Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Radiation efficiency

Radiation efficiency, in the context of , is defined as the ratio of the total power radiated by an antenna to the net power accepted by the antenna from the transmitter, typically expressed as a between 0% and 100%. This parameter accounts for dissipative losses within the antenna structure, such as ohmic heating, ensuring that it reflects how effectively the device converts accepted radiofrequency power into electromagnetic waves propagated into free space. The mathematical formulation of radiation efficiency, denoted as \eta, is given by \eta = \frac{P_{\text{rad}}}{P_{\text{acc}}} = \frac{R_{\text{rad}}}{R_{\text{rad}} + R_{\text{loss}}}, where P_{\text{rad}} is the radiated power, P_{\text{acc}} is the accepted power, R_{\text{rad}} is the , and R_{\text{loss}} represents the equivalent loss resistance due to material imperfections. Key factors influencing radiation efficiency include conductor losses from the skin effect in metallic elements and dielectric losses in insulating materials, all of which dissipate power as rather than radiation. For electrically small antennas, fundamental physical limits further constrain achievable efficiency, often below 50% at lower frequencies, due to the antenna's quality factor and stored reactive energy. In and performance evaluation, radiation efficiency is a critical metric because it directly impacts the realized (G = \eta \times D, where D is ) and the overall in wireless communication systems, determining signal strength, range, and battery life in devices like mobile phones and sensors. High efficiency (approaching 100%) is ideal for minimizing power waste, but practical designs often prioritize a balance with size, bandwidth, and cost, especially in modern applications such as millimeter-wave arrays where material choices and fabrication precision play significant roles. Measurements of radiation efficiency typically involve techniques like the Wheeler cap method or three- pattern integration to separate losses from , ensuring accurate characterization for and .

Fundamentals

Definition

Radiation efficiency, denoted as \eta_{rad}, is a key metric in electromagnetics that describes the effectiveness of an in converting accepted input power into electromagnetic waves propagated into free space. It is formally defined as the ratio of the total power radiated by the (P_{rad}) to the net power accepted by the from the connected transmitter (P_{acc}), given by the equation \eta_{rad} = \frac{P_{rad}}{P_{acc}}. This value is unitless and often presented as a (e.g., 90% efficiency) or in decibels (e.g., $10 \log_{10}(\eta_{rad})). The definition excludes power reflected due to impedance mismatch, focusing solely on losses internal to the after power acceptance. A critical aspect of radiation efficiency is its role in linking an antenna's to its , providing insight into how non-radiative losses affect performance. (D) quantifies the antenna's ability to concentrate in a preferred direction compared to an , defined as D = \frac{4\pi U_{max}}{P_{rad}}, where U_{max} is the maximum intensity. (G), however, normalizes to the accepted power, yielding G = \frac{4\pi U_{max}}{P_{acc}}. Substituting the expressions leads to the relation G = \eta_{rad} \times D, or more precisely for maximum values, G_{max} = \eta_{rad} \times D_{max}. This derivation illustrates that while assumes all accepted power is radiated, adjusts for dissipative losses, ensuring reflects true power delivery in the direction of maximum . For linear wire antennas, such as dipoles or loops, radiation efficiency simplifies to a resistance-based form: \eta_{rad} = \frac{R_{rad}}{R_{rad} + R_{loss}}, where R_{rad} is the radiation resistance (equivalent resistance accounting for power converted to far-field radiation) and R_{loss} encompasses all ohmic and other loss resistances. This expression is derived from the antenna's equivalent circuit model, where the input power is dissipated across these resistive components, with only the radiated portion contributing to useful output. It is particularly applicable to thin-wire approximations, aiding in the design and analysis of resonant structures. The concept of radiation efficiency was pioneered in the mid-20th century within antenna theory, with John D. Kraus providing foundational formalization in his 1950 textbook Antennas, which integrated it into analyses of wire and aperture antennas. Subsequent developments have extended the framework to applications, incorporating frequency-averaged or integrated definitions to evaluate efficiency over wide operational bands rather than at discrete frequencies.

Importance in Antenna Performance

Radiation efficiency plays a pivotal role in performance by quantifying the fraction of input that is effectively radiated as electromagnetic waves, rather than dissipated as through various loss mechanisms. Low efficiency directly results in significant wastage, which is particularly critical in -constrained systems such as devices, where it shortens life by necessitating higher transmit powers to maintain signal strength. In base stations, inefficient antennas reduce the effective transmission range, as less reaches the intended , thereby limiting coverage and requiring denser deployments. In modern wireless systems, high radiation efficiency is essential for overcoming challenges like in millimeter-wave (mmWave) bands used in and emerging networks. For instance, antennas operating in mmWave frequencies demand efficiencies exceeding 90% to mitigate severe losses and ensure reliable high-data-rate links. Similarly, in multiple-input multiple-output () configurations, suboptimal antenna efficiency degrades the (SNR) across diversity branches, thereby reducing overall and multiplexing gains. These impacts underscore efficiency's importance in achieving the targets of next-generation networks. Achieving high radiation efficiency often involves trade-offs with practical constraints, particularly in compact designs for () devices and wearables. Larger structures or specialized low-loss materials can enhance efficiency but conflict with size limitations, leading to compromises in or . In wearable applications, for example, body proximity further exacerbates efficiency drops, necessitating like metamaterials to balance performance and . Recent advancements in technologies, such as reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS), highlight ongoing efforts to address efficiency in dynamic environments. RIS designs prioritize radiation efficiency as a key parameter to minimize losses in high-frequency operations, enabling energy-efficient and coverage extension without active amplification. Studies from the early 2020s emphasize that optimizing RIS element configurations can achieve efficiencies suitable for bands, filling gaps in traditional for beyond-5G systems.

Configurations and Theoretical Models

Single-Port Antennas

In single-port antennas, the radiation efficiency is modeled using the fundamental power balance at the antenna terminals. The input power P_{\text{in}} delivered to the antenna equals the sum of the radiated power P_{\text{rad}} and the dissipated loss power P_{\text{loss}}, expressed as P_{\text{in}} = P_{\text{rad}} + P_{\text{loss}}. The radiation efficiency \eta_{\text{rad}} is then defined as the ratio \eta_{\text{rad}} = \frac{P_{\text{rad}}}{P_{\text{in}}} = \frac{P_{\text{rad}}}{P_{\text{rad}} + P_{\text{loss}}}. This model assumes a single feed port, where the antenna is represented by an equivalent circuit consisting of the radiation resistance R_{\text{rad}}, which accounts for the power converted to electromagnetic waves, in series with the loss resistance R_{\text{loss}}, which represents ohmic and other dissipative mechanisms. For a sinusoidal current distribution with maximum current I_{\max} at the feed and input current I_0, the radiated power relates to P_{\text{rad}} = \frac{1}{2} |I_0|^2 R_{\text{rad}} \left( \frac{I_{\max}}{I_0} \right)^2, while losses are P_{\text{loss}} = \frac{1}{2} |I_0|^2 R_{\text{loss}} \left( \frac{I_{\max}}{I_0} \right)^2, leading to \eta_{\text{rad}} = \frac{R_{\text{rad}}}{R_{\text{rad}} + R_{\text{loss}}}. Calculation of \eta_{\text{rad}} for single-port antennas often incorporates considerations, particularly in scenarios where the operates near . The \Gamma = \frac{Z_{\text{in}} - Z_0}{Z_{\text{in}} + Z_0}, with Z_{\text{in}} as the and Z_0 as the of the feed line (typically 50 Ω), quantifies mismatch losses. The mismatch efficiency, or efficiency, is e_r = 1 - |\Gamma|^2, representing the fraction of accepted by the antenna. For a perfectly matched where |\Gamma| = 0, the total equals \eta_{\text{rad}}, as all accepted is either radiated or lost internally. In cases, assuming constant impedance over a small frequency range around , the accepted P_{\text{acc}} = P_{\text{in}} (1 - |\Gamma|^2), and \eta_{\text{rad}} = \frac{P_{\text{rad}}}{P_{\text{acc}}}. Deriving this, substitute the resistance-based powers into the efficiency formula: with generator voltage V_g and matched load, P_{\text{rad}} = \frac{|V_g|^2 R_{\text{rad}}}{8 (R_{\text{rad}} + R_{\text{loss}})} and P_{\text{loss}} = \frac{|V_g|^2 R_{\text{loss}}}{8 (R_{\text{rad}} + R_{\text{loss}})}, yielding the direct ratio \eta_{\text{rad}} = \frac{R_{\text{rad}}}{R_{\text{rad}} + R_{\text{loss}}}, independent of V_g for operation. Several factors influence \eta_{\text{rad}} in single-port antennas such as dipoles and monopoles. Frequency dependence arises primarily from the scaling of R_{\text{loss}}, which increases with the of due to the skin effect reducing effective conductor cross-section and elevating ohmic es. effects impact efficiency indirectly through the antenna's inherent (vertical for monopoles, horizontal or vertical for dipoles), where misalignment with the desired radiation can alter the distribution without changing the intrinsic \eta_{\text{rad}}, but it must be considered in system-level design to avoid additional mismatch. considerations are critical, as \eta_{\text{rad}} typically peaks at but degrades across the operational band due to varying R_{\text{rad}} and increasing R_{\text{loss}} away from the design ; for example, monopoles exhibit narrower bandwidths than equivalent dipoles owing to interactions. A representative example is an electrically small operating at VHF frequencies (e.g., around 100-300 MHz), where the electrical size ka < 1 (with k = 2\pi / \lambda and a as the radius enclosing the antenna). In such cases, skin effect losses dominate, causing \eta_{\text{rad}} to drop below 50% for copper conductors when ka \approx 0.07 at 300 MHz, as the dissipation factor scales inversely with (ka)^2 and the overall efficiency follows (ka)^4 dependence due to heightened metallic losses.

Multi-Port Antennas and Arrays

In multi-port antennas, such as those found in antenna arrays, radiation efficiency is generalized from the single-port case to account for vector excitations across multiple ports. The total radiated power P_{\text{rad}} is given by P_{\text{rad}} = \frac{1}{2} \Re \left\{ \mathbf{w}^H \mathbf{Y}_{\text{rad}} \mathbf{w} \right\}, where \mathbf{w} is the complex excitation vector representing the currents or voltages at the ports, and \mathbf{Y}_{\text{rad}} is the radiation admittance matrix, which captures the electromagnetic coupling and radiation properties among the ports. The accepted power P_{\text{acc}} is similarly P_{\text{acc}} = \frac{1}{2} \Re \left\{ \mathbf{w}^H \mathbf{Y} \mathbf{w} \right\}, with the total admittance matrix \mathbf{Y} = \mathbf{Y}_{\text{rad}} + \mathbf{Y}_{\text{loss}}, leading to the radiation efficiency \eta_{\text{rad}} = P_{\text{rad}} / P_{\text{acc}}. This matrix formulation extends the scalar resistance model used in single-port antennas, enabling analysis of mutual interactions in arrays. Key performance metrics for multi-port systems include the minimum radiation efficiency e_{R,\text{MIN}} and maximum radiation efficiency e_{R,\text{MAX}}, which represent the worst- and best-case efficiencies over all possible excitations \mathbf{w}. These are determined as the smallest and largest eigenvalues of the generalized eigenvalue problem involving \mathbf{Y}_{\text{rad}} and \mathbf{Y}, respectively, providing bounds on efficiency under arbitrary port excitations. In multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) applications, where excitations are often uncorrelated to maximize diversity, e_{R,\text{MIN}} is particularly critical as it indicates robustness against suboptimal signal combinations that could degrade overall system performance. In antenna arrays for beamforming, radiation efficiency varies with the phase and amplitude settings of the excitation vector \mathbf{w}, influencing directivity and power distribution across beams. Recent advancements, including formulations for massive MIMO in 5G systems, emphasize optimizing these matrices to maintain high \eta_{\text{rad}} under dynamic excitations, as demonstrated in studies of multi-port arrays achieving over 80% efficiency in sub-6 GHz bands despite inter-element coupling. A scattering parameter approach further facilitates computation, where closed-form expressions using the full S-matrix and embedded radiation efficiencies of elements enable evaluation of array-wide efficiency by incorporating mutual scattering terms. This method is essential for simulating efficiency in coupled multi-port environments without full electromagnetic solves.

Loss Mechanisms

Ohmic Losses

Ohmic losses in antennas primarily stem from Joule heating caused by the flow of alternating current through the resistive elements of the antenna's conducting structure. This dissipative process converts electrical energy into thermal energy, reducing the power available for radiation. The ohmic power loss is expressed as P_{\text{ohmic}} = \frac{1}{2} |I|^2 R_{\text{ohmic}}, where I is the RMS current amplitude and R_{\text{ohmic}} represents the effective resistance of the conductors. At high frequencies, R_{\text{ohmic}} is significantly influenced by the , which confines current flow to a shallow depth near the conductor surface, thereby elevating the surface resistance to R_s = \sqrt{\frac{\pi f \mu}{\sigma}}, with f denoting frequency, \mu the magnetic permeability, and \sigma the conductivity of the material. This frequency-dependent increase in resistance exacerbates losses as operating frequencies rise into the GHz range. The impact of ohmic losses on radiation efficiency is quantified through the relation \eta_{\text{rad}} = \frac{R_{\text{rad}}}{R_{\text{rad}} + R_{\text{loss}}}, where R_{\text{rad}} is the radiation resistance and R_{\text{loss}} encompasses R_{\text{ohmic}} along with other non-radiative components. In configurations such as thin-wire dipoles or high-frequency designs, ohmic losses become dominant because the skin depth diminishes relative to the conductor dimensions, leading to a disproportionate rise in R_{\text{ohmic}} compared to R_{\text{rad}}. For electrically small antennas, this can severely degrade overall performance, as the low inherent R_{\text{rad}} amplifies the relative contribution of conductor dissipation. Mitigation strategies focus on minimizing R_{\text{ohmic}} by selecting high-conductivity materials, such as copper with \sigma \approx 5.8 \times 10^7 S/m, which offers lower intrinsic resistance than alternatives like aluminum. For even greater reductions, high-temperature superconductors have been employed in antenna designs, achieving significantly lower insertion losses than those of copper at microwave frequencies due to near-zero resistivity. Additionally, surface treatments like polishing or chemical smoothing reduce conductor roughness, which otherwise perturbs current distribution and inflates effective skin resistance beyond the classical model. As an illustrative case, in microstrip patch antennas operating at GHz frequencies, ohmic losses often contribute substantially to total dissipation, significantly reducing radiation efficiency in miniaturized or high-loss configurations, underscoring the need for optimized conductor layering to enhance gain and efficiency.

Dielectric and Ground Losses

Dielectric losses represent a key non-conductor loss mechanism in antennas, particularly in structures like printed circuit board (PCB) antennas where insulating substrates are integral to the design. These losses stem from the inherent dissipation of electromagnetic energy within the dielectric material, primarily due to the tangential electric field component inducing molecular friction and heat generation. The time-average power dissipated in the dielectric is quantified by the expression P_{\text{diel}} = \frac{1}{2} \omega \epsilon'' \int_V |\mathbf{E}|^2 \, dV where \omega is the angular frequency, \epsilon'' is the imaginary part of the complex permittivity (reflecting the material's lossiness), \mathbf{E} is the electric field strength, and the integral spans the dielectric volume V. This dissipation directly diminishes the radiation efficiency \eta_{\text{rad}} by diverting input power away from radiation into heat, with the impact becoming more pronounced in high-frequency applications or materials with elevated loss tangents (\tan \delta = \epsilon'' / \epsilon'). For instance, in microstrip patch antennas, dielectric losses can be significant when using common substrates like (with \tan \delta \approx 0.02), though low-loss alternatives such as (with \tan \delta \approx 0.001) minimize this effect. Ground losses, another form of environmental interaction, occur when antennas are placed near lossy surfaces like , concrete, or metallic , leading to energy absorption outside the antenna structure. These losses are modeled using the method of images, where the induces virtual image currents that mirror the antenna's currents but introduce additional effective resistance due to the imperfect conductivity of the medium. The resulting power absorption is particularly influenced by the antenna's height h above the : losses are generally negligible for h > \lambda/4, as the image currents contribute constructively to radiation without significant ; however, for low-profile antennas with h \ll \lambda/4, the close amplifies reactive fields and ground currents, causing substantial efficiency degradation—often exceeding 5-10 dB in ground proximity loss for horizontal dipoles near poor . This is critical in applications like vehicle-mounted or handheld devices, where the finite (e.g., a ) acts as both reflector and lossy absorber. The combined effect of and losses integrates into the overall budget as P_{\text{loss}} = P_{\text{ohmic}} + P_{\text{diel}} + P_{\text{ground}}, where each term represents dissipated from distinct mechanisms, collectively lowering \eta_{\text{rad}} = P_{\text{rad}} / (P_{\text{rad}} + P_{\text{loss}}). In practical mobile antennas, such as planar inverted-F antennas (PIFAs) integrated into smartphones, the low height (typically 5-10 mm) above the device can significantly reduce total compared to isolated configurations, due to enhanced absorption and detuning effects. Recent advancements in further highlight these challenges; post-2020 materials like flexible PDMS-Al_2O_3-PTFE composites, designed for bendable substrates in body-worn antennas, exhibit loss tangents around 0.01-0.02 to balance flexibility and mechanical durability, resulting in higher losses than low-loss rigid counterparts, though optimized doping ratios help maintain reasonable efficiencies at 2.4 GHz.

Measurement Techniques

Direct Methods

Direct methods for measuring radiation efficiency involve quantifying the radiated power P_\mathrm{rad} relative to the accepted power P_\mathrm{acc} through far-field electromagnetic field measurements, providing a direct assessment of how effectively an antenna converts input power into radiated energy. These techniques require controlled environments to ensure accurate field capture and are particularly suited for validating high-efficiency designs. The pattern integration method entails measuring the antenna's far-field power pattern in an anechoic chamber, where the electric field magnitude |E(\theta, \phi)| is recorded over a full spherical coverage at a constant radius r in the far-field region (r \geq 2D^2 / \lambda, with D as the maximum antenna dimension and \lambda the wavelength). The total radiated power is then computed by integrating the Poynting vector over the sphere's surface: P_\mathrm{rad} = \iint \frac{r^2 |E(\theta, \phi)|^2}{2 \eta_0} \, d\Omega, where \eta_0 = 377 \, \Omega is the free-space impedance and d\Omega = \sin\theta \, d\theta \, d\phi. The accepted power P_\mathrm{acc} is determined separately using a vector network analyzer (VNA) to measure the reflection coefficient \Gamma at the antenna port, yielding P_\mathrm{acc} = P_\mathrm{in} (1 - |\Gamma|^2), with P_\mathrm{in} as the incident power from a calibrated source. Radiation efficiency follows as \eta_\mathrm{rad} = P_\mathrm{rad} / P_\mathrm{acc}. This approach demands precise calibration of field probes and dense angular sampling (typically 1°–5° steps in \theta and \phi) to minimize integration errors. An alternative direct technique derives efficiency from measured and . G(\theta, \phi) is obtained via absolute methods such as the two-antenna or gain-comparison setup in the same , employing the Friis transmission formula to relate received and transmitted powers between the under test and a reference: G_t G_r = (P_r / P_t) (4\pi r / [\lambda](/page/Lambda))^2. D is calculated independently from the normalized far-field pattern F(\theta, \phi) (where F_\mathrm{max} = 1) as D = 4\pi / \iint F(\theta, \phi) \, d\Omega, using numerical over the sampled data. is then \eta_\mathrm{rad} = G / D, leveraging the relationship that incorporates both and losses. Calibrated probes or horns serve as field sensors, with VNAs ensuring phase-coherent measurements for pattern accuracy. These methods typically achieve accuracies of ±1 (approximately ±10–20% in linear terms), though sensitivities to multipath reflections, positioning, and impedance mismatches can degrade results without rigorous anechoic control (e.g., absorber reflectivity better than -30 ). Advantages include providing direct physical validation of processes, free from enclosure-induced assumptions. For instance, standard pyramidal antennas routinely validate efficiencies exceeding 95% using integration, confirming near-ideal performance in bands.

Indirect Methods

Indirect methods for measuring radiation efficiency infer the value through near-field approximations, models, or enclosure-based power assessments, offering advantages in compact or cost-constrained environments compared to far-field setups. These techniques separate and components indirectly, often using resonant properties or statistical averaging, and are particularly valuable for small or integrated antennas where direct integration is impractical. The Wheeler cap method, introduced in 1959, employs two configurations to isolate R_\text{rad} from loss resistance R_\text{loss}. In the "open" setup, the antenna operates freely with a to suppress feed-line currents, yielding input resistance R_\text{in} = R_\text{rad} + R_\text{loss}. The "cap" configuration encloses the antenna in a metallic tuned to , suppressing radiation while preserving losses, so R_\text{cap} \approx R_\text{loss}. Thus, R_\text{rad} = R_\text{in} - R_\text{cap}, and radiation efficiency is \eta_\text{rad} = \frac{R_\text{rad}}{R_\text{rad} + R_\text{loss}}. Validation involves checking the bandwidth factor, where the ratio of bandwidths in open and cap modes approximates for proper cavity sizing (typically radius \lambda / 2\pi), ensuring minimal perturbation. This method achieves accuracies within 5-10% for small antennas below 3 GHz. The Q-factor method derives radiation efficiency from the unloaded quality factor Q_u obtained via S-parameter bandwidth measurements on resonant antennas. For a singly loaded resonator matched at resonance, Q_u = \frac{f_0}{\Delta f}, where f_0 is the resonant frequency and \Delta f is the 3-dB bandwidth of the reflection coefficient magnitude. The total Q relates to stored energy W and dissipated power P_d as Q_u = \frac{\omega_0 W}{P_d}, with P_d = P_\text{rad} + P_\text{loss}. For electrically small resonant antennas, the radiation Q Q_\text{rad} is theoretically bounded (e.g., via Chu's limit Q_\text{rad} \gtrsim \frac{1}{(ka)^3} + \frac{1}{ka}, large for electrical size ka \ll 1). More generally, \eta_\mathrm{rad} = \frac{Q_u}{Q_\text{rad}} if Q_\text{rad} is estimated separately (e.g., from theory or simulation). When radiation dominates losses (Q_u \approx Q_\text{rad}), \eta_\mathrm{rad} \approx 1. This derivation assumes negligible mismatch and applies to structures like patches or loops, providing efficiency estimates without enclosures. Reverberation chamber techniques utilize mode-stirred fields to statistically average power, estimating radiated power P_\text{rad} for efficiency calculation, and are well-suited for multi-port antennas due to isotropic field emulation. The chamber's stirrers create a diffuse field, where average power transfer is measured via S-parameters between transmit and receive antennas. For the two-antenna method, total efficiency e_t = \eta_\text{rad} \cdot (1 - |\Gamma|^2), with \eta_\text{rad} isolated if mismatch is known; radiated power P_\text{rad} = \frac{P_\text{inc} \eta_\text{rad}}{1 - |\Gamma|^2}, where P_\text{inc} is incident power. Bounds on radiation efficiency are given by e_{R,\min} = \frac{\langle |S_{21}|^2 \rangle}{\langle |S_{11}|^2 \rangle + \langle |S_{21}|^2 \rangle} and e_{R,\max} = 1 - \langle |S_{11}|^2 \rangle, averaged over stirrer positions, with uncertainties below 2 dB for overmoded chambers above 400 MHz. This approach excels for OTA testing of arrays. Post-2020 advancements include hybrid indirect methods combining enclosure statistics with near-field probing for mmWave testing, enhancing accuracy to ±2% over traditional approaches by integrating chamber averaging with selective probe synthesis. These hybrids, such as plane-wave expanded multiprobe systems, reduce stirrer dependency and probe count (e.g., via genetic algorithms for 4-8 probes), while maintaining low RMSE (<0.1) in estimates for sub-6 GHz and bands, addressing 5G's multi-antenna challenges without full far-field ranges.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] LECTURE 4: Fundamental Antenna Parameters
    The antenna parameters describe the antenna performance with respect to space distribution of the radiated energy, power efficiency, matching to the feed.
  2. [2]
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8361028
  3. [3]
    Antenna Radiation Efficiency
    Aug 17, 2022 · Antenna radiation efficiency is closely tied to antenna gain and tells us what part of the RF signal energy delivered to the antenna is radiated ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas
    Jun 1, 2012 · 2.224 loop stick antenna. A loop receiving antenna with a ferrite rod core used for increasing its radiation efficiency. 2.225 Luneburg lens ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Antennas by Kraus - Durenberger.com
    It is the purpose of this book to present the basic theory of antennas with emphasis on their engineering applications. An effort has been made to give a ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] High Radiation Efficiency in Array Antennas Using Cu/Co ...
    The received power by all the devices as a function of distance where overall, 6 dB improvement in signal reception is observed for the Cu/Co metaconductor.
  7. [7]
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6060893
  8. [8]
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10040636
  9. [9]
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9605262
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Module 6: Antennas - MSU College of Engineering
    Radiation resistance - The radiation resistance of an antenna is the equivalent resistance through which its input current must flow in order that the power ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Fundamental Efficiency Limits for Small Metallic Antennas - arXiv
    Dec 20, 2016 · Abstract – Both the radiation efficiency and bandwidth of electrically small antennas are dramatically reduced as the size decreases.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] The Radiation and Transducer Efficiencies of a Multiport Antenna ...
    Jan 4, 2022 · To quantify the efficiency of a multiport antenna array. (MAA) as a radiator of electromagnetic power, we will define and discuss some general ...
  13. [13]
    Transducer and Radiation Efficiency Figures of a Multiport Antenna ...
    Apr 10, 2023 · Consequently, two important figures of merits—transducer and radiation efficiency figures—are adopted to measure the quality of the MIMO ...
  14. [14]
    A Closed-Form Formula of Radiation and Total Efficiency for Lossy ...
    Sep 9, 2019 · Abstract: This letter proposes a closed-form expression of the radiation and the total efficiency for the entire lossy multiport antenna system ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] D. Antenna Impedance
    Nov 29, 2006 · R . * The Ohmic loss resistance is defined such that the power converted to heat is equal to the power absorbed by L.
  16. [16]
    Skin Depth Equation Formula (aka Skin Effect) - RF Cafe
    Skin Depth Equation Formula (aka Skin Effect) as a Function of Frequency, Permeability, & Conductivity.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Small Antennas for High Frequencies - QSL.net
    The low value of radiation resistance and high value of total losses results a poor efficiency: • Longer antennas produce higher radiation efficiency. ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  18. [18]
    High Tc superconducting fabrication of loop antenna - ScienceDirect
    The use of high-Tc superconductors in microwave passive devices has an advantage over normal conductors such as copper and silver in terms of low insertion loss ...Missing: mitigation | Show results with:mitigation
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Influence of Copper Conductor Surface Treatment for High ...
    Generally, conventional copper surface treatment such as chemical roughening has been used to ensure the adhesion by etching (anchoring effect). However, it ...
  20. [20]
    Ohmic Loss Reduction and Gain Enhancement of Microstrip ...
    Because of the miniaturization, the ohmic losses of microstrip antennas increase, which essentially significantly reduces their gain and efficiency.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Curves of ground proximity loss for dipole antennas
    Ground proximity loss is the decibel ratio of antenna input resistance to free space resistance, presented graphically for four antenna types.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Design Methods for 3D RFID Antennas Located on a Conducting ...
    is only a 30% loss in efficiency. This is thought to be because opposing ... : DESIGN METHODS FOR 3D RFID ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A CONDUCTING GROUND PLANE.
  23. [23]
    (PDF) Flexible Wearable Composite Antennas for Global Wireless ...
    Oct 15, 2025 · Test results for the dielectric constant and loss tangent of PDMS-Al2O3-PTFE materials with different doping ratios. …
  24. [24]
    [PDF] LECTURE 8: Basic Methods in Antenna Measurements
    Radiation Efficiency, cd e *. In order to calculate the radiation efficiency, the gain and the directivity must be measured first. Factors like impedance ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] A modified version of the Radiation Pattern Integration Method for ...
    In this paper four methods are reviewed and analyzed: the Wheeler method, Q method, radiometric method and radiation pattern integration method.Missing: direct | Show results with:direct
  26. [26]
    The Radiansphere around a Small Antenna - Semantic Scholar
    The Radiansphere around a Small Antenna · H. A. Wheeler · Published in Proceedings of the IRE 1 August 1959 · Physics.
  27. [27]
    Power control and proportional fair scheduling with minimum rate constraints in clustered multihop TD/CDMA wireless ad hoc networks
    **Summary:**
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Trade-off Between Antenna Efficiency and Q-Factor - arXiv
    Aug 8, 2018 · Abstract—The trade-off between radiation efficiency and an- tenna bandwidth, expressed in terms of Q-factor, for small antennas is ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Reverberation Chamber Techniques for Determining the Radiation ...
    Apr 6, 2012 · In this paper we are concerned with determining both the total efficiency (defined as the ratio of the power radiated to the power available at ...
  30. [30]
    Reverberation Chamber Techniques for Determining the Radiation ...
    Apr 6, 2012 · Reverberation chambers are becoming a popular alternative testing facility for a wide range of electromagnetic applications.
  31. [31]
    A Review of Over‐the‐Air Testing Methods for Performance ...
    Jan 16, 2024 · The measurement efficiency of the traditional anechoic chamber-based antenna measurement is highly improved due to the introduction of ...