Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Shared services center

A shared services center (SSC) is a dedicated, centralized organizational unit that consolidates and delivers standardized support functions—such as , , , , and —to multiple business units or departments across an , operating like an internal to enhance and reduce duplication. These centers focus on process , , and continuous improvement, often spanning multiple locations and leveraging dedicated personnel, processes, and technologies to serve as a single point of service delivery. The concept of shared services traces its roots to the , when early forms of centralization, such as "typing pools" for administrative tasks, emerged to manage high costs of equipment and training, evolving over decades into modern SSCs driven by , advancements, and the need for cost optimization in large corporations. Today, SSCs are implemented in various models, including global, regional, or national scopes, and can be fully internal, outsourced to third-party providers, or a hybrid, with implementation typically progressing through phases like assessment, design, rollout, and optimization. Common functions handled by SSCs include transactional activities like payroll processing, invoice management, and IT support, allowing business units to focus on core strategic objectives rather than routine operations. Key benefits of SSCs include significant cost reductions—often 25-50% in areas like and through , lower labor costs, and technological efficiencies—alongside improved service consistency, better data accuracy for , and enhanced via centralized controls. Additionally, they promote operational flexibility, such as scaling during mergers or market changes, foster cross-functional collaboration by breaking down , and enable strategic insights through aggregated reporting and performance metrics. As of 2025, SSCs increasingly incorporate and generative AI for process automation and enhanced . While primarily adopted by large enterprises and organizations, SSCs have become integral to modern business models, with agreements (SLAs) and systems often used to ensure accountability and customer-like treatment of internal departments.

Definition and Origins

Core Definition

A shared services center (SSC) is a centralized organizational unit that consolidates and delivers common support functions to multiple business units or entities within a company or across organizations. It operates as a dedicated entity comprising people, processes, and technologies structured to provide these services efficiently, often treating internal departments as customers. Key characteristics of an SSC include the centralization of back-office operations, the of standardized processes to ensure consistency, the leveraging of through resource consolidation, and a -oriented delivery model that emphasizes defined service levels and process improvements. This model focuses on optimizing administrative tasks rather than core business activities, enabling better across the . Unlike outsourcing, which transfers functions to external vendors, SSCs emphasize internal service provision to maintain greater control and alignment with organizational goals. Typical functions handled by SSCs include , processing, management such as employee data handling, , IT support, and elements like order management, but exclude strategic or revenue-generating core operations.

Historical Development

While early forms of shared services, such as typing pools for administrative tasks in the , represented initial centralization efforts to manage costs, the modern concept of shared services centers (SSCs) emerged in the mid-, primarily within functions of U.S. corporations, as a response to corporate restructuring trends that sought to consolidate fragmented support activities and recapture lost following widespread in the late and early . This period was marked by aggressive divestitures, spin-offs, and the creation of semi-autonomous business units, which inadvertently led to redundant resources, duplicated systems, and higher operational costs across organizations. By the mid-1990s, SSCs gained broader adoption as companies blended centralization with decentralized service delivery, influenced by accelerating that demanded standardized processes across borders and early IT advancements, such as (ERP) systems, which facilitated and remote management. Key milestones in SSC adoption included pioneering implementations by multinational corporations in the 1990s, such as , which established internal organizations to support its rapid global expansion and manage back-office functions like and for international clients. Similarly, launched its Finance Services Center in 1997 in as an early brownfield site for consolidating and , marking a shift toward location-specific . The 2000s saw accelerated growth, driven by the widespread deployment of platforms like , which enabled seamless centralization of processes across disparate business units and geographies, transforming SSCs from siloed departments into integrated hubs. Post-2000, SSCs evolved from in-house, domestic models to global configurations, with significant to low-cost regions to leverage talent pools and further reduce expenses. emerged as a primary destination, hosting a surge in Global Capability Centers (GCCs) that handled IT, , and analytics for multinational parents, fueled by the country's English-speaking workforce and growth. In parallel, (CEE) became a key hub starting in the late 1990s and accelerating after EU enlargement in 2004, attracting investments in service centers for multilingual support in and customer operations due to skilled labor at competitive costs. As of 2025, SSCs are integrating (AI), automation, and to create hybrid models that combine captive operations with outsourced elements, enhancing agility and scalability. Generative AI and (RPA) are prioritized for streamlining and order-to-cash processes, with nearly 80% of global services (GBS) leaders deploying AI tools for decision support and efficiency gains. platforms further enable and multi-region deployment, while hybrid structures—blending nearshoring in with —address talent shortages and geopolitical risks.

Strategic Motivations

Cost Reduction Drivers

Shared services centers (SSCs) primarily drive cost reductions through the of duplicate functions across an , which eliminates redundancies in staffing and administrative overhead. By centralizing support activities such as , , and IT into a single unit, companies can reduce headcount requirements significantly, with 93% of surveyed organizations attributing their savings mainly to personnel cost reductions via capacity optimization and labor arbitrage effects. This leverages , allowing shared resources like IT infrastructure and facilities to serve multiple units more efficiently than in fragmented setups. Bulk purchasing and resource sharing further lower per-unit costs by enabling volume-based negotiations for supplies, software licenses, and vendor services that would be uneconomical in decentralized models. In decentralized environments, lead to redundant investments in tools, training, and systems, whereas SSCs avoid these by standardizing and deployment across the . contributes substantially, often by relocating operations to lower-wage regions, which can cut personnel expenses by moving activities from high-cost to medium- or low-cost countries. leverage, including and common IT platforms, amplifies these savings by streamlining processes and reducing manual labor needs. Typical cost savings in support functions range from 20% to 40%, achieved as SSCs mature through these mechanisms. For instance, (FTE) reductions often exceed planned levels of 10-30%, with many organizations realizing over 30% in personnel costs alone. These ongoing savings offset initial setup costs, which include investments in technology implementation, process reengineering, and facilities, within a period of 2-4 years. In comparison, decentralized models perpetuate higher baseline costs due to duplicated efforts, making SSCs a financially superior alternative for scalable operations. As of 2025, advancements in and are further enhancing these cost motivations by enabling and hyper-automation, potentially increasing savings beyond traditional levels.

Operational Efficiency Gains

Shared services centers (SSCs) achieve operational efficiency through the of processes, which minimizes variations in execution and significantly reduces errors in routine tasks such as processing and handling. This uniformity also streamlines employee by establishing a consistent that eliminates the need for multiple, location-specific protocols, allowing staff to master core procedures more quickly and effectively. Furthermore, centralization in SSCs pools specialized expertise from across the , enabling faster issue resolution through dedicated teams that address complex queries more efficiently than decentralized units. Technology plays a pivotal role in amplifying these gains, particularly through shared IT platforms like portals that empower users to handle routine requests independently, such as updating personal records or submitting expense reports. These systems reduce manual interventions by automating repetitive workflows, with implementations in financial reconciliations achieving up to 85% of processes without human input, thereby accelerating cycle times and freeing resources for higher-value activities. Advanced tools, including (RPA) and AI-driven chatbots, further enhance this by handling rule-based tasks end-to-end, such as data validation and predictive customer support. Consistent processes in SSCs foster quality improvements by ensuring adherence to regulatory standards and facilitating easier audits through centralized documentation and audit trails. This uniformity also supports benchmarking against industry best practices, allowing organizations to measure performance metrics like agreements (SLAs) and iteratively refine operations for superior reliability and . A key advantage of SSCs is their , which enables them to absorb volume fluctuations—such as seasonal peaks in HR inquiries or demands—without requiring proportional increases in staff, thanks to the leveraged capacity of centralized resources and automated scaling features in digital platforms. This flexibility not only maintains service continuity but also supports organizational growth by efficiently reallocating expertise as needs evolve.

Implementation Framework

Planning and Requirements

The establishment of a shared services center () begins with a thorough phase to evaluate feasibility and build a robust . This involves developing a detailed of potential financial and operational benefits, including cost savings from and efficiency gains from , often through a cost-benefit model that compares current expenses against projected SSC outcomes. Function mapping is a critical component, where organizations identify and categorize processes suitable for centralization, such as transactional activities in or , using tools like process matrices to delineate responsibilities. Maturity evaluation assesses the current state of operations, existing processes against industry standards to identify gaps in , , and skills, ensuring the SSC targets areas with the highest improvement potential. Key requirements for a successful SSC include a strong governance structure to oversee strategy and operations. This typically features a steering committee comprising senior executives from business units and SSC leadership to define policies, resolve conflicts, and align the center with organizational goals, often formalized through service level agreements. A skilled team is essential, responsible for leading transitions, mitigating resistance, and fostering adoption through targeted training and communication strategies. IT infrastructure readiness is paramount, necessitating integrated data systems such as (ERP) platforms to enable seamless process , real-time data sharing, and across functions. Stakeholder alignment is achieved by actively involving business units in definition from the outset. This collaborative approach, often via workshops and impact assessments, ensures buy-in by addressing concerns and clarifying expectations, while distinguishing core strategic functions—retained locally for —from non-core, repetitive tasks ideal for SSC migration, such as or processing. Legal and regulatory considerations must be integrated early, particularly for global SSCs. Compliance with data privacy regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires evaluating data handling practices to safeguard personal information during centralization, including secure transfer mechanisms and consent protocols. Cross-border implications demand analysis of tax structures, rules, and jurisdictional variances to avoid penalties and optimize operations, such as selecting locations with favorable incentives while adhering to international standards.

Deployment Models

Shared services centers (SSCs) can be deployed through various models, primarily categorized as , brownfield, or approaches. In a model, organizations build an entirely new SSC from scratch, allowing for complete customization of processes, , and culture to align with strategic goals, though it requires significant upfront and time. Conversely, the brownfield model involves and consolidating existing facilities or operations into an SSC, leveraging current assets for faster and lower initial costs, but potentially facing challenges from legacy systems and entrenched practices. Hybrid models combine elements of and , such as outsourcing low-value activities like while retaining higher-value functions internally, offering a balanced approach to risk and control. Location plays a critical role in SSC deployment, with options including onshore (within the same country for and cultural alignment), nearshore (in adjacent regions for proximity and moderation, a growing trend as of 2025 for balancing and access), or (in distant low-cost locations for substantial savings). These choices depend on factors like labor , availability, and needs; for instance, models are common for routine tasks in or IT to achieve significant reductions, often 30% or more. Deployment often follows a phased rollout strategy to minimize disruption, beginning with a pilot in one function such as or to test processes and gather insights before scaling enterprise-wide. Each phase typically spans 6-18 months, including build-out, testing, and stabilization periods, enabling iterative improvements and risk mitigation. Technology integration is integral during deployment, with (ERP) systems like or implemented to centralize data and standardize workflows across the SSC. Automation tools, including (RPA) and, as of 2025, generative AI for advanced process handling, are deployed concurrently to handle repetitive tasks, ensuring seamless transitions and enhancing efficiency from the outset. For broader coverage, SSCs may adopt global or regional models; global setups often use multi-site configurations for 24/7 operations, while regional ones focus on localized needs. A prominent structure is the hub-and-spoke model, where a central hub manages core operations and regional spokes handle localized support, facilitating scalability and time zone alignment.

Process Standardization

Process standardization in shared services centers (SSCs) involves establishing uniform procedures across functions such as , , and IT to promote consistency and scalability. Key approaches include process mapping with tools like (BPMN), which provides a standardized graphical representation for documenting workflows and identifying redundancies. Additionally, defining key performance indicators (KPIs) for each process step—such as cycle time, error rates, and cost per transaction—ensures measurable alignment with organizational goals. Frameworks like are often adopted to minimize defects and variability, integrating statistical methods to refine processes before centralization. These methods yield significant benefits by reducing process variability, which facilitates of staff and accelerates for new employees. For instance, enables the application of tools like RPA, which can lead to up to a 30% improvement in , enhancing overall and enabling SSCs to handle higher volumes without proportional increases in resources. By applying best practices globally, organizations achieve consistent across business units, supporting as the SSC expands. A primary challenge addressed through is harmonizing diverse legacy from various units, which often involve incompatible systems or regional variations that hinder . Global process owners (GPOs) play a crucial role here, overseeing end-to-end —such as in order-to-cash cycles—to consolidate high-volume activities and mitigate fragmentation. This harmonization simplifies complexity, paving the way for automation and reducing risks associated with disparate systems. Continuous improvement is embedded via regular audits and updates to maintain process standards amid evolving business needs. Many SSCs implement continuous improvement programs (CIP) with defined benchmarks, conducting periodic reviews—such as annual benchmarking against industry standards—to identify deviations and refine KPIs. This iterative approach ensures adaptability, with 27% of SSCs having fully developed CIP structures that include incentives for ongoing enhancements.

Operational Management

Cost Allocation Methods

Cost allocation methods in shared services centers (SSCs) ensure that the expenses of centralized functions, such as , , and IT, are distributed equitably among business units, promoting and . These methods typically balance fairness, accuracy, and administrative simplicity, drawing on established principles to link costs to consumption or benefit. Direct methods allocate costs based on measurable usage, such as per transaction or activity volume, allowing business units to be charged precisely for services consumed. For example, in accounts payable processes, costs may be assigned per invoice processed, using historical data from prior periods to forecast and bill accurately. This approach fosters cost consciousness by tying expenses directly to demand, as seen in variable pricing models where allocation reflects actual volume. Indirect methods distribute costs using broader proxies, such as a fixed percentage of a business unit's revenue or headcount, when direct tracing is impractical for overhead functions like general accounting. An example formula used in some organizations for such allocation employs a general corporate allocator (GCA), calculated as: \text{GCA} = \frac{\text{Net Revenue} + \text{Total Assets} + \text{Labour Expense}}{3} Costs are then apportioned proportionally to each unit's GCA share, providing a reasonable approximation of benefit without granular tracking. Hybrid models combine elements of direct and indirect approaches to address varying service complexities, such as applying fixed allocations for baseline and usage-based charges for variable demands like IT support tickets. Overall costs can be expressed as: \text{Total SSC Cost} = \text{Fixed Overhead} + \text{Variable Usage Costs} with allocation to units via: \text{Allocated Cost} = \text{Cost per Unit} \times \text{Usage Volume} This flexibility accommodates diverse operations while minimizing disputes. Implementation often relies on (ABC), which traces expenses to specific activities—such as employee in —before assigning them to consuming units based on drivers like full-time equivalents (FTEs) or transaction counts. ABC enhances accuracy by establishing cause-and-effect relationships, reducing arbitrary distributions common in traditional methods. To ensure , SSCs deploy dashboards and reporting tools that provide real-time visibility into cost breakdowns, enabling business units to review and validate charges monthly or quarterly. Over time, SSC cost allocation has evolved from simple cost-plus models—where charges included a markup on incurred expenses—to value-based pricing that aligns fees with delivered business outcomes, such as efficiency gains or risk reduction. This shift reflects SSCs' maturation from mere cost centers to strategic partners, with and transaction-based methods gaining prevalence to sophisticated service-level agreements (SLAs).

Demand-Supply Coordination

Demand-supply coordination in shared services centers (SSCs) involves aligning fluctuating service requests from business units with available resources to ensure efficient operations and service delivery. This coordination relies on predictive tools and structured processes to anticipate needs and allocate capacity effectively, preventing underutilization during low-demand periods and overload during peaks. Standardized processes serve as enablers for this alignment by providing consistent frameworks for service handling. As of 2025, (AI) tools, including generative AI for , are increasingly integrated to enhance forecasting accuracy and automate resource adjustments. Forecasting demand in SSCs utilizes advanced to analyze historical data, seasonal trends, and business activity patterns, enabling proactive capacity adjustments. Capacity planning models, such as modeling, simulate interconnected system behaviors to predict demand fluctuations and optimize resource use in service environments. These models help SSCs identify potential gaps between demand and supply, facilitating strategic decisions on and . Service level agreements (SLAs) play a crucial role in prioritizing requests by defining response times, service quality thresholds, and escalation procedures based on request urgency. In SSCs, SLAs establish clear expectations between the center and business units, allowing high-priority requests—such as those impacting revenue or compliance—to be fast-tracked over routine ones. This prioritization mechanism ensures that critical demands are met without compromising overall throughput. Queue management systems in SSCs employ multiserver queueing models with priority scheduling to handle incoming requests efficiently, distributing workloads across available to match supply with demand variations. algorithms, informed by , optimize staffing levels during peaks and troughs by calculating fair shares of capacity among service classes, minimizing wait times and incentives for collaboration. These techniques model SSCs as priority-based systems where higher-priority queues receive preferential service, balancing individual and collective efficiency. AI-driven automation, such as (RPA), further supports queue handling, with over 70% of SSCs reporting RPA in production as of 2024. Integration of (ERP) modules provides real-time visibility into demand patterns and resource status across the SSC, enabling swift identification and resolution of potential bottlenecks. ERP systems centralize data from , HR, and functions, offering dashboards for service queues and on an ongoing basis. This streamlines workflows, automates request , and supports data-driven adjustments to prevent delays in service delivery. For scalability, SSCs implement dynamic staffing through on-demand platforms that rapidly scale workforce capacity during demand spikes, such as end-of-quarter processing surges. Outsourcing select functions to external providers complements internal resources, allowing temporary augmentation without long-term commitments. These adjustments ensure supply elasticity, maintaining service continuity amid variable business needs.

Performance Measurement

Performance measurement in shared services centers (SSCs) involves evaluating operational effectiveness through a combination of quantitative and qualitative indicators to ensure alignment with organizational goals and agreements. These metrics help identify areas for improvement, validate cost savings, and enhance delivery to internal clients. Key indicators (KPIs) are typically categorized into input, operational, and output types, allowing for a holistic of the partnership between SSCs and business units. As of 2025, KPIs increasingly include and adoption rates to reflect . Essential metrics include cycle time, which measures the duration required to complete processes such as or query resolution, often targeted to reduce and improve throughput. Error rates track defects in transactions, such as invoice discrepancies, with benchmarks in high-performing operations aiming for rates below 1%. Customer satisfaction (CSAT) scores gauge internal client feedback through surveys, with good scores typically ranging 75-85% to reflect reliable service. Utilization rates assess staff , with industry targets often set at 80-85% to balance and workload without burnout. A widely adopted framework is the , which evaluates SSC performance across four perspectives: financial (e.g., cost per transaction), customer (e.g., and service levels), internal processes (e.g., cycle time and error rates), and learning/growth (e.g., employee training and ). This approach integrates strategic objectives with measurable outcomes, as demonstrated in studies of SSC implementations where it facilitated cost reductions of 20-30% while improving service quality. Benchmarking against industry standards, often sourced from reports by and APQC, enables SSCs to compare metrics like utilization and error rates with peers, identifying gaps and best practices. Continuous monitoring tools, such as dashboards integrated with systems, support real-time tracking to ensure ongoing alignment. Quarterly reviews of these metrics drive targeted improvements, with output KPIs shared with stakeholders to foster accountability and iterative enhancements.

Challenges and Risks

Key Operational Hurdles

One of the primary operational hurdles in centers (SSCs) is cultural resistance from business units, where managers often oppose centralization due to perceived loss of and the unique ways each unit conducts business. This resistance manifests as overt or passive-aggressive pushback against efforts, complicating the shift to unified processes across the . Additionally, with legacy systems poses significant challenges, as consolidating disparate IT platforms—such as older systems—into a single global standard like or requires rapid implementation amid compatibility issues and data silos. Talent retention emerges as another critical difficulty, particularly in competitive locations like or , where high attrition rates stem from employees seeking better financial incentives or career advancement elsewhere. In global capability centers akin to SSCs, over 90% of prioritize work flexibility, with over 70% valuing short commutes under 30 minutes, exacerbating turnover when rigid structures fail to accommodate these preferences. issues further compound these problems, as SSCs must handle organizational growth across multiple international sites without proportional , demanding flexible to support increasing transaction volumes and diverse needs. Demand-supply imbalances, such as surging internal requests outpacing capacity, can lead to failures and operational strain in these setups. Technology risks, including cybersecurity threats, present substantial vulnerabilities in SSCs due to shared exposing services to disruptions from vendor errors or fourth-party failures. , often triggered by mistakes in interfaces or external outages, can halt operations across business units, amplifying financial and productivity losses. As of 2025, emerging hurdles include disruptions from integration, where skills gaps and issues affect nearly 60% of SSC leaders adopting generative , leading to uneven implementation and service inconsistencies. Remote and hybrid work coordination adds complexity, with 71% of SSCs operating over half their in distributed models, resulting in challenges like Gen Z attrition—84% of leaders expect high turnover within three years due to location-agnostic hiring demands and gaps.

Mitigation Strategies

To address key operational hurdles in shared services centers (SSCs), organizations implement a range of mitigation strategies encompassing human, technological, and structural elements. programs are essential for fostering cultural buy-in during SSC transitions. These programs typically involve multi-channel communication strategies, such as town halls and tailored messaging, to engage stakeholders and dispel fears of disruption, as demonstrated by the University of Kansas's pre-launch roadshows that began nine months ahead of implementation. Additionally, robust initiatives equip talent for new roles, including on-demand videos with quizzes and mentorship programs to standardize processes and build skills in areas like and process execution. For instance, UC Berkeley's two-month bootcamp for SSC staff incorporates tracks to enhance proficiency in shared functions. Contingency planning for IT risks further supports resilience by outlining exit strategies, data transfer protocols, and annual testing of plans to ensure service continuity amid disruptions. Technology solutions play a in preempting failures. System redundancy, achieved through duplicated and networks, minimizes downtime by providing options in mission-critical operations. Complementing this, AI-driven leverages cognitive and historical data to forecast equipment or issues, enabling proactive interventions that can reduce costs by 40% to 75% in targeted functions. Such tools, including for , allow SSCs to transition staff toward higher-value roles while maintaining operational stability. Effective structures ensure long-term . Centralized oversight committees, comprising senior executives and functional representatives, monitor performance via short service-level agreements and facilitate to align SSC offerings with needs. Regular audits, conducted annually or post-changes, verify , , and process efficiency, helping to mitigate risks like service outages. Best practices emphasize adaptive growth. Phased evolution involves segmenting implementations into 3- to 6-month cycles, selecting diverse pilot groups with strong support to gather feedback and refine processes iteratively. For specialized functions, strategic partnerships with third-party providers enable SSCs to broker services, achieving over 30% cost savings through collaborative reengineering and .

References

  1. [1]
    Definition of Shared Services Center - IT Glossary - Gartner
    Shared services or shared services center (SSC) refers to a dedicated unit (including people, processes and technologies) that is structured as a centralized ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Shared Service Center
    A Shared Service Center (SSC) is an internal service provider that acts as an independent support center, focusing on process improvement and standardisation. ...
  3. [3]
    What are shared services? | Definition from TechTarget
    Jan 25, 2024 · Shared services is a delivery model organizations use to consolidate similar business functions into a single unit that supports the entire organization.
  4. [4]
    What are Shared Services? Benefits and Examples | ScottMadden
    Shared services are when a business consolidates its support functions to better serve the corporation and its business units.
  5. [5]
    Top 10 Developments that changed Shared Services... - SSON
    1. Technological advances · 2. Globalization · 3. The development of outsourcing as a distinct profession · 4. The rise of value-adding finance roles · 5. The rise ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Shared services: Management fad or real value - PwC Strategy
    The corporation lost economies of scale, resulting in redundant resources, operating facilities, information systems, and supplier contracts. In the mid-1990s, ...Missing: history globalization
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Best Practices in Outsourcing: The Procter & Gamble Experience
    With the global expansion in the '90s and the ensuing need to manage the services necessary for the internal corporate clients, P&G set up a Shared Services ...Missing: 1990s milestones
  8. [8]
    How is your shared services organization stacking up against an ...
    Jul 2, 2018 · The DuPont Finance Services Center was established in 1997 in Spain. The location was a classic brownfield site pick for DuPont. The services ...Missing: adopters 1980s 1990s Procter Gamble
  9. [9]
    Global Business Services: The Evolution of Shared Services - IOFM
    Sep 10, 2019 · Shared services centers have long been considered the natural endpoint for back-office optimization. They were born out of the realization ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Global Shared Service Trends in the Central and Eastern European ...
    The first shared service centers in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) were developed later, in the late 1990s. However, after they discovered the region, the.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Eastern Europe in the global services offshoring market
    Jan 23, 2011 · Many Central and Eastern European countries invigorated by EU enlargement became important locations for offshored service centres.
  12. [12]
    10 Shared Services Trends Shaping the GBS Industry in 2025 - Auxis
    combining outsourcing and captives, nearshoring and offshoring, and remote and in-office ...Missing: computing | Show results with:computing
  13. [13]
    7 Global Shared Services Trends Transforming GCCs in 2025
    In 2025, global shared services are becoming hyper-efficient, thanks to AI-led automation. Robotic Process Automation (RPA), machine learning, and NLP-based ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Shared Services: Multiplying Success - Pwc.at
    Shared Services, SAP S/4 HANA Finance with its deployment option Central Finance offers the possibility to replicate data from multiple ERP systems in real time ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Shared Services Centers: Understanding Key Drivers for Success
    One solution is the deployment of shared service centers (SSC). These have been shown to drive cost savings and increase profitability by leveraging existing.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Leveraging Global Business Services to align value to the C-suite ...
    Of course, potential cost savings from GBS are significant. Typical cost reductions range from 20 to. 40 percent as a company's use of GBS becomes more mature.
  17. [17]
    Shared Service Centers for Finance and Tax - KPMG International
    Second, labor arbitrage can additionally cut costs by moving activities from high-cost countries to the SSC, which is typically located in a medium- or low ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Shared Services Handbook Hit the road | Deloitte UK
    With shared services, employees still perform the jobs and the systems should be fully integrated with the business units' systems and processes. The diagram ...
  19. [19]
    Shared Services Center: how to structure an efficient SSC in ...
    Sep 25, 2025 · A Shared Services Center (SSC) is an organizational structure that centralizes repetitive administrative and operational processes, focusing on ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    What is a shared services center? - ProcessMaker
    Oct 29, 2024 · Shared service centers are centralized units providing services to various departments, streamlining operations, reducing costs, and improving ...Key functions and examples of... · Benefits of shared services...
  21. [21]
    A Beginner's Guide To The Shared Service Model - YRCI
    Sep 4, 2024 · By investing in these advanced solutions, the SSC can reduce manual workload, minimize errors, and provide faster service delivery. This ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Taking It To The Next Level - Shared services centers move ... - WNS
    workflow and self-service, designed to reduce the task level content of ... completed within 3 days, 85 percent of which had no manual intervention.
  23. [23]
    Beyond cost efficiencies in shared service centers | Arthur D. Little
    Nov 29, 2019 · We believe shared service centers should be built and operated as sources of value – going well beyond cost efficiencies for organizations.
  24. [24]
    HR Shared Services explained: Benefits, functions, and best practices
    Jul 23, 2025 · Consistency and compliance. Shared services standardise processes across regions, improving compliance and reducing risk. Centralised systems ...
  25. [25]
    Five Characteristics Of The Best Shared Service Centers - Gartner
    The most effective SSOs think globally, expand rationally and locate services wisely.
  26. [26]
    Shared Services Automation: Scale SSCs with Efficiency - HEFLO
    May 27, 2025 · Discover how Shared Services Automation helps scale internal operations, cut costs, improve SLAs, and deliver consistent service across HR, ...Missing: fluctuations | Show results with:fluctuations
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Designing and Implementing a Shared Services Model - ScottMadden
    Aug 28, 2020 · escalation for issue resolution. Key Benefits. ▫ Represent the shared services organization among senior management. ▫ Allow customers to ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Implementing Shared Services Centers - IMA
    This will include building a communication plan that ensures that the progress of the SSC effort toward its goals is well known and understood. 14. PRACTICE OF ...
  29. [29]
    How to Navigate the 'Outsourcing or Shared Services' Maze - SSON
    On the other hand, Outsourcing requires minimal upfront investment in facilities and ... For example, a shared services center will require performance management ...
  30. [30]
    Is Your Shared Services Center Driving Automation Across Your ...
    Dec 5, 2019 · Is Your Shared Services Center Driving Automation Across Your Enterprise? ... Whether large or small, whether onshore, nearshore, or offshore ...
  31. [31]
    Setting Up an Offshore Shared Services Center - SSON
    Jan 10, 2012 · Setting Up an Offshore Shared Services Center - Location, Location, Location (Part 1) ... nearshore business model might be considered.
  32. [32]
    Financial Shared Services For AR: Transform Your Accounts ...
    Phased Implementation and Pilot Programs for AR Shared Services ... shared services center. This ensures accountability, prevents conflicts, and ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Keys to Successful Public Sector Shared Services Implementations
    By exploring how to adapt corporate implementation models for shared ... shared services center.' Once he said that it was really much more difficult ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Generating Significant Value with Oracle ERP Shared Services
    Because the accounting engine automatically applies accounting rules to transactions, you don't need to staff your shared services center with experts on every ...
  35. [35]
    Why Your Shared Services Center Needs Automation - Bizagi
    Nov 30, 2021 · Standardization – Processes are mapped out and approved before being deployed in the shared services center, so you can guarantee that when the ...
  36. [36]
    Shared Services Playbook | Umbrex
    2.1 What Is a Shared Services Center (SSC)? 2.2 Evolution from Functional ... Hub‑and‑Spoke Models 6.3 Captive, Outsourced, and Hybrid Ownership ...
  37. [37]
    Q&A: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Shared Services Centers
    KPIs should cover the key targets of customer service level, quality of service, cost and efficiency, although whether cost KPIs are actually included will ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Applying Lean, Six Sigma, BPM, and SOA to Drive Business Results
    Apr 18, 2013 · 򐂰 Lower technical implementation costs through shared services and higher levels of component reuse; changing and improving processes ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Shared Services: Multiplying Success - Pwc.at
    Shared Service success is achieved by integrating multi-functional services with a global focus, higher activity splits, and higher standardization and ...
  40. [40]
    Global Shared Services and Outsourcing Survey | Deloitte US
    These include process standardization and efficiency, cost reduction, and improved end-to-end ownership. Approximately 58% of respondents have already begun ...
  41. [41]
    Shared Services Pricing Models Have Different Pros and Cons
    Apr 2, 2021 · 1: Cost center model. This is the most basic model, generally used when shared services is a centralized support group without separate budget. ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] 08.105 - Shared Service Cost Allocation Review KPMG Report
    Jun 10, 2024 · ATCO's Cost Allocation Overall Approach. In this Section we summarize ATCO's overall cost allocation approach for shared services. 2.1.
  43. [43]
    Charging Methodologies of Shared Services and Business Process ...
    Shared Services Centers – evolution from cost centers to fully responsible business units. Shared service centers (SSCs) play a vital role in advancing the ...
  44. [44]
    How to Choose an IT Cost Allocation Model for Shared Services
    Apr 22, 2025 · Activity-Based Costing (ABC). ABC allocates costs based on activities performed for each business unit, such as number of tickets resolved ...
  45. [45]
    Effective Service Level Agreements for Shared Services | Peeriosity
    Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are a common tool used during the implementation of Shared Services to set service and performance expectations with operating ...
  46. [46]
    System Dynamics Modeling for Managing Capacity and Demand for Human Services - Systemic Practice and Action Research
    ### Summary of System Dynamics Modeling for Managing Capacity and Demand in Human Services
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Analytics in Shared Services and GBS Emerging as an engine room ...
    Marketing departments have looked deeper into customer segmentation; finance departments have restructured financial forecasting and analysis; IT have invested ...
  48. [48]
    Engage shared services customers in the conversation ... - EAB
    Oct 11, 2019 · SLAs articulate the service and performance expectations required from both the shared services provider and the customer. They increase ...
  49. [49]
    Incentives for Shared Services: Multiserver Queueing Systems with ...
    Dec 9, 2021 · We study shared service whereby multiple independent service providers collaborate by pooling their resources into a shared service center (SSC).
  50. [50]
    Pricing and Capacity Allocation for Shared Services - PubsOnLine
    Apr 12, 2017 · We study the pricing and capacity allocation problem of a service provider who serves two distinct customer classes.
  51. [51]
    Why PSOs are using ERP to leverage the benefits of shared service ...
    May 11, 2023 · Our integrated solutions provide real-time visibility into costs, enabling better cost control and improving cost efficiency. Through these ...
  52. [52]
    How BPOs & SSCs can overcome the talent shortage and other ...
    Mar 9, 2022 · ScaleHub's crowdsourcing solution can help BPOs and SSCs navigate staffing difficulties with an offering that scales your capacity on-demand.Missing: dynamic | Show results with:dynamic
  53. [53]
    [PDF] How to Nail Your Performance Measurement in Shared Services
    Output KPIs measure the success, quality and effectiveness of service delivery; specifically, whether agreed. SPA standards are being achieved. These are ...
  54. [54]
    Shared Services KPIs, Metrics & Benchmarks - OpsDog
    Shared Services KPIs measure efficiency, cost-effectiveness and customer service within centralized shared services centers.
  55. [55]
    Shared Services and Internal Customer Satisfaction - Peeriosity
    Though satisfaction levels are difficult to measure, implementing a process that includes internal customer satisfaction is an important step.
  56. [56]
    How Digital Services Succeed: The Employee Utilization Rate Fallacy
    Apr 27, 2020 · Benchmarks indicate that the highest-performing professional services organizations have an average utilization rate of 75-85%. We'll review ...Missing: staff | Show results with:staff<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Tools & Templates: Balanced Scorecard for HR Services - SSON
    The Balanced Scorecard (BSc) provides a framework which tracks key performance indicators (KPI) to measure the performance of the organization using both ...
  58. [58]
    A Longitudinal Study on the Role of Balanced Scorecard
    Aug 19, 2013 · Through integration in business processes, shared service centers (SSCs) aim to reduce costs and provide better services to internal customers ...
  59. [59]
    Shared Services Metrics Library - Gartner
    Feb 4, 2019 · This library contains a comprehensive list of metrics that shared services leaders use to measure and evaluate the progress of different finance ...Summary · Included In Full Research · Gartner Research: Trusted...
  60. [60]
    Finance Shared Services Key Benchmarks - APQC
    Mar 27, 2025 · Prepared using APQC's Open Standards Benchmarking® portal, these key metrics from FM Shared Services Organizations (SSO) share values for ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Capturing the promise of shared services | PwC Strategy
    The focus was on consolidation rather than fundamentally changing the way services were delivered. And because this solution focused primarily on centralizing ...
  62. [62]
    Catalyzing organizational culture change | Deloitte Insights
    Jun 3, 2016 · Overt or passive aggressive resistance to efforts to establish shared services; each unit has its own way of doing business, “We are special ...
  63. [63]
    The Challenges Facing Shared Services Centers - SSON
    The challenge is that shared services executives are being charged to provide more value, more functionality and across more locations while reducing costs; and ...Missing: setups | Show results with:setups
  64. [64]
    Roundtable: Talent Management in Shared Services - SSON
    Walt Simpson: Getting the right staff into a shared services center, developing them and retaining them—these are constant challenges to shared services leaders ...
  65. [65]
    Employee experience still matters: Talent retention at GCCs
    Oct 3, 2023 · With five focused actions, global capability centers could cut their attrition rates in half.
  66. [66]
    4 Challenges and Solutions for Growing Shared Services Teams
    Nov 5, 2024 · Meeting internal expectations and SLAs is a significant challenge for shared services teams, especially as demand for their services increases.Missing: center supply imbalances
  67. [67]
    Security Implications of Shared Service Environments - ISC2
    Most security issues in SSEs, then, are not particularly related to those services being shared; they are down to the management interfaces being generally ...Missing: threats downtime
  68. [68]
    Evolution of shared services | Deloitte Insights
    Jul 31, 2020 · Shifting from a “back-office” to a “center office” model can enable adaptable and resilient enterprises of the future.
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Ease the Transition to Shared Services with a Plan for Change ...
    Crafting a shared services implementation plan tailored to the culture of your campus can help to reduce the impact of common change management hurdles. In this ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Federal Shared Services Implementation Guide - Assets for CIO.gov
    Apr 16, 2013 · The guide provides agencies with a high level process and key considerations for defining, establishing, and implementing interagency shared ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Shared Services Consulting | Deloitte US
    ... shared services center, to refinements of the shared services organization to help it achieve the next level of performance. businessman hand working with ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Digital labor transforms the shared services delivery model
    Key steps that businesses should consider include establishing a digital labor program management office or center of excellence, evaluating the impact of ...
  73. [73]
    Considering a Phased Approach to Implementing Shared Services?
    A phased approach introduces shared services in manageable segments over time, instead of a single launch, to manage the change.Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution