Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Security management

Security management is a business function designed to protect an organization’s assets and ability to perform its mission by identifying, assessing, and managing current and potential security-related risks through a strategic program management framework that actively engages executives, managers, asset owners, and other relevant stakeholders.^[1] This approach emphasizes a holistic integration of people, processes, and technology to minimize losses and ensure operational continuity.^[1] At its core, security management encompasses key components such as risk assessment, policy development, resource allocation, and continuous monitoring to address threats ranging from physical intrusions to cyber attacks.^[1] It promotes an enterprise-wide culture of security awareness, balancing protection measures with business efficiency to foster resilience against disruptions. In practice, effective security management relies on standards like Enterprise Security Risk Management (ESRM), which aligns security efforts with organizational objectives through proactive threat mitigation and stakeholder collaboration.^[1] Security management spans multiple domains, including physical security to safeguard facilities and personnel, information security via systems like ISO/IEC 27001 that preserve the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data through risk-based controls, and personnel security to vet and train staff.^[1]^[2] Organizations implement these elements via structured programs, often certified under international guidelines, to comply with legal requirements and adapt to evolving threats such as supply chain vulnerabilities or insider risks.^[2]^[1]

Core Concepts

Definition and Scope

Security management is defined as a business function that protects an organization's assets and operational mission by systematically identifying, assessing, prioritizing, and managing security-related risks through the coordinated application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability and impact of adverse events. This process involves strategic program management that engages executives, managers, and stakeholders to align security efforts with organizational objectives. According to the ASIS International report on the state of security management, this definition emphasizes risk management as a core activity, distinguishing it from ad-hoc protective measures.^[1] The scope of security management encompasses a broad range of assets, including people, physical property, information, and intellectual property, and applies across diverse sectors such as corporate enterprises, public administration, and critical infrastructure like energy and transportation systems. It addresses threats that could disrupt operations or cause harm, extending beyond individual facilities to enterprise-wide strategies that integrate multiple security disciplines. For instance, in organizational contexts, security management ensures the protection of human resources through access controls and emergency protocols, while safeguarding tangible assets like facilities and equipment from unauthorized interference. This comprehensive coverage is highlighted in U.S. Department of Education guidelines, which describe security management as nurturing a culture and procedures to protect institutional assets holistically.^[3] Security management differs from related fields such as safety management, where the former focuses on intentional threats like criminal acts, terrorism, or cyberattacks, whereas the latter addresses accidental hazards such as workplace injuries or environmental risks. This distinction is critical for resource allocation, as security prioritizes deliberate adversarial actions over unintentional events. Core elements of security management include both proactive approaches, which emphasize prediction and prevention through ongoing risk assessments and threat intelligence, and reactive measures, which involve response and recovery to mitigate impacts after incidents occur. Effective security management integrates these elements with broader business operations, ensuring that protective strategies support rather than hinder organizational goals, as outlined in ASIS standards for enterprise security risk management.^[1]^[4]

Key Principles and Objectives

Security management is grounded in fundamental principles that guide the protection of organizational assets, ensuring a structured approach to mitigating threats while aligning with operational needs. A cornerstone principle in information security, a key domain of security management, is the CIA triad, which encompasses confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Confidentiality ensures that sensitive information is accessible only to authorized individuals, preventing unauthorized disclosure through measures like encryption and access controls. Integrity maintains the accuracy and completeness of data, protecting it from unauthorized modifications via techniques such as hashing and digital signatures. Availability guarantees that information and systems are accessible to authorized users when needed, supported by redundancies like backup systems and disaster recovery plans. This triad forms the basis for information security frameworks, including those outlined in NIST Special Publication 800-12.^[5]^[6] Building on the CIA triad, additional principles enhance the robustness of security management. Defense in depth advocates for multiple layers of security controls across people, processes, and technology, ensuring that the failure of one layer does not compromise the entire system; for instance, combining firewalls, intrusion detection, and employee training creates overlapping protections. The least privilege principle restricts access rights to the minimum necessary for performing tasks, reducing the potential impact of insider threats or compromised accounts by implementing role-based access controls. Proportionality of measures to risks dictates that security controls should be scaled appropriately to the identified threats and potential impacts, avoiding over-investment in low-risk areas while prioritizing high-value assets, as emphasized in risk-based frameworks like ISO/IEC 27001. Emerging principles include zero trust, which assumes no implicit trust and verifies every access, and AI integration for predictive analytics, as highlighted in recent frameworks.^[5]^[7]^[2]^[8] These principles collectively promote a holistic defense strategy without unnecessary complexity. The primary objectives of security management align closely with these principles, focusing on safeguarding assets against evolving threats. A core goal is to protect physical, digital, and intellectual assets from unauthorized access, disruption, or destruction, thereby preserving organizational value and stakeholder trust. Ensuring business continuity is another key objective, achieved through contingency planning that minimizes downtime during incidents and enables rapid recovery. Compliance with applicable regulations and standards, such as data protection laws, is essential to avoid legal penalties and reputational damage. Finally, fostering a security-aware culture involves educating employees and integrating security into daily operations, promoting proactive behaviors that embed protection throughout the organization. These objectives drive the implementation of security management systems, as defined in international standards.^[2]^[9] Effective security management requires balancing robust protections with practical considerations of usability and cost-effectiveness. Overly stringent controls can hinder productivity, so measures must enhance security without unduly impeding legitimate activities, such as through user-friendly authentication methods. Cost-effectiveness ensures that investments yield proportional returns in risk reduction, evaluating total ownership costs against threat landscapes. Central to this balance is the principle of due diligence, which mandates that organizations exercise reasonable care in identifying, assessing, and addressing risks, including regular audits and vendor evaluations to demonstrate accountability. This approach prevents liability while optimizing resource allocation.^[10]^[11] The principles and objectives of security management have evolved significantly in response to major events, placing greater emphasis on resilience. Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, there was a paradigm shift toward integrated national security frameworks, including the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security^[12] and enhanced focus on critical infrastructure protection, which extended to private sector resilience planning against physical and cyber threats.^[13] The 2017 Equifax data breach, affecting over 147 million individuals due to unpatched vulnerabilities, further underscored the need for agile response mechanisms and supply chain security, prompting regulatory scrutiny and industry-wide adoption of proactive patching and incident resilience strategies to withstand and recover from large-scale compromises.^[14]^[15] More recently, incidents like the 2020 SolarWinds supply chain compromise and the 2024 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 have further emphasized integrated governance and third-party risk management in security principles.^[16]^[17] These events have reinforced resilience as a core objective, integrating adaptive capabilities into security management to address both immediate threats and long-term systemic vulnerabilities.

Risk Management

Risk Identification and Types

Risk identification is the foundational step in security management, involving the systematic process of discovering potential events or conditions that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of organizational assets. This process draws from established risk management frameworks, such as those outlined in ISO 31000, to ensure comprehensive coverage without delving into quantification. By pinpointing risks early, organizations can prepare for threats that align with their operational context and strategic objectives.^[18] Common methods for risk identification include brainstorming sessions, where diverse stakeholders collaborate to generate ideas on potential risks based on collective expertise and experience. Checklists derived from industry standards or past incidents provide a structured approach to ensure no common vulnerabilities are overlooked, often tailored to specific sectors like information technology or physical security.^[19]^[20] Threat modeling is another key technique, particularly in cybersecurity, where it involves decomposing systems into components to identify potential attack vectors and adversaries' motivations, as detailed in methodologies like STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege). Vulnerability scanning employs automated tools to detect weaknesses in networks, applications, or hardware, such as unpatched software or misconfigurations, enabling proactive identification before exploitation occurs.^[21]^[22] Security risks are broadly categorized into external and internal types based on their origin. External risks arise from sources outside the organization, including natural disasters like floods or earthquakes that can disrupt physical infrastructure, cyberattacks from external actors such as distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks or malware injections, and terrorism targeting facilities or personnel.^[23]^[24]^[25] Internal risks, conversely, stem from within the organization and often involve human or procedural elements, such as insider threats where employees intentionally misuse access for personal gain, unintentional employee errors like accidental data leaks through phishing susceptibility, or process failures in areas like inadequate backup protocols leading to data loss. These internal categories can be particularly insidious due to their proximity to sensitive assets, amplifying potential impact.^[23]^[26]^[27] As of 2025, emerging risks have gained prominence, with supply chain vulnerabilities exemplified by the 2020 SolarWinds hack—where attackers compromised software updates to infiltrate multiple organizations—continuing to evolve into sophisticated third-party exploits affecting global ecosystems, identified as a top concern in the World Economic Forum's Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2025. AI-driven threats, including deepfakes used for impersonation fraud or social engineering, represent a growing concern, enabling highly convincing audio-visual manipulations that bypass traditional authentication and erode trust in communications; for instance, AI-driven phishing attacks increased by 1265% in 2025.^[28]^[29]^[30]^[31]^[32] Factors influencing effective risk identification include asset valuation, which prioritizes resources based on their criticality, monetary value, and business impact to focus efforts on high-stakes elements like proprietary data or core infrastructure. Threat intelligence gathering further refines this process by collecting and analyzing data on current and anticipated threats from sources like industry reports or government advisories, ensuring identifications remain relevant to the evolving threat landscape.^[33]^[34]^[35]

Risk Assessment and Analysis

Risk assessment and analysis in security management involves systematically evaluating identified risks to determine their likelihood of occurrence, potential impact, and overall priority for organizational attention. This process enables security professionals to prioritize resources effectively by distinguishing between risks that pose significant threats and those that are more manageable. According to ISO 31000:2018, risk assessment encompasses the identification of risk sources, analysis of risk causes and consequences, and evaluation to support decision-making, providing a structured framework applicable across various sectors.^[36] The assessment process typically employs two primary approaches: qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative assessment categorizes risks using descriptive scales, such as high, medium, or low, based on expert judgment to gauge likelihood and impact without relying on numerical data; this method is particularly useful for initial screenings due to its simplicity and speed.^[37] In contrast, quantitative methods assign numerical values to risks, incorporating probabilistic models and historical data for more precise estimations; for instance, the Annualized Loss Expectancy (ALE) calculates expected annual financial loss from a risk as follows:

ALE = SLE \times ARO

where SLE represents the Single Loss Expectancy (estimated cost of a single occurrence) and ARO the Annual Rate of Occurrence (expected frequency per year).^[38] These methods can be integrated, with qualitative insights informing quantitative models to enhance accuracy in complex security environments.^[39] Several tools facilitate this analysis, including risk matrices, which plot risks on a grid of likelihood versus impact to visualize and prioritize them—for example, a 5x5 matrix categorizing risks into low, medium, high, or extreme levels.^[40] SWOT analysis, adapted for security contexts, evaluates internal strengths and weaknesses alongside external opportunities and threats to uncover vulnerabilities in information systems, such as outdated software exposing organizations to cyber exploits.^[41] Additionally, bow-tie analysis diagrams threat scenarios by illustrating causes (left side of the "bow"), a central top event (e.g., a data breach), and consequences (right side), while highlighting preventive and mitigative barriers to inform targeted assessments.^[42] Impact measurement during analysis considers multiple dimensions beyond direct costs, including financial losses from downtime or remediation, reputational damage affecting customer trust, operational disruptions halting business processes, and legal consequences such as fines under regulations like GDPR.^[39] In 2025 contexts, integrated assessments per ISO 31000 emphasize aligning these evaluations with emerging threats like AI-driven attacks, ensuring holistic prioritization without over-reliance on legacy models.^[36]

Risk Treatment Strategies

Risk treatment strategies in security management involve selecting and implementing measures to address risks identified and assessed during the risk management process. These strategies aim to modify the level of risk to align with organizational tolerance, drawing from established frameworks like ISO 31000:2018, which outlines options to avoid, mitigate, transfer, or accept risks.^[36] The choice of strategy depends on the nature of the risk, available resources, and alignment with broader objectives, ensuring that treated risks—known as residual risks—remain within acceptable bounds.^[36] The primary risk treatment strategies include avoidance, mitigation (or reduction), transfer, and acceptance. Avoidance entails eliminating the risk source entirely, such as discontinuing a high-risk operation or technology that poses unacceptable threats to security.^[36] Mitigation, also termed reduction, involves applying controls to lessen the likelihood or impact of the risk, often through layered security measures like defense-in-depth approaches that combine preventive, detective, and corrective controls; this can include diversification (spreading exposure) to prevent a single event from causing widespread damage, for instance by segmenting networks or distributing assets across multiple locations to limit the blast radius of a potential breach.^[43]^[36] Transfer shifts the financial or operational burden to third parties, commonly via contracts, outsourcing, or insurance mechanisms.^[36] Acceptance means consciously tolerating the risk without further action, typically for low-priority threats, while establishing monitoring to track any changes.^[36] Decision criteria for selecting strategies emphasize cost-benefit analysis, evaluating the expenses of treatment against potential risk impacts, and assessing residual risk levels post-implementation to ensure they do not exceed organizational thresholds.^[36] This process prioritizes treatments that provide the greatest risk reduction per unit cost, often using quantitative methods like expected monetary value calculations alongside qualitative judgments on feasibility and regulatory alignment.^[36] In practice, transfer strategies have gained prominence through cyber insurance policies, particularly following the ransomware surges starting in 2020, which drove the global cyber insurance market to exceed $10 billion in premiums by 2022, reaching $16.6 billion as of 2024.^[44] For mitigation, organizations deploy layered defenses, such as multi-factor authentication and endpoint detection systems, which help lower ransomware incidents and claims in insured environments.^[45] These strategies integrate with business objectives to foster organizational resilience, as exemplified by the ERMsec model, which embeds security risk treatment within enterprise risk management systems to align protective measures with strategic planning and continuity efforts.^[46] This approach, assessed via maturity scales like CMMI, ensures that risk treatments support long-term adaptability without disrupting core operations.^[46]

Security Policies and Governance

Policy Development and Implementation

Policy development in security management begins with aligning organizational security objectives with broader business goals, ensuring that policies support mission-critical functions while mitigating risks. This process involves conducting risk assessments to identify key threats and vulnerabilities, as outlined in established frameworks. Stakeholder involvement is essential, including input from senior management, information security officers, and operational teams to foster ownership and relevance. For instance, the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and Senior Agency Information Security Officer (SAISO) play pivotal roles in defining policy scope and priorities.^[47] Policies are drafted as clear, enforceable documents, such as acceptable use policies that specify rules for data handling and system access, emphasizing simplicity and measurability to facilitate adherence.^[5] Security policies typically fall into two main categories: high-level policies, which provide strategic direction for overall security governance, and procedural policies, which detail specific protocols like data classification and incident reporting. High-level policies, often approved by top management, set the tone for the organization's commitment to security, while procedural ones operationalize these directives through step-by-step guidelines. This distinction ensures comprehensive coverage, with high-level policies informing enterprise-wide strategies and procedural ones addressing day-to-day activities. Development incorporates risk-based principles to prioritize controls that address identified threats effectively.^[5]^[47] Implementation requires robust communication plans to disseminate policies across the organization, followed by integration into human resources processes, such as onboarding, and IT systems for automated enforcement where possible. Training programs are critical, including annual awareness sessions for all employees and role-based training tailored to specific responsibilities, such as for system administrators handling sensitive data. These efforts promote compliance through simulations, briefings, and certification to build a security-conscious culture. Effective rollout also involves establishing review mechanisms to monitor adoption and adjust for evolving needs.^[47] Challenges in policy development and implementation include securing executive buy-in to allocate resources and overcoming resistance to change among employees. Ensuring policies remain current amid technological shifts, such as the widespread adoption of remote work post-2020, demands regular updates to address new risks like unsecured home networks. Funding constraints and balancing policy rigor with usability further complicate efforts, requiring ongoing evaluation to maintain effectiveness.^[47]^[48]

Compliance, Standards, and Legal Frameworks

Security management operates within a complex landscape of international standards, national laws, and regulatory requirements that organizations must navigate to ensure robust protection of assets, data, and operations. Compliance involves aligning security practices with these external mandates to mitigate legal risks, avoid penalties, and demonstrate due diligence. Key standards provide frameworks for establishing, implementing, and maintaining an information security management system (ISMS), while legal frameworks impose enforceable obligations, particularly in data protection and cyber liability. Failure to comply can result in significant financial and reputational damage, underscoring the need for proactive integration of these elements into governance structures. Among the most widely adopted standards is ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies requirements for an ISMS to manage information security risks systematically. Updated in 2022, this standard emphasizes controls for cloud services, threat intelligence, and supply chain security, promoting a risk-based approach that integrates with broader business processes. The transition period from the 2013 version ends on October 31, 2025, after which certifications based on the previous edition will expire. Organizations achieve certification through third-party audits, which verify adherence to its 93 controls across 4 themes (organizational, people, physical, and technological), including access control and cryptography.^[2] Similarly, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, released in 2024, offers a voluntary set of guidelines for managing cybersecurity risks, with enhanced focus on supply chain risk management to address vulnerabilities in third-party integrations. The CSF's core functions—Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover—provide a flexible structure adaptable to various sectors, and its 2024 revision incorporates metrics for measuring governance and supply chain resilience. In the realm of data privacy, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), effective since 2018, mandates stringent controls for personal data processing within the EU, including data protection by design, breach notification within 72 hours, and rights like data portability. Total GDPR fines reached approximately €2.7 billion by 2023, with notable cases like Meta's €1.2 billion penalty in 2023 for transatlantic data transfers and a €345 million fine against TikTok in 2023 for violations related to children's data processing. In May 2025, TikTok received an additional €530 million fine for unlawful data transfers, contributing to total GDPR fines surpassing €4 billion as of November 2025. Legal frameworks further enforce security obligations through liability laws and sector-specific regulations. In the United States, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) of 1986, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act and subsequent updates, criminalizes unauthorized access to computer systems and imposes civil liabilities for damages resulting from cyber incidents. For healthcare, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Security Rule requires covered entities to implement administrative, physical, and technical safeguards for electronic protected health information (ePHI), with enforcement by the Department of Health and Human Services. Non-compliance under these laws can lead to severe penalties; for instance, HIPAA violations resulted in approximately $4.2 million in settlements in 2023, and 2024 settlements exceeded $100 million amid rising breach incidents. The 2019 Equifax settlement following its 2017 breach included ongoing monitoring requirements. Compliance processes typically involve regular audits, certification renewals, and mandatory reporting to demonstrate adherence. Audits, such as those for ISO 27001, are conducted annually by accredited bodies to assess control effectiveness, while NIST CSF adoption often includes self-assessments or third-party validations using tools like the Cybersecurity Framework Profile. Reporting obligations under GDPR require data protection impact assessments for high-risk processing, and U.S. laws like the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity disclosure rules mandate timely breach notifications for public companies. Penalties for non-compliance extend beyond fines to include operational restrictions; for example, the Equifax settlement highlighted the long-term implications of regulatory scrutiny. Global variations in approaches reflect differing priorities, with the European Union emphasizing comprehensive privacy rights through GDPR and the forthcoming AI Act, which from 2025 classifies AI systems by risk levels and mandates security measures for high-risk applications like biometric identification. In contrast, the U.S. relies on a patchwork of federal and state laws, favoring sector-specific regulations like HIPAA and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), with less uniform data protection compared to the EU's extraterritorial reach. Emerging regulations, such as the EU's NIS2 Directive, which applies from October 18, 2024, expand cybersecurity requirements for critical infrastructure operators, requiring incident reporting within 24 hours and supply chain audits. These divergences necessitate multinational organizations to adopt harmonized compliance strategies, often aligning internal policies with the strictest applicable standards to ensure global efficacy.

Security Measures and Controls

Physical Security

Physical security involves the implementation of safeguards to protect physical assets, facilities, and personnel from threats including theft, vandalism, unauthorized entry, burglary, fire, natural disasters, and terrorism. These risks to physical assets can compromise organizational operations and safety, necessitating layered defenses that deter, detect, and respond to potential intrusions or environmental hazards.^[49] Key measures include perimeter controls such as fences, walls, gates, and anti-ram barriers, which establish boundaries to deny or delay unauthorized access and provide standoff distances for added protection. Surveillance systems, including closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras and intrusion detection alarms, enable real-time monitoring and rapid response to suspicious activities at entrances, parking areas, and restricted zones. Environmental safeguards, such as fire suppression systems with sprinklers and fire-rated construction, mitigate risks from fires and other hazards, ensuring operational continuity in mission-critical facilities. Controlled access to facilities further reinforces these protections by limiting entry to authorized personnel through physical barriers and monitoring.^[50] Design principles like Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), which originated in the 1970s through the work of criminologist C. Ray Jeffery and architect Oscar Newman, emphasize natural surveillance, territorial reinforcement, access control, and maintenance to reduce crime opportunities by shaping the built environment. Updated applications, including second-generation CPTED introduced in 1997, incorporate social cohesion, community connectivity, and threshold capacity to foster safer public spaces alongside physical designs. These principles address threats like theft, vandalism, and unauthorized entry by enhancing visibility and perceived risk to potential offenders.^[51] As of 2025, physical security increasingly integrates with smart building technologies, such as Internet of Things (IoT) sensors for automated detection of environmental anomalies and perimeter breaches, enabling proactive responses in interconnected facilities. A notable case of enhancement occurred post-9/11, when the U.S. Department of Homeland Security coordinated with private sector owners to bolster critical infrastructure protections, including improved surveillance, restricted access, and vulnerability assessments for sectors like nuclear power plants, where the 94 reactors across 28 states (as of 2025) adopted heightened readiness and emergency coordination measures.^[52]^[53]^[54]

Information and Cybersecurity

Information and cybersecurity encompasses the practices, technologies, and processes designed to protect digital assets, including data, networks, and systems, from unauthorized access, disruption, or damage within an organization's security management framework. This discipline addresses both internal and external cyber risks by implementing layered defenses to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information. As cyber threats evolve rapidly, effective strategies integrate proactive measures to safeguard against sophisticated attacks that can compromise sensitive data across on-premises and cloud environments.^[55] Key cyber threats include malware, which refers to malicious software such as viruses, trojans, and ransomware that infiltrates systems to steal, encrypt, or destroy data; phishing, deceptive tactics used to trick users into revealing credentials or installing malware via fraudulent emails or websites; and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, which flood networks with traffic to disrupt service availability. In 2025, these threats remain prevalent, with ransomware evolving to include "triple extortion" tactics combining data encryption, theft, and public disclosure demands. Emerging risks from quantum computing pose a significant challenge to traditional encryption methods, as quantum algorithms like Shor's could break widely used public-key cryptography, potentially exposing encrypted data retroactively. To counter this, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) finalized its first three post-quantum encryption standards in August 2024—FIPS 203 (ML-KEM for general encryption), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA for digital signatures), and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA for signatures)—and selected HQC (a code-based key encapsulation mechanism) for standardization on March 11, 2025—designed to withstand quantum attacks, with organizations urged to begin migration planning.^[56]^[57]^[58] Core protective measures involve technical controls such as encryption, which secures data at rest and in transit using algorithms like AES-256 to prevent unauthorized interception; firewalls, network security systems that monitor and block malicious traffic based on predefined rules; and antivirus software, which scans for and removes known malware signatures through real-time detection and heuristic analysis. Additionally, the secure software development lifecycle (SSDLC) embeds security throughout the software creation process, including threat modeling during design, secure coding practices to avoid vulnerabilities like injection flaws, and automated testing for issues in deployment. Best practices further strengthen these measures, such as adopting zero-trust architecture, which assumes no implicit trust and verifies every access request regardless of origin, often incorporating continuous monitoring and least-privilege access; and multi-factor authentication (MFA), requiring multiple verification methods (e.g., password plus biometric or token) to authenticate users, significantly reducing credential-based attacks. A notable example is the response to the 2021 Log4Shell vulnerability (CVE-2021-44228) in Apache Log4j, a remote code execution flaw affecting millions of applications, where organizations applied patches, implemented logging mitigations, and conducted vulnerability scans as recommended by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to limit exploitation.^[59]^[60]^[61] In cloud environments, information and cybersecurity integrates with models like the AWS Shared Responsibility Model, where the provider secures the underlying infrastructure (e.g., physical hosts, networking) while customers manage data protection, application security, and access configurations within their workloads. This delineation ensures comprehensive coverage, with customers responsible for encrypting data, configuring firewalls, and applying SSDLC in cloud-native applications to mitigate threats like misconfigurations that could expose sensitive information. By aligning these elements, organizations achieve resilient digital defenses tailored to modern threat landscapes.^[62]^[63]

Access Control and Intrusion Detection

Access control mechanisms in security management regulate who or what can view or use resources in a computing environment, ensuring that only authorized entities gain entry while preventing unauthorized access. These systems enforce the principle of least privilege, aligning with the confidentiality aspect of the CIA triad by restricting access to sensitive data and systems. Access control is implemented through various models and technologies that authenticate and authorize users based on predefined policies. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) is a widely adopted model where permissions are associated with roles, and users are assigned to appropriate roles to simplify administration in large organizations. Developed by NIST, RBAC reduces complexity by grouping permissions logically, such as granting "manager" roles access to employee records without individual assignments.^[64] In contrast, Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) provides finer-grained control by evaluating attributes of users, resources, actions, and environment against policy rules to make dynamic access decisions. NIST defines ABAC as a logical framework that supports complex scenarios like contextual access in cloud environments, where decisions consider factors such as time, location, or device type.^[65] Biometric systems enhance access control by verifying identity through unique physiological or behavioral characteristics, such as fingerprints, facial recognition, or iris scans, which are difficult to replicate. These systems integrate with access control by capturing biometric data at entry points and matching it against stored templates for authentication. Token-based systems, on the other hand, rely on possession of a physical or digital artifact, like smart cards or one-time password generators, to prove identity and grant access. Tokens often complement other factors in multi-factor authentication setups, adding a layer of security beyond passwords. Intrusion detection systems (IDS) monitor networks or hosts for malicious activities and potential breaches, alerting administrators to suspicious behavior in real-time. Network-based IDS (NIDS) analyze traffic across the network for threats, placing sensors at strategic points like gateways to detect attacks such as denial-of-service without impacting host performance. Host-based IDS (HIDS), conversely, operate on individual devices, examining logs, file integrity, and system calls to identify local intrusions like malware execution.^[66] IDS employ two primary detection methods: signature-based, which matches traffic or behavior against known attack patterns or "signatures" for quick identification of familiar threats, and anomaly-based, which establishes a baseline of normal activity and flags deviations to catch novel attacks. Signature-based detection excels in accuracy for recognized threats but struggles with zero-day exploits, while anomaly detection adapts to evolving environments at the cost of higher false positives.^[67] Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) tools aggregate and analyze logs from across the infrastructure, correlating events from IDS to provide centralized visibility and facilitate intrusion response. SIEM systems like those based on open standards enable real-time logging and automated alerting, reducing manual analysis time.^[68] Implementation of access control and intrusion detection involves integrating with identity management protocols, such as OAuth 2.0, an authorization framework standardized in 2012 that allows secure delegation of access without sharing credentials. OAuth 2.0 supports token issuance for API access, ensuring controlled entry in distributed systems while managing scopes to limit permissions. Effective deployment also addresses false positives in IDS through tuning thresholds and machine learning filters, minimizing alert fatigue and improving operational efficiency.^[69] Since 2023, AI-enhanced intrusion detection has evolved to incorporate machine learning for predictive analytics in hybrid environments, significantly reducing response times by automating threat classification. For instance, AI-driven models have achieved up to 45% faster response times in network threat mitigation compared to traditional methods, enabling proactive defenses in cloud and on-premises setups.^[70]

Evaluation and Improvement

Monitoring, Auditing, and Metrics

Monitoring in security management involves ongoing surveillance to detect anomalies and maintain awareness of the security posture. Continuous logging captures system events, user activities, and network traffic to enable forensic analysis and real-time threat identification.^[71] Dashboards provide visualized, near-real-time insights into security metrics, allowing stakeholders to monitor key indicators such as unauthorized access attempts and vulnerability status.^[71] Threat hunting entails proactive searches across networks and systems for indicators of compromise, often using hypothesis-driven techniques to uncover advanced persistent threats beyond automated alerts.^[72] Auditing ensures the effectiveness of security controls through systematic reviews and testing. Internal audits assess processes from within the organization, evaluating compliance with policies and identifying insider risks, while external audits involve independent third parties to validate perimeter defenses and overall program integrity.^[73] Penetration testing simulates adversarial attacks to exploit vulnerabilities, with internal tests focusing on privilege escalation and external tests targeting public-facing assets.^[73] The frequency of audits is determined by risk levels, with high-impact systems requiring at least annual assessments to align with regulatory requirements like FISMA.^[73] Metrics quantify the performance of security programs, guiding resource allocation and improvement efforts. Key performance indicators (KPIs) include Mean Time to Detect (MTTD), which measures the average duration from incident onset to identification, ideally targeting near-real-time detection for critical systems.^[74] Compliance rates track the percentage of systems adhering to standards, such as patch deployment or configuration baselines, to ensure consistent control implementation.^[75] A balanced scorecard approach integrates multiple perspectives—technology, organizational, supply chain, and risk management—to holistically evaluate cybersecurity, with metrics like endpoint vulnerabilities, phishing success rates, and recovery plan efficacy.^[76] Tools for compliance automation have evolved with AI integration to enhance monitoring and auditing. In 2025, Splunk's updates incorporate agentic AI for automated threat response and reduced alert noise in SIEM platforms, enabling faster analytics on security events.^[77] Similarly, the Elastic Stack (ELK) advances AI-driven security analytics, supporting scalable detection and compliance reporting through features like Agent Builder for custom AI agents.^[78]

Incident Response and Continuous Improvement

Incident response in security management involves a structured process to handle and mitigate security breaches effectively, minimizing damage and restoring normal operations. The key phases, as outlined in the NIST Computer Security Incident Handling Guide, include preparation, identification, containment, eradication, recovery, and lessons learned.^[79] In the preparation phase, organizations establish incident response policies, assemble teams, and acquire necessary tools and training to ensure readiness. Identification focuses on detecting and analyzing potential incidents through monitoring indicators of compromise. Containment aims to limit the spread of the incident, while eradication removes the root cause, such as malware or unauthorized access. Recovery involves restoring systems and data to operational status, often prioritizing critical assets. Finally, lessons learned conduct post-incident reviews to document outcomes and refine future responses.^[79] Effective incident response plans emphasize cross-functional teams comprising cybersecurity experts, IT personnel, legal advisors, human resources, and external partners like managed security service providers to ensure coordinated action.^[79] Communication protocols are critical, defining clear channels for internal notifications, stakeholder updates, and regulatory reporting to maintain transparency and compliance during crises.^[79] Organizations regularly conduct tabletop exercises, which simulate incident scenarios in a discussion-based format to test plans, identify gaps in coordination, and enhance team preparedness without disrupting operations.^[80] Continuous improvement in security management applies the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle to iteratively enhance incident response capabilities, as integrated into ISO/IEC 27001:2022 for information security management systems.^[81] In the Plan phase, risks are assessed and response strategies developed; Do implements these plans; Check monitors effectiveness through audits and metrics; and Act incorporates improvements based on findings. Post-incident reviews form a core part of this cycle, analyzing what occurred, why, and how to prevent recurrence, thereby fostering adaptive strategies against evolving threats. For instance, in response to 2025 ransomware trends—such as increased exploitation of vulnerabilities and a decrease in average recovery costs to $1.53 million—organizations must update defenses with enhanced vulnerability management and skills development to address gaps affecting 63% of victims.^[81]^[82] Key metrics for measuring continuous improvement include reductions in incident frequency, tracked as the number of security events per period, which indicates proactive enhancements in prevention.^[83] Recovery Time Objective (RTO) defines the maximum acceptable downtime for restoring critical functions post-incident, guiding investments in resilient infrastructure to meet business continuity needs.^[84] By monitoring these metrics alongside mean time to detect and respond, organizations can quantify improvements and align incident response with overall risk management goals.^[85]

References

[1]
[PDF] THE STATE OF SECURITY MANAGEMENT - ASIS International
Definition: What is your personal definition of “security management?” The first question asked for the thought leaders' perspectives on their personal defi ...
[2]
Chapter 4-Security Management, from Safeguarding Your ...
Security management involves balancing protection with user convenience, nurturing a security-conscious culture, and developing procedures. The security ...
[3]
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information security management systems
In stockISO/IEC 27001 is the world's best-known standard for information security management systems (ISMS). It defines requirements an ISMS must meet.ISO/IEC 27001:2013 · ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 · Amendment 1 · The basics
[4]
What is Proactive Security? | Trend Micro (US)
Aug 28, 2025 · Proactive vs. reactive security ... Proactive security emphasizes prediction, prevention, and preparedness, encompassing several key strategies:.
[5]
[PDF] An Introduction to Information Security
This approach applies throughout the entire system life cycle. For example, defense-in-depth is a security principle used to protect organizational information.Missing: CIA triad
[6]
Information Security - SANS Institute
The foundation of information security is based on the CIA Triad, which represents three fundamental security principles: Confidentiality: Ensure that only ...Missing: depth | Show results with:depth
[7]
Security design principles - Microsoft Azure Well-Architected ...
Nov 15, 2023 · Least privilege. ... The primary benefit of this approach is that it enables you to preserve or restore the security assurances of the CIA triad ...Missing: depth proportionality diligence
[8]
https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cyber-threats-and-advisories/ai
[9]
DORA: What Is the Proportionality Principle? - IT Governance Blog
Nov 18, 2024 · It says that financial entities need to implement reasonable measures only – measures that are proportionate to the organisation's size, business activities, ...
[10]
Cybersecurity Due Diligence: A Practical Guide - Kroll
Mar 18, 2025 · Cybersecurity due diligence helps firms considering an acquisition to understand cybersecurity risk and develop plans to address risks associated with their ...Missing: principle | Show results with:principle
[11]
20 Years After 9/11: How US Cybersecurity Landscape Evolved
Sep 10, 2021 · 20 Years of Evolution. In the past two decades, the whole notion of security has changed, including the terms used to describe the problems.Missing: Equifax | Show results with:Equifax
[12]
[PDF] Equifax-Report.pdf - Oversight and Government Reform
Equifax failed to fully appreciate and mitigate its cybersecurity risks. Had the company taken action to address its observable security issues prior to this ...
[13]
Managing a cyber risk event: 'Be a student of a crisis' - McKinsey
Mar 3, 2023 · Julia Houston, chief strategy and marketing officer at Equifax Inc., explains how the credit bureau managed one of the biggest data breaches in history.
[14]
Risk Management - SEBoK
Risk management involves defining a risk management strategy, identifying and analyzing risks, handling selected risks, and monitoring the progress in reducing ...
[15]
From identification to mitigation: Understanding risk assessment ...
Nov 12, 2024 · Some common methods used for risk identification are brainstorming sessions, checklists, flowcharts, and historical data analysis. How is ...Missing: scanning | Show results with:scanning
[16]
Risk identification techniques (brainstorming, checklists, interviews)
Various techniques can be used to identify risks, including brainstorming, checklists, and interviews. Each method has its strengths, and combining them ...
[17]
Threat Modeling - OWASP Cheat Sheet Series
This cheatsheet will break the threat modeling down into four basic steps: application decomposition, threat identification and ranking, mitigations, and ...
[18]
Threat Modeling: A Practical Guide to Securing Your Systems
Jan 2, 2025 · - Vulnerability Scanning: Use automated vulnerability scanning tools to identify unpatched software and misconfigurations in the web servers and ...Threat Modeling... · The Threat Modeling Process... · Threat Modeling Tools 🧰<|separator|>
[19]
What is Security Risk? Types & Examples - SentinelOne
Jul 31, 2025 · Threats can include external factors like cyber-attacks, natural disasters, and insider threats. Also, organizations should evaluate ...
[20]
9 types of workplace threats you should know about - Envoy
1. Natural disaster or extreme weather · 2. Theft of physical or intellectual property · 3. Workplace incidents · 4. Cyberattacks · 5. IT failure of a business- ...
[21]
External vs. Internal Cybersecurity Risks: Know the Difference
What are the top types of external cyberattacks? · 1. (DDoS) Distributed denial-of-service attacks · 2. Session hijacking · 3. Drive-by attack · 4. Password attack.
[22]
11 Real-Life Insider Threat Examples | Cyber Threats - Mimecast
Jan 16, 2025 · Examples include former Tesla employees leaking PII, a Yahoo employee stealing trade secrets, and a Microsoft employee exposing login ...
[23]
External Threats vs. Internal Threats in Cybersecurity
Jun 13, 2024 · Types of internal threats. The different forms of internal threats in organizations can include: 1. Insider Attacks: Such acts are commonly ...
[24]
Supply Chain Attack Statistics 2025: Costs & Defenses - DeepStrike
Sep 10, 2025 · Watch out for emerging AI cybersecurity threats that specifically target the AI/ML supply chain itself, such as data poisoning and model ...
[25]
Top 6 Cyber Threat Categories Shaping 2025 - Cybercrime Magazine
Oct 16, 2025 · 1. AI-Powered Phishing & Social Engineering: · 2. Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS): · 3. Deepfake and Impersonation Fraud: · 4. Cloud & API Exploits: ...Missing: emerging risks
[26]
Emerging Cybersecurity Risks for 2025 - Sidechain Security
Following high-profile incidents, such as the SolarWinds breach, supply chain attacks will likely continue to increase: – Attackers infiltrating third-party ...
[27]
[PDF] Identifying and Estimating Cybersecurity Risk for Enterprise Risk ...
This report offers examples and information to illustrate risk tolerance, risk appetite, and methods for determining risks in that context. To support the ...
[28]
Understanding Threat and Risk Assessment: A Quick Guide
Oct 3, 2024 · Discover the essentials of threat and risk assessment (TRA), its benefits, and how to effectively conduct assessments for enhanced security.The Goals Of Threat And Risk... · Nist Risk Assessment Guide · Prioritize RisksMissing: influencing | Show results with:influencing
[29]
What is Threat Intelligence in Cybersecurity? - SecurityScorecard
Sep 12, 2025 · Threat intelligence helps you understand, prevent, and mitigate cyber threats. Learn how threat intelligence can benefit your business.
[30]
ISO 31000:2018 - Risk management — Guidelines
In stockISO 31000 is an international standard that provides principles and guidelines for risk management. It outlines a comprehensive approach to identifying, ...ISO/WD 31000 · The basics · IEC 31010:2019
[31]
Risk Assessment and Analysis Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative
Apr 28, 2021 · Quantitative risk analysis uses numerical values, while qualitative is scenario-based. Qualitative is quick, subjective; quantitative is more ...
[32]
Quantitative risk analysis [updated 2021] - Infosec Institute
May 19, 2021 · ARO is used to calculate ALE (annualized loss expectancy). ALE is calculated as follows: ALE = SLE x ARO.
[33]
[PDF] Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments
A risk assessment methodology typically includes: (i) a risk assessment process (as described in. Chapter Three); (ii) an explicit risk model, defining key ...
[34]
Risk Assessment Matrix: Overview and Guide - AuditBoard
Feb 15, 2024 · A risk assessment matrix is a visual tool depicting potential risks based on likelihood and impact, helping to visualize probability versus ...What Is a Risk Assessment... · How to Make a Risk... · How to Determine the...
[35]
(PDF) Information Security Risk Analysis SWOT - ResearchGate
Aug 12, 2021 · This paper proposes an approach to information risk analysis, namely: the introduction of SWOT-analysis tools for identification and assessment of risks.
[36]
Managing Cyber Security Risks using Bowties - Wolters Kluwer
The bowtie diagram offers a powerful tool to effectively visualize complex IT risks. Moreover, the bowtie diagram provides you with a valuable structure to ...
[37]
SECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT - Threat Analysis Group
Given a specific risk, there are five strategies available to security decision makers to mitigate risk: avoidance, reduction, spreading, transfer and ...
[38]
history of cyber risk transfer | Journal of Cybersecurity
Jan 20, 2025 · By the end of 2021, the ransomware epidemic had caused the median loss ratio among the biggest providers to rise to 76.9%, despite dramatic ...Conventional insurance · Cyber warranties · Parametric insurance · Capital markets
[39]
Integrated security management model: a proposal applied to ...
Jun 2, 2023 · The purpose of this article is to contribute scientifically to the thematic areas of organisational resilience and security risk management.Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
[40]
[PDF] NIST SP 800-100, Information Security Handbook
NIST is responsible for developing standards and guidelines, including minimum requirements, and for providing adequate information security for all agency ...
[41]
Navigating Cybersecurity Challenges in the Remote Work Era - ISC2
Jul 24, 2024 · This blog explores the cybersecurity landscape in the Remote Work Era, providing insights into the challenges, tips for enhancing cybersecurity,
[42]
Physical Security | NJCCIC
Physical security refers to the protection of people, property, and physical assets from the risk of physical actions and events, such as fire, flood, natural ...
[43]
[PDF] Physical Security Design Manual for Mission Critical Facilities
layers of security protection. For guidance on construction requirements for site security, such as perimeter fences and other barriers, refer to the ...
[44]
Primer in CPTED - What is CPTED? - International CPTED Association
Jan 3, 2022 · CPTED in Brief. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) is a multi-disciplinary approach for reducing crime and fear of crime.
[45]
Emerging Physical Security Trends to Watch in 2025
Intelligent IoT sensors can detect poor air quality, carbon dioxide, and nitrous oxide and help determine building emissions. In addition, the IoT sensor can ...
[46]
[PDF] the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assets
Feb 2, 2025 · The September 11, 2001, attacks demonstrated the extent of our vulnerability to the terrorist threat. In the aftermath of these tragic ...
[47]
Cybersecurity Framework | NIST
The Cybersecurity Framework helps organizations better understand and improve their management of cybersecurity risk.CSF 1.1 Archive · ISO/IEC-27001:2022-to... · Updates Archive · CSF 2.0 Profiles
[48]
Malware, Phishing, and Ransomware - CISA
Malware is software for unauthorized access. Ransomware holds data for ransom. Phishing is online scams to steal private information.Overview · Cisa's Role · Featured ContentMissing: NIST | Show results with:NIST
[49]
NIST Releases First 3 Finalized Post-Quantum Encryption Standards
Aug 13, 2024 · NIST has finalized its principal set of encryption algorithms designed to withstand cyberattacks from a quantum computer.
[50]
OWASP Threat and Safeguard Matrix (TaSM)
This matrix allows a company to overlay its major threats with the NIST Cyber Security Framework Functions (Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, & Recover)Common Examples Of Threats · Creating A Cyber Report Card · What Do The Terms Mean?
[51]
Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) Practices - Microsoft
1. Establish security standards, metrics, and governance · 2. Require use of proven security features, languages, and frameworks · 3. Perform security design ...
[52]
[PDF] Zero Trust Architecture - NIST Technical Series Publications
This includes the use of multifactor authentication (MFA) for access to some or all enterprise resources. Continual monitoring with possible reauthentication ...
[53]
Shared Responsibility Model - Amazon Web Services (AWS)
The AWS shared responsibility model divides security into "of the cloud" (AWS) and "in the cloud" (customer), with AWS managing infrastructure and customer ...
[54]
Apache Log4j Vulnerability Guidance - CISA
Apr 8, 2022 · A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability (CVE-2021-44228) in Apache's Log4j software library, versions 2.0-beta9 to 2.14.1, known as "Log4Shell."
[55]
Role Based Access Control | CSRC
The NIST model for RBAC was adopted as American National Standard 359-2004 by the American National Standards Institute, International Committee for Information ...Role Engineering and RBAC... · RBAC Library · RBAC Case Studies · CSRC MENU
[56]
[PDF] Guide to Attribute Based Access Control (ABAC) Definition and ...
ABAC is a logical access control model that is distinguishable because it controls access to objects by evaluating rules against the attributes of entities ( ...
[57]
Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS): Definition, Types, Purpose - Splunk
Network-based (NIDS) and Host-based (HIDS) — and use techniques like signature-based and anomaly-based detection; ...
[58]
What is an Intrusion Detection System (IDS)? - IBM
Whatever form it takes, an IDS uses one or both of two primary threat detection methods: signature-based or anomaly-based detection. Signature-based detection.
[59]
SIEM: Security Information & Event Management Explained - Splunk
SIEM is cybersecurity technology that provides a single, streamlined view of your data, insight into security activities, and operational capabilities.
[60]
RFC 6749 - The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
The OAuth 2.0 authorization framework enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner.
[61]
The Improved Network Intrusion Detection Techniques Using ... - MDPI
Response times have improved by 45%, and total detection accuracy has increased by 30% with the use of AI-driven technologies [8]. Artificial intelligence ...
[62]
[PDF] NIST SP 800-137, Information Security Continuous Monitoring ...
The purpose of this guideline is to assist organizations in the development of an ISCM strategy and the implementation of an ISCM program that provides ...Missing: hunting | Show results with:hunting<|separator|>
[63]
Threat Hunting | CISA
Provide technical capabilities and expertise to understand and remediate adversary activity via detections, partnerships, and forensics.
[64]
[PDF] Technical guide to information security testing and assessment
An internal penetration test is similar to an external test, except that the testers are on the internal network (i.e., behind the firewall) and have been.
[65]
FedRAMP RFC-0006 20x Phase One Key Security Indicators
Apr 24, 2025 · Measure Mean Time To Detect (MTTD) and Mean Time To Resolution (MTTR) for incidents. Related NIST SP 800-53 Controls: CP-2, CP-4, CP-9, CP-10 ...Missing: KPI | Show results with:KPI
[66]
[PDF] Measurement Guide for Information Security: Volume 1
Dec 1, 2024 · Key risk indicators (KRIs) and key performance indicators (KPIs) are examples of metrics, though not all metrics fall into these categories.Missing: MTTD | Show results with:MTTD
[67]
[PDF] Balanced Scorecard for Cybersecurity Management
It includes four major balanced components: Technology security includes measures like end point vulnerability, firewall statistics, and failed or suspicious ...
[68]
Splunk AI
Build resilience and empower teams with agentic AI, GenAI, and ML/DL that power Splunk's leading security and observability solutions.Splunk AI Assistant for SPL · AI Assistant in Observability... · IT Service IntelligenceMissing: ELK | Show results with:ELK
[69]
AI for Security Operations and SOC Teams - Elastic
Elastic named a Leader in The Forrester Wave™: Security Analytics Platforms, Q2 2025. We believe our innovative AI features, community-driven detection ...Missing: stack | Show results with:stack
[70]
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/24/3909
[71]
CISA Tabletop Exercise Packages
CISA Tabletop Exercise Packages (CTEP) are resources for planning exercises on threat scenarios, including objectives, scenarios, and discussion questions.Missing: cross- functional
[72]
https://www.cisa.gov/threat-hunting
[73]
https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/legacy/sp/nistspecialpublication800-115.pdf
[74]
7 Incident Response Metrics and How to Use Them
Jan 24, 2025 · These seven incident response metrics and how to use them can provide you with a way to reduce risk and respond to incidents more efficiently.
[75]
The role of recovery time objectives (RTOs) in cybersecurity - Cutover
Jul 3, 2024 · RTOs define the acceptable window for restoring operations after a security incident, serving as a vital metric for building resilience and ensuring business ...
[76]
Top 8 Incident Response Metrics To Know - Splunk
Feb 27, 2025 · Key metrics to track include mean time to detect (MTTD), mean time to respond or resolution (MTTR), incident frequency or volume, severity, and ...