Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Radiation damage

Radiation damage refers to the irreversible changes in the atomic, molecular, or supramolecular structure of materials or biological systems induced by the energy transfer from ionizing radiation, primarily through mechanisms of atomic displacement, ionization, and excitation. In solid materials, the primary process involves elastic collisions where incident particles or recoil atoms impart sufficient kinetic energy—typically exceeding a threshold of 10–100 eV depending on the material—to eject lattice atoms from their sites, generating cascades of vacancies and interstitial defects that degrade mechanical properties such as ductility and fracture toughness. These defects accumulate over time, quantified in displacements per atom (dpa), and can lead to macroscopic effects like swelling, embrittlement, or altered thermal conductivity, limiting the operational lifespan of nuclear reactor components and space vehicle structures. In biological contexts, radiation damage manifests as direct breaks in DNA strands or indirect oxidative stress from radiolysis products like hydroxyl radicals, triggering cellular responses including apoptosis, senescence, or mutagenesis, with severity scaling with absorbed dose in grays (Gy). Empirical models, such as the Kinchin-Pease approximation for displacement damage, enable prediction of defect production rates via R = \Phi \Sigma = \Phi \sigma \rho_A, where \Phi is particle flux, \sigma the displacement cross-section, and \rho_A atomic density, underscoring the causal primacy of ballistic collisions over mere electronic stopping in dense cascades. While repair mechanisms mitigate low-dose effects in living systems, high-fluence exposures in engineered materials reveal persistent defect clusters resistant to annealing, informing designs for radiation-tolerant alloys through first-principles simulations of defect dynamics.

Fundamentals

Definition and Classification

Radiation damage refers to the microscopic defects and structural alterations induced in by to , encompassing both atomic displacements and electronic excitations that disrupt lattice integrity or molecular bonds. These changes occur on timescales of picoseconds following initial particle interactions, forming the primary damage state before annealing or aggregation modifies the defect population. Damage mechanisms are primarily classified into displacement (non-ionizing) and ionization (electronic) types. Displacement damage arises from elastic collisions where incident particles, such as neutrons or ions, transfer kinetic energy exceeding the displacement threshold (typically 10-100 eV depending on the material) to target atoms, creating primary knock-on atoms (PKAs) that generate cascades of further displacements, often resulting in thousands of defects per event in metals. Ionization damage, dominant for photons, electrons, or lightly ionizing particles, involves inelastic energy loss through electron ejection, leading to charge buildup, trapped holes, or radiolytic decomposition, with effects pronounced in wide-bandgap materials where recombination is inefficient. Defects are further classified by morphology: point defects include vacancies (missing atoms), self-interstitials (extra atoms in non-lattice sites), and Frenkel pairs (vacancy-interstitial combinations); extended defects encompass dislocation loops from coalesced interstitials, voids from vacancy clustering under stress, and amorphous zones in ceramics from overlapping cascades. In biological contexts, analogous classifications apply to DNA strand breaks (single- or double-strand from direct ionization or indirect radical attack) versus clustered damage from high-LET particles, though macroscopic effects like mutagenesis stem from repair failures rather than isolated defects.

Physical and Chemical Mechanisms

Radiation damage arises primarily through physical mechanisms involving atomic displacements and electronic excitations. In displacement damage, incident particles such as neutrons, protons, or heavy ions transfer via elastic nuclear collisions to lattice atoms, ejecting them from their positions if the energy exceeds the material-specific displacement threshold, typically 10–50 eV (equivalent to 2–8 × 10⁻¹⁸ J). This process generates Frenkel defects, pairs of vacancies and self-interstitial atoms, which disrupt the and degrade mechanical properties like . The non-ionizing energy loss (NIEL) quantifies the energy partitioned into such displacements, distinct from ionizing losses that produce electron-hole pairs, with NIEL-driven defects causing permanent lattice perturbations in semiconductors and metals. A single displaced atom, termed the primary knock-on atom (), can trigger a cascade of secondary displacements, forming dense clusters or "spikes" of defects within nanoseconds; the approximate number of displaced atoms scales as the PKA energy divided by twice the , leading to localized melting-like conditions and amorphization in severe cases. Neutrons, prevalent in environments, efficiently induce these cascades through , while lighter particles like electrons require higher energies (e.g., >1 MeV via ) to surpass displacement thresholds. effects complement displacements, as neutron absorption reactions (e.g., (n,α) in alloys) produce atoms that migrate, coalesce into bubbles, and drive void swelling under . Chemical mechanisms stem from and , where radiation breaks molecular bonds directly or indirectly via reactive intermediates, altering composition without net atomic relocation. , the dissociation of molecules by ionizing particles, generates free radicals, ions, and excited states that initiate chain reactions; in liquids like , yields include hydroxyl radicals (G-value ~2.7 molecules/100 eV), hydrated electrons (~2.6), and , which oxidize nearby biomolecules or materials. In solids and polymers, electronic energy deposition cleaves covalent bonds, forming trapped charges, color centers (e.g., F-centers in alkali halides), or cross-links, with damage amplified by diffusion of radicals over micrometer scales. These processes often dominate in molecular or biological systems, contrasting with the ballistic displacements in crystalline solids, though synergies occur where radiolytic species enhance defect recombination or .

Historical Development

The study of radiation damage originated with the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen on November 8, 1895, when he observed their ability to penetrate matter and produce , leading to immediate reports of biological effects such as skin and in experimenters exposed during early trials. In 1896, identified natural radioactivity in uranium salts, and subsequent work by Marie and Pierre Curie isolated and , revealing , and gamma emissions; these findings prompted observations of tissue damage, including burns and cataracts, among researchers like and , who noted eye irritations after prolonged exposure. By the 1920s, radiation's mutagenic effects were recognized through experiments on fruit flies by Hermann Muller, who in 1927 demonstrated induced genetic mutations in using s, establishing as a tool for genetic while highlighting heritable risks. Studies expanded to chemical changes, with papers by 1928 documenting phenomenological effects on diverse materials, including polymers and gases, via ionization and excitation processes. International guidelines emerged in the 1930s, such as the International and Protection Committee recommendations in 1928 and 1934, driven by accumulating evidence of acute injuries among medical and industrial workers. The advent of in 1938 and wartime reactor development accelerated research into material damage, with early observations in the 1940s revealing embrittlement and dimensional changes in metals and under bombardment in pilot reactors like Chicago Pile-1. Post-World War II, the Project's aftermath and testing programs spurred systematic investigations, including cascades in solids theorized by 1950s models, while biological studies quantified dose-response relationships for cellular damage. By the 1956 Annual Review of Nuclear Science, effects on mechanical properties—such as increased yield strength and reduced in irradiated steels—were cataloged from reactor surveillance data. These efforts laid the foundation for modern radiation hardness assessments in nuclear and space applications.

Effects on Non-Biological Materials

Damage to Metals and Alloys

irradiation primarily damages metals and alloys through atomic s caused by events, where incident s transfer sufficient to atoms to exceed the threshold displacement energy, which ranges from 25 in to 40 in iron. These collisions generate primary knock-on atoms (PKAs) that initiate s, producing clusters of Frenkel defects—vacancies paired with self- atoms—in densities up to thousands per for PKAs with energies of several keV. The extent of damage is quantified in displacements per atom (dpa), with 1 dpa corresponding to each atom in the material being displaced once on average. At irradiation temperatures below approximately one-third of the absolute , these point defects remain largely immobile and accumulate, obstructing motion and causing irradiation hardening; for example, neutron fluences of 10^{19} to 10^{20} n/cm² (equivalent to ~0.1-1 dpa for fast neutrons) can increase yield strength in ferritic steels by 50-200% while reducing uniform elongation to near zero. This hardening contributes to embrittlement, shifting the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature upward by 50-150°C in alloys, limiting service life in nuclear reactors. Radiation-enhanced and of alloying elements to defect sinks further promote of phases like copper-rich clusters in low-alloy steels, exacerbating . At higher temperatures (0.4-0.6 T_m), defect mobility enables recombination, clustering into loops, and void , leading to radiation-induced swelling from supersaturated vacancies coalescing into voids under bias-driven differences between voids and dislocations. In austenitic stainless steels like 304 or 316, swelling initiates after an incubation dose of 10-50 dpa, proceeds at a terminal rate of about 1% volume increase per dpa, and can accumulate to 10-30% at 100-150 dpa and temperatures of 300-600°C, causing dimensional in fuel cladding and core internals. Swelling above 10% severely degrades tensile strength and promotes . Irradiation creep, a stress-directed anisotropic deformation, arises from similar defect fluxes, with rates enhanced by factors of 10^4-10^6 over thermal creep in alloys under fluxes. Alloying strategies, such as adding oversize elements like or to stabilize voids or precipitate transmutants like , mitigate swelling and embrittlement; for instance, 20Cr-35Ni-Ti alloys exhibit swelling rates below 0.5%/dpa up to 110 dpa. In refractory metals like for applications, low-temperature hardening dominates due to high densities, with yield strength doubling at 0.1-1 dpa from formation. Post-irradiation annealing partially recovers by defect annihilation, though full restoration requires temperatures exceeding 0.5 T_m.

Damage to Ceramics, Concrete, and Glasses

Ceramics exposed to , particularly neutrons or heavy ions, undergo atomic displacements through elastic collisions, generating point defects, dislocation loops, and Frenkel pairs that accumulate into cascades. In crystalline oxides like Al₂O₃ and ZrO₂, this displacement leads to volumetric swelling, typically a few percent at high fluences, alongside embrittlement and reduced due to microcracking. Thermal conductivity decreases markedly from by defects, while electrical conductivity may increase initially from generation before saturating. Amorphization occurs in susceptible phases, such as pyrochlores or zirconolite, at doses around 0.1-1 displacements per atom (dpa), transforming ordered structures into disordered states with higher stored energy. Heavy-ion induces continuous ion tracks via , promoting radiolytic in materials like CeO₂, where track radii reach 5-10 nm at energies above 1 MeV/amu. Concrete in nuclear facilities, such as biological shields, suffers neutron-induced primarily in siliceous aggregates, where fast neutrons (E > 1 MeV) cause metamictization of and feldspars, resulting in radiation-induced volumetric expansion (RIVE) up to 1-2% at fluences of 10¹⁹-10²⁰ n/cm². This expansion exerts internal stresses, leading to microcracking in the cement paste and overall loss of by 20-50% and of elasticity by similar margins beyond 1 × 10¹⁹ n/cm². Gamma contributes via radiolytic and radiogenic heating, exacerbating drying and shrinkage, though neutron effects dominate structural integrity loss. swelling predominates over paste damage, with synergistic neutron-gamma interactions remaining poorly quantified but potentially amplifying cracking under combined exposures up to 10¹⁸ n/cm² and 10²¹ . Glasses, being amorphous, resist amorphization but experience ballistic disordering and electronic excitation effects, leading to densification (up to 1-3% volume reduction) at low doses from structural relaxation, followed by expansion at higher fluences due to defect percolation. In borosilicate nuclear waste glasses, alpha-decay recoils (from actinides) at 10¹⁸-10¹⁹ events/g induce cascade overlap, altering network polymerization and increasing leach rates by factors of 2-10 via track formation and phase separation. Heavy-ion tracks in glasses create cylindrical damage zones with radii of 2-5 nm, softening the material and reducing chemical durability, as evidenced by enhanced boron and silicon dissolution in simulated high-level waste forms. Mechanical properties like hardness decline modestly, with fracture toughness potentially improving from flaw blunting, though overall radiation tolerance depends on composition, with aluminoborosilicates showing stability up to 10²¹ Gy equivalent dose. In glass-ceramics like zirconolite-based composites, irradiation accelerates amorphization of crystalline phases at fluences as low as 10¹² ions/cm² for 21 MeV Au, exacerbating helium accumulation and swelling.

Damage to Polymers and Organics

Ionizing radiation induces damage in primarily through the generation of reactive intermediates such as free radicals, ions, and excited states via energy deposition from and . These processes lead to two dominant chemical reactions: main-chain scission, which fragments polymer chains and reduces molecular weight, and intermolecular cross-linking, which forms covalent bonds between chains, increasing molecular weight and potentially creating insoluble networks. The prevalence of each reaction depends on the polymer's chemical structure; for instance, and predominantly undergo cross-linking under conditions, enhancing tensile strength but reducing elongation at break, while and favor chain scission, resulting in embrittlement and . In the presence of oxygen, radiation damage is exacerbated by oxidative mechanisms, where initial radicals react with O₂ to form peroxyl radicals, propagating chain reactions that produce peroxides, hydroperoxides, and oxygenated functional groups like carbonyls and carboxyls. This radiolytic oxidation causes yellowing, surface cracking, and accelerated loss of mechanical integrity, with degradation yields often quantified by G-values (molecules reacted per 100 eV absorbed); for example, exhibits a G-value for oxidation of approximately 10-15 under gamma at doses exceeding 1 MGy. Post-irradiation effects further contribute, as trapped radicals persist and react with atmospheric oxygen over time, leading to continued embrittlement even after exposure ceases. For non-polymeric organic materials, such as lubricants or solvents, radiation primarily drives , fragmenting C-H and C-C bonds to yield smaller hydrocarbons, gas, and unsaturated compounds, often with of monomers into dimers or oligomers. In organic liquids like hydrocarbons, doses above 0.1 MGy from gamma rays can reduce by 20-50% due to bond breaking, while aromatic organics like show higher resistance via stabilization, with decomposition yields below 1 molecule/100 eV. Empirical data from environments indicate that unirradiated polymers like (ethylene-propylene rubber) retain >80% elongation after 1 MGy, but oxidative exposure halves this value, underscoring the role of environment in damage accumulation. These effects limit use in high-radiation settings, such as reactor cabling, where stabilizers like antioxidants mitigate but do not eliminate degradation.

Damage to Gases and Liquids

Ionizing radiation induces damage in gases through direct interactions such as , , and , transferring from particles like electrons, α-particles, or γ-rays to gas molecules and producing pairs, free radicals, and excited . These primary events initiate secondary chain reactions, including , , or oxidation, often yielding stable products like smaller molecules or polymers depending on the gas composition and pressure. In dilute gases, reactions proceed via homogeneous with high species mobility and minimal overlap of reaction zones, contrasting with denser ; the required per pair (W-value) typically ranges from 25–35 , as seen in air or . Examples include the of (CH₄), where irradiation produces (H₂), (C₂H₆), and (C₂H₄) as primary decomposition products through C–H cleavage and recombination. In (SO₂)-containing gases, radiation enhances oxidation to precursors, useful for applications like treatment but demonstrating damage via unwanted byproduct formation. Yields are quantified by G-values (molecules per 100 absorbed) or ionization efficiencies, though these vary with (LET); low-LET radiation favors production over molecular products compared to high-LET particles. In liquids, damage arises from similar and but is amplified by the medium's , creating dense ionization tracks and short-lived "spurs" (radii ~10–100 ) where radicals form at high local concentrations, promoting recombination or diffusion-controlled reactions. dissociates molecules into transient that drive oxidative or reductive changes, with serving as the canonical example: under ⁶⁰Co γ-irradiation at 25°C, primary yields include G(eₐq⁻) = 2.65, G(●OH) = 2.80, G(H●) = 0.60, G(H₂) = 0.45, and G(H₂O₂) = 0.68 molecules/100 , reflecting the net G(–H₂O) ≈ 4.15. These —hydrated electrons (eₐq⁻), hydroxyl radicals (●OH), hydrogen atoms (H●), and molecular (H₂) or (H₂O₂)—propagate damage by abstracting hydrogen or adding to solutes, as in nuclear reactor coolant . Liquid-phase reactions differ from gases due to restricted and effects, yielding higher molecular product fractions under high-LET conditions (e.g., α-particles) via intraspur recombination; dependence alters G-values, with yields for eₐq⁻, ●OH, and H₂ increasing ~50% from 25°C to 300°C in γ-irradiated . In organic liquids like hydrocarbons, analogous processes form peroxides or cross-links, while ionic liquids exhibit tailored stability against radiolytic decomposition for advanced applications. Overall, liquid damage emphasizes localized chemistry, enabling both destructive effects (e.g., ) and synthetic utility (e.g., radiation-induced ).

Impacts on Electronic Devices and Semiconductors

Radiation damage to electronic devices and semiconductors primarily arises from two mechanisms: total ionizing dose (TID) effects, where ionizing radiation generates electron-hole pairs that become trapped in insulating layers, and displacement damage dose (DDD), where high-energy particles displace atoms from lattice sites, creating defects that degrade carrier transport. TID leads to parametric shifts such as increased leakage currents and threshold voltage alterations in metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), potentially causing functional failure after cumulative exposures on the order of 10-100 krad(Si). DDD predominantly affects bipolar junction transistors and optoelectronic devices by reducing minority carrier lifetime, with silicon devices showing significant degradation at fluences exceeding 10^12-10^14 neutrons/cm² depending on energy. In integrated circuits, TID induces oxide charge buildup, shifting flat-band voltage by up to several volts in unhardened technologies, which exacerbates power consumption and timing errors; for instance, commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) devices may fail at 50 krad() in low-Earth orbit environments. Displacement damage in lattices forms vacancy-interstitial pairs, reducing (h_FE) by factors of 10-100 in amplifiers under proton typical of (e.g., 10^11 protons/cm² at 50 MeV). Single event effects (SEE), a transient , include upsets flipping bits (SEU) at (LET) thresholds around 10-50 MeV·cm²/mg, leading to in without error correction. Nuclear reactor environments amplify these impacts through neutron fluxes causing bulk damage, with fast neutrons (E > 1 MeV) producing up to 10^15 per atom (dpa) over operational lifetimes, severely degrading power MOSFETs and diodes via increased on-resistance. In space, galactic cosmic rays and solar particle events contribute to SEE rates of 10^-3 to 10^-6 errors/device/day for geosynchronous orbits, as observed in anomalies since the 1970s. Combined effects in mixed radiation fields, such as those in reactors or Jupiter's , exhibit synergy where TID sensitizes devices to subsequent , accelerating failure beyond additive models. Wide-bandgap semiconductors like () and () demonstrate superior resilience, tolerating TID up to 1 Mrad(Si) with minimal threshold shifts due to lower displacement cross-sections, enabling their use in high-radiation missions such as NASA's . However, even hardened devices require techniques like silicon-on-insulator (SOI) structures to isolate active layers, reducing SEE susceptibility by isolating charge collection volumes.

Biological Effects

Cellular and Molecular Damage

Ionizing radiation damages cells by depositing energy that ionizes atoms in biomolecules, either directly or indirectly through the production of reactive species. Direct effects involve ionization of DNA, proteins, or lipids, leading to molecular disruptions such as strand breaks or cross-links. Indirect effects, predominant in hydrated cellular environments, arise from the radiolysis of water, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) like hydroxyl radicals (•OH), hydrogen radicals (•H), and hydrated electrons (e⁻_aq), which diffuse and react with nearby targets. Approximately two-thirds of cellular damage in mammalian cells stems from these indirect mechanisms due to the high water content (about 70-80%) in cytoplasm and nucleus. At the molecular level, DNA is the primary target, sustaining oxidative lesions to bases (e.g., 8-oxoguanine, thymine glycol), abasic sites, and phosphodiester backbone disruptions. Single-strand breaks (SSBs) occur frequently but are generally reparable, whereas double-strand breaks (DSBs)—where both strands are severed within 10-20 base pairs—are induced at yields of about 20-40 DSBs per gray per cell in fibroblasts and pose severe threats due to their potential for misrepair into translocations or deletions. Clustered , involving multiple lesions within a single helical turn (e.g., DSBs with adjacent base ), complicates repair and arises from high (LET) radiation like alpha particles, which deposit energy densely. Proteins undergo denaturation, fragmentation, or aggregation via radical-induced oxidation of (e.g., cysteine sulfhydryl groups forming disulfides) or direct , impairing enzymatic functions and signaling pathways. Lipids in membranes experience peroxidation, where •OH abstracts allylic hydrogens from polyunsaturated fatty acids, propagating chain reactions that compromise integrity and trigger inflammatory cascades. These molecular alterations collectively disrupt cellular , with DSBs and clustered lesions being the most cytotoxic, as evidenced by survival curves showing linear-quadratic dependence on dose for low-LET like X-rays.

Tissue and Organ Responses

Ionizing radiation primarily damages tissues and organs through deterministic effects, which occur above specific threshold absorbed doses and exhibit severity proportional to the dose received. These effects arise from the killing of parenchymal cells, disruption of vascular , and inflammatory responses, leading to impaired organ function such as , , ulceration, or . Tissues with high cell turnover rates, such as those in the and , manifest responses at lower doses (typically 1-10 ) compared to quiescent tissues like muscle or nerve (often >50 ). The Bergonié-Tribondeau law explains this : undifferentiated cells undergoing are most vulnerable due to their inability to repair damage efficiently before division. In the hematopoietic system, doses exceeding 1 suppress stem cells, causing within hours and subsequent , which compromises immunity and increases risk; at 2-6 , this contributes to the prodromal phase of . Gastrointestinal responses emerge above 6-10 , where cell sterilization leads to mucosal , , and barrier breakdown, potentially fatal without supportive care. exhibits at 2-6 due to vascular dilation and release, progressing to dry or moist and temporary epilation above 7 , with late possible. Lung tissue responds with 1-6 months post-exposure above 8-10 , characterized by alveolar inflammation and exudation from endothelial , potentially evolving into that reduces compliance. Renal effects, including glomerular sclerosis, occur above 10-20 , impairing filtration and leading to ; hepatic responses involve sinusoidal endothelial and veno-occlusive disease at similar thresholds. Neural tissues show limited acute responses due to low proliferation but vascular compromise at >50 can cause and . Ocular opacification (cataracts) develops deterministically above 0.5-2 , depending on , via epithelial and fiber disruption.
Relative SensitivityExamples of Tissues/OrgansTypical Threshold for Observable Effects (Gy, whole-body or local)
High, lymphoid organs, 1-2
Moderate, , , liver, /testis5-10
LowMuscle, , >30
These thresholds derive from human and animal data, with variability influenced by dose rate, fractionation, and individual factors like age. Late responses, such as progressive fibrosis from persistent inflammation and cytokine signaling (e.g., TGF-β), can manifest years later even after apparent recovery.

Acute Effects on Humans

Acute radiation syndrome (ARS), also known as radiation sickness, manifests in humans following acute whole-body exposure to ionizing radiation doses exceeding 0.7 gray (Gy), typically from external penetrating sources such as gamma rays or neutrons. Mild prodromal symptoms, including nausea and vomiting, may appear at doses as low as 0.3 Gy, though full ARS requires higher thresholds and affects a substantial portion of the body. The severity correlates directly with absorbed dose, with outcomes ranging from recoverable hematopoietic suppression at 1-2 Gy to rapid fatality from gastrointestinal or cerebrovascular damage at doses above 6 Gy. ARS progresses through four phases: prodromal, latent, manifest illness, and either recovery or death. The prodromal phase begins within minutes to days post-exposure, featuring transient , , and whose onset and incidence predict dose—e.g., in 100% of cases within 30 minutes at 6-8 , versus 10-50% after 2 hours at 1-2 . A latent phase follows, lasting hours to weeks with apparent improvement, during which cellular damage accumulates. The manifest phase then reveals organ-specific syndromes: hematopoietic (1-6 ), characterized by , granulocytopenia, , infections, and hemorrhage due to ablation; gastrointestinal (6-10 ), with severe , , , and from mucosal denudation; and neurovascular (>20 ), involving , seizures, , and from and vascular disruption. Lethality escalates with dose; the median lethal dose (LD50) without supportive care is approximately 3-4 Gy, rising to 6-8 Gy with medical intervention like antibiotics and transfusions, while doses exceeding 10 Gy approach 100% mortality within weeks due to multi-organ failure. Empirical data from accidents, such as the 1961 SL-1 reactor incident where victims received 4-6 Gy and succumbed to hematopoietic collapse, confirm these thresholds, underscoring radiation's causal role in depleting rapidly dividing cells and inducing inflammation via free radical-mediated DNA breaks. Skin erythema and epilation occur at 3-6 Gy localized doses, with burns at higher levels, but systemic ARS dominates whole-body effects. Recovery, when possible, involves repopulation of affected tissues but carries risks of secondary infections and long-term sequelae.

Chronic and Stochastic Effects on Humans

Chronic effects of on humans encompass late-appearing tissue reactions, such as , cataracts, and circulatory diseases, which typically manifest months to years after exposure and exhibit dose thresholds below which they are unlikely to occur. These differ from acute deterministic effects by their delayed onset but share a severity that escalates with increasing dose once the threshold—often estimated at 0.5 for cataracts and around 0.5–1 for cardiovascular risks—is exceeded. Evidence from cohorts like atomic bomb survivors indicates elevated rates of lens opacities and myocardial infarctions at doses above 1 , though thresholds remain debated due to factors like age and comorbidities. Stochastic effects, by contrast, lack a dose and involve probabilistic outcomes where the likelihood of harm rises linearly with under the linear no-threshold (LNT) model, while the severity of any resulting condition remains independent of dose. The primary stochastic risks are cancer , including leukemias appearing 2–10 years post-exposure and solid tumors after 10–40 years, with lifetime fatal cancer risk coefficients derived from Japanese atomic bomb survivors estimated at approximately 5% per for the general population. Hereditary effects, such as genetic mutations in offspring, show no conclusive evidence in human studies despite animal data suggesting potential, leading organizations like UNSCEAR to assign negligible population-level risks. Epidemiological data underpinning stochastic risk models primarily stem from high-dose exposures, such as the and bombings (peak doses >1 Sv) and (often >0.2 Sv), where excess relative risks for cancers like and were observed, with excess absolute risks of 0.004–0.006 per for solid cancers. Low-dose extrapolations (<100 mSv) rely on LNT assumptions, as direct human evidence is limited and confounded by lifestyle factors; occupational studies of nuclear workers exposed to chronic low doses (mean ~20 mSv over lifetime) have not consistently shown elevated cancer incidence, with some analyses indicating risks compatible with zero or even protective effects. UNSCEAR's 2020/2021 assessment highlights biological mechanisms like DNA double-strand breaks and genomic instability as plausible for low-dose carcinogenesis but notes uncertainties in bystander effects and adaptive responses that challenge strict linearity. Circulatory diseases represent a borderline category, with evidence from Mayak workers and atomic bomb survivors linking doses >0.5 to increased and heart disease mortality, potentially via inflammatory or atherosclerotic pathways, though classification as or deterministic remains unresolved due to possible thresholds. Overall detriment calculations by ICRP incorporate cancer risks (weighted at 5% fatal incidence per ) alongside non-fatal outcomes, emphasizing that while high-dose data are robust, low-dose projections involve model-dependent inferences without direct causal verification in humans.

Debates on Low-Dose Risks and Risk Models

The linear no-threshold (LNT) model posits that the risk of stochastic effects, such as cancer, increases linearly with radiation dose from zero, implying no safe exposure level and justifying regulatory limits based on proportionality. Adopted post-World War II from high-dose atomic bomb survivor data extrapolated downward, the LNT framework underpins guidelines from bodies like the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and International Commission on Radiological Protection, despite lacking direct empirical validation below 100 millisieverts (mSv). Critics argue this extrapolation ignores cellular repair mechanisms, DNA damage thresholds, and adaptive responses observed in vitro and in vivo, rendering LNT biologically implausible for low doses where natural background radiation (around 2-3 mSv annually) has not precluded life's evolution. Epidemiological evidence fuels the debate, with atomic bomb survivor studies (Life Span Study cohort) showing no statistically significant cancer excess below 100-200 mSv, challenging LNT's prediction of proportional risk; instead, risks appear confined to higher acute exposures. Nuclear worker cohorts, such as the INWORKS study of over 300,000 individuals, report a 52% increased solid cancer mortality per gray (Gy) at low chronic doses (<100 mSv), supporting LNT linearity, yet these findings rely on statistical aggregation prone to confounding by lifestyle factors and lack individual dose precision below 50 mSv. In contrast, the U.S. Million Person Study, analyzing over 1 million low-dose workers and veterans with cumulative exposures averaging 40 mSv, has preliminarily indicated no elevated cancer rates and potential deficits in some malignancies, aligning with threshold or hormetic models. Alternative models propose a threshold below which risks do not increase—or even decrease via hormesis, where low doses (e.g., 10-100 mSv) stimulate DNA repair, apoptosis of damaged cells, and immune activation, yielding net protective effects against spontaneous cancers. Laboratory data, including reduced tumor incidence in irradiated animals at low doses, and ecological correlations (e.g., lower cancer in high-background areas like ) bolster hormesis, though human epidemiology struggles with detection due to low signal-to-noise ratios and ethical limits on experimentation. Proponents of LNT cite precautionary conservatism, but detractors highlight its failure in toxicological benchmarks—overpredicting risks without adaptive responses—and resultant societal costs, including radiophobia and foregone benefits from low-dose applications like radiology. Ongoing analyses, such as the 's morbidity endpoints, may clarify these discrepancies, potentially shifting paradigms toward evidence-based thresholds.

Contexts and Applications

In Nuclear Energy and Reactors

In nuclear reactors, radiation damage to materials predominantly results from fast neutron bombardment, which displaces atoms from lattice sites, generating primary knock-on atoms that create cascades of vacancies and interstitials. These defects migrate, coalesce into dislocation loops, voids, and precipitates, altering microstructure and mechanical properties such as increased hardness, reduced ductility, and dimensional instability. The extent of damage is quantified using displacements per atom (dpa), a metric representing the average number of atomic displacements per target atom, calculated via models like the Norgett-Robinson-Torrens (NRT) standard, though advanced athermal recombination-corrected variants (arc-dpa) account for defect annihilation more accurately. In light-water reactors, core components may accumulate 1–100 dpa over operational lifetimes, with fuel experiencing higher rates due to proximity to fission events. Reactor pressure vessels (RPVs), typically low-alloy steels, suffer irradiation embrittlement, where neutron fluences shift the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature upward by 50–150°C after exposures equivalent to 0.1–1 dpa, potentially limiting plant life without annealing or replacement. This hardening arises from defect clusters and copper precipitate formation in older alloys, as observed in surveillance programs monitoring Charpy impact energy reductions. Fuel cladding, often zirconium alloys like , undergoes irradiation growth, creep acceleration, and delayed hydrogen embrittlement, with dpa levels reaching 5–15 in pressurized water reactors (PWRs), exacerbating pellet-cladding interaction under power transients. Void swelling in austenitic stainless steels of core internals, peaking at 10–20% volume increase after 20–50 dpa, further compromises structural integrity by promoting creep and stress corrosion. These effects necessitate conservative design margins and post-irradiation examinations, with Generation IV reactors targeting advanced alloys like oxide-dispersion-strengthened steels to withstand higher dpa (>100) for extended fuel cycles. Historical data from U.S. PWRs indicate RPV embrittlement as a retirement driver for units exceeding 40 years, though regulatory fluence limits (e.g., 10^19 n/cm² for >1 MeV neutrons) mitigate risks without direct accident causation. Ongoing research emphasizes cascade simulations to predict damage beyond simple dpa, revealing underestimation in traditional models by up to 30% due to unaccounted recombination.

In Space Radiation Environments

Space radiation environments expose spacecraft and crews to ionizing particles from multiple sources, including galactic cosmic rays (GCR), which consist of high-energy heavy ions from supernovae and other extragalactic origins traveling at near-light speeds; solar particle events (SPE), bursts of protons and lighter ions ejected during solar flares and coronal mass ejections; and trapped radiation in magnetospheric belts like Earth's Van Allen belts, where the inner belt is dominated by protons from cosmic ray interactions with the atmosphere and the outer by electrons. These components vary by mission profile: low-Earth orbit (LEO) missions such as the International Space Station (ISS) benefit partial shielding from Earth's magnetosphere, receiving annual effective doses of 215–310 millisieverts (mSv), while deep-space trajectories beyond LEO, as in Mars transit, encounter unmitigated GCR fluxes yielding estimated cruise doses of approximately 1.3 mSv per day. Radiation damage to electronic systems arises primarily through total ionizing dose (TID) effects, where cumulative charge deposition in insulators increases leakage currents and shifts thresholds in devices like transistors, potentially degrading performance after exposures equivalent to 12 kilorads behind 120-mil aluminum shielding; displacement damage, which knocks atoms from sites in semiconductors and solar cells, causing up to 50% efficiency loss in ; and single-event effects (SEE), such as upsets from GCR heavy ions flipping bits in or latchups triggering destructive currents in power circuits. Historical events, including October-November 2003 X-class solar flares, demonstrated these risks by necessitating safing maneuvers on multiple due to elevated particle fluxes penetrating shielding. Material degradation in space manifests as embrittlement and microcracking in composites from displacements and scission in matrices, alongside surface and optical property alterations in coatings exposed to high-energy electrons and protons in regions like the . For biological tissues, these radiations induce dense ionization tracks that fragment strands, elevating mutagenesis and carcinogenesis risks; Apollo lunar missions recorded transit doses of 0.16–1.14 mSv per day with no observed acute syndromes, yet epidemiological analysis of lunar astronauts indicates elevated mortality potentially linked to vascular endothelial damage from deep-space exposure. Projected Mars round-trip missions could deliver 300–600 mSv effective dose, approaching NASA's 600 mSv career limit calibrated to a 3% excess lifetime cancer mortality risk, compounded by uncertainties in heavy-ion quality factors exceeding proton-based terrestrial models.

In Medical and Therapeutic Uses

Ionizing radiation is employed in radiotherapy to intentionally induce cellular damage in malignant tissues, primarily by generating reactive oxygen species and directly ionizing DNA molecules, resulting in double-strand breaks that impair replication and trigger cell death pathways such as apoptosis or mitotic catastrophe. This approach exploits the relative sensitivity of rapidly dividing cancer cells, which exhibit reduced capacity for DNA repair compared to most normal cells, though healthy tissues in the radiation field inevitably sustain collateral damage. Doses typically range from 40 to 70 Gray (Gy) delivered over multiple fractions—often 1.8 to 2 Gy per session across 20 to 35 treatments—to maximize tumor kill while permitting sublethal repair in normal tissues via mechanisms like non-homologous end joining. External beam radiotherapy, utilizing photons from linear accelerators or protons, directs high-energy beams to precisely target tumors, minimizing exposure to surrounding organs; proton therapy further reduces integral dose to healthy tissue due to its Bragg peak deposition profile, where energy release culminates sharply at depth. Brachytherapy involves placing sealed radioactive sources, such as iridium-192, proximate to the tumor for localized high-dose delivery, as in cervical or prostate cancer treatments, achieving dose rates up to several Gy per hour while limiting scatter to adjacent structures. In systemic applications like radioiodine therapy for thyroid cancer, beta-emitting isotopes such as iodine-131 are administered orally, selectively concentrating in thyroid tissue to deliver cumulative doses of 100-200 Gy, inducing follicular cell destruction through beta particle-induced free radical formation. Damage to non-target tissues manifests acutely as , , and —peaking within 2-4 weeks of treatment due to changes and release—or chronically as , , and from progressive vascular sclerosis and depletion, with risks escalating nonlinearly above thresholds like 45-50 for or 60 for . Late stochastic effects include secondary malignancies, with models estimating a 1% per risk for solid tumors arising 10-20 years post-exposure in irradiated fields. Mitigation strategies emphasize conformal techniques like intensity-modulated (IMRT) to sculpt dose distributions, hypoxic cell sensitizers to enhance tumor-specific lethality, and schedules informed by linear-quadratic models predicting cell survival as S = e^{-(\alpha D + \beta D^2)}, where \alpha and \beta parameters differentiate tissue repair kinetics. Despite advances, the remains constrained by inherent variations and microenvironmental factors like tumor , which confer resistance via upregulated pathways.

Mitigation and Countermeasures

Engineering and Material Strategies

Engineering strategies to mitigate radiation damage emphasize , microstructural engineering, and shielding designs that enhance resistance to cascades, embrittlement, and swelling caused by high-energy particles. In reactors, nanostructured materials incorporating boundaries, boundaries, and dislocations act as defect sinks to recombine radiation-induced vacancies and interstitials, thereby reducing long-term degradation. Oxide-dispersion-strengthened alloys, such as those with yttria nanoparticles, maintain mechanical integrity under neutron fluxes exceeding 10^{21} n/cm² by pinning dislocations and inhibiting void formation. Layered ceramic composites, including alternating thin films of materials like and , improve radiation tolerance by distributing damage across interfaces, which absorb and dissipate energy from cascades more effectively than monolithic structures. These approaches have demonstrated up to 50% higher post-irradiation compared to conventional ceramics in tests at doses simulating 60-year operation. For electronics in radiation environments, hardening techniques involve shielding layers of aluminum or lead equivalents, alongside redundancy and error-correcting architectures to counteract single-event upsets from ionizing particles. Shielding strategies prioritize low-atomic-number rich in , such as or , to moderate neutrons and fragment heavy ions via , minimizing secondary radiation production. In space applications, multilayer composites incorporating lithium-6 borohydrides offer superior of galactic cosmic rays, achieving dose reductions of 30-40% over aluminum alone at energies up to 1 GeV/. Reactor vessel designs incorporate boron-doped steels and liners to capture thermal neutrons, while advanced concepts like coolants (e.g., lead-bismuth eutectic) provide self-shielding and resistance under fluxes of 10^{14} n/cm²/s. These innovations, validated through simulations, extend component lifetimes and reduce maintenance needs in high-radiation settings.

Biological and Pharmacological Interventions

Pharmacological interventions for radiation damage primarily encompass radioprotectors, which reduce direct cellular damage when administered prior to or during exposure, and radiomitigators, which stimulate recovery processes after exposure. Amifostine (WR-2721), a thiol compound and the only FDA-approved radioprotector, selectively protects normal tissues by scavenging free radicals and donating hydrogen atoms to repair DNA, while exhibiting limited uptake in tumors due to its dependence on alkaline phosphatase expression. Clinical trials in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy demonstrated that intravenous amifostine at 340 mg/m² reduced severe xerostomia incidence from 78% to 51% at one year post-treatment, though it carries risks of hypotension and nausea at protective doses exceeding 500 mg/m². Its efficacy in whole-body protection remains limited by toxicity, with ongoing research exploring oral formulations and nanoparticle delivery to enhance bioavailability and reduce side effects. Radiomitigators target post-exposure recovery, particularly for hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (HARS) following doses above 2 Gy. Filgrastim (Neupogen), a recombinant G-CSF, accelerates neutrophil recovery by stimulating bone marrow progenitor proliferation; FDA approval in 2015 for HARS was based on animal models showing 24% absolute survival increase when administered within 24 hours post-exposure for up to 3 weeks. Clinical guidelines recommend subcutaneous doses of 5-10 μg/kg daily starting as soon as possible after suspected exposure ≥2 Gy, with pegfilgrastim as an alternative for prolonged action. Sargramostim (Leukine), a GM-CSF analog, similarly boosts multilineage hematopoiesis and was FDA-approved for HARS in 2021, offering additive benefits in combined cytokine regimens for severe myelosuppression. These agents do not prevent initial DNA damage but mitigate lethality by restoring immune function, though efficacy diminishes if delayed beyond 48-72 hours. Biological interventions leverage endogenous repair mechanisms, with and therapies showing promise in preclinical and early clinical settings. such as (SCF) and interleukin-12 (IL-12) enhance survival in murine models by mobilizing hematopoietic s and modulating immune responses, though human translation is limited to supportive roles in chemotherapy-radiation combos. Mesenchymal s (MSCs), derived from or , mitigate radiation-induced skin injury (RISI) and damage via paracrine effects, including secretion and extracellular vesicle-mediated tissue regeneration; rodent studies reported 50-70% reduction in when MSCs were administered post-irradiation. Human trials for RISI, such as intravenous MSC infusions post-radiotherapy, have demonstrated improved and reduced ulceration in phase I/II studies, but long-term engraftment and tumorigenicity risks necessitate further validation. Emerging approaches include MSC-derived extracellular vesicles, which replicate protective effects without cell transplantation risks, showing reversal of damage in animal models exposed to 7-9 .

Recent Advances in Research and Protection

In biological countermeasures, novel radioprotective agents have emerged from recent studies. Licochalcone B, a derivative, has been identified as a promising compound for mitigating radiation-induced cellular damage via pathways and inhibition of inflammatory responses, with preclinical data from 2024 showing reduced DNA strand breaks and in irradiated models. Similarly, Humanetics Corporation's BIO 300, an oral small-molecule drug, advanced in development through 2024 Phase 2 trials, demonstrating prophylaxis against by preserving lung tissue integrity and reducing in non-human primates exposed to 9-10 total body irradiation. , a ginger-derived , exhibited radioprotective effects in 2023 investigations by scavenging free radicals and modulating signaling cascades, though human trials remain pending. Advances in shielding materials target and environments. Multifunctional composites with plasma-deposited coatings achieved superior absorption (up to 90% attenuation for s) while maintaining high (>200 MPa) in 2024 simulation tests, outperforming traditional shields without added mass. /lead hybrid polymers provided effective mitigation in experimental setups, with lead nanoparticles enhancing for high-energy ions by 25-30% compared to pure . Lead-free alternatives, including oxide-embedded polymers, reduced transmission by 40-50% in 2024 reviews of shielding prototypes, addressing toxicity concerns while matching density-based performance. Gadolinium-doped composites further improved cross-sections (up to 49,000 barns) for reactor applications. Mechanistic research informs protection strategies, particularly for low-dose exposures. Studies in 2024 confirmed adaptive responses at doses below 100 mGy, including upregulated enzymes (e.g., PARP-1 activation) and immune enhancements via modulation, suggesting non-linear damage thresholds that contradict strict linear no-threshold assumptions. U.S. priorities outlined in 2023 emphasize funding for tissue-specific low-dose effects, integrating and bystander signaling to refine risk models. Computational advances, including AI-driven validated in 2025 agendas, enable precise shielding optimizations, reducing overdesign in habitats by 15-20% through real-time flux predictions. These developments prioritize empirical validation over precautionary biases in legacy models.

References

  1. [1]
    Lecture 27: Nuclear Materials—Radiation Damage and Effects in ...
    The concept of ionizing radiation creating nuclear displacements, not just electron ionization, is introduced as the first event in radiation damage. The ...
  2. [2]
    Primary radiation damage: A review of current understanding and ...
    Dec 15, 2018 · ... radiation damage in materials. It is often defined in a very simple form, as the minimum recoil energy given to an atom in a material needed ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Radiation Damage and DPA MCNPX and DPA Calculations ...
    Radiation damage in materials results from nuclear collisions and reactions which produce energetic recoil atoms of the host material or reaction products.<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    [PDF] NUCLEAR AND SPACE RADIATION EFFECTS ON MATERIALS
    Radiation affects mechanical properties like tensile strength, thermal properties like thermal conductivity, and optical properties such as emissivity.
  5. [5]
    Radiation Damage to Materials - Sandia National Laboratories
    Aug 10, 2021 · Radiation damage studies require us to model the evolution of radiation damage beyond the primary defects, i.e., to study defect evolution.
  6. [6]
    Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Biological Molecules—Mechanisms ...
    Radiation induces lipid peroxidation, particularly the peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), leading to an increase in membrane permeability, ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] 5. mechanisms of biological effects
    Ionizing radiation can cause damage to cells, DNA, and cell walls. DNA damage and cell wall destruction are likely bases for lethality.
  8. [8]
    Primary Radiation Damage Formation - UNT Digital Library
    Sep 12, 2025 · The formation and evolution of this primary radiation damage mechanism are described to provide an overview of how stable defects are formed ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Primary Radiation Damage in Materials - INIS-IAEA
    The damage production can in most cases be divided into two categories: the primary damage that is formed immediately (within a few picoseconds) after the ion/ ...
  10. [10]
    Mechanisms of Radiation Damage 1 - DoITPoMS
    At lower energies, the neutron collision causes the nucleus to vibrate, but the nucleus is not displaced. The excess energy is dissipated through the lattice as ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Basic Mechanisms: Displacement Damage
    Jun 7, 2019 · As charged particles travel through the semiconductor lattice, they lose energy through ionizing and nonionizing processes. • Ionizing processes ...
  12. [12]
    Radiation Damage Mechanisms → Term
    Feb 28, 2025 · Ionization occurs when radiation removes electrons from atoms, creating ions. Displacement damage happens when atoms are knocked out of their ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Radiation Damage of Electronic and Optoelectronic Devices in Space
    Although ionizing radiation causes some damage in optoelectronic devices, in almost every case (other than optical fibers) displacement damage is the dominant ...
  14. [14]
    Radiation Effects in Solids | SpringerLink
    This book covers radiation damage fundamentals, energetic particles, atomic displacements, defect aggregation, and material-dependent damage phenomena in  ...
  15. [15]
    Radiation Damage - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Radiation damage refers to the harmful effects on living tissues caused by exposure to ionizing radiation, which can lead to changes, damage, or destruction ...
  16. [16]
    Basic Principles of Radiation Biology - NCBI - NIH
    There are two general types of biological effects from ionizing radiation: deterministic effects and stochastic effects. Stochastic effects are those effects ...
  17. [17]
    Fundamentals of Water Radiolysis - MDPI
    Radiolysis of water and aqueous solutions refers to the decomposition of water and its solutions under exposure to ionizing radiation.
  18. [18]
    Radiolysis - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Radiolysis consists in a series of phenomena by which molecules are destabilized by ionizing irradiation particles such as phonons, electrons or heavy ions, ...
  19. [19]
    The History of Radiation - Mirion Technologies
    The modern understanding of ionizing radiation got its start in 1895 with Wilhelm Röntgen. In the process of conducting various experiments in applying ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Significant Discoveries and the History of Radiation Protection | EPA
    Throughout the 1920s and 1930s more guidelines were developed, scientists were studying the effects of radiation on living organisms, and various organizations ...
  21. [21]
    The history of radiation use in medicine - ScienceDirect.com
    Thomas Edison, William J. Morton, and Nikola Tesla each were among the first to report possible adverse effects when they discovered eye irritations after ...
  22. [22]
    Genetic Effects of Radiation - NCBI - NIH
    The mutagenic effects of radiation were first recognized in the 1920s, and since that time radiation has been used in genetic research as an important means of ...
  23. [23]
    Radiation Chemistry and Radiation Research: A History from the ...
    Aug 1, 2024 · By 1928 there were numerous papers describing the phenomenological effects of ionizing radiation on a wide variety of materials, including the ...
  24. [24]
    Radiation Damage and its Study
    Aug 9, 2000 · Serious efforts to understand and control radiation exposures started in the 1920s and greatly expanded during and after World War II.
  25. [25]
    Historical review of computer simulation of radiation effects in ...
    In this article, I review the development of computer simulation techniques for studying radiation effects in materials from 1946 until 2018.
  26. [26]
    NUCLEAR RADIATION EFFECTS IN SOLIDS By H. BROOKS
    Fission damage in the graphite was found to be inversely pro portional to particle diameter for small particles. Changes in properties re sembled those observed ...
  27. [27]
    Estimated values of averaged displacement threshold energy E d ...
    Displacement energies for V, Cr Fe and W of 57, 40, 40 and 70 eV [32] , respectively, were used in the "ion distribution and quick calculation of damage" mode.
  28. [28]
    Full article: Ab initio threshold displacement energies in iron
    The threshold displacement energy in iron is determined using ab initio molecular dynamics. This is the most fundamental input parameter for radiation damage ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Primary Radiation Damage in Materials - INIS-IAEA
    This report reviews the current understanding of primary radiation damage from neutrons, ions and electrons (excluding photons, atomic clusters and more exotic ...
  30. [30]
    Systematic study of displacement threshold and the near-threshold ...
    Displacement damage, or primary radiation damage, is conventionally used to quantify radiation damage with the unit of Displacement per Atom (DPA) [8]. Atomic ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Neutron Embrittlement, Void Swelling, and Irradiation Creep.
    Phase change: Radiation-induced formation of second phases can remove elements such as Ni, P, and Si, which are known to decrease swelling, from the alloy ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] A Critical Review of Irradiation-Induced Changes in Reactor ...
    This paper highlights key aspects of the behavior of RPV steels under irradiation, identifies gaps or discrepancies in current understandings, and identifies ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] A Physically Based Correlation of Irradiation-Induced Transition ...
    The new model includes the variables copper, nickel, and fluence that are in RG1.99/2, but also includes irradiation temperature, neutron flux, phosphorus, and ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Influence of high dose irradiation on core structural and fuel ...
    Bainitic alloys develop severe hardening due to irradiation-induced precipitation ... Cr-Ni ternary alloys on dpa, irradiation temperature and composition [7,8].<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    RADIATION EFFECTS IN STRUCTURAL MATERIALS
    Mar 24, 2025 · Dimensional Changes Induced by Radiation. There are three important radiation effects characterized by dimensional changes in metals and alloys.
  36. [36]
    Influence of the austenitic stainless steel microstructure on the void ...
    This alloy should be able to sustain doses up to 100–110 displacements per atom (dpaNRT). New austenitic alloys could be designed to reach higher doses, 120–130 ...
  37. [37]
    Swelling and radiation-induced segregation in austentic alloys
    Since measurements have shown that swelling in austenitic stainless steels ultimately reaches a terminal rate of 1%/dpa, any effect of segregation on swelling ...
  38. [38]
    Role of low-level void swelling on plasticity and failure in a 33 dpa ...
    At >10% swelling, drastic degradation in ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was observed in neutron-irradiated austenitic stainless steels. However, there is no ...
  39. [39]
    (PDF) Review of Irradiation Hardening and Embrittlement Effects in ...
    Jun 14, 2019 · A comprehensive literature review was conducted to determine the effects of low-fluence neutron irradiation of pure and alloyed Mo and W.
  40. [40]
    An Introduction to Radiation Damage in Minerals and Ceramics ...
    Mar 16, 2023 · In this presentation, we will focus on the atomistic mechanisms responsible for radiation damage in minerals and ceramics, when energetic particles lose energy ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Summary of radiation effects on thermionic insulator materials
    A brief summary of basic radiation-damage mechanisms for the oxides is also included. ject, especially that published during the last 5 years or so, it is ...
  42. [42]
    Neutron irradiation effects of ceramics insulator - INIS-IAEA
    Neutron irradiation generally cause swelling and extension of ceramic materials. Swelling occurs over a wide temperature range. In Al2O3 and BeO, swelling ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Radiation-induced changes in the physical properties of ceramic ...
    Radiation can cause changes in electrical conductivity, loss tangent, thermal conductivity, mechanical strength, and volumetric swelling in ceramics.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Review Irradiation-Induced Amorphous-to-Crystalline Phase ...
    Aug 27, 2022 · Ceramics are exposed to extreme irradiation environments in numerous applica- tions, including nuclear fuels and claddings, immobilizing and ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Radiation-Induced Effects on Materials Properties of Ceramics - HAL
    May 13, 2020 · ... radiation damage mechanism with high density electronic excitation. SHI irradiation induces ion tracks in CeO2,37,78,79 YSZ 80 and UO2.81 ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Damage Development in Neutron-Irradiated Concrete in a Test ...
    The high neutron fluence causes metamictization and RIVE in the aggregates that are much larger than those observed during thermal expansion or alkali-silica.
  47. [47]
    Radiation Effects in Concrete for Nuclear Systems | ORNL
    Aug 1, 2020 · Among those, the concrete biological shield is exposed to high levels of neutron and gamma irradiation exiting the reactor pressure vessel.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] The Effects of Nuclear Radiation on the Mechanical Properties of ...
    Neutron radiation with a fluence of rrore than 1 x 1o 19 n/cm may have a detrimental effect on concrete strength and rrodulus of elasticity.
  49. [49]
    Review of Radiation-Induced Concrete Degradation and Potential ...
    Aug 27, 2021 · The synergistic effects of neutron and gamma radiation on concrete are not known at this time. Most of the reviewed neutron irradiation data ...
  50. [50]
    Damage development in neutron-irradiated concrete in a test reactor
    This irradiation can result in severe cracking and damage in the concrete, potentially impacting its structural capacity and ability to perform its shielding ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] an analysis of radiation induced stress in glass and ceramics
    Irradiation at the levels anticipated in HLW forms is known to cause measurable density changes in waste form materials: ceramics swell under irradiation, while.
  52. [52]
    Effect of structural disorder induced by external irradiation ... - Nature
    Jun 17, 2024 · The irradiation of glass by heavy ions induces structural damage, generally leading to a decrease in its chemical durability whose amplitude strongly depends ...
  53. [53]
    Combined effects of radiation damage and He accumulation in Y 2 ...
    Zirconolite glass-ceramics irradiated with 21 MeV Au showed the crystalline to amorphous phase transformation at a very low fluence, and the phase separation ...Combined Effects Of... · 3. Result · 3.1. Structural Modification...
  54. [54]
    Polymerization Reactions and Modifications of Polymers by Ionizing ...
    Ionizing radiation has become the most effective way to modify natural and synthetic polymers through crosslinking, degradation, and graft polymerization.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] IONIZING RADIATION-INDUCED CROSSLINKING AND ...
    Ionizing radiation causes chain branching, crosslinking, and degradation in polymers. Crosslinking forms insoluble networks, while degradation reduces ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] RADIATION-INDUCED OXIDATION OF POLYMERS
    The degradation of polymers due to post-irradiation effects results from the reactions of residual radicals with oxygen in the air [8]. Free radicals trapped in ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Advances in radiation chemistry of polymers
    well as radiation degradation of polymers are all similar chain reactions. As such, these processes consist of several steps of: chain initiation, chain ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] RADIATION EFFECTS ON POLYMERS - researchportal.sckcen.be.
    The first part gives an overview off the effects of ionising radiation on polymers. It also deals with some définitions and parameters often used in radiation ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Radiation Effects on Polymer Materials Commonly Used in Medical ...
    Nov 19, 2021 · Its goal is to better understand the mechanisms underlying radiation effects from gamma, e-beam, and X-ray irradiation of polymers and to ...
  60. [60]
    Radiation effects in gases - ScienceDirect.com
    Problems in the studies of radiation effects in gases are discussed. By means of ionization-, excitation- and electron-capture yields various applications ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Radiation Chemistry - KTH
    RADIATION EFFECTS ON GASES,. LIQUIDS AND SOLIDS. ○ Gas: Low density, high mobility. ○ Liquid: High density, intermediate mobility. ○ Solid: High density, low ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    [PDF] 4. Radiation chemistry of liquid systems 4.1.Techniques in radiation ...
    The chief difference between radiation chemistry and photochemistry lies in the energy of the radiation which initiates the reaction, the energy of the ...
  63. [63]
    g-Values for γ-irradiated water as a function of temperature
    The g-values for the hydrated electron, the hydroxyl radical, and molecular hydrogen all increase approximately 50% over this temperature range.
  64. [64]
    [PDF] RADIATION CHEMISTRY OF LIQUID SYSTEMS
    This chapter is divided into four main sections: “Introduction”, “Radiolysis of water”, “Radiolysis of or- ganic solvents”, and “Radiolysis of ionic liquids”.
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Compendium of Total Ionizing Dose and Displacement Damage ...
    Flight electronics can be directly affected by ionizing radiation in the form of total ionizing dose (TID) and single event effects (SEE), while displacement ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Total Ionizing Dose and Displacement Damage Effects in ... - OSTI.gov
    This course reviews the fundamental threats posed by cumulative radiation damage to solid state material and devices used in embedded memory. These radiation ...
  67. [67]
    Total Ionizing Dose and Displacement-Damage Effects in ...
    The buildup of displacement damage with radiation exposure causes gradual but permanent changes in device performance and limits device lifetime in a radiation ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Radiation Effects on Electronics 101 - NASA NEPP
    Radiation can cause degradation of thermal, electrical, optical properties, structural integrity, biasing of readings, power drains, and physical damage.
  69. [69]
    Total Ionizing Dose (TID) Effects on Electronics
    The effects of total ionizing dose in electronics appear as a parametric degradation that leads to functional failure.
  70. [70]
    Radiation effects on electronic devices in space - ScienceDirect.com
    This paper focuses on the Single Event Effects (SEE) at the origin of most observed in-flight anomalies. Insight on the underlying physical mechanisms and ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Space Radiation Environment, Effects, and Mitigation
    Oct 22, 2008 · Space radiation includes trapped electrons/protons, solar events, and cosmic rays. It causes cumulative and single-event effects in electronics ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    [PDF] combined radiation enviroment damage in electronic devices - TRTR
    Combined radiation damage in electronics may be higher than the sum of individual damage due to synergistic effects, where the combined effect differs from ...
  73. [73]
    Space Radiation Effects on Electronic Components in Low-Earth Orbit
    Space radiation can cause degradation and failure of electronic systems, including single event upsets (SEU) and bit errors in storage devices. Using non-rad- ...
  74. [74]
    Displacement Damage, Total Ionizing Dose, and Transient ...
    In this work, we expose GAAs to a variety of surrogate radiation environments, and model relevant space radiation effects.<|control11|><|separator|>
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Radiation Hardened Electronics for Extreme Environments
    Three approaches are being taken to address radiation hardening: improved material hardness, design techniques to improve radiation tolerance, and software.
  76. [76]
    How to Prevent Another Europa Clipper Transistor Panic
    Oct 15, 2024 · Radiation hardening methods work by impeding the movement of these excited electrons. SOI designs add a layer of an insulator like silicon oxide ...
  77. [77]
    Key molecular DNA damage responses of human cells to radiation
    Jul 10, 2024 · These radicals and oxidative stress molecules lead to either direct or indirect oxidative DNA damage, resulting in various cellular survival ...
  78. [78]
    Ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage, response, and repair
    Jul 10, 2014 · IR-induced DNA damage activates a number of DRR signaling cascades that control cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and the cell's fate.
  79. [79]
    Repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks by ...
    One of the major pathways for the repair of IR-induced DSBs in mammalian cells is non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ).
  80. [80]
    Biological Consequences of Radiation-induced DNA Damage
    Ionising radiation creates significant levels of clustered DNA damage, including complex double-strand breaks (DSB), to kill tumour cells.
  81. [81]
    Radiation‐induced tissue damage and response - PMC
    Normal tissue responses to ionizing radiation have been a major subject for study since the discovery of X‐rays at the end of the 19th century.
  82. [82]
    Radiosensitivity of Organs and Tissues [MOE]
    Mar 31, 2022 · Actively dividing cells that are less differentiated tend to show higher radiosensitivity. For example, hematopoietic stem cells in bone ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Biological Effects of Radiation - Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    Radiation is an example of a physical mutagenic agent. There are also many chemical agents as well as biological agents (such as viruses) that cause mutations.
  84. [84]
    SUMMARY OF HEALTH EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION - NCBI
    High doses of ionizing radiation can lead to various effects, such as skin burns, hair loss, birth defects, illness, cancer, and death. The basic principle of ...
  85. [85]
    About Health Effects of Radiation - CDC
    Feb 19, 2024 · However, widespread cell death, such as that caused by high radiation doses, can lead to organ failure and, ultimately, death. High doses of ...
  86. [86]
    Ionizing radiation and health effects
    Jul 27, 2023 · Radiation damage to tissue and/or organs depends on the dose of radiation received, or the absorbed dose which is expressed in a unit called the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Table 5-1, Relative Sensitivities of Major Organs and Tissues ... - NCBI
    Table 5-1Relative Sensitivities of Major Organs and Tissues to the Effects of Ionizing Radiation ; High · Gastrointestinal · Gastric mucosa ; High · Renal, Urinary ...
  88. [88]
  89. [89]
    Acute Radiation Syndrome: Information for Clinicians - CDC
    The radiation dose must be large (i.e., greater than 0.7 Gray (Gy)A or 70 radsB). Mild symptoms may be observed with doses as low as 0.3 Gy or 30 rads. The dose ...
  90. [90]
    Time Phases of Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS)
    ARS time phases and approximate whole body dose from exposure: 1-2 Gy · Onset: 2 hours after exposure or later · Percent of victims who vomit at this dose: ~10-50 ...
  91. [91]
    Time Phases of Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS)
    ARS time phases and approximate whole body dose from exposure: 6-8 Gy · Onset: <30 minutes after exposure · Percent of victims who vomit at this dose: 100%.
  92. [92]
    Medical management of the acute radiation syndrome - PMC
    The gastrointestinal syndrome typically develops within five days of the initial exposure. At doses < 1.5 Gy, only the prodromal phase of nausea, vomiting, and ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] A Brochure for Physicians: Acute Radiation Syndrome - CDC
    ° Mild symptoms may be observed with doses as low as 0.3 Gy or. 30 rads. • The dose usually must be external (i.e., the source of radiation is outside of the ...
  94. [94]
  95. [95]
    Threshold Doses for Tissue Reactions in a Radiation ... - ICRP
    This report provides a review of early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs with respect to radiation protection.
  96. [96]
    Long-term effects of radiation exposure on health - ScienceDirect
    Aug 7, 2015 · At high doses, and possibly at low doses, radiation might increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and some other non-cancer diseases.Missing: chronic | Show results with:chronic
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation - the UNSCEAR
    ... ionizing radiation causes observed health effects, such as severe haematopoietic or gastrointestinal damage, skin burns and ulcers. These so-called ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation - the UNSCEAR
    Sep 16, 2022 · generalizations of three recent cancer models that account for the joint maintenance and renewal of stem and transit cells. A particular ...
  99. [99]
    Cancer Risk of Low Dose Ionizing Radiation - Frontiers
    In this review we aim, through the collected epidemiological and experimental studies' data, to address the central questions in radiological protection.
  100. [100]
    The scientific nature of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model used in ...
    Sep 2, 2024 · This idea was discarded for stochastic effects when more knowledge was gained about the mechanisms of radiation-induced cancer. Currently, a key ...
  101. [101]
    Task Group 123 Classification of Harmful Radiation-induced ... - ICRP
    The classification of health effects into two distinct categories, tissue reactions and stochastic effects, directly underpins the implementation of the system ...Missing: chronic | Show results with:chronic
  102. [102]
    Radiation Hormesis: Historical Perspective and Implications for Low ...
    With the LNT model even a very small dose could cause cancer and the model is used in establishing guidelines for limiting radiation exposure of humans. A slope ...
  103. [103]
    The linear no-threshold model is less realistic than threshold or ...
    Mar 1, 2019 · The LNT model is biologically unrealistic compared to threshold and hormetic models. If LNT were correct, the evolution of life on Earth would not have been ...
  104. [104]
    Linear non-threshold (LNT) fails numerous toxicological stress tests
    Sep 25, 2022 · The findings indicate a lack of flexibility and robustness in the LNT model. •. LNT should not be used to derive cancer risks for public health ...
  105. [105]
    It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low ...
    The LNT model implies that there is no safe dose of ionizing radiation; however, adverse effects from low dose, low-dose rate (LDDR) exposures are not ...
  106. [106]
    A better model? Low levels of radiation and health effects
    Aug 5, 2025 · When the current LNT model (see Eq. 2) is used to estimate cancer risk, generally the user is advised to reduce the risk by a factor of 2 for ...
  107. [107]
    Cancer mortality after low dose exposure to ionising radiation in ...
    Aug 16, 2023 · The estimated rate of mortality due to solid cancer increased with cumulative dose by 52% (90% confidence interval 27% to 77%) per Gy, lagged by 10 years.
  108. [108]
    Risk of cancer associated with low-dose radiation exposure - NIH
    Jan 21, 2021 · A comparison of radiation-cancer mortality risk estimates derived from the LSS and INWORKS, a large international nuclear worker study, is presented.
  109. [109]
    The U.S. Million Person Study of Low-Dose-Rate Health Effects
    Jun 27, 2025 · Healthy American radiation workers and veterans are being evaluated for cancer and noncancer (e.g., heart disease) mortality and morbidity ( ...
  110. [110]
    Linear No-Threshold Model VS. Radiation Hormesis - PMC - NIH
    The new evidence observed in atomic bomb survivors against the LNT model and for radiation hormesis is much stronger than the evidence claimed for low dose ...
  111. [111]
    Facilitating the End of the Linear No-Threshold Model Era
    Jun 21, 2024 · This editorial examines the persistence of the LNT model despite evidence favoring radiation hormesis and proposes a solution.
  112. [112]
    Ethics of Adoption and Use of the Linear No-Threshold Model - PMC
    Jan 10, 2019 · The present LNT-based regulations impose excessive costs to the society, effectively leading to loss, rather than saving, of life.
  113. [113]
    [PDF] Radiation effects in nuclear reactor materials&#x2014
    Five phenomena, irradiation hardening, irradiation embrittlement, irradiation creep, irradiation growth and void swelling that occur in materials by neutron ...<|separator|>
  114. [114]
    [PDF] Improved model for atomic displacement calculation
    Many models, including the international standard metric Norgett-Robinson-Torrens model (NRT), have been developed to calculate the number of Displacement per ...
  115. [115]
    [PDF] Radiation Damage Calculation Methodology - INL Digital Library
    Example values for calculating the average displacement threshold energy. ... damage in silicon carbide irradiated in fission reactors,” Journal of Nuclear ...
  116. [116]
    Embrittlement of Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessels
    Neutron irradiation embrittlement could limit the service life of some of the reactor-pressure vessels in existing commercial nuclear-power plants.
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Radiation Damage Assessment in the Reactor Pressure Vessel of ...
    Abstract. One of the major limiting factors to nuclear reactors lifetime is the radiation- induced material damage in the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV).
  118. [118]
    Evaluation of neutron radiation damage in zircaloy fuel clad of ...
    During the lifetime of nuclear power plants, irradiation and mechanical interactions can cause permanent damage to their structural materials.
  119. [119]
    [PDF] Irradiation effects in Generation IV nuclear reactor materials
    SFTs can form in austenitic steels irradiated under a cascade regime (ion and neutron irradiation) as well as under Frenkel pair regime (electron irradiation).
  120. [120]
    Structural materials for fission & fusion energy - ScienceDirect.com
    The fuel cladding serves to reliably contain the fuel and radioactive fission products while simultaneously efficiently transferring the intense nuclear heat ...
  121. [121]
    [PDF] RADIATION EMBRITTLEMENT ARCHIVE PROJECT
    From the earliest days of commercial nuclear power generation, it was recognized that over time, neutron irradiation hardens and embrittles the steel from which ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  122. [122]
    Estimation of reliable displacements-per-atom based on athermal ...
    The displacements-per-atom (dpa) is widely used as an exposure unit to predict the operating lifetime of materials in radiation environments.
  123. [123]
    Why Space Radiation Matters - NASA
    Apr 13, 2017 · The inner radiation belt, or Van Allen Belt, consists of ionizing radiation in the form of very energetic protons—by-products of collisions ...
  124. [124]
    What are the Van Allen Belts and why do they matter? - NASA Science
    Jul 23, 2023 · These trapped particles form two belts of radiation, known as the Van Allen Belts, that surround the Earth like enormous donuts.
  125. [125]
    Evolving radiological protection guidelines for exploration-class ...
    Crew onboard the ISS are exposed to an effective dose equivalent of ∼215–310 millisieverts per year (mSv/y) (Chancellor J, 2017). Crew in deep space could be ...
  126. [126]
    [PDF] Space Radiation and Its Effects on Electronic Systems
    Space systems become increasingly susceptible to the space environment as use of composite materials and smaller, faster electronics increases. This trend ...
  127. [127]
    [PDF] Space Radiation Effects on Electronics - NASA NEPP
    In Oct-Nov of this year, a series of X-class (X-45!) solar events took place. – High particle fluxes were noted. – Many spacecraft performed safing ...
  128. [128]
    Radiation effects on composite materials used in space systems
    Sep 12, 2022 · The presented research work focuses on studying the impact of space radiation sources on the composite materials used for satellite and spacecraft systems.2. Radiation Environment · Table 3. Radiation Effects... · 5. Mitigation And Protective...
  129. [129]
    [PDF] Radiation Levels on the Surface of Mars - Space Math @ NASA
    What is the estimated Dose Rate in space during the cruise to Mars? Answer: 0.7 x 1.9 = 1.3 milliSieverts/day.Missing: Apollo | Show results with:Apollo
  130. [130]
    Molecular Mechanisms of Radiation-Induced Cancer Cell Death
    Tumour irradiation induces both direct and indirect effects in controlling the tumour. Direct effects are the result of significant radiation-induced DNA damage ...
  131. [131]
    DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for ... - Nature
    May 1, 2020 · During IR treatment, cancer cells evolve personalized DNA damage repair mechanisms against IR insults for survival66.
  132. [132]
    Radiation Therapy for Cancer - NCI
    May 15, 2025 · Radiation therapy is a type of cancer treatment that uses high doses of radiation to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors.Side Effects · External Beam Radiation · Brachytherapy
  133. [133]
    32.3: Therapeutic Uses of Ionizing Radiation - Physics LibreTexts
    Feb 20, 2022 · Radiotherapy is the use of ionizing radiation to treat ailments, now limited to cancer therapy. The sensitivity of cancer cells to radiation ...
  134. [134]
    An Overview on Radiotherapy: From Its History to Its Current ... - NIH
    Jul 25, 2017 · Radiotherapy (RT) uses high-energy rays to damage tumor cells, and is used in dermatology for skin cancers, as a valid treatment.
  135. [135]
    Advances in Radiotherapy and Implications for the Next Century
    Jan 15, 2009 · Cells undergo a critical period after irradiation, which determines their fate: death, repaired damage, or continued growth and division without ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  136. [136]
    Radiation Therapy | US EPA
    Jul 31, 2025 · Radiation therapy uses ionizing radiation to shrink or kill tumors. Focused beams of radiation are produced by a machine outside the body ...About Radiation Therapy · What You Can Do · U.S. Department Of Commerce...<|separator|>
  137. [137]
    Radiation therapy - Mayo Clinic
    Jul 2, 2024 · Radiation therapy damages cells by destroying their genetic material. Genetic material controls how cells grow and divide. Healthy cells may be ...
  138. [138]
    Clinical Applications of Ionizing Radiation - NCBI - NIH
    It is a primary tool in the diagnosis of diseases of the lungs (particularly infectious disease and cancer); it provides information on midline anatomical ...Diagnostic Applications Of... · Therapeutic Applications Of... · Chapter Summary
  139. [139]
    Application of ionising radiation in healthcare - ICRPaedia
    Radiation therapy utilizes ionizing radiation to treat malignant and benign diseases. It has become a standard of care for treating many types of cancer.Diagnostic Radiology · Radiation Therapy · Nuclear Medicine · Veterinary Medicine
  140. [140]
    Ionizing Radiation - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Dec 17, 2023 · Ionizing radiation is a risk factor for malignancy after prolonged exposure. Evidence from studies conducted following the Chernobyl accident, nuclear tests,
  141. [141]
    Radiation-Induced Tissue Damage: Clinical Consequences ... - NIH
    Acute radiation damage, also known as radiodermatitis, occurs within 90 days of treatment. Signs include erythema, edema, desquamation, and ulceration. These ...
  142. [142]
    Radiation therapy‐associated toxicity: Etiology, management, and ...
    Jul 13, 2021 · Ionizing radiation works by producing DNA damage leading to tumor death, but effects on normal tissue may result in acute and/or late toxicity.
  143. [143]
    Effects of radiation on normal tissue: consequences and mechanisms
    Patients may experience symptoms associated with damage to normal tissue during the course of therapy for a few weeks after therapy or months or years later.
  144. [144]
    Mechanisms of injury to normal tissue after radiotherapy: a review
    As radiation exposure increases, the amount of damage increases proportionally, until enough damage is accumulated via direct and indirect means that the repair ...
  145. [145]
    What is radiation fibrosis? 5 things to know
    Jul 16, 2024 · This inflammation can lead to the formation of scar-like fibrous tissue as well as damage to the blood and lymph vessels. Radiation fibrosis ...
  146. [146]
    Molecular mechanisms of tumor resistance to radiotherapy
    Jun 15, 2023 · Recent studies have reported that cancer cells, when exposed to radiation damage, cause their own DNA breaks by activating Caspase-activated ...
  147. [147]
    Radiation-induced gastric injury during radiotherapy
    Oct 3, 2023 · Mechanisms of RIGI include direct injury, indirect injury and bystander effect. Direct injury. Direct injury means that ionizing radiation ...
  148. [148]
    Radiation damage in nanostructured materials - ScienceDirect.com
    Radiation damage in nanostructured materials involves increased defect density, degradation of properties, and the formation of point defects and their ...
  149. [149]
    Radiation-Resistant Nanomaterials for Nuclear Systems - AZoNano
    Mar 11, 2025 · Nano-porous self-healing materials exhibit inherent resistance to radiation damage, making them valuable for next-generation nuclear reactors. ...
  150. [150]
    Ceramic layering can produce better radiation-resistant materials
    Jun 25, 2021 · “Ceramics often have good corrosion resistance and high-temperature stability, so they have a special role to play in nuclear applications,” ...<|separator|>
  151. [151]
    How do we build electronic materials that can survive radiation?
    Dec 7, 2018 · Covering devices with lead or aluminum can shield them from some forms of radiation. Another radiation-defense strategy involves putting several ...
  152. [152]
    Investigation of shielding material properties for effective space ...
    The study investigated aluminum, polyethylene, hydrides, complex hydrides, and composite materials. 6Li10BH4 showed high shielding efficiency, and composite  ...
  153. [153]
    What are the Best Radiation Shielding Materials? - AZoM
    Dec 1, 2022 · Lead is effective for X-rays and gamma rays. Hydrogen is good for neutrons. Plastic or paper can block alpha/beta. Tungsten absorbs gamma, but ...
  154. [154]
    Overview on Radiation Damage Effects and Protection Techniques ...
    Mar 30, 2024 · These approaches involve selecting and optimizing materials, designing device structures to minimize radiation impact, and evaluating device ...
  155. [155]
    Advances of Amifostine in Radiation Protection: Administration and ...
    Sep 25, 2023 · This paper reviews the research progress of amifostine for radiation protection in recent years, discusses its mechanism of action, clinical ...
  156. [156]
    Radioprotective effects of amifostine - PubMed
    However, current radiation doses that can be delivered without causing severe damage to surrounding normal tissues are often insufficient to eradicate a tumor.
  157. [157]
    Effect of Amifostine in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with ...
    So, we concluded that amifostine does not protect the tumor during radiation. Another controversial issue about amifostine is toxicities induced by itself.
  158. [158]
    FDA Approves Radiation Medical Countermeasure
    Neupogen is the first FDA-approved medical countermeasure to increase survival in patients exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation.
  159. [159]
    Prediction of Survival Benefit of Filgrastim in Adult and Pediatric ...
    Additionally, if filgrastim treatment is initiated within 3 days after the acute radiation exposure, treatment should last ≥ 3 weeks. However, if treatment ...
  160. [160]
    Full article: Sargramostim in acute radiation syndrome
    The US FDA has approved G-CSF to (1) accelerate bone marrow recovery after exposure to bone marrow suppressing drugs and/or ionizing radiation; (2) facilitate ...
  161. [161]
    Modulation of Radiation Damage by Cytokines | Stem Cells
    Included here are studies indicating that the cytokines interleukin 1, tumor necrosis factor, stem cell factor and interleukin 12 protect mice from radiation ...Missing: interventions | Show results with:interventions
  162. [162]
    Will mesenchymal stem cells be future directions for treating ...
    Mar 12, 2021 · Radiation-induced skin injury (RISI) is one of the common serious side effects of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with malignant tumors.
  163. [163]
    The Therapeutic Application of Stem Cells and Their Derived ...
    Jan 11, 2023 · Multiple kinds of stem cells currently are used for the treatment of radiation-induced skin injury, such as bone marrow-derived stem cells ( ...<|separator|>
  164. [164]
    A New Drug for the Prevention and Treatment of Radiation Damage
    Dec 18, 2024 · Licochalcone B: A New Drug for the Prevention and Treatment of Radiation Damage ... radioprotective agents. Declarations. Acknowledgement.
  165. [165]
    Humanetics Advances Development of Novel Radiation Protection ...
    Oct 30, 2024 · There are no FDA-approved drugs that can prophylactically prevent individuals exposed to radiation from developing ARS. Humanetics is developing ...Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  166. [166]
    Investigation of the radioprotective properties of Zingerone ...
    Furthermore, the study of active drug substances lays a strong pharmaceutical foundation for developing novel radioprotective drugs with multiple properties.
  167. [167]
    Space Environmental Effects on Multifunctional Radiation Shielding ...
    Nov 16, 2024 · In this paper we discuss two radiation shielding composite architectures and their long duration performance in LEO.1 Introduction · 4.5 Surface Optical... · 4.6 Neutron Testing
  168. [168]
    Recent Advances and Challenges in Polymer-Based Materials for ...
    The findings of this experimental study suggested the potential use of the PI/lead composite in space, offering protection against cosmic radiation. ...2. Experimental Studies · 2.2. Polyimide-Based... · 3. Numerical Studies
  169. [169]
    Development of Lead-Free Materials for Radiation Shielding in ... - NIH
    In the present study, we reviewed current evidence and materials as lead-free protective devices.
  170. [170]
    Advances in gadolinium-based composite materials for neutron and ...
    This paper reviews the current research status of these four types of radiation shielding materials. It provides a comprehensive summary and evaluation of each ...
  171. [171]
    Health Effect of Low-Dose-Rate Irradiation with Cumulative ... - NIH
    Sep 11, 2024 · Research on animals, such as mice, has shown that low doses of radiation can stimulate immune responses, enhance DNA repair mechanisms, and ...
  172. [172]
    A comparative study on the dose–effect of low-dose radiation based ...
    May 21, 2024 · In this study, the potential mechanisms of low-dose radiation when irradiating the BEAS-2B cell lines with a Cs-137 gamma-ray source were investigated through ...
  173. [173]
    Proposed Priorities for Low-Dose Radiation Research and Their ...
    Nov 14, 2023 · This report contains a detailed summary of current low-dose radiation research programs in the United States and provides specific recommendations for the ...
  174. [174]
    Strategic research agenda and roadmaps for radiation protection ...
    Oct 18, 2025 · Computational and AI-supported dosimetry to improve shielding calculations. 2. New reference fields following technological developments. 2.1.