Schering AG was a research-oriented German multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Berlin, founded in 1851 by Ernst Schering as a specialist pharmacy focused on galenical preparations and incorporated in 1871 as Chemische Fabrik auf Actien.[1] Over its history, it became a global leader in hormone therapies, fertility control, diagnostics, and specialized therapeutics, ranking among the top 20 pharmaceutical firms worldwide by the 1990s.[1]The company pioneered key innovations, including Anovlar, the first oral contraceptive introduced outside the United States in Europe in 1961, and Betaseron, the inaugural treatment for multiple sclerosis approved in 1993.[1][2] During World War II, Schering AG operated under the Nazi regime and faced U.S. accusations of collaboration, resulting in the 1942 seizure of its American assets.[1] In March 2006, Bayer AG launched a takeover bid, securing control of over 92% of shares by July and renaming the entity Bayer Schering Pharma AG in December, which was fully integrated into Bayer HealthCare by 2009.[3]
Founding and Early Development
Establishment and Initial Growth (1851–1900)
Ernst Christian Friedrich Schering (1824–1889), a trained pharmacist, established the Grüne Apotheke (Green Pharmacy) in 1851 at Chausseestraße 17 in Berlin's Wedding district, marking the origins of what would become Schering AG.[1] Initially focused on retail pharmacy services, the business capitalized on Schering's expertise in refining chemicals, particularly for the emerging field of photography, where demand for high-purity reagents was growing amid 19th-century technological advances.[4]By the early 1870s, the pharmacy had outgrown its retail scope, prompting expansion into manufacturing. In 1871, operations were incorporated as Chemische Fabrik auf Actien (vorm. E. Schering), enabling production of galenical preparations—extracts and tinctures derived from natural substances—and specialized chemicals for photographic processes, such as developers and fixatives.[1] This shift reflected broader industrialization trends in German pharmacy, where small-scale compounding evolved into factory-based synthesis to meet rising demand from scientific and commercial applications.[5]The company's initial growth was steady but modest, driven by Berlin's position as a hub for chemical innovation. Key early advancements included improvements in chemical purity for photography, which positioned Schering as a reliable supplier to laboratories and studios. By 1890, following Schering's death in 1889, the firm marketed piperazin, a synthetic compound for treating gout and urinary issues, as its first dedicated pharmaceutical product, signaling a pivot toward therapeutic agents alongside its chemical output.[6] This period laid the groundwork for Schering's reputation in precision chemistry, though annual revenues remained in the low millions of marks, supported primarily by photochemicals and basic pharmaceuticals rather than large-scale exports.[1]
Expansion into Pharmaceuticals and International Presence (1900–1930)
During the early 1900s, Schering AG transitioned from its foundational role in producing fine chemicals and galenical preparations toward a greater emphasis on synthetic organic compounds suitable for pharmaceutical applications, including industrial and laboratory chemicals. This shift was marked by diversification into areas such as electroplating in 1902, reflecting broader industrialexpansion while maintaining a focus on chemical purity for medical uses. By 1913, the company achieved notable success with camphor production, generating sales of 1.6 million marks, which underscored its growing capability in pharmaceutical intermediates amid rising global demand for antiseptics and therapeutics.[7][8]In the 1920s, Schering intensified its pharmaceutical orientation by incorporating agrichemicals into its portfolio and initiating research into female sex hormones, which positioned the firm for advancements in endocrine therapies. A key structural development occurred in 1927 with the merger of Schering-Kahlbaum AG, enhancing production capacities and integrating complementary chemical expertise. These efforts built on pre-war foundations, where Schering had supplied diphtheria antitoxins and other biologics through early international distribution networks.[7][9][1]Internationally, Schering cultivated export markets in pharmaceuticals and chemicals, reestablishing a foothold in key regions disrupted by World War I. The company established its first post-war subsidiary in Shanghai in 1922 to distribute products in Asia, capitalizing on earlier sales dating back to 1885 via local agents. In 1929, Schering re-entered the United States by founding Schering Corporation in New York City as a sales and research entity, specializing in hormone and steroid drugs; this subsidiary quickly accounted for a significant portion of the firm's American revenue. These moves reflected strategic recovery from wartime asset seizures, including the dissolution of the pre-1918 U.S. arm Schering & Glatz, and aimed at securing global supply chains for emerging pharmaceutical lines.[10][1][7]
Research Focus and Innovations
Hormone Therapy and Steroid Developments
Schering AG initiated intensive research into steroid hormones during the interwar period, establishing a dedicated subsidiary for hormone studies that positioned the company as a leader in synthesizing steroid-based pharmaceuticals.[1] This work emphasized the preparation of biologically derived steroids, as total chemical synthesis proved technically challenging, enabling therapeutic applications in hormone replacement.[11]A pivotal collaboration with biochemistAdolf Butenandt in the 1930s advanced the isolation and drug development of sex steroids, including androsterone from human urine and estrone from ovarian sources.[12] Butenandt's extractions, supported by Schering's chemical expertise, yielded crystalline forms suitable for medical use, such as injectable testosterone and estradiol esters, addressing deficiencies in male and female reproductive hormones.[13] These efforts transformed empirical hormone preparations into standardized therapies, with Schering prioritizing scalable production over purely synthetic routes until post-war advancements.[14]Key innovations included the 1938 synthesis of ethinylestradiol at Schering, achieved by ethinylation of estradiol to confer oral activity, facilitating non-invasive estrogen therapy for conditions like menopausal symptoms.[15] Similarly, ethinyltestosterone was developed as an orally active androgen derivative. In 1939, the company synthesized desoxycorticosterone acetate and introduced it commercially for adrenal cortex insufficiency, marking an early corticosteroid milestone that supported electrolyte balance in endocrine disorders.[15] These steroid modifications enhanced potency and administration, underpinning Schering's foundational contributions to hormone therapy despite wartime constraints on full-scale production.[11]
Diagnostic Imaging and Other Therapeutic Advances
Schering AG established itself as a global leader in diagnostic imaging through pioneering contrast media for X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and emerging modalities. In the mid-1950s, the company introduced Urografin, a sodium diatrizoate-based ionic agent, which improved upon prior oil-emulsion contrasts by offering aqueous solubility and enhanced renal excretion, thereby reducing toxicity in urography and angiography procedures.[16] This innovation supported the expansion of intravenous pyelography, with Urografin achieving widespread adoption due to its stability and lower incidence of severe reactions compared to earlier benzyl alcohol derivatives.[16]Advancing into non-ionic formulations in the 1970s and 1980s, Schering developed low-osmolar agents like iopromide (marketed as Ultravist), which minimized osmotic stress and chemotoxicity risks associated with ionic media, facilitating safer use in high-volume CT scans and cardiac imaging.[17] These agents, characterized by monomeric structures with iodine atoms for X-rayattenuation, enabled better visualization of vascular and soft-tissue structures, contributing to Schering's dominance in the diagnostics sector where contrast media accounted for a significant portion of sales by the late 20th century.[1]In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Schering's research group under Hanns-Joachim Weinmann filed the inaugural patent for a paramagnetic contrast agent in the early 1980s, leveraging gadolinium-3+ (Gd³⁺) chelated with diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) to shorten T1 relaxation times and enhance signal intensity in T1-weighted images.[18] Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), the resulting product, received approval in 1988 as the first commercial MRI contrast, revolutionizing neuroimaging, oncology staging, and lesion detection by improving diagnostic specificity over unenhanced scans.[19] By 2007, Magnevist had been utilized in over 80 million administrations worldwide, underscoring its clinical reliability despite later scrutiny over gadolinium retention risks in patients with impaired renal function.[20] Schering further expanded ultrasound contrast with galactose microparticle agents; Echovist, approved in 1991, introduced transient bubble enhancement for echocardiography and abdominal vascular imaging via acoustic impedance differences.[21]Beyond imaging, Schering contributed to neurology therapeutics with interferon beta-1b (Betaferon/Betaseron), a recombinant cytokine approved in 1993 for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), the first disease-modifying therapy to demonstrate reduced relapse frequency and MRI lesion activity in pivotal trials involving 372 patients over two years.[22] Administered subcutaneously at 250 micrograms every other day, it modulated immune responses by inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokine production and blood-brain barrier disruption, slowing progression to clinically definite MS when initiated early after clinically isolated syndromes.[23] In oncology, Schering's portfolio included fludarabine (Fludara), a purine analog approved in 1991 for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, which induced apoptosis in lymphoid cells via inhibition of DNA repair enzymes, achieving response rates of 60-70% in refractory cases based on phase II data.[17] These developments reflected Schering's shift toward targeted immunomodulation and cytotoxicity, distinct from its hormonal focus, though oncology efforts increasingly involved collaborations for molecularly directed agents by the 2000s.[24]
Operations During the Nazi Era (1933–1945)
Adaptation to Regime Policies and Economic Integration
Following the Nazi seizure of power in 1933, Schering AG undertook personnel adjustments to align with the regime's racial policies, dismissing or reassigning Jewish employees to achieve "Aryan" status. By 1938, all Jewish senior managers had resigned under pressure, while between 1933 and 1938, the company facilitated the placement of seven Jewish managers in U.S. positions and acquired two small Jewish-owned firms, paying the maximum permitted amounts and assisting one owner's relocation abroad.[25] These measures ensured compliance with Aryanization directives without aggressive exploitation of Jewish assets, distinguishing Schering from firms that profited more substantially from forced sales.[25]In corporate governance, Schering restructured in summer 1937 by merging subsidiaries into a divisional organization, enhancing transparency to meet new Nazi regulations on corporate oversight and reducing vulnerability to state intervention.[25][26] This adaptation reflected broader National Socialist pressures on industrial organization, where firms like Schering adjusted internal structures under evolving corporate laws to maintain operational autonomy amid increasing state influence. In June 1938, Schering established a Swissholding company for foreign subsidiaries to obscure German ownership, circumventing foreign exchange controls and international scrutiny.[25]Economically, Schering integrated into the Nazi autarkic system by supporting regime charities, adhering to employment quotas, and navigating currency restrictions on blocked foreign funds.[25] The company's return on equity nearly doubled from 1932 levels by 1936, aided by state subsidies and the rearmament-driven chemical sector boom, which boosted domestic demand for pharmaceuticals and hormones.[25][26] Such integration prioritized survival and growth within the controlled economy, with managerial innovations largely reactive to political mandates rather than proactive strategy, aligning production with regime social and industrial priorities. By 1943, wartime restrictions halted non-European operations, further embedding Schering in the Axis-aligned supply chain.[25]
Supply of Pharmaceuticals and Alleged Involvement in Medical Experiments
During the Nazi era, Schering AG supplied pharmaceuticals to the German military and SS authorities, including medications delivered to concentration camps as part of broader wartime production efforts aligned with regime demands. The company produced hormones, sulfonamides, and other therapeutic agents that supported the war effort, with output directed toward treating wounded soldiers and maintaining labor in forced-labor facilities.[11][27]Allegations of Schering's involvement in unethical medical experiments surfaced in postwar lawsuits by Holocaust survivors, who claimed the firm provided drugs used on prisoners without consent. In 2003, Simon Rozenkier, a survivor of Auschwitz-Birkenau, sued Schering AG and Bayer AG, asserting that the companies supplied chemicals and expertise for experiments, including injections into his testicles that caused sterility and other injuries. Rozenkier alleged these acts were conducted to test pharmaceutical efficacy under duress, with Schering's hormone products like Progynon implicated in reproductive manipulation studies.[28][29][30]Similar claims were filed by other survivors against Schering, Bayer, and Hoechst, accusing them of furnishing sulfonamides and hormones for wound-infection and sterilization trials at sites like Ravensbrück and Auschwitz, where prisoners served as subjects to evaluate drug performance in extreme conditions. These suits contended that Schering benefited from data derived from such tests, advancing postwar hormone therapies, though the company denied direct orchestration of experiments. U.S. courts dismissed the cases in 2006, citing prior German compensation agreements and jurisdictional limits, without adjudicating the factual merits.[31][32][29]Schering's hormone research, led by figures like Adolf Butenandt in collaboration with the firm, intersected with Nazi priorities on eugenics and population control, potentially supplying compounds tested in camps for contraceptive or sterilizing effects. Wartime records indicate Schering prioritized steroid synthesis for military needs, but no executives faced Nuremberg prosecution for experiment complicity, unlike IG Farben leaders. Historians note that while supply chains enabled regime abuses, direct evidence of Schering-initiated human testing remains tied to survivor testimonies rather than declassified trial documents.[11][12][27]
At the conclusion of World War II in May 1945, Schering AG suffered extensive physical destruction, with its primary factories in Berlin and surrounding areas reduced to rubble from Allied air raids, rendering nearly all production facilities inoperable.[1][7] The company also forfeited its 30 foreign subsidiaries, key patents essential to hormone and chemical synthesis processes, and trademark rights in international markets, compounding operational losses estimated in the millions of Reichsmarks.[1] Soviet occupation forces further expropriated mining divisions and eastern facilities, including portions of the Adlershof plant, which fell within the Soviet sector of Berlin and were later nationalized by the German Democratic Republic.[33]Under the Allied Control Council's denazification directive, implemented from 1945 onward in the Western zones, Schering AG's management and workforce—numbering several thousand pre-war employees—underwent mandatory questionnaires, tribunals, and classifications to excise National Socialist influence.[7] At least two senior executives held Nazi Party memberships, subjecting them to scrutiny, though the company asserted it had avoided direct production of armaments or materiel for the Wehrmacht, a position that faced later contestation in U.S. litigation over asset seizures.[7] Many personnel, typical of German industrial firms, received "fellow traveler" (Mitläufer) categorizations, enabling reinstatements by the late 1940s as Allied priorities shifted toward economic stabilization amid the emerging Cold War; specific tribunal outcomes for Schering remain sparsely documented, reflecting the program's uneven application to non-military enterprises.[34]Reconstruction commenced immediately in West Berlin, Schering's headquarters locale, where remnant staff salvaged machinery fragments from debris to improvise basic assembly lines, prioritizing pharmaceuticals over pre-war specialties like hormones due to material shortages.[7] A auxiliary office in Bergkamen, West Germany, provided redundancy against Berlin's instability. By 1947–1948, output resumed with essential items including lice powder for public health campaigns and imported penicillin formulations, achieving the firm's first post-war product releases within three years of defeat.[1] These efforts, supported by nascent Marshall Plan allocations for chemical reconstruction, restored domestic capacity to approximately 20–30% of 1938 levels by 1950, facilitating gradual patent reacquisitions and export resumption despite partition barriers.[35] The Adlershof site's 1951 repairs proved short-lived under Eastern control, redirecting Schering's focus westward and underscoring the geopolitical fractures impeding full recovery.[9]
Growth in Reproductive Health and Global Markets
Following the devastation of World War II, Schering AG initiated reconstruction efforts in 1945, rebuilding its Berlin facilities and reestablishing production despite the loss of assets in East Germany and international patent disputes.[1] The company prioritized hormone research, leveraging pre-war expertise in steroid synthesis to drive recovery in therapeutic areas including reproductive health.[1]A pivotal advancement occurred in 1961 with the launch of Anovlar, Schering's combined oral contraceptive containing 4 mg norethisterone acetate and 0.05 mg ethinylestradiol, marking Europe's first such product and expanding access beyond early U.S. approvals.[1][36] This innovation, informed by clinical input from Belgian gynecologist Ferdinand Peeters, fueled rapid adoption in West Germany and other European markets, positioning Schering as a leader in fertility control.[37] Subsequent variants like Gynovlar in 1966 further diversified offerings, emphasizing lower-dose formulations to mitigate side effects.[38]By 1972, Schering commanded over 50% of the global hormonal contraceptive market outside the United States, reflecting robust demand for its hormone-based products amid rising acceptance of family planning.[1]Hormone therapy segments, including treatments for menopause and infertility, paralleled this growth, with the company's R&D investments yielding sustained revenue from estrogen-progestin combinations.[1]Global expansion accelerated through strategic acquisitions and subsidiaries, enhancing distribution of reproductive health products. In 1972, Schering acquired a 50% stake in U.S.-based Knoll Pharmaceutical, followed by additions like Berlex Laboratories between 1976 and 1980 to bolster American market penetration.[1] By the late 1990s, over 130 subsidiaries operated worldwide, including Nihon Schering in Japan, supporting exports and localized production of contraceptives.[1]This period culminated in strong financial performance, with 2000 sales reaching €4.49 billion—a 90% increase from 1995 levels—and net income rising 165%, driven partly by reproductive health and hormone therapy segments amid international diversification.[1]
Key Products and Business Segments
Oral Contraceptives and Hormone-Based Treatments
Schering AG advanced the field of reproductive endocrinology through its synthesis of key steroid hormones, including ethinylestradiol in 1938 by chemists Hans Herloff Inhoffen and Walter Hohlweg, which became a foundational component in subsequent hormonal therapies.[39] This work built on earlier 1930s research into sex steroids under collaboration with Nobel laureate Adolf Butenandt, enabling the transformation of natural hormones into synthetic drugs for clinical use.[11] These developments positioned Schering as a leader in hormone-based pharmaceuticals, emphasizing precise molecular modifications to enhance bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy.In oral contraceptives, Schering introduced Anovlar in 1961 as one of the first combined pills available in Europe, formulated with 4 mg norethisterone acetate and 0.05 mg ethinylestradiol to suppress ovulation reliably.[1][37] The product marked a commercial milestone, drawing on Schering's steroid expertise to address unmet needs in family planning amid growing demand for effective, non-invasive methods. Subsequent innovations included low-dose options like Microgynon 30, a monophasic pill with 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and 150 mcg levonorgestrel, launched in the 1970s to minimize estrogen-related risks such as thromboembolism.[40]Schering further differentiated its portfolio with progestins offering unique profiles, exemplified by drospirenone, a spironolactone analogue developed in-house with anti-androgenic and antimineralocorticoid effects to counter bloating and acne. This enabled Yasmin (3 mg drospirenone/30 mcg ethinylestradiol), introduced in Europe in 2000, and its U.S. variant Yaz (3 mg drospirenone/20 mcg ethinylestradiol), approved in 2006, which gained approval partly for non-contraceptive benefits like premenstrual dysphoric disorder treatment.[41] Another key product, Diane-35 (2 mg cyproterone acetate/35 mcg ethinylestradiol), targeted hyperandrogenism symptoms including hirsutism and acne while providing contraception, reflecting Schering's integration of dermatological and gynecological applications.[41]Beyond contraception, Schering applied its hormonal innovations to menopausal treatments, developing hormone replacement therapies (HRT) to alleviate climacteric symptoms and prevent bone loss. The company launched Climara Pro, a weekly transdermal patch delivering 0.045 mg estradiol and 0.015 mg levonorgestrel daily, in the U.S. in 2004, designed for continuous estrogen-progestogen delivery to reduce endometrial risks.[42] Additionally, drospirenone-based HRT formulations, such as 2 mg drospirenone combined with estradiol, demonstrated efficacy in phase III trials for symptom relief and osteoporosis prevention, with European filings by the mid-2000s.[43] These products underscored Schering's focus on tailored hormone balances, informed by decades of empirical steroid research rather than unverified assumptions about long-term safety profiles.
Neurology, Oncology, and Diagnostic Products
Schering AG developed Betaferon (interferon beta-1b), a recombinant interferon for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, which received approval in Europe in 1994 and in the United States as Betaseron in 1993.[22] The drug demonstrated efficacy in slowing disease progression and reducing relapse rates in clinical trials, including the pivotal randomized controlled study showing a 30% reduction in exacerbation frequency compared to placebo.[44] Schering sponsored the BENEFIT trial starting in 2002, evaluating early intervention in clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis, with results supporting long-term benefits in delaying conversion to definite MS.[23]In oncology, Schering marketed Fludara (fludarabine phosphate), a purine analog approved in Europe in 1993 for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), particularly in refractory cases, with an oral formulation launched in the UK in 2001.[45] Fludara established itself as a standard second-line treatment, showing superior response rates over chlorambucil in phase II trials for untreated B-cell CLL.[2] The company expanded its portfolio through acquisitions, including Leukine (sargramostim), a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor purchased from Immunex in 2002 for $380 million, approved for reducing infection risk post-chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia and other neutropenic conditions.[46] Schering also acquired non-US rights to Zevalin (ibritumomab tiuxetan), a radioimmunotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, enhancing its hematological oncology offerings.[24]Diagnostic products formed a core strength, with Schering pioneering gadolinium-based contrast agents for MRI. Magnevist (gadopentetate dimeglumine), the first such agent, was introduced in 1988 and became a global market leader for enhancing visualization in neuroimaging, oncology staging, and vascular imaging.[19] Later developments included Gadovist (gadobutrol), a 1.0 molar macrocyclic agent approved in Germany and Switzerland by the early 2000s, offering higher relaxivity and reduced injection volumes for CNS, body, and vascular applications.[47] Vasovist (gadofosveset), approved in the EU in 2005, targeted blood pool imaging for magnetic resonance angiography, improving detection of vascular abnormalities.[48] Schering's diagnostics division, emphasizing molecular imaging, acquired Diatide in 1999 to advance peptide-based "pathfinders" for tumor targeting, though it divested radiopharmaceutical assets in 2006 to focus on high-growth contrast media.[24]
Acquisition by Bayer and Dissolution (2006)
Takeover Bid, Legal Battles, and Merger Completion
In March 2006, Schering AG became the target of a hostile takeover bid by Merck KGaA, which offered €14.6 per share in cash, valuing the company at approximately €14.9 billion ($17.9 billion).[49] Schering's management opposed the bid, citing concerns over Merck's strategic fit and potential job cuts.[50] On March 23, Bayer AG launched a competing friendly offer of €89.28 per share, totaling about €16.3 billion ($19.5 billion), which Schering's board recommended to shareholders as superior in value and continuity for its pharmaceutical operations.[51]Bayer's bid, approximately 61% above Schering's 12-month average share price, prompted Merck to withdraw on March 24, allowing Bayer to proceed without immediate rivalry.[52] The formal offer period opened on April 13 and closed on May 31, 2006.[53]Tensions escalated in June when Merck, having acquired a 10% stake in Schering through open-market purchases, attempted to influence the outcome by demanding a higher price or merger terms.[54] Bayer responded by filing a lawsuit in U.S. federal court on June 14, alleging Merck violated U.S. securities laws, including tender offer rules under the Williams Act, by secretly accumulating shares and planning to vote against the deal or seek a premium.[55] The suit sought to block Merck from exercising voting rights on its stake until resolution.[56] Amid this, Bayer raised its effective offer slightly through additional purchases, reaching a total enterprise value of €17.1 billion, and secured acceptances from shareholders holding over 88% of Schering's shares by June 20, surpassing the 75% threshold needed for a domination and profit participation agreement under German law.[57] By July 12, Bayer controlled 92.4% of shares, enabling a squeeze-out of minority holders.[58]Antitrust approvals proceeded concurrently, with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and European Commission clearing the transaction under case M.4198 without requiring divestitures of overlapping assets in key areas like oral contraceptives, as the combined entity did not exceed competition thresholds post-review.[59]Bayer acquired majority control effective June 23, 2006.[60] An extraordinary Schering shareholders' meeting in September 2006 approved the merger plan, leading to Schering's delisting from the stock exchange and renaming as Bayer Schering Pharma AG, fully integrated as an independent division within Bayer HealthCare.[61] The deal, Bayer's largest ever, preserved headquarters in Berlin and committed to no immediate plant closures, though it anticipated 6,000 job reductions over time through synergies.[51]
Integration into Bayer HealthCare and Operational Changes
Following Bayer AG's successful takeover of Schering AG, achieving control of 92.4% of shares by July 2006, Schering's pharmaceutical operations were integrated into Bayer HealthCare, forming the combined entity Bayer Schering Pharma AG.[3] This merger created a leading player in specialty pharmaceuticals, with the enlarged division focusing on primary care, women's health, and diagnostics.[62]
The integration process entailed substantial operational restructuring to realize cost synergies and streamline research and development. In November 2006, Bayer announced the closure of its West Haven, Connecticut research site and certain facilities of Schering's U.S. subsidiary Berlex Laboratories, as part of a global R&D reorganization aimed at concentrating efforts on high-potential therapeutic areas.[62][63]
Significant workforce reductions accompanied these changes, with Bayer committing to eliminate approximately 6,100 positions across the combined operations to address redundancies. This included 3,150 jobs in Europe, 1,000 in the United States, 750 in the Asia-Pacific region, and 1,200 in Latin America and Canada, primarily targeting administrative and overlapping functions rather than core R&D or production roles.[64][65]
By August 2007, Bayer reported that the Schering integration was progressing faster than anticipated, contributing to a 26% sales increase in the pharmaceuticals division to €7.783 billion for the year, bolstered by €3.1 billion in revenues from Schering starting June 23, 2006.[66][67] These adjustments enhanced operational efficiency, though they involved short-term disruptions from site consolidations and staff transitions.[62]
Legacy and Historical Assessment
Scientific Contributions and Industry Impact
Schering AG advanced pharmaceutical science through pioneering work in steroid hormone synthesis and application, particularly in the 1930s and 1940s, where collaborations with biochemist Adolf Butenandt enabled the extraction and pharmacological development of sex steroids for endocrine disorders.[12] This built on earlier milestones, such as the 1928 launch of Progynon, one of the first commercial estrogen preparations derived from natural sources, which laid groundwork for hormone replacement therapies.[68] By synthesizing compounds like ethinylestradiol, Schering chemists under figures such as Hans Inhoffen contributed to stable, orally active hormones, transforming biological extracts into scalable drugs for conditions including amenorrhea and menopausal symptoms.[15]In reproductive health, Schering's expertise culminated in the 1961 European market introduction of Anovlar, the first combined oral contraceptive containing norethisterone and ethinylestradiol, marking a breakthrough in fertility control by providing reliable, hormone-based prevention of ovulation.[7] This product, approved in West Germany on June 1, 1961, leveraged Schering's progestin research to achieve efficacy rates exceeding 99% with proper use, influencing global standards for low-dose formulations and expanding access to family planning amid post-war demographic shifts.[39] The company's hormone portfolio, including early tests like Duogynon for pregnancydiagnosis, further demonstrated innovations in endocrine diagnostics, though later scrutiny highlighted risks such as teratogenic effects.[69]Schering also innovated in diagnostic imaging, filing the first patent in the early 1980s for gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), the foundational MRI contrast agent that improved soft-tissue visualization by enhancing T1 relaxation times in paramagnetic complexes.[18] This gadolinium-based compound, approved in 1988, enabled clearer detection of lesions in neurology and oncology, establishing Schering as a leader in in-vivo imaging with products generating significant revenue through targeted receptor-binding technologies.[70] In neurology, Schering developed Betaferon (interferon beta-1b), a recombinant protein approved in 1993 for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, reducing relapse rates by approximately 30% in clinical trials by modulating immune responses.[22]These contributions positioned Schering as a niche innovator, emphasizing R&D in specialized therapeutics over mass-market drugs, with hormone and imaging segments driving over 50% of pre-2006 revenues and influencing industry shifts toward biologics and precision diagnostics.[24] The firm's focus on steroidchemistry and contrast media set precedents for regulatory pathways in high-risk categories, fostering advancements in targeted therapies while highlighting the need for rigorous safety profiling in endocrine interventions.[11]
Evaluations of Controversial Historical Actions
Schering AG faced postwar scrutiny for its use of forced labor during World War II, as documented in lawsuits by Holocaust survivors alleging exploitation of concentration camp prisoners and other coerced workers in its German facilities.[29] In response to such claims, Schering contributed to the German Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility and Future," established in 2000, through which over 1,600 companies collectively provided 5.2 billion euros in compensation to an estimated 1.66 million surviving forced laborers and heirs, shielding participants from further litigation.[71] Historians, including Christopher Kobrak in his analysis of Schering's operations from 1851 to 1950, describe the company's compliance with Nazi directives as pragmatic adaptation rather than ideological zeal, with executives navigating state controls on exports and production while occasionally resisting full Aryanization pressures, though without significant opposition to the regime's core policies.[72]A notable legal challenge arose in 2003 when Auschwitz survivor Simon Rozenkier sued Schering AG and Bayer AG, accusing them of cooperating with the Nazi regime in "horrific medical experiments" on prisoners, including the testing of pharmaceuticals under lethal conditions.[30] U.S. courts dismissed the case in 2006, ruling it a non-justiciable political question deferred to international agreements like the 2000 foundation, though the allegations highlighted Schering's wartime production of hormones and diagnostics potentially supplied for experimental use, amid broader industry patterns of regime-aligned research.[29] Scholarly evaluations, such as those examining Schering's collaboration with figures like Nobel laureate Adolf Butenandt on sex steroid synthesis, note how Nazi wartime mobilization prioritized military applications over civilianhormone therapies, marginalizing ethical boundaries in a context of total war but without evidence of Schering directing atrocities independently.[11]Postwar, Schering encountered criticism over Duogynon, a synthetic hormone pregnancy test marketed from the 1960s, which was linked to severe adverse effects including miscarriages, limb deformities, and infant mortality when administered early in pregnancy.[73] By the mid-1970s, accumulating case reports in Germany prompted regulatory reviews, yet Schering continued sales until voluntarily withdrawing Duogynon in 1981 amid allegations of inadequate risk disclosure and suppression of internal safety data, paralleling the UK withdrawal of its equivalent Primodos in 1978.[74] A 2018 UK government-commissioned review criticized Schering's historical practices for failing to promptly share adverse event findings with regulators, contributing to prolonged exposure, though the company maintained the drug's benefits outweighed risks based on contemporaneous evidence; subsequent German inquiries echoed calls for accountability without establishing direct causation in all cases due to diagnostic confounding.[75] These evaluations underscore tensions between innovation in reproductive diagnostics and pharmacovigilance, with critics attributing delays to profit motives over precautionary principles.[69]