Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Apollo 12

Apollo 12 was the sixth crewed mission in NASA's Apollo program and the second to successfully land humans on the Moon, achieving a precision touchdown in the Ocean of Storms on November 19, 1969, just 163 meters from the unmanned Surveyor 3 probe. Launched atop a Saturn V rocket from Kennedy Space Center on November 14, 1969, at 11:22 a.m. EST, the mission faced immediate drama when the vehicle was struck by lightning twice shortly after liftoff, temporarily knocking out instrumentation until quick thinking by mission control restored systems. The crew consisted of Commander Charles "Pete" Conrad Jr., Lunar Module Pilot Alan L. Bean, and Command Module Pilot Richard F. Gordon Jr., who remained in lunar orbit while Conrad and Bean conducted two extravehicular activities (EVAs) totaling nearly eight hours on the surface. During their 31 hours and 31 minutes on the , the astronauts deployed the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), a set of scientific instruments including a and solar wind spectrometer that operated until 1977, gathering data on lunar quakes and the solar environment. They also retrieved components from , such as its camera and scoop, for return to to study microbial contamination and material degradation in the lunar vacuum, marking the first retrieval of hardware from another space mission. The collected approximately 34 kilograms (75 pounds) of lunar rocks and , primarily basalts dated to 3.1–3.3 billion years old, providing key insights into the 's volcanic . Notably, Bean accidentally pointed the color television camera toward the Sun during the first EVA, destroying it and ending live broadcasts prematurely, though Gordon's orbital photography contributed to certifying landing sites for future missions like Apollo 14. The mission concluded with a in the on November 24, 1969, after 10 days, 4 hours, and 36 minutes in space, during which the command module orbited the 45 times. Apollo 12 demonstrated enhanced accuracy and expanded scientific capabilities compared to , paving the way for subsequent lunar explorations while returning safely with invaluable samples and data that advanced understanding of the 's geology and environment.

Mission Background

Objectives and planning

Apollo 12, as NASA's second crewed lunar landing mission, had primary objectives centered on demonstrating precision landing capabilities near the unmanned Surveyor 3 probe, which had soft-landed in the Ocean of Storms on April 20, 1967. The crew was tasked with conducting two extravehicular activities (EVAs) totaling approximately 7.5 hours to perform selenological inspections, sample collection, and surface exploration. Additional key goals included deploying the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), consisting of instruments such as a seismometer, magnetometer, and solar wind spectrometer, to enable long-term measurements of lunar seismic activity, magnetic fields, and other environmental data. The astronauts also aimed to retrieve components from Surveyor 3, including its camera and scoop, for post-mission analysis to assess the effects of the lunar environment on Earth hardware. Secondary objectives focused on testing enhancements to the Lunar Module's guidance and navigation systems for improved accuracy, gathering geological samples from diverse terrains in to expand understanding of mare basalts, and obtaining photographs of the landing site and nearby features to support planning for subsequent Apollo missions. The mission was planned for a duration of about 10 days, incorporating a non-free-return to allow flexibility in operations and a daylight launch. Planning for Apollo 12 advanced in the late as part of the broader , with the landing site selected in 1968 based on imagery and data, targeting coordinates at approximately 3° S, 23° 42' W within a 200–600 meter radius of the probe to validate pinpoint techniques. In contrast to , which emphasized a general proof-of-concept landing and a single 2.5-hour with about 21 hours on , prioritized targeted precision (aiming for within 200 meters of ), extended surface operations totaling 31 hours across two , and the introduction of ALSEP for ongoing . It also incorporated a camera for real-time surface broadcasts, though this was inadvertently damaged early in the mission. As the follow-up to 's success in , sought to build operational momentum toward longer lunar stays in later missions, within the context of the $25.4 billion authorized under President Kennedy's 1961 directive.

Site selection

The selection of the Apollo 12 landing site prioritized a flat mare basalt terrain in the Oceanus Procellarum region to ensure a safe landing, given the mission's emphasis on precision navigation and surface operations. Key criteria included proximity to the Surveyor 3 spacecraft, which had landed on April 20, 1967, at coordinates approximately 3.0° S, 23.42° W, to allow for retrieval of components during extravehicular activity within a 1-km radius; optimal solar illumination angles of 5 to 14 degrees for the planned 31-hour surface stay, facilitating visibility and thermal control; and favorable Earth visibility for real-time television coverage of activities. These factors were evaluated against engineering feasibility, such as trajectory compatibility and low risk of local electromagnetic disturbances, while balancing scientific objectives like deploying the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP). The selection process began with a pool of candidate sites identified in 1968 using high-resolution imagery from the Lunar Orbiter missions, which provided orbital reconnaissance to map potential areas in the lunar . For Apollo 12, the primary site—designated Site 7 at approximately 3° S, 23° W—was narrowed from initial options including Sites 2, 3, and 5, based on its location in the southeastern along a Copernicus ray. Confirmation came from Surveyor 3's surface photographs, which depicted smooth plains interspersed with craters 1 to 2 meters in diameter, verifying the terrain's suitability for a pinpoint landing. The Apollo Site Selection Board provided final approval on July 10, 1969, after integrating these data with mission planning inputs from geologists and engineers, ensuring alignment with overall lunar exploration goals. Backup sites were prepared as contingencies for launch delays or abort scenarios, with Site 5 at 2.0° N, 42.0° W in a younger area south of Kepler serving as the primary alternate, and Site 2 in the Fra Mauro formation as a secondary option. These alternatives maintained similar characteristics but offered flexibility in longitude to accommodate potential adjustments. Site 3, another region, was also considered in early evaluations but deprioritized due to lower geological homogeneity compared to Site 7. Geologically, the chosen site targeted layered basaltic formations in the to investigate the Moon's volcanic history, focusing on homogeneous mare materials representative of lunar provinces rather than terrains reserved for later missions. This allowed for systematic sampling of and rocks to compare with findings from the Sea of Tranquility, emphasizing prolonged mare-filling processes and ejecta from secondary impacts like those from Copernicus. The proximity to further enabled direct assessment of surface evolution over 31 months, including dust accumulation and micrometeoroid effects on exposed hardware. Challenges in site selection centered on risks associated with the precision landing requirement, such as potential touchdown in the shadow of or on uneven micro-terrain hidden in Orbiter images, which could complicate solar-powered operations or ascent. These were mitigated through detailed pre-mission analysis, including construction of 1:1 scale terrain models based on imagery and Lunar Orbiter data, which informed crew training on landmarks like the distinctive "snowman" pattern. Overall, the process underscored a shift toward targeted scientific returns while upholding safety margins established from Apollo 11.

Crew and Personnel

Prime and backup crews

The prime crew for Apollo 12 consisted of Commander Charles "Pete" Conrad Jr., Command Module Pilot Richard F. Gordon Jr., and Lunar Module Pilot Alan L. Bean. All three were selected as part of NASA's second astronaut group in 1962 and were naval aviators with extensive backgrounds prior to joining the agency. Conrad, aged 39 at launch, commanded the mission and served as the lunar landing pilot, drawing on his prior command of and , which provided over 260 hours of experience focused on long-duration flight and rendezvous operations suitable for the mission's precision landing near Surveyor 3. Gordon, aged 40, handled solo operations in the Command and Service Module (CSM) Yankee Clipper during the lunar excursion, leveraging his approximately 70 hours from , where he demonstrated expertise in rendezvous and support. Bean, aged 37 on a first , acted as (LM) pilot and provided support on the lunar surface, bringing his Navy pilot qualifications to the role. The crew was noted for its close-knit dynamics and Conrad's characteristic humor, fostering a lighthearted yet professional atmosphere during training and flight.
PositionAstronautAge at LaunchPrior SpaceflightsSpaceflight Hours (Approximate)
CommanderCharles "Pete" Conrad Jr.39, 260+
Command Module Pilot4070
Lunar Module PilotAlan L. Bean37None0
The backup crew included Commander David R. Scott, Command Module Pilot James B. Irwin, and Lunar Module Pilot , assigned to support the prime crew and prepared to assume roles if needed. Scott, aged 37 and selected in 's third group in 1963, brought test pilot experience and over 250 hours from and , positioning him well for command duties with his demonstrated skills in spacecraft handling. Irwin, aged 39 and from the 1966 group, was on his first flight assignment with an background, serving as CMP backup. Young, aged 39 and also from the 1962 group, contributed Navy test pilot expertise and nearly 270 hours from , , and , making him ideal for LMP backup with his orbital and proficiency. The selection of both prime and backup crews emphasized complementary experience in Gemini-era , , and piloting to ensure redundancy for the mission's objectives, including precise lunar landing and CSM-LM operations; all members underwent in each other's positions.
PositionAstronautAge at LaunchPrior SpaceflightsSpaceflight Hours (Approximate)
CommanderDavid R. Scott37Gemini 8, Apollo 9250+
Command Module PilotJames B. Irwin39None0
Lunar Module PilotJohn W. Young39Gemini 3, Gemini 10, Apollo 10270+

Key ground support roles

The Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC) in Houston served as the primary nerve center for Apollo 12 mission control, coordinating all flight operations through the Mission Operations Control Room (MOCR) and supporting backrooms. This facility housed teams of flight controllers, engineers, and scientists who monitored spacecraft systems, trajectory, and crew activities in real-time, ensuring 24/7 coverage via rotating shifts. Pacific tracking ships, part of the Manned Space Flight Network (MSFN), provided essential communication relays during translunar and return phases, supplementing ground stations for continuous telemetry data. Flight directors oversaw overall mission execution from the MOCR, with leading the Black Team for translunar injection and reentry shifts, and M.P. "Pete" Frank directing the Orange Team during lunar orbit insertion and landing operations. Other directors, including and , rotated to maintain uninterrupted supervision, adapting to anomalies like the launch lightning strikes while prioritizing crew safety and objectives. Key controllers in the MOCR included the Capsule Communicator (), who relayed critical instructions to the crew; astronaut Gerald P. Carr served in this role during launch and early flight phases, facilitating voice communications. The Guidance, , and Controls (GNC) Officer monitored attitude control and systems to ensure precise lunar adjustments. The Flight Dynamics Officer (FDO), or Guidance Officer, tracked and propulsion burns, verifying the spacecraft's path from Earth orbit to lunar landing. During the launch anomaly, Electrical, Environmental, and Consumables Manager (EECOM) identified anomalous signals from the lightning strikes at T+36 and T+52 seconds, recognizing a pattern from prior tests and directing the crew to switch the Signal Conditioning Equipment () to Auxiliary mode, restoring data flow and averting an abort. Support teams extended beyond the MOCR, with recovery operations led by the U.S. Navy's Pacific Manned Spacecraft Recovery Force (Task Force 130), commanded from the prime recovery ship (CVS-12), which retrieved the command module and crew from the site on November 24, 1969. The geological backroom, staffed by experts advising on lunar surface activities, included Caltech Lee Silver for sample analysis guidance and operational support in interpreting site data during extravehicular activities. Medical monitoring was overseen by NASA's Director of Life Sciences, Charles A. ", who tracked crew physiology via biomedical , ensuring health parameters remained stable throughout the 10-day mission.

Preparation

Astronaut training

The Apollo 12 crew, consisting of commander Charles Conrad Jr., lunar module pilot Alan L. Bean, and command module pilot , underwent specialized geology training to prepare for sample collection and documentation on the lunar surface near the site. This training included field trips to volcanic and crater analogs in the United States, such as the August 9-11, 1969, exercise in at Kilauea Iki and Kapoho, where the crew practiced traverses, lunar module descriptions, and sampling techniques under the guidance of geologists including Harrison H. Schmitt. Additional trips focused on impact craters, including Bean's July 10, 1969, visit to in and the crew's October 9-10, 1969, simulation at , , emphasizing crater mechanics and integrated traverses with Mission Control support. These exercises, led by U.S. Geological Survey and experts like Schmitt and Uel Clanton, built skills in identifying and documenting geological features relevant to the Ocean of Storms landing area. Vehicle simulations formed a core component of the crew's preparation, with over 1,000 collective hours spent in the (LM) simulator at NASA's Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC) in . These sessions replicated the precision landing near the mock spacecraft, honing Conrad's and Bean's piloting for the targeted descent into the 200-by-600-foot box around the probe, as well as maneuvers between the LM and Command/Service Module (CSM) for . The simulations incorporated site-specific models of the landing area, integrating real-time inputs from Mission Control to practice contingencies like engine failures during descent. Overall crew training encompassed approximately 2,300 hours across various simulators and briefings over 12 months, ensuring proficiency in all flight phases. EVA rehearsals emphasized suited mobility and task execution for the planned two lunar surface excursions totaling about 7.5 hours. The crew conducted sessions in the tank at , simulating low-gravity conditions to practice deploying the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), collecting soil and rock samples, and using tools such as core tubes for subsurface sampling and for handling specimens. These drills focused on the two- timeline, with Bean assisting Conrad in the first for deployment and ALSEP setup, and independent in the second, including retrieval of parts from Surveyor 3. The improved A7L pressure suits, tested in these rehearsals, enhanced mobility over previous models. Emergency drills were integrated throughout training, reflecting lessons from the fire, with emphasis on rapid egress procedures and suit integrity. Crews practiced fire escape from the LM cabin using modified hatches and quick-release mechanisms, as well as responses to suit leaks or pressure losses during EVAs, including purging contaminated systems and retreating to the LM. Post- safety enhancements, such as flame-retardant materials in suits and cabins, non-flammable coolants, and outward-opening hatches, were rigorously drilled to minimize risks in the oxygen-rich environment. These procedures were verified in integrated simulations involving full-crew and ground team coordination. Training intensity peaked from August to October 1969, culminating in full-mission integrated simulations that linked all phases from launch to with real-time Mission Control interactions at . These final rehearsals, including site-specific geology and vehicle dynamics, ensured the crew's readiness just weeks before the November 14 launch, building on earlier sessions to address lessons like improved documentation and contingency handling.

Hardware assembly and testing

The assembly of the launch vehicle for Apollo 12, designated SA-507, began in June 1969 at the 's () in High Bay 3. The first stage () was erected on June 25, followed by the second stage () on August 5, the third stage () on August 12, and the Instrument Unit on August 13. The Command and Service Module (CSM-108) arrived at the on March 28, 1969, and was mated to the Spacecraft-Lunar Module Adapter (SLA) on August 26. The (LM-6, named Intrepid) stages arrived on March 24, 1969, and were integrated into the SLA on September 20. The fully stacked vehicle rolled out to Launch Pad 39A on September 8, 1969, aboard the , which supported the 363-foot-tall structure during transport and provided access via the Launch Umbilical Tower (LUT). The LUT housed computers and umbilical connections that sequenced launch operations, including propellant loading and electrical power distribution from . Pre-launch testing commenced shortly after rollout, with the Countdown Demonstration Test (CDDT) conducted in 1969 to simulate the full countdown sequence. This test revealed issues with the cryogenic storage system, including a detanking problem caused by loose or misaligned fill-line components in the liquid tank, which was resolved through component adjustments. Additionally, a weld defect in the service module's hydrogen tank 2 caused a vacuum loss during altitude chamber testing, necessitating its replacement 51 hours before launch in 1969. Fuel cell preparations encountered a transducer failure during a pre-test checkout, but the cells were successfully conditioned and placed online 3.5 hours prior to launch after verification. Vibration tests were performed on the integrated vehicle to assess structural integrity under dynamic loads, including simulations to enhance resilience against potential strikes, drawing from weather-related concerns at the launch site. Compared to Apollo 11, several hardware modifications were implemented for Apollo 12 to improve reliability and mission objectives. The Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) featured an upgraded configuration with larger solar panels on the solar wind spectrometer to enhance particle collection efficiency, alongside the standard radioisotope thermoelectric generator for primary power. A color television camera was mounted on the LM descent stage's Modularized Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), enabling live color broadcasts from the lunar surface—the first such use—unlike the black-and-white system on Apollo 11. The LM's Reaction Control System (RCS) received refinements, including optimized thruster firing logic and propellant management, to support precision hover and landing maneuvers near the Surveyor III site, reducing propellant consumption during approach by approximately 10% in simulations. Quality assurance processes emphasized rigorous nondestructive evaluations throughout assembly. All welds on the Saturn V's S-IC stage—totaling over 5,000 feet—underwent 100% radiographic () inspection in at least two views to detect defects, ensuring structural integrity under extreme loads. Environmental simulations included thermal-vacuum chamber tests at the Manned Spacecraft Center (now ), where the and were subjected to space-like conditions to verify subsystem performance, such as environmental control and isolation valves, confirming no leaks or thermal anomalies under vacuum pressures below 10^{-5} . These tests, conducted on test articles like LTA-8 for the LM, validated crew compartment pressurization and equipment operation for durations exceeding 125 hours.

Hardware

Launch vehicle

The Saturn V launch vehicle for Apollo 12, designated SA-507, stood 363 feet (111 meters) tall and had a fueled weight of approximately 6.35 million pounds (2.88 million kilograms) at liftoff. It consisted of three stages: the first stage, manufactured by , powered by five F-1 engines producing a total thrust of 7.65 million pounds (34 meganewtons) using fuel and ; the second stage, built by North American Rockwell, equipped with five J-2 engines delivering 1.15 million pounds (5.1 meganewtons) of thrust using and ; and the third stage, produced by McDonnell Douglas, featuring a single J-2 engine with 230,000 pounds (1.02 meganewtons) of vacuum thrust, also using and . Following the success of Apollo 11, the SA-507 was assembled with a stringent 100% reliability objective, incorporating enhanced quality controls across manufacturing and testing phases. The SA-507 lifted off from Launch Complex 39A at on November 14, 1969, at 16:22:00 UTC, successfully achieving with a velocity of 35,027 feet per second (10,677 meters per second). After separating from the spacecraft, the third stage was injected into a heliocentric solar orbit, differing from the Apollo 11 S-IVB's targeted lunar impact; this trajectory was enabled by the stage's auxiliary propulsion system, which was also configured for potential contingency support, such as aiding rescue operations if command module docking failed. The vehicle's robust proved critical during ascent when struck the stack twice—at 36.5 seconds and 52 seconds after liftoff—triggering electrical transients that temporarily disabled instrumentation and fuel cells but caused no structural damage or mission compromise.

Spacecraft systems

The Apollo 12 mission utilized the Block II Command and Service Module (CSM), designated CSM-108 and named , manufactured by North American Rockwell. The Service Module housed the Service Propulsion System (), a single AJ10-137 engine delivering 20,500 pounds of thrust using and nitrogen tetroxide propellants, enabling lunar orbit insertion and trans-Earth injection maneuvers. Power was supplied by three hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells in the Service Module, each rated at 1.42 kilowatts continuous output for a total of up to 4.26 kilowatts at 28 volts DC, supporting the crew's electrical needs during the mission. Attitude control was managed by the (), comprising 16 thrusters each producing 93 pounds of thrust, clustered in four quads for precise three-axis stabilization and docking operations. The Lunar Module (LM), designated LM-6 and named Intrepid, was built by Aircraft Engineering Corporation as a two-stage vehicle for lunar landing and ascent. The descent stage featured a throttleable hypergolic with 10,000 pounds of maximum thrust, using the same propellants as the to control powered descent from to the surface. The ascent stage employed a fixed-thrust producing 3,500 pounds of force, also hypergolic, to launch the crew back to for with the CSM. Navigation and guidance integrated the Primary Guidance, Navigation, and Control System (PGNCS) with a quadruplexer interface for the landing radar, allowing real-time altitude and velocity data fusion during descent to enhance landing precision near the site. Mission-specific adaptations included reinforced handrails on the LM's exterior to facilitate extravehicular activity (EVA) mobility and stability for the commander and lunar module pilot during surface operations. The CSM incorporated gold-coated Kapton thermal blankets on the Service Module to reflect solar radiation and maintain temperature control during translunar and lunar orbit phases. Additionally, provisions for a contingency EVA hatch allowed the command module pilot to perform an untethered spacewalk if needed to assist in LM rendezvous recovery. The weighed approximately 63,500 pounds at launch, including propellants and consumables sufficient for three crew members over a 14-day duration, while the fueled massed about 32,000 pounds at separation from the . The environmental control and systems in both vehicles provided breathable air (oxygen-nitrogen mix in the , pure oxygen in the ), temperature regulation, and via canisters, sustaining the crew through all mission phases. Reliability was enhanced by redundant guidance computers: the CSM's inertial subsystem with backup star sighting, and the LM's PGNCS paired with the Abort Guidance System (AGS) for independent ascent control if the primary failed. Abort options included immediate CSM separation during launch via the , LM ascent stage jettison for return, or SPS burns for trajectory corrections, ensuring crew safety across ascent, translunar, lunar, and reentry phases.

Scientific payload

The Apollo 12 mission deployed the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), a set of automated geophysical instruments designed to monitor the lunar environment at the Oceanus Procellarum landing site over an extended period. The package included the Passive Seismic Experiment (PSE) to detect moonquakes and meteoroid impacts, the Lunar Surface Magnetometer (LSM) to measure magnetic fields, the Solar Wind Spectrometer (SWS) to analyze solar wind plasma, the Suprathermal Ion Detector (SIDE) to study low-energy ions and exosphere interactions, and the Charged Particle Lunar Environment Experiment (CPLEE) to examine charged particles in the vicinity of the Moon. Additional components integrated into the ALSEP were the Cold Cathode Ion Gauge (CCIG), attached to the SIDE for atmospheric pressure measurements, and the Lunar Dust Detector (LDD) to track dust accumulation. The entire ALSEP weighed 245 pounds (111 kg) and was powered by a SNAP-27 radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) fueled by plutonium-238, which produced approximately 2.4 kW of thermal power and 70 watts of electrical power at deployment, with a design lifespan of at least seven years. The ALSEP central station served as the hub, connecting the experiments via approximately 100-foot (30 m) cables to allow spaced-out deployment for optimal sensor separation and signal quality. Astronauts and Charles Conrad erected the package on November 19, 1969, during their second , positioning it about 600 feet (180 m) northwest of the Lunar Module within an arc that ensured clear lines of sight and minimal interference. The RTG was activated shortly after deployment, and the system transmitted data continuously to until its shutdown on September 30, 1977, as part of NASA's budget-driven decision to terminate operations for all Apollo ALSEP stations. Over its nearly eight years of operation, the ALSEP provided real-time on lunar conditions, contributing foundational data to . Beyond the ALSEP, the mission included other scientific instruments and retrievals to expand the payload's scope. Astronauts retrieved components from the nearby lander, including its television camera and pieces of tubing from the mechanical arm, which were returned to for analysis; post-mission dissection revealed traces of the bacterium on the camera, sparking debate over potential microbial survival in space versus post-retrieval contamination. High-resolution Hasselblad cameras, equipped with 80 mm and 60 mm lenses, documented the lunar surface and experiments, capturing over 1,300 images that supported geological mapping and ALSEP placement verification. A separate solar wind collector foil, part of the Solar Wind Composition (SWC) experiment, was deployed as a 1.4 by 0.3 meter aluminum sheet to trap particles for later laboratory analysis. Early data from the ALSEP highlighted key lunar phenomena. The PSE recorded natural moonquakes, including deep-focus events up to 700 km below the surface, and impacts from meteoroids as small as 1 gram, with ground motion sensitivity down to 0.3 nanometers. The SWS measured speeds of 250 to 550 km/s and provided insights into isotope abundances, while the SWC foil analysis yielded a flux of approximately 8.2 × 10^6 atoms/cm²/s and confirmed elevated levels compared to terrestrial sources, informing models of solar corona composition. The LSM detected a steady of 36 gammas at the site, with transients up to 96 gammas linked to solar activity. These results established the Moon's dynamic interior and surface environment, though the CCIG failed after 14 hours, limiting pressure data to upper limits below 5 × 10^{-9} .

Mission Timeline

Launch and translunar injection

Apollo 12 lifted off from Launch Complex 39A at NASA's on , 1969, at 11:22:00 a.m. EST (16:22:00 UTC), precisely on schedule despite rainy weather conditions. The Saturn V's first stage ignited at T-8.9 seconds, achieving liftoff at T+0, followed by standard pitch and roll maneuvers to align the trajectory. The ascent proceeded nominally through maximum dynamic pressure at T+1:21, with S-IC stage cutoff at T+2:16 and staging to the S-II at T+2:42. The S-II burn continued until T+7:41 for inboard engines and T+9:13 for outboard, leading to S-IVB ignition shortly thereafter at approximately T+9:19. The S-IVB propelled the stack to orbital insertion at T+11:43, establishing a of 102.5 by 100 nautical miles (190 by 185 km) inclined at 32.5 degrees. Approximately 36.5 seconds after liftoff, as the vehicle passed through a at about 6,400 feet altitude, a occurred, followed by a second at 52 seconds and 14,400 feet; these were triggered by the rocket's exhaust plume ionizing the charged atmosphere, creating a conductive path to ground. The strikes caused a surge that tripped the fuel cells offline, dropped bus voltages to 18-19 volts, caged the (IMU), and triggered multiple master alarms, including the "all lights and bells" indication in the command module. became garbled, and nine telemetry measurements were lost, but structural integrity remained intact with no fire or explosion risk. EECOM quickly directed the crew to switch the signal conditioning equipment (SCE) to at T+1:36, restoring telemetry; fuel cells reconnected at T+2:19, and the ascent continued without abort, as the transients did not meet mission rules for termination and backups were functional. During the initial coast phase in Earth orbit, systems checks confirmed nominal performance post-lightning recovery, including IMU realignment via programs P51 and P52 using star sightings, fuel cell purging, and electrical bus verification. The crew manually held attitude using the (SCS) while monitoring the S-IVB, and Commander took Earth photography, capturing views of the and Fiji islands. Go/no-go polls were conducted at approximately T+1:30 and T+2:30 hours mission elapsed time (GET), with all stations approving despite the earlier weather concerns and anomalies, leading to a "go" for (TLI) at 2:28:15 GET. The S-IVB ignited for TLI at 2:47:21 GET over the Pacific, burning for 5 minutes 44 seconds to achieve a velocity of 35,420 feet per second (10,800 m/s) at cutoff, placing the spacecraft on a three-day with a perilune of 1,850 nautical miles.

Lunar orbit and descent

Apollo 12 achieved lunar orbit insertion (LOI) on , 1969, following a translunar coast of approximately 83 hours ground elapsed time (GET). The primary LOI burn (LOI-1) commenced at 83:25:23 GET using the service propulsion system (), lasting 352.3 seconds and imparting a velocity change of 2,889.5 feet per second to capture the into an initial elliptical orbit with an apolune of 170 nautical miles and a perilune of 62 nautical miles. During the burn, a brief drop in signal strength occurred due to rapid changes, temporarily affecting the "data good" indication, but this was resolved without anomalies upon signal reacquisition at 83:43:57 GET, approximately 12 minutes after burnout. On the subsequent revolution, a short LOI-2 burn of 17 seconds at 87:48:47 GET adjusted the orbit to a more circular 66.2 by 54.1 nautical miles, enabling stable mapping and systems checks over 31 revolutions before descent preparations. On November 19, 1969, at 107:54:02 GET (04:16 UTC), the crew executed undocking of the (LM) Intrepid from the (CSM) Yankee Clipper, with Command Module Pilot Richard F. Gordon remaining alone in the CSM to monitor orbital activities and prepare for . Following a 14.4-second separation maneuver at 108:24:37 GET, the LM proceeded with the Descent Orbit Insertion (DOI) burn at 109:23:39 GET, a 73.1 feet-per-second retrograde SPS firing lasting 6 minutes 37 seconds that lowered the perilune to 8.8 nautical miles while targeting a landing site approximately 200 meters from the spacecraft in the Ocean of Storms. No backup landing site was required, as orbital tracking confirmed alignment with primary objectives. The powered descent phase initiated at 110:20:35 GET, with the LM (DPS) engine throttling between 60% and 100% to manage velocity and altitude during the approximately 12-minute maneuver. The landing radar achieved lock-on at 3,000 feet above the surface, providing real-time altitude data for guidance. Touchdown occurred at 110:32:35 GET (06:54:35 UTC) at coordinates 3.01239° S, 23.42157° W, resulting in a 535-foot overshoot of the planned site due to Commander Conrad's manual override of the automatic system to avoid a and large boulders, during which a significant dust cloud was observed rising from the lunar surface. Post-landing systems assessment showed approximately 20% propellant remaining, sufficient for nominal operations.

Surface exploration

Following touchdown in the Ocean of Storms on November 19, 1969, astronauts Charles Conrad Jr. and Alan L. Bean began preparations for the first extravehicular activity (EVA-1) approximately one hour later. They egressed from the Lunar Module Intrepid at 115:07:07 GET (Ground Elapsed Time), with Conrad descending the ladder first and famously stating, "Whoopee! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me." Bean followed shortly after, and the pair deployed the Modularized Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA) from the LM descent stage, activating the color television camera to broadcast a 33-minute live tour of the surroundings before it failed at 31 minutes due to an electrical overload from solar heating. Over the course of EVA-1, lasting 3 hours and 56 minutes, they deployed the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) approximately 185 meters west of the LM, consisting of instruments for seismic, solar wind, and suprathermal ion measurements, as briefly referenced in mission planning documents. They collected about 16 kilograms of samples during this EVA, including breccias and core tubes from sites near Middle Crescent Crater, while documenting the terrain with photographs. A key objective of EVA-1 was the retrieval of components from the nearby Surveyor 3 probe, which had landed 31 months earlier on April 20, 1967, about 163 meters southeast of the LM. Conrad and Bean hiked to Surveyor Crater, descending the eastern rim over the final 300 feet in a parallel traverse to avoid direct approach hazards, arriving after roughly 20 minutes of travel. They photographed the intact spacecraft, noting its dust-covered tan appearance from micrometeorite and electrostatic effects, and used a hacksaw, bolt cutters, and tongs from the hand-tool carrier to remove the television camera, a scoop of subsurface soil, pieces of tubing, and a cable sample, all sealed in a vacuum container for return. Additional samples included a glass bead and local rock placed in bag 14D. Post-mission analysis of the TV camera's polyurethane foam revealed viable Streptococcus mitis bacteria, initially suggesting survival in the lunar environment, though subsequent debate attributed this to likely terrestrial contamination during handling or testing, as the bacterium is non-spore-forming and the exposure conditions (near-vacuum, temperature swings from -150°C to 120°C) were deemed inhospitable without protective mechanisms. EVA-2 commenced on November 20, 1969, at 131:20:36 GET, after a rest period interrupted by systems checks and suit maintenance in the LM cabin. Shortened to 3 hours and 49 minutes due to crew from the previous day's exertions, this EVA focused on extended traverses to the "Snowman" crater —Head, Bench, and Sharp craters—extending up to 440 meters from the LM. Conrad and Bean deployed the American flag, captured additional panoramic photographs, and collected core samples penetrating up to 2 meters in depth using the Apollo Lunar Surface Drill, targeting subsurface layers for gas analysis. They gathered further rock and soil samples, emphasizing geological diversity around the craters. During both EVAs, the crew documented notable features, including the Snowman crater chain's overlapping impacts revealing layered regolith, and vesicular basalts—dark volcanic rocks with gas bubble voids (vesicles) up to 2 cm in size, comprising up to 10% of some samples' volume and indicating past degassing during lunar volcanism. These basalts, primarily pyroxene- and plagioclase-rich with lower titanium than Apollo 11 samples, dated to 3.1–3.3 billion years ago and included varieties like olivine basalt and pigeonite dolerite. Breccias, formed from impact-fused fragments, were also prominent, alongside one KREEP-rich sample enriched in potassium, rare earth elements, and phosphorus. In total, the mission returned 34.3 kilograms of material: 45 rocks (27.7 kg), 5.9 kg of fines (soil), and special samples like core tubes up to 40 cm deep. Inside the LM between EVAs and after EVA-2, Conrad and Bean conducted sample cataloging, photographing each piece against a for scale and color reference before stowing in the Sample Return Container. They performed suit maintenance, recharging Portable Life Support Systems (PLSS) and inspecting for dust abrasion, while sleep periods were periodically interrupted for ALSEP status checks and biomedical monitoring to ensure crew health. These activities underscored the operational demands of surface operations, balancing scientific collection with habitat management over the 31-hour lunar stay.

Ascent and rendezvous

The ascent stage of the Lunar Module Intrepid ignited at 14:25 UTC on November 20, 1969, lifting off from the Ocean of Storms after approximately 31 hours and 31 minutes on the lunar surface. The ascent propulsion system (APS) burn lasted about 7 minutes, achieving a velocity change of roughly 6,057 ft/sec and inserting the LM into an initial orbit of 9 by 45 nautical miles, with the pericynthion positioned about 166 nautical miles west of the landing site. A minor overburn of 1.2 seconds occurred, which was corrected using the (RCS) thrusters, and the descent stage was jettisoned shortly after engine shutdown at 142 hours ground elapsed time (GET). Rendezvous with the Command and Service Module began immediately after orbital insertion, following a coelliptic sequence similar to but adapted for Apollo 12's landing site offset. Command Module Pilot Richard F. Gordon performed an initial CSM burn at 143 hours GET to raise the pericynthion and match the LM's orbit, while the LM crew executed three corrective maneuvers using the APS and RCS engines: the constant differential height (CDH) at 144 hours GET (13 seconds, 10.1 ft/sec ), terminal phase initiation (TPI) at 144:36 GET (26 seconds, 25.6 ft/sec with out-of-plane correction), and two midcourse corrections at 145 and 146 hours GET. These adjustments closed the range from 200 miles to docking proximity over about 3.5 hours, with the final approach rate controlled at 200 ft/min; VHF communication challenges were resolved by switching antennas. Docking occurred at 18:20 UTC (145.5 hours GET) in an of approximately 58 by 44 nautical miles, after two soft contacts and a hard using the autopilot in narrow deadband mode, with no transients reported. Commander Charles Conrad and Lunar Module Pilot then transferred through the tunnel to the , carrying 34.3 pounds of lunar samples, equipment, and Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) data tapes, completing the transfer by 150 hours GET amid minor delays from lunar dust. The LM ascent stage was jettisoned at 150 hours GET and remotely commanded to the lunar surface about 40 miles from the landing site, generating seismic signals recorded by the ALSEP for 55 minutes. During the 31 hours that Conrad and Bean were on the surface, Gordon conducted solo operations in the CSM, including multispectral photography of candidate landing sites using 80-mm and 500-mm lenses across revolutions 10, 39–45, landmark tracking with a for navigation exercises, and routine systems housekeeping such as orbit maintenance burns. No major issues arose, though a tracking light failed during one pass and the 16-mm camera operated intermittently, requiring manual activation; a plane change maneuver at 159 hours GET adjusted the orbit to 66.1 by 54.3 nautical miles. Following , a service propulsion system burn circularized the stacked orbit to 54 by 54 nautical miles in preparation for trans-Earth injection.

Earth return and splashdown

Following the successful and , the Apollo 12 crew initiated the trans-Earth injection (TEI) maneuver on November 21, 1969, firing the service propulsion system (SPS) engine for approximately 2.5 minutes to achieve a change of 3,042 feet per second. This burn placed the command and service module () on a with an apogee of 24,200 nautical miles relative to , beginning a three-day coast homeward at an average speed of about 3,900 miles per hour. During the trans-Earth coast, the crew conducted three small midcourse corrections using the (RCS) thrusters to fine-tune the trajectory, with velocity changes of 2.0 feet per second, 2.4 feet per second, and another minor adjustment, ensuring precise entry conditions. These corrections occurred on and 23, when the was roughly 208,000 miles from , and included a television broadcast showcasing views of the approaching . On November 24, 1969, at 21:57 UTC, the crew began reentry, targeting an entry angle of -6.5 degrees, which resulted in a peak deceleration of 6.5 g-forces; the command module () separated from the service module at 25,000 feet altitude to complete the descent under three parachutes. Splashdown occurred at 20:58 UTC in the South Pacific Ocean at coordinates 15°47'S, 165°09'W, just 1.9 miles from the recovery ship , in accordance with protocols to the crew for potential lunar microorganisms. Recovery operations commenced immediately, with a helicopter from the hoisting the crew—Commander Charles Conrad, Command Module Pilot Richard Gordon, and Lunar Module Pilot —aboard via swimmer-assisted extraction, followed by decontamination spray application to the and crew. The 21-day period, initiated upon lunar departure, concluded on December 10, 1969, after medical evaluations confirmed no extraterrestrial contamination; the , weighing 13,300 pounds post-landing, was secured for transport to .

Post-Mission Outcomes

Scientific contributions

The Apollo 12 mission returned approximately 34.3 kilograms of lunar samples, including basaltic rocks dated to 3.1–3.3 billion years old, providing evidence of relatively young volcanic activity in Oceanus Procellarum compared to earlier mare sites. These olivine- and pigeonite-rich basalts, analyzed through potassium-argon dating and petrographic examination, revealed lower titanium content than Apollo 11 samples, supporting models of fractional crystallization in lunar mantle sources. Additionally, the solar wind composition experiment exposed aluminum foil to the lunar environment for 28 hours, capturing implanted noble gases including helium-3 at concentrations of about 10–20 parts per billion (ppb), which has informed studies on its potential as a fusion fuel due to its abundance in extraterrestrial materials. Analysis of retrieved parts from the nearby probe, which had been on the for 31 months, confirmed the survival of terrestrial bacterium in protected foam within the television camera, with viable cells estimated at 2-50 per clump after incubation, but no evidence of forms was detected across all examined components. The bacterium's earthly origin was verified through strain matching to pre-launch contamination at the manufacturing site and the presence of beta-cloth fibers from Apollo 12 spacesuits, highlighting the resilience of certain microbes in vacuum and radiation but underscoring the 's sterility for non-protected life. The Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) deployed at the site operated until 1977, with the Passive Seismic Experiment (PSE) detecting over 30 low-frequency signals interpreted as shallow moonquakes or impacts within 100 kilometers, many originating at depths less than 20 kilometers, contributing to the broader network's catalog of more than 100 such events across Apollo sites. The Lunar Surface Magnetometer (LSM) recorded steady magnetic fields of 36 ± 5 gammas directed downward and southeast, along with variations from interactions and a local gradient of 4 × 10⁻³ gammas per centimeter, indicating a nearby rather than a global lunar field. All ALSEP data, including ion mass spectra from 18-50 amu/q, were relayed over 1.5 million miles to the Deep Space Network for analysis, enabling continuous monitoring of lunar and . Geological investigations at the site, informed by sample stratigraphy and stereo photography from Hasselblad cameras, mapped approximately 4 square miles of terrain, revealing as a site of multiple eruptive episodes spanning the and Eratosthenian periods, with mare units dated to 3.13-3.19 billion years ago. Regolith properties, including a of 1.8 ± 0.2 g/cm³ in the top 30 centimeters and high content from melting, demonstrated moderate cohesion and low seismic attenuation ( of 3000-5000), offering key data for modeling future lunar habitats and resource utilization. These findings validated models of mare through layered ejecta blankets and crater size-frequency distributions, with N(1) values of 2.81 × 10⁻³ km⁻² for Eratosthenian mare units. The mission's results broadly advanced lunar science by confirming prolonged basaltic volcanism in , which guided site selections for and 15 to target diverse terrains, and the microbial survival debate prompted enhanced protocols, including stricter sterilization for subsequent missions. Preliminary findings were detailed in NASA's 1970 Apollo 12 Preliminary Science Report (SP-235), while long-term ALSEP data appeared in 1970s publications such as the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference proceedings. Post-2010 (LRO) images, including low-altitude Narrow Angle Camera views from 2020 and ongoing imaging as of 2025, have confirmed landing site disturbances like astronaut tracks and ALSEP remnants, aligning with historical records and refining chronological models.

Spacecraft locations and recovery

The Lunar Module Intrepid's descent stage remains at the Apollo 12 landing site in the Ocean of Storms at coordinates 3.01239° S, 23.42157° W. The ascent stage, jettisoned after docking with the Command Module on November 20, 1969, was intentionally crashed into the lunar surface at approximately 3.42° S, 19.67° W to generate seismic data for experiments; more recent analysis confirms the impact site at 3.920° S, 338.828° E. NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) first imaged the landing site in 2009, revealing the descent stage, footpads, and American flag; higher-resolution images in 2011 further detailed the ALSEP deployment and astronaut footpaths. The Command and Service Module separated prior to reentry, with the Service Module burning up in Earth's atmosphere as planned. The Command Module splashed down on , , at coordinates approximately 15° 47' S, 165° 9' W in the South , about 500 nautical miles east of , and floated upright with no damage for roughly 50 minutes before recovery swimmers attached stabilization flotation devices. The module was retrieved by helicopters from the and is now on permanent display at the Virginia Air & Space Center in , since its transfer from in the early 1970s. From the nearby lander, Apollo 12 astronauts retrieved the television camera, which is preserved at the in Samples of aluminum tubing from the probe were analyzed for microbial contamination and material degradation but were largely consumed or destroyed during testing at NASA's Manned Spacecraft Center. The Saturn V's third stage, after , was placed into a heliocentric solar orbit and later identified as the object , which was temporarily recaptured by Earth's gravity in 2002 before escaping again; it continues to be tracked by NASA's . The Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) at the landing site was powered by a SNAP-27 (RTG) using , which provided electricity until the station was remotely shut down by on September 30, 1977, due to budget constraints despite functional hardware. The RTG and remaining ALSEP components decayed in place on the lunar surface, with no retrieval attempted. In the 2020s, LRO high-resolution imaging continued to monitor the site, capturing shadows from the ALSEP and confirming no disturbance or new artifacts from subsequent missions.

Legacy and cultural impact

Apollo 12 demonstrated NASA's ability to achieve a precision lunar landing, touching down just 163 meters from the targeted site near the probe, which validated techniques for future missions requiring accurate site selection. This success, with a landing error well under 1 kilometer, built confidence in the Apollo program's reliability following the historic but exploratory mission, boosting national morale by showing that lunar landings could become more routine and targeted. The mission's engineering achievements, including spacecraft recovery and precision navigation, directly informed the design of subsequent programs like , which repurposed Apollo hardware for the first U.S. , and the , which adopted similar and protocols refined during Apollo 12's orbital operations. The mission's cultural symbols endure as icons of the Apollo era, including its featuring a winged Command and Service Module soaring over the lunar surface toward the probe, symbolizing naval heritage and exploratory precision. The crew selected call signs "" for the command module, evoking their backgrounds and the speed of 19th-century clipper ships, and "Intrepid" for the , honoring a World War II . Commander Pete Conrad's famous quip upon stepping onto the —"Whoopee! Man, that may have been a small one for , but that's a long one for me"—captured the mission's lighthearted yet triumphant spirit, referencing Armstrong's iconic words while highlighting Conrad's 5-foot-6 stature and personal milestone. Apollo 12's lunar samples, including basalts from the Ocean of Storms, are displayed in museums worldwide, such as the , serving as tangible links to human lunar exploration for public education. Astronaut , inspired by his experiences, later became an artist whose paintings of the mission, textured with actual moon dust and Apollo spacecraft fragments, depict scenes like the retrieval and lunar traverses, influencing space art and outreach. Annual commemorations at sites like honor the crew and ground teams, fostering ongoing public engagement with space history. Data from Apollo 12's landing, including engine plume interactions with the lunar surface, has informed site planning by simulating displacement to protect future habitats and rovers from dust hazards. Lessons from the mission's launch lightning strikes, which caused temporary power disruptions but were mitigated through quick systems reconfiguration, shaped stricter weather launch criteria for modern rockets like the (), emphasizing lightning protection and redundant power management. The 50th anniversary in 2019 featured events, including live rebroadcasts and tributes from the crew, highlighting the mission's lasting inspiration. Additionally, the television camera failure during the first moonwalk, caused by accidental solar exposure, underscored the need for improved power and thermal safeguards in extravehicular activities, influencing later mission protocols. The post-mission quarantine, implemented for Apollo 11, 12, and 14 to guard against potential lunar pathogens, ended after Apollo 14 when no evidence of extraterrestrial life emerged, streamlining future human spaceflight procedures.

References

  1. [1]
    55 Years Ago: Apollo 12 Makes a Pinpoint Landing on the Moon
    Nov 14, 2024 · Conrad and Bean achieved a pinpoint landing in the Ocean of Storms within walking distance of the Surveyor 3 spacecraft that landed there in April 1967.
  2. [2]
    Apollo 12 - NASA
    Oct 11, 2024 · The primary mission objectives of the second crewed lunar landing included an extensive series of lunar exploration tasks by the lunar ...
  3. [3]
    Apollo 12 Mission Overview - Lunar and Planetary Institute
    Altogether, Apollo 12 spent 3.7 days in lunar orbit, circling the Moon 45 times. The crew returned safely to Earth on November 24, 1969 after a flight of 10 ...
  4. [4]
    Apollo 12: The Pinpoint Mission - NASA
    Jul 8, 2009 · The primary mission objectives of the second crewed lunar landing included an extensive series of lunar exploration tasks by the lunar module, or LM, crew.Mission Objective · Mission Highlights
  5. [5]
    [PDF] APOLLO 12 MISSION REPORT MARCH 1970
    One of the objectives of the Apollo 12 mission was to achieve. ---~ ______ a precision landing near the_ Surveyor III spacecraft, which had landed on April ...
  6. [6]
    A new accounting for Apollo: how much did it really cost?
    Jun 17, 2019 · In early 1973 NASA provided written testimony[2] to Congress reporting the total cost of Apollo as $25.4 billion. The data provided summarizes, ...
  7. [7]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the Apollo 12 Landing Site Selection, Criteria, Geological Interest, and Surveyor 3 Integration, based on the provided segments from NASA SP-235. To retain all information in a dense and organized manner, I’ve used a combination of narrative text and a table in CSV format for detailed data points. The narrative provides an overview, while the table captures specific details across the segments for clarity and completeness.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] p R E s s K T J - NASA
    The trek to the Surveyor landing site will depend upon the accuracy of the Apollo 12 lunar module landing. If the LM lands within one kilometer (3,300 feet) of ...
  9. [9]
    None
    ### Summary of Apollo Landing Site Selection Criteria and Process (Especially Apollo 12)
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Minutes of the Apollo Site Selection Board Meeting July 10, 1969
    On July 10, 1969, the Apollo Site Selection Board met at NASA. HeaQquarters ... Apollo Lunar Exploration missions to the set of sites approved for ...
  11. [11]
    50 Years Ago: NASA Names Apollo 12 Crew
    Apr 10, 2019 · The prime crew consisted of Commander Charles “Pete” Conrad, Command Module Pilot (CMP) Richard F. Gordon, and Lunar Module Pilot (LMP) Alan L.
  12. [12]
    Former Astronaut Charles "Pete" Conrad, Jr. - NASA
    Jun 18, 2024 · Selected as a member of the second group of NASA astronauts in 1962, Conrad flew on two Gemini missions and commanded Apollo 12, the second Moon landing.Quick Facts · Apollo 12 · Skylab 2
  13. [13]
    Former Astronaut Richard F. Gordon, Jr. - NASA
    Nov 4, 2024 · Gordon served as the command module pilot on Apollo 12, and remained in lunar orbit. During Navy preflight school in 1951, Dick Gordon and his ...
  14. [14]
    Alan Bean - NASA
    May 26, 2018 · Alan Bean walked on the moon on Apollo 12, commanded the second Skylab crew and then resigned after 18 years as an astronaut to paint the remarkable worlds and ...
  15. [15]
    Apollo 12 Lightning Strike Incident - NASA
    Feb 24, 2021 · The 'chummy' crew of Pete Conrad, Dick Gordon and Alan Bean, apparently the friendliest crew who went to the Moon and made sure to have fun ...
  16. [16]
    Dr. David R. Scott - NASA
    As a NASA astronaut, Scott flew on Gemini 8, Apollo 9, and was Spacecraft Commander on Apollo 15. He has logged 546 hours and 54 minutes in space, of which 20 ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] James Irwin - Biographical Data
    JAMES IRWIN (COLONEL, USAF, RET.) NASA ASTRONAUT (DECEASED). PERSONAL DATA: Born March 17, 1930, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Died August 8,. 1991 of a heart ...
  18. [18]
    Former Astronaut John W. Young - NASA
    Jan 6, 2018 · John Young is the first person to fly in space six times from earth, and. Young was on five backup space flight crews including: Gemini 6, the ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Apollo 12 - Ibiblio
    MISSION CONTROL CENTER. The Mission Control Center at the Manned Spacecraft. Center, Houston, is the focal point for Apollo flight control activities. The ...
  20. [20]
    Apollo 12 Flight Journal - Day 1, part 1: Launch and Reaching Earth ...
    Nov 10, 2022 · The prime crew for the Apollo 12 mission, astronauts Pete Conrad, Dick Gordon and Alan Bean still should be asleep in their crew quarters at the ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Ground Tracking of Apollo - MIT
    This network of ground stations, ships and aircraft-the so-called. “Manned Space Flight Network” (MSFN)-will constitute the only link between the Earth and the ...
  22. [22]
    Flight Directors
    Apollo 12. Directors. Apollo 15. Directors. Shift #1. Glynn S. Lunney. Shift ... According to Pete Frank, the initials “M.P.” do not represent any names, per ...
  23. [23]
    50 Years Ago: “Three More Like Before” – The Recovery of Apollo 12
    Nov 22, 2019 · Left: In Mission Control, Apollo 12 Flight Directors Lunney, Frank, Griffin, and Charlesworth celebrate the successful splashdown of Apollo 12.
  24. [24]
    Apollo 12 Lunar Surface Journal : Crew - NASA
    Aug 6, 2011 · The name 'Ojai' is taken from the Chumash word 'A'hwai', meaning ... Served as EVA CapCom on Apollo 12. Resigned from NASA in November ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Manned Spacecraft Recovery Office
    Task Force 130's participation in the Apollo 12 mission consisted of planning for and executing the location and retrieval of the astronauts and command ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Science Training History of the Apollo Astronauts - NASA
    Cover photographs: From top: Apollo 13 Commander (CDR) James Lovell, left, and Lunar Module Pilot (LMP). Fred Haise during a geologic training trip to ...Missing: Ellen | Show results with:Ellen
  28. [28]
    [PDF] MISSION TRAINING ........ PROGRAM FOR THE ..... APOLLO LUNAR ...
    to assign hours to specific exercises. Instead, a total requirement of 200 hours of simulator time (minimum) and 60 hours of briefing time has been ...
  29. [29]
    Apollo Geology Tool Catalog - NASA
    Aug 16, 2017 · Core tube attached to a shorter-style extension handle while being driven into the ground at Bench Crater site by Apollo 12 astronaut Al Bean.Missing: neutral buoyancy
  30. [30]
    Neutral Buoyancy Facilities for Spacewalk Training - NASA
    Oct 6, 2021 · In 1966, NASA began to use neutral buoyancy as a higher-fidelity tool for spacewalk training, a method astronauts still rely on today.Missing: EVA core tube tongs
  31. [31]
    55 Years Ago: The Apollo 1 Fire and its Aftermath - NASA
    Feb 3, 2022 · Although the fire took place in the CM, NASA instituted these changes in the LM as well to reduce the risk of fire and to increase crew safety.Missing: emergency leak
  32. [32]
    50 Years Ago: Apollo 12 Three Weeks Until Launch - NASA
    Oct 24, 2019 · Launch day, Nov. 14, 1969, was rapidly approaching for Apollo 12 astronauts Commander Charles “Pete” Conrad, Command Module Pilot (CMP) ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  33. [33]
    50 Years Ago: Apollo 12 Rolls Out to Launch Pad - NASA
    Sep 13, 2019 · In September 1969, NASA continued preparations for the second Moon landing mission, Apollo 12, scheduled for launch on Nov. 14.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Apollo Experience Report - The Cryogenic Storage System
    The detanking problem that occurred during the countdown demonstration test was the result of loose or misalined fill-line plumbing components within the tank.<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    [PDF] APOLLO 12 MISSION REPORT MARCH 1970 - NASA
    The Apollo 12 mission provided a wealth of scientific information in this signifi,cant step of detailed lunar exploration . The emplaced experi.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Apollo 12 Preliminary Science Report NASA SP-235
    Jan 7, 1970 · This document, like the initial report of the first manned landing, relates the preliminary scientific observations resulting from the mission ...
  37. [37]
    ALSEP Deployment - NASA
    May 17, 2017 · Apollo 12 carried two solar wind experiments. The first was the Solar Wind Collector (SWC), the foil "window shade" that Al deployed near ...Missing: panels | Show results with:panels
  38. [38]
    [PDF] COMMAND AND SERVICE MODULE REACTION CONTROL ...
    The RCS was to provide the ullage maneuver (propellant settling) thrust for the SM propellant. On November 28, 1961, NASA selected a prime contractor to design ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Applications of Aerospace Technology in Industry
    The first stage of the Saturn V booster (S-IC) requires more than 5, 000 feet of welds, all of which are. 100 percent radiographically inspected in at least two ...
  40. [40]
    Thermo-Vacuum Testing Certifies Critical Lunar Hardware - NASA
    May 24, 2018 · The primary purpose of the LTA-8 thermo-vacuum testing was to assure that the LM maintained the proper environment for crew and equipment in the ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] saturn v flight manual | nasa
    and eventually. Apollo. The Saturn. V launch vehicle evolved from the earlier. Saturn vehicles as a result of the decision in 1961 to proceed with the. Apollo.
  42. [42]
    Earth Orbit and Translunar Injection - Apollo 12 Flight Journal - NASA
    Nov 10, 2022 · Duration of the burn 5 minutes, 44 seconds and a Delta V or added velocity of 1,515 feet per second. We've had acquisition at Canary now. We ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Apollo by the Numbers - NASA
    All provide he end of the decade through the first lunar landing on July 20, 1969, on to the last of six successful Moon landings with Apollo 17 in December ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Apollo experience report - lunar module landing radar and ...
    The landing radar senses the velocity and slant range of the LM relative to the lunar surface by means of a three-beam Doppler velocity sensor and a radar ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] APOllO 12 - NASA
    (2) detail critical performance characteristics of Apollo crew systems and equipment , (3) pro vide technical details of significant launch.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Apollo experience report abort planning
    Definition of a practical return-to-earth abort capability was required for each phase of an Apollo mission. A description of the basic development of the ...
  47. [47]
    ALSEP Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package - NASA
    Sep 30, 1977 · ALSEP was a collection of geophysical instruments designed to continue to monitor the environment of each Apollo landing site for a period of at least a year.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Analysis of Surveyor 3 material ad photoffraphs returned by Apob 12
    Thirty-one months after Surveyor 3 landed, the crew of Apollo 12 photographed the spacecraft and its landing site, and removed and brought back a number of.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] A Microbe on the Moon? - NASA Science
    NO VIABLE MICROBES WERE ISOLATED FROM THE. SURVEYOR-III CABLES, OR FROM ANY APOLLO SURFACE. SAMPLES RETURNED TO EARTH. Page 10. Issues wrt S. mitis on the Moon ...
  50. [50]
    Solar Wind Composition Experiment | Smithsonian Institution
    This experiment was performed on Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, and 16. It consisted of an aluminum foil sheet, 1.4 meters by 0.3 meters, that was deployed on a pole ...
  51. [51]
    Apollo 12 Flight Journal - Day 4, part 3: Lunar Orbit Revolutions 1 ...
    Nov 10, 2022 · The sextant star Fomalhaut won't be visible until after 87 hours GET due to being behind the Moon. 086:14:25 Conrad: Okay. LOI-2 SPS/G&N ...Missing: circularization | Show results with:circularization
  52. [52]
    Apollo 12 Flight Journal - Day 5, part 1: Prepare for Lunar Descent
    Apr 3, 2020 · One, we seem to be find - a little more RCS - there seems to be a little more RCS thruster activity around the Moon than we had imagined. Is ...
  53. [53]
    Apollo 12 Lunar Surface Journal - NASA
    Jan 23, 2016 · Apollo 12 Flight Journal: The First Part of the Mission · A Visit to the Snowman · Post-landing Activities. The First EVA ... LM Timeline Book ...
  54. [54]
    That may have been a small one for Neil... - NASA
    Apr 7, 2018 · The small area available to the crew at the front of the cabin is best illustrated by images taken during final Apollo 16 (LM 11, Orion) and Apollo 17 (LM 12, ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Apollo 12 lunar-sample information - NASA
    Scientific data obtained during the preliminary examination of the lunar samples returned from the Apollo 12 mission are presented.
  56. [56]
    Surveyor Crater and Surveyor III - NASA
    Apr 7, 2018 · Two parts of the Surveyor III craft returned by the Apollo 12 astronauts, Coupons 2050 and 2051, which faced the Apollo 12 landing site, show ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  57. [57]
    None
    ### Summary of Streptococcus mitis Discovery from Surveyor 3
  58. [58]
    Apollo 12 Lunar Samples
    Apollo 12 returned 34 kilograms of samples, including 45 rocks, samples of lunar "soil," and several core tubes that included material from as much as 40 ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Apollo 12 Press Kit - NASA
    A secondary objective is to retrieve portions of the. Surveyor III spacecraft which have been exposed to the lunar environment since the unmanned spacecraft ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  60. [60]
    50 Years Ago: Apollo 12 – The Journey Home - NASA
    Nov 20, 2019 · Apollo 12's en route home.” They had already set up the color TV camera and began transmitting views of the rapidly receding Moon. Capcom ...
  61. [61]
    Apollo 12 Flight Journal - Splashdown for 3 Tail Hookers - NASA
    Mar 29, 2020 · Public Affairs Office - "Apollo Control Houston, Recovery reports the Hornet has radar contact from Apollo 12. ... 244:36:23 Recovery: Splashdown.
  62. [62]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the Apollo 12 Preliminary Science Reports (NASA SP-235, SP-272, SP-214) that consolidates all the information from the provided segments into a single, comprehensive response. To maximize detail and clarity, I’ve organized the information into sections with tables where appropriate (in CSV format within the text) to handle dense data efficiently. The response retains all mentioned details while avoiding redundancy and ensuring a logical flow.
  63. [63]
    Geological mapping and chronology of lunar landing sites: Apollo 12
    We produced a new detailed geological map of the Apollo 12 landing site, using recent orbital data including Lunar Reconnaissance orbiter (LRO) Narrow Angle ( ...
  64. [64]
    Apollo 12 - Preliminary science report
    Preliminary scientific analyses of Apollo 12 ALSEP data, lunar photographs, and returned materials. Document ID 19700025955.
  65. [65]
    Apollo - Images | Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera
    LROC low-altitude image of the Apollo 12 landing site. The Lunar Module descent stage, Apollo Lunar Science Experiment Package (ALSEP), and Surveyor III ...
  66. [66]
    The Apollo 12 Landing Site - NASA Scientific Visualization Studio
    Nov 19, 2019 · The Apollo 12 landing site visualized in three dimensions using photography and a stereo digital elevation model from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera.Missing: selection | Show results with:selection
  67. [67]
    Finding spacecraft impacts on the Moon | The Planetary Society
    Feb 20, 2017 · ... Apollo 12 feature suggests that this is the LM Ascent Stage impact site. The location is 3.420° S, 19.637° W. Chang'E 1. After a successful ...Finding Spacecraft Impacts... · Apollo 12 · Apollo 14
  68. [68]
    Identification of the Apollo 12 lunar module ascent stage impact site ...
    The impact site of the Apollo 12 Lunar Module Ascent Stage is identified in Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) images at 3.920° S, 338.828° E. The ...
  69. [69]
    New LRO Images Offer Sharper Views of Apollo 12, 14, and 17 Sites
    Sep 6, 2011 · The new LRO images show the sharpest views of Apollo 12, 14, and 17 sites, revealing the paths astronauts explored.
  70. [70]
    Apollo 12 Splashdown - NASA
    Nov 7, 2017 · Apollo 12 splashed down at 2:58 p.m. (CST), Nov. 24, 1969, near American Samoa. The crew was picked up by helicopter and flown to the USS ...
  71. [71]
    Spacecraft - Virginia Air & Space Center
    Apollo 12 Command Module: Apollo 12 was the sixth crewed flight in the United States Apollo program to make it to space and the second to land on the Moon. On ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Analysis of Surveyor 3 material and photographs returned by Apollo ...
    The material found in some of the craters is similar in composition to lunar soil. Location and Geometry of Landing. Apollo 12 landed about 155 m northwest of.
  73. [73]
    Newly Discovered Object Could be a Leftover Apollo Rocket Stage
    Sep 11, 2002 · An analysis of the orbital motion of the newly discovered object J002E3 indicates that it could be a leftover Saturn V third stage from one of the Apollo ...Missing: solar | Show results with:solar
  74. [74]
  75. [75]
    Apollo Mission Patches - NASA Science
    Feb 22, 2019 · A collection of Apollo flight crew patches. The main image shows a vintage vinyl sticker set. Individual crew patches are available for download on the right.Missing: call | Show results with:call
  76. [76]
    Call Signs - the Apollo Project Mission Library
    Apollo 12. “Yankee Clipper”, selected from names submitted by employees of the command module prime contractor. “Intrepid”, selected from names submitted by ...
  77. [77]
    Apollo 12 | National Air and Space Museum
    About 37 seconds into the launch of Apollo 12, the Saturn V launch vehicle was struck by lightning. The lightning strike threatened to cause the mission to be ...
  78. [78]
    Alan Bean Art
    My art has evolved into a mixture of painting and sculpture, textured with my lunar tools, sprinkled with bits of our Apollo 12 spacecraft and a touch of ...Available Paintings · Moon Dust & Bits From Our... · About Alan Bean · Galleries
  79. [79]
    Events Celebrating Apollo's 50th Anniversary - NASA
    Friday, July 19, 1 p.m. ET – NASA's Giant Leaps: Past and Future – Celebrating Apollo 50th as we Go Forward to the MoonOn July 19, NASA broadcast live from ...Missing: 12 | Show results with:12
  80. [80]
    NASA supercomputers show how Apollo 12 landing kicked up moon ...
    Nov 15, 2023 · The simulations show how the engine plumes of NASA's Apollo 12 lander interacted with the lunar surface when the vehicle touched down in November 1969.
  81. [81]
    Celebrate NASA's Apollo 12 50th Launch Anniversary with Special ...
    Nov 14, 2019 · NASA's Apollo 12 anniversary extravaganza kicks off with rebroadcast launch coverage of Apollo 12 at 11 a.m. EST (1600 GMT). Two International ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Apollo Television - NASA
    The TV camera was stowed inside the LM ascent stage so the crew could operate it.
  83. [83]
    Apollo mission quarantine procedures - Space Center Houston
    Mar 24, 2020 · Astronauts on the Apollo 11, 12 and 14 missions were quarantined after returning from the Moon. The quarantine lasted 21 days from the time they were first ...