Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Reflection coefficient

The reflection coefficient is a parameter in wave physics that describes the fraction of an incident wave's amplitude or energy that is reflected at a boundary between two media due to a mismatch in their acoustic, mechanical, or electromagnetic impedances.^[1] In general, for amplitude-based reflection (such as for pressure, voltage, or electric field), it is given by \Gamma = \frac{Z_2 - Z_1}{Z_2 + Z_1}, where Z_1 and Z_2 are the characteristic impedances of the first and second media, respectively; this yields a value between -1 and 1, with the magnitude indicating the reflection strength and the sign or phase denoting the reflected wave's polarity relative to the incident wave.^[1] The energy reflection coefficient, which quantifies the reflected power fraction, is then R = \left| \frac{Z_2 - Z_1}{Z_2 + Z_1} \right|^2.^[1] This concept applies across diverse fields, including acoustics, where it governs sound wave reflections at material interfaces; optics, for light reflection at dielectric boundaries (with impedance inversely proportional to refractive index); and electromagnetics, particularly in transmission lines and antennas.^[2]^[3] In electrical engineering, the voltage reflection coefficient \Gamma = \frac{Z_L - Z_0}{Z_L + Z_0} (where Z_L is the load impedance and Z_0 the line's characteristic impedance) determines signal integrity, with \Gamma = 0 indicating perfect matching and no reflection, while extreme mismatches like open (Z_L \to \infty) or short (Z_L = 0) circuits yield \Gamma = \pm 1.^[3] The complementary transmission coefficient, often T = 1 - R for energy, describes the transmitted portion, ensuring conservation of energy at the interface.^[1] Notable aspects include its role in phenomena like standing waves (from interference of incident and reflected waves) and impedance matching techniques to minimize reflections, which are critical in applications such as radar, ultrasound imaging, and high-speed digital circuits.^[3] In oblique incidence scenarios, such as in optics, the coefficient becomes polarization-dependent, with distinct formulas for parallel and perpendicular components, as derived from boundary conditions on electromagnetic fields.^[2] Overall, the reflection coefficient encapsulates the fundamental interaction of waves with discontinuities, influencing design in engineering and natural wave propagation processes.

Fundamentals

Definition and interpretation

The reflection coefficient is a fundamental parameter in wave physics that quantifies the extent to which a wave is reflected at the interface between two media, arising from a mismatch in their characteristic impedances. It is defined as the ratio of the amplitude of the reflected wave to the amplitude of the incident wave at the boundary. This mismatch occurs when the wave propagates from one medium to another with differing properties, such as density or elasticity in acoustics, or permittivity and permeability in electromagnetics, leading to a partial return of the wave energy back into the originating medium.^[1]^[4]^[5] At the interface, boundary conditions—such as the continuity of displacement or pressure—must be satisfied, which generally result in both reflection and transmission of the wave. When the impedance mismatch is severe, as in the case of a wave encountering a rigid or free boundary, total reflection can occur, with the reflected wave amplitude equaling the incident amplitude (either in phase or inverted, depending on the boundary type). Conversely, if the impedances are closely matched, reflection is minimized, allowing most of the wave to transmit through the interface. The amplitude reflection coefficient, conventionally denoted by \Gamma, describes the field or voltage reflection, while the power reflection coefficient |\Gamma|^2 indicates the fraction of incident power that is reflected, emphasizing the energy perspective.^[6]^[7]^[4] A classic example of partial reflection is provided by a plane electromagnetic wave incident normally on the interface between two dielectrics, such as air (with refractive index near 1) and glass (refractive index about 1.5). Here, the impedance difference causes approximately 4% of the incident intensity to be reflected back into air (power reflection coefficient ≈ 0.04), while the majority transmits into the glass, illustrating how even modest mismatches lead to observable reflections in optical systems.^[8] The concept of the reflection coefficient was first formalized in the early 19th century by French physicist Augustin-Jean Fresnel, who derived the relevant equations for light reflection and transmission at dielectric boundaries between 1821 and 1823, establishing a cornerstone of optical theory. This work has been extended to broader wave phenomena, with applications in electromagnetics for transmission lines and in acoustics for sound propagation at boundaries.^[9]

Mathematical formulation

The amplitude reflection coefficient, denoted as \Gamma, quantifies the ratio of the reflected wave amplitude to the incident wave amplitude at an interface between two media. For normal incidence of a plane wave, it is given by

\Gamma = \frac{Z_2 - Z_1}{Z_2 + Z_1},

where Z_1 and Z_2 are the characteristic impedances of the incident and transmitting media, respectively.^[1] This formula arises universally from the one-dimensional wave equation and boundary conditions ensuring continuity across the interface. To derive \Gamma, consider a plane wave propagating along the x-direction in a lossless medium, with the interface at x=0. The incident wave is p_i(x,t) = A e^{j(\omega t - k_1 x)} for pressure in acoustics or analogous fields in electromagnetics, the reflected wave is p_r(x,t) = \Gamma A e^{j(\omega t + k_1 x)}, and the transmitted wave is p_t(x,t) = T A e^{j(\omega t - k_2 x)}, where T is the transmission coefficient and k_1, k_2 are wavenumbers. Boundary conditions require continuity of the wave variable (e.g., pressure p in acoustics or tangential E and H in electromagnetics) and its derivative or related quantity (e.g., particle velocity in acoustics or tangential H in electromagnetics) at x=0. For acoustics, continuity of pressure gives A + \Gamma A = T A, and continuity of velocity (proportional to pressure gradient divided by impedance) yields A - \Gamma A = (Z_1 / Z_2) T A. Solving these equations simultaneously eliminates T and yields \Gamma = (Z_2 - Z_1)/(Z_2 + Z_1).^[10] In electromagnetics, analogous conditions on tangential electric and magnetic fields at the dielectric interface lead to the same form, with Z = \sqrt{\mu / \epsilon} as the intrinsic impedance. In lossy media, impedances become complex to account for attenuation and phase shifts, modifying the reflection coefficient to

\Gamma = \frac{Z_L - Z_0}{Z_L + Z_0},

where Z_L and Z_0 are the complex load and characteristic impedances, respectively; the phase of \Gamma encodes the reflected wave's delay relative to the incident wave.^[11] The power reflection coefficient, |\Gamma|^2, represents the fraction of incident power that is reflected, with the remainder transmitted or absorbed.^[1] For oblique incidence, the reflection coefficient extends to vector forms via the Fresnel equations, which depend on polarization. For s-polarization (electric field perpendicular to the plane of incidence), it is

r_s = \frac{n_1 \cos \theta_i - n_2 \cos \theta_t}{n_1 \cos \theta_i + n_2 \cos \theta_t},

where n_1, n_2 are refractive indices, \theta_i is the incidence angle, and \theta_t is the transmission angle from Snell's law; a parallel (p-polarization) form exists similarly.^[12] These derive from boundary conditions on tangential field components at the interface, generalizing the normal-incidence case.

Electromagnetic applications

Transmission lines

In transmission lines, the reflection coefficient quantifies the mismatch between the characteristic impedance Z_0 of the line and the load impedance Z_L at the termination, leading to partial reflection of electromagnetic waves. For a lossless transmission line supporting transverse electromagnetic (TEM) modes, such as coaxial or stripline configurations, the voltage reflection coefficient at the load is given by

\Gamma = \frac{Z_L - Z_0}{Z_L + Z_0},

where \Gamma is a complex number with magnitude between 0 and 1 for passive loads.^[13] This formula arises from the boundary conditions at the load, ensuring continuity of voltage and current, and determines both the amplitude and phase of the reflected wave relative to the incident wave.^[14] The voltage reflection coefficient \Gamma_V is identical to \Gamma, while the current reflection coefficient \Gamma_I is its negative, \Gamma_I = -\Gamma. This difference stems from the fact that reflected voltage and current waves propagate in opposite directions, resulting in the reflected current being out of phase with the incident current to maintain power conservation.^[15] When a mismatch occurs (|\Gamma| > 0), the superposition of incident and reflected waves forms standing waves along the line, characterized by voltage maxima and minima. The voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR), a key metric of mismatch severity, is defined as

\text{VSWR} = \frac{1 + |\Gamma|}{1 - |\Gamma|},

derived from the ratio of maximum to minimum voltage amplitudes along the line, where V_{\max} = V_0^+ (1 + |\Gamma|) and V_{\min} = V_0^+ (1 - |\Gamma|), with V_0^+ being the incident voltage amplitude.^[16] A VSWR of 1 indicates perfect matching (|\Gamma| = 0), while values greater than 2 signify significant power loss in practical RF systems.^[17] The input impedance Z_{\text{in}} seen at a distance l from the load depends on the reflection coefficient and is expressed as

Z_{\text{in}} = Z_0 \frac{1 + \Gamma e^{-j 2 \beta l}}{1 - \Gamma e^{-j 2 \beta l}},

where \beta = 2\pi / \lambda is the propagation constant and \lambda is the wavelength. This transformation shows how the load impedance appears to vary periodically along the line due to phase shifts in the reflected wave, enabling impedance matching techniques like quarter-wave transformers.^[18] Mismatch effects are quantified by return loss, defined as -20 \log_{10} |\Gamma| in decibels (dB), which measures the power reflected back to the source relative to the incident power. For example, a return loss of 20 dB corresponds to |\Gamma| = 0.1, meaning 99% of the power is delivered to the load in a lossless line.^[19] Higher return loss values indicate better matching and reduced signal distortion in high-frequency applications. Time-domain reflectometry (TDR) leverages the reflection coefficient to diagnose faults in transmission lines by sending a fast-rising step pulse and analyzing the reflected waveform. Discontinuities, such as opens (\Gamma = +1) or shorts (\Gamma = -1), produce distinct reflection signatures, allowing fault location via time-of-flight measurements with resolution down to millimeters in high-speed lines.^[20] This technique is widely used in cable testing and integrated circuit interconnect verification.

Optics and microwaves

In optics, the reflection coefficient describes the amplitude ratio of reflected to incident electromagnetic waves at dielectric interfaces, particularly for plane waves. For p-polarized light (parallel to the plane of incidence), the Fresnel reflection coefficient r_p is given by

r_p = \frac{n_2 \cos \theta_i - n_1 \cos \theta_t}{n_2 \cos \theta_i + n_1 \cos \theta_t},

where n_1 and n_2 are the refractive indices of the incident and transmitting media, respectively, \theta_i is the angle of incidence, and \theta_t is the angle of transmission determined by Snell's law.^[21] This formulation arises from boundary conditions on the electromagnetic fields at the interface, accounting for the continuity of tangential electric and magnetic components.^[22] A similar expression exists for s-polarization (perpendicular to the plane of incidence), but r_p exhibits distinct behavior due to its dependence on the cosine terms. At Brewster's angle, \theta_B = \tan^{-1}(n_2 / n_1), the p-polarized reflection coefficient r_p vanishes, resulting in zero reflection for that polarization while s-polarized light continues to reflect.^[23]^[24] This phenomenon occurs because the reflected and transmitted rays are perpendicular, minimizing the reflected amplitude for p-polarization and enabling applications in polarizing optics.^[25] Total internal reflection happens when light incidents from a higher-index medium (n_1 > n_2) at an angle \theta_i exceeding the critical angle \theta_c = \sin^{-1}(n_2 / n_1), yielding a magnitude of the reflection coefficient |\Gamma| = 1 for both polarizations.^[26] In this regime, no energy propagates into the second medium; instead, an evanescent wave forms on the low-index side, decaying exponentially away from the interface without net power transfer.^[27] This evanescent field enables phenomena like attenuated total reflection spectroscopy. To mitigate unwanted reflections in optical systems, anti-reflection coatings employ layered dielectrics that create destructive interference between multiple reflected waves. A single quarter-wave layer, with optical thickness \lambda / 4 and refractive index n = \sqrt{n_{\text{substrate}}}, can reduce the effective reflection coefficient to near zero at the design wavelength by matching impedances across the interface.^[28]^[29] Multilayer designs extend broadband performance, achieving reflection coefficients below 0.1% over visible spectra in high-efficiency optics.^[30] In microwave engineering, the reflection coefficient \Gamma quantifies mismatches at waveguide discontinuities, such as abrupt changes in cross-sectional dimensions or material properties. For a step discontinuity in a rectangular waveguide, \Gamma arises from mode conversions and can be computed using mode-matching techniques, often resulting in values that degrade signal integrity unless compensated.^[31]^[32] These effects are critical in designing transitions between waveguides of differing sizes, where |\Gamma| must be minimized to maintain low return loss across the operating band.^[33] Reflection coefficients in these domains are measured using specialized techniques. In optics, ellipsometry assesses r_p and r_s by analyzing the change in polarization state (via ellipsometric angles \Psi and \Delta) upon reflection from the sample, enabling precise characterization of thin films and interfaces without contact.^[34] For microwaves, vector network analyzers measure the complex \Gamma by comparing incident and reflected signals in the frequency domain, typically achieving accuracies better than 0.1 dB magnitude and 1° phase through calibration standards.^[35]^[36]

Circuit theory applications

Lumped electrical networks

In lumped electrical networks, where the wavelength of the signal is much larger than the physical dimensions of the components, the reflection coefficient is defined within the framework of two-port networks to quantify the ratio of reflected to incident power waves at a port. Specifically, the input reflection coefficient \Gamma_{11} is given by \Gamma_{11} = \frac{b_1}{a_1} \big|_{a_2=0}, where a_1 and b_1 represent the incident and reflected normalized waves at port 1, respectively, and the condition a_2 = 0 indicates that port 2 is terminated in a matched load.^[37] This formulation allows analysis of discrete elements like resistors, capacitors, and inductors without considering wave propagation effects. The reflection coefficient in such networks draws an analogy to transmission line theory by relating it to the effective impedance seen at the port. For a reference impedance Z_{\text{ref}}, the reflection coefficient is expressed as \Gamma = \frac{Z - Z_{\text{ref}}}{Z + Z_{\text{ref}}}, where Z = V/I is the port impedance derived from voltage V and current I. This relation holds for lumped approximations at low frequencies, enabling impedance matching assessments similar to distributed systems but treating the network as non-propagating.^[38] A representative example is a resistive load R terminating a system with reference impedance Z_{\text{ref}} = 50 \, \Omega. The reflection coefficient at the input is \Gamma = \frac{R - 50}{R + 50}, which equals 0 when R = 50 \, \Omega (perfect match) and approaches 1 for large R (open circuit).^[39] For R = 100 \, \Omega, \Gamma = 0.333, indicating partial reflection of the incident signal.^[40] Impedance mismatches quantified by non-zero reflection coefficients degrade signal integrity in RF circuits, leading to phenomena such as ringing in digital transmission lines due to multiple reflections between discontinuities.^[41] These effects manifest as overshoot, undershoot, and prolonged settling times, compromising data reliability in high-speed applications.^[5] The reflection coefficient, being a complex quantity, is often visualized using the Smith chart, which maps \Gamma in the complex plane with the unit circle representing |\Gamma| \leq 1. Constant magnitude circles centered at the origin illustrate reflection levels, while radial lines denote phase angles, facilitating impedance transformations and matching network design for lumped elements.^[38] At higher frequencies where lumped assumptions break down, this approach extends naturally to distributed line models.

Scattering parameters

In scattering parameter theory, the reflection coefficient plays a central role in characterizing the input and output behavior of multi-port networks under matched conditions. The scattering parameters, or S-parameters, describe the relationship between incident and reflected waves at the ports of a linear network, with the diagonal elements of the S-matrix directly corresponding to reflection coefficients. For a two-port network, the input reflection coefficient is defined as S_{11} = \Gamma_{in} = \frac{b_1}{a_1}, where a_1 is the incident wave at port 1 and b_1 is the reflected wave at port 1, assuming all other ports are terminated with matched loads (i.e., no incident waves from those ports). This measures the fraction of power reflected back to the source due to impedance mismatch at the input.^[37]^[42] The full S-matrix for an N-port network relates the outgoing waves \mathbf{b} to the incoming waves \mathbf{a} via \mathbf{b} = [S] \mathbf{a}, or equivalently [S] = [\mathbf{b}] [\mathbf{a}]^{-1}, where the diagonal elements S_{ii} represent the reflection coefficients at each port when all other ports are matched. These parameters, originally formulated using power waves to ensure physical interpretability in terms of available power, provide a stable representation for high-frequency networks where voltage and current measurements become impractical. The off-diagonal elements describe transmission between ports, but the focus here is on reflections as S_{ii}, which quantify how closely the port impedance matches the reference impedance, typically 50 Ω in microwave systems.^[43] Conversions between S-parameters and other representations, such as impedance (Z) parameters, allow integration with lumped circuit analysis. For a single-port network, the reflection coefficient relates to the input impedance as S_{11} = \frac{Z_{11} - Z_0}{Z_{11} + Z_0}, where Z_0 is the reference impedance; solving for Z_{11} yields Z_{11} = Z_0 \frac{1 + S_{11}}{1 - S_{11}}. Similar transformations exist for multi-port Z-matrices, enabling designers to derive S-parameters from circuit simulations or vice versa, though numerical stability requires care at frequencies where |S_{11}| approaches 1. These conversions are essential for bridging low-frequency lumped models with high-frequency scattering formulations.^[42]^[37] De-embedding techniques are employed to isolate the true reflection coefficient of a device under test (DUT) from parasitic effects introduced by test fixtures, probes, or connectors. By modeling the fixture as an error network and using calibration standards (e.g., open, short, load, and thru in TRL calibration), the measured S-parameters can be mathematically inverted to remove fixture contributions, yielding the intrinsic \Gamma of the DUT. This process, often implemented in vector network analyzer (VNA) software, improves accuracy in on-wafer or packaged device characterization, particularly where fixture reflections can dominate the measured S_{11}. Common methods include time-domain gating to subtract delay-induced reflections or matrix-based error correction using cascaded two-port networks.^[44]^[45] In microwave design, S-parameters, including reflection coefficients, are routinely measured using a VNA, which sweeps frequencies and computes S_{11} versus frequency to assess matching over bandwidth. For instance, a well-matched amplifier might exhibit |S_{11}| < -10 dB (corresponding to |\Gamma| < 0.316) across its operating band, indicating minimal reflected power and efficient energy transfer. These measurements guide impedance matching, filter tuning, and antenna optimization, with VNAs providing phase and magnitude data for full complex \Gamma characterization.^[46]^[47]

Applications in other wave phenomena

Acoustics

In acoustics, the reflection coefficient describes the fraction of an incident sound wave that is reflected at the interface between two media, such as fluids or solids, due to differences in their acoustic properties.^[1] The acoustic impedance Z, which governs this reflection, is defined as the product of the medium's density \rho and the speed of sound c in that medium, Z = \rho c. For a plane sound wave normally incident on an interface, the amplitude reflection coefficient \Gamma is given by \Gamma = \frac{Z_2 - Z_1}{Z_2 + Z_1}, where Z_1 and Z_2 are the impedances of the incident and transmitting media, respectively.^[1] This formulation arises from the continuity of pressure and particle velocity at the boundary, analogous to general wave reflection principles but adapted to acoustic pressure and velocity fields.^[10] At interfaces between air and solids, such as a sound wave striking a wall, the reflection coefficient is typically very high, approaching \Gamma \approx 1 (or -1 depending on convention for pressure), because air has a low acoustic impedance (Z_{\text{air}} \approx 400 rayl) compared to solids like steel (Z_{\text{steel}} \approx 45 \times 10^6 rayl).^[48] This large impedance mismatch results in nearly total reflection of the incident wave, which is the primary mechanism behind echoes in everyday environments. In lossless media, where there is no dissipation of energy, the power reflection coefficient is |\Gamma|^2, representing the fraction of incident acoustic intensity that is reflected.^[1] The corresponding absorption coefficient \alpha at the interface is then \alpha = 1 - |\Gamma|^2, quantifying the fraction of power transmitted or absorbed, while the transmission coefficient for power is $1 - |\Gamma|^2 adjusted by the impedance ratio for intensity.^[49] In room acoustics, sound waves undergo multiple reflections from walls, ceiling, and floor, leading to a buildup of energy that decays over time as portions are absorbed. The reverberation time, the duration for the sound level to drop by 60 dB after the source ceases, is influenced by the average reflection coefficient across room surfaces. Sabine's formula approximates this as T = \frac{0.161 V}{A}, where V is the room volume and A is the total absorption area, with the average absorption coefficient \bar{\alpha} = 1 - \bar{r} and \bar{r} the average energy reflection coefficient over the surfaces.^[50] This model assumes diffuse reflection and is effective for rooms with moderate absorption, where \bar{\alpha} < 0.2.^[51] Underwater acoustics involves reflection of sound waves from the ocean bottom, particularly at low frequencies where wavelengths are long compared to bottom roughness. The reflection coefficient is approximated as \Gamma \approx \frac{Z_{\text{bottom}} - Z_{\text{water}}}{Z_{\text{bottom}} + Z_{\text{water}}}, with Z_{\text{water}} \approx 1.5 \times 10^6 rayl and Z_{\text{bottom}} depending on sediment type (e.g., higher for sand or rock).^[52] This reflection contributes to channel propagation effects like the deep sound channel, enabling long-range detection in sonar applications.^[52]

Seismology

In seismology, the reflection coefficient quantifies the partitioning of elastic wave energy at interfaces between geological layers characterized by contrasts in density (ρ) and elastic velocities (P-wave velocity V_P and S-wave velocity V_S). Unlike acoustic approximations limited to compressional waves in fluids, seismic reflection coefficients account for both compressional (P) and shear (S) waves in solid media, enabling the analysis of mode conversions essential for imaging heterogeneous subsurface structures in elastic earth models.^[53] The Zoeppritz equations provide the exact formulation for reflection coefficients in isotropic elastic media, derived from continuity of displacement and stress across a plane interface. For an incident P-wave, the P-P reflection coefficient Γ_PP is given by a complex expression involving the incident angle θ, ray parameter p = sinθ / V_P1, and medium properties:

\Gamma_{PP} = \frac{ \left[ b \left( E (\rho_2 \alpha_2^2 - 2 \beta_2^2) + F \rho_2 \alpha_2^2 \right) - c \left( E (\rho_1 \alpha_1^2 - 2 \beta_1^2) + F \rho_1 \alpha_1^2 \right) \right] }{ \Delta }

where α = V_P, β = V_S, a = ρ_1 (1 - p² β_1²) - ρ_2 (1 - p² β_2²), b = ρ_1 (1 - 2 p² β_1²) - ρ_2 (1 - 2 p² β_2²), c = ρ_1 ρ_2 (2 p² β_1² - 1) (2 p² β_2² - 1) / (ρ_1 + ρ_2), d = 2 (ρ_2 β_2² - ρ_1 β_1²), E = p (b - 2 ρ_1 β_1²) (2 p² β_2² - b / ρ_2) + c α_2 / ρ_2, F = p (b - 2 ρ_2 β_2²) (2 p² β_1² - b / ρ_1) + c α_1 / ρ_1, and Δ = a (E α_2 / ρ_2 + F α_1 / ρ_1) - c (d - b) (E / ρ_2 + F / ρ_1). This formulation captures angular dependence and mode conversions, such as P-to-SV, critical for interpreting seismic data in layered earth models.^[54] For horizontally polarized shear (SH) waves, which do not convert modes at plane interfaces, the reflection coefficient simplifies to Γ_SH = \frac{\rho_2 V_{S2} - \rho_1 V_{S1}}{\rho_2 V_{S2} + \rho_1 V_{S1}}, where the shear wave impedance is Z_S = \rho V_S.^[55] This form highlights the role of shear wave impedance contrast in reflecting transverse waves, analogous to acoustic impedance contrasts but specific to shear properties. For vertically polarized shear (SV) waves, Γ_SV follows the full Zoeppritz system, incorporating coupling with P-waves and exhibiting post-critical behavior beyond the critical angle where sinθ = V_S1 / V_S2. These coefficients are fundamental for modeling wave propagation in transversely isotropic media common in sedimentary basins. At a free surface, such as the Earth's surface-air interface where the lower medium has negligible density and velocities (ρ_2 ≈ 0, V_P2 ≈ 0, V_S2 ≈ 0), the reflection coefficient for a normally incident P-wave is Γ_PP = -1, resulting in a 180° phase reversal and doubling of the vertical displacement due to the stress-free boundary condition. This effect amplifies ground motion in vertical-component seismograms and is crucial for correcting surface-generated multiples in data processing. For SH waves at the free surface, Γ_SH = 1, preserving polarity and doubling horizontal displacement.^[56] Amplitude versus offset (AVO) analysis exploits the angular variation of Γ_PP to infer subsurface properties, particularly for hydrocarbon detection. The Shuey approximation linearizes the Zoeppritz equations for incidence angles θ < 30°–40°:

R(\theta) \approx R(0) + G \sin^2 \theta,

where R(0) = (1/2) (ΔV_P / V_P + Δρ / ρ) is the normal-incidence coefficient (Z-contrast), and G ≈ (1/2) Δν / (1 - ν)² - 2 (V_S / V_P)² ΔV_P / V_P + ... incorporates Poisson's ratio contrast Δν = ν_2 - ν_1 (ν ≈ 0.25 for sediments). In gas-filled reservoirs, low ν (e.g., 0.1–0.2) yields positive G, causing amplitudes to increase with offset (Class III AVO), distinguishing hydrocarbons from brine sands where G is negative. This technique, applied pre-stack, enhances reservoir delineation by isolating fluid effects from lithology.^[57] In reflection seismology, reflection coefficients underpin data processing workflows to image subsurface reflectors. Stacks of common-offset gathers approximate normal-incidence Γ_PP to construct zero-offset sections, revealing layer boundaries via impedance contrasts; corrections for angular effects using AVO-derived models mitigate distortions in migrated images. These methods, rooted in Zoeppritz-based modeling, enable quantitative inversion for V_P, V_S, and ρ profiles, supporting exploration in complex geological settings like faulted basins.^[58]

References

[1]
Reflection and Transmission Coefficients - Waves - NDE-Ed.org
The reflection coefficient is the fraction of incident energy or amplitude that is reflected as the incident wave reaches the boundary.
[2]
33 Reflection from Surfaces - Feynman Lectures
For E parallel to the plane of incidence, the reflection coefficient R∥ is R∥=IrIi=tan2(θi−θt)tan2(θi+θt). For normal incidence (any polarization, of course!), ...
[3]
https://eng.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Electrical_Engineering/Electro-Optics/Book%3A_Electromagnetics_I_(Ellingson)/03%3A_Transmission_Lines/3.12%3A_Voltage_Reflection_Coefficient
[4]
Understanding Reflection Coefficient In RF Systems
The reflection coefficient is equal to the ratio of the amplitude of the reflected wave to the incident wave. The Greek letter Γ is typically used for ...
[5]
How Signal Reflection and Impedance Mismatch Are Related
Single-ended impedance reflection coefficient. This typical transmission line arrangement has a reflection coefficient defined at the load end of the component.
[6]
9.1: Reflection and Transmission - Physics LibreTexts
Aug 2, 2021 · They are sometimes called the “reflection coefficient” and “transmission coefficient,” or the “amplitudes” for transmission and reflection.Infinite Systems · Impedance Matching · Looking at Reflected Waves
[7]
Transmission and reflection at boundaries | Acoustics Class Notes
Boundary conditions in sound propagation. Rigid boundaries create high impedance mismatch leading to near-total reflection (sound reflecting off concrete wall) ...
[8]
7.6: Normal Incidence onto a Dielectric - Engineering LibreTexts
Oct 3, 2023 · A uniform plane wave normally incident upon a dielectric interface separating two different materials has part of its power reflected and part transmitted.Missing: partial | Show results with:partial
[9]
Reflection Coefficient - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The reflection coefficient is defined as the ratio of the reflected energy to the incident energy on a material's surface, which can be calculated using the ...
[10]
[PDF] Chapter 6 – Reflection and Transmission
All energy reflected at boundary because the reflection coefficient is +1 and the amplitude of the reflected wave is the amplitude of the incident wave.
[11]
1.9: Fields in Lossy Mediums - Engineering LibreTexts
May 22, 2022 · Calculate the electric field reflection coefficient at the interface referred to the medium. Solution. Since it is not explicitly stated ...
[12]
[PDF] Reflection and transmission at oblique incidence - UF Physics
The equations are called the “Fresnel equations” and it is conventional (and correct) to work them out separately for the electric field parallel and ...
[13]
3.12: Voltage Reflection Coefficient - Engineering LibreTexts
Sep 12, 2022 · 6 , determines the magnitude and phase of the reflected wave given the incident wave, the characteristic impedance of the transmission line, and ...
[14]
[PDF] ECE 604, Lecture 12 - Purdue Engineering
Mar 24, 2019 · Γ(z) = Z(z) − Z0. Z(z) + Z0. (1.12). Usually, a transmission line is lossless, and for most practical purpose, γ = jβ. In this case, (1.11) ...
[15]
3: Transmission Lines - Engineering LibreTexts
Sep 12, 2022 · Since the current reflection coefficient is $-\Gamma=+1$ in this case, the reflected current wave is in phase with the incident current ...
[16]
Standing Wave Ratios - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Standing wave ratio (SWR) is defined as the ratio of the maximum to minimum values of a standing wave, calculated using the formula SWR = (1 + |Γ|) / (1 - |Γ|) ...
[17]
3.13: Standing Waves - Engineering LibreTexts
Sep 12, 2022 · ... j ⁢ β ⁢ z = Γ ⁢ V 0 + ⁢ e + j ⁢ β ⁢ z , where Γ is the voltage reflection coefficient. These waves add to make the total potential.
[18]
3.15: Input Impedance of a Terminated Lossless Transmission Line
Sep 12, 2022 · can be written entirely in terms of Z L and Z 0 , since Γ depends only on these two parameters. Here's that version of the expression: ...
[19]
[PDF] Power Flow and Return Loss
Likewise, if the return loss is 30dB, then 0.1 % of the incident power is reflected at the load, with the remaining 99.9% being absorbed by the load—we “lose” ...
[20]
[PDF] TDR Impedance Measurements: A Foundation for Signal Integrity
What is Time Domain Reflectometry? Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) measures the reflections that result from a signal travelling through a transmission.
[21]
Reflection at a dielectric boundary - Richard Fitzpatrick
The coefficient of reflection, $R$, is defined as the ratio of the intensities of the reflected and incident waves.Missing: partial | Show results with:partial
[22]
Fresnel Equations - The University of Arizona
Developed in the years 1821-1823, the Fresnel equations[1] describe the amplitude of transmitted and reflected light at the boundary between two materials.Missing: history | Show results with:history
[23]
Brewster's angle - RP Photonics
The Brewsters angle is an angle of incidence at which there is no reflection of p-polarized light at an uncoated optical surface.
[24]
Polarization by Reflection - HyperPhysics
... reflection coefficient is zero when the incident and transmitted angles sum to 90°. The use of Snell's law gives an expression for the Brewster angle. For ...
[25]
What is Brewster's Angle? - AZoOptics
The incident light with an electric field parallel to the plane of incidence usually has a zero reflection coefficient at a particular angle between 0 and 90°.
[26]
5.12: Evanescent Waves - Physics LibreTexts
May 9, 2020 · When total internal reflection occurs, the transmitted field is an evanescent wave; ie, a surface wave which conveys no power and whose magnitude decays ...
[27]
Total Internal Reflection - Richard Fitzpatrick
When total internal reflection takes place, the evanescent transmitted wave penetrates a few wavelengths into the lower refractive index medium. The ...
[28]
Anti-Reflection Coatings - HyperPhysics
A single quarter-wavelength coating of optimum index can eliminate reflection at one wavelength. Multi-layer coatings can reduce the loss over the visible ...
[29]
Anti-Reflection Coatings - PVEducation
Bare silicon has a high surface reflection of over 30%. The reflection is reduced by texturing and by applying anti-reflection coatings (ARC) to the ...
[30]
Perfect anti-reflection from first principles | Scientific Reports - Nature
Jan 14, 2013 · An anti-reflection coating of a quarter-wave optical thickness is a well-known method for removing reflections of one specific wavelength, while ...
[31]
Reflection and transmission coefficients of rectangular dielectric ...
Abstract: Reflection, transmission, and radiation characteristics of rectangular dielectric waveguide discontinuities with an air gap are analyzed.
[32]
Analysis of Optical Waveguide Discontinuities - IEEE Xplore
3 illustrates the variation of reflection coefficient ... optical ano microwave waveguide problems," IEEE Trans. ... waveguide junctions and discontinuities ...
[33]
Mode-matching analysis of the step discontinuity in elliptical ...
As examples, the input reflection coefficients are calculated of two step discontinuities, a nearly circular-to-circular waveguide transition and a transition ...
[34]
[PDF] Ellipsometry
Ellipsometry is the measurement of the effect of reflection on the state of polarization of light. ... The results for the amplitude reflection coefficient and.
[35]
The Reflection Analyzer - Architecture and Implementation
The measurement of amplitude and phase of reflation coefficient is generally carried out using vector network analyzers. They achieve higher accuracy than ...
[36]
A de-embedding technique for reflection-based S-parameters ...
Abstract: A generalized calibration and de-embedding technique for reflection-based S-parameter measurements of microwave devices is proposed.
[37]
[PDF] RF engineering basic concepts: S-parameters
(1.4) and (1.7) we find the reflection coefficient of a single impedance ZL connected to a generator of source impedance Z0 (Fig. 1, case ZG = Z0 and Z = 0):.
[38]
[PDF] RF Engineering Basic Concepts: The Smith Chart - CERN Indico
Γ =Z - Z0 ... Example: a 10dB attenuator attenuates the reflected wave by 20dB going forth and back and we get a reflection coefficient of Γ=0.1. (= 10% in ...
[39]
[PDF] 5 Smith Chart
Smith Chart is a handy tool that we use to visualize impedances and reflection coefficients. Lumped element and transmission line impedance matching would.
[40]
[PDF] Waves and Impedances on Transmission Lines - Sandiego
For a transmission line of characteristic impedance Zo and load impedance ZL the reflection ... reflection coefficient Γ is. Γ = z-1 z+1. = 1/0. This value of Γ ...
[41]
Lecture 09 - Signal Integrity - MIT
Differences in impedance, whether it be between a transmitting device and a wire/trace or from a trace to a receiving device will result cause reflections and ...
[42]
[PDF] Scattering Parameters - University of California, Berkeley
Recall that the reflection coefficient for a load is given by the same equation! ρ = Z/Z0 − 1. Z/Z0 + 1. • To solve for Z in ...
[43]
2.3: Scattering Parameters - Engineering LibreTexts
May 22, 2022 · Γ V is the voltage reflection coefficient, which is usually denoted as just Γ , while Γ I is the current reflection coefficient. It is clear ...
[44]
De-Embedding and Embedding S-Parameter Networks Using a ...
Explore the techniques of de-embedding and embedding S-parameter networks with a DUT. The error coefficients can be modified using the error-correcting ...
[45]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/333424
[46]
[PDF] Fundamentals of Vector Network Analysis Primer
z = Z/Z0 is defined and used to determine the reflection coefficient. Under these operating conditions, we measure the input reflection coefficient s11 on port ...
[47]
Understanding S-parameters | Rohde & Schwarz
S parameters are a way of representing the RF network characteristics. They describe how much of a signal is reflected back, transmitted through or transferred ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[48]
Acoustic Impedance - Sound - NDE-Ed.org
The following applet can be used to calculate the acoustic impedance for any material, so long as its density (ρ) and acoustic velocity (V) are known.<|control11|><|separator|>
[49]
[PDF] Absorption Coefficients and Impedance
◦ Calculate the sound power reflection (B/A) coefficient using Eq. (9). ◦ Calculate the sound power absorption coefficient α using Eq. (13). ◦ Calculate ...
[50]
[PDF] revisiting sabine's formula - Institute of Acoustics
In 1992, I proposed a generalized Sabine formula that developed reverberation time over a power series of the average reflection coefficient on the ...
[51]
[PDF] Lab #6 – Room Acoustics
The absorption coefficient is the fraction of the power absorbed in one reflection. ... The Sabine formula neglects air absorption, which can be significant for ...
[52]
Low‐frequency negative bottom loss: An effect of the ocean‐bottom ...
Aug 11, 2005 · Ocean bottom reflectivity is generally described by a single function, the reflection coefficient (R), defined as a ratio of reflected‐to ...
[53]
Seismic Reflection Coefficients | GeoScienceWorld Books
Dec 31, 2020 · The Zoeppritz equations (Zoeppritz, 1919) provide a more accurate indication of the reflected amplitudes than Equation (A-1) when the incidence ...
[54]
Reflection coefficients for non-welded interface between ...
Zoeppritz (1919) equation serves as the basis for reflection coefficient calculation and can accurately calculate the reflection and transmission coefficient.
[55]
Introduction to Seismology - Purdue University
Thus, for the SH case at a free surface, the reflection coefficient is 1 for all angles of incidence. Combining the incident and reflected waves at the free ...
[56]
A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations - GeoScienceWorld
Mar 2, 2017 · This simplified formula for R(theta ) accounts for all of the relations between R(theta ) and elastic properties first described by Koefoed in ...
[57]
[PDF] AVO modelling of linearized Zoeppritz approximations - CREWES
The reflection coefficients are calculated and plotted against the angle of incidence up to the critical angle. The various approximations are compared to the ...