Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sen̓áḵw

Sen̓áḵw is a traditional village site of the Sḵwx̱wú7mesh Úxwumixw (Squamish Nation) situated on the south shore of False Creek in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, historically serving as a key location for gathering, trade, and governance among Coast Salish peoples.^[1]^[2] The site's name translates to "the place inside the head of False Creek," reflecting its geographical position.^[3] Portions of the original reserve lands were expropriated by colonial authorities in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to facilitate urban expansion, displacing the Squamish community and converting the area for industrial and other uses, including as a military site during World War II.^[1]^[3] In recent decades, the Squamish Nation has pursued reclamation and redevelopment of the 10.5-acre site at Kitsilano Point adjacent to Vanier Park, aiming to rectify historical dispossession and foster economic self-sufficiency.^[4]^[1] The ongoing Sen̓áḵw project represents Canada's largest Indigenous-led mixed-use development, encompassing eleven residential towers with over 6,000 purpose-built rental units—including more than 1,200 affordable homes—alongside retail spaces, community facilities, and cultural elements integrated to preserve and promote Squamish heritage.^[5]^[6] Designed as one of the world's first large-scale net-zero carbon housing initiatives, it emphasizes sustainability through advanced building standards and renewable energy systems.^[5]^[7] The development's location on reserve land exempts it from certain municipal zoning constraints, enabling higher density and expedited construction timelines compared to typical Vancouver projects.^[4]^[8] While praised for addressing housing shortages and advancing Indigenous autonomy, it has drawn scrutiny from local residents over its scale, potential impacts on waterfront views, and rapid pace, though legal challenges have been limited.^[3]^[9]

Pre-Reserve History

Indigenous Use and Cultural Role

Sen̓áḵw functioned as a seasonal village site for the Sḵwx̱wú7mesh Úxwumixw (Squamish Nation), with records indicating continuous use for thousands of years prior to European arrival in the region around 1791.^[1] ^[10] Families from surrounding villages returned each summer to the site, utilizing its coastal position along False Creek for fishing salmon and gathering marine and terrestrial resources essential to sustenance.^[10] This pattern of seasonal occupation supported a resident population of approximately 20 families, totaling around 150 individuals, who relied on the area's abundant natural productivity.^[11] The site's strategic location near productive waters and fertile shores enabled efficient resource extraction, contributing to the viability of Squamish social and economic structures through direct access to protein-rich fisheries and gatherable plants.^[10] Oral histories preserved by the Squamish Nation describe Sen̓áḵw as a hub for these activities, where geographic advantages—such as tidal flats and proximity to salmon runs—causally underpinned population stability without dependency on distant trade networks for basic needs.^[10] Archaeological surveys in the broader Kitsilano area corroborate long-term indigenous presence, with evidence of habitation extending back millennia, though specific excavations at Sen̓áḵw emphasize functional village remains over ceremonial artifacts.^[12] This pre-contact role highlights Sen̓áḵw's integration into Squamish adaptive strategies, where the site's ecology directly facilitated seasonal aggregation and resource processing, fostering community cohesion through shared labor in fishing and preservation.^[1] Such utilization reflects pragmatic responses to environmental affordances, prioritizing empirical yields from local ecosystems over broader territorial expansion.^[10]

European Contact and Initial Colonial Interactions

The first documented European contact with the Squamish people occurred in 1791–1792, when Spanish explorer José María Narváez and British Captain George Vancouver navigated the waters around present-day Vancouver, including Burrard Inlet and the vicinity of Sen̓áḵw. Vancouver's expedition specifically encountered Squamish individuals in June 1792, when a canoe from the nearby Sta'7mes village approached his ships Discovery and Chatham, facilitating initial exchanges that marked peaceful introductory interactions centered on curiosity and basic trade goods. These encounters preceded sustained fur trade involvement, as Squamish communities engaged with the Hudson's Bay Company's Fort Langley, established in 1827 on the Fraser River, where furs such as sea otter pelts were exchanged for European metal tools, textiles, and firearms, integrating Squamish economies into broader Pacific Northwest networks without immediate territorial concessions.^[13]^[14] Epidemics, particularly smallpox, profoundly altered Squamish demographics during this period, with waves originating from earlier maritime contacts exacerbating mortality rates. A major outbreak in 1862–1863 devastated British Columbia's First Nations, including Coast Salish groups like the Squamish, claiming an estimated 50% of coastal populations in affected areas through direct infection and secondary effects like famine from disrupted food systems. Preceding epidemics in the 1770s and early 1800s had already reduced regional Indigenous numbers by 30–60%, as evidenced by explorer observations of pockmarked survivors and abandoned villages, creating a causal depopulation that diminished labor capacity for traditional resource management around sites like Sen̓áḵw. These losses, transmitted via trade routes rather than deliberate policy, established a baseline of vulnerability for subsequent negotiations, with no verifiable evidence of targeted biological warfare in Squamish territory at this stage.^[15]^[16]^[17] By the mid-19th century, incremental settler activities introduced land pressures on Squamish territories, including the Sen̓áḵw area, through resource extraction tied to colonial economic expansion. The 1858 Fraser River Gold Rush spurred non-Indigenous influx, with over 25,000 miners and traders arriving, prompting informal logging operations that cleared cedar stands for shipbuilding and housing, encroaching on Squamish fishing and village sites without formal grants until later. Shipping interests grew via Burrard Inlet ports, where by the 1860s, commercial vessels transported timber exports, indirectly pressuring waterfront access as Squamish laborers were increasingly drawn into wage work loading cargoes, reflecting economic integration amid spatial competition. Early land pre-emptions, totaling several hundred acres by the 1870s around False Creek, quantified this shift through Crown surveys favoring settler claims, though Squamish retained de facto use of Sen̓áḵw for seasonal habitation without recorded violent displacement in this era.^[18]^[13]^[19]

Reserve Establishment and Operation

Formal Designation and Boundaries

The Sen̓áḵw area, located on the south side of False Creek, was initially designated as an Indian reserve in 1869 by the colonial government of British Columbia during surveys conducted by the Royal Engineers, encompassing approximately 37 acres.^[20] This allocation reflected the province's pre-Confederation policy of minimal reserve provisions under administrators like Joseph Trutch, who prioritized settler land access over expansive Indigenous territories.^[21] Following British Columbia's entry into Confederation in 1871, the federal government assumed responsibility for Indigenous affairs, leading to the creation of the Joint Indian Reserve Commission in 1875 to mediate reserve allocations amid provincial reluctance.^[22] In 1877, commissioners Alexander Caulfield Anderson and Gilbert Malcolm Sproat surveyed Sen̓áḵw and formally designated it as Kitsilano Indian Reserve No. 6, expanding it to 80 acres to address Squamish Nation occupancy.^[20] ^[23] The reserve's boundaries were delineated primarily along the False Creek shoreline to the north, extending southward and eastward from the creek mouth, with limits tied to natural features and early trails to accommodate anticipated urban and railway development.^[21] This sizing aligned with other coastal reserves, such as the six allotted in the Vancouver area, which averaged under 100 acres each to balance federal treaty-like obligations under the 1876 Indian Act with provincial demands for land scarcity in growing settlements.^[24]

Daily Life and Population Dynamics

The Sen̓áḵw reserve, designated as Kitsilano Indian Reserve No. 6, supported a small Squamish population estimated at around 150 individuals in approximately 20 families during its pre-reserve village phase, with resident numbers contracting to about a dozen families by 1913 amid broader demographic pressures on coastal First Nations.^[11] Household structures reflected extended family units common among Squamish communities, facilitating shared subsistence and labor activities in proximity to emerging urban Vancouver. Economic life centered on self-sustaining pursuits integrated with seasonal wage opportunities. Fishing, particularly salmon, remained foundational, with individual Squamish fishers recording earnings of $280 over 14 days in 1882 through commercial sales, alongside subsistence practices using gillnets and canoes. Small-scale gardening supplemented diets, producing potatoes and other crops on limited reserve plots, while many residents commuted to wage labor in Vancouver's sawmills, shipyards, and longshoring, where Squamish men earned competitive rates such as $0.45 per hour by 1912.^[25] These activities enabled adaptation to market economies without reliance on external aid, leveraging the reserve's False Creek location for resource access and urban employment.^[25] Infrastructure included traditional plank longhouses housing multiple families, as depicted in early 20th-century artistic records of shoreline settlements, with gradual incorporation of European tools for fishing and gardening. Formal schooling was limited, though missionary influences from nearby Burrard Inlet missions encouraged basic education alongside vocational skills for wage work. Population stability reflected resilience against epidemics that had reduced overall Squamish numbers to 300-600 by the mid-19th century, sustaining community viability through diversified livelihoods.^[25]

Expropriation Process

Legislative and Administrative Actions

The expropriation of Sen̓áḵw, also known as Kitsilano Indian Reserve No. 6, was facilitated primarily through federal mechanisms under the Indian Act, as amended in May 1911 to authorize the relocation of reserves located adjacent to municipalities with populations exceeding 8,000 residents, on grounds of public interest and urban development needs.^[26] This amendment provided the legal rationale for targeting the reserve amid Vancouver's explosive growth, with the city's population rising from 26,000 in 1901 to 120,000 by 1911, necessitating expanded infrastructure for transportation and public amenities. British Columbia's Attorney General, W.J. Bowser, leveraged these provisions to orchestrate a forced surrender of approximately 72 acres in 1913, emphasizing the land's strategic value for railway expansions, bridge approaches, and recreational parks to accommodate the tripling (and more) of the urban populace.^[23] Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) exerted significant influence on earlier partial expropriations, securing rights-of-way through the reserve in 1886 and 1902 under Railway Act authorities for track and terminal development, which set precedents for broader seizures justified by economic imperatives like enhanced connectivity to False Creek.^[27] The 1913 process culminated in a surrender vote amid provincial pressure, with compensation totaling around $300,000 allocated from federal funds for the transferred lands, though disputes arose over adequacy and distribution per band members.^[28] Relocation provisions under the Indian Act directed affected residents to alternative reserves, such as those at Capilano, framed administratively as equitable exchanges for urban progress.^[23] Administrative memos from the Department of Indian Affairs and municipal records underscored the causal linkage to Vancouver's boom, documenting the reserve's obstruction to viaducts, parks, and commercial hubs essential for a city whose population had surged over fourfold in a decade.^[29] Initial validations invoked eminent domain principles inherent in the Indian Act, permitting federal overrides for public utility, though subsequent judicial reviews, including 20th-century rulings, contested the surrender's procedural integrity without retroactively nullifying the 1913-1916 transfers at the time.^[30]

Implementation and Resident Displacement

In early 1913, British Columbia's Attorney General William Bowser organized a meeting on the Kitsilano Reserve (Sen̓áḵw) to enforce a sale agreement, bypassing federal oversight by pressuring residents to sign under duress, with police present to ensure compliance.^[23] ^[31] On April 9, 1913—referred to in contemporary accounts as "Indians Moving Day"—provincial authorities executed the displacement, loading remaining Squamish residents onto barges and transporting them off-site while simultaneously burning all structures in the village to prevent reoccupation.^[23] ^[32] The operation displaced approximately 60-70 Squamish individuals, representing the core of the remaining community after prior population declines, with homes, gardens, and personal effects destroyed in the fires.^[23] Local newspapers reported the events as a swift clearance to enable settler development, noting the land's proximity to Vancouver's expanding urban core.^[23] By mid-1913, the site was cleared, though isolated structures lingered until full demolition by 1916 amid ongoing provincial inquiries into the process.^[31] Squamish residents resisted the agreement, with reports of at least 44 individuals initially refusing to sign the coerced documents during the March meeting, prompting extended provincial enforcement rather than voluntary relocation.^[33] Government officials justified the actions in public statements and news coverage by portraying the reserve as underutilized waterfront property suitable for military or civic use, such as militia training grounds, contrasting Squamish assertions—documented in petitions and oral accounts—that the land supported active habitation, fishing, and gardening despite population pressures from disease and prior encroachments.^[23] ^[29] The displacement sparked public debate and a 1916 legislative inquiry, which examined enforcement tactics but ultimately cleared provincial actors without reversing the evictions.^[31]

Compensation and Immediate Economic Impacts

In March 1913, following a coerced surrender of the Kitsilano Reserve under the Indian Act, the federal Department of Indian Affairs distributed compensation totaling approximately $300,000 to Squamish band members, with twenty men receiving $11,200 each and two receiving $5,000 each based on band membership entitlements.^[34] These per capita payments, while substantial relative to average Indigenous incomes of the era (around $200–$500 annually per household in British Columbia reserves), fell short of market valuations for the 200-acre waterfront parcel; the Canadian Pacific Railway had earlier appraised adjacent lands at $200–$494 per acre in the 1890s, suggesting an undervaluation amid rising urban demand.^[27] Benchmarking against contemporaneous expropriations, such as Vancouver's acquisition of other False Creek sites for railway and port use at premiums exceeding $100 per acre, indicates the settlement prioritized expedited transfer over equitable pricing.^[27] Displacement affected roughly 50 residents, who faced immediate relocation to reserves like Capilano and Burrard Inlet, with government-provided transport via barge but minimal additional support for rebuilding homes or infrastructure, estimated at under $1,000 collectively in outlays.^[23] Loss of prime False Creek access curtailed traditional livelihoods, particularly salmon and eulachon fishing that sustained the village economy; historical records note annual catches supporting 20–30 households pre-expropriation, with post-relocation productivity declining due to inferior sites lacking tidal runs.^[11] Partial offsets emerged from reallocations of proximate reserve acres, enabling some continuity in subsistence activities, though these yielded lower yields per hectare than Sen̓áḵw's resource-rich locale. The transaction's short-term societal effects reflected causal trade-offs: reserve-based stasis yielded limited output (e.g., subsistence fishing valued at under $10,000 annually for the band), whereas repurposing for urban expansion— including port facilities and rail links—accelerated Vancouver's trade volume growth from 5 million tons in 1913 to over 10 million by 1920, amplifying regional GDP through multiplier effects in shipping and industry.^[35] This net economic uplift, driven by higher-value land utilization, outweighed localized Indigenous disruptions in aggregate terms, as evidenced by the city's population surge and infrastructure investments post-surrender.^[23]

Intervening Period

Municipal Utilization of the Lands

Following the expropriation and clearance of structures on the former Kitsilano Reserve lands in 1913, the City of Vancouver repurposed the area for public benefit, beginning with logging operations in the early 1920s conducted by unemployed World War I veterans, which facilitated initial site preparation amid economic pressures.^[36] This adaptive use aligned with the city's expanding urban needs, as portions of the land were designated for parkland to serve a populace that had grown from approximately 30,000 in 1911 to over 120,000 by 1921, enhancing waterfront access previously limited by private or reserve holdings.^[12] By the late 1920s, specific sites within the former reserve boundaries were formalized as public parks, including Hadden Park, donated in 1928 as two city blocks for recreational use, contributing to the neighborhood's integration into Vancouver's green space network without the administrative burdens associated with prior reserve management.^[37] Adjacent developments, such as the 1931 opening of Kitsilano Pool—a saltwater facility drawing crowds for swimming and reflecting efficient low-cost infrastructure leveraging the site's natural contours—further amplified recreational value, with the pool's design accommodating thousands annually in an era of rising demand for affordable leisure amid the Great Depression.^[37] Military applications emerged during World War II, with the Royal Canadian Air Force establishing Station Kitsilano in 1941 on reserve-adjacent lands for training and operations, including seaplane facilities that operated until closure in 1964, after which the site was transferred to the city for park expansion.^[38] Concurrently, in 1942–1943, army units like the Seaforth Highlanders conducted beach assault drills at nearby Kitsilano Beach using amphibious vehicles and anti-aircraft setups, simulating European landings and underscoring the area's strategic waterfront utility for national defense preparedness.^[39] These temporary installations incurred minimal long-term municipal costs, as federal leasing covered operations, allowing seamless postwar reversion to civilian recreation. Infrastructure enhancements included the city's 1930 securing of a right-of-way across the lands for the Burrard Bridge, completed in 1932, which improved connectivity and spurred adjacent road networks, directly benefiting public transit and vehicle access to the growing Kitsilano district.^[36] By the 1960s, further park consolidation under Vanier Park—encompassing museums and open spaces opened progressively from 1958—demonstrated sustained low-maintenance public yield, with the site's evolution from logged tracts to multifaceted civic assets evidencing pragmatic urban adaptation absent indigenous oversight challenges.^[37]

Squamish Nation's Legal Efforts

In 1977, the Squamish Nation, under Chief Joe Mathias, initiated a lawsuit against the Government of Canada in Federal Court, alleging breach of fiduciary duty in the handling of the Kitsilano Reserve (also known as Sen̓áḵw or False Creek Indian Reserve No. 6).^[40] The action, formally commenced on June 30, 1977, centered on the 1913 surrender of reserve lands, claiming the Crown failed to secure informed band consent, pressured residents into relocation, and mismanaged sale proceeds, resulting in inadequate compensation relative to the land's value.^[41] Historical evidence presented included departmental records showing limited consultation—often limited to meetings with select leaders amid threats of withheld rations—and the allocation of only a fraction of proceeds for band relocation and welfare, underscoring procedural deficiencies in fiduciary oversight.^[23] The Federal Court, in Mathias v. The Queen (2001 FCT 480), ruled that Canada breached its fiduciary obligations by not ensuring the surrender served the band's best interests and through negligent administration of funds, acknowledging inadequate safeguards against undue influence.^[41] However, the court upheld the expropriation's validity under contemporaneous Indian Act provisions, which authorized ministerial approval of surrenders despite evident flaws in process, emphasizing that fiduciary breaches did not retroactively void statutorily compliant actions.^[42] This determination reflected procedural limits inherent in challenging historical Crown decisions, where evidence of moral lapses yielded to legal formalities of the era, preventing land restitution through judicial reversal. The case's outcomes reinforced rule-of-law constraints on retroactive claims, as courts prioritized statutory authority over equitable reconsiderations, yet established key precedents for recognizing Crown fiduciary duties in reserve land dealings—paving the way for subsequent negotiations without immediate policy upheaval.^[43] No direct return of lands occurred via litigation, highlighting systemic barriers to overturning expropriations absent explicit legislative reform.^[23]

Land Return and Redevelopment Initiation

Negotiations and Transfer

In 1977, the Squamish Nation initiated legal proceedings against the Government of Canada, alleging breach of fiduciary duty in the management, leasing, and expropriation of Kitsilano Indian Reserve No. 6, including claims under the case Mathias v. Canada.^[1] These negotiations spanned over two decades, culminating in a comprehensive land claims settlement ratified by Squamish Nation members in 2000, which included a $92.5 million payment to resolve multiple historical claims involving reserve lands across British Columbia.^[11] The settlement addressed fiduciary failures dating back to the reserve's establishment in the 1860s, providing financial compensation while relinquishing further claims to the expropriated portions of the original 80-acre site.^[40] The transfer of the remaining 10.48 acres—designated as Sen̓áḵw—occurred in 2003 following Federal Court rulings in 2002 that affirmed the Nation's entitlement to the remnant lands as partial restitution.^[1]^[44] This handover restored federal reserve status to the irregularly shaped parcel adjacent to False Creek, without imposing specific development preconditions beyond standard Indian Act governance, thereby enabling potential economic utilization by the Nation.^[27] The process was driven primarily by protracted litigation outcomes rather than standalone treaty negotiations, reflecting Canada's policy shift toward settling specific claims to mitigate ongoing fiscal liabilities from historical mismanagement, estimated in court to exceed settlement costs through avoided judgments.^[42] No formal federal-provincial accords governed the transfer, as reserve lands fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction; however, the settlement implicitly balanced reconciliation imperatives—emerging in the late 1990s amid Supreme Court precedents on fiduciary duties—with budgetary constraints, channeling funds into a Squamish Nation Trust for long-term community benefit rather than indefinite litigation.^[40] The agreement precluded additional monetary claims tied to Sen̓áḵw, prioritizing land restoration as a foundational step for Nation-led economic initiatives.^[27]

Project Conceptualization and Partnerships

The Sen̓áḵw project was conceptualized by the Squamish Nation in 2019 as a high-density, mixed-use development on the returned reserve lands, aiming to deliver over 6,000 purpose-built rental units across 11 towers to generate sustained revenue while contributing to Vancouver's housing supply.^[44]^[45] The initiative emphasized self-determination through a development model leveraging reserve status, which exempts the project from Vancouver's zoning restrictions and certain provincial regulations like rent controls, allowing approvals solely under Squamish bylaws and internal governance.^[45]^[46] Partnerships formed the core of the project's structure, with the Squamish Nation establishing a 50-50 joint venture with Vancouver-based developer Westbank in 2019 to handle design, financing, and construction expertise.^[47] This private-sector alignment was restructured in August 2025, when OPTrust, a major Canadian pension fund, acquired Westbank's stake in Phases One and Two, maintaining the equal ownership split to ensure continuity and institutional investment stability.^[48]^[49] Federal support complemented these efforts through a $1.4 billion low-cost loan from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) in 2022, marking the largest such funding for an Indigenous-led housing initiative and enabling scalable rental production without full reliance on ongoing subsidies.^[50] The rationale prioritized economic independence for the Squamish Nation, focusing on market-rate rentals—comprising the majority of units—to produce long-term income streams estimated to reach billions over decades, rather than dependency on government aid or below-market mandates.^[1]^[51] While reserving about 250 units for Nation members and allocating 1,200 as affordable rentals, the model aligned with first-principles resource utilization on ancestral lands to address housing shortages through private-public synergies, bypassing municipal constraints that often stifle density.^[44]^[7]

Project Details

Scale, Components, and Housing Focus

The Sen̓áḵw development occupies 10.5 acres of Squamish Nation land on the north shore of False Creek in Vancouver, featuring 11 high-rise residential towers ranging from 12 to 58 storeys in height.^[5]^[52] The project will deliver approximately 6,000 rental housing units, with over 1,200 designated as affordable, emphasizing purpose-built rentals to promote long-term tenancy and community stability rather than condominium sales.^[5]^[6] Mixed-use elements integrate retail spaces, cultural facilities, and public parks within the site, alongside an energy district supporting residential and commercial functions, all designed to maximize land use efficiency on the constrained urban footprint.^[5] The high density, peaking at 58 storeys, addresses Vancouver's housing supply shortages by concentrating development vertically, though it exceeds typical zoning allowances in surrounding areas.^[52]^[4] Construction occurs in four phases, enabling phased delivery of units while minimizing disruption.^[5]

Sustainability and Infrastructure Features

The Sen̓áḵw development incorporates a 10 MW district energy system that utilizes waste heat extracted from Metro Vancouver's sewer infrastructure via SHARC Energy's wastewater energy transfer technology, providing heating and cooling to all buildings without reliance on fossil fuels.^[5] This system is projected to eliminate 120,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over 30 years compared to a conventional natural gas baseline, equivalent to the carbon sequestration of 2.2 million tree seedlings grown for a decade.^[5] Approved by the British Columbia Utilities Commission in November 2023, the low-carbon thermal network supports the project's net-zero operational carbon aspirations and is designed for scalability to adjacent properties.^[53] To reduce transportation-related emissions, the project limits parking to approximately 850 stalls for over 6,000 residential units, enforcing a car-lite model that prioritizes public transit, cycling, and walking over private vehicle use.^[54] Transportation planning, informed by a Squamish Nation-commissioned study, includes a dedicated transit hub, new bus stops, and integration with Vancouver's all-ages-and-abilities cycling network, alongside upgraded waterfront pathways and protected bike lanes to align with the city's Transportation 2040 and Climate Emergency Action Plans.^[54] Access is managed via two controlled entry points—primary at Fir Street and West 1st Avenue, secondary at Greer Avenue and Chestnut Street—to mitigate peak traffic volumes, though detailed modeling data remains internal to the developer.^[54] Buildings adhere to or exceed British Columbia Energy Step Code Level 3 standards, achieving at least 20% greater efficiency than baseline requirements, with one structure employing mass timber construction for enhanced material sustainability.^[55] No specific LEED certifications or electric vehicle charging infrastructure details have been publicly detailed, though the overall design emphasizes empirical reductions in operational emissions through centralized energy utility and minimized on-site vehicle dependency rather than unverified green branding.^[5]

Economic Model and Funding

The Sen̓áḵw project's funding structure relies on a combination of government-backed loans and private institutional investment to support rental-focused development. In September 2022, the federal government provided a $1.4 billion low-interest construction loan through the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's Rental Construction Financing Initiative, the largest such loan in CMHC history, specifically earmarked for Phases 1 and 2 to finance over 1,400 rental units.^[56]^[44] This initiative facilitates below-market rental rates while enabling scalable construction without immediate equity dilution for the Squamish Nation. Phases 1 and 2 incorporate equity partnerships with pension funds for risk-sharing and capital infusion. As of August 28, 2025, OPTrust, a major Canadian pension fund managing retirement assets for Ontario public workers, acquired a 50% ownership stake by purchasing developer Westbank's prior interest, reflecting a shift toward institutional investors prioritizing long-term stable returns from rental income over short-term development flips.^[48]^[57] The Squamish Nation retains full ownership of Phases 3 and 4, allowing it to capture undiluted future revenues and advance toward financial independence from external developers.^[49] The core economic model emphasizes perpetual rental income over sales, with projections estimating $10 billion to $13 billion in revenues over the 100-year lifespan from approximately 6,000 units, including 1,200 affordable rentals, to sustain Nation-wide priorities such as education, healthcare, and enterprise expansion.^[58]^[59] This generates recurring cash flows independent of government transfers, contrasting with reserve-based economies often limited to resource extraction or subsidies, though vulnerability to Vancouver's high-demand rental market cycles introduces risks of occupancy fluctuations or interest rate sensitivity on leveraged debt.^[60] Development phases are anticipated to yield hundreds of direct jobs in construction, property management, and artisan trades, alongside entrepreneurial opportunities for Squamish members, injecting wages into local economies and amplifying GDP contributions through multiplier effects in supply chains.^[7]^[44] Empirical outcomes from similar Indigenous-led urban projects demonstrate wealth accumulation potential, as rental models have historically outperformed stagnant reserve land uses by harnessing proximity to high-value markets for sustained returns.^[61]

Construction and Timeline

Key Milestones

Pre-construction activities at Sen̓áḵw began in July 2022, including the installation of fencing, signage, and mobilization of site trailers and equipment.^[62] A formal groundbreaking ceremony occurred on September 6, 2022, marking the official start of site development on Squamish Nation lands.^[1] In May 2022, prior to groundbreaking, the Squamish Nation and the City of Vancouver finalized a services agreement providing for utility connections, including water, sewer, and electrical services, while accommodating the project's scale and heights exempt from municipal zoning due to reserve status.^[63] ^[64] This resolved potential disputes over infrastructure integration, enabling construction to proceed without standard city height restrictions.^[55] Tower foundation work commenced in 2023, with Phase 1 activities focusing on the initial three towers; Tower 3 construction started on May 24, 2023, followed by foundation mat rebar installation in June and core footings for Tower 2 in July.^[65] ^[66] By spring 2025, the first three towers in Phase 1 had reached topping out, with Tower 1 completing its structural ascent first in early 2025, followed by the others at heights of 27, 32, and 40 storeys.^[67] ^[5] Minor delays affected ancillary works, such as storm and sanitary sewer extensions pushed to March and February 2025 respectively due to site conditions and approvals, alongside a postponement of Phase 2 excavation to fall 2025.^[68] Despite these, the project advanced on schedule for phased occupancy, with the first tower anticipated for completion by early 2026 and initial residents possibly entering late 2025.^[69] ^[61]

Recent Developments and Status

In August 2025, Westbank sold its entire ownership stake in Phases 1 and 2 of the Sen̓áḵw project to OPTrust, a Canadian pension fund, resulting in equal 50% ownership between OPTrust and the Squamish Nation for those phases; this restructuring was described by the Nation as enhancing project stability and long-term financing.^[48]^[67] Construction progress in 2025 included the energization of permanent power to the main electrical rooms in August, alongside ongoing installation of main distribution piping in the district energy plant and parkade areas.^[68] The first three towers have advanced significantly, with structural floors rising and exterior work underway, positioning the project to achieve key infrastructure milestones.^[69] Occupancy projections indicate that initial rental units in the first tower could become available for residents by late 2025, with full completion of Phase 1 targeted for early 2026; approximately half of the project's rental homes, or 3,000 units, are slated for completion between 2025 and 2028.^[69]^[70] Site activities, including crane operations and material deliveries, reflect steady advancement toward these timelines, coordinated with local infrastructure adjustments planned for 2026 onward.^[4]

Controversies and Criticisms

Density and Infrastructure Concerns

Opponents of the Sen̓áḵw development have raised concerns that its scale—encompassing over 6,000 residential units on 10.5 acres—will exacerbate traffic congestion and strain local infrastructure in the Kits Point area, given the limited on-site parking of approximately 850 stalls.^[54]^[4] Resident petitions organized by the Kits Point Residents Association from 2022 to 2024 highlighted these issues, arguing that the high density would overwhelm narrow local roads like those near Cornwall Avenue and lead to increased vehicle circulation without adequate mitigations.^[71] City engagement summaries from the same period identified parking loss and elevated traffic volumes as the top public concerns, with fears of spillover effects into adjacent neighborhoods due to the project's car-minimal design assuming heavy reliance on public transit.^[72] The proposed parking ratio of roughly 0.14 stalls per resident falls below typical urban averages for rental developments in Metro Vancouver, where ratios often range from 0.5 to 1.0 depending on location and transit access, potentially displacing vehicles to street parking in an area already facing shortages.^[54] Preliminary traffic impact assessments referenced in project agreements with the City of Vancouver projected localized increases in vehicle trips, though exact modeling details remain tied to assumptions of transit uptake amid Vancouver's ongoing push for reduced car dependency through expansions like the SkyTrain network.^[73] Critics contend this could result in 20-30% higher peak-hour volumes on key arterials without proportional infrastructure scaling, contrasting with the city's modeling that emphasizes funded upgrades such as pedestrian and cycling paths to offset impacts.^[44] While the project contributes to alleviating Vancouver's acute housing shortage—where annual starts have hovered around 700 units in recent years against demand far exceeding supply, necessitating tens of thousands more units regionally—the density raises risks of congestion if transit modal shares underperform expectations.^[74]^[75] Proponents note that payments under the services agreement will fund specific infrastructure enhancements, including road and transit improvements, to accommodate the influx, though opponents argue these may prove insufficient for the anticipated resident population of up to 6,000 without broader regional upgrades.^[44]^[54]

Legal and Community Opposition

In October 2022, the Kits Point Residents Association filed a petition in the British Columbia Supreme Court seeking judicial review of the services agreement between the City of Vancouver and the Squamish Nation for the Sen̓áḵw project, alleging breaches of procedural fairness due to inadequate public consultation and secrecy in negotiations.^[76]^[77] The association argued the agreement, which enables the city to provide utilities and services to the reserve-based development, was unlawful and unreasonable, potentially diminishing the site's heritage value and neighborhood character.^[78] On September 29, 2023, Justice Christopher Forth dismissed the petition, ruling there were no legal grounds to impugn the city's decision, as the negotiation process did not violate duties of fairness given the federal jurisdiction over reserve lands and the limited scope of the agreement.^[79]^[80] A separate challenge by the Kitsilano Residents Association sought review of the city's public input process on the project, but it too faced rejection, reinforcing that provincial courts lack authority to override First Nation sovereignty on reserve developments under section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867, which assigns exclusive federal jurisdiction over "Indians, and Lands reserved for the Indians."^[81]^[43] Proponents, including Squamish Nation leaders, framed these outcomes as affirming reconciliation and property rights, allowing the Nation to exercise self-determination on reclaimed ancestral lands without municipal veto.^[79] Community opposition, led by groups like the Kits Point Residents Association and Kitsilano Point Residents Association, centered on the project's potential to obstruct established view corridors from high-rise towers—up to 60 storeys—toward the North Shore mountains and waterfront, altering sightlines protected under Vancouver's view protection guidelines for non-reserve lands.^[82]^[76] Critics also invoked heritage concerns, arguing the development would erode the cultural and historical integrity of adjacent Vanier Park, a site with longstanding public use and proximity to museums, by introducing an access road and overshadowing green spaces tied to the area's pre-expropriation Indigenous history.^[83] These groups contended the scale represented unchecked development, prioritizing Nation interests over adjacent property owners' expectations of preserved aesthetics and light access, though courts upheld the Nation's autonomous land-use rights absent federal intervention.^[84] Supporters countered that such opposition overlooked the reserve's exemption from local zoning and reflected resistance to Indigenous-led growth amid housing shortages, positioning Sen̓áḵw as a model of restorative justice rather than neighborhood erosion.^[85]

Broader Policy Implications

The Sen̓áḵw development exemplifies a policy model where reserve lands enable First Nations to circumvent municipal zoning restrictions, allowing for denser housing construction in urban areas constrained by local bylaws. Located on Kitsilano Indian Reserve No. 6, the project proceeds under Squamish Nation authority without Vancouver's zoning approvals, facilitating up to 6,000 rental units across 18 towers—exceeding the city's annual residential output by a factor of 4.5.^[7]^[59] This exemption stems from federal jurisdiction over reserves, creating a precedent for other Indigenous groups to accelerate supply in high-demand markets like Vancouver, where zoning limits have contributed to chronic shortages.^[86] Such approaches could causally expand housing availability by prioritizing land use efficiency over fragmented municipal controls, though they necessitate coordinated provincial oversight for integrated infrastructure.^[59] Economically, Sen̓áḵw prioritizes revenue generation through market-rate rentals to foster Squamish Nation self-sufficiency, funding education, social services, and member housing without perpetual reliance on transfers. Projections indicate the project will yield long-term income streams, positioning it as a capitalist venture rather than a symbolic gesture, with development costs borne primarily by the Nation via partnerships rather than direct public subsidies.^[1]^[87] This model counters welfare dependency by converting underutilized reserve assets into productive capital, potentially replicable for urban reserves nationwide, though critics note risks of fiscal strain if occupancy or rents underperform amid economic downturns.^[7] Policy tensions arise from diminished municipal leverage, as self-governed developments may overlook broader urban signals like parking demand or traffic integration, prioritizing Indigenous priorities over city-wide planning coherence. While framed in some narratives as decolonization, the project's market-driven density aligns with supply-side realism to alleviate shortages, yet invites scrutiny over unpriced externalities such as infrastructure upgrades funded partly through servicing agreements.^[86]^[73] Empirical outcomes will test whether such exemptions sustainably boost supply without eroding coordinated governance, informing federal policies on reserve commercialization.^[59]

References

[1]
Sen̓áḵw - Squamish Nation
Sen̓áḵw is a long-standing Squamish village, located on False Creek, and is being redeveloped to right a historic wrong and generate economic wealth.
[2]
Sen̓áḵw – The Story of the Festival Site | Bard on the Beach
Sen̓áḵw was a vibrant Coast Salish village, a place of gathering, culture, and governance, and a major trading location. It was later forcibly removed and ...<|separator|>
[3]
Sen̓áḵw
The name for Sen̓áḵw is representative of its place. It can be interpreted as “The place inside the head of False Creek.” ...Construction Update · Project · Place · Careers
[4]
Sen̓áḵw development | City of Vancouver
Sen̓áḵw is a development project on 10.5-acres of Squamish Nation land located on Kits Point adjacent to Vanier Park.
[5]
Project - Sen̓áḵw
Sen̓áḵw is a 10.5-acre project with 6,000+ rental and 1,200+ affordable homes, and is Canada's first large-scale net-zero carbon housing development.
[6]
Sen̓áḵw': A sneak peek inside Canada's largest Indigenous ... - CBC
Feb 7, 2025 · The Squamish Nation said the development is the largest Indigenous-led housing and retail development in the history of Canada.
[7]
Sen̓áḵw | Nch'ḵaỷ
Sen̓áḵw is a 10.5-acre development with 6000+ rental properties, aiming to provide affordable housing, net-zero emissions, and economic independence for the ...<|separator|>
[8]
Sen̓áḵw's past becomes a foundation for the future - Kasian
Sen̓áḵw is a historical Squamish project with 11 residential towers, community space, and is the largest First Nations development, defining a future foundation.
[9]
Sen̓áḵw: A sneak peek inside Canada's largest Indigenous-led ...
Feb 7, 2025 · Everyone is praising how fast-acting this project is, and I agree it is a breath of fresh air to see that, plus getting 6000 units of housing is ...Squamish Nation says first Sen̓áḵw units available to rent this year ...Anyone involved with the Sen̓áḵw development in Vancouver?More results from www.reddit.com
[10]
Place - Sen̓áḵw
Long before the arrival of European settlers in the Vancouver area in 1791, Sḵwx̱wú7mesh (Squamish) ancestors had a village at Sen̓áḵw. Every year, families from ...Missing: contact | Show results with:contact
[11]
The little-known history of Squamish Nation land in Vancouver - CBC
Apr 21, 2019 · The land the Squamish Nation wants to develop was once part of an ancient village called Sen̓áḵw that was home to about 20 Squamish families or 150 people.
[12]
The Hidden History of Kitsilano Beach - Montecristo Magazine
Jul 26, 2019 · Their family's habitation of the area went back at least three generations (although archaeological evidence of First Nations activity goes back ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[13]
BC – Squamish Nation - First Nations History
Mar 27, 2025 · First Contact with Europeans European explorers arrived in Squamish territory in the late 18th century. Spanish expeditions, including those ...Missing: 1790s | Show results with:1790s
[14]
Our History | Tourism Squamish
European Contact In 1792, a Squamish Nation canoe paddled out from Sta'7mes Village to meet explorer Capt. George Vancouver and Lt. Peter Puget at a point ...Missing: 1790s | Show results with:1790s
[15]
Indigenous Communities and Pandemics, Past and Present | Firelight
Jul 31, 2020 · On the Northwest Coast, the 1862 smallpox epidemic was devastating, killing approximately half of the Indigenous people living along the coast ...
[16]
(PDF) The Impact of the 1862-63 Smallpox Epidemic on British ...
Aug 10, 2025 · The smallpox epidemic of 1862-63 had a devastating effect on British Columbia's First Nations, impacting the lives of both individuals and communities.
[17]
Smallpox epidemic ravages Native Americans on the northwest ...
Jan 23, 2003 · During the 1770s, smallpox (variola major) eradicates at least 30 percent of the native population on the Northwest coast of North America.Missing: 19th | Show results with:19th
[18]
Accumulation by repossession: Capitalist settler colonialism in ...
Jan 16, 2025 · The broader area around today's Jericho and Sen̓áḵw sites had been used for cultural, harvesting and residential purposes by the Indigenous ...<|separator|>
[19]
[PDF] The Squamish aboriginal economy, 1860-1940 - SFU Summit
Aug 12, 1996 · Colonial officials were keen to accept these demands,' despite the encroachment of Stamp's lands on the Squamish settlement.
[20]
[PDF] The History of the Kitsilano Indian Reserve
The site was home to an ancient village where several Indigenous families ... In 2002, following decades-long legal proceedings, the Squamish Na- tion ...
[21]
Mapping Tool: Kitsilano Reserve | indigenousfoundations
The following chronology and maps provide and approximation of some of the changes to the Kitsilano reserve, illustrating its transformation from a Coast ...
[22]
1886 Joint Indian Reserve Commission - Ma'amtagila Nation
The formation of the Joint Indian Reserve Commission in 1876 was intended to resolve these disputes. It operated until 1878 and was comprised of three ...
[23]
When Settlers Seized and Set Fire to the Kitsilano Reserve | The Tyee
Feb 5, 2025 · As the Squamish Nation rebuilds with an ambitious new housing project, a scholar examines its long history of displacement.Missing: archaeology | Show results with:archaeology
[24]
https://aptnnews.ca/national-news/squamish-nation-proposing-to-build-3000-affordable-units-on-its-reserve-land-in-vancouver/
[25]
[PDF] INDIANS AT WORK: An Informal History of Native Labour in British ...
Subsistence gardening even spread to many of the reserves along the coast, where the basic economy was fishing and wage work. Some families in fishing ...
[26]
http://www.falsecreeksouth.org/2019/11/our-home-on-native-land/
[27]
History of Vancouver - Wikipedia
That year Vancouver's population was 1,000; by 1891 it reached 14,000 and by 1901 it was 26,000. The population increased to 120,000 by 1911.
[28]
Sen̓áḵw History - Kits Point Residents Association
The Federal Government allotted 91 acres (34 hectares) of the land to the Squamish Nation, naming it Kitsilano Indian Reserve no. 6, named after August Jack ...Missing: archaeology | Show results with:archaeology
[29]
https://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/bcstudies/article/download/626/669/2709
[30]
[PDF] Canada has become increasingly urban. More and more
... 1913; “Militia Want Indian Lands at Kitsilano,”. Vancouver World, 9 April 1913; “Kitsilano Indian Reserve Bargain,” Vancouver World, 11 April. 1913. In ...
[31]
Property and Sovereignty: An Indian Reserve and a Canadian City
The history of the Kitsilano Reserve as a property interest, and understood as a delegation of sovereignty to the False Creek Indian Band,, revealls not only ...
[32]
The Kitsilano Scandal | BC Studies: The British Columbian Quarterly
Oct 25, 2024 · This article looks at the 1913 destruction of the Sḵwx̱wú7mesh village of Sen̓áḵw, located on the Kitsilano Reserve of the Squamish Tribe.Missing: expropriation | Show results with:expropriation
[33]
When Settlers Seized and Set Fire to the Kitsilano Reserve - The Tyee
In 1913, B.C.'s attorney general forced the original residents into an illegal sale of their land, sent them away on barges and burned the village of ...
[34]
(PDF) Erasing Indigenous Indigeneity in Vancouver - Academia.edu
18 The Kitsilano Reserve, also known as the False Creek Reserve and Reserve No. 6, acquired much of its appeal for residents through its access to natural ...
[35]
https://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/bcstudies/article/download/198880/193263/260006
[36]
[PDF] THE KITSILANO SCANDAL: The Destruction of Sen̓áḵw as Told in ...
ignated Kitsilano Indian Reserve No. 6, sometimes known as the False ... population ... by the Canadian Pacific Railway in 1886 and 1902, long before the 1913.
[37]
History | Digital Natives - other sights
1876-1877 In 1876, the federal and provincial governments establish the Joint Indian Reserve Commission to allot Indian reserves throughout British Columbia.Missing: boundaries | Show results with:boundaries
[38]
[PDF] HISTORIC KITSILANO - Vancouver Heritage Foundation
Kitsilano's history includes indigenous people, the CPR, and the gold rush. The area was evaluated for docks, and industrial, business, and real-estate ...
[39]
BRITISH COLUMBIA - Canadian Military History
Several bases were either downsized, merged or closed and as a result, RCAF Station Kitsilano closed in 1964 and was sold to the City of Vancouver for parkland.
[40]
Check out these historic WW2 photos from Vancouver
Nov 11, 2022 · Vancouver's popular Kitsilano Beach was the site of training exercises back in 1942 and 43 as the Allies prepared to land on European ...Missing: Reserve 1920s
[41]
Squamish Nation Trust
... first commenced by the late Chief Joe Mathias on June 30, 1977. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Trust holds the funds for the benefit of the current ...Missing: v | Show results with:v
[42]
Mathias et al. v. Canada et al. - vLex
This case concerned competing interests in the False Creek Indian Reserve, originally created in 1869, in the City of Vancouver, British Columbia.Missing: Kitsilano | Show results with:Kitsilano
[43]
Aboriginal and Treaty Rights - Ratcliff LLP
Canadian Pacific – Claim for land in Kitsilano Point area of Vancouver against the Canadian Pacific Railway resulting in the return to the Squamish Nation of 10 ...
[44]
Kits Point Residents Association v Vancouver, 2023 BCSC 1706
Jan 5, 2024 · In 1977, Squamish Nation successfully sued Canada for the mismanagement of the Kitsilano Reserve and received in return the 10.5-acre parcel, ...Missing: 1911-1913 | Show results with:1911-1913
[45]
FAQ - Sen̓áḵw
The contaminants at Sen̓áḵw are remnant of the uses between 1913 (when the land was taken from the Squamish Nation) and 2003 (when a portion of it was returned).
[46]
'Forging new ground': Squamish Nation planning 11 towers next to ...
Nov 5, 2019 · The Squamish Nation does not require city approval to build 6000 units of mostly rental apartments at the south end of the Burrard Bridge, ...Missing: Sen̓áḵw zoning exemption
[47]
Squamish Nation doubles proposed Kits development to 11 towers ...
Nov 5, 2019 · That proposal has now expanded to include an estimated 6,000 units, of which 80-90 per cent would be rental. ... exempt from city bylaws or the ...Missing: zoning | Show results with:zoning<|separator|>
[48]
OPTrust Buys Out Westbank From Sen̓áḵw Project By Squamish ...
Aug 29, 2025 · The Squamish Nation and its members chose prominent developer Westbank as their partner for Sen̓áḵw in 2019 and formed a 50-50 partnership ...Missing: conceptualization unveiling
[49]
Sen̓áḵw development partnership welcomes 50 ... - OPTrust
Aug 28, 2025 · Sen̓áḵw development partnership welcomes 50% ownership stake by Canadian pension fund, OPTrust · About Sen̓áḵw · About Sḵwx̱wú7mesh Úxwumixw · About ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
[50]
Sen̓áḵw continues to grow stronger - Squamish Nation
Aug 28, 2025 · As part of a restructured partnership, OPTrust—one of Canada's largest pension fund investors—has acquired Westbank's stake in Phases One and ...Missing: conceptualization 2019 unveiling CMHC
[51]
Canada provides $1.4 billion for 3,000 rental homes in deal ... - CBC
Sep 6, 2022 · The Squamish Nation said the development is the largest Indigenous-led housing and retail development in the history of Canada.
[52]
Senakw development in Kitsilano to generate up to $10 ... - Daily Hive
Dec 5, 2019 · Senakw development in Kitsilano to generate up to $10 billion for Squamish First Nation · Squamish Nation planning 6,000 new homes next to ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
[53]
Skyscrapers planned for Indigenous land "look like the future of ...
Oct 18, 2023 · Sen̓áḵw consists of mostly residential space, all rental, which will be open to the general public, with 250 units reserved for members of the ...
[54]
BCUC approves Senakw district energy plant
Nov 8, 2023 · “The panel finds a need for low carbon heating and cooling for the Senakw development,” said the decision. “Further, of the low carbon ...Missing: sustainability features LEED
[55]
Frequently asked questions | Kits Point transportation changes
Sen̓áḵw(External link) is being designed as a car-lite minimal parking development with roughly 850 vehicle parking stalls for 6,000 residents, ...Missing: Senákw | Show results with:Senákw
[56]
Servicing Agreement for Squamish Nation's Senakw Development ...
Aug 8, 2022 · The buildings will meet or exceed BC Energy Code Step 3 (the buildings will be 20% more efficient) and one building will be a mass timber ...Missing: seismic | Show results with:seismic
[57]
Historic partnership between Canada and Sḵwx̱wú7mesh ...
Sep 6, 2022 · This project is the largest First Nations economic partnership and the largest loan from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) ...
[58]
OPTrust acquires 50% stake in Sen̓áḵw, Westbank exits project
Aug 29, 2025 · Westbank had first forged the 50/50 development partnership with Squamish Nation in 2019. ... In 2019, the Nation began efforts to develop Sen̓áḵw.Missing: conceptualization | Show results with:conceptualization
[59]
The legacy of Sen̓áḵw - REMI Network
Sep 27, 2023 · Sen̓áḵw is a testament to Indigenous land ownership and an economic legacy expected to generate more than $10 billion for the Squamish ...Missing: interactions | Show results with:interactions
[60]
How Vancouver's First Nations became Canada's biggest real estate ...
Jul 22, 2024 · Slated for completion in 2030, Sen̓áḵw is expected to generate up to $13 billion for the Nation, whose ancestors occupied a fishing and trading ...Missing: creation | Show results with:creation<|separator|>
[61]
Lessons from the Squamish Nation's ambitious new rental housing ...
Feb 6, 2020 · One of the main benefits to the Squamish Nation of the Sen̓áḵw project will be economic—a large, steady new revenue stream from rents, as well as ...
[62]
Squamish Nation nears milestone as Sen̓áḵw construction ...
Apr 9, 2025 · It takes decades for First Nations to build their economic development groups and businesses, so the Sen̓áḵw project is on the cusp of making history.Missing: funding | Show results with:funding
[63]
Timeline shows history of Vancouver's Sen̓áḵw project - SiteNews
Sep 9, 2022 · 1791: European settlers arrive in the Vancouver area. Prior to this, Squamish ancestors had a village at Senákw. Every year, families from upper ...Missing: interactions | Show results with:interactions
[64]
Squamish Nation and Vancouver sign Senakw service deal
May 25, 2022 · The agreement is designed to provide utilities from the city to the First Nation development, which plans to build 11-towers near the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[65]
[PDF] Sen̓áḵw Services Agreement - City of Vancouver
Jun 20, 2022 · “Member” means an individual member of the Nation under the Squamish Nation. Membership Code 2000 (as amended or replaced from to time), and ...
[66]
Sen̓áḵw Development - Start of Tower 3 Construction - May 24, 2023
May 24, 2023 · Sen̓áḵw Development - Start of Tower 3 Construction - May 24, 2023. 298 views · 2 years ago SEN̓ÁḴW DEVELOPMENT ...more. Zepfancouver. 2.74K.Missing: foundations | Show results with:foundations
[67]
Foundation Mat Re-bar Work for Tower 3 - June 16, 2023 - Imgur
Sen̓áḵw Development - Foundation Mat Re-bar Work for Tower 3 - June 16, 2023. steel-construction-post9971429-Sen-w-Development-Foundation-Mat-. Select .<|separator|>
[68]
Westbank sells its entire stake in the Senakw rental housing project
Aug 28, 2025 · Westbank has sold its entire ownership stake in Squamish Nation's Senakw rental housing project, with OPTrust now being a new lead owner.
[69]
Construction Update - Sen̓áḵw
The installation of the new storm line on the seawall to service the first phase of Sen̓áḵw is expected to be complete on April 4th and the Seawall will be re- ...
[70]
First residents could move into Senakw's first tower by late 2025
Mar 24, 2025 · The first three towers of Senakw in Vancouver are now taking shape, with the first tower set to reach completion no later than early 2026.Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
[71]
58,000 new homes now in pipeline or under review in Vancouver
Nov 7, 2024 · Half of Senakw, about 3,000 rental homes, will reach completion between 2025 and 2028. The single largest housing project currently under ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[72]
SENAKW Petition Update - Kits Point Residents Association
Work on our Petition challenging the Vancouver City Council decision ... density on basic livability issues such as traffic and parking in our area.Missing: infrastructure 2022-2024
[73]
[PDF] Kits Point Engagement Summary - Shape Your City Vancouver
Page 5 provides further details . Top Three Concerns. • Parking loss. • Increased traffic volumes. • Vehicle circulation concerns.Missing: density petitions
[74]
[PDF] Sen̓áḵw Services Agreement - Squamish Nation
an action in court where that Party is seeking a remedy of specific performance, injunction, or any other non-monetary remedy (as opposed to an action for.
[75]
How Vancouver aims to spur new housing construction amid ... - OPB
Jun 24, 2025 · If current trends continue, the city of Vancouver can expect to build roughly 700 new housing units this year.
[76]
Fall 2025 Housing Supply Report - CMHC
Sep 9, 2025 · According to the report Canada's Housing Supply Shortages: Moving to a New Framework, starts must rise by about 30% in Vancouver and 70% in ...
[77]
Kits Point Residents Association takes the city to court over Sen̓áḵw
Oct 6, 2022 · The Kits Point Residents Association filed its petition on Wednesday and wants the court to declare the city breached its duty of procedural ...Missing: rejection grounds
[78]
Senakw services agreement judicial review begins in B.C. Supreme ...
Apr 18, 2023 · Five B.C. Court of Appeal judges unanimously agreed in 2002 to return to Squamish Nation 10.5 acres of land that had been expropriated for the ...
[79]
Decision in KPRA Petition Received - Kits Point Residents Association
The court decided that there were not grounds to legally impugn the decision of the City to enter into the Services Agreement.<|separator|>
[80]
B.C. court rejects challenge to huge Squamish Nation housing ...
Oct 3, 2023 · Kits Point Residents Association filed court petition in October 2022 claiming deal was cloaked in 'secrecy'.
[81]
Court rejects Kitsilano group's petition to stop First Nation's Senakw ...
Sep 29, 2023 · BC's Supreme Court has rejected the claim there was wrongdoing by the City of Vancouver and Squamish First Nation over the Senakw project.
[82]
B.C. court rejects challenge to huge Squamish Nation housing ...
Oct 3, 2023 · The Kitsilano Residents Association is looking for a judicial review of the City of Vancouver's public input on the Squamish Nation-led project.
[83]
Senakw development raises concerns in Kits Point
May 14, 2021 · It may be hard to imagine living in the shadows of 50-storey towers, but that is what parts of Kitsilano are now facing as plans for Senakw ...Missing: opposition view
[84]
"Kits Point Residents Association takes the city to court over Senakw ...
Oct 5, 2022 · The association says it is not opposed to the development, but is concerned with the "size, density, heights of towers and the affect the ...Can indigenous people trust developers in Vanier Park? - FacebookSquamish Nation's Senakw Development Advances - FacebookMore results from www.facebook.com
[85]
B.C. Supreme Court dismisses challenge to Vancouver City Hall's ...
Oct 3, 2023 · The Kits Point Residents Association challenged Vancouver's services agreement because it was negotiated without public consultation.
[86]
First Nation council slams Kitsilano group's court fight against Senakw
Oct 7, 2022 · First Nations Leadership Council has slammed a court petition by a Kitsilano resident group against the Senakw redevelopment in Vancouver.Missing: heritage | Show results with:heritage
[87]
Vancouver's new mega-development is big, ambitious and ...
Mar 11, 2024 · Because the project is on First Nations land, not city land, it's under Squamish authority, free of Vancouver's zoning rules. And the Nation ...Missing: exemption | Show results with:exemption
[88]
An Indigenous capital switch? First Nation real-estate development ...
Apr 7, 2025 · This story is told by discussing the three First Nation real-estate developments Sen̓áḵw, Heather Lands, and Jericho Lands. To that end, I draw ...<|separator|>