Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Shahab-3

The Shahab-3 is a single-stage, liquid-fueled, road-mobile medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) developed by Iran, with an estimated range of 1,300 kilometers when carrying a 750-1,000 kilogram payload.^[1]^[2] It employs an inertial navigation system derived from earlier Scud-based designs, resulting in a circular error probable (CEP) of approximately 2,500 meters.^[1] The missile represents Iran's initial successful effort to indigenously produce an MRBM capable of reaching targets throughout the Middle East, including Israel, and draws heavily from North Korean Nodong-1 technology acquired in the 1990s.^[1] First publicly tested in July 1998, the Shahab-3 has been iteratively improved through variants such as the Ghadr and Emad, which incorporate enhancements to range, reentry vehicle design, and guidance for potentially greater accuracy, though independent assessments question the extent of these improvements beyond Iranian claims.^[3]^[4] Deployed by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the system underscores Tehran's emphasis on asymmetric deterrence amid regional tensions and international sanctions targeting its ballistic missile program.^[5]^[6]

Overview and Technical Characteristics

Design Features and Propulsion

The Shahab-3 employs a single-stage liquid-propellant rocket engine derived from the North Korean Nodong design, utilizing unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) as fuel and a mixture of nitric acid with approximately 27% nitrogen tetroxide (N2O4) as oxidizer, enabling hypergolic ignition upon contact.^[7] ^[8] This propulsion system delivers a sea-level thrust of approximately 255-280 kN, powering the missile through its boost phase.^[9] ^[8] The engine features a gimbaled nozzle for thrust vector control, providing basic trajectory adjustments during ascent.^[10] The missile's airframe measures about 16 meters in length and 1.25 meters in diameter, with a launch weight of roughly 16,000-17,000 kg, incorporating an aerodynamic reentry vehicle atop the propellant tanks.^[1] ^[11] This configuration, while effective for medium-range flight, relies on initial imported components from North Korean suppliers, with subsequent Iranian efforts to substitute domestic parts revealing persistent dependencies in critical subsystems like guidance and materials.^[12] A key operational limitation stems from the liquid fueling process, which requires loading toxic, corrosive propellants shortly before launch—typically taking 30 minutes to several hours—leaving the missile vulnerable to detection and preemptive counterforce strikes during preparation.^[13] ^[14] Unlike solid-fueled systems, this extended setup time necessitates forward deployment of unfueled missiles, increasing logistical risks and exposure to surveillance.^[2]

Specifications and Performance Metrics

The Shahab-3 achieves a nominal range of 800-1,300 km with a payload of 760-1,200 kg, though independent estimates peg the effective maximum at approximately 1,300 km under standard loading conditions, with range extending to around 1,700 km when employing lighter warheads.^[1]^[15] Iranian official claims assert capabilities up to 2,000 km with a 1,000 kg payload, but such figures are viewed skeptically by Western analysts due to inconsistencies with observed test data and the missile's North Korean-derived No Dong design, which imposes physical limits on fuel efficiency and structural integrity.^[16]^[1] Accuracy remains a key limitation, with a circular error probable (CEP) of about 2,500 meters for baseline variants, rendering the system suitable primarily for saturating large areas rather than pinpoint strikes.^[1]^[17] During reentry, the missile attains speeds approaching Mach 7, contributing to its kinetic energy but also exacerbating dispersion from atmospheric stresses on the rudimentary reentry vehicle.^[18] Ballistic trajectory modeling indicates a flight duration of 10-15 minutes to maximum range, with an apogee altitude of roughly 150 km for nominal profiles.^[19]

Specification	Value
Length	15.6-16.58 m
Diameter	1.25-1.38 m
Launch weight	~17,410 kg
Propulsion	Single-stage liquid-fueled
Warhead payload	760-1,200 kg

Guidance Systems and Accuracy Limitations

The Shahab-3 employs a basic inertial navigation system (INS) derived from North Korean Nodong technology, relying on gyroscopes and accelerometers to track position, velocity, and orientation during flight without external updates.^[1]^[17] This system, analogous to that in Scud variants, provides rudimentary gyroscopic stabilization during the boost phase but lacks satellite-based corrections, such as GPS or GLONASS equivalents, in the baseline configuration, resulting in cumulative drift errors over its approximately 1,000–2,000 km range.^[1]^[15] Independent assessments estimate the Shahab-3's circular error probable (CEP)—the radius within which 50% of warheads are expected to land—at around 2,500 meters, reflecting inherent INS limitations like gyroscope precession and accelerometer bias that amplify over the missile's 10–15 minute ballistic trajectory.^[1]^[17] Iranian state media and officials have claimed upgrades achieving CEPs below 300 meters, but these assertions lack independent verification and are contradicted by debris patterns from observed tests, which indicate dispersion consistent with unmitigated INS errors rather than precision guidance.^[20] Simulations incorporating first-principles error propagation—where position uncertainty grows quadratically with time due to uncorrected sensor noise—further support this, as does the absence of evidence for advanced terminal-phase seekers or real-time environmental compensation in base models.^[1] Environmental factors exacerbate inaccuracies; wind shear and atmospheric reentry perturbations, unaccounted for without supplemental sensors, introduce lateral deviations that INS alone cannot correct, particularly in a liquid-fueled design prone to thrust vector control inconsistencies from fuel sloshing and volatility.^[21] Compared to solid-propellant missiles with more predictable burns and potential for integrated avionics, the Shahab-3's reliance on analog-era INS components—lacking ring-laser gyros or fiber-optic equivalents—imposes fundamental precision constraints, rendering it suitable primarily for area bombardment rather than point targeting.^[1]^[17]

Origins and Development

Technology Transfer from North Korea

The Shahab-3 missile program originated from Iran's acquisition of North Korean Nodong technology in the early to mid-1990s, facilitated by barter agreements exchanging Iranian oil shipments and cash payments for missile components and expertise.^[22] In 1993, Iran reportedly entered into a deal with North Korea to purchase Nodong missiles and production technology, with transfers of complete Nodong systems beginning as early as 1995 according to Israeli intelligence assessments.^[1]^[23] These exchanges included liquid-fuel engines, airframes, and technical blueprints, enabling Iran to bypass substantial independent research and development for a medium-range ballistic missile capability.^[12] The resulting Shahab-3 design exhibits a high degree of commonality with the Nodong in propulsion systems, structural configuration, and overall architecture, as confirmed by multiple Western intelligence analyses, underscoring the foundational role of North Korean transfers rather than purely indigenous innovation.^[1]^[12] North Korean engineers provided on-site assistance during initial assembly phases in Iran throughout the 1990s, further evidencing the collaborative dependency.^[24] This technology base allowed Iran to produce a road-mobile, single-stage liquid-propellant missile with comparable range and payload parameters to the Nodong, directly adapting foreign hardware for domestic manufacturing.^[25]

Iranian Indigenization Efforts

Following the acquisition of North Korean Nodong technology, Iran initiated domestic production of the Shahab-3 through the Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group (SHIG) and Shahid Bagheri Industrial Group, subordinate to the Aerospace Industries Organization (AIO), establishing assembly infrastructure by the mid-1990s.^[1] ^[26] Production rates reached an estimated 12-15 missiles per year by around 1998, with efforts centered on fabricating liquid propellant tanks, structural casings using composite materials, and basic airframe components at IRGC-linked sites, including facilities near Parchin.^[1] ^[27] Indigenization extended to electronics and guidance subsystems, where Iranian engineers adapted inertial navigation elements, though initial designs incorporated foreign-sourced gyroscopes and accelerometers via illicit channels.^[12] Partial localization reduced some assembly dependencies, enabling serial output under IRGC Aerospace Force oversight, but high-precision composites like carbon fiber and specialized alloys remained import-reliant, often procured through evasion networks from suppliers in North Korea, China, and Russia.^[12] ^[26] International sanctions, including UN Security Council Resolution 1737 in 2006, exposed ongoing vulnerabilities by targeting AIO entities and interdicting dual-use shipments, such as those containing missile-applicable materials in the mid-2000s, which analysts attribute to incomplete mastery of metallurgical and avionics processes.^[12] These efforts achieved scaled output amid isolation but were hampered by quality inconsistencies, as seen in early production-linked test anomalies, stemming from domestic expertise shortfalls in precision engineering.^[1]^[28]

Major Developmental Milestones

The Shahab-3 development program began in the mid-1990s, leveraging North Korean Nodong missile technology acquired through bilateral cooperation that intensified following earlier Scud-related transfers.^[1] Initial engineering efforts focused on adapting the liquid-fueled propulsion system for Iranian production, with foundational work at facilities like the Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group.^[29] Ground testing of the Shahab-3's Nodong-derived engine commenced in 1997, marking the transition from component assembly to subsystem validation.^[1] This phase addressed integration challenges, including fuel systems and structural adaptations for extended range. The inaugural flight test occurred on July 22, 1998, from a launch site near Semnan; while the missile achieved initial boost phase ascent, it failed during the mid-flight separation stage, indicating partial success but exposing guidance and staging reliability gaps.^[30]^[29] Subsequent iterations incorporated fixes to propulsion stability and airframe design, culminating in a series of tests through 2003 that resolved core deficiencies.^[31] On July 7, 2003, Iranian authorities declared the Shahab-3 operational, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei presiding over its formal unveiling on July 20, signifying integration into the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force inventory for strategic deterrence roles.^[30] Production ramped up post-2003, with U.S. assessments estimating an initial output of 12 to 15 missiles annually starting as early as 1998, scaling to approximately 20 units per year by the mid-2000s through domestic manufacturing at IRGC-linked sites.^[1]^[29] This expansion supported stockpiling for operational deployment, though exact figures remain classified and subject to verification constraints in open-source intelligence.^[20]

Variants and Upgrades

Shahab-3A

The Shahab-3A represents the initial production variant of Iran's Shahab-3 medium-range ballistic missile family, derived from North Korean Nodong-1 technology but incorporating Iranian modifications for improved stability and reliability. Following initial flight tests in July 1998, which ended in failure approximately 100 seconds after launch due to propulsion issues, the Shahab-3A underwent refinements to its airframe, including aerodynamic adjustments to enhance flight stability during reentry.^[29] This baseline model prioritized payload delivery over extended range, achieving an operational range of approximately 1,300 kilometers while carrying a 760-1,000 kilogram warhead, primarily conventional high-explosive types in early deployments.^[1]^[2] The missile employs a single-stage liquid-fueled propulsion system using unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) and nitrogen tetroxide (NTO), with a total launch weight of about 17,410 kilograms and dimensions of roughly 16 meters in length and 1.25 meters in diameter.^[1] It is road-mobile, transported and launched via transporter-erector-launcher (TEL) vehicles to enhance survivability against preemptive strikes, a key feature for Iran's asymmetric deterrence strategy. Early operational status was declared in July 2003 after multiple tests, though empirical data from launches in the late 1990s and early 2000s revealed persistent limitations in engine reliability, including combustion instabilities and guidance errors that contributed to several failures.^[30]^[29] Distinguishing the Shahab-3A as the foundational model, it lacks the warhead and guidance enhancements of subsequent variants like the Shahab-3B, maintaining a focus on robust payload capacity for regional targets within 1,000-1,300 kilometers to ensure reliable delivery of sub-kiloton warheads without range trade-offs. Accuracy remains limited, with circular error probable (CEP) estimates exceeding 1 kilometer in early models, attributable to inertial navigation constraints rather than advanced terminal guidance.^[1] These characteristics underscore the Shahab-3A's role as a developmental stepping stone, with Iranian sources claiming progressive improvements but independent assessments noting ongoing reliability challenges from inherited foreign engine designs.^[16]

Shahab-3B

The Shahab-3B variant represents an incremental upgrade to the baseline Shahab-3 medium-range ballistic missile, focused on extending range through payload mass reduction to approximately 650 kilograms and minor aerodynamic refinements to the airframe and nose cone.^[32] ^[27] These modifications reportedly enable a maximum range of 1,500 to 1,700 kilometers, surpassing the standard Shahab-3's 1,300-kilometer capability while maintaining a liquid-fueled, single-stage design derived from North Korean Nodong technology.^[3] ^[33] Development occurred in the early 2000s amid Iran's efforts to indigenize missile production, with flight tests conducted from 2004 to 2006, including a key August 2004 launch that incorporated a lighter reentry vehicle prototype simulating a nuclear warhead configuration.^[20] ^[32] The Shahab-3B features an updated reentry vehicle with improved thermal protection materials to withstand higher reentry velocities associated with extended-range profiles, potentially incorporating ablative coatings for enhanced heat resistance.^[34] However, it retains the liquid-propellant engine's inherent drawbacks, including extended fueling times of several hours and vulnerability to pre-launch satellite surveillance or airstrikes, as the missile requires ground support equipment for oxidizer and fuel loading.^[1] Iranian state media and military displays, such as those at 2010 parades, have showcased road-mobile Shahab-3B launchers, emphasizing mobility via transporter-erector-launchers (TELs) to mitigate some static vulnerabilities.^[27] Despite guidance enhancements, including potential inertial system tweaks, Western assessments from organizations like the Center for Strategic and International Studies highlight persistent accuracy limitations, with circular error probable (CEP) estimates ranging from 2,000 to 3,000 meters even for improved variants like the Shahab-3B.^[1] ^[35] These shortfalls stem from rudimentary inertial navigation without advanced terminal corrections, rendering the missile unsuitable for precision strikes and reliant on area saturation or massed salvos for effectiveness; Iranian claims of sub-kilometer accuracy lack independent verification and are viewed skeptically by analysts citing telemetry data from observed tests. ^[27] The variant's range gains thus prioritize broader deterrence reach over resolved precision issues, with no evidence of integration with global positioning aids that could further improve CEP.^[3]

Shahab-3C and Shahab-3D

The Shahab-3C, an iteration pursued in the mid-2000s, incorporated potential aerodynamic refinements including a modified nose cone configuration, which Iranian sources claimed enabled a range extension to approximately 2,000 kilometers while maintaining a payload capacity similar to prior variants.^[29] These enhancements were intended to improve reentry stability and overall performance, though independent assessments highlight scant telemetry data or flight test footage to substantiate the full extent of claimed aerodynamic gains.^[15] Development efforts emphasized incremental indigenization of guidance components, positioning the 3C as a transitional design toward more capable systems, with production reportedly limited by technical complexities in warhead integration and propulsion tuning.^[36] The Shahab-3D, announced following a purported test on September 21, 2000, was described by Iranian officials as employing a hybrid propulsion system combining liquid and solid fuels, marking an alleged early foray into solid-propellant technology for upper stages or boosters to enhance responsiveness and storability.^[37] This variant's specifications remain largely unverified, with analyses suggesting the solid-fuel claims may exaggerate maturity levels, as evidenced by the absence of subsequent confirmed hybrid deployments and reliance on observed launch signatures inconsistent with fully integrated solid stages.^[38]^[39] Range assertions hovered around 2,000 kilometers, but evidential gaps persist, including no public disclosure of static motor tests or dispersion patterns indicating reliable solid-liquid handoff.^[38] Flight tests of the 3C around 2006-2008 were said by Iranian reports to demonstrate circular error probable (CEP) improvements to roughly 1,800 meters through refined inertial navigation, yet external modeling of impact dispersions from available test videos and seismic data disputes this, estimating effective accuracies closer to 2,000-2,500 meters due to persistent guidance drift and atmospheric variability.^[1] These discrepancies underscore systemic challenges in Iranian ballistic programs, where state media assertions often outpace empirical validation from neutral observers. Limited serial output for both C and D variants reflects prioritization of simpler liquid-fueled baselines amid resource constraints and reliability hurdles.^[37]

Testing and Operational Deployment

Key Test Launches and Outcomes

The Shahab-3 underwent its initial flight test in 1998, which failed shortly after launch.^[40] A second test on July 15, 2000, achieved a successful end-to-end flight, reaching an estimated range of over 1,000 km, though accuracy remained unverified beyond Iranian claims.^[29] Subsequent attempts, including a September 2000 launch of a purported satellite-launch variant and a January 2002 test, ended in failure due to premature explosions or guidance malfunctions, with debris recovery indicating structural and control system deficiencies.^[1] By mid-2002, a fourth test was reported as successful by Iranian Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani, but independent assessments noted persistent inconsistencies in trajectory data.^[41] Overall, of at least four documented tests through 2003, only two were deemed partial successes, yielding an approximate 50% reliability rate that exposed foundational engineering challenges rather than one-off anomalies.^[40] In the Great Prophet III maneuvers starting July 9, 2008, Iran simultaneously fired nine missiles, including multiple non-upgraded Shahab-3 variants, to simulate salvo capabilities against regional targets.^[42] While the exercise demonstrated basic launch coordination, outcomes revealed no significant accuracy improvements, with the Shahab-3's circular error probable (CEP) estimated at 2,500 meters—insufficient for precision strikes and reliant on inertial guidance prone to drift over medium ranges.^[43] Post-flight analysis of recovered components highlighted inconsistencies in reentry vehicle stability, underscoring that the tests prioritized propaganda over empirical validation of terminal performance.^[1] After 2010, dedicated Shahab-3 tests declined in frequency, shifting toward variant integrations in broader exercises, with a February 2011 launch acknowledged as a failure by Iranian officials after initial success claims.^[44] These later efforts exposed logistical hurdles inherent to the missile's liquid-fueled design, including protracted fueling sequences vulnerable to procedural errors, contributing to aborted or degraded flights.^[29] Recurrent issues across tests—such as engine instabilities and control failures—point to systemic quality control deficits in indigenous production, as evidenced by debris patterns showing material inconsistencies rather than isolated sabotage or external factors.^[45] This pattern tempers official narratives of operational maturity, revealing a weapon more suited to deterrence signaling than reliable deployment.^[1]

Deployment Timeline and Operator Details

The Shahab-3 entered operational service with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force in July 2003, following a series of tests from 1998 to 2003 and an official distribution ceremony on July 20 presided over by Ayatollah Khamenei.^[20]^[12] The IRGC Aerospace Force serves as the exclusive operator of the Shahab-3, managing its deployment separate from Iran's conventional army artillery units, with specialized training emphasizing rapid erection, fueling, and launch procedures to counter preemptive strikes.^[1]^[46] Missiles are stored in hardened underground bunkers and silo-like facilities for protection, while operational launches rely on mobile transporter-erector-launchers (TELs) to enhance survivability and dispersal amid threats.^[44]^[47]^[20] By 2006, the IRGC had achieved brigade-level operational readiness for the Shahab-3, coinciding with intensified regional security concerns including U.S. military presence in Iraq and tensions over Iran's nuclear program, prompting further unit expansions.^[5]

Lack of Combat Usage

As of October 2025, the Shahab-3 medium-range ballistic missile has not been employed in combat operations by Iranian forces.^[12]^[1] Despite Iran's arsenal including hundreds of Shahab-3 variants and upgrades, no verified launches have occurred in battlefield scenarios, distinguishing it from shorter-range systems used by proxies such as Hezbollah or the Houthis.^[27] In Iran's direct strikes against Israel in April and October 2024, known as Operation True Promise, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) deployed successor missiles including the Emad, Ghadr, Kheibar Shekan, and Fattah-1, but not the baseline Shahab-3.^[48]^[49] This pattern suggests the Shahab-3 retains a reserve status, preserved for higher-threshold escalation rather than initial or routine engagements.^[50] The missile's liquid-fuel propulsion necessitates extended preparation, including fueling that can take several hours, rendering launch sites detectable and vulnerable to preemptive airstrikes or intercepts by advanced defenses like Israel's Arrow system.^[13]^[14] Iranian military doctrine prioritizes these MRBMs for deterrence against perceived existential threats, such as invasion or strikes on nuclear facilities, over offensive utility, with official statements framing their role as retaliatory and conditional on aggression rather than first-strike initiation.^[51]^[27] This approach aligns with Iran's preference for asymmetric warfare through proxy forces employing quicker-launch, solid-fuel shorter-range missiles, minimizing direct exposure of strategic assets like the Shahab-3.^[52]

Strategic Implications

Deterrence Role in Iranian Doctrine

The Shahab-3 missile forms a pivotal element in Iran's asymmetric deterrence strategy, designed to safeguard the regime against existential threats from the United States and Israel by enabling retaliatory strikes following an initial attack. With a range of approximately 1,300 to 2,000 kilometers, it provides Iran the capacity for a second-strike capability, as articulated by then-Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani in 1998, who stated that Iran had prepared to "absorb the first strike" and deliver a decisive response. This aligns with the "forward defense" doctrine, which emphasizes projecting power through ballistic missiles to deter invasion or regime-change efforts, complementing Iran's conventional weaknesses exposed during the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War and the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq.^[53]^[1]^[54] Integrated into a broader deterrence framework, the Shahab-3 operates alongside proxy networks such as Hezbollah and the Houthis, forming a layered approach that extends Iran's reach while maintaining plausible deniability for aggressive actions. Post-2003, the missile's development bolstered Iranian military confidence, compelling potential adversaries to weigh the risks of retaliation against regional assets, thereby elevating the costs of military intervention. Iranian military doctrine portrays this posture as purely defensive, necessitated by encirclement from hostile powers and a lack of comparable air superiority.^[55]^[54]^[53] Critics from Western perspectives, however, contend that the Shahab-3 facilitates offensive posturing and regional hegemony, as evidenced by Iran's support for proxy conflicts that escalate tensions, such as missile supplies to non-state actors enabling strikes on Israel and Saudi Arabia. While Iranian sources emphasize deterrence through cost imposition, empirical instances of missile use in retaliatory contexts, like the 2020 strikes on U.S. bases, suggest a willingness to employ such capabilities beyond strict defense, potentially undermining stability by lowering thresholds for escalation in proxy wars. This duality highlights a tension between regime survival imperatives and broader ambitions for influence projection.^[55]^[54]^[53]

Targeting Capabilities and Regional Threats

The Shahab-3 missile, with a maximum range of approximately 1,300 kilometers, enables Iran to target key regional adversaries from launch sites in central and western Iran.^[1] This range encompasses all of Israel, including Tel Aviv, which lies roughly 1,200 to 1,500 kilometers from potential Iranian launch areas depending on the specific site.^[56] It also reaches eastern portions of Saudi Arabia, with Riyadh positioned at about 1,100 kilometers from Tehran, allowing peripheral coverage of major Gulf population centers.^[56] United States military bases in the Persian Gulf region fall well within the Shahab-3's operational envelope, posing a direct threat to installations in Bahrain (approximately 200 kilometers from Iran's coast), Qatar (around 800 kilometers), and the United Arab Emirates.^[57]^[58] These bases, including Naval Support Activity Bahrain and Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, host significant U.S. forces and could be prioritized in escalation scenarios.^[57] Additionally, the missile's reach extends to the eastern Mediterranean, potentially threatening maritime assets or coastal infrastructure.^[1] The missile's road-mobile transporter-erector-launcher (TEL) system enhances its survivability by permitting rapid dispersal and relocation, complicating preemptive strikes by adversaries.^[1] However, this mobility constrains the scale of simultaneous launches compared to silo-based systems, limiting salvo sizes to dozens rather than hundreds in a single operation. Assessments of its effectiveness against defended targets, such as those shielded by Israel's Arrow anti-ballistic missile system, indicate low penetration success in simulated scenarios due to interception capabilities demonstrated in tests against similar liquid-fueled MRBMs.^[1] This dynamic contributes to a regional balance where the Shahab-3 serves as a deterrent against intervention but incentivizes investment in layered defenses, reducing its coercive utility over time.^[56]

Warhead Compatibility and Escalation Risks

The Shahab-3 possesses a payload capacity of 750–1,000 kg, enabling it to accommodate conventional high-explosive warheads or cluster munitions for area saturation effects.^[2]^[1] This configuration aligns with Iran's emphasis on conventional strike options against regional targets, as evidenced by test firings demonstrating submunition dispersal capabilities.^[1] Chemical warheads remain theoretically feasible within the payload envelope, though no verified deployments have occurred, reflecting Iran's adherence to international chemical weapons prohibitions under the Chemical Weapons Convention. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) assessments from the early 2000s indicate that Iran acquired foreign-supplied documentation on a nuclear implosion-type warhead design specifically tailored for the Shahab-3 re-entry vehicle, including hemispherical chamber specifications matching the missile's nose cone.^[59] Complementary IAEA findings documented Iranian experiments with high-explosive detonation triggers, neutron initiators, and fuzing systems compatible with the Shahab-3 as late as 2003, aimed at enabling reliable nuclear detonation during missile flight.^[60] Despite these efforts, subsequent IAEA reports through 2025 confirm no operational nuclear warhead integration or testing for the Shahab-3, underscoring the missile's conventional primacy amid Iran's unproven atomic capabilities.^[61] The prospect of WMD adaptation elevates escalation risks, as the Shahab-3's range and payload foster perceptions of latent nuclear delivery potential, prompting adversaries to weigh preemptive strikes to neutralize launch sites before payload escalation.^[62] In conventional employment, the missile's limited guidance precision—evident in early variants' inertial-only navigation—exacerbates collateral damage in densely populated areas, potentially triggering disproportionate retaliatory responses and spiraling regional conflicts.^[1] While hypothetical nuclear arming could theoretically bolster deterrence against invasion by imposing unacceptable retaliation costs, the system's untested integration and Iran's pariah status under proliferation scrutiny instead amplify miscalculation hazards, as ambiguous launches during crises may be misinterpreted as WMD employment.^[63] This dynamic reinforces incentives for missile defense proliferation among neighbors, further destabilizing force balances without commensurate gains in credible second-strike assurance.^[64]

Controversies and Assessments

Iranian Claims Versus Empirical Evidence

Iranian officials have claimed that the Shahab-3 missile achieves a circular error probable (CEP) of under 100 meters, particularly for upgraded variants like the Shahab-3C and 3D, enabling precise strikes against distant targets.^[65] These assertions, often voiced by military leaders such as Armed Forces Chief of Staff Mohammad Bagheri, emphasize enhanced guidance systems derived from inertial navigation improvements.^[1] However, such precision claims lack independent verification and appear inconsistent with the missile's reliance on basic inertial systems akin to those in Scud derivatives, which inherently suffer from drift over medium ranges.^[1] Empirical assessments from U.S. intelligence and think tanks contradict these precision assertions, estimating the Shahab-3's CEP at approximately 2,500 meters at full range, rendering it suitable primarily for area bombardment rather than pinpoint targeting.^[1]^[12] Test data reinforces this gap; for instance, video analysis of launches revealed early-flight failures, such as thrust vector control malfunctions occurring 19 seconds into powered ascent, which compromise trajectory stability and overall reliability.^[66] Multiple documented test failures, including one in 2006 that ended 100 seconds post-launch and others during exercises where fewer missiles performed than publicly displayed, highlight systemic issues in consistency and control.^[15]^[67] On production scales, Iranian state media and officials have touted "mass production" of the Shahab-3 since the early 2000s, implying stockpiles sufficient for saturation attacks and deterrence signaling.^[68] In reality, production rates have remained modest, with initial output estimated at 12 to 15 missiles annually starting around 1998, leading to fewer than 50 operational launchers by 2017 and likely no more than a few hundred total units across variants.^[1] Congressional Research Service reports note ongoing testing of Shahab-3 derivatives since 1998 but do not indicate scaled-up manufacturing capable of yielding thousands, constrained by technological bottlenecks and material limitations.^[60] These discrepancies suggest that inflated claims primarily bolster domestic propaganda and project resolve to adversaries, while concealing persistent deficiencies in guidance accuracy and production throughput.^[69]

International Sanctions and Proliferation Fears

The United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1737 on December 23, 2006, imposing an arms embargo and asset freezes on Iranian entities and individuals involved in nuclear and ballistic missile activities, including prohibitions on the supply, sale, or transfer of related technology, equipment, or services.^[70] Subsequent resolutions, such as 1747 adopted on March 24, 2007, expanded these measures to explicitly reference Iran's Shahab-3 missile as part of efforts to curb development of systems capable of delivering weapons of mass destruction, with bans on technical assistance or training for such programs.^[71] These actions stemmed from Iran's non-compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards and its pursuit of missile technologies originating from North Korean Nodong designs, which underpin the Shahab-3.^[60] The United States has enforced targeted sanctions against key Iranian organizations tied to the Shahab-3, notably designating the Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group (SHIG)—responsible for solid- and liquid-propellant missile development, including the Shahab-3—on June 28, 2005, under Executive Order 13382 for proliferation activities, with subsequent re-designations in 2007 and beyond.^[72]^[26] Secondary sanctions have penalized foreign entities providing dual-use goods or financial support to SHIG and similar groups, aiming to disrupt procurement networks for missile components like engines and guidance systems.^[73] These measures reflect broader U.S. policy to isolate Iran's missile program from global supply chains, as evidenced by repeated Treasury Department actions since the early 2000s.^[74] Proliferation concerns have intensified due to evidence of Shahab-3-derived technologies transferring to Iranian proxies, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Houthi forces in Yemen, where variants like the liquid-fueled Toufan missile—adapted from Shahab-3 designs—have been deployed in attacks, enabling unattributable strikes by non-state actors.^[75]^[76] Houthis publicly displayed a Shahab-3 engine in 2023 parades, signaling access to advanced Iranian or North Korean-sourced components that extend proxy capabilities beyond conventional rockets.^[77] This diffusion raises fears of destabilizing escalation, as it circumvents direct state accountability and proliferates medium-range ballistic missile expertise originally imported via Nodong transfers in the 1990s.^[78] Iran maintains that its missile program, including the Shahab-3, serves defensive sovereignty and regional deterrence against perceived threats, dismissing sanctions as illegitimate Western coercion that ignores non-proliferation treaty ambiguities on conventional missiles.^[79] In contrast, the prevailing international consensus, as articulated in UN resolutions and Missile Technology Control Regime guidelines, prioritizes restricting such transfers to avert arms races and nuclear delivery risks, viewing Iran's proxy aid as undermining global stability despite Tehran's claims.^[80]^[81]

Criticisms of Reliability and Strategic Value

The Shahab-3's reliance on liquid propellants, specifically unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) and nitrogen tetroxide (N2O4), introduces significant operational challenges due to their hypergolic but highly toxic and corrosive nature, necessitating specialized handling equipment and personnel training that limits rapid deployment and increases logistical burdens.^[82]^[15] These fuels' volatility and health hazards, including carcinogenicity and immediate respiratory risks upon exposure, further degrade readiness, as storage and fueling processes demand controlled environments and expose crews to potential accidents.^[83] Moreover, the missile's liquid-fueled design requires extensive pre-launch preparation—often hours for fueling and erection—rendering it vulnerable to preemptive strikes during this detectable phase, unlike solid-fuel alternatives with minutes-long setups.^[13]^[4] Empirical evidence from tests underscores reliability concerns, with reports indicating failure rates as high as 50% in early Shahab-3 flights, including a 1998 launch that exploded 100 seconds after ignition and subsequent tests plagued by guidance or propulsion malfunctions.^[84]^[15] In operational contexts, such as Iran's 2024 missile salvos, observed failure rates of 8-9% for similar systems highlight persistent issues like in-flight breakups or inaccurate impacts, attributable to outdated components and limited testing under combat stress.^[85] Strategically, the Shahab-3 program imposes opportunity costs on Iran, estimated at $1-3 million per missile amid stringent international sanctions that constrain access to materials and exacerbate economic isolation, diverting funds from conventional air defenses or economic diversification.^[86]^[87] This allocation sustains a capability that, while achieving medium-range ballistic reach despite technological embargoes, provokes regional escalation, including Israeli preemptive actions against missile infrastructure that heighten Iran's vulnerability without commensurate deterrence gains.^[88]^[89] Analysts note that such systems supplement but cannot supplant air power for sustained operations, remaining susceptible to advanced interceptors and electronic warfare, and increasingly obsolete against hypersonic countermeasures adopted by adversaries.^[27]^[18]

Current Status and Prospects

Ongoing Role in Iranian Arsenal

Despite its introduction over two decades ago, the Shahab-3 persists in Iran's ballistic missile inventory as of 2025, serving as a foundational element in layered deterrence strategies alongside newer solid-fuel systems like the Fateh and Kheibar series.^[90] Estimates from U.S. and Israeli intelligence assessments place the active stockpile of Shahab-3 and its variants at around 100 missiles, primarily employed for training purposes to sustain operational familiarity with liquid-propellant technology amid a shift toward more responsive solid-fuel options.^[91] This role allows Iran to maintain a diverse arsenal capable of saturation attacks, where older liquid-fueled missiles supplement rapid-launch counterparts to potentially overload enemy air defenses through sheer volume.^[92] The system's vulnerabilities, however, were underscored during Iran's April and October 2024 ballistic missile barrages against Israel, which involved over 300 projectiles including medium-range types akin to the Shahab-3; Israeli defenses, aided by U.S. and allied interceptors, neutralized approximately 99% of incoming threats, exposing the limitations of predictable trajectories and pre-launch preparation times inherent to liquid-fueled designs.^[93]^[94] Such high interception rates highlight how advanced multi-layered systems like Arrow and David's Sling can counter even massed salvos, reducing the Shahab-3's standalone effectiveness against fortified targets.^[48] Nevertheless, the Shahab-3 upholds baseline threat credibility at relatively low cost, functioning as a reliable backup for regional deterrence against perceived adversaries in the Gulf and Levant, while Iran invests in precision upgrades and hypersonic variants to address these gaps.^[95] Its continued integration enables economical sustainment of Iran's overall missile posture, deterring escalation through demonstrated willingness to employ legacy systems in hybrid barrages pending full transition to more survivable munitions.^[96]

Transition to Successor Systems

The Ghadr-1, first tested around 2005 and entering service by 2007, evolved directly from the Shahab-3 through modifications including an upgraded reentry vehicle and improved inertial navigation, achieving a reported circular error probable of under 300 meters compared to the Shahab-3's 2,500 meters.^[3]^[97] These enhancements extended effective range to approximately 1,600 km while retaining liquid-fueled single-stage propulsion for relative production simplicity and payload compatibility.^[14] Legacy Shahab-3 units have facilitated crew familiarization and operational rehearsals for Ghadr deployments, preserving institutional knowledge amid incremental upgrades.^[98] The Emad variant, publicly unveiled on October 11, 2015, built on this progression by incorporating a maneuverable reentry vehicle for terminal-phase corrections, with a range of 1,700 km and liquid propellant akin to its predecessors.^[3] Iranian assessments claim precision improvements enabling strikes within 500 meters, though independent evaluations question full realization due to reentry heating challenges.^[14] Liquid-fueled designs like Ghadr and Emad persist for their straightforward manufacturing and high payload fractions, yet Iran's broader arsenal is shifting toward solid-propellant systems—exemplified by the two-stage Sejjil (tested since 2008) and Kheibar Shekan—to address vulnerabilities such as extended fueling times and pre-launch signatures detectable by satellite surveillance.^[97]^[14] Tests from 2023 to 2025, including Ghadr and Emad launches in the October 1, 2024, barrage against Israel (over 180 missiles fired), prioritized these successors over baseline Shahab-3 stocks, with hit rates suggesting enhanced guidance efficacy despite interception losses.^[99] Upgrades unveiled in October 2025 integrated electronic warfare resistance and hybrid fueling elements into Ghadr-H and Emad models, tested from hardened underground silos, indicating doctrinal prioritization of survivable, precision-oriented platforms over legacy systems. This evolution maintains Shahab-3-derived reach and deterrence while adapting to asymmetric threats through reduced launch preparation and integrated countermeasures.^[14]

Stockpile and Production Estimates

Estimates of the Shahab-3 stockpile derive primarily from U.S. and Israeli intelligence assessments, satellite imagery analysis, and limited defector information, given the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' (IRGC) opaque accounting practices that preclude precise public verification. Initial production rates were modest, at 12 to 15 missiles per year beginning around 1998, supporting the Aerospace Industries Organization and associated entities like the Shahid Bagheri Industrial Group.^[1] By the mid-2000s, output had scaled to support deployment of dozens of operational units, though exact totals remain classified; launcher deployments numbered fewer than 50 as of 2017, indicating a constrained but sustained inventory rather than mass production.^[1] Key production facilities include underground complexes near Semnan, approximately 220 km east of Tehran, dedicated to liquid-fueled medium-range ballistic missiles such as Shahab-3 variants, with evidence from satellite imagery showing expansion and soil coverage for concealment by 2012.^[100] The Imam Ali Missile Base has also been identified as a historical production site for Shahab-3 missiles, though strikes in 2025 may have impacted its capacity.^[101] International sanctions, including restrictions on dual-use materials like specialty alloys and propellants, have hampered sustainment since the early 2000s, contributing to a slowdown in liquid-fueled missile manufacturing as Iran prioritizes solid-propellant successors.^[31] Pre-2025 conflict assessments placed Iran's overall medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) inventory, encompassing Shahab-3 and derivatives like Ghadr and Emad, at around 2,500 units, with Shahab-3 comprising a significant but aging portion estimated in the low hundreds operationally.^[90] Recent Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) evaluations indicate losses of 33-50% of this MRBM stockpile due to strikes, reducing operational Shahab-3 numbers to 200-300 amid maintenance challenges and no observed surge in output.^[90] Post-JCPOA lapse in 2018, intercepted shipments and seizures by U.S. and allied forces reveal persistent component shortages rather than accelerated assembly, underscoring production bottlenecks over proliferation.^[91] These figures carry uncertainty, as IRGC practices emphasize dispersal and non-disclosure, with empirical evidence from defector reports and imagery favoring conservative operational counts over inflated claims.^[90]

References

[1]
Shahab-3 | Missile Threat - CSIS
The range is likely about 1,300 km, but varies widely depending upon the weight of the payload. Heavier and more effective payloads, like those employing first- ...Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
[2]
Table of Iran's Missile Arsenal | Iran Watch
Feb 22, 2024 · Shahab-3. MRBM. 1,300 km. 750-1,000 kg. liquid fuel, single stage. ~3 km ... specifications in terms of range, warhead size, and accuracy.Missing: history | Show results with:history
[3]
Emad, Ghadr (Shahab-3 Variants) | Missile Threat - CSIS
Of course, the additional range bears a heavy cost on payload, and most experts place the maximum payload of Shahab-3 variants around 800 kg. Given reentry ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[4]
[PDF] Open-Source Analysis of Iran's Missile and UAV Capabilities and ...
Some sources state that the Shahab-3's range could be as great as 1,300 km. See, for example, Missile Defense Project, 'Shahab-3', Missile. Threat, Center ...
[5]
[PDF] Iran Military Power - Defense Intelligence Agency
Sep 9, 2018 · Its substantial arsenal of ballistic missiles is designed to overwhelm U.S. forces and our partners in the region. Its swarms of small boats, ...
[6]
[PDF] Iran's ballistic missile programme - SIPRI
May 1, 2012 · According to widely held estimates, Iran has an inventory of approximately 200–300 Shahab-1 and. Shahab-2 missiles—the number of missiles ...
[7]
No-Dong 1 - North Korea - Nuke
Mar 25, 2024 · Body diam. 1.3 m. Length, 14.2 m. Fuel, Amine mixture. Oxidizer, IRFNA possibly AK-27P 27% N2O4 73% HNO3 with a different inhibitor ... Nodong ...
[8]
The North-Korean/Iranian Nodong-Shahab missile family
This is realistic because Cyrillic letters were seen on a Shahab-3 (Nodong) missile. A single Nodong engine has a thrust of approximately 280 kN (s.l.).
[9]
Nodong
Shahab 3 stage Nitric acid/UDMH rocket stage. 255.00 kN (57,326 lbf) thrust. Mass 15,100 kg (33,290 lb). Paektusan 1 North Korean orbital launch vehicle ...Missing: type N2O4
[10]
[PDF] An Analysis of the North Korean Nodong Missile
... UDMH fuel with N2O4 rather than IRFNA as the oxidizer. The density of N2O4 is 1.44 g cm-3 and the opti- mum mass ratio (N204/UDMH) is about 2.6. Four tonnes ...
[11]
shahab-3 Missile - Mindex
Dec 29, 2024 · Length: Approximately 16 meters · Diameter: 1.3 meters · Weight: Around 16 tons · Range: 1,300 km with a 1,200 kg warhead, 1,500 km with a 1-ton ...Missing: dimensions | Show results with:dimensions
[12]
Iran's Missile Program: Past and Present
Jun 29, 2020 · The Shahab-3 is a single-stage, liquid-fueled, road mobile ballistic missile derived from an imported version of North Korea's No-Dong missile.Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
[13]
Liquid fuel limitations leave Iranian missiles vulnerable to pre ...
Apr 29, 2022 · Iran's short- and medium-range ballistic missiles, which largely rely on liquid fuel, are especially vulnerable to strikes as they prepare to launch.Missing: fueling | Show results with:fueling
[14]
Iran's Ballistic Missile Program - The Iran Primer
Apr 12, 2024 · They are less vulnerable to preemption because the launch requires shorter preparation – minutes rather than hours. Iran is the only country to ...Missing: fueling | Show results with:fueling
[15]
Shahab-3 / Zelzal-3 - Nuke
Dec 14, 2006 · The Iranian Shahab-3 is a single-stage, liquid-fueled, road-mobile, medium-range ballistic missile with a range of approximately 800 miles ...Missing: CSIS | Show results with:CSIS<|separator|>
[16]
Same Old Boring Shahab 3 - Arms Control Wonk
Jul 10, 2008 · The Shahab-3, a Nodong-1 derivative, is known to have a length of about 16 meters and a diameter of roughly 1.3 meters. Fixing the diameter of ...Missing: weight | Show results with:weight<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
Iran's Ballistic Missile Inventory - Atlantic Council
Dec 3, 2018 · However, the Shahab-3 uses the same basic INS guidance of its predecessors, so its accuracy is still weak with a CEP around 2,500 m.
[18]
Iran's Hypersonic Threat: Can Israel's Missile Shield Keep Up?
Jun 15, 2025 · The Shahab‑3B uses a triconic “baby-bottle” aeroshell design, improving lift-to-drag ratio compared to the original cone-shaped warhead. This ...
[19]
Shahab 3
Maximum range: 1,200 km (700 mi). Boost Propulsion: Storable liquid rocket. Family: IRBM, Shahab. Country: Iran.Missing: development history specifications credible
[20]
Iran's Missile Milestones
Jan 29, 2025 · July 2008: Iran claims to have successfully test-fired a Shahab-3 missile with a range of 2,000 km, as well as Fateh surface-to-surface missiles ...
[21]
[PDF] Assessing whether Iran's ballistic missiles are designed to be ...
Shahab-3 missile to accommodate what appears to be a nuclear-implosion weapon. The solid-fuelled Sajjil-2 and the liquid-fuelled Qiam missiles have the same.
[22]
Chronology of North Korea's Missile Trade and Developments: 1992 ...
Aug 17, 2008 · ... deal to provide Iran with 150 Nodong-1 missiles in exchange for oil and cash. The meeting reportedly ends with the North Korean officials ...Missing: Shahab | Show results with:Shahab
[23]
Iran & North Korea: Proliferation Partners | UANI
According to Israeli intelligence estimates, North Korea began transferring Nodong (Shahab-3) missiles to Iran by 1995. The missile was adapted in the mid ...
[24]
Iran, North Korea Deepen Missile Cooperation
... Shahab-3 was developed with North Korean expertise. Moreover, at least one Iranian official may have been in North Korea to witness the July missile tests.Missing: transfer details
[25]
Shahab-3 - Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance
Jun 5, 2018 · The Shahab-3 is a medium range ballistic missile modeled after the North Korean NoDong. The Shahab-3 has a maximum range of 2000km (1,242 ...<|separator|>
[26]
Shahid Hemat Industrial Group (SHIG) - Iran Watch
... missile program, including the medium-range Shahab-3 (based on North Korea's No Dong missile). Reportedly imported fuel and materials for the construction ...
[27]
The Iranian Missile Threat - CSIS
May 30, 2019 · It is not clear they are still fully operational, but they have a 190 kg warhead, a 150 km range, and very poor accuracy. Iran calls them the ...
[28]
Constraining Iran's missile capabilities - Brookings Institution
Mar 28, 2019 · While placing priority on indigenous development, Iran remains dependent on importing key components and materials. It is working on more ...Missing: domestic | Show results with:domestic
[29]
Shahab-3, 3A / Zelzal-3 - GlobalSecurity.org
The Shahab-3 reportedly has a range of between 1,350 and 1,600 kilometers and is capable of carrying a 1,000-760-650 kilogram warhead. Through Spring 2010 there ...Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
[30]
Iran's Shihab-3 Missile | Iran Watch
Mar 9, 2003 · The Shihab-3 will reportedly have a 1300-1500 km operational range with a respective 1000-750 kg warhead. A first generation nuclear warhead has ...Missing: speed analysis
[31]
European Missile Defense: Assessing Iran's ICBM Capabilities
In summary, as of mid-2007, Iran has only flight-tested one medium-range missile, the single-stage Shahab-3, having a range of 1,300-2,000 kilometers. Iran is ...
[32]
Iranian and North Korean Missile Development - GlobalSecurity.org
... payload capacity in the 250-550 kilogram range depending on the orbit. It is ... Shahab-3, 3A Class Missile Performance. Range, Payload. 1,350 km*, 1,158 ...
[33]
Iran Missiles - GlobalSecurity.org
This missile is 16 meters long, 1.2 meters in diameter, and has a range of 1,700 km, while the warhead weighs 748.4 kg. ... (Shahab-3B) MRBM.... Another ...
[34]
Shahab-3B Iranian Medium-Range Ballistic Missile
Apr 8, 2025 · The Shahab-3B has improved guidance, a new re-entry vehicle with an aeroshell design, greater range, and a reduced warhead size.
[35]
[PDF] IRANIAN WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION
Oct 14, 2008 · A German expert notes, for example, that the operational CEP of the improved Shahab-3 is likely to be around 3 kilometers, but the maximum ...<|separator|>
[36]
Iran's Solid Propellant Ballistic Missile Program - GlobalSecurity.org
The Shahab-3B, 3C/Ghadr-1 design has a 2,000 km range performance. How ... Shahab-3B is a lengthened improvement on the Shahab-3A. The Ghadr-110 is the ...
[37]
Iran Claims Successful Test of Shahab-3 Variant
Iran's state-run Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) reported September 21 that Iran had "successfully tested" a Shahab-3D ballistic missile.Missing: 3A introduction failures engine reliability<|separator|>
[38]
Shahab-3D - Iran Missiles - Nuke
Mar 25, 2024 · The Iranian statement that the Shahab-3D was powered by both liquid and solid propellant suggest that this is indeed a different missile design ...Missing: details fuel
[39]
IRIS- Iran Missiles - GlobalSecurity.org
The Iranian statement that the Shahab-3D was powered by both liquid and solid propellant suggest that this is indeed a different missile design from the Shahab- ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[40]
[PDF] Space-Time-Force and the Iranian Shahab-3 - DTIC
Feb 3, 2003 · The USCENTCOM Commander will be required to evaluate the capabilities and limitations of the Shahab-3 to assess the level of threat it.
[41]
Iran Conducts Fourth Shahab-3 Test | Arms Control Association
... Shahab-3 can potentially target all of Israel with weapons of mass destruction. The missile is largely derived from the North Korean Nodong-1 and was built ...
[42]
Shahab-3 | Military Wiki - Fandom
It has improvements to its guidance system and warhead, a few small changes on the missile body, and a new re-entry vehicle whose terminal guidance system and ...Shahab-3b · History And Tests · Great Prophet Iii TestMissing: drift | Show results with:drift<|control11|><|separator|>
[43]
Iran Test Fires Nine Medium-, Long-Range Missiles
Jul 9, 2008 · Richardson says the Shahab-3 has an accuracy range no better than around 2.5 kilometers, meaning it cannot be used against moving targets like ...Missing: results | Show results with:results
[44]
[PDF] Iran's Ballistic Missile and Space Launch Programs | Congress.gov
Dec 6, 2012 · ... Shahab-2 is almost identical to the North Korean Scud C, and the Shahab-3/No Dong is strongly related to the Scud. B. Further Iranian ...
[45]
U.S. Revives Secret Program to Sabotage Iranian Missiles and ...
Feb 13, 2019 · In that time, 67 percent of Iranian orbital launches have failed, an astonishingly high number compared to a 5 percent failure rate worldwide ...
[46]
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force
Jun 16, 2010 · Operates Iran's inventory of ballistic missiles; missiles reportedly include the Shahab 1 and 2 short-range ballistic missiles, the Shahab 3 ...
[47]
[PDF] Iran Missile Chronology - Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI)
In October 2010, Iran tested a. Sejil/Ashura missile, and either a Sejil-1 or Sejil-2 in February 2011. A Shahab-3 test launch also occurred in. February 2011.
[48]
Iran's Second Missile Attack on Israel | Iran Watch
Oct 3, 2024 · Iranian state media reported that the IRGC used its newly developed Fattah-1 “hypersonic” missile for the first time as part of the strike.
[49]
Explainer: Iran's Missile Assault on Israel
Oct 2, 2024 · Iran said that it used four types of ballistic missiles, including the Emad and Ghadr as well as the newer and more advanced Kheibar Shekan ...
[50]
https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/israel-iran-hezbollah-conflict/card/iran-says-it-used-four-types-of-ballistic-missiles-SXCDtZjZXIP5HUrElsw4
[51]
Understanding Iran's Ballistic Missile Doctrine
Apr 23, 2019 · From an Iranian perspective, the country's missile program is non-negotiable, with or without US compliance with the nuclear deal. Though the ...Missing: MRBM | Show results with:MRBM
[52]
Arsenal: Assessing Iran's Ballistic Missile Program - FDD
Feb 15, 2023 · The report covers missile tests in Iran and transfers to proxies abroad, while providing a systematic overview of every known Iranian ballistic missile.
[53]
Iran's 'Forward Defense' Doctrine Missile and Space Programs
Oct 11, 2020 · The Qased SLV was a highly modified version of the Shahab 3 ballistic missile ... The role played by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps ...<|separator|>
[54]
Iran’s Missiles: Military Strategy
### Summary of Iran’s Missile Strategy
[55]
Missiles and the Nuclear Negotiations with Iran
Jul 6, 2015 · Iran's deterrence triad rests on its ability to (1) threaten navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, (2) undertake terrorist attacks on ...
[56]
The Destabilizing Role of Missiles in the Middle East
May 25, 2017 · Three variants of the Shahab missile are supported by 300 launchers. The road-mobile Shahab-3's range of 1,000km permits targeting all of ...
[57]
What are the main US military bases in the Middle East? - Reuters
Jun 22, 2025 · Several sprawling military installations include Camp Arifjan, the forward headquarters of US Army Central and the Ali Al Salem Air Base.
[58]
Distance between Qatar and Iran Countries
↔️ Kilometers: 823.28 km. / Miles: 511.56 miles. / Nautical Miles: 444.24 NM. ✈️ Estimated flight time: 0.9 hours. (With average airplane speed of 567mph).
[59]
The IAEA's Iran Report: Assessment and Implications
Nov 8, 2011 · Shahab-3 Re-entry Vehicle: Documentation reviewed by the IAEA has suggested that, as late as 2003, Iran sought to develop a nuclear warhead ...
[60]
Iran's Ballistic Missile Programs: Background and Context
Jun 17, 2025 · Iran's medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs)—those with a range of between 1,000 and 3,000 kilometers (621 and 1,864 miles)—have included the ...
[61]
Iran and Nuclear Weapons Production - Congress.gov
Jun 24, 2025 · IAEA reports indicate that Iran does not yet have a viable nuclear weapon design or a suitable explosive detonation system. Tehran may also need ...
[62]
Iran's Nuclear Missile Delivery Capability - CSIS
Nov 24, 2014 · This report will analyze the Iranian Shahab 3/3M ballistic missiles as nuclear weapons delivery systems. In the weaponization process of nuclear ...
[63]
Iran, Missiles, and Nuclear Weapons - CSIS
Dec 9, 2015 · The new Iranian test of a Ghadr-110, an upgrade version of the Shahab-3 missile, seems to have been held on November 21st near Chabahar, a port ...Missing: localization composites electronics
[64]
https://www.armscontrolcenter.org/fact-sheet-irans-nuclear-and-ballistic-missile-programs/
[65]
Iran's Ballistic Missile Arsenal Is Still Growing in Size, Reach, and ...
Dec 13, 2021 · Its warhead is smaller but still powerful, and designed to separate in the early midcourse phase, making it more difficult to detect, track, and ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
[66]
Forden on the Shahab 3 - Arms Control Wonk
Feb 10, 2008 · Video from Iran's television show that there is a failure of the missile's thrust vector control system nineteen seconds into its powered flight ...Missing: exercises | Show results with:exercises
[67]
Iran Missile Program - IFMAT
Apr 14, 2017 · According to Iran's Aerospace Industries Organization, the Shahab 3 is designed to carry a 1,200 kg payload 1,300 km; however, another ...
[68]
Iran boasts that Shahab-3 is in mass production - ResearchGate
Tehran claimed in September 2004 that the range of Shahab-3 had been extended from around 1,200 km to 2,000 km. It is indicated that Shababs could be deployed ...
[69]
Iran's Ballistic Missile Program | Council on Foreign Relations
Jul 23, 2012 · The Shahab-3b has an estimated range of 2,500 kilometers, putting within range Israel, Turkey, and U.S. military bases in the Middle East.
[70]
[PDF] UN Security Council Resolution 1737 (2006)
Dec 23, 2006 · Resolution 1737 expresses concern over Iran's nuclear program, seeks a peaceful solution, and aims to constrain Iran's nuclear and missile ...Missing: Shahab- | Show results with:Shahab-
[71]
[PDF] S/RES/1747 (2007) Security Council
Mar 24, 2007 · The Shahab-3 is Iran's long range ballistic missile currently in service). 8. Ahmad Derakhshandeh (Chairman and Managing Director of Bank ...
[72]
Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group - The Nuclear Threat Initiative
Jun 19, 2025 · The Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group (SHIG) is responsible for Iran's ballistic missile programs, including the Shahab-3 and Ghadr missiles.
[73]
Treasury Targets Iranian Weapons Procurement Networks ...
Oct 1, 2025 · OFAC is targeting an Iran-based procurement network that acquires weapons components on behalf of MODAFL subsidiary, the Aerospace Industries ...
[74]
Timeline of U.S. Sanctions | The Iran Primer
Executive Order 13382 was issued on June 28, 2005. It applies to entities accused of supporting Iran's nuclear proliferation and missile-related activities.
[75]
Few Missiles, Large Strategic Impact: The Dynamics of the Houthi ...
Sep 5, 2025 · It appears that in Phase 3 the Houthis are refraining from using the Toufan liquid-fueled missiles—a long-range version of the veteran Shahab-3.
[76]
With help from North Korean friends, Iran fuels concerns of missile ...
Mar 22, 2018 · Iran has become a source of ballistic missile proliferation, supplying rockets to proxies such as Lebanon's Hezbollah and Yemen's Houthis.
[77]
Yemen's “Southern Hezbollah” Celebrates Coup Anniversary in ...
Sep 28, 2023 · A Shahab-3 engine was also displayed, perhaps to prove that the Houthi missile was not a mock-up. If launched from relatively secure cave ...Missing: concerns | Show results with:concerns
[78]
Missiles of Iran | Missile Threat - CSIS
Aug 10, 2021 · Missiles ; Shahab-3, MRBM, 1,300 km ; Simorgh, SLV, 500 km altitude ; Soumar, Cruise Missile, 2,000 - 3,000 km ; Tondar 69, SRBM, 150 km ...Shahab-3 · Emad (Shahab-3 Variant) · Shahab-1 (Scud B-Variant) · Sejjil
[79]
Appendix E: Iran's Ballistic Missiles and the Nuclear Deal
Based on the North Korean Nodong missile, the Shahab-3 has a range of about 1,300 kilometers. Variations of the Shahab-3, including the Ghadr-1, are reported to ...
[80]
Don't Forget Iran's Ballistic Missiles - War on the Rocks
Aug 25, 2014 · Iran shall not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using ballistic ...
[81]
Iran's Mounting Missile Threats to Neighboring Countries
Feb 16, 2023 · One such example includes the 2006 UN Security Council Resolution No. 1737, which imposed a weapons embargo on Iran and restricted its ...
[82]
Why exactly are Liquid-Fueled ICBMs harder to store and why did ...
Dec 14, 2021 · All hydrazine liquid fuels are incredibly toxic and highly volitile. Solid fuels are very stable with complex but rapid ignition mechanisms.Missing: Shahab- | Show results with:Shahab-
[83]
Ultrafast igniting, low toxicity hypergolic hybrid solid fuels and ...
Aug 6, 2025 · ... problems due to their toxic, carcinogenic, and volatile properties. ... Experimental Investigations into the Low Toxicity Hypergolic Ionic Liquid- ...
[84]
Iran's Ballistic Missile and Space Launch Programs
Dec 6, 2012 · One expert wrote that "there are indications that perhaps as many as one-half of them [Shahab-3 tests] failed. ... A flight test failure of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[85]
Iranian Missile Failure Rates During True Promise II
Aug 22, 2025 · We observed that 8-9% of the missiles launched failed, often dramatically. This failure rate aligns well with that drawn from the official ...Missing: test | Show results with:test
[86]
Billion dollar attack: Can Iran's missile barrages drain Israeli ...
Oct 11, 2024 · Iran's ballistic missiles are thought to cost anywhere from $80,000 to $3 million, but the country has prioritised building up its arsenal for ...
[87]
[PDF] Iran Ballistic Missile Procurement Advisory
Key goods sought by Iran's missile program (Annex 3), including specific types of production ... Shahab-3 medium range ballistic missile. It is designated ...Missing: facilities | Show results with:facilities
[88]
[PDF] Going Ballistic: - Responding to Iranian Missile Advances
In addition to provoking an arms race across the Middle East, this policy makes the outbreak of a conventional conflict more likely, by heightening the ...
[89]
Iran in arms race with Israel | News | Al Jazeera
Aug 6, 2009 · Iran's hard-line and irascible president talks of building military capability and destroying Israel, Tel Aviv feels its survival is menaced.
[90]
[PDF] Iranian Ballistic Missile Estimates | JINSA
Jun 26, 2025 · Status of Iranian Missile Launchers. 0. 500. 1000. 1500. 2000. 2500 ... Shahab-3. Ghadr. Emad. Khorramshahr-1, -2, and -4 (Kheibar). Fattah-1.
[91]
Arms Control and Proliferation Profile: Iran
Mar 28, 2025 · Shahab-3: The Shahab-3 is an operational ballistic missile with an estimated range of 800-1,200km. Emad-1: The Emad-1 is a ballistic missile ...
[92]
Iran's arsenal of missiles and Israel's defence system - Reuters
Jun 17, 2025 · Iran's arsenal is the largest stockpile of ballistic missiles in the Middle East and includes multiple long-range missiles that can reach Israel.
[93]
What are the missiles in Iran's arsenal and how does Israel counter ...
Oct 2, 2024 · Iran Watch says the newest variants of the Shahab-3, the Ghadr and Emad missiles, have accuracies of as close to 300 meters (almost 1,000 feet) ...<|separator|>
[94]
U.S. Warships Fire a Dozen Interceptors Against Iranian Missile Attack
USS Bulkely (DDG-84) and USS Cole (DDG-67) fired a dozen interceptors as part of the US response to Iranian missiles launched at Israel, the Pentagon announced ...
[95]
US Strategic Command warns Iran now holds Middle East's largest ...
Mar 28, 2025 · Deployed since 2003, the Shahab-3 (and its improved variants Ghadr and Emad) can target all of the Levant and Gulf region from deep inside Iran.
[96]
EXCLUSIVE REPORT : Iran's Ballistic Missile Doctrine and Nuclear ...
Mar 28, 2025 · Iran indigenized production by blending foreign tech with domestic manufacturing. Technological Features, Guidance Systems, Inertial ...<|separator|>
[97]
[PDF] Iran's Missile Priorities after the Nuclear Deal
For instance, its Shahab-1 missiles. (Scud-Bs) carry one-ton high-explosive warheads and have an estimated accuracy of around 800–1,000 meters circular error ...
[98]
[PDF] Iran's Rocket and Missile Forces and Strategic Options
• 12+ launchers: 12+ Shahab-3/Ghadr-1; some Sajjil-2 Some units with Short ... A variant of the Shahab-3 is known as the Emad. It is essentially a ...
[99]
Iran Update Special Report, June 18, 2025, Evening Edition
Jun 18, 2025 · [14] Emad and Ghadr missiles use liquid fuel, which is extremely volatile and challenging to transport.[15] Iran used Emad and Ghadr missiles ...Missing: shift | Show results with:shift
[100]
NCRI Report: Iran's Covert Nuclear Warhead Program and Missile ...
Feb 1, 2025 · Additionally, a missile facility on the outskirts of Semnan, approximately 220 kilometers east of Tehran, is working to produce liquid-fuel ...
[101]
Iran Update, July 3, 2025 | Critical Threats
Jul 3, 2025 · US and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have likely degraded Iran's ability to develop a nuclear arsenal.Missing: criticisms provoking race