spatial Analysis Eras

The 1980s marked a pivotal shift in quantitative geography toward computational methods, driven by improvements in hardware affordability and software capabilities that enabled geographers to process large spatial datasets beyond manual calculations. This era saw the maturation of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) as core tools for quantitative spatial analysis, building on pioneering efforts like the Canada Geographic Information System (CGIS) developed in 1963 for resource management.^[27] Commercial GIS platforms, such as Esri's Arc/Info released in 1981, facilitated raster and vector-based operations including map algebra for algebraic manipulations of spatial layers, allowing precise quantification of phenomena like land suitability and environmental gradients.^[27] By the late 1980s, GIS adoption expanded from specialized research to broader academic and applied use, with user communities growing from hundreds to thousands, integrating statistical overlays for hypothesis testing on spatial patterns.^[28] In the 1990s, quantitative geography incorporated dynamic simulation models to address the static limitations of earlier approaches, particularly through cellular automata (CA) frameworks that modeled evolving spatial processes via local rules and grid-based interactions. CA simulations, as implemented in systems like the Spatial Analysis and GEographic Experimentation (SAGE) prototype, captured non-linear dynamics in urban growth and landscape evolution by iterating cell states over discrete time steps, informed by empirical transition probabilities derived from historical data.^[29] These models complemented GIS by enabling predictive scenarios for land-use change, with applications demonstrating how neighborhood effects and stochastic elements could replicate observed irregularities in geographical diffusion.^[30] This computational turn fostered a refined quantitative paradigm emphasizing spatial uncertainty and non-stationarity, where processes vary across locations rather than assuming uniformity. Techniques like geostatistics and local indicators of spatial association (LISA) emerged to quantify heterogeneity, addressing critiques of global statistics that masked local variations, as seen in analyses of environmental covariates where kriging interpolated values accounting for spatial covariance structures.^[31] By bridging deterministic models with probabilistic frameworks, this evolution enhanced causal inference in spatial data, supporting applications in policy evaluation while highlighting data quality dependencies in non-stationary contexts.^[32]

Key Techniques and Methodologies

Spatial Statistics and Econometrics

Spatial statistics adapts inferential methods to georeferenced data, incorporating spatial dependence where nearby observations exhibit correlation beyond independence assumptions of classical statistics. This dependence violates standard error estimates, necessitating specialized diagnostics and models to ensure valid hypothesis testing and parameter inference. Core techniques quantify autocorrelation via global indices and model it parametrically to correct biases in estimation.^[33] Moran's I serves as a primary measure of global spatial autocorrelation, defined as I = \frac{n}{\sum_i \sum_j w_{ij}} \frac{\sum_i \sum_j w_{ij} (x_i - \bar{x})(x_j - \bar{x})}{\sum_i (x_i - \bar{x})^2}, where n is the number of observations, x_i are values, \bar{x} the mean, and W = (w_{ij}) a spatial weights matrix capturing proximity. Developed by Patrick Moran in 1950 for general statistical applications, it gained prominence in geography during the 1970s for detecting clustering in areal data. Under the null of no autocorrelation, I approximates a standard normal for large samples, but significance is often tested via Monte Carlo permutation, randomizing attribute values across locations to simulate the null distribution and compute empirical p-values.^[34]^[33] Geostatistics addresses continuous spatial processes through second-order stationarity, modeling covariance via the variogram \gamma(h) = \frac{1}{2} \mathrm{Var}(Z(\mathbf{s}) - Z(\mathbf{s} + \mathbf{h})), fitted empirically to data pairs separated by lag h. Kriging provides best linear unbiased prediction at unsampled sites, minimizing variance under the weights \lambda solving \Sigma \lambda = \gamma_0, where \Sigma derives from the variogram and \gamma_0 includes a nugget for measurement error. Originating in 1950s mining for ore reserve estimation, the framework was formalized by Georges Matheron in 1963, emphasizing intrinsic random functions for non-stationary cases. Validation employs cross-validation or simulation-based kriging variance assessment.^[35]^[36] Spatial econometrics extends regression to panel or cross-sectional data with spatial spillovers, distinguishing models by dependence locus. The spatial autoregressive (SAR) model specifies y = \rho W y + X [\beta](/page/Beta) + \epsilon, capturing endogenous interactions via the lag parameter \rho, estimated by maximum likelihood to address biased OLS due to omitted spatial effects. The spatial error model (SEM) posits y = X [\beta](/page/Beta) + u, u = \lambda W u + \epsilon, modeling disturbance dependence from unobservables like common shocks, yielding GLS-efficient estimates under normality. Both handle endogeneity from mutual influences or measurement error, with specification tests like Lagrange multipliers favoring SAR for substantive spillovers and SEM for nuisance dependence; Monte Carlo methods bootstrap standard errors when heteroskedasticity or non-normality arises.^[37]^[38]

Mathematical and Simulation Models

Mathematical models in quantitative geography provide deterministic frameworks for predicting spatial interactions, such as flows of trade, migration, or commodities, often drawing analogies from physics. Gravity models exemplify this approach, positing that interaction T_{ij} between locations i and j is given by T_{ij} = k \frac{P_i P_j}{d_{ij}^2}, where P represents population or economic size as proxies for "mass," d_{ij} is distance, and exponents may vary empirically from the Newtonian inverse-square form. Originating empirically with Ravenstein's 1885 laws of migration, which observed flows inversely related to distance, the model was mathematically formalized by Stewart in 1948 for demographic influences and refined by Ullman in the 1950s for broader spatial complementarity in geography.^[39] Refinements in the 1960s incorporated calibration via least squares to fit observed data, enabling applications to retail gravitation (Reilly, 1931) and interregional trade, though critiques note their atheoretical nature absent micro-foundations.^[40] Entropy-maximizing models extend these by deriving interaction probabilities through optimization, maximizing Shannon entropy subject to macroscopic constraints like row and column sums for origin-destination matrices. Alan Wilson introduced this in 1967-1969 papers on trip distribution, showing equivalence to constrained gravity forms under average cost constraints, as formalized in his 1970 monograph Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling.^[41]^[42] This statistical inference approach justifies doubly-constrained variants for transport forecasting, where flows maximize dispersal under fixed totals, outperforming unconstrained gravity in reproducing observed urban trip patterns when calibrated to census data from the 1960s onward.^[43] Stochastic simulation models, notably agent-based models (ABMs), shift focus to bottom-up emergence by modeling heterogeneous agents' rule-based decisions in spatial environments. Developed in geography from the 1990s, ABMs simulate micro-behaviors—like adaptive foraging or land-use choices—yielding macro-patterns such as diffusion or clustering without aggregate assumptions.^[44] Key advancements include coupling with raster data for explicit geography, as in Schelling's 1971 segregation model extended spatially, and empirical validation against real-world dynamics in urban growth simulations.^[45] Unlike deterministic models, ABMs incorporate randomness and learning, enabling scenario testing for policy impacts, though their complexity demands rigorous sensitivity analysis to avoid overparameterization.^[46]

Computational Tools Including GIS and Remote Sensing

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) emerged as pivotal computational tools in quantitative geography during the 1970s, facilitating the management and analysis of large-scale spatial datasets through structured data models. Early systems, such as the ODYSSEY GIS developed by Harvard's Laboratory for Computer Graphics in the mid-1970s, introduced vector data structures that represent geographic features as points, lines, and polygons, enabling precise topological relationships and attribute linkages.^[47] Concurrently, raster data structures, based on grid-based pixel arrays, supported continuous surface modeling and were integral to early computer mapping efforts transitioning into spatial analysis.^[48] These foundations allowed quantitative geographers to perform operations like spatial joins, which transfer attributes between datasets based on spatial proximity or containment, and overlay analysis, involving geometric intersections or unions to derive new layers for hypothesis testing and pattern detection.^[49]^[50] The evolution of GIS has emphasized open-source platforms, with QGIS originating in 2002 as a viewer for PostGIS spatial databases and expanding into a full-featured system supporting vector and raster processing, plugin extensibility, and integration of analytical functions like buffer generation and network analysis.^[51]^[52] By the 2010s, QGIS incorporated advanced tools for quantitative workflows, including Python scripting for automation and reproducibility, democratizing access to GIS beyond proprietary software like ArcGIS.^[53] These tools handle terabyte-scale datasets, enabling quantitative geographers to execute reproducible analyses such as zonal statistics, which aggregate raster values within vector boundaries, essential for empirical validation of spatial theories. Remote sensing data integration enhances GIS capabilities for quantitative geography by supplying high-resolution, time-series raster inputs from satellites like Landsat, launched in 1972. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), formulated in 1973 by Rouse et al. for monitoring vegetation in the Great Plains using ERTS-1 imagery, quantifies photosynthetic activity through near-infrared and red band ratios, with values ranging from -1 to 1 indicating bare soil to dense vegetation.^[54] In GIS environments, NDVI time-series facilitate land-use change detection via thresholding and post-classification comparisons, as demonstrated in studies tracking deforestation rates with multi-temporal composites achieving accuracies above 85% in arid regions.^[55] This synergy supports causal inference in environmental modeling, such as correlating spectral changes with anthropogenic drivers. Programming languages like R and Python underpin reproducible spatial scripting in quantitative geography, allowing integration of GIS operations with statistical inference. R's ecosystem, including packages such as sf for vector data handling and raster for grid manipulations, supports spatial autocorrelation tests and geostatistical simulations directly within analytical pipelines.^[56] Python, via libraries like GeoPandas for vector joins and overlays and xarray for multidimensional raster arrays, enables scalable processing of remote sensing data, with tools like GDAL ensuring interoperability across formats.^[57] These languages promote version-controlled workflows, mitigating reproducibility crises in spatial research by embedding data provenance and parameter sweeps.

Fundamental Concepts and Laws

Tobler's First Law and Spatial Autocorrelation

Tobler's First Law of Geography, articulated by Waldo Tobler in 1970, posits that "everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related than distant things." This principle underscores the inherent spatial interdependence in geographic phenomena, where similarity in attribute values tends to cluster rather than distribute randomly, reflecting underlying causal processes such as diffusion or local environmental influences.^[58] The law formalizes the expectation of positive spatial autocorrelation, where observations at proximate locations exhibit greater correlation than those separated by larger distances, challenging assumptions of spatial independence in classical statistics.^[34] Mathematically, Tobler's law manifests through distance decay functions, which model the decline in similarity or interaction strength as a function of separation distance h. Common parameterizations include exponential forms like γ(h) = c₀ + c(1 - e^{-h/a}) in variograms, where c₀ is the nugget effect (discontinuity at origin due to measurement error or microscale variation), c the sill (total variance), and a the range (distance beyond which autocorrelation vanishes).^[59] Variograms provide an empirical tool to quantify this decay by plotting semivariance—half the expected squared difference between paired observations—against lag distance, enabling model fitting to test the law's applicability in datasets such as soil properties or urban densities.^[60] These functions inform kriging interpolation and other geostatistical methods, ensuring predictions respect observed spatial structure rather than assuming uniformity.^[61] The law has critical implications for sampling design in quantitative geography, as spatial autocorrelation reduces the effective sample size and inflates variance estimates under independence assumptions, potentially leading to erroneous inference.^[62] To mitigate this, designs incorporate stratified or systematic sampling to capture autocorrelation ranges identified via variograms, or employ block kriging for variance adjustment, as demonstrated in surveys of urban perceptions where clustered sampling aligned with detected dependence structures improved representativeness.^[63] Empirically, tests across environmental data consistently affirm the law, with variograms revealing structured autocorrelation in over 80% of cases for phenomena like precipitation or species distributions, debunking apparent randomness as artifactual and highlighting process-driven clustering.^[64] Such validations emphasize causal realism, where proximity fosters mechanistic linkages like contagion or resource gradients, rather than mere statistical artifact.^[8]

Gravity Models and Central Place Theory Applications

Central place theory, formulated by Walter Christaller in 1933, posits that settlements function as central places in a hierarchical system, where each provides goods and services to a surrounding market area defined by the threshold population needed to support a function and the range over which consumers are willing to travel for it, resulting in nested hexagonal lattices that optimize spatial coverage and minimize transport costs.^[65] Quantitative extensions emerged in the 1950s through August Lösch's integration of economic competition, profit maximization, and continuous demand surfaces, yielding mathematical derivations for settlement spacing, functional specialization, and equilibrium densities under varying cost and demand assumptions.^[65]^[66] Predictions of this hierarchy are tested empirically via rank-size distributions following Zipf's law, where the population of the r-th largest city approximates P_1 / r, with P_1 as the largest city's population; analyses of urban systems in regions like Europe and North America validate this power-law pattern, indicating systematic hierarchical organization consistent with central place principles rather than uniform or overly centralized (primate) structures.^[67]^[68] Gravity models quantify locational interactions by adapting Newtonian principles, specifying flows T_{ij} between sites i and j as T_{ij} = k \cdot M_i \cdot M_j / f(d_{ij}), where M represents attracting masses (e.g., population or economic output) and f(d) an impedance function, typically a power d^\beta with \beta \approx 2 calibrated from data.^[69] Refinements replace simple power laws with empirically fitted forms like exponentials or polynomials to account for nonlinear distance deterrence, improving fit in datasets exhibiting rapid short-range decay.^[39] In transport economics, Alan G. Wilson's 1970 entropy-maximization framework derives gravity-like distributions from probabilistic constraints on row and column totals in flow matrices, enabling doubly constrained models that match observed trip volumes at origins and destinations.^[70] Calibrations to real-world transport surveys, such as urban commuting data, yield residuals under 10% in many cases, outperforming unconstrained heuristics by incorporating information-theoretic priors.^[71] Empirical calibrations across trade, migration, and retail flows demonstrate gravity models' predictive edge, explaining 70-90% of variance in bilateral volumes when augmented with economic variables, with out-of-sample forecasts for scenarios like Zambia's trade accurately capturing GDP-distance effects over purely descriptive approaches.^[69]^[72] Such validations highlight causal roles of mass and friction in interaction patterns, though models assume stationarity and underperform in volatile temporal contexts without dynamic extensions.^[73]

Other Empirical Principles

Spatial heterogeneity, also known as non-stationarity, describes the spatially varying nature of relationships in geographic data, where parameters of statistical models differ across locations due to underlying contextual factors such as terrain or demographics.^[74] This principle is empirically observed in phenomena like urban vitality, where built environment impacts on activity levels exhibit location-specific variations detectable via geographically weighted regression techniques.^[75] Unlike stationary processes assuming uniform properties, non-stationarity necessitates local modeling to avoid biased inferences, as global averages mask regional disparities in processes like disease risk or economic flows.^[76] Scale dependence highlights how spatial patterns and dependencies alter with the resolution or extent of analysis, a core empirical regularity in quantitative geography. For instance, ecosystem service values show varying spatial differentiation across grid sizes from 1 km to 30 km, with optimal scales emerging around 10-15 km for capturing landscape interactions.^[77] This arises because processes like habitat fragmentation or flow connectivity operate differently at microscales (e.g., local patches) versus macroscales (e.g., regional basins), demanding multi-scale metrics to quantify autocorrelation robustly.^[78] Empirical validations confirm that ignoring scale leads to misattributed causal links, as finer resolutions reveal heterogeneity obscured at coarser levels.^[79] Fractal geometry provides a mathematical framework for scale-invariant irregularities in landscapes, influenced by Benoît Mandelbrot's 1967 analysis of coastline lengths, which demonstrated how measurement scale affects perimeter estimates via fractional dimensions.^[80] Applied to geography, fractals quantify self-similarity in features like river networks or urban boundaries, where patterns persist across scales, enabling simulations of terrain roughness with Hausdorff dimensions typically between 1.2 and 1.5 for natural coastlines.^[80] This approach reveals testable regularities in spatial complexity, departing from Euclidean ideals to model empirical jaggedness in geographic forms. Torsten Hägerstrand's diffusion models, developed in the 1950s and refined with Monte Carlo simulations by the mid-1960s, empirically capture innovation spread as probabilistic processes constrained by distance decay and population thresholds.^[81] Simulations starting from innovation hearths showed hierarchical and contagious propagation patterns matching observed data, such as agricultural adoption in Sweden, with acceptance probabilities decreasing exponentially with distance.^[82] These principles underscore causal barriers like information barriers, validated against real diffusion timelines where early adopters cluster near origins before peripheral expansion. The principle of least effort, rooted in physics-inspired minimization of transport costs, governs optimal configurations in geographic networks and flows, as formalized in Zipf's extensions to spatial interactions.^[83] Empirical evidence from transportation and trade data confirms that flows concentrate on minimal paths, yielding rank-size distributions where larger hubs handle disproportionate volumes to reduce aggregate effort, observable in urban hierarchies and global shipping routes.^[83] This derives from first-principles equilibrium, where deviations from least-cost paths correlate with inefficiencies, testable via gravity model residuals adjusted for network topology.^[84]

Applications and Empirical Impacts

Urban and Economic Geography

Quantitative models in urban geography have successfully predicted aspects of city form by extending monocentric frameworks, such as those positing declining land values and densities with distance from a central business district due to commuting costs.^[85] Empirical validations using remote-sensing data, including satellite-derived land cover and nighttime lights, confirm these patterns in developing cities but highlight polycentric shifts in larger metropolitan areas, where multiple employment subcenters emerge as agglomeration forces balance dispersion.^[86]^[87] For example, analyses of global urban samples from 1960 to 2010 show that initial monocentricity gives way to polycentricity as city populations exceed thresholds around 1-5 million, driven by sub-center formation observable in spatial employment data.^[88] In economic geography, new economic geography models pioneered by Paul Krugman in 1991 quantify agglomeration through forward-backward linkages, where firms cluster to access larger markets and suppliers despite transport costs, yielding core-periphery equilibria.^[89] These simulations replicate observed industry concentrations, such as manufacturing hubs in regions with low trade barriers, with empirical tests on U.S. and European data from the 1990s onward confirming that agglomeration elasticities align with model predictions of 5-10% productivity gains from clustering.^[90]^[91] Policy applications leverage these tools for targeted interventions, as location quotients—calculated as regional employment shares divided by national shares—identify specialized clusters when exceeding 1.25, enabling simulations of incentives that enhance local multipliers by 1.2-1.5 times through induced spillovers.^[92]^[93] In U.S. regional strategies since the 2000s, such analyses have informed cluster-based policies, reducing inefficiencies like mismatched labor markets by prioritizing high-quotient sectors, with ex-post evaluations showing sustained employment growth rates 2-3% above baselines in targeted areas.^[94] Quantitative urban simulations further assess zoning or transport reforms, projecting density optimizations that curb sprawl costs by up to 15% in modeled scenarios calibrated to satellite-verified land use.^[88]

Environmental and Epidemiological Modeling

Quantitative geography employs finite difference methods in environmental modeling to numerically solve partial differential equations describing hydrological processes, such as groundwater flow governed by Darcy's law. These methods discretize continuous spatial domains into finite grids, approximating derivatives to simulate flow velocities and water levels across landscapes. Model predictions are validated against empirical field data, including measurements from observation wells and streamflow gauges, achieving typical calibration errors under 15% in benchmark aquifers as reported in parameter estimation studies.^[95] In epidemiological modeling, extensions of the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) framework incorporate spatial kernels to account for distance-dependent transmission probabilities, enabling simulations of disease diffusion over geographic areas. These spatial SIR models capture heterogeneity in contact rates influenced by proximity, with kernel functions often based on inverse-distance weighting or network connectivity. Empirical calibrations demonstrate improved forecasting accuracy, particularly when integrating mobility data to parameterize dispersal rates.^[96] Post-2020 analyses of COVID-19 outbreaks utilized spatial extensions of SIR models to quantify mobility's role in spread dynamics, revealing that reductions in inter-county travel correlated with 20-40% drops in reproduction numbers in U.S. counties during lockdowns. Studies employing gravity-like mobility kernels predicted case trajectories with mean absolute percentage errors around 25%, outperforming non-spatial baselines by incorporating observed human flows from cell phone data.^[97]^[98] Causal inference techniques in quantitative geography, such as regression discontinuity designs, have attributed deforestation rates to spatial accessibility factors like road proximity. In Mexico, a community-level eligibility discontinuity in the Oportunidades program—providing cash transfers that indirectly affect land use—yielded estimates showing treated areas experienced 5-10% higher deforestation probabilities compared to adjacent untreated zones, isolating income-driven clearing from confounders. Similarly, empirical assessments of rural road construction found proximity within 5 km doubled annual deforestation rates in forested regions, establishing causality through pre-post comparisons at infrastructure thresholds.^[99]^[100]

Policy Evaluation and Real-World Validations

Quasi-experimental designs, including difference-in-differences estimators, have been applied in quantitative geography to rigorously evaluate the causal impacts of infrastructure policies on spatial outcomes. For example, empirical analyses of highway expansions in the United States during the mid-20th century, such as those examining the Interstate Highway System's rollout from the 1950s onward, have used these methods to estimate effects on land values and urban form. One study of highway construction in suburban Cook County, Illinois, between 1943 and 1962 found significant increases in unimproved land values attributable to improved accessibility, with quasi-experimental controls for pre-existing trends demonstrating causal links to decentralization and property appreciation.^[101] More recent validations, such as a 2022 analysis of a new highway opening in South Korea, employed hedonic pricing models integrated with spatial controls to quantify housing price uplifts of up to 10-15% in adjacent areas, validating predictive models from quantitative geography against observed post-construction data.^[102] These approaches outperform purely correlational methods by addressing endogeneity, providing policymakers with evidence-based estimates of benefits like enhanced connectivity outweighing localized disamenities such as noise.^[103] In urban policy contexts, quantitative geographic models have informed data-driven zoning and land-use regulations, yielding efficiency gains over ad-hoc planning in metrics like density optimization and infrastructure cost minimization. Evaluations of GIS-integrated spatial analytics in U.S. cities, for instance, show that predictive zoning models reduce inefficient sprawl by 20-30% compared to traditional discretionary approvals, as measured by post-implementation land-use efficiency indicators aligned with Sustainable Development Goals.^[104]^[105] A quasi-experimental assessment of wastewater infrastructure along the Texas Gulf Coast further demonstrated that spatially informed investments lowered environmental compliance costs by targeting high-impact zones, with difference-in-differences estimates confirming outcome improvements in affected counties relative to controls.^[106] These validations highlight how quantitative geography enables causal realism in policy design, prioritizing empirical spatial interactions over intuitive judgments. Notwithstanding successes, quantitative geography models have faced limitations when over-relying on equilibrium assumptions in volatile settings, such as during market disruptions where dynamic spillovers invalidate static predictions. For instance, spatial equilibrium frameworks applied to place-based policies have occasionally underestimated adjustment frictions, leading to overstated welfare gains in evaluations of regional interventions like Indonesia's integrated economic development zones, where null effects on demographics and employment persisted despite model forecasts.^[107]^[108] Refinements through robustness checks, including sensitivity analyses to non-stationarity and incorporation of lagged spatial effects, have mitigated these issues, as seen in updated highway impact studies that adjust for disequilibrium by integrating time-series data.^[109] Overall, real-world applications affirm that quantitative geography's strength lies in its adaptability to causal inference, with empirical track records supporting informed policy adjustments rather than rigid adherence to initial assumptions.^[110]

Criticisms, Debates, and Empirical Assessments

Methodological and Philosophical Critiques

Critiques of quantitative geography emerged prominently in the 1970s from humanistic and qualitative paradigms, which argued that its reductionist methodologies fragmented complex human experiences into isolated variables, thereby neglecting subjective meanings, cultural contexts, and power relations inherent in spatial phenomena.^[111] Humanistic geographers, such as Yi-Fu Tuan, contended that treating space as mere geometrical abstractions overlooked the lived, phenomenological dimensions of place, reducing geography to sterile positivist measurements devoid of interpretive depth.^[112] These objections, rooted in a broader reaction against the quantitative revolution of the 1950s and 1960s, emphasized that statistical models failed to capture idiographic uniqueness and social constructs like identity and agency, which qualitative methods purportedly addressed more holistically.^[13] Philosophical charges of determinism further intensified these debates, with critics asserting that quantitative models imposed universal spatial laws—such as gravity models or central place theory—that presupposed predictable human behavior akin to physical laws, thereby disregarding contingency, individual decision-making, and historical variability.^[113] Behavioral geography, emerging as a partial response in the late 1960s and 1970s, highlighted how such approaches overlooked cognitive processes and perceptual biases in human spatial choices, charging them with environmental or spatial determinism that mirrored earlier discredited paradigms like Ratzel's anthropogeography.^[114] Proponents of this view, including Reginald Golledge, argued that aggregate statistical patterns masked micro-level variability, rendering predictions overly mechanistic and insensitive to behavioral exceptions.^[115] Claims of inherent positivist bias in quantitative geography have been normalized within academic geography departments, often framed by left-leaning critics as perpetuating ideologically conservative assumptions of objectivity that mask value-laden selections in model parameterization and data aggregation.^[116] Marxist and critical theorists in the 1970s, such as David Harvey in his transitional works, portrayed these methods as aligned with capitalist spatial fixes, prioritizing empirical quantification over dialectical analysis of class power and inequality.^[117] Such perspectives, prevalent in institutions exhibiting systemic ideological skews toward progressive viewpoints, have influenced disciplinary shifts toward post-positivist epistemologies, though they frequently attribute undue uniformity to quantitative practice without disaggregating its diverse applications.^[118]

Evidence of Successes and Failures

Quantitative geographic models have demonstrated empirical successes in disaster response, particularly through GIS-based hurricane trajectory and evacuation forecasting. During Hurricane Matthew in 2016, GIS applications deployed via ArcGIS templates enabled real-time mapping of storm paths, flood risks, and evacuation routes, supporting federal and local agencies in coordinating responses that minimized casualties and infrastructure damage across affected U.S. East Coast regions.^[119] Similarly, network modeling incorporating spatial autocorrelation and traffic data has improved evacuation simulations by accounting for incident frequencies, reducing predicted clearance times by up to 20-30% in tested scenarios compared to non-spatial baselines.^[120] In epidemiological applications, spatial analysis techniques such as disease mapping and cluster detection have enhanced predictive accuracy for outbreak spread. For instance, spatial statistical models applied to COVID-19 data in China from 2020 to 2022 integrated geographic correlation studies to forecast infection hotspots with metrics like Moran's I for autocorrelation, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.85 in validation sets and informing targeted lockdowns that curbed transmission rates.^[121] These outcomes reflect quantitative geography's strength in handling spatiotemporal data to generate actionable, verifiable predictions, outperforming ad-hoc qualitative assessments in speed and precision.^[122] Failures have arisen from methodological limitations like overfitting in early models, where excessive reliance on historical spatial patterns without cross-validation led to policy missteps. In 1960s urban renewal initiatives, quantitative gravity and central place models predicted retail and residential shifts based on economic flows but overlooked endogenous social feedbacks, resulting in overestimated revitalization benefits; for example, projections for U.S. cities like Detroit anticipated population retention post-redevelopment, yet actual out-migration accelerated decay, with error rates in forecast population stability exceeding 40% due to unmodeled behavioral dynamics.^[123] Such overfitting manifested in inflated confidence intervals and non-replicable outcomes when applied beyond training datasets, contributing to inefficient resource allocation in planning. Empirical assessments, including forecasting integrations, indicate quantitative geographic methods generally reduce error rates over purely qualitative approaches, with hybrid models showing 10-15% improvements in accuracy metrics like mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).^[124] However, standalone quantitative applications falter in high-uncertainty contexts without causal validation, as evidenced by meta-reviews of spatial epidemiology where unadjusted models exhibited up to 25% higher false positives in cluster detection due to ecological fallacies.^[125] Overall, successes dominate in data-rich, replicable domains like hazard modeling, while failures underscore the need for robust out-of-sample testing to mitigate extrapolation risks. Defenders of quantitative geography emphasize the integration of causal mechanisms through advanced spatial econometric techniques, such as spatial instrumental variables and difference-in-differences designs adapted for geographic dependence, which enable identification of treatment effects while accounting for spatial spillovers and endogeneity.^[126] These methods prioritize causal realism by focusing on underlying processes—like proximity-driven diffusion or policy-induced locational shifts—rather than correlational patterns alone, providing a rigorous alternative to critiques that dismiss quantification as overly mechanistic.^[127] For instance, in analyzing regional economic policies, such approaches isolate genuine causal impacts from confounding spatial autocorrelation, yielding estimates that withstand robustness checks absent in narrative-based analyses.^[128] Data-driven refinements further bolster these models via Bayesian inference, which facilitates probabilistic updating of spatial priors with observed data, explicitly quantifying uncertainty in heterogeneous geographic contexts.^[129] Hierarchical Bayesian spatial models, for example, decompose variance into structured (e.g., adjacency-based) and unstructured components, allowing iterative refinement that outperforms static qualitative interpretations prone to confirmation bias.^[130] Complementing this, sensitivity analyses systematically vary inputs like parameter distributions or spatial weights to assess output stability, revealing model vulnerabilities and guiding targeted data collection—enhancements that elevate quantitative geography beyond dogmatic alternatives.^[131] Hybrid qualitative-quantitative frameworks are advocated only when the quantitative core is empirically validated through such causal and refinement tools, rejecting dilutions motivated by ideological preferences for interpretive dominance over testable evidence.^[132] This stance underscores falsifiability as central to truth-seeking: quantitative models expose flawed narratives by confronting them with disconfirming spatial trends, as seen in environmental applications where causal inference reveals localized causal pathways that temper generalized alarmism derived from aggregated, non-causal summaries.^[133] Prioritizing these methods ensures geographic inquiry remains anchored in verifiable mechanisms, countering biases in source critiques that undervalue empirical rigor for subjective plausibility.^[134]

Modern Developments and Future Directions

Integration with Big Data, AI, and Machine Learning

The integration of big data into quantitative geography since the early 2000s has enabled the processing of vast volunteered geographic information (VGI) datasets, such as those from crowdsourced platforms, through distributed computing frameworks like Hadoop-GIS, which supports scalable spatial queries and real-time analysis of heterogeneous geospatial data.^[135]^[136] These tools address the volume and velocity of VGI, allowing for efficient gazetteer construction and spatial joins on petabyte-scale data, as demonstrated in workflows processing geotagged social media and sensor inputs for dynamic geographic pattern extraction.^[137] This shift has enhanced empirical rigor by incorporating high-resolution, temporally granular data into spatial models, reducing reliance on aggregated census statistics. Machine learning advancements, particularly deep neural networks, have transformed remote sensing applications within quantitative geography, with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) applied to very-high-resolution imagery for tasks like urban sprawl detection since the mid-2010s.^[138] For instance, ensemble CNN models trained on satellite data from 2010–2015 have achieved accuracies exceeding 90% in classifying built-up areas and predicting growth trajectories, outperforming traditional pixel-based methods by capturing nonlinear spatial dependencies.^[139] GeoAI frameworks further leverage these techniques for geospatial big data mining, integrating unsupervised learning to handle multimodal inputs like LiDAR and hyperspectral data, thereby improving predictive models of land-use change with reduced human bias in feature engineering.^[140] Causal machine learning methods, such as double machine learning (DML), have advanced causal inference in spatial policy evaluation by estimating heterogeneous treatment effects while controlling for confounders in geospatial contexts.^[141] Applied to urban land-use policies, DML has quantified nonlinear impacts on outcomes like building heights, revealing spatially varying effects that linear regressions overlook, with applications in European cities showing treatment effect variances up to 20% across neighborhoods.^[142] These approaches promote causal realism by debiased estimation of policy interventions, as in double/debiased ML for structural parameters, enabling robust assessments of spatial treatments amid endogeneity from geographic confounders.^[143]

Recent Advances in Intelligent and Predictive Geography

GeoAI frameworks have advanced intelligent geography by fusing geospatial data with machine learning for automated scenario modeling, particularly in climate adaptation. Agent-based simulations enhanced by reinforcement learning enable dynamic predictions of socio-economic responses to environmental stressors, such as sea-level rise. A 2025 study applied reinforcement learning within an agent-based model to forecast household adaptation choices over decades, factoring in flood exposure and evolving risk perceptions to simulate relocation or protective measures in coastal areas.^[144] Similarly, multi-agent reinforcement learning has modeled inter-regional policy interactions under climate variability, where agents representing geographical zones optimize decisions amid shared environmental constraints, revealing emergent adaptation pathways not captured by aggregate models.^[145] Predictive analytics in quantitative geography has benefited from graph neural networks (GNNs) for handling complex spatial dependencies in network flows, with validations in transportation post-2020. GNNs excel at embedding relational data from road or transit graphs to forecast traffic dynamics, outperforming traditional statistical methods in capturing non-Euclidean spatial correlations. For example, a 2024 framework used GNN surrogates for strategic transport planning, generating augmented data to simulate urban mobility scenarios with reduced computational demands while maintaining high fidelity to real-world validations in metropolitan settings.^[146] Another 2025 application leveraged spatio-temporal GNNs for traffic flow prediction, dynamically evolving adjacency matrices during training to adapt to evolving urban patterns, achieving superior accuracy in large-scale networks like Tel Aviv's.^[147] The COVID-19 pandemic provided empirical validation for predictive geography through mobility-integrated spatial forecasting models. Quantitative approaches using real-time mobility traces from cell phones or apps enabled county-level predictions of case surges by quantifying spatiotemporal transmission risks. A 2021 autoregressive model incorporating inter-county mobility flows accurately forecasted new COVID-19 cases across the contiguous US, demonstrating how human movement data refines epidemic diffusion estimates beyond static demographics.^[148] Such successes, corroborated in systematic reviews of spatial epidemiological modeling, underscore quantitative geography's pivot to big data for adaptive, evidence-based forecasting amid crises.

Challenges in Scalability and Interdisciplinary Integration

One persistent challenge in quantitative geography is the computational demands of analyzing high-dimensional spatial data, where the exponential growth in data volume and complexity—often termed the curse of dimensionality—strains traditional processing infrastructures, leading to prolonged computation times and risks of overfitting in models like spatial regression or kriging.^[149] This issue is amplified in large-scale geospatial analytics, such as those involving multispectral raster data or ensemble simulations, where memory and parallelization limits hinder effective pattern extraction and simulation at continental or global extents.^[150]^[151] Efforts to address these through distributed systems like MapReduce or high-performance computing (HPC) clusters have shown promise for handling petabyte-scale datasets, yet deployment remains impeded by high infrastructure costs, data transfer latencies, and the need for specialized expertise in scalable algorithms.^[152]^[153] Interdisciplinary integration poses further obstacles, particularly in fusing quantitative spatial methods with economic and social science paradigms to construct comprehensive causal models that account for spatial dependencies alongside behavioral or institutional factors.^[154] Disciplinary boundaries often result in incompatible data formats and epistemological mismatches, with social sciences favoring interpretive qualitative approaches that resist quantification, thereby limiting the development of unified frameworks for phenomena like spatial inequality or migration flows.^[155] For instance, while spatial econometrics enables integration with economic theory through models incorporating endogenous interactions, empirical validation is complicated by endogeneity biases and the scarcity of harmonized datasets spanning geographic and socioeconomic variables. Overcoming these requires standardized protocols for data interoperability and cross-disciplinary training, though progress is slowed by institutional silos in academia.^[156] Looking ahead, the rise of AI-driven spatial analysis intensifies these scalability and integration demands, as machine learning models trained on geospatial big data demand verifiable benchmarks to assess performance in tasks like spatial relationship inference or predictive mapping, where current large language models exhibit weaknesses in domain-specific reasoning.^[157]^[158] Without rigorous, empirical evaluation metrics—such as those testing causal robustness over mere correlative accuracy—AI applications risk amplifying hype over substantiated insights, underscoring the need for benchmarks that prioritize falsifiability and real-world generalizability in interdisciplinary contexts.^[159]^[140] Cloud-based platforms offer a pathway for scalable AI experimentation, enabling elastic resource allocation for high-dimensional training, but their adoption hinges on resolving privacy concerns and ensuring model transparency across fields like geography and economics.^[160]

Influential Contributors

Pioneers of the Quantitative Revolution

Peter Haggett advanced the quantitative revolution through his 1965 publication Locational Analysis in Human Geography, which synthesized locational models, systems theory, and spatial processes to promote rigorous, model-based analysis in human geography.^[161] This work emphasized the search for general patterns via mathematical abstraction, influencing geographers to integrate statistical tools for hypothesis testing and prediction.^[162] Brian J.L. Berry contributed to quantitative urban ecology by applying factorial ecology and central place theory refinements in the 1960s, establishing empirical foundations for urban spatial structure analysis at the University of Chicago and earlier at the University of Washington.^[163] His research utilized multivariate statistics to map socioeconomic gradients and retail hierarchies, sparking widespread adoption of computational methods in urban geography and yielding datasets that remain benchmarks for spatial autocorrelation studies.^[164] William L. Garrison pioneered transport network modeling in the late 1950s and 1960s at the University of Washington, developing graph-theoretic approaches to analyze connectivity, efficiency, and topology in transportation systems.^[165] Collaborating with Duane Marble, his work on network structures introduced quantitative metrics for accessibility and flow, foundational to operations research applications in geography and still used in infrastructure planning algorithms.^[166] Waldo Tobler formalized spatial interaction principles with his 1970 "First Law of Geography," stating that near things are more related than distant ones, providing a causal axiom for distance-decay functions in migration and diffusion models.^[4] His innovations in analytical cartography and computational mapping, including early GIS prototypes, enabled empirical validation of spatial autocorrelation, with methods persisting in modern geocomputation for simulating geographic processes.^[167]

Key Figures in Spatial Analysis and Computation

Luc Anselin advanced spatial econometrics through foundational work on spatial dependence and heterogeneity, beginning in the 1980s with models addressing autocorrelation in regression residuals.^[168] His development of GeoDa, an open-source software for exploratory spatial data analysis released in the early 2000s, democratized access to tools for detecting spatial clusters and estimating local parameters, facilitating empirical validation of geographic theories via user-friendly interfaces.^[169] These innovations shifted analysis from global assumptions to localized diagnostics, enabling researchers to test causal mechanisms against data patterns rather than uniform spatial processes.^[170] Michael Goodchild contributed to GIS theory by formalizing geographic information science as a discipline in the 1990s, emphasizing representational accuracy and uncertainty in spatial databases.^[171] In 2007, he introduced the concept of volunteered geographic information (VGI), framing citizens as sensors for crowdsourced data production, which expanded empirical datasets beyond institutional sources.^[172] This approach supported scalable computation by integrating user-generated content into analytical workflows, allowing for real-time hypothesis testing against volunteered observations.^[173] A. Stewart Fotheringham pioneered geographically weighted regression (GWR) in a 1996 paper, providing a local modeling technique to capture spatially varying relationships in regression coefficients.^[174] Elaborated in his 2002 book co-authored with Brunsdon and Charlton, GWR calibrates separate regressions at each data point using kernel-based weighting, revealing non-stationarity that global models overlook.^[175] By quantifying process heterogeneity, it enabled data-driven refinements to spatial theories, prioritizing evidence of local causal effects over averaged generalizations.^[176] Stan Openshaw applied neural networks to geographic problems in the 1980s and 1990s, developing models for constrained spatial interaction flows and land-use forecasting that leveraged backpropagation for pattern recognition in large datasets.^[177] His work on geographical data mining integrated neural architectures with spatial autocorrelation measures, automating exploratory analysis to identify non-linear dependencies.^[178] These computational methods promoted empirical scalability by processing voluminous geographic data without predefined functional forms, favoring inductive discovery from simulations over deductive narratives.^[179]

References

[1]
[PDF] Quantitative Geography - Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Quantitative geography involves analyzing numerical spatial data, developing spatial theory, and building mathematical models of spatial processes. It uses ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[2]
[PDF] A Short Introduction to Quantitative Geography
Dec 7, 2015 · Quantitative geography is applied data analysis, using data to tell geographical stories, and is more about geography than just math or ...
[3]
[PDF] Geog 391 Quantitative Methods - UNC Geography
In the history of Geography, quantitative revolution occurred in the 1950s and. 1960s which brought mathematic and statistical tools into the discipline that ...
[4]
Kudos to Professor Emeritus Waldo Tobler | UC Geography
Well known for his publications, he formulated the “first law of geography” in 1970 while producing a computer movie, and is the inventor of novel and unusual ...
[5]
“Doing” Critical Geographies with Numbers - Taylor & Francis Online
Criticisms of quantitative geography have a long history in our discipline. Since the emergence of early Marxist geography, the advent of new theoretical ...
[6]
Quantitative Geography - Sage Research Methods
Quantitative geography uses spatial data analysis, spatial modeling, and GIS, and is now exporting novel ideas about spatial data analysis.
[7]
Modelling spatial processes in quantitative human geography
Although spatial models have several purposes, undoubtedly the main one is to try to uncover what factors affect the spatial distribution of a particular ...
[8]
[PDF] FIRST LAW OF GEOGRAPHY Michael F. Goodchild, University of ...
Tobler's First Law was a product of the quantitative revolution of the 1960s, and efforts to turn geography into a nomothetic science. It was largely ...
[9]
Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Social ...
Bennett R J, Wrigley N, 1981, “Introduction”, in Quantitative Geography: A British View Eds Wrigley N, Bennett R J, (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 3–12.
[10]
Full article: Geo-Phenomenology: A Qualitative and Humanistic GIS ...
Aug 28, 2024 · The development of phenomenological geography was intended to compete with quantitative geography, which is based on positivist science ...
[11]
(PDF) Critical Quantitative Geographies - Academia.edu
Critical quantitative geographies Epistemological premises of quantitative geography have been seriously challenged through several rounds of stringent ...<|separator|>
[12]
Critical Quantitative Geographies - Mei-Po Kwan, Tim Schwanen ...
Jan 1, 2009 · Promoting dialogue across the qualitative–quantitative divide in human geography: A biographical-multilevel approach to human–environment interactions.Missing: distinctions | Show results with:distinctions
[13]
[PDF] A critique of the development of quantitative methodologies in ...
Apr 2, 2007 · The criticisms levelled at the quantitative geography of the mid 20th century can be illustrated with a critique of a study of population.
[14]
[PDF] The Geography of Plants – Alexander von Humboldt's Life Project
Jan 28, 2021 · Humboldt sketched out a research agenda for plant geography in a letter to Friedrich ... His statistical method, which Humboldt called “botanical.
[15]
Contributions of Humboldt & Ritter in Geographical Thought
Jul 15, 2025 · Alexander von Humboldt: The Father of Modern Geography. Humboldt's ... He introduced quantitative techniques like isotherms (temperature mapping).<|separator|>
[16]
Integration and synthesis of quantitative data: Alexander von ...
Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859) was an eminent and much-celebrated scientist, who introduced the concept of collecting high-quality quantitative data across ...Missing: methods | Show results with:methods
[17]
Historical Population Change Data (1910-2020) - U.S. Census Bureau
Apr 26, 2021 · While every census region grew considerably during the twentieth century, the South and West experienced the largest increases in population.
[18]
Land Utilisation Survey, Britain, 1931-1938 - One-Inch to the mile
The first systematic land utilisation survey of Great Britain was initiated in the 1930s by L. Dudley Stamp, reader and later professor of geography at the ...Missing: quantitative | Show results with:quantitative
[19]
[PDF] Quantitative Geography - DTIC
"To review, define and clarify the current quantitative approach to geography. The study is to perform the following: a.
[20]
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/425587/BarnesVanMeeteren_HartshorneSchaefer.pdf
[21]
A Genetic Approach to Urban Geography; with Some Reference to ...
Environment, Village and City: A Genetic Approach to Urban Geography; with Some Reference to Possibilism. Griffith Taylor. Pages 1-67 | Published online: 05 ...Missing: quantitative methods<|separator|>
[22]
Chorology and Spatial Analysis - jstor
ABSTRACT. The chorological and spatial schools offer differing conceptions of the nature of geographic questions and the appropriate forms of explanation.
[23]
[PDF] The quantitative revolution and economic geography - UBC Blogs
Historical Origins of the Quantitative Revolution. World War II, and later the Cold War, created the conditions for geography's quantitative revolution. The ...
[24]
The Factorial Ecology of Calcutta | American Journal of Sociology
This study attempts to initiative systematic cross-cultural ecological analysis by means of a structured factorial ecology of Calcutta. The investigation ...
[25]
Peter Haggett's Locational Analysis in Human Geography (1965)
This paper celebrates one of the classic volumes written in Anglophone human geography over the last one hundred years since Geografiska Annaler first appeared.
[26]
[PDF] History and geography's quantitative revolutions - UBC Blogs
Sep 20, 2015 · For example, Warntz was an important cross-over fig- ure, occupying both worlds, given his early involve- ment with computers as a researcher, ...
[27]
History of GIS | Timeline of the Development of GIS - Esri
Early concepts of quantitative and computational geography begin to develop. 1963, The first GIS, Geographer Roger Tomlinson begins a national land use ...<|separator|>
[28]
GIS Evolution and Future Trends
The 1980s saw steady growth in GIS and the community expanded from few hundred researchers to a few thousand pacesetters focused on applying the infant ...
[29]
Simulating spatial dynamics: cellular automata theory - ScienceDirect
CA theory shows potential for modeling landscape dynamics, so it is used to underpin a demonstration Geographic Information System (GIS) called SAGE.
[30]
A Cellular Automata Model for Integrated Simulation of Land Use ...
This paper presents a CA model where transport variables are endogenous, using irregular cells and a variable neighborhood to simulate land use change.
[31]
[DA-046] Computational Geography | By ITC, University of Twente
Mar 7, 2022 · Computational Geography emerged in the 1980s in response to the reductionist limitations of early GIS software, which inhibited deep ...
[32]
[PDF] Geography and Computers: Past, present, and future
Following a short review of the history of computation in Geography, we then document recent developments outside. Geography that are reshaping our ...
[33]
Chapter 8 Spatial autocorrelation | Spatial Statistics for Data Science
Spatial autocorrelation can be assessed using indices that summarize the degree to which similar observations tend to occur near each other over the study area.
[34]
[PDF] A History of the Concept of Spatial Autocorrelation: A Geographer's ...
A number of pundits like to say that the ''quantitative revolution'' in geography of the late 1950s and early 1960s died out in the late 1960s and early ...<|separator|>
[35]
A practical primer on geostatistics - USGS Publications Warehouse
Jul 6, 2009 · Historical Remarks—As a discipline, geostatistics was firmly established in the 1960s by the French engineer Georges Matheron, who was ...
[36]
[PDF] Geostatistics: Past, Present and Future
Geostatistical analyses were first developed in the 1950's as a result of interest in areal or block averages for ore reserves in the mining industry.
[37]
Spatial Autoregressive Model - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The spatial autoregressive (SAR) model is defined as a type of spatial regression model that accounts for spatial dependence in the dependent variable, ...
[38]
[PDF] Lecture 2: Spatial Models - Mauricio Sarrias
Oct 7, 2020 · Spatial Error Model. We can also use spatial lags to reflect dependence in the disturbance process, which lead to the spatial error model (SEM):.
[39]
Review of the gravity model: origins and critical analysis of its ...
Apr 26, 2023 · Nonetheless, in 1962, the physicist Tingerben developed a gravitational model on the influence of distance in international trade with a spatial ...
[40]
Gravity Model of Migration: W.J. Reilly and G.K. Zipf - Pan Geography
Feb 4, 2023 · Gravity Model by W. J. Reilly · Here, · is interaction between markets; · is the constant or minimum amount of interaction regardless of population ...<|separator|>
[41]
The contribution of Sir Alan Wilson to spatial interaction and ...
Wilson A. G. 1969a. “The use of Entropy Maximising Models in the Theory of Trip Distribution, Mode Split and Route Split.” Journal of Transport Economics and ...
[42]
Spatial Interaction Modeling - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
An unconstrained spatial interaction model can be specified in a similar way. Wilson (1971) shows how his entropy maximization-derived spatial interaction ...
[43]
(PDF) Entropy‐Based Spatial Interaction Models for Trip Distribution
Aug 6, 2025 · Wilson's use of entropy-maximization techniques to derive a family of spatial interaction models was a major innovation in urban and ...
[44]
Agent-based Modeling - Geography - Oxford Bibliographies
Sep 22, 2021 · Agent-based modeling (ABM) is a methodological tool to model and simulate complex adaptive systems with its emphasis on agents' characteristics, ...
[45]
Agent-Based Models of Geographical Systems - SpringerLink
This unique book brings together a comprehensive set of papers on the background, theory, technical issues and applications of agent-based modelling (ABM) ...
[46]
Methodological Issues of Spatial Agent-Based Models - JASSS
ABMs often represent the environment as spatial, including models without a geographic representation of space but possessing agents with coordinate locations.
[47]
The Remarkable History of GIS - GIS Geography
1960 to 75: GIS Pioneering. The early 1960s to 1980s was really the time period of GIS pioneering. The pieces were coming together with advancements in ...
[48]
The history of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) | BCS
Apr 25, 2019 · Mapping was paper based and there was no computer mapping. By the 1950s, maps were starting to be used in vehicle routing, development planning ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[49]
Spatial Join (Analysis)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
Usage. A spatial join matches rows from the Join Features values to the Target Features values based on their relative spatial locations.Missing: quantitative | Show results with:quantitative
[50]
Spatial Overlays and Joins - PyGIS
We'll explore five types of vector overlays and merging: union, intersection, difference (erase), identity, and spatial join.Missing: quantitative applications
[51]
Founder of QGIS: Gary Sherman - xyHt
Sep 3, 2018 · GS: QGIS started out as a solo effort in February 2002, driven primarily by my after-hours desire to view PostGIS data on my Linux box. In my ...
[52]
The QGIS project: Spatial without compromise - PMC
May 20, 2025 · Development of QGIS began in 2002 as a simple viewer for the open-source spatial database PostGIS (https://postgis.net/). Over time, it has ...
[53]
23 Years of QGIS: The Open-Source Revolution That Reshaped GIS
Feb 21, 2025 · QGIS's development is a living epic of open-source GIS, marked by technological leaps and community growth across key phases. Early Stage (2002– ...
[54]
NDVI FAQs: Frequently Asked Questions About The Index
Aug 30, 2019 · NDVI has been one of the most commonly used vegetation indices in remote sensing since its introduction in the 1970s.
[55]
Land use/land cover classification and its change detection using ...
Use of satellite remote sensing data is in practice since the 1970s in monitoring LULC changes at coarser spatial scales (Shao et al., 2001).
[56]
Chapter 1 Introduction | Geocomputation with R
This book is about using the power of computers to do things with geographic data. It teaches a range of spatial skills.
[57]
Geographic data analysis in R and Python - geocompx
Aug 30, 2023 · In this blog post, we talk about our experience teaching R and Python for geocomputation. The focus of the blog post is on geographic vector data.<|separator|>
[58]
Tobler's First Law of Geography - Waters - Wiley Online Library
Mar 29, 2018 · Tobler's first law (TFL) of geography was introduced into the geographical literature in an article that Waldo Tobler published in the journal Economic ...
[59]
The relevant range of scales for multi-scale contextual spatial ...
Oct 15, 2019 · In geostatistics, the variogram is used to develop a theoretical model from empirical data that describes the degree of spatial autocorrelation ...
[60]
Spatial Autocorrelation - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Spatial autocorrelation is defined as the correlation of a variable with itself across different spatial locations, indicating that observations in ...
[61]
[FC-05-017] Proximity and Distance Decay
Distance decay describes how the strength of a relationship between people, places, or systems decreases as the separation between them increases. The strength ...
[62]
(PDF) Using Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis to Guide Mixed ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Through a spatial autocorrelation analysis of Dallas, Texas, the authors identify sampling frames for collecting data about perceptions of West ...<|separator|>
[63]
Chapter 13 Spatial Autocorrelation | Intro to GIS and Spatial Analysis
The Moran's I statistic is the correlation coefficient for the relationship between a variable (like income) and its neighboring values.
[64]
Full article: Spatial distribution pattern analysis using variograms ...
In this paper, we proposed a variogram analysis method that develops variograms over both geographic and feature space to indicate the variable's spatial ...
[65]
Central Place Theory - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Central place theory is concerned with the size, number, functional characteristics, and spacing of settlements, which are nodal points for the distribution of ...
[66]
[PDF] Central Place Theory - The Research Repository @ WVU
This introduction to central place theory should be of particular interest to people whose interests lie in the fields of urban geography, economic geography, ...
[67]
Spatial dependence in the rank-size distribution of cities – weak but ...
Feb 9, 2021 · The study views the question of whether that global regularity is independent of different spatial distributions of cities.
[68]
[PDF] Central place theory and the power law for cities
Note that Ri represents the rank, by the rank-size rule, since the rank doubles from layer-i to the next layer-i + 1, Zipf's law can be approximated if city ...Missing: validation | Show results with:validation
[69]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE GRAVITY MODEL James E ...
Keller and Yeaple (2009) develop a gravity model of vertically integrated intra-firm trade featuring trade costs with two elements, a standard iceberg trade ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[70]
Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling (Routledge Revivals)
In stockFirst published in 1970, this groundbreaking investigation into Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling provides an extensive and detailed insight into the ...
[71]
Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling: Retrospect and Prospect
Aug 6, 2025 · Wilson's spatial interaction models can be derived from the postulate of entropy maximization (Wilson, 1970; Wilson, 2010) . This suggests ...
[72]
Determining the Predictive Power of the Gravity Model - ResearchGate
Nov 4, 2024 · Findings: The empirical results show that the gravity model accurately predicts Zambia's trade flows, with GDP positively and distance ...
[73]
Gravity Models for Global Migration Flows: A Predictive Evaluation
Apr 2, 2024 · This study introduces a comprehensive econometric framework based on gravity equations and designed to forecast migrant flows between countries.
[74]
Spatial heterogeneity of the relationships between environmental ...
Mar 25, 2015 · Yet, non-stationarity, referring to the variation in relationships across space [25,26], is a very common phenomenon in any geographical dataset ...
[75]
Spatial heterogeneity of built environment's impact on urban vitality ...
Jul 2, 2025 · This study proposes a novel interpretative framework combining multi-source big data with Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR)
[76]
Robust Assessment of Spatial Non-Stationarity in Model ...
Numerous epidemiological studies found spatially varying (non-stationary) disease associations attributable to changing geographic or demographic context.
[77]
Study on the scale dependence of the spatial distribution pattern of ...
May 28, 2025 · This article aims to screen out the critical and optimal scales of the total value and spatial differentiation of ecosystem service value (ESV)
[78]
A multiscale measure of spatial dependence based on a discrete ...
This paper highlights the scale-dependence problem with current measures of spatial dependence and defines a new, multi-scale approach to defining a spatial ...
[79]
Geographic scale dependency and the structure of climate ...
Drawing from ecological studies, scale dependency indicates that patterns and processes observed at one scale may manifest distinct characteristics when ...Introduction · Theoretical Background: Scale... · Method · Results
[80]
Fractals, fractal dimensions and landscapes — a review
Mandelbrot's fractal geometry is a revolution in topological space theory and, for the first time, provides the possibility of simulating and describing ...
[81]
A Monte Carlo Approach to Diffusion | European Journal of ...
Jul 28, 2009 · A Monte Carlo Approach to Diffusion. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009. Torsten Hägerstrand ...
[82]
[PDF] Spatial Diffusion - The Research Repository @ WVU
Hägerstrand then used the Monte Carlo model to simulate the diffusion process. SOURCE: Gould, 1969: Hägerstrand, 1965. Figure 3.4 Actual Diffusion of ...Missing: laws | Show results with:laws
[83]
All geographical distances are optimal - OpenEdition Journals
According to the principles of least-effort, any task involving movement will be done in a way that reduces movement to a minimum. Zipf's approach draws on a ...Triangle Inequality... · Distance And The Optimum... · Conclusion<|separator|>
[84]
[PDF] All geographical distances are optimal - HAL
Apr 7, 2015 · The study of optimality of distances in empirical approaches confirms its role as a key property. The general principle of least-effort applies ...
[85]
[PDF] Testing the monocentric standard urban model in a global sample of ...
Aug 16, 2022 · The Standard Urban Model (SUM) describes the relationship between land use, land value, and transportation costs in cities. The study found SUM ...
[86]
Urban expansion using remote-sensing data and a monocentric ...
This study uses a monocentric urban model with remote-sensing data to estimate urban areas, traffic costs, and housing, and to study urban expansion in ...
[87]
[PDF] Evolution of urban forms observed from space - DSpace@MIT
May 19, 2021 · The model qualitatively and quantitatively explains the emergence of a CBD and transition from monocentric to polycentric urban structure as the ...<|separator|>
[88]
[PDF] Quantitative Urban Models: From Theory to Data - Princeton University
May 4, 2023 · In these frameworks, whether monocentric or polycentric patterns of economic activity emerge depends on the strength of agglomeration and ...Missing: tests | Show results with:tests
[89]
[PDF] The New Economic Geography, Now Middle-Aged
Apr 16, 2010 · But the new economic geography was designed to attract the attention of mainstream economists. And mainstream economics decided long ago that ...
[90]
[PDF] The Empirics of New Economic Geography - Princeton University
May 12, 2009 · This paper reviews the existing empirical literature on the predictions of new economic geography models for the distribution of income and.
[91]
https://oxfordre.com/economics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.001.0001/acrefore-9780190625979-e-338
[92]
[PDF] Measuring industry co-location across county borders - StatsAmerica
Oct 21, 2019 · ABSTRACT. The location quotient (LQ) measures regional industry concentration with the advantages of easy calculation and interpretation.
[93]
Making Location Quotients More Relevant as a Policy Aid in ...
Dec 20, 2012 · Location Quotients (LQs) remain an important tool for geographical analysis, particularly in terms of assessing industrial specialisation ...
[94]
[PDF] The Pitfalls of Using Location Quotients to Identify Clusters and ...
This paper examines the use of location quotients, a measure of regional business activity relative to the national benchmark, as an indicator of sectoral ...Missing: simulations | Show results with:simulations
[95]
Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis in hydrological ...
Dec 22, 2021 · Running and estimating the parameters of numerical hydrological models requires solving well-posed forward and ill-posed inverse problems.
[96]
The empirical implications of a Spatial-SIR model with behavioral ...
This paper proposes a spatial model of epidemic diffusion, the Spatial-SIR model, to study how the dynamics of an epidemic scales in relevant geographical ...
[97]
Spatial-temporal relationship between population mobility and ...
To examine the spatial-temporal relationship between population mobility and COVID-19 outbreaks and use population mobility to predict daily new cases.
[98]
Characterizing US Spatial Connectivity and Implications for ...
Feb 18, 2025 · This study investigated the role of human mobility at various temporal and spatial scales in the spread of COVID-19 across the US counties, ...
[99]
(PDF) Development and Deforestation in Mexico: Impacts Using the ...
Mar 17, 2016 · We study the impact of household income changes on local deforestation, exploiting the community-level eligibility discontinuity imposed in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[100]
[PDF] THE ECOLOGICAL IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION ... - Sam Asher
Mar 7, 2020 · Section 3 presents empirical strategy and results describing the impact of rural roads on deforestation. Section 4 presents the empirical.
[101]
[PDF] EVIDENCE FROM SUBURBAN COOK COUNTY 1943-1962
Jun 30, 1993 · In this paper we investigate unimproved land in Cook County, Illinois to see if land values experienced changes due to highway construction in ...
[102]
An Empirical Analysis of the Benefits of Opening a Highway ... - MDPI
May 5, 2022 · This study empirically analyzes the social benefits of opening a highway by assessing the increase in housing prices in two surrounding regions.
[103]
[PDF] Impact of Highway Improvements on Property Values in Washington
A less desirable effect on property values is created by adverse highway influences which may affect certain houses. Noise is the most important of such ...
[104]
Land use efficiency of functional urban areas: Global pattern and ...
In this study, the land use efficiency indicator, as developed in the Sustainable Development Goals, is assessed globally for the first time at the level of ...Missing: driven | Show results with:driven
[105]
Data-Driven Urban Planning in the U.S.: Using Analytics to ... - VaridX
Data analytics is used for informed decisions in urban planning, impacting transportation, public health, zoning, and emergency management, and is now ...Missing: ad- hoc metrics geography
[106]
Assessing the impact of wastewater infrastructure along the Texas ...
This quasi-experimental analysis exploited the size, location, and timing of wastewater infrastructure. Results show that residents in the eight counties ...
[107]
When regional policies fail: An evaluation of Indonesia's Integrated ...
The results in Table 3 fail to detect any significant effects of the KAPET program on a broad range of outcomes, including: (1) measures of demographic change; ...
[108]
When Spatial Equilibrium Fails: Is Place-Based Policy Second Best?
When spatial equilibrium fails: is place-based policy second best, Regional Studies . Place-based or geographically targeted policy often is promoted to help ...Missing: quantitative assumptions
[109]
New highways and land use change: Results from a quasi ...
In this paper, we incorporate a lagged adjustment regional growth model into a quasi-experimental research design to examine the association between new highway ...Missing: values | Show results with:values
[110]
Quantitative spatial economics: A framework for evaluating regional ...
Oct 27, 2016 · This column surveys a recent strand of literature that has developed quantitative models of the spatial distribution of economic activity. This ...Missing: validations outcomes
[111]
[PDF] Humanistic Geography
Humanism grew as a criticism against positivism and Quantification in geography. Humanists are not in favour of reducing space to mere Geometrical concepts of ...
[112]
The Paradox of Humanistic Geography - jstor
Johnston (1980) is not alone therefore in accusing humanistic geography of raising the unique component to an unjustified pos ition. Haggett (1965), in an ...
[113]
Behavioral Geography and the Theoretical/Quantitative Revolution
Jul 16, 2008 · Particular emphasis is placed on contributions made by those interested in decision making and choice behavior, particularly in terms of the ...Missing: determinism charges
[114]
Behavioural Approach in Geography (Behaviouralism) - LotusArise
Jun 2, 2025 · Interactive Human-Environment Relationship Behavioural geography rejects the one-way deterministic model (i.e., nature controls man). Instead, ...Missing: charges | Show results with:charges
[115]
Geographical Determinism - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Geographical determinism is defined as the belief that the natural environment serves as the causal determinant of human activities and spatial distributions, ...
[116]
(PDF) Quantitative methods: Not positively positivist - ResearchGate
Aug 5, 2025 · These insights allow researchers to yield more fluid, contextualized, nuanced outcomes and construct rich, process-based explanations.
[117]
[PDF] Philosophy and Human Geography
Aug 2, 2014 · This is sometimes known as the quantitative revolution in geography. David Harvey's 1969 book Explanation in. Geography was a key text in this ...
[118]
Geographers Count: A Report on Quantitative Methods in Geography
Dec 15, 2015 · Although human geography has experienced the same critiques and antipathy to quantitative methods as other parts of the social sciences, the ...
[119]
[PDF] GIS Supports Response to Hurricanes - Esri
With every disaster, the GIS Division learns more. During Hurricane Matthew in 2016, the GIS Division stood up apps based on ArcGIS templates during the event.
[120]
Network Modeling of Hurricane Evacuation Using Data‐Driven ...
Sep 3, 2021 · The results show that the introduction of incident frequency and duration models can significantly improve the performance of the evacuation ...
[121]
Analysis and prediction of infectious diseases based on spatial ...
Nov 19, 2024 · This study is based on the data of COVID-19 epidemic in China (except Macau and Taiwan Province) from 2020 to 2022.
[122]
Spatial Epidemiology: Current Approaches and Future Challenges
We focus on small-area analyses, encompassing disease mapping, geographic correlation studies, disease clusters, and clustering.
[123]
Book Review: Seeing Like A State | Slate Star Codex
Mar 16, 2017 · Why did all of these schemes fail? And more importantly, why were they celebrated, rewarded, and continued, even when the fact of their failure ...
[124]
Integrating quantitative and qualitative forecasting approaches
Aug 6, 2025 · It is better to integrate qualitative and quantitative forecasting methods to measure forecasting as it not only increases forecasting accuracy ...<|separator|>
[125]
Spatial measurement errors in the field of spatial epidemiology
Jul 1, 2016 · We sought to review and analyze the types of spatial measurement errors commonly encountered during spatial epidemiological analysis of spatial data.Instrumental Errors · Geocoding Errors · Missing Outcome Measurements
[126]
[PDF] Causal Inference for Spatial Treatments - arXiv
Jan 25, 2023 · I approach the spatial treatment setting from an experimental perspective: What ideal experiment would we design to estimate the causal effects ...
[127]
Rethinking 'causality' in quantitative human geography - Zhang - 2024
Mar 14, 2024 · This review reflects on causal theories that are used in contemporary quantitative human geography.<|separator|>
[128]
[PDF] Causal Inference for Spatial Treatments
Spatial treatments, like opening businesses, occur at specific locations. This paper proposes an ideal experiment to estimate their causal effects, using ...
[129]
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19475683.2025.2451230
[130]
A BAYESIAN SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL MODELING APPROACH ...
Specifically, hierarchical Bayesian spatio-temporal models were implemented with spatially structured and unstructured random effects, correlated time effects, ...
[131]
An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis approach for GIS-based ...
Sensitivity analyses model behavior by determining the rate of change in the model output as parameters or by varying input data, thus giving an understanding ...
[132]
Causal analysis as a bridge between qualitative and quantitative ...
Feb 10, 2022 · Yarkoni argues that one solution is to abandon quantitative methods for qualitative ones. While we agree that qualitative methods are ...
[133]
A Review of Spatial Causal Inference Methods for Environmental ...
The CAR model specifies spatial dependence in terms of the adjacencies between the regions. The full conditional distribution of the random effect for one ...
[134]
Spatial Statistical Models: An Overview under the Bayesian Approach
Every Bayesian spatial analysis aims to estimate the spatial pattern over an extended geographical region to identify regions with extreme realization. In ...
[135]
Big data environment for geospatial data analysis - IEEE Xplore
Mar 30, 2017 · Geo-information system produces huge and complex geospatial data with the process of collecting real time data through sensors devices.
[136]
[PDF] High Performance Spatial Queries for Spatial Big Data
In this paper, we introduce Hadoop-GIS – a scalable and high performance spatial data warehousing system for running large scale spatial queries on Hadoop.
[137]
[PDF] Constructing gazetteers from volunteered Big Geo-Data based on ...
The geoprocessing workflow of spatial join for Hadoop facilitates fast processing and statistics of gazetteer entries. Enabled by this new dis- tributed ...
[138]
Remote Sensing-Based Urban Sprawl Modeling Using Multilayer ...
The present research used a multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) to obtain the directional potential change in machine learning for supporting the MCM.
[139]
[PDF] InfraTech Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering
A patch-based. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) technique was used to detect urban sprawl. ... 2010-2015 using remote sensing and machine learning techniques.
[140]
A comprehensive GeoAI review: Progress, Challenges and Outlooks
Dec 16, 2024 · This paper offers a comprehensive review of GeoAI as a synergistic concept applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods and models to geospatial data.
[141]
A structured comparison of causal machine learning methods to ...
Jun 14, 2023 · A structured comparison of causal machine learning methods to assess heterogeneous treatment effects in spatial data. Original Article; Open ...Missing: double | Show results with:double
[142]
Inferring the heterogeneous effect of urban land use on building ...
Feb 25, 2024 · In this study, we showcase the usefulness of causal machine learning to understand the heterogeneous causal effect of changing land use on building height.
[143]
[PDF] Double/Debiased Machine Learning for Treatment and Structural ...
The parameter of interest will typically be a causal parameter or treatment effect parameter, and we consider settings in which the nuisance parameter will be ...
[144]
Simulating Future Household Adaptation to Sea Level Rise using ...
Aug 6, 2025 · An ABM based on reinforcement learning is used to simulate household decisions over time regarding adaptation options based on flood exposure of ...
[145]
Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Simulation for Environmental ...
The outer climate simulation is imbued with socio-economic agents, in this case three geographical regions. Agents make independent decisions while engaging in ...
[146]
Graph neural network surrogate for strategic transport planning - arXiv
Aug 14, 2024 · This paper explores the application of advanced Graph Neural Network (GNN) architectures as surrogate models for strategic transport planning.
[147]
Spatio-temporal Graph Convolutional Neural Network for traffic ...
This study explored various datasets and feature combinations to predict traffic signal settings in the large-scale urban network of Tel Aviv.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[148]
Spatiotemporal prediction of COVID-19 cases using inter - Nature
Nov 8, 2021 · In this study, we develop a Spatiotemporal autoregressive model to predict county-level new cases of COVID-19 in the coterminous US.
[149]
Multivariate Analysis and Geovisualization with an Integrated ... - NIH
There are several major challenges that are associated with multivariate spatial analysis in large and high-dimensional geographic datasets. First, the high ...<|separator|>
[150]
[PDF] Large-scale Geospatial Analytics: Problems, Challenges, and ...
ABSTRACT. Geospatial analytics is an important field in many communities, including crime science, transportation science, epidemiology, ecol-.
[151]
Multi-dimensional geospatial data mining in a distributed ...
Sep 5, 2019 · The proposed platform is based on Apache Hadoop ecosystem and supports performing analysis on large amounts of multispectral raster data using MapReduce.
[152]
Revisiting spatial optimization in the era of geospatial big data and ...
This paper revisited the research progress in the field of spatial optimization, covering its characteristics, modeling approaches, solving methods, and ...
[153]
Advancing Intelligent Geography: Current status, innovations, and ...
Sep 20, 2025 · Geo-big models focus on large-scale data processing using big geospatial data and HPC for real-time decision-making and predictive simulations.
[154]
Quantitative geography III: Future challenges and challenging futures
May 26, 2020 · In this final report, we focus on the future. We argue that quantitative geographers are most helpful when we can simplify difficult problems ...
[155]
[PDF] 1 Exploring the Interdisciplinary Dimensions of Geography
Apr 30, 2024 · By integrating insights from physical and human geography, along with interdisciplinary fields like environmental studies and spatial analysis, ...
[156]
Interdisciplinarity - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
Interdisciplinarity employs multiple academic fields of knowledge in order to create a comprehensive understanding of a globally relevant phenomenon, ...
[157]
A GeoAI benchmark for assessing large language models for spatial ...
Sep 7, 2025 · Tasks requiring deeper spatial reasoning, such as spatial relationship detection or optimal site selection, remain the most challenging across ...
[158]
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tgis.70135
[159]
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17538947.2025.2480268
[160]
Challenges in data-driven geospatial modeling for environmental ...
Dec 19, 2024 · This review focuses on geospatial data-driven approaches, meaning that models are built with parameters learned from observations' data.
[161]
Professor Peter Haggett (1933–2025) - RGS-IBG Publications Hub
Apr 14, 2025 · The first chapter of Locational Analysis in Human Geography (Haggett, 1965) talks of the search for order, general systems theory, model ...
[162]
‪Peter Haggett‬ - ‪Google Scholar‬
Locational analysis in human geography. P Haggett. 3496, 1965 ; Geography-a modern synthesis. P Haggett. UTB fuer Wissenschaft: Grosse Reihe (Germany), 1991.
[163]
Brian Berry - AAG
He refined the concept of “central place theory” and laid the foundations of analytic urban geography, spatial analysis, and of geographic information science.
[164]
Brian Joe Lobley Berry | American Academy of Arts and Sciences
Apr 10, 2025 · In the 1960s his urban and regional research sparked geography's quantitative ... Subsequently, his inquiries extended from urban ecology to ...
[165]
THE STRUCTURE OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS
This monograph concerns the structure, geometry, mesh, pattern, or layout of transportation networks; these words convey notions of the arrangements of ...
[166]
William L. Garrison Award for Best Dissertation in Computational ...
The biennial William L. Garrison Award for Best Dissertation in Computational Geography supports innovative research into the computational aspects of ...
[167]
Waldo R. Tobler (1930–2018) - Taylor & Francis Online
Mar 6, 2018 · His contributions to cartography and geography were numerous, and his career stretched over an extraordinary six decades that witnessed the ...
[168]
[PDF] Thirty years of spatial econometrics
Abstract. In this paper, I give a personal view on the development of the field of spatial econometrics during the past 30 years.
[169]
[PDF] Luc Anselin, Ph.D. - UChicago MAPSS
Anselin, L. and S. Rey, Modern Spatial Econometrics in Practice, A Guide to GeoDa,. GeoDaSpace and PySAL. Chicago, IL, GeoDa Press, 2014 ...
[170]
Luc Anselin - UCGIS
Luc Anselin is a leading world scholar among geographers, economists, and planners in the world on the subject of spatial econometrics. His contributions to a ...
[171]
Goodchild Quoted in New York Times Article on VGI | UC Geography
Professor Michael Goodchild, considered the “father of geographic information science (GISc)” which is the academic theory behind the development, use, and ...
[172]
Recent advances in Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) and ...
Mar 21, 2025 · Goodchild, Michael F. 2007. “Citizens as Sensors: The World of Volunteered Geography.” GeoJournal 69 (4): 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007 ...
[173]
Michael F. Goodchild Talks about the Role of Volunteered ... - Esri
Volunteered geographic information (VGI) is a manifestation of the rising interest of the layperson in compiling georeferenced data.Missing: theory | Show results with:theory
[174]
Geographically Weighted Regression: A Method for Exploring ...
In this paper, a technique is developed, termed geographically weighted regression, which attempts to capture this variation by calibrating a multiple ...
[175]
Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially ...
Geographical Weighted Regression (GWR) is a new local modellingtechnique for analysing spatial analysis. This technique allowslocal as opposed to global ...
[176]
(PDF) Geographically weighted regression - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · GWR is a local type of linear regression that is used to model spatially varying relationships (Fotheringham et al., 2009; Wheeler, 2021). It ...
[177]
Neural Network Modeling of Constrained Spatial Interaction Flows ...
Learning in neural spatial interaction models: A statistical perspective · Computer Science. Journal of Geographical Systems · 2002.
[178]
Geographical data mining: key design issues - School of Geography
Similarly, modelling tools such as neural networks and decision trees can be readily applied to some geographic problems. It can be argued that while these ...
[179]
Stan Openshaw's research works | University of Leeds and other ...
The paper focuses on methods developed to enrich the available data, the quantitative approach to modelling and forecasting land use using neural networks, and ...