Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Reprobation

Reprobation is a doctrine in Christian theology, particularly prominent in Reformed and Calvinist traditions, which holds that God, in his eternal decree, has sovereignly determined to exclude certain individuals from salvation and to subject them to eternal damnation as an act of divine justice.^[1] This concept forms the counterpart to divine election, where God chooses some for eternal life, emphasizing God's absolute sovereignty over human destiny while affirming human responsibility for sin.^[2] Unlike election, which actively bestows grace, reprobation is often described as either passive—God passing over the non-elect, leaving them in their sinful state—or active, involving a positive decree of condemnation, though the former view predominates to avoid implying that God authors sin.^[1]^[3] The doctrine's roots trace to early Church father Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD), who developed it in works like On the Gift of Perseverance as a response to Pelagianism, which emphasized human free will over divine grace in salvation.^[4] Augustine argued that God's predestination includes both the merciful election of some and the just reprobation of others, based on Romans 9, to uphold divine sovereignty without negating moral accountability.^[4] This framework influenced medieval theologians like Thomas Aquinas, who integrated it into discussions of providence, viewing reprobation as part of God's permissive will that allows sin to occur for the greater display of his glory.^[5] In the Protestant Reformation, John Calvin (1509–1564) systematized reprobation in his Institutes of the Christian Religion (1536–1559), describing it as God's eternal judgment whereby some are predestined to death while others are adopted to life, a "horrible decree" that nonetheless manifests God's righteousness.^[2]^[6] The doctrine faced intense scrutiny during the Arminian controversies, leading to its affirmation at the Synod of Dort (1618–1619), where Reformed leaders clarified that reprobation involves God's decree to pass over the non-elect in sorrow, not delight, while ordaining their punishment for sin they freely commit.^[7] Biblical foundations include Romans 9:17–23, which portrays God's hardening of Pharaoh's heart as an example of sovereign purpose in judgment, alongside passages like John 12:37–40 and 1 Peter 2:7–8.^[1] Reprobation remains a divisive element within Christianity, critiqued by Arminians and others for appearing to limit God's love or universal salvific will (e.g., 1 Timothy 2:4), yet defended in Reformed circles as essential to coherent biblical soteriology.^[8] It underscores themes of divine justice, mercy, and theodicy, influencing confessions like the Westminster Confession of Faith (1646), which states that God ordains whatsoever comes to pass, including the reprobation of the wicked for their sins.^[9]

Etymology and Definition

Etymology

The term "reprobation" derives from the Late Latin noun reprobatio, the action of disapproving or rejecting, which stems from the verb reprobare, meaning "to disapprove, reject, or condemn." This verb combines the prefix re- (indicating opposition or reversal, as in "back" or "against") with probare (to test, approve, or prove). In classical Latin, probare was commonly used in legal and rhetorical contexts to denote approval after examination, but reprobare itself emerged more prominently in post-Augustan Latin as a term for rejection after testing. It gained traction in Roman legal compilations, such as the Digest of Justinian (6th century CE, drawing on earlier sources), where it described disapproval or condemnation, such as in contexts of disinheritance or rejection of persons. The word entered Christian Latin through St. Jerome's Vulgate translation of the Bible (late 4th century CE), where forms like reprobatus (rejected or reproved) appear to convey divine or moral disapproval, notably in Jeremiah 6:30: "Argentum reprobum vocate eos, quia Dominus reppulit eos" (Call them reprobate silver, because the Lord has rejected them), likening unfaithful people to impure metal discarded after assaying. This biblical usage marked its adaptation from secular rejection to theological condemnation, influencing patristic writers. In the 4th century CE, St. Ambrose employed reprobare in his ethical and moral treatises to denote divine reproof of sin, as in discussions of repentance and judgment, while Jerome extended it in commentaries to signify God's rejection of the unrighteous. By this period, the term had evolved to emphasize not mere disapproval but eternal moral or divine condemnation in Christian discourse. In English, "reprobation" first appeared around 1400 as a borrowing from Church Latin, initially carrying the general sense of disapproval or rejection in moral or judicial contexts, as seen in 16th-century texts like William Tyndale's Bible translations (1520s–1530s), where it translated ideas of divine disfavor without yet emphasizing predestined damnation. By the 17th century, amid the theological debates of the Reformation and Puritan era, the word shifted to denote specifically the eternal decree of damnation for the non-elect, prominently in Calvinist writings such as those of John Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion (1536 onward) and English divines like William Perkins, reflecting its specialized doctrinal role.

Theological Definition

In Christian theology, reprobation refers to the eternal divine decree by which God withholds saving grace from certain individuals, leaving them in their fallen, sinful state and thereby ordaining them to condemnation and eternal wrath, in contrast to the doctrine of election whereby others receive grace unto salvation.^[1]^[10] This decree underscores God's absolute sovereignty in determining the eternal destinies of humanity, ensuring that salvation is entirely an act of divine mercy rather than human merit.^[11] The doctrine distinguishes between passive and active forms of reprobation. Passive reprobation, often termed preterition, involves God simply passing over or not electing certain persons, thereby permitting them to remain in their natural state of sin without extending regenerative grace; this aligns with the Westminster Confession's description of God ordaining the non-elect "to dishonor and wrath for their sin" through withholding mercy.^[1]^[11] Active reprobation, or predamnation, entails God positively decreeing just punishment upon the reprobate for their sins, as seen in some stricter interpretations, though it does not imply that God authors sin but rather executes judgment in accordance with divine justice.^[1] As the negative counterpart to predestination's positive aspect of election, reprobation emphasizes that God's sovereign will operates without equal ultimacy in causing sin, since the reprobate's condemnation arises from their own willful rebellion, not divine compulsion.^[10] Beyond strict Calvinist frameworks, reprobation appears in broader Christian thought as the consequence of persistent rejection of the gospel, resulting in a "seared conscience" where individuals become spiritually insensitive and unable to repent, leading to divine abandonment.^[12] This decree is irrevocable, rooted in God's unchanging counsel from eternity, and is characterized by perfect justice—punishing foreseen or actual sin—while mercifully serving to magnify the unmerited grace extended to the elect.^[11]^[1]

Biblical Foundations

Old Testament References

In the Old Testament, the concept of reprobation emerges through passages depicting God's rejection of individuals or nations due to persistent unfaithfulness, often portrayed in terms of divine testing, hardening, and abandonment. A primary example is found in Jeremiah 6:30, where the prophet declares, "Reprobate silver shall men call them, because the LORD hath rejected them" (KJV). This verse illustrates God's assaying of Israel as impure metal in a refiner's fire, finding it worthless after repeated opportunities for purification through prophetic warnings and judgments; the nation's idolatry and injustice render it unfit for covenant relationship, leading to divine rejection.^[13] Similarly, the narrative of Pharaoh in Exodus highlights divine judicial hardening as a response to rebellion. In Exodus 9:12, it states, "But the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, and he hearkened not unto them; as the LORD had spoken unto Moses" (KJV), with parallel accounts in Exodus 4:21, 7:3, and 10:1, 20, 27, alongside instances where Pharaoh hardens his own heart (e.g., Exodus 8:15, 8:32), showing a progression that serves to manifest God's power and justice, confirming Pharaoh's culpability while advancing the exodus deliverance.^[14] Proverbs 1:23–33 warns of divine abandonment for those who spurn wisdom, personified as calling out in the streets but met with refusal. Verses 24–25 describe the response: "Because I have called, and ye refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no man regarded; But ye have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my reproof" (KJV), culminating in verses 30–31 where wisdom declares, "They would none of my counsel: they despised all my reproof. Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way," leading to self-inflicted ruin without divine intervention or remorse. This passage underscores reprobation as the consequence of willful rejection, leaving individuals to their chosen path of folly.^[15] In Isaiah 6:9–10, God commissions the prophet with a message that will further harden the people's hearts: "Go, and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed" (KJV). This divine directive prefigures reprobation by confirming unbelief through prophetic proclamation, as Israel's covenant unfaithfulness results in spiritual insensitivity and impending judgment.^[16] These Old Testament references emphasize corporate reprobation, particularly of Israel as a nation, for covenant unfaithfulness, portraying God's holiness and justice in rejecting those who persist in rebellion while preserving a remnant for His purposes.^[1]

New Testament References

In the New Testament, reprobation is portrayed through the lens of Christ's redemptive work, shifting emphasis from corporate covenantal themes to individual accountability and the personal rejection of the gospel, culminating in eternal separation from God. This development highlights how humanity's willful unbelief, despite clear revelation in creation and the proclamation of Christ, results in divine judicial abandonment, often linked to the unforgivable sin of blaspheming the Holy Spirit, which represents a hardened rejection of God's saving grace (Matthew 12:31–32).^[17] Such passages underscore the sobering reality that persistent opposition to the Spirit's conviction leads to irreversible condemnation, serving as warnings to believers to persevere in faith.^[18] A foundational text appears in Romans 1:20–28, where Paul describes humanity's suppression of truth manifest in creation, rendering people "without excuse" for their idolatry and immorality. In response, God actively "gives them up" to uncleanness, dishonorable passions, and a debased mind, signifying judicial abandonment rather than mere permission of sin; this act of reprobation allows sinners to pursue their desires unhindered, intensifying their guilt and paving the way for wrath.^[19] The repetition of "God gave them up" (verses 24, 26, 28) illustrates a progressive hardening, where divine restraint is withdrawn as a form of righteous judgment on unrepentant rebellion.^[20] Paul further elaborates on reprobation in Romans 9:17–22, using the example of Pharaoh to demonstrate God's sovereign purpose in hardening hearts for the display of His power and mercy. Here, Pharaoh's repeated resistance leads to divine hardening, not as the origin of his sin but as a judicial confirmation of his self-chosen path, preparing "vessels of wrath" for destruction to magnify God's glory through contrasting vessels of mercy.^[21] This passage emphasizes that reprobation serves God's redemptive plan, where some are fitted for destruction by their own sin, yet under divine sovereignty, without implicating God as the author of evil.^[22] The warning in Hebrews 6:4–8 addresses those who have experienced enlightenment, tasted the heavenly gift, shared in the Holy Spirit, and yet fall away, declaring it impossible to renew them to repentance. This apostasy evokes the imagery of a field soaked by rain but yielding thorns, ultimately burned as useless and cursed, symbolizing the finality of rejecting Christ's once-for-all sacrifice after partial exposure to grace.^[18] The passage stresses that such individuals crucify the Son afresh, positioning themselves beyond restoration, as their hardened state mirrors the unfruitful ground under judgment.^[23] In John 12:37–41, the evangelist explains Israel's unbelief despite Jesus' miracles, attributing it to divine fulfillment of Isaiah's prophecy where God blinds eyes and hardens hearts to prevent healing and conversion. This judicial blinding, rooted in persistent rejection of the light, results in Isaiah seeing Christ's glory yet proclaiming a message that deepens condemnation for those who will not believe.^[24] The passage illustrates reprobation as a sovereign response to unbelief, ensuring that opposition to the Messiah leads to spiritual insensitivity and exclusion from salvation.^[19] Paul's exhortation in 2 Corinthians 13:5–6 urges believers to examine themselves to see if they are in the faith, warning that some may prove "disqualified" (Greek adokimos, often translated as reprobate). This self-testing reveals whether Christ dwells within, implying that failure to pass such scrutiny indicates a reprobate state of ungenuine faith, akin to those abandoned to impurity.^[25] The term adokimos carries connotations of rejection after testing, emphasizing personal responsibility in light of Christ's lordship and the potential for divine disapproval.^[21] Collectively, these texts advance a New Testament theology of reprobation centered on individual response to the gospel, where rejection of Christ and the Spirit's work seals one's fate in eternal judgment, distinct from Old Testament emphases on national unfaithfulness. This framework warns against complacency, linking reprobation inextricably to the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit as the ultimate, unforgivable defiance of God's offer of salvation through Jesus.^[26]

Historical Development

Early Church Fathers

Origen of Alexandria (c. 185–254 CE), in his work De Principiis, addressed divine foreknowledge in relation to human choices, positing that God foreknows apostasy and its consequences, including eternal punishment, but this knowledge does not impose an unconditional decree on the will.^[27] Instead, Origen emphasized the freedom of rational beings to choose between good and evil, arguing that souls could fall into apostasy through negligence or demonic influence yet retain the potential for restoration, rejecting any notion of fixed reprobation.^[28] He viewed punishment as remedial rather than eternally punitive, allowing for eventual reconciliation based on free responses to divine providence.^[29] Augustine of Hippo (354–430 CE) advanced early discussions on reprobation amid debates over grace, introducing elements of predestination in works such as City of God and On Grace and Free Will. In On Grace and Free Will, he described reprobation as God's just desertion of sinners, rooted in original sin inherited from Adam, which renders humanity incapable of turning to God without unmerited grace.^[30] Augustine maintained that this divine abandonment hardens hearts as a punitive response to prior evil deeds, preserving human moral responsibility while underscoring total depravity.^[31] In City of God, he framed reprobation within God's sovereign plan, where the non-elect face judgment not arbitrarily but as a consequence of their fallen state, contrasting with the elect's predestined salvation. John Chrysostom (c. 347–407 CE), in his Homilies on Romans, interpreted passages on divine hardening—such as God's action toward Pharaoh—as punitive measures rather than causes of sin, emphasizing the individual's moral culpability.^[32] In Homily 16, Chrysostom explained that Pharaoh's hardening stemmed from his own prior disobedience, with God enduring him in long-suffering to afford opportunities for repentance, but ultimate rejection arose from Pharaoh's willful persistence in evil.^[33] This view reinforced human accountability, portraying God's role as judicial retribution that exposes and confirms existing hardness of heart without initiating it.^[32] Patristic responses to Pelagianism, particularly from Augustine, defended reprobation as compatible with total depravity while affirming human culpability against Pelagius's emphasis on unaided free will. Augustine's anti-Pelagian writings, including On Grace and Free Will, argued that original sin deprives humans of the ability to choose good without grace, yet reprobation justly permits sinners to follow their corrupted desires, holding them accountable for actions arising from that depravity.^[34] This countered Pelagian extremes by integrating divine justice with moral responsibility, portraying reprobation not as predestined causation of sin but as permission of self-chosen ruin.^[30] Key developments in the 4th and 5th centuries marked a shift from earlier universalist leanings, as seen in Clement of Alexandria (c. 150–215 CE), toward particular judgment and reprobation, influencing subsequent creeds like those at the Council of Orange (529 CE). Clement had advocated eventual restoration for all souls through divine pedagogy, but by Augustine's era, patristic consensus increasingly affirmed irreversible condemnation for the unrepentant, grounding reprobation in scriptural particularity and original sin's effects. This evolution, evident in anti-heretical treatises, established reprobation as a doctrine of divine equity, where God's foreknowledge and justice select outcomes based on foreseen merits amid human fallenness.

Medieval Theology

In medieval theology, the doctrine of reprobation was systematized by scholastic thinkers as part of broader discussions on divine grace, human free will, and God's foreknowledge, often building on earlier Augustinian foundations to reconcile God's sovereignty with human responsibility. Scholastics distinguished reprobation from election, viewing it not as an active decree imposing sin but as a permissive act allowing the consequences of human choices, thereby preserving the compatibility of divine justice and freedom. This framework emerged prominently in the 11th to 14th centuries, influencing debates on predestination and shaping ecclesiastical practices. Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109) contributed early medieval perspectives on predestination and free will in his work De Concordia Praescientiae et Praedestinationis et Gratiae Dei cum Libero Arbitrio, where he argued for the harmony of divine foreknowledge, predestination, and grace with human liberty, portraying reprobation as God's permission of the reprobate's self-chosen path without compelling sin, though without developing a full predestinarian system. Anselm emphasized that God's foreknowledge does not compel sin or damnation but permits the reprobate's self-chosen path, maintaining free will's integrity.^[35]^[36] The Second Council of Orange (529 CE) played a key role in medieval reception, condemning semi-Pelagianism and affirming the necessity of grace for salvation, which underscored reprobation's connection to human total inability without divine aid. Medieval theologians invoked Orange's canons to argue that, absent prevenient grace, individuals remain in a state of reprobation due to original sin's effects, rejecting any human initiative in justification. This reception reinforced scholastic views that reprobation highlights grace's primacy rather than arbitrary exclusion.^[37] Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) further refined these ideas in Summa Theologica (I, q. 23), defining reprobation as part of God's permissive will, which allows sin and its punishment without being its efficient cause, in contrast to election's positive bestowal of grace. Aquinas stressed that this distinction harmonizes reprobation with free will, as God foreknows but does not predetermine demerits, ensuring divine justice punishes foreseen faults equitably.^[38] Duns Scotus (1266–1308) introduced subtle distinctions regarding God's knowledge of future contingents, positing that reprobation follows from foreseen demerits rather than an unconditional decree, thereby emphasizing human merit or fault as the basis for divine response. Scotus argued this approach avoids portraying God as arbitrary, aligning reprobation with a conditional foreknowledge that respects liberty while upholding predestination's gratuity for the elect.^[39] Medieval canon law reflected these theological nuances through penitentials, which treated persistent sinners as effectively reprobate by barring them from sacraments until repentance, viewing unremedied grave sins as indicative of a hardened state warranting exclusion from communal grace. These handbooks, drawing from conciliar decrees, prescribed severe penances for recidivists, reinforcing the scholastic idea that reprobation manifests in willful persistence against offered mercy.^[40]

Reformation Era

The Reformation era marked a pivotal intensification of debates on reprobation, as Protestant reformers emphasized God's sovereign predestination while challenging medieval scholastic balances between divine will and human freedom. Drawing from Augustinian influences but sharpened in response to Renaissance humanism and Catholic teachings, key figures articulated reprobation as an aspect of God's eternal decree, often linked to human depravity and excluding human merit from salvation. This period's controversies not only shaped Protestant confessions but also provoked the Catholic Counter-Reformation's firm reaffirmation of free will.^[41] Martin Luther (1483–1546) advanced a robust view of reprobation in his 1525 treatise The Bondage of the Will, written as a direct rebuttal to Desiderius Erasmus's defense of free will in On Free Will (1524). Luther argued that human will is wholly enslaved to sin due to total depravity, rendering unconditional reprobation necessary as part of God's predestining decree, whereby the non-elect are justly left in their sin without any cooperative merit. He insisted that this bondage eliminates any human capacity for choosing salvation, tying reprobation inextricably to divine sovereignty and human inability. John Calvin (1509–1564) systematized reprobation within Reformed theology in his Institutes of the Christian Religion, particularly in Book III, chapters 21–24 of the 1559 edition. Calvin described reprobation as God's eternal and inscrutable counsel to pass over the non-elect, leaving them in their deserved condemnation rather than actively predestining them to damnation in the same manner as the elect to salvation—a doctrine he termed "double predestination" but distinguished by God's justice in permitting sin's consequences.^[42] This view, rooted in Romans 9, portrayed reprobation as equitable yet mysterious, beyond human comprehension, and essential to magnifying God's glory in election. Huldrych Zwingli (1484–1531), the Swiss reformer, contributed early Reformed perspectives on reprobation through his 1530 work On Providence, where he affirmed double predestination as an expression of God's absolute sovereignty over all events. Zwingli emphasized that God eternally decrees both the salvation of the elect and the reprobation of the non-elect based solely on divine will, influencing subsequent Swiss confessions like the First Helvetic Confession (1536). His teachings, delivered in sermons as early as 1522, underscored providence as encompassing reprobation without contingency on human actions.^[43] In the late 16th century, disputes over predestination in the Netherlands, particularly between strict Calvinists and emerging opponents like Jacobus Arminius (1560–1609), set the stage for the Synod of Dort (1618–1619). These conflicts, fueled by Arminius's lectures at Leiden University from 1603 onward questioning unconditional election and reprobation, escalated into political tensions, culminating in the Remonstrance of 1610 that rejected double predestination and affirmed resistible grace.^[44] The Synod ultimately condemned these views, solidifying Reformed orthodoxy on reprobation. The Catholic Counter-Reformation responded decisively at the Council of Trent (1545–1563), particularly in its sixth session on justification (1547), by reaffirming human free will's role in responding to grace and rejecting unconditional reprobation as heretical. Canon 4 declared that free will, moved by God, assents to justifying grace without compulsion, while Canon 17 anathematized the notion that justification is granted only to the predestined, excluding others called by God.^[45] These decrees positioned reprobation as resulting from human rejection of grace rather than divine decree alone, countering Protestant emphases.^[46]

Doctrine in Calvinism

Key Concepts

In Calvinist theology, reprobation forms part of the doctrine of double predestination, whereby God eternally decrees the election of some individuals to salvation and the reprobation of others to damnation, both acts being unconditional and rooted solely in divine sovereignty rather than human merit or foreseen actions. This dual decree underscores that God's choice is made from eternity, independent of any human qualities, as articulated by John Calvin: "All are not created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation."^[47] The reprobate are thus passed over, excluded from the inheritance of grace predestined for the elect, highlighting the gratuitous nature of salvation.^[1] The standard Reformed understanding distinguishes between passive and active reprobation, adopting the former to affirm God's permissive will without implying that He directly authors sin. In passive reprobation, or preterition, God sovereignly withholds saving grace from the non-elect, allowing them to remain in their sinful state as a consequence of the fall, while ordaining the ultimate display of His justice through their condemnation; this avoids the supralapsarian notion of God actively decreeing sin prior to the fall.^[1] Calvin emphasizes that reprobation arises not from divine caprice but from a just exclusion, where God "passes by" some according to His good pleasure.^[48] Reprobation is inextricably linked to the doctrine of total depravity, which posits that all humanity, post-fall, is utterly incapable of responding to divine grace due to pervasive sinfulness affecting the mind, will, and affections. The reprobate, left in this depraved condition without electing intervention, persist in unbelief and rebellion, thereby demonstrating the unmerited gratuity of election for the chosen; as Calvin notes, human corruption renders all deserving of judgment, making God's forbearance toward the reprobate an act of restraint rather than injustice.^[47] The justice of reprobation rests on the principle that God owes no one mercy, as all have sinned and merit damnation, rendering reprobation not punitive in origin but a righteous permission of deserved consequences. Calvin argues that since "those whom he dooms to destruction are excluded from access to life by a just and blameless... judgment," reprobation magnifies divine equity by punishing sin without violating human voluntariness.^[47] This view aligns with scriptural passages such as Romans 9, where God's hardening of Pharaoh exemplifies sovereign justice.^[1] Within infralapsarianism, the predominant order in Reformed theology, reprobation logically follows God's decree permitting the fall, ensuring that condemnation addresses actual sin rather than a pre-fall hypothetical state. In this sequence—creation, permission of the fall, then election and reprobation—God elects some fallen sinners to life and ordains the rest to wrath based on their sin, preserving the reality of human responsibility while upholding divine priority.^[49]

Prominent Theologians and Confessions

John Calvin provided a detailed exposition of reprobation in the 1559 edition of his Institutes of the Christian Religion, particularly in Book III, chapters 21–24 on predestination, where he rejected the notion of single predestination (election alone) and argued that reprobation is the counterpart to election, rooted in God's sovereign will rather than human merit.^[42] Calvin emphasized that God, in eternal counsel, predestines some to salvation and others to destruction, not arbitrarily but to display both mercy and justice, countering objections by asserting that human reason cannot fully comprehend divine purposes.^[50] Jonathan Edwards (1703–1758), building on Reformed tradition, addressed predestination and reprobation in his 1754 treatise Freedom of the Will, defending their compatibility with moral necessity and the holiness of God through his compatibilist view of free will.^[51] Edwards argued that the will's determinations arise from the strongest inclinations, which in the fallen nature lead toward sin, yet this does not absolve of blame; instead, it underscores God's righteous decree in passing over the non-elect while preserving human accountability under divine sovereignty.^[52] This framework reconciled predestination with God's unchanging holiness, portraying reprobation not as an active decree to damn but as the just permission of sin's consequences.^[53] In the twentieth century, Loraine Boettner (1901–1990) summarized the Reformed view of reprobation in his 1932 book The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination as God's sovereign act of non-election, whereby the non-elect are left in their sinful state without the grace bestowed on the elect.^[54] Boettner clarified that reprobation involves both preterition (passing over) and a decree to punish sin, serving to manifest God's justice and provide a backdrop for the glory of election, while insisting it originates not in foreseen demerit but in divine freedom.^[55] The confessional tradition of Reformed theology codified these ideas in several key documents. The Canons of Dort (1618–1619), responding to Arminian challenges, affirm in Head I, Articles 15–18 the doctrine of eternal reprobation as God's just decree to pass by the non-elect in mercy, ordaining their punishment for actual sins to display His sovereign power and the riches of His grace toward the elect.^[56] These articles explicitly reject Arminian views that limit reprobation to foreseen unbelief, instead grounding it in God's unchangeable counsel for the manifestation of mercy.^[57] The Westminster Confession of Faith (1646), in Chapter III ("Of God's Eternal Decree"), states that God ordains whatsoever comes to pass, including the fall of Adam and all other sins, while describing reprobation as His sovereign decision to pass by the rest of mankind, ordaining them to dishonor and wrath for their sin to the praise of His glorious justice.^[58] This formulation upholds double predestination without implicating God as the author of sin, emphasizing that reprobation flows from divine freedom and the unsearchable counsel of His will.^[59] The Heidelberg Catechism (1563), in Question 54, links the gathering of the holy catholic church to God's eternal election of some from the whole human race to everlasting life through Christ.^[60] By describing the church as those gathered for salvation, the catechism highlights that true faith and good works are fruits of this election, serving as evidence of belonging to the church rather than a cause of salvation.^[61]

Perspectives in Other Christian Traditions

Arminianism and Wesleyan Views

In Arminian theology, Jacobus Arminius (1560–1609) articulated a view of reprobation as conditional rather than an unconditional divine decree, emphasizing human response to grace. In his Declaration of Sentiments (1608), Arminius posited that God's election is based on foreseen faith, with grace being resistible, such that reprobation results from the foreseen rejection of offered salvation rather than an eternal act of preterition.^[62] This framework shifts reprobation from divine sovereignty alone to a consequence of human agency enabled by prevenient grace.^[63] The followers of Arminius, known as the Remonstrants, further developed this perspective in their Five Articles of Remonstrance (1610), explicitly denying forms of reprobation tied to an infralapsarian decree that predestines some to damnation irrespective of their actions. Instead, they affirmed conditional election, universal atonement through Christ's death for all, and the potential for salvation available to every person who believes and perseveres in faith.^[64] Article 1 of the Remonstrance states that God's purpose is to elect those who believe in Christ through grace, while leaving the unbelieving in their sin under wrath, underscoring reprobation as a result of persistent unbelief rather than divine exclusion.^[65] John Wesley (1703–1791), building on Arminian foundations within the Methodist tradition, sharply critiqued Calvinist reprobation in his sermon "Free Grace" (1740), arguing that it portrayed God as arbitrary and limited His universal love. Wesley asserted that predestination to damnation undermines the gospel's offer to all, as it implies salvation is not freely available but restricted to an elect few, contrary to Scriptures like John 3:16.^[66] He advocated prevenient grace as God's enabling work for every person, restoring free will to respond to the gospel, such that reprobation stems from willful rejection rather than an eternal decree that restricts divine mercy.^[67] In Arminian and Wesleyan thought, reprobation is thus conditional, not an irrevocable eternal judgment but a potential outcome of apostasy, where believers may fall away through deliberate unbelief, as influenced by passages like Hebrews 6:4–6. This view holds that genuine faith can be forsaken, leading to loss of salvation, but emphasizes God's ongoing offer of grace to restore the repentant, contrasting with unconditional decrees.^[68] Reprobation, therefore, arises from foreseen persistence in sin rather than divine foreordination to damnation.^[69] Modern Arminian confessions, such as those in the Church of the Nazarene, continue this emphasis on conditional aspects, affirming in their Articles of Faith that salvation is available to "whosoever repents and believes" through prevenient grace, with free moral agency enabling acceptance or rejection, and the finally impenitent facing eternal loss without reference to preterition.^[70] Similarly, the Free Methodist Church, rooted in Wesleyan theology, upholds salvation as a free response to universal grace, rejecting unconditional reprobation in favor of accountability for personal faith choices, as reflected in their doctrinal alignment with Methodist Articles of Religion that prioritize human responsibility in election.^[71]

Catholicism

In Roman Catholic theology, the doctrine of reprobation is understood as God's permissive will allowing certain individuals to persist in sin and thus exclude themselves from salvation, rather than an active decree of damnation. This perspective emphasizes the harmony between divine sovereignty and human free will, rejecting any notion of absolute or unconditional reprobation. The Council of Trent (1545–1563), in its Sixth Session on Justification, affirmed predestination to grace as an initiative of God's mercy through Christ, while condemning the idea of absolute reprobation that would imply God positively wills the damnation of individuals apart from their free choices.^[72] The decree underscores that salvation is cooperative, involving faith working through love and good works enabled by grace, such that no one is predestined to evil but all are called to respond freely to divine assistance.^[72] Influenced by medieval scholasticism, St. Thomas Aquinas shaped the Catholic view of reprobation as a negative act of divine permission rather than a positive decree. In his Summa Theologica (I, q. 23, a. 3), Aquinas explains that God permits some to fall into sin due to foreseen demerits—human failings rooted in free will—without this being an arbitrary sovereign election to damnation; instead, it reflects justice in response to rejection of grace. This framework integrates reprobation into God's overall plan of providence, where damnation results from persistent refusal of offered graces, not from divine caprice. The Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992) elaborates this in paragraphs 600–607, portraying hell not as a predestined state but as self-exclusion from God through unrepented mortal sin, with Christ's redemptive passion universally available to overcome such separation. A significant development in Catholic thought on reprobation came through Molinism, proposed by the 16th-century Jesuit theologian Luis de Molina (1535–1600). Molina's concept of divine "middle knowledge" posits that God possesses scientia media, an understanding of all counterfactuals—what free creatures would do in any possible circumstance—allowing Him to decree reprobation based on foreknown free choices without violating liberty or implying double predestination.^[73] This approach, detailed in Molina's Concordia liberi arbitrii cum gratiae donis (1588), reconciles predestination to salvation with universal salvific will by permitting God to elect based on hypothetical responses to grace. Papal teachings have consistently rejected interpretations of reprobation akin to double predestination, affirming the Church's longstanding opposition to views that undermine free will or God's universal desire for salvation. In the encyclical Humani Generis (1950), Pope Pius XII critiqued erroneous theological trends that distort predestination, insisting that divine foreknowledge includes human freedom and that grace is offered sufficiently to all, with reprobation arising solely from culpable rejection rather than divine reproof independent of merit.^[74] This magisterial clarification reinforces Trent's condemnations, ensuring reprobation remains permissive and tied to human responsibility within the economy of salvation.

Eastern Orthodoxy

In Eastern Orthodoxy, reprobation is interpreted through the framework of synergism, portraying salvation as a cooperative endeavor between divine grace and human free will, rather than an unconditional divine decree of damnation. This perspective rejects the idea of God predestining individuals to eternal separation, viewing such outcomes instead as self-imposed through the persistent rejection of God's invitational love. St. John of Damascus (c. 675–749 CE) articulated this by affirming human rationality and autonomy, noting that "the good that is done by force is not good," thereby underscoring that genuine virtue—and its absence—arises from voluntary choice, not coercion.^[75]^[76] Influences from early patristic thought, such as St. Gregory of Nyssa (c. 335–395 CE), further diminish the notion of eternal reprobation by evoking apokatastasis, the universal restoration of creation to God. Gregory conceived eschatological chastisement as remedial and purgatorial, designed to eradicate evil as a mere privation of good, ultimately aligning all wills with the divine through a process of purification. He drew on biblical motifs, like the temporary darkness over Egypt preceding light's return, to illustrate how punishment serves restoration rather than perpetual exclusion, fulfilling the scriptural promise that God will be "all in all."^[77] The Philokalia tradition elaborates reprobation as the consequence of failing to pursue theosis, or deification, leading to spiritual death through self-chosen alienation from God, not an arbitrary eternal sentence. St. Maximus the Confessor (c. 580–662 CE) described deification as participation in divine energies via virtue and contemplation, transfiguring the soul into likeness with Christ; yet, adherence to passions or sensory attachments hinders this, resulting in a state of inner turmoil and separation experienced as self-inflicted torment. In this view, hell manifests as the voluntary inversion of God's loving presence, where individuals freely opt for madness over communion, though remedial processes may extend beyond death.^[78]^[79] Twentieth-century Orthodox theologian Vladimir Lossky (1903–1958), in The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church (1944), critiqued Western double predestination—including reprobation—as an anthropomorphic projection that reduces divine mystery to deterministic categories, neglecting the Trinitarian relationality central to Eastern soteriology. He contrasted this with Orthodoxy's emphasis on personhood as encompassing nature, allowing for genuine freedom in responding to grace.^[80] The Synod of Jerusalem (1672), through the Confession of Dositheus, explicitly countered Calvinist predestinarianism by affirming free will's role in salvation, stating that God predestines according to foreknowledge of human choices and desires all to be saved (1 Timothy 2:4), without foreordaining any to damnation. Condemnation, it declared, arises solely from rejecting prevenient grace and misusing liberty, reinforcing synergism as the path to deification.^[81]

Contemporary Discussions

Modern Interpretations

In the 20th century, Swiss Reformed theologian Karl Barth significantly reframed the doctrine of reprobation within a Christocentric understanding of election in his multi-volume Church Dogmatics (1932–1967). Barth argued that election and reprobation are not dual decrees applied to individuals but are unified in Jesus Christ, who as the elect one simultaneously represents the reprobate humanity rejected by God on the cross. This approach absorbs reprobation into Christ's vicarious suffering, thereby avoiding any notion of individual predestination to damnation and emphasizing God's gracious election in Christ alone.^[82] Neo-Calvinism, emerging in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, sought to integrate the doctrine of reprobation into broader cultural and societal engagement. Abraham Kuyper (1837–1920), a Dutch theologian and statesman, defended a supralapsarian view of reprobation—positing that God's decree of reprobation precedes the fall—as part of affirming divine sovereignty. Herman Bavinck (1854–1921), in his Reformed Dogmatics (1895–1901), critiqued both supralapsarian and infralapsarian perspectives but upheld the doctrine as a mystery of divine justice that bolsters Christian cultural witness by affirming God's glory in both election and rejection. Together, their interpretations adapted classical Reformed predestination to counter secularism and promote comprehensive Christian involvement in public life.^[83]^[84] Feminist and liberation theologies of the late 20th century offered adaptive critiques of reprobation, viewing it as intertwined with patriarchal structures of divine authority and control. Rosemary Radford Ruether (1936–2022), a prominent Catholic feminist theologian, linked doctrines of divine judgment to oppressive imagery of a male God exercising arbitrary authority, which she argued perpetuates hierarchical power dynamics that marginalize women and the oppressed. In works such as Sexism and God-Talk (1983), Ruether reinterpreted such concepts through a lens of liberation, proposing that true divine justice dismantles patriarchal control by affirming relational equality and communal redemption over individualistic decrees of rejection. This perspective adapts reprobation by redirecting it toward critiques of systemic injustice, influencing broader theological shifts toward inclusive eschatology.^[85] Ecumenical dialogues in the 20th century, particularly through the World Council of Churches' Faith and Order Commission, aimed to foster unity by focusing on shared aspects of Christian faith and practice. These efforts reflect a modern adaptation that subordinates divisive doctrines like reprobation to ecumenical priorities of mutual recognition and collaborative witness. In 21st-century evangelicalism, interpretations of reprobation remain tied to the TULIP acrostic summarizing Calvinist soteriology. John Piper, in Five Points: Toward a Deeper Experience of God's Grace (2007), upholds limited atonement—the "L" in TULIP—as implying reprobation, where Christ's death secures salvation only for the elect, underscoring God's sovereign choice in displaying mercy and justice. Recent works, such as Peter Sammons' Reprobation and God's Sovereignty: Recovering a Biblical Doctrine (2022), defend the doctrine biblically, particularly through Romans 9, as essential to Reformed theology without implying God authors sin.^[86] This view contrasts with open theism, which rejects exhaustive divine foreknowledge of future free choices, thereby undermining any predestinarian decree including reprobation as incompatible with genuine human freedom. Open theists like Gregory Boyd argue that God's relational openness to the future precludes fixed decrees of rejection, adapting the doctrine toward a dynamic theology of risk and response.^[87]^[88]

Criticisms and Debates

One major philosophical challenge to the doctrine of reprobation arises from the problem of evil, particularly how it reconciles with God's benevolence. Critics argue that reprobation, by predestining some to damnation and sin, implies divine causation of evil, undermining God's goodness. Philosopher Alvin Plantinga, in his free will defense, posits that a world with moral good requires the possibility of free creatures choosing evil, thus mitigating the logical inconsistency between God and evil without eliminating all suffering.^[89] However, this defense is seen as insufficient for reprobation, as it does not fully resolve the tension when God actively decrees the fall into sin, leaving unresolved questions about divine responsibility for eternal punishment.^[90] Universalist perspectives further contest eternal reprobation by reviving early Christian ideas of universal restoration. Hans Urs von Balthasar, in his 1986 work Dare We Hope That All Men Be Saved?, draws on Origen's concept of apokatastasis—the ultimate reconciliation of all creation—to argue that while hell is real, Scripture and tradition permit hope in God's mercy extending to all, questioning the certainty of anyone's eternal damnation.^[91] Von Balthasar emphasizes God's universal salvific will (1 Timothy 2:4), suggesting reprobation as self-inflicted but not irrevocably final, thereby challenging doctrines that affirm fixed eternal exclusion from salvation.^[92] Debates between Arminian and Reformed traditions intensify ethical concerns over reprobation's implications for divine justice. In Arminian Theology: Myths and Realities (2006), Roger Olson accuses high Calvinism's unconditional reprobation of portraying God as the author of sin, as divine decrees render evil certain while holding humans solely accountable, contradicting God's holiness (pp. 99, 244).^[93] Olson, echoing Jacob Arminius, contends that such predestination imputes hypocrisy to God, who commands faith from the reprobate without providing means for it (pp. 104, 182-183).^[93] These 20th-century exchanges highlight reprobation's tension with human moral responsibility, with Arminians viewing it as incompatible with a loving God who desires all to be saved. Interfaith dialogues reveal parallels and critiques of reprobation's determinism. In Judaism, predestination emphasizes divine foreknowledge without negating free will, as articulated in the Jewish Encyclopedia, contrasting with Christian double predestination's perceived overemphasis on divine decree over human agency.^[94] Jewish thought critiques such views as diminishing accountability, prioritizing ethical choice in covenantal relationship. Similarly, Islamic qadar (divine decree) affirms God's sovereignty but, per critiques from schools like the Mu'tazila, rejects extreme determinism to preserve moral responsibility, viewing Christian reprobation as akin to Jabriyya fatalism that absolves humans while burdening God with evil.^[95] These traditions highlight reprobation's challenge in balancing divine power with human freedom across faiths. Post-Holocaust theology amplifies ethical concerns, linking predestinarian ideas to theodicy's failures amid radical suffering. Emil Fackenheim (1916–2003), in works like God's Presence in History (1970), rejects traditional theodicies that justify evil—including those implying divine ordination of suffering—as morally inadequate after Auschwitz, arguing they enable Hitler's posthumous victory by rationalizing atrocity.^[96] Fackenheim urges a "614th commandment" for Jews to affirm life against such determinism, critiquing predestination frameworks for failing to address gratuitous evil without compromising God's justice or human dignity.^[97]

References

[1]
The Doctrine of Reprobation - The Gospel Coalition
Reprobation is God's eternal decree whereby he foreordained that certain persons would be excluded from the number of those saved by grace.
[2]
https://ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.v.xxii.html
[3]
[PDF] Prepared by Whom? Reprobation and Non-Calvinist Interpretations ...
The doctrine of reprobation naturally follows from the logic of the situation. The decree of election inevitably implies the decree of reprobation.
[4]
Reprobation: from Augustine to the Synod of Dort - Academia.edu
This research explores the historical development of the doctrine of reprobation, tracing its evolution from Augustine through to the Synod of Dort.
[5]
Aquinas and Calvin on Predestination: Is There Any Common ...
Thomas sees predestination as a part of God's providence and focuses on causality while Calvin posits predestination, not providence, as determinative of our ...
[6]
Calvin, Capitalism, and Predestination | Harvard Divinity Bulletin
But what about predestination in particular: the idea that God chooses some and rejects others? It was Calvin himself who first called this the “horrible decree ...
[7]
Reprobation - The Critics and the Canons
The Canons treated election and reprobation together under the same head of doctrine, recognizing that it is impossible fully to articulate a doctrine of ...
[8]
Romans 9 and the Calvinist Doctrine of Reprobation - Soteriology 101
Apr 9, 2018 · Calvinist theologian Wayne Grudem defines reprobation as “the sovereign decision of God before creation to pass over some persons, in sorrow ...
[9]
The Doctrine of Double Predestination - University of Oregon
This is the doctrine of “double predestination”: the idea that God does not merely chose some for salvation, and omits to save the rest.
[10]
What is reprobation? - Got Questions
Jan 4, 2022 · “Reprobation” is the term used to describe those who by default are left in their fallen human nature to sin and to be eternally damned.
[11]
Confession of Faith: The Orthodox Presbyterian Church
### Summary of Westminster Confession, Chapter 3, Sections 5-7 on Predestination and Reprobation
[12]
What does it mean to have a seared conscience? | GotQuestions.org
Jan 4, 2022 · A seared conscience is a God-given moral consciousness that has been rendered insensitive, like 'spiritual scar tissue' that dulls the sense of ...
[13]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Jeremiah+6%3A30&version=KJV
[14]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+9%3A12&version=KJV
[15]
[PDF] an exegetical and theological consideration - Biblical eLearning
reprobation and free will. One of the crucial passages in this ... Wilson, "The Hardening of Pharaoh's Heart," CBQ 41 [1979] 32, who views a "P ...
[16]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah+6%3A9-10&version=KJV
[17]
https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1123&context=dissertations
[18]
Election and Reprobation - Monergism |
Election Means That We Do Not Have a Choice in Whether We Accept Christ or Not. According to this objection, the doctrine of election denies all the gospel ...
[19]
[PDF] The Sin Against the Holy Spirit in the Writings of G. C. Berkouwer ...
This dissertation examines these respective dilemmas in the context of the sin against the Holy Spirit with the purpose of ascertaining how these views impact ...
[20]
Fallen Away or Fallen Down? Hebrews 6:1-9. Hal Harless
Barnes clearly considered such apostasy hypothetical: The passage proves that if true Christians should apostatize, it would be impossible to renew and save ...
[21]
When Does God Harden a Sinner's Heart?
Oct 30, 2020 · Now let's look at this specific question; namely, Did God first harden the sinners in Romans 1:24, 26, 28 before he gave them up to dishonorable ...Missing: reprobation | Show results with:reprobation
[22]
Are We Living Out Romans 1? | Desiring God
Feb 27, 2020 · ... Romans 1: God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the ...
[23]
[PDF] seeing hell: do the saints in heaven behold the sufferings of the ...
Yet. God is pleased in the display of His power over sinners (Romans 9: 17, 22-23). Perhaps an illustration will be of use. When a judge passes a sentence ...
[24]
[PDF] Dissertation 4 - The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
apostasy (6:4-8).14 After this harsh rebuke and warning, he moves to an expression of confidence in his hearers and exhortation to persevere in 6:9-12. Most ...
[25]
Destined to Disobey? Isaiah 6:10 in John 12:37-41 - Academia.edu
17 He also suggests that unbelief is a form of self-hardening ... "That the evangelist seems to be saying that it was God's will that few believe in Jesus because ...
[26]
(PDF) Lest after preaching to others I become disqualified Grace ...
This paper examines the theological implications of 1 Corinthians 9:27, particularly focusing on the concepts of grace and warning in the context of Paul's ...Cite This Paper · Key Takeaways · References (3)<|separator|>
[27]
Condemnation of the Enemies of the Kingdom, Part 3
Mar 24, 1998 · Therefore, I say to you, any sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven men, but blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven. And whoever ...Missing: Testament | Show results with:Testament
[28]
CHURCH FATHERS: De Principiis, Book III (Origen) - New Advent
De Principiis (Book III). Please help support the mission of New Advent and get the full contents of this website as an instant download. Includes the Catholic ...
[29]
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/04123.htm#chapter6
[30]
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1510.htm
[31]
CHURCH FATHERS: On Grace and Free Will (St. Augustine)
It is in consequence of their opinions that I wrote the book entitled On Grace and Free Will. This work I addressed to the monks of Adrumetum, in whose monastry ...
[32]
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/210216.htm
[33]
CHURCH FATHERS: Homily 16 on Romans (Chrysostom)
### Summary of God's Hardening of Pharaoh (Homily 16 on Romans by Chrysostom)
[34]
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1510.htm#chap13
[35]
https://archive.org/details/theologicaltreat0002anse
[36]
Anselm's Cur Deus Homo - Christian Classics Ethereal Library
Text Size. A. A. Bible Version. Disable scripture popups, King James Version, American Standard Version, World English Bible ... ANSELM'S CUR DEUS HOMO. « Prev ...
[37]
Anselm (1033-1109) | Issue 164 - Philosophy Now
Anselm argues that foreknowledge is not predestination: God knows what you do, but doesn't make you do anything. So God does not damn you. Rather, your own sin ...
[38]
The Canons of the Second Council of Orange (529)
The Canons helped establish the classic Augustinian views on total depravity, original sin, and grace that dominated the church until the middle 1700s. Since ...Missing: Early reprobation culpability
[39]
Predestination (Prima Pars, Q. 23) - Summa Theologiae - New Advent
Therefore, as predestination includes the will to confer grace and glory; so also reprobation includes the will to permit a person to fall into sin, and to ...
[40]
chapter xiii. - HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH*
The non-elect are reprobated in view of their foreseen demerit. On the other hand, Duns seems to hold fast to the doctrine that the elect merit the eternal ...
[41]
Communion (Chapter 3) - The Eucharist in Medieval Canon Law
Footnote However, even the wicked and reprobate received “the true body of Christ” (veram Christi carnem). ... The penitentials punished vomiting up the host, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[42]
Chapter XIV. - HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH*
Luther himself was fully agreed with Augustin on total depravity and predestination, and stated the doctrine of the slavery of the human will even more ...
[43]
John Calvin: Institutes of the Christian Religion
1. Error of those who deny reprobation. 1. Election opposed to reprobation. 2. Those who deny reprobation presumptuously plead with God, whose counsels even ...
[44]
Neglected Sources of the Reformed Doctrine of Predestination
While there, Zwingli preached a sermon on providence and predestination to an audience which included Luther himself. This sermon was later expanded and ...
[45]
The Arminian Challenge and the Reformed Response
Mar 24, 2025 · One of the most significant such controversies arose at the end of the sixteenth century. ... Synod of Dordt was called to deal with the matter.
[46]
CT06 - Hanover College History Department
The Council of Trent's sixth session covered keeping commandments, avoiding rashness in predestination, the gift of perseverance, and the fallen's restoration.
[47]
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Predestination - New Advent
The correct explanation of this symbolic book is given by St. Augustine (City of God XX.13): "Præscientia Dei quæ non potest falli, liber vitæ est" (the ...
[48]
Chapter 21, Institutes of the Christian Religion Book 3, John Calvin ...
But as the Lord seals his elect by calling and justification, so by excluding the reprobate either from the knowledge of his name or the sanctification of his ...
[49]
Chapter 23, Institutes of the Christian Religion Book 3, John Calvin ...
1. Election opposed to reprobation. 2. Those who deny reprobation presumptuously plead with God, whose counsels even angels adore. 3. They murmur against God ...
[50]
Lapsarian Views - The Gospel Coalition
The Supralapsarian and Infralapsarian Orders both teach that God eternally predestines persons for either election or reprobation, but they differ on whether ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[51]
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justin-taylor/jonathan-edwards-on-predestination-and-free-will/
[52]
Jonathan Edwards: Freedom of the Will
... reprobation, election, universal redemption, sufficient and effectual grace, and the freedom of the will of man; and has made vain all his exclamations ...
[53]
[PDF] Freedom of the Will - Early Modern Texts
•a moral necessity of God's will, arising from or con- sisting in the ... as also in a few earlier places, Edwards calls these God's •'disposing' will.
[54]
Calvin on Predestination (Election and Reprobation) - Krisis & Praxis
Jan 1, 2023 · Calvin insists that both election and reprobation rest on the sovereign will and good pleasure of God.
[55]
[PDF] The Reformed Doctrine Of Predestination | Monergism
The very terms "elect" and "election" imply the terms "non-elect" and "reprobation." When some are chosen out others are left not chosen. The high ...
[56]
Loraine Boettner: Reformed Doctrine of Predestination - Christian ...
The very terms "elect" and "election" imply the terms "non-elect" and "reprobation." When some are chosen out others are left not chosen. The high ...Missing: 1932 | Show results with:1932
[57]
The Canons of Dort | Christian Reformed Church
... human depravity, the resistibility of God's grace, and the possibility of a fall from salvation. In the Canons the Synod of Dort rejected these views and ...Missing: culpability | Show results with:culpability
[58]
The Canons of Dortrecht - The Highway
It consists of statements of doctrine adopted by the great Synod of Dort which met in the city of Dordrecht in 1618-1619.
[59]
Westminster Confession of 1646: Of God's Eternal Decree
Chapter III. Of God's Eternal Decree. I. God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain ...
[60]
The Westminster Confession
The authority of the holy Scripture, for which it ought to be believed and obeyed, dependeth not upon the testimony of any man or church, but wholly upon God.
[61]
Heidelberg Catechism - Christian Reformed Church
The new catechism was intended as a tool for teaching young people, a guide for preaching in the provincial churches, and a form of confessional unity.
[62]
Heidelberg 54: We Confess A Holy Catholic Church | The Heidelblog
Jan 22, 2015 · 54. What do you believe concerning the “Holy Catholic Church”? That, out of the whole human race, from the beginning to the end of the ...
[63]
[PDF] Arminius. Declaration of Sentiments - Society of Evangelical Arminians
From this decree of Divine election and reprobation, and from this administration of the means which pertain to the execution of both of them, it follows, that ...
[64]
Predestination As Temporal Only - Society of Evangelical Arminians
Aug 14, 2008 · A fourth view of predestination is Arminius' conditional predestination. Arminius taught that God does predestinate each individual to an ...<|separator|>
[65]
The Five Articles of the Remonstrants (1610)
In these five articles they advocated conditional rather than absolute predestination, universal rather than limited atonement, the necessity of regeneration ...
[66]
The Five Articles of the Remonstrants, 1610
These Articles, thus set forth and taught, the Remonstrants deem agreeable to the Word of God, tending to edification, and, as regards this argument, ...
[67]
Sermon 128 - Free Grace - The Wesley Center Online
Free Grace. Preached at Bristol, in the year 1740. "He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely ...
[68]
Free Grace Revisited - United Methodist Insight
May 30, 2018 · Wesley's sermon, Free Grace, was a convincing a moving manifesto denouncing the Calvinist doctrine of predestination as blasphemous.
[69]
How Do Arminianism's Basic Doctrines Contrast with Those of ...
Mar 25, 2022 · Such apostasy occurs only when the believer willfully turns away from faith. When that occurs, the apostate has departed from the very condition ...
[70]
Preach Reprobation and Preach it Hard! - Arminian Perspectives
Jan 24, 2012 · According to Calvinism, God's reprobation of most of humanity is “for His glory”. From this it seems safe to conclude that God's action in reprobation brings ...
[71]
[PDF] 2023 Church of the Nazarene Manual
This 2023 edition of the Manual includes a brief historical statement of the church; the Church Constitution, which defines our Articles of Faith, our ...
[72]
We Believe - Free Methodist Church USA
We believe in One Living God in three persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The Holy Trinity There is but one living and true God.Missing: predestination | Show results with:predestination
[73]
General Council of Trent: Sixth Session - Papal Encyclicals
The holy Synod declares first, that, for the correct and sound understanding of the doctrine of Justification, it is necessary [Page 31] that each one recognise ...
[74]
Molinism | Catholic Answers Encyclopedia
Molinism tries to clear up the mysterious relation between grace and free will by starting from the rather clear concept of freedom.
[75]
Humani Generis (August 12, 1950)
### Summary of Sections on Predestination, Reprobation, or Double Predestination
[76]
Refuting Predestination: Free Will and Salvation in Orthodoxy
Oct 28, 2025 · John of Damascus teaches, “The good that is done by force is not good.” If God were to predestine some to salvation and others to damnation ...Missing: reprobation synergism
[77]
Plucking the TULIP (1) – An Orthodox Critique of the Reformed ...
Aug 12, 2012 · John of Damascus explained that God made man a rational being endowed with free-will and as a result of the Fall man's free-will was corrupted ( ...
[78]
[PDF] Gregory of Nyssa's Doctrine of apokatastasis: Theology and ...
To Gregory's mind, the darkness experienced by the Egyptians was, or would be, analogous to the darkness of those in Gehenna before the universal restoration.
[79]
Two Hundred Texts on Theology and the Incarnate Dispensation of ...
The eighth day is the transposition and transmutation of those found worthy into a state of deification. The Lord, giving perhaps a mysterious hint of the ...Missing: reprobation | Show results with:reprobation
[80]
Orthodoxy and the Damnation of the Damned
Sep 5, 2013 · In the final analysis of Orthodox theology, damnation consists entirely in the voluntary rejection of God by us.<|separator|>
[81]
Plucking the TULIP (3) — An Eastern Orthodox Critique of the ...
Sep 16, 2012 · Vladimir Lossky in The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church noted: ... double predestination. By leaving no room for free will, Calvin's ...
[82]
The Confession of Dositheus (Eastern Orthodox, 1672)
The Synod produced its own confession, the Confession of Dositheus (Patriarch of Jerusalem), in which point by point it refuted Cyril's' eighteen points.
[83]
[PDF] Karl Barth's Doctrine of the Creation | Church Society
with man are effected in and through the person of Jesus Christ. When applied to election it means that Jesus Christ is both elect and reprobate. As elect ...
[84]
[PDF] ABRAHAM KUYPER, HERMAN BAVINCK, AND “THE ...
Bavinck, against Kuyper, does not commend supralapsarianism as capturing the divine perspective on the order of the decrees, since neither the ...
[85]
Supralapsarianism and Infralapsarianism by Herman Bavinck
Supralapsarianism places the decree of predestination proper above (supra) the decree to permit the fall (lapsus); while infralapsarianism places the decree of ...Missing: cultural engagement
[86]
[PDF] Theological Foundations of Patriarchy - Dialogue Journal
Feminist theologian Rosemary Radford Ruether explains that in traditional Christian thought, "the relationship of male to female is analogous to the ...
[87]
Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry (Faith and Order Paper no. 111, the ...
This famous text, adopted by Faith and Order at its plenary commission meeting in Lima, Peru in 1982, explores the growing agreement - and remaining differences ...Missing: predestination reprobation<|separator|>
[88]
Limited Atonement - Desiring God
Mar 15, 2008 · The doctrine of limited atonement teaches that God did more in the cross than obtain a bonafide offer of forgiveness for all who believe; ...
[89]
Open Theism and Divine Foreknowledge - Frame-Poythress.org
Jun 4, 2012 · Open theists deny that God knows the future exhaustively. In their view, God is often ignorant about what will happen,1 sometimes even mistaken.
[90]
Logical Problem of Evil | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
According to Plantinga's Free Will Defense, there is evil and suffering in this world because people do immoral things. People deserve the blame for the bad ...Logical Consistency · Plantinga's Free Will Defense · An Objection: Free Will and...
[91]
[PDF] Plantinga on "Felix Culpa": Analysis and Critique
Apr 1, 2008 · Possible worlds approaches to the problem of evil easily slide into a consequentialist as sumption: that because agents are to be evaluated in ...
[92]
https://www.amazon.com/Dare-Hope-Saved-Short-Discourse/dp/0898702070
[93]
Dare We Hope That All Men Be Saved? With a Short Discourse on ...
This book is perhaps one of the most misunderstood works of Catholic theology of our time. Critics contend that von Balthasar espouses universalism.Missing: eternal reprobation
[94]
[PDF] Arminian Theology Myths and Realities - Lion and Lamb Apologetics
sary to avoid it, God would be the author of sin, and sin would not really be sin.29 The Fall was instigated by Satan but caused solely by Adam, who in ...
[95]
PREDESTINATION - JewishEncyclopedia.com
The belief that the destiny of man is determined beforehand by God. "Predestination" in this sense is not to be confounded with the term "preordination."
[96]
Predestination vs. Free Will in Islam: Understanding Allah's Qadr
Jul 31, 2017 · The Qadarites said sinful disobedience is not beloved and pleasing to Allah, so it cannot be ordained and decreed by Him; it is outside of His ...
[97]
The Problem of Evil in the Holocaust: Two Jewish Responses
This paper critically examines the problem of evil in the philosophical theologies of two prominent Jewish philosophers: Emil Fackenheim and Richard Rubenstein.Missing: predestination | Show results with:predestination
[98]
Emil Fackenheim, the Holocaust, and Philosophy (Chapter 13)
For Fackenheim, the Holocaust was not solely a rupture in Jewish history and Jewish thought; it was also a rupture in world history and philosophical thought.Missing: theodicy predestination