Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Rectal administration

Rectal administration is an enteral route of medication delivery in which drugs are introduced into the , typically through suppositories, enemas, gels, or foams, to achieve local effects within the colorectal region or systemic absorption via the rectal mucosa. This method leverages the 's anatomical structure—a 15–20 cm long cavity in adults with a surface area of 200–400 cm² and a of 7–8—for passive diffusion of lipophilic drugs, while the low fluid volume (1–3 mL) and minimal enzymatic activity facilitate retention and absorption. Approximately 50% of rectally absorbed drugs enter the systemic circulation directly via the inferior and middle rectal veins, partially bypassing hepatic first-pass and improving for certain compounds compared to oral routes. The rectal route is particularly advantageous for patients unable to take oral medications, such as those experiencing , , , or , and it remains unaffected by gastrointestinal or food intake. It offers a non-invasive alternative to parenteral administration, especially in pediatric, elderly, or emergency settings like management in infants where intravenous access is challenging, and it supports higher drug doses due to the mucosa's vascularization. Common clinical applications include systemic treatments for pain, fever, allergies, , migraines, and therapy (e.g., rectal gel), as well as local therapies for conditions like , , and using agents such as suppositories. Despite these benefits, rectal administration has limitations, including potential patient discomfort, irregular influenced by rectal contents or posture, and unsuitability for hydrophilic drugs like many antibiotics due to poor mucosal permeability. Pharmaceutical formulations must account for the rectum's , often incorporating lipid bases for suppositories to ensure melting at body temperature or aqueous solutions for enemas to promote spreading. Ongoing research explores advanced delivery systems, such as nanoparticles, to enhance and reduce , though widespread adoption remains limited by cultural and formulation challenges.

Definition and Background

Definition

Rectal administration refers to the introduction of medications or substances into the , the terminal portion of the lower , to achieve either local therapeutic effects within the rectal area or systemic absorption into the bloodstream. This route leverages the rectum's anatomical structure for , bypassing the upper and its associated challenges. The extends approximately 12 to 15 cm from the rectosigmoid junction to the anal canal's dentate line, featuring a highly vascularized and absorptive mucosa that facilitates uptake. Its venous primarily involves the superior, , and inferior rectal veins, which partially circumvent hepatic first-pass metabolism by directing blood flow toward the systemic circulation via the for the lower . As a non-oral gastrointestinal delivery method, rectal administration avoids issues such as or degradation in the acidic environment, making it suitable when the oral route is impractical. The primary purposes of rectal administration include local treatment of conditions affecting the rectal region, such as hemorrhoids, and systemic delivery for medications that are unstable in gastric acid or require relatively rapid onset of action. For instance, it serves as an alternative for antiemetics in patients experiencing vomiting where oral administration fails.

History

The practice of rectal administration originated in ancient civilizations, where it was employed for both local and systemic therapeutic effects. In ancient Egypt, the Ebers Papyrus, dating to around 1550 BCE, documents the use of rectal enemas incorporating natural substances such as cumin, cannabis sativa, and moringa to cool and treat anal conditions, reflecting an early recognition of the route's utility in detoxification and symptom relief. Similarly, in ancient Greece, Hippocrates (c. 460–377 BCE) described suppositories composed of anise, myrrh, and goose grease for rectal insertion, aiming to achieve systemic absorption for various ailments. Roman physicians, building on these Greek foundations, further integrated rectal methods into routine medical practice for purgation and pain management. During the medieval and periods, Islamic scholarship preserved and expanded upon classical knowledge of rectal administration. (Ibn Sina, 980–1037 CE), in his influential , detailed anorectal treatments including for conditions like and , and innovated a squeezable enema device to facilitate precise fluid delivery. By the in , these techniques gained wider adoption for purgative purposes, with physicians employing herbal enemas to induce bowel evacuation, often drawing from translated Arabic texts. The 19th and early 20th centuries marked significant pharmaceutical advancements in rectal delivery systems. Cocoa butter was introduced as a suppository base in 1841, providing a solid yet meltable vehicle for active ingredients like opium. Glycerin suppositories, valued for their laxative properties through osmotic action, emerged in the mid-19th century, with refined formulations combining gelatin, glycerin, and water developed by 1897 to improve insertion and dissolution. Following World War II, standardization efforts in the pharmaceutical industry facilitated rectal suppositories of systemic analgesics such as acetaminophen, particularly for pediatric patients unable to take oral medications. In the , from the onward, pharmacokinetic studies elucidated key advantages of rectal administration, including partial avoidance of hepatic first-pass for high-clearance drugs; for instance, a 1979 study on lidocaine demonstrated higher via this route compared to oral dosing. This research spurred broader applications in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, emphasizing rectal routes in pediatric care for fever reduction and in palliative settings for control. More recently, in the 2020s, innovative formulations have emerged, such as dapivirine rectal gels for HIV , with phase 1 trials confirming their safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in diverse populations.

Uses

Medical uses

Rectal administration is employed in various clinical scenarios where oral intake is contraindicated, such as in patients experiencing nausea and vomiting, or when rapid systemic absorption is required without gastrointestinal interference. Primary indications include antiemetic therapy, where ondansetron suppositories effectively prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting by providing reliable absorption despite emesis. Similarly, analgesic relief is achieved with rectal formulations like acetaminophen or diclofenac suppositories, which are particularly useful for postoperative pain management when patients cannot tolerate oral medications. In special populations, rectal administration offers targeted benefits. For pediatrics, rectal gel is a first-line for prolonged febrile s, enabling rapid seizure termination at home or in emergency settings with high efficacy and safety. In , suppositories provide consistent pain control for end-of-life patients unable to swallow, maintaining therapeutic levels over several hours. Emergency applications include rectal administration for , where it rapidly halts convulsions in cases where intravenous access is delayed. Local treatments leverage the rectal route for direct action on rectal and perianal tissues. creams are commonly used for hemorrhoidal relief, reducing inflammation, itching, and pain through topical anti-inflammatory effects. For , mesalamine enemas treat distal by delivering high concentrations of the anti-inflammatory agent to the affected mucosa, inducing remission in a majority of patients. Other applications include antifungal therapy, such as clotrimazole suppositories for rectal , which target localized fungal infections effectively via direct mucosal contact. Experimental rectal delivery is also under investigation to stimulate mucosal immunity, with studies demonstrating induction of both local and systemic immune responses against pathogens like . Efficacy evidence supports rectal administration's role, particularly in nauseated patients, where meta-analyses from the 2010s indicate comparable to oral routes for drugs like acetaminophen and opioids, often with reduced first-pass enhancing systemic exposure.

Non-medical uses

Rectal administration has been employed in various non-medical contexts, often for recreational, cultural, or alternative health purposes, though these practices carry significant risks due to the lack of and potential for rapid absorption of substances. In recreational settings, particularly among users of drugs, substances such as , , , and are sometimes inserted rectally—a method known as "boofing," "plugging," or "booty bumping"—to achieve faster onset and more intense effects compared to oral . This route bypasses first-pass in the liver, leading to quicker but heightened dangers, including overdose from unpredictable dosing and . enemas, or "butt chugging," exemplify this misuse, where individuals introduce alcoholic beverages rectally for rapid absorption, resulting in severe poisoning, as seen in reported cases among young adults at social gatherings. Alternative medicine practices frequently incorporate rectal administration through herbal or natural enemas, purportedly for detoxification or wellness, despite lacking scientific validation. enemas, popularized in the Gerson regimen developed in the 1930s, involve infusing brewed coffee rectally to supposedly stimulate liver function and eliminate toxins, but systematic reviews have found no evidence of efficacy and highlight risks such as , rectal burns, and imbalances. In traditional systems like , basti enemas use herbal oils or decoctions for purification, while western African practices employ plant-based enemas for treating ailments beyond , reflecting a cultural reliance on this route for holistic healing. These methods persist in modern "detox" trends, often promoted online, but case reports document complications like severe inflammation from unsterile preparations. In sexual practices, rectal administration occurs through the application of lubricants during anal intercourse, which can sometimes include additives or drug-laced substances to enhance sensation, though this amplifies health risks. Hyperosmolar or oil-based lubricants may damage the rectal mucosa, increasing vulnerability to infections, while certain formulations have been shown to heighten transmission potential by disrupting epithelial barriers. Stimulants like , when mixed into lubricants or inserted directly, contribute to cardiovascular events due to swift systemic uptake, as evidenced by clinical reports of in unsupervised scenarios. Historically and culturally, non-medical rectal administration has roots in ritualistic purges across civilizations, serving spiritual or prophylactic roles rather than therapeutic ones. Ancient Egyptians used enemas to expel believed disease-causing fecal residues, a practice echoed in rituals where intoxicating enemas facilitated hallucinogenic experiences during ceremonies. These traditions highlight rectal routes in purification rites, contrasting with modern illicit uses. Such non-medical applications often involve controlled substances, rendering them illegal under laws like the U.S. , which prohibits non-prescribed possession or use regardless of administration method. Prevalence remains low overall but notable in specific subcultures.

Pharmacokinetics

Absorption and distribution

Rectal absorption begins at the mucosal surface of the , where drugs must dissolve in the limited rectal fluid volume (approximately 1-3 mL) before crossing the epithelium. The rectal mucosa consists of a single layer of columnar epithelial s with tight junctions, facilitating both transcellular and paracellular transport pathways. Lipophilic drugs, being lipid-soluble in their non-ionized form, primarily undergo passive across the membranes via the transcellular route. In contrast, hydrophilic drugs rely on the paracellular route, diffusing through the intercellular spaces, though this pathway is more restricted due to the tight junctions. The rectal pH, which is neutral (ranging from 7 to 8), favors the of weak bases with pKa values near or above this range, as they remain predominantly non-ionized and thus more permeable. The venous drainage of the rectum plays a critical role in the distribution of absorbed substances, with distinct pathways for the upper and lower regions. The upper rectum is drained by the superior rectal vein, which joins the and enters the circulation, subjecting absorbed drugs to hepatic first-pass . Conversely, the middle and inferior rectal veins drain the lower rectum directly into the internal iliac veins and then the , allowing systemic distribution while bypassing the liver. Due to extensive anastomoses between these veins, approximately 50% of rectally absorbed drugs enter the systemic circulation without hepatic first-pass effect. This partial bypass contributes to the route's utility for drugs with high first-pass , though the exact proportion can vary based on the site of deposition. Several physiological factors influence the extent and rate of and subsequent . The rectal surface area available for is relatively small, measuring 200-400 cm² in adults, which limits overall uptake compared to other routes. Retention time is another key determinant, typically ranging from 15-60 minutes for suppositories but influenced by fecal content, which can dilute or expel the formulation, and by rectal , which promotes to the lower regions. Blood flow to the rectal mucosa, estimated at 15-30 mL/min/100 g, varies regionally, with higher flow in the upper rectum potentially accelerating initial uptake there before portal drainage. Formulation and patient-specific variables further modulate these processes. The choice of base in suppositories—lipophilic (e.g., cocoa butter) or hydrophilic (e.g., polyethylene glycol)—affects drug release and dissolution; lipophilic drugs release more readily from hydrophilic bases, while hydrophilic drugs perform better in lipophilic ones. Patient factors, such as gastrointestinal motility, presence of inflammation (e.g., in inflammatory bowel disease, which increases mucosal permeability), and age, can alter absorption efficiency and distribution patterns. Research from the and , including studies by De Boer et al. (1982, 1984), quantified the hemodynamic differences between upper and lower rectal absorption in animal models and humans, demonstrating that upper rectal deposition leads to greater portal drainage (up to 70%) and first-pass exposure, while lower placement favors systemic entry (around 30% portal contribution overall). These findings underscored the importance of deposition site in achieving desired distribution profiles.

Bioavailability and metabolism

Bioavailability in rectal administration refers to the fraction of the administered drug dose that reaches the systemic circulation in its active form. This route typically achieves ranging from 50% to 100%, often surpassing (which yields 20-90% for many drugs) due to partial avoidance of hepatic first-pass , as approximately half of rectally absorbed drugs bypass the liver via the inferior and middle rectal veins draining into the systemic circulation. Several physicochemical properties influence rectal , including drug in the limited rectal fluid (1-3 mL) and molecular weight, with optimal for lipophilic compounds under 500 Da that favor transcellular diffusion. For instance, demonstrates high rectal of 80-90%, making it suitable for rapid delivery. during rectal administration varies by site: drugs taken up in the upper rectum via the superior rectal undergo substantial hepatic first-pass effects, while lower rectal reduces this exposure. Extrahepatic metabolism occurs locally in the rectal mucosa, mediated by cytochrome P450 enzymes such as , which can inactivate 10-20% of certain substrates before systemic entry; overall, this contributes to the route's pharmacokinetic profile. The can be expressed quantitatively as F_{\text{rectal}} = F_{\text{portal}} \times (1 - E_h) + F_{\text{systemic}}, where F_{\text{portal}} is the fraction absorbed through the , E_h is the hepatic extraction ratio, and F_{\text{systemic}} is the fraction entering systemic circulation directly. Rectal administration often results in faster (5-30 minutes) than oral routes for select drugs, though absorption variability can lead to irregular half-lives. Pharmacokinetic studies from the , including trials on indomethacin, report rectal of 80-100% compared to 60-100% orally, with time to maximum concentration (T_max) reduced to about 20 minutes rectally versus 40 minutes orally, highlighting the route's efficiency for drugs prone to presystemic .

Administration Techniques

Suppositories

Suppositories are solid consisting of an active embedded or dispersed within a base material, designed to melt or dissolve in the rectal cavity for drug release. The base serves as the vehicle for delivery, with lipophilic bases such as ( oil) commonly used for their ability to melt at body temperature, typically in the range of 34–36°C, facilitating smooth release without irritation. Water-soluble bases like () dissolve in rectal fluids and are preferred for hydrophilic drugs or when a more uniform dissolution is needed, offering flexibility in for both local and systemic effects. Preparation of suppositories primarily involves molding techniques, where the is melted and mixed with the before being poured into lubricated molds to solidify, or methods that apply pressure to powdered ingredients without , for heat-sensitive actives. Molded suppositories are the most prevalent for rectal use, while is less common but ensures precise uniformity. Standard sizes include approximately 2 g for adults, shaped as tapered cylinders about 3–5 cm long, and 1 g for pediatric patients, often more slender to ease insertion. Drug release occurs through melting of lipophilic bases upon contact with rectal mucosa or of hydrophilic bases in the aqueous environment, with additives like sometimes incorporated to enhance and . The insertion procedure begins with lubrication of the suppository tip using a water-soluble , such as , to minimize discomfort and ensure smooth passage, avoiding petroleum-based products that may hinder melting. Patients assume a lateral recumbent position () with knees drawn up, inserting the pointed end first using a gloved finger to advance it past the anal sphincter. For systemic absorption, insertion to a depth of 5–10 cm targets the upper , bypassing significant first-pass , while shallower placement (2–5 cm) in the lower suits local effects like treating . Retention for 15–60 minutes is ideal to allow complete melting or dissolution, with patients advised to remain lying down to promote adherence. A 1991 study suggested higher retention rates (up to 98%) with blunt-end-first insertion compared to pointed-end-first (17%), but this evidence has been critiqued as limited and unreliable, with manufacturers and standard guidelines recommending pointed end first. This form provides advantages such as during storage at and precise dosing, enabling consistent of the therapeutic without reliance on patient swallowing or gastrointestinal variability. For instance, suppositories, dosed at 10 mg for adults, offer reliable relief from by stimulating colonic within 15–60 minutes, demonstrating the form's efficacy for targeted action. However, common issues include base migration distally due to rectal or spontaneous expulsion, particularly if inserted incorrectly.

Enemas and other fluid methods

Enemas represent a primary liquid-based method of rectal administration, categorized into evacuant types designed for rapid bowel cleansing and retention types intended for prolonged therapeutic contact. Evacuant enemas, such as saline or solutions, stimulate by distending the or drawing into the bowel, typically evacuating within minutes to prepare for procedures like diagnostic imaging. Retention enemas, exemplified by mesalamine solutions for (IBD), are formulated to remain in the for 20-40 minutes to allow and reduce colonic inflammation. The administration procedure for enemas involves preparing a at , approximately 37°C, to minimize discomfort and enhance tolerance. Adult volumes range from 50-500 mL for small-volume retention or targeted cleansing, up to 1,000 mL for thorough evacuant effects, delivered slowly over 5-10 minutes. Common methods include using a bulb for precise small-volume delivery or an enema bag suspended 18-24 inches above the patient for gravity-assisted flow. Patients are positioned on the left side with knees drawn toward the chest to straighten the and facilitate insertion of the lubricated tip 2-4 inches; for retention, lying or on the side while breathing deeply aids in holding the fluid. Beyond enemas, other fluid methods include rectal gels, foams, and techniques for localized effects. Lidocaine-containing gels, administered as 15 mL of 2% solution intrarectally, provide temporary for procedures such as prostate biopsies, though evidence shows limited improvement in patient tolerance compared to . Rectal foams, such as those containing corticosteroids or for IBD, are aerosolized formulations that expand upon release to coat the rectal and colonic mucosa evenly, typically administered in 5–20 mL volumes via an applicator for better adherence and reduced leakage compared to liquids. Rectal douches or use plain or medicated fluids to flush the lower bowel for cleansing, often employing similar devices but with repeated instillations and evacuations. Devices for these methods vary by purpose and volume, with disposable options like Fleet saline enemas delivering a pre-filled 118-133 mL dose via a for convenience in evacuant applications. Reusable kits, consisting of a bag, tubing, and clamp, allow customization for larger volumes and retention use, with flow rates controlled below 100 mL per minute to prevent rectal pressure or . Key specifics influencing efficacy include solution osmolarity, where hypertonic formulations like enemas (approximately 1,000-2,000 mOsm/L) induce laxation by osmotic pull of into the , softening and promoting evacuation. Modern protocols for barium enemas in diagnostics, updated in the , recommend low-osmolar contrast agents (300-500 mOsm/L) administered via at controlled rates, preceded by oral laxatives and a final cleansing to ensure clear visualization while minimizing risks.

Advantages and Limitations

Advantages

Rectal administration offers several route-specific benefits, particularly in circumventing the upper , which makes it suitable for patients with , , or those requiring nil per os () status. This route partially avoids the hepatic first-pass effect, as approximately 50% of absorbed drugs bypass extensive liver metabolism, resulting in higher systemic for high-extraction medications. For instance, lidocaine exhibits roughly twice the bioavailability rectally compared to orally, with mean systemic availability of 63% versus 31% in . From a perspective, rectal delivery serves as a non-invasive alternative to intravenous routes, facilitating administration in unconscious individuals, young children, or those with limited venous access. It is especially valuable in pediatric emergencies, such as or treatment, where it enables rapid onset—often within 10-30 minutes for analgesics like —without requiring specialized training or equipment. Formulation advantages include enhanced for drugs vulnerable to gastrointestinal degradation, such as peptides or those with poor , due to the rectum's neutral (7-8) and low enzymatic activity. This route also supports targeted local for rectal conditions like , minimizing systemic exposure and potential overload. Evidence from comparative studies underscores these benefits; for example, 2000s reviews and meta-analyses show rectal achieves antipyretic efficacy equivalent to in children with fever, with similar temperature reductions and no need for higher doses. In resource-limited settings, rectal methods prove cost-effective, requiring minimal infrastructure and being less expensive than parenteral options while maintaining therapeutic reliability.

Disadvantages and risks

Rectal administration can cause significant discomfort, including local , cramping, and an urge to , which often leads to non-compliance rates as high as 71% in cases like treatment with mesalamine suppositories. associated with the route contributes to refusal, with up to 65% of nonadherent patients citing the mode of administration as a barrier. Additionally, can interrupt the process, resulting in incomplete and variable absorption that leads to unpredictable dosing. Physiological risks include mucosal irritation or damage from pH variations or chemical components in formulations, potentially exacerbating local . is rare, occurring in less than 1% of cases with proper technique, but has been reported as iatrogenic injury from administration causing mechanical trauma. In non-medical misuse, such as recreational enemas, rapid systemic absorption can lead to severe ; case reports from the 2010s document fatalities from acute via this route. Specific complications encompass electrolyte imbalances from hypertonic enemas, like preparations, which can induce , , and , particularly in vulnerable patients. Allergic reactions to suppository bases may occur, manifesting as localized . Pre-existing rectal pathologies, such as fissures or , heighten risks of worsened or tissue damage during administration. Pharmacokinetic studies, such as those on indomethacin suppositories, show variability with of 80-90% but incomplete and erratic uptake compared to oral routes.

Clinical Considerations

Safety and contraindications

Rectal administration is contraindicated in patients with active , as it may exacerbate hemorrhage or introduce risks. Recent rectal or bowel represents an absolute contraindication due to the potential for disrupting healing tissues and causing . Conditions such as , , or other forms of are absolute contraindications, given the heightened risk of bacterial translocation and from mucosal trauma. and significant anorectal , including strictures, fissures, abscesses, or prolapsed , also constitute absolute contraindications, as they impair retention, , and increase or injury. Relative contraindications include or , where administration may be considered only if benefits outweigh potential mucosal aggravation. Precautions involve thorough assessment for or allergies to the active drug or suppository base, such as or , to prevent allergic reactions or local . In cases of repeated use, clinicians must monitor for and imbalances, particularly with phosphate-based formulations, by tracking fluid intake and serum levels. For immunocompromised patients without absolute contraindications, strict sterile technique is essential, including use of single-dose preparations and gloved administration to minimize contamination risks. Monitoring for adverse effects should include observation for , distension, or tenderness, which may signal rectal , a rare but serious complication requiring immediate evaluation. Additional signs to watch for include , persistent discomfort, or lack of expected therapeutic response, prompting discontinuation and further assessment. Dosing limits are critical to avoid mucosal damage; suppositories should generally not exceed 2-3 administrations per day, with retention encouraged for at least 15-30 minutes to optimize absorption while preventing overuse-related irritation. Guidelines from the emphasize hygienic practices for rectal preparations, including proper packaging to maintain sterility and prevent contamination during administration. The (USP) standards for nonsterile compounding require hand hygiene, such as washing with soap and water for at least 30 seconds before handling, and use of clean equipment to reduce infection risks. Recent reviews from the 2020s highlight the importance of obtaining prior to rectal administration, discussing alternatives like sublingual routes, and ensuring on potential discomfort. In special populations, rectal administration during is generally considered low risk for many medications with favorable pregnancy safety profiles (e.g., certain analgesics and antiemetics), according to current FDA labeling under the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule. However, stimulant laxatives like should be avoided to prevent . For elderly patients, precautions include accounting for reduced rectal retention time due to potential incontinence or decreased , which may necessitate smaller volumes or alternative routes to ensure efficacy.

Patient guidelines

Patients preparing for rectal administration should prioritize to minimize risk. Always wash hands thoroughly with and warm water before handling medications or the rectal area, and clean the perianal region gently with mild and water if soiled. Suppositories should be stored in a cool, dry place away from direct and heat; some formulations, such as mesalamine suppositories, may be refrigerated but must not be frozen to preserve efficacy. For optimal retention, administer the after a bowel movement, as an empty enhances and reduces expulsion. To insert a rectal suppository, lie on your left side with the right knee drawn up toward the chest for comfort and access. Remove the suppository from its wrapper, and if needed, apply a water-based lubricant to the tapered end and your gloved or clean finger. Gently insert the pointed or tapered end first into the rectum, advancing it about 1 inch (2.5–3.5 cm) for adults past the anal sphincter along the rectal wall. For enemas or fluid methods, assume a similar left-side lying position, follow the specific product instructions for volume and retention time, and use the provided applicator to introduce the solution slowly. After insertion of either form, remain lying down for 5–15 minutes to allow the medication to dissolve and be absorbed, avoiding bowel movements during this period. If the suppository is expelled shortly after insertion, attempt to reinsert it if it remains intact and within the recommended window, or use a new one if available, ensuring proper lubrication and positioning to prevent recurrence. Persistent issues like expulsion may indicate inadequate depth of insertion or rectal irritation, so consult a healthcare provider for guidance. Seek immediate medical help if you experience severe , , or allergic reactions during or after . Rectal administration is a safe and effective route when performed with proper , dispelling concerns that it is inherently unclean—thorough handwashing and area eliminate most risks. For , refer to official leaflets from regulatory bodies such as the FDA or , which provide tailored instructions for specific medications like mesalamine for (IBD). For s using rectal medications chronically, such as in IBD management, adherence can be improved by integrating reminders like setting alarms or placing medications in visible locations, and combining rectal therapy with oral regimens for consistent dosing without sole reliance on one route. Strategies like regimen simplification, such as administration to align with daily routines, also enhance compliance and treatment outcomes.

References

  1. [1]
    Medication Routes of Administration - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Similar to sublingual and buccal routes, rectally administered medications undergo passive diffusion and partially bypass the first-pass metabolism. Only about ...Anatomy and Physiology · Indications · Contraindications · Technique or Treatment
  2. [2]
    Physiological and Pharmaceutical Considerations for Rectal Drug ...
    Rectal formulations for systemic drug delivery are used clinically for the treatment of pain, fever, nausea and vomiting, migraines, allergies, and sedation.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    Rectal Administration - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Rectal administration is defined as the delivery of medication and fluids through the rectum, which allows for absorption into the bloodstream and bypasses ...
  4. [4]
    Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis, Rectum - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    [1] The rectum measures between 12 to 15 cm in length from the rectosigmoid junction to the dentate line in the anal canal. Its course is marked by two anterior ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  5. [5]
    Rectum: Anatomy, histology, function - Kenhub
    The rectum is supplied by the superior rectal artery (branch of the inferior mesenteric artery), middle rectal artery (branch of the internal iliac artery) and ...
  6. [6]
    Traditional ancient Egyptian medicine: A review - PMC - NIH
    Jun 19, 2021 · The routes of drug administration were basically five; oral, rectal, vaginal, topical, and fumigation. ... Ebers papyrus, 1550BCE, 1873 ...
  7. [7]
    Per rectum: a history of enemata - ResearchGate
    The practice of administering fluids rectally can be dated back to Egypt in ancient times. ... Bottoms Up: A History of Rectal Nutrition From 1870 to 1920.
  8. [8]
    Insights into Avicenna's Contributions to the Science of Surgery
    Feb 13, 2014 · Avicenna was the first figure in medical history to introduce a squeezable enema device (vol. 3, part 3, p. 33–34) [11]. He described abdominal ...
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    Designing and developing suppository formulations for anti-HIV ...
    Suppositories during this time were approximately 5 g in size. In 1897, a combination of gelatin, glycerin and water was utilized for the first time.
  11. [11]
    Rectal route in the 21st Century to treat children - ScienceDirect
    Jun 30, 2014 · The Old Testament refers to 'Magerarta' – suppository made of silver – and Hippocrates describes various compositions of acorns which were ...
  12. [12]
    Acetaminophen - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Jan 11, 2024 · Rectal: Acetaminophen is available as a rectal suppository for adult and pediatric patients. IV: Acetaminophen is also available as an IV ...
  13. [13]
    Rectal bioavailability of lidocaine in man - PubMed
    This investigation indicates that in principle it is possible to avoid, at least partly, drug loss caused by "first-pass" metabolism by giving the drug rectally ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Safety ...
    Dapivirine (DPV), formulated as vaginal ring, demonstrated HIV risk reduction. MTN-026 explored DPV, formulated as rectal gel, for safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  15. [15]
    The prophylactic effect of rectal acetaminophen on postoperative ...
    Conclusion: We conclude that prophylactic rectal acetaminophen is effective in reducing pain after adenotonsillectomy and postoperative analgesic requirement.
  16. [16]
    Rectal diazepam gel in the home management of seizures in children
    Home use of rectal diazepam gel is effective in aborting seizure activity, often avoiding an emergency department visit.
  17. [17]
    Therapeutic Approaches to Cancer Pain - NCBI - NIH
    Oxymorphone, hydromorphone, and morphine are available as rectal suppositories and are effective in managing chronic cancer pain. ... nausea or vomiting, ...
  18. [18]
    Midazolam for status epilepticus - PMC - NIH
    Feb 1, 2017 · Midazolam is a benzodiazepine which is now the recommended first-line drug for treating convulsive status epilepticus.
  19. [19]
    Improving Hemorrhoid Outcomes: A Narrative Review and Best ...
    In the U.S., 1% hydrocortisone cream is a safe and effective OTC treatment for hemorrhoid symptoms when used as directed for up to 7 days [6].
  20. [20]
    Combined oral and enema treatment with Pentasa (mesalazine) is ...
    Combined oral and enema treatment with Pentasa (mesalazine) is superior to oral therapy alone in patients with extensive mild/moderate active ulcerative colitis ...
  21. [21]
    Rectal Immunization with Rotavirus Virus-Like Particles Induces ...
    Rectal immunization with rotavirus virus-like particles induces systemic and mucosal humoral immune responses and protects mice against rotavirus infection.
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Boofing Drugs Warning | Banyan Treatment Center
    Boofing drugs, sometimes also referred to as plugging drugs, is the process of inserting drugs or alcohol into your anus in order to get a more immediate high.
  24. [24]
    Dangers Of "Plugging" Drugs / Rectal Drug Administration
    While not as frequently discussed as oral or intravenous use, rectal administration ("plugging" drugs) is becoming a more popular trend, especially among ...Missing: enema | Show results with:enema
  25. [25]
    Booty Bump Drugs: Understanding Risks and Health Dangers
    Aug 10, 2025 · Booty bumping, also known as rectal drug use, boofing, or butt chugging, involves administering drugs or alcohol rectally for a more intense ...Missing: recreational | Show results with:recreational
  26. [26]
    The safety and effectiveness of self-administered coffee enema
    Sep 4, 2020 · Coffee enema was initially introduced as a part of the Gerson Therapy, which was developed by Dr Max Gerson in the 1930s for the treatment of ...
  27. [27]
    The safety and effectiveness of self-administered coffee enema
    Sep 4, 2020 · Based on the evidences reviewed, this systematic review does not recommend coffee enema self-administration as a complementary and ...
  28. [28]
    The frequent use of enemas in western African traditional medicine
    Nov 4, 2015 · In Africa, enemas containing herbal medicine are common methods of administering herbal medicine for a variety of diseases, rather than just ...
  29. [29]
    What is Basti? A Look At Ayurvedic Enemas
    Feb 16, 2023 · Basti, which is an Ayurvedic enema, is a suppository that can be made of either tonifying or purifying substances used in Panchakarma.Missing: non- | Show results with:non-
  30. [30]
    Proctocolitis From Coffee Enema - ACG Case Reports Journal
    Coffee enemas are often used by naturopathic practitioners to treat a number of diseases, including cancer. However, there is no supportive evidence, ...
  31. [31]
    Repeated rectal application of a hyperosmolar lubricant is ... - NIH
    Oct 31, 2018 · However, repeated lubricant application is likely to induce tissue damage and inflammation resulting in detectable differences in intracellular ...Missing: administration practices stimulants
  32. [32]
    Study finds most lubricants damage rectal cells and some increase ...
    Feb 26, 2011 · Unexpectedly, the investigators found that four of the lubricants not only damaged the rectal lining cells but appeared actively to increase HIV ...Missing: stimulants | Show results with:stimulants
  33. [33]
    The Cardiovascular Effects of Cocaine - JACC
    Jun 26, 2017 · A case report describing cardiovascular collapse and death in a patient treated with metoprolol after consuming 1,000 mg of cocaine (83) has ...
  34. [34]
    Fun Fact: On Clysters, Ritual Enemas for Health Maintenance ...
    Mar 12, 2021 · In ancient Egypt, people referred to the putrefactive element in feces as whdw, which they believed caused disease and must be purged regularly ...
  35. [35]
    Ritual enemas and snuffs in the Americas - Academia.edu
    Historical evidence suggests intoxicating enemas were used in Mayan rituals, contrary to previous scholarly beliefs. Ethnopharmacology provides insights on ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    42 U.S. Code § 12210 - Illegal use of drugs - Law.Cornell.Edu
    The term “illegal use of drugs” means the use of drugs, the possession or distribution of which is unlawful under the Controlled Substances Act.
  37. [37]
    Drug use and harm reduction practices of applicants to a public ...
    Apr 12, 2025 · Rectal administration (e.g., “boof”, “booty bump”) was the most reported route among all respondents (N = 16) from the free text responses.
  38. [38]
    Advancements in Rectal Drug Delivery Systems: Clinical Trials, and ...
    Oct 17, 2022 · The rectum represents a chamber present at the end of the large intestine in which drugs can be easily administered and can be well absorbed.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  39. [39]
    Pharmacokinetics of Rectal Drug Administration, Part I
    Nov 9, 2012 · For a number of drugs the extent of rectal absorption has been reported to exceed oral values, which may reflect partial avoidance of hepatic ...
  40. [40]
    Rectal Absorption - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Rectal absorption is variable and depends largely on the vehicle base. After oral administration, peak levels are reached in 30 to 60 minutes.
  41. [41]
    A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Predicting ...
    The other non-oral route for diazepam administration that has rapid absorption and showed up to 80% to 90% bioavailability is the rectal route. The therapeutic ...
  42. [42]
    First-pass elimination of some high-clearance drugs following rectal ...
    An equation was derived for the calculation of the fraction of the dose given rectally that bypasses the liver after absorption.
  43. [43]
    None
    ### Summary of Pharmacokinetic Data on Rectal Administration
  44. [44]
    Rectal drug administration: clinical pharmacokinetic considerations
    The human rectum represents a body cavity in which drugs can be easily introduced and retained and from which absorption is well possible.
  45. [45]
    Suppository Base - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Theobroma oil, or cocoa butter, melts to a large degree over a narrow temperature range of 34°C–36°C. It exists in four polymorphic forms: the unstable gamma ...
  46. [46]
    Choosing the Right Suppository Base - THE PCCA BLOG
    Jun 23, 2021 · The melting type of bases are fatty substances and include PCCA MBK™ (Fatty Acid) and Cocoa Butter NF. The dissolving type contains polyethylene ...
  47. [47]
    Methods of Preparation - Pharmlabs
    Suppositories can be prepared by hand rolling, compression molding, or fusion molding. Hand rolling is simple, compression molding uses molds, and fusion  ...
  48. [48]
    Methods of Preparation, Displacement Value, Its Calculation and ...
    Suppositories are prepared by hand rolling, cold compression, fusion/melt mold, or automatic mold methods. Displacement value is calculated by d / (a-c).
  49. [49]
    [PDF] number 3 - SEFH
    Chloral hydrate will decrease the melting point of cocoa butter. Cocoa butter suppositories will release best from molds if the molds are absolutely clean.
  50. [50]
    Rectal Suppository: Positions, Tips, Side Effects - Healthline
    Jun 6, 2022 · Avoid using petroleum jelly, such as Vaseline, to lubricate the suppository. It can keep the suppository from melting after it is inserted.Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
  51. [51]
    Rectal Suppositories - SafeMedication
    Lubricate the suppository tip with a water-soluble lubricant such as K-Y Jelly, not petroleum jelly (Vaseline). If you do not have this lubricant, moisten ...Missing: time | Show results with:time
  52. [52]
    Definition, Types, Advantages and Disadvantages of Suppositories
    Reduce systemic toxicity by delivering the drug to the target site of action in a lower dose; Very helpful for hemorrhoids and vag*inal infections; Effective ...
  53. [53]
    Bisacodyl Rectal: MedlinePlus Drug Information
    Nov 15, 2016 · Rectal bisacodyl is used on a short-term basis to treat constipation. It also is used to empty the bowels before surgery and certain medical procedures.Missing: stable precise example
  54. [54]
    Enema: What It Is, How It Works, Procedure, Benefits
    Nov 20, 2023 · Retention enemas require you to “hold it” or retain the fluid for a bit so the enema has time to work inside your colon. For example, holding a ...
  55. [55]
    Enemas: Types, Procedure, Side Effects, and More - WebMD
    Oct 11, 2025 · Oil-retention enema. This enema type is for people whose stool has hardened. · Return-flow enema. Also known as a Harris flush, a return-flow ...
  56. [56]
    MESALAMINE - rectal - Crohn's & Colitis Foundation
    Feb 1, 2023 · The medication is inserted directly into the rectum and should remain in the colon for at least 20-40 minutes. If taken as prescribed, these ...
  57. [57]
    Mesalamine Enema - Cleveland Clinic
    What is this medication? MESALAMINE (me SAL a meen) treats ulcerative colitis. It works by decreasing inflammation in the digestive tract.
  58. [58]
    Administering an enema: indications, types, equipment and procedure
    Feb 14, 2019 · Indications for the use of enemas include to ... Administering an enema: indications, types, equipment and procedure.
  59. [59]
    Enema Administration: Purpose, Procedure, and Risks - Healthline
    Jan 24, 2017 · An enema is a technique used to stimulate stool evacuation, usually to relieve constipation. How it's done depends on the type of enema and whether you can do ...Uses · Types · Administration · Research
  60. [60]
    The rectal administration of lidocaine gel and tolerance of transrectal ...
    Conclusion: The rectal administration of lidocaine has no impact on the tolerance to prostatic biopsy. Publication types. Clinical Trial; Randomized Controlled ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] FLEET ENEMA, A SALINE LAXATIVE - ready-to-use squeeze bottle
    Each enema unit delivers a dose of 118 mL, which contains 19 g monobasic sodium phosphate monohydrate and 7 g dibasic sodium phosphate heptahydrate. Each Fleet® ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Does sodium phosphate enema use cause electrolyte disorder?
    Mar 16, 2024 · Hypertonicity causes a large movement of fluid into the intestinal lumen and the formation of a third space that allows evacuation of ...
  63. [63]
    Barium enema - Mayo Clinic
    Apr 16, 2024 · Follow a special diet the day before the exam. · Fast after midnight. · Take a laxative the night before the exam. · Use an enema kit. · Ask your ...
  64. [64]
    Effectiveness of Oral vs Rectal Acetaminophen: A Meta-analysis
    Objective To determine, on the basis of published studies, the efficacy of rectal vs oral acetaminophen as treatment of fever and pain.
  65. [65]
    Approach to Rectal Administration: A Refresher - Enclara Pharmacia
    Mar 17, 2022 · The rectal route is an effective route of administration for many medications, including many used at the end of life.Rectal Route For Drug... · Tips For Rectal Medication... · The Macy Catheter
  66. [66]
    Current Updates in Rectal Infusion of Fluids and Medications
    Mar 24, 2023 · This paper briefly reviews the history of therapeutic rectal infusion, including recent improvements in technology and the existing evidence for the use of ...
  67. [67]
    Adherence to Rectal Mesalamine in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis
    Aug 7, 2025 · By medication possession ratio criteria, 71% of all subjects were nonadherent with their prescribed regimen (medication possession ratio <0.6).
  68. [68]
    Adherence to Rectal Mesalamine in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis
    Patients who were nonadherent to rectal mesalamine frequently cited the mode of administration (65%) and busy lifestyle (40%) as reasons for nonadherence.Missing: compliance | Show results with:compliance
  69. [69]
    Rectal Route of Drug Administration: Advantages and Disadvantages
    Some drawbacks associated with rectal administration of pharmaceutical products, include: 1. The interruption of the absorption process by defecation, which can ...
  70. [70]
    Iatrogenic rectal injury associated with fleet enema administration ...
    Feb 24, 2020 · Rectal injuries secondary to fleet enemas are the result of a chemical irritation as well as mechanical trauma causing localized perforation and mucosal ...
  71. [71]
    Self-Administered Ethanol Enema Causing Accidental Death - PMC
    Nov 11, 2014 · This case report describes an individual with klismaphilia whose death resulted from acute ethanol intoxication by rectal absorption of a wine enema.
  72. [72]
    Systematic review: the adverse effects of sodium phosphate enema
    Jul 1, 2007 · The main side effects caused by sodium phosphate enemas are water and electrolyte disturbances. The main risk factors are extreme age and associated ...Missing: hypertonic | Show results with:hypertonic
  73. [73]
    Rectal Drug Administration - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Disadvantages of rectal drug administration include failure to induce anesthesia because of poor drug bioavailability or defecation and delayed recovery from ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Indomethacin Suppositories
    Aug 23, 2023 · ... administration of the drug. The bioavailability of the drug following rectal administration of suppositories has been reported to be about 80-90 ...<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    6.4 Administering Medications Rectally and Vaginally
    Rectal medications are given for their local effects in the gastrointestinal system (e.g., laxatives) or their systemic effects (e.g., analgesics when oral ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  76. [76]
    6.4 Administering Medications Rectally and Vaginally
    Rectal medications are contraindicated in persons with active rectal bleeding, diarrhea, recent rectal or prostate surgery, local trauma and those with ...
  77. [77]
    Palliative Care Per Rectum | Palliative Care Network of Wisconsin
    Mar 2, 2019 · Additional advantages are the option for self-administration and relatively reliable and predictable drug absorption by the rectum. Since most ...Missing: issues sources
  78. [78]
    Rectal Drug Administration at End of Life - OnePoint Patient Care
    Jul 8, 2024 · Lorazepam versus diazepam in the acute treatment of epileptic seizures and status epilepticus. ... Oral versus rectal midazolam as a pre- ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Diastat® C-IV Diastat® AcuDial™ Rectal Delivery System ...
    Diazepam rectal gel is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to diazepam. Diazepam rectal gel may be used in patients with open angle ...
  80. [80]
    Fleet Enema, Pedia-Lax Enema (sodium phosphate rectal) dosing ...
    A: Generally acceptable. Controlled studies in pregnant women show no evidence of fetal risk. B: May be acceptable. Either animal studies show no risk but human ...
  81. [81]
    Enema Rectal: Uses, Side Effects, Interactions, Pictures ... - WebMD
    Do not force the enema tip into the rectum because you could hurt yourself. Squeeze the bottle until the recommended amount of the drug is inside the rectum.
  82. [82]
    Glycerin rectal Uses, Side Effects & Warnings - Drugs.com
    Mar 8, 2024 · Glycerin rectal side effects · stomach pain, nausea, vomiting; · rectal bleeding; or · no bowel movement within 1 hour after use.Glycerin Dosage · Glycerin drug interactions · Glycerin Suppositories · Reviews (32)<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    Suppository for constipation: How to use and precautions
    Oct 30, 2024 · Both glycerin and bisacodyl rectal suppositories begin to work after 15 minutes to 1 hour. Carbon dioxide-releasing suppositories work within 15 ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Annex 9 Guidelines on packaging for pharmaceutical products
    Preparations for nasal, aural, vaginal or rectal use should be supplied in ... Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of medicinal products for ...<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    [PDF] USP <795> Pharmaceutical Compounding Nonsterile Preparations
    Aug 25, 2023 · Personnel must perform the outlined hand hygiene procedures when entering the compounding area. o Wash hands with soap & water for at least 30 ...
  86. [86]
    New HHS guidance on informed consent impacts GIs
    Apr 10, 2024 · In both inpatient and outpatient hospital settings, written informed consent is now required prior to rectal examinations.
  87. [87]
    Exploring the unconventional routes — rectal and vaginal dosage ...
    Aug 29, 2012 · Although rectal and vaginal routes of drug delivery are not common, Kalliopi Dodou examines the design of new formulations that allow easier insertion and ...
  88. [88]
    Mesalamine (rectal route) - Side effects & dosage - Mayo Clinic
    Sep 1, 2025 · Never take rectal suppositories by mouth. · Do not cut or break the suppository. · Remove one suppository from the strip of suppositories. · Before ...
  89. [89]
    Suppositories: What They Treat and How to Use Them - WebMD
    Oct 8, 2023 · How to Insert Them. To put in a rectal suppository: Go to the bathroom first to try to empty your colon. Wash your hands with soap and warm ...
  90. [90]
    Aspirin (rectal route) - Side effects & dosage - Mayo Clinic
    Adults and children 12 years of age and older—1 suppository inserted into your rectum every 4 hours. Do not use for more than 10 days. Children younger than 12 ...
  91. [91]
    Mesalamine Rectal: MedlinePlus Drug Information
    Jan 15, 2023 · Rectal mesalamine is used to treat ulcerative colitis (a condition which causes swelling and sores in the lining of the colon [large intestine] and rectum)Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
  92. [92]
    What strategies do ulcerative colitis patients employ to facilitate ...
    Strategies such as regimen simplification or use of a reminder system are reportedly effective for enhancing medication adherence in patients with IBD; however, ...
  93. [93]
    Adherence to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Medications in Southern ...
    Also, IBD patients frequently employ strategies to facilitate their medication adherence including keeping medications at specific locations and using pill ...