Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Retention basin

A retention basin, also known as a wet pond or retention pond, is a constructed that maintains a permanent of water to capture and manage runoff from impervious surfaces such as rooftops and . Unlike basins, which temporarily store water and dry out between storms, retention basins hold water year-round or during wet seasons, allowing for gradual infiltration, , or controlled release. Their primary purposes include reducing flood risks by attenuating peak runoff rates, preventing along downstream channels, and improving by settling sediments and removing pollutants through biological processes. Retention basins function as multifunctional tools, often serving as artificial wetlands that support aquatic ecosystems while treating . enters the via inlets, where a pretreatment forebay captures coarse sediments before the main facilitates longer detention times for finer particles and nutrients. Outflow is controlled through orifices or risers set at higher elevations to maintain the permanent volume, with spillways preventing overtopping during extreme events. These structures are typically sized for drainage areas of 5–50 acres, with depths ranging from 3–8 feet in the permanent , and require professional engineering to ensure stability and performance. The effectiveness of retention basins is well-documented, achieving approximately 44% removal of total , 13% of total , and 69% of , making them a cornerstone of low-impact development in . They also provide aesthetic and recreational value, such as habitats and open spaces, though ongoing —like removal, control, and stabilization—is essential to sustain functionality and avoid issues like breeding or structural failure. With lifespans exceeding 20 years when properly managed, retention basins represent a cost-effective investment, typically costing $35,000–$75,000 per acre of treated.

Overview

Definition and Terminology

A retention basin, also known as a wet pond or retention pond, is an engineered artificial pond or constructed to manage runoff through the maintenance of a permanent of water that facilitates and flow attenuation. This permanent serves as a baseline volume of water that remains in the even during dry periods, allowing incoming to mix with the existing water for and biological processes. Key terminology associated with retention basins includes the permanent pool, which refers to the consistently present water volume designed to enhance by promoting the settling of sediments and the uptake of pollutants. Stormwater runoff, the primary input managed by these basins, originates mainly from impervious surfaces such as roads, parking lots, and rooftops, which prevent natural infiltration and accelerate surface flow during events. Retention basins differ from related stormwater structures in their operational focus. Unlike detention basins, which temporarily store runoff and release it gradually without a permanent —often drying out between storms—retention basins hold indefinitely to support ongoing . In contrast to infiltration basins, which emphasize by allowing captured runoff to percolate into the without maintaining a standing body, retention basins prioritize surface storage and through the permanent . In settings, retention basins are typically designed for contributing areas of 5–50 acres, with surface areas of 1–3% of the area (often 0.1–1.5 acres), and permanent depths of 3–8 feet to ensure effective hydraulic retention and pollutant removal.

Historical Development

Precursors to modern retention basins can be traced to 19th-century efforts in , such as and reservoirs, and in the United States, where and systems managed flooding from runoff and expanding areas. In the United States, early federal involvement in began in the mid-19th century, focusing on and construction for riverine amid rapid industrialization. Similarly, in , modern systems emerged during this period to handle and effluents, laying the groundwork for later retention practices. The mid-20th century marked a significant shift due to post-World War II urban expansion, which dramatically increased impervious surfaces and exacerbated flooding risks. This prompted the development of basic detention ponds in the and , initially designed to control peak runoff rates rather than . By the late , on-site stormwater detention emerged as a revolutionary approach in the United States, with early implementations in regions like to attenuate flood peaks from developing areas. Contemporary retention basins emerged with the 1972 U.S. , which catalyzed their widespread adoption as best management practices (BMPs) in the 1970s and 1980s, shifting emphasis from quantity control to integrated water quality improvement. During the 1980s, practices evolved to include two-stage detention basins and initial ecological enhancements like wetlands to address pollutant removal in . By the 1990s, designs increasingly incorporated permanent pools and habitat features, aligning with broader low-impact development principles. Globally, retention basins spread from the onward, influenced by international standards and local needs; in , examples include Germany's early flood retention structures like the Odenkirchen basin constructed around 1962, with over 15,000 such facilities by the early 2000s. The 2000 Water Framework Directive further promoted their use across member states by mandating holistic river basin management that integrated stormwater retention for ecological protection. In developing regions like , semi-urban ponds adapted traditional systems into modern retention practices from the 1980s to combat urbanization-induced flooding, often as natural detention basins in flood-prone areas. As of 2025, designs are increasingly incorporating projections, such as larger capacities to handle more frequent extreme events.

Functions and Benefits

Stormwater Management Roles

Retention basins play a crucial role in flood protection by temporarily storing excess runoff during intense precipitation events, thereby reducing peak rates to downstream areas and mitigating the risk of flooding. These structures are typically designed to handle events ranging from 10-year to 100-year frequencies, attenuating flows that would otherwise overwhelm urban drainage systems. For instance, in municipal manuals, basins are engineered to control discharges for both minor (e.g., 10-year) and major (e.g., 100-year) through staged storage volumes above the permanent pool, ensuring controlled release that matches pre-development conditions. In addition to flood mitigation, retention basins contribute to by significantly slowing the velocity of as it enters and is released from the , which minimizes scour in receiving and stabilizes banks downstream. The process allows high-velocity runoff from impervious surfaces to dissipate within the basin, reducing the erosive potential of outflows through orifices or weirs that promote gradual release. This velocity reduction is particularly vital in settings where rapid runoff can exacerbate bank instability and incision. Retention basins also achieve runoff volume reduction by facilitating infiltration into the and from the permanent , thereby mimicking natural hydrological processes and decreasing the overall volume of entering receiving waters. The permanent serves as a base for these mechanisms, allowing a portion of stored to percolate or evaporate rather than being discharged, which helps restore pre-development infiltration rates in urbanized watersheds. Studies and guides emphasize that this volume control can reduce total runoff by promoting , especially in basins sited on permeable soils. Finally, retention basins integrate seamlessly with urban infrastructure by receiving inflows directly from storm drains connected to impervious surfaces such as streets, parking lots, and rooftops, while providing controlled outflows to municipal sewers or natural streams. This connectivity allows basins to capture and manage concentrated that would otherwise bypass natural , channeling it through piped inlets protected against at the outfall. Such enhances overall conveyance in developed areas, preventing localized and supporting broader .

Environmental and Social Advantages

Retention basins provide significant water quality improvements through their permanent pool, which facilitates the sedimentation of pollutants such as sediments and from runoff. Aquatic plants in the pool uptake nutrients like and , while biological filtration processes further enhance removal. These mechanisms typically reduce by 70-90%, depending on and . Ecologically, retention basins support by creating habitats for various , including amphibians, plants, and populations when the permanent pool depth exceeds 4 feet. Well-designed basins with native vegetation foster riparian zones that benefit and , contributing to corridors. In urban settings, such basins have expanded fishing opportunities, with examples like Virginia's retention ponds offering accessible for and in community areas. The aesthetic and recreational value of retention basins enhances urban green spaces through landscaped features like vegetated buffers and benches, providing visual appeal and areas for passive enjoyment. Integration with trails and viewing platforms turns these structures into community amenities, promoting outdoor activities such as walking and without compromising their functions. Socially, retention basins mitigate urban heat islands by promoting evaporation and shading from surrounding vegetation, which cools local microclimates in densely developed areas. Retention basins can provide some ecological services, such as flood storage, but do not fully substitute for natural wetlands lost to urbanization and may not restore functions like nutrient cycling and habitat provision as effectively. However, poorly maintained basins can foster mosquito breeding or support invasive species, necessitating ongoing management to maximize benefits and minimize drawbacks.

Design Principles

Key Structural Components

Retention basins are engineered structures designed to manage runoff through a combination of physical elements that facilitate , controlled release, and environmental . The primary components include structures for directing inflow, a pretreatment forebay for capture, a permanent for baseline retention, outlet controls for regulated , berms and embankments for containment, and for stabilization and enhancement. These elements work together to ensure the basin's structural integrity and functionality in and suburban settings. Inlet structures direct and slow incoming to prevent and scour within the . These typically consist of pipes, swales, or ditches that convey drainage into the , often equipped with energy dissipators such as aprons to reduce and protect the floor. Inlets are positioned at hydraulically remote points from the outlet and stabilized with erosion-control measures to handle design storm flows effectively. The pretreatment forebay is a smaller, isolated area at the inlet that captures coarse sediments and debris from incoming , typically sized to 5-10% of the total volume for easy and to protect the main from excessive loading. The permanent pool forms the always-submerged zone at the basin's base, providing consistent that supports processes. This is typically 3 to 6 feet deep on average, with a maximum depth of 8 feet, and may include an bench 12 to 18 inches deep along the edges for . If seepage is a concern, the is lined with impermeable materials like a 30-mil geomembrane or 6 to 12 inches of clay soil with low permeability (1×10⁻⁵ cm/sec). Outlet control mechanisms regulate water release to maintain the permanent level while allowing controlled drawdown during and after storms. Common features include riser pipes embedded in the , weirs for overflow, and orifices (typically 3 inches or larger in diameter, depending on local standards) with racks to prevent clogging. The outlet often draws water from near the surface (e.g., 1 foot below) via a reverse-slope , ensuring gradual and minimizing resuspension of settled materials. Berms and embankments serve as earthen walls to contain the basin and its water volume, ensuring structural stability against overflow and erosion. These are constructed with side slopes typically ranging from 3:1 to 4:1 (horizontal to vertical) for safety and ease of maintenance, often incorporating a 10-foot-wide safety bench at the normal water edge. Vegetation covers the slopes to enhance stability, while avoiding deep-rooted trees within 15 to 25 feet of the structure to prevent root damage. Landscaping integrates native to stabilize banks, prevent , and improve without compromising functionality. Native grasses and deep-rooted cover slopes and the basin bottom, while shrubs and aquatic wetland are planted along benches and edges to tolerate fluctuating levels. This vegetation selection avoids invasives like cattails or and water-seeking trees like willows near structures, promoting long-term bank integrity. These elements collectively aid in removal through and biological uptake in the permanent pool.

Sizing and Hydraulic Considerations

The of retention basins is primarily determined by the contributing drainage area, typically ranging from 10 to 50 acres for and suburban applications, to ensure adequate capture of runoff without excessive land requirements. Inflow estimation relies on the , a standard approach for small watersheds, expressed as Q = CIA, where Q is the peak discharge rate (typically in cubic feet per second), C is the runoff coefficient (ranging from 0.05 for wooded areas to 0.95 for impervious surfaces), I is the rainfall intensity (derived from local intensity-duration-frequency curves for design storms), and A is the area in acres. This assumes uniform rainfall intensity over the and is applicable for basins up to about 200 acres, though adjustments may be needed for larger areas to account for timing. The permanent pool volume, which maintains a water level for and biological , is calculated to store 0.5 to 1.5 inches of runoff per of the contributing area, providing sufficient depth (usually 3 to 6 feet) for effective improvement. This volume is determined by multiplying the drainage area by the target storage depth and converting units (e.g., 1 inch per equals approximately 1/12 per ), ensuring the pool achieves a of 24 to 48 hours under average flow conditions to promote and uptake without rapid turnover. Designers often verify this through volume-area-depth relationships, adjusting for side slopes to optimize while meeting storage goals. Drawdown time for the temporary storage volume above the permanent is engineered for 24 to 72 hours following a event, preventing stagnation and allowing gradual release to downstream systems. This is controlled via outlet structures, with flow governed by the orifice equation Q = C A \sqrt{2 g h}, where Q is the discharge rate, C is the (typically 0.6 for sharp-edged s), A is the cross-sectional area, g is (32.2 ft/s²), and h is the above the centerline. Iterative routing calculations, often using software like HydroCAD, size the to achieve the desired drawdown while limiting peak outflows to pre-development rates. Key factors influencing retention basin design include permeability, which must be low enough (e.g., hydrologic soil groups C or D) to sustain the permanent without excessive seepage loss during dry periods, potentially requiring liners in highly permeable sites. Local rainfall patterns, characterized by 2- to 5-year events for sizing and larger storms (e.g., 10- or 25-year) for , dictate intensity and volume inputs via intensity-duration-frequency analyses. Additionally, appropriate safety factors for , determined through geotechnical assessments to mitigate risks of during high flows or seismic events.

Construction and Implementation

Site Selection and Planning

Site selection for retention basins prioritizes locations that enhance capture while minimizing construction challenges and environmental risks. Ideal sites are situated in low-lying areas at the of paths, close to impervious surfaces generating runoff, to maximize in collecting and retaining . Topographic assessments on areas with gentle overall slopes, typically up to 15% upstream, and relatively flat local to support stable embankments and controlled flow from to outlet. Sites in designated floodplains are generally avoided to prevent exacerbation of flooding, and high tables should be evaluated, as retention basins with permanent pools can tolerate with but require adjustments to avoid or reduced performance. Soil and geological assessments are critical to ensure the basin's ability to maintain a permanent and structural integrity. Permeable s, classified as NRCS Groups A or B with infiltration rates of at least 0.5 inches per hour, are preferred when incorporating infiltration elements, but basins primarily designed for retention often require low-permeability soils to minimize seepage and sustain water levels. In cases of high seepage risk, such as in sandy or terrains, clay liners or impermeable barriers are incorporated to prevent contamination or formation. Geotechnical investigations, including soil borings extended at least 5 feet below the proposed bottom, test for stability, depth to (ideally greater than 20 inches to avoid limitations), and absence of unstable fill materials. Integration planning emphasizes compatibility with surrounding to facilitate conveyance and while protecting . Basins should be located within or proximate to the contributing area, often serving drainage areas of 10-50 acres with significant impervious to optimize routing without excessive piping. Utility lines, wells, and structures must be avoided through setbacks, such as a minimum from wells or buildings to prevent or risks. zones, typically 10-20 feet wide and vegetated, are established around the basin perimeter with setbacks from residential areas and buildings, typically at least from foundations to prevent ; these also accommodate roads, usually 10 feet wide. Drainage area sizing, as detailed in hydraulic considerations, informs the scale but is balanced against site constraints. Environmental screening ensures minimal impact on ecosystems and cultural resources, promoting sustainable multi-use designs. Sites adjacent to sensitive habitats, such as wetlands or cold-water streams, are avoided due to potential thermal pollution from warmer basin outflows, which can elevate temperatures by up to 10°F and harm aquatic life. Cultural or archaeological sites must be identified and excluded through preliminary surveys. To enhance benefits, planning incorporates recreational elements, like trails or wildlife habitats, within non-inundated zones, supported by vegetated buffers that also aid in pollutant uptake and . Karst or faulted geology requires additional safeguards, such as liners, to mitigate risks.

Construction Processes

The construction of retention basins begins with site preparation to ensure a stable and minimize environmental impacts during building. This phase involves clearing , brush, and debris from the designated area while retaining select trees or shrubs to integrate with the surrounding and reduce risks. Grading follows to achieve contours, with the foundation surface compacted to a depth of approximately 6 inches after removing and stockpiling for later use in . controls, such as silt fences, temporary , or straw , are installed around the perimeter and disturbed areas to prevent runoff into adjacent waterways, in compliance with local management regulations. Embankment construction and pool excavation proceed once preparation is complete, focusing on structural and water retention capacity. A core trench is excavated along the embankment centerline, typically 8 feet wide with 1.5:1 side slopes, extending into an impervious layer to prevent seepage; this trench is backfilled with clay or suitable material in layers no thicker than 9 inches and compacted to achieve stability. The main or berms are then built in horizontal lifts of 6 to 12 inches using on-site fill material at near-optimum moisture content, compacted with to at least 95% of standard density for clay liners or similar impervious zones. The area is excavated to the specified depth, often 4 to 8 feet, with side slopes ranging from 3:1 to 4:1 (horizontal:vertical) for and resistance; subsoil must be free of , hardpan, or contaminants to support long-term functionality. If the site has highly permeable soils or fractured , lining is applied, such as a 12-inch compacted clay , clay at 1-3 pounds per square foot, or geomembranes like 30-mil covered with 6 inches of earth for sealing. Inlet and outlet structures are installed next to manage water flow and prevent structural damage. Inlets are positioned to direct at low velocities, often with aprons or energy dissipators to reduce at entry points. Outlets include risers—typically metal, , or poured in place—with orifices sized to drain the temporary storage volume above the permanent within 24-48 hours, equipped with racks to avoid clogging and anti-seep collars on to minimize leakage through embankments. , such as corrugated or with watertight joints, are bedded on stable foundations, backfilled in 8-inch lifts, and connected to downstream protections like . All installations undergo visual inspections and leak testing, such as pressure or flood tests, to verify integrity before proceeding. Vegetative establishment occurs after structural completion and initial filling to stabilize soils and enhance ecological functions. Aquatic benches and riparian zones are planted with native emergent wetland , such as sedges or rushes, and buffer areas with grasses, shrubs, and trees selected for low maintenance and . are installed carefully to avoid root damage, followed by soil amendments if needed and mulching to retain moisture. Initial is critical: daily watering for the first 8 weeks, then every 3-4 days during dry periods for the first (typically to October), with trees and shrubs receiving weekly applications in the initial month. Full operational status, including 85% vegetative cover in planted zones, is generally achieved within 3-6 months, after which survival rates are assessed to ensure establishment.

Operation and Maintenance

Functional Mechanisms

Retention basins operate under normal conditions through a permanent of that sustains aerobic environments conducive to microbial of and other pollutants. This standing , typically maintained at depths of 3 to 8 feet, promotes by providing oxygen-rich conditions that support bacterial breakdown of soluble contaminants. The in the permanent generally ranges from 14 to 21 days, allowing for baseline treatment of baseline inflows from surrounding areas, such as seepage or minor , which helps in diluting and processing low-level pollutants before they exit the system. During storm events, inflow enters the , raising the water level above the permanent pool and displacing toward the outlet. This temporary storage volume captures the bulk of the runoff, promoting as particles settle into the pool while finer are filtered through the . The 's facilitates controlled via outlet structures, such as risers or weirs, which limit peak discharge rates to downstream channels, typically releasing the detained volume over 2 to 5 days to attenuate peaks and prevent . As referenced in principles, these outlet controls ensure gradual release without resuspending settled materials. Pollutant removal in retention basins occurs through interconnected physical, chemical, and biological processes. Physical settling is the dominant mechanism, capturing up to 80% of (TSS) by reducing flow velocities and allowing to deposit in designated zones like the forebay and main . Chemical precipitation further aids in removing metals and nutrients by binding them to sediments or forming insoluble compounds in the alkaline environment of the . Biological uptake complements these by enabling aquatic plants and algae on vegetated shelves to absorb and , while microbes facilitate and , enhancing overall . Performance of these mechanisms is assessed through key indicators such as levels to verify , to gauge efficiency, and dissolved oxygen levels to ensure aerobic conditions persist for biological treatment. These metrics help identify deviations, like buildup reducing pool volume or oxygen depletion signaling organic overload, allowing for timely evaluation of the basin's operational health.

Maintenance Protocols

Maintenance of retention basins is essential to ensure their long-term functionality in , preventing reduced removal efficiency, increased risk, and ecological . Protocols typically involve a combination of routine monitoring, targeted interventions, and periodic major activities, tailored to site-specific conditions such as size, load, and local . These practices are guided by environmental agencies and manuals, emphasizing proactive measures to address common issues like accumulation and structural wear. Routine inspections form the cornerstone of , conducted quarterly to assess overall condition and immediately after significant events—defined as greater than 2 inches of rainfall in 24 hours—for damage evaluation within 72 hours. Inspectors check for along embankments and inlets (such as rills or gullies), buildup that could impede , and vegetation health to ensure adequate coverage without overgrowth. Post-storm assessments focus on stability, outlet functionality, and any new deposits, allowing for prompt corrective actions to restore design performance. Sediment management addresses the gradual accumulation in the permanent and forebays, where buildup can reduce and capacity; removal is recommended every 5-10 years or when reaches 20-50% of the pool depth or forebay , depending on local guidelines. Methods include hydraulic for minimal disturbance or mechanical excavation for larger volumes, with tested and disposed of appropriately to avoid contaminating downstream areas—often via land application if non-toxic. In the permanent , this process maintains the designed for capture without compromising hydraulic function. Vegetation control promotes bank stability and prevents nutrient enrichment while supporting ; banks are mowed annually or as needed to limit woody growth, with removed and replaced by native plants to restore cover exceeding 85% in buffer zones. Aquatic is harvested periodically—such as when coverage exceeds 20%—to avoid and maintain open water surfaces, using mechanical raking or cutting followed by debris removal to reduce organic buildup. These activities, inspected bi-annually during growing seasons, ensure aids without hindering flow. Infrastructure repairs target components like outlets, liners, and features to prevent failures; outlets are cleaned of quarterly or after storms to avoid clogging, with repairs involving flushing or replacement of anti-vortex devices as needed. Liners and embankments are repaired promptly upon detection of breaches or , using geotextiles, , or reseeding by qualified contractors. For in areas with stagnant water, measures include introducing larvivorous fish like bluegills or applying (Bti) dunks, alongside design enhancements for continuous flow and predator habitats. Annual maintenance budgets typically range from 3-5% of initial construction costs to cover these activities, ensuring cost-effective longevity.

Regulatory and Applied Aspects

Governing Regulations and Standards

In the United States, retention basins are regulated primarily through the Agency's (EPA) Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) under the Clean Water Act, which mandates the use of best management practices (BMPs) to control discharges from construction activities disturbing one or more of land. Retention basins, often implemented as wet ponds, serve as post-construction BMPs to manage loads in runoff, with the EPA providing menus of BMPs that outline their and application for quality improvement. These federal requirements influence state and local programs, ensuring that new developments incorporate retention features to mitigate erosion, sedimentation, and . At the state and local levels, regulations vary but commonly specify design criteria for retention basins to achieve objectives. For instance, California's NPDES stormwater permits, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, require treatment of volumes from the 85th 24-hour event, often equivalent to approximately 0.75 inches of rainfall, with BMPs like retention basins sized to infiltrate or detain this volume where feasible. In , the Department of 's management rules outline wet pond criteria, including permanent depths of 3-6 feet and treatment volumes based on the first inch of runoff to promote and removal. Similarly, Pennsylvania's Best Management Practices Manual, published by the Department of , details wet pond standards such as a permanent sized to capture the water quality volume, typically the runoff from the first 1 inch over impervious areas, and side slopes no steeper than 4:1 to ensure and treatment efficacy. Internationally, frameworks encourage retention basins as part of integrated stormwater management. The European Union's recast Urban Directive (Directive (EU) 2024/3019, entering into force 1 January 2025) establishes standards for urban wastewater collection and treatment, indirectly supporting retention practices to reduce overflows and promote sustainable systems across member states. In , Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) guidelines, developed by bodies like the Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, advocate for retention basins to mimic natural , detain the 1-in-100-year event where appropriate, and treat the first 80% of annual rainfall volume for pollutant reduction. Compliance with these regulations involves permitting processes, performance , and clear assignment of maintenance liabilities. NPDES permits require developers to submit stormwater pollution prevention plans detailing retention basin designs, with ongoing to verify pollutant removal efficiencies, such as a minimum 50% (TSS) reduction for wet ponds under many state programs. Maintenance responsibilities typically rest with developers during construction, transitioning to municipalities, homeowners' associations, or property owners post-development, with liabilities for non-compliance including fines or remediation orders to prevent . The Clean Water Act's historical emphasis on control has shaped these modern standards, ensuring retention basins contribute to broader protection goals.

Case Studies and Examples

One notable urban application of a retention basin is the Lorne Street Naturalized Stormwater Retention Pond in , , constructed in phases starting in 2019. This basin stores approximately 40,000 cubic feet of stormwater, allowing for controlled release into the Tantramar River to mitigate downstream flooding and protect local infrastructure from intense rainfall events associated with . The design incorporates native vegetation and a surrounding , enhancing recreational opportunities for community members while supporting in an urban setting. In suburban contexts, the retrofit of existing flood control basins at Pon Court and Copperhead Drive in , during the early 2010s exemplifies integration with water quality goals in developed areas. These basins, serving residential and roadway runoff in the , were modified with automated gate valves to hold for 24 hours, achieving a 93% reduction in loads through enhanced . Although nutrient reductions for were not significant, the project demonstrated the value of retrofitting for pollutant control, though it necessitated ongoing including sediment removal and equipment checks at an annual cost of $2,500–$3,500. An international example is the flood retention basin in Odenkirchen, , along the Niers River, originally built in the and upgraded in recent decades as part of broader flood defense strategies. This basin functions within a network of measures to attenuate peak flows during extreme events, contributing to 's compliance with the EU Floods Directive by retaining water volumes that reduce downstream risks without major alterations to local . The upgrades emphasized minimal ecological disruption, preserving adjacent wetlands and habitats while improving overall system . Case studies highlight key lessons in retention basin performance, including successes in enhancing and , as seen in semi-urban pond revitalization efforts across . For instance, restored ponds in semi-arid regions like have increased local groundwater levels by over 100 meters in nearby borewells through improved rainwater infiltration and reduced evaporation losses. Conversely, challenges persist in under-maintained U.S. sites, where such as giant reed can overrun basins, impairing hydraulic function, reducing storage capacity, and necessitating costly eradication to restore efficacy.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] NPDES: Stormwater Best Management Practice, Wet Ponds
    Wet ponds are constructed basins with a permanent water pool, removing pollutants through sediment settling and biological activity. They are widely applicable ...
  2. [2]
    Stormwater Basins: How Detention and Retention Ponds Work
    Apr 30, 2015 · A retention basin or pond has a riser and orifice at a higher point and therefore retains a permanent pool of water. A retention pond looks ...
  3. [3]
    None
    ### Summary of Retention Pond Content
  4. [4]
    None
    ### Summary of Stormwater Basins (Retention Focus)
  5. [5]
    9VAC25-875-670. Definitions. - Virginia Law
    "Stormwater retention basin" or "retention basin" means a stormwater management facility that includes a permanent impoundment, or normal pool of water, for the ...
  6. [6]
    FAQs • What is a detention or retention basin? - Creve Coeur, MO
    Detention basins dry out between storms, while retention basins retain a permanent pool of water. Both collect and slowly release storm water.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] NJ Stormwater BMP Manual Chapter 9.11 Wet Ponds, Updated Sept ...
    Wet ponds, also known as retention basins, address stormwater impacts by detaining runoff in a permanent pool. They can also provide wildlife habitat.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] 10. Wet Detention Basin - NC DEQ
    Sep 22, 2016 · 8. The average depth of the permanent pool shall be a minimum of 3 feet. The average depth shall be calculated as described in Figure 10-2b. 9 ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Stormwater Detention Basins - Lincoln.ne.gov
    Detention basins help manage the excess urban stormwater runoff generated by impervious surfaces such as roads, parking lots and rooftops. They also help ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Water Infiltration
    Detention basins filter and slow stormwater and dry completely between stormwater events. Retention basins hold water during and after stormwater events to ...
  11. [11]
    Stormwater Basins - Philadelphia Water Department
    A detention basin slows the flow before releasing it into a smaller outlet. An infiltration basin operates much like a detention basin, but it is designed to ...
  12. [12]
    Fact Sheet - Infiltration Basin - Environmental Review Toolkit
    An infiltration basin is a shallow depression created by excavation or berming that captures stormwater and stores it until it can infiltrate into the soil.
  13. [13]
    None
    ### Typical Construction Sequence for Stormwater Ponds
  14. [14]
    [PDF] United States Flood Control Policy: The Incomplete Transition from ...
    Dec 17, 2012 · Flood-control dams date from the third or second millennium BCE,52 but they did not come into widespread use until the nineteenth century in ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The Origins and Development of Federal Flood Control Legislation
    The Federal government first provided aid for flood control in the mid-19th century. This aid came in the form of three acts in 1849, 1850, and 1860 that ...Missing: retention Europe
  16. [16]
    Evolution of Flood Defense Strategies: Toward Nature-Based ... - MDPI
    The modern urban drainage systems were first instilled in the nineteenth century in western Europe [40], which helped prevent flooding and drainage through a ...Missing: origins retention
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Two Decades of Stormwater Management Evolution - MHFD
    In late 1960 through early 1970 the use of on-site stormwater detention in the United States began to appear. It was a revolutionary concept at that time.
  18. [18]
    Sonoma Water History
    After repeated catastrophic flooding through the 1950s, four flood detention reservoirs were built in the 1960s on Santa Rosa Creek, Matanzas Creek, Paulin ...
  19. [19]
    Evaluation of floating treatment wetlands as retrofits to existing ...
    Since the passage of the Clean Water Act (1972), wet retention basins have been used to mitigate increased post-construction peak flow rates. As such, there ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] "Stormwater Management in Cold Climates – A Historical Perspective"
    1980's: Stormwater policies evolved to incorporate water quality practices. Typical practices included water quality swales, two stage detention basins, ...
  21. [21]
    The History of Stormwater Management and Background for Artful ...
    Stormwater detention systems began to evolve about 1970 [37, 38] and later, deep tunnels were instituted to manage combined sewer overflows and flooding.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Upgrading of the flood retention basin Odenkirchen in Germany
    Abstract. The flood retention basin Odenkirchen on the river Niers in Germany was constructed around 60 years ago as consequence of a major, harmful flood.
  23. [23]
    Why is Germany 30 years ahead of England? - Inderscience Online
    Oct 8, 2012 · Weiss and Brombach (2007) reports that there are over 15,000 retention basins plus more than 2,500 settling tanks in Germany. In 2005, the ...
  24. [24]
    (PDF) Will the Water Framework Directive be a washout?
    Aug 10, 2025 · The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) is being implemented across Europe, signaling a change of thinking in the way water issues are addressed.
  25. [25]
    Flood and Drought Management through Water Resources ...
    The following structural measures are generally adopted for flood protection: Embankments, flood walls, sea walls. Dams and reservoirs. Natural detention basins.Floods And Drought · Structural Measures · Disaster Management In India
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Stormwater Wet Pond and Wetland Management Guidebook
    Stormwater ponds may also provide channel protection storage volume (Cpv) and overbank flood control (Qp) through stormwater detention above the WQv storage.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Chapter 8: Detention / Retention Hydraulics - Nashville.gov
    Design calculations are required to demonstrate that the 2 and 100-year design storms are controlled and that water release rates are designed to facilitate at ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Stormwater Detention Ponds
    In this way, stormwater detention basins reduce how fast runoff enters our natural waterways. This protects areas downstream from flooding and erosion.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Chapter 5 – Detention - Aspen GOV
    Detention is a practice in which storage is provided to temporarily impound stormwater runoff during an event and to release runoff in a controlled manner.<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    2. Stormwater Management in the Ultra-Urban Environment
    As urbanization occurs, the quantity of stormwater runoff from the surrounding watershed increases due to the reduction in the amount of pervious spaces ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Effect of Detention Basin Release Rates on Flood Flows
    The choice of the majority of the municipalities was to design the postdevelopment release rate for control of the 100-year event. In practice, the most ...
  32. [32]
    Retention Ponds - Lake County Government
    Pollutants: Retention ponds are designed to collect stormwater runoff, which often contains pollutants like chemicals (pesticides, fertilizers, oil, antifreeze ...Missing: enhancement | Show results with:enhancement
  33. [33]
    Small Water, Big Fun: Retention Ponds can be Great Places to Hone ...
    Aug 7, 2023 · The big advantages of short travel time and low-pressure family bonding opportunities make retention ponds excellent choices for anglers of any experience ...Missing: basin | Show results with:basin
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Urban Best Management & Low Impact Development Practices
    Retention ponds can be vegetated or unvegetated around the perimeter. Additional benefits: ecosystem services, wildlife habitat, aesthetic value, recreational ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Appendix 3-F: Oxford Retention Basin Multi-Use Enhancement ...
    control facility, to improve its ecological functions and values, and to increase the area's aesthetic and recreational values. Oxford Basin serves a critical ...
  36. [36]
    4.7 Ponds and Wet Basins - Philadelphia Water Department
    The minimum allowable distance between the emergency spillway crest elevation and the top-of-berm elevation is one foot. The minimum allowable basin length-to- ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Asymmetric Loss of Wetlands and Gain of Artificial Water Features in ...
    Aug 30, 2023 · As wetlands have been lost, numerous artificial water features (AWFs), such as stormwater retention ponds, golf course water features, and reser ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Stormwater Ponds - CT.gov
    Jan 24, 2002 · directly to cold water fish habitats. ❍ Require more storage volume ... ❍ An average pool depth of 3 to 6 feet is recommended and varying depths ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Maintaining Your Detention Basin:
    A detention basin contains different components, including inlet pipes (there may be one or multiple inlets), the side slopes and bottom, a low flow channel, ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Chapter 3 - Detention Basins for Flooding Control - Maine.gov
    the settled embankment must be at least one foot above the peak water surface in the basin with the emergency spillway flowing at design depth for a discharge ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
  41. [41]
    Section 12: Rational Method - Texas Department of Transportation
    The Rational method is appropriate for estimating peak discharges for small drainage areas of up to about 200 acres (80 hectares) with no significant flood ...<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Using the Rational Method - HydroCAD
    The Rational method predicts the peak runoff according to the formula: Q=CiA, where C is a runoff coefficient, i is the rainfall intensity, and A is the ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Stormwater Treatment: ST-10 - Detention Computations - CivicLive
    The first flush volume shall be released slowly over a minimum period of 24 hours, with a maximum drain time of 72 hours to allow the detention volume to be ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Stormwater BMP Design: Basins - CED Engineering
    Highly permeable soils may not be acceptable for retention ponds because of excessive drawdown during dry periods. Where permeable soils are encountered, ...
  46. [46]
    Influence of Climate Change on the Design of Retention Basins in ...
    Retention basins are used to control the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff. Their design is based on Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) curves and ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Stormwater Management Structure Guidance Document
    Chapter 1: Site Selection and Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria. 1. Chapter 2: Wet Detention Basins (Stormwater Ponds). 9. Chapter 3: Dry Extended Detention ...
  48. [48]
    Understanding and interpreting soils and soil boring reports for ...
    It is Highly Recommended that soil borings be extended a minimum of 5 feet below the bottom of the proposed infiltration practice and that the most restrictive ...Types Of Soil Sample... · How To Order A Soil Boring · Soil Exploration Reports
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Stormwater Best Management Practices, Dry Detention Ponds
    Structural stormwater controls can achieve four broad resource protection goals: flood control, channel protection, groundwater recharge and pollutant removal.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Ponds — Planning, Design, Construction | NY.Gov
    This handbook describes the requirements for building a pond. It is useful to the landowner for general information and serves as a reference for the engineer, ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Detention Basins Design Guidance - Caltrans
    In addition, Detention Basins should be able to operate by gravity flow while limiting clogging of the water quality outlet and providing a proper overflow ...
  52. [52]
    An Introduction to Stormwater Ponds in South Carolina
    Aug 29, 2021 · Slower water velocities enhance the settling of sediment and sediment-associated pollutants from the water column to the bottom of the pond.
  53. [53]
    [PDF] BMP 6.14: Wet Pond/Retention Basin - DEP
    Wet Detention Ponds are stormwater basins that include a permanent pool for water quality treatment ... Volume Reduction Calculations and Peak Rate ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Maintenance Guidance for Stormwater Management Practices
    Mar 31, 2017 · Ponds and Wetlands: • See Section 4.13 – Pool Quality for general guidance on pond and wetland vegetation maintenance, as well as the following.
  55. [55]
    Operation and maintenance of stormwater ponds
    Maintenance is necessary for a stormwater pond to operate as designed on a long-term basis. The pollutant removal, channel protection, and flood control ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  56. [56]
    Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities | US EPA
    Jun 13, 2025 · A Clean Water Act permit is required for stormwater discharges from any construction activity disturbing: 1 acre or more of land, or; Less ...
  57. [57]
    National Menu of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · Post-construction BMPs include structural and non-structural practices, ordinances, and maintenance. Examples include green parking, green ...
  58. [58]
    Lorne Street Naturalized Stormwater Retention Pond in Sackville ...
    Sep 7, 2023 · The pond stores stormwater, slowly releasing it to reduce flooding, and provides long-term protection, building resilience to heavy rain and ...
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    [PDF] RETROFIT OF AN EXISTING FLOOD CONTROL FACILITY TO ...
    Jul 9, 2014 · The study intended to modify the basin outlet in order to reduce ... The goal of the detention basin retrofit was to demonstrate a 50% reduction ...Missing: case suburban
  61. [61]
    Groundwater Recharge: Rejuvenated Lakes and Ponds Revitalize ...
    Jul 15, 2024 · When the pond began to store rainwater, the borewells near the pond were recharged and groundwater increased by more than 100m. However, success ...
  62. [62]
    Invasive Species Impair Stormwater Detention Basins
    Jun 26, 2019 · When invasive species find their way into stormwater detention ponds, they can inhibit stormwater pond function. Invasive plants like giant reed ...